78 FR 20663 - Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-05

...] Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug... public. Name of Committee: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. General Function..., Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA. FDA intends to...

75 FR 47605 - Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-06

...] Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug... public. Name of Committee: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. General Function... Laboratory of Vector Borne Virus Diseases, Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review...

76 FR 60090 - Performance Review Board, Senior Executive Service (SES)

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-28

... NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice (11-085)] Performance Review Board, Senior... the NASA PRB and the NASA Senior Executive Committee. The latter performs this function for senior..., Marshall Space Flight Center. Director, Stennis Space Center. Senior Executive Committee Chairperson...

75 FR 52009 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-24

[email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review... Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Sensorimotor Integration Study Section. Date: October 5...: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cognitive Neuroscience Study...

A survey. Financial accounting and internal control functions pursued by hospital boards.

PubMed

Gavin, T A

1984-09-01

Justification for a board committee's existence is its ability to devote time to issues judged to be important by the full board. This seems to have happened. Multiple committees pursue more functions than the other committee structures. Boards lacking an FA/IC committee pursue significantly fewer functions than their counterparts with committees. Substantial respondent agreement exists on those functions most and least frequently pursued, those perceived to be most and least important, and those perceived to be most and least effectively undertaken. Distinctions between committee structures and the full board, noted in the previous paragraph, hold true with respect to the importance of functions. All board structures identified reviewing the budget and comparing it to actual results as important. Committee structures are generally more inclined to address functions related to the work of the independent auditor and the effectiveness of the hospital's system and controls than are full board structures. Functions related to the internal auditor are pursued least frequently by all FA/IC board structures. The following suggestions are made to help boards pay adequate attention to and obtain objective information about the financial affairs of their hospitals. Those boards that do not have some form of an FA/IC committee should consider starting one. Evidence shows chief financial officers have been a moving force in establishing and strengthening such committees. Boards having a joint or single committee structure should consider upgrading their structure to either a single committee or multiple committees respectively. The complexity of the healthcare environment requires that more FA/IC functions be addressed by the board. The board or its FA/IC committee(s) should meet with their independent CPA's, fiscal intermediary auditors, and internal auditors. Where the hospital lacks an internal audit function a study should be undertaken to determine the feasibility of initiating such a function. In most cases, the benefits derived from an independent, properly staffed internal audit function far exceed the cost of such a function.

An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan

PubMed Central

Akabayashi, Akira; Slingsby, Brian T; Nagao, Noriko; Kai, Ichiro; Sato, Hajime

2007-01-01

Background Ethics committees and their system of research protocol peer-review are currently used worldwide. To ensure an international standard for research ethics and safety, however, data is needed on the quality and function of each nation's ethics committees. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and developments of ethics committees established at medical schools and general hospitals in Japan. Methods This study consisted of four national surveys sent twice over a period of eight years to two separate samples. The first target was the ethics committees of all 80 medical schools and the second target was all general hospitals with over 300 beds in Japan (n = 1457 in 1996 and n = 1491 in 2002). Instruments contained four sections: (1) committee structure, (2) frequency of annual meetings, (3) committee function, and (4) existence of a set of guidelines for the refusal of blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witnesses. Results Committee structure was overall interdisciplinary. Frequency of annual meetings increased significantly for both medical school and hospital ethics committees over the eight years. The primary activities for medical school and hospital ethics committees were research protocol reviews and policy making. Results also showed a significant increase in the use of ethical guidelines, particularly those related to the refusal of blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witnesses, among both medical school and hospital ethics committees. Conclusion Overall findings indicated a greater recognized degree of responsibilities and an increase in workload for Japanese ethics committees. PMID:17598923

Hospital/clinical ethics committees' notion: an overview

PubMed Central

Hajibabaee, Fatemeh; Joolaee, Soodabeh; Cheraghi, Mohammad Ali; Salari, Pooneh; Rodney, Patricia

2016-01-01

Hospital ethics committees (HECs) help clinicians deal with the ethical challenges which have been raised during clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to provide a historical background of the development of HECs internationally and describe their functions and practical challenges of their day to day work. This is the first part of a comprehensive literature review conducted between February 2014 and August 2016 by searching through scientific databases. The keyword ethics committee, combined with hospital, clinic, and institution, was used without a time limitation. All original and discussion articles, as well as other scientific documents were included. Of all the articles and theses found using these keywords, only 56 were consistent with the objectives of the study. Based on the review goals, the findings were divided into three main categories; the inception of HECs in the world, the function of HECs, and the challenges of HECs. According to the results, the Americas Region and European Region countries have been the most prominent considering the establishment of HECs. However, the majority of the Eastern Mediterranean Region and South-East Asia Region countries are only beginning to establish these committees in their hospitals. The results highlight the status and functions of HECs in different countries and may be used as a guide by health policymakers and managers who are at the inception of establishing these committees in their hospitals. PMID:28523118

Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.

PubMed

Silaigwana, Blessing; Wassenaar, Douglas

2015-04-01

Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are mandated to protect human participants by conducting ethical reviews of biomedical research. To date, there is a dearth of information on the structure, functioning, and outcomes of RECs in Africa. This article reviews empirical studies investigating African RECs, with the aim of providing an overview of what is known and identifying gaps in our knowledge. We conducted a literature search of the EBSCO, PubMed, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Twenty-three empirical studies reporting on the structure, functions, and outcomes of African RECs were included in our analysis. The review yielded limited systematic data on RECs in Africa. Available empirical evidence suggests that challenges hampering the effective functioning of RECs included lack of membership diversity, scarcity of resources, insufficient training of members, inadequate capacity to review and monitor studies, and lack of national ethics guidelines and accreditation. Relatively little data on the review outcomes of African RECs were described. There is an ongoing need for concerted efforts from various stakeholders to support capacity development and enhancement of African RECs. © The Author(s) 2015.

Ethics committees in India: Facing the challenges!

PubMed

Kadam, Rashmi; Karandikar, Shashikant

2012-04-01

The past few years have seen a tremendous rise in the number of clinical trials conducted in India. This is been attributed to the huge patient population, genetic diversity, and rich technical pool in our country. However, the economical upsurge in the clinical trial industry has also caused concerns pertaining to the efficiency of the Regulatory Agencies and Ethics Committees (EC). The EC plays an important role in the regulation of clinical research at the local level. However, it is seen that many ECs are oblivious to their roles and responsibilities. It is reported that ECs lack standard operating procedures, do not have a proper composition or adequate representation, thus affecting their functions in regulating clinical research. Moreover, ECs seem to function in isolation, as self-sufficient bodies, having no communication with the regulatory agency or other ECs. This brings forth the need for ECs to come together and share their experiences and observations, with the aim of updating themselves and refining their functions. Efforts also need to be focused on capacity building, centralized registration of ECs, and bringing an oversight mechanism in place. The Ethics Committees in India need to work in close association with forums such as the Forum for Ethics Review Committees in India and the Forum for Ethical Review Committees in Asia Pacific, in an effort towards empowering themselves.

Regional Infant and Child Mortality Review Committee--2011 final report.

PubMed

Wilson, Ann L; Sideras, James

2012-12-01

The 2011 annual report of the Regional Infant and Child Mortality Review Committee (RICMRC) is presented. Since 1997, the committee has reviewed 224 deaths to achieve its mission to "review infant and child deaths so that information can be transformed into action to protect young lives." In 2011, the committee reviewed 21 deaths (22 met the committee's criteria) of infants and children who were residents of Minnehaha, Turner, Lincoln, Hanson and Brookings counties in South Dakota. The manner of 12 of the reviewed deaths was natural with eight of these the result of progressive neurological diseases or conditions. In 2011 there were no deaths attributed to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), though there were two deaths of infants during sleep. One of these infants was ruled accidental as the baby died of aspiration and the other death occurred in an unsafe environment with its manner determined to be undecided. Six deaths were accidental, one of which occurred as a result of a fire in a home without functional smoke alarms. One motor vehicle death occurred, through no fault of the teen age driver. Another death resulted from tubing over a low head dam on the Big Sioux River. One youth suicide occurred to a resident of the region.

Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.

PubMed

Guillemin, Marilys; Gillam, Lynn; Rosenthal, Doreen; Bolitho, Annie

2012-07-01

Considerable time and resources are invested in the ethics review process. We present qualitative data on how human research ethics committee members and health researchers perceive the role and function of the committee. The findings are based on interviews with 34 Australian ethics committee members and 54 health researchers. Although all participants agreed that the primary role of the ethics committee was to protect participants, there was disagreement regarding the additional roles undertaken by committees. Of particular concern were the perceptions from some ethics committee members and researchers that ethics committees were working to protect the institution's interests, as well as being overprotective toward research participants. This has the potential to lead to poor relations and mistrust between ethics committees and researchers.

International bowel function basic spinal cord injury data set.

PubMed

Krogh, K; Perkash, I; Stiens, S A; Biering-Sørensen, F

2009-03-01

International expert working group. To develop an International Bowel Function Basic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Data Set presenting a standardized format for the collection and reporting of a minimal amount of information on bowel function in daily practice or in research. Working group consisting of members appointed by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS). A draft prepared by the working group was reviewed by Executive Committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets, and later by ISCoS Scientific Committee and the ASIA Board. Relevant and interested scientific and professional (international) organizations and societies (approximately 40) were also invited to review the data set and it was posted on the ISCoS and ASIA websites for 3 months to allow comments and suggestions. The ISCoS Scientific Committee, Council and ASIA Board received the data set for final review and approval. The International Bowel Function Basic SCI Data Set includes the following 12 items: date of data collection, gastrointestinal or anal sphincter dysfunction unrelated to SCI, surgical procedures on the gastrointestinal tract, awareness of the need to defecate, defecation method and bowel care procedures, average time required for defecation, frequency of defecation, frequency of fecal incontinence, need to wear pad or plug, medication affecting bowel function/constipating agents, oral laxatives and perianal problems. An International Bowel Function Basic SCI Data Set has been developed.

78 FR 36553 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-06-18

... . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel Member Conflict: Cell Biology... Structure, Function and Regeneration Date: July 18, 2013. Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

From identification and review to action--maternal mortality review in the United States.

PubMed

Berg, Cynthia J

2012-02-01

The maternal mortality review process is an ongoing quality improvement cycle with 5 steps: identification of maternal deaths, collection of medical and other data on the events surrounding the death, review and synthesis of the data to identify potentially alterable factors, the development and implementation of interventions to decrease the risk of future deaths, and evaluation of the results. The most important step is utilization of the data to identify and implement evidence-based actions; without this step, the rest of the work will not have an impact. The review committee ideally is based in the health department of a state (or large city) as a core public health function. This provides stability for the process as well as facilitates implementation of the review committees' recommendations. The review committee should be multidisciplinary, with its members being official representatives of their organizations or departments, again to improve buy-in of the stakeholders. Published by Elsevier Inc.

77 FR 29673 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-18

..., (301) 594- 2414, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Neurotoxicology and Alcohol Study Section. Date: June 14-15, 2012. Time...

76 FR 24900 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-03

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Brain Function... Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Risk Prevention and Health Behavior. Date: June 6, 2011. Time: 11...

75 FR 26262 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-11

...: Learning, Cognition, and Audition. Date: May 27, 2010. Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Agenda: To review and...: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Pathophysiological Basis of [email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review...

75 FR 77887 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-12-14

... Genetic Disease Therapy. Date: January 19, 2011. Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate... Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review Group. Neuroendocrinology... Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review Group. Neurotoxicology and Alcohol Study Section. Date: January 31...

Justice in jeopardy: a qualitative study of institutional ethics committees in New Delhi.

PubMed

Kandhari, Rohini

2013-01-01

Protecting the safety and welfare of clinical trial subjects is the primary responsibility of the multidisciplinary ethics committee. In India, ethics committees have come under increasing criticism for functioning as "secret societies unaccountable to the public" (1). Yet, little effort has been made to undertake qualitative research on the ethics review bodies. This article describes the essential findings of a study that aimed at providing an insight into the structure and functioning of institutional ethics committees (IECs) in selected hospitals in Delhi. Importantly, the study also attempted to investigate the challenges faced by IEC members that pose barriers to IEC performance and thus jeopardise a just and effective system of protection for the human trial subject.

Ethics committees in India: Facing the challenges!

PubMed Central

Kadam, Rashmi; Karandikar, Shashikant

2012-01-01

The past few years have seen a tremendous rise in the number of clinical trials conducted in India. This is been attributed to the huge patient population, genetic diversity, and rich technical pool in our country. However, the economical upsurge in the clinical trial industry has also caused concerns pertaining to the efficiency of the Regulatory Agencies and Ethics Committees (EC). The EC plays an important role in the regulation of clinical research at the local level. However, it is seen that many ECs are oblivious to their roles and responsibilities. It is reported that ECs lack standard operating procedures, do not have a proper composition or adequate representation, thus affecting their functions in regulating clinical research. Moreover, ECs seem to function in isolation, as self-sufficient bodies, having no communication with the regulatory agency or other ECs. This brings forth the need for ECs to come together and share their experiences and observations, with the aim of updating themselves and refining their functions. Efforts also need to be focused on capacity building, centralized registration of ECs, and bringing an oversight mechanism in place. The Ethics Committees in India need to work in close association with forums such as the Forum for Ethics Review Committees in India and the Forum for Ethical Review Committees in Asia Pacific, in an effort towards empowering themselves. PMID:22701820

77 FR 20872 - Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-04-06

... organization, management, and mission; (5) Overview of the ITS Research Program; and (6) Brief ethics review... welcome new members and to provide the committee an overview of information essential to its functioning..., 2012, was created to advise the Secretary of Transportation on all matters relating to the study...

77 FR 52042 - Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-28

... and Training Neurosciences Integrated Review; Group; Molecular Neurogenetics Study Section. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Neurobiology of Learning and Memory Study Section. Date: September 28, 2012. Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p...

How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review

PubMed Central

Coleman, Carl H; Bouësseau, Marie-Charlotte

2008-01-01

Background Countries are increasingly devoting significant resources to creating or strengthening research ethics committees, but there has been insufficient attention to assessing whether these committees are actually improving the protection of human research participants. Discussion Research ethics committees face numerous obstacles to achieving their goal of improving research participant protection. These include the inherently amorphous nature of ethics review, the tendency of regulatory systems to encourage a focus on form over substance, financial and resource constraints, and conflicts of interest. Auditing and accreditation programs can improve the quality of ethics review by encouraging the development of standardized policies and procedures, promoting a common base of knowledge, and enhancing the status of research ethics committees within their own institutions. However, these mechanisms focus largely on questions of structure and process and are therefore incapable of answering many critical questions about ethics committees' actual impact on research practices. The first step in determining whether research ethics committees are achieving their intended function is to identify what prospective research participants and their communities hope to get out of the ethics review process. Answers to this question can help guide the development of effective outcomes assessment measures. It is also important to determine whether research ethics committees' guidance to investigators is actually being followed. Finally, the information developed through outcomes assessment must be disseminated to key decision-makers and incorporated into practice. This article offers concrete suggestions for achieving these goals. Conclusion Outcomes assessment of research ethics committees should address the following questions: First, does research ethics committee review improve participants' understanding of the risks and potential benefits of studies? Second, does the process affect prospective participants' decisions about whether to participate in research? Third, does it change participants' subjective experiences in studies or their attitudes about research? Fourth, does it reduce the riskiness of research? Fifth, does it result in more research responsive to the local community's self-identified needs? Sixth, is research ethics committees' guidance to researchers actually being followed? PMID:18373857

75 FR 27793 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-18

...: Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Date: June 8, 2010. Time: 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Agenda: To review and...-402- 5671, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience...

43 CFR 10.16 - Review committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Review committee. 10.16 Section 10.16... REPATRIATION REGULATIONS General § 10.16 Review committee. (a) General. The Review Committee will advise... recommendation, finding, report, or other action of the Review Committee is advisory only and not binding on any...

78 FR 16295 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee: Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-03-14

...-PPWOCRADN0] Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee: Meeting AGENCY: National... Protection and Repatriation Review Committee (Review Committee). The Review Committee meeting previously noticed in the Federal Register (77 FR 53228-53229, August 31, 2012), to occur on May 22-23, 2013, in the...

78 FR 5205 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee Findings Related to the...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-24

... to zero (there was one abstention), the Review Committee found that the Alaska State Museum had not... to zero (there was one abstention), the Review Committee found that the Alaska State Museum had not... Review Committee members were self-recused. By a vote of five to zero, the Review Committee found that...

76 FR 3640 - Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-20

...-1747. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience...: Integrative Neuroscience. Date: February 17-18, 2011. Time: 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate...: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group. Biophysics of Neural Systems...

7 CFR 929.125 - Committee review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 8 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Committee review procedures. 929.125 Section 929.125... LONG ISLAND IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK Rules and Regulations § 929.125 Committee review procedures. Growers may request, and the Committee may grant, a review of determinations made by the Committee...

Reporting of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands: descriptive study.

PubMed

Buiting, Hilde; van Delden, Johannes; Onwuteaka-Philpsen, Bregje; Rietjens, Judith; Rurup, Mette; van Tol, Donald; Gevers, Joseph; van der Maas, Paul; van der Heide, Agnes

2009-10-27

An important principle underlying the Dutch Euthanasia Act is physicians' responsibility to alleviate patients' suffering. The Dutch Act states that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are not punishable if the attending physician acts in accordance with criteria of due care. These criteria concern the patient's request, the patient's suffering (unbearable and hopeless), the information provided to the patient, the presence of reasonable alternatives, consultation of another physician and the applied method of ending life. To demonstrate their compliance, the Act requires physicians to report euthanasia to a review committee. We studied which arguments Dutch physicians use to substantiate their adherence to the criteria and which aspects attract review committees' attention. We examined 158 files of reported euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide cases that were approved by the review committees. We studied the physicians' reports and the verdicts of the review committees by using a checklist. Physicians reported that the patient's request had been well-considered because the patient was clear-headed (65%) and/or had repeated the request several times (23%). Unbearable suffering was often substantiated with physical symptoms (62%), function loss (33%), dependency (28%) or deterioration (15%). In 35%, physicians reported that there had been alternatives to relieve patients' suffering which were refused by the majority. The nature of the relationship with the consultant was sometimes unclear: the consultant was reported to have been an unknown colleague (39%), a known colleague (21%), otherwise (25%), or not clearly specified in the report (24%). Review committees relatively often scrutinized the consultation (41%) and the patient's (unbearable) suffering (32%); they had few questions about possible alternatives (1%). Dutch physicians substantiate their adherence to the criteria in a variable way with an emphasis on physical symptoms. The information they provide is in most cases sufficient to enable adequate review. Review committees' control seems to focus on (unbearable) suffering and on procedural issues.

[Legal repercussions of Clinical Ethics Committees reports].

PubMed

Couceiro V, Azucena; Beca I, Juan Pablo

2006-04-01

Clinical Ethics Committees and Research Ethics Committees have their own specific roles. The Clinical Ethics Committee's pronouncements have an advisory function, whereas Research Ethics Committees' decisions are binding. This article analyzes the legal impact of the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports. Legal and medical reasoning share the same practical nature. Both can have several correct answers to the same situation. Clinical Ethics Committees deliberate about these alternatives and analyze the involved values. Their conclusions are non-compulsory recommendations. They do not replace nor diminish the doctor's personal responsibility. Even though the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports are not binding, they constitute a sort of "expert's opinion", expressed by qualified professionals, who assume their own professional responsibility as advisors. The members' behavior is necessarily subject to constitutional and legal regulations. When judges review the Clinical Ethics Committee's reports, they must realize that their nature is advisory, and also consider them an essential element to reduce the gap between the medical and legal fields. In this way, the problem of increasingly transforming medicine into a legal issue can be prevented.

Ethics review of health research on human participants in South Africa.

PubMed

van Wyk, Christa

2010-06-01

In terms of South African legislation, all health research on human participants must be submitted to an accredited research ethics committee for independent ethics review. Health research covers a broad spectrum of research, including clinical trials. This article sets out the ethical-legal framework for the functioning and composition of such committees. It also deals with the newly created National Health Research Ethics Council, which registers and audits health research ethics committees. Special attention is given to the conduct of clinical trials. In conclusion, it is submitted that the National Health Act, the Draft Regulations Relating to Research on Human Subjects, and two sets of ethical guidelines adopted by the Department of Health provide a much needed and coherent ethical-legal framework for research in South Africa.

Evaluation of audiovisual teaching material in family practice: a report of review activities, 1977--1978.

PubMed

Geyman, J P

1979-05-01

Audiovisual teaching materials have found increasing use in medical education in recent years, and a large number of excellent materials have been produced. The plethora of existing audiovisual teaching programs has made it difficult for educators and potential users to be aware of what is available and to select programs relevant to specific learning needs. The Audiovisual Review Committee has functioned over the last five years as a subcommittee of the Education Committee of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. This paper describes the experience of this group over the last two years and presents a complete listing of audiovisual teaching materials which have been reviewed and appraised during that period.

49 CFR 8.9 - Information Security Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 49 Transportation 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Information Security Review Committee. 8.9 Section.../DECLASSIFICATION/ACCESS Classification/Declassification of Information § 8.9 Information Security Review Committee. (a) There is hereby established a Department of Transportation Information Security Review Committee...

49 CFR 8.9 - Information Security Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 49 Transportation 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Information Security Review Committee. 8.9 Section.../DECLASSIFICATION/ACCESS Classification/Declassification of Information § 8.9 Information Security Review Committee. (a) There is hereby established a Department of Transportation Information Security Review Committee...

77 FR 56661 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-13

... Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Neurodevelopment, Plasticity, and Regeneration. Date: October 9, 2012... Bone, Function, Metabolism and Regeneration. Date: October 9, 2012. Time: 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. Agenda..., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1212, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Cell Biology Integrated Review...

Competency Development of Southern African Housing Officers

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Dunn, Munita; Dunkel, Norbert W.

2013-01-01

The Report on the Ministerial Committee for the Review of the Provision of Student Housing at South African Universities (Department of Higher Education and Training, 2011) has provided a comprehensive review of residences across several housing functional areas. In one of the residence management and administration recommendations it stated,…

The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: Update report from the standardization committee of the International Children's Continence Society.

PubMed

Austin, Paul F; Bauer, Stuart B; Bower, Wendy; Chase, Janet; Franco, Israel; Hoebeke, Piet; Rittig, Søren; Walle, Johan Vande; von Gontard, Alexander; Wright, Anne; Yang, Stephen S; Nevéus, Tryggve

2016-04-01

The impact of the original International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) terminology document on lower urinary tract (LUT) function resulted in the global establishment of uniformity and clarity in the characterization of LUT function and dysfunction in children across multiple healthcare disciplines. The present document serves as a stand-alone terminology update reflecting refinement and current advancement of knowledge on pediatric LUT function. A variety of worldwide experts from multiple disciplines within the ICCS leadership who care for children with LUT dysfunction were assembled as part of the standardization committee. A critical review of the previous ICCS terminology document and the current literature was performed. Additionally, contributions and feedback from the multidisciplinary ICCS membership were solicited. Following a review of the literature over the last 7 years, the ICCS experts assembled a new terminology document reflecting current understanding of bladder function and LUT dysfunction in children using the resources from the literature review, expert opinion and ICCS member feedback. The present ICCS terminology document provides a current and consensus update to the evolving terminology and understanding of LUT function in children. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:471-481, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues.

PubMed

Luyckx, Valerie Ann; Biller-Andorno, Nikola; Saxena, Abha; Tran, Nhan T

2017-01-01

Given the focus on health systems in the post-millennium development goal era and moving towards the sustainable development goals, there is a compelling need for a common framework for health policy and systems research ethics to guide researchers and facilitate review by research ethics committees. A consultation of global health policy and systems research and ethics experts was convened to identify ethical considerations relevant to health policy and systems research based on existing knowledge and to identify knowledge gaps through a scoping review and further expert deliberation. Health policy and systems research is highly complex and, in the absence of guidance documents, there is significant variability in ethics review. Although fundamental ethical principles pertain to both traditional clinical research and health policy and systems research, the application of these principles requires a comprehensive understanding of the nature of health policy and systems research with its distinct challenges. Such awareness must be raised among researchers and research ethics committees. Current research ethics committees lack familiarity with health policy and systems research and because health policy and systems research is conducted in real-world contexts, committees often have difficulties in determining whether a project is indeed research and/or requires ethical review. Given the strong current focus on health policy and systems research to rapidly improve health and health systems functioning globally, greater engagement and dialogue around the ethical concerns is required to optimise research review and research conduct in this rapidly evolving field.

Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues

PubMed Central

Biller-Andorno, Nikola; Saxena, Abha; Tran, Nhan T

2017-01-01

Given the focus on health systems in the post-millennium development goal era and moving towards the sustainable development goals, there is a compelling need for a common framework for health policy and systems research ethics to guide researchers and facilitate review by research ethics committees. A consultation of global health policy and systems research and ethics experts was convened to identify ethical considerations relevant to health policy and systems research based on existing knowledge and to identify knowledge gaps through a scoping review and further expert deliberation. Health policy and systems research is highly complex and, in the absence of guidance documents, there is significant variability in ethics review. Although fundamental ethical principles pertain to both traditional clinical research and health policy and systems research, the application of these principles requires a comprehensive understanding of the nature of health policy and systems research with its distinct challenges. Such awareness must be raised among researchers and research ethics committees. Current research ethics committees lack familiarity with health policy and systems research and because health policy and systems research is conducted in real-world contexts, committees often have difficulties in determining whether a project is indeed research and/or requires ethical review. Given the strong current focus on health policy and systems research to rapidly improve health and health systems functioning globally, greater engagement and dialogue around the ethical concerns is required to optimise research review and research conduct in this rapidly evolving field. PMID:29225934

Independent verification and validation for Space Shuttle flight software

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

1992-01-01

The Committee for Review of Oversight Mechanisms for Space Shuttle Software was asked by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Office of Space Flight to determine the need to continue independent verification and validation (IV&V) for Space Shuttle flight software. The Committee found that the current IV&V process is necessary to maintain NASA's stringent safety and quality requirements for man-rated vehicles. Therefore, the Committee does not support NASA's plan to eliminate funding for the IV&V effort in fiscal year 1993. The Committee believes that the Space Shuttle software development process is not adequate without IV&V and that elimination of IV&V as currently practiced will adversely affect the overall quality and safety of the software, both now and in the future. Furthermore, the Committee was told that no organization within NASA has the expertise or the manpower to replace the current IV&V function in a timely fashion, nor will building this expertise elsewhere necessarily reduce cost. Thus, the Committee does not recommend moving IV&V functions to other organizations within NASA unless the current IV&V is maintained for as long as it takes to build comparable expertise in the replacing organization.

29 CFR 14.3 - DOL Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 29 Labor 1 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true DOL Classification Review Committee. 14.3 Section 14.3 Labor... Classification Review Committee. A DOL Classification Review Committee is hereby established. (a) Composition of... under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, when a proposed denial is based on classification...

77 FR 74874 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee: Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-18

... meeting will be limited to finalization of the Review Committee Report to Congress for 2012, the appointment of the subcommittee to draft the Review Committee's Report to the Congress for 2013, and... limited to finalization of the Review Committee Report to Congress for 2012, the appointment of the...

Dielectric and Insulating Technology 2005 : Reviews & Forecasts

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Okamoto, Tatsuki

This article reports the state-of-art of TC-DEI ( Technical Committee of Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation of IEEJ) activites. The activiteis are basically based on the activites of 8-10 investigation committees under TC-DEI. Recent activites were categorized into three functions in this article and remarkable activity or trend for each category is mentioned as was done in the article of 2003. Thoese are activities on asset management (AI application and insulation diagnosis), activities on new insulating and functional materials (Nano composite) and activities on new insulation technology for power tansmission (high Tc superconducting cable insulation).

Dielectric and Insulating Technology 2006 : Review & Forecast

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Okamoto, Tatsuki

This article reports the state-of-art of TC-DEI ( Technical Committee of Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation of IEEJ) activites. The activiteis are basically based on the activites of 8-10 investigation committees under TC-DEI. Recent activites were categorized into three functions in this article and remarkable activity or trend for each category is mentioned as was seen in the articles of 2005. Those are activities on asset management (AI application and insulation diagnosis), activities on new insulating and functional materials (Nano composite) and activities on new insulation technology for power tansmission (high Tc superconducting cable insulation).

Integer Linear Programming for Constrained Multi-Aspect Committee Review Assignment

PubMed Central

Karimzadehgan, Maryam; Zhai, ChengXiang

2011-01-01

Automatic review assignment can significantly improve the productivity of many people such as conference organizers, journal editors and grant administrators. A general setup of the review assignment problem involves assigning a set of reviewers on a committee to a set of documents to be reviewed under the constraint of review quota so that the reviewers assigned to a document can collectively cover multiple topic aspects of the document. No previous work has addressed such a setup of committee review assignments while also considering matching multiple aspects of topics and expertise. In this paper, we tackle the problem of committee review assignment with multi-aspect expertise matching by casting it as an integer linear programming problem. The proposed algorithm can naturally accommodate any probabilistic or deterministic method for modeling multiple aspects to automate committee review assignments. Evaluation using a multi-aspect review assignment test set constructed using ACM SIGIR publications shows that the proposed algorithm is effective and efficient for committee review assignments based on multi-aspect expertise matching. PMID:22711970

76 FR 54730 - Committees on Administration and Management, Collaborative Governance, Judicial Review, and...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-02

... Committees on Administration and Management, Collaborative Governance, Judicial Review, and Regulation ACTION... Governance The Committee on Collaborative Governance will meet to consider two projects. The committee will... FACA committees. The Committee on Collaborative Governance will also discuss a project regarding the...

Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees.

PubMed

Bain, Luchuo Engelbert

2017-01-01

Meaningful progress of medicine depends on research that must ultimately involve human subjects. Obtaining ethical approval therefore, especially in medical sciences, should be a moral reflex for researchers. This unfortunately is not the case, with numerous researchers bypassing the ethics approval procedure, or simply unaware of its importance. Good research involves risks taken by research participants and uses tax payers' money in the process. These mandates the research endeavor to aim at attaining the highest degree of respect for the sacrifices made by others for science. Most researchers mistake scientific clearance or approval, for ethics approval. For a study to be ethical sound, it must be scientifically sound. This is only one of the activities carried out during protocol review. It is not uncommon for sensitive ethical concerns, especially in the social sciences to be overlooked and considered not to be accompanied by any serious risks for the research participants.The researcher has the responsibility of systematically consulting the competent ethics committee for advice and consequent approvals or ethical waivers. Journal editors and reviewers have the duty to systematically evaluate the ethical soundness of manuscripts submitted for review. Capacity building in research ethics and institutional support for Research Ethics Committees to speed up protocol review could reduce the incentive of carrying out research in human subjects without ethics approvals. It is hypocritical and idle to continue to expect optimal reviews on time and of good quality, from ethics committees functioning purely on altruistic grounds. Capacity building for researchers in research ethics, and institutional reforms and support for Research Ethics Committees appear not to have received the attention they truly deserve.

76 FR 24894 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-03

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Chemo... . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational Integrated Review Group...

75 FR 11136 - Federal Advisory Committee; U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Comprehensive Review...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-10

... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Federal Advisory Committee; U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Comprehensive Review Committee; Charter Termination AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD... terminating the charter for the U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Comprehensive Review Committee. FOR...

24 CFR 200.224 - Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 24 Housing and Urban Development 2 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false Multifamily Participation Review... § 200.224 Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer. The membership and authority of the Multifamily Participation Review Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Review...

24 CFR 200.224 - Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 24 Housing and Urban Development 2 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false Multifamily Participation Review... § 200.224 Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer. The membership and authority of the Multifamily Participation Review Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Review...

24 CFR 200.224 - Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... 24 Housing and Urban Development 2 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false Multifamily Participation Review... § 200.224 Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer. The membership and authority of the Multifamily Participation Review Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Review...

24 CFR 200.224 - Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 24 Housing and Urban Development 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Multifamily Participation Review... § 200.224 Multifamily Participation Review Committee and Participation Control Officer. The membership and authority of the Multifamily Participation Review Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Review...

76 FR 370 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-04

... . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Molecular Genetics B Study... Committee: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Integrated Review Group; Lung Cellular, Molecular, and... Committee: Population Sciences and Epidemiology Integrated Review Group; Behavioral Genetics and...

The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the Standardization Committee of the International Children's Continence Society.

PubMed

Austin, Paul F; Bauer, Stuart B; Bower, Wendy; Chase, Janet; Franco, Israel; Hoebeke, Piet; Rittig, Søren; Vande Walle, Johan; von Gontard, Alexander; Wright, Anne; Yang, Stephen S; Nevéus, Tryggve

2014-06-01

The impact of the original International Children's Continence Society terminology document on lower urinary tract function resulted in the global establishment of uniformity and clarity in the characterization of lower urinary tract function and dysfunction in children across multiple health care disciplines. The present document serves as a stand-alone terminology update reflecting refinement and current advancement of knowledge on pediatric lower urinary tract function. A variety of worldwide experts from multiple disciplines in the ICCS leadership who care for children with lower urinary tract dysfunction were assembled as part of the standardization committee. A critical review of the previous ICCS terminology document and the current literature was performed. In addition, contributions and feedback from the multidisciplinary ICCS membership were solicited. Following a review of the literature during the last 7 years the ICCS experts assembled a new terminology document reflecting the current understanding of bladder function and lower urinary tract dysfunction in children using resources from the literature review, expert opinion and ICCS member feedback. The present ICCS terminology document provides a current and consensus update to the evolving terminology and understanding of lower urinary tract function in children. For the complete document visit http://jurology.com/. Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

76 FR 61072 - Committees on Administration and Management, Collaborative Governance, Judicial Review, and...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-10-03

... Committees on Administration and Management, Collaborative Governance, Judicial Review, and Regulation ACTION... Collaborative Governance The Committee on Collaborative Governance will consider recommending improvements to... imposed by FACA or improve the transparency of FACA committees. The Committee on Collaborative Governance...

77 FR 27073 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-08

... . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group; Tumor Progression [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Cancer....nih.gov . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Cancer...

75 FR 76994 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-12-10

... Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review Group Developmental Brain Disorders....gov . Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Cell [email protected] . Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review Group...

10 CFR 7.20 - Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 10 Energy 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. 7.20 Section 7.20 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.20 Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. The Designated Federal...

10 CFR 7.20 - Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 10 Energy 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. 7.20 Section 7.20 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.20 Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. The Designated Federal...

10 CFR 7.20 - Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 10 Energy 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. 7.20 Section 7.20 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.20 Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. The Designated Federal...

10 CFR 7.20 - Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. 7.20 Section 7.20 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.20 Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. The Designated Federal...

10 CFR 7.20 - Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. 7.20 Section 7.20 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.20 Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests. The Designated Federal...

In Brief: Web site for human spaceflight review committee

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Showstack, Randy

2009-06-01

As part of an independent review of human spaceflight plans and programs, NASA has established a Web site for the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee (http://hsfnasagov). The Web site provides the committee's charter, relevant documents, information about meetings and members, and ways to contact the committee. “The human spaceflight program belongs to everyone. Our committee would hope to benefit from the views of all who would care to contact us,” noted committee chairman Norman Augustine, retired chair and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

Improving the Quality of Host Country Ethical Oversight of International Research: The Use of a Collaborative 'Pre-Review' Mechanism for a Study of Fexinidazole for Human African Trypanosomiasis.

PubMed

Coleman, Carl H; Ardiot, Chantal; Blesson, Séverine; Bonnin, Yves; Bompart, Francois; Colonna, Pierre; Dhai, Ames; Ecuru, Julius; Edielu, Andrew; Hervé, Christian; Hirsch, François; Kouyaté, Bocar; Mamzer-Bruneel, Marie-France; Maoundé, Dionko; Martinent, Eric; Ntsiba, Honoré; Pelé, Gérard; Quéva, Gilles; Reinmund, Marie-Christine; Sarr, Samba Cor; Sepou, Abdoulaye; Tarral, Antoine; Tetimian, Djetodjide; Valverde, Olaf; Van Nieuwenhove, Simon; Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie

2015-12-01

Developing countries face numerous barriers to conducting effective and efficient ethics reviews of international collaborative research. In addition to potentially overlooking important scientific and ethical considerations, inadequate or insufficiently trained ethics committees may insist on unwarranted changes to protocols that can impair a study's scientific or ethical validity. Moreover, poorly functioning review systems can impose substantial delays on the commencement of research, which needlessly undermine the development of new interventions for urgent medical needs. In response to these concerns, the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi), an independent nonprofit organization founded by a coalition of public sector and international organizations, developed a mechanism to facilitate more effective and efficient host country ethics review for a study of the use of fexinidazole for the treatment of late stage African Trypanosomiasis (HAT). The project involved the implementation of a novel 'pre-review' process of ethical oversight, conducted by an ad hoc committee of ethics committee representatives from African and European countries, in collaboration with internationally recognized scientific experts. This article examines the process and outcomes of this collaborative process. © 2014 The Authors. Developing World Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

45 CFR 601.4 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

....4 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CLASSIFICATION AND DECLASSIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION § 601.4 Classification Review Committee. The Security Officer (Information) chairs the Foundation's Classification Review Committee which has authority...

45 CFR 601.4 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

....4 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CLASSIFICATION AND DECLASSIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION § 601.4 Classification Review Committee. The Security Officer (Information) chairs the Foundation's Classification Review Committee which has authority...

45 CFR 601.4 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

....4 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CLASSIFICATION AND DECLASSIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION § 601.4 Classification Review Committee. The Security Officer (Information) chairs the Foundation's Classification Review Committee which has authority...

45 CFR 601.4 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

....4 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CLASSIFICATION AND DECLASSIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION § 601.4 Classification Review Committee. The Security Officer (Information) chairs the Foundation's Classification Review Committee which has authority...

45 CFR 601.4 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

....4 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CLASSIFICATION AND DECLASSIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION § 601.4 Classification Review Committee. The Security Officer (Information) chairs the Foundation's Classification Review Committee which has authority...

Referral for competency committee review for poor performance on the internal medicine clerkship is associated with poor performance in internship.

PubMed

Hemann, Brian A; Durning, Steven J; Kelly, William F; Dong, Ting; Pangaro, Louis N; Hemmer, Paul A

2015-04-01

To determine how students who are referred to a competency committee for concern over performance, and ultimately judged not to require remediation, perform during internship. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences' students who graduated between 2007 and 2011 were included in this study. We compared the performance during internship of three groups: students who were referred to the internal medicine competency committee for review who met passing criterion, students who were reviewed by the internal medicine competency committee who were determined not to have passed the clerkship and were prescribed remediation, and students who were never reviewed by this competency committee. Program Director survey results and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 3 examination results were used as the outcomes of interest. The overall survey response rate for this 5-year cohort was 81% (689/853). 102 students were referred to this competency committee for review. 63/102 students were reviewed by this competency committee, given passing grades in the internal medicine clerkship, and were not required to do additional remediation. 39/102 students were given less than passing grades by this competency committee and required to perform additional clinical work in the department of medicine to remediate their performance. 751 students were never presented to this competency committee. Compared to students who were never presented for review, the group of reviewed students who did not require remediation was 5.6 times more likely to receive low internship survey ratings in the realm of professionalism, 8.6 times more likely to receive low ratings in the domain of medical expertise, and had a higher rate of USMLE Step 3 failure (9.4% vs. 2.8%). When comparing the reviewed group to students who were reviewed and also required remediation, the only significant difference between groups regarding professionalism ratings with 50% of the group requiring remediation garnering low ratings compared to 18% of the reviewed group. Students who are referred to a committee for review following completion of their internal medicine clerkship are more likely to receive poor ratings in internship and fail USMLE Step 3 compared to students whose performance in the medicine clerkship does not trigger a committee review. These findings provide validity evidence for our competency committee review in that the students identified as requiring further clinical work had significantly higher rates of poor ratings in professionalism than students who were reviewed by the competency committee but not required to remediate. Additionally, students reviewed but not required to remediate were nonetheless at risk of low internship ratings, suggesting that these students might need some intervention prior to graduation. Reprint & Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.

76 FR 3674 - Guidelines for the Supervisory Review Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-20

... process to review material supervisory determinations, entitled ``Supervisory Review Committee'' (IRPS 95... would consider expanding the disputes covered by the Committee's review process at a later date. 60 FR... ), qualifying credit unions that have applied for and been granted a TAG may purchase goods or spend the funds...

78 FR 1864 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-09

..., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1046, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and....306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93...

Monitoring of approved studies: A difficult tightrope walk by Ethics Committees.

PubMed

Davis, Sanish

2018-01-01

Continuing review of studies approved by the Ethics Committees (ECs) involves review of the progress of the study, annual reports, protocol deviations/violations, serious adverse event monitoring, and on-site monitoring. International and national regulations and guidelines for continuing review state that it is an opportunity for the EC to be assured that risks to subjects are minimized and is are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits if any to the subjects and the knowledge it will generate. There are several barriers (e.g. lack of workforce, lack of training of members for conducting onsite review, and poor infrastructure) for ECs to do ongoing review of projects approved by them. Industry is an important stakeholder for the research enterprise in India and strongly advocates that ECs should at a minimum have pragmatic standard operating procedures for continuing review/monitoring of studies initially approved. ECs which deal with larger volume of studies with well-functioning secretariat, appropriately trained EC members and funding should definitely conduct onsite review/monitoring in addition to the ongoing review.

Ethics committees and the changed clinical research environment in India in 2016: A perspective!

PubMed

Davis, Sanish; Sule, Poonam; Bughediwala, Murtuza; Pandya, Vrunda; Sinha, Shilpi

2017-01-01

Institutional and Independent Ethics Committees (ECs) have as their primary mission the protection of human research subjects. The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization has in the period 2013-2016 introduced several new regulations and amendments to existing regulations overseeing the conduct of Research in India. Several of these have direct effect on the functioning of the EC from a review, approval, and oversight mechanism. The Ethics Council of Indian Society for Clinical Research conducted a questionnaire survey among EC members to understand the impact of these changes in their functioning. The domains surveyed included awareness about recent changes/amendments and impacts, serious adverse events (SAEs) and compensation, informed consent and audio-video recording, monitoring and auditing of research, and future working of ECs. Seventy-nine percent of ECs are of the opinion that the new regulations/guidelines will add to their existing burden in the process of review and approval, providing subject protection and research oversight. Even though 68% of ECs stated that they are comfortable with SAE assessment and compensation determination, they state that there is variability in calculation of compensation amount using the formulae. An overwhelming majority (80%) of ECs stated that they were not in favor of centralized EC for providing review, approval, and oversight of clinical studies. Ethics Committees act as local regulator for clinical trials at sites providing Human Subject protection. The survey captures the contemporary issues faced by the ECs and also raises important questions on the ease of doing research, oversight of approved research, and administrative burden on the EC. Recent changes in regulations have on the one hand empowered Ethics committees but brought in challenges in the way that they provide oversight and monitor research carried out at the site.

International spinal cord injury bowel function basic data set (Version 2.0).

PubMed

Krogh, K; Emmanuel, A; Perrouin-Verbe, B; Korsten, M A; Mulcahey, M J; Biering-Sørensen, F

2017-07-01

International expert working group. To revise the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Bowel Function Basic Data Set as a standardized format for the collecting and reporting of a minimal amount of information on bowel function in clinical practice and research. Working group appointed by the American Spinal injury association (ASIA) and the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS). The draft prepared by the working group was reviewed by the International SCI Data Set Committee and later by members of the ISCoS Executive and Scientific Committees and the ASIA board. The revised data set was posted on the ASIA and ISCoS websites for 1 month to allow further comments and suggestions. Changes resulting from a Delphi process among experts in children with SCI were included. Members of ISCoS Executive and Scientific Committees and the ASIA board made a final review and approved the data set. The International SCI Bowel Function Basic Data Set (Version 2.0) consists of the following 16 items: date of data collection, gastrointestinal and anal sphincter dysfunction unrelated to SCI, surgical procedures on the gastrointestinal tract, defecation method and bowel-care procedures, average time required for defecation, frequency of defecation, uneasiness, headache or perspiration during defecation, digital stimulation or evacuation of the anorectum, frequency of fecal incontinence, flatus incontinence, need to wear pad or plug, oral laxatives and prokinetics, anti-diarrheal agents, perianal problems, abdominal pain and discomfort and the neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. The International SCI Bowel Function Basic Data Set (Version 2.0) has been developed.

Brazilian Version of the Functional Assessment Measure: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Evaluation

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Lourenco Jorge, Liliana; Garcia Marchi, Flavia Helena; Portela Hara, Ana Clara; Battistella, Linamara R.

2011-01-01

The objective of this prospective study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) into Brazilian Portuguese, and to assess the test-retest reliability. The instrument was translated, back-translated, pretested, and reviewed by a committee. The Brazilian version was assessed in 61 brain-injury patients.…

78 FR 6399 - Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Committee Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-30

... DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8172] Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Committee... amendments to the Convention --General review of the Convention, including harmonization with other international instruments: A. Comprehensive review of the Annex to the Convention, including: Intersessional...

5 CFR 1312.12 - Security Program Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... CLASSIFICATION, DOWNGRADING, DECLASSIFICATION AND SAFEGUARDING OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Classification and Declassification of National Security Information § 1312.12 Security Program Review Committee. The... 5 Administrative Personnel 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Security Program Review Committee. 1312...

5 CFR 1312.12 - Security Program Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... CLASSIFICATION, DOWNGRADING, DECLASSIFICATION AND SAFEGUARDING OF NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Classification and Declassification of National Security Information § 1312.12 Security Program Review Committee. The... 5 Administrative Personnel 3 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Security Program Review Committee. 1312...

Optimizing the post-graduate institutional program evaluation process.

PubMed

Lypson, Monica L; Prince, Mark E P; Kasten, Steven J; Osborne, Nicholas H; Cohan, Richard H; Kowalenko, Terry; Dougherty, Paul J; Reynolds, R Kevin; Spires, M Catherine; Kozlow, Jeffrey H; Gitlin, Scott D

2016-02-17

Reviewing program educational efforts is an important component of postgraduate medical education program accreditation. The post-graduate review process has evolved over time to include centralized oversight based on accreditation standards. The institutional review process and the impact on participating faculty are topics not well described in the literature. We conducted multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to identify and implement areas for change to improve productivity in our institutional program review committee. We also conducted one focus group and six in-person interviews with 18 committee members to explore their perspectives on the committee's evolution. One author (MLL) reviewed the transcripts and performed the initial thematic coding with a PhD level research associate and identified and categorized themes. These themes were confirmed by all participating committee members upon review of a detailed summary. Emergent themes were triangulated with the University of Michigan Medical School's Admissions Executive Committee (AEC). We present an overview of adopted new practices to the educational program evaluation process at the University of Michigan Health System that includes standardization of meetings, inclusion of resident members, development of area content experts, solicitation of committed committee members, transition from paper to electronic committee materials, and focus on continuous improvement. Faculty and resident committee members identified multiple improvement areas including the ability to provide high quality reviews of training programs, personal and professional development, and improved feedback from program trainees. A standing committee that utilizes the expertise of a group of committed faculty members and which includes formal resident membership has significant advantages over ad hoc or other organizational structures for program evaluation committees.

75 FR 28623 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-21

... 20892, (301) 435- 0682, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational... . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Clinical Oncology [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group, Cancer...

78 FR 55064 - First Responder Network Authority Board Special Review Committee Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-09

... Network Authority Board Special Review Committee Meeting AGENCY: National Telecommunications and... Responder Network Authority Special Review Committee. SUMMARY: The First Responder Network Authority (First... nationwide, interoperable public safety broadband network. The FirstNet Board is responsible for making...

Tardive Dyskinesia

MedlinePlus

... Supplements Peer Review Process Review Committees Application Support Library Clinical Research Next Steps Pre-Funding: After Review Terms of ... Supplements Peer Review Process Review Committees Application Support Library Clinical Research Next Steps Pre-Funding: After Review Terms of ...

Hemicrania Continua

MedlinePlus

... Supplements Peer Review Process Review Committees Application Support Library Clinical Research Next Steps Pre-Funding: After Review Terms of ... Supplements Peer Review Process Review Committees Application Support Library Clinical Research Next Steps Pre-Funding: After Review Terms of ...

Benign Essential Blepharospasm

MedlinePlus

... Supplements Peer Review Process Review Committees Application Support Library Clinical Research Next Steps Pre-Funding: After Review Terms of ... Supplements Peer Review Process Review Committees Application Support Library Clinical Research Next Steps Pre-Funding: After Review Terms of ...

25 CFR 36.41 - Standard XIV-Textbooks.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... Standard XIV—Textbooks. (a) Each school shall establish a textbook review committee composed of teachers, parents, and students, and school board members. Appointment to the textbook review committee shall be subject to school board approval. (b) The textbook review committee shall establish a procedure and...

24 CFR 200.230 - Standards for disapproval.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... the Review Committee finds mitigating or extenuating circumstances that enable it to make a risk...: (1) Mortgage defaults, assignments or foreclosures, unless the Review Committee determines that the... other obligation to HUD that has not been corrected to the satisfaction of the Review Committee at the...

Joint Integration Office Independent Review Committee annual report, 1985

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

Comprised of seven persons with extensive experience in the issues of nuclear waste, the Independent Review Committee (IRC) provides independent and objective review of Defense Transuranic Waste Program (DTWP) activities managed by the Joint Integration Office (JIO), formerly the Defense Transuranic Waste Lead Organization (TLO). The Committee is ensured a broad, interdisciplinary perspective since its membership includes representatives from the fields of nuclear engineering, nuclear waste transportation, industrial quality control, systems and environmental engineering and state and local government. The scope of IRC activities includes overall review of specific TLO plans, projects and activities, and technical review of particular researchmore » and development projects. The Committee makes specific suggestions and recommendations based upon expertise in the field of TRU Waste Management. The IRC operates as a consulting group, under an independent charter providing objective review of program activities. This report summarizes the 12 major topics reviewed by the committee during 1985.« less

75 FR 17953 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee Findings Related to the...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-04-08

... Repatriation Review Committee Findings Related to the Identity of Cultural Items in the Possession of the.... 3006(c)(3)), reviewed the record and made findings of fact related to the identity of 45 cultural items... Western Apache NAGPRA Working Group, to request from the Review Committee findings of fact on the identity...

Review of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program: An Interim Report. [ISBN 0-309-11944-8 (place in D020A)

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

2008-01-01

NASA requested that a committee under the auspices of the National Research Council's Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board carry out an assessment of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program (ETDP). Organizationally, this program functions under the direction of NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Directorate and is charged with developing new technologies that will enable NASA to conduct future human and robotic exploration missions, while reducing mission risk and cost. The Committee to Review NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program has been tasked to examine how well the program is aligned with the stated objectives of the President's Vision for Space Exploration (VSE), to identify gaps in the program, and to assess the quality of the research. The full statement of task is given in Appendix A. The committee consists of 25 members and includes a cross section of senior executives, engineers, researchers, and other aerospace professionals drawn from industry, universities, and government agencies with expertise in virtually all the technical fields represented within the program.

Recommendations for a Standardized Pulmonary Function Report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement.

PubMed

Culver, Bruce H; Graham, Brian L; Coates, Allan L; Wanger, Jack; Berry, Cristine E; Clarke, Patricia K; Hallstrand, Teal S; Hankinson, John L; Kaminsky, David A; MacIntyre, Neil R; McCormack, Meredith C; Rosenfeld, Margaret; Stanojevic, Sanja; Weiner, Daniel J

2017-12-01

The American Thoracic Society committee on Proficiency Standards for Pulmonary Function Laboratories has recognized the need for a standardized reporting format for pulmonary function tests. Although prior documents have offered guidance on the reporting of test data, there is considerable variability in how these results are presented to end users, leading to potential confusion and miscommunication. A project task force, consisting of the committee as a whole, was approved to develop a new Technical Standard on reporting pulmonary function test results. Three working groups addressed the presentation format, the reference data supporting interpretation of results, and a system for grading quality of test efforts. Each group reviewed relevant literature and wrote drafts that were merged into the final document. This document presents a reporting format in test-specific units for spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity that can be assembled into a report appropriate for a laboratory's practice. Recommended reference sources are updated with data for spirometry and diffusing capacity published since prior documents. A grading system is presented to encourage uniformity in the important function of test quality assessment. The committee believes that wide adoption of these formats and their underlying principles by equipment manufacturers and pulmonary function laboratories can improve the interpretation, communication, and understanding of test results.

The Evolution of American Hospital Ethics Committees: A Systematic Review.

PubMed

Courtwright, Andrew; Jurchak, Martha

2016-01-01

During the 1970s and 1980s, legal precedent, governmental recommendations, and professional society guidelines drove the formation of hospital ethics committees (HECs). The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organization's requirements in the early 1990s solidified the role of HECs as the primary mechanism to address ethical issues in patient care. Because external factors drove the rapid growth of HECs on an institution-by-institution basis, however, no initial consensus formed around the structure and function of these committees. There are now almost 40 years of empirical studies on the composition, administration, and activities of HECs in the United States. We conducted a systematic review of the available empirical literature on HECs to describe their evolution. As HECs changed over time, they increased their total number of members and percentage of members from nursing and the community. Although physicians increasingly chaired these committees, their presence as a percentage of overall members declined. The percentage of administrative members remained steady, although committees became increasingly likely to have at least one administrative member. HECs were also increasingly likely to report to an administrative body or to the board of trustees or directors rather than to the medical staff. Finally, consultation volume increased steadily over time. There has not, however, been a national survey of the composition of ethics committees, their administration, or volume of consultation in more than 10 years, despite increasing calls for professional standards and quality improvement assessments among HECs. Copyright 2016 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.

Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Contamination Survivability: Material Effects Testing

DTIC Science & Technology

2012-06-22

form that can be compared to pretest and posttest functional performance data. If Soldiers are desired, ensure a Test Schedule and Review Committee...test execution. f. The material’s performance specification should also be reviewed before planning test execution. For example , the...test data, and conformance with specified test and operating procedures cannot be overemphasized. 3.1 Test Planning. 3.1.1 Pretest Preparation

15 CFR 2002.1 - Trade Policy Committee Review Group.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Trade Policy Committee Review Group. 2002.1 Section 2002.1 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE OPERATION OF COMMITTEES § 2002.1 Trade Policy Committee...

15 CFR 2002.1 - Trade Policy Committee Review Group.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Trade Policy Committee Review Group. 2002.1 Section 2002.1 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE OPERATION OF COMMITTEES § 2002.1 Trade Policy Committee...

Basic Education Program Review Committee Annual Report.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Tennessee State Board of Education, 2004

2004-01-01

In the effort to improve essential components of the Basic Education Program (BEP), the General Assembly has adopted legislation directing the BEP Review Committee to perform a comprehensive review of the funding formula, identifying needed revisions, additions, or deletions. This year, through a series of full-day meetings, the committee has…

42 CFR 61.7 - Review of applications; committees; awards.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Review of applications; committees; awards. 61.7 Section 61.7 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships § 61.7 Review of applications; committees; awards. The...

42 CFR 61.7 - Review of applications; committees; awards.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Review of applications; committees; awards. 61.7 Section 61.7 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships § 61.7 Review of applications; committees; awards. The...

42 CFR 61.7 - Review of applications; committees; awards.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Review of applications; committees; awards. 61.7 Section 61.7 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships § 61.7 Review of applications; committees; awards. The...

42 CFR 61.7 - Review of applications; committees; awards.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Review of applications; committees; awards. 61.7 Section 61.7 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships § 61.7 Review of applications; committees; awards. The...

42 CFR 61.7 - Review of applications; committees; awards.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Review of applications; committees; awards. 61.7 Section 61.7 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships § 61.7 Review of applications; committees; awards. The...

The Physiology of Female Sexual Function and the Pathophysiology of Female Sexual Dysfunction (Committee 13A).

PubMed

Levin, Roy J; Both, Stephanie; Georgiadis, Janniko; Kukkonen, Tuuli; Park, Kwangsung; Yang, Claire C

2016-05-01

The article consists of six sections written by separate authors that review female genital anatomy, the physiology of female sexual function, and the pathophysiology of female sexual dysfunction but excluding hormonal aspects. To review the physiology of female sexual function and the pathophysiology of female sexual dysfunction especially since 2010 and to make specific recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for evidence based medicine (2009) "levels of evidence" wherever relevant. Recommendations were made for particular studies to be undertaken especially in controversial aspects in all six sections of the reviewed topics. Despite numerous laboratory assessments of female sexual function, genital assessments alone appear insufficient to characterise fully the complete sexual response. Copyright © 2016 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Review of the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC), National Research Center of Egypt, 2003-2011.

PubMed

Abdel-Aal, Wafaa; Ghaffar, Esmat Abdel; El Shabrawy, Osama

2013-10-01

Globally, ethical issues in research are becoming of major importance, being well established in developed countries with little information about research ethics committees (RECs) in Africa to assess whether these committees are actually improving the protection of human research participants. To describe the establishment, structure, function, operations and outcome of the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the National Research Center (NRC) of Egypt from 2003 to 2011. The committee established its regulatory rules for human and animal research ethics based on the Declaration of Helsinki 2000-2008 and WHO regulations 2000-2011. There were 974 protocols revised in the 7 years (2005-2011). The outcome of the committee discussions was to clear 262 of the protocols without conditions. A full 556 were cleared conditionally upon completion of modifications. Another 118 were deferred pending action and further consideration at a subsequent meeting. And 16 researchers did not reply, while 22 protocols were rejected. Since 2005, the MREC in NRC Egypt has built up considerable experience of evaluating the ethical issues arising within the field of medical research.

12 CFR 272.2 - Functions of the Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 12 Banks and Banking 3 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Functions of the Committee. 272.2 Section 272.2... § 272.2 Functions of the Committee. The procedures followed by the Committee are designed to facilitate the effective performance of the Committee's statutory functions with respect to the regulation and...

15 CFR 10.4 - Establishment of the Standard Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... required meetings. (b) A Standard Review Committee may remain in existence for a period necessary for the... shall be subject to approval by the Department. The committee may conduct business either in a meeting...

Aging and the Work Force: Human Resource Strategies. An Information Paper Prepared for Use by the Special Committee on Aging. United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. Senate Special Committee on Aging.

This information paper explores the need for age-neutral functional criteria in the human resources management system and the need for managers to review currently accepted employment policies. Population patterns, labor force profiles, and labor force projections are reviewed. The paper examines the effect of retirement policies and considers…

75 FR 34970 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-06-21

...;and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, #0;delegations of authority... performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b... assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d...

24 CFR 200.245 - Hearing Officer determines facts and law: Review Committee makes final administrative decision.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... and law: Review Committee makes final administrative decision. 200.245 Section 200.245 Housing and... Clearance Procedure § 200.245 Hearing Officer determines facts and law: Review Committee makes final administrative decision. The Hearing Officer will determine the facts and the law relevant to the issues and will...

75 FR 8371 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-02-24

... Rockledge Drive, Room 3139, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1712, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee: AIDS..., [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Urology...-435- 1501, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis...

78 FR 29373 - Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-20

... Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Developmental Therapeutics [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group; Cancer...

Management of Hospital Formularies in Ontario: Challenges within a Local Health Integration Network.

PubMed

Burke, Natasha; Bowen, James M; Troyan, Sue; Jegathisawaran, Jathishinie; Gosse, Carolyn; Tonkin, Marita; Kagoma, Sandra; Goeree, Ron; Holbrook, Anne

2016-01-01

Expenditures on drugs dispensed and administered to patients in Canadian hospitals have been estimated at $2.4 billion per year. Pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees play a key role in the evaluation and management of drug therapies in this setting. Hospitals differ with respect to the composition of these committees, their members' expertise, and the processes used for making formulary decisions. To examine the current processes for formulary drug review from the perspective of P&T committees and their individual members, and to examine the needs and preferences of these stakeholders related to evidence review and potential collaborative drug review processes within a large Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) in Ontario. Twenty-three sites within 10 hospital corporations in LHIN 4 (Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant) were recruited. A 2-part questionnaire was developed and pretested for clarity and comprehensiveness. The institution profile section of the questionnaire was to be completed by pharmacy directors and the P&T section by committee members. Ten pharmacy directors and 28 committee members representing 10 P&T committees responded. A mean of 6.4 new drug requests were reviewed annually by each P&T committee. Across the LHIN, the workload associated with reviewing submissions for new drugs to be added to the formulary represented 0.84 full-time equivalent. The quality of clinical evidence in the drug submissions was rated more favourably than the quality of economic evidence; furthermore, the use of economic evidence was limited by a lack of health economics expertise within the committees. A centralized review process for the LHIN was perceived as beneficial to improve efficiency, the quality of review, and standardization, and also to reduce costs. Across the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant LHIN, considerable time and resources are spent on the review of potential new drugs for addition to the hospitals' formularies. A standardized formulary review process, with greater use of provincial and national drug reviews, would likely benefit all LHINs.

Human Space Flight Plans Committee

NASA Image and Video Library

2009-08-11

Dr. Edward Crawley, Ford Professor of Engineering at MIT and co-chair, NASA Exploration Technology Development Program Review Committee speaks during the final meeting of the Human Space Flight Review Committee, Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009, in Washington. Photo Credit: (NASA/Paul E. Alers)

Report of the DOE Review Committee on the baseline validation of the Superconducting Super Collider

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1993-08-01

The Secretary of Energy directed that an independent review of the current cost and schedule baseline for the SSC be conducted. The purpose of this independent review was to validate the current cost and schedule baseline and to ensure that the project status is accurate as currently reported. Through May 1993, approximately $1.5 billion of the baseline cost of $8.249 billion had been expended, with project completion forecasted on the baseline schedule as of September 1999. This report documents the findings of the SSC Baseline Validation Review Committee (the Committee). The report is organized into five parts. The first sectionmore » is the Executive Summary. This introduction is followed by a discussion of the project progress/status as determined by the Committee. The next section describes the Committee`s estimate of the cost at completion for the SSC project, followed by an assessment of the adequacy of the business management systems currently being used to manage the project. The final section presents the Committee`s conclusions and recommendations. The main body of the report is followed by the subcommittee reports and appendices.« less

Is Your Ethics Committee Efficient? Using “IRB Metrics” as a Self-Assessment Tool for Continuous Improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand

PubMed Central

Adams, Pornpimon; Kaewkungwal, Jaranit; Limphattharacharoen, Chanthima; Prakobtham, Sukanya; Pengsaa, Krisana; Khusmith, Srisin

2014-01-01

Tensions between researchers and ethics committees have been reported in several institutions. Some reports suggest researchers lack confidence in the quality of institutional review board (IRB) reviews, and that emphasis on strict procedural compliance and ethical issues raised by the IRB might unintentionally lead to delays in correspondence between researchers and ethics committees, and/or even encourage prevarication/equivocation, if researchers perceive committee concerns and criticisms unjust. This study systematically analyzed the efficiency of different IRB functions, and the relationship between efficiency and perceived quality of the decision-making process. The major purposes of this study were thus (1) to use the IRB Metrics developed by the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand (FTM-EC) to assess the operational efficiency and perceived effectiveness of its ethics committees, and (2) to determine ethical issues that may cause the duration of approval process to be above the target limit of 60 days. Based on a literature review of definitions and methods used and proposed for use, in assessing aspects of IRB quality, an “IRB Metrics” was developed to assess IRB processes using a structure-process-outcome measurement model. To observe trends in the indicators evaluated, data related to all protocols submitted to the two panels of the FTM-EC (clinical and non-clinical), between January 2010–September 2013, were extracted and analyzed. Quantitative information based on IRB Metrics structure-process-outcome illuminates different areas for internal-process improvement. Ethical issues raised with researchers by the IRB, which were associated with the duration of the approval process in protocol review, could be considered root causes of tensions between the parties. The assessment of IRB structure-process-outcome thus provides a valuable opportunity to strengthen relationships and reduce conflicts between IRBs and researchers, with positive outcomes for all parties involved in the conduct of human-subject research. PMID:25406085

77 FR 54921 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-06

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Radiation... Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Basic Mechanisms of Cancer...

77 FR 28610 - Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-15

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Chemo...

75 FR 1795 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-13

... funding cycle. Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational Integrated Review Group, Tumor... Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Clinical Oncology Study Section. Date...

78 FR 54259 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-03

... . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Molecular Genetics B Study... . Name of Committee: Emerging Technologies and Training Neurosciences Integrated Review Group; Molecular...

Human Space Flight Plans Committee

NASA Image and Video Library

2009-08-11

Dr. Wanda Austin, president and CEO of the Aerospace Corp., left, asks a question during the final meeting of the Human Space Flight Review Committee, Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009, in Washington as committee member Bohdan Bejmuk reviews his notes. Photo Credit: (NASA/Paul E. Alers)

76 FR 51995 - National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-19

... Review Group, Comparative Medicine Review Committee, Comparative Medicine Review Committee. Date: October... Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371...

76 FR 49779 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-11

..., [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group, Tumor..., [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2-Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group...

77 FR 26771 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-07

[email protected] . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Motor... . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Obesity...

Electrophysiologic monitoring characteristics of the recurrent laryngeal nerve preoperatively paralyzed or invaded with malignancy.

PubMed

Kamani, Dipti; Darr, E Ashlie; Randolph, Gregory W

2013-11-01

To elucidate electrophysiologic responses of the recurrent laryngeal nerves that were preoperatively paralyzed or invaded by malignancy and to use this information as an added functional parameter for intraoperative management of recurrent laryngeal nerves with malignant invasion. Case series with chart review. Academic, tertiary care center. All consecutive neck surgeries with nerve monitoring performed by senior author (GWR) between December 1995 and January 2007 were reviewed after obtaining Institutional Review Board approval from Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Human Subjects Committee and the Partners Human Research Committee. Electrophysiologic parameters in all cases with preoperative vocal cord paralysis/paresis, and the recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion by cancer, were studied. Of the 1138 surgeries performed, 25 patients (2.1%) had preoperative vocal cord dysfunction. In patients with preoperative vocal cord dysfunction, recognizable recurrent laryngeal nerve electrophysiologic activity was preserved in over 50% of cases. Malignant invasion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was found in 22 patients (1.9%). Neural invasion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was associated with preoperative vocal cord paralysis in only 50% of these patients. In nerves invaded by malignancy, 60% maintained recognizable electrophysiologic activity, which was more commonly present and robust when vocal cord function was preserved. Knowledge of electrophysiologic intraoperative neural monitoring provides additional functional information and, along with preoperative vocal cord function information, aids in constructing decision algorithms regarding intraoperative management of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, in prognosticating postoperative outcomes, and in patient counseling regarding postoperative expectations.

77 FR 14028 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-08

....gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Biological Chemistry and...-1323, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Biology of Development and Aging Integrated Review...

76 FR 19793 - NASA Advisory Council; Technology and Innovation Committee; Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-04-08

... and Innovation Committee; Meeting AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION... Innovation Committee of the NASA Advisory Council. The meeting will be held for the purpose of reviewing the Space Technology programs and review knowledge management and technology transfer activities within the...

75 FR 61519 - NASA Advisory Council; Technology and Innovation Committee; Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-05

... and Innovation Committee; Meeting AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION... Innovation Committee of the NASA Advisory Council. The meeting will be held for the purpose of reviewing the Space Technology Program planning and review innovation activities at NASA's Langley Research Center...

75 FR 5578 - Federal Advisory Committee; Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-02-03

... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Federal Advisory Committee; Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Disestablishment of Federal advisory committee. SUMMARY: The Department of Defense announced on October 1, 2009 (74 FR 50781) that the...

11 CFR 9007.1 - Audits.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... questions and to aid in locating records. (iii) Failure to provide staff, records or office space. If the..., and Commission staff will be available to answer committee questions. (ii) Review of records. During the fieldwork, Commission staff will review committee records and may conduct interviews of committee...

[Research ethics committees: a necessary good].

PubMed

Riera, Alejandra V

2013-12-01

The Nuremberg Code, issued as the result of the deliberations of the Nuremberg Trials, which judged the atrocities carried out during Nazi Germany (1933-1945), was the first universal document that defined research ethics principles for human experimentation. This code served as the basis for the subsequent ethical codes and principles used today by the Research Ethics Committees. The Research Ethics Committee is a multidisciplinary body whose primary role is to protect the rights and welfare of research subjects through the review of research protocols, ensuring compliance with internationally and locally accepted ethical guidelines. Worldwide, there have been important improvements in order to promote and regulate bioethics in medical research. In Venezuela, several national organizations have been constituted with the aim of promoting the establishment of ethics committees; however, there has not been a significant progress in the quantity or quality of the functioning of Research Ethics Committees in the country. It is imperative for each research institution to establish and work to improve their ethics committee to ensure the quality of the clinical research conducted, making it adherent to ethical codes, and safeguarding the integrity and credibility of the investigators and the research institutions, and more importantly, the patient's rights.

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

The Environmental Engineering Committee conducted a preliminary review of the above document in March 1986, and identified obvious errors or omissions which are explained in detail in its initial report. The Office of Solid Waste asked the Committee to review the final draft ACL guidance when it was ready for publications in the Federal Register. This report represents the Committee's review of the final draft which was found to be well-written and technically sound.

Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees.

PubMed

Schuppli, C A; Fraser, D

2007-05-01

Research ethics committees - animal ethics committees (AECs) for animal-based research and institutional research boards (IRBs) for human subjects - have a key role in research governance, but there has been little study of the factors influencing their effectiveness. The objectives of this study were to examine how the effectiveness of a research ethics committee is influenced by committee composition and dynamics, recruitment of members, workload, participation level and member turnover. As a model, 28 members of AECs at four universities in western Canada were interviewed. Committees were selected to represent variation in the number and type of protocols reviewed, and participants were selected to include different types of committee members. We found that a bias towards institutional or scientific interests may result from (1) a preponderance of institutional and scientist members, (2) an intimidating atmosphere for community members and other minority members, (3) recruitment of community members who are affiliated with the institution and (4) members joining for reasons other than to fulfil the committee mandate. Thoroughness of protocol review may be influenced by heavy workloads, type of review process and lack of full committee participation. These results, together with results from the literature on research ethics committees, suggested potential ways to improve the effectiveness of research ethics committees.

75 FR 79423 - NASA Advisory Council; Technology and Innovation Committee; Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-12-20

... and Innovation Committee; Meeting AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION... Innovation Committee of the NASA Advisory Council. The meeting will be held for the purpose of reviewing the Space Technology Program planning and review innovation activities at NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC...

76 FR 573 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-05

..., [email protected] . Name of Committee: Biology of Development and Aging Integrated Review Group... Committee: Biology of Development and Aging Integrated Review Group, Development--1 Study Section. Date..., Metabolism, Nutrition and Reproductive Sciences Integrated Review Group, Integrative Physiology of Obesity...

77 FR 50703 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-22

... . Name of Committee: Bioengineering Sciences & Technologies Integrated Review Group; Nanotechnology Study... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Dermatology and...

Exploring the role and function of trial steering committees: results of an expert panel meeting.

PubMed

Harman, Nicola L; Conroy, Elizabeth J; Lewis, Steff C; Murray, Gordon; Norrie, John; Sydes, Matt R; Lane, J Athene; Altman, Douglas G; Baigent, Colin; Bliss, Judith M; Campbell, Marion K; Elbourne, Diana; Evans, Stephen; Sandercock, Peter; Gamble, Carrol

2015-12-30

The independent oversight of clinical trials, which is recommended by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, is typically provided by an independent advisory Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) and an independent executive committee, to whom the DMC makes recommendations. The detailed roles and function of this executive committee, known as the Trial Steering Committee (TSC), have not previously been studied or reviewed since those originally proposed by the MRC in 1998. An expert panel (n = 7) was convened comprising statisticians, clinicians and trial methodologists with prior TSC experience. Twelve questions about the role and responsibilities of the TSC were discussed by the panel at two full-day meetings. Each meeting was transcribed in full and the discussions were summarised. The expert panel reached agreement on the role of the TSC, to which it was accountable, the membership, the definition of independence, and the experience and training needed. The management of ethical issues, difficult/complex situations and issues the TSC should not ask the DMC to make recommendations on were more difficult to discuss without specific examples, but support existed for further work to help share issues and to provide appropriate training for TSC members. Additional topics discussed, which had not been identified by previous work relating to the DMCs but were pertinent to the role of the TSC, included the following: review of data sharing requests, indemnity, lifespan of the TSC, general TSC administration, and the roles of both the Funder and the Sponsor. This paper presents recommendations that will contribute to the revision and update of the MRC TSC terms of reference. Uncertainty remains in some areas due to the absence of real-life examples; future guidance on these issues would benefit from a repository of case studies. Notably, the role of a patient and public involvement (PPI) contributor was not discussed, and further work is warranted to explore the role of a PPI contributor in independent trial oversight.

77 FR 6809 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-09

... 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301 806-0009, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee: Healthcare..., Room 3166, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-254-9975, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee... Committee: Healthcare Delivery and Methodologies Integrated Review Group Community-Level Health Promotion...

Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrists on Bioethics Committees: Opportunities for Academic Leadership

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Geppert, Cynthia M. A.; Cohen, Mary Ann

2006-01-01

Objective: This article briefly reviews the history of the relationship between psychiatry and the leadership of ethics committees as a background for examining appropriate educational initiatives to adequately prepare residents and early career psychiatrists to serve as leaders of ethics committees. Method: A Medline review of literature on…

15 CFR 10.14 - Appeals.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... PRODUCT STANDARDS § 10.14 Appeals. (a) Any person directly affected by a procedural action taken by NIST..., by NIST or the Standing Committee under § 10.10 regarding the review of a published standard, or... action complained of (NIST, the Standard Review Committee, or the Standing Committee) within 30 days...

15 CFR 10.14 - Appeals.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... PRODUCT STANDARDS § 10.14 Appeals. (a) Any person directly affected by a procedural action taken by NIST..., by NIST or the Standing Committee under § 10.10 regarding the review of a published standard, or... action complained of (NIST, the Standard Review Committee, or the Standing Committee) within 30 days...

15 CFR 10.14 - Appeals.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... PRODUCT STANDARDS § 10.14 Appeals. (a) Any person directly affected by a procedural action taken by NIST..., by NIST or the Standing Committee under § 10.10 regarding the review of a published standard, or... action complained of (NIST, the Standard Review Committee, or the Standing Committee) within 30 days...

15 CFR 10.14 - Appeals.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... PRODUCT STANDARDS § 10.14 Appeals. (a) Any person directly affected by a procedural action taken by NIST..., by NIST or the Standing Committee under § 10.10 regarding the review of a published standard, or... action complained of (NIST, the Standard Review Committee, or the Standing Committee) within 30 days...

15 CFR 10.14 - Appeals.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... PRODUCT STANDARDS § 10.14 Appeals. (a) Any person directly affected by a procedural action taken by NIST..., by NIST or the Standing Committee under § 10.10 regarding the review of a published standard, or... action complained of (NIST, the Standard Review Committee, or the Standing Committee) within 30 days...

78 FR 30319 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-22

...: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood...

Best practices: The Administrative Review Committee at New Hampshire Hospital: a one-year follow-up.

PubMed

de Nesnera, Alexander; Folks, David G

2012-06-01

New Hampshire Hospital implemented an Administrative Review Committee (ARC), a best practice that provides a risk management process to mitigate potential liability for the hospital and clinicians treating high-profile, high-risk patients. This column reports on the first year of the ARC's operation, during which the committee reviewed 206 patients. The authors describe four patient groups and their distinguishing characteristics. The ARC is accepted by clinicians as an important venue to present high-risk clinical cases and to obtain risk management guidance and consultation. The committee has become an integral part of the hospital culture.

75 FR 54638 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-08

....gov . Name of Committee: Emerging Technologies and Training Neurosciences Integrated Review Group... . Name of Committee: Emerging Technologies and Training Neurosciences Integrated Review Group, Molecular... Integrated Review Group, Genetic Variation and Evolution Study Section. Date: October 14-15, 2010. Time: 8:30...

75 FR 73114 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-29

... Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Topics in Microbiology. Date: December 28-29, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to... Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Developmental Therapeutics Study....gov . Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Acute...

75 FR 25273 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-07

... Genetics Integrated Review Group, Molecular Genetics C Study Section. Date: June 3-4, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to... Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group, Cancer Molecular Pathobiology Study... Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Cellular and...

78 FR 61377 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-10-03

... . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Small Business: Drug Discovery... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Members Conflicts...

24 CFR 200.227 - Multifamily Participation Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 24 Housing and Urban Development 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Multifamily Participation Review... Requirements Previous Participation Review and Clearance Procedure § 200.227 Multifamily Participation Review Committee. (a) Members. (1) The Director, Office of Lender Activities and Land Sales Registration serves as...

76 FR 55691 - National Institute on Aging Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-08

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Aminergic Function and Brain Aging II. Date: October 21, 2011. Time: 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Agenda: To review and... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging...

MELCOR Peer Review

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Boyack, B.E.; Dhir, V.K.; Gieseke, J.A.

1992-03-01

MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findingsmore » of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.« less

42 CFR 24.5 - Peer review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Peer review. 24.5 Section 24.5 Public Health PUBLIC....5 Peer review. An individual may not be considered for appointment into the SBRS unless his/her qualifications have been reviewed by a PHS peer review committee and the committee has recommended appointment to...

78 FR 2681 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-14

...-435-1212, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Immunology Integrated Review Group; Innate Immunity... Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflicts: Pain and Hearing Date: February 12-13, 2013. Time... Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Radiation Oncology. Date...

77 FR 59198 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-26

....gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Drug Discovery for the... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Program Projects...

12 CFR 630.6 - Funding Corporation committees.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... Corporation committees. (a) System Audit Committee. The Funding Corporation must establish and maintain a System Audit Committee (SAC) by adopting a written charter describing the committee's composition..., compensation, and retention of external auditors issuing System-wide audit reports; (B) Review the external...

Anchoring contextual analysis in health policy and systems research: A narrative review of contextual factors influencing health committees in low and middle income countries.

PubMed

George, Asha; Scott, Kerry; Garimella, Surekha; Mondal, Shinjini; Ved, Rajani; Sheikh, Kabir

2015-05-01

Health committees, councils or boards (HCs) mediate between communities and health services in many health systems. Despite their widespread prevalence, HC functions vary due to their diversity and complexity, not least because of their context specific nature. We undertook a narrative review to better understand the contextual features relevant to HCs, drawing from Scopus and the internet. We found 390 English language articles from journals and grey literature since 1996 on health committees, councils and boards. After screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria, we focused on 44 articles. Through an iterative process of exploring previous attempts at understanding context in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and the HC literature, we developed a conceptual framework that delineates these contextual factors into four overlapping spheres (community, health facilities, health administration, society) with cross-cutting issues (awareness, trust, benefits, resources, legal mandates, capacity-building, the role of political parties, non-governmental organizations, markets, media, social movements and inequalities). While many attempts at describing context in HPSR result in empty arenas, generic lists or amorphous detail, we suggest anchoring an understanding of context to a conceptual framework specific to the phenomena of interest. By doing so, our review distinguishes between contextual elements that are relatively well understood and those that are not. In addition, our review found that contextual elements are dynamic and porous in nature, influencing HCs but also being influenced by them due to the permeability of HCs. While reforms focus on tangible HC inputs and outputs (training, guidelines, number of meetings held), our review of contextual factors highlights the dynamic relationships and broader structural elements that facilitate and/or hinder the role of health committees in health systems. Such an understanding of context points to its contingent and malleable nature, links it to theorizing in HPSR, and clarifies areas for investigation and action. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

14 CFR 1203.603 - Systematic review for declassification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM Declassification and Downgrading § 1203.603 Systematic review for... review guidelines. The Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee, shall develop, in... custodian and referred to the Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee. This listing shall...

77 FR 55852 - Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-11

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental...: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Synapses, Cytoskeleton and... . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cellular...

75 FR 3241 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-20

... Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Neurodifferentiation..., (301) 435- 1178, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cellular and Molecular Biology of Neurodegeneration Study Section. Date...

78 FR 21410 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee: Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-10

...: The Review Committee will meet in the Ziibiwing Center of Anishinabe Culture and Lifeways, 6650 East... Committee will meet on November 6-7, 2013, in the Ziibiwing Center of Anishinabe Culture and Lifeways, 6650... return of such items, where consensus among affected parties is unclear or uncertain. A request for...

76 FR 78717 - Public Meeting of a Joint Subcommittee of the Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee and the...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-12-19

... Committee and the Medical Review Board; Obstructive Sleep Apnea AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety... Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC) and Medical Review Board (MRB). SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that MCSAC and... ideas and concepts the Agency should consider for potential regulatory changes to the current physical...

75 FR 52537 - National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-26

... Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group; Genome Research Review Committee. Date: October 29, 2010. Time: 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. Agenda: To...

75 FR 2148 - National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-14

... Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group, Genome Research Review Committee. Date: March 4, 2010. Time: 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To...

76 FR 28056 - National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-13

... Research Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group, Genome Research Review Committee. Date: June 2, 2011. Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3...

78 FR 67370 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-12

... Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: December 6, 2013. Time: 8:00 a.m...-0303, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

77 FR 66854 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-11-07

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: November 30, 2012. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

77 FR 6796 - Notification of a Public Meeting of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC); Ozone...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-09

... Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC); Ozone Review Panel AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA... teleconference of the CASAC Ozone Review Panel to discuss its draft review of EPA's Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (Second External Review Draft--September 2011). DATES...

77 FR 64334 - Notification of a Public Teleconference of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-19

... Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Ozone Review Panel AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency... teleconference of the CASAC Ozone Review Panel to discuss its draft reviews of four EPA documents: Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (Third External Review Draft-- June 2012...

76 FR 36555 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-06-22

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Molecular Genetics. Date: July 6, 2011. Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications... Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Statistical Genetics. Date: July 28, 2011...

75 FR 1399 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-11

... Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group, Molecular Genetics A Study Section. Date... Committee: Vascular and Hematology Integrated Review Group, Vascular Cell and Molecular Biology Study... Molecular Pharmacology Study Section. Date: February 8-9, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

75 FR 11894 - Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-12

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Cancer Diagnostics and Therapeutics SBIR/STTR. Date: March 18, 2010. Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and... of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Cancer Therapy...

78 FR 55752 - National Institute On Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-11

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group, Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: October 3-4, 2013. Time: 4:30 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Agenda: To review...

75 FR 6042 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-02-05

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group, Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: March 4-5, 2010. Time: 4 p.m. to 12 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

75 FR 56119 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-15

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: October 7-8, 2010. Time: 4 p.m. to 12 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

77 FR 24969 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-04-26

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: June 6-7, 2012. Time: 3 p.m. to 12 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

76 FR 6628 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-07

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: March 3-4, 2011. Time: 5 p.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

77 FR 6129 - National Institute on Aging Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-07

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: March 1-2, 2012. Time: 4 p.m. to 12 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

76 FR 24901 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-03

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group, Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: June 1-2, 2011. Time: 4 p.m. to 12 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

76 FR 2399 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-13

...: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Neurotransporters, Receptors...- 1198. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group.... (301) 435-1045. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental...

75 FR 54893 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-09

... 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-3009. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Molecular Neuropharmacology and Signaling... . Name of Committee: Emerging Technologies and Training Neurosciences Integrated Review Group, Molecular...

78 FR 3905 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-17

... . Name of Committee: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Integrated Review Group; Cardiac... 3188, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435- 1146, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Integrated Review Group; Clinical and Integrative Cardiovascular Sciences...

Composition, training needs and independence of ethics review committees across Africa: are the gate-keepers rising to the emerging challenges?

PubMed Central

Nyika, A; Kilama, W; Chilengi, R; Tangwa, G; Tindana, P; Ndebele, P; Ikingura, J

2009-01-01

Background: The high disease burden of Africa, the emergence of new diseases and efforts to address the 10/90 gap have led to an unprecedented increase in health research activities in Africa. Consequently, there is an increase in the volume and complexity of protocols that ethics review committees in Africa have to review. Methods: With a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the African Malaria Network Trust (AMANET) undertook a survey of 31 ethics review committees (ERCs) across sub-Saharan Africa as an initial step to a comprehensive capacity-strengthening programme. The number of members per committee ranged from 3 to 21, with an average of 11. Members of 10 institutional committees were all from the institution where the committees were based, raising prima facie questions as to whether independence and objectivity could be guaranteed in the review work of such committees. Results: The majority of the committees (92%) cited scientific design of clinical trials as the area needing the most attention in terms of training, followed by determination of risks and benefits and monitoring of research. The survey showed that 38% of the ERC members did not receive any form of training. In the light of the increasing complexity and numbers of health research studies being conducted in Africa, this deficit requires immediate attention. Outcome: The survey identified areas of weakness in the operations of ERCs in Africa. Consequently, AMANET is addressing the identified needs and weaknesses through a 4-year capacity-building project. PMID:19251972

78 FR 55088 - DHS Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-09

... education, training, and experience in the fields of data protection, privacy, and/or emerging technologies... Federal regulations. Committee History and Activities: All individuals interested in applying for Committee membership should review the history of the Committee's work. The Committee's charter and current...

76 FR 22100 - Notification of a Public Teleconference of the Science Advisory Board; Drinking Water Committee...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-04-20

... Science Advisory Board; Drinking Water Committee Augmented for the Review of the Effectiveness of Partial... Drinking Water Committee Augmented for the Review of the Effectiveness of Partial Lead Service Line... EPA Science Advisory Board can be found on the EPA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sab . SUPPLEMENTARY...

75 FR 52581 - Notice of Meeting and Closed Meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-26

... or October 13, must request to be scheduled and must submit a written text of the oral comments..., October 13, the Committee will review a proposal to extend the Memorandum of Understanding Between the... Thursday, October 14, the Committee will conduct interim reviews of the Memorandum of Understanding Between...

76 FR 70462 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-14

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: December 2, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 2 p.m... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

75 FR 68368 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-05

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: December 1, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

76 FR 28996 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-19

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: June 17, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

75 FR 29356 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-25

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: June 18, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

78 FR 13880 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-03-01

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: March 22, 2013. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

75 FR 9912 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-04

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: March 19, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee...

77 FR 28890 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-16

...: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Clinical Oncology Study Section. Date: June 11..., (301) 435-0682, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated... Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Developmental Therapeutics Study...

40 CFR 725.235 - Conditions of exemption for activities conducted inside a structure.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... experiments subject to Institutional Biosafety Committee review, or notification simultaneous with initiation of the experiment, the information submitted for review or notification, along with standard... experiments exempt from Institutional Biosafety Committee review or notification simultaneous with initiation...

77 FR 3277 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-23

... Training Neurosciences Integrated Review Group; Molecular Neurogenetics Study Section. Date: February 16-17..., [email protected] . Name of Committee: Vascular and Hematology Integrated Review Group; Molecular and...- 1213, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience...

76 FR 27070 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-10

[email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cellular and Molecular Biology of Neurodegeneration Study Section. Date: June 13-14, 2011. Time... Committee: Population Sciences and Epidemiology Integrated Review Group; Epidemiology of Cancer Study...

17 CFR 8.09 - Review of investigation report.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... PROCEDURES FOR DISCIPLINARY, SUMMARY, AND MEMBERSHIP DENIAL ACTIONS Disciplinary Procedure § 8.09 Review of investigation report. The disciplinary committee shall promptly review each investigation report. In the event the disciplinary committee determines that additional investigation or evidence is needed, it shall...

40 CFR 725.235 - Conditions of exemption for activities conducted inside a structure.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... experiments subject to Institutional Biosafety Committee review, or notification simultaneous with initiation of the experiment, the information submitted for review or notification, along with standard... experiments exempt from Institutional Biosafety Committee review or notification simultaneous with initiation...

40 CFR 725.235 - Conditions of exemption for activities conducted inside a structure.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... experiments subject to Institutional Biosafety Committee review, or notification simultaneous with initiation of the experiment, the information submitted for review or notification, along with standard... experiments exempt from Institutional Biosafety Committee review or notification simultaneous with initiation...

40 CFR 725.235 - Conditions of exemption for activities conducted inside a structure.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... experiments subject to Institutional Biosafety Committee review, or notification simultaneous with initiation of the experiment, the information submitted for review or notification, along with standard... experiments exempt from Institutional Biosafety Committee review or notification simultaneous with initiation...

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014.

PubMed

Kim, Scott Y H; De Vries, Raymond G; Peteet, John R

2016-04-01

Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) of psychiatric patients is increasing in some jurisdictions such as Belgium and the Netherlands. However, little is known about the practice, and it remains controversial. To describe the characteristics of patients receiving EAS for psychiatric conditions and how the practice is regulated in the Netherlands. This investigation reviewed psychiatric EAS case summaries made available online by the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees as of June 1, 2015. Two senior psychiatrists used directed content analysis to review and code the reports. In total, 66 cases from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. Clinical and social characteristics of patients, physician review process of the patients' requests, and the euthanasia review committees' assessments of the physicians' actions. Of the 66 cases reviewed, 70% (n = 46) were women. In total, 32% (n = 21) were 70 years or older, 44% (n = 29) were 50 to 70 years old, and 24% (n = 16) were 30 to 50 years old. Most had chronic, severe conditions, with histories of attempted suicides and psychiatric hospitalizations. Most had personality disorders and were described as socially isolated or lonely. Depressive disorders were the primary psychiatric issue in 55% (n = 36) of cases. Other conditions represented were psychotic, posttraumatic stress or anxiety, somatoform, neurocognitive, and eating disorders, as well as prolonged grief and autism. Comorbidities with functional impairments were common. Forty-one percent (n = 27) of physicians performing EAS were psychiatrists. Twenty-seven percent (n = 18) of patients received the procedure from physicians new to them, 14 of whom were physicians from the End-of-Life Clinic, a mobile euthanasia clinic. Consultation with other physicians was extensive, but 11% (n = 7) of cases had no independent psychiatric input, and 24% (n = 16) of cases involved disagreement among consultants. The euthanasia review committees found that one case failed to meet legal due care criteria. Persons receiving EAS for psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands are mostly women and of diverse ages, with complex and chronic psychiatric, medical, and psychosocial histories. The granting of their EAS requests appears to involve considerable physician judgment, usually involving multiple physicians who do not always agree (sometimes without independent psychiatric input), but the euthanasia review committees generally defer to the judgments of the physicians performing the EAS.

78 FR 735 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-04

... . Name of Committee: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Integrated Review Group, Cardiovascular... 20817-7814, 301-435-0904, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Cardiovascular and Respiratory...

77 FR 297 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-04

... of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Developmental Brain...- 9866, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience Integrated...

77 FR 46755 - Notification of a Public Meeting of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Ozone...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-06

... Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Ozone Review Panel AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA... the CASAC Ozone Review Panel to conduct a peer review of EPA's Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone... Assessment for Ozone--First External Review Draft (July 2012), Welfare Risk and Exposure Assessment for Ozone...

42 CFR 61.15 - Moral character or loyalty; reference to Special Review Committee; review and recommendation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Moral character or loyalty; reference to Special Review Committee; review and recommendation. 61.15 Section 61.15 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships...

42 CFR 61.15 - Moral character or loyalty; reference to Special Review Committee; review and recommendation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Moral character or loyalty; reference to Special Review Committee; review and recommendation. 61.15 Section 61.15 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships...

42 CFR 61.15 - Moral character or loyalty; reference to Special Review Committee; review and recommendation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... 42 Public Health 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Moral character or loyalty; reference to Special Review Committee; review and recommendation. 61.15 Section 61.15 Public Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FELLOWSHIPS, INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS Regular Fellowships...

77 FR 47706 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-09

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on August 21-22, 2012, at... for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information relating to the...

76 FR 37895 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-06-28

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on Wednesday, July 20, 2011... readjustment of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant...

75 FR 15497 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-29

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on April 19-20, 2010, at the... VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information...

75 FR 25925 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-10

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on April 19-20, 2010, at the... VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information...

MHD technology transfer, integration, and review committee

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

1990-05-01

As part of Task 8 of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Integrated Topping Cycle (ITC) project, TRW was given the responsibility to organize, charter and co-chair, with the Department of Energy (DOE), an MHD Technology Transfer, Integration and Review Committee (TTIRC). The TTIRC consists of an Executive Committee (EC) which acts as the governing body, and a General Committee (GC), also referred to as the main or full committee, consisting of representatives from the various POC contractors, participating universities and national laboratories, utilities, equipment suppliers, and other potential MHD users or investors. The purpose of the TTIRC is to: (1) review all Proof-of-Concept (POC) projects and schedules in the national MHD program; to assess their compatibility with each other and the first commercial MHD retrofit plant; (2) establish and implement technology transfer formats for users of this technology; (3) identify interfaces, issues, and funding structures directly impacting the success of the commercial retrofit; (4) investigate and identify the manner in which, and by whom, the above should be resolved; and (5) investigate and assess other participation (foreign and domestic) in the U.S. MHD Program. There are seven sections: introduction; Executive Committee and General Committee activity; Committee activities related to technology transfer; ongoing POC integration activities being performed under the auspices of the Executive Committee; recommendations passed on to the DOE by the Executive Committee; Planned activities for the next six months.

44 CFR 352.23 - Functions of a Regional Assistance Committee (RAC).

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

...) Under 44 CFR part 351, the role of a RAC is to assist State and local government officials to develop their radiological emergency plans, to review the plans, and to observe exercises to evaluate the plans. Under subparts A and B of this part, these technical assistance activities are extended to the licensee...

44 CFR 352.23 - Functions of a Regional Assistance Committee (RAC).

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

...) Under 44 CFR part 351, the role of a RAC is to assist State and local government officials to develop their radiological emergency plans, to review the plans, and to observe exercises to evaluate the plans. Under subparts A and B of this part, these technical assistance activities are extended to the licensee...

78 FR 107 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-02

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel Biophysics and...-1747, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics...

77 FR 77080 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-31

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Biophysics and...-1747, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics...

Site Variability in Regulatory Oversight for an International Study of Pediatric Sepsis.

PubMed

Michelson, Kelly N; Reubenson, Gary; Weiss, Scott L; Fitzgerald, Julie C; Ackerman, Kate K; Christie, LeeAnn; Bush, Jenny L; Nadkarni, Vinay M; Thomas, Neal J; Schreiner, Mark S

2018-04-01

Duplicative institutional review board/research ethics committee review for multicenter studies may impose administrative burdens and inefficiencies affecting study implementation and quality. Understanding variability in site-specific institutional review board/research ethics committee assessment and barriers to using a single review committee (an increasingly proposed solution) can inform a more efficient process. We provide needed data about the regulatory oversight process for the Sepsis PRevalence, OUtcomes, and Therapies multicenter point prevalence study. Survey. Sites invited to participate in Sepsis PRevalence, OUtcomes, and Therapies. Investigators at sites that expressed interest and/or participated in Sepsis PRevalence, OUtcomes, and Therapies. None. Using an electronic survey, we collected data about 1) logistics of protocol submission, 2) institutional review board/research ethics committee requested modifications, and 3) use of a single institutional review board (for U.S. sites). We collected surveys from 104 of 167 sites (62%). Of the 97 sites that submitted the protocol for institutional review board/research ethics committee review, 34% conducted full board review, 54% expedited review, and 4% considered the study exempt. Time to institutional review board/research ethics committee approval required a median of 34 (range 3-186) days, which took longer at sites that required protocol modifications (median [interquartile range] 50 d [35-131 d] vs 32 d [14-54 d)]; p = 0.02). Enrollment was delayed at eight sites due to prolonged (> 50 d) time to approval. Of 49 U.S. sites, 43% considered using a single institutional review board, but only 18% utilized this option. Time to final approval for U.S. sites using the single institutional review board was 62 days (interquartile range, 34-70 d) compared with 34 days (interquartile range, 15-54 d) for nonsingle institutional review board sites (p = 0.16). Variability in regulatory oversight was evident for this minimal-risk observational research study, most notably in the category of type of review conducted. Duplicative review prolonged time to protocol approval at some sites. Use of a single institutional review board for U.S. sites was rare and did not improve efficiency of protocol approval. Suggestions for minimizing these challenges are provided.

International spinal cord injury cardiovascular function basic data set.

PubMed

Krassioukov, A; Alexander, M S; Karlsson, A-K; Donovan, W; Mathias, C J; Biering-Sørensen, F

2010-08-01

To create an International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Cardiovascular Function Basic Data Set within the framework of the International SCI Data Sets. An international working group. The draft of the data set was developed by a working group comprising members appointed by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and a representative of the executive committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets. The final version of the data set was developed after review by members of the executive committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets, the ISCoS scientific committee, ASIA board, relevant and interested international organizations and societies, individual persons with specific interest and the ISCoS Council. To make the data set uniform, each variable and each response category within each variable have been specifically defined in a way that is designed to promote the collection and reporting of comparable minimal data. The variables included in the International SCI Cardiovascular Function Basic Data Set include the following items: date of data collection, cardiovascular history before the spinal cord lesion, events related to cardiovascular function after the spinal cord lesion, cardiovascular function after the spinal cord lesion, medications affecting cardiovascular function on the day of examination; and objective measures of cardiovascular functions, including time of examination, position of examination, pulse and blood pressure. The complete instructions for data collection and the data sheet itself are freely available on the websites of both ISCoS (http://www.iscos.org.uk) and ASIA (http://www.asia-spinalinjury.org).

77 FR 35417 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-06-13

... Committee: AIDS and Related Research Integrated Review Group; AIDS Molecular and Cellular Biology Study... . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Small Business: Orthopedic and... of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research...

77 FR 26021 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-02

... . Name of Committee: Digestive, Kidney and Urological Systems Integrated Review Group; Clinical... 20892, (301) 806-0009, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Digestive, Kidney and Urological Systems Integrated Review Group; Pathobiology of Kidney Disease Study Section. Date: June 4, 2012. Time: 8...

75 FR 1397 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-11

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Molecular Neuropharmacology and Signaling Study Section. Date: February 4-5, 2010. Time: 8 a.m....gov . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Prokaryotic Cell and...

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

PubMed

Winstein, Carolee J; Stein, Joel; Arena, Ross; Bates, Barbara; Cherney, Leora R; Cramer, Steven C; Deruyter, Frank; Eng, Janice J; Fisher, Beth; Harvey, Richard L; Lang, Catherine E; MacKay-Lyons, Marilyn; Ottenbacher, Kenneth J; Pugh, Sue; Reeves, Mathew J; Richards, Lorie G; Stiers, William; Zorowitz, Richard D

2016-06-01

The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke. Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation and underlie this entire guideline. Without communication and coordination, isolated efforts to rehabilitate the stroke survivor are unlikely to achieve their full potential. As systems of care evolve in response to healthcare reform efforts, postacute care and rehabilitation are often considered a costly area of care to be trimmed but without recognition of their clinical impact and ability to reduce the risk of downstream medical morbidity resulting from immobility, depression, loss of autonomy, and reduced functional independence. The provision of comprehensive rehabilitation programs with adequate resources, dose, and duration is an essential aspect of stroke care and should be a priority in these redesign efforts. (Stroke.2016;47:e98-e169. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.). © 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Underground Test Area Activity Preemptive Review Guidance Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Farnham, Irene; Rehfeldt, Kenneth

Preemptive reviews (PERs) of Underground Test Area (UGTA) Activity corrective action unit (CAU) studies are an important and long-maintained quality improvement process. The CAU-specific PER committees provide internal technical review of ongoing work throughout the CAU lifecycle. The reviews, identified in the UGTA Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) (Sections 1.3.5.1 and 3.2), assure work is comprehensive, accurate, in keeping with the state of the art, and consistent with CAU goals. PER committees review various products, including data, documents, software/codes, analyses, and models. PER committees may also review technical briefings including Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO)-required presentations to the Nevadamore » Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and presentations supporting key technical decisions (e.g., investigation plans and approaches). PER committees provide technical recommendations to support regulatory decisions that are the responsibility of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) and NDEP.« less

Ensuring quality Website redesign: the University of Maryland's experience.

PubMed

Fuller, D M; Hinegardner, P G

2001-10-01

The Web Redesign Committee at the Health Sciences and Human Services Library (HS/HSL) of the University of Maryland was formed to evaluate its site and oversee the site's redesign. The committee's goal was to design a site that would be functional, be usable, and provide the library with a more current image. Based on a literature review and discussions with colleagues, a usability study was conducted to gain a better understanding of how the Website was used. Volunteers from across the campus participated in the study. A Web-based survey was also used to gather feedback. To complement user input, library staff were asked to review the existing site. A prototype site was developed incorporating suggestions obtained from the evaluation mechanisms. The usability study was particularly useful because it identified problem areas, including terminology, which would have been overlooked by library staff. A second usability study was conducted to refine the prototype. The new site was launched in the spring of 2000. The usability studies were valuable mechanisms in designing the site. Users felt invested in the project, and the committee received valuable feedback. This process led to an improved Website and higher visibility for the library on campus.

77 FR 15458 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-15

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on March 26-27, 2012, at the... Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information relating to the nature...

75 FR 40036 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-07-13

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on July 26-27, 2010, at the... Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information relating to...

77 FR 48610 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting Amendment

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-14

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting... Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on August 20-21, 2012, at... Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information relating to the nature and character...

78 FR 21349 - Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing; Notice of Federal Advisory Committee...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-10

... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel... advisory committee meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing will take place... meeting is to review planned changes and progress in developing computerized tests for military enlistment...

78 FR 32260 - Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-29

... 20892, (301) 435-4445, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational... . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group Molecular Oncogenesis Study...

76 FR 70710 - Army National Cemeteries Advisory Commission (ANCAC)

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-15

....m.-4 p.m. Place of Meeting: Women in Service to America Memorial, Conference Room, Arlington... committee membership and appointment; formalize committee business rules, review proposed topics for review...

76 FR 7598 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-10

... primary functions of the C2 Audit Committee are focused on (i) C2's financial statements and disclosure... Permit Holder committees. The Exchange's expectation is that C2 management will perform these functions... Audit Committee The Exchange proposes to eliminate its Audit Committee because its functions are...

PREFACE: 7th International Conference on Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Barton, J.

2009-07-01

The proceedings contain the papers presented at the 7th International Conference on Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis. The collection of papers represents the range of activities that are carried out to understand the functionality of engineering systems and structures through stress/strain based evaluation and dynamic response. The scope is broad and covers theoretical studies, modelling and experimental evaluations. Many of the papers cover integration techniques and approaches to better understanding of system performance and failure. All of the papers have been peer reviewed by at least two experts and represent the state of the art of research in this area. The conference is the seventh in the series, following on from previous conferences in Bath, Glasgow, Nottingham, Dublin, Sheffield and Liverpool. Although based in the British Isles the conference has a truly international flavour with offerings from 22 countries. The conference is organised by the Institute of Physics Applied Mechanics Group (formerly the Stress and Vibration Group). It incorporates activities associated with the British Society for Strain Measurement including the Measurements Lecture, the EMex Exhibition and the Young Stress Analyst Competition. The organising committee is grateful for the support of all of the authors, the scientific committee and keynote speakers who played a significant role in the review process, to John Edwards who was instrumental in managing the paper review and submission process, Dawn Stewart and Claire Garland of the Institute of Physics for organising the conference, social programme and registration and Biana Gale of the British Society for Strain Measurement for organising the Exhibition. The organising committee is also grateful to the sponsors of the conference for their kind support and to the co-sponsors for distributing information on the conference. Professor Janice Barton Professor of Experimental Mechanics University of Southampton School of Engineering Sciences Conference Chairman The PDF contains lists of the organising committee, scientific committee, sponsors and co-sponsors.

PREFACE: 7th International Conference on Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Dulieu-Barton, J. M.

2009-07-01

The proceedings contain the papers presented at the 7th International Conference on Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis. The collection of papers represents the range of activities that are carried out to understand the functionality of engineering systems and structures through stress/strain based evaluation and dynamic response. The scope is broad and covers theoretical studies, modelling and experimental evaluations. Many of the papers cover integration techniques and approaches to better understanding of system performance and failure. All of the papers have been peer reviewed by at least two experts and represent the state of the art of research in this area. The conference is the seventh in the series, following on from previous conferences in Bath, Glasgow, Nottingham, Dublin, Sheffield and Liverpool. Although based in the British Isles the conference has a truly international flavour with offerings from 22 countries. The conference is organised by the Institute of Physics Applied Mechanics Group (formerly the Stress and Vibration Group). It incorporates activities associated with the British Society for Strain Measurement including the Measurements Lecture, the EMex Exhibition and the Young Stress Analyst Competition. The organising committee is grateful for the support of all of the authors, the scientific committee and keynote speakers who played a significant role in the review process, to John Edwards who was instrumental in managing the paper review and submission process, Dawn Stewart and Claire Garland of the Institute of Physics for organising the conference, social programme and registration and Biana Gale of the British Society for Strain Measurement for organising the Exhibition. The organising committee is also grateful to the sponsors of the conference for their kind support and to the co-sponsors for distributing information on the conference. Professor Janice M Dulieu-Barton Professor of Experimental Mechanics University of Southampton School of Engineering Sciences Conference Chairman The PDF contains lists of the organising committee, scientific committee, sponsors and co-sponsors.

76 FR 55929 - CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-09

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group; Basic..., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435- 1153, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational...

78 FR 312 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-03

..., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435- 1198, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational... . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Clinical Oncology Study...

75 FR 78716 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-12-16

... 4114, MSC 7816, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 435- 1782. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology... Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group. Basic Mechanisms of Cancer...

77 FR 29672 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-18

... of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational Integrated Review Group; Tumor Cell Biology Study... 20892, 301-435- 1146, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated...

77 FR 46022 - Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-02

...The Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Libby, MT. The committee is authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) (the Act) and operates in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the committee is to improve collaborative relationships and to provide advice and recommendations to the Forest Service concerning projects and funding consistent with the title II of the Act. The meeting is open to the public. The purpose of the meeting is to review status of project implementation and review of status of funds for 2008-2011 Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act.

[Responsibilities of ethics committees].

PubMed

von Bergmann, K

1999-01-15

Increasing numbers of clinical research projects are submitted to ethical committees (institutional review boards) for approval. New therapeutic developments have to be evaluated by these committees to protect patients/volunteers. Thus, the responsibility of ethical committees is increasing. The "Nürnberger Kodex" and the "Declaration of Helsinki" are the background for these evaluations. According to the German drug law the physician is obligated by law to submit the protocol to such a committee. In addition, local state physician authorities require such a procedure. Important considerations during the review process besides ethical aspects are the informed consent, which should be written in an understandable form, and the obligations of the insurance.

[Responsibilities of ethics committees].

PubMed

von Bergmann, K

2000-05-01

Increasing numbers of clinical research projects are submitted to ethical committees (institutional review boards) for approval. New therapeutic developments have to be evaluated by these committees to protect patients/volunteers. Thus, the responsibility of ethical committees is increasing. The "Nürnberger Kodex" and the "Declaration of Helsinki" are the background for these evaluations. According to the German drug law the physician is obligated by law to submit the protocol to such a committee. In addition, local state physician authorities require such a procedure. Important considerations during the review process besides ethical aspects are the informed consent, which should be written in an understandable form, and the obligations of the insurance.

78 FR 60296 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-10-01

... 20892, 301-435-1501, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Prokaryotic Cell and Molecular Biology Study Section. Date: October 25, 2013. Time: 8:00 a... Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group; Cancer Molecular Pathobiology Study...

22 CFR 301.3 - Action on requests for declassification review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... declassification to the Peace Corps Classification Review Committee, which shall consist of the Associate Director... designees, together with his or her recommendation for action. (b) Every effort will be made to complete... downgraded as soon as national security considerations permit. If the Classification Review Committee...

Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.

PubMed

Dyrbye, Liselotte N; Thomas, Matthew R; Mechaber, Alex J; Eacker, Anne; Harper, William; Massie, F Stanford; Power, David V; Shanafelt, Tait D

2007-07-01

To compare how different institutional review boards (IRBs) process and evaluate the same multiinstitutional educational research proposal of medical students' quality of life. Prospective collection in 2005 of key variables regarding the IRB submission and review process of the same educational research proposal involving medical students, which was submitted to six IRBs, each associated with a different medical school. Four IRBs determined the protocol was appropriate for expedited review, and the remaining two required full review. Substantial variation existed in the time to review the protocol by an IRB administrator/IRB member (range 1-101 days) and by the IRB committee (range 6-115 days). One IRB committee approved the study as written. The remaining five IRB committees had a median of 13 requests for additional information/changes to the protocol. Sixty-eight percent of requests (36 of 53) pertained to the informed consent letter; one third (12 of 36) of these requests were unique modifications requested by one IRB but not the others. Although five IRB committees approved the survey after a median of 47 days (range 6-73), one committee had not responded six months after submission (164 days), preventing that school from participating. The findings suggest variability in the timeliness and consistency of IRB review of medical education research across institutions that may hinder multi-institutional research and slow evidence-based medical education reform. The findings demonstrate the difficulties of having medical education research reviewed by IRBs, which are typically designed to review clinical trials, and suggest that the review process for medical education research needs reform.

77 FR 4050 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-26

..., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1046, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic...- 4467, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational Integrated Review Group...

77 FR 56216 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-12

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational Integrated Review Group; Cancer... 20892, 301-435-1254, [email protected]ih.gov . Name of Committee: Oncology 1-Basic Translational...

Regional Infant and Child Mortality Review Committee 2013 final report.

PubMed

Wilson, Ann L; Sideras, Jim

2015-02-01

The Regional Infant and Child Review Committee serves 10 counties in southeastern South Dakota and its mission is to review of deaths of infants and children under the age of 18 so that information can be transformed into action to protect young lives. In 2013, the committee's interdisciplinary team reviewed 32 deaths that met its criteria. The manner of 13 of these deaths was natural, nine accidental, one homicide, five suicide, and four undetermined. There were five infant deaths during sleep and each of these occurred in an unsafe sleep environment. The number of suicides in 2013 was considerably higher than the typical one death by suicide that previously has been observed per year in the area. The report provides the Committee's recommendations for community action that could prevent future deaths of infants and children.

32 CFR 2700.51 - Information Security Oversight Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 32 National Defense 6 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Information Security Oversight Committee. 2700... MICRONESIAN STATUS NEGOTIATIONS SECURITY INFORMATION REGULATIONS Implementation and Review § 2700.51 Information Security Oversight Committee. The OMSN Information Security Oversight Committee shall be chaired...

32 CFR 2700.51 - Information Security Oversight Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 32 National Defense 6 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Information Security Oversight Committee. 2700... MICRONESIAN STATUS NEGOTIATIONS SECURITY INFORMATION REGULATIONS Implementation and Review § 2700.51 Information Security Oversight Committee. The OMSN Information Security Oversight Committee shall be chaired...

76 FR 63600 - Ashley Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-10-13

... DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Ashley Resource Advisory Committee AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: The Ashley Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a meeting to review project status and ammendments to project work. The committee is meeting as authorized...

75 FR 54156 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-03

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Basic... 3211, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435- 0903, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Clinical Oncology Study Section. Date: October 11-12, 2010. Time...

75 FR 52356 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-25

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5... Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict: Reproduction and Metabolism...

76 FR 68202 - MERPAC and MMMAC Recommendations on the STCW SNPRM

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-03

... from the Merchant Mariner Medical Advisory Committee after its review of the STCW SNPRM. DATES...'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand... reviewed the SNPRM and made recommendations. The Merchant Mariner Medical Advisory Committee also reviewed...

75 FR 41212 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-07-15

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5... Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Early Embryo Development Pluripotency. Date...

76 FR 64955 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-10-19

...; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, PAR 10-021: AIDS... Integrated Review Group, AIDS-associated Opportunistic Infections and Cancer Study Section. Date: November 10...

78 FR 5468 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-25

....gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Small Business: Sensory....nih.gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Small Business...; Small Business: Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior. Date: February 21-22, 2013. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5...

7 CFR 780.2 - Definitions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... context, the term may also refer to a request for review by NAD. Appealability review means review of a... otherwise final shall remain final unless the decision is timely appealed to the State committee or NAD. A... of appeal to NAD only after that decision has been appealed to the county committee under the...

77 FR 4049 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-26

... Translational Integrated Review Group, Cancer Genetics Study Section. Date: February 23-24, 2012. Time: 8 a.m... 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402- 6297, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group, Genetics of...

75 FR 1064 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-08

... 20892, 301-435- 1033, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Molecular Genetics B Study Section. Date: February 3-4, 2010. Time: 7 p.m. to 6 p.m. Agenda... Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Genomics, Computational Biology and...

76 FR 27652 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-12

... Integrated Review Group, Molecular Genetics C Study Section. Date: June 23-24, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m... . Name of Committee: Interdisciplinary Molecular Sciences and Training Integrated Review Group, Enabling..., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1782, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and...

77 FR 60430 - Meeting of the Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-03

... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-9736-3] Meeting of the Mobile Sources Technical Review... Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92- 463, notice is hereby given that the Mobile Sources Technical Review... Advisory Committee. This is an open meeting. The meeting will include discussion of current topics and...

75 FR 56554 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-16

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5... Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Memory and Cognition. Date...

78 FR 35943 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-06-14

... Panel; Overflow: Molecular Innate and Adaptive Immunology. Date: July 9, 2013. Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00....gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Topics in Bacterial....nih.gov . Name of Committee: AIDS and Related Research Integrated Review Group; AIDS Immunology and...

International urodynamic basic spinal cord injury data set.

PubMed

Biering-Sørensen, F; Craggs, M; Kennelly, M; Schick, E; Wyndaele, J-J

2008-07-01

To create the International Urodynamic Basic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Data Set within the framework of the International SCI Data Sets. International working group. The draft of the data set was developed by a working group consisting of members appointed by the Neurourology Committee of the International Continence Society, the European Association of Urology, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and a representative of the Executive Committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets. The final version of the data set was developed after review and comments by members of the Executive Committee of the International SCI Standards and Data Sets, the ISCoS Scientific Committee, ASIA Board, relevant and interested (international) organizations and societies (around 40) and persons and the ISCoS Council. Endorsement of the data set by relevant organizations and societies will be obtained. To make the data set uniform, each variable and each response category within each variable have been specifically defined in a way that is designed to promote the collection and reporting of comparable minimal data. Variables included in the International Urodynamic Basic SCI Data Set are date of data collection, bladder sensation during filling cystometry, detrusor function, compliance during filing cystometry, function during voiding, detrusor leak point pressure, maximum detrusor pressure, cystometric bladder capacity and post-void residual volume.

76 FR 28237 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-16

..., Room 4118, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435- 1777, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology[email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Radiation...

76 FR 9541 - Saguache County Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-18

... Committee Act. The purpose is to review and recommend project proposals to be funded with Title II money... projects; (2) Review, evaluate and recommend project proposals to be funded with Title II money; (3) Create...

75 FR 57437 - Saguache County Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-21

... Committee Act. The purpose is to review and recommend project proposals to be funded with Title II money... money; (4) Create a timeline to receive and review new project proposals and schedule the next meeting...

Standards application and development plan for solar thermal technologies

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Cobb, H. R. W.

1981-07-01

Functional and standards matrices, developed from input from ST users and from the industry that will be continually reviewed and updated as commercial aspects develop are presented. The matrices highlight codes, standards, test methods, functions and definitions that need to be developed. They will be submitted through ANSI for development by national consensus bodies. A contingency action is proposed for standards development if specific input is lacking at the committee level or if early development of a standard would hasten commercialization or gain needed jurisdictional acceptance.

Training for an effective health and safety committee in a small business setting.

PubMed

Crollard, Allison; Neitzel, Richard L; Dominguez, Carlos F; Seixas, Noah S

2013-01-01

Health and safety committees are often heralded as a key element of successful health and safety programs, and are thought to represent a means of engaging workers in health and safety efforts. While the understanding of the factors that make these committees effective is growing, there are few resources for how to assist committees in developing these characteristics. This paper describes one approach to creating and implementing a training intervention aimed at improving health and safety committee function at one multilingual worksite. Short-term impacts were evaluated via questionnaire and qualitative observations of committee function. Results indicated high satisfaction with the training as well as modest increases in participation, cooperation, role clarity, and comfort with health and safety skills among committee members. The committee also made considerable achievements in establishing new processes for effective function. Similar interventions may be useful in other workplaces to increase health and safety committee success.

Policy Framework for Covering Preventive Services Without Cost Sharing: Saving Lives and Saving Money?

PubMed

Chen, Stephanie C; Pearson, Steven D

2016-08-01

The US Affordable Care Act mandates that private insurers cover a list of preventive services without cost sharing. The list is determined by 4 expert committees that evaluate the overall health effect of preventive services. We analyzed the process by which the expert committees develop their recommendations. Each committee uses different criteria to evaluate preventive services and none of the committees consider cost systematically. We propose that the existing committees adopt consistent evidence review methodologies and expand the scope of preventive services reviewed and that a separate advisory committee be established to integrate economic considerations into the final selection of free preventive services. The comprehensive framework and associated criteria are intended to help policy makers in the future develop a more evidence-based, consistent, and ethically sound approach.

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions

PubMed Central

Simmons, David; Bunn, Christopher; Nakwagala, Fred; Safford, Monika M.; Ayala, Guadalupe X.; Riddell, Michaela; Graffy, Jonathan; Fisher, Edwin B.

2015-01-01

PURPOSE Ethical review processes have become increasingly complex. We have examined how 8 collaborating diabetes peer-support clinical trials were assessed by ethics committees. METHODS The ethical reviews from the 8 peer-support studies were collated and subjected to a thematic analysis. We mapped the recommendations of local Institutional Review Boards and ethics committees onto the “4+1 ethical framework” (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, along with concern for their scope of application). RESULTS Ethics committees did not consistently focus on tasks within the 4+1 framework: many conducted reviews of scientific, organizational, and administrative activities. Of the 20 themes identified across the ethical reviews, only 4 fell within the scope of the 4+1 framework. Variation in processes and requirements for ethics committees were particularly evident between study countries. Some of the consent processes mandated by ethical review boards were disproportionate for peer support, increased participant burden, and reduced the practicality of testing an ethical intervention. Across the 8 studies, ethics committees’ reviews included the required elements to ensure participant safety; however, they created a range of hurdles that in some cases delayed the research and required consent processes that could hinder the spontaneity and/or empathy of peer support. CONCLUSION Ethics committees should avoid repeating the work of other trusted agencies and consider the ethical validity of “light touch” consent procedures for peer-support interventions. The investigators propose an ethical framework for research on peer support. PMID:26304976

12 CFR 620.30 - Audit committees.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... resources to enable its audit committee to contract for external auditors, outside advisors, and ordinary... record in its minutes its agreement or disagreement with the item(s) under review. (2) External auditors. The external auditor must report directly to the audit committee. Each audit committee must: (i...

32 CFR 2103.51 - Information Security Oversight Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 32 National Defense 6 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Information Security Oversight Committee. 2103... BE DECLASSIFIED Implementation and Review § 2103.51 Information Security Oversight Committee. The NCS Information Security Oversight Committee shall be chaired by the Staff Counsel of the National Security...

32 CFR 2103.51 - Information Security Oversight Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 32 National Defense 6 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Information Security Oversight Committee. 2103... BE DECLASSIFIED Implementation and Review § 2103.51 Information Security Oversight Committee. The NCS Information Security Oversight Committee shall be chaired by the Staff Counsel of the National Security...

12 CFR 620.30 - Audit committees.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... resources to enable its audit committee to contract for external auditors, outside advisors, and ordinary... record in its minutes its agreement or disagreement with the item(s) under review. (2) External auditors. The external auditor must report directly to the audit committee. Each audit committee must: (i...

75 FR 14564 - Dairy Industry Advisory Committee; Public Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-26

... DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farm Service Agency Dairy Industry Advisory Committee; Public Meeting... established Dairy Industry Advisory Committee (Dairy Committee) to review the current state of the dairy industry, discuss current dairy programs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Federal dairy...

78 FR 52552 - National Institute on Aging Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-08-23

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group, Neuroscience of Aging Review Committee. Date: October 10-11, 2013. Time: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and...

77 FR 64118 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-18

... . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Fellowships: Cell Biology, Developmental Biology, and Bioengineering. Date: November 15, 2012. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Agenda: To... . Name of Committee: AIDS and Related Research Integrated Review Group; NeuroAIDS and other End-Organ...

76 FR 26736 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-09

... due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. Name of Committee: Molecular....gov . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Cellular and Molecular Biology of Glia Study Section. Date: June 2-3, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Agenda...

Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic.

PubMed

Alirol, Emilie; Kuesel, Annette C; Guraiib, Maria Magdalena; de la Fuente-Núñez, Vânia; Saxena, Abha; Gomes, Melba F

2017-06-26

Between 2013 and 2016, West Africa experienced the largest ever outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease. In the absence of registered treatments or vaccines to control this lethal disease, the World Health Organization coordinated and supported research to expedite identification of interventions that could control the outbreak and improve future control efforts. Consequently, the World Health Organization Research Ethics Review Committee (WHO-ERC) was heavily involved in reviews and ethics discussions. It reviewed 24 new and 22 amended protocols for research studies including interventional (drug, vaccine) and observational studies. WHO-ERC provided the reviews within on average 6 working days. The WHO-ERC often could not provide immediate approval of protocols for reasons which were not Ebola Virus Disease specific but related to protocol inconsistencies, missing information and complex informed consents. WHO-ERC considerations on Ebola Virus Disease specific issues (benefit-risk assessment, study design, exclusion of pregnant women and children from interventional studies, data and sample sharing, collaborative partnerships including international and local researchers and communities, community engagement and participant information) are presented. To accelerate study approval in future public health emergencies, we recommend: (1) internally consistent and complete submissions with information documents in language participants are likely to understand, (2) close collaboration between local and international researchers from research inception, (3) generation of template agreements for data and sample sharing and use during the ongoing global consultations on bio-banks, (4) formation of Joint Scientific Advisory and Data Safety Review Committees for all studies linked to a particular intervention or group of interventions, (5) formation of a Joint Ethics Review Committee with representatives of the Ethics Committees of all institutions and countries involved to strengthen reviews through the different perspectives provided without the 'opportunity costs' for time to final approval of multiple, independent reviews, (6) direct information exchange between the chairs of advisory, safety review and ethics committees, (7) more Ethics Committee support for investigators than is standard and (8) a global consultation on criteria for inclusion of pregnant women and children in interventional studies for conditions which put them at particularly high risk of mortality or other irreversible adverse outcomes under standard-of-care.

Reflections on the implementation of governance structures for early-stage clinical innovation.

PubMed

Cowie, Luke; Sandall, Jane; Ehrich, Kathryn

2013-12-01

This paper seeks to further explore the question of how best to monitor and govern innovative clinical procedures in their earliest phase of development. We examine the potential value of proposed governance frameworks, such as the IDEAL model, and examine the functioning of a novel procedures review committee. The paper draws upon 20 qualitative, semi-structured interviews. Nine interviews were conducted with members of a committee that was established as a means of governing innovative procedures within a large National Health Service Foundation Trust hospital in the UK. Eleven interviews were conducted with health providers involved with the development of a variety of novel clinical procedures. Prominent themes from the data include the potential willingness of clinicians to engage with regulatory frameworks for innovative procedures, existing ways in which clinicians and others attempt to ensure patient's safety and manage uncertainty in the context of novel procedures, views on the potential benefits and drawbacks of engaging with a review committee for novel procedures, and the pragmatic considerations and potential unintended consequences that are entailed in the implementation of regulatory requirements for the monitoring of innovative procedures. The views of committee members and clinical innovators help us to understand the practical issues of implementing governance structures for novel clinical procedures. The data illustrate those factors that must be taken into account if governance is to support innovation rather than act as an inhibiting factor in the development of new clinical procedures. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

78 FR 54516 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-04

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting.... App. 2, that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on September 10-11, 2013, at... for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information relating to the...

78 FR 12831 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-02-25

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting.... App. 2, that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on March 18-19, 2013, in... VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information...

[Ethics committees in the experience of the IMSS: a Latin American instance].

PubMed

Valdez-Martínez, Edith; Mata-Valderrama, Guadalupe; Bedolla, Miguel; Fajardo-Dolci, Germán Enrique

2015-01-01

The aim of this article is to identify the current state of hospital bioethics committees and local research ethics committees of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed that included all hospitals of the IMSS (N = 262). Two self-administered questionnaires were e-mailed between october and november 2014 to the hospital directors: one for hospital bioethics committees and another for local research ethics committees. Both questionnaires had five sections: committee location, date of committee set up, activity situation, composition, functions, and experience. The response rate was 85 %. It was reported 150 active hospital bioethics committees and 67 active local research ethics committees. In both groups physicians and executive directors dominated committees' membership, and lay people were reported only in seven hospital bioethics committees. The primary function of hospital bioethics committees was case consultation, and their primary goal "to improve the quality of medical care". Local Research Ethics Committees reported as primary function "to evaluate health research protocols and rule of them", and as their primary goal "to protect the rights and wellbeing of the research subjects". Both groups of committees ought to be assessed regularly through audit cycles in order to identify the educative actions that enhance their efficiency.

75 FR 67399 - Performance Review Board, Senior Executive Service (SES)

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-02

... NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice (10-144)] Performance Review Board, Senior...) and the Senior Executive Committee. In addition to the members previously announced, another member... Center Senior Executive Committee Chairperson, Deputy Administrator, NASA Headquarters Chair, Executive...

76 FR 9809 - Notice of a Federal Advisory Committee Meeting Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-22

..., including regulations specifying the permissible scope and conduct of monitoring in accordance with... Manufactured Housing Program Office Review Log of Proposals Call for Committee Reports Proposals Subcommittees...

75 FR 26918 - Siuslaw Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-13

... Resource Advisory Committee AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: The Siuslaw Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Corvallis, OR. The purpose of the meeting is to Review RAC FY10...

Assessing Clinical Microbiology Practice Guidelines: American Society for Microbiology Ad Hoc Committee on Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Assessment

PubMed Central

Kirn, Thomas J.; Westblade, Lars F.; Humphries, Romney

2017-01-01

ABSTRACT As part of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Committee of the Professional Practice Committee, an ad hoc committee was formed in 2014 to assess guidelines published by the committee using an assessment tool, Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation II (AGREE II). The AGREE II assessment helps reviewers determine whether published guidelines are robust, transparent, and clear in presenting practice recommendations in a standardized manner. Identifying strengths and weaknesses of practice guidelines by ad hoc assessments helps with improving future guidelines through the participation of key stakeholders. This minireview describes the development of the ad hoc committee and results from their review of several ASM best practices guidelines and a non-ASM practice guideline from the Emergency Nurses Association. PMID:28835476

Health research ethics review and needs of institutional ethics committees in Tanzania.

PubMed

Ikingura, J K B; Kruger, M; Zeleke, W

2007-09-01

This study was undertaken to describe the performance of health research ethics review procedures of six research centres in Tanzania. Data collection was done through a self-administered questionnaire and personal interviews. The results showed that there were on average 11 members (range = 8-14) in each Research Ethic Committee. However, female representation in the committees was low (15.2%). The largest proportion of the committee members was biomedical scientists (51.5%). Others included medical doctors (19.7%), social scientists (7.6%), laboratory technologists (10.6%), religious leaders (4.5%), statisticians (3.0%), teachers (1.5%) and lawyers (1.5). Committee members had different capacities to carry out review of research proposals (no capacity = 2%; limited capacity = 15%; moderate capacity = 20%; good capacity = 48%, excellent capacity = 13%). Only half of the respondents had prior ethics review training. Although the majority deemed that ethical guidelines were very important (66%), there were challenges in the use of ethical guidelines which included lack of awareness on the national accreditation mechanisms for ethics committee (59%). Adherence to ethical principles and regulations was influenced by being a scientist (OR = 42.47), being an employee of a professional organization (OR = 15.25), and having an interests in the use of ethical guidelines (OR = 10.85) These findings indicate the need for capacity strengthening (through training and resource support), inclusion of more female representation and other mandatory professions to the research ethics committees.

Ministerial Resolution No. 00311-89-AG/DGFF of 8 September 1989 approving the Manual on the Constitution and Functions of the Reforestation Committee.

PubMed

1989-01-01

This Peruvian Resolution approves the Manual on the Constitution and Functions of the Reforestation Committee, to be used by all reforestation committees administering reforestation funds. The Manual contains provisions relating to the laws governing reforestation, the structure and functions of reforestation committees, the funding sources for reforestation, methods of achieving reforestation, and contracts and agreements, among other things.

75 FR 55393 - Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Transport Airplane and Engine Issues

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-10

... Committee Meeting on Transport Airplane and Engine Issues AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT... Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) to discuss transport airplane and engine (TAE) issues. DATES: The...: Opening Remarks, Review Agenda and Minutes. FAA Report. ARAC Executive Committee Report. Transport Canada...

78 FR 23333 - Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-18

... DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting.... App. 2, that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on April 25-26, 2013, in Room... readjustment of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant...

76 FR 55871 - Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Louisiana Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-09

... COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Louisiana Advisory Committee... Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of the... Committee's civil rights project. Review and discuss information collected at the SAC's public briefing...

12 CFR 272.2 - Functions of the Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... § 272.2 Functions of the Committee. The procedures followed by the Committee are designed to facilitate.... Such policy actions ordinarily are taken through the adoption and transmission to the Federal Reserve...

12 CFR 272.2 - Functions of the Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... § 272.2 Functions of the Committee. The procedures followed by the Committee are designed to facilitate.... Such policy actions ordinarily are taken through the adoption and transmission to the Federal Reserve...

12 CFR 272.2 - Functions of the Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... § 272.2 Functions of the Committee. The procedures followed by the Committee are designed to facilitate.... Such policy actions ordinarily are taken through the adoption and transmission to the Federal Reserve...

21 CFR 14.142 - Functions of a color additive advisory committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 1 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Functions of a color additive advisory committee. 14.142 Section 14.142 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE A PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Color Additive Advisory Committees § 14...

21 CFR 14.142 - Functions of a color additive advisory committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 1 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false Functions of a color additive advisory committee. 14.142 Section 14.142 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE A PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Color Additive Advisory Committees § 14...

21 CFR 14.142 - Functions of a color additive advisory committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 1 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false Functions of a color additive advisory committee. 14.142 Section 14.142 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE A PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Color Additive Advisory Committees § 14...

21 CFR 14.142 - Functions of a color additive advisory committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 1 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false Functions of a color additive advisory committee. 14.142 Section 14.142 Food and Drugs FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE A PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Color Additive Advisory Committees § 14...

77 FR 53207 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-31

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group, Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee. Date: October 4-5, 2012. Time: 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m. Agenda: To...

11 CFR 116.8 - Creditor forgiveness of debts owed by ongoing committees; Commission review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... committees; Commission review. (a) General requirements. A creditor may forgive the outstanding balance of a... requirements of 11 CFR 116.3 or 116.5, as appropriate, regarding extensions of credit by commercial vendors and...

76 FR 23871 - Guidelines for the Supervisory Review Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-04-29

... NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 12 CFR Chapter VII [IRPS 11-1] Guidelines for the Supervisory Review Committee AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). ACTION: Final Interpretative Ruling.... 2160 (1994), the NCUA Board (Board) adopted guidelines that established an independent appellate...

76 FR 64359 - Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-10-18

... Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5...: November 10-11, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place...-435-1016, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel...

78 FR 15729 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-03-12

...; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5...: April 2-3, 2013. Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place... 20892, 301-435-1038, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special...

42 CFR 493.2001 - Establishment and function of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Establishment and function of the Clinical... LABORATORY REQUIREMENTS Consultations § 493.2001 Establishment and function of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee. (a) HHS will establish a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee to...

78 FR 23827 - Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation, Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-04-22

... Chair; update on Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment; and discuss the vision for the Committee and... presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee to...

Institutional ethical review and ethnographic research involving injection drug users: a case study.

PubMed

Small, Will; Maher, Lisa; Kerr, Thomas

2014-03-01

Ethnographic research among people who inject drugs (PWID) involves complex ethical issues. While ethical review frameworks have been critiqued by social scientists, there is a lack of social science research examining institutional ethical review processes, particularly in relation to ethnographic work. This case study describes the institutional ethical review of an ethnographic research project using observational fieldwork and in-depth interviews to examine injection drug use. The review process and the salient concerns of the review committee are recounted, and the investigators' responses to the committee's concerns and requests are described to illustrate how key issues were resolved. The review committee expressed concerns regarding researcher safety when conducting fieldwork, and the investigators were asked to liaise with the police regarding the proposed research. An ongoing dialogue with the institutional review committee regarding researcher safety and autonomy from police involvement, as well as formal consultation with a local drug user group and solicitation of opinions from external experts, helped to resolve these issues. This case study suggests that ethical review processes can be particularly challenging for ethnographic projects focused on illegal behaviours, and that while some challenges could be mediated by modifying existing ethical review procedures, there is a need for legislation that provides legal protection of research data and participant confidentiality. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Institutional Ethics Committee Regulations and Current Updates in India.

PubMed

Mahuli, Amit V; Mahuli, Simpy A; Patil, Shankargouda; Bhandi, Shilpa

2017-08-01

The aim of the review is to provide current updates on regulations for ethics committees and researchers in India. Ethical dilemmas in research since time immemorial have been a major concern for researchers worldwide. The question "what makes clinical research ethical" is significant and difficult to answer as multiple factors are involved. The research involving human participants in clinical trials should follow the required rules, regulations, and guidelines in one's own country. It is a dynamic process, and updates have to be learned by researcher and committee members. The review highlights the ethical regulation from the Drug Controller General of India, Clinical Trial Registry of India, and Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines. In this article, the updates on Indian scenario of the Ethical Committee and guidelines are compiled. The review comes handy for clinical researchers and ethics committee members in academic institutions to check on the current updates and keep abreast with the knowledge on regulations of ethics in India.

76 FR 2398 - Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-13

...] Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration.... Name of Committee: Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee... Committee at the March 30 through 31, 2010, meeting of the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee...

78 FR 27977 - National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-13

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee NIA-S. Date: June 12-13, 2013. Time: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Agenda: To...

PATHOGEN EQUIVALENCY COMMITTEE UPDATE: PFRP EQUIVALENCY DETERMINATIONS

EPA Science Inventory

This presentation will:

Review the mandate of the Pathogen Equivalency Committee
Review the PEC's current membership of 10
Discuss how a typical application is evaluated
Note where information can be found
List present deliberations/applications and describe t...

7 CFR 929.125 - Committee review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 8 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Committee review procedures. 929.125 Section 929.125 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; FRUITS, VEGETABLES, NUTS), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CRANBERRIES GROWN IN STATES OF...

7 CFR 929.125 - Committee review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 8 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Committee review procedures. 929.125 Section 929.125 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (Marketing Agreements and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CRANBERRIES GROWN IN STATES OF...

7 CFR 929.125 - Committee review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 8 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Committee review procedures. 929.125 Section 929.125 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (Marketing Agreements and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CRANBERRIES GROWN IN STATES OF...

7 CFR 929.125 - Committee review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 8 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Committee review procedures. 929.125 Section 929.125 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; FRUITS, VEGETABLES, NUTS), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CRANBERRIES GROWN IN STATES OF...

75 FR 51984 - Federal Advisory Committee; Meeting of the Uniform Formulary Beneficiary Advisory Panel

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-24

... and Therapeutics Committee regarding the Uniform Formulary. Meeting Agenda Sign-In; Welcome and Opening Remarks; Public Citizen Comments; Scheduled Therapeutic Class Reviews--Ophthalmic Agents...; Panel Discussions and Vote; and comments following each therapeutic class review. Meeting Accessibility...

Status of national health research systems in ten countries of the WHO African Region.

PubMed

Kirigia, Joses M; Wambebe, Charles

2006-10-19

The World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Committee for Africa, in 1998, passed a resolution (AFR/RC48/R4) which urged its Member States in the Region to develop national research policies and strategies and to build national health research capacities, particularly through resource allocation, training of senior officials, strengthening of research institutions and establishment of coordination mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to take stock of some aspects of national resources for health research in the countries of the Region; identify current constraints facing national health research systems; and propose the way forward. A questionnaire was prepared and sent by pouch to all the 46 Member States in the WHO African Region through the WHO Country Representatives for facilitation and follow up. The health research focal person in each of the countries Ministry of Health (in consultation with other relevant health research bodies in the country) bore the responsibility for completing the questionnaire. The data were entered and analysed in Excel spreadsheet. The key findings were as follows: the response rate was 21.7% (10/46); three countries had a health research policy; one country reported that it had a law relating to health research; two countries had a strategic health research plan; three countries reported that they had a functional national health research system (NHRS); two countries confirmed the existence of a functional national health research management forum (NHRMF); six countries had a functional ethical review committee (ERC); five countries had a scientific review committee (SRC); five countries reported the existence of health institutions with institutional review committees (IRC); two countries had a health research programme; and three countries had a national health research institute (NHRI) and a faculty of health sciences in the national university that conducted health research. Four out of the ten countries reported that they had a budget line for health research in the Ministry of Health budget document. Governments of countries of the African Region, with the support of development partners, private sector and civil society, urgently need to improve the research policy environment by developing health research policies, strategic plans, legislations, programmes and rolling plans with the involvement of all stakeholders, e.g., relevant sectors, research organizations, communities, industry and donors. In a nutshell, development of high-performing national health research systems in the countries of the WHO African Region, though optional, is an imperative. It may be the only way of breaking free from the current vicious cycle of ill-health and poverty.

Status of national health research systems in ten countries of the WHO African Region

PubMed Central

Kirigia, Joses M; Wambebe, Charles

2006-01-01

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Committee for Africa, in 1998, passed a resolution (AFR/RC48/R4) which urged its Member States in the Region to develop national research policies and strategies and to build national health research capacities, particularly through resource allocation, training of senior officials, strengthening of research institutions and establishment of coordination mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to take stock of some aspects of national resources for health research in the countries of the Region; identify current constraints facing national health research systems; and propose the way forward. Methods A questionnaire was prepared and sent by pouch to all the 46 Member States in the WHO African Region through the WHO Country Representatives for facilitation and follow up. The health research focal person in each of the countries Ministry of Health (in consultation with other relevant health research bodies in the country) bore the responsibility for completing the questionnaire. The data were entered and analysed in Excel spreadsheet. Results The key findings were as follows: the response rate was 21.7% (10/46); three countries had a health research policy; one country reported that it had a law relating to health research; two countries had a strategic health research plan; three countries reported that they had a functional national health research system (NHRS); two countries confirmed the existence of a functional national health research management forum (NHRMF); six countries had a functional ethical review committee (ERC); five countries had a scientific review committee (SRC); five countries reported the existence of health institutions with institutional review committees (IRC); two countries had a health research programme; and three countries had a national health research institute (NHRI) and a faculty of health sciences in the national university that conducted health research. Four out of the ten countries reported that they had a budget line for health research in the Ministry of Health budget document. Conclusion Governments of countries of the African Region, with the support of development partners, private sector and civil society, urgently need to improve the research policy environment by developing health research policies, strategic plans, legislations, programmes and rolling plans with the involvement of all stakeholders, e.g., relevant sectors, research organizations, communities, industry and donors. In a nutshell, development of high-performing national health research systems in the countries of the WHO African Region, though optional, is an imperative. It may be the only way of breaking free from the current vicious cycle of ill-health and poverty. PMID:17052326

The evolution of the cancer formulary review in Canada: Can centralization improve the use of economic evaluation?

PubMed

Wranik, W Dominika; Gambold, Liesl; Hanson, Natasha; Levy, Adrian

2017-04-01

Public reimbursement of drugs is a costly proposition for health care systems. Decisions to add drugs to the public formulary are often guided by review processes and committees. The evolution of the formulary review process in Canada's publicly funded health system is characterized by increased centralization and systematization. In the past, the review of evidence and recommendation was conducted at the regional level, but was replaced with the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review in 2011. We assess the extent to which centralization and systematization of the review process have responded to past challenges, focusing on the use of economic evaluation in the process. Past challenges with economic evaluation experienced by regionalized review committees were identified from literature and qualitative data collected in the province of Nova Scotia. We categorize these using a typology with a macro-, meso, and micro-level hierarchy, which provides a useful framework for understanding at which level change is required, and who has the authority to influence change. Using grounded theory methods, we identify approaches used by Nova Scotia past committee members to compensate for perceived shortcomings of the process. These include an undue reliance on other committee members, on the multidisciplinarity of the committee, and on past decisions. Using a policy analysis approach, we argue that centralization and systematization of the review process only partially address the shortcomings of the previous regionalized process. Lessons from Canada can inform policy discussions across all health systems, where similar challenges with the formulary review process have been identified. © 2016 The Authors. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. © 2016 The Authors. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Regional Infant and Child Mortality Review Committee - 2015 Final Report.

PubMed

Wilson, Ann L; Sideras, Jim; Randall, Brad

2016-10-01

The Regional Infant and Child Mortality Review Committee serves 10 counties in southeastern South Dakota and aims to use its reviews to prevent future loss of life during childhood. In 2015, the committee reviewed 24 deaths (compared to 32 cases in 2013 and 25 cases in 2014). Consistent with observations made in previous years, in 2015 all infants (n=7) who died during sleep did so with risks present in the sleep environment. Progress in decreasing these infant deaths in the region is not being observed, and in fact, may even be deteriorating. Two children died subsequent to a motor vehicle crash and neither were wearing a seat belt. The committee was pleased, however, to note that there were no childhood fatalities associated with teenaged drivers. One teen suicide in 2015 marked a decrease in the number observed in 2013 and 2014, but represents an ongoing concern about the safety of emotionally volatile adolescents. Further, one child homicide occurred in the region in 2015 reflecting the fragility of young in the presence of stressed and unstable home environments. The report provides the committee's recommendation for community action that could prevent future deaths of infants and children. Copyright© South Dakota State Medical Association.

78 FR 3882 - U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS®) Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-01-17

... be held at the Western Management Development Center, Cherry Creek Place, 3151 S Vaughn Way, Aurora... Observation System Act, part of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-11). The Committee... Committee for review and advice. The Committee will provide advice on: (a) Administration, operation...

15 CFR 2002.1 - Trade Policy Committee Review Group.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE OPERATION OF COMMITTEES § 2002.1 Trade Policy Committee..., December 11, 1971 (15 CFR 2002.1), is abolished and there is hereby established as a subordinate body of...

75 FR 61574 - Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-05

... session in order to protect patient privacy as the Committee tours the Washington, DC VA Medical Center... its annual ethics review, and discuss other committee management items. A 15 minute period will be...

Assessing Clinical Microbiology Practice Guidelines: American Society for Microbiology Ad Hoc Committee on Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Assessment.

PubMed

Nachamkin, Irving; Kirn, Thomas J; Westblade, Lars F; Humphries, Romney

2017-11-01

As part of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Committee of the Professional Practice Committee, an ad hoc committee was formed in 2014 to assess guidelines published by the committee using an assessment tool, Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation II (AGREE II). The AGREE II assessment helps reviewers determine whether published guidelines are robust, transparent, and clear in presenting practice recommendations in a standardized manner. Identifying strengths and weaknesses of practice guidelines by ad hoc assessments helps with improving future guidelines through the participation of key stakeholders. This minireview describes the development of the ad hoc committee and results from their review of several ASM best practices guidelines and a non-ASM practice guideline from the Emergency Nurses Association. Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Department of Energy fiscal year 1984 authorization (Energy Information Administration). Hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Supply of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, First Session, to review the Department of Energy's fiscal year 1984 budget request, June 24, 1983

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1983-01-01

Erich J. Evered, Administrator of the Energy Information Administration (EIA), testified at a budget hearing in response to committee questions on how research and development transfers to the private sector can function with a 50% cut in the budget and how the agency will provide consumers with energy information and analyses for decision making. The hearing record includes a performance evaluation of the EIA prepared for the President and Congress. Evered describes EIA's mission and defends the budget cuts on the economic grounds. (DCK)

42 CFR 456.236 - Continued stay review process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... (CONTINUED) MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS UTILIZATION CONTROL Utilization Control: Mental Hospitals Ur Plan... each continued stay of a recipient in the mental hospital, the committee, subgroup or designee reviews... committee, subgroup or designee finds that a recipient's continued stay in the mental hospital is needed...

77 FR 1704 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-11

... Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel Collaborative: Cardiovascular Disease and... Group; Cardiovascular and Sleep Epidemiology Study Section. Date: February 9, 2012. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5...-9436, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Integrated...

22 CFR 214.44 - Annual review and reports.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 22 Foreign Relations 1 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Annual review and reports. 214.44 Section 214.44 Foreign Relations AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT... by GSA. (d) Within A.I.D., the Advisory Committee Management Officer collects required information...

75 FR 26970 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-13

...-496-8551, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental...: Oncology 1--Basic Translational Integrated Review Group, Cancer Genetics Study Section. Date: June 3-4... 20892, (301) 435-1154, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental...

ACOG committee opinion number 398, February 2008: fatigue and patient safety.

PubMed

2008-02-01

It has long been recognized that fatigue can affect human cognitive and physical function. Although there are limited published data on the effects of fatigue on health care providers, including full-time practicing physicians, there is increasing awareness within the patient safety movement that fatigue, even partial sleep deprivation, impairs performance. Most of the current literature reviews resident function after recent work reform changes. However, the information available from many studies in health care and other occupations can be applied to the work habits of practicing obstetrician-gynecologists.

76 FR 72422 - Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-23

...] Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration.... Name of Committee: Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee... the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee's required report to the Secretary of Health and...

The therapeutic effects of Cannabis and cannabinoids: An update from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report.

PubMed

Abrams, Donald I

2018-03-01

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine conducted a rapid turn-around comprehensive review of recent medical literature on The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids. The 16-member committee adopted the key features of a systematic review process, conducting an extensive search of relevant databases and considered 10,000 recent abstracts to determine their relevance. Primacy was given to recently published systematic reviews and primary research that studied one of the committee's 11 prioritized health endpoints- therapeutic effects; cancer incidence; cardiometabolic risk; respiratory disease; immune function; injury and death; prenatal, perinatal and postnatal outcomes; psychosocial outcomes; mental health; problem Cannabis use; and Cannabis use and abuse of other substances. The committee developed standard language to categorize the weight of evidence regarding whether Cannabis or cannabinoids use for therapeutic purposes are an effective or ineffective treatment for the prioritized health endpoints of interest. In the Therapeutics chapter reviewed here, the report concluded that there was conclusive or substantial evidence that Cannabis or cannabinoids are effective for the treatment of pain in adults; chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis. Moderate evidence was found for secondary sleep disturbances. The evidence supporting improvement in appetite, Tourette syndrome, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, cancer, irritable bowel syndrome, epilepsy and a variety of neurodegenerative disorders was described as limited, insufficient or absent. A chapter of the NASEM report enumerated multiple barriers to conducting research on Cannabis in the US that may explain the paucity of positive therapeutic benefits in the published literature to date. Copyright © 2018 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

78 FR 49260 - Trademark Public Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-08-13

... other things, established two Public Advisory Committees to review the policies, goals, performance... person, telephonically, on-line through the Internet, or by other appropriate means. The meetings of the... ability to participate in Committee business through the Internet. [[Page 49262

The Proposal Auto-Categorizer and Manager for Time Allocation Review at the Space Telescope Science Institute

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Strolger, Louis-Gregory; Porter, Sophia; Lagerstrom, Jill; Weissman, Sarah; Reid, I. Neill; Garcia, Michael

2017-04-01

The Proposal Auto-Categorizer and Manager (PACMan) tool was written to respond to concerns about subjective flaws and potential biases in some aspects of the proposal review process for time allocation for the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), and to partially alleviate some of the anticipated additional workload from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) proposal review. PACMan is essentially a mixed-method Naive Bayesian spam filtering routine, with multiple pools representing scientific categories, that utilizes the Robinson method for combining token (or word) probabilities. PACMan was trained to make similar programmatic decisions in science category sorting, panelist selection, and proposal-to-panelists assignments to those made by individuals and committees in the Science Policies Group (SPG) at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Based on training from the previous cycle’s proposals, at an average of 87%, PACMan made the same science category assignments for proposals in Cycle 24 as the SPG. Tests for similar science categorizations, based on training using proposals from additional cycles, show that this accuracy can be further improved, to the > 95 % level. This tool will be used to augment or replace key functions in the Time Allocation Committee review processes in future HST and JWST cycles.

Technical Review of the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office Transformational and Applied Research Directorate’s Research and Development Program

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Lavietes, Anthony; Trebes, James; Borchers, Robert

2013-01-01

At the request of the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), a Review Committee comprised of representatives from the American Physical Society (APS) Panel on Public Affairs (POPA) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society (NPSS) performed a technical review of the DNDO Transformational and Applied Research Directorate (TARD) research and development program. TARD’s principal objective is to address gaps in the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture (GNDA) through improvements in the performance, cost, and operational burden of detectors and systems. The charge to the Review Committee was to investigate the existing TARD research andmore » development plan and portfolio, recommend changes to the existing plan, and recommend possible new R&D areas and opportunities. The Review Committee has several recommendations.« less

76 FR 61638 - Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-10-05

... accepted during the latest Candidate Maintenance Coordination Committee meeting. This review resulted in... maintenance requirements] CMR** repetitive inspections, which have been identified as mandatory actions for... Maintenance Coordination Committee meeting. This review resulted in reduced inspection intervals, specifically...

American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses.

PubMed

Hwang, Joo Ha; Rulyak, Stephen D; Kimmey, Michael B

2006-06-01

This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee. The paper was approved by the Committee on January 19, 2006, and by the AGA Institute Governing Board on April 20, 2006.

75 FR 54641 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-08

...-435-2309, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cellular and Molecular Biology of Glia Study Section. Date: October 4-5, 2010. Time... 20892, (301) 435- 4433, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental...

77 FR 52751 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-30

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group, Molecular Neuropharmacology and Signaling Study Section. Date: September 24-25, 2012. Time: 8 a.m... 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435- 0684, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular...

77 FR 66857 - Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee: Intercessional Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-11-07

... Committee (MERPAC) will meet to work on Task Statement 71 concerning review of the Knowledge, Understanding... may be submitted by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations...: (1) Review the knowledge, understanding and proficiency (KUP) guidelines for operational level deck...

76 FR 372 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-04

... 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435- 0684, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic..., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-495- 1718, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Synthetic and Biological Chemistry B Study Section. Date...

77 FR 59199 - National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-26

... Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing...: Mario Rinaudo, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Review, National Institute of Nursing Research...

15 CFR 2008.19 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Classification Review Committee. 2008.19 Section 2008.19 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT E.O. 12065; OFFICE OF THE UNITED...

15 CFR 2008.19 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Classification Review Committee. 2008.19 Section 2008.19 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT E.O. 12065; OFFICE OF THE UNITED...

15 CFR 2008.19 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Classification Review Committee. 2008.19 Section 2008.19 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT E.O. 12065; OFFICE OF THE UNITED...

15 CFR 2008.19 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Classification Review Committee. 2008.19 Section 2008.19 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT E.O. 12065; OFFICE OF THE UNITED...

15 CFR 2008.19 - Classification Review Committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 3 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Classification Review Committee. 2008.19 Section 2008.19 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Foreign Trade Agreements OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT E.O. 12065; OFFICE OF THE UNITED...

14 CFR 1203.604 - Mandatory review for declassification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... requestor may submit the request to: (i) The Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee; or... determination to the Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee, National Aeronautics and Space... Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee, for final resolution and appropriate response. (f...

14 CFR 1203.604 - Mandatory review for declassification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... requestor may submit the request to: (i) The Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee; or... determination to the Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee, National Aeronautics and Space... Chairperson, NASA Information Security Program Committee, for final resolution and appropriate response. (f...

Joint Funding Councils' Libraries Review Group (the "Follett") Report: The Contribution of the Information Technology Sub-Committee

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Brindley, Lynne J.

2006-01-01

Purpose: This article aims to look into a review of library provision in higher education, which was originally set up in 1992 by The Funding Councils of England, Scotland and Wales, and the Department of Education for Northern Ireland. Design/methodology/approach: The review group was structured into three sub-committees, under the umbrella of…

[President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC) Review of the Information Technology for the Twenty-First Century Initiative and Its Implementation Plan.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development, Arlington, VA.

As a part of its ongoing mission, the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC) has completed an initial review of the Information Technology for the 21st Century (IT[squared]) initiative and its implementation plan put forward by the participating federal agencies. This letter conveys the initial conclusions of that review.…

LBNL report of the vetting review of the GRETINA project

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Robinson, K.E.; Bercovitz, J.H.; Bieser, F.S.

GRETINA is a gamma-ray detector array capable of reconstructing the energy and spatial positions of gamma-ray interactions within the germanium crystals. It will be used to study the structure and stability of nuclei under various conditions. The new capabilities provided by gamma-ray tracking will give large gains in sensitivity for a large number of experiments, particularly those aimed at nuclei far from beta stability. A proposal for GRETINA was submitted to DOE in June 2003. It presented the scientific case, the readiness of technical development, the design, the suggested management organizations, and a proposed cost and schedule. The GRETINA proposalmore » received its CD0 approval in August 2003. The CD-1 review will be held on December 3 and 4, 2003, and will be handled by the DOE-N. This report presents the charge to the GRETINA vetting review committee, and the findings, comments and recommendations of this committee. The purpose of this project vetting review was to assure that the GRETINA project is on track to provide DOE and the nuclear physics community with the agreed upon deliverables within the agreed upon budget and schedule. The vetting review committee was asked to cover both technical and management aspects of the GRETINA Project. Reviewers offer expert knowledge in relevant areas and provide recommendations and findings to the project's management team. Upon successful completion, the Laboratory's Integrated Project Management Office (IPMO) will recommend signoff of the project to the Laboratory Directorate. The GRETINA vetting review committee was asked to consider all relevant aspects of the project's management, project execution plan (PEP), technical approach and status, cost estimate, resources, schedule and risk and, in doing so, to advise as to whether the GRETINA Project was likely to successfully provide the agreed upon deliverables within the agreed upon budget and schedule. The review committee was asked to identify any project areas that may be incomplete for the current phase in the project and any area of significant risk for the project reaching its objectives. The committee was also asked to review and evaluate the technical status of the project and advise on any concerns or significant technical risks.« less

Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.

PubMed

Koepsell, David; Brinkman, Willem-Paul; Pont, Sylvia

2015-08-01

For the past half-century, issues relating to the ethical conduct of human research have focused largely on the domain of medical, and more recently social-psychological research. The modern regime of applied ethics, emerging as it has from the Nuremberg trials and certain other historical antecedents, applies the key principles of: autonomy, respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice to human beings who enter trials of experimental drugs and devices (Martensen in J Hist Med Allied Sci 56(2):168-175, 2001). Institutions such as Institutional Review Boards (in the U.S.) and Ethics Committees (in Europe and elsewhere) oversee most governmentally-funded medical research around the world, in more than a hundred nations that are signers of the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association 2008). Increasingly, research outside of medicine has been recognized to pose potential risks to human subjects of experiments. Ethics committees now operate in the US, Canada, the U.K. and Australia to oversee all governmental-funded research, and in other jurisdictions, the range of research covered by such committees is expanding. Social science, anthropology, and other fields are falling under more clear directives to conduct a formal ethical review for basic research involving human participants (Federman et al. in Responsible research: a systems approach to protecting research participants. National Academies Press, Washington, 2003, p. 36). The legal and institutional response for protecting human subjects in the course of developing non-medical technologies, engineering, and design is currently vague, but some universities are establishing ethics committees to oversee their human subjects research even where the experiments involved are non-medical and not technically covered by the Declaration of Helsinki. In The Netherlands, as in most of Europe, Asia, Latin America, or Africa, no laws mandate an ethical review of non-medical research. Yet, nearly 2 years ago we launched a pilot ethics committee at our technical university and began soliciting our colleagues to submit their studies for review. In the past year, we have become officially recognized as a human subjects ethics committee for our university and we are beginning the process of requiring all studies using human subjects to apply for our approval. In this article, we consider some of the special problems relating to protecting human participants in a technology context, and discuss some of our experiences and insights about reviewing human subjects research at a technical university, concluding: that not less than in medical studies, human participants used in technology research benefit from ethical committees' reviews, practical requirements for publications, grants, and avoiding legal liability are also served by such committees, and ethics committees in such contexts have many similarities to, but certain other special foci than medical ethics committees. We believe that this experience, and these observations, are helpful for those seeking to establish such committees in technology research contexts, and for framing the particular issues that may arise in such contexts for the benefit of researchers, and nascent committees seeking to establish their own procedures.

7 CFR 7.38 - Retention of authority.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... programs or exercising other functions delegated to the community committee, county committee, State committee, or any employee of such committees. In exercising this authority, the Secretary, the...

Development Committee. AGB Standing Committee Series.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Kinnison, William

1984-01-01

The structure and functions of college development committees are discussed. The development committee of a board of trustees, also known as "the institutional advancement" committee, is responsible for ensuring the operation of the fund-raising program. Whether the development committee works through a foundation or directly for the…

76 FR 28442 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-17

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Office of the Director.... Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss selected human gene... Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss selected human gene transfer protocols, including a...

78 FR 28599 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-15

... 20892, (301) 402-4411, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical..., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408-9724, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Clinical Oncology Study Section. Date: June 10, 2013. Time: 8:00 a.m. to...

77 FR 59200 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-26

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701...

75 FR 61507 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-05

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Kim, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute...

75 FR 54642 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-08

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special.... Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute...

77 FR 43099 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-07-23

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood...., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge...

75 FR 8085 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-02-23

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute...

76 FR 27068 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-10

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701...

77 FR 6571 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-08

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701...

77 FR 14533 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-12

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701...

77 FR 43098 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-07-23

... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood... Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701...

76 FR 3643 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-20

..., Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 435- 1725. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 2--Translational Clinical Integrated Review Group, Clinical Oncology Study Section. Date: February 14-15, 2011. Time: 8 a.m..., Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-451-0131. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational...

75 FR 53630 - El Dorado County Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-01

... Advisory Committee Act. The agenda includes: review of the draft media release informing people about... approve potential field trips; and continuing education about the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self... is open to the public. The following business will be conducted: Review of the draft media release...

76 FR 22672 - Shoshone Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-04-22

... Committee Act. The purpose of the meeting is to continue to review Title II project proposals and start... to the public. The following business will be conducted: (1) Continue to review Title II project proposals (2) Start selecting projects to recommend to the Designated Federal Official (3) Make a decision...

75 FR 156 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-04

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics Integrated Review..., Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 451-1323. [email protected] . Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and... Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics. Date: January 28-29, 2010. Time: 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Agenda: To...

78 FR 27234 - Notification of a Public Teleconference of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-09

... Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC); Oxides of Nitrogen Primary NAAQS Review Panel AGENCY... Nitrogen (NO X ) Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Review Panel to provide... nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ). Accordingly, the SAB Staff Office solicited nominations for the CASAC NO X...

77 FR 56660 - National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-13

... constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B Subcommittee. MID-B October..., [email protected] . Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group...

77 FR 30021 - Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-21

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience Integrated Review Group; Cellular and Molecular Biology of Glia Study Section. Date: June 14, 2012. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 7..., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435- 4433, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Molecular, Cellular and...

75 FR 80512 - National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-12-22

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis...D, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse... limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse...

77 FR 13318 - Meeting of the Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-06

... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-9643-6] Meeting of the Mobile Sources Technical Review... Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92- 463, notice is hereby given that the Mobile Sources... Air Act Advisory Committee. This is an open meeting. The meeting will include discussion of current...

77 FR 65407 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee: Notice of Nomination...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-26

... recommendations regarding future care of repatriated cultural items. 3. Seven members compose the Review Committee... Indian tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, and traditional Native American religious leaders. At least two of these members must be traditional Indian religious leaders. b. Three members are appointed from...

76 FR 29191 - Lawrence County Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-05-20

... project proposals and will be soliciting for additional projects. The purpose of the meeting is to review submitted projects and vote on project proposals to recommend for funding. DATES: The meeting will be held... be conducted: Review proposed projects. If Committee members have enough information, they may choose...

77 FR 12599 - National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-01

... Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research Special... Review Officer, Office of Review, National Inst of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701...

75 FR 70273 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-17

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196...

75 FR 29356 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-25

... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group... Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee... Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196...

Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.

PubMed

Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, Odile; Munung, Nchangwi Syntia; Tangwa, Godfrey B

2016-05-13

Research ethics review is a critical aspect of the research governance framework for human subjects research. This usually requires that research protocols be submitted to a research ethics committee (REC) for review and approval. This has led to very rapid developments in the domain of research ethics, as RECs proliferate all over the globe in rhyme with the explosion in human subjects research. The work of RECs has increasingly become elaborate, complex, and in many cases urgent, necessitating supporting rules and procedures of operation. Guidelines for elaborating standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the functioning of RECs have also been proposed. The SOPs of well-placed and well-resourced RECs have tended to pay much attention to details, resulting, as a consequence, in generally long, elaborate, intricate and complex SOPs; a model that can hardly be replicated by other committees, equally under ethics review pressures, but working under much more constraining conditions in resource-destitute environments. In this paper, we looked at the content and length of SOPs from African RECs and compared them to the World Health Organization (WHO)'s guidelines as the gold standard. We also looked at the SOPs from the Ethics Review and Consultancy Committee (ERCC) of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative that we elaborated in a simplified way in 2013, and compared them to the WHO's guidelines and to the other SOPs. Sixteen SOPs from 14 African countries were collected from various sources. Their average length was of 30 pages. By comparison to the guidance of the WHO, only six of them were found acceptable with more than 70 % of the criteria from the gold standard that were fully described. Among those six, two of them were very long and detailed (65 and 102 pages), while the four remaining SOPs ranged from 16 to 24 pages. The ERCC SOPs are seven pages long but maintain all that is of essence for the rigorous, efficient and timely review of protocols. We are convinced that, because of their brevity, simplicity, clarity and user-friendliness, the ERCC SOPs recommend themselves as a model template to, at least, committees similarly situated and/or circumstanced as the ERCC of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative is. In fact, brevity, clarity, simplicity and user-friendliness are recognized values. Whatever is brief and clear is better than what is not and saves time. What is simple and user-friendly is better than what is not even though the two have the same aims because it saves both time and mental energy. And if this be true in general, it is even truer of the context and its peculiar constraints that we are addressing.

41 CFR 102-3.115 - What are the responsibilities and functions of an agency Committee Management Officer (CMO)?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What are the responsibilities and functions of an agency Committee Management Officer (CMO)? 102-3.115 Section 102-3.115 Public...? § 102-3.115 What are the responsibilities and functions of an agency Committee Management Officer (CMO...

77 FR 30304 - Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee: Intercessional Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-22

... Committee Working Group Meeting. SUMMARY: A working group of the Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee (MERPAC) will meet to discuss Task Statement 76, ``Review of Performance Measures (Assessment Criteria);'' and Task Statement 77, ``Development of Performance Measures (Assessment Criteria).'' This...

75 FR 26918 - Fishlake Resource Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-13

... requirements, brief participants on Payments to States legislative history, discuss the guidelines for Title II... following business will be conducted: (1) Welcome and Committee introductions; (2) Federal Advisory Committee Act overview and powerpoint; (3) review of Payments to States legislative history and discussion...

77 FR 37408 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-06-21

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... be open to the public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee... with policies developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on July 19...

77 FR 65691 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-30

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on November 13, 2012, from 9...

76 FR 70455 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-14

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: to provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 14, 2011, from 9...

76 FR 79684 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-12-22

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: to provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on January 25, 2012, from 9 a...

77 FR 65690 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-30

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 19, 2012, from 9...

77 FR 45353 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-07-31

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on August 15, 2012, from 9:00...

77 FR 2727 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-19

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on February 29, 2012, from 9...

77 FR 73661 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meetings; Notice of Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-11

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meetings; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: These meetings will be held on the following dates and...

77 FR 60438 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-03

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on October 17, 2012, from 9 a...

77 FR 50690 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-22

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 19, 2012, from 9...

Patients come from populations and populations contain patients. A two-stage scientific and ethics review: The next adaptation for single institutional review boards.

PubMed

Knopman, David; Alford, Eli; Tate, Kaitlin; Long, Mark; Khachaturian, Ara S

2017-08-01

For nearly 50 years, institutional review boards (IRB) and independent ethics committees have featured local oversight as a core function of research ethics reviews. However growing complexity in Alzheimer's clinical research suggests current approaches to research volunteer safety is hampering development of new therapeutics. As a partial response to this challenge, the NIH has mandated that all NIH-funded multi-site studies will use a single Institutional Review Board. The perspective describes a joint program to provide a single IRB of record (sIRB) for phases of multi-site studies. The approach follows two steps. One, an expert Scientific Review Committee (SRC) of senior researchers in the field will conduct the review principally of scientific merit, significance, feasibility, and the likelihood of meaningful results. The second step will be the IRB's regulatory and ethics review. The IRB will apply appropriate regulatory criteria for approval including minimization of risks to subjects and risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, equitable subject selection, informed consent, protections for vulnerable populations, and application of local context considerations, among others. There is a steady demand for scientific, ethical and regulatory review of planned Alzheimer's studies. As of January 15, 2017, there are nearly 400 open studies, Phase II and III, industry and NIH sponsored trials on disease indications affecting memory, movement and mood in the US. The effort will initially accept protocols for studies of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and related disorders effecting memory, movement and mood. Future aims will be to provide scientific review and, where applicable, regulatory and ethical review in an international context outside North America with sites possibly in Asia, Europe and Australia. Copyright © 2017 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Functional Outcome and Graft Retention in Patients With Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

PubMed

Makhni, Eric C; Steinhaus, Michael E; Mehran, Nima; Schulz, Brian S; Ahmad, Christopher S

2015-07-01

To provide a comprehensive review of clinical and functional outcomes after treatment for septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Two reviewers assessed and confirmed the methodologic quality of each study. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for pertinent data, and when available, similar outcomes were combined to generate frequency-weighted means. Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this review, reporting on a total of 203 infected knees. The mean age was 27.5 years and the mean length of follow-up was 44.2 months, with male patients comprising 88% of the population. Hamstring and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts were used in 63% and 33% of patients, respectively, with 78% of patients retaining their grafts. The studies reported mean flexion and extension deficits of 5.8° and 1.0°, respectively, and laxity testing showed a mean difference of 1.9 mm. The studies reported mean Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Tegner scores of 82.1, 68.2, and 5.6, respectively. Of the patients, 83% reported an ability to return to activities of daily living whereas 67% reported a return to their preinjury level of athletics. Evidence of new degenerative changes was seen in 22% of patients. Septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a very infrequent event, affecting 0.5% of patients. On average, outcomes in these patients are comparable with those in patients in whom infection does not develop, including postoperative range of motion, residual instability, Lysholm scores, and return to preinjury level of activity. These patients do exhibit decreased International Knee Documentation Committee scores compared with patients without septic arthritis, however. The impact of this differential is not clear, but this scoring difference suggests that septic arthritis may be associated with more severe symptoms and reduced functional outcomes. In addition, there is limited evidence suggesting that septic arthritis leads to early degenerative changes found on imaging. Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies. Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

78 FR 69097 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-11-18

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: December 4-5, 2013. Time: December 04, 2013, 12:30 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss...

78 FR 29372 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-20

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: June 11-12, 2013. Time: June 11, 2013, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss selected...

77 FR 8270 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-14

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: March 7-8, 2012. Time: March 7, 2012, 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss selected human...

76 FR 7224 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-09

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: March 8, 2011. Time: 11 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss selected human gene transfer...

78 FR 11897 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-02-20

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: March 12, 2013. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss selected human gene transfer...

75 FR 28029 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-05-19

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: June 16-17, 2010. Time: June 16, 2010, 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Agenda: The Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee will review and discuss selected human gene...

78 FR 51196 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-08-20

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: September 11-12, 2013. Time: September 11, 2013, 1:20 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss...

75 FR 69686 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-15

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: December 7-8, 2010. Time: December 7, 2010, 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee will review selected human gene transfer...

76 FR 71580 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-18

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Recombinant DNA... Committee: Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. Date: December 13-14, 2011. Time: December 13, 2011, 2 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Agenda: The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) will review and discuss...

75 FR 63204 - Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors and Its Committees; Amended Notice; Changes to...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-14

... the Audit Committee. 14. Consider and act on the report of the Operations & Regulations Committee 15. Consider and act on the report of the Governance & Performance Review Committee. 16. Consider and act on..., 2010. Patricia D. Batie, Corporate Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010-26078 Filed 10-12-10; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE...

Decision Making and the IACUC: Part 1—Protocol Information Discussed at Full-Committee Reviews

PubMed Central

Silverman, Jerald; Lidz, Charles W; Clayfield, Jonathan C; Murray, Alexandra; Simon, Lorna J; Rondeau, Richard G

2015-01-01

IACUC protocols can be reviewed by either the full committee or designated members. Both review methods use the principles of the 3 Rs (reduce, refine, replace) as the overarching paradigm, with federal regulations and policies providing more detailed guidance. The primary goal of this study was to determine the frequency of topics discussed by IACUC during full-committee reviews and whether the topics included those required for consideration by IACUC (for example, pain and distress, number of animals used, availability of alternatives, skill and experience of researchers). We recorded and transcribed 87 protocol discussions undergoing full-committee review at 10 academic institutions. Each transcript was coded to capture the key concepts of the discussion and analyzed for the frequency of the codes mentioned. Pain and distress was the code mentioned most often, followed by the specific procedures performed, the study design, and the completeness of the protocol form. Infrequently mentioned topics were alternatives to animal use or painful or distressful procedures, the importance of the research, and preliminary data. Not all of the topics required to be considered by the IACUC were openly discussed for all protocols, and many of the discussions were limited in their depth. PMID:26224439

Getting with the times: a narrative review of the literature on group decision making in virtual environments and implications for promotions committees.

PubMed

Acai, Anita; Sonnadara, Ranil R; O'Neill, Thomas A

2018-06-01

Concerns around the time and administrative burden of trainee promotion processes have been reported, making virtual meetings an attractive option for promotions committees in undergraduate and postgraduate medicine. However, whether such meetings can uphold the integrity of decision-making processes has yet to be explored. This narrative review aimed to summarize the literature on decision making in virtual teams, discuss ways to improve the effectiveness of virtual teams, and explore their implications for practice. In August 2017, the Web of Science platform was searched with the terms 'decision making' AND 'virtual teams' for articles published within the last 20 years. The search yielded 336 articles, which was narrowed down to a final set of 188 articles. A subset of these, subjectively deemed to be of high-quality and relevant to the work of promotions committees, was included in this review. Virtual team functioning was explored with respect to team composition and development, idea generation and selection, group memory, and communication. While virtual teams were found to potentially offer a number of key benefits over face-to-face meetings including convenience and scheduling flexibility, inclusion of members at remote sites, and enhanced idea generation and external storage, these benefits must be carefully weighed against potential challenges involving planning and coordination, integration of perspectives, and relational conflict among members, all of which can potentially reduce decision-making quality. Avenues to address these issues and maximize the outcomes of virtual promotions meetings are offered in light of the evidence.

75 FR 22551 - Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the District of Columbia Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-04-29

....S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that an orientation and..., DC 20425. The purpose of the orientation meeting is to review the rules of operation for the Advisory Committee. [[Page 22552

75 FR 22411 - National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-04-28

... Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial Review Group; Interventions Committee for Disorders... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Mental... clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health...

76 FR 23826 - National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-04-28

... Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial Review Group; Interventions Committee for Disorders... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Mental... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial...

77 FR 64997 - Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-24

... Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory... implications for childhood lead poisoning prevention efforts. The committee also reviews and reports regularly on childhood lead poisoning prevention practices and recommends improvements in national childhood...

76 FR 14386 - Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Hanford

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-03-16

...: Red Lion Hotel on the River, Jantzen Beach, 909 North Hayden Island Drive, Portland, Oregon 97217... Committee; Public Involvement Committee; and Budgets and Contracts Committee Potential Board Advice [cir] 2011-2013 Budget [cir] Regulatory document timelines/review [cir] Radioactive solid waste burial...

Iodine-based contrast media, multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathies: literature review and ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines.

PubMed

Stacul, Fulvio; Bertolotto, Michele; Thomsen, Henrik S; Pozzato, Gabriele; Ugolini, Donatella; Bellin, Marie-France; Bongartz, Georg; Clement, Olivier; Heinz-Peer, Gertraud; van der Molen, Aart; Reimer, Peter; Webb, Judith A W

2018-02-01

Many radiologists and clinicians still consider multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathies (MG) a contraindication for using iodine-based contrast media. The ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee performed a systematic review of the incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in these patients. A systematic search in Medline and Scopus databases was performed for renal function deterioration studies in patients with MM or MG following administration of iodine-based contrast media. Data collection and analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement 2009. Eligibility criteria and methods of analysis were specified in advance. Cohort and case-control studies reporting changes in renal function were included. Thirteen studies were selected that reported 824 iodine-based contrast medium administrations in 642 patients with MM or MG, in which 12 unconfounded cases of PC-AKI were found (1.6 %). The majority of patients had intravenous urography with high osmolality ionic contrast media after preparatory dehydration and purgation. MM and MG alone are not risk factors for PC-AKI. However, the risk of PC-AKI may become significant in dehydrated patients with impaired renal function. Hypercalcaemia may increase the risk of kidney damage, and should be corrected before contrast medium administration. Assessment for Bence-Jones proteinuria is not necessary. • Monoclonal gammopathies including multiple myeloma are a large spectrum of disorders. • In monoclonal gammopathy with normal renal function, PC-AKI risk is not increased. • Renal function is often reduced in myeloma, increasing the risk of PC-AKI. • Correction of hypercalcaemia is necessary in myeloma before iodine-based contrast medium administration. • Bence-Jones proteinuria assessment in myeloma is unnecessary before iodine-based contrast medium administration.

75 FR 57279 - Risk Communication Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-20

...] Risk Communication Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS... Communication Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and recommendations to... Committee will hear and discuss developments in FDA's ongoing communications programs, such as FDA's...

77 FR 15760 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-16

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: to provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on April 18, 2012, from 9 a.m...

77 FR 27459 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-10

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of... public. Name of Committee: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide... developed by the HIT Policy Committee. Date and Time: The meeting will be held on June 20, 2012, from 9 a.m...

75 FR 49499 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-13

... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior Integrated Review Group; Psychosocial Risk and Disease Prevention Study Section. Date: September 27-28, 2010. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m... 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435- 3575, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Risk, Prevention and...

15 CFR Supplement No. 9 to Part 748 - End-User Review Committee Procedures

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 2 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false End-User Review Committee Procedures No. Supplement No. 9 to Part 748 Commerce and Foreign Trade Regulations Relating to Commerce and Foreign Trade (Continued) BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE EXPORT ADMINISTRATION...

77 FR 74875 - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee Findings Related to the...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-18

... DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-11687; 2200-1100-665] Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee Findings Related to the Identity and Return of... to convene the parties to a dispute relating to the identity and return of cultural items, and to...

78 FR 27244 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-09

... Molecular Biology Study Section. Date: June 3-4, 2013. Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and... 20892, 301-435- 1781, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Interdisciplinary Molecular Sciences and... 20892, 301-408-9329, [email protected] . Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated...

76 FR 69744 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-09

...; Notice of Closed Meetings Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings. The meetings will be closed to the... personal privacy. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Gap Junctions...

5 CFR 532.237 - Review by the local wage survey committee.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... REGULATIONS PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS Prevailing Rate Determinations § 532.237 Review by the local wage survey... to the lead agency together with a report of its recommendations concerning the use of the data. The local wage survey committee may make any other recommendations concerning the wage survey which it...

77 FR 30541 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-23

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: June 15, 2012. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m...

76 FR 10912 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-02-28

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: March 18, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m...

77 FR 12599 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-01

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and... unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee. Date: March 23, 2012. Time: 8 a.m. to 2 p.m...

Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodology Committee: an international survey of priorities for future work.

PubMed

Levack, William M; Meyer, Thorsten; Negrini, Stefano; Malmivaara, Antti

2017-10-01

Cochrane Rehabilitation aims to improve the application of evidence-based practice in rehabilitation. It also aims to support Cochrane in the production of reliable, clinically meaningful syntheses of evidence related to the practice of rehabilitation, while accommodating the many methodological challenges facing the field. To this end, Cochrane Rehabilitation established a Methodology Committee to examine, explore and find solutions for the methodological challenges related to evidence synthesis and knowledge translation in rehabilitation. We conducted an international online survey via Cochrane Rehabilitation networks to canvass opinions regarding the future work priorities for this committee and to seek information on people's current capabilities to assist with this work. The survey findings indicated strongest interest in work on how reviewers have interpreted and applied Cochrane methods in reviews on rehabilitation topics in the past, and on gathering a collection of existing publications on review methods for undertaking systematic reviews relevant to rehabilitation. Many people are already interested in contributing to the work of the Methodology Committee and there is a large amount of expertise for this work in the extended Cochrane Rehabilitation network already.

The job of 'ethics committees'.

PubMed

Moore, Andrew; Donnelly, Andrew

2015-11-13

What should authorities establish as the job of ethics committees and review boards? Two answers are: (1) review of proposals for consistency with the duly established and applicable code and (2) review of proposals for ethical acceptability. The present paper argues that these two jobs come apart in principle and in practice. On grounds of practicality, publicity and separation of powers, it argues that the relevant authorities do better to establish code-consistency review and not ethics-consistency review. It also rebuts bad code and independence arguments for the opposite view. It then argues that authorities at present variously specify both code-consistency and ethics-consistency jobs, but most are also unclear on this issue. The paper then argues that they should reform the job of review boards and ethics committees, by clearly establishing code-consistency review and disestablishing ethics-consistency review, and through related reform of the basic orientation, focus, name, and expertise profile of these bodies and their actions. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

DOE Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) Subcommittee Report on Scientific and Technical Information

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Hey, Tony; Agarwal, Deborah; Borgman, Christine

The Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) was charged to form a standing subcommittee to review the Department of Energy’s Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) and to begin by assessing the quality and effectiveness of OSTI’s recent and current products and services and to comment on its mission and future directions in the rapidly changing environment for scientific publication and data. The Committee met with OSTI staff and reviewed available products, services and other materials. This report summaries their initial findings and recommendations.

Addressing maternal deaths due to violence: the Illinois experience.

PubMed

Koch, Abigail R; Geller, Stacie E

2017-11-01

Homicide, suicide, and substance abuse accounted for nearly one fourth of all pregnancy-associated deaths in Illinois from 2002 through 2013. Maternal mortality review in Illinois has been primarily focused on obstetric and medical causes and little is known about the circumstances surrounding deaths due to homicide, suicide, and substance abuse, if they are pregnancy related, and if the deaths are potentially preventable. To address this issue, we implemented a process to form a second statewide maternal mortality review committee for deaths due to violence in late 2014. We convened a stakeholder group to accomplish 3 tasks: (1) identify appropriate committee members; (2) identify potential types and sources of information that would be required for a meaningful review of violent maternal deaths; and (3) revise the Maternal Mortality Review Form. Because homicide, suicide, and substance abuse are closely linked to the social determinants of health, the review committee needed to have a broad membership with expertise in areas not required for obstetric maternal mortality review, including social service and community organizations. Identifying additional sources of information is critical; the state Violent Death Reporting System, case management data, and police and autopsy reports provide contextual information that cannot be found in medical records. The stakeholder group revised the Maternal Mortality Review Form to collect information relevant to violent maternal deaths, including screening history and psychosocial history. The form guides the maternal mortality review committee for deaths due to violence to identify potentially preventable factors relating to the woman, her family, systems of care, the community, the legal system, and the institutional environment. The committee has identified potential opportunities to decrease preventable death requiring cooperation with social service agencies and the criminal justice system in addition to the physical and mental health care systems. Illinois has demonstrated that by engaging appropriate members and expanding the information used, it is possible to conduct meaningful reviews of these deaths and make recommendations to prevent future deaths. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

77 FR 39998 - Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-07-06

... Statistical Committee (SSC) and the Bluefish, Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring Committees.... In addition, a meeting of the Council Monitoring Committees for bluefish, summer flounder, scup, and... and bluefish; review and adopt criteria for establishing multi-year ABC recommendations; develop 2013...

77 FR 1944 - Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee: Intercessional Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-12

... Performance Measures (Assessment Criteria).'' This meeting will be open to the public. DATES: A MERPAC working..., working group meeting is as follows: (1) Review existing performance measures and develop new performance... Committee Working Group Meeting. SUMMARY: The Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee (MERPAC) will...

77 FR 11142 - Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee: Intercessional Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-02-24

... Committee working group meeting. SUMMARY: The Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee (MERPAC) will conduct an intercessional meeting so that a working group may discuss Task Statement 76, entitled ``Review of Performance Measures (Assessment Criteria).'' This meeting will be open to the public. DATES: A...

50 CFR 600.133 - Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC).

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 10 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC... Fishery Management Councils § 600.133 Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC). (a) Each Council shall..., evaluation, and peer review of such statistical, biological, economic, social, and other scientific...

77 FR 65691 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-10-30

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 2727 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-01-19

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 15760 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-03-16

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 73660 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meetings; Notice of Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-11

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meetings; Notice of Meetings AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 57567 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-18

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 50690 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-08-22

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 28881 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-16

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: to provide recommendations to...

76 FR 79684 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-12-22

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

76 FR 70455 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-11-14

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: to provide recommendations to...

77 FR 41788 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-07-16

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

77 FR 27459 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-10

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: to provide recommendations to...

77 FR 37407 - HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-06-21

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Policy Committee Advisory Meeting; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, HHS. ACTION: Notice of... of Committee: HIT Policy Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to...

78 FR 29135 - HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-05-17

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES HIT Standards Committee Advisory Meeting AGENCY: Office of...: HIT Standards Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide recommendations to the National... Federal Health IT Strategic Plan, and in accordance with policies developed by the HIT Policy Committee...

75 FR 70933 - Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-11-19

...] Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS... of Committee: Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committees... appropriate clinical study design for thromboxane receptor antagonists for prevention of cardiovascular events...

75 FR 76993 - Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-12-10

...] Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration... Products Scientific Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and... March 30 and 31, 2010, meeting of the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. FDA intends to...

76 FR 4705 - Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-01-26

...] Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration.... Name of Committee: Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee... nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed...

Beyond form and functioning: Understanding how contextual factors influence village health committees in northern India.

PubMed

Scott, Kerry; George, Asha S; Harvey, Steven A; Mondal, Shinjini; Patel, Gupteswar; Ved, Rajani; Garimella, Surekha; Sheikh, Kabir

2017-01-01

Health committees are a common strategy to foster community participation in health. Efforts to strengthen committees often focus on technical inputs to improve committee form (e.g. representative membership) and functioning (e.g. meeting procedures). However, porous and interconnected contextual spheres also mediate committee effectiveness. Using a framework for contextual analysis, we explored the contextual features that facilitated or hindered Village Health, Sanitation and Nutrition Committee (VHSNC) functionality in rural north India. We conducted interviews (n = 74), focus groups (n = 18) and observation over 1.5 years. Thematic content analysis enabled the identification and grouping of themes, and detailed exploration of sub-themes. While the intervention succeeded in strengthening committee form and functioning, participant accounts illuminated the different ways in which contextual influences impinged on VHSNC efficacy. Women and marginalized groups navigated social hierarchies that curtailed their ability to assert themselves in the presence of men and powerful local families. These dynamics were not static and unchanging, illustrated by pre-existing cross-caste problem solving, and the committee's creation of opportunities for the careful violation of social norms. Resource and capacity deficits in government services limited opportunities to build relationships between health system actors and committee members and engendered mistrust of government institutions. Fragmented administrative accountability left committee members bearing responsibility for improving local health without access to stakeholders who could support or respond to their efforts. The committee's narrow authority was at odds with widespread community needs, and committee members struggled to involve diverse government services across the health, sanitation, and nutrition sectors. Multiple parallel systems (political decentralization, media and other village groups) presented opportunities to create more enabling VHSNC contexts, although the potential to harness these opportunities was largely unmet. This study highlights the urgent need for supportive contexts in which people can not only participate in health committees, but also access the power and resources needed to bring about actual improvements to their health and wellbeing.

Decision making in liver transplant selection committees: a multicenter study.

PubMed

Volk, Michael L; Biggins, Scott W; Huang, Mary Ann; Argo, Curtis K; Fontana, Robert J; Anspach, Renee R

2011-10-18

To receive a liver transplant, patients must first be placed on a waiting list-a decision made at most transplant centers by a multidisciplinary committee. The function of these committees has never been studied. To describe decision making in liver transplant committees and identify opportunities for process improvement. Observational multicenter study. 4 liver transplant centers in the United States. 68 members of liver transplant committees across the 4 centers. 63 meetings were observed, and 50 committee members were interviewed. Recorded transcripts and field notes were analyzed by using standard qualitative sociologic methods. Although the structure of the meetings varied by center, the process was uniform and primarily involved inductive reasoning to review possible reasons for patient exclusion. Patients were excluded if they were too well, too sick (in the setting of advanced liver disease), or too old or had nonhepatic comorbid conditions, substance abuse problems, or other psychosocial barriers. Dominant themes in the discussions included member angst over deciding who lived or died, a high correlation between psychosocial barriers to transplantation and the patient's socioeconomic status, and the influence of external forces on decision making. Unwritten center policies and confusion regarding advocacy versus stewardship roles were consistently identified as barriers to effective group decision making. The use of qualitative methods provides broad understanding but limits specific inferences. The 4 centers may not reflect the practices of every transplant center nationwide. The difficult decisions made by liver transplant committees are reasonably consistent and well-intentioned, but the process might be improved by having more explicit written policies and clarifying roles. This may inform resource allocation in other areas of medicine. The Greenwall Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

Decision Making in Liver Transplant Selection Committees

PubMed Central

Volk, Michael L; Biggins, Scott W; Huang, Mary Ann; Argo, Curtis K; Fontana, Robert J; Anspach, Renee R

2011-01-01

Background In order to receive a liver transplant, patients must first be placed on the waiting list – a decision made in most transplant centers by a multidisciplinary committee. The function of these committees has never been studied. Objectives To describe decision making in liver transplant committees and identify opportunities for process improvement. Design Observational multi-center Setting We observed 63 meetings and interviewed 50 committee members at 4 liver transplant centers. Study Subjects Transplant committee members. Measurements Recorded transcripts and field notes were analyzed using standard qualitative sociological methods. Results While the structure of meetings varied by center, the process was uniform and involved reviewing possible reasons for patient exclusion using primarily inductive reasoning. Stated justifications for excluding patients were a) too well, b) non-hepatic comorbidities or advanced age, c) too sick in the setting of advanced liver disease, d) substance abuse, or e) other psychosocial barriers. Dominant themes identified included members’ angst over deciding who lives and dies, a high correlation between psychosocial barriers to transplant and patients’ socioeconomic status, and the influence of external forces on decision making. Consistently identified barriers to effective group decision making were: 1) unwritten center policies, and 2) confusion regarding advocacy versus stewardship roles. Limitations The use of qualitative methods provides broad understanding but limits specific inferences. These four centers may not be reflective of every transplant center nationwide. Conclusion The difficult decisions made by these committees are reasonably consistent and always well-intentioned, but might be improved by more explicit written policies and clarifying roles. This process may help inform resource allocation in other areas of medicine. Primary funding source The Greenwall Foundation. PMID:22007044

International spinal cord injury male sexual function and female sexual and reproductive function basic data sets-version 2.0.

PubMed

Alexander, Marcalee S; New, Peter W; Biering-Sørensen, Fin; Courtois, Frederique; Popolo, Giulio Del; Elliott, Stacy; Kiekens, Carlotte; Vogel, Lawrence; Previnaire, Jean G

2017-01-01

Data set review and modification. To describe modifications in the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Male Sexual Function Basic Data Set Version 2.0 and the International SCI Female Sexual and Reproductive Function Basic Data Set Version 2.0. International expert work group using on line communication. An international team of experts was compiled to review and revise the International SCI Male Sexual Function and Female Sexual and Reproductive Function Basic Data Sets Version 1.0. The group adapted Version 1.0 based upon review of published research, suggestions from concerned individuals and on line work group consensus. The revised data sets were then posted on the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) websites for 2 months for review. Subsequently, the data sets were approved by the ISCoS Scientific and Executive Committees and ASIA board of directors. The data sets were modified to a self-report format. They were reviewed for appropriateness for the pediatric age group and adapted to include a new variable to address the issue of sexual orientation. A clarification of the difference between the data sets and the autonomic standards was also developed. Sexuality is a continuously evolving topic. Modifications were needed to address this topic in a comprehensive fashion. It is recommended that Version 2.0 of these data sets are used for ongoing documentation of sexual status in the medical record and for documentation of sexual concerns during on-going research.

Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.

PubMed

Rasoal, Dara; Skovdahl, Kirsti; Gifford, Mervyn; Kihlgren, Annica

2017-12-01

This study describes which clinical ethics approaches are available to support healthcare personnel in clinical practice in terms of their construction, functions and goals. Healthcare personnel frequently face ethically difficult situations in the course of their work and these issues cover a wide range of areas from prenatal care to end-of-life care. Although various forms of clinical ethics support have been developed, to our knowledge there is a lack of review studies describing which ethics support approaches are available, how they are constructed and their goals in supporting healthcare personnel in clinical practice. This study engages in an integrative literature review. We searched for peer-reviewed academic articles written in English between 2000 and 2016 using specific Mesh terms and manual keywords in CINAHL, MEDLINE and Psych INFO databases. In total, 54 articles worldwide described clinical ethics support approaches that include clinical ethics consultation, clinical ethics committees, moral case deliberation, ethics rounds, ethics discussion groups, and ethics reflection groups. Clinical ethics consultation and clinical ethics committees have various roles and functions in different countries. They can provide healthcare personnel with advice and recommendations regarding the best course of action. Moral case deliberation, ethics rounds, ethics discussion groups and ethics reflection groups support the idea that group reflection increases insight into ethical issues. Clinical ethics support in the form of a "bottom-up" perspective might give healthcare personnel opportunities to think and reflect more than a "top-down" perspective. A "bottom-up" approach leaves the healthcare personnel with the moral responsibility for their choice of action in clinical practice, while a "top-down" approach risks removing such moral responsibility.

Automated Quality of Care Evaluation Support System (AQCESS): AQCESS Functional Description

DTIC Science & Technology

1985-12-04

to greater awareness of and increased expec- tations from the health care field. During the oast several years , incidents of improper or questionable...great deal of time and effort must be spent by OA personnel culling from a large volume of paper the salient information about what problems each...center around manual, labor- and paper -intensive reviews of medical records, hospital incident reports, committee actions and follow-ups, recurring

Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016: A commentary.

PubMed

Timms, Olinda

2018-01-01

Soon after the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016 was approved by the Cabinet for introduction into Parliament in 2016, it was submitted for review to a Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare. The report of this committee, The 102nd Report on the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016 was laid on the table of the Lok Sabha and presented to the Rajya Sabha on August 10, 2017. It contains hearings with stakeholders and witnesses and a review of relevant documents and related legislation. The comments of the Parliamentary Standing Committee are wide ranging and pertinent, seeking to fill the gaps and explain and rationalise the statute and includes responses from the Department of Health Research. This commentary seeks to analyse the recommendations of the Committee, exploring some of the ethical, legal, and social implications of surrogacy arrangements in our country, where diverse viewpoints and strong sentiments can encounter difficult ground realities.

Advanced technology for America's future in space

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

1990-01-01

In response to Recommendation 8 of the Augustine Committee Report, NASA's Office of Aeronautics, Exploration and Technology (OAET) developed a proposed 'Integrated Technology Plan for the Civil Space Program' that entails substantial changes in the processes, structure and the content of NASA's space research and technology program. The Space Systems and Technology Advisory Committee (SSTAC, a subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Committee) and several other senior, expert, informed advisory groups conducted a review of NASA's proposed Integrated Technology Plan (ITP). This review was in response to the specific request in Recommendation 8 that 'NASA utilize an expert, outside review process, managed from headquarters, to assist in the allocation of technology funds'. This document, the final report from that review, addresses: (1) summary recommendations; (2) mission needs; (3) the integrated technology plan; (4) summary reports of the technical panels; and (5) conclusions and observations.

78 FR 12068 - Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-02-21

... DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0001] Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug... Committee: Device Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee: To...

75 FR 65641 - Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-26

...] Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration... Products Scientific Advisory Committee. General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and... by the committee at the March 30 and 31, 2010, meeting of the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory...

76 FR 51938 - Southwest Mississippi Resource Advisory Committee; Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-19

... Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Meadville, MS. The committee is authorized under the Secure Rural... relationships and to provide advice and recommendations to the Forest Service concerning projects and funding... review and select proposed projects. DATES: The meeting will be held September 15, 2011, 6:00 p.m...

General Education: A Curriculum Cornerstone.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Bunker Hill Community Coll., Boston, MA.

Prepared by the General Education (GE) Review Steering Committee of Massachusetts' Bunker Hill Community College in 1991, this guide presents the Committee's GE curiculum Cornerstone model. Following a short preface which discusses the goals and activities of the Steering Committee, chapter 1 presents a rationale for the model and describes its…

75 FR 12768 - Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-03-17

...] Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION... Administration (FDA). At least one portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. Name of Committee: Blood... Biochemistry and Vascular Biology, Division of Hematology, Office of Blood Research and Review, CBER, FDA. FDA...

77 FR 29667 - Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-05-18

...] Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION... Administration (FDA). At least one portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. Name of Committee: Blood... Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics...

78 FR 38351 - Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-06-26

...] Blood Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION... Administration (FDA). At least one portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. Name of Committee: Blood... Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics...

78 FR 55063 - U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS®) Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-09

... Observation System Act, part of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-11). The... Committee for review and advice. The Committee will provide advice on: (a) administration, operation, management, and maintenance of the System; (b) expansion and periodic modernization and upgrade of technology...

The Buildings and Grounds Committee. Effective Committees. Board Basics.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Flinn, Ronald T.

1997-01-01

The committee on buildings and grounds of a college or university governing board is charged with the broad responsibility for overseeing an institution's physical assets: land, buildings, and equipment. Specific tasks include ensuring the adequacy and condition of capital assets, developing and periodically reviewing policies, advocating for new…

77 FR 71028 - Twelfth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface Wireless Communications

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-11-28

... by Special Committee Leadership Agenda Overview Review/Approve prior Plenary Meeting Summary and... committee at any time. Issued in Washington, DC, on November 8, 2012. Richard F. Gonzalez, Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, Federal Aviation Administration. [FR Doc. 2012-28854 Filed 11-27-12; 8...

78 FR 57672 - Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Transport Airplane and Engine Issues

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-19

... Committee Meeting on Transport Airplane and Engine Issues AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT... Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) Transport Airplane and Engine (TAE) Subcommittee to discuss TAE issues... meeting is as follows: Opening Remarks, Review Agenda and Minutes FAA Report ARAC Report Transport Canada...

76 FR 46279 - Smart Grid Advisory Committee

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-02

... this meeting is to review sections of the Committee's draft report to the NIST Director. The sections... site at http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid . Interested members of the public will be able to participate in... via e-mail at [email protected]nist.gov . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established in...

76 FR 53816 - Advisory Committee; Change of Name and Function; Technical Amendment

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-08-30

... amending the standing advisory committees' regulations to change the name and function of the Anesthetic...: FDA is announcing that the name of the Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs Advisory Committee, which was established on May 1, 1978, has been changed. The Agency decided that the name ``Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug...

29 CFR 1430.7 - Application of the Freedom of Information Act to advisory committee functions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 29 Labor 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Application of the Freedom of Information Act to advisory committee functions. 1430.7 Section 1430.7 Labor Regulations Relating to Labor (Continued) FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 1430.7...

75 FR 3240 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-01-20

... notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by... 20892, 301-254-9975, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special..., Room 6164, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435- 1041, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee...

76 FR 22716 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-04-22

.... [email protected]csr.nih.gov . This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific..., Room 6170, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435- 4514. [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee...

76 FR 14036 - Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-03-15

..., [email protected]csr.nih.gov . This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific... 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1166, [email protected]csr.nih.gov . Name of Committee: Center for...

Human Space Flight Plans Committee

NASA Image and Video Library

2009-08-11

Members of the Human Space Flight Review Committee from left, Jeffrey Greason, Dr. Christopher Chyba, Dr. Leroy Chiao, Dr. Sally Ride, Norman Augustine (chair), Philip McAllister, Dr. Edward Crawley, Dr. Wanda Austin, and Bhodan Bejmuk review their notes prior to the start of a public meeting, Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009, in Washington. Photo Credit: (NASA/Paul E. Alers)

Human Space Flight Plans Committee

NASA Image and Video Library

2009-08-11

Members of the Human Space Flight Review Committee from left, Jeffrey Greason, Dr. Christopher Chyba, Dr. Leroy Chiao, Dr. Sally Ride, Norman Augustine (chair), Philip McAllister, Dr. Edward Crawley, Dr. Wanda Austin (not seen), and Bhodan Bejmuk review their notes prior to the start of a public meeting, Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009, in Washington. Photo Credit: (NASA/Paul E. Alers)

Human Space Flight Plans Committee

NASA Image and Video Library

2009-08-11

Bohdan Bejmuk, chair, Constellation program Standing Review Board, and former manager of the Boeing Space Shuttle and Sea Launch programs, right, asks a question during the final meeting of the Human Space Flight Review Committee as Dr. Wanda Austin, president and CEO, The Aerospace Corp., looks on at left, Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009, in Washington. Photo Credit: (NASA/Paul E. Alers)

75 FR 51466 - Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-08-20

... Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Scientific Management.... The purpose of the Scientific Management Review Board (also referred to as SMRB or Board) is to advise... meeting. Name of Committee: Scientific Management Review Board. Date: September 14-15, 2010. Time...