75 FR 74091 - Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-30

... a level of > 22 inches water column in support of SGIG system operation. Exelon is submitting this... site, but should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC... EDGs and the associated support systems, such as the fuel oil storage and transfer systems, are...

41 CFR 102-37.175 - How does a SASP find out what property is potentially available for donation?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... what property is potentially available for donation? 102-37.175 Section 102-37.175 Public Contracts and... REGULATION PERSONAL PROPERTY 37-DONATION OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY State Agency for Surplus Property (SASP... available for donation? A SASP may conduct onsite screening at various Federal facilities, contact or submit...

41 CFR 102-37.175 - How does a SASP find out what property is potentially available for donation?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... what property is potentially available for donation? 102-37.175 Section 102-37.175 Public Contracts and... REGULATION PERSONAL PROPERTY 37-DONATION OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY State Agency for Surplus Property (SASP... available for donation? A SASP may conduct onsite screening at various Federal facilities, contact or submit...

41 CFR 102-37.175 - How does a SASP find out what property is potentially available for donation?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... what property is potentially available for donation? 102-37.175 Section 102-37.175 Public Contracts and... REGULATION PERSONAL PROPERTY 37-DONATION OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY State Agency for Surplus Property (SASP... available for donation? A SASP may conduct onsite screening at various Federal facilities, contact or submit...

41 CFR 102-37.175 - How does a SASP find out what property is potentially available for donation?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... what property is potentially available for donation? 102-37.175 Section 102-37.175 Public Contracts and... REGULATION PERSONAL PROPERTY 37-DONATION OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY State Agency for Surplus Property (SASP... available for donation? A SASP may conduct onsite screening at various Federal facilities, contact or submit...

75 FR 69707 - Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-15

... NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit... accordance with the procedures described below. To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at... software not listed on the Web site, but should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support...

Continuous Improvement and the Safety Case for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Geologic Repository - 13467

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Van Luik, Abraham; Patterson, Russell; Nelson, Roger

2013-07-01

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is a geologic repository 2150 feet (650 m) below the surface of the Chihuahuan desert near Carlsbad, New Mexico. WIPP permanently disposes of transuranic waste from national defense programs. Every five years, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submits an application to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to request regulatory-compliance re-certification of the facility for another five years. Every ten years, DOE submits an application to the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) for the renewal of its hazardous waste disposal permit. The content of the applications made by DOE to the EPA formore » re-certification, and to the NMED for permit-renewal, reflect any optimization changes made to the facility, with regulatory concurrence if warranted by the nature of the change. DOE points to such changes as evidence for its having taken seriously its 'continuous improvement' operations and management philosophy. Another opportunity for continuous improvement is to look at any delta that may exist between the re-certification and re-permitting cases for system safety and the consensus advice on the nature and content of a safety case as being developed and published by the Nuclear Energy Agency's Integration Group for the Safety Case (IGSC) expert group. DOE at WIPP, with the aid of its Science Advisor and teammate, Sandia National Laboratories, is in the process of discerning what can be done, in a reasonably paced and cost-conscious manner, to continually improve the case for repository safety that is being made to the two primary regulators on a recurring basis. This paper will discuss some aspects of that delta and potential paths forward to addressing them. (authors)« less

76 FR 13300 - Procedures for Submitting to the Department of Energy Trade Secrets and Commercial or Financial...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-03-11

... procedures DOE uses to process loan applications submitted to DOE's Advanced Technology Vehicles... procedures DOE uses to process loan applications submitted to DOE's Advanced Technology Vehicles... requirements as described above for any information submitted through the Title XVII loan application process...

30 CFR 210.204 - How do I submit facility data?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 210.204 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MINERALS REVENUE MANAGEMENT FORMS AND REPORTS Production and Royalty Reports-Solid Minerals § 210.204 How do I submit facility...) Output quality or product grades. (5) Your submitted facility data may be internally generated documents...

Closure of hazardous and mixed radioactive waste management units at DOE facilities. [Contains glossary

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

This is document addresses the Federal regulations governing the closure of hazardous and mixed waste units subject to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. It provides a brief overview of the RCRA permitting program and the extensive RCRA facility design and operating standards. It provides detailed guidance on the procedural requirements for closure and post-closure care of hazardous and mixed waste management units, including guidance on the preparation of closure and post-closure plans that must be submitted with facility permit applications. This document also provides guidance on technical activities that must be conducted both during and after closure ofmore » each of the following hazardous waste management units regulated under RCRA.« less

41 CFR 102-75.855 - What happens if DOT does not submit an assignment recommendation?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... not submit an assignment recommendation? 102-75.855 Section 102-75.855 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL....855 What happens if DOT does not submit an assignment recommendation? If DOT does not submit an...

41 CFR 102-75.660 - What happens if DOI does not approve any applications or does not submit an assignment...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... not approve any applications or does not submit an assignment recommendation? 102-75.660 Section 102-75.660 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management Regulations System... approve any applications or does not submit an assignment recommendation? If DOI does not approve any...

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Cummins, G.D.

This request is submitted to seek interim approval to operate a Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 chemical waste landfill for the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) waste. Operation of a chemical waste landfill for disposal of PCB waste is subject to the TSCA regulations of 40 CFR 761. Interim approval is requested for a period not to exceed 5 years from the date of approval. This request covers only the disposal of small 10 quantities of solid PCB waste contained in decommissioned, defueled submarine reactor compartments (SRC). In addition, the request applies only to disposal 12 of thismore » waste in Trench 94 of the 218-E-12B Burial Ground (Trench 94) in the 13 200 East Area of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Hanford Facility. Disposal of this waste will be conducted in accordance with the Compliance 15 Agreement (Appendix H) between the DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and 16 the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 10. During the 5-year interim approval period, the DOE-RL will submit an application seeking final 18 approval for operation of Trench 94 as a chemical waste landfill, including 19 any necessary waivers, and also will seek a final dangerous waste permit from 20 the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) for disposal of lead 21 shielding contained in the SRCS.« less

Occupational dose reduction at Department of Energy contractor facilities: Bibliography of selected readings in radiation protection and ALARA

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Dionne, B.J.; Sullivan, S.G.; Baum, J.W.

1993-12-01

This bibliography contains abstracts relating to various aspects of ALARA program implementation and dose reduction activities, with a focus on DOE facilities. Abstracts included in this bibliography were selected from proceedings of technical meetings, journals, research reports, searches of the DOE Energy, Science and Technology Database (in general, the citation and abstract information is presented as obtained from this database), and reprints of published articles provided by the authors. Facility types and activities covered in the scope of this report include: radioactive waste, uranium enrichment, fuel fabrication, spent fuel storage and reprocessing, facility decommissioning, hot laboratories, tritium production, research, testmore » and production reactors, weapons fabrication and testing, fusion, uranium and plutonium processing, radiography, and aocelerators. Information on improved shielding design, decontamination, containments, robotics, source prevention and control, job planning, improved operational and design techniques, as well as on other topics, has been included. In addition, DOE/EH reports not included in previous volumes of the bibliography are in this volume (abstracts 611 to 684). This volume (Volume 5 of the series) contains 217 abstracts. An author index and a subject index are provided to facilitate use. Both indices contain the abstract numbers from previous volumes, as well as the current volume. Information that the reader feels might be included in the next volume of this bibliography should be submitted to the BNL ALARA Center.« less

Results and Analysis of the Infrastructure Request for Information (DE-SOL-0008318)

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Heidrich, Brenden John

2015-07-01

The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) released a request for information (RFI) (DE-SOL-0008318) for “University, National Laboratory, Industry and International Input on Potential Office of Nuclear Energy Infrastructure Investments” on April 13, 2015. DOE-NE solicited information on five specific types of capabilities as well as any others suggested by the community. The RFI proposal period closed on June 19, 2015. From the 26 responses, 34 individual proposals were extracted. Eighteen were associated with a DOE national laboratory, including Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Pacificmore » Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Sandia National Laboratory (SNL). Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was referenced in a proposal as a proposed capability location, although the proposal did not originate with ORNL. Five US universities submitted proposals (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Pennsylvania State University, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, University of Houston and the University of Michigan). Three industrial/commercial institutions submitted proposals (AREVA NP, Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)). Eight major themes emerged from the submissions as areas needing additional capability or support for existing capabilities. Two submissions supported multiple areas. The major themes are: Advanced Manufacturing (AM), High Performance Computing (HPC), Ion Irradiation with X-Ray Diagnostics (IIX), Ion Irradiation with TEM Visualization (IIT), Radiochemistry Laboratories (RCL), Test Reactors, Neutron Sources and Critical Facilities (RX) , Sample Preparation and Post-Irradiation Examination (PIE) and Thermal-Hydraulics Test Facilities (THF).« less

42 CFR 137.132 - How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? 137.132 Section 137.132 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....132 How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? (a) A written final offer should be submitted: (1...

42 CFR 137.132 - How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? 137.132 Section 137.132 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....132 How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? (a) A written final offer should be submitted: (1...

42 CFR 137.132 - How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? 137.132 Section 137.132 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....132 How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? (a) A written final offer should be submitted: (1...

42 CFR 137.132 - How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? 137.132 Section 137.132 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....132 How does the Indian Tribe submit a final offer? (a) A written final offer should be submitted: (1...

An Analysis of Organizational and Funding Alternatives for the Armed Force Institute of Pathology

DTIC Science & Technology

2001-07-01

operating cost includes costs for leased space but not the cost of major renovations or depreciation on government-owned facilities. As a result, it...the full costs of operations (labor, supplies and materials, overhead, depreciation , and subcontracts) and provide enough money to ensure replacement of... depreciation of assets), its design was too simple. Cus- tomers were charged a flat rate per item submitted for analysis. Although this does provide a

30 CFR 285.632 - What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... construct and install facilities under my approved COP? 285.632 Section 285.632 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF... Requirements Activities Under An Approved Cop § 285.632 What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP? (a) You must submit to MMS the documents listed in the following...

30 CFR 585.632 - What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... construct and install facilities under my approved COP? 585.632 Section 585.632 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF... Approved Cop § 585.632 What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP? (a) You must submit to BOEM the documents listed in the following table: Document...

30 CFR 585.632 - What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... construct and install facilities under my approved COP? 585.632 Section 585.632 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF... Approved Cop § 585.632 What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP? (a) You must submit to BOEM the documents listed in the following table: Document...

30 CFR 585.632 - What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... construct and install facilities under my approved COP? 585.632 Section 585.632 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF... Approved Cop § 585.632 What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP? (a) You must submit to BOEM the documents listed in the following table: Document...

76 FR 26579 - Procedures for Submitting to the Department of Energy Trade Secrets and Commercial or Financial...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-09

... procedures DOE uses to process loan applications submitted to DOE's Advanced Technology Vehicles... information. The procedures are modeled after existing procedures DOE uses to process loan applications... requirements as described above for any information submitted through the Title XVII loan application process...

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Site Environmental Report for 1998

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Hooda, Balwan S.; Allen, Vivian L.

This 1998 annual Site Environmental Report (SER) was prepared in accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.1, ''General Environmental Protection Program''; DOE Order 231.1, ''Environmental Safety and Health Reporting''; the ''Environmental Regulatory Guide for Radiological Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance'' (DOE/EH-0173T); and the Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (DOE/WIPP 96-2199). The above orders and guidance documents require that DOE facilities submit an SER to DOE Headquarters, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health. The purpose of the SER is to provide a comprehensive description of operational environmental monitoring activities, an abstract of environmental activities conducted tomore » characterize site environmental management performance, to confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements, and to highlight significant programs and efforts of environmental merit at WIPP during calendar year ( CY) 1998. The content of this SER is not restricted to a synopsis of the required data. Information pertaining to new and continued monitoring and compliance activities during CY 1998 are also included.« less

Tiger Team Assessments seventeen through thirty-five: A summary and analysis

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1992-12-01

On June 27, 1989, the Secretary of Energy, Admiral James D. Watkins, US Navy (Retired), announced a 10-Point Plan to strengthen environmental, safety, and health (ES H) programs and waste management activities at the US Department of Energy (DOE). The third initiative called for establishing an independent audit (the Tiger Teams) to assess DOE's major operating facilities and laboratories. As of November 1992, all 35 Tiger Team Assessments were completed and formally reported to the Secretary. In May 1991 a report providing an analysis and summary of the findings and root causes identified by the first 16 Tiger Team Assessmentsmore » was completed and submitted to the Secretary of Energy and to all DOE program managers. This document is intended to provide an easily used and easily understood summary and analysis of the information contained in Tiger Team Assessments numbers 17 through 35 to help DOE achieve ES H excellence.« less

78 FR 66763 - Information Collection: Oil Spill Financial Responsibility for Offshore Facilities; Submitted for...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-06

...] Information Collection: Oil Spill Financial Responsibility for Offshore Facilities; Submitted for OMB Review... information collection request (ICR) concerns the paperwork requirements for 30 CFR 553, Oil Spill Financial... 6, 2013 ADDRESSES: Submit comments on this ICR to the Desk Officer for the Department of the...

78 FR 24194 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Solid...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-24

... Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria... Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), Solid Waste Disposal Facility... 40 CFR Part 258 on a State level, owners/operators of municipal solid waste landfills have to comply...

Tiger Team Assessments seventeen through thirty-five: A summary and analysis. Volume 2

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1992-12-01

On June 27, 1989, the Secretary of Energy, Admiral James D. Watkins, US Navy (Retired), announced a 10-Point Plan to strengthen environmental, safety, and health (ES&H) programs and waste management activities at the US Department of Energy (DOE). The third initiative called for establishing an independent audit (the Tiger Teams) to assess DOE`s major operating facilities and laboratories. As of November 1992, all 35 Tiger Team Assessments were completed and formally reported to the Secretary. In May 1991 a report providing an analysis and summary of the findings and root causes identified by the first 16 Tiger Team Assessments wasmore » completed and submitted to the Secretary of Energy and to all DOE program managers. This document is intended to provide an easily used and easily understood summary and analysis of the information contained in Tiger Team Assessments numbers 17 through 35 to help DOE achieve ES&H excellence.« less

Final voluntary release assessment/corrective action report

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1996-11-12

The US Department of Energy, Carlsbad Area Office (DOE-CAO) has completed a voluntary release assessment sampling program at selected Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This Voluntary Release Assessment/Corrective Action (RA/CA) report has been prepared for final submittal to the Environmental protection Agency (EPA) Region 6, Hazardous Waste Management Division and the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) Hazardous and Radioactive Materials Bureau to describe the results of voluntary release assessment sampling and proposed corrective actions at the SWMU sites. The Voluntary RA/CA Program is intended to be the first phase in implementing the Resourcemore » Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) and corrective action process at the WIPP. Data generated as part of this sampling program are intended to update the RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA) for the WIPP (Assessment of Solid Waste Management Units at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant), NMED/DOE/AIP 94/1. This Final Voluntary RA/CA Report documents the results of release assessment sampling at 11 SWMUs identified in the RFA. With this submittal, DOE formally requests a No Further Action determination for these SWMUs. Additionally, this report provides information to support DOE`s request for No Further Action at the Brinderson and Construction landfill SWMUs, and to support DOE`s request for approval of proposed corrective actions at three other SWMUs (the Badger Unit Drill Pad, the Cotton Baby Drill Pad, and the DOE-1 Drill Pad). This information is provided to document the results of the Voluntary RA/CA activities submitted to the EPA and NMED in August 1995.« less

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Waste Management Plan, fiscal year 1994. Revision 3

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Turner, J.W.

1993-12-01

US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5820.2A was promulgated in final form on September 26, 1988. The order requires heads of field organizations to prepare and to submit updates on the waste management plans for all operations under their purview according to the format in Chap. 6, {open_quotes}Waste Management Plan Outline.{close_quotes} These plans are to be submitted by the DOE Oak Ridge Operations Office (DOE-ORO) in December of each year and distributed to the DP-12, ES&H-1, and other appropriate DOE Headquarters (DOE-HQ) organizations for review and comment. This document was prepared in response to this requirement for fiscal year (FY)more » 1994. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) waste management mission is reduction, collection, storage, treatment, and disposal of DOE wastes, generated primarily in pursuit of ORNL missions, in order to protect human health and safety and the environment. In carrying out this mission, waste management staff in the Waste Management and Remedial Action Division (WMRAD) will (1) guide ORNL in optimizing waste reduction and waste management capabilities and (2) conduct waste management operations in a compliant, publicly acceptable, technically sound, and cost-efficient manner. Waste management requirements for DOE radioactive wastes are detailed in DOE Order 5820.2A, and the ORNL Waste Management Program encompasses all elements of this order. The requirements of this DOE order and other appropriate DOE orders, along with applicable Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules and regulations, provide the principal source of regulatory guidance for waste management operations at ORNL. The objective of this document is compilation and consolidation of information on how the ORNL Waste Management Program is conducted, which waste management facilities are being used to manage wastes, what activities are planned for FY 1994, and how all of the activities are documented.« less

14 CFR 330.13 - If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? 330.13 Section 330.13... compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? Yes, if, as an air...

14 CFR 330.13 - If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? 330.13 Section 330.13... compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? Yes, if, as an air...

14 CFR 330.13 - If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? 330.13 Section 330.13... compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? Yes, if, as an air...

14 CFR 330.13 - If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? 330.13 Section 330.13... compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? Yes, if, as an air...

14 CFR 330.13 - If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 4 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false If an air carrier received compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? 330.13 Section 330.13... compensation under the Act previously, does it have to submit a third-round application? Yes, if, as an air...

30 CFR 285.703 - What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Facility Design, Fabrication, and Installation Reports § 285.703 What reports must I submit for...

Amended annual report for Brookhaven National Laboratory: Epidemiologic surveillance - 1994

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

Epidemiologic surveillance at DOE facilities consists of regular and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on absences due to illness and injury in the work force. Its purpose is to provide an early warning system for health problems occurring among employees at participating sites. Data are collected by coordinators at each site and submitted to the Epidemiologic Surveillance Data Center, located at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, where quality control procedures and analyses are carried out. Rates of absences and rates of diagnoses associated with absences are analyzed by occupation and other relevant variables. They maymore » be compared with the disease experience of different groups within the DOE work force and with populations and do not work for DOE to identify disease patterns or clusters that may be associated work activities. This report provides a final summary for BNL.« less

Annual report for Hanford Site: Epidemiologic surveillance - 1994

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1998-01-01

Epidemiologic surveillance at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities consists of regular and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on absences due to illness and injury in the work force. Its purpose is to provide an early warning system for health problems occurring among employees at participating sites. Data are collected by coordinators at each site and submitted to the Epidemiologic Surveillance Data Center, located at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, where quality control procedures and analyses are carried out. Rates of absences and rates of diagnoses associated with absences are analyzed by occupational and othermore » relevant variables. They may be compared with the disease experience of different groups within the DOE work force and with populations that do not work for DOE to identify disease patterns or clusters that may be associated with work activities.This report provides the final summary for the Hanford Reservation.« less

Epidemiologic surveillance. Annual report for EG&G Rocky Flats

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1994-12-31

Epidemiologic surveillance at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities consists of regular and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on absences resulting from illness and injury in the work force. Its purpose is to provide an early warning system for health problems occurring among employees at participating sites. Data are collected by coordinators at each site and submitted to the Epidemiologic Surveillance Data Center, located at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, where quality control procedures and analyses are carried out. Rates of absences and rates of diagnoses associated with absences are analyzed by occupation and othermore » relevant variables. They may be compared with the disease experience of different groups within the DOE work force and with populations that do not work for DOE to identify disease patterns or clusters that may be associated with work activities. This report presents the 1994 morbidity data for the Rocky Flats plant.« less

76 FR 52892 - Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-24

... between the DOE test data and the data submitted by NEMA; describe the methodological changes DOE is... differences between test data obtained by DOE and test data submitted by NEMA; (3) describe the methodological...

Tiger Team Assessment of the Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1990-02-01

This document contains the findings and associated root causes identified during the Tiger Team Assessment of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. This assessment was conducted by the Department's Office of Environment, Safety and Health between October 2 and 31, 1989. The scope of the assessment of the Pantex Plant covered all areas of environment, safety and health (ES H) activities, including compliance with federal, state, and local regulations, requirements, permits, agreements, orders and consent decrees, and DOE ES H Orders. The assessment also included an evaluation of the adequacy of DOE and site contractor ESmore » H management programs. The draft findings were submitted to the Office of Defense Programs, the Albuquerque Operations Office, the Amarillo Area Office, and regulatory agencies at the conclusion of the on-site assessment activities for review and comment on technical accuracy. Final modifications and any other appropriate changes have been incorporated in the final report. The Tiger Team Assessment of the Pantex Plant is part of the larger Tiger Team Assessment program which will encompass over 100 DOE operating facilities. The assessment program is part of a 10-point initiative announced by Secretary of Energy James D. Watkins on June 27, 1989, to strengthen environmental protection and waste management activities in the Department. The results of the program will provide the Secretary with information on the compliance status of DOE facilities with regard to ES H requirements, root causes for noncompliance, adequacy of DOE and site contractor ES H management programs, and DOE-wide ES H compliance trends.« less

30 CFR 285.912 - After I remove a facility, cable, or pipeline, what information must I submit?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false After I remove a facility, cable, or pipeline, what information must I submit? 285.912 Section 285.912 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER...

41 CFR 102-75.660 - What happens if DOI does not approve any applications or does not submit an assignment...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false What happens if DOI does... Disposal Property for Use As Public Park Or Recreation Areas § 102-75.660 What happens if DOI does not approve any applications or does not submit an assignment recommendation? If DOI does not approve any...

21 CFR 803.32 - If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my individual adverse event reports?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my individual adverse event reports? 803.32 Section 803.32 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG... must submit the following: (1) Identification of adverse event or product problem; (2) Outcomes...

21 CFR 803.32 - If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my individual adverse event reports?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my individual adverse event reports? 803.32 Section 803.32 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG... must submit the following: (1) Identification of adverse event or product problem; (2) Outcomes...

13 CFR 126.613 - How does a price evaluation preference affect the bid of a qualified HUBZone SBC in full and open...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... full and open competition, a qualified HUBZone SBC submits an offer of $98, a non-HUBZone SBC submits..., the non-HUBZone SBC's offer at $100 does not displace the large business' offer because a price... and open competition, a qualified HUBZone SBC submits an offer of $98 and a non-HUBZone SBC submits an...

40 CFR 355.20 - If this subpart applies to my facility, what information must I provide, who must I submit it to...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

..., what information must I provide, who must I submit it to, and when is it due? 355.20 Section 355.20....20 If this subpart applies to my facility, what information must I provide, who must I submit it to, and when is it due? Use this table to determine the information you must provide, who to provide it to...

30 CFR 285.632 - What documents must I submit before I may construct and install facilities under my approved COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... construct and install facilities under my approved COP? 285.632 Section 285.632 Mineral Resources MINERALS... FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and Information Requirements Activities Under An Approved Cop... COP? (a) You must submit to MMS the documents listed in the following table: ER29AP09.124 (b) You must...

30 CFR 285.700 - What reports must I submit to MMS before installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP, or GAP? 285.700 Section 285.700 Mineral Resources... described in my approved SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) You must submit the following reports to MMS before installing facilities described in your approved COP (§ 285.632(a)) and, when required by this part, your SAP...

Report on Collaborative Facilities Projects.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

California Community Colleges, Sacramento. Office of the Chancellor.

California's community colleges develop their own requests in concert with their district five-year master plan. They then submit those requests to the State Chancellor's Office for review. This document discusses the current process of submitting proposals for collaborative facilities projects, and outlines and discusses five recommendations for…

Medicaid program; correction and reduction plans for intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded--HCFA. Final rule.

PubMed

1991-07-05

This final rule amends the portions of the Medicaid regulations under which an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded (ICF/MR) with substantial deficiencies that did not pose an immediate jeopardy to the health and safety of clients could continue participation in the Medicaid program. These regulations gave State Medicaid agencies the option of submitting written plans to either correct deficiencies or permanently reduce the number of beds in the certified portion of the facility. This rule removes all requirements for submitting, approving, and monitoring correction plans for ICFs/MR. The requirements for submitting and approving correction plans are being removed because the time limit for submission of these plans has passed. The provisions for monitoring correction plans are being removed because there are no remaining facilities for which these provisions apply. This final rule also removes requirements for submitting and approving reduction plans for ICFs/MR because the time limit for submitting these plans has passed. It retains and updates the requirements for monitoring and compliance that apply to those ICFs/MR for which reduction plans were approved by January 1, 1990.

30 CFR 585.700 - What reports must I submit to BOEM before installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP, or GAP? 585.700 Section 585.700 Mineral Resources... approved SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) You must submit the following reports to BOEM before installing facilities described in your approved COP (§ 585.632(a)) and, when required by this part, your SAP (§ 585.614(b)) or...

30 CFR 585.700 - What reports must I submit to BOEM before installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP, or GAP? 585.700 Section 585.700 Mineral Resources... approved SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) You must submit the following reports to BOEM before installing facilities described in your approved COP (§ 585.632(a)) and, when required by this part, your SAP (§ 585.614(b)) or...

30 CFR 585.700 - What reports must I submit to BOEM before installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP, or GAP? 585.700 Section 585.700 Mineral Resources... approved SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) You must submit the following reports to BOEM before installing facilities described in your approved COP (§ 585.632(a)) and, when required by this part, your SAP (§ 585.614(b)) or...

34 CFR 403.33 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAM How Does A State Apply for a Grant? § 403.33 What procedures does a State use to... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 403.33 Section 403.33 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education...

Hanford Facility dangerous waste permit application, liquid effluent retention facility and 200 area effluent treatment facility

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Coenenberg, J.G.

1997-08-15

The Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to 10 be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (document 11 number DOE/RL-91-28) and a Unit-Specific Portion. The scope of the 12 Unit-Specific Portion is limited to Part B permit application documentation 13 submitted for individual, `operating` treatment, storage, and/or disposal 14 units, such as the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and 200 Area Effluent 15 Treatment Facility (this document, DOE/RL-97-03). 16 17 Both the General Information and Unit-Specific portions of the Hanford 18 Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application address the content of the Part B 19 permit applicationmore » guidance prepared by the Washington State Department of 20 Ecology (Ecology 1987 and 1996) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 21 (40 Code of Federal Regulations 270), with additional information needs 22 defined by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments and revisions of 23 Washington Administrative Code 173-303. For ease of reference, the Washington 24 State Department of Ecology alpha-numeric section identifiers from the permit 25 application guidance documentation (Ecology 1996) follow, in brackets, the 26 chapter headings and subheadings. A checklist indicating where information is 27 contained in the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and 200 Area Effluent 28 Treatment Facility permit application documentation, in relation to the 29 Washington State Department of Ecology guidance, is located in the Contents 30 Section. 31 32 Documentation contained in the General Information Portion is broader in 33 nature and could be used by multiple treatment, storage, and/or disposal units 34 (e.g., the glossary provided in the General Information Portion). Wherever 35 appropriate, the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and 200 Area Effluent 36 Treatment Facility permit application documentation makes cross-reference to 37 the General Information Portion, rather than duplicating text. 38 39 Information provided in this Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and 40 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility permit application documentation is 41 current as of June 1, 1997.« less

78 FR 19568 - Limited Service Exclusion for Household Goods Motor Carriers and Related Registration...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-01

...: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket Management System Number FMCSA-2013-0087 by any... the online instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 1-202-493-2251. Mail: Docket Management Facility... visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of [[Page 19569

41 CFR 102-74.150 - Who submits prospectuses for the construction or alteration of public buildings to the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Section 102-74.150 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Asset... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Who submits prospectuses...

78 FR 68054 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-13

... Rework Facilities (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The... Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GG) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1687.09, OMB Control... are owners or operators of aerospace manufacturing and rework operations. Respondents must submit one...

41 CFR 102-118.500 - How does my agency handle a volunary refund submitted by a TSP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Property Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does my agency... Information for All Claims § 102-118.500 How does my agency handle a volunary refund submitted by a TSP? (a...

Epidemiologic surveillance. [1994] amended annual report for Brookhaven National Laboratory. Revision 2

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1994-12-31

Epidemiologic surveillance at DOE facilities consists of regular and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on absences due to illness and injury in the work force. Its purpose is to provide an early warning system for health problems occurring among employees at participating sites. Data are collected by coordinators at each site and submitted to the Epidemiologic Surveillance Data Center, located at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, where quality control procedures and analyses are carried out. Rates of absences and rates of diagnoses associated with absences are analyzed by occupation and other relevant variables. They maymore » be compared with the disease experience of different groups within the DOE work force and with populations that do not work for DOE to identify disease patterns or clusters that may be associated with work activities. This amended annual report corrects errors in the initial release of the BNL report for 1994. In this annual report, the 1994 morbidity data for BNL are summarized.« less

30 CFR 285.622 - How do I submit my COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and Information Requirements Construction and Operations Plan for Commercial Leases § 285.622 How do I submit my COP? (a) You must submit...

14 CFR 171.23 - Requests for IFR procedure.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

...) NAVIGATIONAL FACILITIES NON-FEDERAL NAVIGATION FACILITIES Nondirectional Radio Beacon Facilities § 171.23... beacon facility that he owns must submit the following information with that request: (1) A description...

A Retrospective Study of the Prevalence and Classification of Intestinal Neoplasia in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)

PubMed Central

Paquette, Colleen E.; Buchner, Cari; Tanguay, Robert L.; Guillemin, Karen; Mason, Timothy J.; Peterson, Tracy S.

2013-01-01

Abstract For over a decade, spontaneous intestinal neoplasia has been observed in zebrafish (Danio rerio) submitted to the ZIRC (Zebrafish International Resource Center) diagnostic service. In addition, zebrafish displayed preneoplastic intestinal changes including hyperplasia, dysplasia, and enteritis. A total of 195 zebrafish, representing 2% of the total fish submitted to the service, were diagnosed with these lesions. Neoplastic changes were classified either as adenocarcinoma or small cell carcinoma, with a few exceptions (carcinoma not otherwise specified, tubular adenoma, and tubulovillous adenoma). Tumor prevalence appeared similarly distributed between sexes and generally occurred in zebrafish greater than 1 year of age, although neoplastic changes were observed in fish 6 months of age. Eleven lines displayed these preneoplastic and neoplastic changes, including wild-types and mutants. Affected zebrafish originated from 18 facilities, but the majority of fish were from a single zebrafish research facility (hereafter referred to as the primary facility) that has submitted numerous samples to the ZIRC diagnostic service. Zebrafish from the primary facility submitted as normal sentinel fish demonstrate that these lesions are most often subclinical. Fish fed the diet from the primary facility and held at another location did not develop intestinal lesions, indicating that diet is not the etiologic agent. PMID:23544991

76 FR 76193 - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-12-06

... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0275] Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating.... You may submit comments by any one of the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to http... Information Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the...

75 FR 14445 - Guidance for Industry on Submitting a Report for Multiple Facilities to the Reportable Food...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-25

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0260] Guidance for Industry on Submitting a Report for Multiple Facilities to the Reportable Food Electronic... Act of 2007.'' The document provides guidance to the industry in complying with the Reportable Food...

30. 'Gould Island Facilities, General Plan,' submitted 29 December 1941 ...

Library of Congress Historic Buildings Survey, Historic Engineering Record, Historic Landscapes Survey

30. 'Gould Island Facilities, General Plan,' submitted 29 December 1941 by John Brackett, Consulting Engineer, to Public Works Department, Bureau of Yards & Docks. PW Drawing 3859-46, Y&D Drawing 190833. Scales 1' = 50' and 1' = 10'. - Naval Torpedo Station, Firing Pier, North end of Gould Island in Narragansett Bay, Newport, Newport County, RI

76 FR 54721 - Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation: Brakes; Adjustment Limits

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-02

... instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200... mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\\1/2\\ by 11 inches, suitable... the Internet, you may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12...

41 CFR 102-75.730 - What happens if a Federal agency does not submit a transfer request to the disposal agency for...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Federal agency does not submit a transfer request to the disposal agency for property to be used for replacement housing for persons who will be displaced by Federal or Federally assisted projects? 102-75.730... will be displaced by Federal or Federally assisted projects? If the disposal agency does not receive a...

40 CFR 52.226 - Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter, San Joaquin Valley and Mountain Counties...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... previously approved in 40 CFR 52.223 is retained. (iii) The addition of Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator... CFR 52.223 are retained. (ii) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on July 22...) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on February 10, 1977, is disapproved and the...

40 CFR 52.226 - Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter, San Joaquin Valley and Mountain Counties...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... previously approved in 40 CFR 52.223 is retained. (iii) The addition of Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator... CFR 52.223 are retained. (ii) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on July 22...) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on February 10, 1977, is disapproved and the...

40 CFR 52.226 - Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter, San Joaquin Valley and Mountain Counties...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... previously approved in 40 CFR 52.223 is retained. (iii) The addition of Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator... CFR 52.223 are retained. (ii) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on July 22...) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on February 10, 1977, is disapproved and the...

40 CFR 52.226 - Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter, San Joaquin Valley and Mountain Counties...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... previously approved in 40 CFR 52.223 is retained. (iii) The addition of Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator... CFR 52.223 are retained. (ii) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on July 22...) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on February 10, 1977, is disapproved and the...

40 CFR 52.226 - Control strategy and regulations: Particulate matter, San Joaquin Valley and Mountain Counties...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... previously approved in 40 CFR 52.223 is retained. (iii) The addition of Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator... CFR 52.223 are retained. (ii) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on July 22...) Rule 209, Fossil Fuel-Steam Generator Facility, submitted on February 10, 1977, is disapproved and the...

41 CFR 102-74.145 - What information must a Federal agency submit to GSA after the agency has identified a need for...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Asset Services § 102-74.145 What information must a Federal agency submit to GSA after... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What information must a...

Hanford facility dangerous waste permit application, general information portion. Revision 3

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Sonnichsen, J.C.

1997-08-21

For purposes of the Hanford facility dangerous waste permit application, the US Department of Energy`s contractors are identified as ``co-operators`` and sign in that capacity (refer to Condition I.A.2. of the Dangerous Waste Portion of the Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit). Any identification of these contractors as an ``operator`` elsewhere in the application is not meant to conflict with the contractors` designation as co-operators but rather is based on the contractors` contractual status with the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. The Dangerous Waste Portion of the initial Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit,more » which incorporated five treatment, storage, and/or disposal units, was based on information submitted in the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application and in closure plan and closure/postclosure plan documentation. During 1995, the Dangerous Waste Portion was modified twice to incorporate another eight treatment, storage, and/or disposal units; during 1996, the Dangerous Waste Portion was modified once to incorporate another five treatment, storage, and/or disposal units. The permit modification process will be used at least annually to incorporate additional treatment, storage, and/or disposal units as permitting documentation for these units is finalized. The units to be included in annual modifications are specified in a schedule contained in the Dangerous Waste Portion of the Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit. Treatment, storage, and/or disposal units will remain in interim status until incorporated into the Permit. The Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, DOE/RL-91-28) and a Unit-Specific Portion. The scope of the Unit-Specific Portion is limited to individual operating treatment, storage, and/or disposal units for which Part B permit application documentation has been, or is anticipated to be, submitted. Documentation for treatment, storage, and/or disposal units undergoing closure, or for units that are, or are anticipated to be, dispositioned through other options, will continue to be submitted by the Permittees in accordance with the provisions of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. However, the scope of the General Information Portion includes information that could be used to discuss operating units, units undergoing closure, or units being dispositioned through other options. Both the General Information and Unit-Specific portions of the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application address the contents of the Part B permit application guidance documentation prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with additional information needs defined by revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303 and by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion is broader in nature and could be used by multiple treatment, storage, and/or disposal units (i.e., either operating units, units undergoing closure, or units being dispositioned through other options).« less

40 CFR 355.20 - If this subpart applies to my facility, what information must I provide, who must I submit it to...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 28 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false If this subpart applies to my facility, what information must I provide, who must I submit it to, and when is it due? 355.20 Section 355.20 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) SUPERFUND, EMERGENCY PLANNING, AND...

Conceptual design of the National Ignition Facility

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Paisner, Jeffrey A.; Boyes, John D.; Kumpan, Steven A.; Lowdermilk, W. Howard; Sorem, Michael S.

1995-12-01

The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) commissioned a conceptual design report (CDR) for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) in January 1993 as part of a key decision zero (KD0), justification of mission need. Motivated by the progress to date by the inertial confinement fusion (ICF) program in meeting the Nova technical contract goals established by the National Academy of Sciences in 1989, the Secretary requested a design using a solid-state laser driver operating at the third harmonic (0.35 micrometer) of neodymium (Nd) glass. The participating ICF laboratories signed a memorandum of agreement in August 1993, and established a project organization, including a technical team from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), and the Laboratory for Laser Energetics at the University of Rochester. Since then, we completed the NIF conceptual design, based on standard construction at a generic DOE defense program's site, and issued a 7,000-page, 27-volume CDR in May 1994. Over the course of the conceptual design study, several other key documents were generated, including a facilities requirements document, a conceptual design scope and plan, a target physics design document, a laser design cost basis document, a functional requirements document, an experimental plan for indirect drive ignition, and a preliminary hazards analysis (PHA) document. DOE used the PHA to categorize the NIF as a low-hazard, non-nuclear facility. On October 21, 1994 the Secretary of Energy issued a key decision one (KD1) for the NIF, which approved the project and authorized DOE to request Office of Management and Budget-approval for congressional line-item FY 1996 NIF funding for preliminary engineering design and for National Environmental Policy Act activities. In addition, the Secretary declared Livermore as the preferred site for constructing the NIF. In February 1995, the NIF Project was formally submitted to Congress as part of the President's FY 1996 budget. If funded as planned, the Project will cost approximately $1.1 billion and will be completed at the end of FY 2002.

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Evans, G.C.

The Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) is to accept both CERCLA (EPA-regulated) and RCRA (Ecology-regulated) remediation waste. The ERDF is considered part of the overall remediation strategy on the Hanford Site, and as such, determination of ERDF viability has followed both RCRA and CERCLA decision making processes. Typically, determination of the viability of a unit, such as the ERDF, would occur as part of record of decision (ROD) or permit modification for each remediation site before construction of the ERDF. However, because construction of the ERDF may take a significant amount of time, it is necessary to begin design andmore » construction of the ERDF before final RODs/permit modifications for the remediation sites. This will allow movement of waste to occur quickly once the final remediation strategy for the RCRA and CERCLA past-practice units is determined. Construction of the ERDF is a unique situation relative to Hanford Facility cleanup, requiring a Hanford Facility specific process be developed for implementing the ERDF that would satisfy both RCRA and CERCLA requirements. While the ERDF will play a significant role in the remediation process, initiation of the ERDF does not preclude the evaluation of remedial alternatives at each remediation site. To facilitate this, the January 1994 amendment to the Tri-Party Agreement recognizes the necessity for the ERDF, and the Tri-Party Agreement states: ``Ecology, EPA, and DOE agree to proceed with the steps necessary to design, approve, construct, and operate such a ... facility.`` The Tri-Party Agreement requires the DOE-RL to prepare a comprehensive ``package`` for the EPA and Ecology to consider in evaluating the ERDF. The package is to address the criteria listed in 40 CFR 264.552(c) for corrective action management unit (CAMU) designation and a CERCLA ROD. This CAMU application is submitted as part of the Tri-Party Agreement-required information package.« less

78 FR 52190 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-08-22

... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution Facilities... Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution... semiannually at a minimum. Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Owners or operators of gasoline...

78 FR 56225 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-12

... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Plywood and Composite Products... Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Plywood and Composite... Composite Products covers both new and existing plywood and composite wood products (PCWP) facilities...

30 CFR 553.40 - What OSFR evidence must I submit to BOEM?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What OSFR evidence must I submit to BOEM? 553.40 Section 553.40 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR...

30 CFR 253.40 - What OSFR evidence must I submit to MMS?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What OSFR evidence must I submit to MMS? 253.40 Section 253.40 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR Information...

30 CFR 553.40 - What OSFR evidence must I submit to BOEM?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What OSFR evidence must I submit to BOEM? 553.40 Section 553.40 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR...

30 CFR 553.40 - What OSFR evidence must I submit to BOEM?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What OSFR evidence must I submit to BOEM? 553.40 Section 553.40 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR...

Recycled Water Reuse Permit Renewal Application for the Central Facilities Area Sewage Treatment Plant

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Lewis, Mike

This renewal application for a Recycled Water Reuse Permit is being submitted in accordance with the Idaho Administrative Procedures Act 58.01.17 “Recycled Water Rules” and the Municipal Wastewater Reuse Permit LA-000141-03 for continuing the operation of the Central Facilities Area Sewage Treatment Plant located at the Idaho National Laboratory. The permit expires March 16, 2015. The permit requires a renewal application to be submitted six months prior to the expiration date of the existing permit. For the Central Facilities Area Sewage Treatment Plant, the renewal application must be submitted by September 16, 2014. The information in this application is consistentmore » with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality’s Guidance for Reclamation and Reuse of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater and discussions with Idaho Department of Environmental Quality personnel.« less

14 CFR 171.203 - Requests for IFR procedure.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

...) NAVIGATIONAL FACILITIES NON-FEDERAL NAVIGATION FACILITIES VHF Marker Beacons § 171.203 Requests for IFR... beacon facility that he owns must submit the following information with that request: (1) A description...

21 CFR 803.32 - If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my individual adverse event reports?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false If I am a user facility, what information must I submit in my individual adverse event reports? 803.32 Section 803.32 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG... problem; (2) Outcomes attributed to the adverse event (e.g., death or serious injury). An outcome is...

77 FR 1087 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested; Reinstatement...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-09

... offender facilities (except in California); vocational training facilities; prison hospitals; drug and... facility. Based on the preference of the respondent, these data can be submitted via an electronic datafile...

31 CFR 356.11 - How are bids submitted in an auction?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... failures or disruptions of equipment or communications facilities used for participating in Treasury.... (c) TreasuryDirect. You must submit your bids through your established book-entry, online Treasury...

Capsule review of the DOE research and development and field facilities

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

None

1980-09-01

A description is given of the roles of DOE's headquarters, field offices, major multiprogram laboratories, Energy Technology and Mining Technology Centers, and other government-owned, contractor-operated facilities, which are located in all regions of the US. Descriptions of DOE facilities are given for multiprogram laboratories (12); program-dedicated facilities (biomedical and environmental facilities-12, fossil energy facilities-7, fusion energy facility-1, nuclear development facilities-3, physical research facilities-4, safeguards facility-1, and solar facilities-2); and Production, Testing, and Fabrication Facilities (nuclear materials production facilities-5, weapon testing and fabrication complex-8). Three appendices list DOE field and project offices; DOE field facilities by state or territory, names, addresses,more » and telephone numbers; DOE R and D field facilities by type, contractor names, and names of directors. (MCW)« less

34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...

34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...

34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...

34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...

34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...

Transuranic Waste Processing Center (TWPC) Legacy Tank RH-TRU Sludge Processing and Compliance Strategy - 13255

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Rogers, Ben C.; Heacker, Fred K.; Shannon, Christopher

2013-07-01

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) needs to safely and efficiently treat its 'legacy' transuranic (TRU) waste and mixed low-level waste (LLW) from past research and defense activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) so that the waste is prepared for safe and secure disposal. The TWPC operates an Environmental Management (EM) waste processing facility on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR). The TWPC is classified as a Hazard Category 2, non-reactor nuclear facility. This facility receives, treats, and packages low-level waste and TRU waste stored at various facilities on the ORR for eventual off-site disposal at various DOE sitesmore » and commercial facilities. The Remote Handled TRU Waste Sludge held in the Melton Valley Storage Tanks (MVSTs) was produced as a result of the collection, treatment, and storage of liquid radioactive waste originating from the ORNL radiochemical processing and radioisotope production programs. The MVSTs contain most of the associated waste from the Gunite and Associated Tanks (GAAT) in the ORNL's Tank Farms in Bethel Valley and the sludge (SL) and associated waste from the Old Hydro-fracture Facility tanks and other Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) tanks. The SL Processing Facility Build-outs (SL-PFB) Project is integral to the EM cleanup mission at ORNL and is being accelerated by DOE to meet updated regulatory commitments in the Site Treatment Plan. To meet these commitments a Baseline (BL) Change Proposal (BCP) is being submitted to provide continued spending authority as the project re-initiation extends across fiscal year 2012 (FY2012) into fiscal year 2013. Future waste from the ORNL Building 3019 U-233 Disposition project, in the form of U-233 dissolved in nitric acid and water, down-blended with depleted uranyl nitrate solution is also expected to be transferred to the 7856 MVST Annex Facility (formally the Capacity Increase Project (CIP) Tanks) for co-processing with the SL. The SL-PFB project will construct and install the necessary integrated systems to process the accumulated MVST Facilities SL inventory at the TWPC thus enabling safe and effective disposal of the waste. This BCP does not include work to support current MVST Facility Surveillance and Maintenance programs or the ORNL Building 3019 U-233 Disposition project, since they are not currently part of the TWPC prime contract. The purpose of the environmental compliance strategy is to identify the environmental permits and other required regulatory documents necessary for the construction and operation of the SL- PFB at the TWPC, Oak Ridge, TN. The permits and other regulatory documents identified are necessary to comply with the environmental laws and regulations of DOE Orders, and other requirements documented in the SL-PFB, Safety Design Strategy (SDS), SL-A-AD-002, R0 draft, and the Systems, Function and Requirements Document (SFRD), SL-X-AD-002, R1 draft. This compliance strategy is considered a 'living strategy' and it is anticipated that it will be revised as design progresses and more detail is known. The design basis on which this environmental permitting and compliance strategy is based is the Wastren Advantage, Inc., (WAI), TWPC, SL-PFB (WAI-BL-B.01.06) baseline. (authors)« less

75 FR 10525 - In the Matter of: AREVA Enrichment Services, LLC (Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility) and All Other...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-08

... official and submitted the individual's fingerprints to the NRC under separate cover. This order imposes... this individual. AES may, at the same time or later, submit the fingerprints of other individuals for whom it seeks to grant access to SGI. Fingerprints shall be submitted and reviewed in accordance with...

30 CFR 254.1 - Who must submit a spill-response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.1 Who must submit a spill-response plan? (a) If you are the owner or operator of an oil handling... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Who must submit a spill-response plan? 254.1...

30 CFR 254.1 - Who must submit a spill-response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.1 Who must submit a spill-response plan? (a) If you are the owner or operator of an oil handling... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Who must submit a spill-response plan? 254.1...

30 CFR 254.2 - When must I submit a response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When must I submit a response plan? 254.2 Section 254.2 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.2 When must I submit a...

30 CFR 254.1 - Who must submit a spill-response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.1 Who must submit a spill-response plan? (a) If you are the owner or operator of an oil handling... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Who must submit a spill-response plan? 254.1...

TRI Reporting for Facilities Located in Indian Country

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

A final rule requires facilities that meet TRI reporting requirements and that are located in Indian country to submit TRI forms to EPA and the appropriate tribe, rather than to the state in which the facility is geographically located.

76 FR 43230 - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System-Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-07-20

... Facilities and Phase I Facilities AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule...) of the Clean Water Act for all existing power generating facilities and existing manufacturing and industrial facilities. EPA requested that public comments on the proposal be submitted on or before July 19...

78 FR 11903 - Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-02-20

... Cycle Facilities AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for public comment... ``Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities.'' The draft NUREG provides guidance to... a fuel cycle facility is acceptable. DATES: Comments may be submitted by April 22, 2013. Comments...

DOE MARC Records System | OSTI, US Dept of Energy Office of Scientific and

Science.gov Websites

: Sponsoring Org: Update Date: to Limit to INIS / NSA records only Search Submit Submit Research Results Search page is being shared by OSTI.GOV. DOE MARC Records System We could not detect that JavaScript is enabled in your browser. Please click the link below to continue. https://www.osti.gov/marc-records U.S

49 CFR 191.17 - Transmission systems; gathering systems; and liquefied natural gas facilities: Annual report.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... liquefied natural gas facilities: Annual report. 191.17 Section 191.17 Transportation Other Regulations...; gathering systems; and liquefied natural gas facilities: Annual report. (a) Transmission or Gathering. Each..., 2011. (b) LNG. Each operator of a liquefied natural gas facility must submit an annual report for that...

Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application for T Plant Complex

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

BARNES, B.M.

2002-09-01

The Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (document number DOE/RL-91-28) and a Unit-Specific Portion. The scope of the Unit-Specific Portion is limited to Part B permit application documentation submitted for individual, operating treatment, storage, and/or disposal units, such as the T Plant Complex (this document, DOE/RL-95-36). Both the General Information and Unit-Specific portions of the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application address the content of the Part B permit application guidance prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology 1996) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencymore » (40 Code of Federal Regulations 270), with additional information needs defined by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments and revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303. For ease of reference, the Washington State Department of Ecology alpha-numeric section identifiers from the permit application guidance documentation (Ecology 1996) follow, in brackets, the chapter headings and subheadings. A checklist indicating where information is contained in the T Plant Complex permit application documentation, in relation to the Washington State Department of Ecology guidance, is located in the Contents Section. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion is broader in nature and could be used by multiple treatment, storage, and/or disposal units (e.g., the glossary provided in the General Information Portion). Wherever appropriate, the T Plant Complex permit application documentation makes cross-reference to the General Information Portion, rather than duplicating text.« less

Proceedings of the 5. DOE review of laboratory programs for women

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1996-12-31

The Fifth DOE Review of Laboratory Programs for Women was held at Brookhaven National Laboratory, May 6--8, 1996, and was co-sponsored by Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. The 1996 Review was organized as a Professional Workshop, that is, there were Invited Talks, plus Oral and Poster Presentations from the participants. These sessions were organized around the Focus Topics selected for the Review. The Focus Topics were: school-lab programs, college programs, positive image of women, cultural audits, employee development, employee mentoring, networking, dependent care, and alternate work schedules. On Monday evening, Toni Joseph gave an informal talk to the participants. She stressedmore » the importance of submitting the Action Items for the respective facilities, and assured them that they would be looked at by the Office of Energy Research. On Tuesday morning, the DOE Points-of-Contact (POC) presented an overview of the past Reviews to give some background on the present DOE Review, and discussed plans for the future. The Review concluded with Focus Sessions, one for each Focus Topic. Each of these sessions was charged with producing a report on the session topic. The Focus Group Reports are included in the Proceedings, along with abstracts to the invited talks, oral presentations and poster presentations.« less

48 CFR 970.5223-7 - Sustainable acquisition program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... Environmental Sustainability Coordinator or equivalent position. (g) The Contractor shall prepare and submit... Sustainability Coordinator at the supported facility. The Subcontractor will advise the Contractor if it is... coordinate its activities with and submit required reports through the Environmental Sustainability...

48 CFR 970.5223-7 - Sustainable acquisition program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... Environmental Sustainability Coordinator or equivalent position. (g) The Contractor shall prepare and submit... Sustainability Coordinator at the supported facility. The Subcontractor will advise the Contractor if it is... coordinate its activities with and submit required reports through the Environmental Sustainability...

48 CFR 970.5223-7 - Sustainable acquisition program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... Environmental Sustainability Coordinator or equivalent position. (g) The Contractor shall prepare and submit... Sustainability Coordinator at the supported facility. The Subcontractor will advise the Contractor if it is... coordinate its activities with and submit required reports through the Environmental Sustainability...

48 CFR 970.5223-7 - Sustainable acquisition program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... Environmental Sustainability Coordinator or equivalent position. (g) The Contractor shall prepare and submit... Sustainability Coordinator at the supported facility. The Subcontractor will advise the Contractor if it is... coordinate its activities with and submit required reports through the Environmental Sustainability...

Renewable Bio-solar Hydrogen Production from Robust Oxygenic Phototrophs: The Second Generation

DTIC Science & Technology

2015-01-22

Demo Project coPI (2014). 7. Advisory: 2014 DOE-H2A Technoeconomic Review Panel; 2013 DOE- Hydrogen Program; 11. 2013-2014 AFOSR Funded...reinhardtii sta6 mutant. Submitted to The Plant Journal. 8. Xiao Qian, Min Kyung Kim, G. Kenchappa Kumaraswamy, Ananya Agarwal, Desmond S. Lun, and...G. Charles Dismukes. Beyond flux balance analysis of photoautotrophic metabolism: Carbon partitioning into different biopolymers. Submitted. 9

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2008 Annual Report

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

editor, Todd C Hansen

2009-02-23

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operatemore » unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Berkeley Lab's research and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program support DOE's Strategic Themes that are codified in DOE's 2006 Strategic Plan (DOE/CF-0010), with a primary focus on Scientific Discovery and Innovation. For that strategic theme, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 LDRD projects support each one of the three goals through multiple strategies described in the plan. In addition, LDRD efforts support the four goals of Energy Security, the two goals of Environmental Responsibility, and Nuclear Security (unclassified fundamental research that supports stockpile safety and nonproliferation programs). The LDRD program supports Office of Science strategic plans, including the 20-year Scientific Facilities Plan and the Office of Science Strategic Plan. The research also supports the strategic directions periodically under consideration and review by the Office of Science Program Offices, such as LDRD projects germane to new research facility concepts and new fundamental science directions. Berkeley Lab LDRD program also play an important role in leveraging DOE capabilities for national needs. The fundamental scientific research and development conducted in the program advances the skills and technologies of importance to our Work For Others (WFO) sponsors. Among many directions, these include a broad range of health-related science and technology of interest to the National Institutes of Health, breast cancer and accelerator research supported by the Department of Defense, detector technologies that should be useful to the Department of Homeland Security, and particle detection that will be valuable to the Environmental Protection Agency. The Berkeley Lab Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY2008 report is compiled from annual reports submitted by principal investigators following the close of the fiscal year. This report describes the supported projects and summarizes their accomplishments. It constitutes a part of the LDRD program planning and documentation process that includes an annual planning cycle, project selection, implementation, and review.« less

28 CFR 36.601 - Definitions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... requirements of title III of the Act for accessibility and usability of facilities covered by that title. Code... accessibility and usability of facilities covered by that title. Submitting official means the State or local...

28 CFR 36.601 - Definitions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... requirements of title III of the Act for accessibility and usability of facilities covered by that title. Code... accessibility and usability of facilities covered by that title. Submitting official means the State or local...

48 CFR 801.602-84 - Documents to submit for business clearance reviews.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... OF VETERANS AFFAIRS GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM Career... reviews. A contracting officer must submit to Acquisition Resources Service (Office of Construction and Facilities Management and National Cemetery Administration contracting officers shall forward the documents...

Report: EPA Can Improve Implementation of the Risk Management Program for Airborne Chemical Releases

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

Report #09-P-0092, February 10, 2009. EPA can improve its program management and oversight to better assure that facilities covered by the Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Program submit or re-submit an RMP.

30 CFR 285.700 - What reports must I submit to MMS before installing facilities described in my approved SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Facility Design, Fabrication, and Installation Reports... (§ 285.651): (1) A Facility Design Report; and (2) A Fabrication and Installation Report. (b) You may...

40 CFR 124.206 - In what situations may I require a facility owner or operator to apply for an individual permit?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... history of significant non-compliance with regulations or permit conditions. (3) The facility has a demonstrated history of submitting incomplete or deficient permit application information. (4) The facility has... standardized RCRA permit. (2) Circumstances have changed since the time the facility owner or operator applied...

78 FR 45983 - Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-07-30

... Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft NUREG; withdrawal... withdrawing draft NUREG-2154, ``Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities,'' based... determine whether a submittal for a Corrective Action Program (CAP), voluntarily submitted by fuel cycle...

42 CFR 37.43 - Approval of radiographic facilities that use film.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... roentgenography of the chest. Amer J Roentgenol 117(4):771-776. (b) Each radiographic facility submitting chest... facility addressing radiation exposures, equipment maintenance, and image quality, and must conform to the... individual data, interpretations, and images) consistent with applicable statutes and regulations governing...

42 CFR 37.43 - Approval of radiographic facilities that use film.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... roentgenography of the chest. Amer J Roentgenol 117(4):771-776. (b) Each radiographic facility submitting chest... facility addressing radiation exposures, equipment maintenance, and image quality, and must conform to the... individual data, interpretations, and images) consistent with applicable statutes and regulations governing...

21 CFR 803.16 - When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reportable event? 803.16 Section 803.16 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE...

21 CFR 803.16 - When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reportable event? 803.16 Section 803.16 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE...

21 CFR 803.16 - When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reportable event? 803.16 Section 803.16 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE...

21 CFR 803.16 - When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reportable event? 803.16 Section 803.16 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE...

21 CFR 803.16 - When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 8 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false When I submit a report, does the information in my report constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reportable event? 803.16 Section 803.16 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE...

21 CFR 814.3 - Definitions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

.... (d) Master file means a reference source that a person submits to FDA. A master file may contain detailed information on a specific manufacturing facility, process, methodology, or component used in the... for a class III medical device, including all information submitted with or incorporated by reference...

76 FR 16434 - Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-03-23

... Advisory Committee AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Committee Management; Notice of Committee... instructions for submitting comments. (2) Fax: 202-493-2251. (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S... viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations...

10 CFR 62.1 - Purpose and scope.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... (42 U.S.C. 2021) to any non-Federal or regional low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility or... regional or non-Federal low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities and who submit a request to the... LOW-LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES General Provisions § 62.1 Purpose and scope. (a) The regulations...

78 FR 55282 - Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Healthcare Facility Documents: Notice of Information...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-10

... HUD has determined must be submitted with original signatures, in hard copy format. These documents... facility documents, in addition to being presented in an unmarked format, were presented in redline/strikeout format so that reviewers could see the changes proposed to the existing healthcare facility...

NIST Document Sharing Test Facility

Science.gov Websites

NIST Document Sharing Test Facility This site supports the IHE effort in Document Sharing as part . This test facility is based on the IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework. All testing done against that Patient IDs be pre-registered before submitting metadata about them. To allocate new patient IDs

New Ways to Showcase Sustainability in Your 2012 TRI Report

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

Slides to accompany a presentation for TRI facilities about improvements to the TRI-MEweb reporting application that make it easier to submit pollution prevention information, and why this is beneficial to facilities.

40 CFR 35.917-8 - Submission and approval of facilities plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-8 Submission and approval of facilities plan. The State agency must submit the...

40 CFR 35.917-8 - Submission and approval of facilities plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-8 Submission and approval of facilities plan. The State agency must submit the...

40 CFR 35.917-8 - Submission and approval of facilities plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-8 Submission and approval of facilities plan. The State agency must submit the...

40 CFR 35.917-8 - Submission and approval of facilities plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-8 Submission and approval of facilities plan. The State agency must submit the...

78 FR 41794 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-07-11

... (Non-Gasoline) Facilities (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice...), ``NESHAP for Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEEE) (Renewal...

Advanced Reactor Technologies - Regulatory Technology Development Plan (RTDP)

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Moe, Wayne L.

This DOE-NE Advanced Small Modular Reactor (AdvSMR) regulatory technology development plan (RTDP) will link critical DOE nuclear reactor technology development programs to important regulatory and policy-related issues likely to impact a “critical path” for establishing a viable commercial AdvSMR presence in the domestic energy market. Accordingly, the regulatory considerations that are set forth in the AdvSMR RTDP will not be limited to any one particular type or subset of advanced reactor technology(s) but rather broadly consider potential regulatory approaches and the licensing implications that accompany all DOE-sponsored research and technology development activity that deal with commercial non-light water reactors. However,more » it is also important to remember that certain “minimum” levels of design and safety approach knowledge concerning these technology(s) must be defined and available to an extent that supports appropriate pre-licensing regulatory analysis within the RTDP. Final resolution to advanced reactor licensing issues is most often predicated on the detailed design information and specific safety approach as documented in a facility license application and submitted for licensing review. Because the AdvSMR RTDP is focused on identifying and assessing the potential regulatory implications of DOE-sponsored reactor technology research very early in the pre-license application development phase, the information necessary to support a comprehensive regulatory analysis of a new reactor technology, and the resolution of resulting issues, will generally not be available. As such, the regulatory considerations documented in the RTDP should be considered an initial “first step” in the licensing process which will continue until a license is issued to build and operate the said nuclear facility. Because a facility license application relies heavily on the data and information generated by technology development studies, the anticipated regulatory importance of key DOE reactor research initiatives should be assessed early in the technology development process. Quality assurance requirements supportive of later licensing activities must also be attached to important research activities to ensure resulting data is usable in that context. Early regulatory analysis and licensing approach planning thus provides a significant benefit to the formulation of research plans and also enables the planning and development of a compatible AdvSMR licensing framework, should significant modification be required.« less

Advanced Reactor Technology -- Regulatory Technology Development Plan (RTDP)

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Moe, Wayne Leland

This DOE-NE Advanced Small Modular Reactor (AdvSMR) regulatory technology development plan (RTDP) will link critical DOE nuclear reactor technology development programs to important regulatory and policy-related issues likely to impact a “critical path” for establishing a viable commercial AdvSMR presence in the domestic energy market. Accordingly, the regulatory considerations that are set forth in the AdvSMR RTDP will not be limited to any one particular type or subset of advanced reactor technology(s) but rather broadly consider potential regulatory approaches and the licensing implications that accompany all DOE-sponsored research and technology development activity that deal with commercial non-light water reactors. However,more » it is also important to remember that certain “minimum” levels of design and safety approach knowledge concerning these technology(s) must be defined and available to an extent that supports appropriate pre-licensing regulatory analysis within the RTDP. Final resolution to advanced reactor licensing issues is most often predicated on the detailed design information and specific safety approach as documented in a facility license application and submitted for licensing review. Because the AdvSMR RTDP is focused on identifying and assessing the potential regulatory implications of DOE-sponsored reactor technology research very early in the pre-license application development phase, the information necessary to support a comprehensive regulatory analysis of a new reactor technology, and the resolution of resulting issues, will generally not be available. As such, the regulatory considerations documented in the RTDP should be considered an initial “first step” in the licensing process which will continue until a license is issued to build and operate the said nuclear facility. Because a facility license application relies heavily on the data and information generated by technology development studies, the anticipated regulatory importance of key DOE reactor research initiatives should be assessed early in the technology development process. Quality assurance requirements supportive of later licensing activities must also be attached to important research activities to ensure resulting data is usable in that context. Early regulatory analysis and licensing approach planning thus provides a significant benefit to the formulation of research plans and also enables the planning and development of a compatible AdvSMR licensing framework, should significant modification be required.« less

30 CFR 285.642 - How do I submit my GAP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF... submit information on any project easement as part of your original GAP submission or as a revision to...

7 CFR 1493.270 - Certifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee Program (FGP... submitted to CCC under this subpart, is the exporter's certification that: (1) There have not been and are... amended, or other U.S. Laws; (2) All information submitted to CCC is true and correct; and (3) The...

7 CFR 1493.270 - Certifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee Program (FGP... submitted to CCC under this subpart, is the exporter's certification that: (1) There have not been and are... amended, or other U.S. Laws; (2) All information submitted to CCC is true and correct; and (3) The...

7 CFR 1493.270 - Certifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee... documentation submitted to CCC under this subpart, is the exporter's certification that: (1) There have not been... amended, or other U.S. Laws; (2) All information submitted to CCC is true and correct; and (3) The...

7 CFR 1493.270 - Certifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee Program (FGP... submitted to CCC under this subpart, is the exporter's certification that: (1) There have not been and are... amended, or other U.S. Laws; (2) All information submitted to CCC is true and correct; and (3) The...

7 CFR 1493.270 - Certifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee... documentation submitted to CCC under this subpart, is the exporter's certification that: (1) There have not been... amended, or other U.S. Laws; (2) All information submitted to CCC is true and correct; and (3) The...

Congress, NRC mull utility access to FBI criminal files

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Ultroska, D.

1984-08-01

Experiences at Alabama Power Company and other nuclear utilities have promped a request for institutionalizing security checks of personnel in order to eliminated convicted criminals and drug users. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which could provide FBI criminal history information by submitting fingerprints, does not do so, and would require new legislation to take on that duty. Believing that current malevolent employees can be managed with existing procedures, NRC allows criminal background checks only on prospective employees in order to avoid a negative social impact on personnel. Legislation to transfer criminal histories to nuclear facilities is now pending, and NRCmore » is leaning toward a request for full disclosure, partly because of terrorist threats and partly to save manpower time and costs in reviewing case histories.« less

21 CFR 20.111 - Data and information submitted voluntarily to the Food and Drug Administration.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... in a way that does not reveal data or information which is not available for public disclosure under... 21 Food and Drugs 1 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false Data and information submitted voluntarily to the... Records § 20.111 Data and information submitted voluntarily to the Food and Drug Administration. (a) The...

6 CFR 27.210 - Submissions schedule.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... in any subsequent Federal Register notice. (2) Security Vulnerability Assessment. Unless otherwise notified, a covered facility must complete and submit a Security Vulnerability Assessment within 90... Department's approval of the facility's Site Security Plan. (2) Security Vulnerability Assessment. Unless...

A National Student Competition on Adaptive Re-use: A Shelter Care Facility.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Illinois Univ., Urbana.

The Shelter Care Competition, devised to help communities identify cost-effective shelter care facilities for juveniles, sought to generate new ideas for, and to apply environmental characteristics to, residential facilities. The designs were submitted by university students who incorporated the concept of adaptive re-use as a cost effective…

31 CFR 356.11 - How are bids submitted in an auction?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

..., our computer time stamp will establish the receipt time. You are bound by your bids after the closing... failures or disruptions of equipment or communications facilities used for participating in Treasury auctions. (4) Submitters are responsible for bids submitted using computer equipment on their premises...

31 CFR 356.11 - How are bids submitted in an auction?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

..., our computer time stamp will establish the receipt time. You are bound by your bids after the closing... failures or disruptions of equipment or communications facilities used for participating in Treasury auctions. (4) Submitters are responsible for bids submitted using computer equipment on their premises...

30 CFR 285.905 - When must I submit my decommissioning application?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When must I submit my decommissioning application? 285.905 Section 285.905 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF...

30 CFR 285.622 - How do I submit my COP?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF... at the address listed in § 285.110(a). (b) You may submit information and a request for any project...

75 FR 54000 - Reports, Forms, and Record keeping Requirements

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-02

... information from the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under... submitted to Docket Management, Room W12-140, ground level, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590... instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200...

77 FR 74677 - Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS)

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-17

... Protection (IP), Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) will submit the following Information... should be forwarded to DHS/NPPD/IP/ISCD CFATS Program Manager, 245 Murray Lane SW., Mail Stop 0610... should be appropriately marked and submitted by mail to the DHS/NPPD/IP/ISCD CFATS Program Manager, 245...

15 CFR 711.2 - Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... REQUIREMENTS, AND THE ELECTRONIC FILING OF DECLARATIONS AND REPORTS § 711.2 Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications. The owner, operator, or senior management official of a facility subject to... subchapter) is responsible for the submission of all required documents in accordance with all applicable...

15 CFR 711.2 - Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... REQUIREMENTS, AND THE ELECTRONIC FILING OF DECLARATIONS AND REPORTS § 711.2 Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications. The owner, operator, or senior management official of a facility subject to... subchapter) is responsible for the submission of all required documents in accordance with all applicable...

15 CFR 711.2 - Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... REQUIREMENTS, AND THE ELECTRONIC FILING OF DECLARATIONS AND REPORTS § 711.2 Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications. The owner, operator, or senior management official of a facility subject to... subchapter) is responsible for the submission of all required documents in accordance with all applicable...

15 CFR 711.2 - Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... REQUIREMENTS, AND THE ELECTRONIC FILING OF DECLARATIONS AND REPORTS § 711.2 Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications. The owner, operator, or senior management official of a facility subject to... subchapter) is responsible for the submission of all required documents in accordance with all applicable...

15 CFR 711.2 - Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... REQUIREMENTS, AND THE ELECTRONIC FILING OF DECLARATIONS AND REPORTS § 711.2 Who submits declarations, reports, and advance notifications. The owner, operator, or senior management official of a facility subject to... subchapter) is responsible for the submission of all required documents in accordance with all applicable...

78 FR 42930 - Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 114-Peoria, Illinois; Notification of Proposed Production Activity...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-07-18

..., Illinois; Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (Sports Equipment), Rantoul, Illinois Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (Easton-Bell Sports) submitted a notification of proposed..., 2013. A separate application for subzone status at the Easton-Bell Sports facility was submitted and is...

76 FR 56483 - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-13

... Information is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by September 23, 2011... instructions on submitting comments and instructions on accessing documents related to this action, see ``Submitting Comments and Accessing Information'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document...

WIPP Remote-Handled TRU Waste Program Update

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Most, W.; Kehrman, B.

2006-07-01

There are two major regulatory approval milestones necessary in order to commence disposal operations for remote-handled transuranic (RH TRU) waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)-the RH TRU hazardous waste permit modification request [1] and the radiological characterization plan [2]. One of those milestones has been achieved. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its final decision to approve the Department of Energy's (DOE) RH TRU radiological characterization plan along with the RH TRU Waste Characterization Program Implementation Plan [3], on March 26, 2004. The RH TRU hazardous waste permit modification request still awaits agency approval. In EPA's decisionmore » to approve the DOE's RH TRU radiological characterization plan, the EPA also set forth the process for approving site-specific RH TRU waste characterization programs. Included in the March 29, 2005, RH TRU second Notice of Deficiency [4] (NOD) on the Class 3 Permit Modification Request for RH TRU Waste, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) requested that the Permittees combine their responses for the RH TRU Waste NOD with the Section 311 permit modification request NOD. The Combined Response Document was submitted April 28, 2005 [5]. Another NOD [6] was issued by the NMED on September 1, 2005, to clarify the Permittees' proposal and submit these clarifications to the administrative record. Combining both the chap. 311 [7] and RH TRU waste permit modification requests allows for both the regulator and Permittees to expedite action on the modification requests. The Combined Response Document preserves human resources and costs by having only one administrative process for both modification requests. Facility readiness requirements of the RH TRU waste final permit [8] must be implemented to declare that the WIPP is ready to receive RH TRU waste for storage and disposal. To demonstrate readiness, the WIPP is preparing for an Operational Readiness Review (ORR) of the RH TRU waste management equipment, system, and procedures. Required by DOE Order, the ORR demonstrates the capability of managing RH TRU waste. The Management and Operating Contractor (MOC) for the WIPP must first perform a Line Management Assessment. Upon successful completion of the Line Management Assessment, the MOC performs the Contractor ORR and presents the results to the local DOE office. At that time, the local DOE office performs its own ORR to declare readiness to DOE Headquarters. (authors)« less

HEP Division Argonne National Laboratory

Science.gov Websites

Argonne National Laboratory Environmental Safety & Health DOE Logo Home Division ES&H ... Search Argonne Home >High Energy Physics> Environmental Safety & Health Environmental Safety & Health New Employee Training */ ?> Office Safety: Checklist (Submitted Checklists) Submitted

Booster Applications Facility report, phase 2

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Thieberger, P.

1991-06-01

This report summarizes studies and planning performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) personnel at the request of NASA for the design, construction and operation of experimental areas and facilities for utilization of ion beams from the BNL Booster synchrotron particle accelerator. These facilities would be primarily utilized to simulate space radiation for radiobiological research, shielding studies and detector calibrations. The feasibility of such a project has been established, preliminary designs and cost estimates have been developed and a formal proposal can be submitted pending DOE concurrence. The main body of this report consists of the material presented by BNL during the meeting with a NASA appointed Panel on December 10 and 11, 1990. The individual speakers have provided brief summaries of their talks and explanations of their figures. In addition there are two appendices. One, contains detailed discussion of the shared mode of operation and the corresponding beam compatibility tables. The second appendix contains cost estimate details. An executive summary on budgets and schedules has been added, containing possible phased construction and outfitting scenarios and the corresponding expense and commitment profiles as well as new operational cost estimates. Material contained in the executive summary reflects the correction of some errors and new studies performed in response to the NASA Panel suggestions.

10 CFR 205.325 - Annual report.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... OF ENERGY OIL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SANCTIONS Electric Power System Permits and Reports... Construction, Connection, Operation, and Maintenance of Facilities for Transmission of Electric Energy at... maintain electric transmission facilities at international boundaries shall submit to the ERA, by February...

Ecological Characterization Data for the 2004 Composite Analysis

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Downs, Janelle L.; Simmons, Mary A.; Stegen, Jennifer A.

2004-11-01

A composite analysis is required by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1 to ensure public safety through the management of active and planned low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities associated with the Hanford Site. The original Hanford Site Composite Analysis of 1998 must be revised and submitted to DOE Headquarters (DOE-HQ) in 2004 because of revisions to waste site information in the 100, 200, and 300 Areas, updated performance assessments and environmental impact statements (EIS), changes in inventory estimates for key sites and constituents, and a change in the definition of offsite receptors. Beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2003, themore » DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) initiated activities, including the development of data packages, to support the 2004 Composite Analysis. This report describes the data compiled in FY 2003 to support ecological site assessment modeling for the 2004 Composite Analysis. This work was conducted as part of the Characterization of Systems Task of the Groundwater Remediation Project (formerly the Groundwater Protection Program) managed by Fluor Hanford, Inc., Richland, Washington. The purpose of this report is to provide summaries of the characterization information and available spatial data on the biological resources and ecological receptors found in the upland, riparian, aquatic, and island habitats on the Hanford Site. These data constitute the reference information used to establish parameters for the ecological risk assessment module of the System Assessment Capability and other assessment activities requiring information on the presence and distribution of biota on the Hanford Site.« less

33 CFR 146.215 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for U.S. or foreign MODUs.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... using methods specified in the NVMC's Web site at http://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/. (c) Updates to a submitted... becomes inaccurate, the owner or operator of the MODU must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise or re-submit an NOA...

33 CFR 146.215 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for U.S. or foreign MODUs.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... using methods specified in the NVMC's Web site at http://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/. (c) Updates to a submitted... becomes inaccurate, the owner or operator of the MODU must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise or re-submit an NOA...

33 CFR 146.215 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for U.S. or foreign MODUs.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... using methods specified in the NVMC's Web site at http://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/. (c) Updates to a submitted... becomes inaccurate, the owner or operator of the MODU must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise or re-submit an NOA...

33 CFR 146.215 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for U.S. or foreign MODUs.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... at http://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/. (c) Updates to a submitted NOA. Unless otherwise specified in this... the MODU must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise or re-submit an NOA for the following: (1) A change in...

31 CFR 256.53 - How does the submitting agency know when payment is made?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... form. Also, FMS maintains an on-line payment status system that the submitting agency can access to determine the status of a payment. The payment reporting system can be accessed from the Judgment Fund Web...

48 CFR 952.223-78 - Sustainable acquisition program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... activities with and submit required reports through the Environmental Sustainability Coordinator or... reports through the Environmental Sustainability Coordinator or equivalent position. Reporting under this... prepare and submit performance reports, if required, using prescribed DOE formats, at the end of the...

40 CFR 265.255 - Action leakage rates.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 25 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Action leakage rates. 265.255 Section... FACILITIES Waste Piles § 265.255 Action leakage rates. (a) The owner or operator of waste pile units subject to § 265.254 must submit a proposed action leakage rate to the Regional Administrator when submitting...

40 CFR 265.302 - Action leakage rate.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 25 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Action leakage rate. 265.302 Section... FACILITIES Landfills § 265.302 Action leakage rate. (a) The owner or operator of landfill units subject to § 265.301(a) must submit a proposed action leakage rate to the Regional Administrator when submitting...

30 CFR 585.703 - What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs? 585.703 Section 585.703 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER...

30 CFR 585.703 - What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs? 585.703 Section 585.703 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER...

30 CFR 585.703 - What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What reports must I submit for project modifications and repairs? 585.703 Section 585.703 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER...

6 CFR 27.235 - Alternative security program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... submit an ASP in lieu of a Security Vulnerability Assessment, Site Security Plan, or both. (2) Tier 1... Tier 3 facilities may not submit an ASP in lieu of a Security Vulnerability Assessment. (b) The... Security Vulnerability Assessment or using the procedure specified in § 27.245 if the ASP is intended to...

77 FR 20070 - Biweekly Notice of Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-04-03

... Docket ID 2012-0078. You may submit comments by the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to.... SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments A. Accessing Information Please... publicly available, by the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov...

14 CFR 63.61 - Flight navigator courses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 2 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Flight navigator courses. 63.61 Section 63... courses. An applicant for approval of a flight navigator course must submit a letter to the Administrator requesting approval, and must also submit three copies of the course outline, a description of his facilities...

14 CFR 63.61 - Flight navigator courses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 2 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Flight navigator courses. 63.61 Section 63... courses. An applicant for approval of a flight navigator course must submit a letter to the Administrator requesting approval, and must also submit three copies of the course outline, a description of his facilities...

77 FR 9998 - Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-21

... on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they... that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request.... Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home...

75 FR 13314 - Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-19

... on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they... holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically..., such as social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC...

76 FR 53896 - Combined Notice of Filings #1

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-30

... following electric rate filings: Docket Numbers: ER11-4336-002. Applicants: ISO New England Inc. Description: ISO New England Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.17(b): Errata to Docket No. ER11-4336-001 to be.... submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2233 Osage Wind/GRDA Facilities Construction Agreement to be...

14 CFR 158.35 - Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... use PFC revenue. 158.35 Section 158.35 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED) AIRPORTS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (PFC'S) Application and Approval § 158.35 Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue. (a) A public agency may request an...

14 CFR 158.35 - Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... use PFC revenue. 158.35 Section 158.35 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED) AIRPORTS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (PFC'S) Application and Approval § 158.35 Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue. (a) A public agency may request an...

14 CFR 158.35 - Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... use PFC revenue. 158.35 Section 158.35 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED) AIRPORTS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (PFC'S) Application and Approval § 158.35 Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue. (a) A public agency may request an...

14 CFR 158.35 - Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... use PFC revenue. 158.35 Section 158.35 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED) AIRPORTS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (PFC'S) Application and Approval § 158.35 Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue. (a) A public agency may request an...

14 CFR 158.35 - Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... use PFC revenue. 158.35 Section 158.35 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED) AIRPORTS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (PFC'S) Application and Approval § 158.35 Extension of time to submit application to use PFC revenue. (a) A public agency may request an...

78 FR 54892 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-06

... Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUU) (Renewal... part 63, subpart UUU. Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit initial notification... petroleum refineries. Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU). Estimated...

30 CFR 253.23 - What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration? 253.23 Section 253.23 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Methods for...

30 CFR 553.23 - What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration? 553.23 Section 553.23 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Methods for...

30 CFR 254.2 - When must I submit a response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false When must I submit a response plan? 254.2 Section 254.2 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.2...

30 CFR 254.2 - When must I submit a response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false When must I submit a response plan? 254.2 Section 254.2 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.2...

30 CFR 553.23 - What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration? 553.23 Section 553.23 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Methods for...

30 CFR 254.2 - When must I submit a response plan?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false When must I submit a response plan? 254.2 Section 254.2 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE General § 254.2...

30 CFR 553.23 - What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What information must I submit to support my net worth demonstration? 553.23 Section 553.23 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Methods for...

76 FR 42686 - DOE Response to Recommendation 2011-1 of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Safety...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-07-19

... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DOE Response to Recommendation 2011-1 of the Defense Nuclear Facilities... Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Office of Health, Safety and Security, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000... Department of Energy (DOE) acknowledges receipt of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board...

20 CFR 655.320 - Appeals of acceptance and rejection of attestations submitted for filing and of State plans.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... STATES Attestations by Facilities Using Nonimmigrant Aliens as Registered Nurses § 655.320 Appeals of... any) representing nurses at the facility shall be a party to the appeal. Appeals shall be in writing...

User Facilities

Science.gov Websites

Los Alamos National Laboratory Search Site submit About Mission Business Newsroom Publications Los Innovation in New Mexico Los Alamos Collaboration for Explosives Detection (LACED) SensorNexus Exascale Computing Project (ECP) User Facilities Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT) Los Alamos Neutron

20 CFR 655.320 - Appeals of acceptance and rejection of attestations submitted for filing and of State plans.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... STATES Attestations by Facilities Using Nonimmigrant Aliens as Registered Nurses § 655.320 Appeals of... any) representing nurses at the facility shall be a party to the appeal. Appeals shall be in writing...

77 FR 74678 - Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT)

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-17

...), National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), Office of Infrastructure Protection (IP.../IP/ISCD Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program Manager, 245 Murray Lane SW., Mail Stop... should be appropriately marked and submitted by mail to the DHS/NPPD/IP/ISCD Chemical Facility Anti...

Beemsterboer Section 114 Information Request - Mar. 5, 2014

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

Modification to earlier letter requiring Beemsterboer Slag Corporation to submit information about its facility at 2900 East 100th St. in Chicago, IL. As the petroleum coke (pet coke) facility is an emission source, it must comply with the Clean Air Act.

7 CFR 1450.104 - Signup.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS BIOMASS CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (BCAP) Matching Payments... biomass conversion facility. The application must be submitted to the FSA county office and approved by CCC before any payment is made by the qualified biomass conversion facility for the eligible material...

7 CFR 1450.104 - Signup.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS BIOMASS CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (BCAP) Matching Payments... biomass conversion facility. The application must be submitted to the FSA county office and approved by CCC before any payment is made by the qualified biomass conversion facility for the eligible material...

7 CFR 1450.104 - Signup.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS BIOMASS CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (BCAP) Matching Payments... biomass conversion facility. The application must be submitted to the FSA county office and approved by CCC before any payment is made by the qualified biomass conversion facility for the eligible material...

7 CFR 1450.104 - Signup.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS BIOMASS CROP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (BCAP) Matching Payments... biomass conversion facility. The application must be submitted to the FSA county office and approved by CCC before any payment is made by the qualified biomass conversion facility for the eligible material...

Experimental High Energy Physics Research: Direct Detection of Dark Matter

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Witherell, Michael S.

2014-10-02

The grant supported research on an experimental search for evidence of dark matter interactions with normal matter. The PI carried out the research as a member of the LUX and LZ collaborations. The LUX research team collected a first data set with the LUX experiment, a large liquid xenon detector installed in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF). The first results were published in Physical Review Letters on March 4, 2014. The journal Nature named the LUX result a scientific highlight of the year for 2013. In addition, the LZ collaboration submitted the full proposal for the Lux Zeplin experiment,more » which has since been approved by DOE-HEP as a second-generation dark matter experiment. Witherell is the Level 2 manager for the Outer Detector System on the LUX-Zeplin experiment.« less

10 CFR 600.504 - Information an applicant must submit.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... submit with the application for financial assistance, or at such later time as may be specified by DOE....504 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (CONTINUED) ASSISTANCE REGULATIONS FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RULES Eligibility Determination for Certain Financial Assistance Programs-General Statement of Policy § 600.504...

30 CFR 585.902 - What are the general requirements for decommissioning for facilities authorized under my SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... decommissioning for facilities authorized under my SAP, COP, or GAP? 585.902 Section 585.902 Mineral Resources... authorized under my SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) Except as otherwise authorized by BOEM under § 585.909, within 2... decommissioning the facilities under your SAP, COP, or GAP, you must submit a decommissioning application and...

30 CFR 585.902 - What are the general requirements for decommissioning for facilities authorized under my SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... decommissioning for facilities authorized under my SAP, COP, or GAP? 585.902 Section 585.902 Mineral Resources... authorized under my SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) Except as otherwise authorized by BOEM under § 585.909, within 2... decommissioning the facilities under your SAP, COP, or GAP, you must submit a decommissioning application and...

78 FR 62630 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-10-22

... Coating Facilities (40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1135.11, OMB Control No. 2060... the Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities (40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS) were: Proposed on January 22, 1986... Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS. Owners or operators of the affected facilities must make...

33 CFR 154.1040 - Specific requirements for facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. 154.1040 Section... to the environment. (a) The owner or operator of a facility that, under § 154.1015, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, shall submit a response plan that meets the...

33 CFR 154.1040 - Specific requirements for facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. 154.1040 Section... to the environment. (a) The owner or operator of a facility that, under § 154.1015, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, shall submit a response plan that meets the...

33 CFR 154.1040 - Specific requirements for facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. 154.1040 Section... to the environment. (a) The owner or operator of a facility that, under § 154.1015, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, shall submit a response plan that meets the...

33 CFR 154.1040 - Specific requirements for facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. 154.1040 Section... to the environment. (a) The owner or operator of a facility that, under § 154.1015, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, shall submit a response plan that meets the...

30 CFR 285.815 - What must I do if I have facility damage or an equipment failure?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Environmental and Safety Management, Inspections, and Facility Assessments for Activities Conducted Under SAPs..., MMS may require you to revise your SAP, COP, or GAP to describe how you will address the facility damage or failure as required by § 285.634 (COP), § 285.617 (SAP), § 285.655 (GAP). You must submit a...

33 CFR 154.1040 - Specific requirements for facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. 154.1040 Section... to the environment. (a) The owner or operator of a facility that, under § 154.1015, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, shall submit a response plan that meets the...

Optically-based Sensor System for Critical Nuclear Facilities Post-Event Seismic Structural Assessment

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

McCallen, David; Petrone, Floriana; Buckle, Ian

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has ownership and operational responsibility for a large enterprise of nuclear facilities that provide essential functions to DOE missions ranging from national security to discovery science and energy research. These facilities support a number of DOE programs and offices including the National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Science, and Office of Environmental Management. With many unique and “one of a kind” functions, these facilities represent a tremendous national investment, and assuring their safety and integrity is fundamental to the success of a breadth of DOE programs. Many DOE critical facilities are located in regionsmore » with significant natural phenomenon hazards including major earthquakes and DOE has been a leader in developing standards for the seismic analysis of nuclear facilities. Attaining and sustaining excellence in nuclear facility design and management must be a core competency of the DOE. An important part of nuclear facility management is the ability to monitor facilities and rapidly assess the response and integrity of the facilities after any major upset event. Experience in the western U.S. has shown that understanding facility integrity after a major earthquake is a significant challenge which, lacking key data, can require extensive effort and significant time. In the work described in the attached report, a transformational approach to earthquake monitoring of facilities is described and demonstrated. An entirely new type of optically-based sensor that can directly and accurately measure the earthquake-induced deformations of a critical facility has been developed and tested. This report summarizes large-scale shake table testing of the sensor concept on a representative steel frame building structure, and provides quantitative data on the accuracy of the sensor measurements.« less

Walkthrough screening evaluation field guide. Natural phenomena hazards at Department of Energy facilities: Revision 2

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Eder, S.J.; Eli, M.W.; Salmon, M.W.

1993-11-01

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has a large inventory of existing facilities. Many of these facilities were not designed and constructed to current natural phenomena hazard (NPH) criteria. The NPH events include earthquakes, extreme winds and tornadoes, and floods. DOE Order 5480.28 establishes policy and requirements for NPH mitigation for DOE facilities. DOE is conducting a multiyear project to develop evaluation guidelines for assessing the condition and determining the need for upgrades at DOE facilities. One element of the NPH evaluation guidelines` development involves the existing systems and components at DOE facilities. This effort is described in detail inmore » a cited reference. In the interim period prior to availability of the final guidelines, DOE facilities are encouraged to implement an NPH walk through screening evaluation process by which systems and components that need attention can be rapidly identified. Guidelines for conducting the walk through screening evaluations are contained herein. The result of the NPH walk through screening evaluation should be a prioritized list of systems and components that need further action. Simple and inexpensive fixes for items identified in the walk through as marginal or inadequate should be implemented without further study. By implementing an NPH walk through screening evaluation, DOE facilities may realize significant reduction in risk from NPH in the short term.« less

77 FR 49784 - Notice of Public Meetings for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Legislative Environmental...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-17

... public comment period to: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, ATTN: NAWSCL Land Withdrawal.... In addition, comments may be submitted any time during the public comment period via the project Web... submitted via the web site during the public review period will become part of the public record on the...

40 CFR 112.20 - Facility response plans.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... response plan based on the criteria in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, the owner or operator shall submit..., and is required to prepare and submit a response plan based on the criteria in paragraph (f)(1) of..., based on the factors in paragraph (f)(3) of this section. If such a determination is made, the Regional...

40 CFR 112.20 - Facility response plans.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... response plan based on the criteria in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, the owner or operator shall submit..., and is required to prepare and submit a response plan based on the criteria in paragraph (f)(1) of..., based on the factors in paragraph (f)(3) of this section. If such a determination is made, the Regional...

30 CFR 285.213 - What must I submit in response to a Request for Interest or a Call for Information and Nominations?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Issuance of OCS Renewable Energy Leases Competitive Lease Process § 285.213 What must I submit in response to a Request for...

30 CFR 285.110 - How do I submit plans, applications, reports, or notices required by this part?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How do I submit plans, applications, reports, or notices required by this part? 285.110 Section 285.110 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE...

30 CFR 285.601 - When am I required to submit my plans to MMS?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When am I required to submit my plans to MMS? 285.601 Section 285.601 Mineral Resources MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and...

77 FR 52175 - Changes to the Inland Navigation Rules

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-28

..., and 33 CFR Part 88, Annex V, Would Be Moved Into the Main Body of 33 CFR Part 83 C. COLREGS Amendment... balloon shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them... with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility. C. Privacy Act Anyone can...

77 FR 22530 - Safety Zone; Fireworks, Hudson River, Rhinecliff, NY

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-04-16

... Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001... balloon shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them... Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New...

75 FR 19307 - Safety Zone; Milwaukee Air and Water Show, Milwaukee, Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-04-14

... Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200... shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an... ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington...

76 FR 9273 - Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Severn River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-17

...) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor... shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an... ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington...

77 FR 11173 - Renewal of Facility Operating License No. NPF-30, Union Electric Company, Callaway Plant, Unit 1

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-24

... the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit.... Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an.... Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home...

30 CFR 250.192 - What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural occurrence? 250.192 Section 250.192 Mineral Resources... What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural..., such as a hurricane, a tropical storm, or an earthquake. Statistics include facilities and rigs...

30 CFR 250.192 - What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural occurrence? 250.192 Section 250.192 Mineral Resources... What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural..., such as a hurricane, a tropical storm, or an earthquake. Statistics include facilities and rigs...

30 CFR 250.192 - What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural occurrence? 250.192 Section 250.192 Mineral Resources... What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural..., such as a hurricane, a tropical storm, or an earthquake. Statistics include facilities and rigs...

30 CFR 254.7 - How do I submit my response plan to the BSEE?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false How do I submit my response plan to the BSEE? 254.7 Section 254.7 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE...

30 CFR 254.7 - How do I submit my response plan to the BSEE?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false How do I submit my response plan to the BSEE? 254.7 Section 254.7 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE...

30 CFR 254.7 - How do I submit my response plan to the BSEE?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false How do I submit my response plan to the BSEE? 254.7 Section 254.7 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL-SPILL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST LINE...

48 CFR 970.5223-2 - Affirmative procurement program.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... Contractor shall coordinate its activities with the DOE Recycling Coordinator. Reports required by paragraph (c) of this clause shall be submitted through the DOE Recycling Coordinator. (c) The Contractor shall... “subcontractor” and the term “DOE Recycling Coordinator” will be understood to mean “Contractor Recycling...

40 CFR 62.5100 - Identification of plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS Maryland Plan for Control... plan. (a) Identification of plan. Maryland Plan for Control Designated Pollutants from Existing Facilities (Section 111(d) plan). (b) The plan was officially submitted as follows: (1) Control of sulfuric...

Los Alamos Science Facilities

Science.gov Websites

Los Alamos National Laboratory Search Site submit About Mission Business Newsroom Publications Los Innovation in New Mexico Los Alamos Collaboration for Explosives Detection (LACED) SensorNexus Exascale Computing Project (ECP) User Facilities Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT) Los Alamos Neutron

40 CFR 62.10100 - Identification of plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS South Carolina... Identification of plan. (a) Identification of plan. South Carolina Designated Facility Plan (Section 111(d) Plan). (b) The plan was officially submitted as follows: (1) Implementation Plan for Control of Designated...

28 CFR 36.606 - Effect of certification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... the question of whether equipment in a building built according to the code satisfies the Act's... buildings and facilities that comply with the certified code. A submitting official may reapply for...

28 CFR 36.606 - Effect of certification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... the question of whether equipment in a building built according to the code satisfies the Act's... buildings and facilities that comply with the certified code. A submitting official may reapply for...

28 CFR 36.606 - Effect of certification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... the question of whether equipment in a building built according to the code satisfies the Act's... buildings and facilities that comply with the certified code. A submitting official may reapply for...

28 CFR 36.606 - Effect of certification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... the question of whether equipment in a building built according to the code satisfies the Act's... buildings and facilities that comply with the certified code. A submitting official may reapply for...

77 FR 32071 - Seaway Regulations and Rules: Periodic Update, Various Categories

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-31

.... SUMMARY: The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC) and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management... instructions for submitting comments/submissions. Fax: 1-202-493-2251. Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S... ; or in person at the Docket Management Facility; U.S. [[Page 32072

How to Submit | Center for Cancer Research

Cancer.gov

be submitted by a current NIH or FDA fellow. The work does not need to have been done at the NIH/FDA. However, the submitter must be an author on the document and be in compliance with the intended journal's authorship guidelines or general good authorship practices. 

WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Update

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Kehrman, B.; Most, W.

2006-07-01

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Hazardous Waste Facility Permit (HWFP) was issued on October 27, 1999 [1]. Since that time, the WIPP has sought modifications to clarify the permit language, provide alternative methods for meeting permit requirements and to update permit conditions. Significant advancements have been made in transuranic (TRU) waste management as the result of modifications to the HWFP. Among these advancements is a modification to obtain a drum age criteria (DAC) value to perform headspace gas sampling on drums to be super-compacted and placed in a 100-gallon overpack drum. In addition, the Section 311 permit modification requestmore » that would allow for more efficient waste characterization, and the modification to authorize the shipment and disposal of Remote-Handled (RH) TRU waste were merged together and submitted to the regulator as the Consolidated Permit Modification Request (PMR). The submittal of the Consolidated PMR came at the request of the regulator as part of responses to Notices of Deficiency (NODs) for the separate PMRs which had been submitted in previous years. Section 311 of the fiscal year 2004 Energy and Water Developments Appropriations Act (Public Law 108-137) [2] directs the Department of Energy to submit a permit modification that limits waste confirmation to radiography or visual examination of a statistical subpopulation of containers. Section 311 also specifically directs that disposal room performance standards be to be met by monitoring for volatile organic compounds in the underground disposal rooms. This statute translates into the elimination of other waste confirmation methods such as headspace gas sampling and analysis and solids sampling and analysis. These methods, as appropriate, will continue to be used by the generator sites during hazardous waste determinations or characterization activities. This modification is expected to reduce the overall cost of waste analysis by hundreds of millions of dollars [3]. Combining both the chap. 311 and RH TRU waste permit modification requests allows for both the regulator and DOE to expedite action on the modification requests. The Combined PMR reduces costs by having only one administrative process for both modification requests. (authors)« less

20 CFR 30.212 - How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer... Cancer Under Parts B and E of Eeoicpa § 30.212 How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer facility or a RECA...

20 CFR 30.212 - How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer... Cancer Under Parts B and E of Eeoicpa § 30.212 How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer facility or a RECA...

10 CFR 770.5 - How does DOE notify persons and entities that defense nuclear facility real property is available...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false How does DOE notify persons and entities that defense nuclear facility real property is available for transfer for economic development? 770.5 Section 770.5 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC...

10 CFR 770.5 - How does DOE notify persons and entities that defense nuclear facility real property is available...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false How does DOE notify persons and entities that defense nuclear facility real property is available for transfer for economic development? 770.5 Section 770.5 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC...

20 CFR 30.212 - How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer... Cancer Under Parts B and E of Eeoicpa § 30.212 How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer facility or a RECA...

20 CFR 30.212 - How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer... Cancer Under Parts B and E of Eeoicpa § 30.212 How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer facility or a RECA...

20 CFR 30.212 - How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer... Cancer Under Parts B and E of Eeoicpa § 30.212 How does a claimant establish that the employee contracted cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility, an atomic weapons employer facility or a RECA...

40 CFR 49.4168 - Notification and reporting requirements.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... FEDERAL ASSISTANCE INDIAN COUNTRY: AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Implementation Plans for Tribes-Region VIII Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Well Production Facilities; Fort Berthold... you own or operate more than one oil and natural gas production facility, you may submit one report...

40 CFR 49.4168 - Notification and reporting requirements.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... FEDERAL ASSISTANCE INDIAN COUNTRY: AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Implementation Plans for Tribes-Region VIII Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Well Production Facilities; Fort Berthold... you own or operate more than one oil and natural gas production facility, you may submit one report...

47 CFR 64.1310 - Payphone compensation procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... tendered for a quarter, the chief financial officer of the Completing Carrier shall submit to each payphone... Intermediate Carrier is a facilities-based long distance carrier that switches payphone calls to other facilities-based long distance carriers. (c) Unless the payphone service provider agrees to other reporting...

40 CFR 62.8350 - Identification of plan.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS North Carolina Plan for... Identification of plan. (a) Identification of plan. North Carolina Designated Facility Plan (Section 111(d) Plan). (b) The plan was officially submitted as follows: (1) Control of sulfuric acid mist emissions from...

75 FR 3954 - Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-25

... (PFC). DATES: Please submit comments by February 24, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla...: Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application. Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently...: 49 U.S.C. 40117 authorizes airports to impose passenger facility charges (PFC). This program requires...

45 CFR 1309.4 - Eligibility-Construction.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 4 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Eligibility-Construction. 1309.4 Section 1309.4... PROGRAM HEAD START FACILITIES PURCHASE, MAJOR RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCTION General § 1309.4 Eligibility—Construction. Before submitting an application under § 1309.10 for construction of a facility, the grantee must...

45 CFR 1309.4 - Eligibility-Construction.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 4 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Eligibility-Construction. 1309.4 Section 1309.4... PROGRAM HEAD START FACILITIES PURCHASE, MAJOR RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCTION General § 1309.4 Eligibility—Construction. Before submitting an application under § 1309.10 for construction of a facility, the grantee must...

78 FR 66388 - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-05

... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0231] Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating... Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive... describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject): Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go...

40 CFR 60.51Da - Reporting requirements.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... actions taken. (3) For owners or operators of affected facilities complying with the percent reduction...) and inlet emission rates (ni) as applicable. (2) The standard deviation of hourly averages for outlet... system malfunction, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement: (1...

Sentinel Surveillance for Expedited Partner Therapy Prescriptions Using Pharmacy Data, in 2 New York City Neighborhoods, 2015.

PubMed

Okah, Ebiere; Arya, Vibhuti; Rogers, Meighan; Kim, Michelle; Schillinger, Julia Ann

2017-02-01

Expedited partner therapy (EPT) for Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is the practice of providing Ct-infected patients with medication, or prescription (prescription-EPT) to deliver to their sex partners without first examining those partners. New York City (NYC) providers commonly use prescription-EPT, yet NYC pharmacists report only occasional receipt of EPT prescriptions. This project assessed the frequency of EPT prescriptions filled in 2 NYC neighborhoods. The 2 NYC facilities reporting the most frequent use of prescription-EPT were identified from Ct provider case reports and contacted to ascertain their EPT practices. Providers at the first facility (facility 1) prescribed two 1-g doses of azithromycin, including sex partner treatment on the index patient's electronic prescription. Providers at the second facility (facility 2) gave patients paper prescriptions for sex partners. We reviewed prescriptions filled in 2015 for azithromycin, 1 or 2 g at pharmacies near these facilities; prescriptions indicating partner therapy were classified "EPT prescriptions". Facility 1 providers submitted 112 Ct case reports indicating prescription-EPT, compared with 114 submitted by facility 2 providers. Twelve of 26 identified pharmacies agreed to participate. At 7 pharmacies near facility 1, we found 61 EPT prescriptions from facility 1 and 37 from other facilities. At 5 pharmacies near facility 2, we found only 1 EPT prescription from facility 2 and 3 from other facilities. Expedited partner therapy prescriptions were received in NYC pharmacies near to EPT-prescribing facilities, but with great variability and at a lower frequency than suggested by provider case reports. Provider EPT prescribing practices may impact the likelihood that partners receive medication and should be further evaluated.

77 FR 11106 - Proposed Agency Information Collection

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-24

... register with PAMS to view the proposals that were submitted. They will also be able to maintain a minimal... research project. Lab technical proposals must be completed by DOE National Laboratories in order to... Office of Science to submit a proposal for funding through an interagency agreement. Neither lab nor...

48 CFR 970.1504-5 - Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, requires the contractor to submit a self-assessment. (4) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate IV when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, permits the contractor to submit a self-assessment at the contractor's option. (b)(1...

48 CFR 970.1504-5 - Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, requires the contractor to submit a self-assessment. (4) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate IV when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, permits the contractor to submit a self-assessment at the contractor's option. (b)(1...

48 CFR 970.1504-5 - Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, requires the contractor to submit a self-assessment. (4) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate IV when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, permits the contractor to submit a self-assessment at the contractor's option. (b)(1...

48 CFR 970.1504-5 - Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, requires the contractor to submit a self-assessment. (4) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate IV when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, permits the contractor to submit a self-assessment at the contractor's option. (b)(1...

48 CFR 970.1504-5 - Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, requires the contractor to submit a self-assessment. (4) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate IV when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, permits the contractor to submit a self-assessment at the contractor's option. (b)(1...

25 CFR 514.1 - Annual fees.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... Commission. § 514.15 May tribes submit fingerprint cards to the NIGC for processing? Tribes may submit fingerprint cards to the Commission for processing by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Commission may charge a fee to process fingerprint cards on behalf of the tribes. § 514.16 How does the...

Factors associated with adequate weekly reporting for disease surveillance data among health facilities in Nairobi County, Kenya, 2013.

PubMed

Mwatondo, Athman Juma; Ng'ang'a, Zipporah; Maina, Caroline; Makayotto, Lyndah; Mwangi, Moses; Njeru, Ian; Arvelo, Wences

2016-01-01

Kenya adopted the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy in 1998 to strengthen disease surveillance and epidemic response. However, the goal of weekly surveillance reporting among health facilities has not been achieved. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of adequate reporting and factors associated with IDSR reporting among health facilities in one Kenyan County. Health facilities (public and private) were enrolled using stratified random sampling from 348 facilities prioritized for routine surveillance reporting. Adequately-reporting facilities were defined as those which submitted >10 weekly reports during a twelve-week period and a poor reporting facilities were those which submitted <10 weekly reports. Multivariate logistic regression with backward selection was used to identify risk factors associated with adequate reporting. From September 2 through November 30, 2013, we enrolled 175 health facilities; 130(74%) were private and 45(26%) were public. Of the 175 health facilities, 77 (44%) facilities classified as adequate reporting and 98 (56%) were reporting poorly. Multivariate analysis identified three factors to be independently associated with weekly adequate reporting: having weekly reporting forms at visit (AOR19, 95% CI: 6-65], having posters showing IDSR functions (AOR8, 95% CI: 2-12) and having a designated surveillance focal person (AOR7, 95% CI: 2-20). The majority of health facilities in Nairobi County were reporting poorly to IDSR and we recommend that the Ministry of Health provide all health facilities in Nairobi County with weekly reporting tools and offer specific trainings on IDSR which will help designate a focal surveillance person.

36 CFR 1281.8 - What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? 1281.8 Section 1281.8... PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FACILITIES § 1281.8 What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? (a) NARA must submit a report to Congress on a proposed new...

36 CFR 1281.8 - What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? 1281.8 Section 1281.8... PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FACILITIES § 1281.8 What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? (a) NARA must submit a report to Congress on a proposed new...

36 CFR 1281.8 - What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? 1281.8 Section 1281.8... PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FACILITIES § 1281.8 What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? (a) NARA must submit a report to Congress on a proposed new...

36 CFR 1281.8 - What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? 1281.8 Section 1281.8... PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FACILITIES § 1281.8 What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? (a) NARA must submit a report to Congress on a proposed new...

48 CFR 970.3770-1 - Policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... REGULATIONS DOE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS Facilities Management Contracting 970.3770-1 Policy. Contractors managing Department of Energy (DOE) facilities shall be required to comply with the DOE Directives applicable to facilities management. [65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36374, July 22, 2009] ...

78 FR 57845 - Notice of Public Meetings for the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-20

... submitted via the U.S. Postal Service to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Attn: Code EV21/CZ... via the project Web site ( http://www.mmaseis.com ). All statements submitted during the public review... in writing at the public meetings, via the U.S. Postal Service, or electronically via the public Web...

40 CFR 125.134 - As an owner or operator of a new offshore oil and gas extraction facility, what must I do to...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... intake structure; or (ii) Based on information submitted by any fishery management agency(ies) or other...) Based on information submitted by any fishery management agency(ies) or other relevant information, that...) and (5) of this section, would still contribute unacceptable stress to the protected species, critical...

40 CFR 125.134 - As an owner or operator of a new offshore oil and gas extraction facility, what must I do to...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... intake structure; or (ii) Based on information submitted by any fishery management agency(ies) or other...) Based on information submitted by any fishery management agency(ies) or other relevant information, that...) and (5) of this section, would still contribute unacceptable stress to the protected species, critical...

40 CFR 125.134 - As an owner or operator of a new offshore oil and gas extraction facility, what must I do to...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... intake structure; or (ii) Based on information submitted by any fishery management agency(ies) or other...) Based on information submitted by any fishery management agency(ies) or other relevant information, that...) and (5) of this section, would still contribute unacceptable stress to the protected species, critical...

30 CFR 250.192 - What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other natural occurrence? 250.192 Section 250.192 Mineral Resources... Requirements § 250.192 What reports and statistics must I submit relating to a hurricane, earthquake, or other... occurrence, such as a hurricane, a tropical storm, or an earthquake. Statistics include facilities and rigs...

40 CFR 60.7 - Notification and record keeping.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... control systems, productive capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected... submitted for each pollutant monitored at each affected facility. (1) If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is less than 1 percent of the total operating time for the reporting...

40 CFR 60.7 - Notification and record keeping.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... control systems, productive capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected... submitted for each pollutant monitored at each affected facility. (1) If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is less than 1 percent of the total operating time for the reporting...

40 CFR 60.7 - Notification and record keeping.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... control systems, productive capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected... submitted for each pollutant monitored at each affected facility. (1) If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is less than 1 percent of the total operating time for the reporting...

40 CFR 60.7 - Notification and record keeping.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... control systems, productive capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected... submitted for each pollutant monitored at each affected facility. (1) If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is less than 1 percent of the total operating time for the reporting...

40 CFR 60.7 - Notification and record keeping.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... control systems, productive capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected... submitted for each pollutant monitored at each affected facility. (1) If the total duration of excess emissions for the reporting period is less than 1 percent of the total operating time for the reporting...

Notices of Intent for Coverage Under the NPDES General Permit for Oil and Gas Exploration Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf in the Chukchi Sea

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

Notices of Intent (NOIs) submitted to EPA for coverage under the NPDES general permit for discharges from oil and gas exploration facilities on the outer continental shelf in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska.

40 CFR 270.10 - General application requirements.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... any time after construction or operation of such facility has begun, file an application for a RCRA... hazardous waste management facility may voluntarily submit part B of the application at any time... requested part B application on time, or to furnish in full the information required by the part B...

21 CFR 1.235 - How and when do you cancel your facility's registration information?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... and faxed cancellations into its registration system, along with CD-ROM cancellations, as soon as... a confirmation. (e) Cancellation by CD-ROM for multiple submissions. If, for example, you do not... cancel your facilities' registrations using a CD-ROM. (1) Registrants submitting their cancellations in...

21 CFR 1.235 - How and when do you cancel your facility's registration information?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... and faxed cancellations into its registration system, along with CD-ROM cancellations, as soon as... a confirmation. (e) Cancellation by CD-ROM for multiple submissions. If, for example, you do not... cancel your facilities' registrations using a CD-ROM. (1) Registrants submitting their cancellations in...

21 CFR 1.235 - How and when do you cancel your facility's registration information?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... and faxed cancellations into its registration system, along with CD-ROM cancellations, as soon as... a confirmation. (e) Cancellation by CD-ROM for multiple submissions. If, for example, you do not... cancel your facilities' registrations using a CD-ROM. (1) Registrants submitting their cancellations in...

21 CFR 1.235 - How and when do you cancel your facility's registration information?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... and faxed cancellations into its registration system, along with CD-ROM cancellations, as soon as... a confirmation. (e) Cancellation by CD-ROM for multiple submissions. If, for example, you do not... cancel your facilities' registrations using a CD-ROM. (1) Registrants submitting their cancellations in...

78 FR 68055 - Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-13

... Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving (Renewal... Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving (40 CFR Part... battery manufacturing facilities, and 393 existing wood preserving facilities. The total annual responses...

77 FR 70837 - Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-11-27

... Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations... Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or... Docket ID NRC-2012-0283. You may submit comments by the following methods: Federal rulemaking Web site...

78 FR 78402 - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-12-26

... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0272] Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating... Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive... submitting comments on a specific subject): Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and...

77 FR 35069 - Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-06-12

... Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations... Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or... ID NRC-2012-0131. You may submit comments by the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go...

CINT - Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies

Science.gov Websites

Skip to Content Skip to Search Skip to Utility Navigation Skip to Top Navigation Search Site submit Facilities Discovery Platform Integration Lab User Facilities LUMOS Research Science Thrusts Integration Challenges Accepted User Proposals Data Management Becoming a User Call for Proposals Proposal Guidelines

15 CFR 717.5 - Post-inspection activities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... CLARIFICATION PROCEDURES (CONSULTATIONS AND CHALLENGE INSPECTIONS) § 717.5 Post-inspection activities. BIS will forward a copy of the final inspection report to the inspected facility for their review upon receipt from the OPCW. Facilities may submit comments on the final inspection report to BIS, and BIS will consider...

33 CFR 154.1060 - Submission and approval procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... SECURITY (CONTINUED) POLLUTION FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK Response Plans for... to which this subpart applies shall submit one copy of a facility response plan meeting the... also required to prepare a response plan under 40 CFR part 112, if the COTP determines that the plan...

33 CFR 154.1060 - Submission and approval procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... SECURITY (CONTINUED) POLLUTION FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK Response Plans for... to which this subpart applies shall submit one copy of a facility response plan meeting the... also required to prepare a response plan under 40 CFR part 112, if the COTP determines that the plan...

33 CFR 154.1060 - Submission and approval procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... SECURITY (CONTINUED) POLLUTION FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK Response Plans for... to which this subpart applies shall submit one copy of a facility response plan meeting the... also required to prepare a response plan under 40 CFR part 112, if the COTP determines that the plan...

33 CFR 154.1060 - Submission and approval procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... SECURITY (CONTINUED) POLLUTION FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK Response Plans for... to which this subpart applies shall submit one copy of a facility response plan meeting the... also required to prepare a response plan under 40 CFR part 112, if the COTP determines that the plan...

33 CFR 154.1060 - Submission and approval procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... SECURITY (CONTINUED) POLLUTION FACILITIES TRANSFERRING OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN BULK Response Plans for... to which this subpart applies shall submit one copy of a facility response plan meeting the... also required to prepare a response plan under 40 CFR part 112, if the COTP determines that the plan...

Development of an Industry Dynamometer/Spin Test Facility--Equipment Only: Cooperative Research and Development Final Report, CRADA Number CRD-05-164

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

McDade, Mark

2016-12-01

The Department of Energy/National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DOE/NREL) owns and operates a megawatt-scale dynamometer used for testing wind turbine drive trains up to 1.5 megawatt (MW) in rated capacity. At this time, this unit is the only unit of its type in the United States, available for use by the American Wind Industry. Currently this dynamometer is heavily backlogged and unavailable to provide testing needed by various wind industry members. DOE/NREL is in possession of two critical pieces of equipment that may be used to develop an alternative Dynamometer facility, but does not have the funds or other resources necessarymore » to develop such a facility. The Participant possesses complimentary facilities and infrastructure that when combined with the NREL equipment can create such a test facility. The Participant is also committed to expending funds to develop and operate such a facility to the subsequent benefit of the Wind Industry and DOE Wind Energy program. In exchange for DOE/NREL providing the critical equipment, the Participant will grant DOE/NREL a minimum of 90 days of testing time per year in the new facility while incurring no facilities fees.« less

25 CFR 1000.169 - How does a Tribe/Consortium initiate the information phase?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 25 Indians 2 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false How does a Tribe/Consortium initiate the information... of Initial Annual Funding Agreements § 1000.169 How does a Tribe/Consortium initiate the information phase? A Tribe/Consortium initiates the information phase by submitting a letter of interest to the...

25 CFR 1000.169 - How does a Tribe/Consortium initiate the information phase?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 25 Indians 2 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false How does a Tribe/Consortium initiate the information... of Initial Annual Funding Agreements § 1000.169 How does a Tribe/Consortium initiate the information phase? A Tribe/Consortium initiates the information phase by submitting a letter of interest to the...

Oil reserve: status of Strategic Petroleum Reserve activities as of December 31, 1985

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

This report discusses events and activities related to the administration's progress in filling, developing, and operating the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) during the first quarter of fiscal year 1986. Specifically, it notes that: DOE added 4.5 million barrels of oil to the SPR, bringing the total to 493.3 million barrels. The oil fill rate averaged about 49,000 barrels per day during the quarter. DOE made payments of $178 million for oil acquisition and transportation, had unpaid obligations of about $140 million, and had about $668 million in unobligated funds. The storage capacity development program proceeded during the quarter; however, themore » West Hackberry, Louisiana site's leaching program was stopped in December due to a leak in the brine disposal line. DOE held an SPR drawdown test sale and distribution exercise. Approximately 1 million barrels of oil were competitively sold to oil company bidders and subsequently withdrawn from DOE storage sites for delivery. The Congress passed a continuing resolution for fiscal year 1986 providing about $113 million for continued construction of storage capacity as directed by the fiscal year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. On December 27, 1985, DOE formally notified cognizant congressional committees that it was planning to submit a deferral of funds for SPR storage facilities development. This report also presents information on (1) the implementation of recommendations made in the DOE Oak Ridge Operations Office's reports on its baseline assessment of the SPR Project Office and its review of allegations about mismanagement or misconduct within the SPR program, (2) DOE's compliance with the Cargo Preference Act of 1954 during the 1985 crude oil procurement program, (3) DOE's program to analyze the quality of oil in filled storage caverns, and (4) DOE's pipeline construction and marine terminal enhancements to improve the SPR oil distribution system.« less

Commercial treatability study capabilities for application to the US Department of Energy`s anticipated mixed waste streams. Revision 1

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1996-09-01

US DOE mixed low-level and mixed transuranic waste inventory was estimated at 181,000 cubic meters (about 2,000 waste streams). Treatability studies may be used as part of DOE`s mixed waste management program. Commercial treatability study suppliers have been identified that either have current capability in their own facilities or have access to licensed facilities. Numerous federal and state regulations, as well as DOE Order 5820.2A, impact the performance of treatability studies. Generators, transporters, and treatability study facilities are subject to regulation. From a mixed- waste standpoint, a key requirement is that the treatability study facility must have an NRC ormore » state license that allows it to possess radioactive materials. From a RCRA perspective, the facility must support treatability study activities with the applicable plans, reports, and documentation. If PCBs are present in the waste, TSCA will also be an issue. CERCLA requirements may apply, and both DOE and NRC regulations will impact the transportation of DOE mixed waste to an off-site treatment facility. DOE waste managers will need to be cognizant of all applicable regulations as mixed-waste treatability study programs are initiated.« less

75 FR 57942 - Notice of Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-23

... instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P...), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington... comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public...

75 FR 57556 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure for Residential Clothes Washers

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-21

... signed original paper copy. 4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy...) 586-2945. Please submit one signed original paper copy. For detailed instructions on submitting....Edwards @ee.doe.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background and Legal Authority II...

34 CFR 656.10 - What combined application may an institution submit?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... LANGUAGE AND AREA STUDIES OR FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES How Does One Apply for a Grant... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What combined application may an institution submit? 656.10 Section 656.10 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued...

36 CFR § 1281.8 - What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? § 1281.8 Section Â... PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FACILITIES § 1281.8 What information must be provided to NARA for its report to Congress on a new Presidential library facility? (a) NARA must submit a report to Congress on a proposed new...

Clean Cities 2012 Annual Metrics Report

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Johnson, Caley

2013-12-01

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Clean Cities program advances the nation's economic, environmental, and energy security by supporting local actions to cut petroleum use in transportation. A national network of nearly 100 Clean Cities coalitions brings together stakeholders in the public and private sectors to deploy alternative and renewable fuels, idle-reduction measures, fuel economy improvements, and new transportation technologies, as they emerge. Each year DOE asks Clean Cities coordinators to submit annual reports of their activities and accomplishments for the previous calendar year. Data and information are submitted via an online database that is maintained as part of themore » Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC) at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Coordinators submit a range of data that characterizes the membership, funding, projects, and activities of their coalitions. They also submit data about sales of alternative fuels, deployment of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), idle-reduction initiatives, fuel economy activities, and programs to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). NREL analyzes the data and translates them into petroleum-use reduction impacts, which are summarized in this report.« less

41 CFR 102-76.60 - To which facilities does the Architectural Barriers Act apply?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false To which facilities does... Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 76-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Architectural Barriers Act § 102-76.60 To which facilities does the...

41 CFR 102-76.60 - To which facilities does the Architectural Barriers Act apply?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false To which facilities does... Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 76-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Architectural Barriers Act § 102-76.60 To which facilities does the...

41 CFR 102-76.60 - To which facilities does the Architectural Barriers Act apply?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false To which facilities does... Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 76-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Architectural Barriers Act § 102-76.60 To which facilities does the...

41 CFR 102-76.60 - To which facilities does the Architectural Barriers Act apply?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false To which facilities does... Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 76-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Architectural Barriers Act § 102-76.60 To which facilities does the...

41 CFR 102-76.60 - To which facilities does the Architectural Barriers Act apply?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false To which facilities does... Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 76-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Architectural Barriers Act § 102-76.60 To which facilities does the...

Advanced Post-Irradiation Examination Capabilities Alternatives Analysis Report

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Jeff Bryan; Bill Landman; Porter Hill

2012-12-01

An alternatives analysis was performed for the Advanced Post-Irradiation Capabilities (APIEC) project in accordance with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order DOE O 413.3B, “Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets”. The Alternatives Analysis considered six major alternatives: ? No Action ? Modify Existing DOE Facilities – capabilities distributed among multiple locations ? Modify Existing DOE Facilities – capabilities consolidated at a few locations ? Construct New Facility ? Commercial Partnership ? International Partnerships Based on the alternatives analysis documented herein, it is recommended to DOE that the advanced post-irradiation examination capabilities be provided by amore » new facility constructed at the Materials and Fuels Complex at the Idaho National Laboratory.« less

Regulatory basis for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant performance assessment

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

HOWARD,BRYAN A.; CRAWFORD,M.B.; GALSON,D.A.

2000-05-22

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is the first operational repository designed for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste from the defense programs of the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for certifications and regulation of the WIPP facility for the radioactive components of the waste. The EPA has promulgated general radioactive waste disposal standards at 40 CFR Part 191. and WIPP-specific criteria to implement and interpret the generic disposal standards at 40 CFR Part 194. In October 1996. the DOE submitted its Compliance Certification Application (CCA) to the EPA tomore » demonstrate compliance with the disposal standards at Subparts B and C of 40 CFR Part 191. This paper summarizes the development of the overall legal framework for radioactive waste disposal at the WIPP, the parallel development of the WIPP performance assessment (PA), and how the EPA disposal standards and implementing criteria formed the basis for the CCA WIPP PA. The CCA resulted in a certification in May 1998 by the EPA of the WIPP'S compliance with the EPA's disposal standard, thus enabling the WIPP to begin radioactive waste disposal.« less

21 CFR 803.56 - If I am a manufacturer, in what circumstances must I submit a supplemental or followup report and...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... that you did not provide because it was not known or was not available when you submitted the initial... report that you are updating with the supplemental information (e.g., your original manufacturer report number and the user facility or importer report number of any report on which your report was based), if...

21 CFR 803.56 - If I am a manufacturer, in what circumstances must I submit a supplemental or followup report and...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... that you did not provide because it was not known or was not available when you submitted the initial... report that you are updating with the supplemental information (e.g., your original manufacturer report number and the user facility or importer report number of any report on which your report was based), if...

21 CFR 803.56 - If I am a manufacturer, in what circumstances must I submit a supplemental or followup report and...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... that you did not provide because it was not known or was not available when you submitted the initial... report that you are updating with the supplemental information (e.g., your original manufacturer report number and the user facility or importer report number of any report on which your report was based), if...

21 CFR 803.56 - If I am a manufacturer, in what circumstances must I submit a supplemental or followup report and...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... that you did not provide because it was not known or was not available when you submitted the initial... report that you are updating with the supplemental information (e.g., your original manufacturer report number and the user facility or importer report number of any report on which your report was based), if...

Factors associated with adequate weekly reporting for disease surveillance data among health facilities in Nairobi County, Kenya, 2013

PubMed Central

Mwatondo, Athman Juma; Ng'ang'a, Zipporah; Maina, Caroline; Makayotto, Lyndah; Mwangi, Moses; Njeru, Ian; Arvelo, Wences

2016-01-01

Introduction Kenya adopted the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy in 1998 to strengthen disease surveillance and epidemic response. However, the goal of weekly surveillance reporting among health facilities has not been achieved. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of adequate reporting and factors associated with IDSR reporting among health facilities in one Kenyan County. Methods Health facilities (public and private) were enrolled using stratified random sampling from 348 facilities prioritized for routine surveillance reporting. Adequately-reporting facilities were defined as those which submitted >10 weekly reports during a twelve-week period and a poor reporting facilities were those which submitted <10 weekly reports. Multivariate logistic regression with backward selection was used to identify risk factors associated with adequate reporting. Results From September 2 through November 30, 2013, we enrolled 175 health facilities; 130(74%) were private and 45(26%) were public. Of the 175 health facilities, 77 (44%) facilities classified as adequate reporting and 98 (56%) were reporting poorly. Multivariate analysis identified three factors to be independently associated with weekly adequate reporting: having weekly reporting forms at visit (AOR19, 95% CI: 6-65], having posters showing IDSR functions (AOR8, 95% CI: 2-12) and having a designated surveillance focal person (AOR7, 95% CI: 2-20). Conclusion The majority of health facilities in Nairobi County were reporting poorly to IDSR and we recommend that the Ministry of Health provide all health facilities in Nairobi County with weekly reporting tools and offer specific trainings on IDSR which will help designate a focal surveillance person. PMID:27303581

DOE’s Management and Oversight of the Nuclear Weapons Complex

DTIC Science & Technology

1990-03-22

and Economic Development Division Before the Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Facilities Panel Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives...and newly created DOE offices. The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, whose board members were appointed this past year, was created to provide 6...mandated Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Continuing dialogue between DOE and the Board can also serve to enhance DOE’s ability to respond more

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1998-04-01

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in DOE's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure strategy and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from December 31, 1997 through April 30, 1998 under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and provided ongoing support to state-DOE interactions in preparation for the March 30-31, 1998 NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force Meeting with DOE. maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE's Environmental Management Budget, and DOE's proposed Intersite Discussions.« less

75 FR 29420 - Revision of LNG and LHG Waterfront Facility General Requirements

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-26

... exclusive authority to approve or deny an application for the siting, construction, expansion, or operation... a Follow-on WSA will be submitted to the U.S. Coast Guard no later than the filing of an application... least 180 days before the applicant files an application for authorization to construct the facility...

78 FR 56682 - Notice of Public Meetings for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-13

... U.S. Postal Service to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific, Attention: MITT EIS/OEIS... project Web site ( www.MITT-EIS.com ). All comments, oral or written, submitted during the public review... Facilities Engineering Command Pacific, Attention: MITT EIS/OEIS Project Manager, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite...

75 FR 62832 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-13

... Registration Form Registered Nurse 6,000 1 5/60 500 (Infection Preventionist). 57.101: Facility Contact Registered Nurse 6,000 1 10/60 1,000 Information. (Infection Preventionist). 57.103: Patient Safety Registered Nurse 6,000 1 40/60 4,000 Component--Annual Facility (Infection Survey. Preventionist). 57.104...

76 FR 56458 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-13

... Registered Nurse (Infection 6,000 1 5/60 500 Preventionist). 57.101: Facility Contact Information Registered Nurse (Infection 6,000 1 10/60 1,000 Preventionist). 57.103: Patient Safety Component--Annual Registered Nurse (Infection 6,000 1 30/60 3,000 Facility Survey. Preventionist). 57.104: Patient Safety Component...

Petroleum Refinery Information Collection Request (ICR) Emissions Test Report for BP-Husky Refining LLC

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

On March 31, 2011, U.S. EPA sent a Section 114 letter to the BP-Husky Refining Company in Oregon, Ohio stating that the facility was subject to the ICR and that certain information would need to be submitted by the facility to satisfy U.S. EPA’s ICR.

78 FR 4785 - Inland Waterways Navigation Regulation: Sacramento River, CA

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-23

... 1975, and the restricted anchorage area is no longer necessary. DATES: This rule is effective April 23... Management Facility by that date. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, is... . (2) Fax: 202-493-2251. (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation...

75 FR 11576 - Energy Northwest; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct the...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-11

... Generating Station Energy Northwest has submitted an application for renewal of Facility Operating License No... license for CGS expires on December 20, 2023. The application for renewal, dated January 19, 2010, was... and opportunity for hearing regarding renewal of the facility operating licenses is also being...

75 FR 54025 - Revision of LNG and LHG Waterfront Facility General Requirements

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-03

...-372-1410 or by e-mail at [email protected] . If you have questions on viewing or submitting... Revision of LNG and LHG Waterfront Facility General Requirements AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Rule; information collection approval. SUMMARY: In a final rule published May 26, 2010, the Coast Guard amended...

77 FR 35273 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Minor New Source Review (NSR...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-06-13

... Permitting Rule for Cotton Gins AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule... particulate matter emissions from cotton ginning facilities. The submitted Cotton Gin regulation provides an alternative preconstruction process for cotton ginning facilities that will emit no more than 50 tons per year...

78 FR 40519 - Cooper Nuclear Station; Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-07-05

...; Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards... submitting comments on a specific subject): Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and...: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0139. NRC...

77 FR 14441 - Facility Operating License Amendment From Southern Nuclear Operating, Inc., Joseph M. Farley...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-09

... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-348 AND 50-364; NRC-2012-0053] Facility Operating License Amendment From Southern Nuclear Operating, Inc., Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2...-0053. You may submit comments by the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www...

76 FR 33180 - Tribal Consultation on No Child Left Behind School Facilities and Construction Negotiated...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-06-08

... to obtain oral and written comments concerning a draft report to provide Congress and the Secretary... equitable distribution of funds to address those needs. The reports are to be submitted to Congress and to... Child Left Behind School Facilities and Construction Negotiated Rulemaking Committee--Draft Report...

76 FR 34996 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-06-15

... categories of residential care facilities within each state that meet the NSLTCP definition and (2) for each... which the agency is responsible. The NSLTCP study definition of a residential care facility is one that..., Office of the Chief Science Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2011-14791...

1999 Report on Hanford Site land disposal restriction for mixed waste

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

BLACK, D.G.

This report was submitted to meet the requirements of Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) Milestone M-26-011. This milestone requires the preparation of an annual report that covers characterization, treatment, storage, minimization, and other aspects of managing land-disposal-restricted mixed waste at the Hanford Facility.

7 CFR 1493.250 - Final application and issuance of a facility payment guarantee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

...) COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee Program (FGP) Operations § 1493.250 Final application and issuance of a... commitment may, within six months of the date of such letter, submit a final application to CCC for a...

7 CFR 1493.250 - Final application and issuance of a facility payment guarantee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

...) COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee Program (FGP) Operations § 1493.250 Final application and issuance of a... commitment may, within six months of the date of such letter, submit a final application to CCC for a...

7 CFR 1493.250 - Final application and issuance of a facility payment guarantee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

...) COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Facility Guarantee Program (FGP) Operations § 1493.250 Final application and issuance of a... commitment may, within six months of the date of such letter, submit a final application to CCC for a...

Design and evaluation guidelines for Department of Energy facilities subjected to natural phenomena hazards

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Kennedy, R.P.; Short, S.A.; McDonald, J.R.

1990-06-01

The Department of Energy (DOE) and the DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Panel have developed uniform design and evaluation guidelines for protection against natural phenomena hazards at DOE sites throughout the United States. The goal of the guidelines is to assure that DOE facilities can withstand the effects of natural phenomena such as earthquakes, extreme winds, tornadoes, and flooding. The guidelines apply to both new facilities (design) and existing facilities (evaluation, modification, and upgrading). The intended audience is primarily the civil/structural or mechanical engineers conducting the design or evaluation of DOE facilities. The likelihood of occurrence of natural phenomena hazards atmore » each DOE site has been evaluated by the DOE Natural Phenomena Hazard Program. Probabilistic hazard models are available for earthquake, extreme wind/tornado, and flood. Alternatively, site organizations are encouraged to develop site-specific hazard models utilizing the most recent information and techniques available. In this document, performance goals and natural hazard levels are expressed in probabilistic terms, and design and evaluation procedures are presented in deterministic terms. Design/evaluation procedures conform closely to common standard practices so that the procedures will be easily understood by most engineers. Performance goals are expressed in terms of structure or equipment damage to the extent that: (1) the facility cannot function; (2) the facility would need to be replaced; or (3) personnel are endangered. 82 refs., 12 figs., 18 tabs.« less

Seismic assessment of Technical Area V (TA-V).

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Medrano, Carlos S.

The Technical Area V (TA-V) Seismic Assessment Report was commissioned as part of Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) Self Assessment Requirement per DOE O 414.1, Quality Assurance, for seismic impact on existing facilities at Technical Area-V (TA-V). SNL TA-V facilities are located on an existing Uniform Building Code (UBC) Seismic Zone IIB Site within the physical boundary of the Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB). The document delineates a summary of the existing facilities with their safety-significant structure, system and components, identifies DOE Guidance, conceptual framework, past assessments and the present Geological and Seismic conditions. Building upon the past information and themore » evolution of the new seismic design criteria, the document discusses the potential impact of the new standards and provides recommendations based upon the current International Building Code (IBC) per DOE O 420.1B, Facility Safety and DOE G 420.1-2, Guide for the Mitigation of Natural Phenomena Hazards for DOE Nuclear Facilities and Non-Nuclear Facilities.« less

Elimination of Pasteurella pneumotropica from a Mouse Barrier Facility by Using a Modified Enrofloxacin Treatment Regimen

PubMed Central

Towne, Justin W; Wagner, April M; Griffin, Kurt J; Buntzman, Adam S; Frelinger, Jeffrey A; Besselsen, David G

2014-01-01

Multiple NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1WjlTg(HLA-A2.1)Enge/Sz (NSG/A2) transgenic mice maintained in a mouse barrier facility were submitted for necropsy to determine the cause of facial alopecia, tachypnea, dyspnea, and sudden death. Pneumonia and soft-tissue abscesses were observed, and Pasteurella pneumotropica biotype Jawetz was consistently isolated from the upper respiratory tract, lung, and abscesses. Epidemiologic investigation within the facility revealed presence of this pathogen in mice generated or rederived by the intramural Genetically Engineered Mouse Model (GEMM) Core but not in mice procured from several approved commercial vendors. Epidemiologic data suggested the infection originated from female or vasectomized male ND4 mice obtained from a commercial vendor and then comingled by the GEMM Core to induce pseudopregnancy in female mice for embryo implantation. Enrofloxacin delivered in drinking water (85 mg/kg body weight daily) for 14 d was sufficient to clear bacterial infection in normal, breeding, and immune-deficient mice without the need to change the antibiotic water source. This modified treatment regimen was administered to 2400 cages of mice to eradicate Pasteurella pneumotropica from the facility. Follow-up PCR testing for P. pneumotropica biotype Jawetz remained uniformly negative at 2, 6, 12, and 52 wk after treatment in multiple strains of mice that were originally infected. Together, these data indicate that enrofloxacin can eradicate P. pneumotropica from infected mice in a less labor-intensive approach that does not require breeding cessation and that is easily adaptable to the standard biweekly cage change schedule for individually ventilated cages. PMID:25255075

WIPP Magnesium Oxide (MgO) - Planned Change Request

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

On April 10, 2006, the DOE submitted a planned change request pertaining to the amount of MgO emplaced in the WIPP repository. MgO is an engineered barrier that DOE included as part of the original WIPP Certification Decision.

Commercial Decommissioning at DOE's Rocky Flats

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Freiboth, C.; Sandlin, N.; Schubert, A.

2002-02-25

Due in large part to the number of nuclear facilities that make up the DOE complex, DOE-EM work has historically been paperwork intensive and driven by extensive regulations. Requirements for non-nuclear facilities are often grouped with those of nuclear facilities, driving up costs. Kaiser-Hill was interested in applying a commercial model to demolition of these facilities and wanted to apply necessary and sufficient standards to the work activities, but avoid applying unnecessary requirements. Faced with demolishing hundreds of uncontaminated or non-radiologically contaminated facilities, Kaiser-Hill has developed a subcontracting strategy to drastically reduce the cost of demolishing these facilities at Rockymore » Flats. Aiming to tailor the demolition approach of such facilities to more closely follow commercial practices, Kaiser-Hill recently released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the demolition of the site's former central administration facility. The RFP significantly reduced requirements for compliance with specific DOE directives. Instead, the RFP required subcontractors to comply with health and safety requirements commonly found in the demolition of similar facilities in a commercial setting. This resulted in a number of bids from companies who have normally not bid on DOE work previously and at a reduced cost over previous approaches. This paper will discuss the details of this subcontracting strategy.« less

Natural phenomena hazards design and evaluation criteria for Department of Energy Facilities

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1994-04-01

This DOE standard gives design and evaluation criteria for natural phenomena hazards (NPH) effects as guidance for implementing the NPH mitigation requirements of DOE 5480.28. Goal of the criteria is to assure that DOE facilities can withstand the effects of earthquakes, extreme winds, tornadoes, flooding, etc. They apply to the design of new facilities and the evaluation of existing facilities; they may also be used for modification and upgrading of the latter.

42 CFR 137.246 - How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? 137.246 Section 137.246 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....246 How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? The Self-Governance Tribe submits a written...

42 CFR 137.246 - How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? 137.246 Section 137.246 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....246 How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? The Self-Governance Tribe submits a written...

25 CFR 1000.222 - How does a Tribe/Consortium obtain a waiver?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 25 Indians 2 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false How does a Tribe/Consortium obtain a waiver? 1000.222...-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION ACT Waiver of Regulations § 1000.222 How does a Tribe/Consortium obtain a waiver? To obtain a waiver, the Tribe/Consortium must: (a) Submit a written request from the designated Tribal...

42 CFR 137.246 - How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? 137.246 Section 137.246 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....246 How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? The Self-Governance Tribe submits a written...

25 CFR 1000.333 - How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 25 Indians 2 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program? 1000.333...-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION ACT Retrocession § 1000.333 How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program? The Tribe/Consortium must submit: (a) A written notice to: (1) The Office of Self-Governance for BIA...

42 CFR 137.246 - How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? 137.246 Section 137.246 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES....246 How does a Self-Governance Tribe retrocede a PSFA? The Self-Governance Tribe submits a written...

25 CFR 1000.333 - How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 25 Indians 2 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program? 1000.333...-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION ACT Retrocession § 1000.333 How does a Tribe/Consortium retrocede a program? The Tribe/Consortium must submit: (a) A written notice to: (1) The Office of Self-Governance for BIA...

A National Study of Efficiency for Dialysis Centers: An Examination of Market Competition and Facility Characteristics for Production of Multiple Dialysis Outputs

PubMed Central

Ozgen, Hacer; A. Ozcan, Yasar

2002-01-01

Objective To examine market competition and facility characteristics that can be related to technical efficiency in the production of multiple dialysis outputs from the perspective of the industrial organization model. Study Setting Freestanding dialysis facilities that operated in 1997 submitted cost report forms to the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), and offered all three outputs—outpatient dialysis, dialysis training, and home program dialysis. Data Sources The Independent Renal Facility Cost Report Data file (IRFCRD) from HCFA was utilized to obtain information on output and input variables and market and facility features for 791 multiple-output facilities. Information regarding population characteristics was obtained from the Area Resources File. Study Design Cross-sectional data for the year 1997 were utilized to obtain facility-specific technical efficiency scores estimated through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). A binary variable of efficiency status was then regressed against its market and facility characteristics and control factors in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Principal Findings The majority of the facilities in the sample are functioning technically inefficiently. Neither the intensity of market competition nor a policy of dialyzer reuse has a significant effect on the facilities' efficiency. Technical efficiency is significantly associated, however, with type of ownership, with the interaction between the market concentration of for-profits and ownership type, and with affiliations with chains of different sizes. Nonprofit and government-owned facilities are more likely than their for-profit counterparts to become inefficient producers of renal dialysis outputs. On the other hand, that relationship between ownership form and efficiency is reversed as the market concentration of for-profits in a given market increases. Facilities that are members of large chains are more likely to be technically inefficient. Conclusions Facilities do not appear to benefit from joint production of a variety of dialysis outputs, which may explain the ongoing tendency toward single-output production. Ownership form does make a positive difference in production efficiency, but only in local markets where competition exists between nonprofit and for-profit facilities. The increasing inefficiency associated with membership in large chains suggests that the growing consolidation in the dialysis industry may not, in fact, be the strategy for attaining more technical efficiency in the production of multiple dialysis outputs. PMID:12132602

A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs.

PubMed

Ozgen, Hacer; Ozcan, Yasar A

2002-06-01

To examine market competition and facility characteristics that can be related to technical efficiency in the production of multiple dialysis outputs from the perspective of the industrial organization model. Freestanding dialysis facilities that operated in 1997 submitted cost report fonns to the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), and offered all three outputs--outpatient dialysis, dialysis training, and home program dialysis. The Independent Renal Facility Cost Report Data file (IRFCRD) from HCFA was utilized to obtain information on output and input variables and market and facility features for 791 multiple-output facilities. Information regarding population characteristics was obtained from the Area Resources File. Cross-sectional data for the year 1997 were utilized to obtain facility-specific technical efficiency scores estimated through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). A binary variable of efficiency status was then regressed against its market and facility characteristics and control factors in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The majority of the facilities in the sample are functioning technically inefficiently. Neither the intensity of market competition nor a policy of dialyzer reuse has a significant effect on the facilities' efficiency. Technical efficiency is significantly associated, however, with type of ownership, with the interaction between the market concentration of for-profits and ownership type, and with affiliations with chains of different sizes. Nonprofit and government-owned Facilities are more likely than their for-profit counterparts to become inefficient producers of renal dialysis outputs. On the other hand, that relationship between ownership form and efficiency is reversed as the market concentration of for-profits in a given market increases. Facilities that are members of large chains are more likely to be technically inefficient. Facilities do not appear to benefit from joint production of a variety of dialysis outputs, which may explain the ongoing tendency toward single-output production. Ownership form does make a positive difference in production efficiency, but only in local markets where competition exists between nonprofit and for-profit facilities. The increasing inefficiency associated with membership in large chains suggests that the growing consolidation in the dialysis industry may not, in fact, be the strategy for attaining more technical efficiency in the production of multiple dialysis outputs.

34 CFR 222.183 - How does an LEA apply for a grant?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... fiscal year. An LEA must submit a separate application for each school for which it proposes a project, and may submit more than one application for a single school if multiple projects are proposed. Examples: 1. An LEA wants to receive both an emergency and a modernization grant for one school that has a...

76 FR 570 - Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Establishing the Performance...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-05

... electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by April 5, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for... INFORMATION section for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit electronic comments on the..., plasma, and blood. These devices are used to aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. This document does not...

13 CFR 127.503 - When is a contracting officer authorized to restrict competition under this part?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... be made at fair market prices. This requirement does not preclude a contracting officer from making... reasonable expectation based on market research that: (1) Two or more EDWOSBs will submit offers for the... reasonable expectation based on market research that: (1) Two or more WOSBs will submit offers (this includes...

75 FR 56562 - Proposed Information Collection Request Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations; Slope...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-16

... Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations; Slope and Shaft Sinking Plans, 30 CFR 77.1900 (Pertains to... information collection for Slope and Shaft Sinking Plans, 30 CFR 77.1900. DATES: All comments must be received....1900. MSHA does not intend to publish the results from this information collection and is not seeking...

77 FR 51943 - Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dehumidifiers: Public Meeting and Availability of...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-28

...) 586-2945. Please submit one signed original paper copy. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.... Please submit one signed original paper copy. Docket: For access to the docket to read background... the comment period should extend past the public meeting date. DOE has determined that an extension of...

10 CFR 770.8 - May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear... ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § 770.8 May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less than fair market...

10 CFR 770.8 - May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear... ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § 770.8 May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less than fair market...

10 CFR 770.8 - May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less than fair market value? 770.8 Section 770.8 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § 770.8 May DOE...

10 CFR 770.8 - May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less than fair market value? 770.8 Section 770.8 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § 770.8 May DOE...

Environmental assessment of the Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center Facility

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1995-10-01

This Environmental Assessment has been prepared to determine if the Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center (the Center), or its alternatives would have significant environmental impacts that must be analyzed in an Environmental Impact Statement. DOE`s proposed action is to continue funding the Center. While DOE is not funding construction of the planned Center facility, operation of that facility is dependent upon continued funding. To implement the proposed action, the Center would initially construct a facility of approximately 2,300 square meters (25,000 square feet). The Phase 1 laboratory facilities and parking lot will occupy approximately 1.2 hectares (3 acres) ofmore » approximately 8.9 hectares (22 acres) of land which were donated to New Mexico State University (NMSU) for this purpose. The facility would contain laboratories to analyze chemical and radioactive materials typical of potential contaminants that could occur in the environment in the vicinity of the DOE Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site or other locations. The facility also would have bioassay facilities to measure radionuclide levels in the general population and in employees of the WIPP. Operation of the Center would meet the DOE requirement for independent monitoring and assessment of environmental impacts associated with the planned disposal of transuranic waste at the WIPP.« less

18 CFR 1316.5 - Clean Air and Water Acts.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... Water Acts (a) If performance of this contract would involve the use of facilities which have given rise... which gave rise to said conviction. If no such statement is submitted, submission of an offer... facilities which have given rise to a conviction under section 113(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act or section 309...

78 FR 34918 - Direct Final Approval of Sewage Sludge Incinerators State Plan for Designated Facilities and...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-06-11

... Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted the State Plan on February 27, 2013. The State Plan is consistent with... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R05-OAR-2013-0372; FRL-9821-1] Direct Final Approval of Sewage Sludge Incinerators State Plan for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Indiana AGENCY...

76 FR 37853 - Arizona Public Service Company; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-06-28

...] Arizona Public Service Company; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating... your comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the Federal rulemaking Web site http://www.regulations.gov . Because your comments will not be...

33 CFR 154.1240 - Specific requirements for animal fats and vegetable oils facilities that could reasonably be...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... environment. 154.1240 Section 154.1240 Navigation and Navigable Waters COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND... oils facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. (a) The... expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, must submit a response plan that meets the...

33 CFR 154.1240 - Specific requirements for animal fats and vegetable oils facilities that could reasonably be...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... environment. 154.1240 Section 154.1240 Navigation and Navigable Waters COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND... oils facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. (a) The... expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, must submit a response plan that meets the...

33 CFR 154.1240 - Specific requirements for animal fats and vegetable oils facilities that could reasonably be...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... environment. 154.1240 Section 154.1240 Navigation and Navigable Waters COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND... oils facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. (a) The... expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, must submit a response plan that meets the...

76 FR 30884 - Special Local Regulation; Kelley's Island Swim, Lake Erie; Kelley's Island, Lakeside, OH

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-27

...) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor... ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail... Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New...

18 CFR 1316.5 - Clean Air and Water Acts.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... Water Acts (a) If performance of this contract would involve the use of facilities which have given rise... which gave rise to said conviction. If no such statement is submitted, submission of an offer... facilities which have given rise to a conviction under section 113(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act or section 309...

78 FR 54635 - Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for EA-18G Growler Airfield...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-05

... the potential environmental effects associated with the introduction of two additional EA-18G Growler... CONTACT: EA-18G EIS Project Manager (Code EV21/ SS); Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC... request should be submitted to: EA-18G EIS Project Manager (Code EV21/SS); Naval Facilities Engineering...

33 CFR 154.1240 - Specific requirements for animal fats and vegetable oils facilities that could reasonably be...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... environment. 154.1240 Section 154.1240 Navigation and Navigable Waters COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND... oils facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. (a) The... expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, must submit a response plan that meets the...

77 FR 67056 - Application for a Presidential Permit To Operate and Maintain Pipeline Facilities on the Border...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-11-08

... transport natural gas liquids (``NGLs'') extending from a block valve site in St. Clair County, Michigan... Storage LLC., by FERC. Because NOVA intends to place Line 20 facilities back into natural gas liquids... gas liquids would be in the U.S. national interest. DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit...

30 CFR 254.7 - How do I submit my response plan to the MMS?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70123-2394. (c) Send plans for facilities in the Pacific Ocean (except seaward of...? 254.7 Section 254.7 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT..., Anchorage, AK 99508-4302. (b) Send plans for facilities in the Gulf of Mexico or Atlantic Ocean to: Minerals...

20 CFR 10.118 - Does the employer participate in the claims process in any other way?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... of Proof § 10.118 Does the employer participate in the claims process in any other way? (a) The employer is responsible for submitting to OWCP all relevant and probative factual and medical evidence in... 20 Employees' Benefits 1 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Does the employer participate in the claims...

25 CFR 224.173 - How does a tribe rescind a TERA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 25 Indians 1 2012-04-01 2011-04-01 true How does a tribe rescind a TERA? 224.173 Section 224.173... does a tribe rescind a TERA? To rescind a TERA, a tribe must submit to the Secretary a written tribal resolution or other official action of the tribe's governing body approving the voluntary rescission of the...

25 CFR 224.173 - How does a tribe rescind a TERA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... 25 Indians 1 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false How does a tribe rescind a TERA? 224.173 Section 224.173... does a tribe rescind a TERA? To rescind a TERA, a tribe must submit to the Secretary a written tribal resolution or other official action of the tribe's governing body approving the voluntary rescission of the...

25 CFR 224.173 - How does a tribe rescind a TERA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 25 Indians 1 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false How does a tribe rescind a TERA? 224.173 Section 224.173... does a tribe rescind a TERA? To rescind a TERA, a tribe must submit to the Secretary a written tribal resolution or other official action of the tribe's governing body approving the voluntary rescission of the...

25 CFR 1200.13 - How does a tribe apply to withdraw funds?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 25 Indians 2 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false How does a tribe apply to withdraw funds? 1200.13 Section... INDIAN TRUST FUND MANAGEMENT REFORM ACT Withdrawing Tribal Funds From Trust § 1200.13 How does a tribe apply to withdraw funds? To withdraw funds, a tribe must submit four copies of its application and the...

25 CFR 224.173 - How does a tribe rescind a TERA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 25 Indians 1 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false How does a tribe rescind a TERA? 224.173 Section 224.173... does a tribe rescind a TERA? To rescind a TERA, a tribe must submit to the Secretary a written tribal resolution or other official action of the tribe's governing body approving the voluntary rescission of the...

43 CFR 3216.14 - What filing fees and forms does a transfer require?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... for three leases, submit three times the fee for “Assignment and transfer of record title or operating... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false What filing fees and forms does a transfer... LEASING Transfers § 3216.14 What filing fees and forms does a transfer require? With each transfer request...

43 CFR 3216.14 - What filing fees and forms does a transfer require?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... for three leases, submit three times the fee for “Assignment and transfer of record title or operating... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false What filing fees and forms does a transfer... LEASING Transfers § 3216.14 What filing fees and forms does a transfer require? With each transfer request...

43 CFR 3216.14 - What filing fees and forms does a transfer require?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... for three leases, submit three times the fee for “Assignment and transfer of record title or operating... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false What filing fees and forms does a transfer... LEASING Transfers § 3216.14 What filing fees and forms does a transfer require? With each transfer request...

43 CFR 3216.14 - What filing fees and forms does a transfer require?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... for three leases, submit three times the fee for “Assignment and transfer of record title or operating... 43 Public Lands: Interior 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false What filing fees and forms does a transfer... LEASING Transfers § 3216.14 What filing fees and forms does a transfer require? With each transfer request...

25 CFR 1000.21 - When does a Tribe/Consortium have a “material audit exception”?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

...-Governance Eligibility § 1000.21 When does a Tribe/Consortium have a “material audit exception”? A Tribe/Consortium has a material audit exception if any of the audits that it submitted under § 1000.17(c...

41 CFR 102-75.655 - What does the assignment recommendation contain?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... recommendation contain? 102-75.655 Section 102-75.655 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 75-REAL PROPERTY... What does the assignment recommendation contain? Any recommendation submitted by DOI must provide...

2002 Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Report for the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, Title III, Section 313

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

M. Stockton

2003-11-01

For reporting year 2002, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory) submitted Form R reports for lead compounds and mercury as required under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Section 313. No other EPCRA Section 313 chemicals were used in 2002 above the reportable thresholds. This document was prepared to provide a description of the evaluation of EPCRA Section 313 chemical usage and threshold determinations for LANL for calendar year 2002 as well as provide background information about the data included on the Form R reports. Section 313 of EPCRA specifically requires facilities to submit a Toxicmore » Chemical Release Inventory report (Form R) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies if the owners and operators manufacture, process, or otherwise use any of the listed toxic chemicals above listed threshold quantities. EPA compiles this data in the Toxic Release Inventory database. Form R reports for each chemical over threshold quantities must be submitted on or before July 1 each year and must cover activities that occurred at the facility during the previous year. In 1999 EPA promulgated a final rule on Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxics (PBTs). This rule added several chemicals to the EPCRA Section 313 list of toxic chemicals and established lower reporting thresholds for these and other PBT chemicals that were already reportable under EPCRA Section 313. These lower thresholds became applicable in reporting year 2000. In 2001, EPA expanded the PBT rule to include a lower reporting threshold for lead and lead compounds. Facilities that manufacture, process, or otherwise use more than 100 lb of lead or lead compounds must submit a Form R.« less

2006 Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Report for the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, Title III, Section 313

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Ecology and Air Quality Group

2007-12-12

For reporting year 2006, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL or the Laboratory) submitted Form R reports for lead as required under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) Section 313. No other EPCRA Section 313 chemicals were used in 2006 above the reportable thresholds. This document was prepared to provide a description of the evaluation of EPCRA Section 313 chemical use and threshold determinations for LANL for calendar year 2006, as well as to provide background information about data included on the Form R reports. Section 313 of EPCRA specifically requires facilities to submit a Toxic Chemical Release Inventorymore » Report (Form R) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies if the owners and operators manufacture, process, or otherwise use any of the listed toxic chemicals above listed threshold quantities. EPA compiles this data in the Toxic Release Inventory database. Form R reports for each chemical over threshold quantities must be submitted on or before July 1 each year and must cover activities that occurred at the facility during the previous year. In 1999, EPA promulgated a final rule on persistent bioaccumulative toxics (PBTs). This rule added several chemicals to the EPCRA Section 313 list of toxic chemicals and established lower reporting thresholds for these and other PBT chemicals that were already reportable. These lower thresholds became applicable in reporting year 2000. In 2001, EPA expanded the PBT rule to include a lower reporting threshold for lead and lead compounds. Facilities that manufacture, process, or otherwise use more than 100 lb of lead or lead compounds must submit a Form R.« less

2008 Toxic Chemical Release Inventory 2008 Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, Title III, Section 313

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Ecology and Air Quality Group

2009-10-01

For reporting year 2008, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) submitted a Form R report for lead as required under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to- Know Act (EPCRA) Section 313. No other EPCRA Section 313 chemicals were used in 2008 above the reportable thresholds. This document was prepared to provide a description of the evaluation of EPCRA Section 313 chemical use and threshold determinations for LANL for calendar year 2008, as well as to provide background information about data included on the Form R reports. Section 313 of EPCRA specifically requires facilities to submit a Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reportmore » (Form R) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies if the owners and operators manufacture, process, or otherwise use any of the listed toxic chemicals above listed threshold quantities. EPA compiles this data in the Toxic Release Inventory database. Form R reports for each chemical over threshold quantities must be submitted on or before July 1 each year and must cover activities that occurred at the facility during the previous year. In 1999, EPA promulgated a final rule on persistent bioaccumulative toxics (PBTs). This rule added several chemicals to the EPCRA Section 313 list of toxic chemicals and established lower reporting thresholds for these and other PBT chemicals that were already reportable. These lower thresholds became applicable in reporting year 2000. In 2001, EPA expanded the PBT rule to include a lower reporting threshold for lead and lead compounds. Facilities that manufacture, process, or otherwise use more than 100 lb of lead or lead compounds must submit a Form R.« less

42 CFR 413.9 - Cost related to patient care.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Introduction and General... after the provider has submitted fiscal and statistical reports. The retroactive adjustment will...

Construction Cost Growth for New Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Kubic, Jr., William L.

Cost growth and construction delays are problems that plague many large construction projects including the construction of new Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. A study was conducted to evaluate cost growth of large DOE construction projects. The purpose of the study was to compile relevant data, consider the possible causes of cost growth, and recommend measures that could be used to avoid extreme cost growth in the future. Both large DOE and non-DOE construction projects were considered in this study. With the exception of Chemical and Metallurgical Research Building Replacement Project (CMRR) and the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facilitymore » (MFFF), cost growth for DOE Nuclear facilities is comparable to the growth experienced in other mega construction projects. The largest increase in estimated cost was found to occur between early cost estimates and establishing the project baseline during detailed design. Once the project baseline was established, cost growth for DOE nuclear facilities was modest compared to non-DOE mega projects.« less

Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF) Facility Stewardship Plan: Revision 2.1

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Torres, Juan; Anderson, Art

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), has established the Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF) on the campus of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and has designated it as a DOE user facility. This 182,500-ft2 research facility provides state-of-the-art laboratory and support infrastructure to optimize the design and performance of electrical, thermal, fuel, and information technologies and systems at scale. This Facility Stewardship Plan provides DOE and other decision makers with information about the existing and expected capabilities of the ESIF and the expected performance metrics to be applied to ESIF operations.more » This plan is a living document that will be updated and refined throughout the lifetime of the facility.« less

34 CFR 606.13 - How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit? 606.13 Section 606.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education... INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM How Does an Institution Apply for a Grant? § 606.13 How many applications for a...

34 CFR 607.13 - How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit? 607.13 Section 607.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education... Does an Institution Apply for a Grant? § 607.13 How many applications for a development grant may an...

13 CFR 127.503 - When is a contracting officer authorized to restrict competition under this part?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... reasonable expectation based on market research that: (1) Two or more EDWOSBs will submit offers for the... reasonable expectation based on market research that: (1) Two or more WOSBs will submit offers (this includes... terms of quality and delivery and award will be made at fair market prices. This requirement does not...

78 FR 34970 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Section 110(a)(2...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-06-11

... submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia addressing the basic program elements specified in 110(a)(2) of... action does not include the nonattainment requirements of part D, Title I (referred to as element I), since this element is not required to be submitted by the 3-year submission deadline of CAA section 110...

Proposal for an Accelerator R&D User Facility at Fermilab's Advanced Superconducting Test Accelerator (ASTA)

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Church, M.; Edwards, H.; Harms, E.

2013-10-01

Fermilab is the nation’s particle physics laboratory, supported by the DOE Office of High Energy Physics (OHEP). Fermilab is a world leader in accelerators, with a demonstrated track-record— spanning four decades—of excellence in accelerator science and technology. We describe the significant opportunity to complete, in a highly leveraged manner, a unique accelerator research facility that supports the broad strategic goals in accelerator science and technology within the OHEP. While the US accelerator-based HEP program is oriented toward the Intensity Frontier, which requires modern superconducting linear accelerators and advanced highintensity storage rings, there are no accelerator test facilities that support themore » accelerator science of the Intensity Frontier. Further, nearly all proposed future accelerators for Discovery Science will rely on superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) acceleration, yet there are no dedicated test facilities to study SRF capabilities for beam acceleration and manipulation in prototypic conditions. Finally, there are a wide range of experiments and research programs beyond particle physics that require the unique beam parameters that will only be available at Fermilab’s Advanced Superconducting Test Accelerator (ASTA). To address these needs we submit this proposal for an Accelerator R&D User Facility at ASTA. The ASTA program is based on the capability provided by an SRF linac (which provides electron beams from 50 MeV to nearly 1 GeV) and a small storage ring (with the ability to store either electrons or protons) to enable a broad range of beam-based experiments to study fundamental limitations to beam intensity and to develop transformative approaches to particle-beam generation, acceleration and manipulation which cannot be done elsewhere. It will also establish a unique resource for R&D towards Energy Frontier facilities and a test-bed for SRF accelerators and high brightness beam applications in support of the OHEP mission of Accelerator Stewardship.« less

Argonne National Laboratory annual report of Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program Activities FY 2009.

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Office of the Director

2010-04-09

I am pleased to submit Argonne National Laboratory's Annual Report on its Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) activities for fiscal year 2009. Fiscal year 2009 saw a heightened focus by DOE and the nation on the need to develop new sources of energy. Argonne scientists are investigating many different sources of energy, including nuclear, solar, and biofuels, as well as ways to store, use, and transmit energy more safely, cleanly, and efficiently. DOE selected Argonne as the site for two new Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs) - the Institute for Atom-Efficient Chemical Transformations and the Center for Electrical Energymore » Storage - and funded two other EFRCs to which Argonne is a major partner. The award of at least two of the EFRCs can be directly linked to early LDRD-funded efforts. LDRD has historically seeded important programs and facilities at the lab. Two of these facilities, the Advanced Photon Source and the Center for Nanoscale Materials, are now vital contributors to today's LDRD Program. New and enhanced capabilities, many of which relied on LDRD in their early stages, now help the laboratory pursue its evolving strategic goals. LDRD has, since its inception, been an invaluable resource for positioning the Laboratory to anticipate, and thus be prepared to contribute to, the future science and technology needs of DOE and the nation. During times of change, LDRD becomes all the more vital for facilitating the necessary adjustments while maintaining and enhancing the capabilities of our staff and facilities. Although I am new to the role of Laboratory Director, my immediate prior service as Deputy Laboratory Director for Programs afforded me continuous involvement in the LDRD program and its management. Therefore, I can attest that Argonne's program adhered closely to the requirements of DOE Order 413.2b and associated guidelines governing LDRD. Our LDRD program management continually strives to be more efficient. In addition to meeting all reporting requirements during fiscal year 2009, our LDRD Office continues to enhance its electronic systems to streamline the LDRD management process. You will see from the following individual project reports that Argonne's researchers have once again done a superb job pursuing projects at the forefront of their respective fields and have contributed significantly to the advancement of Argonne's strategic thrusts. This work has not only attracted follow-on sponsorship in many cases, but is also proving to be a valuable basis upon which to continue realignment of our strategic portfolio to better match the Laboratory's Strategic Plan.« less

28 CFR 36.603 - Preliminary determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... filed by a submitting official for certification of a code, and after consultation with the...

28 CFR 36.603 - Preliminary determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... filed by a submitting official for certification of a code, and after consultation with the...

28 CFR 36.603 - Preliminary determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... filed by a submitting official for certification of a code, and after consultation with the...

28 CFR 36.603 - Preliminary determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes... filed by a submitting official for certification of a code, and after consultation with the...

30 CFR 553.45 - Where do I send my OSFR evidence?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR... Mexico Region, Oil Spill Financial Responsibility Program, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans...

30 CFR 553.45 - Where do I send my OSFR evidence?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR... Mexico Region, Oil Spill Financial Responsibility Program, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans...

30 CFR 553.45 - Where do I send my OSFR evidence?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Requirements for Submitting OSFR... Mexico Region, Oil Spill Financial Responsibility Program, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans...

20 CFR 655.1113 - Element III-What does “facility wage rate” mean?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... Facility Meet to Employ H-1C Nonimmigrant Workers as Registered Nurses? § 655.1113 Element III—What does... for registered nurses similarly employed by the facility.” (b) The facility must pay the higher of the...., prevailing wage). (c) Wage obligations for H-1C nurses in nonproductive status—(1) Circumstances where wages...

20 CFR 655.1113 - Element III-What does “facility wage rate” mean?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... Facility Meet to Employ H-1C Nonimmigrant Workers as Registered Nurses? § 655.1113 Element III—What does... for registered nurses similarly employed by the facility.” (b) The facility must pay the higher of the...., prevailing wage). (c) Wage obligations for H-1C nurses in nonproductive status—(1) Circumstances where wages...

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1998-01-01

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in the EM 2006 cleanup plans and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from October 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997, under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE activities in the area of the Hazardous Waste Identification Rule, and DOE's proposed National Dialogue.« less

Biennial Hazardous Waste Report

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

Federal regulations require large quantity generators to submit a report (EPA form 8700-13A/B) every two years regarding the nature, quantities and disposition of hazardous waste generated at their facility.

21 CFR 803.33 - If I am a user facility, what must I include when I submit an annual report?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

..., DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTING User Facility... medical device reports, or the number assigned by us for reporting purposes in accordance with § 803.3; (2...) Date of the annual report and report numbers identifying the range of medical device reports that you...

21 CFR 803.33 - If I am a user facility, what must I include when I submit an annual report?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

..., DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICAL DEVICES MEDICAL DEVICE REPORTING User Facility... medical device reports, or the number assigned by us for reporting purposes in accordance with § 803.3; (2...) Date of the annual report and report numbers identifying the range of medical device reports that you...

40 CFR 112.4 - Amendment of Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan by Regional Administrator.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

...), or discharged more than 42 U.S. gallons of oil in each of two discharges as described in § 112.1(b), occurring within any twelve month period, submit the following information to the Regional Administrator...) Your name; (3) Location of the facility; (4) Maximum storage or handling capacity of the facility and...

40 CFR 112.4 - Amendment of Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan by Regional Administrator.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

...), or discharged more than 42 U.S. gallons of oil in each of two discharges as described in § 112.1(b), occurring within any twelve month period, submit the following information to the Regional Administrator...) Your name; (3) Location of the facility; (4) Maximum storage or handling capacity of the facility and...

40 CFR 112.4 - Amendment of Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan by Regional Administrator.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

...), or discharged more than 42 U.S. gallons of oil in each of two discharges as described in § 112.1(b), occurring within any twelve month period, submit the following information to the Regional Administrator...) Your name; (3) Location of the facility; (4) Maximum storage or handling capacity of the facility and...

40 CFR 112.4 - Amendment of Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan by Regional Administrator.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

...), or discharged more than 42 U.S. gallons of oil in each of two discharges as described in § 112.1(b), occurring within any twelve month period, submit the following information to the Regional Administrator...) Your name; (3) Location of the facility; (4) Maximum storage or handling capacity of the facility and...

30 CFR 585.618 - What must I do upon completion of approved site assessment activities?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... assessment term, you timely submit a COP meeting the requirements of this subpart, or a complete FERC license... facilities in place on your lease during the time that BOEM reviews your COP for approval or FERC reviews... for facilities that are authorized to remain in place under your approved COP or approved FERC license...

30 CFR 585.618 - What must I do upon completion of approved site assessment activities?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... assessment term, you timely submit a COP meeting the requirements of this subpart, or a complete FERC license... facilities in place on your lease during the time that BOEM reviews your COP for approval or FERC reviews... for facilities that are authorized to remain in place under your approved COP or approved FERC license...

30 CFR 585.618 - What must I do upon completion of approved site assessment activities?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... assessment term, you timely submit a COP meeting the requirements of this subpart, or a complete FERC license... facilities in place on your lease during the time that BOEM reviews your COP for approval or FERC reviews... for facilities that are authorized to remain in place under your approved COP or approved FERC license...

78 FR 67300 - Anchorage Regulations: Pacific Ocean at San Nicolas Island, Calif.; Restricted Anchorage Areas

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-12

... reflect the needs and operational use of the United States Navy. DATES: This rule is effective February 10... Docket Management Facility by that date. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse... . (2) Fax: (202) 493-2251. (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of...

30 CFR 285.902 - What are the general requirements for decommissioning for facilities authorized under my SAP, COP...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... decommissioning for facilities authorized under my SAP, COP, or GAP? 285.902 Section 285.902 Mineral Resources... SAP, COP, or GAP? (a) Except as otherwise authorized by MMS under § 285.909, within 2 years following... under your SAP, COP, or GAP, you must submit a decommissioning application and receive approval from the...

34 CFR 222.121 - How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 34 Education 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request... § 222.121 How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency not be withheld? (a) The affected Indian tribe or tribes may submit to the Assistant Secretary a...

34 CFR 222.121 - How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 34 Education 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request... § 222.121 How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency not be withheld? (a) The affected Indian tribe or tribes may submit to the Assistant Secretary a...

34 CFR 222.121 - How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 34 Education 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request... § 222.121 How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency not be withheld? (a) The affected Indian tribe or tribes may submit to the Assistant Secretary a...

34 CFR 222.121 - How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 34 Education 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request... § 222.121 How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency not be withheld? (a) The affected Indian tribe or tribes may submit to the Assistant Secretary a...

34 CFR 222.121 - How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 34 Education 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request... § 222.121 How does the affected Indian tribe or tribes request that payments to a local educational agency not be withheld? (a) The affected Indian tribe or tribes may submit to the Assistant Secretary a...

Lessons Learned from the 200 West Pump and Treatment Facility Construction Project at the US DOE Hanford Site - A Leadership for Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold-Certified Facility - 13113

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Dorr, Kent A.; Freeman-Pollard, Jhivaun R.; Ostrom, Michael J.

CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) designed, constructed, commissioned, and began operation of the largest groundwater pump and treatment facility in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) nationwide complex. This one-of-a-kind groundwater pump and treatment facility, located at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation Site (Hanford Site) in Washington State, was built to an accelerated schedule with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds. There were many contractual, technical, configuration management, quality, safety, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) challenges associated with the design, procurement, construction, and commissioning of this $95 million, 52,000 ft groundwater pump and treatment facility tomore » meet DOE's mission objective of treating contaminated groundwater at the Hanford Site with a new facility by June 28, 2012. The project team's successful integration of the project's core values and green energy technology throughout design, procurement, construction, and start-up of this complex, first-of-its-kind Bio Process facility resulted in successful achievement of DOE's mission objective, as well as attainment of LEED GOLD certification (Figure 1), which makes this Bio Process facility the first non-administrative building in the DOE Office of Environmental Management complex to earn such an award. (authors)« less

Content of system design descriptions

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

A System Design Description (SDD) describes the requirements and features of a system. This standard provides guidance on the expected technical content of SDDs. The need for such a standard was recognized during efforts to develop SDDs for safety systems at DOE Hazard Category 2 nonreactor nuclear facilities. Existing guidance related to the corresponding documents in other industries is generally not suitable to meet the needs of DOE nuclear facilities. Across the DOE complex, different contractors have guidance documents, but they vary widely from site to site. While such guidance documents are valuable, no single guidance document has all themore » attributes that DOE considers important, including a reasonable degree of consistency or standardization. This standard is a consolidation of the best of the existing guidance. This standard has been developed with a technical content and level of detail intended to be most applicable to safety systems at DOE Hazard Category 2 nonreactor nuclear facilities. Notwithstanding that primary intent, this standard is recommended for other systems at such facilities, especially those that are important to achieving the programmatic mission of the facility. In addition, application of this standard should be considered for systems at other facilities, including non-nuclear facilities, on the basis that SDDs may be beneficial and cost-effective.« less

41 CFR 102-118.25 - Does GSA still require my agency to submit its overall transportation policies for approval?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Public Contracts and Property Management Federal Property Management Regulations System (Continued) FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION TRANSPORTATION 118-TRANSPORTATION PAYMENT AND AUDIT General Introduction... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Does GSA still require...

75 FR 56021 - Energy Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies: Public Meeting...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-15

... Preliminary Technical Support Document AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of public meeting and availability of preliminary technical support document... that DOE could consider for these products. DOE also encourages interested parties to submit written...

77 FR 43015 - Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Electric Motors: Public Meeting and...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-07-23

... Motors: Public Meeting and Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document AGENCY: Office of... availability of preliminary technical support document. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or... consider for this equipment. DOE also encourages interested parties to submit written comments on these...

Occupational dose reduction at Department of Energy contractor facilities: Bibliography of selected readings in radiation protection and ALARA; Volume 5

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Dionne, B.J.; Sullivan, S.G.; Baum, J.W.

1994-01-01

Promoting the exchange of information related to implementation of the As Low as Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) philosophy is a continuing objective for the Department of Energy (DOE). This report was prepared by the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) ALARA Center for the DOE Office of Health. It contains the fifth in a series of bibliographies on dose reduction at DOE facilities. The BNL ALARA Center was originally established in 1983 under the sponsorship of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to monitor dose-reduction research and ALARA activities at nuclear power plants. This effort was expanded in 1988 by the DOE`s Office of Environment,more » Safety and Health, to include DOE nuclear facilities. This bibliography contains abstracts relating to various aspects of ALARA program implementation and dose-reduction activities, with a specific focus on DOE facilities. Abstracts included in this bibliography were selected from proceedings of technical meetings, journals, research reports, searches of the DOE Energy, Science and Technology Database (in general, the citation and abstract information is presented as obtained from this database), and reprints of published articles provided by the authors. Facility types and activities covered in the scope of this report include: radioactive waste, uranium enrichment, fuel fabrication, spent fuel storage and reprocessing, facility decommissioning, hot laboratories, tritium production, research, test and production reactors, weapons fabrication and testing, fusion, uranium and plutonium processing, radiography, and accelerators. Information on improved shielding design, decontamination, containments, robotics, source prevention and control, job planning, improved operational and design techniques, as well as on other topics, has been included. In addition, DOE/EH reports not included in previous volumes of the bibliography are in this volume (abstracts 611 to 684). This volume (Volume 5 of the series) contains 217 abstracts.« less

42 CFR 456.611 - Reports on inspections.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... (CONTINUED) MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS UTILIZATION CONTROL Inspections of Care in Intermediate Care Facilities and Institutions for Mental Diseases § 456.611 Reports on inspections. (a) The team must submit a...

34 CFR 646.10 - How many applications for a Student Support Services award may an eligible applicant submit?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How many applications for a Student Support Services award may an eligible applicant submit? 646.10 Section 646.10 Education Regulations of the Offices of... STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM How Does One Apply for an Award? § 646.10 How many applications for a...

40 CFR 80.551 - How does a refiner obtain approval as a small refiner under this subpart?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

...) Applications for motor vehicle diesel fuel small refiner status must be submitted to EPA by December 31, 2001. (ii) Applications for NRLM diesel fuel small refiner status must be submitted to EPA by December 31, 2004. (2)(i) In the case of a refiner who acquires or reactivates a refinery that was shutdown or non...

40 CFR 51.30 - When does my state report which emissions data to EPA?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... the 2009 inventory year and must be submitted to EPA within 12 months, i.e., by December 31, 2010. (2... for every third inventory year the annual (12-month) emissions of all pollutants listed in § 51.15(a... first 3-year cycle inventory will be for the 2011 inventory and must be submitted to us within 12 months...

10 CFR 770.8 - May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... facilities for economic development at less than fair market value? 770.8 Section 770.8 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § 770.8 May DOE transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development at less than fair market...

NSUF Ion Beam Investment Options Workshop Report

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Heidrich, Brenden John

2016-03-01

The workshop that generated this data was convened to develop a set of recommendations (a priority list) for possible funding in the area of US domestic ion beam irradiation capabilities for nuclear energy-focused RD&D. The results of this workshop were intended for use by the Department of Energy - Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) for consideration of support for these facilities. The workshop considered, as part of the initial potential future support discussions, input submitted through the Office of Nuclear Energy Request for Information (RFI) (DE-SOL-0008318, April 13, 2015), but welcomed discussion (and presentation) of other options, whether specific ormore » general in scope. Input from users, including DOE-NE program interests and needs for ion irradiation RD&D were also included. Participants were selected from various sources: RFI respondents, NEUP/NEET infrastructure applicants, universities with known expertise in nuclear engineering and materials science and other developed sources. During the three days from March 22-24, 2016, the workshop was held at the Idaho National Laboratory Meeting Center in the Energy Innovation Laboratory at 775 University Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401. Thirty-one members of the ion beam community attended the workshop, including 15 ion beam facilities, six representatives of Office of Nuclear Energy R&D programs, an industry representative from EPRI and the chairs of the NSUF User’s Organization and the NSUF Scientific Review Board. Another four ion beam users were in attendance acting as advisors to the process, but did not participate in the options assessment. Three members of the sponsoring agency, the Office of Science and Technology Innovation (NE-4) also attended the workshop.« less

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Plemons, R.E.; Hopwood, W.H. Jr.; Hamilton, J.H.

For a number of years the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Laboratory has been analyzing coal predominately for the utilities department of the Y-12 Plant. All laboratory procedures, except a Leco sulfur method which used the Leco Instruction Manual as a reference, were written based on the ASTM coal analyses. Sulfur is analyzed at the present time by two methods, gravimetric and Leco. The laboratory has two major endeavors for monitoring the quality of its coal analyses. (1) A control program by the Plant Statistical Quality Control Department. Quality Control submits one sample for every nine samples submitted by the utilitiesmore » departments and the laboratory analyzes a control sample along with the utilities samples. (2) An exchange program with the DOE Coal Analysis Laboratory in Bruceton, Pennsylvania. The Y-12 Laboratory submits to the DOE Coal Laboratory, on even numbered months, a sample that Y-12 has analyzed. The DOE Coal Laboratory submits, on odd numbered months, one of their analyzed samples to the Y-12 Plant Laboratory to be analyzed. The results of these control and exchange programs are monitored not only by laboratory personnel, but also by Statistical Quality Control personnel who provide statistical evaluations. After analysis and reporting of results, all utilities samples are retained by the laboratory until the coal contracts have been settled. The utilities departments have responsibility for the initiation and preparation of the coal samples. The samples normally received by the laboratory have been ground to 4-mesh, reduced to 0.5-gallon quantities, and sealed in air-tight containers. Sample identification numbers and a Request for Analysis are generated by the utilities departments.« less

Commercial low-Btu coal-gasification plant. Feasibility study: General Refractories Company, Florence, Kentucky. Volume I. Project summary. [Wellman-Galusha

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

None

1981-11-01

In response to a 1980 Department of Energy solicitation, the General Refractories Company submitted a Proposal for a feasibility study of a low Btu gasification facility for its Florence, KY plant. The proposed facility would substitute low Btu gas from a fixed bed gasifier for natural gas now used in the manufacture of insulation board. The Proposal from General Refractories was prompted by a concern over the rising costs of natural gas, and the anticipation of a severe increase in fuel costs resulting from deregulation. The proposed feasibility study is defined. The intent is to provide General Refractories with themore » basis upon which to determine the feasibility of incorporating such a facility in Florence. To perform the work, a Grant for which was awarded by the DOE, General Refractories selected Dravo Engineers and Contractors based upon their qualifications in the field of coal conversion, and the fact that Dravo has acquired the rights to the Wellman-Galusha technology. The LBG prices for the five-gasifier case are encouraging. Given the various natural gas forecasts available, there seems to be a reasonable possibility that the five-gasifier LBG prices will break even with natural gas prices somewhere between 1984 and 1989. General Refractories recognizes that there are many uncertainties in developing these natural gas forecasts, and if the present natural gas decontrol plan is not fully implemented some financial risks occur in undertaking the proposed gasification facility. Because of this, General Refractories has decided to wait for more substantiating evidence that natural gas prices will rise as is now being predicted.« less

48 CFR 970.2672-1 - Policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... at a DOE Defense Nuclear Facility is necessary, DOE contractors and subcontractors at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities shall accomplish work force restructuring or displacement so as to mitigate social and... with the objectives of section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, 42...

48 CFR 970.2672-1 - Policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... at a DOE Defense Nuclear Facility is necessary, DOE contractors and subcontractors at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities shall accomplish work force restructuring or displacement so as to mitigate social and... with the objectives of section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, 42...

48 CFR 970.2672-1 - Policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... at a DOE Defense Nuclear Facility is necessary, DOE contractors and subcontractors at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities shall accomplish work force restructuring or displacement so as to mitigate social and... with the objectives of section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, 42...

48 CFR 970.2672-1 - Policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... at a DOE Defense Nuclear Facility is necessary, DOE contractors and subcontractors at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities shall accomplish work force restructuring or displacement so as to mitigate social and... with the objectives of section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, 42...

Guide of good practices for occupational radiological protection in plutonium facilities

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1998-06-01

This Technical Standard (TS) does not contain any new requirements. Its purpose is to provide guides to good practice, update existing reference material, and discuss practical lessons learned relevant to the safe handling of plutonium. the technical rationale is given to allow US Department of Energy (DOE) health physicists to adapt the recommendations to similar situations throughout the DOE complex. Generally, DOE contractor health physicists will be responsible to implement radiation protection activities at DOE facilities and DOE health physicists will be responsible for oversight of those activities. This guidance is meant to be useful for both efforts. This TSmore » replaces PNL-6534, Health Physics Manual of Good Practices for Plutonium Facilities, by providing more complete and current information and by emphasizing the situations that are typical of DOE`s current plutonium operations; safe storage, decontamination, and decommissioning (environmental restoration); and weapons disassembly.« less

THE NGA-DOE GRANT TO EXAMINE CRITICAL ISSUES RELATED TO RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MATERIALS DISPOSITION INVOLVING DOE FACILITIES

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1998-07-01

Through the National Governors' Association (NGA) project ''Critical Issues Related to Radioactive Waste and Materials Disposition Involving DOE Facilities'' NGA brings together Governors' policy advisors, state regulators, and DOE officials to examine critical issues related to the cleanup and operation of DOE nuclear weapons and research facilities. Topics explored through this project include: Decisions involving disposal of mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and disposition of nuclear materials. Decisions involving DOE budget requests and their effect on environmental cleanup and compliance at DOE facilities. Strategies to treat mixed, low-level, and transuranic (TRU) waste and their effect on individual sites inmore » the complex. Changes to the FFCA site treatment plans as a result of proposals in DOE's Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure strategy and contractor integration analysis. Interstate waste and materials shipments. Reforms to existing RCRA and CERCLA regulations/guidance to address regulatory overlap and risks posed by DOE wastes. The overarching theme of this project is to help the Department improve coordination of its major program decisions with Governors' offices and state regulators and to ensure such decisions reflect input from these key state officials and stakeholders. This report summarizes activities conducted during the quarter from April 30, 1998 through June 30, 1998 under the NGA project. The work accomplished by the NGA project team during the past four months can be categorized as follows: maintained open communication with DOE on a variety of activities and issues within the DOE environmental management complex; and provided ongoing support to state-DOE interactions. maintained communication with NGA Federal Facilities Compliance Task Force members regarding DOE efforts to formulate a configuration for mixed low-level waste and low-level treatment and disposal, DOE's Environmental Management Budget, and DOE's proposed Intersite Discussions.« less

47 CFR 1.981 - Reports, annual and semiannual.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... Random Selection Wireless Radio Services Applications and Proceedings Reports to Be Filed with the... agreements with other persons for the cooperative use of radio station facilities must submit annually an...

78 FR 16692 - Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS)

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-03-18

... Protection (IP), Infrastructure Security Compliance Division (ISCD) will submit the following Information... submissions of responses. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CFATS Program Manager, DHS/NPPD/IP/ ISCD, [email protected

EPCRA Sections 311-312

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act hazardous chemical storage reporting requirements. Facilities must maintain a material safety data sheet (MSDS) and inventory to submit to their SERC, LEPC, and local fire department.

Annual report for Brookhaven National Laboratory 1994 epidemiologic surveillance

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1997-01-01

Epidemiologic surveillance at DOE facilities consists of regular and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on absences due to illness and injury in the work force. Its purpose is to provide an early warning system for health problems occurring among employees at participating sites. Data are collected by coordinators at each site and submitted to the Epidemiologic Surveillance Data Center, located at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, where quality control procedures and analyses are carried out. Rates of absences and rates of diagnoses associated with absences are analyzed by occupation and other relevant variables. They maymore » be compared with the disease experience of different groups within the DOE work force and with populations that do not work for DOE to identify disease patterns or clusters that may be associated with work activities. In this annual report, the 1994 morbidity data for BNL are summarized. These analyses focus on absences of 5 or more consecutive workdays occurring among workers aged 16-80 years. They are arranged in five sets of tables that present: (1) the distribution of the labor force by occupational category and salary status; (2) the absences per person, diagnoses per absence, and diagnosis rates for the whole work force; (3) diagnosis rates by type of disease or injury; (4) diagnosis rates by occupational category; and (5) relative risks for specific types of disease or injury by occupational category.« less

Natural phenomena hazards design and evaluation criteria for Department of Energy Facilities

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1996-01-01

The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued an Order 420.1 which establishes policy for its facilities in the event of natural phenomena hazards (NPH) along with associated NPH mitigation requirements. This DOE Standard gives design and evaluation criteria for NPH effects as guidance for implementing the NPH mitigation requirements of DOE Order 420.1 and the associated implementation Guides. These are intended to be consistent design and evaluation criteria for protection against natural phenomena hazards at DOE sites throughout the United States. The goal of these criteria is to assure that DOE facilities can withstand the effects of natural phenomena suchmore » as earthquakes, extreme winds, tornadoes, and flooding. These criteria apply to the design of new facilities and the evaluation of existing facilities. They may also be used for modification and upgrading of existing facilities as appropriate. The design and evaluation criteria presented herein control the level of conservatism introduced in the design/evaluation process such that earthquake, wind, and flood hazards are treated on a consistent basis. These criteria also employ a graded approach to ensure that the level of conservatism and rigor in design/evaluation is appropriate for facility characteristics such as importance, hazards to people on and off site, and threat to the environment. For each natural phenomena hazard covered, these criteria consist of the following: Performance Categories and target performance goals as specified in the DOE Order 420.1 NPH Implementation Guide, and DOE-STD-1 021; specified probability levels from which natural phenomena hazard loading on structures, equipment, and systems is developed; and design and evaluation procedures to evaluate response to NPH loads and criteria to assess whether or not computed response is permissible.« less

Guide for Determining Compliance With the Clean Air Act Standards for Radionuclide Emissions From NRC-Licensed and Non-DOE Federal Facilities: Revision 2

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

The requirements described apply to certain facilities licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) or its Agreement States to handle radioactive materials. Federal facilities not part of the Department of Energy (DOE) are also covered.

10 CFR 770.2 - What real property does this part cover?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

....2 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC... sale or lease at closed or downsized defense nuclear facilities, for the purpose of permitting economic development. (b) DOE may transfer, by lease only, improvements at defense nuclear facilities on land withdrawn...

10 CFR 770.2 - What real property does this part cover?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

....2 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FOR ECONOMIC... sale or lease at defense nuclear facilities, for the purpose of permitting economic development. (b) DOE may transfer, by lease only, improvements at defense nuclear facilities on land withdrawn from the...

30 CFR 553.10 - What facilities does this part cover?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What facilities does this part cover? 553.10 Section 553.10 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Applicability and Amount of OSFR § 553.10...

30 CFR 553.10 - What facilities does this part cover?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What facilities does this part cover? 553.10 Section 553.10 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Applicability and Amount of OSFR § 553.10...

30 CFR 553.10 - What facilities does this part cover?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What facilities does this part cover? 553.10 Section 553.10 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE OIL SPILL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES Applicability and Amount of OSFR § 553.10...

Progress on plutonium stabilization

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Hurt, D.

1996-05-01

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has safety oversight responsibility for most of the facilities where unstable forms of plutonium are being processed and packaged for interim storage. The Board has issued recommendations on plutonium stabilization and has has a considerable influence on DOE`s stabilization schedules and priorities. The Board has not made any recommendations on long-term plutonium disposition, although it may get more involved in the future if DOE develops plans to use defense nuclear facilities for disposition activities.

40 CFR 125.86 - As an owner or operator of a new facility, what must I collect and submit when I apply for my new...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... additional chemical, water quality, and other anthropogenic stresses on the source waterbody. (B) Evaluation... 125.86 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS CRITERIA... Cooling Water Intake Structures for New Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Act § 125.86 As an owner or...

40 CFR 125.86 - As an owner or operator of a new facility, what must I collect and submit when I apply for my new...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... additional chemical, water quality, and other anthropogenic stresses on the source waterbody. (B) Evaluation... 125.86 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS CRITERIA... Cooling Water Intake Structures for New Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Act § 125.86 As an owner or...

Drafting Recommendations for a Shared Statewide High-Density Storage Facility: Experiences with the State University Libraries of Florida Proposal

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Walker, Ben

2008-01-01

In August 2007, an $11.2 million proposal for a shared statewide high-density storage facility was submitted to the Board of Governors, the governing body of the State University System in Florida. The project was subsequently approved at a slightly lower level and funding was delayed until 2010/2011. The experiences of coordinating data…

Nuclear facility decommissioning and site remedial actions: A selected bibliography, Volume 18. Part 1B: Citations with abstracts, sections 10 through 16

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

NONE

1997-09-01

This bibliography contains 3,638 citations with abstracts of documents relevant to environmental restoration, nuclear facility decontamination and decommissioning (D and D), uranium mill tailings management, and site remedial actions. The bibliography contains scientific, technical, financial, and regulatory information that pertains to DOE environmental restoration programs. The citations are separated by topic into 16 sections, including (1) DOE Environmental Restoration Program; (2) DOE D and D Program; (3) Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning; (4) DOE Formerly Utilized sites Remedial Action Program; (5) NORM-Contaminated Site Restoration; (6) DOE Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project; (7) Uranium Mill Tailings Management; (8) DOE Site-Wide Remedial Actions;more » (9) DOE Onsite Remedial Action Projects; (10) Contaminated Site Remedial Actions; (11) DOE Underground Storage Tank Remediation; (12) DOE Technology Development, Demonstration, and Evaluation; (13) Soil Remediation; (14) Groundwater Remediation; (15) Environmental Measurements, Analysis, and Decision-Making; and (16) Environmental Management Issues.« less

33 CFR 146.405 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for vessels arriving at a place on the OCS.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... pursuant to the laws on vessel entry (19 U.S.C. 1434) and clearance (46 U.S.C. 60105). Vessel owners and... or operator of that vessel must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise and re-submit an NOA for the...

33 CFR 146.405 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for vessels arriving at a place on the OCS.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... pursuant to the laws on vessel entry (19 U.S.C. 1434) and clearance (46 U.S.C. 60105). Vessel owners and... or operator of that vessel must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise and re-submit an NOA for the...

33 CFR 146.405 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for vessels arriving at a place on the OCS.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... or operator of that vessel must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise and re-submit an NOA for the... site at http://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/. (e) Required reporting time of an NOA update. The owner or operator...

33 CFR 146.405 - Safety and Security notice of arrival for vessels arriving at a place on the OCS.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... or operator of that vessel must revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise and re-submit an NOA for the... site at http://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/. (e) Required reporting time of an NOA update. The owner or operator...