DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1995-12-01
The Office of Defense Programs (DP) was the first US Department of Energy (DOE) Cognizant Secretarial Office (CSO) to attempt to benchmark private industries for best-in-class practices in the field of pollution prevention. Defense Programs` intent in this effort is to identify and bring to DOE field offices strategic and technological tools that have helped private companies minimize waste and prevent pollution. Defense Programs` premier benchmarking study focused on business practices and process improvements used to implement exceptional pollution prevention programs in four privately owned companies. The current interest in implementing partnerships information exchange, and technology transfer with the privatemore » sector prompted DP to continue to seek best practices in the area of pollution prevention through a second benchmarking endeavor in May 1994. This report presents the results of that effort. The decision was made to select host facilities that own processes similar to those at DOE plants and laboratories, that have programs that have been recognized on a local or national level, that have an interest in partnering with the Department on an information-sharing basis, and that are located in proximity to each other. The DP benchmarking team assessed the pollution prevention programs of five companies in the Chicago area--GE Plastics, Navistar, Northrop Corporation, Sundstrand and Caterpillar. At all facilities visited, Ozone Depleting Compounds (ODCs), hazardous wastes, releases under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), waste water and non-hazardous wastes are being eliminated, replaced, reduced, recycled and reused whenever practicable.« less
Benchmarks for target tracking
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Dunham, Darin T.; West, Philip D.
2011-09-01
The term benchmark originates from the chiseled horizontal marks that surveyors made, into which an angle-iron could be placed to bracket ("bench") a leveling rod, thus ensuring that the leveling rod can be repositioned in exactly the same place in the future. A benchmark in computer terms is the result of running a computer program, or a set of programs, in order to assess the relative performance of an object by running a number of standard tests and trials against it. This paper will discuss the history of simulation benchmarks that are being used by multiple branches of the military and agencies of the US government. These benchmarks range from missile defense applications to chemical biological situations. Typically, a benchmark is used with Monte Carlo runs in order to tease out how algorithms deal with variability and the range of possible inputs. We will also describe problems that can be solved by a benchmark.
Benchmarks for Evaluation of Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS)
2008-01-01
publications: [1] E. Arikan , Attack Profiling for DDoS Benchmarks, MS Thesis, University of Delaware, August 2006. [2] J. Mirkovic, A. Hussain, B. Wilson...Sigmetrics 2007, June 2007 [5] J. Mirkovic, E. Arikan , S. Wei, S. Fahmy, R. Thomas, and P. Reiher Benchmarks for DDoS Defense Evaluation, Proceedings of the...Security Experimentation, June 2006. [9] J. Mirkovic, E. Arikan , S. Wei, S. Fahmy, R. Thomas, P. Reiher, Benchmarks for DDoS Defense Evaluation
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Fagnoni, Cynthia M.
The Department of Defense's (DOD) child development program has been identified as a model for the rest of the nation. To provide a benchmark cost estimate for Congress as it addresses child care issues, this report identifies the objectives of the military child development program, describes its operation, determines the full costs of DOD…
The Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Felty, James R.
2005-05-01
This paper broadly covers key events and activities from which the Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) evolved. The NCSP maintains fundamental infrastructure that supports operational criticality safety programs. This infrastructure includes continued development and maintenance of key calculational tools, differential and integral data measurements, benchmark compilation, development of training resources, hands-on training, and web-based systems to enhance information preservation and dissemination. The NCSP was initiated in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 97-2, Criticality Safety, and evolved from a predecessor program, the Nuclear Criticality Predictability Program, that was initiated in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-2, The Need for Critical Experiment Capability. This paper also discusses the role Dr. Sol Pearlstein played in helping the Department of Energy lay the foundation for a robust and enduring criticality safety infrastructure.
Implementing a Strategically-Focused Science and Technology Program for Missile Defense
2004-07-01
Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices,” Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol 14, 1997, pp. 429–458. V-18...Development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 15, 1998, pp. 57–74. V-32 situation. Thus, each stage-gate process must be customized to meet the
Benchmarking Best Practices in Transformation for Sea Enterprise
2006-09-15
programs. The following are some current trends. Less management and more employee empowerment: In 1988, Peter Drucker predicted that in twenty...Acting President Provost The Center for Defense Management Reform, Graduate School of Business & Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School...and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2
Taking the Battle Upstream: Towards a Benchmarking Role for NATO
2012-09-01
Benchmark.........................................................................................14 Figure 8. World Bank Benchmarking Work on Quality...Search of a Benchmarking Theory for the Public Sector.” 16 Figure 8. World Bank Benchmarking Work on Quality of Governance One of the most...the Ministries of Defense in the countries in which it works ). Another interesting innovation is that for comparison purposes, McKinsey categorized
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Lele, Sanjiva K.
2002-08-01
Funds were received in April 2001 under the Department of Defense DURIP program for construction of a 48 processor high performance computing cluster. This report details the hardware which was purchased and how it has been used to enable and enhance research activities directly supported by, and of interest to, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the Department of Defense. The report is divided into two major sections. The first section after this summary describes the computer cluster, its setup, and some cluster performance benchmark results. The second section explains ongoing research efforts which have benefited from the cluster hardware, and presents highlights of those efforts since installation of the cluster.
Aluminum Data Measurements and Evaluation for Criticality Safety Applications
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Leal, L. C.; Guber, K. H.; Spencer, R. R.; Derrien, H.; Wright, R. Q.
2002-12-01
The Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 93-2 motivated the US Department of Energy (DOE) to develop a comprehensive criticality safety program to maintain and to predict the criticality of systems throughout the DOE complex. To implement the response to the DNFSB Recommendation 93-2, a Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) was created including the following tasks: Critical Experiments, Criticality Benchmarks, Training, Analytical Methods, and Nuclear Data. The Nuclear Data portion of the NCSP consists of a variety of differential measurements performed at the Oak Ridge Electron Linear Accelerator (ORELA) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), data analysis and evaluation using the generalized least-squares fitting code SAMMY in the resolved, unresolved, and high energy ranges, and the development and benchmark testing of complete evaluations for a nuclide for inclusion into the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF/B). This paper outlines the work performed at ORNL to measure, evaluate, and test the nuclear data for aluminum for applications in criticality safety problems.
The US commercial space launch program and the Department of Defense dilemma
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Clapp, William G.
1994-08-01
A scenario by which the United States might regain its lost advantage in launching commercial satellites is developed using the Ariane space commercial launch company as a benchmark. Ariane's advantages are identified and low-cost recommendations for countering them are presented The four areas selected for analysis inidentifying an American strategy are launch vehicle: (1) payload characteristics; (2) delivery costs; (3) selection process; and (4) technology. Several of the recommendations require Department of Defense funding even though the primary beneficiary appears to be the commercial space sector. But this will ensure that the military has affordable access to space and it is part of a dual purpose strategy whereby government spending benefits both the public and private sector. There is also a brief discussion of other foreign launch vehicle competition.
77 FR 8842 - Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-15
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army [Docket ID USA-2008-0006] Proposed Collection... effort as a useful self-assessment, self-improvement, and benchmarking tool, while ensuring that data..., Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2012-3506 Filed 2-14-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P ...
The philosophy of benchmark testing a standards-based picture archiving and communications system.
Richardson, N E; Thomas, J A; Lyche, D K; Romlein, J; Norton, G S; Dolecek, Q E
1999-05-01
The Department of Defense issued its requirements for a Digital Imaging Network-Picture Archiving and Communications System (DIN-PACS) in a Request for Proposals (RFP) to industry in January 1997, with subsequent contracts being awarded in November 1997 to the Agfa Division of Bayer and IBM Global Government Industry. The Government's technical evaluation process consisted of evaluating a written technical proposal as well as conducting a benchmark test of each proposed system at the vendor's test facility. The purpose of benchmark testing was to evaluate the performance of the fully integrated system in a simulated operational environment. The benchmark test procedures and test equipment were developed through a joint effort between the Government, academic institutions, and private consultants. Herein the authors discuss the resources required and the methods used to benchmark test a standards-based PACS.
The NAS kernel benchmark program
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Bailey, D. H.; Barton, J. T.
1985-01-01
A collection of benchmark test kernels that measure supercomputer performance has been developed for the use of the NAS (Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation) program at the NASA Ames Research Center. This benchmark program is described in detail and the specific ground rules are given for running the program as a performance test.
Sputnik and United States K-12 science education
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Hare, Donna Leigh
The intention of this study was to examine the relationships of the United States space program, education (especially science education), politics, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) to each other and the effects set in motion by the Russian's launch of Sputnik I upon those entities and their relationships. It provides a preliminary assessment of developments in United States rocket science as well as science education to the early 1950s. The scope of this investigation was confined to the historical development of four distinct yet related entities; (1) U.S. science education, (2) space exploration, (3) government and politics, and (4) the National Science Foundation. Its focus was on the years 1957 to 1966. The launch of Sputnik I in 1957, the passage of the National Defense Education Act (NDEA) in 1958, the Secondary Education Act in 1965 and the end of the Gemini program in 1966 represent the defining benchmarks for this study. 169 The most significant and durable outcomes of the Sputnik crisis in relation to science education were: (1) a formalized linkage between science education and national defense; (2) federal funding to education; (3) the passage of the NDEA with its entitlements; (4) the alignment of the NSF with precollege science education issues; (5) NSF Summer Institutes for Science Teachers and NSF Science Course Improvement Projects; and (6) the establishment of response to perceived threat to national defense as a legislative and funding support mechanism for science education.
A Competitive Benchmarking Study of Noncredit Program Administration.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Alstete, Jeffrey W.
1996-01-01
A benchmarking project to measure administrative processes and financial ratios received 57 usable replies from 300 noncredit continuing education programs. Programs with strong financial surpluses were identified and their processes benchmarked (including response to inquiries, registrants, registrant/staff ratio, new courses, class size,…
Benchmarking clinical photography services in the NHS.
Arbon, Giles
2015-01-01
Benchmarking is used in services across the National Health Service (NHS) using various benchmarking programs. Clinical photography services do not have a program in place and services have to rely on ad hoc surveys of other services. A trial benchmarking exercise was undertaken with 13 services in NHS Trusts. This highlights valuable data and comparisons that can be used to benchmark and improve services throughout the profession.
Measuring How Benchmark Assessments Affect Student Achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 039
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Henderson, Susan; Petrosino, Anthony; Guckenburg, Sarah; Hamilton, Stephen
2007-01-01
This report examines a Massachusetts pilot program for quarterly benchmark exams in middle-school mathematics, finding that program schools do not show greater gains in student achievement after a year. But that finding might reflect limited data rather than ineffective benchmark assessments. Benchmark assessments are used in many districts…
Barty, Rebecca L; Gagliardi, Kathleen; Owens, Wendy; Lauzon, Deborah; Scheuermann, Sheena; Liu, Yang; Wang, Grace; Pai, Menaka; Heddle, Nancy M
2015-07-01
Benchmarking is a quality improvement tool that compares an organization's performance to that of its peers for selected indicators, to improve practice. Processes to develop evidence-based benchmarks for red blood cell (RBC) outdating in Ontario hospitals, based on RBC hospital disposition data from Canadian Blood Services, have been previously reported. These benchmarks were implemented in 160 hospitals provincewide with a multifaceted approach, which included hospital education, inventory management tools and resources, summaries of best practice recommendations, recognition of high-performing sites, and audit tools on the Transfusion Ontario website (http://transfusionontario.org). In this study we describe the implementation process and the impact of the benchmarking program on RBC outdating. A conceptual framework for continuous quality improvement of a benchmarking program was also developed. The RBC outdating rate for all hospitals trended downward continuously from April 2006 to February 2012, irrespective of hospitals' transfusion rates or their distance from the blood supplier. The highest annual outdating rate was 2.82%, at the beginning of the observation period. Each year brought further reductions, with a nadir outdating rate of 1.02% achieved in 2011. The key elements of the successful benchmarking strategy included dynamic targets, a comprehensive and evidence-based implementation strategy, ongoing information sharing, and a robust data system to track information. The Ontario benchmarking program for RBC outdating resulted in continuous and sustained quality improvement. Our conceptual iterative framework for benchmarking provides a guide for institutions implementing a benchmarking program. © 2015 AABB.
Global ISR: Toward a Comprehensive Defense Against Unauthorized Code Execution
2010-10-01
implementation using two of the most popular open- source servers: the Apache web server, and the MySQL database server. For Apache, we measure the effect that...utility ab. T o ta l T im e ( s e c ) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Native Null ISR ISR−MP Fig. 3. The MySQL test-insert bench- mark measures...various SQL operations. The figure draws total execution time as reported by the benchmark utility. Finally, we benchmarked a MySQL database server using
Research on computer systems benchmarking
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Smith, Alan Jay (Principal Investigator)
1996-01-01
This grant addresses the topic of research on computer systems benchmarking and is more generally concerned with performance issues in computer systems. This report reviews work in those areas during the period of NASA support under this grant. The bulk of the work performed concerned benchmarking and analysis of CPUs, compilers, caches, and benchmark programs. The first part of this work concerned the issue of benchmark performance prediction. A new approach to benchmarking and machine characterization was reported, using a machine characterizer that measures the performance of a given system in terms of a Fortran abstract machine. Another report focused on analyzing compiler performance. The performance impact of optimization in the context of our methodology for CPU performance characterization was based on the abstract machine model. Benchmark programs are analyzed in another paper. A machine-independent model of program execution was developed to characterize both machine performance and program execution. By merging these machine and program characterizations, execution time can be estimated for arbitrary machine/program combinations. The work was continued into the domain of parallel and vector machines, including the issue of caches in vector processors and multiprocessors. All of the afore-mentioned accomplishments are more specifically summarized in this report, as well as those smaller in magnitude supported by this grant.
Competing dynamic phases of active polymer networks
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Freedman, Simon; Banerjee, Shiladitya; Dinner, Aaron R.
Recent experiments on in-vitro reconstituted assemblies of F-actin, myosin-II motors, and cross-linking proteins show that tuning local network properties can changes the fundamental biomechanical behavior of the system. For example, by varying cross-linker density and actin bundle rigidity, one can switch between contractile networks useful for reshaping cells, polarity sorted networks ideal for directed molecular transport, and frustrated networks with robust structural properties. To efficiently investigate the dynamic phases of actomyosin networks, we developed a coarse grained non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of model semiflexible filaments, molecular motors, and cross-linkers with phenomenologically defined interactions. The simulation's accuracy was verified by benchmarking the mechanical properties of its individual components and collective behavior against experimental results at the molecular and network scales. By adjusting the model's parameters, we can reproduce the qualitative phases observed in experiment and predict the protein characteristics where phase crossovers could occur in collective network dynamics. Our model provides a framework for understanding cells' multiple uses of actomyosin networks and their applicability in materials research. Supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Bailey, David H.
The NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) are a suite of parallel computer performance benchmarks. They were originally developed at the NASA Ames Research Center in 1991 to assess high-end parallel supercomputers. Although they are no longer used as widely as they once were for comparing high-end system performance, they continue to be studied and analyzed a great deal in the high-performance computing community. The acronym 'NAS' originally stood for the Numerical Aeronautical Simulation Program at NASA Ames. The name of this organization was subsequently changed to the Numerical Aerospace Simulation Program, and more recently to the NASA Advanced Supercomputing Center, althoughmore » the acronym remains 'NAS.' The developers of the original NPB suite were David H. Bailey, Eric Barszcz, John Barton, David Browning, Russell Carter, LeoDagum, Rod Fatoohi, Samuel Fineberg, Paul Frederickson, Thomas Lasinski, Rob Schreiber, Horst Simon, V. Venkatakrishnan and Sisira Weeratunga. The original NAS Parallel Benchmarks consisted of eight individual benchmark problems, each of which focused on some aspect of scientific computing. The principal focus was in computational aerophysics, although most of these benchmarks have much broader relevance, since in a much larger sense they are typical of many real-world scientific computing applications. The NPB suite grew out of the need for a more rational procedure to select new supercomputers for acquisition by NASA. The emergence of commercially available highly parallel computer systems in the late 1980s offered an attractive alternative to parallel vector supercomputers that had been the mainstay of high-end scientific computing. However, the introduction of highly parallel systems was accompanied by a regrettable level of hype, not only on the part of the commercial vendors but even, in some cases, by scientists using the systems. As a result, it was difficult to discern whether the new systems offered any fundamental performance advantage over vector supercomputers, and, if so, which of the parallel offerings would be most useful in real-world scientific computation. In part to draw attention to some of the performance reporting abuses prevalent at the time, the present author wrote a humorous essay 'Twelve Ways to Fool the Masses,' which described in a light-hearted way a number of the questionable ways in which both vendor marketing people and scientists were inflating and distorting their performance results. All of this underscored the need for an objective and scientifically defensible measure to compare performance on these systems.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Arnis Judzis
2003-01-01
This document details the progress to date on the ''OPTIMIZATION OF MUD HAMMER DRILLING PERFORMANCE -- A PROGRAM TO BENCHMARK THE VIABILITY OF ADVANCED MUD HAMMER DRILLING'' contract for the quarter starting October 2002 through December 2002. Even though we are awaiting the optimization portion of the testing program, accomplishments included the following: (1) Smith International participated in the DOE Mud Hammer program through full scale benchmarking testing during the week of 4 November 2003. (2) TerraTek acknowledges Smith International, BP America, PDVSA, and ConocoPhillips for cost-sharing the Smith benchmarking tests allowing extension of the contract to add to themore » benchmarking testing program. (3) Following the benchmark testing of the Smith International hammer, representatives from DOE/NETL, TerraTek, Smith International and PDVSA met at TerraTek in Salt Lake City to review observations, performance and views on the optimization step for 2003. (4) The December 2002 issue of Journal of Petroleum Technology (Society of Petroleum Engineers) highlighted the DOE fluid hammer testing program and reviewed last years paper on the benchmark performance of the SDS Digger and Novatek hammers. (5) TerraTek's Sid Green presented a technical review for DOE/NETL personnel in Morgantown on ''Impact Rock Breakage'' and its importance on improving fluid hammer performance. Much discussion has taken place on the issues surrounding mud hammer performance at depth conditions.« less
Benchmarking Helps Measure Union Programs, Operations.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Mann, Jerry
2001-01-01
Explores three examples of benchmarking by college student unions. Focuses on how a union can collect information from other unions for use as benchmarking standards for the purposes of selling a concept or justifying program increases, or for comparing a union's financial performance to other unions. (EV)
Machine characterization and benchmark performance prediction
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Saavedra-Barrera, Rafael H.
1988-01-01
From runs of standard benchmarks or benchmark suites, it is not possible to characterize the machine nor to predict the run time of other benchmarks which have not been run. A new approach to benchmarking and machine characterization is reported. The creation and use of a machine analyzer is described, which measures the performance of a given machine on FORTRAN source language constructs. The machine analyzer yields a set of parameters which characterize the machine and spotlight its strong and weak points. Also described is a program analyzer, which analyzes FORTRAN programs and determines the frequency of execution of each of the same set of source language operations. It is then shown that by combining a machine characterization and a program characterization, we are able to predict with good accuracy the run time of a given benchmark on a given machine. Characterizations are provided for the Cray-X-MP/48, Cyber 205, IBM 3090/200, Amdahl 5840, Convex C-1, VAX 8600, VAX 11/785, VAX 11/780, SUN 3/50, and IBM RT-PC/125, and for the following benchmark programs or suites: Los Alamos (BMK8A1), Baskett, Linpack, Livermore Loops, Madelbrot Set, NAS Kernels, Shell Sort, Smith, Whetstone and Sieve of Erathostenes.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Munro, J.F.; Kristal, J.; Thompson, G.
The Office of Environmental Management is bringing Headquarters and the Field together to implement process improvements throughout the Complex through a systematic process of organizational learning called benchmarking. Simply stated, benchmarking is a process of continuously comparing and measuring practices, processes, or methodologies with those of other private and public organizations. The EM benchmarking program, which began as the result of a recommendation from Xerox Corporation, is building trust and removing barriers to performance enhancement across the DOE organization. The EM benchmarking program is designed to be field-centered with Headquarters providing facilitatory and integrative functions on an ``as needed`` basis.more » One of the main goals of the program is to assist Field Offices and their associated M&O/M&I contractors develop the capabilities to do benchmarking for themselves. In this regard, a central precept is that in order to realize tangible performance benefits, program managers and staff -- the ones closest to the work - must take ownership of the studies. This avoids the ``check the box`` mentality associated with some third party studies. This workshop will provide participants with a basic level of understanding why the EM benchmarking team was developed and the nature and scope of its mission. Participants will also begin to understand the types of study levels and the particular methodology the EM benchmarking team is using to conduct studies. The EM benchmarking team will also encourage discussion on ways that DOE (both Headquarters and the Field) can team with its M&O/M&I contractors to conduct additional benchmarking studies. This ``introduction to benchmarking`` is intended to create a desire to know more and a greater appreciation of how benchmarking processes could be creatively employed to enhance performance.« less
LASL benchmark performance 1978. [CDC STAR-100, 6600, 7600, Cyber 73, and CRAY-1
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
McKnight, A.L.
1979-08-01
This report presents the results of running several benchmark programs on a CDC STAR-100, a Cray Research CRAY-1, a CDC 6600, a CDC 7600, and a CDC Cyber 73. The benchmark effort included CRAY-1's at several installations running different operating systems and compilers. This benchmark is part of an ongoing program at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory to collect performance data and monitor the development trend of supercomputers. 3 tables.
Issues to consider in the derivation of water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life.
Schneider, Uwe
2014-01-01
While water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life have been in use in some jurisdictions for several decades (USA, Canada, several European countries), more and more countries are now setting up their own national water quality benchmark development programs. In doing so, they either adopt an existing method from another jurisdiction, update on an existing approach, or develop their own new derivation method. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages, and many issues have to be addressed when setting up a water quality benchmark development program or when deriving a water quality benchmark. Each of these tasks requires a special expertise. They may seem simple, but are complex in their details. The intention of this paper was to provide some guidance for this process of water quality benchmark development on the program level, for the derivation methodology development, and in the actual benchmark derivation step, as well as to point out some issues (notably the inclusion of adapted populations and cryptic species and points to consider in the use of the species sensitivity distribution approach) and future opportunities (an international data repository and international collaboration in water quality benchmark development).
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Baker, Thomas E.
This paper describes Austin College's (Texas) participation in the Benchmark Project, a collaborative followup study of teacher education graduates and their principals, focusing on the second round of data collection. The Benchmark Project was a collaboration of 11 teacher preparation programs that gathered and analyzed data comparing graduates…
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Self-Brown, Shannon; Valente, Jessica R.; Wild, Robert C.; Whitaker, Daniel J.; Galanter, Rachel; Dorsey, Shannon; Stanley, Jenelle
2012-01-01
Benchmarking is a program evaluation approach that can be used to study whether the outcomes of parents/children who participate in an evidence-based program in the community approximate the outcomes found in randomized trials. This paper presents a case illustration using benchmarking methodology to examine a community implementation of…
14 CFR 1274.204 - Costs and payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... Government. (4) When other Government agencies act as partners along with NASA (e.g., Department of Defense... cooperative agreement are made by NASA based on the accomplishment by the recipient of predetermined tangible... benchmarks. The milestone must represent the accomplishment of verifiable, significant event(s) and may not...
14 CFR 1274.204 - Costs and payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... Government. (4) When other Government agencies act as partners along with NASA (e.g., Department of Defense... cooperative agreement are made by NASA based on the accomplishment by the recipient of predetermined tangible... benchmarks. The milestone must represent the accomplishment of verifiable, significant event(s) and may not...
Benchmarks: The Development of a New Approach to Student Evaluation.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Larter, Sylvia
The Toronto Board of Education Benchmarks are libraries of reference materials that demonstrate student achievement at various levels. Each library contains video benchmarks, print benchmarks, a staff handbook, and summary and introductory documents. This book is about the development and the history of the benchmark program. It has taken over 3…
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Coughlin, David C.; Bielen, Rhonda P.
This paper has been prepared to assist the United States Department of Labor to explore new approaches to evaluating and measuring the performance of employment and training activities for youth. As one of several tools for evaluating success of local youth training programs, "benchmarking" provides a system for measuring the development…
Benchmark Evaluation of HTR-PROTEUS Pebble Bed Experimental Program
Bess, John D.; Montierth, Leland; Köberl, Oliver; ...
2014-10-09
Benchmark models were developed to evaluate 11 critical core configurations of the HTR-PROTEUS pebble bed experimental program. Various additional reactor physics measurements were performed as part of this program; currently only a total of 37 absorber rod worth measurements have been evaluated as acceptable benchmark experiments for Cores 4, 9, and 10. Dominant uncertainties in the experimental keff for all core configurations come from uncertainties in the ²³⁵U enrichment of the fuel, impurities in the moderator pebbles, and the density and impurity content of the radial reflector. Calculations of k eff with MCNP5 and ENDF/B-VII.0 neutron nuclear data aremore » greater than the benchmark values but within 1% and also within the 3σ uncertainty, except for Core 4, which is the only randomly packed pebble configuration. Repeated calculations of k eff with MCNP6.1 and ENDF/B-VII.1 are lower than the benchmark values and within 1% (~3σ) except for Cores 5 and 9, which calculate lower than the benchmark eigenvalues within 4σ. The primary difference between the two nuclear data libraries is the adjustment of the absorption cross section of graphite. Simulations of the absorber rod worth measurements are within 3σ of the benchmark experiment values. The complete benchmark evaluation details are available in the 2014 edition of the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments.« less
"Aid to Thought"--Just Simulate It!
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Kinczkowski, Linda; Cardon, Phillip; Speelman, Pamela
2015-01-01
This paper provides examples of Aid-to-Thought uses in urban decision making, classroom laboratory planning, and in a ship antiaircraft defense system. Aid-to-Thought modeling and simulations are tools students can use effectively in a STEM classroom while meeting Standards for Technological Literacy Benchmarks O and R. These projects prepare…
The Zoo, Benchmarks & You: How To Reach the Oregon State Benchmarks with Zoo Resources.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
2002
This document aligns Oregon state educational benchmarks and standards with Oregon Zoo resources. Benchmark areas examined include English, mathematics, science, social studies, and career and life roles. Brief descriptions of the programs offered by the zoo are presented. (SOE)
Benchmarking in Academic Pharmacy Departments
Chisholm-Burns, Marie; Nappi, Jean; Gubbins, Paul O.; Ross, Leigh Ann
2010-01-01
Benchmarking in academic pharmacy, and recommendations for the potential uses of benchmarking in academic pharmacy departments are discussed in this paper. Benchmarking is the process by which practices, procedures, and performance metrics are compared to an established standard or best practice. Many businesses and industries use benchmarking to compare processes and outcomes, and ultimately plan for improvement. Institutions of higher learning have embraced benchmarking practices to facilitate measuring the quality of their educational and research programs. Benchmarking is used internally as well to justify the allocation of institutional resources or to mediate among competing demands for additional program staff or space. Surveying all chairs of academic pharmacy departments to explore benchmarking issues such as department size and composition, as well as faculty teaching, scholarly, and service productivity, could provide valuable information. To date, attempts to gather this data have had limited success. We believe this information is potentially important, urge that efforts to gather it should be continued, and offer suggestions to achieve full participation. PMID:21179251
Benchmarking in academic pharmacy departments.
Bosso, John A; Chisholm-Burns, Marie; Nappi, Jean; Gubbins, Paul O; Ross, Leigh Ann
2010-10-11
Benchmarking in academic pharmacy, and recommendations for the potential uses of benchmarking in academic pharmacy departments are discussed in this paper. Benchmarking is the process by which practices, procedures, and performance metrics are compared to an established standard or best practice. Many businesses and industries use benchmarking to compare processes and outcomes, and ultimately plan for improvement. Institutions of higher learning have embraced benchmarking practices to facilitate measuring the quality of their educational and research programs. Benchmarking is used internally as well to justify the allocation of institutional resources or to mediate among competing demands for additional program staff or space. Surveying all chairs of academic pharmacy departments to explore benchmarking issues such as department size and composition, as well as faculty teaching, scholarly, and service productivity, could provide valuable information. To date, attempts to gather this data have had limited success. We believe this information is potentially important, urge that efforts to gather it should be continued, and offer suggestions to achieve full participation.
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Favata, Antonino; Micheletti, Andrea; Ryu, Seunghwa; Pugno, Nicola M.
2016-10-01
An analytical benchmark and a simple consistent Mathematica program are proposed for graphene and carbon nanotubes, that may serve to test any molecular dynamics code implemented with REBO potentials. By exploiting the benchmark, we checked results produced by LAMMPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) when adopting the second generation Brenner potential, we made evident that this code in its current implementation produces results which are offset from those of the benchmark by a significant amount, and provide evidence of the reason.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Arnis Judzis
2002-10-01
This document details the progress to date on the OPTIMIZATION OF MUD HAMMER DRILLING PERFORMANCE -- A PROGRAM TO BENCHMARK THE VIABILITY OF ADVANCED MUD HAMMER DRILLING contract for the quarter starting July 2002 through September 2002. Even though we are awaiting the optimization portion of the testing program, accomplishments include the following: (1) Smith International agreed to participate in the DOE Mud Hammer program. (2) Smith International chromed collars for upcoming benchmark tests at TerraTek, now scheduled for 4Q 2002. (3) ConocoPhillips had a field trial of the Smith fluid hammer offshore Vietnam. The hammer functioned properly, though themore » well encountered hole conditions and reaming problems. ConocoPhillips plan another field trial as a result. (4) DOE/NETL extended the contract for the fluid hammer program to allow Novatek to ''optimize'' their much delayed tool to 2003 and to allow Smith International to add ''benchmarking'' tests in light of SDS Digger Tools' current financial inability to participate. (5) ConocoPhillips joined the Industry Advisors for the mud hammer program. (6) TerraTek acknowledges Smith International, BP America, PDVSA, and ConocoPhillips for cost-sharing the Smith benchmarking tests allowing extension of the contract to complete the optimizations.« less
NASA Software Engineering Benchmarking Effort
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Godfrey, Sally; Rarick, Heather
2012-01-01
Benchmarking was very interesting and provided a wealth of information (1) We did see potential solutions to some of our "top 10" issues (2) We have an assessment of where NASA stands with relation to other aerospace/defense groups We formed new contacts and potential collaborations (1) Several organizations sent us examples of their templates, processes (2) Many of the organizations were interested in future collaboration: sharing of training, metrics, Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) appraisers, instructors, etc. We received feedback from some of our contractors/ partners (1) Desires to participate in our training; provide feedback on procedures (2) Welcomed opportunity to provide feedback on working with NASA
The Army Pollution Prevention Program: Improving Performance Through Benchmarking.
1995-06-01
Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE June 1995 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE...unlimited 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) This report investigates the feasibility of using benchmarking as a method for...could use to determine to what degree it should integrate benchmarking with other quality management tools to support the pollution prevention program
Weaver, GracieLee M; Mendenhall, Brandon N; Hunnicutt, David; Picarella, Ryan; Leffelman, Brittanie; Perko, Michael; Bibeau, Daniel L
2018-05-01
The purpose of this study was to quantify the performance of organizations' worksite health promotion (WHP) activities against the benchmarking criteria included in the Well Workplace Checklist (WWC). The Wellness Council of America (WELCOA) developed a tool to assess WHP with its 100-item WWC, which represents WELCOA's 7 performance benchmarks. Workplaces. This study includes a convenience sample of organizations who completed the checklist from 2008 to 2015. The sample size was 4643 entries from US organizations. The WWC includes demographic questions, general questions about WHP programs, and scales to measure the performance against the WELCOA 7 benchmarks. Descriptive analyses of WWC items were completed separately for each year of the study period. The majority of the organizations represented each year were multisite, multishift, medium- to large-sized companies mostly in the services industry. Despite yearly changes in participating organizations, results across the WELCOA 7 benchmark scores were consistent year to year. Across all years, benchmarks that organizations performed the lowest were senior-level support, data collection, and programming; wellness teams and supportive environments were the highest scoring benchmarks. In an era marked with economic swings and health-care reform, it appears that organizations are staying consistent in their performance across these benchmarks. The WWC could be useful for organizations, practitioners, and researchers in assessing the quality of WHP programs.
1986-10-01
The package had been modified and enhanced by a commercial vendor who was marketing the package. Unforeseen events halted pursuit of this approach and...them against the criteria listed in the test plan. Benchmarking took over 10 months to complete. The UNICORN System from SIRSI Corporation and BRS
78 FR 72930 - Determination of Benchmark Compensation Amount for Certain Executives and Employees
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-04
... applies to the compensation of certain contractor senior executives on contracts with civilian agencies (i... senior executives to all of its employees (section 803 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY... remains applicable only to certain contractor senior executives, which is defined as the five most highly...
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Mehring, James W.; Thomas, Scott D.
1995-11-01
The Data Services Segment of the Defense Mapping Agency's Digital Production System provides a digital archive of imagery source data for use by DMA's cartographic user's. This system was developed in the mid-1980's and is currently undergoing modernization. This paper addresses the modernization of the imagery buffer function that was performed by custom hardware in the baseline system and is being replaced by a RAID Server based on commercial off the shelf (COTS) hardware. The paper briefly describes the baseline DMA image system and the modernization program, that is currently under way. Throughput benchmark measurements were made to make design configuration decisions for a commercial off the shelf (COTS) RAID Server to perform as system image buffer. The test program began with performance measurements of the RAID read and write operations between the RAID arrays and the server CPU for RAID levels 0, 5 and 0+1. Interface throughput measurements were made for the HiPPI interface between the RAID Server and the image archive and processing system as well as the client side interface between a custom interface board that provides the interface between the internal bus of the RAID Server and the Input- Output Processor (IOP) external wideband network currently in place in the DMA system to service client workstations. End to end measurements were taken from the HiPPI interface through the RAID write and read operations to the IOP output interface.
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Bailey, D. H.; Barszcz, E.; Barton, J. T.; Carter, R. L.; Lasinski, T. A.; Browning, D. S.; Dagum, L.; Fatoohi, R. A.; Frederickson, P. O.; Schreiber, R. S.
1991-01-01
A new set of benchmarks has been developed for the performance evaluation of highly parallel supercomputers in the framework of the NASA Ames Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation (NAS) Program. These consist of five 'parallel kernel' benchmarks and three 'simulated application' benchmarks. Together they mimic the computation and data movement characteristics of large-scale computational fluid dynamics applications. The principal distinguishing feature of these benchmarks is their 'pencil and paper' specification-all details of these benchmarks are specified only algorithmically. In this way many of the difficulties associated with conventional benchmarking approaches on highly parallel systems are avoided.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
McGregor, Ellen N.; Attinasi, Louis C., Jr.
This paper describes the processes involved in selecting peer institutions for appropriate benchmarking using national databases (NCES-IPEDS). Benchmarking involves the identification of peer institutions and/or best practices in specific operational areas for the purpose of developing standards. The benchmarking process was borne in the early…
Benchmarking to improve the quality of cystic fibrosis care.
Schechter, Michael S
2012-11-01
Benchmarking involves the ascertainment of healthcare programs with most favorable outcomes as a means to identify and spread effective strategies for delivery of care. The recent interest in the development of patient registries for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been fueled in part by an interest in using them to facilitate benchmarking. This review summarizes reports of how benchmarking has been operationalized in attempts to improve CF care. Although certain goals of benchmarking can be accomplished with an exclusive focus on registry data analysis, benchmarking programs in Germany and the United States have supplemented these data analyses with exploratory interactions and discussions to better understand successful approaches to care and encourage their spread throughout the care network. Benchmarking allows the discovery and facilitates the spread of effective approaches to care. It provides a pragmatic alternative to traditional research methods such as randomized controlled trials, providing insights into methods that optimize delivery of care and allowing judgments about the relative effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Policy. 323.3 Section 323.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.3 Policy. DLA adopts and supplements the DoD Privacy Program policy...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Policy. 323.3 Section 323.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.3 Policy. DLA adopts and supplements the DoD Privacy Program policy...
An Integrated Development Environment for Adiabatic Quantum Programming
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Humble, Travis S; McCaskey, Alex; Bennink, Ryan S
2014-01-01
Adiabatic quantum computing is a promising route to the computational power afforded by quantum information processing. The recent availability of adiabatic hardware raises the question of how well quantum programs perform. Benchmarking behavior is challenging since the multiple steps to synthesize an adiabatic quantum program are highly tunable. We present an adiabatic quantum programming environment called JADE that provides control over all the steps taken during program development. JADE captures the workflow needed to rigorously benchmark performance while also allowing a variety of problem types, programming techniques, and processor configurations. We have also integrated JADE with a quantum simulation enginemore » that enables program profiling using numerical calculation. The computational engine supports plug-ins for simulation methodologies tailored to various metrics and computing resources. We present the design, integration, and deployment of JADE and discuss its use for benchmarking adiabatic quantum programs.« less
32 CFR 2.2 - Statutory relief for participating programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Statutory relief for participating programs. 2.2 Section 2.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM POLICY § 2.2 Statutory relief for participating programs. (a) Within the limitations prescribed...
32 CFR 2.2 - Statutory relief for participating programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Statutory relief for participating programs. 2.2 Section 2.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM POLICY § 2.2 Statutory relief for participating programs. (a) Within the limitations prescribed...
32 CFR 2.2 - Statutory relief for participating programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Statutory relief for participating programs. 2.2 Section 2.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM POLICY § 2.2 Statutory relief for participating programs. (a) Within the limitations prescribed...
32 CFR 2.2 - Statutory relief for participating programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Statutory relief for participating programs. 2.2 Section 2.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM POLICY § 2.2 Statutory relief for participating programs. (a) Within the limitations prescribed...
32 CFR 2.2 - Statutory relief for participating programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Statutory relief for participating programs. 2.2 Section 2.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAM POLICY § 2.2 Statutory relief for participating programs. (a) Within the limitations prescribed...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 195 - Programs to Which This Part Applies
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Programs to Which This Part Applies A Appendix A to Part 195 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) MISCELLANEOUS NONDISCRIMINATION IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 195 - Programs to Which This Part Applies
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Programs to Which This Part Applies A Appendix A to Part 195 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) MISCELLANEOUS NONDISCRIMINATION IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 195 - Programs to Which This Part Applies
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Programs to Which This Part Applies A Appendix A to Part 195 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) MISCELLANEOUS NONDISCRIMINATION IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-13
... the Defense Manpower Data Center, Department of Defense AGENCY: Postal Service TM . ACTION: Notice of Computer Matching Program--United States Postal Service and the Defense Manpower Data Center, Department of... as the recipient agency in a computer matching program with the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-21
... 2006 Decision Memorandum) at ``Benchmarks for Short-Term Financing.'' B. Benchmark for Long-Term Loans.... Subsidies Valuation Information A. Benchmarks for Short-Term Financing For those programs requiring the application of a won-denominated, short-term interest rate benchmark, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.505(a)(2...
32 CFR 323.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... on the Defense Privacy Board and the Defense Data Integrity Board. (3) Provides advice and assistance... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.4 Responsibilities. (a) General Counsel. The General...
The Medical Library Association Benchmarking Network: development and implementation.
Dudden, Rosalind Farnam; Corcoran, Kate; Kaplan, Janice; Magouirk, Jeff; Rand, Debra C; Smith, Bernie Todd
2006-04-01
This article explores the development and implementation of the Medical Library Association (MLA) Benchmarking Network from the initial idea and test survey, to the implementation of a national survey in 2002, to the establishment of a continuing program in 2004. Started as a program for hospital libraries, it has expanded to include other nonacademic health sciences libraries. The activities and timelines of MLA's Benchmarking Network task forces and editorial board from 1998 to 2004 are described. The Benchmarking Network task forces successfully developed an extensive questionnaire with parameters of size and measures of library activity and published a report of the data collected by September 2002. The data were available to all MLA members in the form of aggregate tables. Utilization of Web-based technologies proved feasible for data intake and interactive display. A companion article analyzes and presents some of the data. MLA has continued to develop the Benchmarking Network with the completion of a second survey in 2004. The Benchmarking Network has provided many small libraries with comparative data to present to their administrators. It is a challenge for the future to convince all MLA members to participate in this valuable program.
The Medical Library Association Benchmarking Network: development and implementation*
Dudden, Rosalind Farnam; Corcoran, Kate; Kaplan, Janice; Magouirk, Jeff; Rand, Debra C.; Smith, Bernie Todd
2006-01-01
Objective: This article explores the development and implementation of the Medical Library Association (MLA) Benchmarking Network from the initial idea and test survey, to the implementation of a national survey in 2002, to the establishment of a continuing program in 2004. Started as a program for hospital libraries, it has expanded to include other nonacademic health sciences libraries. Methods: The activities and timelines of MLA's Benchmarking Network task forces and editorial board from 1998 to 2004 are described. Results: The Benchmarking Network task forces successfully developed an extensive questionnaire with parameters of size and measures of library activity and published a report of the data collected by September 2002. The data were available to all MLA members in the form of aggregate tables. Utilization of Web-based technologies proved feasible for data intake and interactive display. A companion article analyzes and presents some of the data. MLA has continued to develop the Benchmarking Network with the completion of a second survey in 2004. Conclusions: The Benchmarking Network has provided many small libraries with comparative data to present to their administrators. It is a challenge for the future to convince all MLA members to participate in this valuable program. PMID:16636702
A comparison of five benchmarks
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Huss, Janice E.; Pennline, James A.
1987-01-01
Five benchmark programs were obtained and run on the NASA Lewis CRAY X-MP/24. A comparison was made between the programs codes and between the methods for calculating performance figures. Several multitasking jobs were run to gain experience in how parallel performance is measured.
32 CFR 323.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Responsibilities. 323.4 Section 323.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.4 Responsibilities. (a) Headquarters Defense Logistics...
32 CFR 323.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Responsibilities. 323.4 Section 323.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.4 Responsibilities. (a) Headquarters Defense Logistics...
48 CFR 228.102-70 - Defense Environmental Restoration Program construction contracts.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Restoration Program construction contracts. 228.102-70 Section 228.102-70 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEFENSE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS BONDS AND INSURANCE Bonds 228.102-70 Defense Environmental Restoration Program construction contracts...
2011-07-01
www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf. 23. Gustav Lindstrom , “Enter the EU Battlegroups,” Chaillot Paper, No. 97, February 2007, Paris, France: EU...individual human be- ing is our Benchmark. U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE Major General Gregg F. Martin Commandant ***** STRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE Director
Department of Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization (DHMSM)
2016-03-01
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Department of Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization (DHMSM) Defense...DSN Fax: Date Assigned: November 16, 2015 Program Information Program Name Department of Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization...DHMSM) DoD Component DoD The acquiring DoD Component is Program Executive Office (PEO) Department of Defense (DoD) Healthcare Management Systems (DHMS
32 CFR 322.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.1 Purpose and... of Defense Privacy Program (32 CFR part 310) within the National Security Agency/Central Security...
32 CFR 322.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.1 Purpose and... of Defense Privacy Program (32 CFR part 310) within the National Security Agency/Central Security...
32 CFR 322.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.1 Purpose and... of Defense Privacy Program (32 CFR part 310) within the National Security Agency/Central Security...
32 CFR 322.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.1 Purpose and... of Defense Privacy Program (32 CFR part 310) within the National Security Agency/Central Security...
32 CFR 322.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.1 Purpose and... of Defense Privacy Program (32 CFR part 310) within the National Security Agency/Central Security...
7 CFR 1469.7 - Benchmark condition inventory and conservation stewardship plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 7 Agriculture 10 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Benchmark condition inventory and conservation...) COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS CONSERVATION SECURITY PROGRAM General Provisions § 1469.7 Benchmark condition inventory and conservation stewardship...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Purpose. 323.1 Section 323.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.1 Purpose. This part sets out Defense Logistics Agency policy...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Purpose. 323.1 Section 323.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.1 Purpose. This part sets out Defense Logistics Agency policy...
32 CFR 318.1 - Reissuance and purpose.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 318.1 Reissuance and purpose. (a) This part updates the policies, responsibilities, and procedures of the DTRA Privacy Program under the Privacy Act...
Benchmarking: applications to transfusion medicine.
Apelseth, Torunn Oveland; Molnar, Laura; Arnold, Emmy; Heddle, Nancy M
2012-10-01
Benchmarking is as a structured continuous collaborative process in which comparisons for selected indicators are used to identify factors that, when implemented, will improve transfusion practices. This study aimed to identify transfusion medicine studies reporting on benchmarking, summarize the benchmarking approaches used, and identify important considerations to move the concept of benchmarking forward in the field of transfusion medicine. A systematic review of published literature was performed to identify transfusion medicine-related studies that compared at least 2 separate institutions or regions with the intention of benchmarking focusing on 4 areas: blood utilization, safety, operational aspects, and blood donation. Forty-five studies were included: blood utilization (n = 35), safety (n = 5), operational aspects of transfusion medicine (n = 5), and blood donation (n = 0). Based on predefined criteria, 7 publications were classified as benchmarking, 2 as trending, and 36 as single-event studies. Three models of benchmarking are described: (1) a regional benchmarking program that collects and links relevant data from existing electronic sources, (2) a sentinel site model where data from a limited number of sites are collected, and (3) an institutional-initiated model where a site identifies indicators of interest and approaches other institutions. Benchmarking approaches are needed in the field of transfusion medicine. Major challenges include defining best practices and developing cost-effective methods of data collection. For those interested in initiating a benchmarking program, the sentinel site model may be most effective and sustainable as a starting point, although the regional model would be the ideal goal. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
32 CFR 323.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.4 Responsibilities. (a) Headquarters Defense Logistics...) Formulate policies, procedures, and standards necessary for uniform compliance with the Privacy Act by DLA...
2013-02-25
Directive 5160.41E, Defense Language Program . 10GAO-11-456. Page 5 GAO-13-251R Defense Contracting types of foreign language support that DOD has acquired...Language Transformation Roadmap, (January 2005), and Department of Defense Directive 5160.41E, Defense Language Program . Page 15 GAO-13-251R Defense...examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help
32 CFR 37.1340 - Program official.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Program official. 37.1340 Section 37.1340 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT.... A Federal Government program manager, scientific officer, or other individual who is responsible for...
32 CFR 37.1340 - Program official.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Program official. 37.1340 Section 37.1340 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT.... A Federal Government program manager, scientific officer, or other individual who is responsible for...
42 CFR 422.308 - Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 3 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments. 422.308 Section 422.308 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM (CONTINUED) MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM...
42 CFR 422.308 - Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 3 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments. 422.308 Section 422.308 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM Payments to...
42 CFR 422.308 - Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 3 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments. 422.308 Section 422.308 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM (CONTINUED) MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM...
42 CFR 422.308 - Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 3 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Adjustments to capitation rates, benchmarks, bids, and payments. 422.308 Section 422.308 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM (CONTINUED) MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM...
Setting Evidence-Based Language Goals
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Goertler, Senta; Kraemer, Angelika; Schenker, Theresa
2016-01-01
The purpose of this project was to identify target language benchmarks for the German program at Michigan State University (MSU) based on national and international guidelines and previous research, to assess language skills across course levels and class sections in the entire German program, and to adjust the language benchmarks as needed based…
Iowa's Community College Adult Literacy Annual Report. Program Year 2007, July 1, 2006-June 30, 2007
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Division of Community Colleges and Workforce Preparation, Iowa Department of Education, 2007
2007-01-01
This comprehensive document replaces the previously published Benchmark Report, Benchmark Report Executive Summary, Iowa's Community College Basic Literacy Skills Credential Report, Iowa GED Statistical Report, GED Annual Performance Report and Iowa's Adult Literacy Program National Reporting System Annual Performance Report (Graphic…
MHEC Survey Establishes Midwest Property Insurance Benchmarks.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Midwestern Higher Education Commission Risk Management Institute Research Bulletin, 1994
1994-01-01
This publication presents the results of a survey of over 200 midwestern colleges and universities on their property insurance programs and establishes benchmarks to help these institutions evaluate their insurance programs. Findings included the following: (1) 51 percent of respondents currently purchase their property insurance as part of a…
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Herman, Joan L.; Baker, Eva L.
2005-01-01
Many schools are moving to develop benchmark tests to monitor their students' progress toward state standards throughout the academic year. Benchmark tests can provide the ongoing information that schools need to guide instructional programs and to address student learning problems. The authors discuss six criteria that educators can use to…
40 CFR 141.543 - How is the disinfection benchmark calculated?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
...) WATER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS Enhanced Filtration and Disinfection-Systems Serving Fewer Than 10,000 People Disinfection Benchmark § 141.543 How is the disinfection... 40 Protection of Environment 22 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How is the disinfection benchmark...
32 CFR 319.12 - General exemptions. [Reserved
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false General exemptions. [Reserved] 319.12 Section 319.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.12 General exemptions...
32 CFR 319.12 - General exemptions. [Reserved
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false General exemptions. [Reserved] 319.12 Section 319.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.12 General exemptions...
32 CFR 319.12 - General exemptions. [Reserved
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false General exemptions. [Reserved] 319.12 Section 319.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.12 General exemptions...
32 CFR 298.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Information requirements. 298.5 Section 298.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE (DIS) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR 298.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Information requirements. 298.5 Section 298.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE (DIS) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
Efficient Tracking, Logging, and Blocking of Accesses to Digital Objects
2015-09-01
suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services , Directorate for Information Operations and Reports...4.3.1 Initial User Feedback ................................................................................... 33 4.4 Objective Benchmarks of the System...used and, that we can trap guest OS page faults. Shadow paging is a technique that creates a copy of guest page tables, sanitizes and propagates the
Weapons and Materials Research Directorate (WMRD) Laboratory Demonstration Study
2015-02-01
increases) • Miscellaneous (Protocol for determining GS equivalency and Special Act or Service awards) • Intern and Student Trainee Benchmarking The ARL...the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services , Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson...change from the Civil Service General Schedule (GS) system were 1) enhanced hiring flexibilities, 2) broadbanding, 3) automated classification, 4
2012-02-09
1nclud1ng suggestions for reduc1ng the burden. to the Department of Defense. ExecutiVe Serv1ce D>rectorate (0704-0188) Respondents should be aware...benchmark problem we contacted Bertrand LeCun who in their poject CHOC from 2005-2008 had applied their parallel B&B framework BOB++ to the RLT1
Toccalino, Patricia L.; Nowell, Lisa; Wilber, William; Zogorski, John S.; Donohue, Joyce; Eiden, Catherine; Krietzman, Sandra; Post, Gloria
2003-01-01
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has a need to communicate the significance of the water-quality findings of its National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program in a human-health context. Historically, the USGS has assessed water-quality conditions by comparing water concentration data against established drinking-water standards and guidelines. However, because drinking- water standards and guidelines do not exist for many of the contaminants analyzed by the NAWQA Program and other USGS studies, this approach has proven to be insufficient for placing USGS data in a human-health context. To help meet this need, health-based screening level (HBSL) concentrations or ranges are being determined for unregulated compounds (that is, those for which Federal or State drinking-water standards have not been established), using a consensus approach that was developed collaboratively by the USGS, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA), New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and Oregon Health & Science University. USEPA Office of Water methodologies for calculating Lifetime Health Advisory and Risk-Specific Dose values for drinking water are being used to develop HBSL concentrations (for unregulated noncarcinogens) and HBSL concentration ranges (for most unregulated carcinogens). This report describes the methodologies used to develop HBSL concentrations and ranges for unregulated compounds in State- and local-scale analyses, and discusses how HBSL values can be used as tools in water-quality assessments. Comparisons of measured water concentrations with Maximum Contaminant Level values and HBSL values require that water-quality data be placed in the proper context, with regard to both hydrology and human health. The use of these HBSL concentrations and ranges by USGS will increase by 27 percent the number of NAWQA contaminants for which health-based benchmarks are available for comparison with USGS water-quality data. USGS can use HBSL values to assist the USEPA and State and local agencies by providing them with comparisons of measured water concentrations to scientifically defensible human health-based benchmarks, and by alerting them when measured concentrations approach or exceed these benchmarks.
32 CFR 321.4 - Requirements for identification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Requirements for identification. 321.4 Section 321.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.4 Requirements for identification. (a...
32 CFR 321.4 - Requirements for identification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Requirements for identification. 321.4 Section 321.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.4 Requirements for identification. (a...
32 CFR 321.4 - Requirements for identification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Requirements for identification. 321.4 Section 321.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.4 Requirements for identification. (a...
32 CFR 321.4 - Requirements for identification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Requirements for identification. 321.4 Section 321.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.4 Requirements for identification. (a...
32 CFR 321.4 - Requirements for identification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Requirements for identification. 321.4 Section 321.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.4 Requirements for identification. (a...
32 CFR 300.10 - Judicial actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial actions. 300.10 Section 300.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM FOIA Request Processing...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 316.1 Section 316.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 316.1 Purpose. This part delineates responsibility and provides...
32 CFR 318.13 - Enforcement actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Enforcement actions. 318.13 Section 318.13 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 318.13 Enforcement actions. Procedures and...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... for National Defense, Emergency Preparedness, and Energy Program Use. 52.211-14 Section 52.211-14... for National Defense, Emergency Preparedness, and Energy Program Use. As prescribed in 11.604(a), insert the following provision: Notice of Priority Rating for National Defense, Emergency Preparedness...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-19
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Parts 212 and 252 RIN 0750-AH27 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Pilot Program for Acquisition of Military-Purpose Nondevelopmental Items (DFARS Case 2011-D034) AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System...
32 CFR 319.7 - Special procedures: Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Special procedures: Medical records. 319.7 Section 319.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.7 Special procedures: Medical...
32 CFR 319.7 - Special procedures: Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Special procedures: Medical records. 319.7 Section 319.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.7 Special procedures: Medical...
32 CFR 319.7 - Special procedures: Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Special procedures: Medical records. 319.7 Section 319.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.7 Special procedures: Medical...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Purpose. 291.1 Section 291.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.1 Purpose. This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Purpose. 291.1 Section 291.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.1 Purpose. This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Purpose. 291.1 Section 291.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.1 Purpose. This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 291.1 Section 291.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.1 Purpose. This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Purpose. 291.1 Section 291.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.1 Purpose. This part...
32 CFR 321.6 - Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Medical records. 321.6 Section 321.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.6 Medical records. General. Medical records that are part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Definitions. 321.2 Section 321.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.2 Definitions. (a) All terms used in this part which are...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Fees. 321.11 Section 321.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.11 Fees. Individuals may request copies for retention of any...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Penalties. 321.12 Section 321.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.12 Penalties. (a) An individual may bring a civil action...
32 CFR 321.6 - Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Medical records. 321.6 Section 321.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.6 Medical records. General. Medical records that are part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Fees. 321.11 Section 321.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.11 Fees. Individuals may request copies for retention of any...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Penalties. 321.12 Section 321.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.12 Penalties. (a) An individual may bring a civil action...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Definitions. 321.2 Section 321.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.2 Definitions. (a) All terms used in this part which are...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Definitions. 321.2 Section 321.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.2 Definitions. (a) All terms used in this part which are...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Definitions. 321.2 Section 321.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.2 Definitions. (a) All terms used in this part which are...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Fees. 321.11 Section 321.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.11 Fees. Individuals may request copies for retention of any...
32 CFR 321.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Purpose and applicability. 321.1 Section 321.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.1 Purpose and applicability. (a) This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Definitions. 321.2 Section 321.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.2 Definitions. (a) All terms used in this part which are...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Penalties. 321.12 Section 321.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.12 Penalties. (a) An individual may bring a civil action...
32 CFR 321.6 - Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Medical records. 321.6 Section 321.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.6 Medical records. General. Medical records that are part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Penalties. 321.12 Section 321.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.12 Penalties. (a) An individual may bring a civil action...
32 CFR 321.6 - Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Medical records. 321.6 Section 321.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.6 Medical records. General. Medical records that are part...
32 CFR 321.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose and applicability. 321.1 Section 321.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.1 Purpose and applicability. (a) This part...
32 CFR 321.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Purpose and applicability. 321.1 Section 321.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.1 Purpose and applicability. (a) This part...
32 CFR 321.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Purpose and applicability. 321.1 Section 321.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.1 Purpose and applicability. (a) This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Fees. 321.11 Section 321.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.11 Fees. Individuals may request copies for retention of any...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Fees. 321.11 Section 321.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.11 Fees. Individuals may request copies for retention of any...
32 CFR 321.1 - Purpose and applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Purpose and applicability. 321.1 Section 321.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.1 Purpose and applicability. (a) This part...
32 CFR 321.6 - Medical records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Medical records. 321.6 Section 321.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.6 Medical records. General. Medical records that are part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Penalties. 321.12 Section 321.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.12 Penalties. (a) An individual may bring a civil action...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Authority. 287.3 Section 287.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 287.3 Authority. This part...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Reports. 287.9 Section 287.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 287.9 Reports. An annual...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Appeals. 300.9 Section 300.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM FOIA Request Processing § 300.9...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false General. 300.5 Section 300.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM Exemptions § 300.5 General. Refer to...
32 CFR 300.2 - DLA FOIA regulatory precedence.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false DLA FOIA regulatory precedence. 300.2 Section 300.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM General...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Authority. 316.3 Section 316.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 316.3 Authority. This part is published in accordance with the...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Fees. 287.7 Section 287.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 287.7 Fees. Fees charged...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Questions. 316.7 Section 316.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 316.7 Questions. Questions on both the substance and procedure of...
Global Benchmarking of Marketing Doctoral Program Faculty and Institutions by Subarea
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Elbeck, Matt; Vander Schee, Brian A.
2014-01-01
This study benchmarks marketing doctoral programs worldwide in five popular subareas by faculty and institutional scholarly impact. A multi-item approach identifies a collection of top-tier scholarly journals for each subarea, while citation data over the decade 2003 to 2012 identify high scholarly impact marketing faculty by subarea used to…
Improving Federal Education Programs through an Integrated Performance and Benchmarking System.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Department of Education, Washington, DC. Office of the Under Secretary.
This document highlights the problems with current federal education program data collection activities and lists several factors that make movement toward a possible solution, then discusses the vision for the Integrated Performance and Benchmarking System (IPBS), a vision of an Internet-based system for harvesting information from states about…
Short-Term Field Study Programs: A Holistic and Experiential Approach to Learning
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Long, Mary M.; Sandler, Dennis M.; Topol, Martin T.
2017-01-01
For business schools, AACSB and Middle States' call for more experiential learning is one reason to provide study abroad programs. Universities must attend to the demand for continuous improvement and employ metrics to benchmark and evaluate their relative standing among peer institutions. One such benchmark is the National Survey of Student…
Benchmark Lisp And Ada Programs
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Davis, Gloria; Galant, David; Lim, Raymond; Stutz, John; Gibson, J.; Raghavan, B.; Cheesema, P.; Taylor, W.
1992-01-01
Suite of nonparallel benchmark programs, ELAPSE, designed for three tests: comparing efficiency of computer processing via Lisp vs. Ada; comparing efficiencies of several computers processing via Lisp; or comparing several computers processing via Ada. Tests efficiency which computer executes routines in each language. Available for computer equipped with validated Ada compiler and/or Common Lisp system.
Sczyrba, Alexander; Hofmann, Peter; Belmann, Peter; Koslicki, David; Janssen, Stefan; Dröge, Johannes; Gregor, Ivan; Majda, Stephan; Fiedler, Jessika; Dahms, Eik; Bremges, Andreas; Fritz, Adrian; Garrido-Oter, Ruben; Jørgensen, Tue Sparholt; Shapiro, Nicole; Blood, Philip D.; Gurevich, Alexey; Bai, Yang; Turaev, Dmitrij; DeMaere, Matthew Z.; Chikhi, Rayan; Nagarajan, Niranjan; Quince, Christopher; Meyer, Fernando; Balvočiūtė, Monika; Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg; Sørensen, Søren J.; Chia, Burton K. H.; Denis, Bertrand; Froula, Jeff L.; Wang, Zhong; Egan, Robert; Kang, Dongwan Don; Cook, Jeffrey J.; Deltel, Charles; Beckstette, Michael; Lemaitre, Claire; Peterlongo, Pierre; Rizk, Guillaume; Lavenier, Dominique; Wu, Yu-Wei; Singer, Steven W.; Jain, Chirag; Strous, Marc; Klingenberg, Heiner; Meinicke, Peter; Barton, Michael; Lingner, Thomas; Lin, Hsin-Hung; Liao, Yu-Chieh; Silva, Genivaldo Gueiros Z.; Cuevas, Daniel A.; Edwards, Robert A.; Saha, Surya; Piro, Vitor C.; Renard, Bernhard Y.; Pop, Mihai; Klenk, Hans-Peter; Göker, Markus; Kyrpides, Nikos C.; Woyke, Tanja; Vorholt, Julia A.; Schulze-Lefert, Paul; Rubin, Edward M.; Darling, Aaron E.; Rattei, Thomas; McHardy, Alice C.
2018-01-01
In metagenome analysis, computational methods for assembly, taxonomic profiling and binning are key components facilitating downstream biological data interpretation. However, a lack of consensus about benchmarking datasets and evaluation metrics complicates proper performance assessment. The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) challenge has engaged the global developer community to benchmark their programs on datasets of unprecedented complexity and realism. Benchmark metagenomes were generated from ~700 newly sequenced microorganisms and ~600 novel viruses and plasmids, including genomes with varying degrees of relatedness to each other and to publicly available ones and representing common experimental setups. Across all datasets, assembly and genome binning programs performed well for species represented by individual genomes, while performance was substantially affected by the presence of related strains. Taxonomic profiling and binning programs were proficient at high taxonomic ranks, with a notable performance decrease below the family level. Parameter settings substantially impacted performances, underscoring the importance of program reproducibility. While highlighting current challenges in computational metagenomics, the CAMI results provide a roadmap for software selection to answer specific research questions. PMID:28967888
76 FR 5729 - Department of Defense Personnel Security Program (PSP)
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-02
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary 32 CFR Part 156 [DOD-2008-OS-0160; RIN 0790-AI42] Department of Defense Personnel Security Program (PSP) AGENCY: Department of Defense. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: This rule would update policies and responsibilities for the Department of Defense (DoD...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Fees. 290.8 Section 290.8 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 290.8 Fees. (a) Fees...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Fees. 290.8 Section 290.8 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 290.8 Fees. (a) Fees...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Privacy Program under 5 U.S.C. 552a and OMB Circular A-130. (b) Authorizes the Defense Privacy Board, the Defense Privacy Board Legal Committee, and the Defense Data Integrity Board. (c) Continues to authorize... Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... Privacy Program under 5 U.S.C. 552a and OMB Circular A-130. (b) Authorizes the Defense Privacy Board, the Defense Privacy Board Legal Committee, and the Defense Data Integrity Board. (c) Continues to authorize... Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Policy. 323.2 Section 323.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.2 Policy. It is the policy of DLA to safeguard personal information...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Privacy Program under 5 U.S.C. 552a and OMB Circular A-130. (b) Authorizes the Defense Privacy Board, the Defense Privacy Board Legal Committee, and the Defense Data Integrity Board. (c) Continues to authorize... Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Fees. 319.11 Section 319.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.11 Fees. (a) The schedule of fees chargeable is contained at § 286.60...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Fees. 319.11 Section 319.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.11 Fees. (a) The schedule of fees chargeable is contained at § 286.60...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Fees. 319.11 Section 319.11 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.11 Fees. (a) The schedule of fees chargeable is contained at § 286.60...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Policy. 316.5 Section 316.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 316.5 Policy. It is the policy of DISA: (a) To preserve the...
32 CFR 321.10 - Disclosure to other than subject.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Disclosure to other than subject. 321.10 Section 321.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.10 Disclosure to other than...
32 CFR 321.10 - Disclosure to other than subject.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Disclosure to other than subject. 321.10 Section 321.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.10 Disclosure to other than...
32 CFR 321.5 - Access by subject individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Access by subject individuals. 321.5 Section 321.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.5 Access by subject individuals. (a...
32 CFR 321.5 - Access by subject individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Access by subject individuals. 321.5 Section 321.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.5 Access by subject individuals. (a...
32 CFR 321.10 - Disclosure to other than subject.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Disclosure to other than subject. 321.10 Section 321.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.10 Disclosure to other than...
32 CFR 321.5 - Access by subject individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Access by subject individuals. 321.5 Section 321.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.5 Access by subject individuals. (a...
32 CFR 321.5 - Access by subject individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Access by subject individuals. 321.5 Section 321.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.5 Access by subject individuals. (a...
32 CFR 321.10 - Disclosure to other than subject.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Disclosure to other than subject. 321.10 Section 321.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.10 Disclosure to other than...
32 CFR 321.5 - Access by subject individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Access by subject individuals. 321.5 Section 321.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.5 Access by subject individuals. (a...
32 CFR 323.6 - Forms and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Forms and reports. 323.6 Section 323.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.6 Forms and reports. DLA activities may be required to...
32 CFR 323.6 - Forms and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Forms and reports. 323.6 Section 323.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.6 Forms and reports. DLA activities may be required to...
32 CFR 323.6 - Forms and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Forms and reports. 323.6 Section 323.6 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.6 Forms and reports. DLA activities may be required to...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Policy. 323.2 Section 323.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.2 Policy. It is the policy of DLA to safeguard personal information...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Policy. 323.2 Section 323.2 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 323.2 Policy. It is the policy of DLA to safeguard personal information...
32 CFR Appendix D to Part 290 - Audit Working Papers
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Audit Working Papers D Appendix D to Part 290 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR Appendix D to Part 290 - Audit Working Papers
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Audit Working Papers D Appendix D to Part 290 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR Appendix D to Part 290 - Audit Working Papers
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Audit Working Papers D Appendix D to Part 290 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR Appendix D to Part 290 - Audit Working Papers
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Audit Working Papers D Appendix D to Part 290 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR Appendix D to Part 290 - Audit Working Papers
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Audit Working Papers D Appendix D to Part 290 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR 37.885 - May I require updated program plans?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false May I require updated program plans? 37.885 Section 37.885 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND... Financial and Programmatic Reporting § 37.885 May I require updated program plans? In addition to reports on...
32 CFR 37.885 - May I require updated program plans?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false May I require updated program plans? 37.885 Section 37.885 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND... Financial and Programmatic Reporting § 37.885 May I require updated program plans? In addition to reports on...
32 CFR 37.885 - May I require updated program plans?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false May I require updated program plans? 37.885 Section 37.885 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND... Financial and Programmatic Reporting § 37.885 May I require updated program plans? In addition to reports on...
32 CFR 37.885 - May I require updated program plans?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false May I require updated program plans? 37.885 Section 37.885 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND... Financial and Programmatic Reporting § 37.885 May I require updated program plans? In addition to reports on...
32 CFR 37.885 - May I require updated program plans?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false May I require updated program plans? 37.885 Section 37.885 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND... Financial and Programmatic Reporting § 37.885 May I require updated program plans? In addition to reports on...
The China Factor in Japanese Military Modernization for the 21st Century
1997-06-01
Japan’s ongoing modernization of its forces, which are directed under its National Defense Program Outline and Midterm Defense Program, do not, however...directed under its National Defense Program Outline and Midterm Defense Program, do not, however, seem to be in reaction to any overt perception of a...It did so with the economic motive of acquiring a captive market for Japanese consumer goods, the strategic consideration of preempting Russian
32 CFR 505.13 - Computer Matching Agreement Program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 true Computer Matching Agreement Program. 505.13 Section 505.13 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS ARMY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 505.13 Computer Matching Agreement Program. (a...
Analysis of a benchmark suite to evaluate mixed numeric and symbolic processing
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Ragharan, Bharathi; Galant, David
1992-01-01
The suite of programs that formed the benchmark for a proposed advanced computer is described and analyzed. The features of the processor and its operating system that are tested by the benchmark are discussed. The computer codes and the supporting data for the analysis are given as appendices.
32 CFR 1285.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Defense Other Regulations Relating to National Defense DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 1285.4 Responsibilities. (a) The Staff Director... program, providing guidance and instructions to PLFA's and PSE's. (2) Designates a FOIA manager to...
78 FR 4844 - Defense Programs Advisory Committee
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-23
... Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Defense Programs... Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs on the stewardship and maintenance of the Nation's nuclear... DP management issues, including facility operations and fiscal matters. e. Where appropriate...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Ensuring compliance with this part in programs and activities conducted by the Department of Defense. 56.10 Section 56.10 National Defense Department... THE BASIS OF HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ASSISTED OR CONDUCTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Ensuring compliance with this part in programs and activities conducted by the Department of Defense. 56.10 Section 56.10 National Defense Department... THE BASIS OF HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ASSISTED OR CONDUCTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Ensuring compliance with this part in programs and activities conducted by the Department of Defense. 56.10 Section 56.10 National Defense Department... THE BASIS OF HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ASSISTED OR CONDUCTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Ensuring compliance with this part in programs and activities conducted by the Department of Defense. 56.10 Section 56.10 National Defense Department... THE BASIS OF HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ASSISTED OR CONDUCTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Ensuring compliance with this part in programs and activities conducted by the Department of Defense. 56.10 Section 56.10 National Defense Department... THE BASIS OF HANDICAP IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES ASSISTED OR CONDUCTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE...
32 CFR Appendix F to Part 323 - Litigation Status Sheet
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Litigation Status Sheet F Appendix F to Part 323 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. F Appendix F to Part 323—Litigation Status...
32 CFR 291.9 - For official use only (FOUO).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false For official use only (FOUO). 291.9 Section 291.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.9...
32 CFR 291.9 - For official use only (FOUO).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false For official use only (FOUO). 291.9 Section 291.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.9...
32 CFR 291.9 - For official use only (FOUO).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false For official use only (FOUO). 291.9 Section 291.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.9...
32 CFR Appendix F to Part 323 - Litigation Status Sheet
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Litigation Status Sheet F Appendix F to Part 323 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. F Appendix F to Part 323—Litigation Status...
32 CFR Appendix F to Part 323 - Litigation Status Sheet
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Litigation Status Sheet F Appendix F to Part 323 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. F Appendix F to Part 323—Litigation Status...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-09
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Department of Defense Program for Construction... Economic Adjustment (OEA), Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice describes a... INFORMATION: The Secretary of Defense is authorized by Section 8109 of Public Law 112-10, the Department of...
32 CFR Appendix B to Part 327 - Internal Management Control Review Checklist
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Internal Management Control Review Checklist B Appendix B to Part 327 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Pt. 327, App. B Appendix...
32 CFR Appendix B to Part 327 - Internal Management Control Review Checklist
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Internal Management Control Review Checklist B Appendix B to Part 327 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Pt. 327, App. B Appendix...
Diagnostic Algorithm Benchmarking
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Poll, Scott
2011-01-01
A poster for the NASA Aviation Safety Program Annual Technical Meeting. It describes empirical benchmarking on diagnostic algorithms using data from the ADAPT Electrical Power System testbed and a diagnostic software framework.
Defense Acquisitions: Addressing Incentives is Key to Further Reform Efforts
2014-04-30
championed sound management practices, such as realistic cost estimating, prototyping, and systems engineering . While some progress has been made...other reforms have championed sound management practices, such as realistic cost estimating, prototyping, and systems engineering . DOD’s declining...principles from disciplines such as systems engineering , as well as lessons learned and past reforms. The body of work we have done on benchmarking
Demand Forecasting: An Evaluation of DODs Accuracy Metric and Navys Procedures
2016-06-01
inventory management improvement plan, mean of absolute scaled error, lead time adjusted squared error, forecast accuracy, benchmarking, naïve method...Manager JASA Journal of the American Statistical Association LASE Lead-time Adjusted Squared Error LCI Life Cycle Indicator MA Moving Average MAE...Mean Squared Error xvi NAVSUP Naval Supply Systems Command NDAA National Defense Authorization Act NIIN National Individual Identification Number
Report from the First CERT-RMM Users Group Workshop Series
2012-04-01
deploy processes to support our programs – Benchmark our programs to determine current gaps – Complements current work in CMMI® and ISO 27001 19...benchmarking program performance through process analytics and Lean/Six Sigma activities to ensure Performance Excellence. • Provides ISO Standards...Office www.cmu.edu/ iso 29 Carnegie Mellon University • Est 1967 in Pittsburgh, PA • Global, private research university • Ranked 22nd • 15,000
32 CFR 329.5 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU PRIVACY PROGRAM § 329.5 Responsibilities. (a) Chief of the National Guard Bureau...), approves and establishes overall policy, direction, and guidance for the NGB privacy program and...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 287.1 Purpose. This part assigns responsibilities for the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Program for DISA. ...
Benchmarks of programming languages for special purposes in the space station
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Knoebel, Arthur
1986-01-01
Although Ada is likely to be chosen as the principal programming language for the Space Station, certain needs, such as expert systems and robotics, may be better developed in special languages. The languages, LISP and Prolog, are studied and some benchmarks derived. The mathematical foundations for these languages are reviewed. Likely areas of the space station are sought out where automation and robotics might be applicable. Benchmarks are designed which are functional, mathematical, relational, and expert in nature. The coding will depend on the particular versions of the languages which become available for testing.
Benchmarking reference services: an introduction.
Marshall, J G; Buchanan, H S
1995-01-01
Benchmarking is based on the common sense idea that someone else, either inside or outside of libraries, has found a better way of doing certain things and that your own library's performance can be improved by finding out how others do things and adopting the best practices you find. Benchmarking is one of the tools used for achieving continuous improvement in Total Quality Management (TQM) programs. Although benchmarking can be done on an informal basis, TQM puts considerable emphasis on formal data collection and performance measurement. Used to its full potential, benchmarking can provide a common measuring stick to evaluate process performance. This article introduces the general concept of benchmarking, linking it whenever possible to reference services in health sciences libraries. Data collection instruments that have potential application in benchmarking studies are discussed and the need to develop common measurement tools to facilitate benchmarking is emphasized.
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 323 - Instructions for Preparation of System Notices
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. A Appendix A to... Copies may be obtained from the Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DSS-CV, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite... Secretary of Defense has issued DoD Directive 5105.22 (32 CFR part 398), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 323 - Instructions for Preparation of System Notices
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. A Appendix A to... Copies may be obtained from the Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DSS-CV, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite... Secretary of Defense has issued DoD Directive 5105.22 (32 CFR part 398), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 323 - Instructions for Preparation of System Notices
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. A Appendix A to... Copies may be obtained from the Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: DSS-CV, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite... Secretary of Defense has issued DoD Directive 5105.22 (32 CFR part 398), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the...
32 CFR 319.9 - Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record. 319.9 Section 319.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.9 Agency...
32 CFR 319.9 - Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record. 319.9 Section 319.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.9 Agency...
32 CFR 319.9 - Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record. 319.9 Section 319.9 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.9 Agency...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 327 - Sample DeCA Response Letter
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Sample DeCA Response Letter A Appendix A to Part 327 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Pt. 327, App. A Appendix A to Part 327...
32 CFR Appendix C to Part 323 - Instructions for Preparation of Reports to New or Altered Systems
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Instructions for Preparation of Reports to New or Altered Systems C Appendix C to Part 323 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR Appendix C to Part 323 - Instructions for Preparation of Reports to New or Altered Systems
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Instructions for Preparation of Reports to New or Altered Systems C Appendix C to Part 323 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt...
32 CFR 310.44 - Inspection reporting.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Inspections § 310.44 Inspection reporting. (a) Document the findings of the... appropriate, shall reflect overall assets of the Component Privacy Program inspected, or portion thereof...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-26
... Comment 19: Value Added Tax and Import Duties in the HRS Benchmark Used to Calculate CS Wind's Benefit...: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 77 FR... of HRS Benchmark Provision of Electricity for LTAR Comment 16: Electricity Benchmarks Tax Programs...
Implementing Cognitive Strategy Instruction across the School: The Benchmark Manual for Teachers.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Gaskins, Irene; Elliot, Thorne
Improving reading instruction has been the primary focus at the Benchmark School in Media, Pennsylvania. This book describes the various phases of Benchmark's development of a program to create strategic learners, thinkers, and problem solvers across the curriculum. The goal is to provide teachers and administrators with a handbook that can be…
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Bess, John D.
2014-03-01
PROTEUS is a zero-power research reactor based on a cylindrical graphite annulus with a central cylindrical cavity. The graphite annulus remains basically the same for all experimental programs, but the contents of the central cavity are changed according to the type of reactor being investigated. Through most of its service history, PROTEUS has represented light-water reactors, but from 1992 to 1996 PROTEUS was configured as a pebble-bed reactor (PBR) critical facility and designated as HTR-PROTEUS. The nomenclature was used to indicate that this series consisted of High Temperature Reactor experiments performed in the PROTEUS assembly. During this period, seventeen criticalmore » configurations were assembled and various reactor physics experiments were conducted. These experiments included measurements of criticality, differential and integral control rod and safety rod worths, kinetics, reaction rates, water ingress effects, and small sample reactivity effects (Ref. 3). HTR-PROTEUS was constructed, and the experimental program was conducted, for the purpose of providing experimental benchmark data for assessment of reactor physics computer codes. Considerable effort was devoted to benchmark calculations as a part of the HTR-PROTEUS program. References 1 and 2 provide detailed data for use in constructing models for codes to be assessed. Reference 3 is a comprehensive summary of the HTR-PROTEUS experiments and the associated benchmark program. This document draws freely from these references. Only Cores 9 and 10 are evaluated in this benchmark report due to similarities in their construction. The other core configurations of the HTR-PROTEUS program are evaluated in their respective reports as outlined in Section 1.0. Cores 9 and 10 were evaluated and determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
John D. Bess
2013-03-01
PROTEUS is a zero-power research reactor based on a cylindrical graphite annulus with a central cylindrical cavity. The graphite annulus remains basically the same for all experimental programs, but the contents of the central cavity are changed according to the type of reactor being investigated. Through most of its service history, PROTEUS has represented light-water reactors, but from 1992 to 1996 PROTEUS was configured as a pebble-bed reactor (PBR) critical facility and designated as HTR-PROTEUS. The nomenclature was used to indicate that this series consisted of High Temperature Reactor experiments performed in the PROTEUS assembly. During this period, seventeen criticalmore » configurations were assembled and various reactor physics experiments were conducted. These experiments included measurements of criticality, differential and integral control rod and safety rod worths, kinetics, reaction rates, water ingress effects, and small sample reactivity effects (Ref. 3). HTR-PROTEUS was constructed, and the experimental program was conducted, for the purpose of providing experimental benchmark data for assessment of reactor physics computer codes. Considerable effort was devoted to benchmark calculations as a part of the HTR-PROTEUS program. References 1 and 2 provide detailed data for use in constructing models for codes to be assessed. Reference 3 is a comprehensive summary of the HTR-PROTEUS experiments and the associated benchmark program. This document draws freely from these references. Only Cores 9 and 10 are evaluated in this benchmark report due to similarities in their construction. The other core configurations of the HTR-PROTEUS program are evaluated in their respective reports as outlined in Section 1.0. Cores 9 and 10 were evaluated and determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
John D. Bess
2013-03-01
PROTEUS is a zero-power research reactor based on a cylindrical graphite annulus with a central cylindrical cavity. The graphite annulus remains basically the same for all experimental programs, but the contents of the central cavity are changed according to the type of reactor being investigated. Through most of its service history, PROTEUS has represented light-water reactors, but from 1992 to 1996 PROTEUS was configured as a pebble-bed reactor (PBR) critical facility and designated as HTR-PROTEUS. The nomenclature was used to indicate that this series consisted of High Temperature Reactor experiments performed in the PROTEUS assembly. During this period, seventeen criticalmore » configurations were assembled and various reactor physics experiments were conducted. These experiments included measurements of criticality, differential and integral control rod and safety rod worths, kinetics, reaction rates, water ingress effects, and small sample reactivity effects (Ref. 3). HTR-PROTEUS was constructed, and the experimental program was conducted, for the purpose of providing experimental benchmark data for assessment of reactor physics computer codes. Considerable effort was devoted to benchmark calculations as a part of the HTR-PROTEUS program. References 1 and 2 provide detailed data for use in constructing models for codes to be assessed. Reference 3 is a comprehensive summary of the HTR-PROTEUS experiments and the associated benchmark program. This document draws freely from these references. Only Cores 9 and 10 are evaluated in this benchmark report due to similarities in their construction. The other core configurations of the HTR-PROTEUS program are evaluated in their respective reports as outlined in Section 1.0. Cores 9 and 10 were evaluated and determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments.« less
Implementation of Programmatic Quality and the Impact on Safety
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Huls, Dale Thomas; Meehan, Kevin
2005-01-01
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the implementation of a programmatic quality assurance discipline within the International Space Station Program and the resulting impact on safety. NASA culture has continued to stress safety at the expense of quality when both are extremely important and both can equally influence the success or failure of a Program or Mission. Although safety was heavily criticized in the media after Colimbiaa, strong case can be made that it was the failure of quality processes and quality assurance in all processes that eventually led to the Columbia accident. Consequently, it is possible to have good quality processes without safety, but it is impossible to have good safety processes without quality. The ISS Program quality assurance function was analyzed as representative of the long-term manned missions that are consistent with the President s Vision for Space Exploration. Background topics are as follows: The quality assurance organizational structure within the ISS Program and the interrelationships between various internal and external organizations. ISS Program quality roles and responsibilities with respect to internal Program Offices and other external organizations such as the Shuttle Program, JSC Directorates, NASA Headquarters, NASA Contractors, other NASA Centers, and International Partner/participants will be addressed. A detailed analysis of implemented quality assurance responsibilities and functions with respect to NASA Headquarters, the JSC S&MA Directorate, and the ISS Program will be presented. Discussions topics are as follows: A comparison of quality and safety resources in terms of staffing, training, experience, and certifications. A benchmark assessment of the lessons learned from the Columbia Accident Investigation (CAB) Report (and follow-up reports and assessments), NASA Benchmarking, and traditional quality assurance activities against ISS quality procedures and practices. The lack of a coherent operational and sustaining quality assurance strategy for long-term manned space flight. An analysis of the ISS waiver processes and the Problem Reporting and Corrective Action (PRACA) process implemented as quality functions. Impact of current ISS Program procedures and practices with regards to operational safety and risk A discussion regarding a "defense-in-depth" approach to quality functions will be provided to address the issue of "integration vs independence" with respect to the roles of Programs, NASA Centers, and NASA Headquarters. Generic recommendations are offered to address the inadequacies identified in the implementation of ISS quality assurance. A reassessment by the NASA community regarding the importance of a "quality culture" as a component within a larger "safety culture" will generate a more effective and value-added functionality that will ultimately enhance safety.
32 CFR 310.45 - Administrative remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Administrative remedies. 310.45 Section 310.45 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.45 Administrative remedies. Any individual who...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... promote the national defense by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, under the authority of the Defense Production Act, the Stafford Act, and Executive Order... ratings on contracts or orders needed to support approved programs. National defense means programs for...
32 CFR 322.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Responsibilities. 322.4 Section 322.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.4 Responsibilities. (a) The...
32 CFR 322.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Responsibilities. 322.4 Section 322.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.4 Responsibilities. (a) The...
32 CFR 322.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Responsibilities. 322.4 Section 322.4 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.4 Responsibilities. (a) The...
32 CFR 317.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Information requirements. 317.5 Section 317.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 317.5 Information requirements. The Report Control Symbol. Unless...
32 CFR 317.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Information requirements. 317.5 Section 317.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 317.5 Information requirements. The Report Control Symbol. Unless...
32 CFR 317.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Information requirements. 317.5 Section 317.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 317.5 Information requirements. The Report Control Symbol. Unless...
32 CFR 317.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Information requirements. 317.5 Section 317.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 317.5 Information requirements. The Report Control Symbol. Unless...
32 CFR 317.5 - Information requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Information requirements. 317.5 Section 317.5 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 317.5 Information requirements. The Report Control Symbol. Unless...
Cost and Time Overruns for Major Defense Acquisition Programs: An Annotated Brief
2011-04-30
Logistics Management) • Director, Strategic Systems Programs Office • Deputy Director, Acquisition Career Management, US Army • Defense Business...acquisition and industrial base issues and their impact on the transatlantic defense market. Before joining CSIS, he worked as a freelance defense
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.2 Applicability. This part applies to Headquarters, Defense Nuclear Agency (HQ, DNA), Field Command, Defense Nuclear...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.2 Applicability. This part applies to Headquarters, Defense Nuclear Agency (HQ, DNA), Field Command, Defense Nuclear...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.2 Applicability. This part applies to Headquarters, Defense Nuclear Agency (HQ, DNA), Field Command, Defense Nuclear...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.2 Applicability. This part applies to Headquarters, Defense Nuclear Agency (HQ, DNA), Field Command, Defense Nuclear...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY (DNA) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM § 291.2 Applicability. This part applies to Headquarters, Defense Nuclear Agency (HQ, DNA), Field Command, Defense Nuclear...
32 CFR 324.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... levels, and contractor personnel working with personal data comply with the DFAS Privacy Act Program. (2... personnel and contractors working with personal data comply with the Privacy Act Program. (2) Serves as the... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM...
32 CFR 229.20 - Public awareness programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED...) Each Federal land manager will establish a program to increase public awareness of the need to protect... interpretation programs where appropriate. (b) Each Federal land manager annually will submit to the Secretary of...
32 CFR 317.4 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DCAA PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 317.4 Responsibilities. (a) The Assistant Director, Resources has overall responsibility for the DCAA Privacy Act Program and will serve as the sole appellate authority for appeals to...
32 CFR 813.1 - Purpose of the visual information documentation (VIDOC) program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 6 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose of the visual information documentation (VIDOC) program. 813.1 Section 813.1 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE SALES AND SERVICES VISUAL INFORMATION DOCUMENTATION PROGRAM § 813.1 Purpose of the visual information documentation (VIDOC) program....
Notes on numerical reliability of several statistical analysis programs
Landwehr, J.M.; Tasker, Gary D.
1999-01-01
This report presents a benchmark analysis of several statistical analysis programs currently in use in the USGS. The benchmark consists of a comparison between the values provided by a statistical analysis program for variables in the reference data set ANASTY and their known or calculated theoretical values. The ANASTY data set is an amendment of the Wilkinson NASTY data set that has been used in the statistical literature to assess the reliability (computational correctness) of calculated analytical results.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Bess, John D.; Sterbentz, James W.; Snoj, Luka
PROTEUS is a zero-power research reactor based on a cylindrical graphite annulus with a central cylindrical cavity. The graphite annulus remains basically the same for all experimental programs, but the contents of the central cavity are changed according to the type of reactor being investigated. Through most of its service history, PROTEUS has represented light-water reactors, but from 1992 to 1996 PROTEUS was configured as a pebble-bed reactor (PBR) critical facility and designated as HTR-PROTEUS. The nomenclature was used to indicate that this series consisted of High Temperature Reactor experiments performed in the PROTEUS assembly. During this period, seventeen criticalmore » configurations were assembled and various reactor physics experiments were conducted. These experiments included measurements of criticality, differential and integral control rod and safety rod worths, kinetics, reaction rates, water ingress effects, and small sample reactivity effects (Ref. 3). HTR-PROTEUS was constructed, and the experimental program was conducted, for the purpose of providing experimental benchmark data for assessment of reactor physics computer codes. Considerable effort was devoted to benchmark calculations as a part of the HTR-PROTEUS program. References 1 and 2 provide detailed data for use in constructing models for codes to be assessed. Reference 3 is a comprehensive summary of the HTR-PROTEUS experiments and the associated benchmark program. This document draws freely from these references. Only Cores 9 and 10 are evaluated in this benchmark report due to similarities in their construction. The other core configurations of the HTR-PROTEUS program are evaluated in their respective reports as outlined in Section 1.0. Cores 9 and 10 were evaluated and determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments.« less
Species management benchmarking: outcomes over outputs in a changing operating environment.
Hogg, Carolyn J; Hibbard, Chris; Ford, Claire; Embury, Amanda
2013-03-01
Species management has been utilized by the zoo and aquarium industry, since the mid-1990s, to ensure the ongoing genetic and demographic viability of populations, which can be difficult to maintain in the ever-changing operating environments of zoos. In 2009, the Zoo and Aquarium Association Australasia reviewed their species management services, focusing on addressing issues that had arisen as a result of the managed programs maturing and operating environments evolving. In summary, the project examined resourcing, policies, processes, and species to be managed. As a result, a benchmarking tool was developed (Health Check Report, HCR), which evaluated the programs against a set of broad criteria. A comparison of managed programs (n = 98), between 2008 and 2011, was undertaken to ascertain the tool's effectiveness. There was a marked decrease in programs that were designated as weak (37 down to 13); and an increase in excellent programs (24 up to 49) between the 2 years. Further, there were significant improvements in the administration benchmarking area (submission of reports, captive management plan development) across a number of taxon advisory groups. This HCR comparison showed that a benchmarking tool enables a program's performance to be quickly assessed and any remedial measures applied. The increases observed in program health were mainly due to increased management goals being attained. The HCR will be an ongoing program, as the management of the programs increases and goals are achieved, criteria will be refined to better highlight ongoing issues and ways in which these can be resolved. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Department of Defense Directive 5505.5, Implementation of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act E Appendix E to Part 516 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Pt...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Department of Defense Directive 5505.5, Implementation of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act E Appendix E to Part 516 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Pt...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2012-07-01 2009-07-01 true Department of Defense Directive 5505.5, Implementation of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act E Appendix E to Part 516 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Pt...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2011-07-01 2009-07-01 true Department of Defense Directive 5505.5, Implementation of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act E Appendix E to Part 516 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Pt...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 true Department of Defense Directive 5505.5, Implementation of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act E Appendix E to Part 516 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Pt...
32 CFR Appendix B to Part 327 - Internal Management Control Review Checklist
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Internal Management Control Review Checklist B Appendix B to Part 327 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Pt. 327, App. B Appendix B to Part 327—Internal Management Control...
32 CFR Appendix B to Part 327 - Internal Management Control Review Checklist
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Internal Management Control Review Checklist B Appendix B to Part 327 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Pt. 327, App. B Appendix B to Part 327—Internal Management Control...
32 CFR Appendix B to Part 327 - Internal Management Control Review Checklist
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Internal Management Control Review Checklist B Appendix B to Part 327 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Pt. 327, App. B Appendix B to Part 327—Internal Management Control...
NACA0012 benchmark model experimental flutter results with unsteady pressure distributions
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Rivera, Jose A., Jr.; Dansberry, Bryan E.; Bennett, Robert M.; Durham, Michael H.; Silva, Walter A.
1992-01-01
The Structural Dynamics Division at NASA Langley Research Center has started a wind tunnel activity referred to as the Benchmark Models Program. The primary objective of this program is to acquire measured dynamic instability and corresponding pressure data that will be useful for developing and evaluating aeroelastic type computational fluid dynamics codes currently in use or under development. The program is a multi-year activity that will involve testing of several different models to investigate various aeroelastic phenomena. This paper describes results obtained from a second wind tunnel test of the first model in the Benchmark Models Program. This first model consisted of a rigid semispan wing having a rectangular planform and a NACA 0012 airfoil shape which was mounted on a flexible two degree of freedom mount system. Experimental flutter boundaries and corresponding unsteady pressure distribution data acquired over two model chords located at the 60 and 95 percent span stations are presented.
Cyber-Based Turbulent Combustion Simulation
2012-02-28
flame thickness by comparing with benchmark of AFRL/RZ ( UNICORN ) suppressing the oscillatory numerical behavior. These improvements in numerical...fraction with the benchmark results of AFRL/RZ. This validating base is generated by the UNICORN program on the finest mesh available and the local...shared kinematic and thermodynamic data from the UNICORN program. The most important and meaningful conclusion can be drawn from this comparison is
32 CFR 148.2 - Classified programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Classified programs. 148.2 Section 148.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL, MILITARY AND CIVILIAN NATIONAL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCITY OF FACILITIES National Policy on Reciprocity of Use and...
32 CFR 148.2 - Classified programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Classified programs. 148.2 Section 148.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL, MILITARY AND CIVILIAN NATIONAL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCITY OF FACILITIES National Policy on Reciprocity of Use and...
32 CFR 148.2 - Classified programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Classified programs. 148.2 Section 148.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL, MILITARY AND CIVILIAN NATIONAL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCITY OF FACILITIES National Policy on Reciprocity of Use and...
32 CFR 148.2 - Classified programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Classified programs. 148.2 Section 148.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL, MILITARY AND CIVILIAN NATIONAL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCITY OF FACILITIES National Policy on Reciprocity of Use and...
32 CFR 148.2 - Classified programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Classified programs. 148.2 Section 148.2 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL, MILITARY AND CIVILIAN NATIONAL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCITY OF FACILITIES National Policy on Reciprocity of Use and...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Policy. 322.3 Section 322.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.3 Policy. (a) The National Security...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Policy. 322.3 Section 322.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.3 Policy. (a) The National Security...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Policy. 322.3 Section 322.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.3 Policy. (a) The National Security...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Policy. 322.3 Section 322.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.3 Policy. (a) The National Security...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Policy. 322.3 Section 322.3 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.3 Policy. (a) The National Security...
32 CFR 310.43 - Privacy Act inspections.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Privacy Act inspections. 310.43 Section 310.43 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Inspections § 310.43 Privacy Act inspections. During internal inspections...
32 CFR 310.43 - Privacy Act inspections.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Privacy Act inspections. 310.43 Section 310.43 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Inspections § 310.43 Privacy Act inspections. During internal inspections...
32 CFR 310.43 - Privacy Act inspections.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Privacy Act inspections. 310.43 Section 310.43 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Inspections § 310.43 Privacy Act inspections. During internal inspections...
32 CFR 310.43 - Privacy Act inspections.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Privacy Act inspections. 310.43 Section 310.43 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Inspections § 310.43 Privacy Act inspections. During internal inspections...
32 CFR 310.43 - Privacy Act inspections.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Privacy Act inspections. 310.43 Section 310.43 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Inspections § 310.43 Privacy Act inspections. During internal inspections...
32 CFR 310.47 - Civil remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Civil remedies. 310.47 Section 310.47 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.47 Civil remedies. In addition to specific remedial...
32 CFR 310.47 - Civil remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Civil remedies. 310.47 Section 310.47 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.47 Civil remedies. In addition to specific remedial...
32 CFR 310.47 - Civil remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Civil remedies. 310.47 Section 310.47 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.47 Civil remedies. In addition to specific remedial...
32 CFR 310.47 - Civil remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Civil remedies. 310.47 Section 310.47 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.47 Civil remedies. In addition to specific remedial...
32 CFR 310.47 - Civil remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Civil remedies. 310.47 Section 310.47 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.47 Civil remedies. In addition to specific remedial...
32 CFR 562.7 - Program information.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Program information. 562.7 Section 562.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ORGANIZED RESERVES RESERVE OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS § 562.7 Program information. (a) The Senior ROTC is conducted at military colleges...
32 CFR 562.7 - Program information.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2012-07-01 2009-07-01 true Program information. 562.7 Section 562.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ORGANIZED RESERVES RESERVE OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS § 562.7 Program information. (a) The Senior ROTC is conducted at military colleges, civilian...
78 FR 51678 - Voluntary Education Programs; Correction
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-21
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 32 CFR Part 68 [Docket No. DOD-2013-OS-0093] RIN 0790-AJ06 Voluntary Education Programs; Correction AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness...), the Department of Defense published a proposed rule titled Voluntary Education Programs. Subsequent to...
32 CFR 319.6 - Disclosure of requested information to individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.6 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. The Defense Intelligence Agency, upon receiving a request for...
32 CFR 319.6 - Disclosure of requested information to individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.6 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. The Defense Intelligence Agency, upon receiving a request for...
32 CFR 319.6 - Disclosure of requested information to individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.6 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. The Defense Intelligence Agency, upon receiving a request for...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... Relating to Organizational Conflict of Interest-Major Defense Acquisition Program. 252.209-7008 Section 252....209-7008 Notice of Prohibition Relating to Organizational Conflict of Interest—Major Defense... RELATING TO ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST—MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAM (DEC 2010) (a...
32 CFR 322.7 - Exempt systems of records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Exempt systems of records. 322.7 Section 322.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.7 Exempt systems of...
32 CFR 321.3 - Information and procedures for requesting notification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.3 Information and... mail to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Information and procedures for requesting...
32 CFR 321.3 - Information and procedures for requesting notification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.3 Information and... mail to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Information and procedures for requesting...
32 CFR 322.7 - Exempt systems of records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Exempt systems of records. 322.7 Section 322.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.7 Exempt systems of...
32 CFR 322.7 - Exempt systems of records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Exempt systems of records. 322.7 Section 322.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.7 Exempt systems of...
32 CFR 321.3 - Information and procedures for requesting notification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.3 Information and... mail to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Information and procedures for requesting...
32 CFR 322.7 - Exempt systems of records.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Exempt systems of records. 322.7 Section 322.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.7 Exempt systems of...
32 CFR 321.3 - Information and procedures for requesting notification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.3 Information and... mail to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Information and procedures for requesting...
32 CFR 321.3 - Information and procedures for requesting notification.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.3 Information and... mail to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Information and procedures for requesting...
32 CFR 310.42 - Reports control symbol.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Reports control symbol. 310.42 Section 310.42 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.42 Reports control symbol. Any report established by this...
32 CFR 310.41 - Suspense for submission of reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Suspense for submission of reports. 310.41 Section 310.41 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.41 Suspense for submission of reports. The...
32 CFR 310.40 - Requirement for reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Requirement for reports. 310.40 Section 310.40 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.40 Requirement for reports. The DPO shall establish requirements...
32 CFR 310.40 - Requirement for reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Requirement for reports. 310.40 Section 310.40 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.40 Requirement for reports. The DPO shall establish requirements...
32 CFR 310.42 - Reports control symbol.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Reports control symbol. 310.42 Section 310.42 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.42 Reports control symbol. Any report established by this...
32 CFR 310.42 - Reports control symbol.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Reports control symbol. 310.42 Section 310.42 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.42 Reports control symbol. Any report established by this...
32 CFR 286.33 - Reports control.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Reports control. 286.33 Section 286.33 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM REGULATION Reports § 286.33 Reports control. (a...
32 CFR 310.42 - Reports control symbol.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Reports control symbol. 310.42 Section 310.42 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.42 Reports control symbol. Any report established by this...
32 CFR 310.41 - Suspense for submission of reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Suspense for submission of reports. 310.41 Section 310.41 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.41 Suspense for submission of reports. The...
32 CFR 310.41 - Suspense for submission of reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Suspense for submission of reports. 310.41 Section 310.41 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.41 Suspense for submission of reports. The...
32 CFR 310.40 - Requirement for reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Requirement for reports. 310.40 Section 310.40 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.40 Requirement for reports. The DPO shall establish requirements...
32 CFR 286.33 - Reports control.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Reports control. 286.33 Section 286.33 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM REGULATION Reports § 286.33 Reports control. (a...
32 CFR 310.40 - Requirement for reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Requirement for reports. 310.40 Section 310.40 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.40 Requirement for reports. The DPO shall establish requirements...
32 CFR 310.42 - Reports control symbol.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Reports control symbol. 310.42 Section 310.42 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.42 Reports control symbol. Any report established by this...
32 CFR 286.33 - Reports control.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Reports control. 286.33 Section 286.33 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM REGULATION Reports § 286.33 Reports control. (a...
32 CFR 310.41 - Suspense for submission of reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Suspense for submission of reports. 310.41 Section 310.41 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.41 Suspense for submission of reports. The...
32 CFR 310.40 - Requirement for reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Requirement for reports. 310.40 Section 310.40 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.40 Requirement for reports. The DPO shall establish requirements...
32 CFR 239.13 - Program performance reviews.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Program performance reviews. 239.13 Section 239.13 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED... HAPMIS and CEFMS reports) at the Headquarters Department of the Army and at the DUSD(I&E) levels. ...
32 CFR 310.41 - Suspense for submission of reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Suspense for submission of reports. 310.41 Section 310.41 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Reports § 310.41 Suspense for submission of reports. The...
32 CFR 318.7 - Disclosure of requested information to individuals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 318.7 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. (a) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency, upon receiving a request for... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Disclosure of requested information to...
32 CFR 318.8 - Request for correction or amendment to a record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 318.8 Request for correction or amendment to a record. (a) An individual may request that the Defense Threat Reduction Agency... Division, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, 45045 Aviation Drive, Dulles, VA 20166-7517. (c) The requester...
32 CFR 33.40 - Monitoring and reporting program performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Monitoring and reporting program performance. 33.40 Section 33.40 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT... STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Post-Award Requirements Reports, Records, Retention, and Enforcement § 33.40...
32 CFR 33.40 - Monitoring and reporting program performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Monitoring and reporting program performance. 33.40 Section 33.40 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT... STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Post-Award Requirements Reports, Records, Retention, and Enforcement § 33.40...
32 CFR 33.40 - Monitoring and reporting program performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Monitoring and reporting program performance. 33.40 Section 33.40 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT... STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Post-Award Requirements Reports, Records, Retention, and Enforcement § 33.40...
32 CFR 33.40 - Monitoring and reporting program performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Monitoring and reporting program performance. 33.40 Section 33.40 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT... STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Post-Award Requirements Reports, Records, Retention, and Enforcement § 33.40...
32 CFR 33.40 - Monitoring and reporting program performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Monitoring and reporting program performance. 33.40 Section 33.40 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT... STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Post-Award Requirements Reports, Records, Retention, and Enforcement § 33.40...
32 CFR 310.39 - Funding for training.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Funding for training. 310.39 Section 310.39 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Training Requirements § 310.39 Funding for training. Each DoD Component shall...
32 CFR 310.46 - Civil actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Civil actions. 310.46 Section 310.46 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.46 Civil actions. An individual may file a civil suit...
32 CFR 310.46 - Civil actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Civil actions. 310.46 Section 310.46 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.46 Civil actions. An individual may file a civil suit...
32 CFR 310.46 - Civil actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Civil actions. 310.46 Section 310.46 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.46 Civil actions. An individual may file a civil suit...
32 CFR 310.46 - Civil actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Civil actions. 310.46 Section 310.46 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.46 Civil actions. An individual may file a civil suit...
32 CFR 310.46 - Civil actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Civil actions. 310.46 Section 310.46 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.46 Civil actions. An individual may file a civil suit...
Hardware, Languages, and Architectures for Defense Against Hostile Operating Systems
2015-05-14
Executive Service Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to...in privileged system services . ExpressOS requires only a modest annotation burden (annotations were about 3% of code of the kernel), modest performance...INT benchmarks . In addition to enabling the development of an architecture- neutral instrumentation framework, our approach can take advantage of the
2016-04-30
previously, PALT duration was identified by customers as the single most important performance measure . In this section, we present the benchmark...decrease customer satisfaction . We identified percentage of warranted contracting officers ranging from 24% to 91% of an organization’s contracting...multiple uses of CPDO and other measures to optimize contract awards and meet the needs of procurement customers more effectively. Extending this
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Defense Civil Preparedness Agency (DOD), Battle Creek, MI.
The need for, and a description of, emergency functions required to save lives and protect property in nuclear or natural disasters are presented. Topics discussed include: (1) The Civil Defense Warning System, (2) Introduction to the Emergency Operations Program, (3) Five subprograms of the Emergency Operations Program, (4) Emergency Operations…
Failure Is Not an Option: A Root Cause Analysis of Failed Acquisition Programs
2017-12-01
Kendall (2012, 2015). ..................................................................................4 Table 3. Description and Decision Authority...Assessment and Program Evaluation DAE Defense Acquisition Executive DAMIR Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval DARPA Defense Advanced...and evaluation OTA other transactions authority PARCA performance assessments and root cause analyses PBD program budget decisions PDR preliminary
32 CFR 542.7 - Program information.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Program information. 542.7 Section 542.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY EDUCATION SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES § 542.7 Program information. (a) The JROTC/NDCC is organized into units at public and private...
32 CFR 542.7 - Program information.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2012-07-01 2009-07-01 true Program information. 542.7 Section 542.7 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY EDUCATION SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES § 542.7 Program information. (a) The JROTC/NDCC is organized into units at public and private secondary...
78 FR 45513 - Privacy Act of 1974; Computer Matching Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-29
...; Computer Matching Program AGENCY: Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), DoD. ACTION: Notice of a Computer... individual's privacy, and would result in additional delay in determining eligibility and, if applicable, the... Defense. NOTICE OF A COMPUTER MATCHING PROGRAM AMONG THE DEFENSE MANPOWER DATA CENTER, THE DEPARTMENT OF...
76 FR 1410 - Privacy Act of 1974; Computer Matching Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-10
...; Computer Matching Program AGENCY: Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), DoD. ACTION: Notice of a Computer... administrative burden, constitute a greater intrusion of the individual's privacy, and would result in additional... Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. Notice of a Computer Matching Program Among the Defense Manpower...
Defense Workforce Training Programs.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Fletcher, J. D.; And Others
This report discusses the amount and kinds of Department of Defense (DoD) interactive courseware (ICW) programs that are candidates for transfer to the private sector. Candidates for transfer were identified through an analysis of the Defense Instructional Technology Information System (DITIS). Out of 4,644 ICW programs that have been reported to…
Under Secretary of Defense for Policy > OUSDP Offices > ASD for
cooperation programs and foreign military sales programs in these regions. Responsibilities and Functions The defense establishments; and for oversight of security cooperation programs and foreign military sales all foreign governments in assigned areas of responsibility. Develop regional security and defense
Benchmarking in pathology: development of an activity-based costing model.
Burnett, Leslie; Wilson, Roger; Pfeffer, Sally; Lowry, John
2012-12-01
Benchmarking in Pathology (BiP) allows pathology laboratories to determine the unit cost of all laboratory tests and procedures, and also provides organisational productivity indices allowing comparisons of performance with other BiP participants. We describe 14 years of progressive enhancement to a BiP program, including the implementation of 'avoidable costs' as the accounting basis for allocation of costs rather than previous approaches using 'total costs'. A hierarchical tree-structured activity-based costing model distributes 'avoidable costs' attributable to the pathology activities component of a pathology laboratory operation. The hierarchical tree model permits costs to be allocated across multiple laboratory sites and organisational structures. This has enabled benchmarking on a number of levels, including test profiles and non-testing related workload activities. The development of methods for dealing with variable cost inputs, allocation of indirect costs using imputation techniques, panels of tests, and blood-bank record keeping, have been successfully integrated into the costing model. A variety of laboratory management reports are produced, including the 'cost per test' of each pathology 'test' output. Benchmarking comparisons may be undertaken at any and all of the 'cost per test' and 'cost per Benchmarking Complexity Unit' level, 'discipline/department' (sub-specialty) level, or overall laboratory/site and organisational levels. We have completed development of a national BiP program. An activity-based costing methodology based on avoidable costs overcomes many problems of previous benchmarking studies based on total costs. The use of benchmarking complexity adjustment permits correction for varying test-mix and diagnostic complexity between laboratories. Use of iterative communication strategies with program participants can overcome many obstacles and lead to innovations.
Pedron, Sara; Winter, Vera; Oppel, Eva-Maria; Bialas, Enno
2017-08-23
Operating room (OR) efficiency continues to be a high priority for hospitals. In this context the concept of benchmarking has gained increasing importance as a means to improve OR performance. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how participation in a benchmarking and reporting program for surgical process data was associated with a change in OR efficiency, measured through raw utilization, turnover times, and first-case tardiness. The main analysis is based on panel data from 202 surgical departments in German hospitals, which were derived from the largest database for surgical process data in Germany. Panel regression modelling was applied. Results revealed no clear and univocal trend of participation in a benchmarking and reporting program for surgical process data. The largest trend was observed for first-case tardiness. In contrast to expectations, turnover times showed a generally increasing trend during participation. For raw utilization no clear and statistically significant trend could be evidenced. Subgroup analyses revealed differences in effects across different hospital types and department specialties. Participation in a benchmarking and reporting program and thus the availability of reliable, timely and detailed analysis tools to support the OR management seemed to be correlated especially with an increase in the timeliness of staff members regarding first-case starts. The increasing trend in turnover time revealed the absence of effective strategies to improve this aspect of OR efficiency in German hospitals and could have meaningful consequences for the medium- and long-run capacity planning in the OR.
Gidycz, Christine A; Dardis, Christina M
2014-10-01
There remains resistance to feminist self-defense and resistance training programming for women, despite (a) documented effectiveness of rape resistance strategies in avoiding rape, (b) consistently high rates of sexual victimization on college campuses, and (c) limited evidence of lasting change in sexual assault perpetration reduction within existing men's prevention programs. The current article seeks to discuss (1) the rationale for feminist self-defense and resistance training for women, (2) key components of feminist self-defense and resistance training, (3) barriers to its implementation, (4) outcomes of self-defense and resistance training programming, and (5) recommendations for future work. Such suggestions include increasing funding for large-scale self-defense and rape resistance outcome research to examine program effectiveness. Specifically, outcome research that examines the role of contextual factors (e.g., alcohol use) and women's victimization histories is needed. Finally, self-defense training and resistance training should be combined with bystander intervention and men's programs with the goal of providing synergistic effects on rape reduction. © The Author(s) 2014.
32 CFR 319.8 - Request for correction or amendment to record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.8 Request for correction or amendment to record. (a) An individual may request that the Defense Intelligence Agency correct...
32 CFR 319.8 - Request for correction or amendment to record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.8 Request for correction or amendment to record. (a) An individual may request that the Defense Intelligence Agency correct...
32 CFR 319.8 - Request for correction or amendment to record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM § 319.8 Request for correction or amendment to record. (a) An individual may request that the Defense Intelligence Agency correct...
42 CFR 425.602 - Establishing the benchmark.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... claims. (5)(i) Using CMS Office of the Actuary national Medicare expenditure data for each of the years...-service program using data from CMS' Office of the Actuary. (2) To update the benchmark, CMS makes...
42 CFR 425.602 - Establishing the benchmark.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... claims. (5)(i) Using CMS Office of the Actuary national Medicare expenditure data for each of the years...-service program using data from CMS' Office of the Actuary. (2) To update the benchmark, CMS makes...
42 CFR 425.602 - Establishing the benchmark.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... claims. (5)(i) Using CMS Office of the Actuary national Medicare expenditure data for each of the years...-service program using data from CMS' Office of the Actuary. (2) To update the benchmark, CMS makes...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Welch, Doug
As part of its Jobs Initiative (JI) program in six metropolitan areas Denver, Milwaukee, New Orleans, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and Seattle the Annie E. Casey Foundation sought to develop and test a method for establishing benchmarks for workforce development agencies. Data collected from 10 projects in the JI from April through March, 2000,…
Comparing the OpenMP, MPI, and Hybrid Programming Paradigm on an SMP Cluster
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Jost, Gabriele; Jin, Haoqiang; anMey, Dieter; Hatay, Ferhat F.
2003-01-01
With the advent of parallel hardware and software technologies users are faced with the challenge to choose a programming paradigm best suited for the underlying computer architecture. With the current trend in parallel computer architectures towards clusters of shared memory symmetric multi-processors (SMP), parallel programming techniques have evolved to support parallelism beyond a single level. Which programming paradigm is the best will depend on the nature of the given problem, the hardware architecture, and the available software. In this study we will compare different programming paradigms for the parallelization of a selected benchmark application on a cluster of SMP nodes. We compare the timings of different implementations of the same CFD benchmark application employing the same numerical algorithm on a cluster of Sun Fire SMP nodes. The rest of the paper is structured as follows: In section 2 we briefly discuss the programming models under consideration. We describe our compute platform in section 3. The different implementations of our benchmark code are described in section 4 and the performance results are presented in section 5. We conclude our study in section 6.
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Lee, Yeong-Heok (Editor); Bowen, Brent D. (Editor); Tarry, Scott E. (Editor)
2001-01-01
The ATRS held its Annual conference at Jeju Island, Korea in July 2001. The conference was a success with nearly 140 participants including 70 presenters. This report contains presentations from Volume 1 on the following: Airline and Travel Agent Relationships in Asia;Benchmarking Aviation Safety in the Commercial Airline Industry;Impact of Frequent Flyer Program on the Demand for Air Travel; Application of Genetic Algorithm on Airline Schedule;The Effects of Dual Carrier Designation and Partial Liberalization: The Case of Canada;Defense of Air Carriers and Air Agencies in FAA Enforcement proceedin gs - Damage Control Before the Case Arises; Cost Incentives for Airline Mergers? - An examination on the cost impact of U.S. airline mergers and acquisitions;Airport Regulation, Airline Competition and Canada's Airport System; Airline Competition: The Case of Israel's Domestic Doupoly; Non-Financial Indicators of Airline Distress: A Conceptual Approach;and Airport Privatization: An Empirical Analysis of Financial and Operational Efficiency.
Fact Sheet: Selected Highlights of the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4909)
2016-05-12
shaped by the legally binding caps on discretionary spending for defense programs and for non-defense programs, which were established by P.L. 114-74...of Defense (DOD) funding for FY2017 that (1) exceeds the relevant BBA cap ; and (2) is exempt from that spending cap because it is classified as...funding for so- called Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). The 2015 BBA increased binding caps on defense and non-defense discretionary appropriations
32 CFR 286.30 - Collection of fees and fee rates for technical data.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Collection of fees and fee rates for technical data. 286.30 Section 286.30 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR 326.12 - Procedures to request amendment or correction of record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Procedures to request amendment or correction of record. 326.12 Section 326.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.12...
32 CFR 326.12 - Procedures to request amendment or correction of record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Procedures to request amendment or correction of record. 326.12 Section 326.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.12...
32 CFR 326.12 - Procedures to request amendment or correction of record.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Procedures to request amendment or correction of record. 326.12 Section 326.12 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.12...
32 CFR 319.5 - Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM... seeking notification of whether a system of records, maintained by the Defense Intelligence Agency... request to the Defense Intelligence Agency, DSP-1A, Washington, DC 20340-3299 and indicate clearly on the...
32 CFR 319.5 - Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM... seeking notification of whether a system of records, maintained by the Defense Intelligence Agency... request to the Defense Intelligence Agency, DSP-1A, Washington, DC 20340-3299 and indicate clearly on the...
32 CFR 319.5 - Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM... seeking notification of whether a system of records, maintained by the Defense Intelligence Agency... request to the Defense Intelligence Agency, DSP-1A, Washington, DC 20340-3299 and indicate clearly on the...
32 CFR 324.8 - Right of access.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Right of access. 324.8 Section 324.8 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DFAS PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Individual Access to Records § 324.8 Right of access. The provisions of DoD...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Givler, Jill I.
2005-01-01
Resources for self-defense training programs have become more popular and available over the last few years. Introducing a self-defense unit as part of a school physical education program is a wonderful way to address a number of psychosocial issues that prevail among teenagers today. The physical skills learned in this type of program allow…
77 FR 34941 - Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of a Computer Matching Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-12
...; Notice of a Computer Matching Program AGENCY: Defense Manpower Data Center, DoD. ACTION: Notice of a... computer matching program are the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Defense Manpower Data Center... identified as DMDC 01, entitled ``Defense Manpower Data Center Data Base,'' last published in the Federal...
48 CFR 222.101-3-70 - Impact of labor disputes on defense programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 48 Federal Acquisition Regulations System 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Impact of labor disputes... ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS Basic Labor Policies 222.101-3-70 Impact of labor disputes on defense programs. (a...
32 CFR 516.68 - Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (PFCRA).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2011-07-01 2009-07-01 true Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (PFCRA). 516.68 Section 516.68 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Remedies in Procurement Fraud and Corruption § 516.68 Program...
32 CFR 34.41 - Monitoring and reporting program and financial performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... performance. 34.41 Section 34.41 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD... and business status, as follows: (1) The program portions of the reports must address progress toward... program progress reported in the periodic report, in relation to reported expenditures, is sufficient to...
32 CFR 34.41 - Monitoring and reporting program and financial performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... performance. 34.41 Section 34.41 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD... and business status, as follows: (1) The program portions of the reports must address progress toward... program progress reported in the periodic report, in relation to reported expenditures, is sufficient to...
32 CFR 34.41 - Monitoring and reporting program and financial performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... performance. 34.41 Section 34.41 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD... and business status, as follows: (1) The program portions of the reports must address progress toward... program progress reported in the periodic report, in relation to reported expenditures, is sufficient to...
32 CFR 34.41 - Monitoring and reporting program and financial performance.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... performance. 34.41 Section 34.41 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD... and business status, as follows: (1) The program portions of the reports must address progress toward... program progress reported in the periodic report, in relation to reported expenditures, is sufficient to...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
DeSalvatore, Larry; Goldberger, Susan; Steinberg, Adria
This document presents the lessons of Jobs for the Future's Benchmark Communities Initiative (BCI), a 5-year systemic educational reform initiative launched in 1994 in five communities. Before joining the BCI, the five Benchmark communities had each begun a school-to-career effort. Five key findings from the BCI are outlined: (1) students engaged…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-18
... Defense Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Pilot Program (DFARS Case 2011-D050) AGENCY: Defense Acquisition... applications under the DoD Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Pilot Program for new mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreements and the date mentors may incur costs and/or receive credit towards fulfilling their small business...
Rural Civil Defense Education Program. Report for Fiscal Year 1968.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Federal Extension Service (USDA), Washington, DC.
In 1968, the Rural Civil Defense Education Program, conducted by the Cooperative Extension Service under contract with the Office of Civil Defense, was faced with discontinuance of funds; in some cases, the Rural Civil Defense (RCD) leader was absorbed into the regular budgets and in others the work was incorporated into the regular ongoing…
2013-06-01
distribution is unlimited 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE A 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) Some major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) are cancelled...68 VI. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION .....................73 A . OVERVIEW...Contract Performance Report C /SCSC Cost/Schedule Control Systems Criteria CV Cost Variance CV % Cost Variance Percentage DAE Defense Acquisition
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What requirements must I include for periodic reports on program and business status? 37.880 Section 37.880 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What requirements must I include for periodic reports on program and business status? 37.880 Section 37.880 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What requirements must I include for periodic reports on program and business status? 37.880 Section 37.880 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What requirements must I include for periodic reports on program and business status? 37.880 Section 37.880 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What requirements must I include for periodic reports on program and business status? 37.880 Section 37.880 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DoD GRANT AND AGREEMENT REGULATIONS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS...
32 CFR Appendix H to Part 310 - Litigation Status Sheet
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Litigation Status Sheet H Appendix H to Part 310 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 310, App. H Appendix H to Part 310—Litigation Status Sheet (See § 310.49...
A comparison of common programming languages used in bioinformatics.
Fourment, Mathieu; Gillings, Michael R
2008-02-05
The performance of different programming languages has previously been benchmarked using abstract mathematical algorithms, but not using standard bioinformatics algorithms. We compared the memory usage and speed of execution for three standard bioinformatics methods, implemented in programs using one of six different programming languages. Programs for the Sellers algorithm, the Neighbor-Joining tree construction algorithm and an algorithm for parsing BLAST file outputs were implemented in C, C++, C#, Java, Perl and Python. Implementations in C and C++ were fastest and used the least memory. Programs in these languages generally contained more lines of code. Java and C# appeared to be a compromise between the flexibility of Perl and Python and the fast performance of C and C++. The relative performance of the tested languages did not change from Windows to Linux and no clear evidence of a faster operating system was found. Source code and additional information are available from http://www.bioinformatics.org/benchmark/. This benchmark provides a comparison of six commonly used programming languages under two different operating systems. The overall comparison shows that a developer should choose an appropriate language carefully, taking into account the performance expected and the library availability for each language.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Lell, R. M.; Schaefer, R. W.; McKnight, R. D.
Over a period of 30 years more than a hundred Zero Power Reactor (ZPR) critical assemblies were constructed at Argonne National Laboratory. The ZPR facilities, ZPR-3, ZPR-6, ZPR-9 and ZPPR, were all fast critical assembly facilities. The ZPR critical assemblies were constructed to support fast reactor development, but data from some of these assemblies are also well suited to form the basis for criticality safety benchmarks. Of the three classes of ZPR assemblies, engineering mockups, engineering benchmarks and physics benchmarks, the last group tends to be most useful for criticality safety. Because physics benchmarks were designed to test fast reactormore » physics data and methods, they were as simple as possible in geometry and composition. The principal fissile species was {sup 235}U or {sup 239}Pu. Fuel enrichments ranged from 9% to 95%. Often there were only one or two main core diluent materials, such as aluminum, graphite, iron, sodium or stainless steel. The cores were reflected (and insulated from room return effects) by one or two layers of materials such as depleted uranium, lead or stainless steel. Despite their more complex nature, a small number of assemblies from the other two classes would make useful criticality safety benchmarks because they have features related to criticality safety issues, such as reflection by soil-like material. The term 'benchmark' in a ZPR program connotes a particularly simple loading aimed at gaining basic reactor physics insight, as opposed to studying a reactor design. In fact, the ZPR-6/7 Benchmark Assembly (Reference 1) had a very simple core unit cell assembled from plates of depleted uranium, sodium, iron oxide, U3O8, and plutonium. The ZPR-6/7 core cell-average composition is typical of the interior region of liquid-metal fast breeder reactors (LMFBRs) of the era. It was one part of the Demonstration Reactor Benchmark Program,a which provided integral experiments characterizing the important features of demonstration-size LMFBRs. As a benchmark, ZPR-6/7 was devoid of many 'real' reactor features, such as simulated control rods and multiple enrichment zones, in its reference form. Those kinds of features were investigated experimentally in variants of the reference ZPR-6/7 or in other critical assemblies in the Demonstration Reactor Benchmark Program.« less
2011-01-01
Shared Services in the Public Sector - Accenture Shared Services in Government - AT Kearney – 2009 Global Shared Services Survey Results - Deloitte... Shared Services - a Benchmark Study - The Johnson Group – Economics of Business Process Outsourcing - Technology Association of Georgia – State of... Shared Services and Business Process Outsourcing - Accenture – Public Sector Outsourcing Surge in 2010 - National Outsourcing Association – Naval
48 CFR 225.7016-2 - Restriction.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... the Ballistic Missile Defense Program. [68 FR 15627, Mar. 31, 2003. Redesignated at 74 FR 53413, Oct... Section 225.7016-2 Federal Acquisition Regulations System DEFENSE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS FOREIGN ACQUISITION Authorization Acts, Appropriations Acts, and...
Department of Defense high power laser program guidance
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Muller, Clifford H.
1994-06-01
The DoD investment of nominally $200 million per year is focused on four high power laser (HPL) concepts: Space-Based Laser (SBL), a Ballistic Missile Defense Organization effort that addresses boost-phase intercept for Theater Missile Defense and National Missile Defense; Airborne Laser (ABL), an Air Force effort that addresses boost-phase intercept for Theater Missile Defense; Ground-Based Laser (GBL), an Air Force effort addressing space control; and Anti-Ship Missile Defense (ASMD), a Navy effort addressing ship-based defense. Each organization is also supporting technology development with the goal of achieving less expensive, brighter, and lighter high power laser systems. These activities represent the building blocks of the DoD program to exploit the compelling characteristics of the high power laser. Even though DoD's HPL program are focused and moderately strong, additional emphasis in a few technical areas could help reduce risk in these programs. In addition, a number of options are available for continuing to use the High-Energy Laser System Test Facility (HELSTF) at White Sands Missile Range. This report provides a brief overview and guidance for the five efforts which comprise the DoD HPL program (SBL, ABL, GBL, ASMD, HELSTF).
32 CFR Appendix F to Part 286 - DoD Freedom of Information Act Program Components
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Defense Information Systems Agency Defense Contract Audit Agency Defense Intelligence Agency Defense Security Service Defense Logistics Agency National Imagery and Mapping Agency Defense Special Weapons Agency National Security Agency Office of the Inspector General, Department of Defense Defense Finance...
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Rivera, Jose A., Jr.; Dansberry, Bryan E.; Farmer, Moses G.; Eckstrom, Clinton V.; Seidel, David A.; Bennett, Robert M.
1991-01-01
The Structural Dynamics Div. at NASA-Langley has started a wind tunnel activity referred to as the Benchmark Models Program. The objective is to acquire test data that will be useful for developing and evaluating aeroelastic type Computational Fluid Dynamics codes currently in use or under development. The progress is described which was achieved in testing the first model in the Benchmark Models Program. Experimental flutter boundaries are presented for a rigid semispan model (NACA 0012 airfoil section) mounted on a flexible mount system. Also, steady and unsteady pressure measurements taken at the flutter condition are presented. The pressure data were acquired over the entire model chord located at the 60 pct. span station.
Educating Next Generation Nuclear Criticality Safety Engineers at the Idaho National Laboratory
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
J. D. Bess; J. B. Briggs; A. S. Garcia
2011-09-01
One of the challenges in educating our next generation of nuclear safety engineers is the limitation of opportunities to receive significant experience or hands-on training prior to graduation. Such training is generally restricted to on-the-job-training before this new engineering workforce can adequately provide assessment of nuclear systems and establish safety guidelines. Participation in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) can provide students and young professionals the opportunity to gain experience and enhance critical engineering skills. The ICSBEP and IRPhEP publish annual handbooks that contain evaluations of experiments along withmore » summarized experimental data and peer-reviewed benchmark specifications to support the validation of neutronics codes, nuclear cross-section data, and the validation of reactor designs. Participation in the benchmark process not only benefits those who use these Handbooks within the international community, but provides the individual with opportunities for professional development, networking with an international community of experts, and valuable experience to be used in future employment. Traditionally students have participated in benchmarking activities via internships at national laboratories, universities, or companies involved with the ICSBEP and IRPhEP programs. Additional programs have been developed to facilitate the nuclear education of students while participating in the benchmark projects. These programs include coordination with the Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR) Next Degree Program, the Collaboration with the Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office to train nuclear and criticality safety engineers, and student evaluations as the basis for their Master's thesis in nuclear engineering.« less
Evaluation of the ACEC Benchmark Suite for Real-Time Applications
1990-07-23
1.0 benchmark suite waSanalyzed with respect to its measuring of Ada real-time features such as tasking, memory management, input/output, scheduling...and delay statement, Chapter 13 features , pragmas, interrupt handling, subprogram overhead, numeric computations etc. For most of the features that...meant for programming real-time systems. The ACEC benchmarks have been analyzed extensively with respect to their measuring of Ada real-time features
Lang, Carrie L; Simon, Diane; Kilgore, Jane
The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma revised the Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient to include the criteria for trauma centers to participate in a risk-adjusted benchmarking system. Trauma Quality Improvement Program is currently the risk-adjusted benchmarking program sponsored by the American College of Surgeons, which will be required of all trauma centers to participate in early 2017. Prior to this, there were no risk-adjusted programs for Level III verified trauma centers. The Ohio Society of Trauma Nurse Leaders is a collaborative group made up of trauma program managers, coordinators, and other trauma leaders who meet 6 times a year. Within this group, a Level III Subcommittee was formed initially to provide a place for the Level III centers to discuss issues specific to the Level III centers. When the new requirement regarding risk-adjustment became official, the subcommittee agreed to begin reporting simple data points with the idea to risk adjust in the future.
2013-01-01
Background The objective of screening programs is to discover life threatening diseases in as many patients as early as possible and to increase the chance of survival. To be able to compare aspects of health care quality, methods are needed for benchmarking that allow comparisons on various health care levels (regional, national, and international). Objectives Applications and extensions of algorithms can be used to link the information on disease phases with relative survival rates and to consolidate them in composite measures. The application of the developed SAS-macros will give results for benchmarking of health care quality. Data examples for breast cancer care are given. Methods A reference scale (expected, E) must be defined at a time point at which all benchmark objects (observed, O) are measured. All indices are defined as O/E, whereby the extended standardized screening-index (eSSI), the standardized case-mix-index (SCI), the work-up-index (SWI), and the treatment-index (STI) address different health care aspects. The composite measures called overall-performance evaluation (OPE) and relative overall performance indices (ROPI) link the individual indices differently for cross-sectional or longitudinal analyses. Results Algorithms allow a time point and a time interval associated comparison of the benchmark objects in the indices eSSI, SCI, SWI, STI, OPE, and ROPI. Comparisons between countries, states and districts are possible. Exemplarily comparisons between two countries are made. The success of early detection and screening programs as well as clinical health care quality for breast cancer can be demonstrated while the population’s background mortality is concerned. Conclusions If external quality assurance programs and benchmark objects are based on population-based and corresponding demographic data, information of disease phase and relative survival rates can be combined to indices which offer approaches for comparative analyses between benchmark objects. Conclusions on screening programs and health care quality are possible. The macros can be transferred to other diseases if a disease-specific phase scale of prognostic value (e.g. stage) exists. PMID:23316692
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kennedy, R.
1996-03-01
This Change 1 to DoD Directive 5134.8, dated June 8, 1994, is provided to DTIC. NOTE: In accordance with Section 904 of the DoD Authorization Act for FY 1996 (P.L. 104-106), this change redesignates the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Atomic Energy (ATSD(AE)) as the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs (ATSD(NCB)).
32 CFR Appendix E to Part 286 - DD Form 2564, “Annual Report Freedom of Information Act”
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false DD Form 2564, âAnnual Report Freedom of Information Actâ E Appendix E to Part 286 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR Appendix E to Part 286 - DD Form 2564, “Annual Report Freedom of Information Act”
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false DD Form 2564, âAnnual Report Freedom of Information Actâ E Appendix E to Part 286 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR Appendix E to Part 286 - DD Form 2564, “Annual Report Freedom of Information Act”
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false DD Form 2564, âAnnual Report Freedom of Information Actâ E Appendix E to Part 286 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR Appendix E to Part 286 - DD Form 2564, “Annual Report Freedom of Information Act”
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false DD Form 2564, âAnnual Report Freedom of Information Actâ E Appendix E to Part 286 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR Appendix E to Part 286 - DD Form 2564, “Annual Report Freedom of Information Act”
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false DD Form 2564, âAnnual Report Freedom of Information Actâ E Appendix E to Part 286 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM...
32 CFR 324.14 - Relationship between the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Relationship between the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act. 324.14 Section 324.14 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DFAS PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM Individual Access to Records § 324.14 Relationship between the...
Goetzel, R Z; Guindon, A M; Turshen, I J; Ozminkowski, R J
2001-01-01
Major areas considered under the rubric of health and productivity management (HPM) in American business include absenteeism, employee turnover, and the use of medical, disability, and workers' compensation programs. Until recently, few normative data existed for most HPM areas. To meet the need for normative information in HPM, a series of Consortium Benchmarking Studies were conducted. In the most recent application of the study, 1998 HPM costs, incidence, duration, and other program data were collected from 43 employers on almost one million workers. The median HPM costs for these organizations were $9992 per employee, which were distributed among group health (47%), turnover (37%), unscheduled absence (8%), nonoccupational disability (5%), and workers' compensation programs (3%). Achieving "best-practice" levels of performance (operationally defined as the 25th percentile for program expenditures in each HPM area) would realize savings of $2562 per employee (a 26% reduction). The results indicate substantial opportunities for improvement through effective coordination and management of HPM programs. Examples of best-practice activities collated from on-site visits to "benchmark" organizations are also reviewed.
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 195 - Programs to Which This Part Applies
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
...-EFFECTUATION OF TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 Pt. 195, App. A Appendix A to Part 195—Programs to... Defense assistance to programs of adult education in civil defense subjects (50 United States Code App. 2281 (e), (f)). 6. Office of Civil Defense radiological instruments grants (50 United States Code App...
32 CFR Appendix A to Part 195 - Programs to Which This Part Applies
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
...-EFFECTUATION OF TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 Pt. 195, App. A Appendix A to Part 195—Programs to... Defense assistance to programs of adult education in civil defense subjects (50 United States Code App. 2281 (e), (f)). 6. Office of Civil Defense radiological instruments grants (50 United States Code App...
Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems (JOMIS)
2016-03-01
Component is Program Executive Office (PEO) Department of Defense (DoD) Healthcare Management Systems (DHMS) for Defense Health Agency (DHA). Responsible...AT&L)) and the Program Executive Office (PEO) Defense Healthcare Management Systems (DHMS). Operational medicine is the application of routine and...acquired by the DoD Healthcare Management System Modernization (DHMSM) program for Health Care Delivery (HCD) capabilities. JOMIS future release(s
Review of defense display research programs
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Tulis, Robert W.; Hopper, Darrel G.; Morton, David C.; Shashidhar, Ranganathan
2001-09-01
Display research has comprised a substantial portion of the defense investment in new technology for national security for the past 13 years. These investments have been made by the separate service departments and, especially, via several Defense Research Projects Agency (DARPA) programs, known collectively as the High Definition Systems (HDS) Program (which ended in 2001) and via the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Defense Production Act (DPA) Title III Program (efforts ended in 2000). Using input from the Army, Navy, and Air Force to focus research and identify insertion opportunities, DARPA and the Title III Program Office have made investments to develop the national technology base and manufacturing infrastructure necessary to meet the twin challenge of providing affordable displays in current systems and enabling the DoD strategy of winning future conflicts by getting more information to all participants during the battle. These completed DARPA and DPA research and infrastructure programs are reviewed. Service investments have been and are being made to transition display technology; examples are described. Display science and technology (S&T) visions are documented for each service to assist the identification of areas meriting consideration for future defense research.
Data Race Benchmark Collection
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Liao, Chunhua; Lin, Pei-Hung; Asplund, Joshua
2017-03-21
This project is a benchmark suite of Open-MP parallel codes that have been checked for data races. The programs are marked to show which do and do not have races. This allows them to be leveraged while testing and developing race detection tools.
77 FR 57016 - Privacy Act; Implementation
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-17
... Act; Implementation AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, DoD. ACTION: Direct final rule with request for comments. SUMMARY: Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) is updating the DIA Privacy Act Program by... final rule makes non-substantive changes to the Defense Intelligence Agency Program rules. These changes...
32 CFR 326.5 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... files subject to the provisions of this part. (g) Directorate and Office Managers, NRO: (1) Ensure that... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.5 Responsibilities. (a) The Director, NRO (DNRO...
32 CFR 326.5 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... files subject to the provisions of this part. (g) Directorate and Office Managers, NRO: (1) Ensure that... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.5 Responsibilities. (a) The Director, NRO (DNRO...
32 CFR 326.5 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... files subject to the provisions of this part. (g) Directorate and Office Managers, NRO: (1) Ensure that... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.5 Responsibilities. (a) The Director, NRO (DNRO...
32 CFR 326.5 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... files subject to the provisions of this part. (g) Directorate and Office Managers, NRO: (1) Ensure that... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.5 Responsibilities. (a) The Director, NRO (DNRO...
32 CFR 310.45 - Administrative remedies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.45 Administrative remedies. Any individual who... employee concerning any right granted by this part shall be permitted to seek relief through appropriate...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Energy Defense Programs. Activities, equipment, and facilities of the Department of Defense used or... characteristics. (e) Information. Any fact or concept regardless of the physical form or characteristics of the... function in support of atomic energy defense programs whose disruption could reasonably be expected to have...
1994-06-03
wft*:¥A:ft:i:ft& OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AV-8B REMANUFACTURE PROGRAM AS PART OF THE AUDIT OF THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION BOARD...Part of the Audit of the Defense Acquisition Board Review Process - FY 1994 B. DATE Report Downloaded From the Internet: 03/23/99 C. Report’s Point...NAVY FOR RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITION SUBJECT: Audit Report on the AV-8B Remanufacture Program as Part of the Audit of the Defense
FY2017 Defense Appropriations Fact Sheet: Selected Highlights of H.R. 5293 and S. 3000
2016-06-17
legally binding caps on discretionary spending for defense programs and for non-defense programs, which were established by P.L. 114-74, the Bipartisan...funding for FY2017 that (1) exceeds the relevant BBA cap ; and (2) is also exempt from that spending cap because it is classified as funding for so-called...Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). The 2015 BBA increased binding caps on defense and non-defense discretionary appropriations for FY2016 and
Validation of tsunami inundation model TUNA-RP using OAR-PMEL-135 benchmark problem set
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Koh, H. L.; Teh, S. Y.; Tan, W. K.; Kh'ng, X. Y.
2017-05-01
A standard set of benchmark problems, known as OAR-PMEL-135, is developed by the US National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program for tsunami inundation model validation. Any tsunami inundation model must be tested for its accuracy and capability using this standard set of benchmark problems before it can be gainfully used for inundation simulation. The authors have previously developed an in-house tsunami inundation model known as TUNA-RP. This inundation model solves the two-dimensional nonlinear shallow water equations coupled with a wet-dry moving boundary algorithm. This paper presents the validation of TUNA-RP against the solutions provided in the OAR-PMEL-135 benchmark problem set. This benchmark validation testing shows that TUNA-RP can indeed perform inundation simulation with accuracy consistent with that in the tested benchmark problem set.
Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System-Increment 1 (DEAMS Inc 1)
2016-03-01
information accurately and in conformance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles , to comply with Congressional requirements of the Chief Financial ...2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System-Increment 1 (DEAMS Inc 1) Defense...Phone: 937-257-2714 Fax: DSN Phone: 787-2714 DSN Fax: Date Assigned: August 17, 2015 Program Information Program Name Defense Enterprise Accounting
Defense Health Care: DOD Chiropractor Wage Rates
2013-03-14
Page 2 Introduction • In 2000, Congress mandated that the Department of Defense (DOD) develop a plan to provide chiropractic care as a permanent...part of the Defense Health Program. • Prior to the establishment of DOD’s chiropractic program, Congress directed DOD to conduct demonstration...projects to evaluate the feasibility and advisability of expanding DOD’s health system to include chiropractic care. • The National Defense
Joint Logistics Commanders Guide for the Management of Multinational Program,
1981-07-01
purchase of the A-300 Airbus and the 1977 record-breaking export performance of the French and UK aerospace industries of around $5 billion and $2 billion...DIS. They are the Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office ( DISCO ), the Defense Industrial Security Institute (DISI), and the Office of Industrial...Security International (ISI). Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office ( DISCO ) The Defense Industrial Security Program (DISP) establishes pro
32 CFR 634.10 - Remedial driver training programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 true Remedial driver training programs. 634.10 Section 634.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED) LAW... individual driving history or incidents requiring additional training. The curriculum should provide...
32 CFR 634.10 - Remedial driver training programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 4 2012-07-01 2011-07-01 true Remedial driver training programs. 634.10 Section 634.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED) LAW... individual driving history or incidents requiring additional training. The curriculum should provide...
32 CFR 634.10 - Remedial driver training programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 4 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Remedial driver training programs. 634.10 Section 634.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED) LAW... individual driving history or incidents requiring additional training. The curriculum should provide...
32 CFR 634.10 - Remedial driver training programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 4 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Remedial driver training programs. 634.10 Section 634.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED) LAW... individual driving history or incidents requiring additional training. The curriculum should provide...
32 CFR 634.10 - Remedial driver training programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 32 National Defense 4 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Remedial driver training programs. 634.10 Section 634.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CONTINUED) LAW... individual driving history or incidents requiring additional training. The curriculum should provide...
32 CFR 310.21 - Conditions of disclosure.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Disclosure of Personal Information to Other Agencies and Third Parties § 310.21 Conditions of disclosure. (a) Disclosures to third parties. (1) The Privacy Act only compels...
32 CFR 310.21 - Conditions of disclosure.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Disclosure of Personal Information to Other Agencies and Third Parties § 310.21 Conditions of disclosure. (a) Disclosures to third parties. (1) The Privacy Act only compels...
32 CFR 322.6 - Establishing exemptions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.6 Establishing... the National Security Agency shall be prohibited to the extent authorized by Pub. L. No. 86-36 (1959...
32 CFR 322.6 - Establishing exemptions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.6 Establishing... the National Security Agency shall be prohibited to the extent authorized by Pub. L. No. 86-36 (1959...
32 CFR 322.6 - Establishing exemptions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.6 Establishing... the National Security Agency shall be prohibited to the extent authorized by Pub. L. No. 86-36 (1959...
32 CFR 322.6 - Establishing exemptions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.6 Establishing... the National Security Agency shall be prohibited to the extent authorized by Pub. L. No. 86-36 (1959...
32 CFR 322.6 - Establishing exemptions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICES PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 322.6 Establishing... the National Security Agency shall be prohibited to the extent authorized by Pub. L. No. 86-36 (1959...
32 CFR 310.48 - Criminal penalties.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Privacy Act Violations § 310.48 Criminal penalties. (a) The Act also provides... requests or obtains access to any record concerning another individual under false pretenses may be found...
48 CFR 252.219-7004 - Small business subcontracting plan (test program).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... DEFENSE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CLAUSES AND FORMS SOLICITATION PROVISIONS..., Small Business Programs, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and... accomplishments, and percentages for each of the two designated industry categories. (d) The failure of the...
42 CFR 440.345 - EPSDT services requirement.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... the additional benefits will be provided, how access to additional benefits will be coordinated and... (CONTINUED) MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS SERVICES: GENERAL PROVISIONS Benchmark Benefit and Benchmark... plan benefits or as additional benefits provided by the State for any child under 21 years of age...
40 CFR 141.172 - Disinfection profiling and benchmarking.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
...) WATER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS Enhanced Filtration and Disinfection-Systems Serving 10,000 or More People § 141.172 Disinfection profiling and benchmarking. (a... 40 Protection of Environment 22 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Disinfection profiling and...
Cost and Schedule Benchmarks for Defense Acquisition Contracts
1994-09-01
and schedule deviations early Knepp & S -curves for cost S -curves couldn’t Stroble/1993 control be used Terry & EAC Indices SCI-based EAC is...completed and on-going contracts from the early 1970’ s to date. Some of the fields in the database used in determining the status of cost overruns and...Measurement Data (Christensen, 1992:20). Christensen Article David S . Christensen published an analysis of cost overruns on DoD acquisition contracts
2010-04-01
analytical community. 5.1 Towards a Common Understanding of CD&E and CD&E Project Management Recent developments within NATO have contributed to the... project management purposes it is useful to distinguish four phases [P 21]: a) Preparation, Initiation and Structuring; b) Concept Development Planning...examined in more detail below. While the NATO CD&E policy provides a benchmark for a comprehensive, disciplined management of CD&E projects , it may
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-21
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System [OMB Control Number 0704-0332] Information Collection Requirement; Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; DoD Pilot Mentor-Protege Program AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION...
New NAS Parallel Benchmarks Results
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Yarrow, Maurice; Saphir, William; VanderWijngaart, Rob; Woo, Alex; Kutler, Paul (Technical Monitor)
1997-01-01
NPB2 (NAS (NASA Advanced Supercomputing) Parallel Benchmarks 2) is an implementation, based on Fortran and the MPI (message passing interface) message passing standard, of the original NAS Parallel Benchmark specifications. NPB2 programs are run with little or no tuning, in contrast to NPB vendor implementations, which are highly optimized for specific architectures. NPB2 results complement, rather than replace, NPB results. Because they have not been optimized by vendors, NPB2 implementations approximate the performance a typical user can expect for a portable parallel program on distributed memory parallel computers. Together these results provide an insightful comparison of the real-world performance of high-performance computers. New NPB2 features: New implementation (CG), new workstation class problem sizes, new serial sample versions, more performance statistics.
32 CFR 321.14 - DSS implementation policies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
...) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.14 DSS implementation policies. (a) General... matters of particular concern to the Defense Security Service. (b) Privacy Act rules application. Any... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false DSS implementation policies. 321.14 Section 321...
32 CFR 321.14 - DSS implementation policies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
...) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.14 DSS implementation policies. (a) General... matters of particular concern to the Defense Security Service. (b) Privacy Act rules application. Any... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false DSS implementation policies. 321.14 Section 321...
32 CFR 321.14 - DSS implementation policies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.14 DSS implementation policies. (a) General... matters of particular concern to the Defense Security Service. (b) Privacy Act rules application. Any... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false DSS implementation policies. 321.14 Section 321...
Life of an Idea: DLIFLC Annual Program Review.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Woytak, Lidia
1999-01-01
Discusses the Defense Language Institute's Foreign Language Center's (DLIFLC) annual program review. Representatives from the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, HQ TRADOC, National Security Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communication, and Intelligence met to discuss…
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE PRIVACY ACT PROGRAM § 326.16 Penalties. Each request shall be treated as a certification by the requester that he is the individual named in the request. The Privacy Act provides criminal...
76 FR 12073 - Extension of Web-Based TRICARE Assistance Program Demonstration Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-04
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Extension of Web-Based TRICARE Assistance Program Demonstration Program AGENCY: Department of Defense. ACTION: Notice of a Two Year Extension of the Web-Based..., entitled Web-Based TRICARE Assistance Program. This demonstration was effective August 1, 2009, as...
Flight program language requirements. Volume 1: Executive summary
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
1972-01-01
The activities and results of a study for the definition of flight program language requirements are described. A set of detailed requirements are presented for a language capable of supporting onboard application programming for the Marshall Space Flight Center's anticipated future activities in the decade of 1975-85. These requirements are based, in part, on the evaluation of existing flight programming language designs to determine the applicability of these designs to flight programming activities which are anticipated. The coding of benchmark problems in the selected programming languages is discussed. These benchmarks are in the form of program kernels selected from existing flight programs. This approach was taken to insure that the results of the study would reflect state of the art language capabilities, as well as to determine whether an existing language design should be selected for adaptation.
An approach to radiation safety department benchmarking in academic and medical facilities.
Harvey, Richard P
2015-02-01
Based on anecdotal evidence and networking with colleagues at other facilities, it has become evident that some radiation safety departments are not adequately staffed and radiation safety professionals need to increase their staffing levels. Discussions with management regarding radiation safety department staffing often lead to similar conclusions. Management acknowledges the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) or Director of Radiation Safety's concern but asks the RSO to provide benchmarking and justification for additional full-time equivalents (FTEs). The RSO must determine a method to benchmark and justify additional staffing needs while struggling to maintain a safe and compliant radiation safety program. Benchmarking and justification are extremely important tools that are commonly used to demonstrate the need for increased staffing in other disciplines and are tools that can be used by radiation safety professionals. Parameters that most RSOs would expect to be positive predictors of radiation safety staff size generally are and can be emphasized in benchmarking and justification report summaries. Facilities with large radiation safety departments tend to have large numbers of authorized users, be broad-scope programs, be subject to increased controls regulations, have large clinical operations, have significant numbers of academic radiation-producing machines, and have laser safety responsibilities.
Department of Defense Chemical and Biological Defense Program. Annual Report to Congress
2008-05-01
defense system acquisition costs through collaboration in the areas of development, production , and support, and to enhance interoperability with...security area leverages S&T efforts of the other product areas. Where unmet requirements are identified and where S&T is required to meet cost ...Defense Program Inventory Requirements The industrial base, which has scaled down since the end of the Cold War, has stabilized. Ongoing military
Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) Program
1997-05-01
1997 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) Program References: (a) DoD Directive 1350.2, subject as above...Military Departments, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Service Chiefs), May 19, 1994 1 (c) Secretary of Defense Memorandum, " Equal ...in the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense ( Equal Opportunity), Pentagon, Washington, DC, (703) 697-6381 or DSN 227-6381. Report
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Policy. 162.4 Section 162.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCING CAPITAL...D Component investment planning and of the Defense Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Policy. 162.4 Section 162.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCING CAPITAL...D Component investment planning and of the Defense Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Policy. 162.4 Section 162.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCING CAPITAL...D Component investment planning and of the Defense Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Policy. 162.4 Section 162.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCING CAPITAL...D Component investment planning and of the Defense Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS...
42 CFR 457.420 - Benchmark health benefits coverage.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 4 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Benchmark health benefits coverage. 457.420 Section 457.420 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS (SCHIPs) ALLOTMENTS AND GRANTS TO STATES...
42 CFR 457.420 - Benchmark health benefits coverage.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 4 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Benchmark health benefits coverage. 457.420 Section 457.420 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS (SCHIPs) ALLOTMENTS AND GRANTS TO STATES...
42 CFR 457.420 - Benchmark health benefits coverage.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 4 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Benchmark health benefits coverage. 457.420 Section 457.420 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS (SCHIPs) ALLOTMENTS AND GRANTS TO STATES...
42 CFR 457.420 - Benchmark health benefits coverage.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 4 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Benchmark health benefits coverage. 457.420 Section 457.420 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS (SCHIPs) ALLOTMENTS AND GRANTS TO STATES...
42 CFR 457.420 - Benchmark health benefits coverage.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 4 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Benchmark health benefits coverage. 457.420 Section 457.420 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS (SCHIPs) ALLOTMENTS AND GRANTS TO STATES...
7 CFR 245.12 - State agencies and direct certification requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR FREE AND... performance benchmarks set forth in paragraph (b) of this section for directly certifying children who are.... State agencies must meet performance benchmarks for directly certifying for free school meals children...
Parallelization of NAS Benchmarks for Shared Memory Multiprocessors
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Waheed, Abdul; Yan, Jerry C.; Saini, Subhash (Technical Monitor)
1998-01-01
This paper presents our experiences of parallelizing the sequential implementation of NAS benchmarks using compiler directives on SGI Origin2000 distributed shared memory (DSM) system. Porting existing applications to new high performance parallel and distributed computing platforms is a challenging task. Ideally, a user develops a sequential version of the application, leaving the task of porting to new generations of high performance computing systems to parallelization tools and compilers. Due to the simplicity of programming shared-memory multiprocessors, compiler developers have provided various facilities to allow the users to exploit parallelism. Native compilers on SGI Origin2000 support multiprocessing directives to allow users to exploit loop-level parallelism in their programs. Additionally, supporting tools can accomplish this process automatically and present the results of parallelization to the users. We experimented with these compiler directives and supporting tools by parallelizing sequential implementation of NAS benchmarks. Results reported in this paper indicate that with minimal effort, the performance gain is comparable with the hand-parallelized, carefully optimized, message-passing implementations of the same benchmarks.
Integrated Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM)
2015-12-01
Selected Acquisition Report ( SAR ) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-418 Integrated Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM) As of FY 2017 President’s Budget...Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) March 10, 2016 08:58:42 UNCLASSIFIED IDECM December 2015 SAR March 10, 2016 08:58:42... SAR March 10, 2016 08:58:42 UNCLASSIFIED 3 PB - President’s Budget PE - Program Element PEO - Program Executive Officer PM - Program Manager POE
32 CFR 516.60 - Procurement fraud and irregularities programs at MACOMs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 true Procurement fraud and irregularities programs at MACOMs. 516.60 Section 516.60 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Remedies in Procurement Fraud and Corruption...
78 FR 18325 - Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-26
... received in connection with the Defense Personal Property Program (DP3) Phase III Direct Procurement Method... at http://www.transcom.mil/dtr/part-iv/phaseiii.cfm (DPM SECTION). All identified changes will be... Defense Personal Property System (DPS) Phase III programming projected for FY17. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION...
76 FR 36095 - Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-21
... with the Defense Personal Property Program (DP3) Phase III Domestic Small Shipments (dS2) and... Regulation, Part IV Web site at http://www.transcom.mil/dtr/part-iv/phaseiii.cfm . All identified changes... based on completion of Defense Personal Property System (DPS) Phase III programming projected for FY15...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-15
... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Termination of the Department of Defense Web-Based..., entitled Web-Based TRICARE Assistance Program (TRIAP). The demonstration project uses existing health care support contracts (HCSC) to allow web-based behavioral health and related services including non-medical...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND JOINT STAFF PRIVACY PROGRAM § 311.4 Policy. It is DoD policy, in..., United States Code, commonly known and hereafter referred to as the “Privacy Act” and Appendix I of...
32 CFR 310.32 - System notices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Publication Requirements § 310.32 System notices. (a) Contents of the system... database or the IT system if the name does not meet the criteria in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. (d...
32 CFR 310.32 - System notices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Publication Requirements § 310.32 System notices. (a) Contents of the system... database or the IT system if the name does not meet the criteria in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. (d...
32 CFR 310.32 - System notices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DOD PRIVACY PROGRAM Publication Requirements § 310.32 System notices. (a) Contents of the system... database or the IT system if the name does not meet the criteria in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. (d...
32 CFR 321.9 - Appeal of initial amendment decision.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.9 Appeal of initial amendment... record, the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy will assure that such appeal is handled... may be sent to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, (GCF), 1340 Braddock Place...
32 CFR 321.9 - Appeal of initial amendment decision.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.9 Appeal of initial amendment... record, the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy will assure that such appeal is handled... may be sent to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, (GCF), 1340 Braddock Place...
32 CFR 321.7 - Request for correction or amendment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.7 Request for correction or... Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651. (b... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Request for correction or amendment. 321.7...
32 CFR 321.7 - Request for correction or amendment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.7 Request for correction or... Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651. (b... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Request for correction or amendment. 321.7...
32 CFR 321.7 - Request for correction or amendment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.7 Request for correction or... Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651. (b... 32 National Defense 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Request for correction or amendment. 321.7...
32 CFR 321.7 - Request for correction or amendment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.7 Request for correction or... Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651. (b... 32 National Defense 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Request for correction or amendment. 321.7...
32 CFR 321.9 - Appeal of initial amendment decision.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.9 Appeal of initial amendment... record, the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy will assure that such appeal is handled... may be sent to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, (GCF), 1340 Braddock Place...
32 CFR 321.9 - Appeal of initial amendment decision.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.9 Appeal of initial amendment... record, the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy will assure that such appeal is handled... may be sent to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, (GCF), 1340 Braddock Place...
32 CFR 321.7 - Request for correction or amendment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.7 Request for correction or... Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, 1340 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651. (b... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Request for correction or amendment. 321.7...
32 CFR 321.9 - Appeal of initial amendment decision.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) PRIVACY PROGRAM DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE PRIVACY PROGRAM § 321.9 Appeal of initial amendment... record, the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy will assure that such appeal is handled... may be sent to the Defense Security Service, Office of FOI and Privacy, (GCF), 1340 Braddock Place...
32 CFR Appendix H to Part 323 - DLA Exemption Rules
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM Pt. 323, App. H Appendix H to Part 323—DLA Exemption Rules Exempted Records Systems. All systems of records maintained by the Defense Logistics Agency will.... b. ID: S500.20 (Specific exemption). 1. System name: Defense Logistics Agency Criminal Incident...
Personal and Family Survival. Civil Defense Adult Education; Teacher's Manual.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Office of Civil Defense (DOD), Washington, DC.
A manual intended as an instructor's aid in presenting a Civil Defense Adult Education Course is presented. It contains 10 lesson plans: Course Introduction, Modern Weapons and Radioactive Fallout (Effects), Modern Weapons and Radioactive Fallout (Protection), National Civil Defense Program, National Shelter Program (Community Shelters), National…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-08
... Regulations System; Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Balance of Payments Program Exemption... implement the exemption from the Balance of Payments Program for construction material that is commercial... is proposing to amend the DFARS to implement in the clauses at 252.225-7044, Balance of Payments...
32 CFR 516.60 - Procurement fraud and irregularities programs at MACOMs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 3 2011-07-01 2009-07-01 true Procurement fraud and irregularities programs at MACOMs. 516.60 Section 516.60 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AID OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES AND PUBLIC RELATIONS LITIGATION Remedies in Procurement Fraud and Corruption...
Assessment of Accelerated Acquisition of Defense Programs
2016-09-01
I N S T I T U T E F O R D E F E N S E A N A L Y S E S Assessment of Accelerated Acquisition of Defense Programs Richard H. Van Atta R. Royce...Defense for Acquisition . The views, opinions, and findings should not be construed as representing the official position of either the Department of...S T I T U T E F O R D E F E N S E A N A L Y S E S IDA Paper P-8161 Assessment of Accelerated Acquisition of Defense Programs Richard H. Van Atta
COMPETITIVE BIDDING IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE: EFFECT OF BENCHMARK CHANGES ON PLAN BIDS
Song, Zirui; Landrum, Mary Beth; Chernew, Michael E.
2013-01-01
Bidding has been proposed to replace or complement the administered prices in Medicare pays to hospitals and health plans. In 2006, the Medicare Advantage program implemented a competitive bidding system to determine plan payments. In perfectly competitive models, plans bid their costs and thus bids are insensitive to the benchmark. Under many other models of competition, bids respond to changes in the benchmark. We conceptualize the bidding system and use an instrumental variable approach to study the effect of benchmark changes on bids. We use 2006–2010 plan payment data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, published county benchmarks, actual realized fee-for-service costs, and Medicare Advantage enrollment. We find that a $1 increase in the benchmark leads to about a $0.53 increase in bids, suggesting that plans in the Medicare Advantage market have meaningful market power. PMID:24308881
Competitive bidding in Medicare Advantage: effect of benchmark changes on plan bids.
Song, Zirui; Landrum, Mary Beth; Chernew, Michael E
2013-12-01
Bidding has been proposed to replace or complement the administered prices that Medicare pays to hospitals and health plans. In 2006, the Medicare Advantage program implemented a competitive bidding system to determine plan payments. In perfectly competitive models, plans bid their costs and thus bids are insensitive to the benchmark. Under many other models of competition, bids respond to changes in the benchmark. We conceptualize the bidding system and use an instrumental variable approach to study the effect of benchmark changes on bids. We use 2006-2010 plan payment data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, published county benchmarks, actual realized fee-for-service costs, and Medicare Advantage enrollment. We find that a $1 increase in the benchmark leads to about a $0.53 increase in bids, suggesting that plans in the Medicare Advantage market have meaningful market power. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Bennett, George L.; Fram, Miranda S.
2014-01-01
Results for constituents with non-regulatory benchmarks set for aesthetic concerns from the grid wells showed that iron concentrations greater than the CDPH secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL-CA) of 300 μg/L were detected in 13 grid wells. Chloride was detected at a concentration greater than the SMCL-CA recommended benchmark of 250 mg/L in two grid wells. Sulfate concentrations greater than the SMCL-CA recommended benchmark of 250 mg/L were measured in two grid wells, and the concentration in one of these wells was also greater than the SMCL-CA upper benchmark of 500 mg/L. TDS concentrations greater than the SMCL-CA recommended benchmark of 500 mg/L were measured in 15 grid wells, and concentrations in 4 of these wells were also greater than the SMCL-CA upper benchmark of 1,000 mg/L.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Policy. 169.4 Section 169.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM... implementing Instruction, DoD Components shall consider the overall DoD mission and the defense objective of...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Purpose. 155.1 Section 155.1 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SECURITY DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE PROGRAM § 155.1 Purpose. This part updates policy, responsibilities, and procedures of the Defense...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Policy. 169.4 Section 169.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM... implementing Instruction, DoD Components shall consider the overall DoD mission and the defense objective of...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Policy. 169.4 Section 169.4 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE CONTRACTING COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM... implementing Instruction, DoD Components shall consider the overall DoD mission and the defense objective of...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Purpose. 155.1 Section 155.1 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SECURITY DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE PROGRAM § 155.1 Purpose. This part updates policy, responsibilities, and procedures of the Defense...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 32 National Defense 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 155.1 Section 155.1 National Defense Department of Defense OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SECURITY DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE PROGRAM § 155.1 Purpose. This part updates policy, responsibilities, and procedures of the Defense...