Sample records for facilities neshaps limits
-
Scofield, Patricia A.; Smith, Linda Lenell; Johnson, David N.
2017-07-01
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated national emission standards for emissions of radionuclides other than radon from US Department of Energy facilities in Chapter 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 61, Subpart H. This regulatory standard limits the annual effective dose that any member of the public can receive from Department of Energy facilities to 0.1 mSv. As defined in the preamble of the final rule, all of the facilities on the Oak Ridge Reservation, i.e., the Y–12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, East Tennessee Technology Park, and any other U.S. Department of Energy operations onmore » Oak Ridge Reservation, combined, must meet the annual dose limit of 0.1 mSv. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, there are monitored sources and numerous unmonitored sources. To maintain radiological source and inventory information for these unmonitored sources, e.g., laboratory hoods, equipment exhausts, and room exhausts not currently venting to monitored stacks on the Oak Ridge National Laboratory campus, the Environmental Protection Rad NESHAPs Inventory Web Database was developed. This database is updated annually and is used to compile emissions data for the annual Radionuclide National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Rad NESHAPs) report required by 40 CFR 61.94. It also provides supporting documentation for facility compliance audits. In addition, a Rad NESHAPs source and dose database was developed to import the source and dose summary data from Clean Air Act Assessment Package—1988 computer model files. As a result, this database provides Oak Ridge Reservation and facility-specific source inventory; doses associated with each source and facility; and total doses for the Oak Ridge Reservation dose.« less
-
Scofield, Patricia A; Smith, Linda L; Johnson, David N
2017-07-01
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated national emission standards for emissions of radionuclides other than radon from US Department of Energy facilities in Chapter 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 61, Subpart H. This regulatory standard limits the annual effective dose that any member of the public can receive from Department of Energy facilities to 0.1 mSv. As defined in the preamble of the final rule, all of the facilities on the Oak Ridge Reservation, i.e., the Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, East Tennessee Technology Park, and any other U.S. Department of Energy operations on Oak Ridge Reservation, combined, must meet the annual dose limit of 0.1 mSv. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, there are monitored sources and numerous unmonitored sources. To maintain radiological source and inventory information for these unmonitored sources, e.g., laboratory hoods, equipment exhausts, and room exhausts not currently venting to monitored stacks on the Oak Ridge National Laboratory campus, the Environmental Protection Rad NESHAPs Inventory Web Database was developed. This database is updated annually and is used to compile emissions data for the annual Radionuclide National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Rad NESHAPs) report required by 40 CFR 61.94. It also provides supporting documentation for facility compliance audits. In addition, a Rad NESHAPs source and dose database was developed to import the source and dose summary data from Clean Air Act Assessment Package-1988 computer model files. This database provides Oak Ridge Reservation and facility-specific source inventory; doses associated with each source and facility; and total doses for the Oak Ridge Reservation dose.
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Scofield, Patricia A.; Smith, Linda Lenell; Johnson, David N.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated national emission standards for emissions of radionuclides other than radon from US Department of Energy facilities in Chapter 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 61, Subpart H. This regulatory standard limits the annual effective dose that any member of the public can receive from Department of Energy facilities to 0.1 mSv. As defined in the preamble of the final rule, all of the facilities on the Oak Ridge Reservation, i.e., the Y–12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, East Tennessee Technology Park, and any other U.S. Department of Energy operations onmore » Oak Ridge Reservation, combined, must meet the annual dose limit of 0.1 mSv. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, there are monitored sources and numerous unmonitored sources. To maintain radiological source and inventory information for these unmonitored sources, e.g., laboratory hoods, equipment exhausts, and room exhausts not currently venting to monitored stacks on the Oak Ridge National Laboratory campus, the Environmental Protection Rad NESHAPs Inventory Web Database was developed. This database is updated annually and is used to compile emissions data for the annual Radionuclide National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Rad NESHAPs) report required by 40 CFR 61.94. It also provides supporting documentation for facility compliance audits. In addition, a Rad NESHAPs source and dose database was developed to import the source and dose summary data from Clean Air Act Assessment Package—1988 computer model files. As a result, this database provides Oak Ridge Reservation and facility-specific source inventory; doses associated with each source and facility; and total doses for the Oak Ridge Reservation dose.« less
-
LLNL NESHAPs 2015 Annual Report - June 2016
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Wilson, K. R.; Gallegos, G. M.; MacQueen, D. H.
2016-06-01
Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC operates facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in which radionuclides are handled and stored. These facilities are subject to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart H, which regulates radionuclide emissions to air from Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. Specifically, NESHAPs limits the emission of radionuclides to the ambient air to levels resulting in an annual effective dose equivalent of 10 mrem (100 μSv) to any member of the public. Using measured and calculated emissions, andmore » building-specific and common parameters, LLNL personnel applied the EPA-approved computer code, CAP88-PC, Version 4.0.1.17, to calculate the dose to the maximally exposed individual member of the public for the Livermore Site and Site 300.« less
-
Benzene waste operations NESHAP. Waiver guidance document
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1993-01-01
Subpart FF of 40 CFR Part 61 addresses benzene emissions from waste operations at petroleum refineries, chemical manufacturing plants, coke by-product plants, and waste management units that manage wastes from these facilities. Subpart FF, also known as the benzene waste operations national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP), was amended and published in the Federal Register on January 7, 1993. Facilities unable to comply with the NESHAP by April 7, 1993, may apply for a waiver of compliance for a period that shall not extend beyond January 7, 1995. As a condition of the waiver, facilities will be requiredmore » to mitigate benzene air emissions that result from the delay in compliance with the NESHAP. The document outlines the goals and objectives of the benzene waste NESHAP waiver policy, and provides guidance for preparing, reviewing and evaluating waiver requests.« less
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-11
... (Non-Gasoline) Facilities (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice...), ``NESHAP for Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEEE) (Renewal...
-
Find regulatory information regarding the NESHAP for Aerospace manufacturing and rework facilities. This page contains the rule summary, rule history, and related rules and additional resources for this standard.
-
Learn about the NESHAP for ethylene oxide emissions for sterilization facilities. Find the rule history information, federal register citations, legal authority, and related rules as well as a rule summary.
-
This page contains a November 1994 fact sheet for the final NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution Facilities. This page also contains a December fact sheet with information regarding the final amendments to the 2003 final rule for the NESHAP.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-22
... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution Facilities... Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution... semiannually at a minimum. Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Owners or operators of gasoline...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-12
... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Plywood and Composite Products... Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Plywood and Composite... Composite Products covers both new and existing plywood and composite wood products (PCWP) facilities...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-28
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk Plants, Pipeline Facilities and Gasoline Dispensing Facilities AGENCY: Environmental... http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk Plants...
-
This page contains a January 2007 fact sheet for the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities. This document provides a summary of the 2007 final rule.
-
This February 2003 document contains a diagram of dates and events for compliance with the NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating. Also on this page is an April 2004 flow chart to determine if the NESHAP applies to your facility.
-
40 CFR 62.3625 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS Indiana Fluoride.... “Fluoride Emission Limitations for Existing Primary Aluminum Plants.” (b) The plan was officially submitted... Federal NESHAP for controlling fluoride emissions from primary aluminum reduction plants promulgated on...
-
40 CFR 62.3625 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS Indiana Fluoride.... “Fluoride Emission Limitations for Existing Primary Aluminum Plants.” (b) The plan was officially submitted... Federal NESHAP for controlling fluoride emissions from primary aluminum reduction plants promulgated on...
-
National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) from facilities that manufacture pharmaceutical products. Includes rule history, Federal Register citations, implementation and compliance information, and additional resources.
-
Correspondence about the Applicability of Asbestos NESHAP to Residential Demolition Projects
These correspondence about the asbestos NESHAP provide clarification on some demolition concerns such as the definition of a facility, the definition of site, and ownership applicability for renovations conducted on buildings after resale.
-
This NESHAP applies to facilities using pressure or thermal treatment processes involving wood preservatives containing chromium, arsenic, dioxins, or methylene chloride. Page includes rule summary, rule history and additional documents.
-
This March 2003 document contains three diagrams that that are intended to assist you in determining whether you own or operate any equipment that is subject to the NESHAP for Secondary Aluminum Production Facilities.
-
This NESHAP applies to facilities using pressure or thermal treatment processes involving wood preservatives containing chromium, arsenic, dioxins, or methylene chloride. Inlcudes federal register citations, rule history and additional resources.
-
This document contains a September 2001 list of sources potentially subject to the secondary aluminum production national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP). This list does not include auto salvage i.e. sweat furnaces.
-
This summary of implementation requirements document for the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework facilties NESHAP was originally prepared in August 1997, but it was updated in January 2001 with a new amendments update.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-22
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Metal Furniture Surface... further information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Metal... disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Metal furniture surface coating facilities...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Primary Magnesium Refining... information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Primary Magnesium...: Owners or operators of primary magnesium refining facilities. Estimated Number of Respondents: 1...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Chemical Preparations... information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Chemical Preparations.../Affected Entities: Owners or operators of area source chemical preparation facilities. Estimated Number of...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Printing and Publishing... information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Printing and Publishing...: Owners and operators of printing and publishing facilities. Estimated Number of Respondents: 352...
-
This page contains a July 2008 document that has flow charts to help determine if this National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) rule for Nine metal Fabrication and Finishing Area Source Categories applies to your facility.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-05-14
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Asbestos (Renewal). AGENCY... information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Asbestos (Renewal) ICR... operators of demolition and renovation of facilities; the disposal of asbestos waste; asbestos milling...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-08
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Beryllium Rocket Motor... . Title: NESHAP for Beryllium Rocket Motor Fuel Firing (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1125.06, OMB...: Owners or operators of beryllium rocket motor fuel firing facilities. Estimated Number of Respondents: 1...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-04-24
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Site Remediation (Renewal...: NESHAP for Site Remediation (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2062.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0534.... Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operator of site remediation facilities. Estimated Number of...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-08
... acknowledging that West Virginia's delegation of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and NSPS had been... regulated facilities and the public of West Virginia's updated delegation of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and NSPS, EPA is making available a copy of EPA's letter to West Virginia through this...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-09
.... Title: NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number.... Title: NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCL Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (40... Engine Test Cells/Stands (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPPP); Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance...
-
Steel Pickling Inspection Checklist
Checklist to establish whether a facility or operations within a facility are subject to and are in compliance with 40 C.F.R Part 63 Subpart CCC (Steel Pickling—HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants NESHAP).
-
Fact Sheet for Friction Materials Manufacturing Facilities Residual Risk and Technology Review
proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Friction Materials Manufacturing Facilities to address the results of the residual risk and technology review
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-25
... Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection...: NESHAP for Steel Pickling, HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants (Renewal...: Steel pickling, HCl process facilities and hydrochloric acid regeneration plants. Estimated Number of...
-
Radiological NESHAP ANNUAL REPORT CY 2016.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Evelo, Stacie
2017-06-01
This report provides a summary of the radionuclide releases from the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration facilities at Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) during Calendar Year (CY) 2016, including the data, calculations, and supporting documentation for demonstrating compliance with 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 61, Subpart H--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR EMISSIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN RADON FROM DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES (Radiological NESHAP). A description is given of the sources and their contributions to the overall dose assessment. In addition, the maximally exposed individual (MEI) radiological dose calculation and the population dosemore » to local and regional residents are discussed.« less
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-14
... gasoline dispensing facilities more stringent by applying them statewide, making the rule applicable to... Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for gasoline dispensing facilities. The revisions... January 10, 2008, EPA issued new, more stringent National Regulations for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities...
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NSTec Ecological and Environmental Monitoring
2011-06-30
The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office operates the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly the Nevada Test Site) and North Las Vegas Facility (NLVF). From 1951 through 1992, the NNSS was the continental testing location for U.S. nuclear weapons. The release of radionuclides from NNSS activities has been monitored since the initiation of atmospheric testing. Limitation to underground detonations after 1962 greatly reduced radiation exposure to the public surrounding the NNSS. After nuclear testing ended in 1992, NNSS radiation monitoring focused on detecting airborne radionuclides from historically contaminated soils. These radionuclides are derived frommore » re-suspension of soil (primarily by wind) and emission of tritium-contaminated soil moisture through evapotranspiration. Low amounts of tritium are also emitted to air at the NLVF, an NNSS support complex in North Las Vegas. To protect the public from harmful levels of man-made radiation, the Clean Air Act, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 61 Subpart H) (CFR, 2010a) limits the release of radioactivity from a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facility to that which would cause 10 millirem per year (mrem/yr) effective dose equivalent to any member of the public. This limit does not include radiation unrelated to NNSS activities. Unrelated doses could come from naturally occurring radioactive elements, from sources such as medically or commercially used radionuclides, or from sources outside of the United States, such as those from the damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan. Because this report is intended to discuss radioactive air emissions during calendar year 2010, data on radionuclides in air from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear power plant releases are not presented but will be included in the report for calendar year 2011. The NNSS demonstrates compliance with the NESHAP limit by using environmental measurements of radionuclide air concentrations at critical receptor locations (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] and DOE, 1995). This method was approved by the EPA for use on the NNSS in 2001(EPA, 2001a) and has been the sole method used since 2005. Six locations on the NNSS have been established to act as critical receptor locations to demonstrate compliance with the NESHAP limit. These locations are actually pseudo-critical receptor stations, because no member of the public actually resides at these onsite locations. Compliance is demonstrated if the measured annual average concentration is less than the NESHAP Concentration Levels (CLs) for Environmental Compliance listed in 40 CFR 61, Appendix E, Table 2 (CFR, 2010a). For multiple radionuclides, compliance is demonstrated when the sum of the fractions (determined by dividing each radionuclide's concentration by its CL and then adding the fractions together) is less than 1.0. In 2010, the potential dose from radiological emissions to air, resulting from both current and past NNSS activities, at onsite compliance monitoring stations was well below the 10 mrem/yr dose limit. Air sampling data collected at all air monitoring stations had average concentrations of radioactivity that were a fraction of the CL values. Concentrations ranged from less than 1 percent to a maximum of 17 percent of the allowed NESHAP limit. Because the nearest member of the public resides about 20 kilometers from potential release points on the NNSS, dose to the public would be only a small fraction of that measured on the NNSS. The potential dose to the public from NLVF emissions was also very low at 0.000032 mrem/yr, more than 300,000 times lower than the 10 mrem/yr limit.« less
-
Fact Sheet summarizing the main points of the national emssions standard for hazaradous air pollutants (NESHAP) for Steel Pickling— HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants as promulgated on June 22, 1999.
-
This page contains a May 1999 fact sheet for the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Petroleum Refineries. This document provides a summary of the 1999 final rule.
-
Water and Sewage Utilities Sector (NAICS 2213)
Environmental regulation information for water utilities, including drinking and wastewater treatment facilities. Includes links to NESHAP for POTW, compliance information, and information about pretreatment programs.
-
Transportation and Warehousing Sector (NAICS 48-49)
Find EPA regulatory information for the transportation and warehousing, including NESHAPs for RICE and gasoline dispensing facilities, effluent guidelines, power wash discharges, and border and port compliance
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1990-06-01
There appears to be no compelling public health protection reason for EPA`s promulgation of NESHAP regulations to control air emissions of radioactive materials from NRC-licensed facilities engaged in activities associated with the practice and development of nuclear medicine. The NRC`s existing regulations provide the necessary controls for protection and EPA`s regulations would only add burdensome reporting requirements at substantial cost to medical treatment and diagnosis. Availability of nuclear medicine practice could be impacted and advancements through research delayed.
-
40 CFR 63.7180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Semiconductor Manufacturing What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for semiconductor manufacturing facilities. This...
-
40 CFR 63.7180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Semiconductor Manufacturing What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for semiconductor manufacturing facilities. This...
-
This document is a copy of the Federal Register publication of the September 22, 1993 Final Rule for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories: Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-14
...This action proposes amendments to the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for mercury emissions from mercury cell chlor-alkali plants (Mercury Cell NESHAP). On June 11, 2008, EPA proposed amendments to this NESHAP in response to a petition for reconsideration filed by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). This action is a supplement to the June 11, 2008, proposal. Specifically, this action proposes two options for amending the NESHAP for mercury emissions from mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. The first option would require the elimination of mercury emissions and thus encourage the conversion to non-mercury technology. The second option would require the measures proposed in 2008. These measures, which included significant improvements in the work practices to reduce fugitive emissions from the cell room, would result in near-zero levels of mercury emissions while still allowing the mercury cell facilities to continue to operate. We are specifically requesting comment on which of these options is more appropriate, and may finalize either option or a combination of elements from them. In addition, this action proposes several amendments that would apply regardless of which option we select. These proposed amendments are provisions of the existing NESHAP that would apply to periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM), and corrections to compliance errors in the currently effective rule.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-13
... Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving (Renewal... Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication, Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing, and Wood Preserving (40 CFR Part... battery manufacturing facilities, and 393 existing wood preserving facilities. The total annual responses...
-
Secondary Aluminum Production: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for new and existing sources at secondary aluminum production facilities. Includes rule history, summary, federal register citations and implementation information.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-13
... Rework Facilities (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The... Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GG) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1687.09, OMB Control... are owners or operators of aerospace manufacturing and rework operations. Respondents must submit one...
-
76 FR 68747 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-07
... Polymeric Coating of Supporting Substrates Facilities; 40 CFR part 60, subparts A and VVV; was approved on....10; Oil Pollution Act Facility Response Plans (Renewal); 40 CFR 112.20 and 112.21; was approved on 10... comment on 10/25/2011. EPA ICR Number 2439.01; NESHAP for Natural Gas Transmission and Storage; in 40 CFR...
-
This page contains a February 2003 fact sheet with information regarding the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing.
-
How EPA's Asbestos Regulations Apply to Municipal Demolition Activities
Memos about the Asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants provide clarification on demolition concerns such as the definition of a facility, and the applicability of asbestos NESHAP to structures demolished by municipal entities.
-
77 FR 13150 - Notice of Lodging of Third Amendment to Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-05
... adopt facility-wide enhanced benzene waste monitoring and fugitive emission control programs..., $98,500, and $21,000 to resolve alleged Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP (``BWON'') violations at its...
-
This January 2004 document contains 14 diagrams illustrating the different compliance options available for those facilities that fall under the Paper and Web Coating Maximum Achievable control Technology (MACT).
-
This page contains a November 2009 fact sheet with information regarding the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Area Sources of Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing.
-
40 CFR 63.8680 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for existing and new asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities. This subpart also establishes requirements to...
-
40 CFR 63.8680 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for existing and new asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities. This subpart also establishes requirements to...
-
40 CFR 63.8680 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for existing and new asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities. This subpart also establishes requirements to...
-
40 CFR 63.8680 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for existing and new asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities. This subpart also establishes requirements to...
-
40 CFR 63.8680 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for existing and new asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities. This subpart also establishes requirements to...
-
MEMBRANE-MEDIATED EXTRACTION AND BIODEGRADATION OF VOCS FROM AIR
The paper discusses a project designed to evaluate the feasibility of using a membrane-supported extraction and biotreatment process to meet the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for aircraft painting and depainting facilities. The proposed system...
-
This page contains November 1994 and November 1999 fact sheets with information regarding the Final Ethylene Oxide Emissions Standards for Sterilization Facilities. These documents contain answers to common questions for this NESHAP
-
40 CFR 63.4881 - Am I subject to this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... themselves: household, office, institutional, laboratory, hospital, public building, restaurant, barber and... conducted in an operation that is subject to the wood furniture manufacturing NESHAP in subpart JJ of this... janitorial, building, and facility maintenance operations. (4) Surface coating of only small items such as...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-25
... Composites Production (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In...: NESHAP for Reinforced Plastic Composites Production (Renewal) ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1976.05, OMB...: Owners or operators of reinforced plastic composites production facilities. Estimated Number of...
-
Joint EPA/NASA/USAF Interagency Depainting Study
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Clark-Ingram, M.
2001-01-01
Environmental regulations such as National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) are drivers for the implementation of environmentally compliant methodologies in the manufacture of aerospace hardware. In 1995, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the NESHAP for the Aerospace Manufacture and Rework (Aerospace NESHAP) industry. Affected facilities were to be in compliance by September 1998. Several aerospace manufacturing operations are regulated within the Aerospace NESHAP including Depainting operations. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), EPA, and United States Air Force (USAF) combined resources to evaluate the performance of nine alternative depainting processes. The seven alternative depainting processes were: (1) Chemical stripping (non-methylene chloride); (2) Carbon Dioxide Blasting; (3) Xenon Flashlamp; (4) Carbon Dioxide Laser Stripping; (5) Plastic Media Blasting; (6) Sodium Bicarbonate Wet Stripping; and (7) Waterjet Blasting and Wheat Starch Blasting. All epoxy primer and polyurethane top coat system was applied to 2024-T3 clad and non-clad aluminum test specimens. Approximately 200 test specimens were evaluated in this study. Each coupon was subjected to three, four, or five complete depainting cycles. This paper discusses the conclusions from the study including the test protocol, test parameters, and achievable strip rates for the alternative depainting processes. Test data includes immersion corrosion testing, sandwich corrosion testing and hydrogen embrittlement testing for the non-methylene chloride chemical strippers. Additionally, the cumulative effect of the alternative depainting processes on the metallurgical integrity of the test substrate is addressed with the results from tensile and fatigue evaluations.
-
On December 20, 2002, the EPA proposed national emission standards for HAP emissions from lime manufacturing plants located at major source facilities (67 FR 78046). Summaries of the comments, and the EPA's responses, are presented in this BID.
-
This document is a copy of the Federal Register publication of the November 20, 1990 Final Rule of Asbestos National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Revision for the Asbestos NESHAP.
-
Pollution prevention and the use of low-VOC/HAP coatings at wood furniture manufacturing facilities
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Marshall, A.M.; Spaight, J.L.; Jones, J.W.
1999-10-01
Midwest Research Institute, under a cooperative agreement with the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division of the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA`s) National Risk Management Research Laboratory, is conducting a study to identify wood furniture and cabinet manufacturing facilities that have converted to low-volatile organic compound/hazardous air pollutant (VOC/HAP) coatings and to develop case studies for those facilities. This paper discusses the progress of the project and pollution prevention options at wood furniture manufacturing facilities and the regulatory requirements (e.g., the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations) that these facilities face.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-08
... electroplating and anodizing facilities and proposes revisions to the NESHAP based on those reviews. This action...; and email address: [email protected] . For specific information regarding the risk modeling... based on our technology review? B. What are the results of the risk assessment? C. What are our proposed...
-
40 CFR 63.8985 - Am I subject to this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... concentration of 30 weight percent or greater. (1) An HCl production facility is the collection of unit... subpart if it is also subject to NESHAP under one of the subparts listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section. (1) 40 CFR part 63, subpart S, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-06
... Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUU) (Renewal... part 63, subpart UUU. Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit initial notification... petroleum refineries. Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU). Estimated...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-10
... Virginia) a letter acknowledging that West Virginia's delegation of authority to implement and enforce... regulated facilities and the public of West Virginia's updated delegation of authority to implement and enforce NESHAP and NSPS, EPA is making available a copy of EPA's letter to West Virginia through this...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-21
... Creek In-Situ Recovery Project. The holding ponds at the Lost Creek facility are subject to 40 CFR part... in 2011 by EPA Region 8 for the construction or modification of sources subject to the Radionuclide... Provisions to the Radionuclide NESHAP in 40 CFR part 61, subpart A, require a source owner or operator to...
-
78 FR 31315 - Kraft Pulp Mills NSPS Review
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-23
... furnaces to levels equivalent to the new source PM limits in the NESHAP for chemical recovery combustion... will enable a broader understanding of condensable PM emissions from pulp and paper combustion sources... for 0.5 seconds (no ppmdv limit). 2. Use non-combustion control device with a limit of 5 ppmdv. 3. It...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-11
... Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (Renewal... Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR... required semiannually. Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Lime manufacturing plants...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-24
... Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for the Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins AGENCY: Environmental... . Title: NESHAP for the Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1869.... Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Manufacture of...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-05
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Printing and Publishing....regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Printing and Publishing Industry (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number.... Abstract: The National Emission Standards of Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing and Publishing...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-05
... Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Plywood and Composite Products (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental... . Title: NESHAP for Plywood and Composite Products (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1984.04, OMB... National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Plywood and Composite Products were...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Friction Materials... information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Friction... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Friction Materials Manufacturing were proposed on...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-11
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Pesticide Active... . Title: NESHAP for Pesticide Active Ingredient Production (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1807.05... Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Pesticide Active Ingredient Production were proposed on November 10, 1997...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-04
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Polyether Polyols... electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Polyether Polyols Production (Renewal). ICR... Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Polyether Polyols Production (40 CFR part 63 subpart PPP) were...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-05
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Municipal Solid Waste... electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (Renewal... Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills were...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-22
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries... electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries (Renewal). ICR Numbers.... Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Petroleum Refineries...
-
NESHAP Annual Report for CY 2015 Sandia National Laboratories Tonopah Test Range
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Evelo, Stacie
2016-05-01
This National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Annual Report has been prepared in a format to comply with the reporting requirements of 40 CFR 61.94 and the April 5, 1995 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). According to the EPA approved NESHAP Monitoring Plan for the Tonopah Test Range (TTR), 40 CFR 61, subpart H, and the MOA, no additional monitoring or measurements are required at TTR in order to demonstrate compliance with the NESHAP regulation.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating... electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (Renewal... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants were proposed on July...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-08
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Epoxy Resin and Non- Nylon....gov . Title: NESHAP for Epoxy Resin and Non-Nylon Polyamide Production (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR.... Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Epoxy Resin and Non...
-
This page contains the August 2002 final rule fact sheet on the NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating. Also on this page is an April 2004 presentation that on the NESHAP, designed to be used for basic education
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-28
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Automobile and Light- Duty... electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Automobile and Light-duty Truck... Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Automobile and Light-duty Truck Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-30
... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Automobile and Light-duty Truck... Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Automobile... semiannually at a minimum. Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Owners or operators of automobile...
-
The Asbestos NESHAP (National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants) requires the removal of all Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) prior to the demolition of the buildings that fall under the auspices of the NESHAP. This removal process can be a costly and ti...
-
Minter, Kelsey M; Jannik, G Timothy; Stagich, Brooke H; Dixon, Kenneth L; Newton, Joseph R
2018-04-01
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the model CAP88 to estimate the total effective dose (TED) to an offsite maximally exposed individual (MEI) for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 61, Subpart H: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. For NESHAP compliance at the Savannah River Site (SRS), the EPA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), South Carolina's Department of Health and Environmental Control, and SRS approved a dose assessment method in 1991 that models all radiological emissions as if originating from a generalized center of site (COS) location at two allowable stack heights (0 m and 61 m). However, due to changes in SRS missions, radiological emissions are no longer evenly distributed about the COS. An area-specific simulation of the 2015 SRS radiological airborne emissions was conducted to compare to the current COS method. The results produced a slightly higher dose estimate (2.97 × 10 mSv vs. 2.22 × 10 mSv), marginally changed the overall MEI location, and noted that H-Area tritium emissions dominated the dose. Thus, an H-Area dose model was executed as a potential simplification of the area-specific simulation by adopting the COS methodology and modeling all site emissions from a single location in H-Area using six stack heights that reference stacks specific to the tritium production facilities within H-Area. This "H-Area Tritium Stacks" method produced a small increase in TED estimates (3.03 × 10 mSv vs. 2.97 × 10 mSv) when compared to the area-specific simulation. This suggests that the current COS method is still appropriate for demonstrating compliance with NESHAP regulations but that changing to the H-Area Tritium Stacks assessment method may now be a more appropriate representation of operations at SRS.
-
This January 2005 document contains a diagram of dates and events for compliance with the NESHAP for surface coating of wood building products. Also on this page is a January 2005 document with flow charts to demonstrate compliance options for the NESHAP
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Primary Copper Smelters... information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Primary Copper... Pollutants (NESHAP) for Primary Copper Smelters were proposed on April 20, 1998 (63 FR 19582), and on June 26...
-
75 FR 68354 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-05
....04; NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and KKKK; was... Number 1966.04; NESHAP for Boat Manufacturing; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and VVVV; was approved on 10/01... 1801.09; NESHAP for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and LLL; was...
-
76 FR 56708 - Ohio: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-14
.... January 4, 1989, 54 FR 246.... NESHAPS: Final Standards for May 14, 2001, 66 FR 24270..... OAC 3745-50-41...; Checklist 188.1. NESHAPS: Interim Standards for February 13, 2002, 67 FR 6792. OAC 3745-50-44; 3745-50-66... Waste Combustors 2009. (Interim Standards Rule); Checklist 197. NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-25
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Paper and Other Web... electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (Renewal). ICR... and Other Web Coating is subject to the General Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A...
-
Final Rule: NESHAP for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Alternative Monitoring Method
EPA is extending its approval for the use of an alternative method to show compliance with hydrogen chloride (HCl) emissions limits in the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
-
NESHAP for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Fact Sheets for Actions Since 2015
EPA is extending its approval for the use of an alternative method to show compliance with hydrogen chloride (HCl) emissions limits in the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
-
40 CFR 63.2830 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production What This Subpart... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for emissions during vegetable oil production. This subpart limits hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from specified vegetable oil production processes. This...
-
40 CFR 63.2830 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production What This Subpart... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for emissions during vegetable oil production. This subpart limits hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from specified vegetable oil production processes. This...
-
This manual provides a compliance checklist, and overview of emissions limitations, how to do performance tests, and an overview of applicability of general provisions for the Nutritional Yeast NESHAP.
-
Organic Liquids Distribution: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for organic liquidsdistribution (OLD) (non-gasoline) operations. Includes rule history, Federal Registry citations, implementation and compliance information.
-
Find relevant environmental regulations for the petroleum industry (NAICS 324), including National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)s for petroleum refineries and gasoline dispensing & effluent guidelines for oil and gas extraction
-
This April 2004 document is a table that details the various requirements of the Paper and Other Web Coating NESHAP, broken down by category. This table covers applicability, recordkeeping, emission limits, work practice standards, and other requirements
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Drive, Suite 320, P.O. Box 2509, Grass Valley, CA 95945-2509. Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution... a table listing Region VIII's NESHAP delegation status, see paragraph (c) of this section. (H) State... Requirements, Alternate Means of Emission Limitation; § 61.13(h), Major Change to an Emissions Test; § 61.14(g...
-
Stationary Combustion Turbines: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
Learn about the NESHAP for stationary combustion turbines by reading the rule history, the rule summary, additional resources, docket folder documents, the economic impact analysis, fact sheet and more
-
Fact Sheet - Phosphate Fertilizer Production Plants and Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants NESHAP
Fact sheet summarizing National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Phosphate Fertilizer Production Plants and Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR 63 Subparts AA and BB).
-
75 FR 39244 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-08
.... EPA ICR Number 2098.05; NESHAP for Primary Magnesium Refining; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and TTTTT.... EPA ICR Number 1666.08; NESHAP for Commercial Ethylene Oxide Sterilization and Fumigation Operations...
-
Cellulose Products Manufacturing: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
Read the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Cellulose Products Manufacturing, see the rule history for this Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT), and find Compliance help for this source.
-
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
Learn about the NESHAP regulation for clay ceramic manufacturing by reading the rule summary, rule history, code of federal regulations, and the additional resources like fact sheets and background information documents
-
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW): NESHAP Risk and Technology Review Final
These proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) result from the results of the residual risk and technology review of that source category.
-
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW): NESHAP Risk and Technology Review Proposal
These proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) result from the results of the residual risk and technology review of that source category.
-
This action promulgates national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for the pesticide active ingredient (PAI) production source category under section 112 of the Clean Air Act as amended (CAA or Act).
-
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW): Final Air Toxics Rule Fact Sheets
This page contains an October 1999 fact sheet for the final NESHAP for POTW. This page also contains a December 2002 fact sheet with information regarding the new final amendments to the rule for the NESHAP.
-
Learn about the NESHAP regulation for brick and structural clay products by reading the rule summary, rule history, code of federal regulations, and the additional resources like fact sheets and background information documents
-
Petroleum Refining Industry Final Air Toxics Rule Fact Sheets
This page contains a July 1995 fact sheet for the final NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries. This page also contains a June 2013 fact sheet with information regarding the final amendments to the 2013 final rule for the NESHAP.
-
The purpose of this document is to provide implementation materials to assist in conducting complete and efficient inspections at ethylene oxide commercial sterilization and fumigation operations to determine compliance with the NESHAP
-
Site Remediation National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Fact Sheets
This page contains July 2003 and May 2016 fact sheets with information regarding the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). This document provides a summary of the information for these regulations.
-
Learn about the NESHAP for the printing and publishing industry by reading the rule summary and history. You can also find the additional resources like fact sheets, background information documents and related rules
-
Learn about the NESHAP for surface coating of wood building products by reading the rule summary and history, with links to the federal register notices, additional documents, related rules and compliance information
-
Semiconductor Manufacturing Final Air Toxics Rules Fact Sheets
This page contains a February 2003 fact sheet for the final NESHAP for Semiconductor Manufacturing. This page also contains a July 2008 fact sheet with information regarding the final amendments to the 2003 final rule for the NESHAP.
-
This 2011 document answers common questions about the NESHAP for Area Sources for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing. The questions range in topics including applicability, specific requirements, and recordkeeping.
-
Paper and Other Web Coating: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
Find information on the NESHAP for paper and other web coatings. Read the rule summary, history and supporting documents including fact sheets, responses to public comments, related rules, and compliance and applicability information for this regulation.
-
Learn more about the NESHAP for the manufacture of amino and phenolic resins. Here you will find the relevant CFR text, federal register citations, rule summary, related rules and some additional resources, including fact sheets.
-
Read the text of this NESHAP regulation on Paints and Allied Products manufacturing. Find the rule summary, and rule history, effective dates, and the federal register citations and fact sheets on the rule.
-
Fact Sheets: Air Toxics Rules for the Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins
This page contains a December 1999 fact sheet for the proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins and a September 2014 fact sheet with information regarding the final NESHAP
-
Final Rule to Reduce Toxic Air Emissions from Lime Manufacturing Plants Fact Sheet
This page contains an August 2003 fact sheet with information regarding the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Lime Manufacturing Plants. This document provides a summary of the information for this NESHAP.
-
Read the final rule on the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast, see the rule history, and a compliance and enforcement manual on this Maximum Achievable Control Technology.
-
This page contains July 1996 and February 2015 fact sheets with information regarding the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. This document provides a summary of the information for these regulations.
-
Learn about the NESHAP for inorganic arsenic from glass manufacturing plants by reading the rule summary, the rule history, the code of federal regulations text, additional resources and related rules
-
This page contains an August 2003 fact sheet with information regarding the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Stationary Combustion Turbines. This document provides a summary of the information for this NESHAP.
-
This May 2003 document contains questions and answers on the Paper and Web Coating National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulation. The questions cover topics such as compliance, applicability, and initial notification.
-
learn more about the NESHAP for catalytic cracking and reforming units, as well as sulfur recovery units in petroleum refineries by reading the rule history, rule summary, background information documents, and compliance information
-
Fact Sheets: Air Toxics Standards for Area Sources in Seven Industry Sectors
This page contains a June 2007 fact sheet and a March 2008 fact sheet for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Wood Preserving Area Sources. These documents provide a summary of the information for this NESHAP.
-
This page contains three documents, one from 1997, one from 1999, and one from 2001, that provide further clarification on complying with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning.
-
This is a November 2001 list of sources identified by EPA as potentially affected by the Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacturing National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).
-
This Spring 2016 document is intended for the use of EPA staff, State and Local regulatory agencies and their staff, and industry plant managers for the NESHAP for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry.
-
Overview On Alternate Asbestos Control Method Research And NESHAP Comparison - Nashville, TN
The alternative asbestos control method (AACM) is an experimental approach to building demolition. Unlike the NESHAP method, the AACM allows some regulated asbestos containing material to remain in the building and a surfactant-water solution is used to suppress asbestos fibers ...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-21
... Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations AGENCY: Environmental... electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Magnetic Tape Manufacturing.../Affected Entities: Magnetic tape manufacturing operations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 6. Frequency of...
-
This September 2004 document contains questions and answers on the Surface Coating of Wood Building Products National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulation. The questions cover topics such as compliance, and applicability, etc
-
This page contains a February 2003 and September 2015 fact sheet with information regarding the final rules to the NESHAP for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and the NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing
-
This 2002 report includes the costs associated with the regulatory control options associated with the proposed NESHAP, results of the economic impact analysis, a summary of impacts on small businesses, and results of the monetized benefits analysis.
-
Ross In Situ Uranium Recovery Project NESHAP Subpart W Construction Approval
On May 5, 2015, EPA issued a Construction Approval under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) at 40 CFR Part 61, subpart W, to Strata Energy, Inc., for their Ross In Situ Recovery (ISR) Uranium Project in Crook County, WY.
-
Learn more about the NESHAP for the surface coating of textiles and apparel. On this page you can read the rule summary and history, as well as find supporting documents, including a fact sheet and a compliance timeline.
-
Read about the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. Read the rules, find the CFR text, dockets, effective dates, rule history and compliance information.
-
This September 1999 document provides implementation information by supplying answers to frequently asked questions, such as applicability, definitions, various system processes, etc. on the Pulp and Paper NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart S).
-
The GENII System provides a state-of-the-art, fully documented set of programs for calculating radiation dose and risk from radionuclides released to the environment. The GENII-NESHAPs Edition can be utilized for assessing compliance with 40 CFR 61, Subparts H and I.
-
77 FR 8004 - Fall 2011 Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-13
.... Title Identifier No. 438 SAN No. 5367 NESHAP: Brick 2060-AP69 and Structural Clay Products and Clay...-Term Actions 438. NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products and Clay Products Legal Authority: Not Yet... metals) emitted from brick and clay ceramics kilns and glazing operations at clay ceramics production...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-19
... includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0669; FRL-9532-3] Information Collection Request... Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-23
... Internal Combustion Engines (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice...), ``NESHAP for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1975.09, OMB... combustion engines (RICE) have been regulated under previous actions. Thus, this final action fulfills the...
-
40 CFR 63.1584 - When do I have to comply?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Publicly Owned Treatment Works Industrial Potw Treatment Plant Description and Requirements § 63.1584 When do I have to comply? (a) Existing industrial POTW treatment plant. If you have an existing industrial POTW treatment plant, the appropriate NESHAP(s) for the industrial...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-24
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Commercial Ethylene Oxide..., go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Commercial Ethylene Oxide Sterilization and Fumigation.... Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operator of commercial ethylene oxide sterilization and fumigation...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-21
... Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Wood Furniture... electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Wood Furniture Manufacturing.... Respondents/Affected Entities: Wood furniture manufacturing operations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 750...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-04-05
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Plastic Parts and Products... www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Plastic Parts and Products Surface Coating (Renewal). ICR... information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Plastic parts...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-25
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Semiconductor...: NESHAP for Semiconductor Manufacturing (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2042.05, OMB Control Number... the owners or operators of semiconductor manufacturing plants. Estimated Number of Respondents: 1...
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
evelo, stacie; Miller, Mark L.
2015-05-01
This report provides a summary of the radionuclide releases from the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration facilities at Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) during Calendar Year (CY) 2014, including the data, calculations, and supporting documentation for demonstrating compliance with 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 61, Subpart H--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR EMISSIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN RADON FROM DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES. A description is given of the sources and their contributions to the overall dose assessment. In addition, the maximally exposed individual (MEI) radiological dose calculation and the population dose to localmore » and regional residents are discussed.« less
-
This page contains the February 2003 and the October 2004 final rule fact sheet that contain information on the NESHAP for Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles. These documents provide a summary of the information for this NESHAP.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-22
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Mercury (Renewal) AGENCY... further information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Mercury (40... process mercury ore to recover mercury Estimated Number of Respondents: 107. Frequency of Response...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-06
... Steel Manufacturing (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2003.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0517. ICR...: The NESHAP for Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing are subject to the General Provisions of the... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Integrated Iron and Steel...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-22
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Aluminum, Copper and Other... docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Aluminum, Copper and Other Non-ferrous Metals... disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Aluminum, copper and other non- ferrous metal...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-03
... National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; State of Nevada; Clark... pollutants (NESHAP) to Clark County, Nevada. DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by December 3...: This proposal concerns the delegation of unchanged NESHAP to Clark County, Nevada. In the Rules and...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-13
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Mercury Cell Chlor- Alkali...: NESHAP for Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2046.07, OMB Control... disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of mercury cell chlor-alkali...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-08
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Vinyl Chloride (Renewal... . Title: NESHAP for Vinyl Chloride (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 0186.12, OMB Control Number 2060... disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of vinyl chloride production...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-07
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Cellulose Products... in paper, will be made available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives... information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Cellulose...
-
75 FR 78733 - Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-16
... alleges that U.S. Oil violated the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Benzene Waste Operations (the ``Benzene NESHAP''), 40 CFR part 61, Subpart FF, the National Emission Standards... Benzene NESHAP compliance program; and (4) implement measures, in addition to compliance with the LDAR...
-
This October 2016 question and answer (Q&A) document is in response to a number of questions the EPA has received from delegated state and local agencies and the regulated community regarding the NESHAP for Area source boilers. Document updates 4/2014 PDF.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-21
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for the Wood Building Products...: NESHAP for the Wood Building Products Surface Coating Industry (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number... transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of wood...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-04
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Site Remediation, EPA ICR... electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Site Remediation. ICR Numbers: EPA.... Abstract: 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGGG, applies to site remediation activities to cleanup materials...
-
Learn about the NESHAP for GMACT for acetal resins, hydrogen fluoride, polycarbonate, ethylene production and cyanide chemicals. Find the rule history information, federal register citations, legal authority, rule summary, and additional resources
-
This document is a copy of the Federal Register publication of the November 29, 1993 Proposed Rule and Test Method & Notice of Public Hearing for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Halogenated Solvent Cleaning.
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Fuehne, David Patrick; Lattin, Rebecca Renee
The Rad-NESHAP program, part of the Air Quality Compliance team of LANL’s Compliance Programs group (EPC-CP), and the Radiation Instrumentation & Calibration team, part of the Radiation Protection Services group (RP-SVS), frequently partner on issues relating to characterizing air flow streams. This memo documents the most recent example of this partnership, involving performance testing of sulfur hexafluoride detectors for use in stack gas mixing tests. Additionally, members of the Rad-NESHAP program performed a functional trending test on a pair of optical particle counters, comparing results from a non-calibrated instrument to a calibrated instrument. Prior to commissioning a new stack samplingmore » system, the ANSI Standard for stack sampling requires that the stack sample location must meet several criteria, including uniformity of tracer gas and aerosol mixing in the air stream. For these mix tests, tracer media (sulfur hexafluoride gas or liquid oil aerosol particles) are injected into the stack air stream and the resulting air concentrations are measured across the plane of the stack at the proposed sampling location. The coefficient of variation of these media concentrations must be under 20% when evaluated over the central 2/3 area of the stack or duct. The instruments which measure these air concentrations must be tested prior to the stack tests in order to ensure their linear response to varying air concentrations of either tracer gas or tracer aerosol. The instruments used in tracer gas and aerosol mix testing cannot be calibrated by the LANL Standards and Calibration Laboratory, so they would normally be sent off-site for factory calibration by the vendor. Operational requirements can prevent formal factory calibration of some instruments after they have been used in hazardous settings, e.g., within a radiological facility with potential airborne contamination. The performance tests described in this document are intended to demonstrate the reliable performance of the test instruments for the specific tests used in stack flow characterization.« less
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-06
... Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for the Manufacture of Amino... Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOO) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1869.07, OMB... the Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins were proposed on December 14, 1998, and promulgated on...
-
This is a document that demonstrates the changes in the Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters: (NESHAP for Major Sources, from the revised October 2015 to the January 2013 version of the rule.
-
Status Report on the Evaluation of the Alternative Asbestos Control Method – A Comparison to the NESHAP Method of Demolition of Asbestos Containing Buildings. This abstract and presentation are based, at least in part, on preliminary data and conclusions. The Alternative Asbestos...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-19
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam... Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The... www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production (Renewal) ICR Numbers...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-20
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Engine Test Cells/ Stands... Cells/Stands (Renewal) ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2066.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0483. ICR Status... Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Engine Test Cells/Stands were proposed on May 14, 2002 (67 FR 34547...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-31
... and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements; NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic... Requirements (Heavy-Duty 610 Review); NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production (Plastics 610 Review...-0313 (for the Heavy-Duty 610 Review), Docket ID No. EPA-HQ- OAR-2012-0816 (for the Plastics 610 Review...
-
40 CFR Table 44 to Subpart Uuu of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Provisions to Subpart UUU 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units Pt. 63, Subpt. UUU, Table 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63—Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU As...
-
40 CFR Table 44 to Subpart Uuu of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Provisions to Subpart UUU 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units Pt. 63, Subpt. UUU, Table 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63—Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU As...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-14
... Industrial Process Cooling X Towers. R Gasoline Distribution X S Pulp & Paper MACT I X T Halogenated Solvent.... IIII Auto & Light Duty Truck (Surface X Coating). JJJJ Paper & Other Webs (Surface X Coating). KKKK... subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W. For the part 63 NESHAPs, this includes the NESHAPs set forth in the...
-
40 CFR Table 44 to Subpart Uuu of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... Provisions to Subpart UUU 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL..., Subpt. UUU, Table 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63—Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU As stated in § 63.1577, you shall meet each requirement in the following table that applies to...
-
40 CFR Table 44 to Subpart Uuu of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... Provisions to Subpart UUU 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL..., Subpt. UUU, Table 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63—Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU As stated in § 63.1577, you shall meet each requirement in the following table that applies to...
-
40 CFR Table 44 to Subpart Uuu of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... Provisions to Subpart UUU 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL..., Subpt. UUU, Table 44 Table 44 to Subpart UUU of Part 63—Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart UUU As stated in § 63.1577, you shall meet each requirement in the following table that applies to...
-
Stagich, Brooke H; Moore, Kelsey R; Newton, Joseph R; Dixon, Kenneth L; Jannik, G Timothy
2017-04-01
Most U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities with radiological airborne releases use the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) environmental dosimetry code CAP88-PC to demonstrate compliance with regulations in 40CFR61, subpart H [National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Radiological (NESHAP)]. In 2015, EPA released Version 4 of CAP88-PC, which included significant modifications that improved usability and age-dependent dose coefficients and usage factors for six age groups (infant, 1 y, 5 y, 10 y, 15 y, and adult). However, EPA has not yet provided specific guidance on how to use these age-dependent factors. For demonstrating compliance with DOE public dose regulations, the Savannah River Site (SRS) recently changed from using the maximally exposed individual (MEI) concept (adult male) to the representative person concept (age- and gender-averaged reference person). In this study, dose comparisons are provided between the MEI and a SRS-specific representative person using the age-specific dose coefficients and usage factors in CAP88-PC V.4. Dose comparisons also are provided for each of the six age groups using five radionuclides of interest at SRS (tritium oxide, Cs, Sr, Pu, and I). In general, the total effective dose increases about 11% for the representative person as compared to the current NESHAP MEI because of the inclusion of the more radiosensitive age groups.
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Trimor, P.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the computer model CAP88-PC to estimate the total effective doses (TED) for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 61, Subpart H (EPA 2006), the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. As such, CAP88 Version 4.0 was used to calculate the receptor dose due to routine atmospheric releases at the Savannah River Site (SRS). For estimation, NESHAP dose-release factors (DRFs) have been supplied to Environmental Compliance and Area Closure Projects (EC&ACP) for many years. DRFs represent the dose to a maximum receptor exposed to 1 Ci of a specified radionuclidemore » being released into the atmosphere. They are periodically updated to include changes in the CAP88 version, input parameter values, site meteorology, and location of the maximally exposed individual (MEI). In this report, the DRFs were calculated for potential radionuclide atmospheric releases from 13 SRS release points. The three potential onsite MEI locations to be evaluated are B-Area, Three Rivers Landfill (TRL), and Savannah River Ecology Lab Conference Center (SRELCC) with TRL’s onsite workers considered as members-of-the-public, and the potential future constructions of dormitories at SRELCC and Barracks at B-Area. Each MEI location was evaluated at a specified compass sector with different area to receptor distances and was conducted for both ground-level and elevated release points. The analysis makes use of area-specific meteorological data (Viner 2014). The resulting DRFs are compared to the 2014 NESHAP offsite MEI DRFs for three operational areas; A-Area, H-Area, and COS for a release rate of 1 Ci of tritium oxide at 0 ft. elevation. CAP88 was executed again using the 2016 NESHAP MEI release rates for 0 and 61 m stack heights to determine the radionuclide dose at TRL from the center-of-site (COS).« less
-
Compliance with the Aerospace MACT Standard at Lockheed Martin
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kurucz, K.L.; Vicars, S.; Fetter, S.
1997-12-31
Actions taken and planned at four Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC) facilities to comply with the Aerospace MACT Standard are reviewed. Many LMC sites have taken proactive steps to reduce emissions and implement low VOC coating technology. Significant administrative, facility, and material challenges remain to achieve compliance with the upcoming NESHAP and Control Technology Guideline (CTG) standards. The facilities discussed herein set up programs to develop and implement compliance strategies. These facilities manufacture military aircraft, missiles, satellites, rockets, and electronic guidance and communications systems. Some of the facilities are gearing up for new production lines subject to new source MACT standards.more » At this time the facilities are reviewing compliance status of all primers, topcoats, maskants and solvents subject to the standard. Facility personnel are searching for the most efficient methods of satisfying the recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring, sections of the standards while simultaneously preparing or reviewing their Title V permit applications. Facility decisions on paint booths are the next highest priority. Existing dry filter paint booths will be subject to the filtration standard for existing paint booths which requires the use of two-stage filters. Planned paint booths for the F-22 program, and other new booths must comply with the standard for new and rebuilt booths which requires three stage or HEPA filters. Facilities looking to replace existing water wash paint booths, and those required to retrofit the air handling equipment to accommodate the two-stage filters, are reviewing issues surrounding the rebuilt source definition.« less
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-18
...Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act, EPA granted delegation of specific national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department on May 6, 2010, and December 14, 2010, and to the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District on July 30, 2010. EPA is proposing to revise the Code of Federal Regulations to reflect the current delegation status of NESHAP in Arizona and California.
-
Pollution prevention and the use of low-VOC/HAP coatings at wood furniture manufacturing facilities
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Marshall, A.M.; Spaight, J.L.; Jones, J.W.
1999-07-01
Midwest Research Institute, under a cooperative agreement with the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) National Risk Management Research Laboratory, is conducting a study to identify wood furniture and cabinet manufacturing facilities that have converted to low-volatile organic compound/hazardous air pollutant (VOC/HAP) coatings and to develop case studies for those facilities. The case studies include: (1) a discussion of the types of products each facility manufactures; (2) the types of low-VOC/HAP coatings each facility is using; (3) problems encountered in converting to low-VOC/HAP coatings; (4) equipment changes that were required; (5) the costsmore » associated with the conversion process, including capital costs associated with equipment purchases, research and development costs, and operating costs such as operator training in new application techniques; (6) advantages/disadvantages of the low-VOC/HAP coatings; and (7) customer feedback on products finished with the low-VOC/HAP coatings. The primary goals of the project are (1) to demonstrate that low-VOC/HAP coatings can be used successfully by many wood furniture manufacturing facilities, and (2) to assist other wood furniture manufacturing facilities in their conversion to low-VOC/HAP coatings, in particular facilities that do not have the resources to devote to extensive coatings research. This paper discusses the progress of the project and pollution prevention options at wood furniture manufacturing facilities and the regulatory requirements (e.g., the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants [NESHAP] for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations) that these facilities face.« less
-
Asbestos/NESHAP regulated asbestos-containing-materials guidance
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Shafer, R.; Throwe, S.; Salgado, O.
In the initial Asbestos NESHAP rule promulgated in 1973, a distinction was made between building materials that would readily release asbestos fibers when damaged or disturbed and those materials that were unlikely to result in significant fiber release. The terms friable and nonfriable were used to make this distinction. EPA has since determined that, if severely damaged, otherwise nonfriable materials can release significant amounts of asbestos fibers. Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) is (a) friable asbestos material, (b) Category 1 nonfriable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category 1 nonfriable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding,more » cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category 2 nonfriable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. The purpose of the document is to assist asbestos inspectors and the regulated community in determining whether or not a material is RACM and thus subject to the Asbestos NESHAP.« less
-
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Caruso, Salvadore V.; Clark-Ingram, Marceia A.
2000-01-01
This paper presents a memorandum of agreement on Clean Air Regulations. NASA headquarters (code JE and code M) has asked MSFC to serve as principle center for review of Clean Air Act (CAA) regulations. The purpose of the principle center is to provide centralized support to NASA headquarters for the management and leadership of NASA's CAA regulation review process and to identify the potential impact of proposed CAA reguations on NASA program hardware and supporting facilities. The materials and processes utilized in the manufacture of NASA's programmatic hardware contain HAPs (Hazardous Air Pollutants), VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds), and ODC (Ozone Depleting Chemicals). This paper is presented in viewgraph form.
-
Maximally exposed offsite individual location determination for NESHAPS compliance
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Simpkins, A.A.
2000-03-13
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the computer program CAP88 for demonstrating compliance with the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS.) One of the inputs required for CAP88 is the location of the maximally exposed individual (MEI) by sector and distance. Distances to the MEI have been determined for 15 different potential release locations at SRS. These locations were compared with previous work and differences were analyzed. Additionally, SREL Conference Center was included as a potential offsite location since in the future it may be used as a dormitory. Worst sectors were then determined basedmore » on the distances.« less
-
Find environmental regulatory and compliance information for the nonmetallic mineral processing sector (NAICS 327), including NESHAPs for asbestos and hazardous waste, and wastewater permit information.
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Trimor, P.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the computer model CAP88-PC to estimate the total effective doses (TED) for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 61, Subpart H (EPA 2006), the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. As such, CAP88 Version 4.0 was used to calculate the receptor dose due to routine atmospheric releases at the Savannah River Site (SRS). For estimation, NESHAP dose-release factors (DRFs) have been supplied to Environmental Compliance and Area Closure Projects (EC&ACP) for many years. DRFs represent the dose to a maximum receptor exposed to 1 Ci of a specified radionuclidemore » being released into the atmosphere. They are periodically updated to include changes in the CAP88 version, input parameter values, site meteorology, and location of the maximally exposed individual (MEI). This report presents the DRFs of tritium oxide released at two onsite locations, center-of-site (COS) and H-Area, at 0 ft. elevation to maximally exposed individuals (MEIs) located 1000, 3000, 6000, 9000, and 12000 meters from the release areas for 16 compass sectors. The analysis makes use of area-specific meteorological data (Viner 2014).« less
-
Find environmental regulatory information about the metals sector (NAICS 331 & 332), including NESHAPs for metal coatings, effluent guidelines for metal products, combustion compliance assistance, and information about foundry sand recycling.
-
77 FR 37397 - Proposed Settlement Agreement
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-21
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (the RICE NESHAP... revised the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion...
-
Chemical Manufacturing Sector (NAICS 325)
find EPA regulatory information for the chemical manufacturing sector, including NESHAPs, the SNAP program for ozone depleting substances,effluent guidelines, and new and existing chemicals testing requirements under TSCA.
-
40 CFR 63.2430 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for miscellaneous organic chemical...
-
40 CFR 63.2430 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for miscellaneous organic chemical...
-
The national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for miscellaneous coating manufacturing. Includes summary, rule history, compliance and implementation information, federal registry citations.
-
Get ready for the new asbestos standard
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Onderick, W.A.
On October 1, OSHA`s revised asbestos rules became law, and with them are many changes from the previous 1986 standard. The presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) rule is one of the bigger changes in the revised standard. OSHA has declared that owners must presume that there are certain high-risk asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in facilities built prior to 1981, unless bulk sample results prove them to be nonasbestos. The impact of this provision forces companies to think carefully before presuming where asbestos is or where it is not. Companies must also heed the EPA Asbestos National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutantsmore » (NESHAP), which require inspections and bulk sampling to identify materials prior to renovation or demolition. Short and long term needs should be examined when analyzing how to comply with the PACM provision. There are four options available. Option 1: Ignore the standard and face potential enforcement fines. Option 2: Presume all materials in pre-1981 buildings contain asbestos and simply post additional warning signs. Option 3: Survey or resurvey the facilities to be in compliance with the PACM ruling. Option 4: Conduct more comprehensive surveys. Option 3 is discussed in some detail.« less
-
Sequim Site Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2012
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Snyder, Sandra F.; Barnett, J. Matthew; Gervais, Todd L.
2013-04-01
This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Subpart H, National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities and ashington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 246-247, Radiation Protection Air Emissions. This report meets the calendar year 2012 Sequim Site annual reporting requirement for its operations as a privately-owned facility as well as its federally-contracted status that began in October 2012. Compliance is indicated by comparing the estimated dose to the maximally exposedmore » individual (MEI) with the 10 mrem/yr Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard. The MSL contains only sources classified as fugitive emissions. Despite the fact that the regulations are intended for application to point source emissions, fugitive emissions are included with regard to complying with the EPA standard. The dose to the Sequim Site MEI due to routine operations in 2012 was 9E-06 mrem (9E-08 mSv). No non-routine emissions occurred in 2012. The MSL is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard.« less
-
40 CFR 63.9480 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Friction Materials Manufacturing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for friction materials manufacturing...
-
40 CFR 63.9480 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Friction Materials Manufacturing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for friction materials manufacturing...
-
40 CFR 63.9480 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Friction Materials Manufacturing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for friction materials manufacturing...
-
40 CFR 63.9480 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Friction Materials Manufacturing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for friction materials manufacturing...
-
40 CFR 63.2430 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing What This Subpart... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing. This...
-
40 CFR 63.2430 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
...) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing...
-
40 CFR 63.2430 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing What This Subpart... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing. This...
-
Textile Manufacturing Sector (NAICS 313)
Find environmental regulatory and compliance information for the textile and leather manufacturing sector, including NESHAPs for leather tanning and fabric printing, and small business guidance for RCRA hazardous waste requirements.
-
40 CFR 63.9480 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Friction Materials Manufacturing... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for friction materials manufacturing...
-
Stokke, Jennifer M; Mazyck, David W
2008-04-01
The release of mercury to the environment is of particular concern because of its volatility, persistence, and tendency to bioaccumulate. The recovery of mercury from end-box exhaust at chlor-alkali facilities is important to prevent release into the environment and reduce emissions as required by NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants). A pilot-scale photocatalytic reactor packed with silica-titania composite (STC) pellets was tested at a chloralkali facility over a 3-month period. This pilot reactor treated up to 10 ft3/min (ACFM) of end-box exhaust and achieved 95% removal. The pilot reactor was able to maintain excellent removal efficiency even with large fluctuations in influent mercury concentration (400-1600 microg/ft3). The STC pellets were regenerated ex situ by regeneration with hydrochloric acid and performed similarly to virgin STC pellets when returned to service. On the basis of these promising results, two full-scale reactors with in situ regeneration capabilities were installed and operated. After optimization, these reactors performed similarly to the pilot reactor. A cost analysis was performed comparing the treatment costs (i.e., cost per pound of mercury removed) for sulfur-impregnated activated carbon and the STC system. The STC proved to be both technologically and economically feasible for this installation.
-
Wood and Paper Manufacturing Sectors
Find EPA regulatory information for the wood product and paper manufacturing sectors, including paper, pulp and lumber. Information includes NESHAPs and effluent guidelines for pulp and paper rulemaking, and compliance guidelines
-
Compliance Software for Radioactive Air Emissions
Atmospheric dispersion and transport models that are used to assess radiation dose and risk and to demonstrate compliance with certain radionuclide National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) regulations.
-
Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing Sector (NAICS 3254)
Find environmental regulatory and compliance information for the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector, including essential uses of CFCs, NESHAP for pharmaceutical production, effluent guidelines for wastewater and management of hazardous waste.
-
40 CFR 63.8780 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) emitted from flexible polyurethane foam...
-
40 CFR 63.8780 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) emitted from flexible polyurethane foam...
-
40 CFR 63.8780 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) emitted from flexible polyurethane foam...
-
40 CFR 63.8780 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) emitted from flexible polyurethane foam...
-
40 CFR 63.8780 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) emitted from flexible polyurethane foam...
-
40 CFR 63.9880 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Primary Magnesium Refining What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for primary magnesium refineries. This subpart...
-
40 CFR 63.9880 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Primary Magnesium Refining What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for primary magnesium refineries. This subpart...
-
40 CFR 63.9880 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Primary Magnesium Refining What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for primary magnesium refineries. This subpart...
-
40 CFR 63.9880 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Primary Magnesium Refining What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for primary magnesium refineries. This subpart...
-
40 CFR 63.9880 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Primary Magnesium Refining What... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for primary magnesium refineries. This subpart...
-
40 CFR 63.5780 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Reinforced Plastic Composites Production What This Subpart Covers... for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for reinforced plastic composites production. This subpart also...
-
Compliance Assistance Tools for Demolition
Learn about how to comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), find contacts for asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and get construction industry specific compliance assistance
-
Halogenated Solvent Cleaning: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
Learn about the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards for halogenated solvent cleaner. Find the rule history information, federal register citations, legal authority, and additional resources.
-
This page contains the current National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and additional information regarding rule compliance and implementation.
-
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing (NAICS 326)
Find environmental regulatory and compliance information for plastics and rubber products manufacturing (which includes the manufacture of cellulose and other fibers) including information about NESHAPs and effluent guidelines for wastewater discharges
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Hamel, T.M.
1997-12-31
A steroids processing plant located in northeastern Puerto Rico emits a combined average of 342 lb/hr of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from various process operations. The approach that this facility used to implement maximum achievable control technology (MACT) may assist others who must contend with MACT for pharmaceutical or related manufacturing facilities. Federal air regulations define MACT standards for stationary sources emitting any of 189 HAPs. The MACT standards detailed in the NESHAPs are characterized by industry and type of emission control system or technology. It is anticipated that the standard will require HAP reductionsmore » of approximately 95%. The steroid plant`s emissions include the following pollutant loadings: VOC/HAP Emission Rate (lb/hr): Methanol 92.0; Acetone 35.0; Methylene chloride 126.0; Chloroform 25.0; Ethyl acetate 56.0; Tetrahydrofuran 5.00; and 1,4-Dioxane 3.00. The facility`s existing carbon adsorption control system was nearing the end of its useful life, and the operators sought to install an air pollution control system capable of meeting MACT requirements for the pharmaceutical industry. Several stand-alone and hybrid control technologies were considered for replacement of the carbon adsorption system at the facility. This paper examines the following technologies: carbon adsorption, membrane separation, thermal oxidation, membrane separation-carbon adsorption, and condensation-carbon adsorption. Each control technology is described; the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing each technology for the steroid processing plant are examined; and capital and operating costs associated with the implementation of each technology are presented. The rationale for the technology ultimately chosen to control VOC and HAP emissions is presented.« less
-
40 CFR 63.7080 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Lime Manufacturing Plants What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for lime manufacturing plants. This subpart also establishes...
-
40 CFR 63.9580 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Taconite Iron Ore Processing What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for taconite iron ore processing. This subpart also...
-
40 CFR 63.9580 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Taconite Iron Ore Processing What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for taconite iron ore processing. This subpart also...
-
40 CFR 63.9580 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Taconite Iron Ore Processing What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for taconite iron ore processing. This subpart also...
-
40 CFR 63.9580 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Taconite Iron Ore Processing What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for taconite iron ore processing. This subpart also...
-
40 CFR 63.9580 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Taconite Iron Ore Processing What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for taconite iron ore processing. This subpart also...
-
78 FR 41794 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-11
... INFORMATION: OMB Responses To Agency Clearance Requests OMB Approvals EPA ICR Number 1981.05; Distribution of... Number 1160.12; NSPS/NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants; 40 CFR part 60 subparts...
-
How EPA's Asbestos Regulations Apply to Roofing Materials
Guidance Manual and letters that clarify the applicability of the asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) to the removal of asbestos-containing roofing material including tiles, and piping during demolition
-
Printing and Related Support Activities Sector (NAICS 323)
Find environmental regulatory and compliance information for the printing sector, including NESHAPs for paper surface coating, RCRA hazardous waste guide for small business, and a pollution prevention guidance for lithographic and screen printing
-
Oil and Gas Extraction Sector (NAICS 211)
Environmental regulatory information for oil and gas extraction sectors, including oil and natural gas drilling. Includes information about NESHAPs for RICE and stationary combustion engines, and effluent guidelines for synthetic-based drilling fluids
-
40 CFR 63.5980 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing What This Subpart Covers § 63.5980 What is... pollutants (NESHAP) for rubber tire manufacturing. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate...
-
Ship and Boat Building Sector (NAICS 3336)
Find environmental regulatory and compliance information for the shipbuilding sector (NAICS 3336), including NESHAPs and air toxics regulations, nonroad engines and vehicles, managing used oil, and polluted runoff from marinas and boating areas.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-18
... alternative ways to improve the collection activity. 6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline... which include hazardous waste burning incinerators, cement kilns, lightweight aggregate kilns...
-
40 CFR 63.9280 - What is the purpose of subpart PPPPP?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Engine Test Cells/Stands What This... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for engine test cells/stands located at major...
-
How EPA's Asbestos Regulations Apply to Transite Siding
Letters that provide guidance on asbestos National Emissions Standard of Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) applicability to transite sliding in demolitions, specifically regarding friability, and removal requirements prior to, and after, demolition.
-
40 CFR 63.9280 - What is the purpose of subpart PPPPP?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Engine Test Cells/Stands What This... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for engine test cells/stands located at major...
-
40 CFR 63.9280 - What is the purpose of subpart PPPPP?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Engine Test Cells/Stands What This... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for engine test cells/stands located at major...
-
40 CFR 63.9280 - What is the purpose of subpart PPPPP?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Engine Test Cells/Stands What This... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for engine test cells/stands located at major...
-
40 CFR 63.9280 - What is the purpose of subpart PPPPP?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Engine Test Cells/Stands What This... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for engine test cells/stands located at major...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-21
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Commercial Ethylene Oxide... Commercial Ethylene Oxide Sterilization and Fumigation Operations (Renewal). [[Page 28608
-
78 FR 26772 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-08
...-0001; expires on 04/30/2016; Approved without change. EPA ICR Number 2046.07; NESHAP for Mercury Cell... Nonferrous Metals--Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium (Renewal); 40 CFR part 63 subparts A, DDDDDD, EEEEEE, FFFFFF...
-
American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Governments Sectors (NAICS 921150)
Find environmental regulatory information for Tribal Governments Sectors. Learn about American Indian Tribal laws and regulations, tribal drinking water programs, as well as greenhouse gas programs and NESHAPs for boilers and landfills
-
Summary of Public Comments and Responses for Final NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production
This document provides summaries of public comments and EPA responses related to the final standards for the reduction of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emitted through the manufacture of pharmaceutical products
-
National emission standards for each new or existing potline, paste production operation, and anode bake furnace associated with a primary aluminum reduction plant. Includes rule history, implementation information and additional resources.
-
Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution (NAICS 2211)
Find EPA regulatory information for electrical utilities, including coal-fired power plants. Includes links to NESHAPs for RICE, stationary combustion engines, fossil fuel waste, cooling water, effluent guidelines. Find information on the MATS rule.
-
40 CFR 63.110 - Applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... of 40 CFR parts 260 through 272. The owner or operator shall keep a record of the information used to... 272. (f) Overlap with the Vinyl Chloride NESHAP. (1) After the compliance dates specified in § 63.100...
-
Summary of Energy Assessment Requirements under the Area Source Boiler Rule
This document provides an overview of the energy assessment requirements for the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for area sources: industrial, commercial and Institutional boilers, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJJJ.
-
A Guide to Normal Demolition Practices Under the Asbestos NESHAP (EPA-340/1-92-013)
This document includes demolition practices, waste handling procedures, and definitions of terms taken from the November 20,1990 revision of the asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants regulation.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-24
...: http://www.epa.gov/dockets . Abstract: The sources subject to this rule (i.e., extraction plants, ceramic plants, foundries, incinerators, propellant plants, and machine shops which process beryllium and...
-
77 FR 61598 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-10
... the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a... without change. EPA ICR Number 1976.05; NESHAP for Reinforced Plastic Composites Production; 40 CFR part...
-
77 FR 29334 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-05-17
.../2012. EPA ICR Number 1611.09; NESHAP for Chromium Emissions from Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; in 40 CFR part 63 subparts A and N; OMB filed comment on 04/04/2012...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-10
... ICR Number 0193.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0092 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION... . Title: NESHAP for Beryllium (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 0193.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0092...
-
SURFACE PLASMA ELECTRODE FOR ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS - PHASE I
Electrostatic precipitators are widely used for the removal of particulate matter from boiler exhaust gases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgation of National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Industrial, Commercial, and Insti...
-
PLASMA DISCHARGE ELECTRODE FOR ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS - PHASE II
Electrostatic precipitators are widely used for removal of particulate matter form boiler exhaust gases. The EPA promulgation of National emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers and Process Heater will req...
-
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants in Region 7
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) are applicable requirements under the Title V operating permit program. This is a resource for permit writers and reviewers to learn about the rules and explore other helpful tools.
-
76 FR 26284 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-06
... 2060-0264; expires on 04/30/2014; Approved without change. EPA ICR Number 1080.13; NESHAP for Benzene Emission from Benzene Storage Vessels and Coke By Product Recovery Plants; 40 CFR part 61, subparts A and L...
-
78 FR 37218 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-20
... the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a... 2044.05; NESHAP for Plastic Parts and Products Surface Coating; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and PPPP...
-
Read this page to find information on the National Emission Standards for hazardous air pollutants for magnetic tape manufacturing operations. Read the rule summary and history, as well as supporting documents and related rules.
-
Read this regulation on emission standards for miscellaneous metal parts and surface coatings. Read the rule history and summary, and find related documents including fact sheets, related rules, and compliance timelines
-
AIR DISPERSION MODELING AT THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Rucker, D.F.
2000-08-01
One concern at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is the amount of alpha-emitting radionuclides or hazardous chemicals that can become airborne at the facility and reach the Exclusive Use Area boundary as the result of a release from the Waste Handling Building (WHB) or from the underground during waste emplacement operations. The WIPP Safety Analysis Report (SAR), WIPP RCRA Permit, and WIPP Emergency Preparedness Hazards Assessments include air dispersion calculations to address this issue. Meteorological conditions at the WIPP facility will dictate direction, speed, and dilution of a contaminant plume of respirable material due to chronic releases or duringmore » an accident. Due to the paucity of meteorological information at the WIPP site prior to September 1996, the Department of Energy (DOE) reports had to rely largely on unqualified climatic data from the site and neighboring Carlsbad, which is situated approximately 40 km (26 miles) to the west of the site. This report examines the validity of the DOE air dispersion calculations using new meteorological data measured and collected at the WIPP site since September 1996. The air dispersion calculations in this report include both chronic and acute releases. Chronic release calculations were conducted with the EPA-approved code, CAP88PC and the calculations showed that in order for a violation of 40 CFR61 (NESHAPS) to occur, approximately 15 mCi/yr of 239Pu would have to be released from the exhaust stack or from the WHB. This is an extremely high value. Hence, it is unlikely that NESHAPS would be violated. A site-specific air dispersion coefficient was evaluated for comparison with that used in acute dose calculations. The calculations presented in Section 3.2 and 3.3 show that one could expect a slightly less dispersive plume (larger air dispersion coefficient) given greater confidence in the meteorological data, i.e. 95% worst case meteorological conditions. Calculations show that dispersion will decrease slightly if a more stable wind class is assumed, where very little vertical mixing occurs. It is recommended that previous reports which used fixed values for calculating the air dispersion coefficient be updated to reflect the new meteorological data, such as the WIPP Safety Analysis Report and the WIPP Emergency Preparedness Hazards Assessment. It is also recommended that uncertainty be incorporated into the calculations so that a more meaningful assessment of risk during accidents can be achieved.« less
-
OVERVIEW ON ALTERNATIVE ASBESTOS CONTROL METHOD RESEARCH
The alternative asbestos control method (AACM) is an experimental approach to building demolition. Unlike the NESHAP method, the AACM allows some regulated asbestos-containing material to remain in the building and a surfactant-water solution is used to suppress asbestos fibers ...
-
Basis and Purpose Document for the proposed NESHAP for Pharmaceuticals Production
The Basis and Purpose Document provides background information on, and the rationale for, decisions made by EPA related to the proposed standards for the reduction of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emitted through the manufacture of pharmaceutical products
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-26
... Maine Department of Environmental Protection's (``ME DEP'') request to implement and enforce the amended... Cleaning NESHAP''), as it applies to area sources. This approval would make the ME DEP's amended rule...
-
78 FR 9045 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-07
... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry; 40 CFR part 60, subparts T, U, V, W and X; was approved on 01/30/2013; OMB.... EPA ICR Number 2323.05; NESHAP for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and...
-
This August 2003 document contains a diagram of dates and events for compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles.
-
Fact Sheets: Proposed and Final Air Toxics Standards for Hospital Sterilizers
This page contains an October 2006 and December 2007 fact sheet with information regarding the proposed and final National Emissions Standards for Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers. This document provides a summary of the information for this NESHAP.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-09
... preferred method), by email to: [email protected] , or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental... an adjustment decrease in the Agency labor costs due to a correction of mathematical error. The...
-
Overview On Alternative Asbestos Control Method Research - Nashville, TN
The alternative asbestos control method (AACM) is an experimental approach to building demolition. Unlike the NESHAP method, the AACM allows some regulated asbestos-containing material to remain in the building and a surfactant-water solution is used to suppress asbestos fibers ...
-
Memorandum from EPA Deputy Administrator to Assistant Administrators and Regional Administrators and attachment communicating NESHAP, CERCLA, TSCA, OSHA requirements sent recommendation of the Inspector General in Report No. 1 2-P-01 25.
-
PRELIMINARY RESULTS: EVALUATIONS OF THE ALTERNATIVE ASBESTOS CONTROL METHOD FOR BUILDING DEMOLITION
This presentation describes the preliminary results of the evaluations of the alternative asbestos control method for demolishing buildings containing asbestos, and are covered under the regulatory requirements of the Asbestos NESHAP. This abstract and presentation are based, at ...
-
Overview On Alternative Asbestos Control Method Research - St. Louis, MO
The alternative asbestos control method (AACM) is an experimental approach to building demolition. Unlike the NESHAP method, the AACM allows some regulated asbestos-containing material to remain in the building and a surfactant-water solution is used to suppress asbestos fibers ...
-
ALTERNATIVE ASBESTOS CONTROL METHOD (AACM) AT GEBO
This presentation describes the status to date of the AACM research, which is intended as a possible alternative technology for use in the demolition of buildings that contain asbestos and are covered under the regulatory requirements of the Asbestos NESHAP. This abstract and pr...
-
Overview On Alternative Asbestos Control Method Research - Wisconsin Dells
The alternative asbestos control method (AACM) is an experimental approach to building demolition. Unlike the NESHAP method, the AACM allows some regulated asbestos containing material to remain in the building and a surfactant-water solution is used to suppress asbestos fibers ...
-
78 FR 44315 - Spring 2013 Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-23
... Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing. 238 Standards of Performance 2060... (NESHAP): Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing Legal Authority... pollutants (HF, HCl, and metals) emitted from brick and clay ceramics kilns, as well as dryers and glazing...
-
AEROSPACE NESHAP GUIDANCE: PAINTING AND DEPAINTING ALTERNATIVES FOR SELECTED DOD OPERATIONS
This project was sponsored by the DOD's Strategic Environmental Research and Development program (SERDP) and conducted by the EPA's Clean Processes and Products Branch at the NRMRL. In support of SERDP's objective of developing environmental solutions that improve mission readine...
-
The EPA has identified solvent extraction for vegetable oil production processes as major sources of a single hazardous air pollutant (HAP), n-hexane. Learn more about the rule requirements and regulations, as well as find compliance help
-
Learn about the regulations for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Production regarding the emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Find Federal Register citations, read the rule, and find the rule history here.
-
Letters that provide guidance on asbestos National Emissions Standard of Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) applicability to linoleum, tar paper, electric wiring, floor tile mastic, caulking compounds, and other similar materials during demolition
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Serageldin, M.A.
1999-07-01
The US Environmental Protection Agency is providing background information that supports the use of Metro Machine Corporation`s (MMC) compliant all position enclosure (CAPE) plus air management system and regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) (CAPE + RTO System) as an alternative means of limiting the emissions of volatile organic hazardous air pollutants per volume of applied solids (nonvolatiles). This document also explains how the authors arrived at the operating, recordkeeping, and reporting conditions that MMC must meet for approval. The add-on control system they used consists of a pollution capture unit operation (CAPE) plus air management system and a destruction unit operationmore » (RTO). When operated according to the specified procedures, it will control emissions to a level no greater than that from using coatings which comply with the limits in Table 2 of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart II.« less
-
76 FR 63295 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-12
... the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with...; Underground Storage Tanks: Technical and Financial Requirements, and State Program Approval Procedures; 40 CFR... with change. EPA ICR Number 2028.06; NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and...
-
40 CFR 63.8180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions From Mercury Cell... establishes national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for affected sources of mercury emissions at mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate...
-
40 CFR 63.8180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions From Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali... national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for affected sources of mercury emissions at mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate...
-
40 CFR 63.8180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions From Mercury Cell... establishes national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for affected sources of mercury emissions at mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate...
-
40 CFR 63.8180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions From Mercury Cell... establishes national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for affected sources of mercury emissions at mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate...
-
40 CFR 63.8180 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions From Mercury Cell... establishes national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for affected sources of mercury emissions at mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This subpart also establishes requirements to demonstrate...
-
Alternative Asbestos Control Method and the Asbestos Releasability Research
Alternative Asbestos Control Method shows promise in speed, cost, and efficiency if equally protective. ORD conducted side by side test of AACM vs NESHAP on identical asbestos-containing buildings at Fort Chaffee. This abstract and presentation are based, at least in part, on pr...
-
Overview On Alternative Asbestos Control Method Research: Alternative Methods To Demolition
The Alternative Asbestos Control Method (AACM) is an experimental approach to building demolition. Unlike the NESHAP method, the AACM allows some regulated asbestos-containing material to remain in the building and a surfactant-water solution is used to suppress asbestos fibers ...
-
Fact Sheets: Final Rules to Reduce Toxic Air Pollutants from Surface Coating of Metal Cans
This page contains the August 2003 final rule fact sheet and the December 2005 final rule fact sheet that contain information on the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Surface Coating of Metal Cans.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-06
... recently approved ICR is due to a mathematical correction in labor hours and to an increase in labor costs... burden. In addition, this ICR uses updated labor rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate...
-
This page contains a December 2007 fact sheet with information regarding the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources
-
40 CFR 63.7080 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Lime Manufacturing Plants What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for lime manufacturing plants. This subpart also establishes...? 63.7080 Section 63.7080 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR...
-
40 CFR 63.7080 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Lime Manufacturing Plants What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for lime manufacturing plants. This subpart also establishes...? 63.7080 Section 63.7080 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR...
-
40 CFR 63.7080 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Lime Manufacturing Plants What This Subpart... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for lime manufacturing plants. This subpart also establishes....7080 Section 63.7080 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS...
-
40 CFR 63.7080 - What is the purpose of this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Lime Manufacturing Plants What This... standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for lime manufacturing plants. This subpart also establishes...? 63.7080 Section 63.7080 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-24
...: Philip Egidi, Radiation Protection Division, Center for Waste Management and Regulations, (Mail code... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0085; FRL-9622-1] Agency Information Collection... AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork...
-
This page contains an August 2004 fact sheet with information regarding the final NESHAP for Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products. This document provides a summary of the information for the information for this regulation.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-22
...The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYY) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 1967.05, OMB Control No. 2060-0540) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through September 30, 2013. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (77 FR 63813) on October 17, 2012, during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
-
This November 2003 memo indicates that size presses or size press alternative (SP/SPA), and on-machine coaters that apply sizing or water-based clays as a component of papermaking system are not subject to requirement of Subpart JJJJ.
-
EVALUATION OF AEROSOLIZATION OF ASBESTOS AND RELATED FIBERS FROM BULK MATERIALS
1. Status Report on the Evaluation of the Alternative Asbestos Control Method – A Comparison to the NESHAP Method of Demolition of Asbestos Containing Buildings; and, 2. Update on the Evaluation of Aerosolization of Asbestos and Related Fibers from Bulk Materials. This abstract a...
-
40 CFR 63.2853 - How do I determine the actual solvent loss?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... written approval from the agency responsible for these NESHAP. (2) Source operating status. You must... least one normal operating period. You must consistently follow the procedures described in your plan... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES...
-
40 CFR 63.2853 - How do I determine the actual solvent loss?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... written approval from the agency responsible for these NESHAP. (2) Source operating status. You must... least one normal operating period. You must consistently follow the procedures described in your plan... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES...
-
40 CFR 63.2853 - How do I determine the actual solvent loss?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... written approval from the agency responsible for these NESHAP. (2) Source operating status. You must... least one normal operating period. You must consistently follow the procedures described in your plan... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES...
-
40 CFR 63.2853 - How do I determine the actual solvent loss?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... written approval from the agency responsible for these NESHAP. (2) Source operating status. You must... least one normal operating period. You must consistently follow the procedures described in your plan... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-13
... Chloride and Copolymer Production, Primary Copper Smelting, Secondary Copper Smelting, and Primary... www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Area Sources: Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymer Production.... Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of polyvinyl chloride and copolymer, primary copper smelter...
-
This page contains two tune-up guides for area source boilers for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters. The first guide is for owners and operators, and the second is for technicians for the area source boilers.
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
The purpose of this testing program was to obtain emissions data for uncontrolled and controlled hydrochloric acid (HCl), particulate matter (PM) and speciated hydrocarbon Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) from a secondary aluminum processing plant to support a national emission standard for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP).
-
40 CFR 63.2872 - What definitions apply to this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... NESHAP General Provisions. (c) In this section as follows: Accounting month means a time interval defined... solvent from the extracted meal. Oilseeds processed in a conventional desolventizer produce crude vegetable oil and crude meal products, such as animal feed. Corn germ dry milling means a source that...
-
40 CFR 63.1595 - List of definitions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
..., gauge wells) that are necessary for operation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of the treatment unit... emitted (fe monthly) using fe monthly = ΣE/ΣL. HAP means hazardous air pollutant(s). Industrial POTW means a POTW that accepts a waste stream regulated by an industrial NESHAP and provides treatment and...
-
ASBESTOS RELEASE FROM THE DEMOLITION OF TWO SCHOOLS IN FAIRBANKS, ALASKA
Two elementary schools on Fort Wainwright Army Base in Fairbanks, Alaska were demolished during the Summer of 1992. rior to demolition, all friable asbestos was removed from the buildings in accordance with the applicable U.S. EPA's asbestos NESHAP. he primary objective of the st...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-04
... Emissions From Glass Manufacturing Plants AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice... electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass... Glass Manufacturing Plants were proposed on July 20, 1983, and promulgated on August 4, 1986. The...
-
LLW Notes, Volume 12, Number 1
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Norris, C.; Brown, H.; Colsant, J.
Contents include articles entitled: Suit against Envirocare sparks investigations: Formal petition filed with NRC; Group alleges misconduct by USGS re Beatty study; EPA rescinds NESHAPs subpart 1; Northwest Compact executive director changes jobs; New forum participant for the state of New Jersey; and Director of North Carolina division of radiation control retires.
-
40 CFR 63.2872 - What definitions apply to this subpart?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... NESHAP General Provisions. (c) In this section as follows: Accounting month means a time interval defined... consistent and regular basis. An accounting month will consist of approximately 4 to 5 calendar weeks and each accounting month will be of approximate equal duration. An accounting month may not correspond...
-
75 FR 65032 - Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-21
... absorber vent as a Group 2 process vent under the Hazardous Organic NESHAP regulations. For three years, Westlake will also implement an enhanced Leak Detection and Repair program to control emissions of...'s common control, and Westlake will not contest administratively or judicially a finding by the...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-27
..., Quenching, and Battery Stacks (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice...: NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing Quenching and Battery Stacks (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1995.05..., quenching, and battery stacks. Estimated Number of Respondents: 19. Frequency of Response: Initially...
-
40 CFR 63.1595 - List of definitions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... a POTW that accepts a waste stream regulated by an industrial NESHAP and provides treatment and...-containing waste stream to the POTW for treatment to comply with 40 CFR part 61, Subpart FF—National Emission... receive grant assistance under the Subchapter II of the Clean Water Act, and any federally owned treatment...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-03
... Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills (Renewal) AGENCY... electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources... chemical recovery combustion sources at kraft, soda, sulfite, and stand-alone semichemical pulp mills cause...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-29
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (Renewal) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In... review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. The ICR which is...
-
40 CFR 63.2860 - What notifications must I submit and when?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production... address of the owner or operator. (2) The physical address of the vegetable oil production process. (3) Identification of the relevant standard, such as the vegetable oil production NESHAP, and compliance date. (4) A...
-
40 CFR 63.2860 - What notifications must I submit and when?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production... address of the owner or operator. (2) The physical address of the vegetable oil production process. (3) Identification of the relevant standard, such as the vegetable oil production NESHAP, and compliance date. (4) A...
-
40 CFR 63.4510 - What notifications must I submit?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products Notifications... with this subpart for any or all of your plastic parts coating operations, then you must include a... subpart in regard to those plastic parts coating operations. If you are complying with another NESHAP that...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-27
... in the public docket without change including any personal information provided, unless the comment...: 144 (total). Frequency of response: Initially, quarterly, and semiannually. Total estimated burden: 23... year), includes $800 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs. Changes in the Estimates...
-
77 FR 14777 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-13
....06; NESHAP for Beryllium Rocket Motor Fuel Firing (Renewal); 40 CFR part 61 subparts A and D; was... from New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards (Final Rule); 40 CFR parts 86, 523.... EPA ICR Number 1557.08; NSPS for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills; 40 CFR part 60 subparts A and WWW...
-
This page has a 12/2012 document that provides EPA’s responses to public comments on EPA’s Proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-17
... Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing and Phosphate Fertilizers Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subparts AA and BB). ICR... September 30, 2013. (33) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0686. Title: NESHAP for Organic Liquids... Acid Manufacturing and Phosphate Fertilizers Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subparts AA and BB); Learia...
-
76 FR 55664 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-08
...; Approved with change. EPA ICR Number 2277.03; NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking... Miscellaneous Surface Coating at Area Sources; 40 CFR part 63 subparts A and HHHHHH; was approved on 08/04/2011...; Approved without change. EPA ICR Number 1550.09; Conflict of Interest Rule 1 (Renewal); 40 CFR 486; was...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-27
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Glass Manufacturing Plants... information about the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov . Title: NESHAP for Glass... New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Glass Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart CC...
-
Fact Sheet: Final Rule to Reduce Toxic Air Pollutants from Surface Coating of Wood Building Products
This page contains the February 2003 final rule fact sheet on the NESHAP for Surface Coating of Wood Building Products. This document provides a background for this rule, a summary of the benefits of this rule, who is affected by the rule, and rule costs
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-12
... are the health effects of these pollutants? VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive... into account the effect of the EPA's Nonhazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) rule on the standards. The NHSM rule, issued after the NESHAP was promulgated, had the effect of reclassifying some cement kilns...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-01
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Pulp and Paper Production... FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Monitoring, Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office... Production (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1657.07, OMB Control Number 2060-0387. ICR Status: This ICR...
-
77 FR 22776 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-17
... for Pulp and Paper Production; in 40 CFR part 63 subparts A and S; OMB filed comment on 03/02/2012...; OMB filed comment on 03/02/2012. EPA ICR Number 1811.08; NESHAP for Polyether Polyol Production; in 40... Number 2313.02; Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: Revisions to Network Design Requirements (Final...
-
40 CFR Table 1 to Subpart Aaaa of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart AAAA
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... constructed, and reconstructed sources 63.6(e) Operation and maintenance requirements, startup, shutdown and... taken during a startup, shutdown and malfunction plan are consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown and malfunction plan, this information shall be included in a semi-annual startup, shutdown and...
-
40 CFR Table 1 to Subpart Aaaa of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart AAAA
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... constructed, and reconstructed sources 63.6(e) Operation and maintenance requirements, startup, shutdown and... taken during a startup, shutdown and malfunction plan are consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown and malfunction plan, this information shall be included in a semi-annual startup, shutdown and...
-
40 CFR Table 1 to Subpart Aaaa of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart AAAA
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... constructed, and reconstructed sources 63.6(e) Operation and maintenance requirements, startup, shutdown and... taken during a startup, shutdown and malfunction plan are consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown and malfunction plan, this information shall be included in a semi-annual startup, shutdown and...
-
40 CFR 63.5415 - What notifications must I submit and when?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Operations NESHAP, and compliance date. (4) A brief description of the source including the types of leather... you startup your new or reconstructed affected source on or after February 27, 2002, you must submit... of the owner or operator. (2) The physical address of the leather finishing operation. (3) Each type...
-
40 CFR 63.5415 - What notifications must I submit and when?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... Finishing Operations NESHAP, and compliance date. (4) A brief description of the source including the types...) and (2), if you startup your new or reconstructed affected source on or after February 27, 2002, you.... (3) Each type of leather product process operation performed during the previous 12 months. (4) Each...
-
40 CFR 63.5415 - What notifications must I submit and when?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... Finishing Operations NESHAP, and compliance date. (4) A brief description of the source including the types...) and (2), if you startup your new or reconstructed affected source on or after February 27, 2002, you.... (3) Each type of leather product process operation performed during the previous 12 months. (4) Each...
-
40 CFR 63.5415 - What notifications must I submit and when?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Operations NESHAP, and compliance date. (4) A brief description of the source including the types of leather... you startup your new or reconstructed affected source on or after February 27, 2002, you must submit... of the owner or operator. (2) The physical address of the leather finishing operation. (3) Each type...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-12
... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0286; FRL-9698-6] Delegation of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; Gila River Indian Community... emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) to the Gila River Indian Community Department of...
-
75 FR 76004 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-07
... without change. EPA ICR Number 1975.08; NESHAP for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines... Motor Vehicles (Proposed Rule); in 40 CFR parts 85, 86 and 600; OMB filed comment on 11/12/2010. EPA ICR... Duty Engines and Vehicles Equipped with On-Board Diagnostics (PR for Alt Fuel Conversion of Heavy-duty...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-06
... Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production (40 CFR part 63... wool production plants are required to install fabric filter bag leak detection systems and then... Air Act. The required information consists of emissions data and other information that have been...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-18
... parameters; (2) bag leak detention systems; (3) maintenance plan for air pollution control devices (e.g.... Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) using Maximum Achievable Control Technology were proposed on August 4, 1998, promulgated on May 20, 1999, and amended most recently...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-12
... Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Iron and Steel Foundries (40 CFR part 63... foundries that are major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions. The rule applies to emissions... lead compounds, and identify the date, time, cause, and corrective actions taken for all bag-leak...
-
This page has a 12/2012 document that provides EPA’s responses to public comments on EPA’s Proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-08
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc... preferred method), or by e-mail to [email protected] , or by mail to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC..., 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: Office of Information and...
-
This page contains examples of the type of information that must be submitted to fulfill the Notification of Compliance Status requirement of 40 CFR 63, subpart XXXXXX for sources reporting and not reporting visible emissions information.
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-18
... effect if the Office of Management and Budget receives a copy of your comments on or before August 17... impacts? I. What are the health effects of these pollutants? VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A... of the NESHAP to take into account the effect of the EPA's Nonhazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-18
... Halogenated Solvent Cleaning Machines: State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management AGENCY... machines in Rhode Island, except for continuous web cleaning machines. This approval would grant RI DEM the... Halogenated Solvent NESHAP for organic solvent cleaning machines and would make the Rhode Island Department of...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-25
... Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam... Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4... Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2027.05, OMB Control Number...
-
40 CFR Table 1 to Subpart Aaaa of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart AAAA
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... reconstructed sources 63.6(e) Operation and maintenance requirements, startup, shutdown and malfunction plan...(b)(2)(i)-(b)(2)(v) General recordkeeping requirements 63.10(d)(5) If actions taken during a startup, shutdown and malfunction plan are consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown and malfunction...
-
40 CFR Table 1 to Subpart Aaaa of... - Applicability of NESHAP General Provisions to Subpart AAAA
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... reconstructed sources 63.6(e) Operation and maintenance requirements, startup, shutdown and malfunction plan...(b)(2)(i)-(b)(2)(v) General recordkeeping requirements 63.10(d)(5) If actions taken during a startup, shutdown and malfunction plan are consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown and malfunction...
-
75 FR 62383 - Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-08
... ICR Number 2080.04; Motor Vehicle and Engine Compliance Program Fees (Renewal); 40 CFR part 1027; was... ICR Number 1967.04; NESHAP for Stationary Combustion Turbines; 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and 40 CFR... Vehicles (Renewal); 19 CFR 12.73, 12.74, and 85.1501, 19 CFR part 85, subparts P and R, was approved on 09...
-
The purpose of this July 2012 document is to provide guidance for developing a consistent approach to documenting efficiency credits generated from energy conservation measures in the Implementation Plan for boilers covered by the Boiler MACT rule.
-
40 CFR 61.145 - Standard for demolition and renovation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during... intentional burning, all RACM including Category I and Category II nonfriable ACM must be removed in accordance with the NESHAP before burning. EC01MY92.002 EC01MY92.003 [55 FR 48419, Nov. 20, 1990; 56 FR 1669...
-
40 CFR 61.145 - Standard for demolition and renovation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during... intentional burning, all RACM including Category I and Category II nonfriable ACM must be removed in accordance with the NESHAP before burning. EC01MY92.002 EC01MY92.003 [55 FR 48419, Nov. 20, 1990; 56 FR 1669...
-
40 CFR 61.145 - Standard for demolition and renovation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during... intentional burning, all RACM including Category I and Category II nonfriable ACM must be removed in accordance with the NESHAP before burning. EC01MY92.002 EC01MY92.003 [55 FR 48419, Nov. 20, 1990; 56 FR 1669...
-
40 CFR 61.145 - Standard for demolition and renovation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during... intentional burning, all RACM including Category I and Category II nonfriable ACM must be removed in accordance with the NESHAP before burning. EC01MY92.002 EC01MY92.003 [55 FR 48419, Nov. 20, 1990; 56 FR 1669...
-
40 CFR 61.145 - Standard for demolition and renovation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during... intentional burning, all RACM including Category I and Category II nonfriable ACM must be removed in accordance with the NESHAP before burning. EC01MY92.002 EC01MY92.003 [55 FR 48419, Nov. 20, 1990; 56 FR 1669...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-04
... Item Specific ICR Titles Provided in the Text AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION... request (ICR) (See item specific ICR title, EPA ICR Number, and OMB Control Number provided in the text... additional comments to OMB. (1) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0337; Title: NESHAP for Portland Cement...
-
This example training certification format and any attached training documentation may be used to demonstrate, document and certify successful completion of required training topics under 40 CFR 63.11515(d)(6) for personnel, who spray apply surface coating
-
Project #OPE-FY17-0010, Feb 6, 2017. The EPA OIG plans to begin field work to determine whether EPA Region 4 and the state of North Carolina followed appropriate procedures in addressing claims of an improper asbestos demolition.
-
For the regulatory process, EPA is required to develop a regulatory impact analysis (RIA). This August 2010 RIA includes an economic impact analysis (EIA) and a small entity impacts analysis and documents the RIA methods and results for the 2010 rules
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Subpart M of... - Interpretive Rule Governing Roof Removal Operations
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... condition of the material at the time of demolition or renovation, (2) the nature of the operation to which... roofing materials. C. Cutting vs. Slicing and Manual Methods for Removal of Category I ACM 1.C.1. Because.... However, EPA believes that few roof removal jobs constitute “demolitions” as defined in the NESHAP (§ 61...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Subpart M of... - Interpretive Rule Governing Roof Removal Operations
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... condition of the material at the time of demolition or renovation, (2) the nature of the operation to which... roofing materials. C. Cutting vs. Slicing and Manual Methods for Removal of Category I ACM 1.C.1. Because.... However, EPA believes that few roof removal jobs constitute “demolitions” as defined in the NESHAP (§ 61...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Subpart M of... - Interpretive Rule Governing Roof Removal Operations
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... condition of the material at the time of demolition or renovation, (2) the nature of the operation to which... roofing materials. C. Cutting vs. Slicing and Manual Methods for Removal of Category I ACM 1.C.1. Because.... However, EPA believes that few roof removal jobs constitute “demolitions” as defined in the NESHAP (§ 61...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Subpart M of... - Interpretive Rule Governing Roof Removal Operations
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... condition of the material at the time of demolition or renovation, (2) the nature of the operation to which... roofing materials. C. Cutting vs. Slicing and Manual Methods for Removal of Category I ACM 1.C.1. Because.... However, EPA believes that few roof removal jobs constitute “demolitions” as defined in the NESHAP (§ 61...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-27
... anticipated to change over the next three years; and (2) the growth rate for the respondents is very low... is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change including any... 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes, or additions, to the Provisions specified at 40 CFR part...
-
Guidelines for catastrophic emergency situations involving asbestos
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
These guidelines are intended to assist regional, state, and local agencies in managing potential asbestos hazards resulting from a catastrophic accident or disaster. The guidelines may be used as a reference for advanced planning or, once the emergency presents itself, to help ensure that, to the extent feasible and compatible with other emergency measures, all appropriate steps are taken to safely handle and dispose of all asbestos, while avoiding unnecessary exposures to asbestos. The guidelines provide information that may be helpful to EPA Regional offices and delegated NESHAP agencies that must respond to emergencies involving asbestos. The guidelines review themore » experiences of EPA Regional and state enforcement agencies in dealing with asbestos during recent emergencies. Information is included on statutes and regulations that may be applicable in emergency situations, including the emergency provisions of the asbestos NESHAP. Lines of communication within EPA and between EPA and emergency management agencies are discussed. A list of contacts responsible at the state level for emergency and disaster activities is provided. Information is provided to help identify potential sources of asbestos releases, and factors are identified that should be considered in planning for the cleanup and disposal of asbestos.« less
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-03
... Paper X X T Halogenated Solvent X X X Cleaning. U Group I Polymers and Resins X X W Epoxy Resins... Trucks. JJJJ Paper and Other Web Coating X X KKKK Surface Coating of Metal X X Cans. MMMM Miscellaneous...,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. Background A. Delegation of NESHAP B. Clark...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-02
... 264, Subpart CC and 40 CFR Part 265). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1593.08, OMB Control Number 2060... ICR Number 1593.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0318; expiration date October 31, 2010. (6) NESHAP for..., subpart CC and 40 CFR part 265), Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0370, EPA ICR Number 1593.08, OMB...
-
Disposal and Reuse of Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan. Environmental Impact Statement
1989-09-01
impacts of the Proposed Action and reasonable alternatives over the 20-year study period are summarized in Table S-2. Mitigations and Pollution ...and wastewater services for reuse. The Oscoda sewage treatment plant would eventually have to be upgraded. There is sufficient capacity in local utility...Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations and National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). A survey
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Snyder, Sandra F.; Barnett, J. Matthew; Bisping, Lynn E.
This report documents radionuclide air emissions that result in the highest effective dose equivalent (EDE) to a member of the public, referred to as the maximally exposed individual (MEI). The report has been prepared in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Subpart H, National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 246-247, Radiation Protection Air Emissions. The dose to the PNNL Site MEI due to routine major and minormore » point source emissions in 2013 from PNNL Site sources is 2E-05 mrem (2E-07 mSv) EDE. The dose from fugitive emissions (i.e., unmonitored sources) is 2E-6 mrem (2E-8 mSv) EDE. The dose from radon emissions is 1E-11 mrem (1E-13 mSv) EDE. No nonroutine emissions occurred in 2013. The total radiological dose for 2013 to the MEI from all PNNL Site radionuclide emissions, including fugitive emissions and radon, is 2E-5 mrem (2E-7 mSv) EDE, or 100,000 times smaller than the federal and state standard of 10 mrem/yr, to which the PNNL Site is in compliance« less
-
2010-05-01
implementing best management practices (BMPs). The SWPPP outlines several BMPs such as permanent seeding, mulching, silt fence, straw barrier, filter strips...The DoD banned LBP use in 1978. Exposure to lead is usually through inhalation during renovation and demolition activities or through ingestion of...for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), which requires all suspect material (anything other than wood, glass, plastic , metal) to be assumed to be
-
Joint Service Solvent Substitution (JS3)
2012-05-01
Process Evaluation Acceptance Criteria Market Research Demonstration Plan Demonstration Validate Implementation Approval Start Approval...PRF-63460D Mg (AZ 31B-H24) mg/cm^2 0.7 Mg (SAE AMS 4377) “ Al (AMS-QQ-A-250) “ Al (7075-T6) “ 0.49 Ti (AMS 4911, 6AL- 4V ...properties – Evaluation of vendor test results – Industry experience – DOD Aerospace & Shipbuilding NESHAP experience Market Research 21 Approved for
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-28
...-Duty Trucks. JJJJ Paper and Other Web 12/22/08 07/01/08 12/31/08 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 Coating. 11... been delegated? List of Delegation Tables Table I--NSPS, 40 CFR part 60 Table II--NESHAP, 40 CFR part... authority to enforce the standards. What has been delegated? Tables I, II, and III below list the delegated...
-
2011 Radioactive Materials Usage Survey for Unmonitored Point Sources
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Sturgeon, Richard W.
This report provides the results of the 2011 Radioactive Materials Usage Survey for Unmonitored Point Sources (RMUS), which was updated by the Environmental Protection (ENV) Division's Environmental Stewardship (ES) at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). ES classifies LANL emission sources into one of four Tiers, based on the potential effective dose equivalent (PEDE) calculated for each point source. Detailed descriptions of these tiers are provided in Section 3. The usage survey is conducted annually; in odd-numbered years the survey addresses all monitored and unmonitored point sources and in even-numbered years it addresses all Tier III and various selected other sources.more » This graded approach was designed to ensure that the appropriate emphasis is placed on point sources that have higher potential emissions to the environment. For calendar year (CY) 2011, ES has divided the usage survey into two distinct reports, one covering the monitored point sources (to be completed later this year) and this report covering all unmonitored point sources. This usage survey includes the following release points: (1) all unmonitored sources identified in the 2010 usage survey, (2) any new release points identified through the new project review (NPR) process, and (3) other release points as designated by the Rad-NESHAP Team Leader. Data for all unmonitored point sources at LANL is stored in the survey files at ES. LANL uses this survey data to help demonstrate compliance with Clean Air Act radioactive air emissions regulations (40 CFR 61, Subpart H). The remainder of this introduction provides a brief description of the information contained in each section. Section 2 of this report describes the methods that were employed for gathering usage survey data and for calculating usage, emissions, and dose for these point sources. It also references the appropriate ES procedures for further information. Section 3 describes the RMUS and explains how the survey results are organized. The RMUS Interview Form with the attached RMUS Process Form(s) provides the radioactive materials survey data by technical area (TA) and building number. The survey data for each release point includes information such as: exhaust stack identification number, room number, radioactive material source type (i.e., potential source or future potential source of air emissions), radionuclide, usage (in curies) and usage basis, physical state (gas, liquid, particulate, solid, or custom), release fraction (from Appendix D to 40 CFR 61, Subpart H), and process descriptions. In addition, the interview form also calculates emissions (in curies), lists mrem/Ci factors, calculates PEDEs, and states the location of the critical receptor for that release point. [The critical receptor is the maximum exposed off-site member of the public, specific to each individual facility.] Each of these data fields is described in this section. The Tier classification of release points, which was first introduced with the 1999 usage survey, is also described in detail in this section. Section 4 includes a brief discussion of the dose estimate methodology, and includes a discussion of several release points of particular interest in the CY 2011 usage survey report. It also includes a table of the calculated PEDEs for each release point at its critical receptor. Section 5 describes ES's approach to Quality Assurance (QA) for the usage survey. Satisfactory completion of the survey requires that team members responsible for Rad-NESHAP (National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants) compliance accurately collect and process several types of information, including radioactive materials usage data, process information, and supporting information. They must also perform and document the QA reviews outlined in Section 5.2.6 (Process Verification and Peer Review) of ES-RN, 'Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Rad-NESHAP Compliance Project' to verify that all information is complete and correct.« less
-
2008-04-07
1 h~ clean::.) nthcsr:; gas 1"- com cncd 111 energy\\ 1:1 an imcrnal cnmhustinn engi1w-drin:n generator !"he cngmc produ~c.; ck·ctn~1ty \\\\ lllch rs...day mWh megawatt-hours NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEI National Emissions Inventory NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NESHAP...System (PRRS) at Hurlburt Field, Florida. This EA has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Council
-
NSPS-NESHAP Applicability for Excelerate Energy's Aguirre GasPort Emission Units
This document may be of assistance in applying the New Source Review (NSR) air permitting regulations including the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements. This document is part of the NSR Policy and Guidance Database. Some documents in the database are a scanned or retyped version of a paper photocopy of the original. Although we have taken considerable effort to quality assure the documents, some may contain typographical errors. Contact the office that issued the document if you need a copy of the original.
-
New Mexico NSPS/NESHAP Delegation
This document may be of assistance in applying the New Source Review (NSR) air permitting regulations including the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements. This document is part of the NSR Policy and Guidance Database. Some documents in the database are a scanned or retyped version of a paper photocopy of the original. Although we have taken considerable effort to quality assure the documents, some may contain typographical errors. Contact the office that issued the document if you need a copy of the original.
-
EPA/NASA/USAF Depainting Effort Concludes
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Finckenor, Miria M.; Clark-Ingram, Marceia
2000-01-01
The final report contains strip rate data from all of the methods, lessons learned during processing, metallurgical evaluations of the panels, and summaries of corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement studies. Any changes in surface roughness, fatigue and tensile properties, and crack detectability are noted in the report. No process was singled out above the others, as companies should consider equipment and operational costs when complying with the Aerospace NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and new OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) regulations.
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and Information... facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP? 285.651... facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP? If you are...
-
2001-01-12
This final rule modifies the Medicaid upper payment limits for inpatient hospital services, outpatient hospital services, nursing facility services, intermediate care facility services for the mentally retarded, and clinic services. For each type of Medicaid inpatient service, existing regulations place an upper limit on overall aggregate payments to all facilities and a separate aggregate upper limit on payments made to State-operated facilities. This final rule establishes an aggregate upper limit that applies to payments made to government facilities that are not State government-owned or operated, and a separate aggregate upper limit on payments made to privately-owned and operated facilities. This rule also eliminates the overall aggregate upper limit that had applied to these services. With respect to outpatient hospital and clinic services, this final rule establishes an aggregate upper limit on payments made to State government-owned or operated facilities, an aggregate upper limit on payments made to government facilities that are not State government-owned or operated, and an aggregate upper limit on payments made to privately-owned and operated facilities. These separate upper limits are necessary to ensure State Medicaid payment systems promote economy and efficiency. We are allowing a higher upper limit for payment to non-State public hospitals to recognize the higher costs of inpatient and outpatient services in public hospitals. In addition, to ensure continued beneficiary access to care and the ability of States to adjust to the changes in the upper payment limits, the final rule includes a transition period for States with approved rate enhancement State plan amendments.
-
The Radionuclide NESHAP and the Title V Operating Permits Program
This document may be of assistance in applying the Title V air operating permit regulations. This document is part of the Title V Policy and Guidance Database available at www2.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-operating-permit-policy-and-guidance-document-index. Some documents in the database are a scanned or retyped version of a paper photocopy of the original. Although we have taken considerable effort to quality assure the documents, some may contain typographical errors. Contact the office that issued the document if you need a copy of the original.
-
26 CFR 1.141-8 - $15 million limitation for output facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-04-01
... 26 Internal Revenue 2 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false $15 million limitation for output facilities. 1....141-8 $15 million limitation for output facilities. (a) In general—(1) General rule. Section 141(b)(4... million output limitation, the benefits and burdens test of § 1.141-7 applies, except that “$15 million...
-
26 CFR 1.141-8 - $15 million limitation for output facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... 26 Internal Revenue 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false $15 million limitation for output facilities. 1....141-8 $15 million limitation for output facilities. (a) In general—(1) General rule. Section 141(b)(4... million output limitation, the benefits and burdens test of § 1.141-7 applies, except that “$15 million...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP? 285.651 Section 285.651 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP? 585.651 Section 585.651 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP? 585.651 Section 585.651 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... facilities on my limited lease or any facilities on my project easement proposed under my GAP? 585.651 Section 585.651 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF Plans and...
-
47 CFR 27.804 - Field strength limits at WMTS facility.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Field strength limits at WMTS facility. 27.804... MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 1.4 GHz Band § 27.804 Field strength limits at WMTS facility. For any operation in the 1392-1395 MHz band, the predicted or measured field strength—into the WMTS band...
-
47 CFR 27.804 - Field strength limits at WMTS facility.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Field strength limits at WMTS facility. 27.804... MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 1.4 GHz Band § 27.804 Field strength limits at WMTS facility. For any operation in the 1392-1395 MHz band, the predicted or measured field strength—into the WMTS band...
-
10 CFR 503.22 - Site limitations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... more specific physical limitations relevant to the location or operation of the proposed facility exist... of these regulations. Note: Examples of the types of site limitations to which a petitioner may... of a specific physical limitation; (ii) Unavailability of transportation facilities for alternate...
-
10 CFR 503.22 - Site limitations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... more specific physical limitations relevant to the location or operation of the proposed facility exist... of these regulations. Note: Examples of the types of site limitations to which a petitioner may... of a specific physical limitation; (ii) Unavailability of transportation facilities for alternate...
-
10 CFR 503.33 - Site limitations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... OF ENERGY (CONTINUED) ALTERNATE FUELS NEW FACILITIES Permanent Exemptions for New Facilities § 503.33... include: (i) Inaccessibility of alternate fuels as a result of a specific physical limitation; (ii) Unavailability of transportation facilities for alternate fuels; (iii) Unavailability of adequate land or...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... Federal facilities and resources for emergency preparedness. 352.25 Section 352.25 Emergency Management... COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLANNING Federal Participation § 352.25 Limitation on committing Federal facilities and resources for emergency preparedness. (a) The commitment of Federal...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... CATEGORY Dissolving Sulfite Subcategory § 430.42 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent... limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where nitration grade pulp is produced] Pollutant or... [BPT effluent limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where viscose grade pulp is produced...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... CATEGORY Dissolving Sulfite Subcategory § 430.42 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent... limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where nitration grade pulp is produced] Pollutant or... [BPT effluent limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where viscose grade pulp is produced...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Dissolving Sulfite Subcategory § 430.42 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction... limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where nitration grade pulp is produced] Pollutant or... [BPT effluent limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where viscose grade pulp is produced...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... CATEGORY Dissolving Sulfite Subcategory § 430.42 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent... limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where nitration grade pulp is produced] Pollutant or... [BPT effluent limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where viscose grade pulp is produced...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Dissolving Sulfite Subcategory § 430.42 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction... limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where nitration grade pulp is produced] Pollutant or... [BPT effluent limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where viscose grade pulp is produced...
-
42 CFR 413.348 - Limitation on review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.348 Limitation on review. Judicial or administrative review under...
-
42 CFR 413.348 - Limitation on review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.348 Limitation on review. Judicial or administrative review under...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-04-01
... Designated contract market and swap execution facility position limits and accountability rules. (a) Spot... rules and procedures for monitoring and enforcing spot-month position limits set at levels no greater... monitoring and enforcing spot-month position limits set at levels no greater than 25 percent of estimated...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-04-01
... Designated contract market and swap execution facility position limits and accountability rules. (a) Spot... rules and procedures for monitoring and enforcing spot-month position limits set at levels no greater... monitoring and enforcing spot-month position limits set at levels no greater than 25 percent of estimated...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Mechanical Pulp Subcategory § 430.72 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction... limitations for mechanical pulp facilities where pulp and paper at groundwood chemi-mechanical mills are... times. Subpart G [BPT effluent limitations for mechanical pulp facilities where pulp and paper at...
-
Burke, Thomas F; Hines, Rosemary; Ahn, Roy; Walters, Michelle; Young, David; Anderson, Rachel Eleanor; Tom, Sabrina M; Clark, Rachel; Obita, Walter; Nelson, Brett D
2014-01-01
Objective Injuries, trauma and non-communicable diseases are responsible for a rising proportion of death and disability in low-income and middle-income countries. Delivering effective emergency and urgent healthcare for these and other conditions in resource-limited settings is challenging. In this study, we sought to examine and characterise emergency and urgent care capacity in a resource-limited setting. Methods We conducted an assessment within all 30 primary and secondary hospitals and within a stratified random sampling of 30 dispensaries and health centres in western Kenya. The key informants were the most senior facility healthcare provider and manager available. Emergency physician researchers utilised a semistructured assessment tool, and data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic coding. Results No lower level facilities and 30% of higher level facilities reported having a defined, organised approach to trauma. 43% of higher level facilities had access to an anaesthetist. The majority of lower level facilities had suture and wound care supplies and gloves but typically lacked other basic trauma supplies. For cardiac care, 50% of higher level facilities had morphine, but a minority had functioning ECG, sublingual nitroglycerine or a defibrillator. Only 20% of lower level facilities had glucometers, and only 33% of higher level facilities could care for diabetic emergencies. No facilities had sepsis clinical guidelines. Conclusions Large gaps in essential emergency care capabilities were identified at all facility levels in western Kenya. There are great opportunities for a universally deployed basic emergency care package, an advanced emergency care package and facility designation scheme, and a reliable prehospital care transportation and communications system in resource-limited settings. PMID:25260371
-
Safeguards Approaches for Black Box Processes or Facilities
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Diaz-Marcano, Helly; Gitau, Ernest TN; Hockert, John
2013-09-25
The objective of this study is to determine whether a safeguards approach can be developed for “black box” processes or facilities. These are facilities where a State or operator may limit IAEA access to specific processes or portions of a facility; in other cases, the IAEA may be prohibited access to the entire facility. The determination of whether a black box process or facility is safeguardable is dependent upon the details of the process type, design, and layout; the specific limitations on inspector access; and the restrictions placed upon the design information that can be provided to the IAEA. Thismore » analysis identified the necessary conditions for safeguardability of black box processes and facilities.« less
-
USDA-ARS?s Scientific Manuscript database
Purpose of the Study: Older adults are among the most challenging population groups to enroll into health-related research. This article describes two methods used by investigators to recruit mobility limited older adults residing at assisted living or senior housing (SH) facilities into a facility-...
-
40 CFR 372.23 - SIC and NAICS codes to which this Part applies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... facilities primarily engaged in reproducing text, drawings, plans, maps, or other copy, by blueprinting...)); 212324Kaolin and Ball Clay Mining Limited to facilities operating without a mine or quarry and that are...)); 212393Other Chemical and Fertilizer Mineral Mining Limited to facilities operating without a mine or quarry...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS THE PULP, PAPER, AND PAPERBOARD POINT SOURCE CATEGORY Bleached... [BPT effluent limitations for bleached kraft facilities where market pulp is produced] Pollutant or... effluent limitations for bleached kraft facilities where paperboard, coarse paper, and tissue paper are...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... [Bisulfite liquor/surface condensers; BPT effluent limitations for papergrade sulfite facilities where blow... range of 5.0 to 9.0 at all times. Subpart E [Bisulfite liquor/barometric condensers; BPT effluent... [Acid sulfite liquor/surface condensers; BPT effluent limitations for papergrade sulfite facilities...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... [Bisulfite liquor/surface condensers; BPT effluent limitations for papergrade sulfite facilities where blow... range of 5.0 to 9.0 at all times. Subpart E [Bisulfite liquor/barometric condensers; BPT effluent... [Acid sulfite liquor/surface condensers; BPT effluent limitations for papergrade sulfite facilities...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... CATEGORY Alaskan Hand-Butchered Salmon Processing Subcategory § 408.162 Effluent limitations guidelines... available (BPT): (a) Any hand-butchered salmon processing facility located in population or processing... salmon processing facility not covered under § 408.162(a) shall meet the following limitations: No...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... CATEGORY Alaskan Hand-Butchered Salmon Processing Subcategory § 408.162 Effluent limitations guidelines... available (BPT): (a) Any hand-butchered salmon processing facility located in population or processing... salmon processing facility not covered under § 408.162(a) shall meet the following limitations: No...
-
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Wheeler, W.
1998-12-01
This report estimates the economic and financial effects and the benefits of compliance with the proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment (CWT) industry. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has measured these impacts in terms of changes in the profitability of waste treatment operations at CWT facilities, changes in market prices to CWT services, and changes in the quantities of waste management at CWT facilities in six geographic regions. EPA has also examined the impacts on companies owning CWT facilities (including impacts on small entities), on communities in which CWT facilities are located, and on environmentalmore » justice. EPA examined the benefits to society of the CWT effluent limitations guidelines and standards by examining cancer and non-cancer health effects of the regulation, recreational benefits, and cost savings to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) to which indirect-discharging CWT facilities send their wastewater.« less
-
Quality improvement nursing facilities: a nursing leadership perspective.
Adams-Wendling, Linda; Lee, Robert
2005-11-01
The purposes of this study were to characterize the state of quality improvement (QI) in nursing facilities and to identify barriers to improvement from nursing leaders' perspectives. The study employed a non-experimental descriptive design, using closed- and open-ended survey questions in a sample of 51 nursing facilities in a midwestern state. Only two of these facilities had active QI programs. Furthermore, turnover and limited training among these nursing leaders represented major barriers to rapid implementation of such programs. This study is consistent with earlier findings that QI programs are limited in nursing homes.
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 23 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Size classes and associated liability limits for fixed onshore oil storage facilities, 1,000 barrels or less capacity. 113.4 Section 113.4 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS LIABILITY LIMITS FOR...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 22 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Size classes and associated liability limits for fixed onshore oil storage facilities, 1,000 barrels or less capacity. 113.4 Section 113.4 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS LIABILITY LIMITS FOR...
-
Identifying and Funding the Greatest Needs in School Facilities
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Gorrell, Bob; Salamone, Frank
2012-01-01
How should public school facilities programs allocate limited resources to school facilities needs fairly, cost-effectively, and efficiently while taking into account facility condition, educational adequacy, and other priorities? New Mexico has developed a solution that overcomes key challenges that are common to school facilities programs across…
-
40 CFR 160.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... aquatic plants. (2) Facilities for plant growth, including, but not limited to greenhouses, growth... preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be provided. As...
-
40 CFR 160.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... aquatic plants. (2) Facilities for plant growth, including, but not limited to greenhouses, growth... preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be provided. As...
-
40 CFR 160.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... aquatic plants. (2) Facilities for plant growth, including, but not limited to greenhouses, growth... preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be provided. As...
-
40 CFR 430.76 - Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... limitations are only applicable at facilities where chlorophenolic-containing biocides are used. Permittees not using chlorophenolic-containing biocides must certify to the permit-issuing authority that they are not using these biocides. Zinc limitations are only applicable at facilities where zinc...
-
40 CFR 430.76 - Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... limitations are only applicable at facilities where chlorophenolic-containing biocides are used. Permittees not using chlorophenolic-containing biocides must certify to the permit-issuing authority that they are not using these biocides. Zinc limitations are only applicable at facilities where zinc...
-
40 CFR 160.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... aquatic plants. (2) Facilities for plant growth, including, but not limited to greenhouses, growth chambers, light banks, and fields. (c) When appropriate, facilities for aquatic animal tests shall be... preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be provided. As...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Federal facilities and resources for emergency preparedness. 352.25 Section 352.25 Emergency Management and Assistance FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY PREPAREDNESS COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLANNING Federal Participation § 352.25 Limitation on...
-
Comparing countermeasures for mitigating wrong-way entries onto limited access facilities.
DOT National Transportation Integrated Search
2017-03-01
Wrong-way crashes are a major cause for safety concerns along freeways and limited-access facilities. Although wrong-way crashes account for a relatively small portion of total crashes, the impact between two cars crashing into each other at high spe...
-
Keohane, Laura M; Grebla, Regina C; Mor, Vincent; Trivedi, Amal N
2015-06-01
Inpatient and skilled nursing facility (SNF) cost sharing in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans may reduce unnecessary use of these services. However, large out-of-pocket expenses potentially limit access to care and encourage beneficiaries at high risk of needing inpatient and postacute care to avoid or leave MA plans. In 2011 new federal regulations restricted inpatient and skilled nursing facility cost sharing and mandated limits on out-of-pocket spending in MA plans. After these regulations, MA members in plans with low premiums averaged $1,758 in expected out-of-pocket spending for an episode of seven hospital days and twenty skilled nursing facility days. Among members with the same low-premium plan in 2010 and 2011, 36 percent of members belonged to plans that added an out-of-pocket spending limit in 2011. However, these members also had a $293 increase in average cost sharing for an inpatient and skilled nursing facility episode, possibly to offset plans' expenses in financing out-of-pocket limits. Some MA beneficiaries may still have difficulty affording acute and postacute care despite greater regulation of cost sharing. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
-
Keohane, Laura M.; Grebla, Regina C.; Mor, Vincent; Trivedi, Amal N.
2015-01-01
Inpatient and skilled nursing facility (SNF) cost sharing in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans may reduce unnecessary use of these services. However, large out-of-pocket expenses potentially limit access to care and encourage beneficiaries at high risk of needing inpatient and postacute care to avoid or leave MA plans. In 2011 new federal regulations restricted inpatient and skilled nursing facility cost sharing and mandated limits on out-of-pocket spending in MA plans. After these regulations, MA members in plans with low premiums averaged $1,758 in expected out-of-pocket spending for an episode of seven hospital days and twenty skilled nursing facility days. Among members with the same low-premium plan in 2010 and 2011, 36 percent of members belonged to plans that added an out-of-pocket spending limit in 2011. However, these members also had a $293 increase in average cost sharing for an inpatient and skilled nursing facility episode, possibly to offset plans’ expenses in financing out-of-pocket limits. Some MA beneficiaries may still have difficulty affording acute and postacute care despite greater regulation of cost sharing. PMID:26056208
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... facilities that receive trade-in vehicles under the CARS program. 599.401 Section 599.401 Transportation... facilities that receive trade-in vehicles under the CARS program. (a) The disposal facility must: (1) Not... or shredded, report the vehicle to NMVTIS as crushed or shredded. (b) The disposal facility may not...
-
40 CFR 792.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... maintaining algae and aquatic plants. (2) Facilities, as specified in the protocol, for plant growth... supplies shall be preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be..., facilities for aquatic animal tests shall be provided. These include but are not limited to aquaria, holding...
-
40 CFR 160.51 - Specimen and data storage facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 25 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Specimen and data storage facilities... PROGRAMS GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS Facilities § 160.51 Specimen and data storage facilities. Space shall be provided for archives, limited to access by authorized personnel only, for the storage and...
-
40 CFR 160.51 - Specimen and data storage facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 24 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Specimen and data storage facilities... PROGRAMS GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS Facilities § 160.51 Specimen and data storage facilities. Space shall be provided for archives, limited to access by authorized personnel only, for the storage and...
-
40 CFR 160.51 - Specimen and data storage facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 25 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Specimen and data storage facilities... PROGRAMS GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS Facilities § 160.51 Specimen and data storage facilities. Space shall be provided for archives, limited to access by authorized personnel only, for the storage and...
-
40 CFR 160.51 - Specimen and data storage facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 24 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Specimen and data storage facilities... PROGRAMS GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE STANDARDS Facilities § 160.51 Specimen and data storage facilities. Space shall be provided for archives, limited to access by authorized personnel only, for the storage and...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
...) EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS THE PULP, PAPER, AND PAPERBOARD POINT SOURCE CATEGORY Dissolving Sulfite... dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where nitration, viscose, or cellophane pulps are produced] Pollutant or... ton of product. Subpart D [BAT effluent limitations for dissolving sulfite pulp facilities where...
-
2001-09-05
This final rule modifies the Medicaid upper payment (UPL) limit provisions by establishing a new transition period for States that submitted plan amendments before March 13, 2001 that do not comply with the new UPLs effective on that date (but do comply with the prior UPLs) and were approved on or after January 22, 2001. This new transition period applies to payments for inpatient hospital services, outpatient hospital services, nursing facility services, intermediate care facility services for the mentally retarded, and clinic services.
-
Boadu, Nana Yaa; Amuasi, John; Ansong, Daniel; Einsiedel, Edna; Menon, Devidas; Yanow, Stephanie K
2016-02-27
Rapid diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for malaria enable diagnostic testing at primary care facilities in resource-limited settings, where weak infrastructure limits the use of microscopy. In 2010, Ghana adopted a test-before-treat guideline for malaria, with RDT use promoted to facilitate diagnosis. Yet healthcare practitioners still treat febrile patients without testing, or despite negative malaria test results. Few studies have explored RDT implementation beyond the notions of provider or patient acceptability. The aim of this study was to identify the factors directly influencing malaria RDT implementation at primary care facilities in a Ghanaian district. Qualitative interviews, focus groups and direct observations were conducted with 50 providers at six purposively selected primary care facilities in the Atwima-Nwabiagya district. Data were analysed thematically. RDT implementation was hampered by: (1) healthcare delivery constraints (weak supply chain, limited quality assurance and control, inadequate guideline emphasis, staffing limitations); (2) provider perceptions (entrenched case-management paradigms, limited preparedness for change); (3) social dynamics of care delivery (expected norms of provider-patient interaction, test affordability); and (4) limited provider engagement in policy processes leading to fragmented implementation of health sector reform. Limited health system capacity, socio-economic, political, and historical factors hampered malaria RDT implementation at primary care facilities in the study district. For effective RDT implementation providers must be: (1) adequately enabled through efficient allocation and management of essential healthcare commodities; (2) appropriately empowered with the requisite knowledge and skill through ongoing, effective professional development; and (3) actively engaged in policy dialogue to demystify socio-political misconceptions that hinder health sector reform policies from improving care delivery. Clear, consistent guideline emphasis, with complementary action to address deep-rooted provider concerns will build their confidence in, and promote uptake of recommended policies, practices, and technology for diagnosing malaria.
-
Improving Tanzanian childbirth service quality.
Jaribu, Jennie; Penfold, Suzanne; Green, Cathy; Manzi, Fatuma; Schellenberg, Joanna
2018-04-16
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a quality improvement (QI) intervention in primary health facilities providing childbirth care in rural Southern Tanzania. Design/methodology/approach A QI collaborative model involving district managers and health facility staff was piloted for 6 months in 4 health facilities in Mtwara Rural district and implemented for 18 months in 23 primary health facilities in Ruangwa district. The model brings together healthcare providers from different health facilities in interactive workshops by: applying QI methods to generate and test change ideas in their own facilities; using local data to monitor improvement and decision making; and health facility supervision visits by project and district mentors. The topics for improving childbirth were deliveries and partographs. Findings Median monthly deliveries increased in 4 months from 38 (IQR 37-40) to 65 (IQR 53-71) in Mtwara Rural district, and in 17 months in Ruangwa district from 110 (IQR 103-125) to 161 (IQR 148-174). In Ruangwa health facilities, the women for whom partographs were used to monitor labour progress increased from 10 to 57 per cent in 17 months. Research limitations/implications The time for QI innovation, testing and implementation phases was limited, and the study only looked at trends. The outcomes were limited to process rather than health outcome measures. Originality/value Healthcare providers became confident in the QI method through engagement, generating and testing their own change ideas, and observing improvements. The findings suggest that implementing a QI initiative is feasible in rural, low-income settings.
-
Quality and rural-urban comparison of tuberculosis care in Rivers State, Nigeria.
Tobin-West, Charles Ibiene; Isodje, Anastasia
2016-01-01
Nigeria ranks among countries with the highest burden of tuberculosis. Yet evidence continues to indicate poor treatment outcomes which have been attributed to poor quality of care. This study aims to identify some of the systemic problems in order to inform policy decisions for improved quality of services and treatment outcomes in Nigeria. A comparative assessment of the quality of TB care in rural and urban health facilities was carried out between May and June 2013, employing the Donabedian model of quality assessment. Data was analysed using the SPSS software package version 20.0. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Health facility infrastructures were more constrained in the urban than rural settings. Both the urban and rural facilities lacked adequate facilities for infection control such as, running water, air filter respirators, hand gloves and extractor fans. Health education and HIV counselling and testing (HCT) were limited in rural facilities compared to urban facilities. Although anti-TB drugs were generally available in both settings, the DOTS strategy in patient care was completely ignored. Finally, laboratory support for diagnosis and patient monitoring was limited in the rural facilities. The study highlights suboptimal quality of TB care in Rivers State with limitations in health education and HCT of patients for HIV as well as laboratory support for TB care in rural health facilities. We, therefore, recommend that adequate infection control measures, strict observance of the DOTS strategy and sufficient laboratory support be provided to TB clinics in the State.
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-04-01
... spot-month positions. Spot-month limits should be adopted for significant price discovery contracts to... market or derivatives transaction execution facility should set the spot-month limit for its significant... designated contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility. In this case, the spot-month...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 49 Transportation 7 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Requirements and limitations for disposal facilities that receive trade-in vehicles under the CARS program. 599.401 Section 599.401 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED)...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 49 Transportation 7 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Requirements and limitations for disposal facilities that receive trade-in vehicles under the CARS program. 599.401 Section 599.401 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED)...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 49 Transportation 7 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Requirements and limitations for disposal facilities that receive trade-in vehicles under the CARS program. 599.401 Section 599.401 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED)...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 49 Transportation 7 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Requirements and limitations for disposal facilities that receive trade-in vehicles under the CARS program. 599.401 Section 599.401 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED)...
-
Cartwright, Alice F; Karunaratne, Mihiri; Barr-Walker, Jill; Johns, Nicole E; Upadhyay, Ushma D
2018-05-14
Abortion is a common medical procedure, yet its availability has become more limited across the United States over the past decade. Women who do not know where to go for abortion care may use the internet to find abortion facility information, and there appears to be more online searches for abortion in states with more restrictive abortion laws. While previous studies have examined the distances women must travel to reach an abortion provider, to our knowledge no studies have used a systematic online search to document the geographic locations and services of abortion facilities. The objective of our study was to describe abortion facilities and services available in the United States from the perspective of a potential patient searching online and to identify US cities where people must travel the farthest to obtain abortion care. In early 2017, we conducted a systematic online search for abortion facilities in every state and the largest cities in each state. We recorded facility locations, types of abortion services available, and facility gestational limits. We then summarized the frequencies by region and state. If the online information was incomplete or unclear, we called the facility using a mystery shopper method, which simulates the perspective of patients calling for services. We also calculated distance to the closest abortion facility from all US cities with populations of 50,000 or more. We identified 780 facilities through our online search, with the fewest in the Midwest and South. Over 30% (236/780, 30.3%) of all facilities advertised the provision of medication abortion services only; this proportion was close to 40% in the Northeast (89/233, 38.2%) and West (104/262, 39.7%). The lowest gestational limit at which services were provided was 12 weeks in Wyoming; the highest was 28 weeks in New Mexico. People in 27 US cities must travel over 100 miles (160 km) to reach an abortion facility; the state with the largest number of such cities is Texas (n=10). Online searches can provide detailed information about the location of abortion facilities and the types of services they provide. However, these facilities are not evenly distributed geographically, and many large US cities do not have an abortion facility. Long distances can push women to seek abortion in later gestations when care is even more limited. ©Alice F Cartwright, Mihiri Karunaratne, Jill Barr-Walker, Nicole E Johns, Ushma D Upadhyay. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.05.2018.
-
Waste Sampling & Characterization Facility (WSCF) Complex Safety Analysis
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
MELOY, R.T.
2002-04-01
This document was prepared to analyze the Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility for safety consequences by: Determining radionuclide and highly hazardous chemical inventories; Comparing these inventories to the appropriate regulatory limits; Documenting the compliance status with respect to these limits; and Identifying the administrative controls necessary to maintain this status. The primary purpose of the Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility (WSCF) is to perform low-level radiological and chemical analyses on various types of samples taken from the Hanford Site. These analyses will support the fulfillment of federal, Washington State, and Department of Energy requirements.
-
Tanning facility use: are we exceeding Food and Drug Administration limits?
Hornung, Robin L; Magee, Kristin H; Lee, Willie J; Hansen, Lori A; Hsieh, Yi-Ching
2003-10-01
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends exposure limits for tanning bed use. Tanning patrons may not be following these recommendations and may be overexposed to damaging ultraviolet radiation (UV). This study was conducted to assess tanning patrons' adherence to FDA-recommended exposure limits and to measure the amount of UVA and UVB radiation emitted by tanning beds. A community-based survey was administered during routine state inspections of North Carolina tanning facilities (n = 50). At each facility, patron records were randomly selected (n = 483) for a survey of exposure records, and UVA and UVB outputs were measured for each tanning bed. The recommended limits were exceeded by 95% of patrons, and 33% of patrons began tanning at the maximum doses recommended for maintenance tanning. Average tanning bed output was 192.1 W/m(2) UVA and 0.35 W/m(2) erythemally weighted UVB. Interventions for tanning bed operators and patrons are needed to increase compliance with federally recommended exposure limits.
-
36 CFR 1234.10 - What are the facility requirements for all records storage facilities?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
.../structural engineer that there are no obvious structural weaknesses that would indicate a high potential for... permit unrestricted access for emergency vehicles. (f) A floor load limit must be established for the..., etc. The allowable load limit must be posted in a conspicuous place and must not be exceeded. (g) The...
-
36 CFR 1234.10 - What are the facility requirements for all records storage facilities?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
.../structural engineer that there are no obvious structural weaknesses that would indicate a high potential for... permit unrestricted access for emergency vehicles. (f) A floor load limit must be established for the..., etc. The allowable load limit must be posted in a conspicuous place and must not be exceeded. (g) The...
-
36 CFR § 1234.10 - What are the facility requirements for all records storage facilities?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
.../structural engineer that there are no obvious structural weaknesses that would indicate a high potential for... permit unrestricted access for emergency vehicles. (f) A floor load limit must be established for the..., etc. The allowable load limit must be posted in a conspicuous place and must not be exceeded. (g) The...
-
36 CFR 1234.10 - What are the facility requirements for all records storage facilities?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
.../structural engineer that there are no obvious structural weaknesses that would indicate a high potential for... permit unrestricted access for emergency vehicles. (f) A floor load limit must be established for the..., etc. The allowable load limit must be posted in a conspicuous place and must not be exceeded. (g) The...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... CATEGORY Alaskan Mechanized Salmon Processing Subcategory § 408.172 Effluent limitations guidelines... available (BPT): (a) Any mechanized salmon processing facility located in population or processing centers... grease 29 11 pH (1) (1) 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. (b) Any mechanized salmon processing facility not...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... CATEGORY Alaskan Mechanized Salmon Processing Subcategory § 408.172 Effluent limitations guidelines... available (BPT): (a) Any mechanized salmon processing facility located in population or processing centers... grease 29 11 pH (1) (1) 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. (b) Any mechanized salmon processing facility not...
-
Quality and rural-urban comparison of tuberculosis care in Rivers State, Nigeria
Tobin-West, Charles Ibiene; Isodje, Anastasia
2016-01-01
Introduction Nigeria ranks among countries with the highest burden of tuberculosis. Yet evidence continues to indicate poor treatment outcomes which have been attributed to poor quality of care. This study aims to identify some of the systemic problems in order to inform policy decisions for improved quality of services and treatment outcomes in Nigeria. Methods A comparative assessment of the quality of TB care in rural and urban health facilities was carried out between May and June 2013, employing the Donabedian model of quality assessment. Data was analysed using the SPSS software package version 20.0. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Health facility infrastructures were more constrained in the urban than rural settings. Both the urban and rural facilities lacked adequate facilities for infection control such as, running water, air filter respirators, hand gloves and extractor fans. Health education and HIV counselling and testing (HCT) were limited in rural facilities compared to urban facilities. Although anti-TB drugs were generally available in both settings, the DOTS strategy in patient care was completely ignored. Finally, laboratory support for diagnosis and patient monitoring was limited in the rural facilities. Conclusion The study highlights suboptimal quality of TB care in Rivers State with limitations in health education and HCT of patients for HIV as well as laboratory support for TB care in rural health facilities. We, therefore, recommend that adequate infection control measures, strict observance of the DOTS strategy and sufficient laboratory support be provided to TB clinics in the State. PMID:27642401
-
40 CFR 792.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... maintaining algae and aquatic plants. (2) Facilities, as specified in the protocol, for plant growth, including but not limited to, greenhouses, growth chambers, light banks, and fields. (c) When appropriate... supplies shall be preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be...
-
40 CFR 792.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... maintaining algae and aquatic plants. (2) Facilities, as specified in the protocol, for plant growth, including but not limited to, greenhouses, growth chambers, light banks, and fields. (c) When appropriate... supplies shall be preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be...
-
40 CFR 792.45 - Test system supply facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... maintaining algae and aquatic plants. (2) Facilities, as specified in the protocol, for plant growth, including but not limited to, greenhouses, growth chambers, light banks, and fields. (c) When appropriate... supplies shall be preserved by appropriate means. (b) When appropriate, plant supply facilities shall be...
-
Marine Sciences Laboratory Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2013
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Snyder, Sandra F.; Barnett, J. Matthew; Ballinger, Marcel Y.
2014-05-01
The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Marine Sciences Laboratory (MSL) located on Battelle Land – Sequim (Sequim). This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 246-247, “Radiation Protection–Air Emissions.” The EDE to the Sequimmore » MEI due to routine operations in 2013 was 5E-05 mrem (5E-07 mSv). No non-routine emissions occurred in 2013. The MSL is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard.« less
-
Marine Sciences Laboratory Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2014
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Snyder, Sandra F.; Barnett, J. Matthew
2015-05-04
The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Marine Sciences Laboratory (MSL) located on Battelle Land – Sequim.This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Subpart H, ''National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 246-247, “Radiation Protection–Air Emissions.'' The EDE to the MSL MEI duemore » to routine operations in 2014 was 9E-05 mrem (9E-07 mSv). No non-routine emissions occurred in 2014. The MSL is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard.« less
-
Geothermal-retrofit study for the National Orange Show Facilities in San Bernardino, California
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1981-11-17
The cost and feasibility of retrofitting the National Orange Show Facilities to use geothermal heat instead of natural gas for heating are determined. Because of the limited usage of the smaller facilities the study was limited to the conversion of the six major buildings: Domed, Hobby, Citrus, Auditorium, Restaurant and Commercial. A major problem is that most of the buildings are used on a very limited basis. This drastically reduced the amount of savings that could be used to amortize the retrofit cost. Another problem is that the buildings are spread over a large area and so the below grademore » piping costs were high. Finally, all of the buildings except for the Auditorium have direct gas fired heaters that would require all new terminal heating systems. In order to limit the retrofit cost, the retrofit system was designed to handle less than the peak load. This seemed appropriate because the facility might not even be in operation when a peak load condition occurred. Also, the existing systems could be used to supplement the geothermal system if necessary. The calculated and design peak loads are summarized.« less
-
Tell, R A; Hooper, H C; Sias, G G; Mezei, G; Hung, P; Kavet, R
2015-01-01
The southwest region of the United States is expected to experience an expansion of commercial solar photovoltaic generation facilities over the next 25 years. A solar facility converts direct current generated by the solar panels to three-phase 60-Hz power that is fed to the grid. This conversion involves sequential processing of the direct current through an inverter that produces low-voltage three-phase power, which is stepped up to distribution voltage (∼12 kV) through a transformer. This study characterized magnetic and electric fields between the frequencies of 0 Hz and 3 GHz at two facilities operated by the Southern California Edison Company in Porterville, CA and San Bernardino, CA. Static magnetic fields were very small compared to exposure limits established by IEEE and ICNIRP. The highest 60-Hz magnetic fields were measured adjacent to transformers and inverters, and radiofrequency fields from 5-100 kHz were associated with the inverters. The fields measured complied in every case with IEEE controlled and ICNIRP occupational exposure limits. In all cases, electric fields were negligible compared to IEEE and ICNIRP limits across the spectrum measured and when compared to the FCC limits (≥0.3 MHz).
-
An investigation of ADA compliance of aquatic facilities in the North Texas area.
Pike, Hilary; Walker, Joseph; Collins, John; Hodges, Jan
2008-01-01
The study expands research on accessibility, comparing compliance scores of aquatic facilities in North Texas built before the 1991 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) with facilities built after the 1991 ADAAG and the proposed 2002 supplement. A quasi-experimental design directed the selection of 52 facilities where measurements were taken to determine compliance with ADAAG and the supplement. A focus group provided insight into interpreting which features functioned as barriers or constraints to participation. Metropolitan statistical area in North Texas. A total of 52 aquatic facilities and 12 focus group participants (University of North Texas institutional review board 07-283). ADA aquatic facility compliance instrument. Frequency, ratios. No facilities were 100% ADA compliant overall, although some facilities were 100% compliant with specific structural domains. Women's restrooms rated lowest (average = 55%), and men's restrooms received the second lowest rating (average = 64%). Focus group results indicated that improperly designed restrooms and pool entries are primary barriers to participation. The findings support a need for stronger enforcement of policies that improve accessibility of facilities. Architectural reviews and construction practices need to be improved. The structural barriers and constraints identified can be limiting factors in efforts aimed at increasing physical activity among individuals with disabilities and individuals with physical limitations.
-
44 CFR 206.347 - Requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...) Energy facilities. For the repair of facilities necessary for the exploration, extraction or..., including but not limited to aeronautical, atmospheric, space, geologic, marine, fish and wildlife and other...
-
44 CFR 206.347 - Requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...) Energy facilities. For the repair of facilities necessary for the exploration, extraction or..., including but not limited to aeronautical, atmospheric, space, geologic, marine, fish and wildlife and other...
-
44 CFR 206.347 - Requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...) Energy facilities. For the repair of facilities necessary for the exploration, extraction or..., including but not limited to aeronautical, atmospheric, space, geologic, marine, fish and wildlife and other...
-
44 CFR 206.347 - Requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...) Energy facilities. For the repair of facilities necessary for the exploration, extraction or..., including but not limited to aeronautical, atmospheric, space, geologic, marine, fish and wildlife and other...
-
78 FR 65690 - Trees and Plantings Associated With Eligible Facilities, RP9524.5
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-01
...] Trees and Plantings Associated With Eligible Facilities, RP9524.5 AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management... policy Trees and Plantings Associated with Eligible Facilities. The Federal Emergency Management Agency... trees, shrubs, and other plantings, including limited eligibility for replacement of grass and sod...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-24
... company's management, production facilities and customer/supplier relationships have not changed as a... in no significant changes to management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customers... limited to, changes in: (1) Management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4...
-
28 CFR 91.55 - Categorical exclusions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... disposal, or water facilities. (c) Expansion of support facilities. Projects for the expansion of bed space... Historic Places, or is eligible for listing on the register. (b) Limited expansion. Projects for the expansion of an existing facility or within an existing correctional complex, which does not add more than...
-
28 CFR 91.55 - Categorical exclusions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... disposal, or water facilities. (c) Expansion of support facilities. Projects for the expansion of bed space... Historic Places, or is eligible for listing on the register. (b) Limited expansion. Projects for the expansion of an existing facility or within an existing correctional complex, which does not add more than...
-
28 CFR 91.55 - Categorical exclusions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... disposal, or water facilities. (c) Expansion of support facilities. Projects for the expansion of bed space... Historic Places, or is eligible for listing on the register. (b) Limited expansion. Projects for the expansion of an existing facility or within an existing correctional complex, which does not add more than...
-
40 CFR 437.4 - Monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... compliance monitoring is required for each regulated parameter. (b) Any CWT facility that discharges... wastestream subcategory limitations or standards, it is only subject to one subpart. (3) When a CWT facility treats any waste receipt that contains cyanide at a concentration higher than 136 mg/L, the CWT facility...
-
40 CFR 437.4 - Monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... compliance monitoring is required for each regulated parameter. (b) Any CWT facility that discharges... wastestream subcategory limitations or standards, it is only subject to one subpart. (3) When a CWT facility treats any waste receipt that contains cyanide at a concentration higher than 136 mg/L, the CWT facility...
-
Goldman, L Elizabeth; Walker, Rod; Hubbard, Rebecca; Kerlikowske, Karla
2013-04-01
Whether timeliness of follow-up after abnormal mammography differs at facilities serving vulnerable populations, such as women with limited education or income, in rural areas, and racial/ethnic minorities is unknown. We examined receipt of diagnostic evaluation after abnormal mammography using 1998-2006 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium-linked Medicare claims. We compared whether time to recommended breast imaging or biopsy depended on whether women attended facilities serving vulnerable populations. We characterized a facility by the proportion of mammograms performed on women with limited education or income, in rural areas, or racial/ethnic minorities. We analyzed 30,874 abnormal screening examinations recommended for follow-up imaging across 142 facilities and 10,049 abnormal diagnostic examinations recommended for biopsy across 114 facilities. Women at facilities serving populations with less education or more racial/ethnic minorities had lower rates of follow-up imaging (4%-5% difference, P<0.05), and women at facilities serving more rural and low-income populations had lower rates of biopsy (4%-5% difference, P<0.05). Women undergoing biopsy at facilities serving vulnerable populations had longer times until biopsy than those at facilities serving nonvulnerable populations (21.6 vs. 15.6 d; 95% confidence interval for mean difference 4.1-7.7). The proportion of women receiving recommended imaging within 11 months and biopsy within 3 months varied across facilities (interquartile range, 85.5%-96.5% for imaging and 79.4%-87.3% for biopsy). Among Medicare recipients, follow-up rates were slightly lower at facilities serving vulnerable populations, and among those women who returned for diagnostic evaluation, time to follow-up was slightly longer at facilities that served vulnerable population. Interventions should target variability in follow-up rates across facilities, and evaluate effectiveness particularly at facilities serving vulnerable populations.
-
Cryogenic implications of orbit selection of the Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF)
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Lee, J. H.; Brooks, W. F.; Maa, S.
1986-01-01
An investigation has been conducted to determine how the choice of orbit for NASA's prospective Space IR Telescope Facility (SIRTF), between polar (99-deg) and low inclination (28.5-deg) alternatives, will affect the performance of the all-superfluid He-cooled IR optics employed. While the dewar design met both the service life and 200-micron background-limited performance criteria in the case of the polar orbit mission, the alternative orbit allowed the background-limited criteria to be met only 50 percent of the time. It is accordingly recommended that the 200-micron background-limited observations be made only for a limited portion of the mission, while meeting the 100-micron limit at all times.
-
Protocol for the E-Area Low Level Waste Facility Disposal Limits Database
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Swingle, R
2006-01-31
A database has been developed to contain the disposal limits for the E-Area Low Level Waste Facility (ELLWF). This database originates in the form of an EXCEL{copyright} workbook. The pertinent sheets are translated to PDF format using Adobe ACROBAT{copyright}. The PDF version of the database is accessible from the Solid Waste Division web page on SHRINE. In addition to containing the various disposal unit limits, the database also contains hyperlinks to the original references for all limits. It is anticipated that database will be revised each time there is an addition, deletion or revision of any of the ELLWF radionuclidemore » disposal limits.« less
-
42 CFR 416.61 - Scope of facility services.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Scope of facility services. 416.61 Section 416.61 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES... are not limited to— (1) Nursing, technician, and related services; (2) Use of the facilities where the...
-
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-19
... On August 3, 2011, Brown Bear Power, LLC, Topsham Hydroelectric Generating Facility (Trust No. 1... DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 4784-082] Brown Bear Power, LLC, Topsham Hydroelectric Generating Facility Trust No. 1, Topsham Hydro Partners Limited Partnership...
-
Tour NREL Facilities During Energy Awareness Month
laboratories for photovoltaics (solar electricity) research; the Photovoltaic Outdoor Test Facility, where scientists test photovoltaic systems; and the Alternative Fuels User Facility, which houses a biofuels pilot month. Space is limited and pre-registration is required at (303) 384-6565. NREL is a national
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Part 20 - Guidelines for Certification
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... that pollution control facilities must be used in connection with a plant or other property in... FACILITIES Pt. 20, App. A Appendix A to Part 20—Guidelines for Certification 1. General. 2. Air Pollution.... Air pollution control facility boundaries. c. Examples of eligibility limits. d. Replacement of...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Part 20 - Guidelines for Certification
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... that pollution control facilities must be used in connection with a plant or other property in... FACILITIES Pt. 20, App. A Appendix A to Part 20—Guidelines for Certification 1. General. 2. Air Pollution.... Air pollution control facility boundaries. c. Examples of eligibility limits. d. Replacement of...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Part 20 - Guidelines for Certification
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... that pollution control facilities must be used in connection with a plant or other property in... FACILITIES Pt. 20, App. A Appendix A to Part 20—Guidelines for Certification 1. General. 2. Air Pollution.... Air pollution control facility boundaries. c. Examples of eligibility limits. d. Replacement of...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Part 20 - Guidelines for Certification
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... that pollution control facilities must be used in connection with a plant or other property in... FACILITIES Pt. 20, App. A Appendix A to Part 20—Guidelines for Certification 1. General. 2. Air Pollution.... Air pollution control facility boundaries. c. Examples of eligibility limits. d. Replacement of...
-
40 CFR Appendix A to Part 20 - Guidelines for Certification
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... that pollution control facilities must be used in connection with a plant or other property in... FACILITIES Pt. 20, App. A Appendix A to Part 20—Guidelines for Certification 1. General. 2. Air Pollution.... Air pollution control facility boundaries. c. Examples of eligibility limits. d. Replacement of...
-
40 CFR 60.500 - Applicability and designation of affected facility.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Performance for Bulk Gasoline Terminals § 60.500 Applicability and designation of affected facility. (a) The... bulk gasoline terminal which deliver liquid product into gasoline tank trucks. (b) Each facility under... technologies (BDT). The numerical emission limits in this standard are expressed in terms of total organic...
-
40 CFR 60.500 - Applicability and designation of affected facility.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Performance for Bulk Gasoline Terminals § 60.500 Applicability and designation of affected facility. (a) The... bulk gasoline terminal which deliver liquid product into gasoline tank trucks. (b) Each facility under... technologies (BDT). The numerical emission limits in this standard are expressed in terms of total organic...
-
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... annual precipitation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing surface runoff... difference between annual precipitation falling on the treatment facility and the drainage area contributing surface runoff to the treatment facility and annual evaporation may be discharged subject to the...
-
26 CFR 1.142(a)(5)-1 - Exempt facility bonds: Sewage facilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-04-01
...; however, for property treating wastewater reasonably expected to have an average daily raw wasteload... the extent the treatment is for wastewater having an average daily raw wasteload concentration of BOD...—(i) Exception to BOD limit. A facility treating wastewater with an average daily raw wasteload...