Sample records for antitrust laws

  1. 32 CFR 644.440 - Application of antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 4 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Application of antitrust laws. 644.440 Section... Application of antitrust laws. Section 207 of the Federal Property Act provides that real property and related... the antitrust laws. Prior to obligating the Government on any such disposal, the District Engineer...

  2. 49 CFR 95.13 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Antitrust laws. 95.13 Section 95.13 Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 95.13 Antitrust laws. The activities of advisory committees are subject to the antitrust laws and committee members are not immune from prosecution...

  3. 32 CFR 644.440 - Application of antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 4 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Application of antitrust laws. 644.440 Section... Application of antitrust laws. Section 207 of the Federal Property Act provides that real property and related... the antitrust laws. Prior to obligating the Government on any such disposal, the District Engineer...

  4. 49 CFR 95.13 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Antitrust laws. 95.13 Section 95.13 Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 95.13 Antitrust laws. The activities of advisory committees are subject to the antitrust laws and committee members are not immune from prosecution...

  5. 49 CFR 95.13 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Antitrust laws. 95.13 Section 95.13 Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 95.13 Antitrust laws. The activities of advisory committees are subject to the antitrust laws and committee members are not immune from prosecution...

  6. 32 CFR 644.542 - Application of anti-trust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 32 National Defense 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 true Application of anti-trust laws. 644.542 Section... PROPERTY REAL ESTATE HANDBOOK Disposal Sale Procedure § 644.542 Application of anti-trust laws. The Federal... tend to create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the anti-trust laws. Prior to obligating the...

  7. 48 CFR 1303.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... Antitrust Violations 1303.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations. Suspected anti-competitive practices and antitrust law violations, as described in FAR 3.301 and FAR 3.303, shall be reported to the Contract Law Division, by the HCO. A copy of the report shall be sent to the Procurement Executive...

  8. 41 CFR 109-45.310 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Antitrust laws. 109-45.310 Section 109-45.310 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management... Antitrust laws. DOE offices shall submit to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance...

  9. 41 CFR 109-45.310 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Antitrust laws. 109-45.310 Section 109-45.310 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management... Antitrust laws. DOE offices shall submit to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance...

  10. 41 CFR 109-45.310 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Antitrust laws. 109-45.310 Section 109-45.310 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management... Antitrust laws. DOE offices shall submit to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance...

  11. 41 CFR 109-45.310 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Antitrust laws. 109-45.310 Section 109-45.310 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management... Antitrust laws. DOE offices shall submit to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance...

  12. 41 CFR 109-45.310 - Antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Antitrust laws. 109-45.310 Section 109-45.310 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management... Antitrust laws. DOE offices shall submit to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance...

  13. Judge Rules MIT Violated Antitrust Law as Member of 23-College "Overlap Group."

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Jaschik, Scott

    1992-01-01

    A federal judge has ruled that 23 prestigious colleges and universities in the Overlap Group violated federal antitrust laws for over 20 years when they met to compare financial-aid packages to be awarded to prospective students, rejecting arguments of social and educational need and nonapplicability of antitrust law. Massachusetts Institute of…

  14. Understanding Antitrust Laws, Competition, the Economy, and Their Impact on Our Everyday Lives

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Hawke, Catherine, Ed.; Middleton, Tiffany Willey, Ed.

    2011-01-01

    This article presents an interview with Edward Biester, an attorney and a member of the ABA Section of Antitrust Law, who recently led the Section's initiative to develop a curriculum for high school students. In this interview, Biester discusses the history of American antitrust laws, looks at some of the contemporary issues, and highlights the…

  15. Broken trusts: The Texas Attorney General versus the oil industry, 1889-1909

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Singer, Jonathan Whitney

    The legal history of state antitrust enforcement and the oil industry in Texas illustrates how and why antitrust law contemplated complementary enforcement at the state and federal government level. Historians, economists, and lawyers have concentrated on federal antitrust law and enforcement, ignoring state efforts. Yet for most of the first twenty-five years following the enactment of the Sherman Antitrust Act, federal enforcement efforts were extremely limited, leaving the field to the states. Texas was one of several states that had strong antitrust laws, and whose attorneys general prosecuted antitrust violations with vigor. Political ambition was a factor in the decisions to investigate and prosecute cases against a highly visible target, the petroleum industry, but there was also a genuine belief in the goals of antitrust policy, and in the efficacy of enforcement of the laws. Enforcement efforts were also complicated by the fact that large oil companies provided vital commodities, articles of "prime necessity," to the citizens of Texas and following the discovery of large oil fields, played an increasingly important role in the economies of many Texas communities. The Texas Attorney General's antitrust enforcement efforts against the oil industry in this time of transition from an agricultural society to an industrial society provide insights into the litigation process, and reveal how well the rhetoric of trust-busting fit with the reality of antitrust enforcement. The antitrust crusade against the petroleum industry also highlights the changing roles of state government in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, particularly the Attorney General's Department. The experience of Texas undermines the view that federal action has always dominated antitrust enforcement efforts and that antitrust litigation against Standard Oil was ineffective and ineffectual. Rather, the Texas Attorney General's litigations and their results suggest that some states took their role in the dual enforcement scheme seriously and that the measure of success of antitrust enforcement goes beyond the amount of monetary penalties collected, and companies permanently ousted from a state.

  16. 41 CFR 102-38.325 - What are the requirements pertaining to antitrust laws?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... PROPERTY 38-SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY Other Governing Statutes Antitrust Requirements § 102-38.325 What are the requirements pertaining to antitrust laws? When the sale of personal property has an estimated fair market value of $3 million or more or if the sale involves a patent, process, technique, or...

  17. Collaborating with the Private Sector

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2009-08-01

    private sector, laws, Patriot Act, FISA, FAR, Intellectual Property, Antitrust Law, Title 10, Title 50, FOIA, FACA, data classification, culture...33 Intellectual Property...Patriot Act) Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Intellectual Property Antitrust Law Title 10

  18. 75 FR 57109 - Premerger Notification; Reporting and Waiting Period Requirements

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-09-17

    ... the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the ``Assistant Attorney General'' or the ``Antitrust Division'') (together the ``Antitrust Agencies'' or ``Agencies'') conduct their initial review of... or acquisition may violate the antitrust laws if consummated and, when appropriate, to seek a...

  19. Accountable Care Organizations and Antitrust Enforcement: Promoting Competition and Innovation.

    PubMed

    Feinstein, Deborah L; Kuhlmann, Patrick; Mucchetti, Peter J

    2015-08-01

    The antitrust laws stand to protect consumers of health care services from conduct that would raise prices, lower quality, and decrease innovation by lessening competition. Importantly, though, vigorous antitrust enforcement does not impede accountable care organizations (ACOs) and similar collaborations that advance these same goals of better and more efficient care; in fact, by fostering competitive markets, the antitrust laws encourage such initiatives. This article summarizes the legal framework that the federal antitrust agencies - the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice - use to analyze ACOs and other collaborations among health care providers. It outlines the guidance provided by the federal antitrust agencies concerning when ACOs and other provider collaborations likely would harm competition and consumers. In addition, it reviews common antitrust issues that can arise with ACOs and provides examples of enforcement actions that have prevented health care providers from taking or continuing anticompetitive actions. Copyright © 2015 by Duke University Press.

  20. An Analysis of Newspaper Antitrust Actions: 1980-1986.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Busterna, John C.

    The American Newspaper Association's 1986 compilation of 45 newspaper antitrust actions filed since 1980 revealed that the majority of antitrust actions during that period involved disputes over advertising practices. The federal government was virtually absent in its enforcement of antitrust laws against newspapers. About one-third of the…

  1. 48 CFR 903.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... Violations 903.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations. (a) Potential anti-competitive practices, such as described in 48 CFR 3.301, and antitrust law violations as described in 48 CFR 3.303, evidenced in...

  2. 48 CFR 903.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... Violations 903.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations. (a) Potential anti-competitive practices, such as described in FAR 3.301, and antitrust law violations as described in FAR 3.303, evidenced in bids...

  3. Application of the Federal Antitrust Laws to Municipal Taxicab Regulation

    DOT National Transportation Integrated Search

    1983-12-01

    This report analyzes the application of Federal antitrust laws to municipal regulation of the taxicab industry. Spurred by two recent Supreme Court decisions involving the electric utility and cable television industries, municipalities have become c...

  4. Antitrust and the Control of Higher Education.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Hartman, Greg

    This report presents the basic components of a "prima facie" antitrust case against the Oregon State System of Higher Education. It deals with the constitutional issues raised as well as showing that higher education is interstate commerce within the meaning of the antitrust laws. The report analyzes the state exemption to antitrust laws…

  5. Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 2015 (Public Law 114-44)

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    US Congress, 2015

    2015-01-01

    The Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 2015 (Public Law 114-44) was put in place to improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid. The contents for this Act is as follows: (1) Short Title; and (2) Extension Relating to the Application of the Antitrust Laws to the…

  6. Antitrust Law and the Media: Making the Newspapers Safe for Democracy.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Coulson, David C.

    1980-01-01

    Illuminates constitutional and economic problems involved in the process of insuring a free press and demonstrates that the government--armed with antitrust laws through its chief enforcer, the Justice Department--can, but does not, provide adequate safeguards. (Author/GT)

  7. Antitrust Law and the Media: Making the Newspapers Safe for Democracy.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Coulson, David

    A number of constitutional and economic problems are involved in the process of insuring a free press. The enforcement of antitrust laws by the Justice Department can, but does not, provide adequate safeguards for the public. Beginning with the 1945 Supreme Court decision, "Associated Press v. United States," many court decisions have…

  8. The Newspaper Preservation Act: Is It a Necessary Loophole in Antitrust Laws?

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Jones, Fredrick

    Decreasing competition between daily newspapers led the United States Congress to pass the Newspaper Preservation Act (NPA) of 1970, providing limited exemption from antitrust laws for newspapers working under joint operating agreements. The bill was passed after the Justice Department successfully brought suit against two Arizona newspapers that…

  9. Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-14

    2013-01-03

    House - 01/25/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  10. To make the antitrust laws applicable to a political committee under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act.

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Grayson, Alan [D-FL-9

    2013-03-13

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  11. Increasing consolidation in healthcare markets: what are the antitrust policy implications?

    PubMed Central

    Haas-Wilson, D; Gaynor, M

    1998-01-01

    OBJECTIVE: To discuss the implications of the rapid transformation of the healthcare financing and delivery system for competition, social welfare, and antitrust policy. PRINCIPAL FINDING: Horizontal and vertical consolidations can enhance efficiency but can also be anticompetitive in markets characterized by entry barriers. RECOMMENDATION: Active enforcement of the antitrust laws is essential to ensure that competition in healthcare markets will lead to procompetitive, rather than anticompetitive effects. However, healthcare antitrust enforcement policy must be flexible enough to allow efficient new forms of organization and practice to emerge. PMID:9865226

  12. Antitrust law and collective physician negotiations with third parties: the relative value guide object lesson.

    PubMed

    Pfizenmayer, R F

    1982-01-01

    This article examines the role of collective physician participation in the third-party reimbursement system. It critiques the Havighurst-Kissam analysis of the antitrust implications of professionally-developed relative value guides and, using lessons derived from the only litigated case on relative value guides, argues that collective physician input into third-party reimbursement plans can be made in a manner which is consistent with the antitrust law as and cost-containment policy objectives. In particular, collective "negotiations" by organized physicians with third parties, unaccompanied by fee agreements among physicians or by actual or threatened physician boycotts, are found to be procompetitive and hence permissible under the rule of reason.

  13. The Role of Regulatory Agencies and Intellectual Property: Part II

    PubMed Central

    Noonan, Kevin E.

    2015-01-01

    Patent law and antitrust law have traditionally been areas of the law involving at least some inherent tension. Champions of antitrust argue that the patent “monopoly” must be strictly limited as an exception to the general legal principle that competition should be unfettered. Patent lawyers argue that patents are the result of an exercise of congressional authority, enshrined in the Constitution, reflecting the policy decision by the Founders that granting a limited exclusionary right was justified by the public benefits derived from full disclosure of the patented invention. In the modern era these competing values have played out in the context of so-called ANDA litigation, involving disputes between branded pharmaceutical companies and generic competitors. Settlement of such litigation has been identified by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and private parties encouraged by the FTC’s position, as an antitrust violation, in large part because such settlements are viewed as frustrating the congressional purpose in promoting early generic competition. After almost a decade of fighting these battles in the federal courts, the Supreme Court addressed the issue directly. The result is that such settlements are not per se illegal but are also not protected by the presumption of patent validity for activities within the “scope of the patent.” Rather, the court decided that these agreements should be assessed for antitrust liability under the “rule of reason” used in other antitrust contexts. PMID:25775920

  14. An analysis of physician antitrust exemption legislation: adjusting the balance of power.

    PubMed

    Hellinger, F J; Young, G J

    2001-07-04

    Current antitrust law restricts physicians from joining together to collectively negotiate. However, such activities may be approved by state laws under the so-called state action immunity doctrine and by federal legislation under an explicit antitrust exemption. In 1999, Texas became the first state to pass physician antitrust exemption legislation allowing physicians, under certain defined circumstances, to collectively negotiate fees with health plans. Last year, similar legislation was introduced in the US Congress, in 18 state legislatures, and in the District of Columbia. This legislation was passed only in the District of Columbia where its implementation was blocked by the city's financial control board. Nonetheless, legislation permitting physicians to collectively negotiate fees with managed care plans has been introduced in 10 state legislatures this year, and there is continued interest in introducing similar legislation in the US Congress. This analysis examines the basic features of this legislation and its potential impact on the balance of power between physicians and managed care plans.

  15. The Role of Regulatory Agencies and Intellectual Property: Part II.

    PubMed

    Noonan, Kevin E

    2015-03-16

    Patent law and antitrust law have traditionally been areas of the law involving at least some inherent tension. Champions of antitrust argue that the patent "monopoly" must be strictly limited as an exception to the general legal principle that competition should be unfettered. Patent lawyers argue that patents are the result of an exercise of congressional authority, enshrined in the Constitution, reflecting the policy decision by the Founders that granting a limited exclusionary right was justified by the public benefits derived from full disclosure of the patented invention. In the modern era these competing values have played out in the context of so-called ANDA litigation, involving disputes between branded pharmaceutical companies and generic competitors. Settlement of such litigation has been identified by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and private parties encouraged by the FTC's position, as an antitrust violation, in large part because such settlements are viewed as frustrating the congressional purpose in promoting early generic competition. After almost a decade of fighting these battles in the federal courts, the Supreme Court addressed the issue directly. The result is that such settlements are not per se illegal but are also not protected by the presumption of patent validity for activities within the "scope of the patent." Rather, the court decided that these agreements should be assessed for antitrust liability under the "rule of reason" used in other antitrust contexts. Copyright © 2015 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.

  16. 77 FR 23202 - Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Service Arrangements

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-04-18

    ... immunity from the antitrust laws. In August 2005, the Commission issued a notice of inquiry to consider... the district court agreed, that they had antitrust immunity based on three provisions of the Shipping... for statutory immunity discussed above constituted a denial or removal such that any penalty could...

  17. The Overlap Group: A Study of Nonprofit Competition.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Matlock, Thao P.

    1994-01-01

    In 1991 the Department of Justice brought an antitrust action against the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and eight Ivy League colleges and universities for participating in a financial aid disbursement scheme. Argues that antitrust laws should apply only if competition among nonprofit organizations tends to enhance efficiency and consumer…

  18. 78 FR 22298 - United States v. Apple, Inc., et al.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-15

    ... Section VII, Penguin also must designate an Antitrust Compliance Officer, who is required to distribute... antitrust laws; certify compliance with the Penguin Final Judgment; maintain a log of all communications... Circuit affirmed this Court's denial of Mr. Kohn's motion to intervene for purposes of appealing the Court...

  19. How can PPOs control prices without violating antitrust laws?

    PubMed

    Fried, J M

    1984-03-01

    Preferred provider organizations (PPOs) have caused concern because they raise the question whether providers can establish mechanisms to control the price of medical care without violating antitrust laws. The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided in Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society that the practices of a physicians' organization which set fee schedules by majority vote constituted price fixing because "independent competing entrepreneurs" made the agreements. The decision implies that PPOs must carefully structure collective efforts to set prices in order to avoid unlawful agreement among competitors. To avoid antitrust exposure, hospitals may independently determine prices and contract individually with providers, or they may act as brokers for individual physicians, establishing fees and claims-processing procedures and then contracting with physicians who agree to these requirements. Setting fees independently may be difficult, however, since hospitals need to know what payment physicians will accept. Thus some physician involvement is probably inevitable. No antitrust liability results, however, if individual physicians are sampled in an information-gathering process but do not collectively set fees. In addition, a PPO that is structured as a partnership or other joint arrangement involving true risk sharing should withstand antitrust challenge. In recent business review letters, the Department of Justice approved two different PPO structures: A Hospital Corporation of America subsidiary would contract (nonexclusively) with providers, hospitals, and third party payers to treat the third party payers' beneficiaries at discounted rates. The charges would be negotiated individually with each physician and hospital. A management consultant firm would act as an intermediary between providers and third party payers, negotiating patient discounts but not participating in fee setting. A PPO need not be structured in every respect like these programs. Individual situations vary, and with sound antitrust advice, PPOs can avoid legal pitfalls.

  20. The Golden Arches Meet the Hallowed Halls: Franchise Law and the Law School Curriculum.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Wright, Danaya

    1995-01-01

    A law school course in franchise law focuses on how various legal issues and categories interact within the context of the narrowly defined business relationship of a franchise. Four major topics included federal and state disclosure regulations, trademarks and service marks, common law contract issues, and antitrust law. Class exercises included…

  1. 48 CFR 1303.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... Contract Law Division, by the HCO. A copy of the report shall be sent to the Procurement Executive concurrently with the submission to the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, Ethics Law...

  2. 11 CFR 111.51 - Debts that are covered.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ...)) Collection of Debts Arising From Enforcement and Administration of Campaign Finance Laws § 111.51 Debts that... antitrust laws. (4) Debts under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (5) Debts between the Commission and...

  3. 11 CFR 111.51 - Debts that are covered.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ...)) Collection of Debts Arising From Enforcement and Administration of Campaign Finance Laws § 111.51 Debts that... antitrust laws. (4) Debts under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (5) Debts between the Commission and...

  4. 11 CFR 111.51 - Debts that are covered.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ...)) Collection of Debts Arising From Enforcement and Administration of Campaign Finance Laws § 111.51 Debts that... antitrust laws. (4) Debts under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (5) Debts between the Commission and...

  5. 11 CFR 111.51 - Debts that are covered.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ...)) Collection of Debts Arising From Enforcement and Administration of Campaign Finance Laws § 111.51 Debts that... antitrust laws. (4) Debts under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (5) Debts between the Commission and...

  6. Higher Education: Schools' Use of the Antitrust Exemption Has Not Significantly Affected College Affordability or Likelihood of Student Enrollment to Date. Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-06-963

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Ashby, Cornelia M.

    2006-01-01

    In 1991 the U.S. Department of Justice sued nine colleges and universities, alleging that they had restrained competition by making collective financial aid determinations for students accepted to more than one of these schools. Against the backdrop of this litigation, Congress enacted a temporary exemption from antitrust laws for higher education…

  7. FANS Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26

    2013-11-12

    House - 01/09/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  8. Law and Marketing: Implications for the Secondary Curriculum.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Beck-Dudley, Caryn L.; Stull, William A.

    1990-01-01

    Provides a basic understanding of some of the legal issues that should be included in a secondary education marketing curriculum. Teaching legal concepts in the areas of contract, antitrust, agency, employment law, and finance is an excellent way to introduce students to legal problems they may encounter in business. (Author)

  9. Ivy League Agrees to End Collaboration on Financial Aid.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Jaschik, Scott

    1991-01-01

    The Ivy League colleges, formally charged with violating federal antitrust laws, agreed to stop setting joint financial-aid policies and sharing information about aid packages. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology denies violating any laws. A group of 23 prestigious institutions, the Overlap Group, have collaborated annually on financial aid.…

  10. Offshore Fairness Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA-6

    2013-04-09

    House - 04/30/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  11. Verify It Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Fincher, Stephen Lee [R-TN-8

    2014-05-29

    House - 07/21/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  12. Competitive Health Insurance Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8

    2013-01-22

    House - 02/28/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  13. Captive Insurers Clarification Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Welch, Peter [D-VT-At Large

    2014-07-31

    House - 09/26/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  14. VALUE Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Kingston, Jack [R-GA-1

    2013-10-24

    House - 01/09/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  15. FINER Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK-2

    2014-12-04

    House - 12/18/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  16. Energy Regulatory Public Protection Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Gerlach, Jim [R-PA-6

    2013-04-12

    House - 04/30/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  17. Sound Regulation Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Brady, Kevin [R-TX-8

    2014-01-14

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  18. Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Womack, Steve [R-AR-3

    2013-02-14

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  19. Foreclosure Fairness Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Lujan Grisham, Michelle [D-NM-1

    2014-03-27

    House - 04/16/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  20. Energy Security and Employment Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5

    2013-08-02

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  1. Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1

    2013-01-29

    House - 02/28/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  2. Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [D-GA-4

    2013-05-07

    House - 06/14/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  3. One In, Two Out Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10

    2013-08-02

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  4. Stop Punishing Innocent Taxpayers Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16

    2014-04-28

    House - 06/09/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  5. Health Savings Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Burgess, Michael C. [R-TX-26

    2014-05-30

    House - 07/21/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  6. Recent Developments at DG Competition: 2016/2017.

    PubMed

    Buehler, Benno; Coublucq, Daniel; Hariton, Cyril; Langus, Gregor; Valletti, Tommaso

    2017-01-01

    The Directorate General for Competition at the European Commission enforces competition law in the areas of antitrust, merger control, and state aids. This year's article provides first a general presentation of the role of the Chief Competition Economist's team and surveys the main achievements of the Directorate General for Competition over 2016/2017. The article then reviews the economic work undertaken in one merger case between Dow/DuPont, which raised specific issues related to innovation, as well as in an antitrust case on parity clauses related to Amazon e-books.

  7. Stop the EPA Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6

    2014-07-09

    House - 09/02/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  8. Unfunded Mandates Accountability Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Yoder, Kevin [R-KS-3

    2014-05-09

    House - 07/21/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  9. Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. DeFazio, Peter A. [D-OR-4

    2013-02-15

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  10. Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Shea-Porter, Carol [D-NH-1

    2014-06-19

    House - 07/21/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  11. National Regulatory Budget Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Scalise, Steve [R-LA-1

    2014-07-24

    House - 09/26/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  12. Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Sen. Enzi, Michael B. [R-WY

    2013-04-16

    House - 06/14/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status Passed SenateHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  13. Infrastructure Jobs and Energy Independence Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Murphy, Tim [R-PA-18

    2013-02-15

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  14. Coastal States Extension Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Sanford, Mark [R-SC-1

    2013-08-02

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  15. IRS Rulemaking Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Michaud, Michael H. [D-ME-2

    2013-09-23

    House - 01/09/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  16. Review Every Dollar Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Chaffetz, Jason [R-UT-3

    2013-05-08

    House - 06/14/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  17. Diploma and Accreditation Integrity Protection Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Bishop, Timothy H. [D-NY-1

    2013-06-04

    House - 07/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  18. Bankruptcy Nondiscrimination Enhancement Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9

    2013-02-13

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  19. Army Corps Accountability Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Richmond, Cedric L. [D-LA-2

    2013-04-19

    House - 04/30/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  20. Home Foreclosure Reduction Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-14

    2013-01-03

    House - 01/25/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  1. Wireless Tax Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-19

    2013-06-11

    House - 07/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  2. Domestic Energy Production Protection Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Shuster, Bill [R-PA-9

    2013-08-01

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  3. Structured Settlement Claimants Rights Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26

    2013-12-11

    House - 01/27/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  4. To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act.

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Scott, Austin [R-GA-8

    2013-01-22

    House - 02/28/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  5. Quality Health Care Coalition Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13

    2014-02-25

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  6. Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Luetkemeyer, Blaine [R-MO-3

    2014-12-04

    House - 12/18/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  7. Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-4

    2013-02-28

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  8. Protect Small Business Jobs Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Bentivolio, Kerry L. [R-MI-11

    2013-02-15

    House - 04/08/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  9. Free Competition in Currency Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Broun, Paul C. [R-GA-10

    2013-01-03

    House - 01/25/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  10. Regulatory Sunset and Review Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Hultgren, Randy [R-IL-14

    2013-01-18

    House - 02/28/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  11. Preventing the EPA from Garnishing Wages Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. McAllister, Vance M. [R-LA-5

    2014-07-31

    House - 09/26/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  12. Puerto Rico Chapter 9 Uniformity Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Pierluisi, Pedro R. [D-PR-At Large

    2014-07-31

    House - 09/26/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  13. Tax and Fee Collection Fairness Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5

    2014-07-29

    House - 09/26/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  14. Social Cost of Carbon Transparency Enhancement Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Hunter, Duncan D. [R-CA-50

    2013-07-31

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  15. 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Tierney, John F. [D-MA-6

    2013-12-11

    House - 01/27/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  16. Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Transparency Enhancement Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Hunter, Duncan D. [R-CA-50

    2013-06-28

    House - 07/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  17. Preserving Our Hometown Independent Pharmacies Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10

    2013-03-14

    House - 04/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  18. Protecting Gun Owners in Bankruptcy Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Collins, Chris [R-NY-27

    2014-01-27

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  19. Student Loan Borrowers' Bill of Rights Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24

    2014-01-15

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  20. National Flood Insurance Program Termination Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Miller, Candice S. [R-MI-10

    2013-03-14

    House - 04/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  1. Multi-State Worker Tax Fairness Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Himes, James A. [D-CT-4

    2014-02-25

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  2. Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Judicial Fairness Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Duffy, Sean P. [R-WI-7

    2013-09-26

    House - 10/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  3. Energy Production and Project Delivery Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Bishop, Rob [R-UT-1

    2013-05-08

    House - 06/14/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  4. Private Student Loan Bankruptcy Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9

    2013-02-06

    House - 02/28/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  5. Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21

    2013-12-12

    House - 01/27/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  6. Preventing Termination of Utility Services in Bankruptcy Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13

    2014-07-17

    House - 09/02/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  7. Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-14

    2013-01-03

    House - 01/25/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  8. Limiting Investor and Homeowner Loss in Foreclosure Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9

    2014-05-07

    House - 07/21/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  9. Taking Hold of Regulations to Increase Vital Employment In Energy Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Murphy, Tim [R-PA-18

    2013-08-02

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  10. Granting the consent of Congress to the Health Care Compact.

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Lankford, James [R-OK-5

    2014-02-11

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  11. End Discriminatory State Taxes for Automobile Renters Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9

    2013-06-27

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  12. To prevent certain discriminatory taxation of natural gas pipeline property.

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Flores, Bill [R-TX-17

    2013-07-31

    House - 09/13/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  13. Protecting Employees and Retirees in Municipal Bankruptcies Act of 2014

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13

    2014-07-17

    House - 09/02/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  14. New Fair Deal Banking and Housing Stability Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Amash, Justin [R-MI-3

    2013-11-20

    House - 01/09/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  15. The cost conundrum: financing the business of health care insurance.

    PubMed

    Kelly, Annemarie

    2013-01-01

    Health care spending in both the governmental and private sectors skyrocketed over the last century. This article examines the rapid growth of health care expenditures by analyzing the extent of this financial boom as well some of the reasons why health care financing has become so expensive. It also explores how the market concentration of insurance companies has led to growing insurer profits, fewer insurance providers, and less market competition. Based on economic data primarily from the Government Accountability Office, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the American Medical Associa tion, it has become clear that this country needs more competitive rates for the business of health insurance. Because of the unique dynamics of health insurance payments and financing, America needs to promote affordability and innovation in the health insurance market and lower the market's high concentration levels. In the face of booming insurance profits, soaring premiums, many believe that in our consolidated health insurance market, the "business of insurance" should not be exempt from antitrust laws. All in all, it is in our nation's best interest that Congress restore the application of antitrust laws to health sector insurers by passing the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act as an amendment to the McCarran-Ferguson Act's "business of insurance" provision.

  16. Protecting Honest, Everyday Americans from Senseless And Needless Taxes (PHEASANT) Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6

    2013-06-13

    House - 07/15/2013 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  17. The NAFTA Effect -- Mexico’s Unfulfilled Dream

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2011-10-28

    and reap the benefits of NAFTA , Mexico will need to become more aggressive in its enforcement of competition and anti-trust laws .30 Having...the courts and rule of law . Mexico’s courts are notoriously unhurried and corrupt. Disastrous to NAFTA aims, few cases end up in court, due to the...any other provision of law , no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a

  18. Sharing, samples, and generics: an antitrust framework.

    PubMed

    Carrier, Michael A

    Rising drug prices are in the news. By increasing price, drug companies have placed vital, even life-saving, medicines out of the reach of consumers. In a recent development, brand firms have prevented generics even from entering the market. The ruse for this strategy involves risk-management programs known as Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies ("REMS"). Pursuant to legislation enacted in 2007, the FDA requires REMS when a drug's risks (such as death or injury) outweigh its rewards. Brands have used this regime, intended to bring drugs to the market, to block generic competition. Regulations such as the federal Hatch-Waxman Act and state substitution laws foster widespread generic competition. But these regimes can only be effectuated through generic entry. And that entry can take place only if a generic can use a brand's sample to show that its product is equivalent. More than 100 generic firms have complained that they have not been able to access needed samples. One study of 40 drugs subject to restricted access programs found that generics' inability to enter cost more than $5 billion a year. Brand firms have contended that antitrust law does not compel them to deal with their competitors and have highlighted concerns related to safety and product liability in justifying their refusals. This Article rebuts these claims. It highlights the importance of samples in the regulatory regime and the FDA's inability to address the issue. It shows how a sharing requirement in this setting is consistent with Supreme Court caselaw. And it demonstrates that the brands' behavior fails the defendant-friendly "no economic sense" test because the conduct literally makes no sense other than by harming generics. Brands' denial of samples offers a textbook case of monopolization. In the universe of pharmaceutical antitrust behavior, other conduct--such as "pay for delay" settlements between brands and generics and "product hopping" from one drug to a slightly modified version--has received the lion's share of attention. But sample denials are overdue for antitrust scrutiny. This Article fills this gap. Given the failure of Congress and the FDA to remedy the issue, antitrust can play a crucial role in ensuring generic access to samples, affirming a linchpin of the pharmaceutical regime.

  19. The Expanding Role of Television in College Football: A Chronology.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1984

    1984-01-01

    A chronology of television in college football is presented from the first televised college football game (a University of Pennsylvania game) to the Supreme Court ruling declaring that the National Collegiate Athletic Association contracts violate antitrust law. (MLW)

  20. Getting the product right: how competition policy can improve health care markets.

    PubMed

    Sage, William M

    2014-06-01

    As hospital, physician, and health insurance markets consolidate and change in response to health care reform, some commentators have called for vigorous enforcement of the federal antitrust laws to prevent the acquisition and exercise of market power. In health care, however, stricter antitrust enforcement will benefit consumers only if it accounts for the competitive distortions caused by the sector's long history of government regulation. This article directs policy makers to a neglected dimension of health care competition that has been altered by regulation: the product. Competition may have failed to significantly lower costs, increase access, or improve quality in health care because we have been buying and selling the wrong things. Competition policy makers-meaning both antitrust enforcers and regulators-should force the health care industry to define and market products that can be assembled and warranted to consumers while keeping emerging sectors such as mHealth free from overregulation, wasteful subsidy, and appropriation by established insurer and provider interests. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  1. Addressing Pricing Power in Integrated Delivery: The Limits of Antitrust.

    PubMed

    Berenson, Robert

    2015-08-01

    Prices are the major driver of why the United States spends so much more on health care than other countries do. The pricing power that hospitals have garnered recently has resulted from consolidated delivery systems and concentrated markets, leading to enhanced negotiating leverage. But consolidation may be the wrong frame for viewing the problem of high and highly variable prices; many "must-have" hospitals achieve their pricing power from sources other than consolidation, for example, reputation. Further, the frame of consolidation leads to unrealistic expectations for what antitrust's role in addressing pricing power should be, especially because in the wake of two periods of merger "manias" and "frenzies" many markets already lack effective competition. It is particularly challenging for antitrust to address extant monopolies lawfully attained. New payment and delivery models being pioneered in Medicare, especially those built around accountable care organizations (ACOs), offer an opportunity to reduce pricing power, but only if they are implemented with a clear eye on the impact on prices in commercial insurance markets. This article proposes approaches that public and private payers should consider to complement the role of antitrust to assure that ACOs will actually help control costs in commercial markets as well as in Medicare and Medicaid. Copyright © 2015 by Duke University Press.

  2. 43 CFR 2203.0-6 - Policy.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... Federal Coal Deposits § 2203.0-6 Policy. When determining whether a fee exchange of the Federal coal... Lands: Interior Regulations Relating to Public Lands (Continued) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT... the exchange will create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the Federal anti-trust laws. The...

  3. 43 CFR 2203.0-6 - Policy.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... Federal Coal Deposits § 2203.0-6 Policy. When determining whether a fee exchange of the Federal coal... Lands: Interior Regulations Relating to Public Lands (Continued) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT... the exchange will create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the Federal anti-trust laws. The...

  4. 43 CFR 2203.0-6 - Policy.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... Federal Coal Deposits § 2203.0-6 Policy. When determining whether a fee exchange of the Federal coal... Lands: Interior Regulations Relating to Public Lands (Continued) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT... the exchange will create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the Federal anti-trust laws. The...

  5. 43 CFR 2203.0-6 - Policy.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... Federal Coal Deposits § 2203.0-6 Policy. When determining whether a fee exchange of the Federal coal... Lands: Interior Regulations Relating to Public Lands (Continued) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT... the exchange will create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the Federal anti-trust laws. The...

  6. Newspaper Failure: An Elusive Concept.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Walden, Ruth

    This study explores the antecedents of the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 (a provision which allowed for limited exemption from federal antitrust laws), including the case of "United States vs. Citizen Publishing Company" and the failing-company doctrine as enunciated in "International Shoe Company vs. Federal Trade…

  7. An economic analysis of unilateral refusals to license intellectual  property

    PubMed Central

    Gilbert, Richard J.; Shapiro, Carl

    1996-01-01

    The intellectual property laws in the United States provide the owners of intellectual property with discretion to license the right to use that property or to make or sell products that embody the intellectual property. However, the antitrust laws constrain the use of property, including intellectual property, by a firm with market power and may place limitations on the licensing of intellectual property. This paper focuses on one aspect of antitrust law, the so-called “essential facilities doctrine,” which may impose a duty upon firms controlling an “essential facility” to make that facility available to their rivals. In the intellectual property context, an obligation to make property available is equivalent to a requirement for compulsory licensing. Compulsory licensing may embrace the requirement that the owner of software permit access to the underlying code so that others can develop compatible application programs. Compulsory licensing may undermine incentives for research and development by reducing the value of an innovation to the inventor. This paper shows that compulsory licensing also may reduce economic efficiency in the short run by facilitating the entry of inefficient producers and by promoting licensing arrangements that result in higher prices. PMID:8917489

  8. 29 CFR 100.603 - Debts that are covered.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... proceedings. (Regulations concerning the collection of these types of debts are found in 29 CFR Part 102, Subparts U and V.); (2) A debt involving criminal actions of fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or... fraud, false claims, misrepresentation, or which violate antitrust laws will be promptly referred to the...

  9. 29 CFR 100.603 - Debts that are covered.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... proceedings. (Regulations concerning the collection of these types of debts are found in 29 CFR Part 102, Subparts U and V.); (2) A debt involving criminal actions of fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or... fraud, false claims, misrepresentation, or which violate antitrust laws will be promptly referred to the...

  10. 14 CFR 255.1 - Purpose.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... REGULATIONS AIRLINE COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS § 255.1 Purpose. (a) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements for the operation of computer reservations systems used by travel agents and certain... operates to exempt any person from the operation of the antitrust laws set forth in subsection (a) of the...

  11. 14 CFR 255.1 - Purpose.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... REGULATIONS AIRLINE COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS § 255.1 Purpose. (a) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements for the operation of computer reservations systems used by travel agents and certain... operates to exempt any person from the operation of the antitrust laws set forth in subsection (a) of the...

  12. 14 CFR 255.1 - Purpose.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... REGULATIONS AIRLINE COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS § 255.1 Purpose. (a) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements for the operation of computer reservations systems used by travel agents and certain... operates to exempt any person from the operation of the antitrust laws set forth in subsection (a) of the...

  13. 14 CFR 255.1 - Purpose.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... REGULATIONS AIRLINE COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS § 255.1 Purpose. (a) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements for the operation of computer reservations systems used by travel agents and certain... operates to exempt any person from the operation of the antitrust laws set forth in subsection (a) of the...

  14. 14 CFR 255.1 - Purpose.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... REGULATIONS AIRLINE COMPUTER RESERVATIONS SYSTEMS § 255.1 Purpose. (a) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements for the operation of computer reservations systems used by travel agents and certain... operates to exempt any person from the operation of the antitrust laws set forth in subsection (a) of the...

  15. The Economics of Comparable Worth.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Killingsworth, Mark R.

    This document concludes that the basic difficulty with comparable worth is that it is an ill-conceived solution to a serious problem and that alternative policies, such as equal employment opportunity legislation or application of antitrust laws, provide means of addressing employment discrimination that are both more effective and less likely to…

  16. A guide to organizing joint ventures with physicians.

    PubMed

    Peters, G R

    1986-12-01

    Catholic health care facilities must consider the business and legal risks, canon law, and other constraints when planning a joint venture with physicians. Participants should first establish goals and compatibility, then determine the venture's type (property, service), form ("true," lease, contract), and structure (corporation, partnership, joint property ownership, trust). The administrator must decide whether the facility will participate directly in the venture or form a separate organization. Participants must determine their relationships with the venture, choosing among many options. The administrator should consider whether a venture raises any canon law issues, especially regarding ecclesiastical and secular assets, approval by the local bishop or Holy See, and need for consultation. Other pertinent legal issues include: Fraud and abuse. The venture should not appear as compensation to induce referrals. Physician referrals. Many states prohibit or restrict referrals by physician participants. Antitrust law. Participants may be liable for actions constituting on antitrust violation. Securities low. Organizers must clarify Securities and Exchange Commission registration exemptions and observe state "blue sky" laws. Tax issues. Catholic health care facilities must consider such factors as tax-exempt status, unrelated business income, taxable subsidiaries, and public charity status. Other considerations include tax ramifications for physicians; tax shelter registration; certificate of need (CON), licensing, and building standards; effects on reimbursement and pension plans; organizational and bond documents; corporate medical practice and fee-splitting questions; and labor and contractual issues.

  17. Antitrust Criminal Penalties Enforcement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension Act

    THOMAS, 111th Congress

    Sen. Kohl, Herb [D-WI

    2009-06-09

    Senate - 06/09/2009 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (All Actions) Notes: For further action, see H.R.2675, which became Public Law 111-30 on 6/19/2009. Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  18. Appeals Court Gives MIT Another Chance to Prove Benefits of Overlap Group.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Jaschik, Scott

    1993-01-01

    A federal appeals court has given the Massachusetts Institute of Technology another chance to prove in court that the Overlap Group, of which MIT was a member, did not violate antitrust laws. The group of 23 colleges set common financial-aid awards for students admitted to more than one institution. (MSE)

  19. A Report to the Nation on the Management of Metric Implementation.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Perica, Lou, Ed.

    The progress toward United States conversion to the metric system is the major focus of this publication. The status of Federal legislation and the influence of anti-trust laws on this legislation are discussed. Metric implementation by industry is surveyed with respect to several industries: automobile, aerospace, tooling, building and…

  20. Antitrust Criminal Penalties Enforcement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension Act of 2010

    THOMAS, 111th Congress

    Sen. Kohl, Herb [D-WI

    2010-04-26

    Senate - 04/26/2010 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (All Actions) Notes: For further action, see H.R.5330, which became Public Law 111-190 on 6/9/2010. Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  1. Coping With Concentration.

    PubMed

    Greaney, Thomas L

    2017-09-01

    Provider market power is a powerful driver of high health care costs in the United States. Despite decades of antitrust litigation and regulatory interventions, the problem has worsened and threatens to undermine the benefits of market-based policies. A critical but neglected challenge for all health care reform proposals relying on market competition to address costs is finding effective tools to address the extant market power of dominant hospitals, hospital systems, and many specialty physician practices. This article analyzes the principal market-oriented approaches that have been used in the past and proposed for the future. It argues that antitrust law has an important but constrained role to play and has proved to be especially inept in dealing with extant market power. It finds serious deficiencies in the conduct decrees imposed by some courts and in open-ended regulatory regimes such as those established by Certificate of Public Advantage laws. Although not without administrative complications, policies that target providers who possess market power by capping prices may be the most effective means to control costs and retain the benefits of a competitive delivery system. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  2. DOD Contractor Collaborations: Proposed Procedures for Integrating Antitrust Law, Procurement Law, and Purchasing Decisions

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2001-04-01

    conducted at the initial stages of program definition. DoD 5000.2-R, supra note 2, at para. 2.3.1. For "commercial activities" conversion studies , market...by the post- facto nature of the Competition Advocacy program. This program generally requires setting of competition goals, measurement of goal...expanded coverage of the False Claims Act and expost review of prices.344 Contracting officers can inject a degree of prospective management oversight of

  3. Incorporating health care quality into health antitrust law

    PubMed Central

    2008-01-01

    Background Antitrust authorities treat price as a proxy for hospital quality since health care quality is difficult to observe. As the ability to measure quality improved, more research became necessary to investigate the relationship between hospital market power and patient outcomes. This paper examines the impact of hospital competition on the quality of care as measured by the risk-adjusted mortality rates with the hospital as the unit of analysis. The study separately examines the effect of competition on non-profit hospitals. Methods We use California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) data from 1997 through 2002. Empirical model is a cross-sectional study of 373 hospitals. Regression analysis is used to estimate the relationship between Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) risk-adjusted mortality rates and hospital competition. Results Regression results show lower risk-adjusted mortality rates in the presence of a more competitive environment. This result holds for all alternative hospital market definitions. Non-profit hospitals do not have better patient outcomes than investor-owned hospitals. However, they tend to provide better quality in less competitive environments. CABG volume did not have a significant effect on patient outcomes. Conclusion Quality should be incorporated into the antitrust analysis. When mergers lead to higher prices and lower quality, thus lower social welfare, the antitrust challenge of hospital mergers is warranted. The impact of lower hospital competition on quality of care delivered by non-profit hospitals is ambiguous. PMID:18430219

  4. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Lyme guidelines: a cautionary tale about the development of clinical practice guidelines

    PubMed Central

    2010-01-01

    Flawed clinical practice guidelines may compromise patient care. Commercial conflicts of interest on panels that write treatment guidelines are particularly problematic, because panelists may have conflicting agendas that influence guideline recommendations. Historically, there has been no legal remedy for conflicts of interest on guidelines panels. However, in May 2008, the Attorney General of Connecticut concluded a ground-breaking antitrust investigation into the development of Lyme disease treatment guidelines by one of the largest medical societies in the United States, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Although the investigation found significant flaws in the IDSA guidelines development process, the subsequent review of the guidelines mandated by the settlement was compromised by a lack of impartiality at various stages of the IDSA review process. This article will examine the interplay between the recent calls for guidelines reform, the ethical canons of medicine, and due process considerations under antitrust laws as they apply to the formulation of the IDSA Lyme disease treatment guidelines. The article will also discuss pitfalls in the implementation of the IDSA antitrust settlement that should be avoided in the future. PMID:20529367

  5. The Suspension of the National Association of Broadcasters' Code and Its Effects on the Regulation of Advertising.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Maddox, Lynda M.; Zanot, Eric J.

    After a federal judge ruled in 1982 that some stipulations of the National Association of Broadcasters' (NAB) Television Code were violating antitrust laws, the NAB responded by suspending all code operations. Effects of the suspension on network advertising included (1) the disappearance of preclearance for commercials about cholesterol-related…

  6. To amend section 3716 of title 31, United States Code, to raise to at least the poverty line the amount of Social Security benefits that are exempt from being offset to satisfy student loan debt.

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. Grayson, Alan [D-FL-9

    2014-01-21

    House - 03/20/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  7. 41 CFR 102-75.280 - What information concerning a proposed disposal must a disposal agency provide to the Attorney...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... concerning a proposed disposal must a disposal agency provide to the Attorney General to determine the... information concerning a proposed disposal must a disposal agency provide to the Attorney General to determine the applicability of antitrust laws? The disposal agency must promptly provide the Attorney General...

  8. Health Care Efficiencies: Consolidation and Alternative Models vs. Health Care and Antitrust Regulation - Irreconcilable Differences?

    PubMed

    King, Michael W

    2017-11-01

    Despite the U.S. substantially outspending peer high income nations with almost 18% of GDP dedicated to health care, on any number of statistical measurements from life expectancy to birth rates to chronic disease, 1 the U.S. achieves inferior health outcomes. In short, Americans receive a very disappointing return on investment on their health care dollars, causing economic and social strain. 2 Accordingly, the debates rage on: what is the top driver of health care spending? Among the culprits: poor communication and coordination among disparate providers, paperwork required by payors and regulations, well-intentioned physicians overprescribing treatments, drugs and devices, outright fraud and abuse, and medical malpractice litigation. Fundamentally, what is the best way to reduce U.S. health care spending, while improving the patient experience of care in terms of quality and satisfaction, and driving better patient health outcomes? Mergers, partnerships, and consolidation in the health care industry, new care delivery models like Accountable Care Organizations and integrated care systems, bundled payments, information technology, innovation through new drugs and new medical devices, or some combination of the foregoing? More importantly, recent ambitious reform efforts fall short of a cohesive approach, leaving fundamental internal inconsistencies across divergent arms of the federal government, raising the issue of whether the U.S. health care system can drive sufficient efficiencies within the current health care and antitrust regulatory environments. While debate rages on Capitol Hill over "repeal and replace," only limited attention has been directed toward reforming the current "fee-for-service" model pursuant to which providers are paid for volume of care rather than quality or outcomes. Indeed, both the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") 3 and proposals for its replacement focus primarily on the reach and cost of providing coverage for health care, rather than specifics for the delivery of health care. 4 With the U.S. expenditures on health care producing inferior results, experts see consolidation and alternatives to fee-for-service as fundamental to reducing costs. 5 Integrating care coordination and delivery and increasing scale to drive efficiencies allows organizations to benefit from shared savings and relationships with payors and vendors. 6 Deloitte forecasts that, by 2024, the current health system landscape-which includes roughly 80 national health systems, 275 regional systems, 130 academic medical centers, and 1,300 small community systems-will morph into just over 900 multi-hospital systems. 7 Even though health care market and payment reforms encourage organizations to consolidate and integrate, innovators must proceed with extreme caution. Health care organizations attempting to drive efficiencies and bring down costs through mergers may run afoul of numerous federal and state laws and regulations. 8 Calls for updates or leniency in these laws are growing, including the possible recognition of an "Obamacare defense" to antitrust restrictions 9 and speculation that laws restricting physicians from having financial relationships will be repealed, ostensibly to allow sharing of the rewards reaped from coordinated care. 10 In the meantime, however, absent specific waivers or exemptions, all the usual rules and regulations apply, including antitrust constraints, 11 physician self-referral 12 and anti-kickback laws and regulations, 13 state fraud and abuse restrictions, 14 and more. In short, a maelstrom of conflicting political prescriptions, health care regulations, and antitrust restrictions undermine the ability of innovators to achieve efficiencies through joint ventures, transactions, innovative models, and other structures. This article first considers the conflicting positions taken by the United States government with respect to achieving efficiencies in health care under the ACA and alternative delivery models, on the one hand, and health care regulatory enforcement and antitrust enforcement, on the other. At almost a fifth of the U.S. economy, 15 health care arguably has grown ungovernable, exceeding the ability of any one law or branch of government to create or implement coherent reform. Indeed, the article posits that although the ACA reformed and expanded access to health care, it failed to transform the way health care is delivered beyond limited "demonstration projects", leaving fee-for-service intact. Nonetheless, even with limited rather than revolutionary goals, the ACA still lacks sufficient authority across disparate branches of government to achieve its stated goals. The article then examines the conflicting positions of the various United States regulatory schemes and enforcement agencies governing health care, and whether they can be reconciled with the stated goal of the government, often referred to as the "Triple Aim": 16 improving quality of care, improving population health, and lowering health care costs. It examines fundamental, systemic challenges to achieving the "Triple Aim": longstanding health care regulatory laws that impede adoption of innovative delivery systems beyond their current "demonstration project" status, and antitrust enforcement that promotes waste and duplication in densely populated areas, while preventing necessary consolidation to more efficiently reach rural areas. The article concludes with recommendations for promoting efficiency through modest reconciliation of the conflicting goals and regulations in health care.

  9. 14 CFR 303.05 - Applications requesting antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Applications requesting antitrust immunity... Applications requesting antitrust immunity. (a) Each application must state explicitly whether or not the applicant seeks antitrust immunity under the provisions of section 414 of the Act. If antitrust immunity is...

  10. 14 CFR 303.05 - Applications requesting antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Applications requesting antitrust immunity... Applications requesting antitrust immunity. (a) Each application must state explicitly whether or not the applicant seeks antitrust immunity under the provisions of section 414 of the Act. If antitrust immunity is...

  11. 14 CFR 303.05 - Applications requesting antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Applications requesting antitrust immunity... Applications requesting antitrust immunity. (a) Each application must state explicitly whether or not the applicant seeks antitrust immunity under the provisions of section 414 of the Act. If antitrust immunity is...

  12. 14 CFR 303.05 - Applications requesting antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Applications requesting antitrust immunity... Applications requesting antitrust immunity. (a) Each application must state explicitly whether or not the applicant seeks antitrust immunity under the provisions of section 414 of the Act. If antitrust immunity is...

  13. 14 CFR 303.05 - Applications requesting antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Applications requesting antitrust immunity... Applications requesting antitrust immunity. (a) Each application must state explicitly whether or not the applicant seeks antitrust immunity under the provisions of section 414 of the Act. If antitrust immunity is...

  14. 26 CFR 1.162-22 - Treble damage payments under the antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... maintain prices of electrical transformers from 1965 to 1970. All defendants entered pleas of nolo... and maintain prices in the electrical transformer market. Thereafter, Z Co. sued X Co. and Y Co. for... transformers. X Co. and Y Co. each paid Z Co. $85,000 in full settlement of Z Co.'s action. Of each $85,000...

  15. 26 CFR 1.162-22 - Treble damage payments under the antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-04-01

    ... maintain prices of electrical transformers from 1965 to 1970. All defendants entered pleas of nolo... and maintain prices in the electrical transformer market. Thereafter, Z Co. sued X Co. and Y Co. for... transformers. X Co. and Y Co. each paid Z Co. $85,000 in full settlement of Z Co.'s action. Of each $85,000...

  16. 26 CFR 1.162-22 - Treble damage payments under the antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-04-01

    ... maintain prices of electrical transformers from 1965 to 1970. All defendants entered pleas of nolo... and maintain prices in the electrical transformer market. Thereafter, Z Co. sued X Co. and Y Co. for... transformers. X Co. and Y Co. each paid Z Co. $85,000 in full settlement of Z Co.'s action. Of each $85,000...

  17. 26 CFR 1.162-22 - Treble damage payments under the antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-04-01

    ... maintain prices of electrical transformers from 1965 to 1970. All defendants entered pleas of nolo... and maintain prices in the electrical transformer market. Thereafter, Z Co. sued X Co. and Y Co. for... transformers. X Co. and Y Co. each paid Z Co. $85,000 in full settlement of Z Co.'s action. Of each $85,000...

  18. 26 CFR 1.162-22 - Treble damage payments under the antitrust laws.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-04-01

    ... maintain prices of electrical transformers from 1965 to 1970. All defendants entered pleas of nolo... and maintain prices in the electrical transformer market. Thereafter, Z Co. sued X Co. and Y Co. for... transformers. X Co. and Y Co. each paid Z Co. $85,000 in full settlement of Z Co.'s action. Of each $85,000...

  19. 38 CFR 2.6 - Secretary's delegations of authority to certain officials (38 U.S.C. 512).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... equipment provided under chapter 39 of title 38, United States Code, or to appoint a designee to perform... based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of the antitrust laws. Such cases will be considered... where the Department of Justice determines that action based upon the alleged fraud, false claim, or...

  20. 48 CFR 303.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 4 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Reporting suspected antitrust violations. 303.303 Section 303.303 Federal Acquisition Regulations System HEALTH AND HUMAN... Antitrust Violations 303.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations. (h) The HCA shall provide a copy of...

  1. 48 CFR 303.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 4 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Reporting suspected antitrust violations. 303.303 Section 303.303 Federal Acquisition Regulations System HEALTH AND HUMAN... Antitrust Violations 303.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations. (h) The HCA shall provide a copy of...

  2. Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the garnishment of non-Federal wages to collect delinquent non-tax debts owed to the United States without first obtaining a court order.

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Rep. McKinley, David B. [R-WV-1

    2014-07-10

    House - 09/02/2014 Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  3. 14 CFR 303.06 - Review of antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Review of antitrust immunity. 303.06... antitrust immunity. The Assistant Secretary may initiate a proceeding to review any antitrust immunity... Assistant Secretary may terminate or modify such immunity if the Assistant Secretary finds after notice and...

  4. 14 CFR 303.06 - Review of antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Review of antitrust immunity. 303.06... antitrust immunity. The Assistant Secretary may initiate a proceeding to review any antitrust immunity... Assistant Secretary may terminate or modify such immunity if the Assistant Secretary finds after notice and...

  5. 14 CFR 303.06 - Review of antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Review of antitrust immunity. 303.06... antitrust immunity. The Assistant Secretary may initiate a proceeding to review any antitrust immunity... Assistant Secretary may terminate or modify such immunity if the Assistant Secretary finds after notice and...

  6. 14 CFR 303.06 - Review of antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Review of antitrust immunity. 303.06... antitrust immunity. The Assistant Secretary may initiate a proceeding to review any antitrust immunity... Assistant Secretary may terminate or modify such immunity if the Assistant Secretary finds after notice and...

  7. 14 CFR 303.06 - Review of antitrust immunity.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Review of antitrust immunity. 303.06... antitrust immunity. The Assistant Secretary may initiate a proceeding to review any antitrust immunity... Assistant Secretary may terminate or modify such immunity if the Assistant Secretary finds after notice and...

  8. Sharing the Knowledge: Government-Private Sector Partnerships to Enhance Information Security

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2000-05-01

    private sector . However, substantial barriers threaten to block information exchanges between the government and private sector . These barriers include concerns over release of sensitive material under Freedom of Information Act requests, antitrust actions, protection of business confidential and other private material, possible liability due to shared information, disclosure of classified information, and burdens entailed with cooperating with law enforcement agencies. There is good cause to believe that the government and private

  9. NRC antitrust licensing actions, 1978--1996

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Mayer, S.J.; Simpson, J.J.

    NUREG-0447, Antitrust Review of Nuclear Power Plants, was published in May 1978 and includes a compilation and discussion of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proceedings and activity involving the NRC`s competitive review program through February 1978, NUREG-0447 is an update of an earlier discussion of the NRC`s antitrust review of nuclear power plants, NR-AIG-001, The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Antitrust Review of Nuclear Power Plants: The Conditioning of Licenses, which reviewed the Commission`s antitrust review function from its inception in December 1970 through April 1976. This report summarizes the support provided to NRC staff in updating the compilation of themore » NRC`s antitrust licensing review activities for commercial nuclear power plants that have occurred since February 1978. 4 refs., 4 tabs.« less

  10. Statement of Roger B. Andewelt, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, before the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, concerning H.R. 557, Intellectual Property Licensing Legislation.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Andewelt, Roger B.

    The recent increased awareness of the importance to our economy of innovation and the development of new technologies has been coupled with the crafting of new legislation to increase the level of intellectual property protection available to innovators. Because one of the key methods of encouraging the efficient use of intellectual property is…

  11. 48 CFR 1203.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Reporting suspected antitrust violations. 1203.303 Section 1203.303 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEPARTMENT OF... suspected antitrust violations shall be coordinated with legal counsel for referral to the Department of...

  12. Innovation and Antitrust: Some Thoughts on Government Patent Policy.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Ewng, Ky P., Jr.

    1978-01-01

    Government patent policy and the effect of antitrust legislation on innovation are discussed along with the efforts of the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department to formulate new government patent policy recommendations. Participation, disclosure, commercialization, and administrative cost are discussed as issues that concern the patent…

  13. 28 CFR 50.6 - Antitrust Division business review procedure.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Antitrust Division business review procedure. 50.6 Section 50.6 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) STATEMENTS OF POLICY § 50.6 Antitrust Division business review procedure. Although the Department of Justice is not...

  14. 10 CFR 1015.103 - Antitrust, fraud, tax, interagency, transportation account audit, acquisition contract, and...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... does not apply to tax debts. (c) Part 1015 does not apply to claims between Federal agencies. Federal... 10 Energy 4 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Antitrust, fraud, tax, interagency, transportation account... General § 1015.103 Antitrust, fraud, tax, interagency, transportation account audit, acquisition contract...

  15. 28 CFR Appendix to Subpart B of... - Redelegation of Authority to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Litigation, Antitrust...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Assistant Attorney General for Litigation, Antitrust Division, To Authorize Production or Disclosure of... Assistant Attorney General for Litigation, Antitrust Division, To Authorize Production or Disclosure of... described in 28 CFR 16.21(a) is hereby redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Litigation...

  16. 45 CFR 30.3 - Antitrust, fraud, exception in the account of an accountable official, and interagency claims...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 45 Public Welfare 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Antitrust, fraud, exception in the account of an accountable official, and interagency claims excluded. 30.3 Section 30.3 Public Welfare DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH... antitrust violations or fraud. (1) The standards in this part relating to compromise, suspension, and...

  17. 31 CFR 900.3 - Antitrust, fraud, and tax and interagency claims excluded.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... apply to tax debts. (c) Parts 900-904 of this chapter do not apply to claims between Federal agencies... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Antitrust, fraud, and tax and...) SCOPE OF STANDARDS § 900.3 Antitrust, fraud, and tax and interagency claims excluded. (a) The standards...

  18. 28 CFR 48.7 - Report of the Assistant Attorney General in Charge of the Antitrust Division.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Report of the Assistant Attorney General... (CONTINUED) NEWSPAPER PRESERVATION ACT § 48.7 Report of the Assistant Attorney General in Charge of the Antitrust Division. (a) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division shall, not later...

  19. Market structure and advertising in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry: some implications for public policy.

    PubMed

    Hornbrook, M C

    1978-02-01

    Distortions in market processes for pharmaceuticals raise the important policy problem of devising measures to improve industry performance. This paper first reviews the basic issues involved in formulating economic policy regarding the pharmaceutical industry. Methods for reducing structural market power and undesirable promotional expenditures are examined, and the impacts of four oft-suggested policy "reforms"--removal of trade names, removal of patents, relaxation of requirements for certification of new drug products, and increased enforcement of antitrust laws--are then analyzed. Finally, problems requiring additional research are identified.

  20. 38 CFR 1.902 - Antitrust, fraud, and tax and interagency claims.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ....900 through 1.953 do not apply to tax debts. (c) Sections 1.900 through 1.953 do not apply to claims... 38 Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Antitrust, fraud, and tax... Collection Effort, and Referral of Civil Claims for Money Or Property § 1.902 Antitrust, fraud, and tax and...

  1. 41 CFR 105-55.003 - Antitrust, fraud, tax, interagency claims, and claims over $100,000 excluded.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ...) This part does not apply to tax debts. (c) This part does not apply to claims between GSA and other... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Antitrust, fraud, tax... § 105-55.003 Antitrust, fraud, tax, interagency claims, and claims over $100,000 excluded. (a) The...

  2. 28 CFR 0.177a - Antitrust civil investigative demands.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... JUSTICE Assigning Responsibility Concerning Applications for Orders Compelling Testimony or Production of..., United States Code, to compel testimony in response to antitrust civil investigative demands for oral...

  3. 15 CFR 1160.24 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... Partnership Initiative § 1160.24 Antitrust considerations. (a) The Department of Commerce will offer no... Strategic Partnership Initiative is to make the private sector aware of this vehicle and, where requested...

  4. Competition policy in patent cases and antitrust.

    PubMed

    Sobel, Gerald

    2003-01-01

    The article that follows examines the competition policy reflected in the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in its patent cases. The court's views on this subject have been manifested most plainly in decisions that have transformed the law concerning infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and claim construction. In both categories, the court narrowed patent scope by reason of its desire to protect competitors. The article argues that the court's premise in prescribing narrower claim scope reflected an incomplete view of competition policy. The court's analysis overlooked the benefits to competition provided by patents, which stimulate inventions and their development. The article traces the development of antitrust jurisprudence and demonstrates how respect for the contribution of patents to competition and skepticism of free-riding has evolved, particularly beginning in the 1970s. The article draws a parallel between the Court's reasoning about competition policy, on the one hand, and the rejected views of Justices Hugo Black and William O. Douglas and abandoned patent-antitrust jurisprudence, on the other. The Federal Circuit's decision in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., 234 F.3d 558 (Fed. Cir. 2000), on the subject of equivalents is considered in the paper. In that decision, the majority adopted a new rule that completely barred infringement under the doctrine of equivalents of any claim limitation where, in prosecution, there had been a narrowing amendment relating to patentability. In the past, prosecution estoppel foreclosing equivalents had been subject to a "flexible bar," which, in some circumstances, allowed for equivalence notwithstanding such an amendment. The article points out that because almost all patents are amended during prosecution, the effect would be to allow widespread copying of patented inventions by trivial modifications of any narrowed claim limitation. The incentive to innovate in the future would be correspondingly diminished and the expectations of past patentees would be correspondingly altered.

  5. 15 CFR 1160.4 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Antitrust considerations. 1160.4 Section 1160.4 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PRODUCTIVITY, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Promotion of...

  6. 15 CFR 1160.4 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Antitrust considerations. 1160.4 Section 1160.4 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PRODUCTIVITY, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Promotion of...

  7. 15 CFR 1160.4 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Antitrust considerations. 1160.4 Section 1160.4 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PRODUCTIVITY, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Promotion of...

  8. 15 CFR 1160.24 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Antitrust considerations. 1160.24 Section 1160.24 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PRODUCTIVITY, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Strategic...

  9. 15 CFR 1160.24 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Antitrust considerations. 1160.24 Section 1160.24 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PRODUCTIVITY, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Strategic...

  10. 15 CFR 1160.24 - Antitrust considerations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Antitrust considerations. 1160.24 Section 1160.24 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PRODUCTIVITY, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Strategic...

  11. Mergers and Anti-trust Issues in Recent CAB Cases

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Andrews, A. M.

    1972-01-01

    The airline industry is surveyed-particularly domestic trunklines-in relation to collective approaches to industry concerns. These actions are classified by the apparent degree of anti-trust issue present. Recent route merger cases are considered from the CAB staff viewpoint.

  12. Institute on oil and gas law and taxation

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Ernst, A.C.

    1979-01-01

    This volume contains discussions, by acknowledged authorities, of important legal and tax problems of the oil and gas industries. The articles were delivered in condensed form as lectures during the Thirtieth Annual Institute on Oil and Gas Law and Taxation held by the Southwest Legal Foundation. The following topics are discussed: crude oil issues; natural gas liquid-selected problems in regulation; recent developments in DOE audits of refiners and marketers; contrasting administrative procedures before the DOE, DOE organization - the limit of regulatory power, current major developments in federal natural gas legislation and regulation; dedication and abandonment - problems under sectionmore » 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act; Natural gas pipelines - their regulation and their current problems, current antitrust developments in oil and gas exploration and production; developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law; recent developments in oil and gas taxation; entity selection - an experience in alchemy - a comparison of corporations, partnerships, and joint ventures; foreign money and US oil and gas - tax considerations; 1978 legislative developments in oil and gas taxation; and recapture of intangibles under section 1254. (DC)« less

  13. 48 CFR 803.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 5 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Reporting suspected antitrust violations. 803.303 Section 803.303 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS GENERAL IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Reports of Suspected...

  14. 48 CFR 803.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Reporting suspected antitrust violations. 803.303 Section 803.303 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS GENERAL IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Reports of Suspected...

  15. 48 CFR 245.7308 - Antitrust notification.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... calendar or fiscal year); (10) Estimated net worth of proposed purchaser; and (11) Intended use of property... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Antitrust notification. 245.7308 Section 245.7308 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEFENSE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS...

  16. 77 FR 9965 - Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-21

    ...: 1. Antitrust Division, ``Antitrust Information Management Information System (AMIS)--Monthly Report...) 307-0693. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holley B. O'Brien, Director, Debt Collection Management... management inspections conducted under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. (o) Information from this...

  17. Antitrust enforcement in the medical services industry: what does it all mean?

    PubMed

    Havighurst, C C

    1980-01-01

    Before 1975, federal antitrust authorities neglected the health care sector, thereby allowing the entrenchment of many anticompetitive practices and institutions that seemed not only "natural," but also beneficial to the quality and professionalism of doctor-patient relations. While antitrust enforcement shares the usual physician preference for free enterprise, prosecutorial discretion is often feared as eroding professional discretion and even well-intentioned reform. However, strengthened competition in the health services industry offers a way to bring some stability to health policy, and to resolve some of the conflicts between advocates of institutional status quo and enthusiasts for increased government regulatory power.

  18. 48 CFR 245.7310-8 - Antitrust clearance.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ..., DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT PROPERTY Sale of Surplus Contractor Inventory 245.7310-8... following in the invitation: Antitrust When the property offered for sale has an acquisition cost of $3 million or more, or consists of patents, processes, techniques, or inventions, irrespective of cost, the...

  19. 75 FR 80456 - Export Trade Certificate of Review

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-22

    ... . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001-21... government antitrust actions and from private treble damage antitrust actions for the export conduct... of technology rights. 2. ARC seeks certification to exchange information with individual Suppliers on...

  20. Private financing and operation of a space station: Investment requirements, risk, government support and other primary business management considerations

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Simon, M.

    1982-01-01

    Private investment in a manned space station is considered as an alternative to complete government sponsorship of such a program. The implications of manned space operations are discussed from a business perspective. The most significant problems and risks which would be faced by a private company involved in a space station enterprise are outlined and possible government roles in helping to overcome these difficulties suggested. Economic factors such as inflation and the rate of interest are of primary concern, but less obvious conditions such as antitrust and appropriate regulatory laws, government appropriations for space activities, and national security are also considered.

  1. 48 CFR 3.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... turn in sequence as low bidder, or so that certain competitors bid low only on some sizes of contracts and high on other sizes; (5) Division of the market, so that certain competitors bid low only for..., Attention: Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, and shall include— (1) A brief statement...

  2. 77 FR 40085 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Gap...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-07-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Gap Association Notice is hereby given that, on June 6, 2012, pursuant to...'' educational programs. Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2012...

  3. 49 CFR 1331.5 - Additional standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. 1331.5 Section 1331.5 Transportation Other Regulations... standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. (a) Rate bureaus must... of immunity for that activity. (b) The bureaus are required to maintain detailed minutes of all...

  4. 49 CFR 1331.5 - Additional standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. 1331.5 Section 1331.5 Transportation Other Regulations... standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. (a) Rate bureaus must... of immunity for that activity. (b) The bureaus are required to maintain detailed minutes of all...

  5. 49 CFR 1331.5 - Additional standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. 1331.5 Section 1331.5 Transportation Other Regulations... standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. (a) Rate bureaus must... of immunity for that activity. (b) The bureaus are required to maintain detailed minutes of all...

  6. 49 CFR 1331.5 - Additional standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. 1331.5 Section 1331.5 Transportation Other Regulations... standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. (a) Rate bureaus must... of immunity for that activity. (b) The bureaus are required to maintain detailed minutes of all...

  7. 49 CFR 1331.5 - Additional standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. 1331.5 Section 1331.5 Transportation Other Regulations... standards for retaining antitrust immunity by passenger bus industry rate bureaus. (a) Rate bureaus must... of immunity for that activity. (b) The bureaus are required to maintain detailed minutes of all...

  8. 77 FR 10560 - United States v. International Paper Company et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-22

    ..., Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20530... Packaging Group, which produces containerboard and corrugated products, accounting for $8.4 billion. 10... linerboards in a wavy, fluted pattern. Linerboard is made from virgin wood fiber, recycled fiber (usually...

  9. 45 CFR 30.3 - Antitrust, fraud, exception in the account of an accountable official, and interagency claims...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... accountable official, and interagency claims excluded. 30.3 Section 30.3 Public Welfare DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CLAIMS COLLECTION General Provisions § 30.3 Antitrust, fraud, exception in the account of an accountable official, and interagency claims excluded. (a) Claims involving...

  10. An Antitrust Primer: How To Avoid Bid Rigging and Other Collusions.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Connolly, Robert E.

    1997-01-01

    Shows school business officials how to detect and avoid bid rigging, price fixing, and other types of unlawful collusion prohibited by the Sherman Antitrust Act. School administrators should expand the list of bidders, consolidate purchases as a defensive tactic, consider reletting the contract in tie-bid situations, recognize the elements of…

  11. 75 FR 6709 - United States, et al. v. Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. and Live Nation Inc.; Proposed Final...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-02-10

    ... software to Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc., to divest Paciolan, Inc. to Comcast-Spectacor, L.P. or... Justice, Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 1010, Washington, DC... Justice, Hoover Office Building- Second Floor, 1305 East Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50319; State of...

  12. 28 CFR 49.1 - Purpose.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 49.1 Section 49.1 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS ACT § 49.1 Purpose. The regulations in... the Antitrust Civil Process Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1313(c)). The terms used in this part shall be...

  13. Assembled Products: The Key to More Effective Competition And Antitrust Oversight in Health Care.

    PubMed

    Sage, William M

    2016-01-01

    This Article argues that recent calls for antitrust enforcement to protect health insurers from hospital and physician consolidation are incomplete. The principal obstacle to effective competition in health care is not that one or the other party has too much bargaining power, but that they have been buying and selling the wrong things. Vigorous antitrust enforcement will benefit health care consumers only if it accounts for the competitive distortions caused by the sector's long history of government regulation. Because of regulation, what pass for products in health care are typically small process steps and isolated components that can be assigned a billing code, even if they do little to help patients. Instead of further entrenching weakly competitive parties engaged in artificial commerce, antitrust enforcers and regulators should work together to promote the sale of fully assembled products and services that can be warranted to consumers for performance and safety. As better products emerge through innovation and market entry, competition may finally succeed at lowering medical costs, increasing access to treatment, and improving quality of care.

  14. Physician Practice Consolidation Driven By Small Acquisitions, So Antitrust Agencies Have Few Tools To Intervene.

    PubMed

    Capps, Cory; Dranove, David; Ody, Christopher

    2017-09-01

    The growing concentration of physician markets throughout the United States has been raising antitrust concerns, yet the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have challenged only a small number of mergers and acquisitions in this field. Using proprietary claims data from states collectively containing more than 12 percent of the US population, we found that 22 percent of physician markets were highly concentrated in 2013, according to federal merger guidelines. Most of the increases in physician practice size and market concentration resulted from numerous small transactions, rather than a few large transactions. Among highly concentrated markets that had increases large enough to raise antitrust concerns, only 28 percent experienced any individual acquisition that would have been presumed to be anticompetitive under federal merger guidelines. Furthermore, most acquisitions were below the dollar thresholds that would have required the parties to report the transaction to antitrust authorities. Under present mechanisms, federal authorities have only limited ability to counteract consolidation in most US physician markets. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  15. 76 FR 23839 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Opensaf Foundation

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-04-28

    ... U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research... to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et... notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust...

  16. 75 FR 3468 - Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds For Section 7A of the Clayton Act

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-01-21

    ... revised thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 required by the 2000... Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94-435, 90 Stat. 1390 (``the Act... product, in accordance with Section 8(a)(5). The new thresholds, which take effect 30 days after...

  17. 75 FR 5132 - United States v. Cameron International Corp., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-02-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Cameron International Corp., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Stipulation and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed...

  18. 76 FR 81528 - United States v. Exelon Corporation, et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-28

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Exelon Corporation, et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h) that a proposed Final Judgment, Stipulation and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the...

  19. 78 FR 32443 - United States, et al. v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-05-30

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States, et al. v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order and Competitive Impact...

  20. 78 FR 79485 - United States v. Gannett Co., Inc., Belo Corp., and Sander Media LLC; Proposed Final Judgment and...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-30

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Gannett Co., Inc., Belo Corp., and Sander Media LLC; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Stipulation, and Competitive Impact Statement...

  1. Increasing the marketability and recognition of provider network joint ventures.

    PubMed

    Sjobeck, S J

    1998-08-01

    Physicians have been developing provider network joint ventures to market their services jointly to managed care plans, employers, and other purchasers. Over the past few years, external market factors have produced a growing impact on these joint ventures. These external market factors include the Federal government's revised antitrust guidelines, National Committee for Quality Assurance activities, and state and Federal consumer protection laws. Simply responding to these forces may not increase a provider network's marketability unless the network can demonstrate its value in the terms and measurements accepted by the consumer, managed care plans, and provider networks. By doing so, a provider network can not only increase its marketability, but also increase its recognition in the market, improve its competitive advantage, and enhance its return on investment.

  2. Marshfield Clinic, physician networks, and the exercise of monopoly power.

    PubMed Central

    Greenberg, W

    1998-01-01

    OBJECTIVE: Antitrust enforcement can improve the performance of large, vertically integrated physician-hospital organizations (PHOs). Objective: To examine the recent court decisions in the Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic antitrust case to understand better the benefits and costs of vertical integration in healthcare. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: Vertical integration in the Marshfield Clinic may have had the benefits of reducing transactions and uncertainty costs while improving the coordination between ambulatory and inpatient visits, but at the cost of Marshfield Clinic's monopolizing of physician services and foreclosing of HMO entry in northwest Wisconsin. The denial of hospital staff privileges to non-Marshfield Clinic physicians combined with certificate-of-need regulations impeded physician entry and solidified Marshfield Clinic's monopoly position. Enforcement efforts of recent antitrust guidelines by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission will need to address carefully the benefits and costs of vertically integrated systems. PMID:9865229

  3. Beyond Antitrust: Health Care And Health Insurance Market Trends And The Future Of Competition.

    PubMed

    Glied, Sherry A; Altman, Stuart H

    2017-09-01

    The United States relies on competition to balance costs and quality in the health care system. But concentration is increasing throughout the hospital, physician, and insurer markets. Midsize community hospitals face declining demand and growing competition from both larger hospitals and smaller freestanding diagnostic and surgical centers, leaving the midsize hospitals vulnerable to closure or merger with other facilities. Competition among insurers has been limited by the development of hospital systems that extend the bargaining power of "must-have" hospitals (those perceived to provide the best care for complex and less common conditions) across local health care markets. Government antitrust enforcement could play an important role in maintaining competition in both the hospital and insurer markets, but in many markets, the impact of that enforcement has been limited to date. Policy makers should consider supplementing antitrust activities with strategies that combine competition and regulation-for example, by regulating selected prices and structuring competition to cover entire insurance markets. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  4. Beware: hospital control or ownership of medical groups.

    PubMed

    Hepps, S A

    1995-01-01

    The rapidly changing, unsettled economic and political health care environment is cause for great anxieties for physicians and hospitals alike. Most physicians have joined IPAs or medical groups in order to obtain continued access to patients who are rapidly shifting from indemnity to cost saving HMOs and PPOs. Many hospitals are seeking to increase their primary care provider base by obtaining control of physicians which may increase their opportunity for institutional success. In many cases, hospitals are providing substantial subsidies or buying physician practices, sometimes in apparent violation of anti-trust law. Physicians ostensibly receive good management advice and infrastructure support from hospital business officers or hospital controlled MSOs. However, when the hospital controls individual physicians or medical groups, there is an inherent conflict of interest because of very different strategic needs. It is not in the physicians' best interests to succumb to the siren songs which hospitals are playing. Providing the highest level of care possible for patients requires that physicians maintain professional independence and autonomy now and in the foreseeable future. Equitable negotiation and collaboration between medical groups and hospitals can only be obtained when there is a lawful and level playing field.

  5. Horses or unicorns: can paying for performance make quality competition routine?

    PubMed

    Sage, William M; Kalyan, Dev N

    2006-06-01

    The competitive benefits of pay-for-performance (P4P) financial incentives are widely assumed. These incentives can affect health care through several mechanisms, however, not all of which involve competition. This insight has three implications. First, federal antitrust enforcement should continue to scrutinize P4P arrangements. Second, government needs to play a larger role in P4P than through antitrust oversight. Third, widespread enthusiasm for a particular health policy reform does not relieve policy makers of the obligation to understand its theoretical basis.

  6. Competition policy in health care markets: navigating the enforcement and policy maze.

    PubMed

    Gaynor, Martin

    2014-06-01

    US health care is in ferment. Private entities are merging, aligning, and coordinating in a wide array of configurations. At the same time, there is a great deal of policy change. This includes the federal government's Affordable Care Act, as well as actions by Medicare, state legislatures, and state agencies. The health system is built upon markets, which determine how (and how well) goods and services are delivered to consumers, so it is critical that these markets work as well as possible. As the primary federal antitrust enforcement agencies, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice are charged with ensuring that health care markets operate well, but they are not alone. The functioning of health care markets is also profoundly affected by other parts of the federal government (notably the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and by state legislation and regulation. In this current period of such dynamic change, it is particularly important for the antitrust agencies to continue and enhance their communication and coordination with other government agencies as well as to maintain vigilant antitrust enforcement and consumer protection in health care markets. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  7. Oil company mergers raise concern among some geoscientists

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Showstack, Randy

    With the blessings of the antitrust regulatory agencies and the ghost of John D. Rockefeller, the proposed marriage between Exxon and Mobil would create the world's largest energy company and corporation of any type. This merger also would reunite the two biggest pieces of Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company, which the U.S. Supreme Court ordered dismantled in 1911 in an antitrust case.Exxon, Mobil, and financial analysts say the merger is driven by the need to operate more efficiently in a tough, competitive environment. The price of oil, after all, recently has been scraping near bottom of the barrel at about $11 per barrel, and companies often need to muster significant capital resources to develop more remote reservoirs.

  8. Private credentialing of health care personnel: an antitrust perspective. Part Two.

    PubMed

    Havighurst, C C; King, N M

    1983-01-01

    Having argued in Part One against extensive judicial or regulatory interference with private personnel credentialing in the health care field, this Article now shifts its focus to emphasize the anticompetitive hazards inherent in credentialing as practiced by professional interests. Competitor-sponsored credentialing is shown to be a vital part of a larger cartel strategy to curb competition by standardizing personnel and services and controlling the flow of information to health care consumers. Instead of altering the conclusions reached in Part One, however, Part Two sets forth a new and hitherto unexplored agenda for antitrust enforcement, one that the authors believe will increase the quantity and quality of information available to consumers and offer a fairer competitive environment to individuals and groups disadvantaged by the denial of desirable credentials. The specific targets singled out for antitrust scrutiny are (1) the practice of "grandfathering," by which new candidates for credentials are required to meet tougher requirements than were met by existing credential holders; (2) agreements to standardize educational programs if they go beyond setting and applying accrediting standards and impair the freedom of institutions to decide independently whether to offer unaccredited training; (3) agreements by which independent certifying or accrediting bodies limit the nature or scope of competition among themselves; and (4) mergers and joint ventures in credentialing and accrediting. The legal theory supporting antitrust attacks in the latter two categories is strengthened by the apparently original insight that commercial information and opinion are themselves articles of commerce such that agreements and combinations restricting their nature and output can be characterized as restraints of trade. Among the many self-regulatory institutions in the health care field whose operation or sponsorship is called into question by the analysis herein are the leading medical specialty boards, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, various accrediting and certifying bodies in the allied health occupations, and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals.

  9. Bib Pharma Monopoly: Why Consumers Keep Landing on "Park Place" and How the Game is Rigged.

    PubMed

    Levy, Mark S

    Now, more than ever before, pharmacologists are contributing medical advances to confront ravaging disease. They are developing drugs to mitigate the effects of Alzheimer’s, HIV, multiple sclerosis, and various forms of cancer. To capitalize on the opportunity, brand-name pharmaceutical firms are patenting these drugs, consequently guarding formulas and, with it, profits. Patents grant brand-name firms market exclusivity, which essentially allows them to set their own prices. Even though brand-name firms are investing some of their capital to cultivate new drugs, they also are enjoying gigantic revenue streams, absurd profit margins, and seemingly unfettered control of their respective markets. Consequently, sick patients are unable to afford their medication; high prices are bankrupting consumers in the absence of reasonably-priced generic alternatives. Despite the fact that generic drugs contain identical ingredients, cure the same symptoms, and cost 70% less, brand-name drugs persistently dominate their generic counterparts. Indeed, brand-name firms are improperly preventing generic market entry. Without generic competition, no watchdog exists to curb big pharma’s prohibitive prices. Despite the Supreme Court’s fleeting fix in FTC v. Actavis, which condemned reverse payment settlements that precluded competition, brand-name firms are employing other tactics predatorily to extend their market exclusivity and charge consumers unaffordable prices. To prevent brand-name abuse and help infirm patients afford their medication, this Comment proposes that courts apply federal antitrust law to brand-name firms that attempt to monopolize a pharmaceutical market through anticompetitive means, particularly by abusing Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategies (REMS) and by "product hopping." To combat exclusionary conduct, courts should mirror the “rule of reason” framework set forth in Actavis and apply an "enhanced" version specifically tailored to the pharmaceutical industry, giving stronger credence to generic challengers. In addition to finding brand-name tactics exclusionary, this Comment also proposes that courts adopt a bright-line rule prohibiting brand-name firms from exploiting the "legitimate business" defense to immunize their destructive conduct. The current framework perpetuates abuse and grants brand-name firms ostensibly indefinite monopolies. Analyzing brand-name defensive tactics under federal antitrust law would facilitate generic market entry and consequently moderate drug prices. Even after sacrificing their entire financial portfolios, patients are still unable to afford their medication. This Comment interprets Actavis as prohibiting the “legitimate business” defense and provides a remedy to deserving consumers by preventing REMS abuse and product hopping, fostering generic competition, and tempering excessive drug prices.

  10. Legally speaking: Federal Trade Commission issues positive advisory opinions on antitrust implications of clinical integration.

    PubMed

    Wright, Robert

    2009-10-01

    From time to time, groups of physicians in an area may determine that they would benefit from "integrating" their practices into an IPA, PHO, or other joint venture. The anticipated benefits may include economies of scale, the ability to coordinate care between primary care physicians and specialists, providing disease management services for patients with certain conditions, or a myriad of other reasons. A key characteristic of these proposed integrated models is the ability for the group as a whole to negotiate with insurance companies and self-funded health care plans. When a group reaches the point of negotiating collectively for the fees that a pay- or is going to pay for various services throughout the plan, possible antitrust implications arise.

  11. Antitrust principles for radiologists.

    PubMed

    Reuter, S R

    1990-12-01

    As the practice of medicine becomes more competitive, the states' attorneys general, the Federal Trade Commission, the Justice Department, and individual competitors progressively will use the Sherman Antitrust Act to ensure a competitive market for the delivery of health care services. Therefore, radiologists must have an understanding of the purposes of the Sherman Act and an understanding of types of anticompetitive activities that will trigger civil and criminal penalties. Specifically, radiologists must avoid blatant violations, such as price fixing, division of markets, and group boycotts, any of which may elicit the interest of the Justice Department. Further, radiologists need to consult knowledgable legal counsel when carrying out peer review activities and when entering into exclusive contracts with hospitals, particularly hospitals that have significant market power.

  12. 48 CFR 3.301 - General.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Reports of Suspected Antitrust Violations 3.301 General. (a..., and sharing of the business. (b) Contracting personnel are an important potential source of...

  13. 75 FR 70031 - Antitrust Division

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-11-16

    ...) operate a branding program based upon distinctive trademarks to create high customer awareness of, demand... or subcontract a branding program; (vii) create printed and/or electronic materials for distribution...

  14. 15 CFR 970.207 - Antitrust information.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SERVICE DEEP SEABED MINING REGULATIONS FOR EXPLORATION LICENSES Applications Contents § 970... license, provided that said agreement relates to deep seabed hard mineral resource exploration or mining...

  15. 15 CFR 970.207 - Antitrust information.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SERVICE DEEP SEABED MINING REGULATIONS FOR EXPLORATION LICENSES Applications Contents § 970... license, provided that said agreement relates to deep seabed hard mineral resource exploration or mining...

  16. 15 CFR 970.207 - Antitrust information.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SERVICE DEEP SEABED MINING REGULATIONS FOR EXPLORATION LICENSES Applications Contents § 970... license, provided that said agreement relates to deep seabed hard mineral resource exploration or mining...

  17. 15 CFR 970.207 - Antitrust information.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SERVICE DEEP SEABED MINING REGULATIONS FOR EXPLORATION LICENSES Applications Contents § 970... license, provided that said agreement relates to deep seabed hard mineral resource exploration or mining...

  18. 15 CFR 970.207 - Antitrust information.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SERVICE DEEP SEABED MINING REGULATIONS FOR EXPLORATION LICENSES Applications Contents § 970... license, provided that said agreement relates to deep seabed hard mineral resource exploration or mining...

  19. 48 CFR 1403.303 - Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... INTERIOR GENERAL IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Reports of Suspected... also be sent to the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Investigations. (b) Depending on the nature...

  20. 28 CFR 16.88 - Exemption of Antitrust Division Systems-limited access.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... information, and statutorily confidential information such as grand jury information must be protected from... party privacy information, and statutorily confidential information such as grand jury information must...

  1. 15 CFR 971.207 - Antitrust information.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SERVICE DEEP SEABED MINING REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL RECOVERY PERMITS Applications Contents... share it has with respect to the mining or marketing of the metals proposed to be recovered under the...

  2. Graduate Medical Education Specialty Mix and Geographic Residency Program Maldistribution: Is There a Role for the ACGME?

    PubMed

    Nasca, Thomas J; Carlson, Douglas

    2016-03-01

    As we've stated, GME is the final common pathway toward clinical medical practice in the US. It makes sense, then, that national physician workforce policy aimed at meeting future public health demands should be directed at this phase of medical education. It would also make sense that ACGME, as the single accreditor of all residency programs in the US, should be engaged in physician workforce policymaking on behalf of the public. We identified three issues that must be addressed in order for the ACGME to assume this role: First, there must be a national agreed-upon and long-term plan for the design and implementation of the health care delivery system. Second, there must be a nationally coordinated strategy for identifying long-term physician workforce needs and funding mechanisms to physician and other health care professional developments. Third, in order to execute these roles, the ACGME must receive support from the profession and national and state-level statutory protection from enforcement of state and federal antitrust law.

  3. Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2012

    THOMAS, 112th Congress

    Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-14

    2012-05-18

    House - 06/05/2012 Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  4. Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN

    2013-02-04

    Senate - 07/23/2013 Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights. Hearings held. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  5. Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009

    THOMAS, 111th Congress

    Sen. Kohl, Herb [D-WI

    2009-01-06

    Senate - 06/01/2009 Cloture motion on the motion to proceed withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  6. Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2011

    THOMAS, 112th Congress

    Sen. Kohl, Herb [D-WI

    2011-01-25

    Senate - 07/18/2011 By Senator Leahy from Committee on the Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 112-38. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  7. Anti-Trust Freedom Act of 2013

    THOMAS, 113th Congress

    Sen. Paul, Rand [R-KY

    2013-05-21

    Senate - 05/22/2013 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 77. (All Actions) Tracker: This bill has the status IntroducedHere are the steps for Status of Legislation:

  8. 16 CFR 802.80 - Transitional rule for transactions investigated by the agencies.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ..., REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976... compulsory process from all parties that would be required to submit a Notification and Report Form for...

  9. 16 CFR 802.60 - Acquisitions by securities underwriters.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 EXEMPTION RULES § 802.60... underwriter, in the ordinary course of business, and in the process of underwriting, shall be exempt from the...

  10. 77 FR 26044 - Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-02

    ...-to-pay'' settlement based on financial analyses conducted by the Department's Antitrust Corporate Finance Unit. Senser Metal and Mr. Senser's Estate (represented by Kenneth Senser as the Executor the...

  11. 77 FR 39899 - Technical Corrections

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-07-06

    ..., Nuclear material, Oil and gas exploration--well logging, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements... recordkeeping requirements, Source material, Uranium. 10 CFR Part 50 Antitrust, Classified information, Criminal... measures, Special nuclear material, Uranium enrichment by gaseous diffusion. 10 CFR Part 81 Administrative...

  12. 78 FR 73884 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; National...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-09

    ..., Blackhawk Management, Houston, TX; Blue Juice, Inc., San Rafael, CA; Engineering and Management Executives... FR 52787). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2013-29272...

  13. 76 FR 24523 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ODVA, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-02

    ... under specified circumstances. Specifically, TMG Technologie and Engineering GmbH, Karlsruhe, GERMANY... 79024). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2011-10466 Filed...

  14. Legal and economic aspects of competitive market behavior.

    DOT National Transportation Integrated Search

    1988-01-01

    This report represents the first phase of an effort in support of the Virginia Department of Transportation's recently created Antitrust Monitoring and Detection Unit within the Construction Division. It provides background on the economic and legal ...

  15. Disentangling Regulatory Policy: The Effects of State Regulations on Trucking Rates

    DOT National Transportation Integrated Search

    1995-11-01

    Study attempts to estimate the independent effect on transportation prices from different types of economic regulations: rate regulations, entry restrictions and the providion of antitrust immunity for decisions made jointly by competitors. The study...

  16. An economic assessment of patent settlements in the pharmaceutical industry.

    PubMed

    Dickey, Bret; Orszag, Jonathan; Tyson, Laura

    2010-01-01

    This article demonstrates that in recent years, patent settlements between branded and generic manufacturers involving "reverse payments" from branded manufacturers to generic manufacturers have received close antitrust scrutiny, driven by concerns that such settlements harm consumers by delaying the entry of lower-priced generic drugs. The authors note that such settlements will be a focus of the Obama Administration's antitrust enforcement policy, yet there is a growing consensus among the courts that such settlements are anticompetitive only under narrow sets of circumstances. In this article, the authors present an analytical framework for evaluating the competitive effects of patent settlements, including those involving reverse payments, and demonstrate that these settlements can benefit consumers. Thus, the authors conclude that while continued scrutiny of such settlements is important, broad brush treatments are inappropriate and only a more individualized evaluation can correctly determine the competitive effects of a particular settlement agreement.

  17. Attorney General forces Infectious Diseases Society of America to redo Lyme guidelines due to flawed development process.

    PubMed

    Johnson, L; Stricker, R B

    2009-05-01

    Lyme disease is one of the most controversial illnesses in the history of medicine. In 2006 the Connecticut Attorney General launched an antitrust investigation into the Lyme guidelines development process of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). In a recent settlement with IDSA, the Attorney General noted important commercial conflicts of interest and suppression of scientific evidence that had tainted the guidelines process. This paper explores two broad ethical themes that influenced the IDSA investigation. The first is the growing problem of conflicts of interest among guidelines developers, and the second is the increasing centralisation of medical decisions by insurance companies, which use treatment guidelines as a means of controlling the practices of individual doctors and denying treatment for patients. The implications of the first-ever antitrust investigation of medical guidelines and the proposed model to remediate the tainted IDSA guidelines process are also discussed.

  18. DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Kaufman, B.I.

    A power with inordinate wealth and influence, the oil industry has been seen as a sovereign entity, capable of dictating the terms and conditions under which oil is produced and sold throughout the world. The book examines the American government's attempt to curtail this international power in an antitrust suit which the Department of Justice brought in 1953 against the United States' five major oil corporations: Esso, Gulf, Mobil, Socal, and Texaco. While focusing on the cartel case, Burton Kaufman also tries to place it in the broader framework of foreign antitrust development in the Cold War era. His thesis:more » American concepts of national interest and national security, for the most part, destroyed the value of the cartel case as a curb on Mideastern oil monopolies. In support of his argument, Kaufman includes lengthy appendixes containing major documents relating to the cartel case, among them previously unpublished Justice Department records.« less

  19. 76 FR 34252 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Portland Cement...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-06-13

    ...; Argos USA Corporation, Houston, TX; Penta Engineering Corporation, St. Louis, MO; and Schreiber Yonley... March 7, 2011 (76 FR 12370). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR...

  20. 78 FR 52787 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-08-26

    ...; Serco, Inc., Reston, VA; Simulations, LLC, Simsbury, CT; SURVICE Engineering Company, LLC, Belcamp, MD... 54611). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2013-20687 Filed...

  1. 77 FR 9266 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Pistoia Alliance...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-16

    ... filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to... LLC, San Diego, CA; Unilever (UK) Central Resources Limited, London, United Kingdom; Ian Harrow...

  2. 28 CFR 0.1 - Organizational units.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Legal Policy. Office of Public Affairs. Office of the Pardon Attorney. Office of Special Counsel for.... INTERPOL—United States National Central Bureau. Office of International Programs. Office of Community.... Professional Responsibility Advisory Office. Divisions Antitrust Division. Civil Division. Civil Rights...

  3. 48 CFR 3403.301 - General.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 7 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false General. 3403.301 Section 3403.301 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ACQUISITION REGULATION GENERAL IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Reports of Suspected Antitrust Violations...

  4. 78 FR 4439 - United States

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-01-22

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Oklahoma State Chiropractic Independent... Chiropractic Independent Physicians Association and Larry M. Bridges, Civil Case No. 13-CV-21- TCK-TLW. On... prices or terms for chiropractic services. Copies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, and...

  5. 78 FR 17431 - Antitrust Division

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-21

    ... Production Act of 1993--Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed... in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc...

  6. 77 FR 73676 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; National...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-12-11

    ..., Morgan Hill, CA; and Waltonen Engineering, Inc., Warren, MI, have been added as parties to this venture... September 5, 2012 (77 FR 54611). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR...

  7. 48 CFR 1203.301 - General.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false General. 1203.301 Section 1203.301 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL IMPROPER BUSINESS... violations, except reports of suspected antitrust violations shall be coordinated with legal counsel for...

  8. 75 FR 80536 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-22

    .... Specifically, Franklin Engineering Group, Inc., Franklin, TN; RDM Engineering, LLC, East Brunswick, NJ; Rocky..., Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2010-32052 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am] BILLING...

  9. 77 FR 43615 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Sematech, Inc. D...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-07-25

    ..., have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. (``ASE... on April 13, 2012 (77 FR 22347). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division...

  10. 77 FR 26583 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-04

    ... are: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Fairfax, VA; BP Products North America Inc... of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2012-10803 Filed 5-3-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P ...

  11. 77 FR 36292 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Border Security...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-06-18

    ... research, development, engineering and production of border security-related systems; and (iii) to insert.... Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2012-14766 Filed 6-15-12; 8...

  12. 75 FR 11842 - Export Trade Certificate of Review

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-12

    ... the Certificate from state and federal government antitrust actions and from private treble damage... Company Affairs (``ETCA''), International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, has received an... issued. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Flynn, Director, Office of Competition and Economic...

  13. 75 FR 25206 - Export Trade Certificate of Review

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-07

    ... the Certificate from state and federal government antitrust actions and from private treble damage... Company Affairs (``ETCA''), International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, has received an... issued. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Flynn, Director, Office of Competition and Economic...

  14. 48 CFR 9.604 - Limitations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS Contractor Team Arrangements 9.604 Limitations. Nothing in this subpart authorizes contractor team arrangements in violation of antitrust statutes or limits the Government's rights to— (a... team arrangement, the responsibility of the prime contractor (see subpart 9.1); (c) Provide to the...

  15. 48 CFR 9.604 - Limitations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS Contractor Team Arrangements 9.604 Limitations. Nothing in this subpart authorizes contractor team arrangements in violation of antitrust statutes or limits the Government's rights to— (a... team arrangement, the responsibility of the prime contractor (see subpart 9.1); (c) Provide to the...

  16. 48 CFR 9.604 - Limitations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS Contractor Team Arrangements 9.604 Limitations. Nothing in this subpart authorizes contractor team arrangements in violation of antitrust statutes or limits the Government's rights to— (a... team arrangement, the responsibility of the prime contractor (see subpart 9.1); (c) Provide to the...

  17. 48 CFR 9.604 - Limitations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS Contractor Team Arrangements 9.604 Limitations. Nothing in this subpart authorizes contractor team arrangements in violation of antitrust statutes or limits the Government's rights to— (a... team arrangement, the responsibility of the prime contractor (see subpart 9.1); (c) Provide to the...

  18. 48 CFR 9.604 - Limitations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS Contractor Team Arrangements 9.604 Limitations. Nothing in this subpart authorizes contractor team arrangements in violation of antitrust statutes or limits the Government's rights to— (a... team arrangement, the responsibility of the prime contractor (see subpart 9.1); (c) Provide to the...

  19. 16 CFR 0.20 - Office of International Affairs.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... consumer protection aspects of trade fora and negotiations, such as the U.S. inter-agency delegations... international antitrust, international consumer protection, and international technical assistance. OIA is... advice to the Bureaus of Competition and Consumer Protection with regard to the international aspects of...

  20. 78 FR 9451 - Academy Express, L.L.C.-Acquisition of Property-Golden Ring Travel & Transportation, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-02-08

    ... decision can be made on the record as developed, a procedural schedule will be adopted to reconsider the... Justice, Antitrust Division, 10th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530; and (3) the U.S...

  1. 77 FR 17500 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-03-26

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1105-0025] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Federal Coal Lease Request. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Antitrust Division (ATR), will be submitting the...

  2. 77 FR 65413 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Pistoia Alliance...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-26

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Pistoia Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2012, pursuant to Section [[Page 65414

  3. 76 FR 79218 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-U.S. Photovoltaic...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-21

    ... Nanoscale Science and Engineering (``CNSE'') of the University at Albany, State University of New York.... Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2011-32709 Filed 12-20-11; 8...

  4. 75 FR 39285 - Tennessee Valley Authority; Notice of Receipt of Updated Antitrust Information and Opportunity...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-08

    ... either the Web-based search (advanced search) engine or the ADAMS find tool in Citrix. Within 30 days.... To search for other related documents in ADAMS using the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 OL...

  5. Drug Product Life-Cycle Management as Anticompetitive Behavior: The Case of Memantine.

    PubMed

    Capati, Vincent C; Kesselheim, Aaron S

    2016-04-01

    A "product hop" involves the substitution of a new formulation of a prescription drug by a pharmaceutical manufacturer for an old version to forestall generic competition. In 2015, for example, Forest Laboratories, the brand-name drug manufacturer of memantine, an Alzheimer's disease treatment, introduced an extended-release version and tried to restrict patient access to the previous version. Product hops can lead to useful incremental innovation but can also have major public health implications by disrupting patients on stable treatment regimens and increasing costs for patients and payers. This commentary reviews alleged anticompetitive product hopping in the case of memantine, which involved proposed conduct that would have left Alzheimer's disease patients with no effective choice but to transition to memantine XR. Policy solutions that can limit anticompetitive product hops include raising the bar for obtaining patents on new drug product formulations and changing automatic generic substitution laws. No outside funding supported this research. To support his work at PORTAL in the summer of 2015, Capati was the recipient of the University of New Hampshire School of Law Rudman Center Public Service Fellowship. Kesselheim's research was supported by Greenwall Faculty Scholars program, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, and the Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science. In 2013, Kesselheim served as an expert on behalf of a class of individual plaintiffs against Warner Chilcott regarding potential antitrust violations Kesselheim was responsible for concept and design of this commentary. Capati took the lead in data collection and analysis, along with Kesselheim. Capati wrote the manuscript, which was revised by primarily by Kesselheim, along with Capati.

  6. Realising new health technologies: problems of regulating human stem cells in the USA.

    PubMed

    Warren-Jones, Amanda

    2012-01-01

    Stem cell technology holds the promise of radically changing medicine through the provision of better disease models; the creation of tissue, cells, and organs for therapeutic uses; and the increased personalisation of healthcare. However, the degree to which any of these developments can be realised in the USA rests upon how effective the regulatory environment is in nurturing the technology to market. This article assesses the regulation in terms of its ability to minimise factors which erode the public interest in developing medical innovations (abuse) and promoting them to the market. This requires an overarching review of patent law (and how it fits with anti-trust and contract law); as well as the general regulation of innovation through ethical review, clinical trials, market authorisation, post-market oversight; government lead regulation of stem cells; and finally incorporating the impact of self-regulation by industry. From this assessment, it becomes possible to appreciate that the optimal system of regulation is reliant upon the gentle tweaking of many factors, rather than the wholesale revision of only a few. It also becomes possible to identify that individual tools of regulation have varying impacts. For example, the patent system may be the most open to abuse by individual companies, but as a regulatory framework it has the most mechanisms for dealing with such abuses. However, the biggest impact upon curtailing abuse derives from the self-regulation of the industry. Conversely, government led regulation is open to abuse from political agendas, but it has the greatest capacity to nurture innovation productively.

  7. 77 FR 32149 - Excepted Service

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-31

    ... Director, White DB120027 1/20/2012 Secretary. House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic..., DB120049 1/27/2012 Secretary. White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans.../2012 Solicitor. Department of Justice Antitrust Division. Chief of Staff and DJ120018 1/4/2012 Counsel...

  8. 77 FR 75190 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-12-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on November 23, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), [[Page 75191

  9. Science, Scientists, and Public Policy.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Schooler, Dean, Jr.

    The politically relevant behavior of scientists in the formulation of public policy by the United States government from 1945-68 is studied. The following types of policy issues are treated: science, space, weather, weapons, deterrence and defense, health, fiscal and monetary, pollution, conservation, antitrust, transportation safety, trade and…

  10. 77 FR 38831 - Antitrust Division

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-06-29

    ... Production Act of 1993--Bluetooth Sig, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on May 30, 2012, pursuant to Section... Act''), Bluetooth SIG, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General... Bluetooth SIG, Inc., Kirkland, WA. The nature and scope of Bluetooth SIG, Inc.'s standards development...

  11. 78 FR 5778 - Export Trade Certificate of Review

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-01-28

    ... number) or email at [email protected] . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company... the Certificate from State and Federal government antitrust actions and from private treble damage... amended Certificate should be issued. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of...

  12. 28 CFR 0.41 - Special functions.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Special functions. 0.41 Section 0.41 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division § 0.41 Special functions. The following functions are assigned to, and shall be conducted, handled, or...

  13. 77 FR 3282 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested: Federal Coal...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-01-23

    ... under Review. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Antitrust Division (ATR), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1105-0025] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed...

  14. 75 FR 4422 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-01-27

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Clean Diesel V Notice is hereby given that, on December 10, 2009, pursuant to Section [[Page 4423

  15. 76 FR 63659 - Antitrust Division

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-13

    ... Production Act of 1993; Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. (``NCOIC... circumstances. Specifically, The Open Group, San Francisco, CA, has been added as a party to this venture. Also...

  16. 75 FR 54915 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Sensory System...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-09-09

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Sensory System for Critical Infrastructure Defect Recognition, Visualization and... Critical Infrastructure Defect Recognition, Visualization and Failure Prediction ('Sensory System'') has...

  17. 76 FR 21894 - Proposed Statement of Antitrust Enforcement Policy Regarding Accountable Care Organizations...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-04-19

    ... structure that includes clinical and administrative processes; (3) processes to promote evidence-based medicine and patient engagement; (4) reporting on quality and cost measures; and (5) coordinated care for... costs and ensure quality.\\16\\ Federal Trade Commission staff advisory opinions discuss evidence...

  18. 16 CFR 803.10 - Running of time.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Running of time. 803.10 Section 803.10 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 TRANSMITTAL RULES § 803.10 Running of time. (a...

  19. 76 FR 43347 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-07-20

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Diesel Aftertreatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy... Institute-- Cooperative Research Group on Diesel Aftertreatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy-Duty...

  20. 28 CFR 49.2 - Duties of custodian.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Duties of custodian. 49.2 Section 49.2 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS ACT § 49.2 Duties of custodian. (a) Upon taking physical possession of documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or...

  1. 28 CFR 49.4 - Deputy custodians.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Deputy custodians. 49.4 Section 49.4 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS ACT § 49.4 Deputy custodians. Deputy custodians may perform such of the duties assigned to the custodian as may be authorized...

  2. Wealth and Power.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Martz, Carlton

    2000-01-01

    This theme issue examines three historical and current problems surrounding wealth and power. The first article looks at King Leopold of Belgium and his exploitation of the Congo. The second article explores John D. Rockefeller and the Standard Oil monopoly. The final article examines the antitrust case against the Microsoft Corporation. Each…

  3. 75 FR 2889 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-International...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-01-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (``iNEMI...

  4. 78 FR 22901 - United States v. Chiropractic Associates, Ltd. of South Dakota Proposed Final Judgment and...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-17

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Chiropractic Associates, Ltd. of South... District of South Dakota in United States of America v. Chiropractic Associates Ltd, of South Dakota, (CASD... terms for chiropractic services. Copies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, and Competitive...

  5. 14 CFR 303.04 - General rules governing application content, procedure and conditions of approval.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ..., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS REVIEW OF AIR CARRIER AGREEMENTS... Chief, Transportation Section, Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, at the same time as it... waive or alter the procedural requirements of this part to permit a transaction to proceed on an...

  6. 14 CFR 303.04 - General rules governing application content, procedure and conditions of approval.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ..., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS REVIEW OF AIR CARRIER AGREEMENTS... Chief, Transportation Section, Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, at the same time as it... waive or alter the procedural requirements of this part to permit a transaction to proceed on an...

  7. 14 CFR 303.04 - General rules governing application content, procedure and conditions of approval.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ..., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS REVIEW OF AIR CARRIER AGREEMENTS... Chief, Transportation Section, Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, at the same time as it... waive or alter the procedural requirements of this part to permit a transaction to proceed on an...

  8. 14 CFR 303.04 - General rules governing application content, procedure and conditions of approval.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ..., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS REVIEW OF AIR CARRIER AGREEMENTS... Chief, Transportation Section, Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, at the same time as it... waive or alter the procedural requirements of this part to permit a transaction to proceed on an...

  9. 28 CFR Appendix I to Part 16 - Components of the Department of Justice

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Development * Office of Professional Responsibility Office of Public Affairs * C Antitrust Division, U.S... Appendix I to Part 16 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRODUCTION OR DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL OR... Office of the Intelligence Policy and Review Office of Intergovernmental Affairs * Office of...

  10. 76 FR 56471 - Membership of the Senior Executive Service Standing Performance Review Boards

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-09-13

    ..., OK. LOCKETT, CHARLES L COMPLEX WARDEN-USP, FCC, TERRE HAUTE, IN. LONGLEY, ARCHELAUS WARDEN, FCI... ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES STAFF. HOLTGREWE, KENT L DIRECTOR, IT POLICY AND PLANNING STAFF. JOHNSTON, JAMES W.... STEWART, MALCOLM L DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL. Antitrust Division--ATR POZEN, SHARIS PRINCIPAL DEPUTY...

  11. 75 FR 40851 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-14

    ... of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Warner Music Group, New York, NY; Push Entertainment LTD., Bath, UNITED KINGDOM; MOD Systems Incorporated, Seattle, WA; PacketVideo Corporation, San Diego, CA; BACH Technology AS, Bergen, NORWAY; Sony Corporation of...

  12. 75 FR 16178 - Antitrust Division

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-31

    ... Production Act of 1993--Joint Venture Agreement Between Cambridge Major Laboratories, Inc. and Konarka... Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Joint Venture Agreement Between Cambridge Major... to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the...

  13. 78 FR 7455 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Heterogeneous...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-02-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation Notice is hereby given that, on December..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation (``HSA Foundation...

  14. 78 FR 79499 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Heterogeneous...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-30

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation Notice is hereby given that, on November..., 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation (``HSA...

  15. 78 FR 64248 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Heterogeneous...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-10-28

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation (``HSA Foundation...

  16. 77 FR 66636 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Heterogeneous...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-11-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation Notice is hereby given that, on October..., 15 U.S.C. 301 et seq. (``the Act''), Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation (``HSA Foundation...

  17. 77 FR 26045 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Accellera Systems...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-02

    ..., IRELAND; Freescale Semiconductor, Austin, TX; IBM, Hopewell Junction, NY; Jasper Design Automation..., San Jose, CA; Vayavya Labs, Belguam, INDIA; Verilab, Austin, TX; and Xilinx, Inc., San Jose, CA, have... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...

  18. 77 FR 61786 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Heterogeneous...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-11

    ..., Austin, TX; ARM, Ltd., Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; Imagination Technologies Group plc, Kings Langley... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 31, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  19. 75 FR 20003 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Wireless...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-04-16

    ... circumstances. Specifically, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX; and Cooper Industries, Houston, TX have... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 12, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  20. 77 FR 40085 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-FDI Cooperation LLC

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-07-06

    ... are: FDT Group, AISBL, Jodoigne, BELGIUM; Fieldbus Foundation, Austin, TX; HART Communication Foundation, Austin, TX; PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e. V., Karlsruhe, GERMANY; OPC Foundation, Scottsdale, AZ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...

  1. 78 FR 14836 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Members of SGIP 2...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-07

    ...; Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), Austin, TX; Helikon.net , Washington, DC; Honeywell... Systems Engineering Research Center (PSERC), Tempe, AZ; Samsung Telecommunications America, Richardson, TX... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...

  2. 76 FR 59162 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Center...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-09-23

    ... Lake, IL; Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc., Newberg, OR; Clockwork Solutions, Inc. (CSI), Austin, TX..., MA; University of Texas Austin, Austin, TX; Vista Controls, Inc., dba Curtiss-Wright Controls... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...

  3. 77 FR 5574 - United States v. Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. de C.V., et al.; Public Comment and Response on Proposed...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-03

    .... Procedural History On October 21, 2011, the United States filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Defendants... hypercritically, nor with a microscope, but with an artist's reducing glass''); see generally Microsoft, 56 F.3d...

  4. 78 FR 42977 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-07-18

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in... Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in Eagle Ford Formation and Equivalent...

  5. 78 FR 19009 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-International...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-28

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials Notice is hereby given... Mechanical Officials (``IAPMO'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and...

  6. 77 FR 31040 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in... Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in Eagle Ford Formation and Equivalent...

  7. 77 FR 73676 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-12-11

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in... Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in Eagle Ford Formation and Equivalent...

  8. 77 FR 58870 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-09-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on September 4, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') filed written notifications...

  9. 77 FR 22348 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-04-13

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on March 16, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications...

  10. 76 FR 29267 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-20

    ... Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on April 26, 2011... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications... of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Topspin Media...

  11. 75 FR 79024 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-17

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on November 1, 2010... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications...

  12. 78 FR 13896 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on February 5, 2013... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') filed written notifications...

  13. 76 FR 70758 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-11-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2011... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications...

  14. 76 FR 52013 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 15, 2011... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed [[Page 52014

  15. 75 FR 62569 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-12

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on August 17, 2010... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications...

  16. 76 FR 16819 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-03-25

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on February 8, 2011... sect. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications...

  17. 78 FR 52787 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-08-26

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 24, 2013... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') filed written notifications...

  18. 77 FR 1727 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-01-11

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on December 21, 2011... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications...

  19. 78 FR 73883 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-09

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 2013... seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (``CMX'') filed written notifications...

  20. Interactions Between Monetary and Fiscal Policies in the Euro Area

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2006-03-01

    185-210. "* Haucap, Justus, Uwe Pauly & Christian Wey, Collective Wage Setting When Wages Are Generally Binding: An Antitrust Perspective, Nr. 106 (2000...Generations Model, Nr. 8/1999. "* Henning, Andreas & Wolfgang Greiner, Organknappheit im Transplantationswesen - L6sungs- ansditze aus 6konomischer Sicht, Nr. 7

  1. 16 CFR 801.32 - Conversion and acquisition.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Conversion and acquisition. 801.32 Section... INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 COVERAGE RULES § 801.32 Conversion and acquisition. A conversion is an acquisition within the meaning of the act. Example: Assume that...

  2. 16 CFR 801.32 - Conversion and acquisition.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Conversion and acquisition. 801.32 Section... INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 COVERAGE RULES § 801.32 Conversion and acquisition. A conversion is an acquisition within the meaning of the act. Example: Assume that...

  3. 78 FR 56939 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Opendaylight...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-09-16

    ... of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Adva Optical Networking SE., Munich, Germany; Versa Networks, Santa Clara, CA; Guavus, San Mateo, CA; Pantheon.... In addition, Big Switch Networks, Mountain View, CA has withdrawn as a party to this venture. No...

  4. 78 FR 36792 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Ford Motor...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-06-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Ford Motor Company and General Motors Holdings LLC Collaboration Notice is hereby... LLC Collaboration (``Ford and GM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney...

  5. 75 FR 79025 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-17

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--National Shipbuilding Research Program Notice is hereby given that, on November 29....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Shipbuilding Research Program (``NSRP'') has filed written...

  6. 75 FR 65511 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-25

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--National Shipbuilding Research Program Notice is hereby given that, on September 20....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Shipbuilding Research Program (``NSRP'') has filed written...

  7. 78 FR 73565 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Vehicle...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on October..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium (``VIIC'') has...

  8. 75 FR 80536 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 Vehicle...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-22

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on November..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium (``VIIC...

  9. 78 FR 22297 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Vehicle...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on March..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium (``VIIC'') has...

  10. 76 FR 6497 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Industrial...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-02-04

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Industrial Nacromolecular Crystallography Association Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Industrial Nacromolecular Crystallography Association (``INCA...

  11. 76 FR 17160 - Notice of Finding of No Significant Antitrust Changes and Time for Filing Requests for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-03-28

    ... Time for Filing Requests for Reevaluation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aaron Szabo, Financial Analyst, Financial Analysis and International Projects Branch, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office... Analysis and Recommendation In reaching this conclusion, the NRC staff considered the structure of the...

  12. 75 FR 45156 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-02

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on June 2, 2010... seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications...

  13. 77 FR 54612 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-09-05

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on July 5, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications...

  14. 77 FR 28405 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-14

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on April 17, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications...

  15. 76 FR 78044 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on November 1....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written...

  16. 77 FR 61786 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-11

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on September 10....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written...

  17. 77 FR 14046 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-03-08

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on January 31....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written...

  18. 77 FR 40086 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Petroleum...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-07-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Notice is hereby given that, on June 8, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notifications...

  19. 76 FR 27351 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-11

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--National Biodiesel Accreditation Commission Notice is hereby given that, on April 14....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Biodiesel Accreditation Commission (``NBAC'') has filed...

  20. 75 FR 14191 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group On: Diesel After Treatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy... Institute--Cooperative Research Group on Diesel After Treatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy-Duty...

  1. Review and Evaluation of Analyses on the Economic Impact of Rate and Service Cooperation by Ocean Liner Companies

    DOT National Transportation Integrated Search

    1984-03-01

    The literature on liner shipping companies is reviewed and discussed. The first section of the report examines the argument that liner shipping has unique characteristics that require a special public policy as regards monopoly and anti-trust legisla...

  2. 16 CFR 801.20 - Acquisitions subsequent to exceeding threshold.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Acquisitions subsequent to exceeding threshold. 801.20 Section 801.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 COVERAGE RULES § 801.20 Acquisitions subsequent to exceeding...

  3. 16 CFR 801.20 - Acquisitions subsequent to exceeding threshold.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Acquisitions subsequent to exceeding threshold. 801.20 Section 801.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 COVERAGE RULES § 801.20 Acquisitions subsequent to exceeding...

  4. 41 CFR 102-117.290 - What is the difference between temporary nonuse, suspension and debarment?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What is the difference... Federal or State antitrust statutes; (3) Embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or... Federal agencies. The seriousness of the TSP's acts or omissions and the mitigating factors must be...

  5. 75 FR 27001 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-13

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  6. 77 FR 43615 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-07-25

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  7. 76 FR 5826 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-02-02

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  8. 75 FR 8115 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-02-23

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  9. 77 FR 5573 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993- Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-03

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  10. 78 FR 9069 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-02-07

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  11. 75 FR 2890 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-01-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  12. 75 FR 54915 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-09-09

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  13. 76 FR 48884 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-09

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  14. 78 FR 48904 - United States v. Chiropractic Associates, Ltd. of South Dakota; Public Comment and Response on...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-08-12

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Chiropractic Associates, Ltd. of South... proposed Final Judgment in United States v. Chiropractic Associates, Ltd. of South Dakota., Civil Action No... SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATES, LTD. OF...

  15. 78 FR 7456 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-02-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Indian River School... Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on...

  16. 76 FR 9812 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Marinenet, LLC

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-02-22

    ..., evaluating, testing and developing a process or service to establish and support a platform for the... invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under... are: ACL Transportation Services LLC, Jeffersonville, IN; Ingram Barge Company, Nashville, TN; and AEP...

  17. 16 CFR 803.20 - Requests for additional information or documentary material.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Requests for additional information or documentary material. 803.20 Section 803.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 TRANSMITTAL RULES § 803.20 Requests for additional...

  18. 16 CFR 803.20 - Requests for additional information or documentary material.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Requests for additional information or documentary material. 803.20 Section 803.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 TRANSMITTAL RULES § 803.20 Requests for additional...

  19. 16 CFR 803.20 - Requests for additional information or documentary material.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Requests for additional information or documentary material. 803.20 Section 803.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 TRANSMITTAL RULES § 803.20 Requests for additional...

  20. 16 CFR 803.20 - Requests for additional information or documentary material.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Requests for additional information or documentary material. 803.20 Section 803.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 TRANSMITTAL RULES § 803.20 Requests for additional...

  1. 16 CFR 803.20 - Requests for additional information or documentary material.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Requests for additional information or documentary material. 803.20 Section 803.20 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 TRANSMITTAL RULES § 803.20 Requests for additional...

  2. 76 FR 66324 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-26

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Nasgro Development and Support Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production...

  3. 75 FR 30440 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ASTM International

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-01

    ... Production Act of 1993--ASTM International Notice is hereby given that, on May 6, 2010, pursuant to Section 6... Act''), ASTM International (``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney... recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has...

  4. 75 FR 24972 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II Notice is... Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II, (``HEDGE II'') has filed written notifications...

  5. 76 FR 9811 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-02-22

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II Notice is... Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II (``HEDGE II'') has filed written notifications...

  6. 75 FR 62569 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-12

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II Notice is...--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II, (``HEDGE II'') has filed written...

  7. 75 FR 4423 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-01-27

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II Notice is...--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II, (``HEDGE II'') has filed written...

  8. 75 FR 14192 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II Notice is...--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II (``HEDGE II'') has filed written...

  9. 75 FR 79024 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-17

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II Notice is... Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II (``HEDGE II'') has filed written notifications...

  10. 76 FR 79219 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Sematech, Inc. d...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-21

    ...., Hsinchu, TAIWAN; Global Foundaries Inc., Milpitas, CA; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX; Infineon... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 18, 2011, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  11. 75 FR 24972 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 ODVA, Inc...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-06

    ..., Greifensee, SWITZERLAND; Ten X Technology, Inc., Austin, TX; Cervis Inc., Warrendale, PA; IDEC IZUNI... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... that, on March 17, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production...

  12. 75 FR 57502 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Robotics...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-09-21

    ..., in the eighth line from the bottom of the page, ``Amstin, TX'' should read ``Austin, TX''. 4. On the... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... full paragraph, in the second and third lines, ``activity of this group research additional written...

  13. 78 FR 37572 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-U.S. Photovoltaic...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-06-21

    ... circumstances. Specifically, Esgee Technologies, Inc., Austin, TX; and Magnolia Solar, Albany, NY, have been... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 21, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  14. 77 FR 34067 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-06-08

    ..., 21 CT, Inc., Austin, TX; Cerebrus Corporation, Morris Plains, NJ; Conax Florida Corporation, St... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S...

  15. 78 FR 14837 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Health Product...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-07

    ... (individual member), Austin, TX; Ted van der Linden (individual member), Falls Church, VA; Scott Day... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... February 12, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  16. 76 FR 59161 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-09-23

    ...., Albuquerque, NM; Tetra Tech, Inc., Honolulu, HI; Trident Research, LLC, Austin, TX; Unified Design Corporation, Rockaway, NJ; and University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...

  17. 78 FR 37572 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Sematech, Inc. D...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-06-21

    ..., Windsor, Berkshire, UNITED KINGDOM; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX; and TriQuint Semiconductors... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S...

  18. 78 FR 33859 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-DIE Products...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-06-05

    ... Technologies, AG, Munich, Germany; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX; Philips Semiconductors, Inc., San... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  19. 78 FR 14838 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act Of 1993-National Center...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-07

    ...; Clockwork Solutions, Inc., Austin, TX; Diamond Nets Inc., Everson, WA; Eastern Michigan University... of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX; and Wend Associates, Inc., Marine City, MI. No other changes have been... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...

  20. 76 FR 72724 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-11-25

    .... Specifically, Accurate Munition Systems, Inc., Austin, TX; Excelitas Technologies Sensors, Inc., Miamisburg, OH... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 04, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  1. 78 FR 16868 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-19

    ..., PA; Systems and Materials Research Corporation, Austin, TX; and Targeted GeoSystems, LLC, Madison, AL... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 19, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  2. 78 FR 19529 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-International...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-01

    ... Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization... the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual... of business of the standards development organization is IKECA, Philadelphia, PA. The nature and...

  3. 76 FR 16820 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Warheads...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-03-25

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... 25, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993.... Specifically, Directed Energy Technologies, Inc., Sumerduck, VA; MaxPower, Inc., Harleysville, PA; Omnitek...

  4. 77 FR 9266 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ODVA, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-16

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act.... Also, Q-Lambda, Lund, Sweden; Exlar Corporation, Chanhassen, MN; Spang Power Electronics, Mentor, OH...

  5. 78 FR 20141 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 -- American...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-03

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 -- American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on March 5....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed...

  6. 78 FR 58558 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-09-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on August 20....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed...

  7. 76 FR 80406 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-23

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on December 6....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written...

  8. 76 FR 27351 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-11

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on April 12....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written...

  9. 75 FR 70031 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-11-16

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on October 14....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written...

  10. 76 FR 52014 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on July 25....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written...

  11. 76 FR 6497 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-02-04

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on January 10....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written...

  12. 75 FR 45156 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-02

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on June 28....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed...

  13. 77 FR 31041 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on April 27....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed...

  14. 75 FR 14191 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on February 25....C. 4301 et seq.. (``the Act''), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed...

  15. 77 FR 58412 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; American Society...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-09-20

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; American Society of Mechanical Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on August 27....C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed...

  16. 76 FR 77251 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Consortium for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-12

    ...., Bedford, IN; UXB International, Blacksburg, VA; Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation, Blacksburg, VA... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... hereby given that, on November 18, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research...

  17. 75 FR 35089 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; National...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-21

    ..., Tucson, AZ; ANEASOL, LLC, Santa Fe, NM; AMEC, Somerset, NJ; Applied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., 2010, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S...

  18. 76 FR 48884 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ODVA, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-09

    ... Motion, Inc., Boulder, CO; Hitachi Cable Manchester, Inc., Manchester, NH; and Global Engineering..., Applied Robotics, Inc., Glenville, NY; WIT, St.-Laurent-Du- Var, FRANCE; Caron Engineering, Inc., Wells... Act on May 2, 2011 (76 FR 24523). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division...

  19. Who Owns What--An Initial Inquiry into Current Crossownership among Leading Companies in Cable Television.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Katz, Helen

    Despite longstanding interest in cable television regulation, little has been investigated concerning crossownership of cable with other media properties. A study examined the issue from economic (antitrust) and First Amendment (diversity of sources) perspectives. Data on where the cable companies' franchises were located and in what other media…

  20. 75 FR 8116 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Ice Crystal...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-02-23

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Ice Crystal Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on December 31, 2009, pursuant to.... (``the Act''), the Ice Crystal Consortium (``ICC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with...

  1. 77 FR 64128 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Wireless...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-18

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Wireless Industrial Technology Konsortium Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Wireless Industrial Technology Konsortium Inc. (``WITEK'') has...

  2. Statement of the Authors Guild, Inc.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Karp, Irwin

    This paper is related to a similar statement presented at a Federal Trade Commission Symposium on Media Concentration. It was submitted by the Authors Guild to Senator Edward Kennedy's Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly on May 10, 1978. It is one of several memoranda by the Guild opposing the acquisitions and mergers they feel have given…

  3. 78 FR 22297 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on March 19, 2013... seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (``IMS Global'') has filed written...

  4. 75 FR 35088 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-21

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Correction The document appearing on June 4... Global Learning Consortium, Inc.; In the second line, first paragraph, INS should read as IMS; In the...

  5. 76 FR 65536 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-21

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Correction In notice document 2011-26426... same column, in the forth paragraph, in the first line, ``earning'' should read ``Learning''. [FR Doc...

  6. 77 FR 66635 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-11-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on October 9, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (``IMS Global'') has filed written...

  7. 75 FR 31816 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Diesel After...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-04

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Diesel After Treatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy-Duty Notice is hereby given... Group on Diesel After treatment Accelerated Aging Cycles--Heavy-Duty (``DAAAC-HD'') has filed written...

  8. 77 FR 5845 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-the Acoustical...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-06

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--the Acoustical Society of America Notice is hereby given that, on January 17, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), The Acoustical Society of America (``ASA'') has filed written notifications...

  9. 76 FR 70759 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-11-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Energy Storage System Evaluation and Safety Notice is hereby given that, on October 6, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and...

  10. 75 FR 40852 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Development of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-14

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Development of High Toughness, Low Viscosity Resin for Reinforcing Pothole Patching...''), Development of High Toughness, Low Viscosity Resin for Reinforcing Pothole Patching Materials, TIP Award No...

  11. 76 FR 31638 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Global Climate...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-06-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Global Climate and Energy Project Notice is hereby given that, on April 8, 2011... seq. (``the Act''), Global Climate and Energy Project (``GCEP'') has filed written notifications...

  12. 77 FR 17095 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Global Climate...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-03-23

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Global Climate and Energy Project Notice is hereby given that, on February 17, 2012... seq. (``the Act''), Global Climate and Energy Project (``GCEP'') has filed written notifications...

  13. 76 FR 58539 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-09-21

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Development and Validation of FlawPRO for Assessing... Development and Validation of FlawPRO for Assessing Defect Tolerance of Welded Pipes Under Generalized High...

  14. 77 FR 73676 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-12-11

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Cooperative Research Group on Development and Validation of Flawpro for Assessing... Development and Validation of FlawPRO for Assessing Defect Tolerance of Welded Pipes Under Generalized High...

  15. The joint venture alternative to mergers.

    PubMed

    Enders, R J

    1995-02-01

    However, while a joint venture may be "safe" from antitrust challenge, it is not without some practical difficulties, especially with respect to consolidating services at one location or jointly offering services provided at multiple facilities. These practical concerns include: 1. Who will exercise operational management of the joint venture? 2. How will the joint venture deal with different pricing for services that will be provided at multiple locations? 3. What criteria will be used to decide the location at which consolidated tertiary services will be offered? 4. In what circumstances can the joint venture be unwound, either in its entirety or as to discrete functions? When clinical services have been consolidated at one location, there is an appropriate concern by the other hospital that it will be unable to provide or re-enter the market for those services if the joint venture dissolves. These operational concerns, of course, are not addressed in the Consent Decree. Thus, even if a joint venture relationship survives antitrust scrutiny, the parties must still negotiate and resolve these operational issues in order for the joint venture to be viable.

  16. Corporate Investors Increased Common Ownership In Hospitals And The Postacute Care And Hospice Sectors.

    PubMed

    Fowler, Annabelle C; Grabowski, David C; Gambrel, Robert J; Huskamp, Haiden A; Stevenson, David G

    2017-09-01

    The sharing of investors across firms is a new antitrust focus because of its potential negative effects on competition. Historically, the ability to track common investors across the continuum of health care providers has been limited. Thus, little is known about common investor ownership structures that might exist across health care delivery systems and how these linkages have evolved over time. We used data from the Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to identify common investor ownership linkages across the acute care, postacute care, and hospice sectors within the same geographic markets. To our knowledge, this study provides the first description of common investor ownership trends in these sectors. We found that the percentage of acute care hospitals having common investor ties to the postacute or hospice sectors increased from 24.6 percent in 2005 to 48.9 percent in 2015. These changes have important implications for antitrust, payment, and regulatory policies. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  17. (Re)inventing Government-Industry R and D Collaboration

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Holmes, Bruce J.

    1996-01-01

    This paper describes the lessons learned in developing and operating a large-scale strategic alliance whose organization and coordination is U.S. Government-led using new means for R&D collaboration. Consortia in the United States counter a century of 1884 Sherman Anti-Trust Law-based governmental and legal policy and a longstanding business tradition of unfettered competition. Success in public-private collaboration in America requires compelling vision and motivation by both partners to reinvent our ways of doing business. The foundations for reinventing government and alliance building were laid in 1994 with Vice President Al Gore's mandates for Federal Lab Reviews and other examinations of the roles and missions for the nation's more than 700 government labs. In addition, the 1984 National Cooperative Research Act (NCRA) set in motion the abilities for U.S. companies to collaborate in pre-competitive technology development. The budget realities of the 1990's for NASA and other government agencies demand that government discover the means to accomplish its mission by leveraging resources through streamlining as well as alliances. Federal R&D investments can be significantly leveraged for greater national benefit through strategic alliances with industry and university partners. This paper presents early results from one of NASA's first large-scale public/private joint R&D ventures.

  18. Health Care Market Concentration Trends In The United States: Evidence And Policy Responses.

    PubMed

    Fulton, Brent D

    2017-09-01

    Policy makers and analysts have been voicing concerns about the increasing concentration of health care providers and health insurers in markets nationwide, including the potential adverse effect on the cost and quality of health care. The Council of Economic Advisers recently expressed its concern about the lack of estimates of market concentration in many sectors of the US economy. To address this gap in health care, this study analyzed market concentration trends in the United States from 2010 to 2016 for hospitals, physician organizations, and health insurers. Hospital and physician organization markets became increasingly concentrated over this time period. Concentration among primary care physicians increased the most, partially because hospitals and health care systems acquired primary care physician organizations. In 2016, 90 percent of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) were highly concentrated for hospitals, 65 percent for specialist physicians, 39 percent for primary care physicians, and 57 percent for insurers. Ninety-one percent of the 346 MSAs analyzed may have warranted concern and scrutiny because of their concentration levels in 2016 and changes in their concentrations since 2010. Public policies that enhance competition are needed, such as stricter enforcement of antitrust laws, reducing barriers to entry, and restricting anticompetitive behaviors. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

  19. 78 FR 39326 - Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Institute of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-07-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Notice is hereby given that, on May..., 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE...

  20. 75 FR 11564 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act Of 1993-Telemanagement Forum

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-11

    ...; Innovative Systems, Mitchell, SD; Kentor IT AB, Stockholm, SWEDEN; Keste, LLC, Piano, TX; King Mongkut's... Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq... were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust...

  1. 78 FR 33437 - United States v. Apple, Inc., et al.; Public Comments and Response on Proposed Final Judgment

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-06-04

    ... must designate an Antitrust Compliance Officer, who is required to distribute copies of the Macmillan... compliance with the Macmillan Final Judgment; maintain a log of all communications between Macmillan and... Circuit affirmed this Court's denial of Mr. Kohn's motion to intervene for purposes of appealing the Court...

  2. 76 FR 67025 - Statement of Antitrust Enforcement Policy Regarding Accountable Care Organizations Participating...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-28

    ... ``isolated rural,'' or ``other small rural,'' according to the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center of the...-8.4, or 9.0-9.2 as developed by the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center of the University of Washington and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov...

  3. 75 FR 25294 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-High Definition...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-07

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--High Definition Metrology and Process-2 Micron Manufacturing Under ATP Award No... Metrology and Process-2 Micron Manufacturing under ATP Award No. 70NANB7H7041 has filed written...

  4. 76 FR 72723 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Fieldbus Foundation

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-11-25

    ...: Fieldbus Foundation, Austin, TX. More information about Fieldbus can be found at http://www.fieldbus.org... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  5. 78 FR 56939 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-09-16

    ..., Dell Inc., Austin, TX; Miami-Dade College--Virtual College, Miami, FL; National Labor College, Silver... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et...

  6. 75 FR 14190 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Joint Venture To...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-24

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Joint Venture To Perform Project Entitled Robotic Rehabilitation of Aging Water... Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et sect. (``the Act''), Joint [[Page 14191...

  7. 78 FR 22296 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Heterogeneous...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-04-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S... Communications AB, Lund, SWEDEN, and Fabric Engine, Cowansville, Quebec, CANADA, have been added as parties to...

  8. 78 FR 16869 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ODVA, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-03-19

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and...) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act... parties to this venture. Also, Precision Engine Controls Corporation, San Diego, CA; FlexLink, G[ouml...

  9. 75 FR 42461 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-21

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Connected Media Experience, Inc. Correction In notice document 2010-16862 beginning on page 40851 in the issue of Wednesday, July 14, 2010 make the following correction: On page 40851, in...

  10. 75 FR 48362 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933-PXI Systems...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-10

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933-PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. Correction In notice document 2010-12033 appearing on page 28294 in the issue of Thursday, May 20, 2010 make the following correction: In the second column, in the...

  11. 75 FR 79024 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ODVA, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-17

    ... Precision Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea; Monaghan Engineering, Inc., Dripping Springs, TX; Samsung..., Shihung-Shi, Republic of Korea, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Schweitzer Engineering.... Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2010-31593 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am...

  12. 75 FR 36689 - United States, et al. v. Election Systems & Software, Inc.; Public Comments and Response on...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-28

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States, et al. v. Election Systems & Software, Inc... proposed Final Judgment in United States, et al. v. Election Systems & Software Inc., Case No. 1:10-00380... America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Election Systems and Software, Inc., Defendant. Case No.: 1:10-cv-00380...

  13. 75 FR 12256 - United States, et al. v. Election Systems and Software, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-03-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States, et al. v. Election Systems and Software... Columbia in United States, et al. v. Election Systems and Software Inc., Civil Action No. 10-00380. On... Systems and Software, Inc., (``ES&S'') of Premier Election Services, Inc., and PES Holdings, Inc. violated...

  14. 76 FR 65749 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-TAI and Southwest...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-24

    ... tools research and development by organizing and implementing joint engineering and scientific research... components in the engineering and scientific areas of electronic systems, hardware design, packaging and... Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2011-27114 Filed 10-21-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-11...

  15. 76 FR 79217 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-National Center...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-21

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on November 22, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993...

  16. 76 FR 5439 - United States, et al. v. Comcast Corp., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-01-31

    ... Vol. 76 Monday, No. 20 January 31, 2011 Part III Department of Justice Antitrust Division United States, et al. v. Comcast Corp., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement; Notice #0;#0;Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices#0;#0; [[Page 5440

  17. 76 FR 35017 - United States et al. v. United Regional Health Care System; Public Comments and Response on...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-06-15

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States et al. v. United Regional Health Care... proposed Final Judgment in United States and State of Texas v. United Regional Health Care System, Civil... Texas, (RCO) Plaintiffs, V. United Regional Health Care System, Defendant. Case No.: 7:11-cv-00030...

  18. 75 FR 45155 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Energistics...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-02

    ... solutions to the upstream oil and natural gas industry. Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et...

  19. 76 FR 39901 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-07-07

    ... invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under... NETHERLANDS; Tubos De Acero De Mexico S.A., Veracruz, MEXICO; Shell Oil Company, Houston, TX; and ExxonMobil Development Company, Houston, TX. The general area of FlawPRO-JIP's planned activity is to develop an enhanced...

  20. 76 FR 28036 - Request for Comments and Announcement of Workshop on Standard-Setting Issues

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-05-13

    ... negotiated ex post? To what extent do concerns about antitrust liability deter ex ante disclosure or... reflects not only the ex ante market value of the patented invention, but also added value associated with...''). Third, they may require or allow ex ante disclosure of specific licensing terms as part of the standard...

  1. 75 FR 30440 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Recreational Off...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-01

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association (Formerly Known as Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Organization) Notice is hereby given that, on May 4, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and...

  2. 26 CFR 1.186-1 - Recoveries of damages for antitrust violations, etc.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... periods before and after the period covered by the civil action instituted. (3) Net operating losses... to be applied after the other portion of such net operating loss. If, for example, in the year of the... injury will be applied against profits in the carryover or carryback periods. (e) Effect on net operating...

  3. 76 FR 12370 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Green Seal, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-03-07

    ... and coatings, paper products, personal care products and service, restaurants and food services, and... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  4. 28 CFR Appendix to Subpart H - Delegation of Authority Respecting Denials of Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Requests

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Denials of Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Requests Appendix to Subpart H Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Pt. 0, Subpt. H, App. Appendix to Subpart H—Delegation of Authority Respecting Denials of Freedom of Information and Privacy Act...

  5. 16 CFR 802.21 - Acquisitions of voting securities not meeting or exceeding greater notification threshold (as...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Acquisitions of voting securities not meeting or exceeding greater notification threshold (as adjusted). 802.21 Section 802.21 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976...

  6. 16 CFR 802.21 - Acquisitions of voting securities not meeting or exceeding greater notification threshold (as...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Acquisitions of voting securities not meeting or exceeding greater notification threshold (as adjusted). 802.21 Section 802.21 Commercial Practices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES, REGULATIONS, STATEMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976...

  7. NCAA's Latest Pay-to-Play Scheme Would Sack Concept of Amateur Student Athlete, Raise Antitrust Questions

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Sullivan, Tom

    2014-01-01

    Now that members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) have voted to approve a sweeping, if not radical, proposal giving the five largest athletic conferences "autonomy" to establish new governance rules regarding a compensation pay package for the recruitment of athletes, some important public policy concerns need to be…

  8. 28 CFR 50.15 - Representation of Federal officials and employees by Department of Justice attorneys or by...

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... resolve the conflict as indicated by paragraph (a) (6), (9) and (10) of this section, and by § 50.16. (9... division (Antitrust, Civil Rights, Criminal, Land and Natural Resources or the Tax Division), a statement... of the possible existence of inter-defendant conflicts) the litigating division may delegate the fact...

  9. 77 FR 71830 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-SGIP 2.0, Inc.

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-12-04

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--SGIP 2.0, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on October 17, 2012, pursuant to Section..., educational, literary, and scientific purposes, within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal...

  10. 78 FR 79498 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Open-IX Association

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-30

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and... Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq... Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business...

  11. The Browser War: An Ethical Analysis of the Struggle between Microsoft and the U.S. Department of Justice.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Meier, Dennis

    1999-01-01

    Examines two ethical questions regarding the ongoing antitrust battle between the U.S. Department of Justice and Microsoft Corporation using traditional rights-based ethical theory, utilitarianism, and John Rawls's principles of justice. Concludes that it is neither good nor fair for a company having a near-monopoly over a market to sell products…

  12. 76 FR 80405 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-PXI Systems...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-12-23

    ...; SignalCore Inc., Austin, TX; Modular Methods, LLC, Steamboat Springs, CO; and SELEX Galileo S.p.A., Roma... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and..., pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et...

  13. 75 FR 65657 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Alliance for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-26

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Alliance for Water Stewardship Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et...

  14. 78 FR 54277 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cable Television...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-09-03

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on August 1, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et...

  15. 75 FR 51114 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Pistoia Alliance...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-18

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Pistoia Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 13, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  16. 75 FR 31815 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Pistoia Alliance...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-04

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Pistoia Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on April 22, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  17. 78 FR 67399 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-PXI System...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-11-12

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--PXI System Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on October 10, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et...

  18. 75 FR 51115 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-PXI Systems...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-18

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 8, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  19. 78 FR 55296 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-American Gap...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-09-10

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--American Gap Association Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq...

  20. Energy: the states' response in 1978

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Mackey, Earl S.

    A compilation of all state legislative energy enactments for legislature, in 1978 is presented. It provides source material to legislators and their staff. Each bill is separated into one or more of the 37 major subject categories. Broad categories cover public utilities; tax exemption; tax application; franchise protection; conservation; resource development; solar easements; mineral extraction regulation; management; emergency powers; anti-trust; anit-environment; and miscellaneous legislation.

  1. 77 FR 34068 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Secure Content...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-06-08

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Secure Content Storage Association, LLC Notice is hereby given that, on May 3, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Secure...

  2. 77 FR 47882 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-08-10

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Clean Diesel VI Notice is hereby given that, on July 16, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''),...

  3. 75 FR 66792 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Cooperative...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-29

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Clean Diesel V Notice is hereby given that, on October 7, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''),...

  4. 78 FR 9939 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-U.S. Photovoltaic...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-02-12

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--U.S. Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on January 15, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'')...

  5. 77 FR 64128 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Advanced Media...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-18

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on September 24, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''),...

  6. 78 FR 79498 - Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-IMS Global...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-12-30

    ... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on November 22, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS...

  7. Barriers to achieving a cost-effective workforce mix: lessons from anesthesiology.

    PubMed

    Cromwell, J

    1999-12-01

    As pressures to control health care costs increase, competition among physicians, advanced practice nurses, and other allied health providers has also intensified. Anesthesia care is one of the most highly contested terrains, where the growth in anesthesiologist supply has far outstripped total demand. This article explains why the supply has grown so fast despite evidence that nurse anesthetists provide equally good care at a fraction of the cost. Emphasis is given to payment incentives in the private sector and Medicare. Laudable attempts by the government to make Medicare payments more efficient and equitable by lowering the economic return to physicians specializing in anesthesia have created a hostile work environment. Nurse anesthetists are being dismissed from hospitals in favor of anesthesiologists who do not appear "on the payroll" but cost society more, nonetheless. Claims of antitrust violations by nurse anesthetists against anesthesiologists have not found much support in the courts for several reasons outlined in this essay. HMO penetration and other market forces have begun signaling new domestic physician graduates to eschew anesthesia, but, again, Medicare payment incentives encourage teaching hospitals to recruit international medical graduates to maintain graduate medical education payments. After suggesting desirable but likely ineffective reforms involving licensure laws and hospital organizational restructuring, the article discusses several alternative payment methods that would encourage hospitals and medical staffs to adopt a more cost-effective anesthesia workforce mix. Lessons for other nonphysician personnel conclude the article.

  8. Arab oil weapon. [documents, treaties, commentaries

    DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

    Paust, J.J.; Blaustein, A.P.

    1977-01-01

    This compilation of publications dealing with the Arab oil weapon presents documents and commentaries. In Part I, the Embargo, fhe documents include: Historical Chronologies; The United States Oil Shortage and the Arab-Israelic Conflict; OPEC: Oil Negotations, OPEC, and the Stability of Supply; and OPEC Resolutions and Other Documents. Commentaries include: The Arab Oil Weapon--A Threat to International Peace, by Jordon J. Paust and Albert P. Blaustein; Destination Embargo of Arab Oil: Its Legality Under International Law, by Ibrahim F. I. Shihata; The Arab Oil Weapon: A Reply and Re-Affirmation of Illegality, by Jordan J. Paust and Albert P. Blaustein; Economicmore » Coercion and the International Legal Order, by Richard B. Lillich; Some Politico-Legal Aspects of Resource Scarcity, by Timothy Stanley; and OPEC in the Context of the Global Power Equation, by Jahangir Amuzegar. Part II, The Response, includes the following documents: Presidential Statements: Carter and Ford; The Energy Crisis: Strategy for Cooperative Action, by Henry A. Kissinger; Oil Fields as Military Objectives; and Data and Analysis: Concerning the Possibility of a U.S. Food Embargo as a Response to the present Arab Oil Boycott. The commentaries in Part II are: Oil: The Issue of American Intervention, by Robert W. Tucker; War--The Ultimate Antitrust Actions, by Andrew Tobias; and The Need for Negotiated Reforms, by John H. Jackson. Part III, Legal Framework, contains 10 United Nations documents and 4 treaties. (MCW)« less

  9. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (77th, Atlanta, Georgia, August 10-13, 1994). Part VIII: Advertising and Public Relations.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.

    The Advertising and Public Relations section of this collection of conference presentations contains the following 17 papers: "Using the FCB Grid and the 'Lost Quadrants' to Write Advertising Strategy" (Johan C. Yssel); "Antitrust and the Marketplace of Ideas: The Continuing Problem of Issue Advertising Access to Broadcast…

  10. The changing tide: Federal support of civilian-sector R and D

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Fusfeld, H. I.; Langlois, R. N.; Nelson, R. R.

    1981-01-01

    The involvement of the Federal government in civilian sector research and development is discussed. Relevant policies are put in an historical perspective. The roles played by industrial research and public funding are reveiwed. Government support of basic an generic research, clientele-oriented applied research, and research with commercial ends is studied. Procurement, anti-trust, and patent policies, all of which affect the climate for private research and development, are examined.

  11. Technical change in US industry: A cross-industry analysis

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Nelson, R. R. (Editor)

    1981-01-01

    The nature of the public policies which have influenced the pace and pattern of technical progress in a number of American industries is studied with the view of assessing the broad effects of these policies. The industries studied are agriculture, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, computers, civil aircraft, automobiles and residential construction. The policies considered include research and development funding as well as government procurement, education, information dissemination, patent protection, licensing, regulations, and anti-trust policies.

  12. Market power in the United States red meatpacking industry.

    PubMed

    Koontz, Stephen R

    2003-07-01

    The basic question asked in the beginning of this article was whether the evidence from research is persuasive enough to conclude that competition in the meatpacking industry is deficient. The literature review led to the conclusion that the answer is no. Research varies widely in terms of data and methodologic approaches. The research, however, clearly finds evidence of market power. Many SCP studies indicated the existence and exercise of market power, but the failure of the paradigm makes definitive conclusions dangerous. The NEIO studies showed a persistent gap between the price of livestock and marginal costs but the studies did not incorporate sufficient detail to prove specific behavior. Azzam and Anderson [4] conducted an extensive review of competition in meatpacking. In their summary, they offered criticisms of the SCP approach and the conduct parameter approach. These investigators concluded that the body of empiric evidence was insufficient to persuasively argue that the meatpacking industry was not competitive. Sexton [69] discussed more recent critiques of the conduct parameter appraoch. Despite its weaknesses, he concluded that market power estimates in meatpacking are modest but that structural changes on balance are beneficial, from an efficiency viewpoint. Examining the evidence either by data aggregation, methodology, or time period results in little difference in the qualitative interpretation. The research community has done what Nicholls [2] said was needed. The need remains relevant. The research leaves us with a clear picture and nagging questions. Azzam and Anderson [4] recommended that further research focus on the process of competition or the rivalrous interaction between competitors, and on competitors' strategies for responding to technologic and market forces, as the business history of the industry suggests. Specifically, they recommended two approaches. First, to develop empiric pricing models for short-term monitoring. Such models infer conduct from spatial price linkages rather than from concentration as do SCP studies or estimation of conduct parameters as do NEIO studies. Second, to study the dynamics of the competitive process, making use of data describing changes at the firm and plant level, to better understand the effect of market and technologic forces on the evolution of firm behavior and industry structure. After discussing existing research quality and future research needs, two practical things remain to do. The first centers on the following question: How important are the relatively small measures of market power? Most believable price distortions are found to be 3% or less. These distortions are below the 5% regulatory standards related to mergers used by the US Department of Justice and US Federal Trade Commission [70]. These standards, however, are guidelines and not law. Antitrust laws state that the exercise of market power is illegal. Courts and regulatory agencies also have not defined how much market power is significant and for how long a firm or firms must maintain significant market power [71]. From the viewpoint of public welfare, small impacts on price make a substantial difference to livestock producers and rival meatpacking firms. In relatively low-profit commodity businesses, small degrees of market power have significant profit implications. Small price or percentage impacts represent large total dollar amounts, especially over long time periods. To some, the evidence of market power provides clear reasons for antitrust lawsuits, conclusive evidence of weak and disinterested antitrust enforcement, and undeniable grounds for corrective legislation. If we conclude that action is needed, then the second issue emerges: What should be done and will our actions result in a net improvement? The research reviewed in the article by MacDonald elsewhere in this issue clearly shows the economic benefits of large meat processing firms. Likewise, some of the research reviewed here shows that increased concentration benefits producers and consumers. Some of the benefits of lower costs are passed on to producers through improved prices. The clear problems seen in the 1910s and 1920s--the pools and trusts--are not present in the 1990s and 2000s. Legislative action requiring the restructuring of the meatpacking industry or limiting behavior (similar to the Packer Consent Decree of 1920) will come at a large cost to the industry and society. So what should be done? Some people want to do nothing and allow the market to function unencumbered by political action. This approach ignores the problems seen in research. Some people want to go back in time, forgetting the economic incentives for change. They would legislate change in the market structure where they perceive problems, break up large meatpacking firms, restrict supposed problematic conduct, and eliminate contracting and vertical integration. Some people want to treat agriculture as a unique sector of society and create laws and regulations applicable to agriculture alone, regardless of whether the issues driving these actions apply to other sectors of the economy. Little, if any, thought is given to public and private costs or public and private benefits. Structural changes are clear. Research findings on the impacts and consequences are robust. What should be done, however, is not clear or robust. We are in the realm of second-best choices. The fact that we are in a realm of second-best choices is not satisfying to me nor will it likely be to agricultural producers and policy makers. What to do from here is not an economic decision (i.e., economics cannot provide a clear best answer). Rather, it is a political and public choice question that has economic implications: What do we want our livestock and meat industry to look like?

  13. The Unilateral, Self-Deregulation of AT&T

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Maloff, Joel H.

    1990-01-01

    The provision of telecommunications products and services in the United States has been dominated by AT&T and the Bell System for more than one hundred years. From the early days of telephones, it was clear that some framework of logic was required to provide "universal" telephone services to the vast majority of American citizens. The concept was known as "natural monopoly", and for the most part, has served us well. We are all aware of statements concerning absolute power corrupting absolutely, and AT&T has not been immune to this law of human nature. Several times during the past century, action has been required by the Federal Government to regulate and constrain AT&T and the Bell System from anti-competitive and predatory actions. These have been called consent decrees, Computer Inquiry II, Computer Inquiry III, and the Modified Final Judgment. The regulations and constraints imposed upon AT&T, with good reason, are now becoming eroded. The perception of a more highly competitive marketplace capable of accommodating an unrestrained AT&T, the impact of uncoordinated national and regional government policies, and unilateral actions by AT&T themselves are bringing us to the edge of an abyss. There are substantial reasons to believe that AT&T will use its considerable might to eliminate its competitors, once free to do so. Must we be doomed to repeat history with still another antitrust case against AT&T some years from now? Logic demands that we learn from the past, and that telecommunications policies be based upon that knowledge.

  14. Using Expressiveness to Increase Efficiency in Social and Economic Mechanisms

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2011-05-01

    I cannot say enough about how much I learned from and relied heavily on the support of my close friends and colleagues at CMU, especially George Davis...exists an equivalent mechanism that only allows the expression of one real value (i.e., Θi = R).(This follows immediately from Cantor (1890): being able...bundling is attributed to economist George J. Stigler in his 1963 discussion of anti-trust Supreme Court rulings over price dis- crimination via bundling

  15. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.

    PubMed

    Purtell, D L

    1990-11-01

    The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 can help protect medical professionals and healthcare facilities from antitrust and defamation claims and other forms of litigation arising from the peer review process. Some hospitals may need to make major changes in their peer review activity as a result of the act. The healthcare entity, not the physicians involved in peer review, has the burden of complying with the provisions of the act. Failure to comply with the act can lead to loss of immunity from damages, fines, and potential exclusion from the Medicare program. The potential for liability has sparked a need for hospitals to reexamine and possibly reorganize medical staff and update procedures and related governing documents. Healthcare entities may consider changes such as implementing a director of medical affairs function, choosing medical staff for multiple-year terms, and centralizing physician review files. In the 1980s many hospitals created quality assurance and risk management programs. Risk managers need to share data with quality assurance personnel, who must in turn share the information with medical staff involved with credentialing, peer review, and medical affairs management. Legal counsel will need to be familiar with the legalities of the act, as well as the hospital's peer review procedures and operations. General legal counsel should oversee coordination of hospital proceedings and assist in educating staff on the legalities of peer review.

  16. The anti-trust suit against the AMA, 1939-1943: background for today's health planning.

    PubMed

    Puder, K L; Pumphrey, R E

    1978-01-01

    Today, prepaid group medical schemes form a significant component of many legislative health care proposals. Although the concept is over 60 years old, its legality was not established until 1943 by a United States Supreme Court decision that convicted the American Medical Association and the District of Columbia Medical Society for restraint of trade. The history of that suit highlights the antagonisms that exist between prepaid group medical care and the more traditional fee-for-service system.

  17. Managed care, market power, and monopsony.

    PubMed Central

    Pauly, M V

    1998-01-01

    OBJECTIVE: To examine the theoretical possibility of monopsony behavior under managed care insurance. STUDY DESIGN: Use of microeconomic theory to examine how managed care plans with market power would be expected to behave, and effects of that behavior on consumer and supplier welfare. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The article shows that, under managed care monopsony, the welfare of consumers may be increased but overall economic welfare will necessarily be reduced. It offers a test for whether the lower prices paid by managed care buyers with larger market share represent welfare-reducing monopsony or a welfare-increasing movement away from provider monopoly. The test says that, if the quantity of inputs (supplied under conditions of increasing long-run marginal cost) declines, monopsony is present. The article also argues that the translation of lower provider prices into lower premiums is consistent with welfare-reducing monopsony by nonprofit health plans. In contrast, for-profit health plans that obtain monopsony may reduce the welfare of consumers as well as that of input suppliers. These theoretical conclusions are shown to be consistent with recent empirical research indicating a negative relationship between buyer market power and cost per enrollee. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional antitrust policy has not been able to deal well with monopsony. The article concludes that health plans that use their market power to reduce medical spending may harm the well-being both of specialized medical workers and of consumers of medical care. Antitrust policy may need to be modified to deal with this situation. PMID:9865228

  18. Consolidation and the transformation of competition in health insurance.

    PubMed

    Robinson, James C

    2004-01-01

    This paper presents data on fifty state and substate insurance markets, in terms of the 2003 relative shares of the largest health plans and the antitrust index of concentration. It presents 2000-03 data on rates of growth in premiums, costs, operating earnings, returns on equity, and share prices for the nation's largest health plans (Well-Point, Anthem, Aetna, and CIGNA). Private insurers face renewed price and profit pressures in the short term, but long-term prospects depend on the emergence of new products and new competitors in an increasingly consolidated industry.

  19. AT&T (American Telephone and Telegraph Company) Aftermath of Antitrust. Preserving Positive Command and Control,

    DTIC Science & Technology

    1983-01-01

    First printing, December, 1983. Accesslon Fot D’ý:1C TAB u.7. DXl ml,’i butl ou Av•Llab11¶ •t C., P5 Avv ,! il d.o0 Dist IV - To my mother, my wife, and my...Reaction to Reform .......................... 35 Difficulties for Defense........................ 42 V1i viii Contents V. The Antlitrust Suit: A Clinic ...repre- sented the views traditionally held by Defense regarding AT&T and per- mitted its introduction.27 The trial continued with occasional recesses

  20. R and D limited partnerships (possible applications in advanced communications satellite technology experiment program)

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1985-01-01

    Typical R&D limited partnership arrangements, advantages and disadvantages of R&D limited partnership (RDLPs) and antitrust and tax implications are described. A number of typical forms of RDLPs are described that may be applicable for use in stimulating R&D and experimental programs using the advanced communications technology satellite. The ultimate goal is to increase the rate of market penetration of goods and/or services based upon advanced satellite communications technology. The conditions necessary for these RDLP forms to be advantageous are outlined.

Top