43 CFR 4.1600 - Purpose and nature of the appeal process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Purpose and nature of the appeal process... Circular A-76 § 4.1600 Purpose and nature of the appeal process. (a) This appeals procedure embodies an... rather than judicial in nature, and does not provide for a judicial review or for further levels of...

Procedural "Due Process" Remedies Available to Nontenured Faculty in Private Postsecondary Education in New England in 1979.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Begin, Richard L.

The status of judicial theory regarding private responsibility for granting procedural due process, and the extent to which policies in New England's private postsecondary institutions adhered to judicial requirements for due process in nontenured faculty terminations were studied. A review of the literature, research methodology, and definition…

43 CFR 4.1600 - Purpose and nature of the appeal process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Purpose and nature of the appeal process... Circular A-76 § 4.1600 Purpose and nature of the appeal process. (a) This appeals procedure embodies an... rather than judicial in nature, and does not provide for a judicial review or for further levels of...

43 CFR 4.1600 - Purpose and nature of the appeal process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Purpose and nature of the appeal process... Circular A-76 § 4.1600 Purpose and nature of the appeal process. (a) This appeals procedure embodies an... rather than judicial in nature, and does not provide for a judicial review or for further levels of...

43 CFR 4.1600 - Purpose and nature of the appeal process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Purpose and nature of the appeal process... Circular A-76 § 4.1600 Purpose and nature of the appeal process. (a) This appeals procedure embodies an... rather than judicial in nature, and does not provide for a judicial review or for further levels of...

28 CFR 105.13 - Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing. 105.13 Section 105.13 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals...

28 CFR 105.12 - Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing. 105.12 Section 105.12 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals § 105.12...

28 CFR 105.12 - Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing. 105.12 Section 105.12 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals § 105.12...

28 CFR 105.12 - Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing. 105.12 Section 105.12 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals § 105.12...

28 CFR 105.13 - Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing. 105.13 Section 105.13 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals...

28 CFR 105.12 - Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing. 105.12 Section 105.12 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals § 105.12...

28 CFR 105.13 - Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing. 105.13 Section 105.13 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals...

28 CFR 105.13 - Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing. 105.13 Section 105.13 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals...

28 CFR 0.111 - General functions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

.... (b) The service of all civil and criminal process emanating from the Federal judicial system... psychological well-being and social adjustment of such persons, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3521, et seq., and... intimidation impedes the functioning of the Federal judicial process. (f) Provision of assistance in the...

28 CFR 105.12 - Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Notification for candidates eligible for expedited processing. 105.12 Section 105.12 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals § 105.12...

28 CFR 105.13 - Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Notification for candidates not eligible for expedited processing. 105.13 Section 105.13 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECKS Aviation Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals...

43 CFR 4.1600 - Purpose and nature of the appeal process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2012-10-01 2011-10-01 true Purpose and nature of the appeal process. 4... Circular A-76 § 4.1600 Purpose and nature of the appeal process. (a) This appeals procedure embodies an... rather than judicial in nature, and does not provide for a judicial review or for further levels of...

[The thesis of judicialization of health care by the elites: medication for mucopolysaccharidosis].

PubMed

Medeiros, Marcelo; Diniz, Debora; Schwartz, Ida Vanessa Doederlein

2013-04-01

This paper evaluates the hypothesis that the judicialization of medicine for mucopolysaccharidosis in Brazil is an action promoted by economic elites. Previous studies upholding the thesis of judicialization by elites in the case of other types of medication that are more costly for the Unified Health Service are discussed. An analysis of all 196 processes containing information about judicial processes brought to court between February 2006 and December 2010 that ended by determining that the State should provide such medication free of charge to patients was conducted. There is evidence that attorneys' fees were covered by entities interested in the results of judicialization, such as the distributors or pharmaceutical industries. Patients may also be migrating for diagnosis and treatment to university centers that are a benchmark for medical innovation in the country, as the option for public health services is related to their higher technical and scientific capacity. Therefore, the resort to private lawyers, indicators of social exclusion based on the address of patients and the use of public health services, are not adequate class information to corroborate or refute the thesis of judicialization by the elites.

Limitations of cadaveric organ donation on judicial cases and problems confronted in autopsy: Istanbul data in comparative perspective.

PubMed

Arslan, M N; Esen Melez, I; Melez, D O; Cavlak, M; Gur, A

2014-04-01

Organ transplantation is one of the most important services of modern medicine to the humanity. In judicial death cases the interaction between judicial needs and transplantation needs is inevitable and both should be provided in a short time before the decomposition of the body. Thus, the description of this interaction and the algorithm which should be carried out to manage these cases are important. Aim of this study is to determine the problems confronted in forensic autopsies and to determine what to do for both judicial processes' and cadaveric organ donations' not becoming limited due to each other. With these aims, autopsy case archive of the Council of Forensic Medicine Istanbul Morgue Department was reviewed, between the years 2009 and 2011, to reveal the number of organ donors among autopsy cases and also to find out the judicial problems confronted during autopsies. Among 12,016 judicial death cases referred to Istanbul Morgue Department in 3 years, 35 cases were found to have undergone cadaveric solid organ harvesting procedure and 307 cases cornea-only harvesting procedure. Manner of deaths for organ donor cases were blunt trauma due to traffic accident in 20 cases, firearm injury in 3 cases, stabbing in 2 cases, suspicious criminal battery in 4 cases and fatal falls in 5 cases. Only 1 case was suspected to have died due to high dose insulin administration. Through the whole data presented in this study, it can be concluded that consulting with the Forensic Medicine Expert not only for the autopsies but also during the clinical process of a judicial case, who is a candidate to be an organ donor, is absolutely important. The early contribution of the Forensic Medicine Expert would provide help to plan both the judicial process and the transplantation process which needs urgent decisions. A Forensic Medicine Expert may be an organ harvest team member performing initial investigations on the cause of death and collecting some of the toxicological screening samples when needed. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

28 CFR 49.1 - Purpose.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 49.1 Section 49.1 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS ACT § 49.1 Purpose. The regulations in... the Antitrust Civil Process Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1313(c)). The terms used in this part shall be...

28 CFR 542.16 - Assistance.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Assistance. 542.16 Section 542.16 Judicial Administration BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE... disability to prepare and process a Request or an Appeal. ...

[Mistakes and omissions in judicial reports prepared in emergency services].

PubMed

Turla, Ahmet; Aydin, Berna; Sataloğlu, Neva

2009-03-01

We aimed in this study to determine any mistakes or omissions made while preparing judicial reports, which contribute to the judicial process. In this study, we evaluated as samples 351 judicial reports of victims who applied to the Emergency Service of Ondokuz Mayis University between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005 with respect to the judicial facts, and we recorded any mistakes or omissions of data in these reports. We determined that there was no record of age in 6% of the judicial reports, of examination time in 71.8%, of traumatic lesion or not in 30.5%, of the state of consciousness in 58.7%, and of the presence or not of life-threatening risks in 2.6%. The name of the physician who prepared the report was not provided in 8.0% of the reports. The most important omission is that none of the reports had the name, surname or signature of the person who had taken the prepared report. We concluded that, after graduation, it is necessary for physicians, who are responsible for both treating the patients and writing judicial reports, to attend in-service training programs. They must also be properly advised regarding their responsibilities in judicial cases.

[Permanent disability and the insurance estimation process].

PubMed

Soumah, M M; Mbaye, I; Ndiaye, M; Bah, H; Gaye Fall, M C; Sow, M L

2006-01-01

The casualties are indemnified according to two processes. First by transaction on rate proposition of insurance physicians, and the second process on rate proposition by a medical expert assigned by law-court. Indemnification scale failure justifies the Interafrican Conference of insurance Markets code adoption. Six insurance societies and the Automotive Guarantee Fund were debtors. Only 627 victims had been indemnified between 1986 and 2003. Expert valuations done at forensic medicine service were the support of the investigation. Inquired parameters were insurance societies, regulation type, aftermaths and the retained prejudices. The data collected on computer card have been analyzed by software Epi Info. The partial permanent inabilities fixed since its adoption differ to inabilities fixed before this adoption. Transaction process concerned 567 victims (90.4%). Sixty victims were indemnified by judicial way. According to process type, the rates fixed in judicial process were 61.6% middle permanent partial inabilities. After 1997, there have observed a decrease in the high and middle permanent partial inabilities in the two processes. The appreciation of the pretium doloris is more subjective but must repair the aftermaths. The middle pretium was majority in the two processes, before and after 1997 with a high decrease of the middle pretium in the transaction process (-15.07) and a small pretium increase of 10.98 points. A common scale code has decreased the judicial litigation concerning casualties in spite of scales' limits. Only the patients with important aftermaths arrive in the judicial process since 1997.

The First Critical Steps through the Criminal Justice System for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Mercier, Celine; Crocker, Anne G.

2011-01-01

This paper deals with the initial steps of the judicial process for persons with intellectual disabilities who are suspected of a minor offense; a stage where plaintiffs, police officers, and crown attorneys make a series of decisions that will have a significant impact on the course of the judicial process. The objective of this study was…

The judicial process: an overview from the TDA Council on Ethics and Judicial Affairs.

PubMed

Burk, Roy N

2011-08-01

From time to time, the Council on Ethics and Judicial Affairs must investigate and act on the alleged unethical behavior of Texas Dental Association members. Because the alleged behavior is directed at a colleague and TDA member, the work of the council is neither comfortable nor inviting. Nonetheless, council decisions are made taking into account its mission to investigate the allegation between the parties and to improve dental ethics in the state.

77 FR 59618 - Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals; Adjustment to the Amount in Controversy Threshold Amounts for...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-09-28

...This notice announces the annual adjustment in the amount in controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearings and judicial review under the Medicare appeals process. The adjustment to the AIC threshold amounts will be effective for requests for ALJ hearings and judicial review filed on or after January 1, 2013. The calendar year 2013 AIC threshold amounts are $140 for ALJ hearings and $1,400 for judicial review.

78 FR 59702 - Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals: Adjustment to the Amount in Controversy Threshold Amounts for...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-27

...This notice announces the annual adjustment in the amount in controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearings and judicial review under the Medicare appeals process. The adjustment to the AIC threshold amounts will be effective for requests for ALJ hearings and judicial review filed on or after January 1, 2014. The calendar year 2014 AIC threshold amounts are $140 for ALJ hearings and $1,430 for judicial review.

76 FR 59138 - Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals; Adjustment to the Amount in Controversy Threshold Amounts for...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2011-09-23

...This notice announces the annual adjustment in the amount in controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearings and judicial review under the Medicare appeals process. The adjustment to the AIC threshold amounts will be effective for requests for ALJ hearings and judicial review filed on or after January 1, 2012. The calendar year 2012 AIC threshold amounts are $130 for ALJ hearings and $1,350 for judicial review.

75 FR 58407 - Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals; Adjustment to the Amount in Controversy Threshold Amounts for...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-24

...This notice announces the annual adjustment in the amount in controversy (AIC) threshold amounts for Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearings and judicial review under the Medicare appeals process. The adjustment to the AIC threshold amounts will be effective for requests for ALJ hearings and judicial review filed on or after January 1, 2011. The 2011 AIC threshold amounts are $130 for ALJ hearings and $1,300 for judicial review.

28 CFR 91.60 - Grantee's responsibilities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Grantee's responsibilities. 91.60 Section 91.60 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) GRANTS FOR CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES...'s responsibilities. Specific duties. As part of its role in the NEPA process, the grantee agency...

28 CFR 91.57 - Actions that normally require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Actions that normally require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. 91.57 Section 91.57 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF... process. Environmental Review Procedures ...

28 CFR 524.10 - Purpose.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 524.10 Section 524.10 Judicial Administration BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INMATE ADMISSION, CLASSIFICATION, AND TRANSFER... subpart is to explain the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) process for classifying newly committed inmates and...

28 CFR 26.21 - Definitions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Definitions. 26.21 Section 26.21 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEATH SENTENCES PROCEDURES Certification Process for State Capital Counsel Systems § 26.21 Definitions. For purposes of this part, the term— Appropriate state official means the...

28 CFR 16.44 - Classified information.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Classified information. 16.44 Section 16.44 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRODUCTION OR DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL OR INFORMATION... information. In processing a request for access to a record containing information that is classified under...

28 CFR 65.40 - General.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false General. 65.40 Section 65.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) EMERGENCY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE Submission and Review of Applications § 65.40 General. This subpart describes the process and criteria for the Attorney...

28 CFR 65.40 - General.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false General. 65.40 Section 65.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) EMERGENCY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE Submission and Review of Applications § 65.40 General. This subpart describes the process and criteria for the Attorney...

28 CFR 65.40 - General.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false General. 65.40 Section 65.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) EMERGENCY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE Submission and Review of Applications § 65.40 General. This subpart describes the process and criteria for the Attorney...

28 CFR 65.40 - General.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false General. 65.40 Section 65.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) EMERGENCY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE Submission and Review of Applications § 65.40 General. This subpart describes the process and criteria for the Attorney...

28 CFR 26.20 - Purpose.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Purpose. 26.20 Section 26.20 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEATH SENTENCES PROCEDURES Certification Process for State Capital Counsel... Attorney General to certify whether a state has a mechanism for providing legal representation to indigent...

32 CFR 300.10 - Judicial actions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 32 National Defense 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial actions. 300.10 Section 300.10 National Defense Department of Defense (Continued) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (CONTINUED) FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM FOIA Request Processing...

28 CFR 51.34 - Expedited consideration.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Expedited consideration. 51.34 Section 51.34 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.34 Expedited...

28 CFR 51.39 - Supplementary submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Supplementary submissions. 51.39 Section 51.39 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.39 Supplementary...

28 CFR 51.34 - Expedited consideration.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Expedited consideration. 51.34 Section 51.34 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.34 Expedited...

28 CFR 33.103 - How to apply.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false How to apply. 33.103 Section 33.103 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS Bulletproof Vest... the process to follow in applying to the program for grants of armor vests. ...

28 CFR 33.103 - How to apply.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false How to apply. 33.103 Section 33.103 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS Bulletproof Vest... the process to follow in applying to the program for grants of armor vests. ...

28 CFR 33.103 - How to apply.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How to apply. 33.103 Section 33.103 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS Bulletproof Vest... the process to follow in applying to the program for grants of armor vests. ...

28 CFR 33.103 - How to apply.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How to apply. 33.103 Section 33.103 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS Bulletproof Vest... the process to follow in applying to the program for grants of armor vests. ...

28 CFR 33.103 - How to apply.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false How to apply. 33.103 Section 33.103 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS Bulletproof Vest... the process to follow in applying to the program for grants of armor vests. ...

20 CFR 418.3605 - What is an initial determination?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... Subsidies Determinations and the Administrative Review Process § 418.3605 What is an initial determination? Initial determinations are the determinations we make that are subject to administrative and judicial... conclusions. Examples of initial determinations that are subject to administrative and judicial review include...

28 CFR 345.70 - General.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false General. 345.70 Section 345.70 Judicial Administration FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES (FPI) INMATE WORK... industry processes or safety or which conserve energy or materials consumed in FPI operations, and for...

28 CFR 34.102 - Peer review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Peer review procedures. 34.102 Section 34.102 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OJJDP COMPETITION AND PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES Peer... substantive and procedural matters related to the peer review process, the “Guideline” addresses such issues...

28 CFR 34.102 - Peer review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Peer review procedures. 34.102 Section 34.102 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OJJDP COMPETITION AND PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES Peer... substantive and procedural matters related to the peer review process, the “Guideline” addresses such issues...

28 CFR 34.102 - Peer review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Peer review procedures. 34.102 Section 34.102 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OJJDP COMPETITION AND PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES Peer... substantive and procedural matters related to the peer review process, the “Guideline” addresses such issues...

28 CFR 34.102 - Peer review procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Peer review procedures. 34.102 Section 34.102 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OJJDP COMPETITION AND PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES Peer... substantive and procedural matters related to the peer review process, the “Guideline” addresses such issues...

28 CFR 51.45 - Request for reconsideration.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Request for reconsideration. 51.45 Section 51.45 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.45 Request...

28 CFR 51.47 - Conference.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Conference. 51.47 Section 51.47 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.47 Conference. (a) A submitting authority...

28 CFR 51.45 - Request for reconsideration.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Request for reconsideration. 51.45 Section 51.45 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.45 Request...

28 CFR 51.47 - Conference.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Conference. 51.47 Section 51.47 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.47 Conference. (a) A submitting authority...

28 CFR 51.48 - Decision after reconsideration.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Decision after reconsideration. 51.48 Section 51.48 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.48 Decision...

[On the competitiveness between parties in judicial proceedings with the participation of a forensic medical expert].

PubMed

Topil'skaia, E V; Kadochnikov, D S; Makarov, I Iu; Pankratova, I V; Rakitin, V A

2011-01-01

The authors report the results of analysis of the rights of the participants in judicial proceedings (both the prosecution and the defense) to appoint and carry out forensic medical expertise in the course of the criminal court process.

28 CFR 49.2 - Duties of custodian.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Duties of custodian. 49.2 Section 49.2 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS ACT § 49.2 Duties of custodian. (a) Upon taking physical possession of documentary material, answers to interrogatories, or...

28 CFR 570.37 - Violation of furlough.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Violation of furlough. 570.37 Section 570.37 Judicial Administration BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMMUNITY PROGRAMS AND RELEASE.... (a) Staff shall process as an escapee an inmate who absconds from furlough. (b) Staff may take...

28 CFR 49.4 - Deputy custodians.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Deputy custodians. 49.4 Section 49.4 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS ACT § 49.4 Deputy custodians. Deputy custodians may perform such of the duties assigned to the custodian as may be authorized...

28 CFR 61.6 - Consideration of environmental documents in decisionmaking.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Consideration of environmental documents in decisionmaking. 61.6 Section 61.6 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED..., the Department of Justice shall: (a) Consider from the earliest possible point in the process all...

28 CFR 33.60 - General.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false General. 33.60 Section 33.60 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS Criminal Justice Block Grants Submission and Review of Applications § 33.60 General. This subpart describes the process and criteria for...

32 CFR 701.12 - FOIA appeals/litigation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... do not take effect until it is received by the right one. If, however, the time limit for responding... right of judicial remedy. Nonetheless, the appellate authority will continue to process the case... the official responsible for the denial and advise the requester of the right to seek judicial review...

[Judicial or administrative settlement of medical malpractice claims. Update on medical liability].

PubMed

Crégut, P

2012-03-01

Settlement of medical malpractice claims was radically changed by the Kouchner Law that set up a rapid, effective system of indemnification. Victims can choose between conventional court proceedings and a non-judicial conciliation procedure. Choice between the two processes depends on the circumstances of the case.

28 CFR 51.38 - Obtaining information from others.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Obtaining information from others. 51.38 Section 51.38 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.38 Obtaining...

28 CFR 51.40 - Failure to complete submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Failure to complete submissions. 51.40 Section 51.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.40 Failure...

28 CFR 51.40 - Failure to complete submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Failure to complete submissions. 51.40 Section 51.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.40 Failure...

28 CFR 51.44 - Notification of decision to object.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Notification of decision to object. 51.44 Section 51.44 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.44...

28 CFR 51.36 - Release of information concerning submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Release of information concerning submissions. 51.36 Section 51.36 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.36...

28 CFR 51.33 - Notice to registrants concerning submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Notice to registrants concerning submissions. 51.33 Section 51.33 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.33 Notice...

28 CFR 51.38 - Obtaining information from others.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Obtaining information from others. 51.38 Section 51.38 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.38 Obtaining...

28 CFR 51.39 - Supplemental information and related submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Supplemental information and related submissions. 51.39 Section 51.39 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.39...

19 CFR 103.9 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... exhausted the administrative remedies with respect to the request. (b) Procedure of initiating judicial... records are situated, or (4) in the District of Columbia. Service of process in that action is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U.S.C. App.) applicable to actions against an agency of the...

28 CFR 51.40 - Failure to complete submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Failure to complete submissions. 51.40 Section 51.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.40 Failure...

28 CFR 51.40 - Failure to complete submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Failure to complete submissions. 51.40 Section 51.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.40 Failure...

28 CFR 51.40 - Failure to complete submissions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Failure to complete submissions. 51.40 Section 51.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.40 Failure...

28 CFR 71.40 - Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Stays ordered by the Department of Justice. 71.40 Section 71.40 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) IMPLEMENTATION OF... finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or...

Eye on the Judicial Process.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Shea, Christopher

1994-01-01

A growing number of college students report that campus judicial systems are more concerned with political correctness than with fairness, or that the systems are unfair regardless of the discipline issue, and complain about the secrecy of proceedings. Shift from a paternalistic discipline policy to a legalistic one is seen. (MSE)

Disciplinary Counseling: Implications for Policy and Practice.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Dannells, Michael; Consolvo, Camille

2000-01-01

A survey of college and university judicial officers and counseling center directors explores the use of disciplinary counseling in the student judicial process, and how the individuals in this position view it. Provides data about demographics and the frequency of referrals, and discusses issues related to disciplinary counseling. (Contains 18…

28 CFR 570.45 - Violation of escorted trip.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Violation of escorted trip. 570.45 Section 570.45 Judicial Administration BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMMUNITY PROGRAMS AND RELEASE COMMUNITY PROGRAMS Escorted Trips § 570.45 Violation of escorted trip. (a) Staff shall process as...

3 CFR 8511 - Proclamation 8511 of April 29, 2010. Law Day, U.S.A., 2010

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... transactions, dispute resolution, human migration, and environmental regulation affect us all. The enduring legal principles of due process and equal protection of the law, judicial independence, access to....A. I call upon all Americans to acknowledge the importance of our Nation’s legal and judicial...

28 CFR 51.37 - Obtaining information from the submitting authority.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Obtaining information from the submitting authority. 51.37 Section 51.37 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.37...

28 CFR 51.42 - Failure of the Attorney General to respond.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Failure of the Attorney General to respond. 51.42 Section 51.42 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.42...

28 CFR 51.42 - Failure of the Attorney General to respond.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Failure of the Attorney General to respond. 51.42 Section 51.42 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.42...

20 CFR 405.505 - Extension of time to file a civil action.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

....505 Section 405.505 Employees' Benefits SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCESS FOR ADJUDICATING INITIAL DISABILITY CLAIMS Judicial Review § 405.505 Extension of time to file a civil... judicial review in a Federal district court. Your request must be in writing and explain why the action was...

Judicious Discipline: A Constitutional Approach for Public High Schools.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Grandmont, Richard P.

2003-01-01

Examines the practices in a large public high school where constitutional language and democratic citizenship education--judicious discipline--are introduced into the decision-making processes of the classroom. Data analysis suggests that a considerable number of students felt they possessed a high level of respect and responsibility as a result.…

[Judicial institutions of medical experts].

PubMed

Godoy, Roberto Lm

2016-05-01

This article considers the evolutive process that judicial organisms of medical experts have experienced in Argentina since their creation and formulates a proposal for its adequacy and modernization. Due to multiple and various evolutive factors, judicial organisms managing medicolegal expert activities show, nowadays, signals that a structural and dynamic reform is needed. They remain as organizational units of Public Administration and their effectiveness and efficiency depends not only of a scientific criteria but a managing one. The present and future challenge will be their conceptual transformation, from "corporate scientific entities" to "public-service-providing units" within the justice administration system.

College Student Perceptions and Learning Points from the Formal University Judicial Process: A Multiple Case Study

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Lucas, Christopher M.

2009-01-01

For educators in the field of higher education and judicial affairs, issues are growing. Campus adjudicators must somehow maximize every opportunity for student education and development in the context of declining resources and increasing expectations of public accountability. Numbers of student misconduct cases, including matters of violence and…

30 CFR 241.77 - How may MMS collect the penalty?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... MMS collect the penalty? (a) MMS may use all available means to collect the penalty including, but not... to compel your payment under 30 U.S.C. 1719(k). (b) If the Department uses judicial process, or if you seek judicial review under § 241.74 and the court upholds assessment of a penalty, the court shall...

Students' Perceived Learning and Anticipated Future Behaviors as a Result of Participation in the Student Judicial Process

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Howell, Martin T.

2005-01-01

This qualitative study was undertaken to explore the meaning that students make of their interactions with campus judicial systems. Using a multiple case study approach, 10 students from 3 institutions in the Southeastern United States were observed and interviewed. The findings presented here relate to students' perceived learning and anticipated…

28 CFR 30.6 - What procedures apply to the selection of programs and activities under these regulations?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What procedures apply to the selection of programs and activities under these regulations? 30.6 Section 30.6 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF... consult with local elected officials. (b) Each state that adopts a process shall notify the Attorney...

The assessment of expert testimony relevance and admissibility in medical malpractice cases in the Czech Republic. Can American judicial practice help us?

PubMed

Zakharov, Sergey

2011-03-01

The relevance and admissibility of expert medical testimony in relation to medical malpractice suits requires a more successful development of formal criteria and a more intentional compliance with efficient judicial procedures. The American judicial system provides an excellent model for implementation of a critical approach to knowledge collection, the evaluation of the validity of scientifically sound information, and the examination of expert's testimony on the basis of a sound methodology. An analysis of the assessment and application of reliability yields evidence that assuring standards to improve the quality of expert medical testimony will increase the overall probability of a fair outcome during the judicial process. Applying these beneficial strategies in medical malpractice cases will continue to support further considerations of promoting justice and solving problems through sufficient scientific means.

Psychological model for judicial decision making in emergency or temporary child placement.

PubMed

Ballou, M; Barry, J; Billingham, K; Boorstein, B W; Butler, C; Gershberg, R; Heim, J; Lirianio, D; McGovern, S; Nicastro, S; Romaniello, J; Vazquez-Nuttall, K; White, C

2001-10-01

In emergencies, family court judges must often make rapid decisions, without benefit of thorough information, that have significant impact on people's lives. Action-oriented research was used to develop a model that would bring psychosocial factors to the legal system for the purpose of enhancing the judicial decision-making process in emergency and temporary child placement cases.

Medical negligence: Indian legal perspective.

PubMed

Agrawal, Amit

2016-10-01

A basic knowledge of how judicial forums deal with the cases relating to medical negligence is of absolute necessity for doctors. The need for such knowledge is more now than before in light of higher premium being placed by the Indian forums on the value of human life and suffering, and perhaps rightly so. Judicial forums, while seeking to identify delinquents and delinquency in the cases of medical negligence, actually aim at striking a careful balance between the autonomy of a doctor to make judgments and the rights of a patient to be dealt with fairly. In the process of adjudication, the judicial forums tend to give sufficient leeway to doctors and expressly recognize the complexity of the human body, inexactness of medical science, the inherent subjectivity of the process, genuine scope for error of judgment, and the importance of the autonomy of the doctors. The law does not prescribe the limits of high standards that can be adopted but only the minimum standard below which the patients cannot be dealt with. Judicial forums have also signaled an increased need of the doctors to engage with the patients during treatment, especially when the line of treatment is contested, has serious side effects and alternative treatments exist.

A technical analysis of medicines request-related decision making in Brazilian courts.

PubMed

Macedo, Eloisa Israel de; Lopes, Luciane Cruz; Barberato-Filho, Silvio

2011-08-01

To analyze judicial requests for medications that are covered by the pharmaceutical assistance components of the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS - Brazilian Unified Health System). We analyzed 81 judicial requests for medications in the State of São Paulo between 2005 and 2009. The details of these cases were obtained electronically from the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo. Directives that regulate pharmaceutical assistance were consulted to identify judicially requested medications that are covered by the SUS. To assess the level of evidence supporting the use of these medications to treat the clinical indications described, we consulted the Thomson Micromedex® database. The number of individual medications requested in each case ranged from 1 to 7; in total, 77 different pharmaceuticals agents were identified. Of the medications requested, 14.3% should have been available through SUS primary care, 19.5% were classified under the exceptionally dispensed medications component of the SUS, and 66.2% were not on any official list. Medications of the exceptionally dispensed medications component showed better clinical evidence when indicated for the treatment of medical conditions covered by the Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines of Brazil's Ministry of Health. The judicial process has been used to ensure access to medications that are covered by the SUS and to request access to those that are not covered. Our assessment of the level of available evidence reinforces the need for technical analysis in the decision-making process in cases of judicially requested medications.

The beneficial role of a judicial process when "everything" is too much?

PubMed

Handelman, Mark; Parke, Bob

2008-01-01

This narrative is written with the intent to encourage physicians as well as other healthcare professionals to use judicial processes, such as those provided by the Ontario Consent and Capacity Board, to help resolve conflict with treatment decisions between care providers and decision-makers. Through the presentation of a fictional yet common case scenario, it is argued that after all attempts at mediation have been attempted that the timely use of a third party is in the patient's, the family's and the healthcare team's best interests.

Disability inquiries shorn from Chicago's judicial review process.

PubMed

1997-03-07

The Chicago Bar Association changed the wording of the questions it routinely asks judicial candidates for election and appointment to the bench. Prior to the change, the request for information was so broad that the bar association could learn the candidate's HIV status through a questionnaire that gave the result of the candidate's last physical examination. The new wording better reflects the spirit and intent of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Legislative and educational alternatives to a judicial remedy for the transfer trauma dilemma.

PubMed

Cohen, E S

1986-01-01

Transfer trauma is alleged to be an increase in morbidity and mortality in institutionally relocated chronically ill elderly. Efforts by the legal profession to persuade courts that transfer trauma should be a legally recognized phenomenon invoking judicial protections against transfer (the "transfer trauma argument") have been unproductive. In O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center, Inc., the United States Supreme Court denied standing to elderly persons claiming a property interest in remaining in alleged substandard facilities. The Court rejected the argument that the possibility of transfer trauma constituted a deprivation of life or liberty that would have required due process protections of notice and hearing. Despite the Court's preclusion of transfer trauma litigation in a constitutional context and the general unwillingness of lower courts to recognize the phenomenon, attorneys continue to burden the judicial system with frivolous transfer trauma arguments. The unfruitful pursuit of a judicial remedy for the ethical and social problems that arise with relocation of the elderly continues, in part, because of a misguided belief that this distressing social phenomenon is best remedied by the courts. Judicial unwillingness to recognize the transfer trauma argument, however, does not preclude legislative consideration of the humanitarian issues concerning the institutional relocation of elderly persons. This Article examines gerontological research in order to understand the judicial rejection of the transfer trauma argument and argues in support of legislative and educational solutions for the ethical and social problems attending transfer.

[Judicial intervention of the DNA test (comment on decisions of the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court No. 501/2005, of April 19, 2005, and No. 1311/2005, of October 14, 2005)].

PubMed

Libano Beristain, Arantza

2005-01-01

The controversy has been arisen by the Spanish Supreme Court in two recent judgments, as they clearly show the lack of a unique criterion in the Spanish jurisprudence when genetic data have to be analysed in the course of a criminal process, in order to identify a person. The DNA proof cannot be practised without judicial intervention under Spanish law.

A case study of infant health promotion and corporate marketing of milk substitutes.

PubMed

Mendoza, Roger Lee

2012-06-01

The mismatch between the demand for, and supply of, health products has led to the increasing involvement of courts worldwide in health promotion and marketing. This study critically examines the implementation of one country's Milk Code within the framework of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes, and the efficacy of the judicial process in balancing corporate marketing and state regulatory objectives. Drawing upon the Philippine experience with its own Milk Code, it evaluates the capacities of courts to determine policy costs and risks against the benefits of delineating and containing corporate marketing strategies for milk substitutes and supplements. The study finds that the methodological and information-based challenges faced by courts in resolving multi-dimensional health issues may not be overcome without serious questions concerning the legitimacy of the judicial process itself. Despite the deficiencies of litigation and adjudication, the study notes the catalytic potential of a judicial decision in opening up vital policy space for future renegotiations among rival parties and interests. Third-party intervention is explored relative to this catalytic function.

Craniocervical injuries in judicial hangings: an anthropologic analysis of six cases.

PubMed

Spence, M W; Shkrum, M J; Ariss, A; Regan, J

1999-12-01

Restoration projects and archaeologic excavations in two Canadian prisons resulted in the recovery of the skeletons of six felons executed by judicial hanging. Damage inflicted by hanging on various skeletal elements was observed. Among the injuries seen were fractures of the hyoid cornua, styloid processes, occipital bones, and cervical vertebral bodies (C2) and transverse processes (C1, C2, C3, and C5). Despite the general uniformity of the hanging technique, which involved a subaural knot, the trauma to the skeletal elements and the cause of death varied among individuals. Although some of this variation was probably due to minor differences in hanging practices, individual anatomic peculiarities of the victims likely also contributed.

Rape Victim Counseling: The Legal Process

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Burgess, Ann Wolbert; Holmstrom, Lynda Lytle

1974-01-01

This paper focuses on the counseling framework developed for the Victim Counseling Program for post-rape victims, the steps in the judicial process, reactions of victims to court, and victim counseling techniques during the court process. Presented at NAWDAC Conference, Chicago, April, 1974. (Author/PC)

28 CFR 541.5 - Discipline process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Discipline process. 541.5 Section 541.5... AND SPECIAL HOUSING UNITS Inmate Discipline Program § 541.5 Discipline process. (a) Incident report... the discipline process, but that your silence may be used to draw an adverse inference against you at...

Judges, Legislators, and Social Change

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Dienes, C. Thomas

1970-01-01

The interaction analysis scheme describes the adjustment of the legal system to change. It is a dynamic decision-making process interacting internally among the judicial and legislative subsystems, and, externally with the social environment in the policy-making process. (SE)

The judicial role in life-sustaining medical treatment decisions.

PubMed

Hafemeister, T L; Keilitz, I; Banks, S M

1991-01-01

Although there has been speculation regarding the pervasiveness and nature of judicial decisions regarding life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT), no attempt has been made to empirically assess their prevalence or the issues they address. An exploratory study utilizing a mail survey of a nationwide random sample (N = 905) of state trial court judges was conducted to provide initial information regarding this decision-making process. Twenty-two percent of the responding judges had heard at least one LSMT case, and judicial review did not appear endemic to particular states. The number of judges hearing LSMT cases dropped from 1975 to 1981 but has increased since then. Three major issues predominate: patient competency, appointment of a surrogate decisionmaker, and resolution of the ultimate issue of forgoing LSMT. Relatively few cases either contested a prior directive's validity or involved imposing sanctions for instituting or forgoing LSMT. Although subject to different interpretations, the results suggest the courts are having a significant impact on certain aspects of the LSMT decision-making process. However, the infrequency with which any one judge is called upon to make an LSMT decision causes concern about the judiciary's ability to respond in a timely and appropriate manner. With their potential for a profound effect on the actions of health care providers, greater attention to this decision-making process is warranted.

49 CFR 551.45 - What is the purpose of this subpart?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... service of administrative or judicial notices or processes may be made. ... TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURAL RULES Service of Process on Foreign Manufacturers and Importers Designation of An Agent for Service of Process § 551.45 What is the purpose of this...

14 CFR 13.113 - Noncompliance with the investigative process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... process. 13.113 Section 13.113 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF... an Order of Investigation § 13.113 Noncompliance with the investigative process. If any person fails... Officer or the designee of the Presiding Officer, judicial enforcement may be initiated against that...

28 CFR 71.42 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 71.42 Section 71.42....42 Judicial review. Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an... assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review. ...

28 CFR 42.735 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial review. 42.735 Section 42.735 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NONDISCRIMINATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY; POLICIES AND... of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 Compliance Procedures § 42.735 Judicial review. A final...

Managing the Judicial Function in Student Affairs.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Steele, Brenton H.; And Others

1984-01-01

Surveyed chief student affairs officers at 264 colleges and universities regarding the administration of judicial affairs and judicial policies and procedures. Results showed 88 percent of the schools did not have a judicial affairs office. Over half felt no change in judicial programs was needed. (JAC)

Enforcer, manager or leader? The judicial role in family violence courts.

PubMed

King, Michael; Batagol, Becky

2010-01-01

Judicial supervision of offenders is an important component of many family violence courts. Skepticism concerning the ability of offenders to reform and a desire to protect victims has led to some judges to use supervision as a form of deterrence. Supervision is also used to hold offenders accountable for following court orders. Some family violence courts apply processes used in drug courts, such as rewards and sanctions, to promote offender rehabilitation. This article suggests that while protection and support of victims should be the prime concern of family violence courts, a form of judging that engages offenders in the development and implementation of solutions for their problems and supports their implementation is more likely to promote their positive behavioral change than other approaches to judicial supervision. The approach to judging proposed in this article draws from therapeutic jurisprudence, feminist theory, transformational leadership and solution-focused brief therapy principles. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

28 CFR 30.7 - How does the Attorney General communicate with state and local officials concerning the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS... process under § 30.6, the Attorney General, to the extent permitted by law: (1) Uses the state process to...

42 CFR 423.1976 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 423.1976 Section 423.1976 Public...) MEDICARE PROGRAM VOLUNTARY MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT Reopening, ALJ Hearings, MAC review, and Judicial Review § 423.1976 Judicial review. (a) Review of ALJ's decision. The enrollee may request judicial...

28 CFR 13.7 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial review. 13.7 Section 13.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATOMIC WEAPONS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS REWARDS REGULATIONS § 13.7 Judicial review. The decision of the Attorney General is final and conclusive and no court...

28 CFR 13.7 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial review. 13.7 Section 13.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATOMIC WEAPONS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS REWARDS REGULATIONS § 13.7 Judicial review. The decision of the Attorney General is final and conclusive and no court...

28 CFR 13.7 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial review. 13.7 Section 13.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATOMIC WEAPONS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS REWARDS REGULATIONS § 13.7 Judicial review. The decision of the Attorney General is final and conclusive and no court...

28 CFR 13.7 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial review. 13.7 Section 13.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATOMIC WEAPONS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS REWARDS REGULATIONS § 13.7 Judicial review. The decision of the Attorney General is final and conclusive and no court...

28 CFR 13.7 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 13.7 Section 13.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATOMIC WEAPONS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS REWARDS REGULATIONS § 13.7 Judicial review. The decision of the Attorney General is final and conclusive and no court...

28 CFR 32.55 - Judicial appeal.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial appeal. 32.55 Section 32.55 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS' DEATH, DISABILITY, AND EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE BENEFIT CLAIMS Director Appeals and Reviews § 32.55 Judicial appeal. (a) Consistent with § 32.8...

28 CFR 0.49 - International judicial assistance.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false International judicial assistance. 0.49 Section 0.49 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Civil Division § 0.49 International judicial assistance. The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil...

28 CFR 32.55 - Judicial appeal.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial appeal. 32.55 Section 32.55 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS' DEATH, DISABILITY, AND EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE BENEFIT CLAIMS Director Appeals and Reviews § 32.55 Judicial appeal. (a) Consistent with § 32.8...

31 CFR 341.7 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial proceedings. 341.7 Section... BONDS § 341.7 Judicial proceedings. No judicial determinations will be recognized which would give... against a registered owner will be recognized when established by valid judicial proceedings, but in no...

31 CFR 346.7 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial proceedings. 346.7 Section... RETIREMENT BONDS § 346.7 Judicial proceedings. No judicial determination will be recognized which would give... claim against a registered owner will be recognized when established by valid judicial proceedings, but...

50 CFR 296.15 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 50 Wildlife and Fisheries 7 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 296.15 Section 296.15..., DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CONTINENTAL SHELF FISHERMEN'S CONTINGENCY FUND § 296.15 Judicial review. Any claimant... determination, seek judicial review of the determination in the United States District Court for such judicial...

40 CFR 179.125 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 23 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 179.125 Section 179... EVIDENTIARY PUBLIC HEARING Judicial Review § 179.125 Judicial review. (a) The Administrator's final decision... judicial review within the period ending on the 60th day after the date of the publication of the order...

78 FR 49768 - Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committees on Rules of Bankruptcy and Civil Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-08-15

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committees... Civil Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States. ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments and... Judicial Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Washington, DC...

Legal process, litigation, and judicial decisions.

PubMed

Beresford, H Richard

2013-01-01

Ethically salient issues in neurologic care may have important legal overtones. This chapter considers some of these, emphasizing how law may influence the outcome of controversies over how best to promote autonomy, beneficence, and justice in the care of individuals with neurologic disorders. Constitutional, statutory, and judicial dimensions are addressed. With respect to autonomy, discussion emphasizes legal dimensions of the doctrine of informed consent and the obligations of medical professionals to protect the privacy and confidentiality of their patients. The discussion of beneficence focuses on issues relating to actual or potential conflicts of interest in the care of patients and on the conduct of research involving human subjects. The section on justice considers how law aims to define protectable rights and interests of individuals and to provide a fair and efficient process for resolving disputes. Applications of legal principles and doctrines are illustrated primarily through the examples afforded by judicial decisions. These cases demonstrate how law both promotes ethical decision-making and protects the rights and interests of those affected. The cases also highlight some of the ethical quandaries that evoke resort to litigation and the limits of law in advancing ethically appropriate outcomes. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

40 CFR 178.65 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 23 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 178.65 Section 178.65... REQUESTS FOR HEARINGS Judicial Review § 178.65 Judicial review. An order issued under § 178.37 is final... of the order in the Federal Register. The failure to file a petition for judicial review within the...

Classifying and Assessing the Effectiveness of Judicial Procedures in Mississippi Community Colleges

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Rice, Edward, II

2009-01-01

This study classified and compared the judicial procedures that mirrored the criminal justice system with judicial procedures that were less formal and more student-oriented. The judicial procedures of Mississippi's Community and Junior Colleges are the focus of the study. Each school's judicial procedure was classified and placed on a continuum…

28 CFR 28.24 - Exceptions based on the results of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... judicial proceedings. 28.24 Section 28.24 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DNA IDENTIFICATION... inapplicable in two circumstances relating to the results of judicial proceedings: (a) Judicial denial of DNA testing. Section 3600A(c)(1) exempts situations in which a court has denied a motion for DNA testing under...

28 CFR 28.24 - Exceptions based on the results of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... judicial proceedings. 28.24 Section 28.24 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DNA IDENTIFICATION... inapplicable in two circumstances relating to the results of judicial proceedings: (a) Judicial denial of DNA testing. Section 3600A(c)(1) exempts situations in which a court has denied a motion for DNA testing under...

28 CFR 28.24 - Exceptions based on the results of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... judicial proceedings. 28.24 Section 28.24 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DNA IDENTIFICATION... inapplicable in two circumstances relating to the results of judicial proceedings: (a) Judicial denial of DNA testing. Section 3600A(c)(1) exempts situations in which a court has denied a motion for DNA testing under...

28 CFR 28.24 - Exceptions based on the results of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... judicial proceedings. 28.24 Section 28.24 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DNA IDENTIFICATION... inapplicable in two circumstances relating to the results of judicial proceedings: (a) Judicial denial of DNA testing. Section 3600A(c)(1) exempts situations in which a court has denied a motion for DNA testing under...

28 CFR 28.24 - Exceptions based on the results of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... judicial proceedings. 28.24 Section 28.24 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DNA IDENTIFICATION... inapplicable in two circumstances relating to the results of judicial proceedings: (a) Judicial denial of DNA testing. Section 3600A(c)(1) exempts situations in which a court has denied a motion for DNA testing under...

28 CFR 8.7 - Judicial forfeiture.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial forfeiture. 8.7 Section 8.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FBI FORFEITURE AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN STATUTES § 8.7 Judicial... 5312(a)(3) of title 31 of the United States Code, the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI field office...

28 CFR 8.7 - Judicial forfeiture.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial forfeiture. 8.7 Section 8.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FBI FORFEITURE AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN STATUTES § 8.7 Judicial... 5312(a)(3) of title 31 of the United States Code, the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI field office...

28 CFR 8.7 - Judicial forfeiture.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial forfeiture. 8.7 Section 8.7 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FBI FORFEITURE AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN STATUTES § 8.7 Judicial... 5312(a)(3) of title 31 of the United States Code, the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI field office...

28 CFR 42.605 - Agency processing of complaints of employment discrimination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... employment discrimination. 42.605 Section 42.605 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NONDISCRIMINATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY; POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Procedures for Complaints of Employment Discrimination Filed Against Recipients of Federal Financial Assistance § 42.605 Agency processing of complaints...

43 CFR 429.37 - Does interest accrue on monies owed to the United States during my appeal process?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... United States during my appeal process? 429.37 Section 429.37 Public Lands: Interior Regulations Relating... States during my appeal process? Except for any period in the appeal process during which a stay is then... decision to OHA, or during judicial review of final agency action. ...

36 CFR 1275.34 - Access for use in judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 36 Parks, Forests, and Public Property 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Access for use in judicial... Agencies, and For Use in Any Judicial Proceeding § 1275.34 Access for use in judicial proceedings. In... custody and control of the Archivist will be made available for use in any judicial proceeding and are...

36 CFR 218.14 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... process set forth in this subpart fully implements Congress' design for a predecisional administrative.... Individuals and groups must structure their participation so as to alert the local agency officials making...

7 CFR 1.41 - Service of process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Service of process. 1.41 Section 1.41 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Judicial Proceedings § 1.41 Service of... of the General Counsel, in order that service of process may be made. In the event an officer of the...

Teach Democracy through Experiences.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Penning, Nick; Hunter, Bruce, Ed.

1987-01-01

To help public schools produce well-educated citizens, the Center for Civic Education (originating at UCLA in 1965) works with elementary and secondary school students and teachers to promote better understanding of such basic democratic principles as due process, federalism, and judicial review. The process transforms student interactions while…

19 CFR 207.51 - Judicial review of denial of application for disclosure of certain business proprietary...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 19 Customs Duties 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Judicial review of denial of application for... SUBSIDIZED EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES Judicial Review § 207.51 Judicial review of denial of application for.... Persons entitled to judicial review under section 777(c)(2) of the Commission determination not to...

Temporary brittle bone disease: relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome

PubMed Central

Paterson, Colin R.; Monk, Elizabeth A.

2011-01-01

There is a wide differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained fractures including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency rickets. Over the last 20 years we and others have described a self-limiting syndrome characterised by fractures in the first year of life. This has been given the provisional name temporary brittle bone disease. This work had proved controversial mostly because the fractures, including rib fractures and metaphyseal fractures, were those previously regarded as typical or even diagnostic of non-accidental injury. Some have asserted that the condition does not exist. Over the years 1985 to 2000 we investigated 87 such cases with fractures with a view to determining the future care of the children. In 85 of these the judiciary was involved. We examined the clinical and radiological findings in the 33 cases in which there was a judicial finding of abuse, the 24 cases in which the parents were exonerated and the 28 cases in which no formal judicial finding was made. The three groups of patients were similar in terms of demographics, age at fracturing and details of the fractures. The clinical similarities between the three groups of patients contrast with the very different results of the judicial process. PMID:22053268

Temporary brittle bone disease: relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome.

PubMed

Paterson, Colin R; Monk, Elizabeth A

2011-06-30

There is a wide differential diagnosis for the child with unexplained fractures including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta and vitamin D deficiency rickets. Over the last 20 years we and others have described a self-limiting syndrome characterised by fractures in the first year of life. This has been given the provisional name temporary brittle bone disease. This work had proved controversial mostly because the fractures, including rib fractures and metaphyseal fractures, were those previously regarded as typical or even diagnostic of non-accidental injury. Some have asserted that the condition does not exist. Over the years 1985 to 2000 we investigated 87 such cases with fractures with a view to determining the future care of the children. In 85 of these the judiciary was involved. We examined the clinical and radiological findings in the 33 cases in which there was a judicial finding of abuse, the 24 cases in which the parents were exonerated and the 28 cases in which no formal judicial finding was made. The three groups of patients were similar in terms of demographics, age at fracturing and details of the fractures. The clinical similarities between the three groups of patients contrast with the very different results of the judicial process.

32 CFR 1901.32 - Requests for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

...-in, first-out” basis. Exceptions to this rule will only be made in circumstances that the Agency... health, humanitarian, or due process considerations involving possible deprivation of life or liberty... judicial precedent, requests more properly the scope of requests under the Federal Rules of Civil or...

31 CFR 536.506 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... specially designated narcotics trafficker or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

31 CFR 536.506 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... specially designated narcotics trafficker or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

49 CFR 551.66 - What is the legal effect of service of process on an agent?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 49 Transportation 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What is the legal effect of service of process on... Service of Process on Foreign Manufacturers and Importers Method of Service of Process § 551.66 What is the legal effect of service of process on an agent? Service on an agent of administrative or judicial...

43 CFR 27.12 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 27.12 Section 27.12... UNDER TITLE II OF PUBLIC LAW 93-153 § 27.12 Judicial review. Action taken pursuant to this part is subject to judicial review. ...

31 CFR 562.506 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise...

31 CFR 542.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

31 CFR 537.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

31 CFR 542.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

31 CFR 544.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise...

31 CFR 541.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

31 CFR 576.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise...

31 CFR 545.513 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... agreement affecting property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to...

31 CFR 541.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

31 CFR 588.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... agreement affecting property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to...

31 CFR 544.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise...

31 CFR 537.507 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... property or interests in property or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

7 CFR 1.41 - Service of process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Service of process. 1.41 Section 1.41 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Judicial Proceedings § 1.41 Service of... officer of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in any matter involving the activities of this Department...

32 CFR 1801.32 - Requests for expedited processing.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... “first-in, first-out” basis. Exceptions to this rule will only be made in circumstances that NACIC deems... health, humanitarian, or due process considerations involving possible deprivation of life or liberty... judicial precedent, requests more properly the scope of requests under the Federal Rules of Civil or...

Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Dickerson, Jaffe D.; Chapman, Mayer

1978-01-01

The NCAA has enjoyed almost total freedom from judicial scrutiny of its rules, procedures, and official acts in large part because of its private nature as an unincorporated association. The function of the NCAA, California State University, Hayward v NCAA, and due process of the student-athlete are discussed. (MLW)

Children's Rights and Society's Duties

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Stier, Serena

1978-01-01

Recent legal decisions affecting the rights of children are reviewed and analyzed in terms of efforts to balance the often competing interests of children, their families, and the state. It is concluded that the political process, not the judicial process, will have to be engaged to provide what children need. (Author/AM)

28 CFR 92.11 - Content of the recruitment and retention programs.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Content of the recruitment and retention... ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES (COPS) Police Recruitment Program Guidelines § 92.11 Content of the recruitment... program and applicant needs throughout the recruitment process. The process should be based on an...

Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards in the Educational Sector.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

McKinney, Joseph R.; Place, A. William

1993-01-01

Reviews the grievance-arbitration process and examines the judiciary's approach to handling appeals of arbitrators' awards. Analyzes 213 court decisions made during a 10-year period involving appeals of arbitrators' awards. Draws some conclusions and further examines the relationship of the grievance-arbitration appeals process to public education…

47 CFR 1.1529 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 47 Telecommunication 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 1.1529 Section 1.1529 Telecommunication FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION GENERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Implementation of the Equal... Judicial review. Judicial review of final agency decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C...

17 CFR 201.58 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 17 Commodity and Securities Exchanges 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Judicial review. 201.58 Section 201.58 Commodity and Securities Exchanges SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULES OF PRACTICE Regulations Pertaining to the Equal Access to Justice Act § 201.58 Judicial review. Judicial review of final...

49 CFR 1016.310 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 49 Transportation 8 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 1016.310 Section 1016.310 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD, DEPARTMENT... Judicial review. Judicial review of final Board decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C...

45 CFR 1703.601 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 4 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Judicial review. 1703.601 Section 1703.601 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE ACT Judicial Review § 1703.601 Judicial review. Any person may...

45 CFR 1703.601 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 4 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 1703.601 Section 1703.601 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE ACT Judicial Review § 1703.601 Judicial review. Any person may...

28 CFR 9.5 - Criteria governing administrative and judicial remission and mitigation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... judicial remission and mitigation. 9.5 Section 9.5 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE REMISSION OR MITIGATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL, AND CRIMINAL FORFEITURES § 9.5 Criteria governing administrative and judicial remission and mitigation. (a) Remission. (1) The ruling...

28 CFR 9.5 - Criteria governing administrative and judicial remission and mitigation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... judicial remission and mitigation. 9.5 Section 9.5 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE REMISSION OR MITIGATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL, AND CRIMINAL FORFEITURES § 9.5 Criteria governing administrative and judicial remission and mitigation. (a) Remission. (1) The ruling...

44 CFR 62.22 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 44 Emergency Management and Assistance 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 62.22... HOMELAND SECURITY INSURANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION National Flood Insurance Program SALE OF INSURANCE AND ADJUSTMENT OF CLAIMS Claims Adjustment, Claims Appeals, and Judicial Review § 62.22 Judicial review. (a) Upon...

43 CFR 17.10 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 17.10 Section 17.10... Origin § 17.10 Judicial review. Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the act. [29 FR 16293, Dec. 4, 1964] ...

14 CFR 1262.309 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 5 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 1262.309 Section 1262.309... PROCEEDINGS Procedures for Considering Applications § 1262.309 Judicial review. Judicial review of final... the determination to the court of the United States having jurisdiction to review the merits of the...

42 CFR 423.2136 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 423.2136 Section 423.2136 Public...) MEDICARE PROGRAM VOLUNTARY MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT Reopening, ALJ Hearings, MAC review, and Judicial Review § 423.2136 Judicial review. (a) General rule. To the extent authorized by sections 1876(c...

40 CFR 180.30 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 23 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 180.30 Section 180.30... EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD Procedural Regulations § 180.30 Judicial review. (a) Under FFDCA section 408(h), judicial review is available in the United States Courts of Appeal as to the...

42 CFR 422.612 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 422.612 Section 422.612 Public... Judicial review. (a) Review of ALJ's decision. Any party, including the MA organization, may request judicial review (upon notifying the other parties) of an ALJ's decision if— (1) The Board denied the party...

37 CFR 11.802 - Judicial and legal officials.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial and legal officials... Rules of Professional Conduct Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession § 11.802 Judicial and legal..., adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or...

37 CFR 11.802 - Judicial and legal officials.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights 1 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial and legal officials... Rules of Professional Conduct Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession § 11.802 Judicial and legal..., adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or...

78 FR 77492 - Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; Federal...

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-12-23

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on...: Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States. ACTION..., 2014, Chicago, IL. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules Officer...

77 FR 72885 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-06

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of... CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office...

77 FR 66481 - Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-11-05

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules... Circle NE., Washington, DC 20544. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Chief Rules Officer...

78 FR 76177 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-12-16

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of..., Phoenix, Arizona 85003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules...

45 CFR 79.42 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 79.42 Section 79.42 Public Welfare DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES § 79.42 Judicial review. Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an...

6 CFR 13.42 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 6 Domestic Security 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 13.42 Section 13.42 Domestic Security DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES § 13.42 Judicial review. Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate...

10 CFR 12.309 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 12.309 Section 12.309 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT IN AGENCY PROCEEDINGS Procedures for Considering Applications § 12.309 Judicial review. Judicial review of final agency decisions on awards may be...

49 CFR 98.13 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 49 Transportation 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 98.13 Section 98.13 Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS ON POST-EMPLOYMENT ACTIVITIES Judicial Review § 98.13 Judicial review. Any former employee found to have violated 18 U.S.C. 207...

28 CFR 9.5 - Criteria governing administrative and judicial remission and mitigation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... judicial remission and mitigation. 9.5 Section 9.5 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE REMISSION OR MITIGATION OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL FORFEITURES § 9.5 Criteria governing administrative and judicial remission and mitigation. (a) Remission. (1) The Ruling Official shall not grant...

45 CFR 1203.11 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 4 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 1203.11 Section 1203.11 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE... Judicial review. Action taken pursuant to section 602 of title VI is subject to judicial review as provided...

15 CFR 18.23 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 15 Commerce and Foreign Trade 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 18.23 Section 18.23 Commerce and Foreign Trade Office of the Secretary of Commerce ATTORNEY'S FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES Procedures for Considering Applications § 18.23 Judicial review. Judicial review of final agency decisions on...

40 CFR 180.30 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD Procedural Regulations § 180.30 Judicial review. (a) Under FFDCA section 408(h), judicial review is available in the United States Courts of Appeal as to the... 40 Protection of Environment 24 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial review. 180.30 Section 180.30...

40 CFR 180.30 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD Procedural Regulations § 180.30 Judicial review. (a) Under FFDCA section 408(h), judicial review is available in the United States Courts of Appeal as to the... 40 Protection of Environment 25 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial review. 180.30 Section 180.30...

40 CFR 180.30 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD Procedural Regulations § 180.30 Judicial review. (a) Under FFDCA section 408(h), judicial review is available in the United States Courts of Appeal as to the... 40 Protection of Environment 25 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial review. 180.30 Section 180.30...

31 CFR 586.509 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... property are blocked pursuant to § 586.201 or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment or other judicial process purporting to transfer or...

Media Notes: Bringing Government to Life.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Sive, Mary Robinson

1981-01-01

This column examines some recent media materials for middle and high schools on federal, state, and local government; the legislative process; the presidency; the judicial branch; elections; and citizen participation. Complete ordering information is included. (Author/SJL)

Violate, incur sanctions, and exhaust: the steep price of judicial review under Illinois Council.

PubMed

Burke, Virginia

2003-01-01

This Article analyzes the decision in Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., in which the Supreme Court held that providers seeking to challenge Medicare regulations must first pursue those challenges through an administrative review process, except when application of this rule would result in "no review at all." In reaching this decision, the five-justice majority rejected the interpretation given to prior holdings by many commentators and circuits, and reasoned that it was appropriate to require providers to exhaust their administrative appeals even though the penalties for the challenged violations would not be stayed during the process. Given the nature of the administrative appeal process and the scope of penalties that may be assessed against Medicare providers, the author argues that the decision in Illinois Council evidences excessive deference towards the agency, or a disinclination on the part of the court towards entertaining Medicare lawsuits, either of which bodes ill for providers seeking judicial relief.

31 CFR 92.18 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 92.18 Section 92.18... States Mint § 92.18 Judicial review. A Final Notice of Assessment issued under the procedures in this subpart may be subject to judicial review pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq. ...

43 CFR 35.42 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 43 Public Lands: Interior 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 35.42 Section 35.42... CLAIMS AND STATEMENTS § 35.42 Judicial review. Section 3805 of title 31, U.S. Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate U.S. District Court of a final decision of the Secretary imposing penalties or...

31 CFR 27.8 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 27.8 Section 27.8... OF DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY NAMES, SYMBOLS, ETC. § 27.8 Judicial review. A final Notice of Assessment issued under this party may be subject to judicial review pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq. ...

31 CFR 6.16 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 6.16 Section 6.16... EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT Procedures for Considering Applications § 6.16 Judicial review. Judicial review of final agency decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2). ...

14 CFR 1250.110 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 5 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 1250.110 Section 1250.110... PROGRAMS OF NASA-EFFECTUATION OF TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 § 1250.110 Judicial review. Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603...

31 CFR 28.630 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 28.630 Section 28.630 Money and Finance: Treasury Office of the Secretary of the Treasury NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS... Judicial review. Action taken pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 1682 is subject to judicial review as provided in 20 U...

14 CFR 1264.141 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 5 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 1264.141 Section 1264.141... PENALTIES ACT OF 1986 § 1264.141 Judicial review. Section 3805 of Title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the authority head...

31 CFR 16.42 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 16.42 Section 16.42... FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT OF 1986 § 16.42 Judicial review. Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the...

32 CFR 776.67 - Judicial and legal officers.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 32 National Defense 5 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial and legal officers. 776.67 Section 776... Rules of Professional Conduct § 776.67 Judicial and legal officers. (a) Judicial and legal officers. A... officer, hearing officer, adjudicatory officer, or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or...

32 CFR 776.67 - Judicial and legal officers.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 32 National Defense 5 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial and legal officers. 776.67 Section 776... Rules of Professional Conduct § 776.67 Judicial and legal officers. (a) Judicial and legal officers. A... officer, hearing officer, adjudicatory officer, or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or...

32 CFR 776.67 - Judicial and legal officers.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 32 National Defense 5 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial and legal officers. 776.67 Section 776... Rules of Professional Conduct § 776.67 Judicial and legal officers. (a) Judicial and legal officers. A... officer, hearing officer, adjudicatory officer, or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or...

77 FR 72885 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-06

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of... Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief...

78 FR 64012 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-10-25

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of... Columbus Circle NE., Washington, DC 20544. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and...

78 FR 45564 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-07-29

... States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502- 1820. Dated: July 24, 2013. Jonathan C. Rose... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of...

77 FR 72885 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-06

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of..., Coral Gables, FL 33146. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules...

Teaching about Judicial Review. ERIC Digest.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Patrick, John J.

Judicial review is a fundamental facet of constitutional government in the United States. Invented during the founding of the United States, judicial review has spread to most constitutional democracies of the world. This digest discusses: (1) the concept of judicial review; (2) the origin of this concept; (3) the uses of this concept in U.S.…

Which Procedural Parts of the IEP Process Are the Most Judicially Vulnerable?

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Zirkel, Perry A.; Hetrick, Allyse

2017-01-01

To provide a missing piece to the legal foundation of professional development and practice for the individualized education program (IEP) process, the authors report the results of a comprehensive systematic analysis of court decisions specific to IEP-related procedural violations after the 2004 amendments of the Individuals With Disabilities…

An Analysis of Due Process Cases and Doctrines: Implications for School Districts

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Bleakney, William; Glass, Thomas

1977-01-01

Identifies criteria relating to procedural due process from current judicial opinions, rulings of state attorneys general, and state administrative codes; applies the criteria to an analysis of school policies; and suggests guidelines for public school districts in the assessment, implementation, and revision of policies relating to procedural due…

[The concept of mental health deterioration in light of decisions by higher judicial bodies].

PubMed

Kaya, Ahsen; Aktaş, Ekin Özgür

2014-01-01

Important arrangements were made to protect an individuals' sexual safety in the Turkish Penal Code. During judgments of sexual crimes, the witnesses of medical experts are usually used for evidence collection and for researching whether the crimes were aggravated. Due to this, reports are frequently requested from all physicians in all fields of medicine in their daily clinical practices by judicial authorities. Following implementation of the new Turkish Penal Code, the concept of mental health deterioration was frequently discussed and is still a discussed topic in the fields of both law and medicine in terms of crimes against sexual immunity. It is believed that subjects discussed in this article will provide important information for both adult, child and adolescent mental health professionals in terms of drawing attention to the importance of the medicolegal evaluations which are frequently requested from psychiatrists in their daily clinical practice and in terms of providing an evaluation of the concept of mental health deterioration in light of judicial decisions. Regarding the process from the beginning of application to the present, prejudications reduce questions about how the concept must be evaluated and what the meaning of the concept is. In this study, the decisions of Higher Judicial Bodies were researched and situations relating to how concepts must be evaluated and the meaning of the concept of mental health deterioration today in accordance with the prejudications were presented.

[Interest in periodic health examinations for young people in the judicial system].

PubMed

North, S

2003-12-01

The Centre for Health Examinations (CES) in Roche sur Yon has experience with the Periodic Health Examinations (EPS) on population groups in fragile or disadvantaged situations and young people in the process of integration. Minors followed by the Judicial Protection of the Youth (PJJ) are in a preoccupying state of health. Professionals led a working group for reflection from two institutions working in health management. This study aims to explore the representations of young people's health under the care of the judicial system in order to evaluate the pertinence of EPS in the health course of youth in the judicial correctional system. 23 semi-directed interviews allowed the team to show that if the youth have a somatic definition of health, they are nevertheless open to a comprehensive approach to health. Their parents are unavoidable reference points. The readability of the speakers in terms of mental health remains average. The resources in health documentation are under-utilised. The treating doctor remains a special partner for health. The knowledge of social rights is insufficient. The notion of risk and the need for more information concerns the areas of drunk driving, sexuality and road rage. The EPS very logically places itself in the health course of the youth. The partnership between the health and the justice systems should be constructed in the framework of a convention between the two institutions.

46 CFR 1.01-30 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 46 Shipping 1 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 1.01-30 Section 1.01-30 Shipping COAST... Judicial review. (a) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit any party from seeking judicial review of any Commandant's decision or action taken pursuant to the regulations in this part or part 5 of...

77 FR 72884 - Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-12-06

... JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of... but not participation. DATES: April 2-3, 2013. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: United States...

7 CFR 1.215 - Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or administrative proceedings in which the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or... the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Appearance of USDA Employees as Witnesses in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings § 1.215 Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or...

7 CFR 1.215 - Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or administrative proceedings in which the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or... the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Appearance of USDA Employees as Witnesses in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings § 1.215 Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or...

7 CFR 1.215 - Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or administrative proceedings in which the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or... the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Appearance of USDA Employees as Witnesses in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings § 1.215 Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or...

7 CFR 1.215 - Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or administrative proceedings in which the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or... the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Appearance of USDA Employees as Witnesses in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings § 1.215 Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or...

7 CFR 1.215 - Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or administrative proceedings in which the...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or... the Secretary of Agriculture ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Appearance of USDA Employees as Witnesses in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings § 1.215 Subpoenas duces tecum for USDA records in judicial or...

28 CFR 42.601 - Purpose and application.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 42.601 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NONDISCRIMINATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY; POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Procedures for Complaints of Employment Discrimination Filed Against Recipients of... procedures for processing and resolving complaints of employment discrimination filed against recipients of...

78 FR 55171 - Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Processing Sweet Corn Crop Insurance Provisions

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2013-09-10

... good farming practices, as applicable, must be exhausted before any action against FCIC for judicial... insurance program are the same for all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For...

37 CFR 104.42 - Finality of settlement or denial of claims.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ADMINISTRATION LEGAL PROCESSES Tort Claims § 104.42 Finality of... or denial of any claim under this subpart may be considered final for the purpose of judicial review. ...

15 CFR 930.116 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... FEDERAL CONSISTENCY WITH APPROVED COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS Secretarial Mediation § 930.116 Judicial... implicitly to limit the parties' use of alternate forums to resolve disputes. Specifically, judicial review...

28 CFR 68.57 - Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under section 274B. 68.57 Section 68.57 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS...

28 CFR 68.57 - Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under section 274B. 68.57 Section 68.57 Judicial... BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IN CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS, UNFAIR...

28 CFR 68.57 - Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under section 274B. 68.57 Section 68.57 Judicial... BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IN CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS, UNFAIR...

28 CFR 68.57 - Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under section 274B. 68.57 Section 68.57 Judicial... BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IN CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS, UNFAIR...

28 CFR 68.57 - Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial review of the final agency order of an Administrative Law Judge in cases arising under section 274B. 68.57 Section 68.57 Judicial... BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IN CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS, UNFAIR...

IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN LITIGATION CONCERNING ACCESS TO HIGH-COST DRUGS.

PubMed

Aleman, Alicia; Perez Galan, Ana

2017-01-01

The impact of health technology assessment (HTA) in the judicialization of the right of health has not been deeply studied in Latin American countries. The purpose of this study is to review the process of judicialization of the access to high cost drugs in Uruguay and assess the impact HTAs have had on this process. The methodology used for this study included a comprehensive literature search in electronic databases, local journals, internal documents developed in the Ministry of Health, as well as conducting interviews with key informants. Judicialization of the access of high cost drugs has been increasing since 2010. The strategy of the Ministry of Health of Uruguay to decrease this problem included the organization of roundtables with judges and other stakeholders on the basis of HTA, the training of defense lawyers in the use and interpretation of HTA, and the participation of a professional who develops HTA in the preparation of the defense arguments. A year after the implementation of this strategy, 25 percent of writs of protection were won by the Ministry of Health. Even though the strategy implemented was effective in reducing the loss of litigations, it was not effective in reducing the growing number of writs of protection. It is essential to address this problem in a broad debate and to promote understanding between the parties.

Judicial case management and the custody and access assessment: melding the approaches.

PubMed

Leverette, J; Crowe, T; Wenglensky, R; Dunbar, M

1997-08-01

The presence of the Unified Family Court, with procedures emphasizing judicial case management and settlement in custody disputes, provided an opportunity to combine these practices with those of a university hospital-based family court clinic experienced in the provision of custody assessments. Specifically, a process integrating the clinical custody assessment with the work of counsel and court procedures was developed. This format, incorporating the preparation of a clinical settlement conference brief, was then evaluated with emphasis on time management, outcome in relation to settlement or trial, and the effect of clinical assessment at critical points in the combined endeavour. Seventy-two judicial referrals conducted using this format were reviewed. To assess efficiency, we determined time intervals to various points in the process and compared them to previous local practice. Settlement rates, recorded incrementally to mark each component's contribution, were compared with rates noted in the literature. Assessment functions were identified according to the point of resolution of the dispute and in a manner to facilitate comparison with previously published work. The format resulted in 50% of cases settling without trial in under 5 months, a minimum settlement rate of 50%, and confirmed the ability of clinical assessment to contribute flexibly to dispute resolution in several conciliation venues and at trial. Combining legal and mental health efforts can results in more efficient use of resources and a substantial diversion of cases from continuing litigation. While altering the process of clinical assessments enhances such findings, further work is required to assure appropriate selection criteria for various intervention formats.

The collision of healthcare and corporate law in a hospital closure case.

PubMed

Himes, S M

2001-01-01

This Article analyzes potential conflicts that arise from both the judicial and administrative approval processes that govern the closure of charitable hospitals through a sale of all or substantially all of their assets. Examining the recent closure attempt by the Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital as an example, the Article highlights the various public health and corporate law issues that are raised when a not-for-profit hospital seeks closure. The Article thoroughly discusses both the statutorily and judicially required approval schemes applicable to the closure of charitable hospitals. The Article also suggests ways in which these conflicts might be avoided or remedied, as well as gives advice regarding hospital board decisionmaking.

The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: lessons from the past and their modern consequences.

PubMed

Howe, Mark L; Knott, Lauren M

2015-01-01

The capability of adult and child witnesses to accurately recollect events from the past and provide reliable testimony has been hotly debated for more than 100 years. Prominent legal cases of the 1980s and 1990s sparked lengthy debates and important research questions surrounding the fallibility and general reliability of memory. But what lessons have we learned, some 35 years later, about the role of memory in the judicial system? In this review, we focus on what we now know about the consequences of the fallibility of memory for legal proceedings. We present a brief historical overview of false memories that focuses on three critical forensic areas that changed memory research: children as eyewitnesses, historic sexual abuse and eyewitness (mis)identification. We revisit some of the prominent trials of the 1980s and 1990s to not only consider the role false memories have played in judicial decisions, but also to see how this has helped us understand memory today. Finally, we consider the way in which the research on memory (true and false) has been successfully integrated into some courtroom procedures.

A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.

PubMed

Ferrara, Santo Davide; Ananian, Viviana; Baccino, Eric; Boscolo-Berto, Rafael; Domenici, Ranieri; Hernàndez-Cueto, Claudio; Mendelson, George; Norelli, Gian Aristide; Ranavaya, Mohammed; Terranova, Claudio; Vieira, Duarte Nuno; Viel, Guido; Villanueva, Enrique; Zoia, Riccardo; Sartori, Giuseppe

2016-09-01

Personal injury is a legal term for a physical or psychic injury suffered by the plaintiff under civil and/or tort law. With reference to non-pecuniary damages, the evidence itself of physical and/or psychic injury is not sufficient for damage compensation. The process of ascertaining impairments and/or disabilities which pertain to the "personal sphere" of the individual, such as pain and suffering, loss of amenity, and/or psycho-existential damage, poses particular difficulties in relation to the obtainment of scientific evidence. The "immateriality" and the subjective connotation of the personal sphere are, in themselves, critical issues. The clinical data obtained from the neuropsychological ascertainment find their essential prerequisite in the active participation of the examinee who, in legally relevant contexts (criminal law, civil law, insurance), may be "affected" by personal interests. The present manuscript presents a novel interdisciplinary methodology, experimented on a series of judicial and extra-judicial cases, aimed at the attainment of objectivity and accuracy eligible in relation to the judicial settlement of cases and other matters involving the ascertainment of peculiar aspects of non-pecuniary damage.

The Child-Centered Social Worker and the Sexually Abused Child: Pathway to Healing.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Anderson, Lorie Elizabeth; Weston, Elisabeth A.; Doueck, Howard J.; Krause, Denise J.

2002-01-01

In an effort to assist the sexually abused child throughout the court process, the authors propose the concept of a child-centered social worker committed to minimizing the potential for system-induced trauma by assisting the sexually abused child through the judicial process and providing clinical treatment as well. (Contains 68 references.) (GCP)

The Impact of Judicial Reform on Crime Victimization and Trust in Institutions in Mexico.

PubMed

Blanco, Luisa

2016-01-01

This article studies the impact of judicial reform in Mexico. It does so using a survey about crime victimization and perceptions of insecurity (Encuesta Nacional Sobre la Inseguridad [ENSI]) collected in 2005, 2008, and 2009 in 11 Mexican cities, 3 of which implemented the reform in 2007 and 2008. This analysis shows that judicial reform not only reduces victimization but also lowers perceptions of security. Although we find that judicial reform has a negative effect on trust in the local and federal police, judicial reform reduces the probability of being asked by the transit police for a bribe.

28 CFR 540.51 - Procedures.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Judicial Administration BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT CONTACT WITH... of the Bureau of Prisons. (b) Preparation of the list of visitors. (1) Staff shall ask each inmate to submit during the admission-orientation process a list of proposed visitors. After appropriate...

28 CFR 22.28 - Use of data identifiable to a private person for judicial, legislative or administrative purposes.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONFIDENTIALITY OF IDENTIFIABLE RESEARCH AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION § 22.28 Use of...) Research or statistical information identifiable to a private person shall be immune from legal process and...

A New Court for the Little Guy

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Star, Jack

1973-01-01

The Pro Se Court, a courtroom for the little guy'', is also an ideal courtroom for elementary students because decisions are explained in layman's terms. In this special court, children can begin to understand the judicial process through firsthand observation. (Author)

28 CFR 22.28 - Use of data identifiable to a private person for judicial, legislative or administrative purposes.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONFIDENTIALITY OF IDENTIFIABLE RESEARCH AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION § 22.28 Use of...) Research or statistical information identifiable to a private person shall be immune from legal process and...

Medical futility in end-of-life care: report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.

PubMed

1999-03-10

Use of life-sustaining or invasive interventions in patients in a persistent vegetative state or who are terminally ill may only prolong the dying process. What constitutes futile intervention remains a point of controversy in the medical literature and in clinical practice. In clinical practice, controversy arises when the patient or proxy and the physician have discrepant values or goals of care. Since definitions of futile care are value laden, universal consensus on futile care is unlikely to be achieved. Rather, the American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs recommends a process-based approach to futility determinations. The process includes at least 4 steps aimed at deliberation and resolution including all involved parties, 2 steps aimed at securing alternatives in the case of irreconcilable differences, and a final step aimed at closure when all alternatives have been exhausted. The approach is placed in the context of the circumstances in which futility claims are made, the difficulties of defining medical futility, and a discussion of how best to implement a policy on futility.

28 CFR 552.31 - Negotiations.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Negotiations. 552.31 Section 552.31... Situation Management § 552.31 Negotiations. The Warden is not ordinarily involved directly in the negotiation process. Instead, this responsibility is ordinarily assigned to a team of individuals specifically...

28 CFR 552.31 - Negotiations.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Negotiations. 552.31 Section 552.31... Situation Management § 552.31 Negotiations. The Warden is not ordinarily involved directly in the negotiation process. Instead, this responsibility is ordinarily assigned to a team of individuals specifically...

28 CFR 552.31 - Negotiations.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Negotiations. 552.31 Section 552.31... Situation Management § 552.31 Negotiations. The Warden is not ordinarily involved directly in the negotiation process. Instead, this responsibility is ordinarily assigned to a team of individuals specifically...

28 CFR 552.31 - Negotiations.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Negotiations. 552.31 Section 552.31... Situation Management § 552.31 Negotiations. The Warden is not ordinarily involved directly in the negotiation process. Instead, this responsibility is ordinarily assigned to a team of individuals specifically...

28 CFR 552.31 - Negotiations.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Negotiations. 552.31 Section 552.31... Situation Management § 552.31 Negotiations. The Warden is not ordinarily involved directly in the negotiation process. Instead, this responsibility is ordinarily assigned to a team of individuals specifically...

Medical Information Management System

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

Alterescu, S.; Hipkins, K. R.; Friedman, C. A.

1979-01-01

On-line interactive information processing system easily and rapidly handles all aspects of data management related to patient care. General purpose system is flexible enough to be applied to other data management situations found in areas such as occupational safety data, judicial information, or personnel records.

A New Perspective on Teaching Constitutional Law

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Rosenblum, Robert

1977-01-01

The author suggests that a major failure of most law schools and traditional undergraduate constitutional law courses is that they omit an adequate analysis of the political nature of the judicial process. Political influences on a variety of court cases are discussed. (LBH)

28 CFR 26.22 - Requirements.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEATH SENTENCES PROCEDURES Certification Process for State... of death in state postconviction proceedings. As provided in 28 U.S.C. 2261(c) and (d), the mechanism... represented the prisoner at trial unless the prisoner and counsel expressly request continued representation...

32 CFR 701.12 - FOIA appeals/litigation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... Counsel, and the Associate General Counsel (Management). (1) In their capacity, appellate authorities will... activities in the areas of business and commercial law, real and personal property law, intellectual property... right of judicial remedy. Nonetheless, the appellate authority will continue to process the case...

40 CFR 1601.23 - Appeals of denials.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 1601.23 Protection of Environment CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD PROCEDURES FOR... requester may appeal the denial to: FOIA Appeals Officer, United States Chemical Safety and Hazard..., the request will be processed promptly in accordance with the decision on appeal. (d) Judicial review...

40 CFR 1601.23 - Appeals of denials.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 1601.23 Protection of Environment CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD PROCEDURES FOR... requester may appeal the denial to: FOIA Appeals Officer, United States Chemical Safety and Hazard..., the request will be processed promptly in accordance with the decision on appeal. (d) Judicial review...

40 CFR 1601.23 - Appeals of denials.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 1601.23 Protection of Environment CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD PROCEDURES FOR... requester may appeal the denial to: FOIA Appeals Officer, United States Chemical Safety and Hazard..., the request will be processed promptly in accordance with the decision on appeal. (d) Judicial review...

28 CFR 17.17 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION AND ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION Administration § 17.17 Judicial proceedings. (a)(1) Any Department official or organization receiving an order or subpoena from a federal or state court to produce classified information...

28 CFR 17.17 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION AND ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION Administration § 17.17 Judicial proceedings. (a)(1) Any Department official or organization receiving an order or subpoena from a federal or state court to produce classified information...

28 CFR 17.17 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION AND ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION Administration § 17.17 Judicial proceedings. (a)(1) Any Department official or organization receiving an order or subpoena from a federal or state court to produce classified information...

28 CFR 17.17 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION AND ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION Administration § 17.17 Judicial proceedings. (a)(1) Any Department official or organization receiving an order or subpoena from a federal or state court to produce classified information...

28 CFR 17.17 - Judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION AND ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION Administration § 17.17 Judicial proceedings. (a)(1) Any Department official or organization receiving an order or subpoena from a federal or state court to produce classified information...

7 CFR 1580.506 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 10 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Judicial review. 1580.506 Section 1580.506 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR FARMERS § 1580.506 Judicial review. Any producer...

5 CFR 1201.133 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 5 Administrative Personnel 3 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Judicial review. 1201.133 Section 1201.133 Administrative Personnel MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES Procedures for Original Jurisdiction Cases Special Counsel Corrective Actions § 1201.133 Judicial...

5 CFR 1201.133 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 5 Administrative Personnel 3 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 1201.133 Section 1201.133 Administrative Personnel MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES Procedures for Original Jurisdiction Cases Special Counsel Corrective Actions § 1201.133 Judicial...

Representation and Re-Presentation in Litigation Science

PubMed Central

Jasanoff, Sheila

2008-01-01

Federal appellate courts have devised several criteria to help judges distinguish between reliable and unreliable scientific evidence. The best known are the U.S. Supreme Court’s criteria offered in 1993 in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This article focuses on another criterion, offered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, that instructs judges to assign lower credibility to “litigation science” than to science generated before litigation. In this article I argue that the criterion-based approach to judicial screening of scientific evidence is deeply flawed. That approach buys into the faulty premise that there are external criteria, lying outside the legal process, by which judges can distinguish between good and bad science. It erroneously assumes that judges can ascertain the appropriate criteria and objectively apply them to challenged evidence before litigation unfolds, and before methodological disputes are sorted out during that process. Judicial screening does not take into account the dynamics of litigation itself, including gaming by the parties and framing by judges, as constitutive factors in the production and representation of knowledge. What is admitted through judicial screening, in other words, is not precisely what a jury would see anyway. Courts are sites of repeated re-representations of scientific knowledge. In sum, the screening approach fails to take account of the wealth of existing scholarship on the production and validation of scientific facts. An unreflective application of that approach thus puts courts at risk of relying upon a “junk science” of the nature of scientific knowledge. PMID:18197311

Legal Terms Used in Reception Order and their Relevance to Judicial Process.

PubMed

Subramanian, Nakkeerar; Ramanathan, Rajkumar; Kumar, Venkatesh Madhan; Chellappan, Dhanabalan Kalingarayan Palayam; Ramasamy, Jeyaprakash

2016-01-01

Law governs the admission and management of involuntary admissions of mentally ill persons who are admitted under the provisions of the mental health act. The court directs the doctor to take charge of such persons. In the further dealings of such person the medical officer of the psychiatric facility comes across legal terms, which require understanding so that patients could be dealt with properly. Various terms such as accused, under police custody, judicial custody, remand prisoner, or under trial prisoner are used to denote their legal status. It is imperative for the medical officer to understand the nuances in the meanings of these terms. There are many times when the relevant section under which the admission is ordered is not found in the reception order. In these cases the terminology by which the patient is mentioned throws a light on the status of the patient. Towards this aim a study was carried out to assess the awareness and understanding of such terms by the faculty and post- graduates of a tertiary care hospital that deals with the admission and care of such patients. They were administered a questionnaire containing these terms and asked to provide the meaning of these terms. The results showed that nearly half the faculty and students were not having clarity in awareness or understanding of the terms. Hence these terms and their meanings were gleaned from various judgments. The proper meaning of these terms and their use in judicial process and their importance is discussed.

Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.

PubMed

Jasanoff, Sheila

2008-01-01

Federal appellate courts have devised several criteria to help judges distinguish between reliable and unreliable scientific evidence. The best known are the U.S. Supreme Court's criteria offered in 1993 in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This article focuses on another criterion, offered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, that instructs judges to assign lower credibility to "litigation science" than to science generated before litigation. In this article I argue that the criterion-based approach to judicial screening of scientific evidence is deeply flawed. That approach buys into the faulty premise that there are external criteria, lying outside the legal process, by which judges can distinguish between good and bad science. It erroneously assumes that judges can ascertain the appropriate criteria and objectively apply them to challenged evidence before litigation unfolds, and before methodological disputes are sorted out during that process. Judicial screening does not take into account the dynamics of litigation itself, including gaming by the parties and framing by judges, as constitutive factors in the production and representation of knowledge. What is admitted through judicial screening, in other words, is not precisely what a jury would see anyway. Courts are sites of repeated re-representations of scientific knowledge. In sum, the screening approach fails to take account of the wealth of existing scholarship on the production and validation of scientific facts. An unreflective application of that approach thus puts courts at risk of relying upon a "junk science" of the nature of scientific knowledge.

Judicialization 2.0: Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time.

PubMed

Biehl, João; Socal, Mariana P; Gauri, Varun; Diniz, Debora; Medeiros, Marcelo; Rondon, Gabriela; Amon, Joseph J

2018-05-21

Over the past two decades, debate over the whys, the hows, and the effects of the ever-expanding phenomenon of right-to-health litigation ('judicialization') throughout Latin America have been marked by polarised arguments and limited information. In contrast to claims of judicialization as a positive or negative trend, less attention has been paid to ways to better understand the phenomenon in real time. In this article, we propose a new approach-Judicialization 2.0-that recognises judicialization as an integral part of democratic life. This approach seeks to expand access to information about litigation on access to medicines (and health care generally) in order to better characterise the complexity of the phenomenon and thus inform new research and more robust public discussions. Drawing from our multi-disciplinary perspectives and field experiences in highly judicialized contexts, we thus describe a new multi-source, multi-stakeholder mixed-method approach designed to capture the patterns and heterogeneity of judicialization and understand its medical and socio-political impact in real time, along with its counterfactuals. By facilitating greater data availability and open access, we can drive advancements towards transparent and participatory priority setting, as well as accountability mechanisms that promote quality universal health coverage.

32 CFR 286.25 - Judicial actions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROGRAM REGULATION Release and Processing Procedures...-United States government source information. A requester may bring suit in a U.S. District Court to compel the release of records obtained from a non-government source or records based on information...

28 CFR 701.14 - Classified information.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Classified information. 701.14 Section... UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT § 701.14 Classified information. In processing a request for information that is classified or classifiable under Executive Order 12356 or any other Executive Order...

"Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz": Student Due Process Rights and Judicial Deference to Academic Dismissals.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Brock, Allan D.

1979-01-01

The "Horowitz" case is consistent with the general reluctance of courts to sustain constitutional challenges to decisions by educators in academic matters. Available from Willamette University College of Law, Salem, OR 97301. (Author)

75 FR 55463 - Iraq Stabilization and Insurgency Sanctions Regulations

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-09-13

... attachment, garnishment, or execution in their respective domestic legal systems, unless the proceeds are.... Section 576.411 states that the mere compliance with certain legal, administrative, or procedural... reinvestment of certain funds. 576.507 Provision of certain legal services authorized. 576.508 Judicial process...

Academic Integrity Policy: The Journey

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Spain, Judith Winters; Robles, Marcel Marie

2011-01-01

An undergraduate student breaks into a professor's office and steals the answers to an exam; the university initiates only process available--discipline pursuant to regulations governing student behavior through judicial affairs. An undergraduate student fabricates lab data and is flunked for the course; the student initiates only process…

Pro Se Court: A Simulation Game

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Gallagher, Arlene F.; Hartstein, Elliott

1973-01-01

The complexities of courtroom procedure and rule of evidence often dissuade the classroom teacher from using the mock trial strategy. This model has been designed for role playing and for focusing on the judicial decision-making process: deliberation on the issues of a case. (Author/JB)

28 CFR 92.8 - Providing recruitment services.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Providing recruitment services. 92.8... POLICING SERVICES (COPS) Police Recruitment Program Guidelines § 92.8 Providing recruitment services. The... populations to a police department. The recruitment strategies employed may include: (a) A process for...

40 CFR 173.9 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 40 Protection of Environment 23 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 173.9 Section 173.9 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) PESTICIDE PROGRAMS PROCEDURES GOVERNING... Judicial review. The State may appeal an order rescinding, in whole or in part, its primary enforcement...

31 CFR 357.23 - Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity. 357.23 Section 357.23 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance....23 Judicial proceedings—sovereign immunity. (a) Department and Federal Reserve Banks not proper...

31 CFR 357.23 - Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity. 357.23 Section 357.23 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance....23 Judicial proceedings—sovereign immunity. (a) Department and Federal Reserve Banks not proper...

31 CFR 357.23 - Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity. 357.23 Section 357.23 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance....23 Judicial proceedings—sovereign immunity. (a) Department and Federal Reserve Banks not proper...

Selected Regional Judicial Officer Cases, 2005 - Present

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

This dataset contains selected cases involving EPA's Regional Judicial Officers (RJOs) from 2005 to present. EPA's Regional Judicial Officers (RJOs) perform adjudicatory functions and act as Agency neutrals in administrative cases. EPA's RJOs are senior attorneys with backgrounds in EPA enforcement, general law, or both.

19 CFR 152.16 - Judicial changes in classification.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... OF THE TREASURY (CONTINUED) CLASSIFICATION AND APPRAISEMENT OF MERCHANDISE Classification § 152.16 Judicial changes in classification. The following procedures apply to changes in classification made by... 19 Customs Duties 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Judicial changes in classification. 152.16 Section...

The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: Lessons from the past and their modern consequences

PubMed Central

Howe, Mark L.; Knott, Lauren M.

2015-01-01

The capability of adult and child witnesses to accurately recollect events from the past and provide reliable testimony has been hotly debated for more than 100 years. Prominent legal cases of the 1980s and 1990s sparked lengthy debates and important research questions surrounding the fallibility and general reliability of memory. But what lessons have we learned, some 35 years later, about the role of memory in the judicial system? In this review, we focus on what we now know about the consequences of the fallibility of memory for legal proceedings. We present a brief historical overview of false memories that focuses on three critical forensic areas that changed memory research: children as eyewitnesses, historic sexual abuse and eyewitness (mis)identification. We revisit some of the prominent trials of the 1980s and 1990s to not only consider the role false memories have played in judicial decisions, but also to see how this has helped us understand memory today. Finally, we consider the way in which the research on memory (true and false) has been successfully integrated into some courtroom procedures. PMID:25706242

[Safeguarding of the social right to pharmaceutical assistance in the state of São Paulo, Brazil].

PubMed

Marques, Silvia Badim; Dallari, Sueli Gandolfi

2007-02-01

To evaluate how the Judicial Power safeguards the social right to pharmaceutical assistance as well as the relationships between the legal and political systems to safeguard this right. There were assessed decisions in lawsuits of drug supply in the state of São Paulo, Southern Brazil, between 1997 and 2004. Discourse of the Collective Subject of procedural actors was the methodological approach used. In 96.4% of the cases analyzed, judges' discourse sentenced the State. In these cases, the State was obliged to provide drugs exactly as requested by the plaintiff, even when drugs were not registered in the National Health Surveillance Agency (9.6% of cases). Also, 100% of the lawsuits were proposed by individual plaintiffs; in 77.4% of the cases the plaintiff requested an specific drug of a specific pharmaceutical company; and in 93,5%, the drugs were provided to the plaintiff through an urgent preliminary order. The Judicial Power is not taking into account in its decisions political elements of drug policies, established to enforce the social right to pharmaceutical assistance. The Judicial Power is hindering the collective decision making process by the political system, prioritizing plaintiffs' individual needs over community interests.

[Giving medico-legal opinions in cases with suspicion of medical mistake.part 1. between medicine and justice.

PubMed

Chowaniec, Czesław; Chowaniec, Małgorzata; Wilk, Mateusz

2017-01-01

Creating medico-legal opinion is a sophisticated investigative, analytical, decision-making and creative process. Forensic medicine specialist in cooperation with clinical medicine consultants, on the basis of evidence analysis, which was gathered during procedures and contained in the acts has to create an objective and essential opinion. This opinion is a vital, very important and irreplaceable proof in every case. Judicial body consults with forensic medicine specialist or specialists if there are circumstances for settlement of which there is a need of classified informations - art. 193 of Penalty Code. Forensic medicine specialists face many difficulties which may have effect on quality, positiveness of opinion, compliance with the deadline, increasing expectancy of judicial body or sides. It is very difficult to find clinical specialists which except their clinical knowledge have basic knowledge about law, the role and duties of an court expert. In this article we discuss creating-opinion problems, role and position of court expert in confrontation with expectations of judicial body and the Justice with particular emphasis on medical mistakes and assessment of medical proceedings. We show the complexity of creating of medical opinions, especially these institutional.

20 CFR 418.1305 - What is not an initial determination regarding your income-related monthly adjustment amount?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... Amount Determinations and the Administrative Review Process § 418.1305 What is not an initial... process as provided by §§ 418.1320 through 418.1325 and §§ 418.1340 through 418.1355, and they are not subject to judicial review. These actions include, but are not limited to, our dismissal of a request for...

14 CFR 14.29 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Judicial review. 14.29 Section 14.29 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURAL RULES RULES IMPLEMENTING THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT OF 1980 Procedures for Considering Applications § 14.29 Judicial...

14 CFR 14.29 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Judicial review. 14.29 Section 14.29 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURAL RULES RULES IMPLEMENTING THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT OF 1980 Procedures for Considering Applications § 14.29 Judicial...

14 CFR 14.29 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Judicial review. 14.29 Section 14.29 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURAL RULES RULES IMPLEMENTING THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT OF 1980 Procedures for Considering Applications § 14.29 Judicial...

14 CFR 14.29 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 14.29 Section 14.29 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURAL RULES RULES IMPLEMENTING THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT OF 1980 Procedures for Considering Applications § 14.29 Judicial...

14 CFR 14.29 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 14 Aeronautics and Space 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Judicial review. 14.29 Section 14.29 Aeronautics and Space FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURAL RULES RULES IMPLEMENTING THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT OF 1980 Procedures for Considering Applications § 14.29 Judicial...

31 CFR 357.23 - Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity. 357.23 Section 357.23 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance...) § 357.23 Judicial proceedings—sovereign immunity. (a) Department and Federal Reserve Banks not proper...

31 CFR 357.23 - Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial proceedings-sovereign immunity. 357.23 Section 357.23 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance... Securities System (Legacy Treasury Direct) § 357.23 Judicial proceedings—sovereign immunity. (a) Department...

22 CFR 1101.15 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 22 Foreign Relations 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 true Judicial review. 1101.15 Section 1101.15 Foreign Relations INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES AND MEXICO, UNITED STATES SECTION PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 § 1101.15 Judicial review. After having exhausted all administrative remedies set...

29 CFR 785.7 - Judicial construction.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 29 Labor 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial construction. 785.7 Section 785.7 Labor Regulations Relating to Labor (Continued) WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR STATEMENTS OF GENERAL... Hours Worked § 785.7 Judicial construction. The United States Supreme Court originally stated that...

29 CFR 785.7 - Judicial construction.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 29 Labor 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial construction. 785.7 Section 785.7 Labor Regulations Relating to Labor (Continued) WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR STATEMENTS OF GENERAL... Hours Worked § 785.7 Judicial construction. The United States Supreme Court originally stated that...

29 CFR 785.7 - Judicial construction.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 29 Labor 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial construction. 785.7 Section 785.7 Labor Regulations Relating to Labor (Continued) WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR STATEMENTS OF GENERAL... Hours Worked § 785.7 Judicial construction. The United States Supreme Court originally stated that...

37 CFR 204.9 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 204.9 Section 204.9 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights COPYRIGHT OFFICE, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS COPYRIGHT OFFICE AND PROCEDURES PRIVACY ACT: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES § 204.9 Judicial review. Within two years of the...

Judicial Checks and Balances

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

La Porta, Rafael; Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio; Pop-Eleches, Cristian; Shleifer, Andrei

2004-01-01

In the Anglo-American constitutional tradition, judicial checks and balances are often seen as crucial guarantees of freedom. Hayek distinguishes two ways in which the judiciary provides such checks and balances: judicial independence and constitutional review. We create a new database of constitutional rules in 71 countries that reflect these…

22 CFR 1101.15 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... 22 Foreign Relations 2 2011-04-01 2009-04-01 true Judicial review. 1101.15 Section 1101.15 Foreign Relations INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES AND MEXICO, UNITED STATES SECTION PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 § 1101.15 Judicial review. After having exhausted all administrative remedies set...

22 CFR 1101.15 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 22 Foreign Relations 2 2012-04-01 2009-04-01 true Judicial review. 1101.15 Section 1101.15 Foreign Relations INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES AND MEXICO, UNITED STATES SECTION PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 § 1101.15 Judicial review. After having exhausted all administrative remedies set...

33 CFR 140.30 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... review provisions of section 23 of the Act (43 U.S.C. 1349). ... 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 140.30 Section... CONTINENTAL SHELF ACTIVITIES GENERAL General § 140.30 Judicial review. (a) Nothing in this subchapter shall be...

10 CFR 501.69 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 10 Energy 4 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 501.69 Section 501.69 Energy DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (CONTINUED) ALTERNATE FUELS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SANCTIONS Exemptions and Certifications § 501.69 Judicial review. Any person aggrieved by any order issued by OFE under this subpart, must...

44 CFR 295.43 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... Judicial review. As an alternative to arbitration, a Claimant dissatisfied with the outcome of an Administrative Appeal may seek judicial review of the decision by bringing a civil lawsuit against FEMA in the... of the date that appears on the Administrative Appeal decision. The court may only consider evidence...

44 CFR 295.43 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... Judicial review. As an alternative to arbitration, a Claimant dissatisfied with the outcome of an Administrative Appeal may seek judicial review of the decision by bringing a civil lawsuit against FEMA in the... of the date that appears on the Administrative Appeal decision. The court may only consider evidence...

Counselor Role and Responsibilities in Special Education Hearings.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Humes, Charles W.

1982-01-01

Presents areas requiring counselor testimony in special education hearings. Discusses types of appeals proceedings including mediation, administrative, and judicial. Describes the role of the hearing officer and delineates hearing issues. Lists situations and behaviors that the counselor should be aware of during the hearing process. (RC)

28 CFR 34.108 - Selection of reviewers.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

....108 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OJJDP COMPETITION AND PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES Peer Review § 34.108 Selection of reviewers. The Program Manager, through the Director of the OJJDP program... by the Administrator. The selection process for peer reviewers is detailed in the OJJDP “Peer Review...

Disciplinary versus Academic Sanctions in Higher Education: A Doomed Dichotomy?

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Dutile, Fernand N.

2003-01-01

Explains that courts have generally subjected disciplinary action to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, while academic sanctions have garnered greater deference. Examines the judicial history of this dual track, establishes the difficulty of characterizing as either disciplinary or academic the countless situations reflecting…

Prescribed burning in southwestern ponderosa pine

Treesearch

Stephen S Sackett; Sally M Haase; Michael G Harrington

1996-01-01

Prescribed burning is an effective way of restoring the fire process to ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) ecosystems of the Southwest. If used judiciously, fire can provide valuable effects for hazard reduction, natural regeneration, thinning, vegetation revitalization, and in general, better forest health. Relatively short burning...

Women Judges--Why So Few?

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Ness, Susan; Wechsler, Fredrica

1979-01-01

Examines the Omnibus Judgeship Act and the process of making judicial appointments in an effort to explain why there are so few women judges. Suggests that the restricted number of women lawyers, sex discrimination within the legal profession, and lack of political power are responsible for this condition. (SF)

Entitled to What? Public Policy and the Responsibilities of Early Intervention.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Brown, Wesley; Conroy, Maureen

1999-01-01

Examines early-intervention entitlements currently extended by all states. Perspectives from the legislative process, federal and state implementation, judicial interpretation, and professional views are included. Distinctions among the key provisions for differing early intervention service systems are presented, legal cases are reviewed, and…

A View from Albemarle

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Holt, Thaddeus

1977-01-01

This paper was originally delivered in July of 1975, within a few weeks of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of "Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody". Its intent is to shed light on the interrelationship between the practice of industrial psychology and the judicial process in operation. (Editor/RK)

20 CFR 405.515 - Application of circuit court law.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 20 Employees' Benefits 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Application of circuit court law. 405.515 Section 405.515 Employees' Benefits SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCESS FOR ADJUDICATING INITIAL DISABILITY CLAIMS Judicial Review § 405.515 Application of circuit court law. We will...

49 CFR 386.67 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 49 Transportation 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 386.67 Section 386.67... Decision § 386.67 Judicial review. (a) Any party to the underlying proceeding, who, after an administrative... service of the Final Agency Order, petition for review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals...

31 CFR 29.515 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 29.515 Section 29.515 Money and Finance: Treasury Office of the Secretary of the Treasury FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENTS UNDER... Overpayments § 29.515 Judicial review. An individual whose request for reconsideration has been denied (in...

31 CFR 29.406 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review. 29.406 Section 29.406 Money and Finance: Treasury Office of the Secretary of the Treasury FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENTS UNDER CERTAIN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RETIREMENT PROGRAMS Claims and Appeals Procedures § 29.406 Judicial review...

17 CFR 200.64 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 17 Commodity and Securities Exchanges 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Judicial review. 200.64... AND ETHICS; AND INFORMATION AND REQUESTS Canons of Ethics § 200.64 Judicial review. The Congress has provided for review by the courts of the decisions and orders by this Commission. Members should recognize...

45 CFR 681.41 - What judicial review is available?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false What judicial review is available? 681.41 Section 681.41 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT REGULATIONS Decisions and Appeals § 681.41 What judicial review is...

Judicial Review: Issues of State Court Involvement in School Finance Litigation.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Colwell, William Bradley

1998-01-01

Due to state legislatures' reluctance to initiate school-funding reform, judicial bodies are asked to provide relief from alleged inequities. Before providing judicial review, the judiciary must decide whether an issue is justiciable (does not violate separation of powers) and warrants court intervention. Children's education has not substantially…

Brown's Legacy: The Promises and Pitfalls of Judicial Relief

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Merritt, Deborah Jones

2005-01-01

"Brown v. Board of Education" (1954) is one of the greatest achievements of the American judicial system. It decisively declared racial segregation in the schools unconstitutional, inaugurating the modern civil rights era. In addition to advancing equality, "Brown" initiated a new type of judicial decision making. After…

21 CFR 1316.68 - Copies of petitions for judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 21 Food and Drugs 9 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Copies of petitions for judicial review. 1316.68 Section 1316.68 Food and Drugs DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS, PRACTICES, AND PROCEDURES Administrative Hearings § 1316.68 Copies of petitions for judicial...

13 CFR 142.36 - Can I obtain judicial review?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 13 Business Credit and Assistance 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Can I obtain judicial review? 142.36 Section 142.36 Business Credit and Assistance SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT REGULATIONS Decisions and Appeals § 142.36 Can I obtain judicial review? If the initial...

20 CFR 320.45 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 20 Employees' Benefits 1 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Judicial review. 320.45 Section 320.45... INITIAL DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE RAILROAD UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT AND REVIEWS OF AND APPEALS FROM SUCH DETERMINATIONS § 320.45 Judicial review. Upon being notified of a decision of the Board made (a) upon review, on...

22 CFR 1003.7 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 22 Foreign Relations 2 2013-04-01 2009-04-01 true Judicial review. 1003.7 Section 1003.7 Foreign Relations INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION RULES SAFEGUARDING PERSONAL INFORMATION IN IAF RECORDS § 1003.7 Judicial review. Any person may file a complaint against the Inter-American Foundation in the appropriate U.S...

9 CFR 381.216 - Procedure for judicial seizure, condemnation, and disposition.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 9 Animals and Animal Products 2 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Procedure for judicial seizure... Detention; Seizure and Condemnation; Criminal Offenses § 381.216 Procedure for judicial seizure, condemnation, and disposition. Any poultry or other article subject to seizure and condemnation under this...

9 CFR 329.6 - Articles or livestock subject to judicial seizure and condemnation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... judicial seizure and condemnation. 329.6 Section 329.6 Animals and Animal Products FOOD SAFETY AND... PRODUCTS INSPECTION AND VOLUNTARY INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION DETENTION; SEIZURE AND CONDEMNATION; CRIMINAL OFFENSES § 329.6 Articles or livestock subject to judicial seizure and condemnation. Any carcass...

18 CFR 701.208 - WRC petition for judicial extension of time.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 18 Conservation of Power and Water Resources 2 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false WRC petition for judicial extension of time. 701.208 Section 701.208 Conservation of Power and Water Resources WATER RESOURCES COUNCIL COUNCIL ORGANIZATION Availability of Information § 701.208 WRC petition for judicial...

18 CFR 701.208 - WRC petition for judicial extension of time.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 18 Conservation of Power and Water Resources 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false WRC petition for judicial extension of time. 701.208 Section 701.208 Conservation of Power and Water Resources WATER RESOURCES COUNCIL COUNCIL ORGANIZATION Availability of Information § 701.208 WRC petition for judicial...

18 CFR 701.208 - WRC petition for judicial extension of time.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-04-01

... 18 Conservation of Power and Water Resources 2 2013-04-01 2012-04-01 true WRC petition for judicial extension of time. 701.208 Section 701.208 Conservation of Power and Water Resources WATER RESOURCES COUNCIL COUNCIL ORGANIZATION Availability of Information § 701.208 WRC petition for judicial...

18 CFR 701.208 - WRC petition for judicial extension of time.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-04-01

... 18 Conservation of Power and Water Resources 2 2014-04-01 2014-04-01 false WRC petition for judicial extension of time. 701.208 Section 701.208 Conservation of Power and Water Resources WATER RESOURCES COUNCIL COUNCIL ORGANIZATION Availability of Information § 701.208 WRC petition for judicial...

18 CFR 701.208 - WRC petition for judicial extension of time.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-04-01

... 18 Conservation of Power and Water Resources 2 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false WRC petition for judicial extension of time. 701.208 Section 701.208 Conservation of Power and Water Resources WATER RESOURCES COUNCIL COUNCIL ORGANIZATION Availability of Information § 701.208 WRC petition for judicial...

45 CFR 681.41 - What judicial review is available?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 3 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false What judicial review is available? 681.41 Section 681.41 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT REGULATIONS Decisions and Appeals § 681.41 What judicial review is...

45 CFR 681.41 - What judicial review is available?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 3 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false What judicial review is available? 681.41 Section 681.41 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT REGULATIONS Decisions and Appeals § 681.41 What judicial review is...

45 CFR 681.41 - What judicial review is available?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 3 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false What judicial review is available? 681.41 Section 681.41 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT REGULATIONS Decisions and Appeals § 681.41 What judicial review is...

45 CFR 681.41 - What judicial review is available?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-10-01

... 45 Public Welfare 3 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false What judicial review is available? 681.41 Section 681.41 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT REGULATIONS Decisions and Appeals § 681.41 What judicial review is...

42 CFR 419.60 - Limitations on administrative and judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 42 Public Health 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Limitations on administrative and judicial review... DEPARTMENT SERVICES Limitations on Review § 419.60 Limitations on administrative and judicial review. There... duration of the additional payments (consistent with subpart G of this part), the determination of initial...

POLICY ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH USING SIMULATION TO ASSESS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Uchitel, Kirsten; Tanana, Heather

This report examines the relationship between simulation-based science and judicial assessments of simulations or models supporting evaluations of environmental harms or risks, considering both how it exists currently and how it might be shaped in the future. This report considers the legal standards relevant to judicial assessments of simulation-based science and provides examples of the judicial application of those legal standards. Next, this report discusses the factors that inform whether there is a correlation between the sophistication of a challenged simulation and judicial support for that simulation. Finally, this report examines legal analysis of the broader issues that must bemore » addressed for simulation-based science to be better understood and utilized in the context of judicial challenge and evaluation. !« less

The Search for Accountability and Transparency in Plan Colombia: Reforming Judicial Institutions - Again

DTIC Science & Technology

2001-05-01

acquired money coming mainly from drug sources heavily influenced Colombia’s political process and institutions. 7 The first step to ending corruption is to...and took his case for Plan Colombia directly to the international stage in the formative process for the plan. In fact, a Spanish language version of...by which repressive colonial regimes enforced first monarchical and later executive authority over the populace. In the process , the subservience of

Implications for therapeutic judging (TJ) of a psychoanalytical approach to the judicial role - Reflections on Robert Burt's contribution.

PubMed

Sourdin, Tania; Cornes, Richard

Robert Burt in, "The Yale School of Law and Psychoanalysis, from 1963 Onward", in this issue, explains and laments a decline in influence of psychoanalytic ideas in legal thinking. He notes "the fundamental similarity that both litigation and psychotherapy involve recollections of past events", buttressing his argument with eight parallels between the two. In this article we take up Burt's theme, first noting the relationship between therapeutic jurisprudence and psychoanalytic concepts before presenting an outline for a psychoanalytical understanding of the judicial role. We then consider the litigation process from the linked perspectives of therapeutic jurisprudence and psychoanalysis before closing with a reflection on the eight parallels elaborated by Burt. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

49 CFR 397.225 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-10-01

... 49 Transportation 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Judicial review. 397.225 Section 397.225... MATERIALS; DRIVING AND PARKING RULES Preemption Procedures § 397.225 Judicial review. A party to a proceeding under § 397.205(a), § 397.213(a), or § 397.223(a) may seek review by the appropriate district...

31 CFR 598.706 - Judicial review of civil penalty.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Judicial review of civil penalty. 598.706 Section 598.706 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance (Continued... REGULATIONS Penalties § 598.706 Judicial review of civil penalty. A civil penalty imposed pursuant to this...

31 CFR 598.706 - Judicial review of civil penalty.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Judicial review of civil penalty. 598.706 Section 598.706 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance (Continued... REGULATIONS Penalties § 598.706 Judicial review of civil penalty. A civil penalty imposed pursuant to this...

31 CFR 598.706 - Judicial review of civil penalty.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Judicial review of civil penalty. 598.706 Section 598.706 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance (Continued... REGULATIONS Penalties § 598.706 Judicial review of civil penalty. A civil penalty imposed pursuant to this...

31 CFR 598.706 - Judicial review of civil penalty.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance:Treasury 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial review of civil penalty. 598.706 Section 598.706 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance (Continued... REGULATIONS Penalties § 598.706 Judicial review of civil penalty. A civil penalty imposed pursuant to this...

31 CFR 598.706 - Judicial review of civil penalty.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 31 Money and Finance: Treasury 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review of civil penalty. 598.706 Section 598.706 Money and Finance: Treasury Regulations Relating to Money and Finance (Continued... REGULATIONS Penalties § 598.706 Judicial review of civil penalty. A civil penalty imposed pursuant to this...

Semantic Storyboard of Judicial Debates: A Novel Multimedia Summarization Environment

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Fersini, E.; Sartori, F.

2012-01-01

Purpose: The need of tools for content analysis, information extraction and retrieval of multimedia objects in their native form is strongly emphasized into the judicial domain: digital videos represent a fundamental informative source of events occurring during judicial proceedings that should be stored, organized and retrieved in short time and…

28 CFR 50.9 - Policy with regard to open judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... safety of parties, witnesses, or other persons; or (iii) A substantial likelihood that ongoing... judicial proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3509 (d) and (e) for the protection of child victims or child witnesses. (f) Because of the vital public interest in open judicial proceedings, the records of any...

28 CFR 50.9 - Policy with regard to open judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... safety of parties, witnesses, or other persons; or (iii) A substantial likelihood that ongoing... judicial proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3509 (d) and (e) for the protection of child victims or child witnesses. (f) Because of the vital public interest in open judicial proceedings, the records of any...

28 CFR 50.9 - Policy with regard to open judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... safety of parties, witnesses, or other persons; or (iii) A substantial likelihood that ongoing... judicial proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3509 (d) and (e) for the protection of child victims or child witnesses. (f) Because of the vital public interest in open judicial proceedings, the records of any...

28 CFR 50.9 - Policy with regard to open judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... safety of parties, witnesses, or other persons; or (iii) A substantial likelihood that ongoing... judicial proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3509 (d) and (e) for the protection of child victims or child witnesses. (f) Because of the vital public interest in open judicial proceedings, the records of any...

36 CFR 1202.84 - Can I seek judicial review?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 36 Parks, Forests, and Public Property 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Can I seek judicial review? 1202.84 Section 1202.84 Parks, Forests, and Public Property NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS... Can I seek judicial review? Yes, within 2 years of receipt of a NARA final determination as provided...

28 CFR 50.9 - Policy with regard to open judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... § 50.9 Policy with regard to open judicial proceedings. Because of the vital public interest in open... of justice. In furtherance of the Department's concern for the right of the public to attend judicial..., sentencing proceedings, or portions thereof, except as indicated in paragraph (e) of this section. (b) A...

Peers and Plagiarism: The Role of Student Judicial Boards

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Whitaker, Elaine

2007-01-01

After reading Kathryn Valentine's article that talked about her interaction with a Chinese student accused of plagiarism, the author was reminded of the effectiveness of student judicial boards. In this article, the author describes the benefits of having a student judicial board in fighting off plagiarism among students. She relates that although…

36 CFR 251.101 - Policy in event of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 36 Parks, Forests, and Public Property 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Policy in event of judicial proceedings. 251.101 Section 251.101 Parks, Forests, and Public Property FOREST SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF....101 Policy in event of judicial proceedings. It is the position of the Department of Agriculture that...

36 CFR 251.101 - Policy in event of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 36 Parks, Forests, and Public Property 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Policy in event of judicial proceedings. 251.101 Section 251.101 Parks, Forests, and Public Property FOREST SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF....101 Policy in event of judicial proceedings. It is the position of the Department of Agriculture that...

36 CFR 251.101 - Policy in event of judicial proceedings.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 36 Parks, Forests, and Public Property 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Policy in event of judicial proceedings. 251.101 Section 251.101 Parks, Forests, and Public Property FOREST SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF....101 Policy in event of judicial proceedings. It is the position of the Department of Agriculture that...

10 CFR 207.8 - Judicial actions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 10 Energy 3 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial actions. 207.8 Section 207.8 Energy DEPARTMENT OF... Coordination Act of 1974 § 207.8 Judicial actions. (a) Enforcement of subpoenas; contempt. Any United States... may request the Attorney General to bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the...

32 CFR 286.25 - Judicial actions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 32 National Defense 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Judicial actions. 286.25 Section 286.25 National... § 286.25 Judicial actions. (a) General. (1) This section states current legal and procedural rules for... the denial was justified. (d) Actions by the court. (1) When a DoD Component has failed to make a...

34 CFR 300.535 - Referral to and action by law enforcement and judicial authorities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Procedural Safeguards Due Process Procedures for Parents and Children Discipline Procedures § 300.535 Referral to and action by law enforcement and... crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law...

34 CFR 300.535 - Referral to and action by law enforcement and judicial authorities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Procedural Safeguards Due Process Procedures for Parents and Children Discipline Procedures § 300.535 Referral to and action by law enforcement and... crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law...

34 CFR 300.535 - Referral to and action by law enforcement and judicial authorities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Procedural Safeguards Due Process Procedures for Parents and Children Discipline Procedures § 300.535 Referral to and action by law enforcement and... crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law...

34 CFR 300.535 - Referral to and action by law enforcement and judicial authorities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Procedural Safeguards Due Process Procedures for Parents and Children Discipline Procedures § 300.535 Referral to and action by law enforcement and... crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law...

34 CFR 300.535 - Referral to and action by law enforcement and judicial authorities.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Procedural Safeguards Due Process Procedures for Parents and Children Discipline Procedures § 300.535 Referral to and action by law enforcement and... crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law...

28 CFR 700.14 - Classified information.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Classified information. 700.14 Section... INFORMATION OF THE OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL Protection of Privacy and Access to Individual Records Under the Privacy Act of 1974 § 700.14 Classified information. In processing a request for access to a...

28 CFR 35.105 - Self-evaluation.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Self-evaluation. 35.105 Section 35.105... LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES General § 35.105 Self-evaluation. (a) A public entity shall, within one year... participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments. (c) A public entity that employs 50 or more...

Cheating in the Classroom: Beyond Policing

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Lee, Daniel E.

2009-01-01

Regrettably, cheating is widespread on all levels of our educational system. Effective monitoring and judicial review processes that ensure that students who cheat are subjected to appropriate disciplinary action are essential. However, policing is not enough. We must go beyond policing to change the culture of the classroom in ways that…

Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Pavela, Gary

1997-01-01

Reviews 1995 case law concerning constitutional due process in college student disciplinary cases. Finds that administrators should follow substantive and procedural rules carefully; disciplinary determinations should not substitute for academic judgments; academic dishonesty should be treated as a disciplinary offense; internships and clinical…

75 FR 65032 - Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2010-10-21

... absorber vent as a Group 2 process vent under the Hazardous Organic NESHAP regulations. For three years, Westlake will also implement an enhanced Leak Detection and Repair program to control emissions of...'s common control, and Westlake will not contest administratively or judicially a finding by the...

20 CFR 405.510 - Claims remanded by a Federal court.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-04-01

... 20 Employees' Benefits 2 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false Claims remanded by a Federal court. 405.510 Section 405.510 Employees' Benefits SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCESS FOR ADJUDICATING INITIAL DISABILITY CLAIMS Judicial Review § 405.510 Claims remanded by a Federal court. When a...

20 CFR 405.510 - Claims remanded by a Federal court.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 20 Employees' Benefits 2 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Claims remanded by a Federal court. 405.510 Section 405.510 Employees' Benefits SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCESS FOR ADJUDICATING INITIAL DISABILITY CLAIMS Judicial Review § 405.510 Claims remanded by a Federal court. When a...

Measuring Accessibility for Inclusive Development: A Census Based Index

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Bisht, Shailendra Singh; Mishra, Vishal; Fuloria, Sanjay

2010-01-01

State is often involved in the challenging process of judicious allocation and apportioning of resources for an inclusive growth through creating infrastructure and ensuring accessibility- the "ability of the people to reach and engage in opportunities and activities". The issue at the heart of the debate concerns with the…

7 CFR 1599.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... Eligibility determination. (a) An entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines...-Dole Program. In order to determine whether the entity is financially responsible, FAS may require it... judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and (5) An operating financial account in...

7 CFR 1599.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... Eligibility determination. (a) An entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines...-Dole Program. In order to determine whether the entity is financially responsible, FAS may require it... judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and (5) An operating financial account in...

7 CFR 1499.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... determination. (a) An entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines that the entity... whether the entity is financially responsible, FAS may require it to submit corporate policies and... located in the United States with respect to which service of judicial process may be obtained by FAS on...

7 CFR 1499.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines that the entity has: (1... financially responsible, FAS may require it to submit corporate policies and financial materials that have... with respect to which service of judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and...

7 CFR 1599.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... Eligibility determination. (a) An entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines...-Dole Program. In order to determine whether the entity is financially responsible, FAS may require it... judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and (5) An operating financial account in...

7 CFR 1499.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines that the entity has: (1... financially responsible, FAS may require it to submit corporate policies and financial materials that have... with respect to which service of judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and...

7 CFR 1499.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines that the entity has: (1... financially responsible, FAS may require it to submit corporate policies and financial materials that have... with respect to which service of judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and...

7 CFR 1599.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... Eligibility determination. (a) An entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines...-Dole Program. In order to determine whether the entity is financially responsible, FAS may require it... judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and (5) An operating financial account in...

7 CFR 1599.3 - Eligibility determination.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... Eligibility determination. (a) An entity will be eligible to become a participant only after FAS determines...-Dole Program. In order to determine whether the entity is financially responsible, FAS may require it... judicial process may be obtained by FAS on behalf of the entity; and (5) An operating financial account in...

An Update on Academic Dismissal for Clinical Reasons.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Price, Sheila S.; Andes, John O.

1990-01-01

Four due process cases in which judicial decisions were made about dental students' dismissals occurring as a result of poor clinical performance are reviewed. All decisions reiterate the opinion that educators are uniquely qualified to assess a student's academic achievement and professional development. The school's responsibility is also…

The Supreme Court at the Bar of History: A Bibliographic Essay.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Stephenson, D. Grier, Jr.

1998-01-01

Presents a bibliographic essay surveying research and literature on the United States Supreme Court. Divides literature on the Court into six categories: (1) constitutional interpretation; (2) general and period histories; (3) biographies; (4) case studies; (5) judicial process; and (6) reference works. Includes a four-page bibliography. (DSK)

Selecting Supreme Court Justices: A Dialogue

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Landman, James H.

2006-01-01

The ABA Division for Public Education asked a panel of experts--Joyce Baugh, Mary Dudziak, Michael Gerhardt, Timothy Johnson, John Maltese, Mark Moller, Jason Roberts, Elliot Slotnick, and David Yalof--to respond to questions about the judicial nomination process. These questions touched on the balance between the president and the Senate, the…

The Disturbing Student and the Judicial Process

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Ragle, John D.; Paine, Gage E.

2009-01-01

The Assessment-Intervention of Student Problems (AISP) model is a useful tool for preparing student affairs professionals to assess the problems of disturbed, disturbing, or disturbed/disturbing students and to make appropriate referrals. It is particularly useful because it emphasizes the necessity of developing an integrated system for this…

Legal Terms Used in Reception Order and their Relevance to Judicial Process

PubMed Central

Subramanian, Nakkeerar; Ramanathan, Rajkumar; Kumar, Venkatesh Madhan; Chellappan, Dhanabalan Kalingarayan Palayam; Ramasamy, Jeyaprakash

2016-01-01

Introduction: Law governs the admission and management of involuntary admissions of mentally ill persons who are admitted under the provisions of the mental health act. The court directs the doctor to take charge of such persons. In the further dealings of such person the medical officer of the psychiatric facility comes across legal terms, which require understanding so that patients could be dealt with properly. Various terms such as accused, under police custody, judicial custody, remand prisoner, or under trial prisoner are used to denote their legal status. It is imperative for the medical officer to understand the nuances in the meanings of these terms. There are many times when the relevant section under which the admission is ordered is not found in the reception order. In these cases the terminology by which the patient is mentioned throws a light on the status of the patient. Towards this aim a study was carried out to assess the awareness and understanding of such terms by the faculty and post- graduates of a tertiary care hospital that deals with the admission and care of such patients. Method: They were administered a questionnaire containing these terms and asked to provide the meaning of these terms. Results: The results showed that nearly half the faculty and students were not having clarity in awareness or understanding of the terms. Discussion: Hence these terms and their meanings were gleaned from various judgments. The proper meaning of these terms and their use in judicial process and their importance is discussed. PMID:27833226

26 CFR 301.6231(e)-2 - Judicial decision not a bar to certain adjustments.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-04-01

... 26 Internal Revenue 18 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Judicial decision not a bar to certain....6231(e)-2 Judicial decision not a bar to certain adjustments. (a) In general. A court decision with respect to a partner's income tax liability attributable to nonpartnership items shall not be a bar to...

40 CFR 123.30 - Judicial review of approval or denial of permits.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... NPDES permit (see § 509 of the Clean Water Act). A State will not meet this standard if it narrowly... (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS State Program Submissions § 123.30 Judicial review of... surface waters in order to obtain judicial review.) This requirement does not apply to Indian Tribes. [61...

40 CFR 123.30 - Judicial review of approval or denial of permits.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... NPDES permit (see § 509 of the Clean Water Act). A State will not meet this standard if it narrowly... (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS State Program Submissions § 123.30 Judicial review of... surface waters in order to obtain judicial review.) This requirement does not apply to Indian Tribes. [61...

40 CFR 123.30 - Judicial review of approval or denial of permits.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... NPDES permit (see § 509 of the Clean Water Act). A State will not meet this standard if it narrowly... (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS State Program Submissions § 123.30 Judicial review of... surface waters in order to obtain judicial review.) This requirement does not apply to Indian Tribes. [61...

40 CFR 123.30 - Judicial review of approval or denial of permits.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... NPDES permit (see § 509 of the Clean Water Act). A State will not meet this standard if it narrowly... (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS State Program Submissions § 123.30 Judicial review of... surface waters in order to obtain judicial review.) This requirement does not apply to Indian Tribes. [61...

40 CFR 123.30 - Judicial review of approval or denial of permits.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... NPDES permit (see § 509 of the Clean Water Act). A State will not meet this standard if it narrowly... (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS State Program Submissions § 123.30 Judicial review of... surface waters in order to obtain judicial review.) This requirement does not apply to Indian Tribes. [61...

28 CFR 68.56 - Judicial review of a final agency order in cases arising under section 274A or 274C.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... review by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer of a final order by an Administrative Law Judge shall... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Judicial review of a final agency order... OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BEFORE...

32 CFR 270.13 - No right to judicial review or legal cause of action.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Payment § 270.13 No right to judicial review or legal cause of action. Subject... 32 National Defense 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false No right to judicial review or legal cause of..., and such review is specifically precluded. This part does not create or acknowledge any legal right or...

41 CFR 102-74.345 - Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Does the smoking policy... REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Smoking § 102-74.345 Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch? This smoking policy applies to the judicial branch when...

41 CFR 102-74.345 - Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Does the smoking policy... REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Smoking § 102-74.345 Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch? This smoking policy applies to the judicial branch when...

41 CFR 102-74.345 - Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Does the smoking policy... REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Smoking § 102-74.345 Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch? This smoking policy applies to the judicial branch when...

41 CFR 102-74.345 - Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Does the smoking policy... REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Smoking § 102-74.345 Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch? This smoking policy applies to the judicial branch when...

41 CFR 102-74.345 - Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Does the smoking policy... REGULATION REAL PROPERTY 74-FACILITY MANAGEMENT Facility Management Smoking § 102-74.345 Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch? This smoking policy applies to the judicial branch when...

Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of the 1997 Judicial Decisions.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Stoner, Edward N.; Schupansky, Susan P.

1998-01-01

Reviews key cases concerning disciplinary and academic decisions in higher education handed down by courts in 1997. Cases touched on procedural due process (for medical residents, academic versus disciplinary decisions, other notable issues), double jeopardy, breach of contract, student discipline records under the Family Education Rights and…

28 CFR 802.5 - Freedom of Information Act requests.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Freedom of Information Act requests. 802... DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS Freedom of Information Act § 802.5 Freedom of Information Act...) ordinarily will be processed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. Your request must be...

The Origin of a Jury in Ancient Greece and England

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Tumanov, Dmitriy Yu.; Sakhapov, Rinat R.; Faizrahmanov, Damir I.; Safin, Robert R.

2016-01-01

The purpose of the study is to analyze the implementation of the democratic principles in the court and judicial process in the trial by jury by the example of the history and development of this institution in Russia. The authors used different methods and approaches, in particular, historical, systemic and Aristotelian method, concrete…

37 CFR 102.10 - Appeals from initial determinations or untimely delays.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ADMINISTRATION DISCLOSURE OF GOVERNMENT INFORMATION... respect to the request, giving rise to a right of judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C). If the..., the administrative appeal process may continue. (e) A determination on appeal shall be in writing and...

28 CFR 30.10 - How does the Attorney General make efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Attorney General make... the Attorney General make efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns? (a) If a state process... form as the Attorney General in his or her discretion deems appropriate. The Attorney General may also...

28 CFR 115.132 - Detainee, contractor, and inmate worker notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy. 115.132 Section 115.132 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT... and Education § 115.132 Detainee, contractor, and inmate worker notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy. (a) During the intake process, employees shall notify all detainees of the agency's zero...

28 CFR 115.132 - Detainee, contractor, and inmate worker notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy. 115.132 Section 115.132 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT... and Education § 115.132 Detainee, contractor, and inmate worker notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy. (a) During the intake process, employees shall notify all detainees of the agency's zero...

28 CFR 115.132 - Detainee, contractor, and inmate worker notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy. 115.132 Section 115.132 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT... and Education § 115.132 Detainee, contractor, and inmate worker notification of the agency's zero-tolerance policy. (a) During the intake process, employees shall notify all detainees of the agency's zero...

Primary Prevention in Appalachian Kentucky: Peer Reinforcement of Classroom Attendance

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Noonan, J. Robert; Thibeault, Robert

1974-01-01

Peers chosen on the basis of their popularity and positive involvement in the educational process were found to be effective enhancers of attendance for chronic absentees. The judicious use of situational and interpersonal reinforcement can modify a student's behavior even in a region as indifferent to education as Appalachia. (EH)

28 CFR 51.49 - Absence of judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.49 Absence of... objection is not reviewable. The preclearance by the Attorney General of a voting change does not constitute the certification that the voting change satisfies any other requirement of the law beyond that of...

28 CFR 51.49 - Absence of judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED Processing of Submissions § 51.49 Absence of... objection is not reviewable. The preclearance by the Attorney General of a voting change does not constitute the certification that the voting change satisfies any other requirement of the law beyond that of...

The Courts and Student Rights -- Procedural Matters.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Phay, Robert E.

This paper traces the evolution of student rights and the judicial protection of these rights through numerous court cases. The author outlines the minimum standards of due process required in disciplinary proceedings and discusses cases that point up (1) the required specificity of rules on student conduct, (2) the requirements of notice to…

Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response

DTIC Science & Technology

2010-01-15

in Haiti (MINUSTAH), Special Representative Hedi Annabi, his deputy, Luiz Carlos da Costa, and other civilian staff and peacekeepers. U.N. Secretary...its development strategy, including security; judicial reform; macroeconomic management; procurement processes and fiscal transparency; increased...American States ( OAS ) pledged humanitarian, financial and other support to Haiti, and its Assistant Secretary General, Ambassador Albert Ramdin, will

Why Professors Don't Do More To Stop Students Who Cheat.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Schneider, Alison

1999-01-01

While college faculty complain about student cheating and plagiarism, many do little or nothing about it. Few lodge formal complaints against individual students, finding the campus judicial process laborious, and punishments often unrelated to the offense. At institutions with honor codes, the issues can be different, with reporting of…

The Other Shoe Drops: Courts Make College Admission a Risky Business.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Van Tyle, Peter

1996-01-01

The University of Texas law school's race-based admissions process triggered the boldest judicial statement addressing affirmative action since 1978. Colleges and universities throughout the country must now look at student diversity on a student-by-student basis and without reference to racial classifications. Admissions offices failing to comply…

Revitalizing Adversary Evaluation: Deep Dark Deficits or Muddled Mistaken Musings

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Thurston, Paul

1978-01-01

The adversary evaluation model consists of utilizing the judicial process as a metaphor for educational evaluation. In this article, previous criticism of the model is addressed and its fundamental problems are detailed. It is speculated that the model could be improved by borrowing ideas from other legal forms of inquiry. (Author/GC)

7 CFR 15f.26 - May I seek judicial review of the final determination?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false May I seek judicial review of the final determination? 15f.26 Section 15f.26 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADJUDICATIONS UNDER SECTION 741 What if I Do Not Agree With the Final Determination by USDA? § 15f.26 May I seek judicial review...

7 CFR 15f.26 - May I seek judicial review of the final determination?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false May I seek judicial review of the final determination? 15f.26 Section 15f.26 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADJUDICATIONS UNDER SECTION 741 What if I Do Not Agree With the Final Determination by USDA? § 15f.26 May I seek judicial review...

7 CFR 15f.26 - May I seek judicial review of the final determination?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false May I seek judicial review of the final determination? 15f.26 Section 15f.26 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADJUDICATIONS UNDER SECTION 741 What if I Do Not Agree With the Final Determination by USDA? § 15f.26 May I seek judicial review...

7 CFR 15f.26 - May I seek judicial review of the final determination?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false May I seek judicial review of the final determination? 15f.26 Section 15f.26 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADJUDICATIONS UNDER SECTION 741 What if I Do Not Agree With the Final Determination by USDA? § 15f.26 May I seek judicial review...

7 CFR 15f.26 - May I seek judicial review of the final determination?

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false May I seek judicial review of the final determination? 15f.26 Section 15f.26 Agriculture Office of the Secretary of Agriculture ADJUDICATIONS UNDER SECTION 741 What if I Do Not Agree With the Final Determination by USDA? § 15f.26 May I seek judicial review...

Characteristics of claims in the management of septic arthritis in Japan: Retrospective analyses of judicial precedents and closed claims.

PubMed

Otaki, Yasuhiro; DaSilva, Makiko Ishida; Saito, Yuichi; Oyama, Yasuaki; Oiso, Giichiro; Yoshida, Tomohiko; Fukuhara, Masakazu; Moriyama, Mitsuru

2018-03-01

Septic arthritis (SA) cases can result in claims or litigation because of poor prognosis even if it is unavoidable. Although these claims or litigation are useful for understanding causes and background factors of medical errors, the characteristics of malpractice claims associated with SA remain undetermined in Japan. This study aimed to increase our understanding of malpractice claims in the clinical management of SA. We analyzed 6 civil precedents and 16 closed claims of SA from 8530 malpractice claims processed between July 2004 and June 2014 by the Tokyo office of Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Insurance, Incorporated. We also studied 5 accident and 21 incident reports of SA based on project data compiled by the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. The rate of negligence was 83.3% in the precedents and 75.0% in closed claims. Two main malpractice claim patterns were revealed: SA in a lower extremity joint following sepsis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in newborns and SA in an injection site following joint injection. These two patterns accounted for 83.3% and 56.3% of judicial cases and closed claim cases, respectively. Breakdowns in care process of accident and incident reports were clearly differentiated from judicial cases or closed claim cases (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). It is important to pay particular attention to SA following sepsis in newborns and to monitor for any signs of SA after joint injection to ensure early diagnosis. Analysis of both malpractice claims and accident and incident reports is essential to ensure a full understanding of the situation in Japan. Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

What Can Tribes Do? Strategies and Institutions in American Indian Economic Development. American Indian Manual and Handbook Series No. 4.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Cornell, Stephen, Ed.; Kalt, Joseph P., Ed.

This collection of research papers focuses on conditions that affect self-determined economic development on American Indian reservations. Topics include obstacles that Indian nations face as they pursue their development goals; development of economic development corporations; effective tribal judicial systems; a model for processing land-use…

From Rejected to Accepted: Part 1--Strategies for Revising and Resubmitting a Manuscript

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Stivers, Jan; Cramer, Sharon

2017-01-01

Manuscript rejection is a fact of life for academics, and should be seen as just one step in a process of revision and resubmission that typically results in publication. This two-part article offers suggestions to help authors take action on their rejected manuscripts, including analyzing reviewer feedback, revising judiciously, and making…

31 CFR 515.512 - Provision of certain legal services authorized.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... authorized. (a) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of Cuba or a Cuban national is... services to Cuba or a Cuban national, not otherwise authorized in this part, requires the issuance of a... other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property in which Cuba or a...

77 FR 22467 - Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Fresh Market Tomato (Dollar Plan) Crop Provisions

Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

2012-04-16

... farming operation. For instance, all producers are required to submit an application and acreage report to... part 11, or 7 CFR part 400, subpart J for the informal administrative review process of good farming practices as applicable, must be exhausted before any action against FCIC for judicial review may be brought...

5 CFR 1630.14 - Appeals process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-01-01

... pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) and the right to file a concise statement of disagreement with the Executive... not exceed an additional 30 work days. (b) If the original request was for access and the initial..., the requester will be so informed and advised of the right to judicial review pursuant to 5 U.S.C...

5 CFR 1630.14 - Appeals process.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) and the right to file a concise statement of disagreement with the Executive... not exceed an additional 30 work days. (b) If the original request was for access and the initial..., the requester will be so informed and advised of the right to judicial review pursuant to 5 U.S.C...

Civil Rights and Social Change: The Contributions of Interest Groups, Social Movements, and the Courts.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

O'Connor, Karen

1990-01-01

Discusses a faculty seminar on the role of interest groups in the judicial process, focusing on U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Explores the dynamics of social change and defines interest groups. Examines the role of interest groups in civil rights litigation and delineates the contours of the current constitutional changes. Includes seminar…

After "Fisher": Academic Review and Judicial Scrutiny

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

La Noue, George R.

2013-01-01

This article describes the outcomes of the case "Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin," in which the plaintiff had accused the University of Texas (UT) of racial discrimination in the admission process. The author believes that the ruling of the court in this case makes it harder to hide race-based measures used in college admissions.…

In Italy, a Partisan Defender of Foreign Professors

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Rocca, Francis X.

2007-01-01

Over the past quarter-century David Petrie, a 56-year-old Scotsman has attended, in the capacity of plaintiff or interested observer, at least 80 court hearings at various levels of the Italian and pan-European judicial systems--all in cases of alleged job discrimination by Italian universities. In the process, Mr. Petrie has become the public…

The Failure of Legalization in Education: Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Goldberg, Steven S.

1989-01-01

A federal statute provided that parents may use the judicial process to challenge educators' decisions. Describes the intent of legalization; how reaction to an adversarial system led to the use of mediation in most states; and why this alternative model is not appropriate for resolving education questions. (MLF)

The Supreme Court, Civil Rights, and Preference Policies: Judicial Decision Making Processes in the United States and India.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Parikh, Sunita

1990-01-01

Presents a comparative analysis of the U.S. and Indian Supreme Courts' roles in civil rights and preference policies. Despite structural and historical differences, similarities exist in the development of such policies. Both are more concerned with fidelity to constitutional and statutory interpretations than to personal ideological viewpoints.…

Hodgson v. Minnesota.

PubMed

1990-06-25

Doctors, clinics, pregnant minors, and the mother of a pregnant minor filed suit in District Court to enjoin enforcement of Minnesota's abortion statute. The plaintiffs objected on due process and equal protection grounds to subdivisions of the statute mandating either that both parents of a minor be notified of her pending abortion, or, in lieu of two-parent notification, that a court authorize the abortion after determining that the minor is capable of giving informed consent. The District Court declared the entire statute unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals reversed, ruling that the provision for judicial bypass of the two-parent notification requirement was valid and saved the statute as a whole. In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals judgment. It concluded that while the two-parent notification requirement in itself violated the Constitution, the statute was rendered constitutional by the judicial bypass provision.

Child maltreatment: the collaboration of child welfare, mental health, and judicial system.

PubMed

Butler, S; Atkinson, L; Magnatta, M; Hood, E

1995-03-01

The alliance of child welfare, mental health, and legal systems has received little empirical attention, despite the magnitude of its impact on children and families. We examined the congruence of child protection agencies legal positions, court clinic recommendations, and judicial dispositions in a sample of 59 contested child maltreatment cases. Placement recommendations/decisions among all three systems were highly correlated, although the relationship was not so strong as to undermine the independence of any one system. Where there was disagreement between successive evaluations, it was in the direction of enhancing family integrity and parental access rights. We advanced three hypotheses to account for our findings: (a) changes in successive recommendations reflect the increasing sophistication of the assessment process; (b) changes reflect increasing distance from the family's ecology and are therefore increasingly ill informed; and (c) the changes are purely probabilistic, reflecting a drift toward the societal status quo.

The Courts and Public Health: Caught in a Pincer Movement

PubMed Central

Parmet, Wendy E.

2014-01-01

Public health practitioners are familiar with the general outlines of legal authority and with judicial standards for reviewing public health regulations. What may not be as familiar are 3 emerging judicial doctrines that pose considerable risks to public health initiatives. We explain the contentious series of judicial rulings that now place health departments’ broad grant of authority in jeopardy. One doctrine invokes the First Amendment to limit regulatory authority. The second involves the Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of federalism to limit both federal and state public health interventions. The third redefines the standard of evidence required to support regulations. Together, these judicial trends create a pincer movement that places substantial new burdens on the ability of health departments to protect health. PMID:24432949

The courts and public health: caught in a pincer movement.

PubMed

Parmet, Wendy E; Jacobson, Peter D

2014-03-01

Public health practitioners are familiar with the general outlines of legal authority and with judicial standards for reviewing public health regulations. What may not be as familiar are 3 emerging judicial doctrines that pose considerable risks to public health initiatives. We explain the contentious series of judicial rulings that now place health departments' broad grant of authority in jeopardy. One doctrine invokes the First Amendment to limit regulatory authority. The second involves the Supreme Court's reinterpretation of federalism to limit both federal and state public health interventions. The third redefines the standard of evidence required to support regulations. Together, these judicial trends create a pincer movement that places substantial new burdens on the ability of health departments to protect health.

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Zining, Jin, E-mail: jinzn@pkusz.edu.cn

The article explores the practices of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Law in China's courts by examining 107 judicial decisions. Each of the 107 judicial decisions has been analyzed to determine the time/location of the decision, what type of EIA document was referred to, what specific claim was made by the plaintiffs, and what the court's ruling was on the case. The results indicate that: unlike in Germany or Japan, all kinds of EIA decisions made by environment protect bureaus (EPBs) in China were widely taken as justiciable, and China's courts generally allowed local residents to have standing and thus challengemore » the EPBs' decisions made during the EIA process. On the other hand, the research also shows the EPBs overwhelmingly prevailed in those EIA lawsuits. It is also found that China's reviewing judges were highly self-restrained, giving obvious deference to the technocrat with the substantial contents of EIA documents. Also, the concept of “flaw” was created when it came to procedural issues. These two factors, among others, were both helping the EPBs' prevailing successes. - Highlights: • 107 judicial decisions referring to China's EIA law are examined. • The justiciability of EPB's EIA decisions were taken for granted. • The defenders overwhelmingly prevailed in those EIA lawsuits. • The reviewing judges were highly self-restrained, defering to the technocrat with the EIA documents. • A functional concept, “flaw”, was created by reviewing judges when it came to procedural issues.« less

[Evaluation of Articles 33 and 59, of the Code of Deontology of Doctors in Catalonia (2005), judicially annulled].

PubMed

Collazo Chao, Eliseo

2009-01-01

At the end of the year 2004, the Autonomous Conseil of the Medical School in Catalonia (Spain) approved its Deontology Code. The articles 33 and 59 were then judicially resorted by more than one hundred doctors in Catalonia; nowadays those articles themselves have been annulled by judicial sentence. This research aims to accomplish a valuation ethical and deontological of the annulled articles, according to the statutes.

The Judicialization of Health and the Quest for State Accountability: Evidence from 1,262 Lawsuits for Access to Medicines in Southern Brazil

PubMed Central

Socal, Mariana P.; Amon, Joseph J.

2016-01-01

Abstract The impact of increasing numbers of lawsuits for access to medicines in Brazil is hotly debated. Government officials and scholars assert that the “judicialization of health” is driven by urban elites and private interests, and is used primarily to access high-cost drugs. Using a systematic sample of 1,262 lawsuits for access to medicines filed against the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, we assess these claims, offering empirical evidence that counters prevailing myths and affirms the heterogeneity of the judicialization phenomenon. Our findings show that the majority of patient-litigants are in fact poor and older individuals who do not live in major metropolitan areas and who depend on the state to provide their legal representation, and that the majority of medicines requested were already on governmental formularies. Our data challenge arguments that judicialization expands inequities and weakens the universal health care system. Our data also suggest that judicialization may serve as a grassroots instrument for the poor to hold the state accountable. Failing to acknowledge regional differences and attempting to fit all data into one singular narrative may be contributing to a biased interpretation of the nature of judicialization, and limiting the understanding of its drivers, consequences, and implications at local levels. PMID:27781011

Superfund TIO videos. Set B. Basics of administrative law, and prp search process: PRP search, information exchange and access. Part 3. Audio-Visual

DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)

Not Available

1990-01-01

The videotape is divided into two sections. Section 1 identifies the various types of administrative hearings, including quasi-legislative, quasi-judicial, and hybrid types. Section 2 provides an overview of the PRP search process; explains how and when to issue Section 104(e) letters and administrative subpoenas; outlines the enforcement authorities available in cases of non-compliance; and describes the types of information that can be released to PRPs.

16 CFR 5.68 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... CONDUCT Disciplinary Actions Concerning Postemployment Conflict of Interest § 5.68 Judicial review. A respondent against whom the Commission has issued an order imposing disciplinary action under this part may...

A Judicial Presentation of Evidence of a Student Culture of "Dealing"

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Wood, Nathan B.; Lawrenz, Frances; Haroldson, Rachelle

2009-01-01

This study uses a new-to-educational-research methodology, based on the legal process, to build a case that U.S. students have been largely ignored in discussion and planning for their own, presumed futures. A variety of evidence, from two large and distinct data bases, is drawn together to show: (1) students perceive their classrooms in ways…

28 CFR 30.8 - How does the Attorney General provide an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial...

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false How does the Attorney General provide an... PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES § 30.8 How does the Attorney General provide an opportunity to comment on proposed... Attorney General gives state processes or directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local officials...

Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response

DTIC Science & Technology

2010-02-19

Special Representative Hedi Annabi, and his deputy, Luiz Carlos da Costa, were among the dead. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon sent Assistant...development strategy, including security; judicial reform; macroeconomic management; procurement processes and fiscal transparency; increased voter...but 101 are confirmed dead, with 6 unaccounted for.17 The head of MINUSTAH, Special Representative Hedi Annabi and his deputy, Luiz Carlos da Costa

Children's Participation in Child-Protection Processes as Experienced by Foster Children and Social Workers

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Polkki, Pirjo; Vornanen, Riitta; Pursiainen, Merja; Riikonen, Marjo

2012-01-01

Children in foster care often have no means of influencing matters that concern them, and can easily become outsiders in their own lives. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child enshrines the rights of capable children to express their views freely in matters affecting them and to be heard in any judicial or administrative…

The Impact of Protective Factors in Desistance from Violent Reoffending: A Study in Three Samples of Adolescent Offenders

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Lodewijks, Henny P. B.; de Ruiter, Corine; Doreleijers, Theo A. H.

2010-01-01

This study examined the impact of protective factors, assessed by means of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), on desistance from violent reoffending in adolescents. Three samples included male adolescents in different stages of the judicial process: pre-trial (n = 111); during residential treatment (n = 66); and after…

An Introduction to the American Legal System: A Supplement to "Higher Education & the Law".

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Edwards, Harry T.; Nordin, Virginia Davis

As a supplement to the basic text, "Higher Education and the Law," this book briefly describes the American legal system for scholars, students, and administrators in the field of higher education who have had little or no legal training. The following topics are addressed: The United States Courts, the process of judicial review, reading and…

Guidance: CERCLA Section 106 Judicial Actions

EPA Pesticide Factsheets

This guidance provides criteria for consideration in selecting and initiating Section 106 judicial actions. The guidance also identifies and discusses issues that should be considered in preparation of a Section 106 referral.

Judicial Decisions in the Field of Labour Law.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

International Labour Review, 1993

1993-01-01

Summarizes recent judicial decisions in various countries concerning application of general legal principles to labor law, access to employment, conditions of employment, occupational safety and health, social security, and labor relations. (Author/SK)

28 CFR 61.9 - Emergencies.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Emergencies. 61.9 Section 61.9 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY... following otherwise applicable procedural requirements under NEPA. ...

28 CFR 61.9 - Emergencies.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Emergencies. 61.9 Section 61.9 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY... following otherwise applicable procedural requirements under NEPA. ...

28 CFR 61.9 - Emergencies.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Emergencies. 61.9 Section 61.9 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY... following otherwise applicable procedural requirements under NEPA. ...

28 CFR 61.9 - Emergencies.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Emergencies. 61.9 Section 61.9 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY... following otherwise applicable procedural requirements under NEPA. ...

28 CFR 61.9 - Emergencies.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Emergencies. 61.9 Section 61.9 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY... following otherwise applicable procedural requirements under NEPA. ...

28 CFR 115.173 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.173 Section 115.173 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Lockups Investigations § 115.173 [Reserved] Discipline ...

28 CFR 115.173 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.173 Section 115.173 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Lockups Investigations § 115.173 [Reserved] Discipline ...

28 CFR 115.173 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.173 Section 115.173 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Lockups Investigations § 115.173 [Reserved] Discipline ...

Judicial perspectives on child passenger protection legislation

DOT National Transportation Integrated Search

1980-08-01

This report provides an analysis of judicial perspectives of general sessions judges concerning the Tennessee child passenger protection law. Two methods were employed to gather information: questionnaire were mailed to 103 judges while 12 judges par...

28 CFR 16.1 - General provisions.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false General provisions. 16.1 Section 16.1 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRODUCTION OR DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL OR INFORMATION... administration of the Department of Justice. ...

Foster family care review by judicial-citizen panels: an evaluation.

PubMed

Lindsey, E W; Wodarski, J S

1986-01-01

The findings of this study are mixed. In general, after one year of judicial-citizen review, there is no clear indication that this alternative to internal case review has led to more positive outcomes for children in foster care. This finding should be heartening to public child welfare agency personnel whose motivation for accountability has been called into question by proponents of external foster care review. At least when compared with a new citizen review system, the already existing internal review system measured up quite well. Although the study did not indicate a clear pattern of more positive outcomes for the study group, there is evidence of some favorable characteristics of CRPs that may show promise for the future. With additional training in developing behaviorally measurable and time-limited parental objectives, citizen panels may be able to maintain some of their initial strength in this area. Increased involvement of juvenile court judges in cases where little or no progress is made could motivate some parents to meet specified objectives and speed up the process of terminating parental rights when no progress has been demonstrated within specified time periods. The data also indicate a need for some adjustment to the process used to involve parents in case reviews. Another potentially positive outcome was highlighted during interviews with the juvenile court judges and the DFCS staff in the three study counties. Many of these respondents believed that the process had the potential for moving children out of foster care more quickly than does the internal review process. In addition to this primary goal, however, respondents were excited about the potential for heightened community awareness and education as citizens come to understand more about the plight of foster children and family conditions that can lead to placement. Interviews with panel members themselves indicated a definite belief that the community needed to accept more responsibility for children in foster care. One panel member's comment reflects the general sentiment expressed by other respondents: "These are kids we used to call 'those kids,' but now they are 'our kids'." It is hoped that the judicial-citizen review process will help to create a community environment in which needed resources can be developed both to prevent placement and to provide more support for families and children when placement occurs. This is the sentiment of the three juvenile court judges and almost all DFCS staff members who were interviewed, when they asserted that they felt the CRP process should be continued and expanded statewide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz: Student Due Process Rights and Judicial Deference to Academic Dismissals.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Brock, Allan D.

1979-01-01

The Horowitz case is consistent with the general reluctance of courts to sustain constitutional challenges to decisions by educators in academic matters. Precedent is heavily weighted in favor of the academic community and should be overcome in future challenges. (Journal availability: Willamette University College of Law, Salem, OR 97301, $5.00…

Faithful communication Hamiltonian in photonic lattices

NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

Bellec, Matthieu; Nikolopoulos, Georgios M.; Tzortzakis, Stelios

2012-11-01

Faithful communication is a necessary precondition for large scale all-optical networking and quantum information processing. Related theoretical investigations in different areas of physics have led to various proposals in which finite discrete lattices are used as channels for short-distance communication tasks. Here, in the framework of femtosecond-laser-written waveguide arrays, we present the first experimental realization of such a channel with judiciously engineered couplings.

28 CFR 42.603 - Confidentiality.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 1 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Confidentiality. 42.603 Section 42.603 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NONDISCRIMINATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY; POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Procedures for Complaints of Employment Discrimination Filed Against Recipients of Federal...

28 CFR 115.133 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.133 Section 115.133 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Lockups Training and Education § 115.133 [Reserved] ...

28 CFR 115.314 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.314 Section 115.314 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Juvenile Facilities Prevention Planning § 115.314 [Reserved] ...

28 CFR 115.314 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

2013-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.314 Section 115.314 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Juvenile Facilities Prevention Planning § 115.314 [Reserved] ...

28 CFR 115.133 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.133 Section 115.133 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Lockups Training and Education § 115.133 [Reserved] ...

28 CFR 115.133 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

2012-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.133 Section 115.133 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Lockups Training and Education § 115.133 [Reserved] ...

28 CFR 115.314 - [Reserved

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-07-01

... 28 Judicial Administration 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false [Reserved] 115.314 Section 115.314 Judicial Administration DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED) PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Standards for Juvenile Facilities Prevention Planning § 115.314 [Reserved] ...

Intervention of the Courts in School Finance.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

Hack, Walter G.

1978-01-01

The rhythm and intensity of judicial activity, questions and issues adjudicated by the courts, judicial approaches and strategies, and the roles played by the courts are discussed with regard to court intervention in state school finance systems. (DS)

7 CFR 2901.8 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

2010-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 15 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Judicial review. 2901.8 Section 2901.8 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) OFFICE OF ENERGY POLICY AND NEW USES, DEPARTMENT OF... Policy Act of 1978. ...

7 CFR 2901.8 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

2014-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 15 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Judicial review. 2901.8 Section 2901.8 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) OFFICE OF ENERGY POLICY AND NEW USES, DEPARTMENT OF... Policy Act of 1978. ...

7 CFR 2901.8 - Judicial review.

Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

2011-01-01

... 7 Agriculture 15 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Judicial review. 2901.8 Section 2901.8 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) OFFICE OF ENERGY POLICY AND NEW USES, DEPARTMENT OF... Policy Act of 1978. ...

Unwelcome, Unwanted and Increasingly Illegal: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace.

ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

World of Work, 1997

1997-01-01

A discussion of judicial and arbitral trends regarding sexual harassment addresses what constitutes harassment, outlines legislative action and judicial decisions, and identifies recent trends that show the evolution of social responses to it. (JOW)