Science.gov

Sample records for 747-400d 747-400f 747sr

  1. 75 FR 38397 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F Series Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-02

    ..., 2009 (74 FR 26317). That NPRM proposed to require installing new pump control and time delay relays... consistent with the AFM certificate limitations contained in AD 2007- 13-04, Amendment 39-15108 (72 FR 33859... Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44...

  2. 75 FR 6821 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F Series Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-02-11

    ...), would protect the fuel densitometer for the horizontal stabilizer tank (HST) and the center wing tank...) For all airplanes: Install the HSP in the center wing tank, in accordance with the Accomplishment... system (FQIS) of the center fuel tank and, for certain airplanes, the horizontal stabilizer fuel...

  3. 75 FR 60614 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F Series Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-01

    .... (1) For all airplanes: Install the HSP in the center wing tank, in accordance with the Accomplishment... the fuel quantity indicating system (FQIS) of the center fuel tank and, for certain airplanes, the... source inside the center or horizontal stabilizer fuel tanks. An ignition source, in combination...

  4. 75 FR 47245 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F Series...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-05

    .... Related AD 2009-13- 03, Amendment 39-15942 (74 FR 31169, June 30, 2009), applies to Boeing Model 747-400... Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or... performance and consequent collision with terrain and obstacles or forced landing of the airplane. DATES:...

  5. 76 FR 27244 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F Series...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-11

    ... Register on August 5, 2010 (75 FR 47245). That NPRM proposed to require modifying certain thrust reverser... Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR... performance and consequent collision with terrain and obstacles or forced landing of the airplane. DATES:...

  6. 75 FR 27966 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and 747-400D Series Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-19

    ... 12866, 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034... certain Model 747-400 and 747-400D series airplanes. This proposed AD would ] require installing aluminum... November 4, 2009. The service bulletin describes procedures for installing aluminum gutter...

  7. 78 FR 28767 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-05-16

    ...We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747- 200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of a disbonded doubler and a skin crack in section 41 of the fuselage, and multiple reports of cracked or missing fastener......

  8. 77 FR 50411 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-08-21

    ... the ECS. AD 2008-02-16, Amendment 39-15346 (73 FR 4061, January 24, 2008), applicable to certain Model 767-200 and 767-300 series airplanes. AD 2010-14-01, Amendment 39-16344 (75 FR 38007, July 1, 2010..., 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. AD 2012-02-09, Amendment 39-16932 (77 FR 5996, February...

  9. 75 FR 1533 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-200F, 747-200C, 747-400, 747-400D, and 747...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-01-12

    ... certain fuselage internal structure (i.e., Sections 42 and 46 fuselage frames, upper deck floor beams... (i.e., Section 41 fuselage frames where they connect to upper deck floor beams, and Section 41... where fatigue cracks can occur. We are issuing this AD to prevent the loss of structural integrity...

  10. 75 FR 10669 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-200B, 747-300, and 747SR Series...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-09

    ...) This AD results from a report of water contamination in the electrical and electronic units in the main... closeout panel and moisture curtains for the main equipment center. This AD results from a report of water contamination in the electrical and electronic units in the main equipment center. We are issuing this AD...

  11. 78 FR 60670 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-10-02

    ...We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -100B, -100B SUD, -200B, -200C, - 200F, -300, -400, -400D, -400F, and 747SR series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking at the aft upper corner of the main entry door (MED) 5 cutout. This AD requires inspecting for the presence of repairs and measuring the edge margin at certain......

  12. Air Launch: Examining Performance Potential of Various Configurations and Growth Options

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Waters, Eric D.; Creech, Dennis M.; Philips, Alan

    2013-01-01

    The Advanced Concepts Office at NASA's George C. Marshall Space Flight Center conducted a high-level analysis of various air launch vehicle configurations, objectively determining maximum launch vehicle payload while considering carrier aircraft capabilities and given dimensional constraints. With the renewed interest in aerial launch of low-earth orbit payloads, referenced by programs such as Stratolaunch and Spaceship2, there existed a need to qualify the boundaries of the trade space, identify performance envelopes, and understand advantages and limiting factors of designing for maximum payload capability. Using the NASA/DARPA Horizontal Launch Study (HLS) Point Design 2 (PD-2) as a point-of-departure configuration, two independent design actions were undertaken. Both configurations utilized a Boeing 747-400F as the carrier aircraft, LOX/RP-1 first stage and LOX/LH2 second stage. Each design was sized to meet dimensional and mass constraints while optimizing propellant loads and stage delta V (?V) splits. All concepts, when fully loaded, exceeded the allowable Gross Takeoff Weight (GTOW) of the aircraft platform. This excess mass was evaluated as propellant/fuel offload available for a potential in-flight refueling scenario. Results indicate many advantages such as large, relative payload delivery of approximately 47,000 lbm and significant mission flexibility, such as variable launch site inclination and launch window; however, in-flight cryogenic fluid transfer and carrier aircraft platform integration are substantial technical hurdles to the realization of such a system configuration.

  13. Air Launch: Examining Performance Potential of Various Configurations and Growth Options

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Waters, Eric D.; Creech, Dennis M.; Philips, Alan D.

    2013-01-01

    The Advanced Concepts Office at NASA's George C. Marshall Space Flight Center conducted a high-level analysis of various air launch vehicle configurations, objectively determining maximum launch vehicle payload while considering carrier aircraft capabilities and given dimensional constraints. With the renewed interest in aerial launch of low-earth orbit payloads, referenced by programs such as Stratolaunch and Spaceship2, there exists a need to qualify the boundaries of the trade space, identify performance envelopes, and understand advantages and limiting factors of designing for maximum payload capability. Using the NASA/DARPA Horizontal Launch Study (HLS) Point Design 2 (PD-2) as a pointof- departure configuration, two independent design actions were undertaken. Both designs utilized a Boeing 747-400F as the carrier aircraft, LOX/RP-1 first stage and LOX/LH2 second stage. Each design was sized to meet dimensional and mass constraints while optimizing propellant loads and stage delta V splits. All concepts, when fully loaded, exceeded the allowable Gross Takeoff Weight (GTOW) of the aircraft platform. This excess mass was evaluated as propellant/fuel offload available for a potential in-flight propellant loading scenario. Results indicate many advantages such as payload delivery of approximately 47,000 lbm and significant mission flexibility including variable launch site inclination and launch window. However, in-flight cryogenic fluid transfer and carrier aircraft platform integration are substantial technical hurdles to the realization of such a system configuration.