Sample records for million doe grant

  1. DOE/Industry Matching Grant Program

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    John C. Lee

    2003-09-30

    For the academic year 2001-2002, the Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences received $50,000 of industrial contributions, matched by a DOE grant of $35,000. We used the combined DOE/Industry Matching Grant of $85,000 toward (a) undergraduate merit scholarships and research support, (b) graduate student support, and (c) partial support of a research scientist.

  2. DOE Matching Grant Program

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Dr Marvin Adams

    2002-03-01

    OAK 270 - The DOE Matching Grant Program provided $50,000.00 to the Dept of N.E. at TAMU, matching a gift of $50,000.00 from TXU Electric. The $100,000.00 total was spent on scholarships, departmental labs, and computing network.

  3. Pell Grants: Where Does All the Money Go

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Robinson, Jenna Ashley; Cheston, Duke

    2012-01-01

    The Federal Pell Grant Program, which provides need-based grants to millions of college students, is the federal government's largest education expenditure. It consumes over half the Department of Education's annual budget and in 2010-2011 cost taxpayers about $36 billion per year. Although the program started out as a way to provide college…

  4. 42 CFR 63a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 63a.8 Section 63a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TRAINING GRANTS § 63a.8 How long does grant support last...

  5. 42 CFR 63a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 63a.8 Section 63a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TRAINING GRANTS § 63a.8 How long does grant support last...

  6. 42 CFR 63a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 63a.8 Section 63a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TRAINING GRANTS § 63a.8 How long does grant support last...

  7. 42 CFR 63a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 63a.8 Section 63a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TRAINING GRANTS § 63a.8 How long does grant support last...

  8. 42 CFR 63a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 63a.8 Section 63a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TRAINING GRANTS § 63a.8 How long does grant support last...

  9. 45 CFR 2522.415 - How does the grant selection process work?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 45 Public Welfare 4 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How does the grant selection process work? 2522... Programs § 2522.415 How does the grant selection process work? The selection process includes: (a... eligibility requirements; (b) Applying the basic selection criteria to assess the quality of your proposal; (c...

  10. Philanthro-metrics: Mining multi-million-dollar gifts.

    PubMed

    Osili, Una O; Ackerman, Jacqueline; Kong, Chin Hua; Light, Robert P; Börner, Katy

    2017-01-01

    The Million Dollar List (MDL, online at http://www.milliondollarlist.org) is a compilation of publicly announced charitable donations of $1 million or more from across the United States since 2000; as of December 2016, the database contains close to 80,000 gifts made by U.S. individuals, corporations, foundations, and other grant-making nonprofit organizations. This paper discusses the unique value of the Million Dollar List and provides unique insights to key questions such as: How does distance affect giving? How do networks impact million-dollar-plus gifts? Understanding the geospatial and temporal dimensions of philanthropy can assist researchers and policymakers to better understand the role of private funding in innovation and discovery. Moreover, the results from the paper emphasize the importance of philanthropy for fueling research and development in science, the arts, environment, and health. The paper also includes the limitations of the presented analyses and promising future work.

  11. 42 CFR 59.4 - How does one apply for a family planning services grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false How does one apply for a family planning services grant? 59.4 Section 59.4 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTS GRANTS FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES Project Grants for Family Planning Services § 59.4 How does...

  12. 42 CFR 59.4 - How does one apply for a family planning services grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How does one apply for a family planning services grant? 59.4 Section 59.4 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTS GRANTS FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES Project Grants for Family Planning Services § 59.4 How does...

  13. 42 CFR 59.4 - How does one apply for a family planning services grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How does one apply for a family planning services grant? 59.4 Section 59.4 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTS GRANTS FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES Project Grants for Family Planning Services § 59.4 How does...

  14. 42 CFR 59.4 - How does one apply for a family planning services grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false How does one apply for a family planning services grant? 59.4 Section 59.4 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTS GRANTS FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES Project Grants for Family Planning Services § 59.4 How does...

  15. 42 CFR 59.4 - How does one apply for a family planning services grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How does one apply for a family planning services grant? 59.4 Section 59.4 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTS GRANTS FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES Project Grants for Family Planning Services § 59.4 How does...

  16. Philanthro-metrics: Mining multi-million-dollar gifts

    PubMed Central

    2017-01-01

    The Million Dollar List (MDL, online at http://www.milliondollarlist.org) is a compilation of publicly announced charitable donations of $1 million or more from across the United States since 2000; as of December 2016, the database contains close to 80,000 gifts made by U.S. individuals, corporations, foundations, and other grant-making nonprofit organizations. This paper discusses the unique value of the Million Dollar List and provides unique insights to key questions such as: How does distance affect giving? How do networks impact million-dollar-plus gifts? Understanding the geospatial and temporal dimensions of philanthropy can assist researchers and policymakers to better understand the role of private funding in innovation and discovery. Moreover, the results from the paper emphasize the importance of philanthropy for fueling research and development in science, the arts, environment, and health. The paper also includes the limitations of the presented analyses and promising future work. PMID:28552937

  17. 34 CFR 648.20 - How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How does an institution of higher education apply for a... NATIONAL NEED How Does an Institution of Higher Education Apply for a Grant? § 648.20 How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant? (a) To apply for a grant under this part, an institution of...

  18. 34 CFR 648.20 - How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false How does an institution of higher education apply for a... NATIONAL NEED How Does an Institution of Higher Education Apply for a Grant? § 648.20 How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant? (a) To apply for a grant under this part, an institution of...

  19. 34 CFR 648.20 - How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does an institution of higher education apply for a... NATIONAL NEED How Does an Institution of Higher Education Apply for a Grant? § 648.20 How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant? (a) To apply for a grant under this part, an institution of...

  20. 34 CFR 648.20 - How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false How does an institution of higher education apply for a... NATIONAL NEED How Does an Institution of Higher Education Apply for a Grant? § 648.20 How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant? (a) To apply for a grant under this part, an institution of...

  1. 34 CFR 648.20 - How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false How does an institution of higher education apply for a... NATIONAL NEED How Does an Institution of Higher Education Apply for a Grant? § 648.20 How does an institution of higher education apply for a grant? (a) To apply for a grant under this part, an institution of...

  2. 50 CFR 86.15 - How does the grant process work?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false How does the grant process work? 86.15 Section 86.15 Wildlife and Fisheries UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (CONTINUED) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE-WILDLIFE SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM BOATING INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (BIG...

  3. 34 CFR 636.31 - How does the Secretary establish a network of urban grant institutions?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How does the Secretary establish a network of urban... Institutions Network? § 636.31 How does the Secretary establish a network of urban grant institutions? (a) The Secretary establishes a network of urban grant institutions consisting of the urban grant institutions...

  4. 34 CFR 636.31 - How does the Secretary establish a network of urban grant institutions?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary establish a network of urban... Institutions Network? § 636.31 How does the Secretary establish a network of urban grant institutions? (a) The Secretary establishes a network of urban grant institutions consisting of the urban grant institutions...

  5. Final Technical Report - DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-07ER46424

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Stroud, David

    We present a final report on the activities undertaken under DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-07ER46424, titled "Interaction effects in quasi one-dimensional electronic systems," originally under the direction of Prof. Julia Meyer. The report includes an overview of the grant and the personnel involved, a list of publications acknowledging the grant, and a summary of the results and conclusions drawn from research supported by the grant.

  6. 13 CFR 120.712 - How does an Intermediary get a grant to assist Microloan borrowers?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 13 Business Credit and Assistance 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false How does an Intermediary get a grant to assist Microloan borrowers? 120.712 Section 120.712 Business Credit and Assistance SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION BUSINESS LOANS Microloan Program § 120.712 How does an Intermediary get a grant to...

  7. FINAL Progress Report DOE Grant DE-FG02-04ER15587

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Mullins, Charles Buddie

    Catalysis Program - Viviane Schwartz Program Manager This Final Report discusses several archival journal articles that have been published that present and discuss the results that were discovered through this DOE grant.

  8. 34 CFR 365.10 - How does a State apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does a State apply for a grant? 365.10 Section 365.10 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES How Does...

  9. 34 CFR 365.10 - How does a State apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2011-07-01 2010-07-01 true How does a State apply for a grant? 365.10 Section 365.10 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES How Does...

  10. 42 CFR 65.6 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65.6 Section 65.6 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS WASTE WORKER TRAINING § 65.6 How...

  11. 42 CFR 65.6 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65.6 Section 65.6 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS WASTE WORKER TRAINING § 65.6 How...

  12. 42 CFR 65.6 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65.6 Section 65.6 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS WASTE WORKER TRAINING § 65.6 How...

  13. 34 CFR 611.3 - What procedures does the Secretary use to award a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What procedures does the Secretary use to award a grant? 611.3 Section 611.3 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TEACHER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT GRANTS PROGRAM...

  14. 42 CFR 65a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65a.8 Section 65a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES BASIC RESEARCH...

  15. 42 CFR 65a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65a.8 Section 65a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES BASIC RESEARCH...

  16. 42 CFR 65a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65a.8 Section 65a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES BASIC RESEARCH...

  17. 42 CFR 65a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65a.8 Section 65a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES BASIC RESEARCH...

  18. 42 CFR 65a.8 - How long does grant support last?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false How long does grant support last? 65a.8 Section 65a.8 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES BASIC RESEARCH...

  19. 13 CFR 120.712 - How does an Intermediary get a grant to assist Microloan borrowers?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... contribution. It may only use grant funds to provide Microloan borrowers with marketing, management, and... 13 Business Credit and Assistance 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false How does an Intermediary get a grant to assist Microloan borrowers? 120.712 Section 120.712 Business Credit and Assistance SMALL...

  20. 34 CFR 367.42 - When does the Secretary award noncompetitive continuation grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2011-07-01 2010-07-01 true When does the Secretary award noncompetitive continuation grants? 367.42 Section 367.42 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INDEPENDENT...

  1. 34 CFR 367.42 - When does the Secretary award noncompetitive continuation grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When does the Secretary award noncompetitive continuation grants? 367.42 Section 367.42 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INDEPENDENT...

  2. 34 CFR 366.20 - When does the Secretary award grants to centers?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When does the Secretary award grants to centers? 366.20 Section 366.20 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING...

  3. 34 CFR 366.20 - When does the Secretary award grants to centers?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2011-07-01 2010-07-01 true When does the Secretary award grants to centers? 366.20 Section 366.20 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING...

  4. 50 CFR 86.61 - What process does the Service use to select projects for grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What process does the Service use to....61 What process does the Service use to select projects for grants? The Service's Division of Federal... SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (CONTINUED) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE-WILDLIFE SPORT FISH RESTORATION...

  5. 12 Scientists Will Share $120-Million from Saudis

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Guterman, Lila

    2008-01-01

    This spring 12 scientists found themselves in an unusual position--they have to figure out how to spend $2-million every year for the next five years. The money adds up to $10-million per researcher. In May the researchers made a pilgrimage to the source of the generous grants: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, a graduate…

  6. 34 CFR 609.43 - Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant? 609.43 Section 609.43 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK...

  7. 34 CFR 609.43 - Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant? 609.43 Section 609.43 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK...

  8. 34 CFR 609.43 - Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant? 609.43 Section 609.43 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK...

  9. 34 CFR 609.43 - Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant? 609.43 Section 609.43 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK...

  10. 34 CFR 609.43 - Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Under what conditions does the Secretary terminate a grant? 609.43 Section 609.43 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK...

  11. 34 CFR 367.30 - Under what circumstances does the Secretary award contingent formula grants to States?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... EDUCATION INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES FOR OLDER INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE BLIND How Does the Secretary Award... 34 Education 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Under what circumstances does the Secretary award contingent formula grants to States? 367.30 Section 367.30 Education Regulations of the Offices of the...

  12. 34 CFR 367.30 - Under what circumstances does the Secretary award contingent formula grants to States?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... EDUCATION INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES FOR OLDER INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE BLIND How Does the Secretary Award... 34 Education 2 2011-07-01 2010-07-01 true Under what circumstances does the Secretary award contingent formula grants to States? 367.30 Section 367.30 Education Regulations of the Offices of the...

  13. 34 CFR 490.10 - How does an eligible entity apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How does an eligible entity apply for a grant? 490.10 Section 490.10 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LIFE SKILLS FOR STATE AND LOCAL PRISONERS PROGRAM How...

  14. 34 CFR 606.24 - How does the Secretary use an applicant's performance under a previous development grant when...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary use an applicant's performance under a previous development grant when awarding a development grant? 606.24 Section 606.24 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION...

  15. 34 CFR 607.24 - How does the Secretary use an applicant's performance under a previous development grant when...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary use an applicant's performance under a previous development grant when awarding a development grant? 607.24 Section 607.24 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION...

  16. Final report to DOE: Matching Grant Program for the Penn State University Nuclear Engineering Program

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Jack S. Brenizer, Jr.

    2003-01-17

    The DOE/Industry Matching Grant Program is designed to encourage collaborative support for nuclear engineering education as well as research between the nation's nuclear industry and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Despite a serious decline in student enrollments in the 1980s and 1990s, the discipline of nuclear engineering remained important to the advancement of the mission goals of DOE. The program is designed to ensure that academic programs in nuclear engineering are maintained and enhanced in universities throughout the U.S. At Penn State, the Matching Grant Program played a critical role in the survival of the Nuclear Engineering degree programs.more » Funds were used in a variety of ways to support both undergraduate and graduate students directly. Some of these included providing seed funding for new graduate research initiatives, funding the development of new course materials, supporting new teaching facilities, maintenance and purchase of teaching laboratory equipment, and providing undergraduate scholarships, graduate fellowships, and wage payroll positions for students.« less

  17. 34 CFR 609.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant? 609.31 Section 609.31 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK GRADUATE...

  18. 34 CFR 609.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant? 609.31 Section 609.31 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK GRADUATE...

  19. 34 CFR 609.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant? 609.31 Section 609.31 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK GRADUATE...

  20. 34 CFR 410.23 - How does the Secretary select grantees for institutional support grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary select grantees for institutional support grants? 410.23 Section 410.23 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TRIBALLY CONTROLLED...

  1. Final Report. Grant DOE DE-FG02-04ER54768

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Betti, Riccardo

    The magnetized spherical implosion campaign funded by this grant is summarized in this progress report. The main goal of this grant was to improve the seed eld generator MIFEDS (Magneto- Inertial Fusion Energy Delivery System) on the OMEGA laser to enable experiments at high elds (> 8 T) and to carry out magnetized spherical implosion experiments to study the e ect of magnetic elds on the fusion yield. New experiments were carried out in the last budget period to study the e ect of higher elds and shaped laser pulses. These new experiments improved the magnetized implosion database and allowedmore » us to improve the con dence of our conclusions with respect to the e ect of magnetic elds on implosion performance. The main conclusion is that adding magnetic eld leads to a 30% higher neutron yield, but using seed magnetic eld higher than 8 T does not further increase the neutron yield. A further conclusion is that the yield enhancement due to the magnetic eld is approximately independent of the laser pulse shape.« less

  2. 34 CFR 647.20 - How does the Secretary decide which new grants to make?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary decide which new grants to make? 647.20 Section 647.20 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RONALD E. MCNAIR POSTBACCALAUREATE ACHIEVEMENT...

  3. 34 CFR 647.23 - How does the Secretary set the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary set the amount of a grant? 647.23 Section 647.23 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RONALD E. MCNAIR POSTBACCALAUREATE ACHIEVEMENT...

  4. 34 CFR 608.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant? 608.31 Section 608.31 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND...

  5. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ethan W. Brown

    2001-09-01

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the period from April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2001, under the NGA grant.« less

  6. 34 CFR 607.25 - What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants? 607.25 Section 607.25 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING...

  7. 34 CFR 607.25 - What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants? 607.25 Section 607.25 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING...

  8. 34 CFR 607.25 - What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants? 607.25 Section 607.25 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING...

  9. 34 CFR 607.25 - What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants? 607.25 Section 607.25 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING...

  10. 34 CFR 607.25 - What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants? 607.25 Section 607.25 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING...

  11. 34 CFR 658.34 - What additional factors does the Secretary consider in selecting grant recipients?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What additional factors does the Secretary consider in selecting grant recipients? 658.34 Section 658.34 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION UNDERGRADUATE INTERNATIONAL...

  12. Citation Impact of NHLBI R01 Grants Funded Through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as Compared to R01 Grants Funded Through a Standard Payline

    PubMed Central

    Danthi, Narasimhan S.; Wu, Colin O.; DiMichele, Donna; Hoots, W. Keith; Lauer, Michael S.

    2015-01-01

    Rationale The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) allowed NHLBI to fund R01 grants that fared less well on peer review than those funded by meeting a payline threshold. It is not clear whether the sudden availability of additional funding enabled research of similar or lesser citation impact than already funded work. Objective To compare the citation impact of ARRA-funded de novo NHLBI R01 grants with concurrent de novo NHLBI R01 grants funded by standard-payline mechanisms. Methods and Results We identified de novo (“Type 1”) R01 grants funded by NHLBI in fiscal year (FY) 2009: these included 458 funded by meeting Institute’s published payline and 165 funded only because of ARRA funding. Compared to payline grants, ARRA grants received fewer total funds (median values $1.03 million versus $1.87 million, P<0.001) for a shorter duration (median values including no-cost extensions 3.0 versus 4.9 years, P<0.001). Through May 2014, the payline R01 grants generated 3895 publications, while the ARRA R01 grants generated 996. Using the InCites database from Thomson-Reuters, we calculated a “normalized citation impact” for each grant by weighting each paper for the number of citations it received normalizing for subject, article type, and year of publication. The ARRA R01 grants had a similar normalized citation impact per $1 million spent as the payline grants (median values[IQR] 2.15[0.73–4.78] versus 2.03[0.75–4.10], P=0.61). The similar impact of the ARRA grants persisted even after accounting for potential confounders. Conclusions Despite shorter durations and lower budgets, ARRA R01 grants had comparable citation outcomes per $million spent to that of contemporaneously funded payline R01 grants. PMID:25722441

  13. 34 CFR 373.11 - What other factors does the Secretary consider when making a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What other factors does the Secretary consider when making a grant? 373.11 Section 373.11 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPECIAL...

  14. Independent Design Review: Grants Chlorinated Solvents Plume, Superfund Site, Grants, Cibola County, New Mexico, EPA Region 6

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    The Grants Chlorinated Solvents Plume Superfund Site in Grants, Cibola County, New Mexico was selected by EPA OSRTI based on a nomination from EPA Region 6. The remedy is in the early design stage and has an estimated cost of $29.5 million.

  15. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ann M. Beauchesne

    1999-04-30

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex; Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; Interstate waste and materials shipments; and Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from February 1, 1999, through April 30, 1999, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and EM Integration activities; and continued to serve as a liaison

  16. 77 FR 37687 - Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-06-22

    ... importance of mitigation activities, the FY 2012 FP&S will be allocated $35 million for grants. The FP&S... grants supporting eligible fire prevention activities and research and development activities that...,250) of AFG Program funds for the FP&S Grant Program. However, due to the importance of mitigation...

  17. 2003-05 High Demand Enrollment Grants Report: Competitive Grants to Link Higher Education and Economic Development

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Washington Higher Education Coordinating Board, 2006

    2006-01-01

    The Higher Education Coordinating Board (HECB) received two appropriations totaling $11.8 million in the 2003-05 state operating budget to award competitive grants to increase enrollment in high-demand fields. Grants were available to Washington's public four-year colleges and universities during the 2003-04 and 2004-05 academic years. This report…

  18. Districts Abandon Grants Targeting Teacher Quality

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Zubrzycki, Jaclyn

    2012-01-01

    Three big-city districts--Chicago, Milwaukee, and New York--have terminated federal grants aimed at promoting performance-based compensation plans and professional development for teachers and principals. Overall, the 2010 Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) grants to the three districts would have provided an $88 million payout over five years--nearly 7…

  19. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ann M. Beauchesne

    2000-01-01

    Through the National Governors Association (NGA) project ``Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex; Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; Interstate waste and materials shipments; and Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the period from October 1, 1999 through January 31, 2000, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past three months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; convened and facilitated the October 6--8 NGA FFCA Task Force Meeting in Oak Ridge, Tennessee; maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal

  20. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ann M. Beauchesne

    1999-07-30

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex; Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; Interstate waste and materials shipments; and Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from May 1, 1999, through July 30, 1999, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and continued to facilitate interactions between the states and DOE to

  1. Program Spotlight: Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Partnership Receives $8 Million Grant

    Cancer.gov

    The UMass Boston and Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center PACHE Partnership received a grant to start-up a Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy on the UMass Boston campus. The center is deigned to train underrepresented students to work in cancer research.

  2. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ann B. Beauchesne

    1998-09-30

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: (1) Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; (2) Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; (3) Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect onmore » individual sites in the complex; (4) Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; (5) Interstate waste and materials shipments; and (6) Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from June 1, 1998 through September 30, 1998, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: (1) maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; (2) maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and EM Integration activities; and (3

  3. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ann M. Beauchesne

    1999-01-31

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: (1) Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials; (2) Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities; (3) Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect onmore » individual sites in the complex; (4) Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the Department's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure plan and contractor integration analysis; (5) Interstate waste and materials shipments; and (6) Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from October 1, 1998 through January 31, 1999, under the NGA grant. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: (1) maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; (2) maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, external regulation of DOE; and EM Integration activities; and

  4. U.S. Department of Energy awards $200 million for next-generation

    Science.gov Websites

    build a powerful new next-gen supercomputer, Aurora. The press conference took place at Chicago tech Congress and industry at the announcement of DOE's award of $200 million to Argonne in order to build a accelerate to next-generation exascale computing. DOE earlier announced a $325 million investment to build

  5. 76 FR 35918 - Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2011

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-06-20

    ... DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration Susan Harwood Training Grant... Funding Opportunity for Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2011. Funding Opportunity No.: SHTG-FY-11... of approximately $4.7 million for Susan Harwood Training Program grants under the following...

  6. 75 FR 29783 - Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2010

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-27

    ... DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration Susan Harwood Training Grant... Funding Opportunity for Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2010. Funding Opportunity No.: SHTG-FY-10... availability of approximately $8 million for the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program for Capacity Building...

  7. 42 CFR 51b.605 - How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ...? (3) Is the method of operation logical and clearly related to project objectives, and does it... HUMAN SERVICES GRANTS PROJECT GRANTS FOR PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES Grants for Research, Demonstrations... following criteria: (1) Is there adequate evidence that the proposed project is needed and that the outcome...

  8. 34 CFR 226.13 - What statutory funding priority does the Secretary use in making a grant award?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What statutory funding priority does the Secretary use in making a grant award? 226.13 Section 226.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE CHARTER...

  9. 34 CFR 660.31 - What selection criteria does the Secretary use for all applications for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What selection criteria does the Secretary use for all applications for a grant? 660.31 Section 660.31 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH...

  10. Prior publication productivity, grant percentile ranking, and topic-normalized citation impact of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants.

    PubMed

    Kaltman, Jonathan R; Evans, Frank J; Danthi, Narasimhan S; Wu, Colin O; DiMichele, Donna M; Lauer, Michael S

    2014-09-12

    We previously demonstrated absence of association between peer-review-derived percentile ranking and raw citation impact in a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute cardiovascular R01 grants, but we did not consider pregrant investigator publication productivity. We also did not normalize citation counts for scientific field, type of article, and year of publication. To determine whether measures of investigator prior productivity predict a grant's subsequent scientific impact as measured by normalized citation metrics. We identified 1492 investigator-initiated de novo National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01 grant applications funded between 2001 and 2008 and linked the publications from these grants to their InCites (Thompson Reuters) citation record. InCites provides a normalized citation count for each publication stratifying by year of publication, type of publication, and field of science. The coprimary end points for this analysis were the normalized citation impact per million dollars allocated and the number of publications per grant that has normalized citation rate in the top decile per million dollars allocated (top 10% articles). Prior productivity measures included the number of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-supported publications each principal investigator published in the 5 years before grant review and the corresponding prior normalized citation impact score. After accounting for potential confounders, there was no association between peer-review percentile ranking and bibliometric end points (all adjusted P>0.5). However, prior productivity was predictive (P<0.0001). Even after normalizing citation counts, we confirmed a lack of association between peer-review grant percentile ranking and grant citation impact. However, prior investigator publication productivity was predictive of grant-specific citation impact. © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

  11. Prior Publication Productivity, Grant Percentile Ranking, and Topic-Normalized Citation Impact of NHLBI Cardiovascular R01 Grants

    PubMed Central

    Kaltman, Jonathan R.; Evans, Frank; Danthi, Narasimhan; Wu, Colin O.; DiMichele, Donna; Lauer, Michael S.

    2014-01-01

    Rationale We previously demonstrated absence of association between peer-review derived percentile ranking and raw citation impact in a large cohort of NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants, but we did not consider pre-grant investigator publication productivity. We also did not normalize citation counts for scientific field, type of paper, and year of publication. Objective Determine whether measures of investigator prior productivity predict a grant’s subsequent scientific impact as measured by normalized citation metrics. Methods and Results We identified 1492 investigator-initiated de novo NHLBI R01 grant applications funded between 2001 and 2008 and linked the publications from these grants to their “InCites™” (Thompson Reuters) citation record. InCites™ provides a normalized citation count for each publication stratifying by year of publication, type of publication, and field of science. The co-primary endpoints for this analysis were the normalized citation impact per million dollars allocated and the number of publications per grant that have normalized citation rate in the top decile per million dollars allocated (“top-10% papers”). Prior productivity measures included the number of NHLBI-supported publications each principal investigator published in the 5 years before grant review and the corresponding prior normalized citation impact score. After accounting for potential confounders, there was no association between peer-review percentile ranking and bibliometric endpoints (all adjusted P > 0.5). However, prior productivity was predictive (P<0.0001). Conclusion Even after normalizing citation counts, we confirmed a lack of association between peer-review grant percentile ranking and grant citation impact. However, prior investigator publication productivity was predictive of grant-specific citation impact. PMID:25214575

  12. 75 FR 38837 - Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2010

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration Susan Harwood Training Grant... Funding Opportunity for Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2010. Funding Opportunity No.: SHTG-FY-10... availability of approximately $2.75 million for the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program for Targeted Topic...

  13. Gates Foundation donates $25 million for AIDS vaccine.

    PubMed

    1999-05-07

    The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) received a $25 million five-year grant from Bill and Melinda Gates through the William H. Gates Foundation. This is the largest gift seen in the AIDS epidemic, and will allow IAVI to more than double vaccine development efforts. IAVI is currently developing two potential vaccines, hopes to study three others, and is working with the business community to insure that a successful vaccine is affordable in developing countries. With 16,000 new infections occurring daily, a vaccine is seen as the most effective way to stop the epidemic. The William H. Gates Foundation had donated $1.5 million to IAVI and $100 million for programs to speed the delivery of vaccines to children in poor countries. Internet addresses are included for both IAVI and the William H. Gates Foundation.

  14. I Don't Need a Million-Dollar Grant--$5,000 Will Do!

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Keast, Dan A.

    2011-01-01

    Music teachers often need to be creative in finding monies for programs that go beyond the basics and reach more students. Grant-writing skills can bring both funding and other types of donations to enhance music programs. Researching the funding sources, looking at successful proposals, carefully following directions, seeking the opinions of…

  15. Final Report for DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 Retrieval of Cloud Properties and Direct Testing of Cloud and Radiation Parameterizations using ARM Observations.

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Donovan, David Patrick

    This report briefly summaries the work performed at KNMI under DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 which, in turn was conducted in support of DOE Grant DE-FG02-90ER61071 lead by E. Clothieux of Penn. State U. The specific work at KNMI revolved around the development and application of the EarthCARE simulator to ground-based multi-sensor simulations.

  16. Assistance to Firefighters Program: Distribution of Fire Grant Funding

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2010-07-13

    shows the appropriations history for firefighter assistance, including AFG, SAFER, and the Fire Station Construction Grants ( SCG ) provided in the...1.109 billion $210 million $6.521 billion a. Assistance to Firefighters Fire Station Construction Grants ( SCG ) grants were funded by the American...and FY2010. The application period for ARRA Assistance to Firefighters Fire Station Construction Grants ( SCG ) opened on June 11 and closed on July 10

  17. 75 FR 19358 - Availability of Grant Funds for FY 2010

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-04-14

    ... $1 billion annually. With its Exclusive Economic Zone of 3.4 million square miles, the United States... Programs: (1) Sea Grant Aquaculture Research Program 2010; (2) NOAA Sea Grant Aquaculture Extension and Technology Transfer 2010; and (3) NOAA Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive Species 2010. This notice supplements the...

  18. New Program Aims $300-Million at Young Biomedical Researchers

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Goodall, Hurley

    2008-01-01

    Medical scientists just starting at universities have been, more and more often, left empty-handed when the federal government awards grants. To offset this, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to medical research, announced a new program that will award $300-million to as many as 70 young scientists. The Early…

  19. Changing Tires En Route: Michigan Rolls out Millions in School Improvement Grants

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Scott, Caitlin

    2011-01-01

    A recent massive infusion of federal funding marked a dramatic shift in the federal approach to helping low-performing schools. As part of the broad array of economic stimulus efforts included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), the U.S. Congress appropriated an extra $3 billion for school improvement grants (SIGs) to…

  20. EPA Awards Restore America's Estuaries with nearly $4 million to manage Southeast New England grant program

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today announced a major grant to Restore America’s Estuaries under the Southeast New England Program (SNEP) of $3,945,172. With this grant, Restore America’s Estuaries will manage a competitive sub-award gr

  1. 40 CFR 35.2036 - Design/build project grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works § 35.2036 Design/build...) project grant provided that: (1) The proposed treatment works has an estimated total cost of $8 million or less; (2) The proposed treatment works is an aerated lagoon, trickling filter, waste stabilization pond...

  2. 77 FR 11592 - Notice of Funding Opportunity and Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for the Trade...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-27

    ... at least 0.5 percent of the approximately $500 million total amount of funds available under this SGA, the Department intends to fund grants of $2.5 to $3.0 million to applicants from each State, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. In addition to grants of $2.5 to $3.0 million to individual...

  3. University Administration of Federal Grants at the University of Rochester.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Comptroller General of the U.S., Washington, DC.

    Federal research grant activities at the University of Rochester for the year ending June 30, 1977, during which the university received $38.6 million in grants and contracts, are reviewed. The report includes: (1) a review of the university's system for administering and accounting for these funds; (2) an analysis of selected major grants awarded…

  4. Wilder-Naifeh Technical Skills Grant Program Report: A Baseline Evaluation

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Tennessee Higher Education Commission, 2010

    2010-01-01

    The Wilder-Naifeh Technical Skills Grant, introduced in Winter 2004, grants awards of up to $2,000 to students who attend one of the 27 Tennessee Technology Centers. Since the inception of this program, approximately 50,000 students have received grants, and the state of Tennessee has spent roughly $47.5 million on the program over the last four…

  5. Special Populations Grant Report, Fiscal Year 1991. Executive Summary.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Singley, Yvonne

    Special population grants to Illinois public community colleges fund services, special programs, and instruction that assist academically and socially disadvantaged students, students with disabilities, and minority students to succeed in college. In fiscal year 1991, grants totaling $9.7 million enabled the Illinois community colleges to provide…

  6. Examination into Grants to National Reading Center Foundation.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Comptroller General of the U.S., Washington, DC.

    Reported is a review by the U. S. General Accounting Office of procedures and requirements related to grants totaling $2.9 million to the National Reading Center Foundation by the Office of Education (OE), Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Costs totaling $305,300 incurred during the initial grant period were deemed unallowable.…

  7. Higher Education Cooperation Act: Fiscal Year 1998 Grant Allocations.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Illinois State Board of Higher Education, Springfield.

    This report describes fiscal year 1998 grant allocations made under the Illinois Higher Education Cooperation Act (HECA) to support programs and projects involving cooperation among higher education institutions. A total of $16.59 million was allocated. Projects recommended for grant funds include 3 new and 12 continuing interinstitutional…

  8. DOE EPSCoR Initiative in Structural and computational Biology/Bioinformatics

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Wallace, Susan S.

    2008-02-21

    The overall goal of the DOE EPSCoR Initiative in Structural and Computational Biology was to enhance the competiveness of Vermont research in these scientific areas. To develop self-sustaining infrastructure, we increased the critical mass of faculty, developed shared resources that made junior researchers more competitive for federal research grants, implemented programs to train graduate and undergraduate students who participated in these research areas and provided seed money for research projects. During the time period funded by this DOE initiative: (1) four new faculty were recruited to the University of Vermont using DOE resources, three in Computational Biology and one inmore » Structural Biology; (2) technical support was provided for the Computational and Structural Biology facilities; (3) twenty-two graduate students were directly funded by fellowships; (4) fifteen undergraduate students were supported during the summer; and (5) twenty-eight pilot projects were supported. Taken together these dollars resulted in a plethora of published papers, many in high profile journals in the fields and directly impacted competitive extramural funding based on structural or computational biology resulting in 49 million dollars awarded in grants (Appendix I), a 600% return on investment by DOE, the State and University.« less

  9. A Short Term Evaluation of the Direct Operating Grants. Final Report.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Levy-Coughlin Partnership.

    Findings of a survey of a sample of center-based child care (CBCC) programs and private home day care (PHDC) agencies listed in Ontario's Direct Operating Grant Calculation Data Base are reported. During 1988, licensed child care programs in Ontario received approximately 46.5 million dollars in Direct Operating Grants (DOGs). Grants were…

  10. NOAA Sea Grant awards $15.9 million in projects to build resilient coastal

    Science.gov Websites

    a larger effort by President Obama's Administration to help reduce climate-related impacts on ocean coastal flooding and erosion from coastal storms, as well as research into the long-term impacts of these minimize impacts. For instance, Ohio Sea Grant is funding research on watershed and river discharge models

  11. 34 CFR 222.193 - What other limitations on grant amounts apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... cost of an approved project. (2) The total amount of grant funds may not exceed four million dollars during any four-year period. Example: An LEA that is awarded four million dollars in the first year may...

  12. EPA Provides Brownfields Grants to Maine Communities

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency celebrated the recipients of nine Brownfields grants in Maine. This year, entities in Maine will receive $2.7 million for assessment and cleanup of Brownfield sites.

  13. 28 CFR 38.2 - Formula grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or... grants. (a) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to...

  14. 28 CFR 38.2 - Formula grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or... grants. (a) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to...

  15. 28 CFR 38.2 - Formula grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or... grants. (a) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to...

  16. 28 CFR 38.2 - Formula grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or... grants. (a) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to...

  17. 28 CFR 38.2 - Formula grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or... grants. (a) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to...

  18. 42 CFR 51b.605 - How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ..., or unprecedented? (4) Does the method of operation include an assessment of any possible impact, both... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded? 51b.605 Section 51b.605 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND...

  19. 42 CFR 51b.605 - How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ..., or unprecedented? (4) Does the method of operation include an assessment of any possible impact, both... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded? 51b.605 Section 51b.605 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND...

  20. 42 CFR 51b.605 - How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ..., or unprecedented? (4) Does the method of operation include an assessment of any possible impact, both... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded? 51b.605 Section 51b.605 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND...

  1. 42 CFR 51b.605 - How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ..., or unprecedented? (4) Does the method of operation include an assessment of any possible impact, both... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false How will grant applications be evaluated and the grants awarded? 51b.605 Section 51b.605 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND...

  2. 38 CFR 39.80 - General requirements for a grant.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... of a State or Tribal veterans cemetery: (1) Its preapplication for the grant must be approved by VA... § 39.3 for the applicable fiscal year so that funds are available for the project, and a grant for the project must not result in payment of more than the $5 million total amount permissible for all Operation...

  3. 38 CFR 39.80 - General requirements for a grant.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... of a State or Tribal veterans cemetery: (1) Its preapplication for the grant must be approved by VA... § 39.3 for the applicable fiscal year so that funds are available for the project, and a grant for the project must not result in payment of more than the $5 million total amount permissible for all Operation...

  4. 38 CFR 39.80 - General requirements for a grant.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... veterans cemetery: (1) Its preapplication for the grant must be approved by VA under § 39.81(e); (2) Its... fiscal year so that funds are available for the project, and a grant for the project must not result in payment of more than the $5 million total amount permissible for all Operation and Maintenance Projects in...

  5. 38 CFR 39.80 - General requirements for a grant.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... of a State or Tribal veterans cemetery: (1) Its preapplication for the grant must be approved by VA... § 39.3 for the applicable fiscal year so that funds are available for the project, and a grant for the project must not result in payment of more than the $5 million total amount permissible for all Operation...

  6. Final report, DOE/industry matching grant

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Kumar, Arvind S.

    2003-02-25

    The Department of Energy/Industry Matching Grant was used to help improve nuclear engineering and science education at the University of Missouri-Rolla. The funds helped in the areas of recruitment and retention. Funds allowed the department to give scholarships to over 100 students (names included). Funds were also used for equipment upgrade and research, including two computers with peripherals, two NaI detectors, and a thermoluminescent dosimeter.

  7. The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity*

    PubMed Central

    Jacob, Brian A.; Lefgren, Lars

    2011-01-01

    In this paper, we estimate the impact of receiving an NIH grant on subsequent publications and citations. Our sample consists of all applications (unsuccessful as well as successful) to the NIH from 1980 to 2000 for standard research grants (R01s). Both OLS and IV estimates show that receipt of an NIH research grant (worth roughly $1.7 million) leads to only one additional publication over the next five years, which corresponds to a 7 percent increase. The limited impact of NIH grants is consistent with a model in which the market for research funding is competitive, so that the loss of an NIH grant simply causes researchers to shift to another source of funding. PMID:21857758

  8. Final Report: Archiving Data to Support Data Synthesis of DOE Sponsored Elevated CO 2 Experiments

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Megonigal, James; Lu, Meng

    Over the last three decades DOE made a large investment in field-scale experiments in order to understand the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon cycle, and forecast how carbon cycling will change over the next century. The Smithsonian Environmental Research Center received one of the first awards in this program and managed two long-term studies (25 years and 10 years) with a total of approximately $10 million of support from DOE, and many more millions leveraged from the Smithsonian Institution and agencies such as NSF. The present DOE grant was based on the premise that such a largemore » investment demands a proper synthesis effort so that the full potential of these experiments are realized through data analysis and modeling. The goal of the this grant was to archive legacy data from two major elevated carbon dioxide experiments in DOE databases, and to engage in synthesis activities using these data. Both goals were met. All datasets deemed a high priority for data synthesis and modeling were prepared for archiving and analysis. Many of these datasets were deposited in DOE’s CDIAC, while others are being held at the Oak Ridge National Lab and the Smithsonian Institution until they can be received by DOE’s new ESS-DIVE system at Berkeley Lab. Most of the effort was invested in researching and re-constituting high-quality data sets from a 30-year elevated CO 2 experiment. Using these data, the grant produced products that are already benefiting climate change science, including the publication of new coastal wetland allometry equations based on 9,771 observations, public posting of dozens of datasets, metadata and supporting codes from long-term experiments at the Global Change Research Wetland, and publication of two synthetic data papers on scrub oak forest responses to elevated CO 2. In addition, three papers are in review or nearing submission reporting unexpected long-term patterns in ecosystem responses to elevated CO 2 and nitrogen

  9. 25 CFR 1000.48 - What must a Tribe do if it does not wish to receive a negotiation grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... 25 Indians 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false What must a Tribe do if it does not wish to receive a negotiation grant? 1000.48 Section 1000.48 Indians OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ANNUAL FUNDING AGREEMENTS UNDER THE TRIBAL SELF-GOVERNMENT ACT AMENDMENTS TO THE INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION AC...

  10. EPA Provides Brownfields Grants to Western Massachusetts Communities

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency celebrated the recipients of seven Brownfields grants in western Massachusetts. This year, entities in western Massachusetts received $2.4 million for assessment and cleanup of Brownfields sites.

  11. 43 CFR 3501.16 - Does my permit or lease grant me an exclusive right to develop the lands covered by the permit or...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... INTERIOR MINERALS MANAGEMENT (3000) LEASING OF SOLID MINERALS OTHER THAN COAL AND OIL SHALE Leasing of Solid Minerals Other Than Coal and Oil Shale-General § 3501.16 Does my permit or lease grant me an...

  12. 43 CFR 3501.16 - Does my permit or lease grant me an exclusive right to develop the lands covered by the permit or...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... INTERIOR MINERALS MANAGEMENT (3000) LEASING OF SOLID MINERALS OTHER THAN COAL AND OIL SHALE Leasing of Solid Minerals Other Than Coal and Oil Shale-General § 3501.16 Does my permit or lease grant me an...

  13. 43 CFR 3501.16 - Does my permit or lease grant me an exclusive right to develop the lands covered by the permit or...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... INTERIOR MINERALS MANAGEMENT (3000) LEASING OF SOLID MINERALS OTHER THAN COAL AND OIL SHALE Leasing of Solid Minerals Other Than Coal and Oil Shale-General § 3501.16 Does my permit or lease grant me an...

  14. 43 CFR 3501.16 - Does my permit or lease grant me an exclusive right to develop the lands covered by the permit or...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... INTERIOR MINERALS MANAGEMENT (3000) LEASING OF SOLID MINERALS OTHER THAN COAL AND OIL SHALE Leasing of Solid Minerals Other Than Coal and Oil Shale-General § 3501.16 Does my permit or lease grant me an...

  15. UMCP-BG and E collaboration in nuclear power engineering in the framework of DOE-Utility Nuclear Power Engineering Education Matching Grant Program

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Wolfe, Lothar PhD

    2000-03-01

    The DOE-Utility Nuclear Power Engineering Education Matching Grant Program has been established to support the education of students in Nuclear Engineering Programs to maintain a knowledgeable workforce in the United States in order to keep nuclear power as a viable component in a mix of energy sources for the country. The involvement of the utility industry ensures that this grant program satisfies the needs and requirements of local nuclear energy producers and at the same time establishes a strong linkage between education and day-to-day nuclear power generation. As of 1997, seventeen pairs of university-utility partners existed. UMCP was never amore » member of that group of universities, but applied for the first time with a proposal to Baltimore Gas and Electric Company in January 1999 [1]. This proposal was generously granted by BG&E [2,3] in the form of a gift in the amount of $25,000 from BG&E's Corporate Contribution Program. Upon the arrival of a newly appointed Director of Administration in the Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering, the BG&E check was deposited into the University's Maryland Foundation Fund. The receipt of the letter and the check enabled UMCP to apply for DOE's matching funds in the same amount by a proposal.« less

  16. Community Colleges Try Bold Strategies to Get More Grant Money

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Mangan, Katherine

    2008-01-01

    A lot of students have benefited from part of the $27-million in federal and state grant money that Del Mar College has received since it opened a centralized office for grants and sponsored research in 2005. Del Mar, which has about 11,000 credit-seeking students, is one of a growing number of community colleges that make up for shrinking state…

  17. 76 FR 24917 - Notice of Funding Opportunity and Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for H-1B Technical...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-03

    ... Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for H-1B Technical Skills Training Grants AGENCY: Employment and... million in funds for an H-1B Technical Skills Training Grants program. This grant program is designed to... training. H-1B technical skills training grants are financed by a user fee paid by employers to bring...

  18. FY 2015 Pollution Prevention Grant Program Request for Proposals

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    This grant is to assist state and tribal governments to encourage businesses to adopt environmental strategies and solutions that significantly reduce or eliminate waste from the source. EPA anticipates it will award approximately $3.97 million.

  19. FY 2014 Pollution Prevention Grant Program Request for Proposals

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    This grant is to assist state and tribal governments to encourage businesses to adopt environmental strategies and solutions that significantly reduce or eliminate waste from the source. EPA anticipates it will award approximately $4.1 million.

  20. Impact of the National Cancer Act on grant support.

    PubMed

    Kalberer, J T

    1975-03-01

    The National Cancer Act of 1971 resulted in a threefold increase in appropriations for the National Cancer Institute (NCI) within a 4-year period. A major effect was the increase for the Grants Program from +93 million in fiscal year 1970 to more than +280 million in 1974. Grant programs, administered by the Division of Cancer Research Resources and Centers, account for more than 50% of the total NCI extramural research budget and fall into four broad categories: research, training (including fellowships), cancer control, and construction. With the exception of the training area, funding for all grant programs has increased dramatically as a result of the Act. The ocst of research has also risen, as reflected in the average twofold increase in cost per NCI traditional grant over the past 10 years. This rise in cost is due to a number of factors, including inflation, more sophisticated equipment and supplies and, in some cases, more ambitious projects. The principal type of research grants include traditional awarded for investigator-initiated research projects, and center, awarded for comprehensive and specialized cancer centers. While support for traditional grants has remained in the forefront of NCI funding, money for cancer center grants has increased at a greater rate in recent years, reflecting emphasis on the development of cancer centers throughout the country. Compared to other institutes at the NIH, NCI is in a very favorable funding position; in fiscal year 1974 NCI awarded more money for its research grant programs than all of the other institutes (with the exception of the National Heart and Lung Institue) obligated for their entire budgets. The Act has stimulated a large increase in new cancer applications received, and the increased funding has made it possible for NCI to award a greater number of grants. Young investigators have competed well for the additional monies made available by the Act and funding for cancer research outside the United

  1. $1. 9 million OKd for Michigan shale project. [Antrim shale deposits

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Kreiling, J.

    Dow Chemical Co. has received a $1.9 million Energy Research and Development Administration grant to begin developing ''in-situ'' technology to extract gas and oil from Michigan's vast Antrim shale deposits. Dow estimates that the deposits contain at least 2.5 trillion barrels of crude oil and it is speculated that 10 percent of it is recoverable. Michigan Gov. William G. Milliken says ''Success in this high-risk, unconventional but potentially big-payoff project could substantially ease the energy crunch in Michigan and the nation.'' Michigan imports 95 percent of its fuel. The $1.9 million will get work started and foreshadows a $13 millionmore » contract that will support Dow's research in fracturing and ignition.« less

  2. Arkansas DOE/EPSCoR traineeship grant. Final technical report, September 30, 1991--October 15, 1996

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Geren, C.R.

    1998-03-06

    The traineeship grant proposal was submitted by Karl David Straub on March 19, 1991 on the behalf of the Arkansas EPSCoR Committee. The University of Arkansas, Fayetteville submitted the proposal for the Arkansas EPSCoR Committee and agreed to act as the fiduciary for the project if it was funded. The duration of the original project was 9/1/91 through 8/31/92. A competitive renewal application for years two and three was submitted by Collis Geren for the Arkansas EPSCoR Committee and the DOE EPSCoR Subcommittee, and no cost extensions extended the program through October 15, 1996. The total funding from the Departmentmore » of Energy, for this traineeship grant was $750,000 which was matched as required by participating Arkansas entities. The Arkansas Energy Office provided $725,000 of the match from stripper well funds. Participating universities provided the final required $25,000. This report describes the process the state followed in recruiting to fill training positions, problems encountered with the program, the participants, their research programs, and their progress. Students worked on programs ranging from diamond films to molecular conductors, particle physics to photo cells, catalysts to solar siding to rice drying.« less

  3. 76 FR 50315 - Notice of Fiscal Year 2012 Safety Grants and Solicitation for Applications

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-12

    ... grants; MCSAP Incentive grants; New Entrant Safety Audit grants; MCSAP High Priority grants; Commercial...'s License Program Improvement (CDLPI) grants; Performance and Registration Information Systems... Information Systems and Networks (CVISN) grants. It should be noted that FMCSA does not expect the Commercial...

  4. 76 FR 62455 - Announcement of Updated Funding Availability for H-1B Technical Skills Training Grants

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-07

    ... 10-13] Announcement of Updated Funding Availability for H-1B Technical Skills Training Grants AGENCY... the availability of $240 million for the H-1B Technical Skills Training Grants to be awarded through a... additional applicants to apply for the H-1B Technical Skills Training Grants competition that will close on...

  5. Mission Critical Community Colleges Use Business Partnerships, Grants to Train New IT Workers

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Wong, Wylie

    2015-01-01

    Community colleges are using grants and workforce partnerships to train a new generation of technology workers. In September, the Obama administration awarded $450 million in grants to nearly 270 community colleges that have partnered with more than 400 employers nationally. It was the final installment of a four-year, $2 billion competitive grant…

  6. No Money? Write a Winning Grant Proposal

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Stephens, Pam

    2009-01-01

    Most art educators have had the experience of coming up with a great idea for their programs only to have that idea shot down by lack of funding. Whatever the idea, it almost always requires extra funding to implement. One effective way of obtaining extra cash is through grant funding; however, since grants provide money that does not need to be…

  7. Interest high in EEC technology grants

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Not Available

    1981-06-01

    There has been high interest shown by oil companies and industrialists in the seventh round grants for hydrocarbon technology projects funded by the European Economic Community (EEC). So far, the EEC has obtained 63 applications for projects costing 668 million European units of account. A listing of the 1980 projects describes concepts, company, and country; EEC contributions; and a brief sketch of project objectives.

  8. 26 CFR 53.4945-5 - Grants to organizations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... organization uses to make payments to another organization (the secondary grantee) shall not be regarded as a grant by the private foundation to the secondary grantee if the foundation does not earmark the use of... an organization described in section 170(c)(1) and such grant is earmarked for use by another...

  9. 26 CFR 53.4945-4 - Grants to individuals.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... cases of grantees whose study at an educational institution does not involve the taking of courses but... individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes by such individual unless the grant satisfies the... travel, study, or other similar purposes is not a “taxable expenditure” only if: (a) The grant is awarded...

  10. 26 CFR 53.4945-4 - Grants to individuals.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-04-01

    ... cases of grantees whose study at an educational institution does not involve the taking of courses but... individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes by such individual unless the grant satisfies the... travel, study, or other similar purposes is not a “taxable expenditure” only if: (a) The grant is awarded...

  11. 26 CFR 53.4945-4 - Grants to individuals.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-04-01

    ... cases of grantees whose study at an educational institution does not involve the taking of courses but... individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes by such individual unless the grant satisfies the... travel, study, or other similar purposes is not a “taxable expenditure” only if: (a) The grant is awarded...

  12. 26 CFR 53.4945-4 - Grants to individuals.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-04-01

    ... cases of grantees whose study at an educational institution does not involve the taking of courses but... individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes by such individual unless the grant satisfies the... travel, study, or other similar purposes is not a “taxable expenditure” only if: (a) The grant is awarded...

  13. 26 CFR 53.4945-4 - Grants to individuals.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-04-01

    ... cases of grantees whose study at an educational institution does not involve the taking of courses but... individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes by such individual unless the grant satisfies the... travel, study, or other similar purposes is not a “taxable expenditure” only if: (a) The grant is awarded...

  14. 2 CFR 2520.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false What does this part do? 2520.10 Section 2520.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the...

  15. 2 CFR 2520.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false What does this part do? 2520.10 Section 2520.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the...

  16. 2 CFR 2700.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false What does this part do? 2700.10 Section 2700.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2700.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the...

  17. 2 CFR 2520.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 2520.10 Section 2520.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the...

  18. 2 CFR 801.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false What does this part do? 801.10 Section 801.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 801.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the...

  19. 78 FR 66987 - Railroad Safety Technology Program Grant Program

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-11-07

    ... carriers, railroad suppliers, and State and local governments for projects that have a public benefit of... projects . . . that have a public benefit of improved safety and network efficiency.'' To be eligible for... million. This grant program has a maximum 80-percent Federal and minimum 20-percent grantee cost share...

  20. State-Funded Scholarship/Grant Programs for Students to Attend Postsecondary Education Institutions. National Association of Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP) 27th Annual Survey Report, 1995-96 Academic Year.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    DeSalvatore, Kristen; Hughes, Linda

    This report presents data for the 1995-96 academic year on state-funded student scholarship and grant programs in 14 tables. States awarded over $2.9 billion in student aid to over 2 million students in 1995-96, an increase of 1.6 percent over the amount awarded the previous year. Of the $2.5 billion in need-based grant aid available, 99 percent…

  1. 40 CFR 35.4220 - How does my group ensure a prospective contractor does not have a conflict of interest?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does my group ensure a prospective contractor does not have a conflict of interest? 35.4220 Section 35.4220 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GRANTS AND OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for...

  2. 2 CFR 2520.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false What does this part do? 2520.10 Section 2520.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance...

  3. 2 CFR 2520.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false What does this part do? 2520.10 Section 2520.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.10 What does this part do? This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance...

  4. 2012-13 Operating Grants: Too Little to Offset District Budget Shortfalls. BCTF Research Report. Section V. 2012-EF-01

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    White, Margaret

    2012-01-01

    The BC Ministry of Education announcement about 2012-13 operating grants estimates includes "new" funding to districts of $11.2 million for vulnerable students, $10.7 million for districts to implement elements of the Education Plan, and $21.8 million to address "districts' differing geographic circumstances." This makes for a…

  5. A Discussion on Governmental Research Grants.

    PubMed

    Fang, Hui

    2015-10-01

    Governmental research grants are financially supported by taxpayers to meet financial requirements of research, particularly research that is unlikely to be supported by private funds. Researchers reward donors by producing knowledge. Publishing research results in an academic journal reflects achievement by researchers; however, receiving a grant award does not. The latter only provides the researcher with the capacity to perform his/her research. Applicants may receive more financial support than they actually need because there is no strict audit on the amount of money requested by each research proposal. There are fewer opportunities to apply for a governmental grant than there are for publishing an academic article, and the application process for governmental grants is not flexible. Some potentially innovative research may be impeded by the intense competition among scientific researchers applying for financial support. Researchers face stiffer competition at this stage than at the stage of publishing results. This paper suggests that scientific foundations can improve their efficiency by giving funding preference to economic proposals. Methods for estimating the efficiency of grants are proposed. The practice followed by the Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme of the National Science Foundation validates my analysis and recommendations.

  6. 2 CFR 1880.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1880.20 Section 1880.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1880.20 Does this part apply to me...

  7. 2 CFR 1880.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1880.20 Section 1880.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1880.20 Does this part apply to me...

  8. 2 CFR 1880.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1880.20 Section 1880.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1880.20 Does this part apply to me...

  9. Final Technical Report for DOE Grant DE-SC0017198

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Jurisson, Silvia

    This grant supported students, postdocs and trainees from US institutions to attend the 22nd International Symposium on Radiopharmaceutical Sciences (ISRS). The trainees supported all presented their research at ISRS2017 held in Dresden, Germany from 14-19 May 2017. All trainees performed their research at US institutions. Ten trainees were supported.

  10. Grant writing: Moving from generating ideas to applying to grants that matter.

    PubMed

    Nelson, David; Ruffalo, Leslie

    2017-05-01

    There is an extraordinary burden placed upon the healthcare system and people as a result of health disparities that exist within the United States. If there is going to be a concerted effort to develop innovative strategies to reduce health disparities, input from the community and behavioral scientists can and should be included in this approach and narrative. Grant writing provides one vehicle to express the narrative and to provide a means to fund research and programs within clinic-based and community settings. This paper describes a four-step inquiry process to guide healthcare professionals with varying degrees of clinical and scholarship interests through the grant writing process. They include: (1) Why write grants (motivations), (2) what is the area of focus? (Interests), (3) whom should be on the project? (partnerships), and (4) what needs to happen next to move the idea forward? (actions) The complexity of psychosocial issues means that behavioral science is well suited to develop both hypotheses-driven and phenomenological research to understand bio-psycho-social health issues. Grant writing does not need to be mysterious or daunting. It can provide a means to an end, not only to fund research but also as a means to an end of health disparities.

  11. 2 CFR 902.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 902.20 Section 902.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 902.20 Does this part apply to me...

  12. 2 CFR 902.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 902.20 Section 902.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 902.20 Does this part apply to me...

  13. 2 CFR 901.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 901.20 Section 901.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 901.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  14. 2 CFR 3000.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3000.20 Section 3000.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3000.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  15. 2 CFR 2520.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2520.20 Section 2520.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  16. 2 CFR 2200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2200.20 Section 2200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2200.20 Does this part apply to me...

  17. 2 CFR 3254.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3254.20 Section 3254.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3254.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  18. 2 CFR 780.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 780.20 Section 780.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 780.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  19. 2 CFR 376.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 376.20 Section 376.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 376.20 Does this part apply to me? This...

  20. 2 CFR 1200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1200.20 Section 1200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NONPROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT § 1200.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  1. 2 CFR 3254.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3254.20 Section 3254.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3254.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  2. 2 CFR 2520.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2520.20 Section 2520.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2520.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  3. 2 CFR 2424.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2424.20 Section 2424.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2424.20 Does this part apply to me...

  4. 2 CFR 801.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 801.20 Section 801.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 801.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  5. 2 CFR 3185.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3185.20 Section 3185.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3185.20 Does this part apply to me...

  6. 2 CFR 1532.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1532.20 Section 1532.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1532.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  7. 2 CFR 2424.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2424.20 Section 2424.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2424.20 Does this part apply to me...

  8. 2 CFR 1532.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1532.20 Section 1532.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1532.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  9. 2 CFR 3369.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3369.20 Section 3369.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3369.20 Does this part apply to me? This...

  10. 2 CFR 2200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2200.20 Section 2200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2200.20 Does this part apply to me...

  11. 2 CFR 2339.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2339.20 Section 2339.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 2339.20 Does this part apply to me...

  12. 2 CFR 3185.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3185.20 Section 3185.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3185.20 Does this part apply to me...

  13. 2 CFR 417.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 417.20 Section 417.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 417.20 Does this part apply to me? Through this part...

  14. 2 CFR 417.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 417.20 Section 417.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 417.20 Does this part apply to me? Through this part...

  15. 2 CFR 2424.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2424.20 Section 2424.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2424.20 Does this part apply to me...

  16. 2 CFR 2424.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2424.20 Section 2424.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2424.20 Does this part apply to me...

  17. 2 CFR 1326.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1326.20 Section 1326.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1326.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  18. 2 CFR 1125.30 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1125.30 Section 1125.30 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1125.30 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  19. 2 CFR 901.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 901.20 Section 901.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 901.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  20. 2 CFR 2700.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2700.20 Section 2700.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2700.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  1. 2 CFR 3000.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3000.20 Section 3000.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3000.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  2. 2 CFR 1125.30 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1125.30 Section 1125.30 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1125.30 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  3. 2 CFR 1200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1200.20 Section 1200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NONPROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT § 1200.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  4. 2 CFR 901.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 901.20 Section 901.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 901.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  5. 2 CFR 801.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 801.20 Section 801.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 801.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  6. 2 CFR 5800.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 5800.20 Section 5800.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 5800.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  7. 2 CFR 2336.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2336.20 Section 2336.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2336.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  8. 2 CFR 1532.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1532.20 Section 1532.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1532.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  9. 2 CFR 2200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2200.20 Section 2200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2200.20 Does this part apply to me...

  10. 2 CFR 417.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 417.20 Section 417.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 417.20 Does this part apply to me? Through this part...

  11. 2 CFR 376.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 376.20 Section 376.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 376.20 Does this part apply to me? This...

  12. 2 CFR 2339.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2339.20 Section 2339.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 2339.20 Does this part apply to me...

  13. 2 CFR 3185.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3185.20 Section 3185.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3185.20 Does this part apply to me...

  14. 2 CFR 780.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 780.20 Section 780.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 780.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  15. 2 CFR 1200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1200.20 Section 1200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NONPROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT § 1200.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  16. 2 CFR 1880.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1880.20 Section 1880.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1880.20 Does this part apply to me...

  17. 2 CFR 2339.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2339.20 Section 2339.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 2339.20 Does this part apply to me...

  18. 2 CFR 3000.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3000.20 Section 3000.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3000.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  19. 2 CFR 1326.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1326.20 Section 1326.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1326.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  20. 2 CFR 2336.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2336.20 Section 2336.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2336.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  1. 2 CFR 1532.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1532.20 Section 1532.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1532.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  2. 2 CFR 376.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 376.20 Section 376.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 376.20 Does this part apply to me? This...

  3. 2 CFR 1200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1200.20 Section 1200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NONPROCUREMENT SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT § 1200.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  4. 2 CFR 3369.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3369.20 Section 3369.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3369.20 Does this part apply to me? This...

  5. 2 CFR 1326.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1326.20 Section 1326.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1326.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  6. 2 CFR 1125.30 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1125.30 Section 1125.30 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1125.30 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  7. 2 CFR 3513.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3513.20 Section 3513.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3513.20 Does this part apply to me...

  8. 2 CFR 801.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 801.20 Section 801.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 801.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  9. 2 CFR 1326.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1326.20 Section 1326.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1326.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  10. 2 CFR 421.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 421.20 Section 421.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 421.20 Does this part apply to me...

  11. 2 CFR 2336.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2336.20 Section 2336.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2336.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  12. 2 CFR 1125.30 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1125.30 Section 1125.30 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1125.30 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  13. 2 CFR 2336.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2336.20 Section 2336.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2336.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  14. 2 CFR 2700.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2700.20 Section 2700.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2700.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  15. 2 CFR 2200.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2200.20 Section 2200.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2200.20 Does this part apply to me...

  16. 2 CFR 421.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 421.20 Section 421.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 421.20 Does this part apply to me...

  17. 2 CFR 5800.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 5800.20 Section 5800.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 5800.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  18. 2 CFR 2700.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2700.20 Section 2700.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 2700.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  19. 2 CFR 3513.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3513.20 Section 3513.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3513.20 Does this part apply to me...

  20. Final Report DOE SSL Grant (No. DE-EE0006673) Advanced Light Extraction Structure for OLED Lighting

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Cooper, Gregory; Monickam, Selina

    The innovation proposed in this grant is to demonstrate a novel internal light extraction (ILE) design that can maximize the energy efficiency of Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) lighting devices without negatively impacting the device voltage, efficacy or angular color dependences. Even though, OLEDs have unique features compared to its inorganic counterparts, LEDs, in terms of technology development and market readiness levels, it still lags LEDs by several years. The main challenges as identified in the National Research Council’s 2013 Assessment on Solid State Lighting, are the cost of the materials and the low light extraction efficacy [1]. Improving themore » light extraction will improve both the $/Klm and lm/W, two important metrics DOE uses to measure the cost effectiveness of a light source.« less

  1. 2 CFR 902.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 902.20 Section 902.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 902.20 Does this part apply to me...

  2. 2 CFR 376.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 376.20 Section 376.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 376.20 Does this part apply to me? This...

  3. 2 CFR 601.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 601.20 Section 601.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF STATE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 601.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part...

  4. 2 CFR 3700.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3700.20 Section 3700.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements PEACE CORPS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3700.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part...

  5. 2 CFR 382.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 382.20 Section 382.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH....20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB...

  6. 2 CFR 1532.1105 - Does this subpart apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this subpart apply to me? 1532.1105 Section 1532.1105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act § 1532.1105 Does this subpart apply to me? (a) Portions of this...

  7. 2 CFR 3700.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3700.20 Section 3700.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements PEACE CORPS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3700.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part...

  8. 2 CFR 601.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 601.20 Section 601.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF STATE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 601.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part...

  9. 2 CFR 801.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 801.20 Section 801.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 801.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  10. 2 CFR 3513.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3513.20 Section 3513.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3513.20 Does this part apply to me...

  11. 2 CFR 601.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 601.20 Section 601.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF STATE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 601.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part...

  12. 2 CFR 3254.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3254.20 Section 3254.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 3254.20 Does this part apply to me? This part...

  13. 2 CFR 1532.1105 - Does this subpart apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this subpart apply to me? 1532.1105 Section 1532.1105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act § 1532.1105 Does this subpart apply to me? (a) Portions of this...

  14. 2 CFR 1532.1105 - Does this subpart apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this subpart apply to me? 1532.1105 Section 1532.1105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act § 1532.1105 Does this subpart apply to me? (a) Portions of this...

  15. 2 CFR 901.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 901.20 Section 901.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 901.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and...

  16. Fiscal Year 1999 Higher Education Budget Recommendations. Operations and Grants.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Illinois State Board of Higher Education, Springfield.

    This report presents staff recommendations of the Illinois Board of Higher Education concerning budget recommendations for higher education operations and grants for fiscal year 1999. General funds recommendations total $2,207.1 million, an increase of 6.1 percent over 1998 appropriations. Recommendations are also included for locally-held…

  17. 2 CFR 182.115 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 182.115 Section 182.115 Grants and Agreements Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements... § 182.115 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A...

  18. 2 CFR 1401.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1401.105 Section 1401.105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE... § 1401.105 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB...

  19. 2 CFR 601.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 601.20 Section 601.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF STATE NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 601.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part...

  20. 2 CFR 182.115 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 182.115 Section 182.115 Grants and Agreements Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements... § 182.115 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A...

  1. 2 CFR 1532.1105 - Does this subpart apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this subpart apply to me? 1532.1105 Section 1532.1105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act § 1532.1105 Does this subpart apply to me? (a) Portions of this...

  2. 2 CFR 182.115 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 182.115 Section 182.115 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND... Coverage § 182.115 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1...

  3. DOE's Geothermal Program still in game

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Bush, Susan

    In the ongoing search to find cost-effective, renewable forms of energy that neither contribute to global warming nor threaten national security, geothermal energy remains a player. Although Department of Energy funding for geothermal research has declined over the past decade, from its peak in 1979 of $160 million, there is still tremendous potential in terms of geothermal development, said Gladys Hooper, program manager of DOE's Hot Dry Rock and Brine Chemistry divisions. Technology for harnessing geothermal power is by and large there, she said. What is needed is more awareness and publicity regarding the merits of geothermal energy.For fiscal year 1993, proposed DOE funding for geothermal research was $24 million, down from $27 million in fiscal 1992 and nearly $30 million in fiscal 1991. DOE's Geothermal Division oversees the network of national laboratories and universities involved in developing the nation's geothermal resources and bringing them into commercial competitiveness.

  4. 2 CFR 1400.20 - When does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false When does this part apply to me? 1400.20 Section 1400.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1400.20 When does this part apply to me? This...

  5. 2 CFR 1400.20 - When does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false When does this part apply to me? 1400.20 Section 1400.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1400.20 When does this part apply to me? This...

  6. 2 CFR 1400.20 - When does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false When does this part apply to me? 1400.20 Section 1400.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1400.20 When does this part apply to me? This...

  7. FY 2018 and FY 2019 Pollution Prevention Grant Program Request for Proposals

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    To assist state and tribal governments to encourage businesses to adopt environmental strategies and solutions that significantly reduce or eliminate waste from the source, EPA anticipates it will award approximately $4.69 million for the P2 Grant in 2018.

  8. FY 2016 and FY 2017 Pollution Prevention Grant Program Request for Proposals

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    To assist state and tribal governments to encourage businesses to adopt environmental strategies and solutions that significantly reduce or eliminate waste from the source, EPA anticipates it will award approximately $3.97 million for the P2 Grant in 2016.

  9. 2 CFR 1400.20 - When does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false When does this part apply to me? 1400.20 Section 1400.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NONPROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION § 1400.20 When does this part apply to me? This...

  10. Off the roadmap? Family medicine's grant funding and committee representation at NIH.

    PubMed

    Lucan, Sean C; Phillips, Robert L; Bazemore, Andrew W

    2008-01-01

    Family medicine is challenged to develop its own research infrastructure and to inform and contribute to a national translational-research agenda. Toward these ends, understanding family medicine's engagement with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is important. We descriptively analyzed NIH grants to family medicine from 2002 through 2006 and the current NIH advisory committee memberships. Grants (and dollars) awarded to departments of family medicine increased from 89 ($25.6 million) in 2002, to 154 ($44.6 million) in 2006. These values represented only 0.20% (0.15% for dollars) and 0.33% (0.22% for dollars), respectively, of total NIH awards. Nearly 75% of family medicine grants came from just 6 of NIH's grant-funding 24 institutes and centers. Although having disproportionately fewer grant continuations (62% vs 72%) and R awards (68% vs 74%)-particularly R01 awards (53% vs 84%)-relative to NIH grantees overall, family medicine earned proportionately more new (28% vs 21%) and K awards (25% vs 9%) and had more physician principal investigators (52% vs 15%). Ten of the nation's 132 departments of family medicine (7.6%) earned almost 50% of all family medicine awards. Representatives from family medicine were on 6.4% of NIH advisory committees (0.38% of all members); family physicians were on 2.7% (0.16% of members). Departments of family medicine, and family physicians in particular, receive a miniscule proportion of NIH grant funding and have correspondingly minimal representation on standing NIH advisory committees. Family medicine's engagement at the NIH remains near well-documented historic lows, undermining family medicine's potential for translating medical knowledge into community practice, and advancing knowledge to improve health care and health for the US population as a whole.

  11. Percentile Ranking and Citation Impact of a Large Cohort of NHLBI-funded Cardiovascular R01 Grants

    PubMed Central

    Danthi, Narasimhan; Wu, Colin O.; Shi, Peibei; Lauer, Michael

    2014-01-01

    Rationale Funding decisions for cardiovascular R01 grant applications at NHLBI largely hinge on percentile rankings. It is not known whether this approach enables the highest impact science. Objective To conduct an observational analysis of percentile rankings and bibliometric outcomes for a contemporary set of funded NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants. Methods and results We identified 1492 investigator-initiated de novo R01 grant applications that were funded between 2001 and 2008, and followed their progress for linked publications and citations to those publications. Our co-primary endpoints were citations received per million dollars of funding, citations obtained within 2-years of publication, and 2-year citations for each grant’s maximally cited paper. In 7654 grant-years of funding that generated $3004 million of total NIH awards, the portfolio yielded 16,793 publications that appeared between 2001 and 2012 (median per grant 8, 25th and 75th percentiles 4 and 14, range 0 – 123), which received 2,224,255 citations (median per grant 1048, 25th and 75th percentiles 492 and 1,932, range 0 – 16,295). We found no association between percentile ranking and citation metrics; the absence of association persisted even after accounting for calendar time, grant duration, number of grants acknowledged per paper, number of authors per paper, early investigator status, human versus non-human focus, and institutional funding. An exploratory machine-learning analysis suggested that grants with the very best percentile rankings did yield more maximally cited papers. Conclusions In a large cohort of NHLBI-funded cardiovascular R01 grants, we were unable to find a monotonic association between better percentile ranking and higher scientific impact as assessed by citation metrics. PMID:24406983

  12. 34 CFR 75.232 - The cost analysis; basis for grant amount.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Secretary sets the amount of a new grant, the Secretary does a cost analysis of the project. The Secretary... objectives of the project with reasonable efficiency and economy under the budget in the application... 34 Education 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false The cost analysis; basis for grant amount. 75.232...

  13. The Gannett Foundation Literacy Challenge Grants Program 1987-1990. Assessment Report.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Sibbison, Virginia Hayes

    This report describes how 20 states and Puerto Rico used $2.7 million awarded by the Gannett Foundation to build and expand adult literacy activities in a coordinated fashion statewide. Chapter 1 presents information on development of the Literacy Challenge grants program and brief descriptions of each project, including year funded, amount of…

  14. Off the Roadmap? Family Medicine’s Grant Funding and Committee Representation at NIH

    PubMed Central

    Lucan, Sean C.; Phillips, Robert L.; Bazemore, Andrew W.

    2008-01-01

    PURPOSE Family medicine is challenged to develop its own research infrastructure and to inform and contribute to a national translational-research agenda. Toward these ends, understanding family medicine’s engagement with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is important. METHODS We descriptively analyzed NIH grants to family medicine from 2002 through 2006 and the current NIH advisory committee memberships. RESULTS Grants (and dollars) awarded to departments of family medicine increased from 89 ($25.6 million) in 2002, to 154 ($44.6 million) in 2006. These values represented only 0.20% (0.15% for dollars) and 0.33% (0.22% for dollars), respectively, of total NIH awards. Nearly 75% of family medicine grants came from just 6 of NIH’s grant-funding 24 institutes and centers. Although having disproportionately fewer grant continuations (62% vs 72%) and R awards (68% vs 74%)—particularly R01 awards (53% vs 84%)—relative to NIH grantees overall, family medicine earned proportionately more new (28% vs 21%) and K awards (25% vs 9%) and had more physician principal investigators (52% vs 15%). Ten of the nation’s 132 departments of family medicine (7.6%) earned almost 50% of all family medicine awards. Representatives from family medicine were on 6.4% of NIH advisory committees (0.38% of all members); family physicians were on 2.7% (0.16% of members). CONCLUSIONS Departments of family medicine, and family physicians in particular, receive a miniscule proportion of NIH grant funding and have correspondingly minimal representation on standing NIH advisory committees. Family medicine’s engagement at the NIH remains near well-documented historic lows, undermining family medicine’s potential for translating medical knowledge into community practice, and advancing knowledge to improve health care and health for the US population as a whole. PMID:19001306

  15. 2 CFR 1401.100 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 1401.100 Section 1401.100 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE... F of 2 CFR part 182) for DOI's grants and cooperative agreements; and (b) Establishes DOI policies...

  16. 34 CFR 76.131 - How does an insular area apply for a consolidated grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... § 76.125(c) under which the consolidated grant funds will be used and administered; (3) Describes the goals, objectives, activities, and the means of evaluating program outcomes for the programs for which the Insular Area will use the funds received under the consolidated grant during the fiscal year for...

  17. New Jersey Grant Program To Reduce Student Disruption in Schools: Award Recipients.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    New Jersey State Dept. of Education, Trenton. Div. of General Academic Education.

    New Jersey's $1 million Grant Program to Reduce Student Disruption in Schools is intended to provide resources to individual school districts or groups of cooperating districts for developing and implementing programs for chronically disruptive students, and thereby to identify models to make available to other districts throughout the state. Out…

  18. 34 CFR 607.13 - How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit? 607.13 Section 607.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education... Does an Institution Apply for a Grant? § 607.13 How many applications for a development grant may an...

  19. What are the health costs of uranium mining? A case study of miners in Grants, New Mexico

    PubMed Central

    Jones, Benjamin A

    2014-01-01

    Background: Uranium mining is associated with lung cancer and other health problems among miners. Health impacts are related with miner exposure to radon gas progeny. Objectives: This study estimates the health costs of excess lung cancer mortality among uranium miners in the largest uranium-producing district in the USA, centered in Grants, New Mexico. Methods: Lung cancer mortality rates on miners were used to estimate excess mortality and years of life lost (YLL) among the miner population in Grants from 1955 to 2005. A cost analysis was performed to estimate direct (medical) and indirect (premature mortality) health costs. Results: Total health costs ranged from $2.2 million to $7.7 million per excess death. This amounts to between $22.4 million and $165.8 million in annual health costs over the 1955–1990 mining period. Annual exposure-related lung cancer mortality was estimated at 2185.4 miners per 100 000, with a range of 1419.8–2974.3 per 100 000. Conclusions: Given renewed interest in uranium worldwide, results suggest a re-evaluation of radon exposure standards and inclusion of miner long-term health into mining planning decisions. PMID:25224806

  20. What are the health costs of uranium mining? A case study of miners in Grants, New Mexico.

    PubMed

    Jones, Benjamin A

    2014-10-01

    Uranium mining is associated with lung cancer and other health problems among miners. Health impacts are related with miner exposure to radon gas progeny. This study estimates the health costs of excess lung cancer mortality among uranium miners in the largest uranium-producing district in the USA, centered in Grants, New Mexico. Lung cancer mortality rates on miners were used to estimate excess mortality and years of life lost (YLL) among the miner population in Grants from 1955 to 2005. A cost analysis was performed to estimate direct (medical) and indirect (premature mortality) health costs. Total health costs ranged from $2·2 million to $7·7 million per excess death. This amounts to between $22·4 million and $165·8 million in annual health costs over the 1955-1990 mining period. Annual exposure-related lung cancer mortality was estimated at 2185·4 miners per 100 000, with a range of 1419·8-2974·3 per 100 000. Given renewed interest in uranium worldwide, results suggest a re-evaluation of radon exposure standards and inclusion of miner long-term health into mining planning decisions.

  1. New York State Health Foundation grant helps health centers win federal expansion funds.

    PubMed

    Sandman, David; Cozine, Maureen

    2012-11-01

    With approximately 1.2 million New Yorkers poised to gain health insurance coverage as a result of federal health reform, demand for primary care services is likely to increase greatly. The Affordable Care Act includes $11 billion in funding to enhance primary care access at community health centers. Recognizing a need and an opportunity, in August 2010 the New York State Health Foundation made a grant of nearly $400,000 to the Community Health Care Association of New York State to work with twelve health centers to develop successful proposals for obtaining and using these federal funds. Ultimately, eleven of the twelve sites are expected to receive $25.6 million in federal grants over a five-year period-a sixty-four-fold return on the foundation's investment. This article describes the strategy for investing in community health centers; identifies key project activities, challenges, and lessons; and highlights its next steps for strengthening primary care.

  2. Final Report for DOE Grant DE-FG02-03ER25579; Development of High-Order Accurate Interface Tracking Algorithms and Improved Constitutive Models for Problems in Continuum Mechanics with Applications to Jetting

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Puckett, Elbridge Gerry; Miller, Gregory Hale

    published by Dr. Phillip Colella, the head of ANAG, and some of his colleagues. Chris Algieri is now employed as a staff member in Dr. Bill Collins' Climate Science Department in the Earth Sciences Division at LBNL working with computational models of climate change. Finally, it should be noted that the work conducted by Professor Puckett and his students Sarah Williams and Chris Algieri and described in this final report for DOE grant # DE-FC02-03ER25579 is closely related to work performed by Professor Puckett and his students under the auspices of Professor Puckett's DOE SciDAC grant DE-FC02-01ER25473 An Algorithmic and Software Framework for Applied Partial Differential Equations: A DOE SciDAC Integrated Software Infrastructure Center (ISIC). Dr. Colella was the lead PI for this SciDAC grant, which was comprised of several research groups from DOE national laboratories and five university PI's from five different universities. In theory Professor Puckett tried to use funds from the SciDAC grant to support work directly involved in implementing algorithms developed by members of his research group at UCD as software that might be of use to Puckett's SciDAC CoPIs. (For example, see the work reported in Section 2.2.2 of this final report.) However, since there is considerable lead time spent developing such algorithms before they are ready to become `software' and research plans and goals change as the research progresses, Professor Puckett supported each member of his research group partially with funds from the SciDAC APDEC ISIC DE-FC02-01ER25473 and partially with funds from this DOE MICS grant DE-FC02-03ER25579. This has necessarily resulted in a significant overlap of project areas that were funded by both grants. In particular, both Sarah Williams and Chris Algieri were supported partially with funds from grant # DE-FG02-03ER25579, for which this is the final report, and in part with funds from Professor Puckett's DOE SciDAC grant # DE-FC02-01ER25473. For example

  3. 22 CFR 205.1 - Grants and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-04-01

    ..., including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use... beneficiary on the basis of religion or religious belief. (f) No grant document, contract, agreement, covenant... Section 205.1 Foreign Relations AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS...

  4. 22 CFR 205.1 - Grants and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-04-01

    ..., including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use... beneficiary on the basis of religion or religious belief. (f) No grant document, contract, agreement, covenant... Section 205.1 Foreign Relations AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS...

  5. 22 CFR 205.1 - Grants and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-04-01

    ..., including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use... beneficiary on the basis of religion or religious belief. (f) No grant document, contract, agreement, covenant... Section 205.1 Foreign Relations AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS...

  6. 22 CFR 205.1 - Grants and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ..., including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use... beneficiary on the basis of religion or religious belief. (f) No grant document, contract, agreement, covenant... Section 205.1 Foreign Relations AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS...

  7. 22 CFR 205.1 - Grants and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-04-01

    ..., including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use... beneficiary on the basis of religion or religious belief. (f) No grant document, contract, agreement, covenant... Section 205.1 Foreign Relations AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION BY RELIGIOUS...

  8. 40 CFR 1074.105 - Criteria for granting authorization.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... POLLUTION CONTROLS PREEMPTION OF STATE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR WAIVER OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION FOR NONROAD.... (a) The Administrator will grant the authorization if California determines that its standards will... following are true: (1) California's determination is arbitrary and capricious. (2) California does not need...

  9. 40 CFR 1074.105 - Criteria for granting authorization.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... POLLUTION CONTROLS PREEMPTION OF STATE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR WAIVER OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION FOR NONROAD.... (a) The Administrator will grant the authorization if California determines that its standards will... following are true: (1) California's determination is arbitrary and capricious. (2) California does not need...

  10. 40 CFR 1074.105 - Criteria for granting authorization.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... POLLUTION CONTROLS PREEMPTION OF STATE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR WAIVER OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION FOR NONROAD.... (a) The Administrator will grant the authorization if California determines that its standards will... following are true: (1) California's determination is arbitrary and capricious. (2) California does not need...

  11. A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research.

    PubMed

    King, Keyonna M; Pardo, Yvette-Janine; Norris, Keith C; Diaz-Romero, Maria; Morris, D'Ann; Vassar, Stefanie D; Brown, Arleen F

    2015-10-01

    Grant writing is an essential skill necessary to secure financial support for community programs and research projects. Increasingly, funding opportunities for translational biomedical research require studies to engage community partners, patients, or other stakeholders in the research process to address their concerns. However, there is little evidence on strategies to prepare teams of academic and community partners to collaborate on grants. This paper presents the description and formative evaluation of a two-part community-academic partnered grant writing series designed to help community organizations and academic institutions build infrastructure for collaborative research projects using a partnered approach. The first phase of the series was a half-day workshop on grant readiness, which was open to all interested community partners. The second phase, open only to community-academic teams that met eligibility criteria, was a 12-week session that covered partnered grant writing for foundation grants and National Institutes of Health grants. Participants in both phases reported an increase in knowledge and self-efficacy for writing partnered proposals. At 1-year follow-up, participants in Phase 2 had secured approximately $1.87 million in funding. This community-academic partnered grant writing series helped participants obtain proposal development skills and helped community-academic teams successfully compete for funding. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

  12. A Community–Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research

    PubMed Central

    Pardo, Yvette‐Janine; Norris, Keith C.; Diaz‐Romero, Maria; Morris, D'Ann; Vassar, Stefanie D.; Brown, Arleen F.

    2015-01-01

    Abstract Grant writing is an essential skill necessary to secure financial support for community programs and research projects. Increasingly, funding opportunities for translational biomedical research require studies to engage community partners, patients, or other stakeholders in the research process to address their concerns. However, there is little evidence on strategies to prepare teams of academic and community partners to collaborate on grants. This paper presents the description and formative evaluation of a two‐part community–academic partnered grant writing series designed to help community organizations and academic institutions build infrastructure for collaborative research projects using a partnered approach. The first phase of the series was a half‐day workshop on grant readiness, which was open to all interested community partners. The second phase, open only to community–academic teams that met eligibility criteria, was a 12‐week session that covered partnered grant writing for foundation grants and National Institutes of Health grants. Participants in both phases reported an increase in knowledge and self‐efficacy for writing partnered proposals. At 1‐year follow‐up, participants in Phase 2 had secured approximately $1.87 million in funding. This community–academic partnered grant writing series helped participants obtain proposal development skills and helped community–academic teams successfully compete for funding. PMID:26365589

  13. Federal Preschool Development Grants: Evaluation Needed. Evidence Speaks Reports, Vol 1, #22

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Farran, Dale C.

    2016-01-01

    In December 2014, then Secretary of Education Arnie Duncan announced that $226 million had been awarded to 18 states under the Preschool Development Grants (PDG) program. Duncan said that expanding access to high quality preschool programs was critically important, and that the states receiving funding would serve as a model for others. The goal…

  14. 50 CFR 86.11 - What does the national BIG Program do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What does the national BIG Program do? 86.11 Section 86.11 Wildlife and Fisheries UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE... GRANT (BIG) PROGRAM General Information About the Grant Program § 86.11 What does the national BIG...

  15. 2 CFR 180.5 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false What does this part do? 180.5 Section 180.5 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS Reserved OMB GUIDELINES TO AGENCIES ON GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (NONPROCUREMENT) § 180.5...

  16. 2 CFR 1200.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 1200.10 Section 1200.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF... Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented...

  17. 2 CFR 180.15 - To whom does the guidance apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false To whom does the guidance apply? 180.15 Section 180.15 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS Reserved OMB GUIDELINES TO AGENCIES ON GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION...

  18. 2 CFR 902.225 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than...-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Other Than Individuals § 902.225 Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A...

  19. 2 CFR 902.225 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than...-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Other Than Individuals § 902.225 Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A...

  20. 2 CFR 902.225 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than...-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Other Than Individuals § 902.225 Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A...

  1. 2 CFR 902.225 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than...-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Other Than Individuals § 902.225 Whom in the DOE does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A...

  2. USEPA Grants

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    This is a provisional dataset that contains point locations for all grants given out by the USEPA going back to the 1960s through today. There are many limitations to the data so it is advised that these metadata be read carefully before use. Although the records for these grant locations are drawn directly from the official EPA grants repository (IGMS ?? Integrated Grants Management System), it is important to know that the IGMS was designed for purposes that did not include accurately portraying the grant??s place of performance on a map. Instead, the IGMS grant recipient??s mailing address is the primary source for grant locations. Particularly for statewide grants that are administered via State and Regional headquarters, the grant location data should not be interpreted as the grant??s place of performance. In 2012, a policy was established to start to collect the place of performance as a pilot for newly awarded grants ?? that were deemed ??community-based?? in nature and for these the grant location depicted in this database will be a more reliable indicator of the actual place of performance. As for the locational accuracy of these points, there is no programmatic certification process, however, they are being entered by the Grant Project Officers who are most familiar with the details of the grants, apart from the grantees themselves. Limitations notwithstanding, this is a first-of-breed attempt to map all of the Agency??s grants, using the best

  3. 2 CFR 1326.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 1326.10 Section 1326.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE... Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part...

  4. 2 CFR 1400.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 1400.10 Section 1400.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE... Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented...

  5. 2 CFR 1125.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 1125.10 Section 1125.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE... Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part...

  6. 2 CFR 3513.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false What does this part do? 3513.10 Section 3513.10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF... supplemented by this part, as the Export Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) policies and procedures...

  7. Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants.

    PubMed

    Danthi, Narasimhan; Wu, Colin O; Shi, Peibei; Lauer, Michael

    2014-02-14

    Funding decisions for cardiovascular R01 grant applications at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) largely hinge on percentile rankings. It is not known whether this approach enables the highest impact science. Our aim was to conduct an observational analysis of percentile rankings and bibliometric outcomes for a contemporary set of funded NHLBI cardiovascular R01 grants. We identified 1492 investigator-initiated de novo R01 grant applications that were funded between 2001 and 2008 and followed their progress for linked publications and citations to those publications. Our coprimary end points were citations received per million dollars of funding, citations obtained <2 years of publication, and 2-year citations for each grant's maximally cited paper. In 7654 grant-years of funding that generated $3004 million of total National Institutes of Health awards, the portfolio yielded 16 793 publications that appeared between 2001 and 2012 (median per grant, 8; 25th and 75th percentiles, 4 and 14; range, 0-123), which received 2 224 255 citations (median per grant, 1048; 25th and 75th percentiles, 492 and 1932; range, 0-16 295). We found no association between percentile rankings and citation metrics; the absence of association persisted even after accounting for calendar time, grant duration, number of grants acknowledged per paper, number of authors per paper, early investigator status, human versus nonhuman focus, and institutional funding. An exploratory machine learning analysis suggested that grants with the best percentile rankings did yield more maximally cited papers. In a large cohort of NHLBI-funded cardiovascular R01 grants, we were unable to find a monotonic association between better percentile ranking and higher scientific impact as assessed by citation metrics.

  8. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    NONE

    1998-07-01

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in DOE's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure strategy and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from April 30, 1998 through June 30, 1998 under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and provided ongoing support to state-DOE interactions. maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE's Environmental Management Budget, and DOE

  9. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    NONE

    1998-04-01

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in DOE's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure strategy and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from December 31, 1997 through April 30, 1998 under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and provided ongoing support to state-DOE interactions in preparation for the March 30-31, 1998 NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force Meeting with DOE. maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed

  10. Sun Grant Initiative Regional Biomass Feedstock Partnership Competitive Grants Program

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Owens, Vance

    The Sun Grant Initiative partnered with the US Department of Energy (DOE) in 2008 to create the Regional Biomass Feedstock Partnership Competitive Grants Program. The overall goal of this project was to utilize congressionally directed funds to leverage the North Central Regional Sun Grant’s Competitive Grant program at South Dakota State University (SDSU) to address key issues and research gaps related to development of the bioeconomy. Specific objectives of this program were to: 1. Identify research projects through a Regional Competitive Grants program that were relevant to the sustainable production, harvest, transport, delivery, and processing/conversion of cost-competitive, domestically grown biomass.more » 2. Build local expertise and capacity at the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at SDSU through an internal selection of key bioenergy research projects. To achieve these, three nationwide Request for Applications (RFA) were developed: one each in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Internal, capacity building projects at SDSU were also selected during each one of these RFAs. In 2013 and 2015, two additional Proof of Concept RFAs were developed for internal SDSU projects. Priority areas for each RFA were 1) Biomass feedstock logistics including biomass harvesting, handling, transportation, storage, and densification; 2) Sustainable biomass feedstock production systems including biomass crop development, production, and life-cycle analysis; 3) Biomass production systems that optimize biomass feedstock yield and economic return across a diverse landscape while minimizing negative effects on the environment and food/feed production; and 4) Promotion of knowledge-based economic development in science and technology and to advance commercialization of inventions that meet the mission of the Sun Grant Initiative. A total of 33 projects were selected for funding through this program. Final reports for each of these diverse projects are included in this summary report

  11. 50 CFR 80.80 - How does an agency apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... INTERIOR (CONTINUED) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE-WILDLIFE SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, PITTMAN-ROBERTSON WILDLIFE RESTORATION AND DINGELL-JOHNSON SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACTS... Management and Budget for the grant application process; and (ii) Available on the Federal Web site for...

  12. Making College Possible for Low-Income Students: Grant and Scholarship Aid in California

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Johnson, Hans

    2014-01-01

    Improving college access and completion is vital to California's economic well-being. Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) projections show that the state will need one million more college graduates with a bachelor's degree by 2025 in order to satisfy labor force demand. As the costs of attending college have grown, grant and scholarship…

  13. 50 CFR 80.80 - How does an agency apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... INTERIOR (CONTINUED) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE-WILDLIFE AND SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, PITTMAN-ROBERTSON WILDLIFE RESTORATION AND DINGELL-JOHNSON SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACTS... Management and Budget for the grant application process; and (ii) Available on the Federal Web site for...

  14. 50 CFR 80.80 - How does an agency apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... INTERIOR (CONTINUED) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE-WILDLIFE AND SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, PITTMAN-ROBERTSON WILDLIFE RESTORATION AND DINGELL-JOHNSON SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACTS... Management and Budget for the grant application process; and (ii) Available on the Federal Web site for...

  15. 2 CFR 902.300 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an... WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Who Are Individuals § 902.300 Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A recipient who is an...

  16. 2 CFR 902.300 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an... WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Who Are Individuals § 902.300 Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A recipient who is an...

  17. 2 CFR 902.300 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an... WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Who Are Individuals § 902.300 Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A recipient who is an...

  18. 2 CFR 902.300 - Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an... WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Requirements for Recipients Who Are Individuals § 902.300 Whom in the DOE does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A recipient who is an...

  19. 2 CFR 2245.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2245.20 Section 2245.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR... this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  20. 2 CFR 782.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 782.20 Section 782.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements AGENCY FOR... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  1. 2 CFR 3373.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3373.20 Section 3373.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT... part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts...

  2. 2 CFR 3373.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3373.20 Section 3373.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ENDOWMENT... part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts...

  3. 2 CFR 2600.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2600.20 Section 2600.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ARCHIVES... me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I...

  4. 2 CFR 2000.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2000.20 Section 2000.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements UNITED STATES... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  5. 2 CFR 1536.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1536.20 Section 1536.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through...

  6. 2 CFR 3001.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3001.20 Section 3001.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts A...

  7. 2 CFR 2000.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2000.20 Section 2000.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements UNITED STATES... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  8. 2 CFR 2429.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2429.20 Section 2429.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF... this part apply to me? This part, and through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  9. 2 CFR 2000.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2000.20 Section 2000.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements UNITED STATES... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  10. 2 CFR 2600.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2600.20 Section 2600.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ARCHIVES... me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I...

  11. 2 CFR 1536.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1536.20 Section 1536.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through...

  12. 2 CFR 2245.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2245.20 Section 2245.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR... this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  13. 2 CFR 2429.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2429.20 Section 2429.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF... this part apply to me? This part, and through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  14. 2 CFR 1536.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1536.20 Section 1536.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements ENVIRONMENTAL... to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through...

  15. 2 CFR 782.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 782.20 Section 782.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements AGENCY FOR... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  16. 2 CFR 2600.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2600.20 Section 2600.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL ARCHIVES... me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I...

  17. 2 CFR 2245.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2245.20 Section 2245.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements CORPORATION FOR... this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  18. Health Disparities Grants Funded by National Institute on Aging: Trends Between 2000 and 2010

    PubMed Central

    Kim, Giyeon; DeCoster, Jamie; Huang, Chao-Hui; Parmelee, Patricia

    2012-01-01

    Purpose of the Study: The present study examined the characteristics of health disparities grants funded by National Institute on Aging (NIA) from 2000 to 2010. Objectives were (a) to examine longitudinal trends in health disparities–related grants funded by NIA and (b) to identify moderators of these trends. Design and Methods: Our primary data source was the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) system. The RePORTER data were merged with data from the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. General linear models were used to examine the longitudinal trends and how these trends were associated with type of grant and institutional characteristics. Results: NIA funded 825 grants on health disparities between 2000 and 2010, expending approximately 330 million dollars. There was an overall linear increase over time in both the total number of grants and amount of funding, with an outlying spike during 2009. These trends were significantly influenced by several moderators including funding mechanism and type of institution. Implications: The findings highlight NIA’s current efforts to fund health disparities grants to reduce disparities among older adults. Gerontology researchers may find this information very useful for their future grant submissions. PMID:22454392

  19. THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    NONE

    1998-01-01

    Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the EM 2006 cleanup plans and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from October 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997, under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE activities in the area of the Hazardous Waste Identification Rule, and DOE's proposed National Dialogue.« less

  20. 2 CFR 1401.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1401.105 Section 1401.105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE... this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  1. 2 CFR 3186.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3186.20 Section 3186.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM... part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts...

  2. 2 CFR 1401.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1401.105 Section 1401.105 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE... this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in...

  3. 2 CFR 3186.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 3186.20 Section 3186.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM... part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts...

  4. 2 CFR 382.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 382.20 Section 382.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  5. 2 CFR 382.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 382.20 Section 382.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  6. 2 CFR 382.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 382.20 Section 382.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH... apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A...

  7. 2 CFR 2520.20 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 2520.20 Section 2520.20 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements NATIONAL SCIENCE... transaction” (see Subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180...

  8. 77 FR 22376 - Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant Assurances

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-04-13

    .... Additionally, the FAA is amending paragraph (a) of Sponsor Assurance 29, Airport Layout Plan, to require that... be depicted on the airport layout plan (ALP). This includes all residential and commercial through... the statutory grant assurance relating to airport layout plans to provide that a sponsor does not have...

  9. 75 FR 45623 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-03

    ... Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to Samsung Electronics America...-014) that grants to Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Samsung) a waiver from the DOE electric... Energy. Decision and Order In the Matter of: Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Case No. RF- 014...

  10. 2 CFR 182.115 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 182.115 Section 182.115 Grants and Agreements Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements... this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A recipient of a...

  11. Epidemiologic Study of One Million American Workers and Military Veterans Exposed to Ionizing Radiation

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Boice, John D.

    2015-02-27

    A pilot study was completed demonstrating the feasibility of conducting an epidemiologic study assessing cancer and other disease mortality among nearly one million US veterans and workers exposed to ionizing radiation, a population 10 times larger than atomic bomb survivor study with high statistical power to evaluate low dose rate effects. Among the groups enumerated and/or studied were: (1) 194,000 Department of Energy Uranium Workers; (2) 6,700 Rocketdyne Radiation Workers; (3) 7,000 Mound Radiation Workers; (4) 156,000 DOE Plutonium Workers; (5) 212,000 Nuclear Power Plant Workers; (6) 130,000 Industrial Radiography Workers; (7) 1.7 million Medical Workers and (8) 135,000 Atomicmore » Veterans.« less

  12. Final Report of DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-04ER41306

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Nandi, Satyanarayan; Babu, Kaladi S; Rizatdinova, Flera

    2013-12-10

    Project: Theoretical and Experimental Research in Weak, Electromagnetic and Strong Interactions: Investigators: S. Nandi, K.S. Babu, F. Rizatdinova Institution: Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 This completed project focused on the cutting edge research in theoretical and experimental high energy physics. In theoretical high energy physics, the two investigators (Nandi and Babu) worked on a variety of topics in model-building and phenomenological aspects of elementary particle physics. This includes unification of particles and forces, neutrino physics, Higgs boson physics, proton decay, supersymmetry, and collider physics. Novel physics ideas beyond the Standard Model with testable consequences at the LHC have beenmore » proposed. These ideas have stimulated the experimental community to look for new signals. The contributions of the experimental high energy physics group has been at the D0 experiment at the Fermilab Tevatraon and the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. At the D0 experiment, the main focus was search for the Higgs boson in the WH channel, where improved limits were obtained. At the LHC, the OSU group has made significant contributions to the top quark physics, and the calibration of the b-tagging algorithms. The group is also involved in the pixel detector upgrade. This DOE supported grant has resulted in 5 PhD degrees during the past three years. Three postdoctoral fellows were supported as well. In theoretical research over 40 refereed publications have resulted in the past three years, with several involving graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. It also resulted in over 30 conference presentations in the same time period. We are also involved in outreach activities through the Quarknet program, where we engage Oklahoma school teachers and students in our research.« less

  13. When patients govern: federal grant funding and uncompensated care at federally qualified health centers.

    PubMed

    Wright, Brad; Ricketts, Thomas C

    2013-05-01

    To determine if the proportion of consumers on federally qualified health center (FQHC) governing boards is associated with their use of federal grant funds to provide uncompensated care. Using FQHC data from the Uniform Data System, county-level data from the Area Resource File and governing board data from FQHC grant applications, the uncompensated care an FQHC provides relative to the amount of its federal funding is modeled as a function of board and executive committee composition using fixed-effects regression with FQHC and county-level controls. Consumer governance does not predict how much uncompensated care an FQHC provides relative to the size of its federal grant. Rather, the proportion of an FQHC's patient-mix that is uninsured drives uncompensated care provision. Aside from a small executive committee effect, consumer governance does not influence FQHCs' provision of uncompensated care. More work is needed to understand the role of consumer governance.

  14. Illinois Community College System. Workforce Development Grant Report Business and Industry Services, Fiscal Year 2009

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Illinois Community College Board, 2009

    2009-01-01

    The Illinois Community College Board provided more than $3.3 million to community colleges during fiscal year 2009 to support local workforce and economic development services through their Business and Industry Centers. The workforce development activities conducted under this grant include customized job training on campus or on-site at a…

  15. The i3 "We Are a Village" Grant: Successes, Challenges, and Lessons Learned about Supporting Family Engagement in Early Childhood. Final Evaluation Summary

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Geller, Joanna D.; López, Ruth M.; Alcantara, Vianna; Catone, Keith C.; Tung, Rosann

    2016-01-01

    In January 2013, Rhode Island's Central Falls School District (CFSD) was awarded a $3 million Investing in Innovation (i3) grant from the U.S. Department of Education. The grant, named "We Are A Village," focused on developing an early childhood education culture (from pre-K to grade 3) where families would feel welcome, valued, and…

  16. 50 CFR 80.80 - How does an agency apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... Management and Budget for the grant application process; and (ii) Available on the Federal Web site for... or his or her designee must sign all standard forms submitted in the application process. (c) The... Single Point of Contact before sending it to the Regional Director if the State supports this process...

  17. 28 CFR 38.1 - Discretionary grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or...) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to participate in any...

  18. 28 CFR 38.1 - Discretionary grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or...) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to participate in any...

  19. 28 CFR 38.1 - Discretionary grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or...) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to participate in any...

  20. 28 CFR 38.1 - Discretionary grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or...) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to participate in any...

  1. 28 CFR 38.1 - Discretionary grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from the Department... religious belief. (e) No grant document, agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or...) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as any other organization, to participate in any...

  2. 75 FR 13120 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-18

    ... Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to Samsung Electronics America... (Case No. RF-011) that grants to Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Samsung) a waiver from the DOE... and Order In the Matter of: Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Case No. RF- 011). Background Title III...

  3. 41 CFR 109-50.105 - Equipment which may not be granted.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... Management Regulations System (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS UTILIZATION AND DISPOSAL 50-SPECIAL DOE DISPOSAL AUTHORITIES 50.1-Used Energy-Related Laboratory Equipment Grant...; drafting supplies; refrigerators; tools; presses; lathes; furnaces; hydraulic and mechanical jacks; cranes...

  4. 41 CFR 109-50.105 - Equipment which may not be granted.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... Management Regulations System (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS UTILIZATION AND DISPOSAL 50-SPECIAL DOE DISPOSAL AUTHORITIES 50.1-Used Energy-Related Laboratory Equipment Grant...; drafting supplies; refrigerators; tools; presses; lathes; furnaces; hydraulic and mechanical jacks; cranes...

  5. 41 CFR 109-50.105 - Equipment which may not be granted.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... Management Regulations System (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS UTILIZATION AND DISPOSAL 50-SPECIAL DOE DISPOSAL AUTHORITIES 50.1-Used Energy-Related Laboratory Equipment Grant...; drafting supplies; refrigerators; tools; presses; lathes; furnaces; hydraulic and mechanical jacks; cranes...

  6. 34 CFR 606.13 - How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit? 606.13 Section 606.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education... INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM How Does an Institution Apply for a Grant? § 606.13 How many applications for a...

  7. Twenty-million-year relationship between mammalian diversity and primary productivity

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Fritz, Susanne A.; Eronen, Jussi T.; Schnitzler, Jan; Hof, Christian; Janis, Christine M.; Mulch, Andreas; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin; Graham, Catherine H.

    2016-09-01

    At global and regional scales, primary productivity strongly correlates with richness patterns of extant animals across space, suggesting that resource availability and climatic conditions drive patterns of diversity. However, the existence and consistency of such diversity-productivity relationships through geological history is unclear. Here we provide a comprehensive quantitative test of the diversity-productivity relationship for terrestrial large mammals through time across broad temporal and spatial scales. We combine >14,000 occurrences for 690 fossil genera through the Neogene (23-1.8 Mya) with regional estimates of primary productivity from fossil plant communities in North America and Europe. We show a significant positive diversity-productivity relationship through the 20-million-year record, providing evidence on unprecedented spatial and temporal scales that this relationship is a general pattern in the ecology and paleo-ecology of our planet. Further, we discover that genus richness today does not match the fossil relationship, suggesting that a combination of human impacts and Pleistocene climate variability has modified the 20-million-year ecological relationship by strongly reducing primary productivity and driving many mammalian species into decline or to extinction.

  8. Illinois Community College System Workforce Development Grant Report Business and Industry Services, Fiscal Year 2008

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Illinois Community College Board, 2008

    2008-01-01

    The Illinois Community College Board provided more than $3.3 million to community colleges during fiscal year 2008 to provide workforce and economic development services through their Business and Industry Centers. The workforce development activities conducted under this grant include customized job training on campus or on-site at a business;…

  9. Illinois Community College System Workforce Development Grant Report Business and Industry Services, Fiscal Year 2007

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Illinois Community College Board, 2007

    2007-01-01

    The Illinois Community College Board provided more than $3.3 million to community colleges during fiscal year 2007 to provide workforce and economic development services through their Business and Industry Centers. The workforce development activities conducted under this grant include customized job training on campus or on-site at a business;…

  10. 2 CFR 182.5 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS Reserved GOVERNMENTWIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 182.5 What does this part do? This part provides Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance for Federal agencies on the...

  11. 34 CFR 222.183 - How does an LEA apply for a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... fiscal year. An LEA must submit a separate application for each school for which it proposes a project, and may submit more than one application for a single school if multiple projects are proposed. Examples: 1. An LEA wants to receive both an emergency and a modernization grant for one school that has a...

  12. 2 CFR 180.30 - Where does a Federal agency implement these guidelines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Where does a Federal agency implement these guidelines? 180.30 Section 180.30 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS Reserved OMB GUIDELINES TO AGENCIES ON GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT AND...

  13. HRSA's PCRE grant recipients' plans for continuation after funding ends.

    PubMed

    Staff, Thomas J; Burke, Daniel; Engel, Matthew; Loomis, Lucy

    2015-01-01

    In 2010, the US Department of Health and Human Services, under the Affordable Care Act, appropriated over $167 million to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) for the Primary Care Residency Expansion (PCRE) program. In 2011, grants from the PCRE program were provided to residency programs in the specialties of family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics, allowing them to increase the number of residents in their programs. Seventy-seven programs received grant funding, and 504 primary care resident positions were created. The grants provide 5 years of funding for these positions. There is no provision for federal funding of these positions after 2016. The purpose of this study was to determine the number of residencies that had identified funding that would allow them to continue training these new positions after the PCRE grant period ends. Programs receiving PCRE funding were identified through the HRSA data warehouse website.1 Program directors were surveyed by email between January and March of 2013. A total of 55 programs responded, for a 71.4% response rate. Of those programs, 17.5% had identified funding that would allow them to continue training the increased number of positions beyond 2016. This one-time funding exhibits challenges to sustainability. This information will help inform policy makers that sustainable expansion of primary care graduate medical education (GME) training will require strategies other than time-limited funding mechanisms.

  14. 2 CFR 902.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ....10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 902.10 What does this part do? This... Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of...

  15. 2 CFR 902.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ....10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 902.10 What does this part do? This... Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of...

  16. 2 CFR 902.10 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ....10 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 902.10 What does this part do? This... Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of...

  17. 50 CFR 86.10 - What does this regulation do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What does this regulation do? 86.10... (CONTINUED) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE-WILDLIFE SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM BOATING INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (BIG... Boating Infrastructure Grant (BIG) Program. “We” and “us” refers to the Fish and Wildlife Service. This...

  18. Review of Florida's Eminent Scholar and Major Gift Challenge Grant Programs. Report No. 96-01.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Florida State Legislature, Tallahassee. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.

    This audit report presents results of a review of the Florida Eminent Scholar and Major Gift Challenge Grant Programs. In four chapters the report: (1) reviews the purpose, scope, and background of the programs; (2) looks at program successes, fees, and expenditures, noting that the programs have raised $219 million in private donations to support…

  19. 77 FR 9703 - Notice of Funding Opportunity and Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for Serving Young...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-17

    ...-Learning AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice of Solicitation for Grant... $30 million to serve juvenile offenders ages 18-21 who have been involved in the juvenile justice system from the age of 14 or above and have never been convicted as an adult under Federal or State Law...

  20. 10 CFR 727.3 - To whom does this part apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COMPUTERS § 727.3 To whom does... subcontractor employees, and any other individual who has been granted access to a DOE computer or to information on a DOE computer. (b) Section 727.4 of this part also applies to any person who uses a DOE...

  1. 10 CFR 727.3 - To whom does this part apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COMPUTERS § 727.3 To whom does... subcontractor employees, and any other individual who has been granted access to a DOE computer or to information on a DOE computer. (b) Section 727.4 of this part also applies to any person who uses a DOE...

  2. 10 CFR 727.3 - To whom does this part apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COMPUTERS § 727.3 To whom does... subcontractor employees, and any other individual who has been granted access to a DOE computer or to information on a DOE computer. (b) Section 727.4 of this part also applies to any person who uses a DOE...

  3. 10 CFR 727.3 - To whom does this part apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COMPUTERS § 727.3 To whom does... subcontractor employees, and any other individual who has been granted access to a DOE computer or to information on a DOE computer. (b) Section 727.4 of this part also applies to any person who uses a DOE...

  4. 10 CFR 727.3 - To whom does this part apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COMPUTERS § 727.3 To whom does... subcontractor employees, and any other individual who has been granted access to a DOE computer or to information on a DOE computer. (b) Section 727.4 of this part also applies to any person who uses a DOE...

  5. US EPA EJ Grants/IGD: PERF_EJ_GRANTS_INT_MV

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    This is a provisional dataset that contains point locations for all Environmental Justice (EJ) grants given out by the US EPA. There are many limitations to the data so it is advised that these metadata be read carefully before use. Although the records for these grant locations are drawn directly from the official EPA grants repository (IGMS fffd Integrated Grants Management System), it is important to know that the IGMS was designed for purposes that did not include accurately portraying the grantfffds place of performance on a map. Instead, the IGMS grant recipientfffds mailing address is the primary source for grant locations. Particularly for statewide grants that are administered via State and Regional headquarters, the grant location data should not be interpreted as the grantfffds place of performance. In 2012, a policy was established to start to collect the place of performance as a pilot for newly awarded grants fffd that were deemed fffdcommunity-basedfffd in nature and for these the grant location depicted in this database will be a more reliable indicator of the actual place of performance. As for the locational accuracy of these points, there is no programmatic certification process, however, they are being entered by the Grant Project Officers who are most familiar with the details of the grants, apart from the grantees themselves. Limitations notwithstanding, this is a first-of-breed attempt to map all of the Agencyfffds grants, using the

  6. 76 FR 29733 - Petition for Waiver From LG Electronics, Inc. and Granting of the Interim Waiver From Commercial...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-23

    ... for Waiver From LG Electronics, Inc. and Granting of the Interim Waiver From Commercial Package Air... LG Electronics, Inc. (LG). The petition for waiver (hereafter ``petition'') requests a waiver from... factors stated in the waivers that DOE granted to Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. (Mitsubishi...

  7. Facts on Grants, 1982. A Report on Grant-Making.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Mott (C.S.) Foundation, Flint, MI.

    Summaries of 361 grants made in 1982 by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation are presented. The guide contains fact sheets on grants for $15,000 or more; all grants for amounts under $15,000 are listed with brief descriptions. Most of the fact sheets provide information on how the grants meet the objectives of the Foundation, what they might…

  8. Final report for DOE grant FG02-06ER15805

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Gage, Daniel

    2012-05-31

    DOE funding was used to investigate the role of the phosphotransferase system (PTS) in the symbiotic, nodulating bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. This system is well studied in several bacterial species. However, it's organization and function in S. meliloti is substantially different than in the those other, well-studied bacteria. The S. meliloti PTS, through our DOE-funded work, has become a model for how this important signal transduction system works in the a-proteobacteria. We have found that the PTS is relatively simple, used for only signal transduction and not transport, and is involved in regulation of carbon metabolism in response to carbon availabilitymore » and nitrogen availability.« less

  9. Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines

    DOE PAGES

    Bouville, André; Toohey, Richard E.; Boice, John D.; ...

    2015-02-01

    The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans (the Million-Worker study) is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time, and not acutely as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiological study is cancer mortality but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide unbiased estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses and theirmore » accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the Million-Worker study are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 years. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, DOE workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma-ray or x-ray sources, for certain of the study groups there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that require internal radiation dosimetry measures. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by NCRP to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the Million-Worker study. The Committee’s report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Reports 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the various components of the Million

  10. Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: Status and Guidelines

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Bouville, André; Toohey, Richard E.; Boice, John D.

    The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans (the Million-Worker study) is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time, and not acutely as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiological study is cancer mortality but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide unbiased estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses and theirmore » accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the Million-Worker study are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 years. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, DOE workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma-ray or x-ray sources, for certain of the study groups there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that require internal radiation dosimetry measures. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by NCRP to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the Million-Worker study. The Committee’s report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Reports 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the various components of the Million

  11. Photographer : JPL Range : 7 million kilometers (5 million miles) Callisto is the outermost Galilean

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 7 million kilometers (5 million miles) Callisto is the outermost Galilean satellite of Jupiter and the darkest of the four, but still twice as bright as Earth's Moon. Mottled appearance from bright and dark patches; bright ones look like rayed or brite craters on our Moon. This face of Callisto is always turned toward Jupiter. Photo taken through violet filter.

  12. 76 FR 80916 - Publication of the Petition for Waiver From Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Granting of the...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-27

    ...] Publication of the Petition for Waiver From Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Granting of the Interim... notice announces receipt of and publishes a petition for waiver from Samsung Electronics America, Inc... stated in the waivers that DOE granted to Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics America USA, Inc. (Mitsubishi...

  13. The 50 million missing women.

    PubMed

    Allahbadia, Gautam N

    2002-09-01

    The epidemic of gender selection is ravaging countries like India & China. Approximately fifty million women are "missing" in the Indian population. Generally three principle causes are given: female infanticide, better food and health care for boys and maternal death at childbirth. Prenatal sex determination and the abortion of female fetuses threatens to skew the sex ratio to new highs. Estimates of the number of female fetuses being destroyed every year in India vary from two million to five million. This review from India attempts to summarize all the currently available methods of sex selection and also highlights the current medical practice regards the subject in south-east Asia.

  14. EPA Grants.gov Workspace Training for Grant Applicants and Recipients

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    Beginning January 1, 2018 all grant applicants must use Workspace to submit applications through Grants.gov. EPA’s Office of Grants and Debarment is hosting a Grants.gov-led session that will provide training and a demonstration on Workspace.

  15. Skin Friction Measurements at a Mach Number of Three and Momentum Thickness Reynolds Numbers Up to a Half Million.

    DTIC Science & Technology

    1980-09-01

    k ADAOGZ 826 ~~~~~~~~~AIR FORCE FLIGHT DNMC A RGTPTESNABO / / I SKIN FRICTION MEASUREMENTS AT A MACH NUMBER OF THREE AND MOMENT--ETCIU) UNCASSFIE...AT A MACH NUMBER OF THREE AND MOMENTUM THICKNESS REYNOLDS NUMEERS UP TO A HALF MILLION Anthony W. Fiore Aeromechanics Division DTIC September 1980...NOR(&) S. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER (s) 9. PER ORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS PROR UNT N WU Flight Dynamics Laboratory (AFWAL/FIMG)RA; WOKUNTU

  16. Twenty-million-year relationship between mammalian diversity and primary productivity

    PubMed Central

    Fritz, Susanne A.; Eronen, Jussi T.; Schnitzler, Jan; Hof, Christian; Janis, Christine M.; Mulch, Andreas; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin; Graham, Catherine H.

    2016-01-01

    At global and regional scales, primary productivity strongly correlates with richness patterns of extant animals across space, suggesting that resource availability and climatic conditions drive patterns of diversity. However, the existence and consistency of such diversity–productivity relationships through geological history is unclear. Here we provide a comprehensive quantitative test of the diversity–productivity relationship for terrestrial large mammals through time across broad temporal and spatial scales. We combine >14,000 occurrences for 690 fossil genera through the Neogene (23–1.8 Mya) with regional estimates of primary productivity from fossil plant communities in North America and Europe. We show a significant positive diversity–productivity relationship through the 20-million-year record, providing evidence on unprecedented spatial and temporal scales that this relationship is a general pattern in the ecology and paleo-ecology of our planet. Further, we discover that genus richness today does not match the fossil relationship, suggesting that a combination of human impacts and Pleistocene climate variability has modified the 20-million-year ecological relationship by strongly reducing primary productivity and driving many mammalian species into decline or to extinction. PMID:27621451

  17. Medical communication companies and industry grants.

    PubMed

    Rothman, Sheila M; Brudney, Karen F; Adair, Whitney; Rothman, David J

    2013-12-18

    Medical communication companies (MCCs) are among the most significant health care stakeholders, supported mainly by drug and device companies. How MCCs share or protect physicians' personal data requires greater transparency. To explore the financial relationships between MCCs and drug and device companies, to describe the characteristics of the large MCCs, and to explore whether they accurately represent themselves to physicians. We combined data from the 2010 grant registries of 14 pharmaceutical and device companies; grouped recipients into categories such as MCCs, academic medical centers, disease-targeted advocacy organizations, and professional associations; and created a master list of 19,272 grants. Determine the distribution of funds from drug and device companies to various entities and assess the characteristics of large MCCs. Of the 6493 recipients of more than $657 million grant awards from drug and device companies, 18 of 363 MCCs received 26%, academic medical centers received 21%, and disease-targeted organizations received 15%. For-profit MCCs received 77% of funds (208 of 363). Among the top 5% of MCCs, 14 of 18 were for-profit. All 18 offered continuing medical education: 14 offered live and 17 offered online CME courses. All required physicians to provide personal data. Ten stated that they shared information with unnamed third parties. Eight stated they did not share information, but almost all added exceptions. None required explicit physician consent to their sharing policies. Medical communication companies receive substantial support from drug and device companies. Physicians who interact with MCCs should be aware that all require personal data from the physician and some share these data with unnamed third parties.

  18. 40 CFR 35.4205 - How does my group procure a technical advisor or any other contractor?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does my group procure a technical... PROTECTION AGENCY GRANTS AND OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Technical Assistance Procuring A Technical Advisor Or Other Contractor with Tag Funds § 35.4205 How does my group...

  19. 45 CFR 16.1 - What this part does.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 45 Public Welfare 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false What this part does. 16.1 Section 16.1 Public Welfare DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES OF THE DEPARTMENTAL GRANT APPEALS BOARD § 16.1 What this part does. This part contains requirements and procedures...

  20. 32 CFR 22.310 - Statutes concerning certain research, development, and facilities construction grants.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ...)(i) of this section does not apply to any grant that calls upon the National Academy of Sciences to: (A) Investigate, examine, or experiment upon any subject of science or art of significance to the...

  1. DOE Workshop at Tapia Conference

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Taylor, Valerie

    2015-02-19

    The DE-SC0013568 DOE Grant, in the amount of $11,822.79, was used to support five doctoral students from underrepresented groups to attend the 2015 Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing Conference, held February 18-21 in Boston, MA. Each scholarship was approximately $1200 to cover conference registration, travel, and lodging for the duration of the conference. The remaining $5,822.79 was used to support a DOE Breakfast Workshop during breakfast on Thursday, February 19. The Breakfast supported approximately 140 graduate students from underrepresented groups to learn about the different career opportunities at the different DOE National Laboratories.

  2. Final Report for U.S. DOE GRANT No. DEFG02-96ER41015 November 1, 2010 - April 30, 2013 entitled HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATOR AND COLLIDING BEAM USER GROUP at the UNIVERSITY of MARYLAND

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Hadley, Nicholas; Jawahery, Abolhassan; Eno, Sarah C

    2013-07-26

    We have finished the third year of a three year grant cycle with the U.S. Department of Energy for which we were given a five month extension (U.S. D.O.E. Grant No. DEFG02-96ER41015). This document is the fi nal report for this grant and covers the period from November 1, 2010 to April 30, 2013. The Maryland program is administered as a single task with Professor Nicholas Hadley as Principal Investigator. The Maryland experimental HEP group is focused on two major research areas. We are members of the CMS experiment at the LHC at CERN working on the physics of themore » Energy Frontier. We are also analyzing the data from the Babar experiment at SLAC while doing design work and R&D towards a Super B experiment as part of the Intensity Frontier. We have recently joined the LHCb experiment at CERN. We concluded our activities on the D experiment at Fermilab in 2009.« less

  3. 20 CFR 645.200 - What does this subpart cover?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false What does this subpart cover? 645.200 Section 645.200 Employees' Benefits EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROVISIONS GOVERNING WELFARE-TO-WORK GRANTS General Program and Administrative Requirements § 645.200 What does this...

  4. 28 CFR 83.100 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What does this part do? 83.100 Section 83...-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Purpose and Coverage § 83.100 What does this part do? This part carries out the... awards, as a matter of Federal Government policy. ...

  5. 28 CFR 83.100 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What does this part do? 83.100 Section 83...-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Purpose and Coverage § 83.100 What does this part do? This part carries out the... awards, as a matter of Federal Government policy. ...

  6. Grant management procedure for energy saving TDM-PONs

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Alaelddin, Fuad Yousif Mohammed; Newaz, S. H. Shah; AL-Hazemi, Fawaz; Choi, Jun Kyun

    2018-01-01

    -PON with sleep mode enabled ONUs. GMP contributes in defining the location of the different types of grants during a DBA polling cycle. Furthermore, GMP devises a mechanism so as to allow an ONU to predict its assigned gratuitous grant control message arrival time, thereby allowing an ONU to remain its transceiver unit powered off until the arrival period of the next gratuitous grant control message, increasing the energy saving of the ONU. Results show that, with the increment of IGI, the energy saving performance of an ONU with GMP increases noticeably in compare to a conventional ONU (an ONU that does not use GMP) without imposing any additional upstream frame delay.

  7. 75 FR 65044 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-21

    ... market value of publicly held shares for common stock on the Capital Market range from $5 million to $15...-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Eligibility Criteria for the Second Compliance Period for a Bid Price Deficiency on the Nasdaq...

  8. 2 CFR 1401.120 - Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive? 1401.120 Section 1401.120 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE...

  9. 34 CFR 263.9 - When does payback begin?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 34 Education 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When does payback begin? 263.9 Section 263.9 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INDIAN EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAMS Professional Development Program § 263.9 When does payback begin? (a) For...

  10. 76 FR 65707 - Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to LG Electronics, Inc. From the Department of Energy...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-24

    ... and Order Granting a Waiver to LG Electronics, Inc. From the Department of Energy Commercial Package... Energy's (DOE) Decision and Order in Case No. CAC-032, which grants LG Electronics, Inc. (LG) a waiver... Electronics, Inc. (LG) (Case No. CAC-032). Background Title III, part C of the Energy Policy and Conservation...

  11. 2 CFR 180.605 - How does suspension differ from debarment?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false How does suspension differ from debarment? 180.605 Section 180.605 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE... responsible. (b) Must— (1) Have adequate evidence that there may be a cause for debarment of a person; and (2...

  12. State Implementation and Perceptions of Title I School Improvement Grants under the Recovery Act: One Year Later

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    McMurrer, Jennifer; McIntosh, Shelby

    2012-01-01

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), also known as the stimulus package, appropriated $100 billion for education and included $3 billion for school improvement grants (SIGs) to help reform low-performing schools. This amount was in addition to the $546 million provided by the regular fiscal year 2009 appropriations bill for…

  13. 43 CFR 2802.11 - How does BLM designate corridors?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... air, water, soil, fish, wildlife, and vegetation; (3) Physical effects and constraints on corridor... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false How does BLM designate corridors? 2802.11... POLICY MANAGEMENT ACT Lands Available for FLPMA Grants § 2802.11 How does BLM designate corridors? (a...

  14. 43 CFR 2802.11 - How does BLM designate corridors?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... air, water, soil, fish, wildlife, and vegetation; (3) Physical effects and constraints on corridor... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How does BLM designate corridors? 2802.11... POLICY MANAGEMENT ACT Lands Available for FLPMA Grants § 2802.11 How does BLM designate corridors? (a...

  15. 43 CFR 2802.11 - How does BLM designate corridors?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... air, water, soil, fish, wildlife, and vegetation; (3) Physical effects and constraints on corridor... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How does BLM designate corridors? 2802.11... POLICY MANAGEMENT ACT Lands Available for FLPMA Grants § 2802.11 How does BLM designate corridors? (a...

  16. 20 CFR 645.100 - What does this part cover?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false What does this part cover? 645.100 Section 645.100 Employees' Benefits EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROVISIONS GOVERNING WELFARE-TO-WORK GRANTS Scope and Purpose § 645.100 What does this part cover? (a) Subpart A...

  17. 34 CFR 607.22 - What are the selection criteria for development grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What are the selection criteria for development grants? 607.22 Section 607.22 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM How Does...

  18. 34 CFR 607.22 - What are the selection criteria for development grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What are the selection criteria for development grants? 607.22 Section 607.22 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM How Does...

  19. 34 CFR 607.22 - What are the selection criteria for development grants?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What are the selection criteria for development grants? 607.22 Section 607.22 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM How Does...

  20. 34 CFR 608.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... institution during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. Number of Pell Grant recipients at all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. (2... year. Number of graduates of all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding...

  1. 34 CFR 608.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... institution during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. Number of Pell Grant recipients at all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. (2... year. Number of graduates of all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding...

  2. 34 CFR 608.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... institution during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. Number of Pell Grant recipients at all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. (2... year. Number of graduates of all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding...

  3. 34 CFR 608.31 - How does the Secretary determine the amount of a grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... institution during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. Number of Pell Grant recipients at all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding that fiscal year. (2... year. Number of graduates of all applicant institutions during the school year immediately preceding...

  4. Promoting Educational Opportunity: The Pell Grant Program at Community Colleges. AACC Policy Brief 2011-03PBL

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Baime, David S.; Mullin, Christopher M.

    2011-01-01

    The Federal Pell Grant Program serves as the foundation of the Federal Student Aid system, with more than 9.5 million students relying on the program to provide access to higher education in 2010-2011. It is one of the rare large federal domestic programs that has almost entirely avoided suggestions that it is ineffective or that it plays a role…

  5. 2 CFR 902.605 - Award (DOE supplement to Governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 182.605).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Award (DOE supplement to Governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 182.605). 902.605 Section 902.605 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL...

  6. 2 CFR 902.605 - Award (DOE supplement to Governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 182.605).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Award (DOE supplement to Governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 182.605). 902.605 Section 902.605 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL...

  7. 2 CFR 902.605 - Award (DOE supplement to Governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 182.605).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Award (DOE supplement to Governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 182.605). 902.605 Section 902.605 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reserved REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL...

  8. 2 CFR 180.130 - How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in covered transactions?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in covered transactions? 180.130 Section 180.130 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS Reserved OMB GUIDELINES TO AGENCIES ON...

  9. 34 CFR 225.11 - What selection criteria does the Secretary use in evaluating an application for a Credit...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 34 Education 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What selection criteria does the Secretary use in... Secretary Award a Grant? § 225.11 What selection criteria does the Secretary use in evaluating an... criteria to evaluate an application for a Credit Enhancement for Charter School Facilities grant: (a...

  10. Brownfields Grants Information

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    This asset includes all types of information regarding Brownfields grant programs that subsidize/support Brownfield cleanup. This includes EPA's Brownfields Program grant funding for brownfields assessment, cleanup, revolving loans, and environmental job training. Assessment grants provide funding for a grant recipient to inventory, characterize, assess, and conduct planning and community involvement related to brownfield sites. Revolving Loan Fund Grants enable States, political subdivisions, and Indian tribes to make low interest loans to carryout cleanup activities at brownfields properties. Cleanup grants provide funding for a grant recipient to carry out cleanup activities at brownfield sites. Environmental Workforce Development and Job Training Grants are designed to provide funding to eligible entities, including nonprofit organizations, to recruit, train, and place predominantly low-income and minority, unemployed and under-employed residents of solid and hazardous waste-impacted communities with the skills needed to secure full-time, sustainable employment in the environmental field and in the assessment and cleanup work taking place in their communities. Training, Research, and Technical Assistance Grants provide funding to eligible organizations to provide training, research, and technical assistance to facilitate brownfields cleanup. Regulatory authority for the collection and use of this information is found in the Small Business Liability Relief

  11. US EPA EJ Grants

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    This is a provisional dataset that contains point locations for all Environmental Justice (EJ) grants given out by the US EPA. There are many limitations to the data so it is advised that these metadata be read carefully before use. Although the records for these grant locations are drawn directly from the official EPA grants repository (IGMS Integrated Grants Management System), it is important to know that the IGMS was designed for purposes that did not include accurately portraying the grants place of performance on a map. Instead, the IGMS grant recipients mailing address is the primary source for grant locations. Particularly for statewide grants that are administered via State and Regional headquarters, the grant location data should not be interpreted as the grants place of performance. In 2012, a policy was established to start to collect the place of performance as a pilot for newly awarded grants that were deemed community-based in nature and for these the grant location depicted in this database will be a more reliable indicator of the actual place of performance. As for the locational accuracy of these points, there is no programmatic certification process, however, they are being entered by the Grant Project Officers who are most familiar with the details of the grants, apart from the grantees themselves. Limitations notwithstanding, this is a first-of-breed attempt to map all of the Agencys grants, using the best internal geocoding algorithms avail

  12. Administering Grants, Contracts, and Funds. Evaluating and Improving Your Grants System.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Bauer, David G.; Otto, Mary L.

    Aspects of the grants system are examined, and information on ways to improve the structure of a grants office and sharpen staff skills are provided. Thirteen chapters deal with the following topics: the purpose of the office of grants and contract administration (e.g., the essentials of brainstorming); measuring the success of a grants system…

  13. Photographer : JPL Range : 12.2 million kilometers (7.6 million miles) This images shows Jupiter's

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 12.2 million kilometers (7.6 million miles) This images shows Jupiter's Great Red Spot emerging from the five-hour Jovian night. One of three bright, oval clouds which were observed to form approx. 40 years ago can be seen below the Red Spot. Most other features appearing in this view are too small to be seen clearly from Earth. This black and white photo was taken through a violet filter.

  14. Photographer : JPL Range : 5 million km. ( 3 million miles ) This photograph, shot from Voyager I,

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 5 million km. ( 3 million miles ) This photograph, shot from Voyager I, shows Jupiter's Great Red Spot, turbulent regions immediattely to the west, and, middle right, one of the several white ovals seen on Jupiter from Earth. This photograph represents much better resolution than ever seen by telescopic means to date. The Red Spot and Ovals both reveal intricate, involved structures, the smallest details of which, are estimated at 95 km. ( 55 miles ) across.

  15. 42 CFR 51a.1 - To which programs does this regulation apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... (CISS) projects for the development and expansion of: maternal and infant health home visiting; projects... GRANTS FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH § 51a.1 To which programs does this regulation apply? The regulation... Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside project grant programs. Section 502(a) authorizes funding for...

  16. 42 CFR 51a.1 - To which programs does this regulation apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... (CISS) projects for the development and expansion of: maternal and infant health home visiting; projects... GRANTS FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH § 51a.1 To which programs does this regulation apply? The regulation... Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside project grant programs. Section 502(a) authorizes funding for...

  17. 42 CFR 51a.1 - To which programs does this regulation apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... (CISS) projects for the development and expansion of: maternal and infant health home visiting; projects... GRANTS FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH § 51a.1 To which programs does this regulation apply? The regulation... Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside project grant programs. Section 502(a) authorizes funding for...

  18. 42 CFR 51a.1 - To which programs does this regulation apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... (CISS) projects for the development and expansion of: maternal and infant health home visiting; projects... GRANTS FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH § 51a.1 To which programs does this regulation apply? The regulation... Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside project grant programs. Section 502(a) authorizes funding for...

  19. 42 CFR 51a.1 - To which programs does this regulation apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... (CISS) projects for the development and expansion of: maternal and infant health home visiting; projects... GRANTS FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH § 51a.1 To which programs does this regulation apply? The regulation... Child Health (MCH) Federal Set-Aside project grant programs. Section 502(a) authorizes funding for...

  20. Don't Take Marketing for "Grant"ed: Building Marketing Efforts into Library Grant Initiatives

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Germain, Carol Anne

    2009-01-01

    Libraries frequently apply for grants to help fund special projects and resources, such as purchases for library collections, innovative instructional technologies, and research subscription databases. Grants provide support for cultural events, professional development sessions, new construction, and building renovations. Like other library…

  1. 50 CFR 86.121 - What does the Comprehensive National Assessment do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What does the Comprehensive National... INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (BIG) PROGRAM Completing the Comprehensive National Assessment § 86.121 What does the Comprehensive National Assessment do? The Comprehensive National Assessment determines nationwide the adequacy...

  2. 2 CFR 182.5 - What does this part do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What does this part do? 182.5 Section 182.5... REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) § 182.5 What does this part do? This part provides... of the Act to cooperative agreements and other financial assistance awards, as a matter of Federal...

  3. 28 CFR 83.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 83.105 Section 83.105 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Purpose and Coverage § 83.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of...

  4. 28 CFR 83.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 83.105 Section 83.105 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Purpose and Coverage § 83.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of...

  5. 28 CFR 83.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 83.105 Section 83.105 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Purpose and Coverage § 83.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of...

  6. 28 CFR 83.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 83.105 Section 83.105 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Purpose and Coverage § 83.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of...

  7. Cash grants in humanitarian assistance: a nongovernmental organization experience in Aceh, Indonesia, following the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami.

    PubMed

    Doocy, Shannon; Johnson, Diane; Robinson, Courtland

    2008-06-01

    Historically, cash interventions, as opposed to material or in-kind aid, have been relatively uncommon in the humanitarian response to emergencies. The widespread implementation of cash-based programs following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami provided an opportunity to examine cash distributions following disasters. The Mercy Corps cash grant program in Aceh, Indonesia, was a short-term intervention intended to assist in recompensing losses from the December 2004 tsunami. An evaluation of the Mercy Corps cash grant program was conducted for the 12-month period following the tsunami using program monitoring data and a systematic survey of cash grant beneficiaries. in 2005, the cash grant program disbursed more than US$3.3 million to more than 53,000 beneficiaries; the average cash grant award was US$6390, which was shared by an average of 108 beneficiaries. In a beneficiary survey, more than 95% of respondents reported the grant allocation processes were fair and transparent and that grant funds were received. The Mercy Corps experience with cash programs suggests that cash interventions in the emergency context, when properly administered, can have an immediate impact and serve as an efficient mechanism for providing assistance. Organizations involved in humanitarian relief, particularly donors and nongovernmental organizations, should consider incorporating cash-based interventions as an element of their response in future emergencies.

  8. Hawai'i DOE On-Line

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Kajioka, Vicki; Shiroma, Donna; Tisdell, Debi; Kanemori, Lena; Tsuda, Jean

    2002-01-01

    The E-School Technology Innovation Challenge Grant of 1996 was the genesis of the Department of Education's (DOE's) efforts to initiate a multi-prong approach to bring standards-based curriculum to the children of Hawai'i and use technology to upgrade professional development for its teachers. In this article, the authors describe how various…

  9. 2 CFR 180.140 - Does an exclusion under the nonprocurement system affect a person's eligibility for Federal...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does an exclusion under the nonprocurement system affect a person's eligibility for Federal procurement contracts? 180.140 Section 180.140 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS...

  10. 2 CFR 180.145 - Does an exclusion under the Federal procurement system affect a person's eligibility to...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Does an exclusion under the Federal procurement system affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement transactions? 180.145 Section 180.145 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS...

  11. One million haemopoietic stem-cell transplants: a retrospective observational study.

    PubMed

    Gratwohl, Alois; Pasquini, Marcelo C; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Atsuta, Yoshiko; Baldomero, Helen; Foeken, Lydia; Gratwohl, Michael; Bouzas, Luis Fernando; Confer, Dennis; Frauendorfer, Karl; Gluckman, Eliane; Greinix, Hildegard; Horowitz, Mary; Iida, Minako; Lipton, Jeff; Madrigal, Alejandro; Mohty, Mohamad; Noel, Luc; Novitzky, Nicolas; Nunez, José; Oudshoorn, Machteld; Passweg, Jakob; van Rood, Jon; Szer, Jeff; Blume, Karl; Appelbaum, Frederic R; Kodera, Yoshihisa; Niederwieser, Dietger

    2015-03-01

    The transplantation of cells, tissues, and organs has been recognised by WHO as an important medical task for its member states; however, information about how to best organise transplantation is scarce. We aimed to document the activity worldwide from the beginning of transplantation and search for region adapted indications and associations between transplant rates and macroeconomics. Between Jan 1, 2006, and Dec 31, 2014, the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation collected data for the evolution of haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) activity and volunteer donors in the 194 WHO member states. 953,651 HSCTs (553,350 [58%] autologous and 400,301 [42%] allogeneic) were reported by 1516 transplant centres from 75 countries. No transplants were done in countries with fewer than 300,000 inhabitants, a surface area less than 700 km(2), and a gross national income per person of US$1260 or lower. Use of HSCT increased from the first transplant in 1957 to almost 10,000 by 1985. We recorded a cumulative total of about 100,000 transplants by 1995, and an estimated 1 million by December, 2012. Unrelated donor registries contributed 22·3 million typed volunteer donors and 645,646 cord blood products by 2012. Numbers of allogeneic HSCTs increased in the past 35 years with no signs of saturation (R(2)=0·989). Transplant rates were higher in countries with more resources, more transplant teams, and an unrelated donor infrastructure. Our findings show achievements and high unmet needs and give guidance for decisions; to grant access for patients, to provide a donor infrastructure, and to limit overuse by defining risk and region adapted indications for HSCT as an efficient and cost-effective approach for life-threatening, potentially curable diseases. Funding for this study was indirectly provided by support of the WBMT. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

  12. 40 CFR 35.4190 - How does my group identify a qualified technical advisor?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... technical advisor? 35.4190 Section 35.4190 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GRANTS AND OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Technical Assistance Procuring A Technical Advisor Or Other Contractor with Tag Funds § 35.4190 How does my group identify a qualified...

  13. 2 CFR 902.500 - Who in the DOE determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Who in the DOE determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part? 902.500 Section 902.500 Grants and... authorized to make the determinations under 2 CFR 182.500 for DOE, including NNSA. ...

  14. Photographer : JPL Range : 6 million kilometers (3.7 million miles) Central Longitude 120 degrees

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 6 million kilometers (3.7 million miles) Central Longitude 120 degrees west, North is up. and 3rd from the planet. Photo taken after midnight Ganymede is slightly larger than Mercury but much less dense (twice the density of water). Its surface brightness is 4 times of Earth's Moon. Mare regions (dark features) are like the Moon's but have twice the brightness, and believed to be unlikely of rock or lava as the Moon's are. It's north pole seems covered with brighter material and may be water frost. Scattered brighter spots may be related to impact craters or source of fresh ice.

  15. The impact of intramural grants on educators' careers and on medical education innovation.

    PubMed

    Adler, Shelley R; Chang, Anna; Loeser, Helen; Cooke, Molly; Wang, Jason; Teherani, Arianne

    2015-06-01

    The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Haile T. Debas Academy of Medical Educators Innovations Funding program awards competitive grants to create novel curricula and faculty development programs, compare pedagogical approaches, and design learner assessment methods. The authors examined the principal investigators' (PIs') perceptions of the impact of these intramural grants on their careers and on medical education innovation. At 12 months (project completion) and 24 months (follow-up), PIs submit a progress report describing the impact of their grant on their careers, work with collaborators, subsequent funding, project dissemination, and the UCSF curriculum. The authors analyzed these reports using qualitative thematic analysis and achieved consensus in coding and interpretation through discussion. From 2001 to 2012, the program funded 77 PIs to lead 103 projects, awarding over $2.2 million. The authors analyzed reports from 88 grants (85.4%) awarded to 68 PIs (88.3%). PIs noted that the funding led to accelerated promotion, expanded networking opportunities, enhanced knowledge and skills, more scholarly publications and presentations, extramural funding, and local and national recognition. They also reported that the funding improved their status in their departments, enhanced their careers as medical educators, laid the foundation for subsequent projects, and engaged an array of stakeholders, including trainees and junior faculty. These modest intramural education grants not only created innovative, enduring programs but also promoted educators' professional identity formation, fostered collaborations, supported junior faculty in finding their desired career paths, provided advancement opportunities, and raised the local and national profiles of recipients.

  16. 32 CFR 21.400 - To what instruments does this subpart apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false To what instruments does this subpart apply? 21... AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Authorities and Responsibilities for Making and Administering Assistance Awards § 21.400 To what instruments does this subpart apply...

  17. 32 CFR 21.400 - To what instruments does this subpart apply?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false To what instruments does this subpart apply? 21... AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Authorities and Responsibilities for Making and Administering Assistance Awards § 21.400 To what instruments does this subpart apply...

  18. 34 CFR 611.13 - What competitive preference does the Secretary provide?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What competitive preference does the Secretary provide? 611.13 Section 611.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued... State Grants Program § 611.13 What competitive preference does the Secretary provide? The Secretary...

  19. 34 CFR 611.13 - What competitive preference does the Secretary provide?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What competitive preference does the Secretary provide? 611.13 Section 611.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued... State Grants Program § 611.13 What competitive preference does the Secretary provide? The Secretary...

  20. 34 CFR 611.13 - What competitive preference does the Secretary provide?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What competitive preference does the Secretary provide? 611.13 Section 611.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued... State Grants Program § 611.13 What competitive preference does the Secretary provide? The Secretary...

  1. 2 CFR 902.505 - Who in the DOE determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Who in the DOE determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part? 902.505 Section 902.505 Grants and... make the determinations under 2 CFR 182.500 for DOE, including NNSA. ...

  2. Photographer : JPL Range : 5.9 million kilometers (3.66 million miles) Europa is Jupiter's 2nd

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 5.9 million kilometers (3.66 million miles) Europa is Jupiter's 2nd Galilean satellites from the planet and the brightest. Photo taken early morning through violet filter. Faint swirls and linear patterns show in the equatorial region (which shows darker than the poles). This hemisphere always faces Jupiter. North is up. Density and size comparable to Earth's Moon and seems to show water ice or ground water on its surface.

  3. Mars at 43 Million Miles From Earth

    NASA Image and Video Library

    2001-06-26

    NASA Earth-orbiting Hubble Space Telescope took the picture on June 26, 2001 when Mars was approximately 43 million miles 68 million km from Earth -- the closest Mars has ever been to Earth since 1988.

  4. Dedicated health systems strengthening of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria: an analysis of grants.

    PubMed

    Fan, Victoria Y; Tsai, Feng-Jen J; Shroff, Zubin C; Nakahara, Branden; Vargha, Nabil; Weathers, Scott

    2017-01-01

    This study aims to understand the determinants of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria's dedicated channel for health systems strengthening (HSS) funding across countries and to analyze their health system priorities expressed in budgets and performance indicators. We obtained publicly available data for disease-specific and HSS grants from the Global Fund over 2004-2013 prior to the new funding model. Regression analysis was employed to assess the determinants of dedicated HSS funding across 111 countries. Documents for 27 dedicated HSS grants including budgets and performance indicators were collected, and activities were analyzed by health system functions. HSS funding per capita is significantly associated with TB and HIV funding per capita, but not per capita income and health worker density. Of 27 dedicated HSS grants, 11 had line-item budgets publicly available, in which health workforce and medical products form the majority (89% or US$132 million of US$148 million) of funds. Yet these areas accounted for 41.7% (215) of total 516 performance indicators. Health worker densities were not correlated with HSS funding, despite the emphasis on health workforce in budgets and performance indicators. Priorities in health systems in line-item budgets differ from the numbers of indicators used. © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

  5. 2 CFR 182.650 - Grant.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Grant. 182.650 Section 182.650 Grants and Agreements OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS Reserved GOVERNMENTWIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Definitions § 182.650 Grant. Grant...

  6. 40 CFR 35.4170 - What kinds of reporting does EPA require?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What kinds of reporting does EPA require? 35.4170 Section 35.4170 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GRANTS AND... § 35.4170 What kinds of reporting does EPA require? There are several types of reports you need to...

  7. 40 CFR 36.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 36.105 Section 36.105 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GRANTS AND OTHER FEDERAL... § 36.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A...

  8. 2 CFR 182.115 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... assistance award (see definitions of award and recipient in §§ 182.605 and 182.660, respectively); or (2) A... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 182.115 Section... REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Purpose and Coverage § 182.115 Does this part apply...

  9. 2 CFR 1401.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... Subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182 apply if you are— (a) A recipient of an assistance award from the... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Does this part apply to me? 1401.105 Section... INTERIOR REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Purpose and Coverage § 1401.105 Does...

  10. 2 CFR 1401.250 - Grant.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Grant. 1401.250 Section 1401.250 Grants and Agreements Federal Agency Regulations for Grants and Agreements DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) (Eff. 1-21-2011) Definitions § 1401.250 Grant. Grant means...

  11. Costs of community-based interventions from the Community Transformation Grants.

    PubMed

    Khavjou, Olga A; Honeycutt, Amanda A; Yarnoff, Benjamin; Bradley, Christina; Soler, Robin; Orenstein, Diane

    2018-07-01

    Limited data are available on the costs of evidence-based community-wide prevention programs. The objective of this study was to estimate the per-person costs of strategies that support policy, systems, and environmental changes implemented under the Community Transformation Grants (CTG) program. We collected cost data from 29 CTG awardees and estimated program costs as spending on labor; consultants; materials, travel, and services; overhead activities; partners; and the value of in-kind contributions. We estimated costs per person reached for 20 strategies. We assessed how per-person costs varied with the number of people reached. Data were collected in 2012-2015, and the analysis was conducted in 2015-2016. Two of the tobacco-free living strategies cost less than $1.20 per person and reached over 6 million people each. Four of the healthy eating strategies cost less than $1.00 per person, and one of them reached over 6.5 million people. One of the active living strategies cost $2.20 per person and reached over 7 million people. Three of the clinical and community preventive services strategies cost less than $2.30 per person, and one of them reached almost 2 million people. Across all 20 strategies combined, an increase of 10,000 people in the number of people reached was associated with a $0.22 reduction in the per-person cost. Results demonstrate that interventions, such as tobacco-free indoor policies, which have been shown to improve health outcomes have relatively low per-person costs and are able to reach a large number of people. Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

  12. Environmental change preceded Caribbean extinction by 2 million years

    PubMed Central

    O'Dea, Aaron; Jackson, Jeremy B. C.; Fortunato, Helena; Smith, J. Travis; D'Croz, Luis; Johnson, Kenneth G.; Todd, Jonathan A.

    2007-01-01

    Paleontologists typically treat major episodes of extinction as single and distinct events in which a major environmental perturbation results in a synchronous evolutionary response. Alternatively, the causes of biotic change may be multifaceted and extinction may lag behind the changes ultimately responsible because of nonlinear ecological dynamics. We examined these alternatives for the major episode of Caribbean extinction 2 million years ago (Ma). Isolation of the Caribbean from the Eastern Pacific by uplift of the Panamanian Isthmus was associated with synchronous changes in Caribbean near shore environments and community composition between 4.25 and 3.45 Ma. Seasonal fluctuations in Caribbean seawater temperature decreased 3-fold, carbonate deposition increased, and there was a striking, albeit patchy, shift in dominance of benthic ecosystems from heterotrophic mollusks to mixotrophic reef corals and calcareous algae. All of these changes correspond well with a simple model of decreased upwelling and collapse in planktonic productivity associated with the final stages of the closure of the isthmian barrier. However, extinction rates of mollusks and corals did not increase until 3–2 Ma and sharply peaked between 2 and 1 Ma, even though extinction overwhelmingly affected taxa commonly associated with high productivity. This time lag suggests that something other than environmental change per se was involved in extinction that does not occur as a single event. Understanding cause and effect will require more taxonomically refined analysis of the changing abundance and distribution patterns of different ecological guilds in the 2 million years leading up to the relatively sudden peak in extinction. PMID:17369359

  13. Photographer : JPL Range : 6.5 million kilometers (4 million miles) Six violet images of Jupiter

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 6.5 million kilometers (4 million miles) Six violet images of Jupiter makes the mosaic photo, showing the Great Red Spot as a swirling vortex type motion. This motion is also seen in several nearby white clouds. These bright white clouds and the Red Spot are rotating in a counter clockwise direction, except the peculiar filimentary cloud to the right of the Red Spot is going clockwise. The top of the picture shows the turbulence from the equatorial jet and more northerly atmospheric currents. The smallest clouds shown are only 70 miles (120 km) across.

  14. 30 CFR 285.305 - How do I request an ROW grant or RUE grant?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Rights-of-Way Grants and Rights-of-Use and Easement Grants for Renewable Energy Activities Obtaining Row Grants and Rue... one electronic copy of a request for a new or modified ROW grant or RUE grant. You must submit a...

  15. Photographer : JPL Range : 7 million kilometers (5 million miles) Callisto is Jupiter's outermost

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 7 million kilometers (5 million miles) Callisto is Jupiter's outermost Galilean satellites and darkest of the four(but almost twice as bright as Earth's Moon). Mottled appearance from bright and dark patches. Bright spots seem like rayed or bright halved craters seen on our Moon. This face is always turned toward Jupiter. Photo taken through violet filter. Ganymede is slightly larger than Mercury but much less dense (twice the density of water). Its surface brightness is 4 times of Earth's Moon. Mare regions (dark features) are like the Moon's but have twice the brightness, and believed to be unlikely of rock or lava as the Moon's are. It's north pole seems covered with brighter material and may be water frost. Scattered brighter spots may be related to impact craters or source of fresh ice.

  16. 75 FR 30108 - Low Income Taxpayer Clinic Grant Program; Availability of 2011 Grant Application Package

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-28

    ...) matching grant for the 2011 grant cycle (the 2011 grant cycle runs January 1, 2011, through December 31.... Based on the findings of this assessment, for the 2011 grant cycle, the LITC Program Office is... currently receiving a grant for the 2010 grant cycle, or (2) organizations servicing the following counties...

  17. 34 CFR 656.20 - How does the Secretary evaluate an application?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... STUDIES OR FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES How Does the Secretary Make a Grant? § 656.20 How... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Secretary evaluate an application? 656.20 Section 656.20 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF...

  18. Clustering Millions of Faces by Identity.

    PubMed

    Otto, Charles; Wang, Dayong; Jain, Anil K

    2018-02-01

    Given a large collection of unlabeled face images, we address the problem of clustering faces into an unknown number of identities. This problem is of interest in social media, law enforcement, and other applications, where the number of faces can be of the order of hundreds of million, while the number of identities (clusters) can range from a few thousand to millions. To address the challenges of run-time complexity and cluster quality, we present an approximate Rank-Order clustering algorithm that performs better than popular clustering algorithms (k-Means and Spectral). Our experiments include clustering up to 123 million face images into over 10 million clusters. Clustering results are analyzed in terms of external (known face labels) and internal (unknown face labels) quality measures, and run-time. Our algorithm achieves an F-measure of 0.87 on the LFW benchmark (13 K faces of 5,749 individuals), which drops to 0.27 on the largest dataset considered (13 K faces in LFW + 123M distractor images). Additionally, we show that frames in the YouTube benchmark can be clustered with an F-measure of 0.71. An internal per-cluster quality measure is developed to rank individual clusters for manual exploration of high quality clusters that are compact and isolated.

  19. School Improvement Grants: Early Implementation under Way, but Reforms Affected by Short Time Frames. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO-11-741

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Scott, George A.

    2011-01-01

    The School Improvement Grants (SIG) program, which was created in 2002, funds reforms in the country's lowest-performing schools with the goal of improving student outcomes, such as standardized test scores and graduation rates. Congress greatly increased SIG program funding from $125 million available in fiscal year 2007--the first year the…

  20. Final Report for DOE Grant Number DE-SC0001481

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Liang, Edison

    2013-12-02

    This report covers research activities, major results and publications supported by DE-SC-000-1481. This project was funded by the DOE OFES-NNSA HEDLP program. It was a joint research program between Rice University and the University of Texas at Austin. The physics of relativistic plasmas was investigated in the context of ultra-intense laser irradiation of high-Z solid targets. Laser experiments using the Texas Petawatt Laser were performed in the summers of 2011, 2012 and 2013. Numerical simulations of laser-plasma interactions were performed using Monte Carlo and Particle-in-Cell codes to design and support these experiments. Astrophysical applications of these results were also investigated.

  1. Making Time for Dissertation Grants

    PubMed Central

    Hasche, Leslie K.; Perron, Brian E.; Proctor, Enola K.

    2013-01-01

    Grant writing is a necessary skill for becoming an independent and successful social work researcher. Since social work dissertation grants are a relatively new trend, students face many challenges in identifying, preparing, and submitting dissertation grants. Lack of resources and experiences, difficulties in protecting time for grant writing, and the uncertainty of success can hinder work on dissertation grants. Thus, this article provides an overview of dissertation grants, including a review of grant mechanisms, suggestions for preparing grants in the context of program milestones, and identifying institutional infrastructure to facilitate submissions. Strategies discussed include how to learn about funding priorities, how to establish timelines to account for grant deadlines, and how to use peer reviews to guide the revision process. PMID:24244078

  2. 76 FR 78910 - Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. From the Department of Energy...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-20

    ... and Order Granting a Waiver to LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. From the Department of Energy Commercial.... Department of Energy's (DOE) Decision and Order in Case No. CAC-036, which grants LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.... Decision and Order In the Matter of: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (LG) (Case No. CAC- 036). Background Title...

  3. Cancellation of the Annual Facility Grant Creates More Shortfalls for School Districts. BCTF Research Report. Section V. 2009-EF-02

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    White, Margaret

    2009-01-01

    The Ministry of Education recently announced the cancellation of the Annual Facility Grant (AFG) for 2009-10, resulting in a loss of $110 million dollars in revenue to school districts. This decision comes after Boards of Education submitted their 2009-10 balanced budgets by June 30, based on expected revenues for the coming school year. Boards of…

  4. 78 FR 20355 - Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant Applications for Face Forward-Serving...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-04

    ...The U.S. Department of Labor (we, the Department or DOL) Employment and Training Administration (ETA), announces the availability of approximately $26 million in grant funds authorized by the Workforce Investment Act. Under this solicitation, DOL expects to award 26 grants for up to $1,000,000 each to cover a 39-month period of performance, which includes a planning period of up to six months, program operation period of 24 months, and a minimum of nine months of post program support and follow-up services provided to each participant. Any non- profit organization with IRS 501(c)(3) status, unit of state or local government, or any Indian and Native American entity eligible for grants under WIA Section 166, may apply for these grants to provide services to eligible participants in areas with high-poverty and high- crime rates. These services will include diversion and/or expungement (required for all participants), case management, mentoring, education, training leading to industry-recognized credentials for in demand industries and occupations in the State or local area, service- learning, workforce activities, and post-program support and follow-up services. The complete SGA and any subsequent SGA amendments in connection with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, review and selection procedures, and other program requirements governing this solicitation.

  5. 50 CFR 86.130 - What does the State program plan do?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What does the State program plan do? 86.130 Section 86.130 Wildlife and Fisheries UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE... GRANT (BIG) PROGRAM How States Will Complete the State Program Plans § 86.130 What does the State...

  6. 32 CFR 26.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 26.105 Section 26.105 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT... § 26.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A...

  7. 32 CFR 26.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 26.105 Section 26.105 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT... § 26.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A...

  8. 32 CFR 26.105 - Does this part apply to me?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Does this part apply to me? 26.105 Section 26.105 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT... § 26.105 Does this part apply to me? (a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either— (1) A...

  9. Photographer : JPL Range : 4.2 million kilometers (2.6 million miles) Ganymede is Jupiter's Largest

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 4.2 million kilometers (2.6 million miles) Ganymede is Jupiter's Largest Galilean satellites and 3rd from the planet. Photo taken after midnight Ganymede is slightly larger than Mercury but much less dense (twice the density of water). Its surface brightness is 4 times of Earth's Moon. Mare regions (dark features) are like the Moon's but have twice the brightness, and believed to be unlikely of rock or lava as the Moon's are. It's north pole seems covered with brighter material and may be water frost. Scattered brighter spots may be related to impact craters or source of fresh ice.

  10. Photographer : JPL Range : 6 Million km. ( 3.72 million miles ) This photograph of Jupiter, shot

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 6 Million km. ( 3.72 million miles ) This photograph of Jupiter, shot from Voyager 2, shows the equator to the southern polar latitudes, near the Great Red Spot. The white oval that appears here is different from the one seen in a similiar position when voyager 1 passed years before. The region of white clouds now extends from east of The Red Spot and around it's northern boundary, preventing small cloud vortices from circling the feature. The disturbed region west of The Red Spot has also changed since Voyager1. It shows more small scale structure and cloud vortices being formed out of the wave structures.

  11. 41 CFR 105-71.112 - Special grant or subgrant conditions for “high-risk” grantees.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Special grant or... Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION... unsatisfactory performance, or (2) Is not financially stable, or (3) Has a management system which does not meet...

  12. EPA Grants 101 Tutorial

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    EPA Grants 101 Tutorial teaches you how to apply for , manage, and complete an EPA Grant with this easy-to-follow flowchart. This tutorial is extremely benefical for those seeking EPA Grant knowledge.

  13. Photographer : JPL Range : 5.9 million kilometers (3.66 million miles) Europa is Jupiter's 2nd

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1979-01-01

    Photographer : JPL Range : 5.9 million kilometers (3.66 million miles) Europa is Jupiter's 2nd Galilean satellite from the planet. Photo taken early morning and through a violet filter. Faint swirls and Linear Patterns show in the equarorial region(which is darker than the poles). The hemisphere shown always faces Jupiter. North is up. Europa is the brightest of the Galilian satellites but shows low contrast on this hemisphere. Density and size is similar to Earth's Moon. Indications of water ice or ground water on surface is shown

  14. 2 CFR 1401.401 - Whom in the DOI does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 2 Grants and Agreements 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Whom in the DOI does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? 1401.401 Section 1401.401 Grants and Agreements Federal... Whom in the DOI does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? The DOI...

  15. 32 CFR 21.510 - Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... maintaining the Federal Assistance Programs Retrieval System, a computerized data base of the information. 4... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA... GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Information Reporting on...

  16. 32 CFR 21.510 - Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... maintaining the Federal Assistance Programs Retrieval System, a computerized data base of the information. 4... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA... GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Information Reporting on...

  17. 32 CFR 21.510 - Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... maintaining the Federal Assistance Programs Retrieval System, a computerized data base of the information. 4... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA... GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Information Reporting on...

  18. 32 CFR 21.510 - Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... maintaining the Federal Assistance Programs Retrieval System, a computerized data base of the information. 4... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA... GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Information Reporting on...

  19. 32 CFR 21.510 - Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... maintaining the Federal Assistance Programs Retrieval System, a computerized data base of the information. 4... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Why does the DoD report information to the CFDA... GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS-GENERAL MATTERS Information Reporting on...

  20. 30 CFR 585.301 - What do ROW grants and RUE grants include?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ....301 Section 585.301 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Rights-of-Way Grants and Rights-of-Use and Easement Grants for Renewable Energy Activities Row Grants and...

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.