Science.gov

Sample records for production test ip-549-a

  1. Production readiness verification testing

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    James, A. M.; Bohon, H. L.

    1980-01-01

    A Production Readiness Verification Testing (PRVT) program has been established to determine if structures fabricated from advanced composites can be committed on a production basis to commercial airline service. The program utilizes subcomponents which reflect the variabilities in structure that can realistically be expected from current production and quality control technology to estimate the production qualities, variation in static strength, and durability of advanced composite structures. The results of the static tests and a durability assessment after one year of continuous load/environment testing of twenty two duplicates of each of two structural components (a segment of the front spar and cover of a vertical stabilizer box structure) are discussed.

  2. Antimicrobials Products Tested or Pending Testing

    EPA Pesticide Factsheets

    The agency has completed testing of the majority of registered hospital disinfectants and tuberculocide products. The list of products can assist users in making informed choices regarding infection control in their facilities.

  3. Fission product separations testing

    SciTech Connect

    Bostick, D.A.; DePaoli, S.M.

    1997-10-01

    The initial goal of this task is to adequately understand the treatment needs of the end user in treating contaminated wastewater. These needs are then incorporated into the evaluation of new treatment technologies for wastewater treatment. Pertinent information is than supplied to the end user so that they can select a preferred process to meet their waste treatment needs. New sorbent materials, ion-exchange materials, or other processes of interest to DOE`s Office of Environmental Restoration (EM-40) will be evaluated initially for the removal of {sup 90}Sr and {sup 137}Cs from groundwater and process wastewater. Laboratory studies will strive to obtain a quantitative understanding of the behavior of these new materials and to evaluate their sorption efficiency in reference to a standard benchmark treatment technique. Testing of the new materials will begin by conducting scoping tests where new treatment materials are compared with standard, commercially available materials in batch shaker tests. Experimental data for the most promising sorbents will then be fit to an equilibrium model so that nuclide sorption can be predicted for variable wastewater composition. Additional testing with actual wastewater will be conducted with two or three of the most effective treatment methods. Once batch testing of a treatment method is completed, dynamic column tests will be performed to validate the equilibrium sorption model and to obtain the defining column operating parameters for scaling up the technology.

  4. Production Hydraulic Packer Field Test

    SciTech Connect

    Schneller, Tricia; Salas, Jose

    2000-06-30

    In October 1999, the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center and Halliburton Energy Services cooperated on a field test of Halliburton's new Production Hydraulic Packer technology on Well 46-TPX-10 at Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 near Casper, WY. Performance of the packer was evaluated in set and unset operations. The packer's ability to seal the annulus between the casing and tubing was hydraulically tested and the results were recorded.

  5. Consumer oriented product noise testing

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Blomberg, Les

    2005-09-01

    This paper explores the need for product noise measurements and how best to meet that need in the near future. Currently there is only a small market place for quieter consumer products. This is not because of lack of interest. No one really wants to announce to everyone in their house that they just flushed the toilet, few really want the entire neighborhood to know they are mowing their yard, etc. The small market place is primarily due to a lack of regulations on product noise, a lack of information easily available to consumers about which products are quieter, and market consolidation resulting in fewer manufacturers, most of whom are unwilling to emphasize their quieter products at the risk of eroding sales of their noisier ones (that currently have greater market share). In the absence of the EPA fulfilling its statutory requirement to regulate and label product noise under the Noise Control Act of 1972, and with the unwillingness of most industries to voluntarily publish accurate product noise data, there is a significant role for ``Consumer Oriented Product Noise Testing.'' This paper explores the Noise Pollution Clearinghouse's ongoing and planned product noise testing, evaluating its advantages, disadvantages, and limitations.

  6. 16 CFR 1204.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Production testing. 1204.16 Section 1204.16... STANDARD FOR OMNIDIRECTIONAL CITIZENS BAND BASE STATION ANTENNAS Certification § 1204.16 Production testing... production testing. Each production test shall be conducted at a production interval short enough to...

  7. 16 CFR 1204.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Production testing. 1204.16 Section 1204.16... STANDARD FOR OMNIDIRECTIONAL CITIZENS BAND BASE STATION ANTENNAS Certification § 1204.16 Production testing... production testing. Each production test shall be conducted at a production interval short enough to...

  8. 16 CFR 1209.36 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Production testing. 1209.36 Section 1209.36... SAFETY STANDARD FOR CELLULOSE INSULATION Certification § 1209.36 Production testing. (a) General... importers shall determine the types of tests for production testing. Each production test shall be...

  9. 16 CFR 1209.36 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Production testing. 1209.36 Section 1209.36... SAFETY STANDARD FOR CELLULOSE INSULATION Certification § 1209.36 Production testing. (a) General... importers shall determine the types of tests for production testing. Each production test shall be...

  10. Natural gas production verification tests

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1992-02-01

    This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared by the Department of Energy (DOE) in compliance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to fund, through a contract with Petroleum Consulting Services, Inc. of Canton, Ohio, the testing of the effectiveness of a non-water based hydraulic fracturing treatment to increase gas recovery from low-pressure, tight, fractured Devonian Shale formations. Although Devonian Shales are found in the Appalachian, Michigan, and Illinois Basins, testing will be done only in the dominant, historical five state area of established production. The objective of this proposed project is to assess the benefits of liquid carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2})/sand stimulations in the Devonian Shale. In addition, this project would evaluate the potential nondamaging (to the formation) properties of this unique fracturing treatment relative to the clogging or chocking of pores and fractures that act as gas flow paths to the wellbore in the target gas-producing zones of the formation. This liquid CO{sub 2}/sand fracturing process is water-free and is expected to facilitate gas well cleanup, reduce the time required for post-stimulation cleanup, and result in improved production levels in a much shorter time than is currently experienced.

  11. Subsea production test valve assembly

    SciTech Connect

    Yates, P.D.

    1988-03-22

    In the subsea test assembly securable within a blowout preventer stack above a subterranean well and positionable between upper and lower portions of a tubular conduit in fluid communication with a production zone within the well, the test assembly is described including an upper subassembly carriable with the upper conduit portion, a lower subassembly carriable with the lower conduit portion, and valve means in the lower subassembly manipulatable between opened and closed positions to control fluid flow within the conduit. The improvement comprises: the upper subassembly including an upper housing and first rigid dog means fixedly secured to the upper housing; the lower subassembly including a lower housing and second rigid dog means fixedly secured to the lower housing; the first rigid dog means positionable between a latch position for latching the upper and lower subassemblies and an unlatch position for unlatching the upper and lower subassemblies upon rotational movement of the first dog means with respect to the second dog means; and lock means axially movable relative to the first and second dog means from a lock position for limiting rotational movement of the first dog means with respect to the second dog means to an unlock position for allowing the first dog means to rotate relative to the second dog means and unlatch the upper subassembly from the lower subassembly.

  12. Automated Product Test Wafer Procedure

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Brown, Andrew; Minvielle, Anna; Salugsugan, Anita

    1987-04-01

    An automated test wafer procedure has been developed using the KLA 2020 wafer inspector to measure registration and critical dimensions on production wafers. The procedure reduces operator interactions to loading the wafer and entering information for wafer identification. The analysis of the registration data is performed on a PC using the methods established by Perloff to determine both intrafield and grid errors. These results are then used to correct the stepper. CD data is also analyzed by the program and corrections to the exposure time are calculated. It was found that the KLA 2020 is as much as 10 times faster and 4 times more precise in obtaining registration data then an operator reading optical verniers on a microscope. Due to the high precision of the reading, the analysis does not need a large number of readings to obtain precise and accurate stepper corrections. Further, significant improvements can be obtained by adding registration targets to measure the intrafield errors. Using the KLA 2020 and computer analysis we have demonstrated an ability to reduce the errors for a manually aligned run to a one sigma distribution of 0.09 um for x and y translation, 0.4 PPM for scaling and orthogonality, and 2.3 PPM for rotation from the first test wafer for a GCA 6100. Nearly all of this variation is due to operator misalignment or the inability of the stepper to correct the errors. The corrections with this technique measuring the same wafer are precise to + 0.01 um in translation and + 0.5 PPM for rotation, scaling, and orthogonality. It has also been shown that a simple linear equation can be used to correct exposure time, even when a process is not tightly controlled.

  13. Test Marketing in New Product Development

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Klompmaker, Jay E.; And Others

    1976-01-01

    Discusses the role of test marketing in new product development, based on interviews with marketing executives. Attempts to clarify when a test market should be done, what its aims should be, and how it should be used. (JG)

  14. Measuring test productivity - The elusive dream

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Ward, D. T.; Cross, E. J., Jr.

    1983-11-01

    The paper summarizes definitions and terminology relating to measurement of Test and Evaluation productivity before settling on the appropriate criteria for such a measurement model. A productivity measurement scheme suited for use by Test and Evaluation organizations is suggested. This mathematical model is a simplified version of one proposed by the American Productivity Center and applied to an aircraft maintenance facility by Fletcher. It includes only four primary variables: safety, schedule, cost, and deficiencies reported with varying degrees of objectivity and subjectivity involved in quantifying them. A hypothetical example of a fighter aircraft flight test program is used to illustrate the application of the productivity measurement model. The proposed model is intended to serve as a first iteration procedure and should be tested against real test programs to verify and refine it.

  15. 16 CFR 1210.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... demonstrate that the lighters meet the specifications, required under § 1210.15, of the surrogate that has... action changes the product from the surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that...

  16. 16 CFR 1210.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ... demonstrate that the lighters meet the specifications, required under § 1210.15, of the surrogate that has... action changes the product from the surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that...

  17. 16 CFR 1210.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... demonstrate that the lighters meet the specifications, required under § 1210.15, of the surrogate that has... action changes the product from the surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that...

  18. 16 CFR 1210.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ... demonstrate that the lighters meet the specifications, required under § 1210.15, of the surrogate that has... action changes the product from the surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that...

  19. 16 CFR 1210.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... demonstrate that the lighters meet the specifications, required under § 1210.15, of the surrogate that has... action changes the product from the surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that...

  20. ConocoPhillips Gas Hydrate Production Test

    SciTech Connect

    Schoderbek, David; Farrell, Helen; Howard, James; Raterman, Kevin; Silpngarmlert, Suntichai; Martin, Kenneth; Smith, Bruce; Klein, Perry

    2013-06-30

    Work began on the ConocoPhillips Gas Hydrates Production Test (DOE award number DE-NT0006553) on October 1, 2008. This final report summarizes the entire project from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2013.

  1. 16 CFR 1204.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... STANDARD FOR OMNIDIRECTIONAL CITIZENS BAND BASE STATION ANTENNAS Certification § 1204.16 Production testing. (a) General. Manufacturers and importers shall test antennas subject to the standard periodically as they are manufactured, to demonstrate that the antennas meet the requirements of the standard....

  2. 16 CFR 1204.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... STANDARD FOR OMNIDIRECTIONAL CITIZENS BAND BASE STATION ANTENNAS Certification § 1204.16 Production testing. (a) General. Manufacturers and importers shall test antennas subject to the standard periodically as they are manufactured, to demonstrate that the antennas meet the requirements of the standard....

  3. 16 CFR 1204.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... STANDARD FOR OMNIDIRECTIONAL CITIZENS BAND BASE STATION ANTENNAS Certification § 1204.16 Production testing. (a) General. Manufacturers and importers shall test antennas subject to the standard periodically as they are manufactured, to demonstrate that the antennas meet the requirements of the standard....

  4. 16 CFR 1209.36 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... SAFETY STANDARD FOR CELLULOSE INSULATION Certification § 1209.36 Production testing. (a) General. Manufacturers, private labelers, and importers shall test the cellulose insulation periodically as it is... can be corrected (see § 1209.37) so as to yield passing results and meet the standard....

  5. 16 CFR 1209.36 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... SAFETY STANDARD FOR CELLULOSE INSULATION Certification § 1209.36 Production testing. (a) General. Manufacturers, private labelers, and importers shall test the cellulose insulation periodically as it is... can be corrected (see § 1209.37) so as to yield passing results and meet the standard....

  6. 16 CFR 1209.36 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... SAFETY STANDARD FOR CELLULOSE INSULATION Certification § 1209.36 Production testing. (a) General. Manufacturers, private labelers, and importers shall test the cellulose insulation periodically as it is... can be corrected (see § 1209.37) so as to yield passing results and meet the standard....

  7. Production Testing Of Electro-Optical Systems

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Nash, S. L.

    1982-12-01

    Hughes Aircraft Company builds a variety of Electra-Optical Systems within its Manufacturing Division in El Segundo, California. The magnitude of the testing function within the manufacturing cycle of these systems, whether they are a Laser Fire Control System, a Thermal Imaging System, or some type of dedicated electronics, is almost beyond measure. Whereas testing was once quite simple, today's more complex products demand more complex test strategies. In our typical manufacturing cycle, there are at least nine (9) separate areas in which testing related to the product (end-item) may be performed. In this paper, an overview of these test areas will be discussed along with same of the considerations that are necessary for a logical manufacturing test strategy.

  8. ORNL fission product release tests VI-6

    SciTech Connect

    Osborne, M.F.; Lorenz, R.A.; Collins, J.L.; Lee, C.S.

    1991-01-01

    The ORNL fission product release tests investigate release and transport of the major fission products from high-burnup fuel under LWR accident conditions. The two most recent tests (VI-4 and VI-5) were conducted in hydrogen. In three previous tests in this series (VI-1, VI-2, and VI-3), which had been conducted in steam, the oxidized Zircaloy cladding remained largely intact and acted as a barrier to steam reaction with the UO{sub 2}. Test VI-6 was designed to insure significant oxidation of the UO{sub 2} fuel, which has been shown to enhance release of certain fission products, especially molybdenum and ruthenium. The BR3 fuel specimen used in test VI-6 will be heated in hydrogen to 2300 K; the Zircaloy cladding is expected to melt and runoff at {approximately}2150 K. Upon reaching the 2300 K test temperature, the test atmosphere will be changed to steam, and that temperature will be maintained for 60 min, with the three collection trains being operated for 2-, 18-, and 40-min periods. The releases of {sup 85}Kr and {sup 137}Cs will be monitored continuously throughout the test. Posttest analyses of the material collected on the three trains will provide results on the release and transport of Mo, Ru, Sb, Te, Ba, Ce, and Eu as a function of time at 2300 K. Continuous monitoring of the hydrogen produced during the steam atmosphere period at high temperature will provide a measure of the oxidation rate of the cladding and fuel. Following delays in approval of the safety documentation and in decontamination of the hot cell and test apparatus, test VI-6 will be conducted in late May.

  9. CLIC RF High Power Production Testing Program

    SciTech Connect

    Syratchev, I.; Riddone, G.; Tantawi, S.G.; /SLAC

    2011-11-02

    The CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) is a passive microwave device in which bunches of the drive beam interact with the impedance of the periodically loaded waveguide and generate RF power for the main linac accelerating structure. The demands on the high power production ({approx} 150 MW) and the needs to transport the 100 A drive beam for about 1 km without losses, makes the PETS design rather unique and the operation very challenging. In the coming year, an intense PETS testing program will be implemented. The target is to demonstrate the full performance of the PETS operation. The testing program overview and test results available to date are presented.

  10. Robotic mannequin technology for enhanced product testing

    SciTech Connect

    Fecht, B.A.; Bennett, D.W.

    1991-06-01

    Engineers at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) have developed several articulated robotic mannequin systems which closely simulate human anthropometric shape, complex motion and physiological function. These systems provide highly reproducible and realistic tests which aid in the evaluation of high performance clothing, consumer products, and human comfort.

  11. 46 CFR 160.028-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.028-4 Section 160.028... § 160.028-4 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval test. An independent laboratory accepted by the... paragraph (c) of this section. (b) Production inspections and tests. Production inspections and tests...

  12. 46 CFR 57.06-1 - Production test plate requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production test plate requirements. 57.06-1 Section 57.06-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-1 Production test plate requirements. (a) Production test plates shall...

  13. 46 CFR 57.06-1 - Production test plate requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production test plate requirements. 57.06-1 Section 57.06-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-1 Production test plate requirements. (a) Production test plates shall...

  14. 46 CFR 57.06-1 - Production test plate requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production test plate requirements. 57.06-1 Section 57.06-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-1 Production test plate requirements. (a) Production test plates shall...

  15. 46 CFR 57.06-1 - Production test plate requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production test plate requirements. 57.06-1 Section 57.06-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-1 Production test plate requirements. (a) Production test plates shall...

  16. 46 CFR 160.022-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.022-4 Section 160.022... Minutes) § 160.022-4 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. The manufacturer must produce a... Commandant under § 159.010 of this chapter. (b) Production inspections and tests. Production inspections...

  17. 46 CFR 160.057-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.057-4 Section 160.057... Minutes) § 160.057-4 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. The manufacturer must produce a... under § 159.010 of this chapter. (b) Production inspections and tests. Production inspections and...

  18. 46 CFR 57.06-1 - Production test plate requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production test plate requirements. 57.06-1 Section 57.06-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-1 Production test plate requirements. (a) Production test plates shall...

  19. 46 CFR 164.023-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests and inspections. 164.023-13 Section 164... Production tests and inspections. (a) Manufacturer's test equipment and facilities. The manufacturer shall provide the following test equipment and facilities for use in production tests and inspections: (1)...

  20. 46 CFR 160.031-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.031-5 Section 160.031... Equipment) § 160.031-5 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval test. An independent laboratory accepted... operational test in paragraph (c) of this section. (b) Production inspections and tests....

  1. Natural gas production verification tests. Environmental assessment

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1992-02-01

    This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared by the Department of Energy (DOE) in compliance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to fund, through a contract with Petroleum Consulting Services, Inc. of Canton, Ohio, the testing of the effectiveness of a non-water based hydraulic fracturing treatment to increase gas recovery from low-pressure, tight, fractured Devonian Shale formations. Although Devonian Shales are found in the Appalachian, Michigan, and Illinois Basins, testing will be done only in the dominant, historical five state area of established production. The objective of this proposed project is to assess the benefits of liquid carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2})/sand stimulations in the Devonian Shale. In addition, this project would evaluate the potential nondamaging (to the formation) properties of this unique fracturing treatment relative to the clogging or chocking of pores and fractures that act as gas flow paths to the wellbore in the target gas-producing zones of the formation. This liquid CO{sub 2}/sand fracturing process is water-free and is expected to facilitate gas well cleanup, reduce the time required for post-stimulation cleanup, and result in improved production levels in a much shorter time than is currently experienced.

  2. 46 CFR 57.06-5 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production toughness testing. 57.06-5 Section 57.06-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-5 Production toughness testing. (a) In addition to the test specimens required...

  3. 46 CFR 57.06-5 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production toughness testing. 57.06-5 Section 57.06-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-5 Production toughness testing. (a) In addition to the test specimens required...

  4. 46 CFR 57.06-5 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production toughness testing. 57.06-5 Section 57.06-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-5 Production toughness testing. (a) In addition to the test specimens required...

  5. 46 CFR 57.06-5 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production toughness testing. 57.06-5 Section 57.06-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-5 Production toughness testing. (a) In addition to the test specimens required...

  6. 46 CFR 160.017-27 - Production tests and examination.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests and examination. 160.017-27 Section 160... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Chain Ladder § 160.017-27 Production tests and... tested. (d) Independent laboratory. Each production test must be conducted or supervised by...

  7. 46 CFR 160.076-31 - Production tests and examinations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests and examinations. 160.076-31 Section... Flotation Devices § 160.076-31 Production tests and examinations. (a) Samples used in testing must be...) General. On each PFD lot that passes production testing, the manufacturer shall perform a final...

  8. 46 CFR 57.06-5 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production toughness testing. 57.06-5 Section 57.06-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-5 Production toughness testing. (a) In addition to the test specimens required...

  9. 75 FR 28335 - Testing and Labeling Pertaining to Product Certification

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-05-20

    ... children's products.\\1\\ The proposal would also address labeling of consumer products to show that the... products or under compliance and continuing testing for children's products. The proposed rule would...)(2) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(2)) establishes testing requirements for children's products...

  10. 46 CFR 57.06-4 - Production testing specimen requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-4 Production testing specimen requirements. (a) For test... to welding shall not throw the finished test plate out of line by an angle of over 5°. (c) Where the welding has warped the test plates, the plates shall be straightened before being stress-relieved....

  11. 46 CFR 160.174-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production testing. 160.174-25 Section 160.174-25...: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Thermal Protective Aids § 160.174-25 Production testing. (a) Thermal protective aid production testing is conducted under the procedures in this section and...

  12. 46 CFR 160.171-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production testing. 160.171-25 Section 160.171-25...: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Immersion Suits § 160.171-25 Production testing. (a) Immersion suit production testing is conducted under the procedures in this section and subpart 159.007 of...

  13. 46 CFR 160.066-15 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production testing. 160.066-15 Section 160.066-15 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS....066-15 Production testing. (a) Production tests must be performed under the procedures in Subpart...

  14. 46 CFR 160.174-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production testing. 160.174-25 Section 160.174-25...: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Thermal Protective Aids § 160.174-25 Production testing. (a) Thermal protective aid production testing is conducted under the procedures in this section and...

  15. 46 CFR 160.066-15 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production testing. 160.066-15 Section 160.066-15 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS....066-15 Production testing. (a) Production tests must be performed under the procedures in Subpart...

  16. 46 CFR 160.171-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production testing. 160.171-25 Section 160.171-25...: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Immersion Suits § 160.171-25 Production testing. (a) Immersion suit production testing is conducted under the procedures in this section and subpart 159.007 of...

  17. 46 CFR 159.007-9 - Production inspections and tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-9 Production inspections and tests. (a) If the... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production inspections and tests. 159.007-9 Section...

  18. 46 CFR 159.007-9 - Production inspections and tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-9 Production inspections and tests. (a) If the... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections and tests. 159.007-9 Section...

  19. 46 CFR 159.007-9 - Production inspections and tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-9 Production inspections and tests. (a) If the... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections and tests. 159.007-9 Section...

  20. 46 CFR 159.007-9 - Production inspections and tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-9 Production inspections and tests. (a) If the... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections and tests. 159.007-9 Section...

  1. 46 CFR 159.007-9 - Production inspections and tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-9 Production inspections and tests. (a) If the... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production inspections and tests. 159.007-9 Section...

  2. Product Sterility Testing . . . To Test or Not to Test? That Is the Question.

    PubMed

    Daniell, Elaine; Bryans, Trabue; Darnell, Kimbrell; Hansen, Joyce; Hitchins, Victoria M; Saavedra, Manuel

    2016-04-02

    The applications for sterility testing in the validation and routine control of sterilization of medical devices have changed dramatically over the years. As the definition of sterility assurance has evolved, so has the state of the science associated with product sterility testing. Historically, product sterility testing has been applied to such things as sterilization validation, sterilization lot release, packaging qualification, aseptic processing qualification, and determination of shelf life for the packaged medical device. In most of these cases, however, the results obtained from performing sterility testing on products do not provide the desired confirmation and assurance. Utilizing sterility testing on fully processed finished product is not appropriate for determination of sterilization process effectiveness, sterility assurance level, package integrity, or shelf life. The industry has developed more robust methods for validation of these applications to assure sterility and package performance. This article outlines the appropriate applications for sterility testing and highlight the applications currently in use that have significant limitations within the results and introduce undesirable risk to the validity of the data.

  3. 16 CFR 1212.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-01-01

    ..., of the surrogate that has been shown by qualification testing to meet the requirements of the... surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that could adversely affect its child-resistance,...

  4. 16 CFR 1212.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-01-01

    ..., of the surrogate that has been shown by qualification testing to meet the requirements of the... surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that could adversely affect its child-resistance,...

  5. 16 CFR 1212.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ..., of the surrogate that has been shown by qualification testing to meet the requirements of the... surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that could adversely affect its child-resistance,...

  6. 16 CFR 1212.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ..., of the surrogate that has been shown by qualification testing to meet the requirements of the... surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that could adversely affect its child-resistance,...

  7. 16 CFR 1212.16 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ..., of the surrogate that has been shown by qualification testing to meet the requirements of the... surrogate used for qualification testing in a manner that could adversely affect its child-resistance,...

  8. 49 CFR 178.33b-8 - Production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 3 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production tests. 178.33b-8 Section 178.33b-8 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY... Containers, and Linings § 178.33b-8 Production tests. (a) Burst Testing. (1) One out of each lot of...

  9. 49 CFR 178.33b-8 - Production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests. 178.33b-8 Section 178.33b-8 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY... Specifications for Inside Containers, and Linings § 178.33b-8 Production tests. (a) Burst Testing. (1) One out...

  10. CALIPERS. Planning the Systems Approach to Field Testing Educational Products.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Southwest Educational Development Lab., Austin, TX.

    Field testing, the last step in the developmental cycle for educational products, must ascertain whether the test product, placed in a natural environment, will actually elicit the behavioral changes it was designed to effect. A systems approach to field testing requires that certain basic areas of investigation first be established. Specific…

  11. 78 FR 51678 - Market Tests of Experimental Postal Products

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-08-21

    ... 39 CFR Parts 3001 and 3035 Market Tests of Experimental Postal Products AGENCY: Postal Regulatory... Service filings concerning market tests of experimental products. The proposed rules address the contents of market test filings, describe how the filings will be reviewed, and discuss related matters....

  12. 49 CFR 178.33b-8 - Production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 3 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production tests. 178.33b-8 Section 178.33b-8... Containers, and Linings § 178.33b-8 Production tests. (a) Burst Testing. (1) One out of each lot of 5,000...,000 containers or less, successively produced per day, shall constitute a lot and if the...

  13. 46 CFR 54.05-16 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... be oriented parallel to the rolling direction of the adjacent production material. The test-plate... production impact tests will be of weld metal and half of heat affected zone material. For the weld metal... the same grade of material, a test plate shall be furnished for each 50 feet of welding for Class...

  14. 46 CFR 54.05-16 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... be oriented parallel to the rolling direction of the adjacent production material. The test-plate... production impact tests will be of weld metal and half of heat affected zone material. For the weld metal... the same grade of material, a test plate shall be furnished for each 50 feet of welding for Class...

  15. 46 CFR 54.05-16 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... be oriented parallel to the rolling direction of the adjacent production material. The test-plate... production impact tests will be of weld metal and half of heat affected zone material. For the weld metal... the same grade of material, a test plate shall be furnished for each 50 feet of welding for Class...

  16. 46 CFR 54.05-16 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... be oriented parallel to the rolling direction of the adjacent production material. The test-plate... production impact tests will be of weld metal and half of heat affected zone material. For the weld metal... the same grade of material, a test plate shall be furnished for each 50 feet of welding for Class...

  17. 46 CFR 54.05-16 - Production toughness testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... be oriented parallel to the rolling direction of the adjacent production material. The test-plate... production impact tests will be of weld metal and half of heat affected zone material. For the weld metal... the same grade of material, a test plate shall be furnished for each 50 feet of welding for Class...

  18. 46 CFR 163.003-27 - Production tests and examination.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION Pilot Ladder § 163.003-27 Production tests and... independent laboratory. However, if a test is performed more than 4 different times per year, laboratory... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production tests and examination. 163.003-27 Section...

  19. 46 CFR 163.003-27 - Production tests and examination.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION Pilot Ladder § 163.003-27 Production tests and... independent laboratory. However, if a test is performed more than 4 different times per year, laboratory... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production tests and examination. 163.003-27 Section...

  20. 46 CFR 160.076-31 - Production tests and examinations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production tests and examinations. 160.076-31 Section..., AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Inflatable Recreational Personal Flotation Devices § 160.076-31 Production tests and examinations. (a) Samples used in testing must...

  1. 46 CFR 160.076-31 - Production tests and examinations.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production tests and examinations. 160.076-31 Section..., AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Inflatable Recreational Personal Flotation Devices § 160.076-31 Production tests and examinations. (a) Samples used in testing must...

  2. 46 CFR 163.003-27 - Production tests and examination.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION Pilot Ladder § 163.003-27 Production tests and... independent laboratory. However, if a test is performed more than 4 different times per year, laboratory... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests and examination. 163.003-27 Section...

  3. Correlation of in vitro challenge testing with consumer use testing for cosmetic products.

    PubMed Central

    Brannan, D K; Dille, J C; Kaufman, D J

    1987-01-01

    An in vitro microbial challenge test has been developed to predict the likelihood of consumer contamination of cosmetic products. The challenge test involved inoculating product at four concentrations (30, 50, 70, and 100%) with microorganisms known to contaminate cosmetics. Elimination of these microorganisms at each concentration was followed over a 28-day period. The test was used to classify products as poorly preserved, marginally preserved, or well preserved. Consumer use testing was then used to determine whether the test predicted the risk of actual consumer contamination. Products classified by the challenge test as poorly preserved returned 46 to 90% contaminated after use. Products classified by the challenge test as well preserved returned with no contamination. Marginally preserved products returned with 0 to 21% of the used units contaminated. As a result, the challenge test described can be accurately used to predict the risk of consumer contamination of cosmetic products. PMID:3662517

  4. Molten carbonate fuel cell product development test

    SciTech Connect

    Scroppo, J.A.; Camara, E.H.; Figueroa, R.A.

    1993-11-01

    M-C Power Corp. will design, fabricate, install, test, and evaluate a 250 kW Proof-of-Concept MCFC Power Plant. The plant will be located at Kaiser Permanente`s San Diego Medical Center; it will be designed and built by Bechtel Corp. Two 250 keV MCFC stacks will be assembled and tested at M-C Power; one stack will be used to support the San Diego field demonstration. This report outlines 6 tasks: project management/permitting, demonstration design, stack manufacturing, BOP fabrication, site work, and testing.

  5. Major advances in testing of dairy products: milk component and dairy product attribute testing.

    PubMed

    Barbano, D M; Lynch, J M

    2006-04-01

    Milk component analysis is relatively unusual in the field of quantitative analytical chemistry because an analytical test result determines the allocation of very large amounts of money between buyers and sellers of milk. Therefore, there is high incentive to develop and refine these methods to achieve a level of analytical performance rarely demanded of most methods or laboratory staff working in analytical chemistry. In the last 25 yr, well-defined statistical methods to characterize and validate analytical method performance combined with significant improvements in both the chemical and instrumental methods have allowed achievement of improved analytical performance for payment testing. A shift from marketing commodity dairy products to the development, manufacture, and marketing of value added dairy foods for specific market segments has created a need for instrumental and sensory approaches and quantitative data to support product development and marketing. Bringing together sensory data from quantitative descriptive analysis and analytical data from gas chromatography olfactometry for identification of odor-active compounds in complex natural dairy foods has enabled the sensory scientist and analytical chemist to work together to improve the consistency and quality of dairy food flavors.

  6. PERFORMANCE TESTING OF AIR CLEANING PRODUCTS

    EPA Science Inventory

    The paper discuses the application of the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program for products that clean ventilation air to the problem of protecting buildings from chemical and biological attack. This program is funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency und...

  7. Product acceptance environmental and destructive testing for reliability.

    SciTech Connect

    Dvorack, Michael A.; Kerschen, Thomas J.; Collins, Elmer W.

    2007-08-01

    To determine whether a component is meeting its reliability requirement during production, acceptance sampling is employed in which selected units coming off the production line are subjected to additional environmental and/or destructive tests that are within the normal environment space to which the component is expected to be exposed throughout its life in the Stockpile. This report describes what these tests are and how they are scored for reliability purposes. The roles of screens, Engineering Use Only tests, and next assembly product acceptance testing are also discussed, along with both the advantages and disadvantages of environmental and destructive testing.

  8. 46 CFR 160.040-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... Rocket Type (and Equipment) § 160.040-5 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. An independent... accordance with the approved plans. The performance tests in paragraph (c) of this section must be performed... buoyant type rockets, except that the approval test must include both types. The line shall be...

  9. 46 CFR 160.040-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... Rocket Type (and Equipment) § 160.040-5 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. An independent... accordance with the approved plans. The performance tests in paragraph (c) of this section must be performed... buoyant type rockets, except that the approval test must include both types. The line shall be...

  10. 46 CFR 160.040-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... Rocket Type (and Equipment) § 160.040-5 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. An independent... accordance with the approved plans. The performance tests in paragraph (c) of this section must be performed... buoyant type rockets, except that the approval test must include both types. The line shall be...

  11. The product consistency test for the DWPF wasteform

    SciTech Connect

    Jantzen, C.M.; Bibler, N.E.

    1990-01-01

    The preliminary specifications on the glass wasteform to be produced by the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) require extensive characterization of the glass product both before actual production begins and then during production. To aid in this characterization, a leach test was needed that was easily reproducible, could be performed remotely on highly radioactive samples, and could yield results rapidly. Several standard leach tests were examined with a variety of test configurations. Using existing tests as a starting point, the DWPF Product Consistency Test (PCT) was developed in which crushed glass samples are exposed to 90{degrees}C deionized water for seven days. Based on extensive testing, including a seven-laboratory round robin and confirmatory testing with radioactive samples, the PCT is very reproducible, yields reliable results rapidly, and can be performed in shielded cell facilities with radioactive samples.

  12. The product consistency test for the DWPF wasteform

    SciTech Connect

    Jantzen, C.M.; Bibler, N.E.

    1990-12-31

    The preliminary specifications on the glass wasteform to be produced by the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) require extensive characterization of the glass product both before actual production begins and then during production. To aid in this characterization, a leach test was needed that was easily reproducible, could be performed remotely on highly radioactive samples, and could yield results rapidly. Several standard leach tests were examined with a variety of test configurations. Using existing tests as a starting point, the DWPF Product Consistency Test (PCT) was developed in which crushed glass samples are exposed to 90{degrees}C deionized water for seven days. Based on extensive testing, including a seven-laboratory round robin and confirmatory testing with radioactive samples, the PCT is very reproducible, yields reliable results rapidly, and can be performed in shielded cell facilities with radioactive samples.

  13. Molten carbonate fuel cell product development test

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    1993-12-01

    Advanced fuel cell active components have been developed and scaled up from laboratory scale to commercial scale. Full width components of both the stabilized nickel cathodes and the low chrome anodes have been successfully cast on M-C Power's production tape caster. An improved design for a fuel cell separator plate has been developed. The improved design meets the goals of lower cost and manufacturing simplicity, and addresses performance issues of the current commercial area plate. The engineering that the Bechtel Corporation has completed for the MCFC power plant includes a site design, a preliminary site layout, a Process Flow Diagram, and specification for the procurement of some of the major equipment items. Raw materials for anode and cathode components were ordered and received during the first half of 1993. Tape casting of anodes was started in late summer and continued through August. In addition to the technical progress mentioned above, an environment assessment was prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). As a result, the PDT has received a categorical exclusion from the Air Pollution Control District permit requirements. The PDT is configured to demonstrate the viability of natural gas-fueled MCFC for the production of electricity and thermal energy in an environmentally benign manner for use in commercial and industrial applications.

  14. 46 CFR 161.012-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests and inspections. 161.012-13 Section 161.012-13 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND... Production tests and inspections. (a) The manufacturer of approved lights must randomly select a sample...

  15. 46 CFR 163.002-27 - Production tests and examination.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production tests and examination. 163.002-27 Section 163.002-27 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION Pilot Hoist § 163.002-27 Production tests...

  16. 46 CFR 160.021-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... sources of raw materials, or (iii) the start of production on a new production line or on a previously discountinued production line. (2) Inspections and tests by the manufacturer. The manufacturer's quality control... discussion in section 10 of “The Universal Color Language”). (8) Heptane ignition. (i) A metal pan must...

  17. CTBTO Contractor Laboratory Test Sample Production Report

    SciTech Connect

    Bob Hague; Tracy Houghton; Nick Mann; Matt Watrous

    2013-08-01

    In October 2012 scientists from both Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and the CTBTO contact laboratory at Seibersdorf, Austria designed a system and capability test to determine if the INL could produce and deliver a short lived radio xenon standard in time for the standard to be measured at the CTBTO contact laboratory at Seibersdorf, Austria. The test included sample standard transportation duration and potential country entrance delays at customs. On October 23, 2012 scientists at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) prepared and shipped a Seibersdorf contract laboratory supplied cylinder. The canister contained 1.0 scc of gas that consisted of 70% xenon and 30% nitrogen by volume. The t0 was October 24, 2012, 1200 ZULU. The xenon content was 0.70 +/ 0.01 scc at 0 degrees C. The 133mXe content was 4200 +/ 155 dpm per scc of stable xenon on t0 (1 sigma uncertainty). The 133Xe content was 19000 +/ 800 dpm per scc of stable xenon on t0 (1 sigma uncertainty).

  18. 46 CFR 57.06-2 - Production test plate interval of testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-2 Production test plate interval of testing. (a) At least one... follows: (1) When the extent of welding on a single vessel exceeds 50 lineal feet of either or both... joint. (2) When the extent of welding on vessels welded in succession exceeds 50 lineal feet of...

  19. 46 CFR 57.06-2 - Production test plate interval of testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-2 Production test plate interval of testing. (a) At least one... follows: (1) When the extent of welding on a single vessel exceeds 50 lineal feet of either or both... joint. (2) When the extent of welding on vessels welded in succession exceeds 50 lineal feet of...

  20. 46 CFR 57.06-2 - Production test plate interval of testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-2 Production test plate interval of testing. (a) At least one... follows: (1) When the extent of welding on a single vessel exceeds 50 lineal feet of either or both... joint. (2) When the extent of welding on vessels welded in succession exceeds 50 lineal feet of...

  1. 46 CFR 57.06-2 - Production test plate interval of testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-2 Production test plate interval of testing. (a) At least one... follows: (1) When the extent of welding on a single vessel exceeds 50 lineal feet of either or both... joint. (2) When the extent of welding on vessels welded in succession exceeds 50 lineal feet of...

  2. 46 CFR 57.06-2 - Production test plate interval of testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... WELDING AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-2 Production test plate interval of testing. (a) At least one... follows: (1) When the extent of welding on a single vessel exceeds 50 lineal feet of either or both... joint. (2) When the extent of welding on vessels welded in succession exceeds 50 lineal feet of...

  3. Germanium ``hexa'' detector: production and testing

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Sarajlić, M.; Pennicard, D.; Smoljanin, S.; Hirsemann, H.; Struth, B.; Fritzsch, T.; Rothermund, M.; Zuvic, M.; Lampert, M. O.; Askar, M.; Graafsma, H.

    2017-01-01

    Here we present new result on the testing of a Germanium sensor for X-ray radiation. The system is made of 3 × 2 Medipix3RX chips, bump-bonded to a monolithic sensor, and is called ``hexa''. Its dimensions are 45 × 30 mm2 and the sensor thickness was 1.5 mm. The total number of the pixels is 393216 in the matrix 768 × 512 with pixel pitch 55 μ m. Medipix3RX read-out chip provides photon counting read-out with single photon sensitivity. The sensor is cooled to ‑126°C and noise levels together with flat field response are measured. For ‑200 V polarization bias, leakage current was 4.4 mA (3.2 μ A/mm2). Due to higher leakage around 2.5% of all pixels stay non-responsive. More than 99% of all pixels are bump bonded correctly. In this paper we present the experimental set-up, threshold equalization procedure, image acquisition and the technique for bump bond quality estimate.

  4. 46 CFR 160.040-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... Rocket Type (and Equipment) § 160.040-5 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. An independent... lot of rockets which fails the inspections and tests must not be represented as meeting this subpart... rockets at least once each year. The inspection must determine that the appliances and rockets are...

  5. 46 CFR 160.040-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... Rocket Type (and Equipment) § 160.040-5 Approval and production tests. (a) Approval tests. An independent... lot of rockets which fails the inspections and tests must not be represented as meeting this subpart... rockets at least once each year. The inspection must determine that the appliances and rockets are...

  6. Diesel emission production audit test procedure. SAE standard

    SciTech Connect

    1995-06-01

    This SAE Recommended Practice applies to a production dynamometer test procedure which can be used to measure the smoke and gaseous emission characteristics of vehicular diesel engines. This procedure describes the smoke emission test method, smoke test cycle, gaseous emission test method, steady-state gaseous emission test cycle, equipment, instrumentation, calibration, data analysis, and correlation of results for comparison of production engine emission performance to the requirements of current or past Federal regulations. Variations in engines, instrumentation, and test equipment may require modifications to these procedures or data reduction methods. The acceptability of this procedure is dependent upon documented statistical data appropriate to correlate all tests, data reduction techniques, and special instrumentation to the required Federal tests. When using the audit test procedure to assess the emissions performance of production engines, considerations should be given to expected emissions deterioration factors and quality control limits should be adjusted accordingly. This document is intended as a guide for the measurement and assessment of transient smoke and steady-state gaseous emissions from heavy duty vehicular diesel engines only using a shortened engine dynamometer cycle which may be applicable to production line or production quality audit conditions. Key elements of the procedure closely resemble key elements of the federal rest procedures used for regulatory approval by the United States Government.

  7. 21 CFR 640.92 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HUMAN BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCTS Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) § 640.92 Tests on...) Heat stability. A final container sample of Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) shall remain unchanged,...

  8. 21 CFR 640.92 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-04-01

    ... ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HUMAN BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCTS Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) § 640.92 Tests on...) Heat stability. A final container sample of Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) shall remain unchanged,...

  9. 21 CFR 640.92 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-04-01

    ... ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HUMAN BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCTS Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) § 640.92 Tests on...) Heat stability. A final container sample of Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) shall remain unchanged,...

  10. 21 CFR 640.92 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-04-01

    ... ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HUMAN BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCTS Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) § 640.92 Tests on...) Heat stability. A final container sample of Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) shall remain unchanged,...

  11. 21 CFR 640.92 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-04-01

    ... ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR HUMAN BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCTS Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) § 640.92 Tests on...) Heat stability. A final container sample of Plasma Protein Fraction (Human) shall remain unchanged,...

  12. Bioluminescence for USP sterility testing of pharmaceutical suspension products.

    PubMed Central

    Bussey, D M; Tsuji, K

    1986-01-01

    Bioluminescence measurement significantly improved the accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and reliability of the current visual endpoint determination for the USP sterility test and eliminated the day 7 transfer/dilution step required for testing suspension products. Thirteen strains of bacteria and fungi (representing potential contaminants in sterile products), three pharmaceutical suspension products, and four media were used in the experiment. No interference from suspension products was encountered in the detection of microbial growth by the bioluminescence measurement. The poor fungal growth encountered was attributed to insufficient diffusion of oxygen into the medium and was circumvented by use of a large tube size (38 by 200 mm) or by vortexing the medium once during the 2-week incubation period. Bioluminescence measurement would facilitate automated handling of the sterility test endpoint readout operation. The optimum parameters of bioluminescence measurement for application in sterility testing were determined. PMID:3954348

  13. Production and preliminary testing of multianalyte imaging sensor arrays

    SciTech Connect

    Richards, J.B.; Brown, S.B.; Milanovich, F.P.; Healey, B.G.; Chadha, S.; Walt, D.R.

    1994-11-01

    This report covers the production and preliminary testing of fiber optic sensors that contain a discrete array of analyte specific sensors on their distal ends. The development of the chemistries associated with this technology is covered elsewhere.

  14. INEL advanced test reactor plutonium-238 production feasibility assessment

    SciTech Connect

    Schnitzler, B.G. )

    1993-01-10

    Results of a preliminary neutronics assessment indicate the feasibility of [sup 238]Pu production in the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Based on the results of this assessment, an annual production of 11.3 kg [sup 238]Pu can be achieved in the ATR. An annual loading of 102 kg [sup 237]Np is required for the particular target configuration and irradiation scenario examined. The [sup 236]Pu contaminant level is approximately 6 parts per million at zero cooling time. The product quality is about 90% [sup 238]Pu. Neptunium feedstock requirements, [sup 238]Pu production rates, or product purity can be optimized depending on their relative importances.

  15. INEL advanced test reactor plutonium-238 production feasibility assessment

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Schnitzler, Bruce G.

    1993-01-01

    Results of a preliminary neutronics assessment indicate the feasibility of 238Pu production in the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Based on the results of this assessment, an annual production of 11.3 kg 238Pu can be achieved in the ATR. An annual loading of 102 kg 237Np is required for the particular target configuration and irradiation scenario examined. The 236Pu contaminant level is approximately 6 parts per million at zero cooling time. The product quality is about 90% 238Pu. Neptunium feedstock requirements, 238Pu production rates, or product purity can be optimized depending on their relative importances.

  16. Data summary report for fission product release test VI-4

    SciTech Connect

    Obsorne, M.F.; Lorenz, R.A.; Collins, J.L.; Travis, J.R.; Webster, C.S.; Nakamura, T. )

    1991-01-01

    This was the fourth in a series of high-temperature fission product release tests in a vertical test apparatus. The test specimen, a 15.2-cm-long section of a fuel rod from the BR3 reactor in Belgium, had been irradiated to a burnup of 47 MWd/kg. In simulation of a severe accident in a light-water reactor, it was heated in hydrogen in a hot cell-mounted test apparatus to a maximum test temperature of 2400 K for a period of 20 min. The released fission products were collected on components designed to facilitate sampling and analysis. On-line radioactivity measurements and posttest inspection revealed that the fuel had partially collapsed at about the time the cladding melted. Based on fission product inventories measured in the fuel or calculated by ORIGEN2, analyses of test components showed total releases from the fuel of 85% for {sup 85}Kr, <1% for {sup 106}Ru, 3.9% for {sup 125}Sb, 96% for both {sup 134}Cs and {sup 137}Cs, and 13% for {sup 154}Eu. Large fractions of the released fission products (up to 96% of the {sup 154}Eu) were retained in the furnace. Small release fractions for several other fission products -- Rb, Br, Sr, Te, I, and Ba -- were detected also. In addition, very small amounts of fuel material -- uranium and plutonium -- were released. Total mass release from the furnace to the collection system, which included fission products, fuel material, and structural materials, was 0.40g, with 40% of this material being deposited as vapor and 60% of it being collected as aerosols. The results from this test were compared with previous tests in this series and with an in-pile test at similar conditions at Sandia National Laboratories. There was no indication that the mode of heating (fission heat vs radiant heat) significantly affected fission product release. 24 refs., 25 figs., 14 tabs.

  17. Bubble-Good Data: Product Testing and Other Sources.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Atwood, Virginia A.

    1985-01-01

    The goal of this mini-unit is to teach elementary students economic concepts related to consumerism and to develop problem-solving skills. Students test a product such as sugarless bubble gum and study how it is advertised. The students then make their own advertisement for the product. (RM)

  18. 46 CFR 160.036-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... production line or on a previously discontinued production line. (2) Inspections and tests by the... intensity and without damaging the parachute, shrouds, or leader line. (iii) Altitude. The altitude reached... the “Color Names Dictionary” (see the discussion in Section 10 of “The Universal Color Language”)....

  19. 46 CFR 160.024-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... production line or on a previously discontinued production line. (2) Inspections and tests by the... shall burn with uniform intensity and without damaging the parachute, shrouds, or leader line. (iii... the “Color Names Dictionary” (see the discussion in section 10 of “the Universal Color Language”)....

  20. Consumer Research - Product Testing. USMES Teacher's Resource Book, Preliminary Edition.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Education Development Center, Inc., Newton, MA.

    This USMES unit challenges students to determine which brand of a product is the best buy for a certain purpose. The teacher resource book for the Consumer Research - Product Testing unit contains five sections. The first section describes the USMES approach to student-initiated investigations of real problems, including a discussion of the nature…

  1. Word Processing for Item Banking and Test Production. Final Report.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Boyd, Joseph L.

    This report describes the sequence of activities that took place as the Examination Division of the New Jersey Department of Civil Service introduced a word processing system for a test item bank and for production of camera-ready test copy. The equipment selection, installation and orientation procedures are discussed. Keyboard and CRT terminals,…

  2. Data summary report for fission product release test VI-5

    SciTech Connect

    Osborne, M.F.; Lorenz, R.A.; Travis, J.R.; Webster, C.S.; Collins, J.L. )

    1991-10-01

    Test VI-5, the fifth in a series of high-temperature fission product release tests in a vertical test apparatus, was conducted in a flowing mixture of hydrogen and helium. The test specimen was a 15.2-cm-long section of a fuel rod from the BR3 reactor in Belgium which had been irradiated to a burnup of {approximately}42 MWd/kg. Using a hot cell-mounted test apparatus, the fuel rod was heated in an induction furnace under simulated LWR accident conditions to two test temperatures, 2000 K for 20 min and then 2700 K for an additional 20 min. The released fission products were collected in three sequentially operated collection trains on components designed to measure fission product transport characteristics and facilitate sampling and analysis. The results from this test were compared with those obtained in previous tests in this series and with the CORSOR-M and ORNL diffusion release models for fission product release. 21 refs., 19 figs., 12 tabs.

  3. 46 CFR 160.171-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production testing. 160.171-25 Section 160.171-25 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS... manufacturer must ensure that the quality control procedure described in the test plans previously...

  4. 46 CFR 160.171-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production testing. 160.171-25 Section 160.171-25 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS... manufacturer must ensure that the quality control procedure described in the test plans previously...

  5. Food Production Worker. Dietetic Support Personnel Achievement Test.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Oklahoma State Dept. of Vocational and Technical Education, Stillwater.

    This guide contains a series of multiple-choice items and guidelines to assist instructors in composing criterion-referenced tests for use in the food production worker component of Oklahoma's Dietetic Support Personnel training program. Test items addressing each of the following occupational duty areas are provided: human relations; hygiene and…

  6. Data summary report for fission product release test VI-3

    SciTech Connect

    Osborne, M.F.; Lorenz, R.A.; Collins, J.L.; Travis, J.R.; Webster, C.S.; Lee, H.K.; Nakamura, T.; Tong, Y.-C. )

    1990-06-01

    Test VI-3, the third in a series of high-temperature fission product release tests in the vertical test apparatus, was conducted in flowing steam. The test specimen was a 15.2-cm-long section of a fuel rod from the BR3 reactor in Belgium, which had been irradiated to a burnup of 42 MWd/kg. Using an induction furnace, it was heated under simulated light-water reactor (LWR) accident conditions to two test temperatures, 20 min at 2000 K and then 20 min at 2700 K, in a hot cell-mounted test apparatus. The released fission products were collected on components designed to facilitate sampling and analysis. Posttest inspection confirmed that the cladding had been completely oxidized during the test. Only minimal fragmentation of the fuel specimen was found, however, and very little melting or fuel-cladding interaction had occurred. Based on fission product inventories measured in the fuel or calculated by ORIGEN2, analyses of test components showed total releases from the fuel of 100% for {sup 85}Kr, 5% for {sup 106}Ru, 99% for {sup 125}Sb, and 99% for both {sup 134}Cs and {sup 137}Cs. A large fraction (27%) of the released {sup 125}Sb was retained in the furnace, but most of the released cesium (89%) escaped to the collection system. In addition, very small amounts of fuel material --- uranium and plutonium --- were released. Including fission products and fuel and structural materials, the total mass released from the furnace to the collection system was 3.17 g, 78% of which was collected on the filters. The results from this test were compared with previous tests in this series and with a commonly used model for fission product release. 25 refs., 22 figs., 14 tabs.

  7. Antimycobacterial susceptibility testing methods for natural products research

    PubMed Central

    Sánchez, Juan Gabriel Bueno; Kouznetsov, Vladimir V.

    2010-01-01

    The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis underscores the need of continuous developments on new and efficient methods to determine the susceptibility of isolates of M. tuberculosis in the search for novel antimicrobial agents. Natural products constitute an important source of new drugs, but design and implementation of antimycobacterial susceptibility testing methods are necessary for evaluate the different extracts and compounds. A number of biological assay methodologies are in current use, ranging from the classical disk diffusion and broth dilution assay format, to radiorespirometric (BACTEC), dye-based, and fluorescent/luminescence reporter assays. This review presents an analysis on the in vitro susceptibility testing methods developed for determinate antitubercular activity in natural products and related compounds (semi-synthetic natural products and natural products-derived compounds) and the criteria to select the adequate method for determination of biological activity of new natural products. PMID:24031490

  8. Gonadotropin regulation of in vitro androgen production by reptilian testes.

    PubMed

    Wo Tsui, H; Licht, P

    1977-04-01

    The hormonal regulation of in vitro androgen production by minced testes from 7 species of reptiles representing the 3 major orders was studied using purified follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from tetrapod species. Androgen content was measured by radioimmunoassay. All 7 species showed a dose-dependent response to all preparations of FSH and LH tested. However, variations were found depending on the species tested and the source of the hormone. All snake hormones were particularly inactive in turtles. Some of the variation in relative potencies of hormone reflect phylogenetic specificity in the testes. Synergism between FSH and LH was tested in the sea turtle. While subliminal doses of FSH and LH produced a small stimulation of androgen production, each alone was ineffective. Both gonadotropins have intrinsic activity with regard to the stimulation of steroidogenesis.

  9. Preconceptual design of the new production reactor circulator test facility

    SciTech Connect

    Thurston, G.

    1990-06-01

    This report presents the results of a study of a new circulator test facility for the New Production Reactor Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor. The report addresses the preconceptual design of a stand-alone test facility with all the required equipment to test the Main Circulator/shutoff valve and Shutdown Cooling Circulator/shutoff valve. Each type of circulator will be tested in its own full flow, full power helium test loop. Testing will cover the entire operating range of each unit. The loop will include a test vessel, in which the circulator/valve will be mounted, and external piping. The external flow piping will include a throttle valve, flowmeter, and heat exchanger. Subsystems will include helium handling, helium purification, and cooling water. A computer-based data acquisition and control system will be provided. The estimated costs for the design and construction of this facility are included. 2 refs., 15 figs.

  10. Periodogram based tests for distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

    PubMed

    Craigmile, Peter F; King, Wayne M

    2004-07-01

    Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are an important nonbehavioral measure of cochlear function, which provides a close analogue of the behavioral pure-tone audiogram. DPOAEs are sinusoidal distortion products (DPs) produced by nonlinearities in the healthy cochlea. Detection of DPs is accomplished in the Fourier domain with a periodogram based test. The test compares the power in the DP periodogram bin to a noise estimate derived from a certain number of the surrounding bins. Statistical properties of this test to date have only been examined by constructing receiver operator characteristics curves derived from DPOAE measurements in normal and hearing impaired individuals. In this paper the null distribution of this order-statistic based test is explicitly derived, and via simulations intended to mimic the nonwhite features of real-ear noise measurements, the power of the test is demonstrated. These simulations demonstrate that a local F test is more powerful than this DPOAE test, with critical values that are easier to calculate. Although the power of both tests increase with an increasing number of bins, the improvement is negligible at around four bins. Since the power of both tests decrease at lower DP frequencies, it is not recommended to use a large number of bins.

  11. 46 CFR 160.176-15 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... continuing program of employee training and a program for maintaining production and test equipment; (v) Have...) Seam Strength 1 1 2 2 3 4 Over-pressure 2,3 1 2 3 4 6 8 Air Retention EVERY DEVICE IN THE LOT Buoyancy & Inflation Media Retention 1 2 3 4 6 8 Tensile Strength 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 Detailed Product Examination 2 2 3 4...

  12. Alternatives to animal testing in the safety evaluation of products.

    PubMed

    Knight, Derek J; Breheny, Damien

    2002-01-01

    The conventional method for assessing the safety of products, ranging from pharmaceuticals to agrochemicals, biocides and industrial and household chemicals - including cosmetics - involves determining their toxicological properties by using experimental animals. The aim is to identify any possible adverse effects in humans by using these animal models. Providing safe products is undoubtedly of the utmost importance but, over the last decade or so, this aim has come into conflict with strong public opinion, especially in Europe, against animal testing. Industry, academia and the regulators have worked in partnership to find other ways of evaluating the safety of products, by non-animal testing, or at least by reducing the numbers of animals required and the severity of the tests in which they are used. There is a long way to go before products can be evaluated without any animal studies, and it may be that this laudable aim is an impossible dream. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been made by using a combination of in vitro tests and the prediction of properties based on chemical structure. The aim of this review is to describe these important and worthwhile developments in various areas of toxicological testing, with a focus on the European regulatory framework for general industrial and household chemicals.

  13. THE PRODUCT CONSISTENCY TEST HOW AND WHY IT WAS DEVELOPED

    SciTech Connect

    Jantzen, C; Ned Bibler, N

    2008-12-15

    The Product Consistency Test (PCT), American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard C1285, is currently used world wide for testing glass and glass-ceramic waste forms for high level waste (HLW), low level waste (LLW), and hazardous wastes. Development of the PCT was initiated in 1986 because HLW glass waste forms required extensive characterization before actual production began and required continued characterization during production ({ge}25 years). Non-radioactive startup was in 1994 and radioactive startup was in 1996. The PCT underwent extensive development from 1986-1994 and became an ASTM consensus standard in 1994. During the extensive laboratory testing and inter- and intra-laboratory round robins using non-radioactive and radioactive glasses, the PCT was shown to be very reproducible, to yield reliable results rapidly, to distinguish between glasses of different durability and homogeneity, and to easily be performed in shielded cell facilities with radioactive samples. In 1997, the scope was broadened to include hazardous and mixed (radioactive and hazardous) waste glasses. In 2002, the scope was broadened to include glass-ceramic waste forms which are currently being recommended for second generation nuclear wastes yet to be generated in the nuclear renaissance. Since the PCT has proven useful for glass-ceramics with up to 75% ceramic component and has been used to evaluate Pu ceramic waste forms, the use of this test for other ceramic/mineral waste forms such as geopolymers, hydroceramics, and fluidized bed steam reformer mineralized product is under investigation.

  14. Chemical test for mammalian feces in grain products: collaborative study.

    PubMed

    Gerber, H R

    1989-01-01

    A collaborative study was conducted to validate the use of the AOAC alkaline phosphatase method for mammalian feces in corn meal, 44.B01-44.B06, for 7 additional products: brown rice cream, oat bran, grits, semolina, pasta flour, farina, and barley plus (a mixture of barley, oat bran, and brown rice). The proposed method determines the presence of alkaline phosphatase, an enzyme contained in mammalian feces, by using phenolphthalein diphosphate as the enzyme substrate in a test agar medium. Fecal matter is separated from the grain products by specific gravity differences in 1% test agar. As the product is distributed on liquid test agar, fecal fragments float while the grain products sink. The alkaline phosphatase cleaves phosphate radicals from phenolphthalein diphosphate, generating free phenolphthalein, which produces a pink to red-purple color around the fecal particles in the previously colorless medium. Collaborators' recovery averages ranged from 21.7 particles (72.3%) for oat bran to 25.3 particles (84.3%) for semolina at the 30 particle spike level. Overall average background was 0.4 positive reactions per food type. The collaborators reported that the method was quick, simple, and easy to use. The method has been approved interim official first action for all 7 grain products.

  15. EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS ON FETAL TESTES TESTOSTERONE PRODUCTION

    EPA Science Inventory

    Effects of Environmental Chemicals on Fetal Testes Testosterone Production

    Lambright, CS , Wilson, VS , Furr, J, Wolf, CJ, Noriega, N, Gray, LE, Jr.
    US EPA, ORD/NHEERL/RTD, RTP, NC

    Exposure of pregnant rodents to certain environmental chemicals during criti...

  16. 46 CFR 57.01-1 - Qualifications and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ....01-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND... regulations in this part shall apply to the qualification of welding procedures, welders, and brazers, and to production tests for all types of manual and machine arc and gas welding and brazing processes. (b)...

  17. 46 CFR 57.01-1 - Qualifications and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ....01-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND... regulations in this part shall apply to the qualification of welding procedures, welders, and brazers, and to production tests for all types of manual and machine arc and gas welding and brazing processes. (b)...

  18. 46 CFR 57.01-1 - Qualifications and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ....01-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND... regulations in this part shall apply to the qualification of welding procedures, welders, and brazers, and to production tests for all types of manual and machine arc and gas welding and brazing processes. (b)...

  19. 46 CFR 57.01-1 - Qualifications and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ....01-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND... regulations in this part shall apply to the qualification of welding procedures, welders, and brazers, and to production tests for all types of manual and machine arc and gas welding and brazing processes. (b)...

  20. 46 CFR 161.012-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production tests and inspections. 161.012-13 Section 161.012-13 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Personal Flotation Device Lights §...

  1. 46 CFR 161.012-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production tests and inspections. 161.012-13 Section 161.012-13 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Personal Flotation Device Lights §...

  2. 46 CFR 161.012-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production tests and inspections. 161.012-13 Section 161.012-13 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Personal Flotation Device Lights §...

  3. 46 CFR 161.012-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production tests and inspections. 161.012-13 Section 161.012-13 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Personal Flotation Device Lights §...

  4. 46 CFR 160.036-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.036-4 Section 160.036-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Hand-Held Rocket-Propelled Parachute Red...

  5. 46 CFR 160.036-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.036-4 Section 160.036-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Hand-Held Rocket-Propelled Parachute Red...

  6. 46 CFR 160.036-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.036-4 Section 160.036-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Hand-Held Rocket-Propelled Parachute Red...

  7. 46 CFR 57.01-1 - Qualifications and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ....01-1 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING WELDING AND... regulations in this part shall apply to the qualification of welding procedures, welders, and brazers, and to production tests for all types of manual and machine arc and gas welding and brazing processes. (b)...

  8. 46 CFR 160.023-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.023-4 Section 160.023-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Hand Combination Flare and Smoke...

  9. 46 CFR 160.023-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Approval and production tests. 160.023-4 Section 160.023-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Hand Combination Flare and Smoke...

  10. 49 CFR 229.313 - Product testing results and records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 4 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Product testing results and records. 229.313 Section 229.313 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RAILROAD LOCOMOTIVE SAFETY STANDARDS Locomotive Electronics §...

  11. 49 CFR 229.313 - Product testing results and records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 4 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Product testing results and records. 229.313 Section 229.313 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RAILROAD LOCOMOTIVE SAFETY STANDARDS Locomotive Electronics §...

  12. 49 CFR 229.313 - Product testing results and records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 49 Transportation 4 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Product testing results and records. 229.313 Section 229.313 Transportation Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (Continued) FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RAILROAD LOCOMOTIVE SAFETY STANDARDS Locomotive Electronics §...

  13. Tests show production logging problems in horizontal gas wells

    SciTech Connect

    Branagan, P. ); Knight, B.L. ); Aslakson, J. ); Middlebrook, M.L. )

    1994-01-10

    A study has concluded that production logging tools employed to evaluate multiphase horizontal well production behavior should be carefully screened as to their response characteristics in fully-segregated, two-phase flow. The study, performed at Marathon Oil Co.'s petroleum technology center in Littleton, Colo., indicated that gas in highly deviated well bores segregates rapidly in the presence of water, creating a downhole environment that produces sporadic responses from full bore and diverter spinners as well as density and holdup tools. Gas Research Institute (GRI), as part of its horizontal gas well completion technology program, initiated the full-scale laboratory study to determine the severity and consequences of multiphase flow on tool response from horizontal well production. The paper discusses background of the problem, the test objectives, test facility, experimental procedures, single-phase flow, two-phase flow, and recommendations.

  14. Nuclear waste glass Product Consistency Test (PCT), Version 3. 0

    SciTech Connect

    Jantzen, C.M.; Bibler, N.E.

    1990-11-01

    Liquid high-level nuclear waste will be immobilized at the Savannah River Site (SRS) by vitrification in borosilicate glass. The glass will be produced in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), poured into stainless steel canisters, and eventually disposed of in a geologic repository. In order to comply with the Waste Acceptance Preliminary Specifications (WAPS), the durability of the glass needs to be measured during production to assure its long term stability and radionuclide release properties. A durability test, designated the Product Consistency Test (PCT), was developed for DWPF glass in order to meet the WAPS requirements. The response of the PCT procedure was based on extensive testing with glasses of widely different compositions. The PCT was determined to be very reproducible, to yield reliable results rapidly, and to be easily performed in shielded cell facilities with radioactive samples.

  15. On organic emissions testing from indoor consumer products' use.

    PubMed

    Bartzis, J; Wolkoff, P; Stranger, M; Efthimiou, G; Tolis, E I; Maes, F; Nørgaard, A W; Ventura, G; Kalimeri, K K; Goelen, E; Fernandes, O

    2015-03-21

    A wide range of consumer and personal care products may, during their use, release significant amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOC) into the air. The identification and quantification of the emissions from such sources is typically performed in emission test chambers. A major question is to what degree the obtained emissions are reproducible and directly applicable to real situations. The present work attempts partly to address this question by comparison of selected VOC emissions in specific consumer products tested in chambers of various dimensions. The measurements were performed in three test chambers of different volumes (0.26-20 m(3)). The analytic performance of the laboratories was rigorously assessed prior to chamber testing. The results show emission variation for major VOC (terpenes); however, it remains in general, within the same order of magnitude for all tests. This variability does not seem to correlate with the chamber volume. It rather depends on the overall testing conditions. The present work is undertaken in the frame of EPHECT European Project.

  16. 40 CFR 1054.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1054.310 Section 1054.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Test... engine families with projected U.S.-directed production volume of at least 1,600, the test periods...

  17. 40 CFR 1054.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1054.310 Section 1054.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Test... engine families with projected U.S.-directed production volume of at least 1,600, the test periods...

  18. 40 CFR 1054.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1054.310 Section 1054.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Test... engine families with projected U.S.-directed production volume of at least 1,600, the test periods...

  19. 40 CFR 1054.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1054.310 Section 1054.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Test... engine families with projected U.S.-directed production volume of at least 1,600, the test periods...

  20. Review: production, characterization, and testing of banked mammalian cell substrates used to produce biological products.

    PubMed

    Schiff, Leonard J

    2005-01-01

    A critical component in controlling the production of biological products derived from human and animal cell lines is the characterization and testing of banked cell substrates. The objective is to confirm the identity, purity, and suitability of these cells for manufacturing use. Quality concerns for biological products derived from cell lines originate from the presence of cellular and adventitious contaminants. Well-characterized cell banks not only permit a consistent source of production cells throughout the life of a product but also decrease the likelihood of contamination by other cell lines and adventitious agents. An important part of qualifying a cell line is choosing the appropriate testing for the presence of adventitious contaminants. The qualification of cell banks includes tests for cell identity and endogenous and adventitious microbial contaminants (bacteria, fungi, mycoplasmas, and viruses). For cells producing recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid-derived products, analysis of the expression construct at the nucleic acid level (genetic stability) is also a primary concern. The strategy for designing a safety-testing program for banked cells should be based on sound scientific principles and current regulatory guidance.

  1. Product consistency testing of West Valley Compositional Variation Glasses

    SciTech Connect

    Olson, K.M.; Marschman, S.C.; Piepel, G.F.; Whiting, G.K.

    1994-11-01

    Nuclear waste glass produced by the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) must meet the requirements of the Waste Acceptance Preliminary Specification (WAPS) as developed by the US Department of Energy (DOE). To assist WVDP in complying with WAPS, the Materials Characterization Center (MCC) at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) used the Product Consistency Test (PCT) to evaluate 44 West Valley glasses that had previously been tested in FY 1987 and FY 1988. This report summarizes the results of the PCTs. The glasses tested, which were fabricated as sets of Compositional Variation Glasses for studies performed by the West Valley Support Task (WVST) at PNL during FY 1987 and FY 1988, were doped with Th and U and were variations of West Valley reference glasses. In addition, Approved Reference Material-1 (ARM-1) was used as a test standard (ARM-1 is supplied by the MCC). The PCT was originated at Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) by C. M. Jantzen and N. R. Bibler (Jantzen and Bibler 1989). The test is a seven-day modified MCC-3 test that uses crushed glass in the size range -100 +200 mesh with deionized water in a Teflon container. There is no agitation during the PCT, and no attempt to include CO{sub 2} from the test environment. Based on B and Li release, the glasses performed about the same as in previous modified MCC-3 testing performed in FY 1987 and FY 1988 (Reimus et al. 1988). The modified MCC-3 tests performed by Reimus et al. were similar to the PCT containers and the exclusion of CO{sub 2} from the tests.

  2. Durability Testing of Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming Products

    SciTech Connect

    JANTZEN, CAROL M.; PAREIZS, JOHN M.; LORIER, TROY H.; MARRA, JAMES C.

    2005-07-01

    Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) is being considered as a potential technology for the immobilization of a wide variety of radioactive wastes but especially aqueous high sodium wastes at the Hanford site, at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), and at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The FBSR technology converts organic compounds to CO{sub 2} and H{sub 2}O, converts nitrate/nitrite species to N{sub 2}, and produces a solid residue through reactions with superheated steam, the fluidizing media. If clay is added during processing a ''mineralized'' granular waste form can be produced. The mineral components of the waste form are primarily Na-Al-Si (NAS) feldspathoid minerals with cage-like and ring structures and iron bearing spinel minerals. The cage and ring structured minerals atomically bond radionuclides like Tc{sup 99} and Cs{sup 137} and anions such as SO{sub 4}, I, F, and Cl. The spinel minerals appear to stabilize Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous species such as Cr and Ni. Durability testing of the FBSR products was performed using ASTM C1285 (Product Consistency Test) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). The FBSR mineral products (bed and fines) evaluated in this study were found to be two orders of magnitude more durable than the Hanford Low Activity Waste (LAW) glass requirement of 2 g/m{sup 2} release of Na{sup +}. The PCT responses for the FBSR samples tested were consistent with results from previous FBSR Hanford LAW product testing. Differences in the response can be explained by the minerals formed and their effects on PCT leachate chemistry.

  3. Standard test method for saponification number of petroleum products

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1980-01-01

    This method covers the determination of the amount of constituents in petroleum products that will saponify under the conditions of the test. Since compounds of sulfur, phosphorus, the halogens, and certain other elements which are sometimes added to petroleum products also consume alkali and acids, the results obtained indicate the effect of these extraneous materials in addition to the saponifiable material present. Results on products containing such materials, on used internal-combustion-engine crank-case oils, and on used turbine oils must be interpreted in this respect. Summary of method: a known weight of the sample, dissolved in methylethylketone is heated with a known amount of alcoholic potassium hydroxide (KOH). The excess alkali is titrated with standard acid and the saponification number calculated.

  4. Production circulator fabrication and testing for core flow test loop. Final report, Phase III

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1981-05-01

    The performance testing of two production helium circulators utilizing gas film lubrication is described. These two centrifugal-type circulators plus an identical circulator prototype will be arranged in series to provide the helium flow requirements for the Core Flow Test Loop which is part of the Gas-Cooled Fast Breeder Reactor Program (GCFR) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This report presents the results of the Phase III performance and supplemental tests, which were carried out by MTI during the period of December 18, 1980 through March 19, 1981. Specific test procedures are outlined and described, as are individual tests for measuring the performance of the circulators. Test data and run descriptions are presented.

  5. Transient productivity index for numerical well test simulations

    SciTech Connect

    Blanc, G.; Ding, D.Y.; Ene, A.

    1997-08-01

    The most difficult aspect of numerical simulation of well tests is the treatment of the Bottom Hole Flowing (BHF) Pressure. In full field simulations, this pressure is derived from the Well-block Pressure (WBP) using a numerical productivity index which accounts for the grid size and permeability, and for the well completion. This productivity index is calculated assuming a pseudo-steady state flow regime in the vicinity of the well and is therefore constant during the well production period. Such a pseudo-steady state assumption is no longer valid for the early time of a well test simulation as long as the pressure perturbation has not reached several grid-blocks around the well. This paper offers two different solutions to this problem: (1) The first one is based on the derivation of a Numerical Transient Productivity Index (NTPI) to be applied to Cartesian grids; (2) The second one is based on the use of a Corrected Transmissibility and Accumulation Term (CTAT) in the flow equation. The representation of the pressure behavior given by both solutions is far more accurate than the conventional one as shown by several validation examples which are presented in the following pages.

  6. Production of LEU Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuel for Irradiation Testing

    SciTech Connect

    Terrani, Kurt A; Kiggans Jr, James O; McMurray, Jake W; Jolly, Brian C; Hunt, Rodney Dale; Trammell, Michael P; Snead, Lance Lewis

    2016-01-01

    Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated (FCM) fuel consists of tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel particles embedded inside a SiC matrix. This fuel inherently possesses multiple barriers to fission product release, namely the various coating layers in the TRISO fuel particle as well as the dense SiC matrix that hosts these particles. This coupled with the excellent oxidation resistance of the SiC matrix and the SiC coating layer in the TRISO particle designate this concept as an accident tolerant fuel (ATF). The FCM fuel takes advantage of uranium nitride kernels instead of oxide or oxide-carbide kernels used in high temperature gas reactors to enhance heavy metal loading in the highly moderated LWRs. Production of these kernels with appropriate density, coating layer development to produce UN TRISO particles, and consolidation of these particles inside a SiC matrix have been codified thanks to significant R&D supported by US DOE Fuel Cycle R&D program. Also, surrogate FCM pellets (pellets with zirconia instead of uranium-bearing kernels) have been neutron irradiated and the stability of the matrix and coating layer under LWR irradiation conditions have been established. Currently the focus is on production of LEU (7.3% U-235 enrichment) FCM pellets to be utilized for irradiation testing. The irradiation is planned at INL s Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). This is a critical step in development of this fuel concept to establish the ability of this fuel to retain fission products under prototypical irradiation conditions.

  7. Seafloor Deformation Monitoring for Methane Hydrate Production Test

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Yokoyama, T.; Matsuda, S.; Takeshima, J.; Sano, K.; Nakatsuka, Y.

    2014-12-01

    In order to observe the seafloor deformation during methane hydrate production test, we have developed a monitoring system for seafloor subsidence and inclination. According to simulation of seafloor deformation around the production well, the range of subsidence will be from 10cm to 30 cm with the continuous production of methane hydrate in a month. This monitoring system has been examined in the offshore of Suruga Bay which has water depth more than 1000m. All the features of this system were confirmed by the examination at the deep sea area. Subsidence is measured with change of water pressure on the seafloor. A pressure gauge we selected is applied a quartz crystal resonator. The range of the pressure gauge is 0 to 1,400m, the resolution is 0.014mm, and actual accuracy is around 10mm in conversion to water level. An inclinometer we selected is applied liquid electrolyte. The range of the inclinometer is from +30 to -30 degreee, resolution is 0.001degree, and actual accuracy is around 0.03-0.3degree depending on measuring condition. We have monitored by using this system during the production test of methane hydrate at East Nankai trough in the beginning of 2013.This work was carried out by OYO corporation with the support of JOGMEC which is a member of MH21 consortium sponsored by Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry in Japan.

  8. Development and Testing of the VAHIRR Radar Product

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Barrett, Joe III; Miller, Juli; Charnasky, Debbie; Gillen, Robert; Lafosse, Richard; Hoeth, Brian; Hood, Doris; McNamara, Todd

    2008-01-01

    Lightning Launch Commit Criteria (LLCC) and Flight Rules (FR) are used for launches and landings at government and commercial spaceports. They are designed to avoid natural and triggered lightning strikes to space vehicles, which can endanger the vehicle, payload, and general public. The previous LLCC and FR were shown to be overly restrictive, potentially leading to costly launch delays and scrubs. A radar algorithm called Volume Averaged Height Integrated Radar Reflectivity (VAHIRR), along with new LLCC and FR for anvil clouds, were developed using data collected by the Airborne Field Mill II research program. VAHIRR is calculated at every horizontal position in the coverage area of the radar and can be displayed similar to a two-dimensional derived reflectivity product, such as composite reflectivity or echo tops. It is the arithmetic product of two quantities not currently generated by the Weather Surveillance Radar 1988 Doppler (WSR-88D): a volume average of the reflectivity measured in dBZ and the average cloud thickness based on the average echo top height and base height. This presentation will describe the VAHIRR algorithm, and then explain how the VAHIRR radar product was implemented and tested on a clone of the National Weather Service's (NWS) Open Radar Product Generator (ORPG-clone). The VAHIRR radar product was then incorporated into the Advanced Weather Interactive Processing System (AWIPS), to make it more convenient for weather forecasters to utilize. Finally, the reliability of the VAHIRR radar product was tested with real-time level II radar data from the WSR-88D NWS Melbourne radar.

  9. Nuclear waste glass product consistency test (PCT), Version 5. 0

    SciTech Connect

    Jantzen, C.M.; Bibler, N.E.; Beam, D.C.; Ramsey, W.G.; Waters, B.J.

    1992-06-01

    Liquid high-level nuclear waste will be immobilized at the Savannah River Site (SRS) by vitrification in borosilicate glass. The glass will be produced in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), poured into stainless steel canisters, and eventually disposed of in a geologic repository. In order to comply with the Waste Acceptance Preliminary Specifications (WAPS), the durability of the glass needs to be measured during production to assure its long term stability and radionuclide release properties. A durability test, designated the Produce Consistency Test (PCT), was developed for DWPF glass in order to meet the WAPS requirements. The response of the PCT procedure was based on extensive testing with glasses of widely different compositions. The PCT was determined to be very reproducible, to yield reliable results rapidly, and to be easily performed in shielded cell facilities with radioactive samples. Version 5.0 of the PCT procedure is attached.

  10. 40 CFR 90.703 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Production line testing by the... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.703 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of small SI engines shall test production line engines from each engine family according to...

  11. 40 CFR 1054.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1054.305 Section 1054.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  12. 40 CFR 1054.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1054.305 Section 1054.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  13. 40 CFR 90.703 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Production line testing by the... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.703 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of small SI engines shall test production line engines from each engine family according to...

  14. 40 CFR 1042.305 - Preparing and testing production-line engines.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Preparing and testing production-line... AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.305 Preparing and testing production-line engines. This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the...

  15. 40 CFR 1054.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1054.305 Section 1054.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  16. 40 CFR 1048.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What production-line testing records... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a... information: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2)...

  17. 40 CFR 1054.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce... if there is evidence of a nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines...

  18. 40 CFR 1054.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce... if there is evidence of a nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines...

  19. 40 CFR 1048.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1048.305 Section 1048.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  20. 40 CFR 90.703 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Production line testing by the... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.703 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of small SI engines shall test production line engines from each engine family according to...

  1. 40 CFR 1054.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What production-line testing records... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a...) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State the total...

  2. 40 CFR 1048.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1048.305 Section 1048.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  3. 40 CFR 1042.305 - Preparing and testing production-line engines.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Preparing and testing production-line... AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.305 Preparing and testing production-line engines. This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the...

  4. 40 CFR 1054.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce... if there is evidence of a nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines...

  5. 40 CFR 1048.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1048.305 Section 1048.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  6. 40 CFR 1048.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1048.305 Section 1048.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  7. 40 CFR 90.703 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Production line testing by the... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.703 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of small SI engines shall test production line engines from each engine family according to...

  8. 40 CFR 1042.305 - Preparing and testing production-line engines.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Preparing and testing production-line... AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.305 Preparing and testing production-line engines. This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the...

  9. 40 CFR 1054.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce... if there is evidence of a nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines...

  10. 40 CFR 1054.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1054.305 Section 1054.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  11. 40 CFR 1054.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1054.305 Section 1054.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  12. 40 CFR 1054.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What production-line testing records... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a...) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State the total...

  13. 40 CFR 1054.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What production-line testing records... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a...) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State the total...

  14. 40 CFR 1042.305 - Preparing and testing production-line engines.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 32 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Preparing and testing production-line... AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.305 Preparing and testing production-line engines. This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the...

  15. 40 CFR 1054.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 32 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce... if there is evidence of a nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines...

  16. 40 CFR 1048.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What production-line testing records... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a... information: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2)...

  17. 40 CFR 90.703 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Production line testing by the... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.703 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of small SI engines shall test production line engines from each engine family according to...

  18. 40 CFR 1042.305 - Preparing and testing production-line engines.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Preparing and testing production-line... AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.305 Preparing and testing production-line engines. This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the...

  19. 40 CFR 1048.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... production-line engines? 1048.305 Section 1048.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line engines. You must assemble the test engine in...

  20. 40 CFR 1048.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What production-line testing records... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a... information: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2)...

  1. Data summary report for fission product release test VI-6

    SciTech Connect

    Osborne, M.F.; Lorenz, R.A.; Travis, J.R.; Webster, C.S.; Collins, J.L.

    1994-03-01

    Test VI-6 was the sixth test in the VI series conducted in the vertical furnace. The fuel specimen was a 15.2-cm-long section of a fuel rod from the BR3 reactor in Belgium. The fuel had experienced a burnup of {approximately}42 MWd/kg, with inert gas release during irradiation of {approximately}2%. The fuel specimen was heated in an induction furnace at 2300 K for 60 min, initially in hydrogen, then in a steam atmosphere. The released fission products were collected in three sequentially operated collection trains designed to facilitate sampling and analysis. The fission product inventories in the fuel were measured directly by gamma-ray spectrometry, where possible, and were calculated by ORIGEN2. Integral releases were 75% for {sup 85}Kr, 67% for {sup 129}I, 64% for {sup 125}Sb, 80% for both {sup 134}Cs and {sup 137}Cs, 14% for {sup 154}Eu, 63% for Te, 32% for Ba, 13% for Mo, and 5.8% for Sr. Of the totals released from the fuel, 43% of the Cs, 32% of the Sb, and 98% of the Eu were deposited in the outlet end of the furnace. During the heatup in hydrogen, the Zircaloy cladding melted, ran down, and reacted with some of the UO{sub 2} and fission products, especially Te and Sb. The total mass released from the furnace to the collection system, including fission products, fuel, and structural materials, was 0.57 g, almost equally divided between thermal gradient tubes and filters. The release behaviors for the most volatile elements, Kr and Cs, were in good agreement with the ORNL Diffusion Model.

  2. Low Speed PSP Testing in Production Wind Tunnels

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Bell, James; Mehta, Rabi; Schairer, Ed; Hand, Larry; Nixon, David (Technical Monitor)

    1998-01-01

    The brightness signal from a pressure-sensitive paint varies inversely with absolute pressure. Consequently high signal-to-noise ratios are required to resolve aerodynamic pressure fields at low speeds, where the pressure variation around an object might only be a few percent of the mean pressure. This requirement is unavoidable, and implies that care must be taken to minimize noise sources present in the measurement. This paper discusses and compares the main noise sources in low speed PSP testing using the "classical" intensity-based single-luminophore technique. These are: temperature variation, model deformation, and lamp drift/paint degradation. Minimization of these error sources from the point of view of operation in production wind tunnels is discussed, with some examples from recent tests in NASA Ames facilities.

  3. Modified Hodge test: A simple and effective test for detection of carbapenemase production

    PubMed Central

    Amjad, A; Mirza, IA; Abbasi, SA; Farwa, U; Malik, N; Zia, F

    2011-01-01

    Background and Objectives Resistance among bacterial isolates is the leading cause of increased mortality and morbidity worldwide. Carbapenems once thought to be effective are becoming ineffective mostly due to the emergence of carbapenemase. This study was designed to determine in vitro efficacy of Modified Hodge test for detection of carbapenemase production in Gram negative rods. Material and Methods The study was done in the Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Rawalpindi Pakistan from January 2010 to December 2010. A total of 200 Gram negative rods from different clinical samples were taken. Those isolates which showed intermediate or susceptible zones i.e 16mm-21mm on disc diffusion were included in the study. These isolates were then subjected to Modified Hodge test. Result Out of 200 isolates, 138 (69%) were positive for carbapenemase production by Modified Hodge test. Out of 138 MHT positive organisms, the frequency of E. coli was 38%, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (17%), Acinetobacter baumannii (12%), Citrobacter diversus (2%) and Enterobacter agglomerans (1.4%). Conclusion Modified Hodge test is a simple test which can be performed in the routine lab for detection of carbapenemases in isolates showing intermediate or sensitive zone diameter on disc diffusion. PMID:22530087

  4. Statistical comparison of similarity tests applied to speech production data

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Kollia, H.; Jorgenson, Jay; Saint Fleur, Rose; Foster, Kevin

    2004-05-01

    Statistical analysis of data variability in speech production research has traditionally been addressed with the assumption of normally distributed error terms. The correct and valid application of statistical procedure requires a thorough investigation of the assumptions that underlie the methodology. In previous work [Kollia and Jorgenson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 (1997); 109 (2002)], it was shown that the error terms of speech production data in a linear regression can be modeled accurately using a quadratic probability distribution, rather than a normal distribution as is frequently assumed. The measurement used in the earlier Kollia-Jorgenson work involved the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test. In the present work, the authors further explore the problem of analyzing the error terms coming from linear regression using a variety of known statistical tests, including, but not limited to chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, Cramer-von Mises, skewness and kurtosis, and Durbin. Our study complements a similar study by Shapiro, Wilk, and Chen [J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (1968)]. [Partial support provided by PSC-CUNY and NSF to Jay Jorgenson.

  5. The Accelerator Production of Tritium Materials Test Program

    SciTech Connect

    Maloy, Stuart A.; Sommer, Walter F.; James, Michael R.; Romero, Tobias J.; Lopez, Manuel R.; Zimmermann, Eugene; Ledbetter, James M.

    2000-10-15

    A materials qualification program has been developed to irradiate and test candidate materials (alloy 718, Type 316L, and Type 304L stainless steel, modified Fe9Cr-1Mo(T91), Al-6061-T6, and Al-5052-O) for use in the Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) target and blanket. The irradiations were performed in prototypic proton and neutron spectra at prototypic temperatures (50 to 160 deg. C). The study used the 800-MeV, 1.0-mA proton accelerator at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center, which produces a Gaussian beam with 2 sigma = 3 cm. The experiment geometry is arranged to contain near-prototypic modules of the tungsten neutron source and the lead and aluminum blanket as well as mechanical test specimens of candidate APT materials. The particle spectrum varies throughout the irradiation volume; specimens are exposed to protons and a variety of mixed proton and neutron spectra, depending on the specimen's position relative to the beam center. These specimens have been irradiated for >3600 h to a maximum proton fluence of 4 x 10{sup 21} p/cm{sup 2} in the center of the proton beam. Specimens will yield data on the effect of proton irradiation, to high dose, on material properties from tensile tests, three-point bend tests, fracture toughness tests, pressurized tubes, U-bend stress corrosion cracking specimens, corrosion measurements, and microstructural characterization using transmission electron microscopy specimens. Results from these studies are applicable to all spallation neutron sources now in operation and under consideration, including the Spallation Neutron Source, the European Spallation Source, and The Accelerator Transmutation of Waste project.

  6. 40 CFR 1045.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... requirements of 40 CFR part 1045. We have not changed production processes or quality-control procedures for... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What production-line testing records... VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.345 What production-line testing records must I send to...

  7. 40 CFR 1060.310 - Supplying products to EPA for testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... Production Verification Testing § 1060.310 Supplying products to EPA for testing. Upon our request, you must supply a reasonable number of production samples to us for verification testing. ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Supplying products to EPA for...

  8. 40 CFR 1060.310 - Supplying products to EPA for testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... Production Verification Testing § 1060.310 Supplying products to EPA for testing. Upon our request, you must supply a reasonable number of production samples to us for verification testing. ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Supplying products to EPA for...

  9. 40 CFR 1060.310 - Supplying products to EPA for testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... Production Verification Testing § 1060.310 Supplying products to EPA for testing. Upon our request, you must supply a reasonable number of production samples to us for verification testing. ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Supplying products to EPA for...

  10. 40 CFR 1060.310 - Supplying products to EPA for testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Production Verification Testing § 1060.310 Supplying products to EPA for testing. Upon our request, you must supply a reasonable number of production samples to us for verification testing. ... 40 Protection of Environment 32 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Supplying products to EPA for...

  11. 40 CFR 1060.310 - Supplying products to EPA for testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... Production Verification Testing § 1060.310 Supplying products to EPA for testing. Upon our request, you must supply a reasonable number of production samples to us for verification testing. ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Supplying products to EPA for...

  12. 40 CFR 1048.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-line Engines § 1048.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce engines... is evidence of a nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this...

  13. 40 CFR 1051.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What production-line testing records... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a...: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line vehicles or engines and state its location....

  14. 40 CFR 1051.301 - When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.301 When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines? (a... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  15. 40 CFR 1051.301 - When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.301 When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines? (a... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  16. 40 CFR 1051.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What production-line testing records... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a...: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line vehicles or engines and state its location....

  17. 40 CFR 1051.301 - When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.301 When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines? (a... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  18. 40 CFR 1048.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-line Engines § 1048.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce engines... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  19. 40 CFR 1048.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 32 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-line Engines § 1048.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce engines... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  20. 40 CFR 1048.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-line Engines § 1048.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce engines... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  1. 40 CFR 1051.301 - When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.301 When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines? (a... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  2. 40 CFR 1051.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What production-line testing records... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA? (a...: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line vehicles or engines and state its location....

  3. 40 CFR 1051.301 - When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 32 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.301 When must I test my production-line vehicles or engines? (a... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  4. 40 CFR 1048.301 - When must I test my production-line engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false When must I test my production-line... Production-line Engines § 1048.301 When must I test my production-line engines? (a) If you produce engines... nonconformity, we may require you to test production-line engines under this subpart, or under 40 CFR part...

  5. Improving Quality of Seal Leak Test Product using Six Sigma

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Luthfi Malik, Abdullah; Akbar, Muhammad; Irianto, Dradjad

    2016-02-01

    Seal leak test part is a polyurethane material-based product. Based on past data, defect level of this product was 8%, higher than the target of 5%. Quality improvement effort was done using six sigma method that included phases of define, measure, analyse, improve, and control. In the design phase, a Delphi method was used to identify factors that were critical to quality. In the measure phase, stability and process capability was measured. Fault tree analysis (FTA) and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) were used in the next phase to analize the root cause and to determine the priority issues. Improve phase was done by compiling, selecting, and designing alternative repair. Some improvement efforts were identified, i.e. (i) making a checklist for maintenance schedules, (ii) making written reminder form, (iii) modifying the SOP more detail, and (iv) performing a major service to the vacuum machine. To ensure the continuity of improvement efforts, some control activities were executed, i.e. (i) controlling, monitoring, documenting, and setting target frequently, (ii) implementing reward and punishment system, (iii) adding cleaning tool, and (iv) building six sigma organizational structure.

  6. Data summary report for fission product release Test VI-7

    SciTech Connect

    Osborne, M.F.; Lorentz, R.A.; Travis, J.R.; Collins, J.L.; Webster, C.S.

    1995-05-01

    Test VI-7 was the final test in the VI series conducted in the vertical furnace. The fuel specimen was a 15.2-cm-long section of a fuel rod from the Monticello boiling water reactor (BWR). The fuel had experienced a burnup of {approximately}-40 Mwd/kg U. It was heated in an induction furnace for successive 20-min periods at 2000 and 2300 K in a moist air-helium atmosphere. Integral releases were 69% for {sup 85}Kr, 52% for {sup 125}Sb, 71% for both {sup 134}Cs and {sup 137}Cs, and 0.04% for {sup 154}Eu. For the non-gamma-emitting species, release values for 42% for I, 4.1% for Ba, 5.3% for Mo, and 1.2% for Sr were determined. The total mass released from the furnace to the collection system, including fission products, fuel, and structural materials, was 0.89 g, with 37% being collected on the thermal gradient tubes and 63% downstream on filters. Posttest examination of the fuel specimen indicated that most of the cladding was completely oxidized to ZrO{sub 2}, but that oxidation was not quite complete at the upper end. The release behaviors for the most volatile elements, Kr and Cs, were in good agreement with the ORNL-Booth Model.

  7. 76 FR 62714 - Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization With International Standards

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-10-11

    ... Harmonization With International Standards AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed...) titled ``Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization With International Standards'' in the... publishing an interim rule titled ``Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization...

  8. 77 FR 9859 - Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization With International Standards

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-02-21

    ... Harmonization With International Standards AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Interim rule. SUMMARY: The Coast... rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization With International... interim rule titled ``Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization With...

  9. Chemical Characterization and Reactivity Testing of Fuel-Oxidizer Reaction Product (Test Report)

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    1996-01-01

    The product of incomplete reaction of monomethylhydrazine (MMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (NTO) propellants, or fuel-oxidizer reaction product (FORP), has been hypothesized as a contributory cause of an anomaly which occurred in the chamber pressure (PC) transducer tube on the Reaction Control Subsystem (RCS) aft thruster 467 on flight STS-51. A small hole was found in the titanium-alloy PC tube at the first bend below the pressure transducer. It was surmised that the hole may have been caused by heat and pressure resulting from ignition of FORP. The NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) was requested to define the chemical characteristics of FORP, characterize its reactivity, and simulate the events in a controlled environment which may have lead to the Pc-tube failure. Samples of FORP were obtained from the gas-phase reaction of MMH with NTO under laboratory conditions, the pulsed firings of RCS thrusters with modified PC tubes using varied oxidizer or fuel lead times, and the nominal RCS thruster firings at WSTF and Kaiser-Marquardt. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC), ion chromatography (IC), inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometry, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) coupled to FTIR (TGA/FTIR), and mechanical impact testing were used to qualitatively and quantitatively characterize the chemical, thermal, and ignition properties of FORP. These studies showed that the composition of FORP is variable but falls within a limited range of compositions that depends on the fuel loxidizer ratio at the time of formation, composition of the post-formation atmosphere (reducing or oxidizing), and reaction or postreaction temperature. A typical composition contains methylhydrazinium nitrate (MMHN), ammonium nitrate (AN), methylammonium nitrate (MAN), and trace amounts of hydrazinium nitrate and 1,1-dimethylhydrazinium nitrate. The thermal decomposition

  10. 40 CFR 1051.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ...: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line vehicles or engines and state its location. (2... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM RECREATIONAL ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?...

  11. 40 CFR 1051.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ...: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line vehicles or engines and state its location. (2... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM RECREATIONAL ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?...

  12. 40 CFR 1045.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ...: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State the... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM SPARK-IGNITION PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.345 What production-line testing records must I send to...

  13. 40 CFR 1048.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... information: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW, LARGE NONROAD SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?...

  14. 40 CFR 1048.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... information: (1) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW, LARGE NONROAD SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.345 What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?...

  15. 76 FR 4549 - Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group of Chemicals; Technical Correction

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-01-26

    ... AGENCY 40 CFR Part 799 RIN 2070-AD16 Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group of... testing of certain high production volume (HPV) chemical substances to obtain screening level data for.... 799.5087 Chemical testing requirements for second group of high production volume chemicals...

  16. 76 FR 46598 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toys: Requirements for Accreditation of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-03

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Chapter II Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toys: Requirements for..., 2011. Comments on this notice should be captioned ``Third party Testing for Certain Children's Products... Requirements for Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products. The Federal Register notice will...

  17. 46 CFR 159.007-3 - Production inspections and tests: Independent laboratory's procedures.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-3 Production... and tests; (2) Include labeling or marking the equipment or material when the equipment or material... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Independent...

  18. 46 CFR 159.007-3 - Production inspections and tests: Independent laboratory's procedures.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-3 Production... and tests; (2) Include labeling or marking the equipment or material when the equipment or material... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Independent...

  19. 46 CFR 159.007-13 - Production inspections and tests: Records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-13 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Records....

  20. 46 CFR 159.007-13 - Production inspections and tests: Records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-13 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Records....

  1. 46 CFR 159.007-3 - Production inspections and tests: Independent laboratory's procedures.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-3 Production... and tests; (2) Include labeling or marking the equipment or material when the equipment or material... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Independent...

  2. 46 CFR 159.007-5 - Production inspections and tests: Application for acceptance.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-5 Production inspections and...) Is accepted by the Commandant for approval inspections and tests of the equipment or material under... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Application...

  3. 46 CFR 159.007-5 - Production inspections and tests: Application for acceptance.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-5 Production inspections and...) Is accepted by the Commandant for approval inspections and tests of the equipment or material under... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Application...

  4. 46 CFR 159.007-11 - Production inspections and tests: Yearly report.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-11 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Yearly report....

  5. 46 CFR 159.007-13 - Production inspections and tests: Records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-13 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Records....

  6. 46 CFR 159.007-13 - Production inspections and tests: Records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-13 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Records....

  7. 46 CFR 159.007-11 - Production inspections and tests: Yearly report.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-11 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Yearly report....

  8. 46 CFR 159.007-3 - Production inspections and tests: Independent laboratory's procedures.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-3 Production... and tests; (2) Include labeling or marking the equipment or material when the equipment or material... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Independent...

  9. 46 CFR 159.007-11 - Production inspections and tests: Yearly report.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-11 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Yearly report....

  10. 46 CFR 159.007-11 - Production inspections and tests: Yearly report.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-11 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Yearly report....

  11. 46 CFR 159.007-5 - Production inspections and tests: Application for acceptance.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-5 Production inspections and...) Is accepted by the Commandant for approval inspections and tests of the equipment or material under... 46 Shipping 6 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Application...

  12. 46 CFR 159.007-5 - Production inspections and tests: Application for acceptance.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-5 Production inspections and...) Is accepted by the Commandant for approval inspections and tests of the equipment or material under... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Application...

  13. 46 CFR 159.007-11 - Production inspections and tests: Yearly report.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-11 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Yearly report....

  14. 46 CFR 159.007-5 - Production inspections and tests: Application for acceptance.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-5 Production inspections and...) Is accepted by the Commandant for approval inspections and tests of the equipment or material under... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Application...

  15. 46 CFR 159.007-13 - Production inspections and tests: Records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ..., CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL APPROVAL OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-13 Production inspections and tests... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Records....

  16. 46 CFR 159.007-3 - Production inspections and tests: Independent laboratory's procedures.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... MATERIALS Production Inspection and Tests of Approved Equipment and Materials § 159.007-3 Production... and tests; (2) Include labeling or marking the equipment or material when the equipment or material... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections and tests: Independent...

  17. 40 CFR 94.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 94.510 Section 94.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Programs § 94.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing....

  18. 40 CFR 91.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 91.510 Section 91.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Production Line Testing Program § 91.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A...

  19. 40 CFR 91.503 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Production line testing by the... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM MARINE SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 91.503 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of marine...

  20. 40 CFR 1048.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1048.310 Section 1048.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Use... end of the assembly line for each engine family. (c) Calculate the required sample size for...

  1. 40 CFR 91.503 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Production line testing by the... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM MARINE SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 91.503 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of marine...

  2. 40 CFR 1048.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1048.310 Section 1048.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Use... end of the assembly line for each engine family. (c) Calculate the required sample size for...

  3. 40 CFR 94.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 94.510 Section 94.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Programs § 94.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing....

  4. 40 CFR 1033.330 - Compliance criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 1033.330 Compliance criteria for production line testing. There... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Compliance criteria for production line testing. 1033.330 Section 1033.330 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  5. 40 CFR 1033.330 - Compliance criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 1033.330 Compliance criteria for production line testing. There... 40 Protection of Environment 34 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Compliance criteria for production line testing. 1033.330 Section 1033.330 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  6. 40 CFR 92.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... production line testing. 92.510 Section 92.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer and Remanufacturer Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 92.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A failed locomotive or locomotive engine is one whose final...

  7. 40 CFR 92.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... production line testing. 92.510 Section 92.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer and Remanufacturer Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 92.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A failed locomotive or locomotive engine is one whose final...

  8. 40 CFR 91.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... Production Line Testing Program § 91.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A failed... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 91.510 Section 91.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  9. 40 CFR 91.503 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Production line testing by the... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM MARINE SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 91.503 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of marine...

  10. 40 CFR 92.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... production line testing. 92.510 Section 92.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer and Remanufacturer Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 92.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A failed locomotive or locomotive engine is one whose final...

  11. 40 CFR 1048.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1048.310 Section 1048.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Use... end of the assembly line for each engine family. (c) Calculate the required sample size for...

  12. 40 CFR 91.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 91.510 Section 91.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Production Line Testing Program § 91.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A...

  13. 40 CFR 94.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Programs § 94.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 94.510 Section 94.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  14. 40 CFR 91.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 91.510 Section 91.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Production Line Testing Program § 91.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A...

  15. 40 CFR 94.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 94.510 Section 94.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Programs § 94.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing....

  16. 40 CFR 1033.330 - Compliance criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 1033.330 Compliance criteria for production line testing. There... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Compliance criteria for production line testing. 1033.330 Section 1033.330 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  17. 40 CFR 91.503 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Production line testing by the... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM MARINE SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 91.503 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of marine...

  18. 40 CFR 1033.330 - Compliance criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 1033.330 Compliance criteria for production line testing. There... 40 Protection of Environment 33 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Compliance criteria for production line testing. 1033.330 Section 1033.330 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  19. 40 CFR 92.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... production line testing. 92.510 Section 92.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer and Remanufacturer Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 92.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A failed locomotive or locomotive engine is one whose final...

  20. 40 CFR 1048.310 - How must I select engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... production-line testing? 1048.310 Section 1048.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.310 How must I select engines for production-line testing? (a) Use... end of the assembly line for each engine family. (c) Calculate the required sample size for...

  1. 40 CFR 91.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 91.510 Section 91.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Production Line Testing Program § 91.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A...

  2. 40 CFR 94.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 94.510 Section 94.510 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... Manufacturer Production Line Testing Programs § 94.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing....

  3. 40 CFR 91.503 - Production line testing by the manufacturer.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Production line testing by the... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM MARINE SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 91.503 Production line testing by the manufacturer. (a) Manufacturers of marine...

  4. 40 CFR 1033.330 - Compliance criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 1033.330 Compliance criteria for production line testing. There... 40 Protection of Environment 32 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Compliance criteria for production line testing. 1033.330 Section 1033.330 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION...

  5. An 'inherent' biodegradability test for oil products: description and results of an international ring test. CONCAWE Biodegradation Task Force.

    PubMed

    Battersby, N S; Ciccognani, D; Evans, M R; King, D; Painter, H A; Peterson, D R; Starkey, M

    1999-06-01

    Current test guidelines for assessing 'inherent' (potential) biodegradability were designed for water-soluble, organic compounds of low volatility and are unsuitable for most oil products. It was against this background, that CONCAWE (the oil companies' European organisation for environment, health and safety) formed a task force to develop a standard test protocol for assessing the 'inherent' biodegradability of oil products.

  6. 21 CFR 640.82 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-04-01

    ... solution of the final product diluted to a concentration of 1 percent protein with 0.15 molar sodium chloride. (d) Sodium concentration. The sodium concentration of the final product shall be 130 to...

  7. 21 CFR 640.82 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-04-01

    ... solution of the final product diluted to a concentration of 1 percent protein with 0.15 molar sodium chloride. (d) Sodium concentration. The sodium concentration of the final product shall be 130 to...

  8. 21 CFR 640.82 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-04-01

    ... solution of the final product diluted to a concentration of 1 percent protein with 0.15 molar sodium chloride. (d) Sodium concentration. The sodium concentration of the final product shall be 130 to...

  9. 21 CFR 640.82 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-04-01

    ... solution of the final product diluted to a concentration of 1 percent protein with 0.15 molar sodium chloride. (d) Sodium concentration. The sodium concentration of the final product shall be 130 to...

  10. 21 CFR 640.82 - Tests on final product.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-04-01

    ... solution of the final product diluted to a concentration of 1 percent protein with 0.15 molar sodium chloride. (d) Sodium concentration. The sodium concentration of the final product shall be 130 to...

  11. A Production Test in Black Standard and Nonstandard Speech

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Politzer, Robert L.; Brown, Dwight

    1973-01-01

    As part of the development of a battery of tests to determine proficiency in black standard and nonstandard speech, a test, consisting of 20 items involving verbal and pictorial cues, was developed and administered to 27 third graders and 32 sixth graders. Results were analyzed to determine test reliability and correlation with other test scores.…

  12. 46 CFR 160.176-15 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ...— (i) Perform all required tests and examinations on each lifejacket lot before the independent laboratory inspector tests and inspects the lot; (ii) Perform required testing of each incoming lot of... for tests prescribed in this subpart. (2) Independent laboratory. (i) An inspector may not perform...

  13. 46 CFR 160.176-15 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ...— (i) Perform all required tests and examinations on each lifejacket lot before the independent laboratory inspector tests and inspects the lot; (ii) Perform required testing of each incoming lot of... for tests prescribed in this subpart. (2) Independent laboratory. (i) An inspector may not perform...

  14. 46 CFR 160.176-15 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ...— (i) Perform all required tests and examinations on each lifejacket lot before the independent laboratory inspector tests and inspects the lot; (ii) Perform required testing of each incoming lot of... for tests prescribed in this subpart. (2) Independent laboratory. (i) An inspector may not perform...

  15. 30 CFR 250.1151 - How often must I conduct well production tests?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... after the end of the test period. (2) At least one well test during a calendar half-year for each... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false How often must I conduct well production tests... Gas Production Requirements Well Tests and Surveys § 250.1151 How often must I conduct well...

  16. 30 CFR 250.1151 - How often must I conduct well production tests?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... after the end of the test period. (2) At least one well test during a calendar half-year for each... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false How often must I conduct well production tests... Gas Production Requirements Well Tests and Surveys § 250.1151 How often must I conduct well...

  17. 30 CFR 250.1151 - How often must I conduct well production tests?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... after the end of the test period. (2) At least one well test during a calendar half-year for each... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false How often must I conduct well production tests... Gas Production Requirements Well Tests and Surveys § 250.1151 How often must I conduct well...

  18. Recent Performance Testing Results Using the 3-element Production Test Array for the Allen Telescope Array

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Tarter, J. C.; Blitz, L.; ATA 25 person Team; Paul G. Allen Foundation Collaboration

    2002-12-01

    The Allen Telescope Array will consist of 350 fixed six-meter dishes at the Hat Creek Radio Observatory in northern California (land use permits pending). It is the first massively parallel array ever built. Where possible, components from consumer markets and mass-production manufacturing processes have been used to lower costs. The architecture of the array explicitly anticipates future growth as a result of "Moore's Law" improvements. There will be many novel features of this array including ultra-wideband instantaneous frequency coverage from 0.5 to 11 GHz, a very wide field of view (2.5 degrees across at 21 cm), miniaturized 80K cryogenics, full bandwidth analog data transmission from the antennas to the Myhrvold central processing facility, dynamic null-formation and tracking of satellite interferers, and continuous multi-user support for radio astronomical research and SETI explorations. Starting in July 2000, the technology development for this array has been a collaboration between the Paul G. Allen Foundation and the ATA team located at the SETI Institute and at the Radio Astronomy Laboratory at UC Berkeley. A rapid prototyping array (RPA) consisting of seven COTS antennas and room temperature L-band receivers was erected in Orinda, CA in March 2001. Thanks to strong and continuing support from Sun Microsystems, the RPA has provided an invaluable testbed for software development and evaluation of RFI mitigation schemes. An operational 3-element Production Test Array (PTA) has been implemented at Hat Creek Observatory over the last few months. The antennas, drives, monitor and control software, and frontend components are near-final versions to be manufactured for the full array. This poster provides performance data from the first few months of testing with the PTA. A final decision on commitment for construction is expected by April 1, 2003.

  19. 76 FR 22030 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toddler Beds: Requirements for Accreditation...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-04-20

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1217 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toddler Beds: Requirements... children's products for conformity with ``other children's product safety rules.'' Section 14(f)(1) of the CPSA defines ``children's product safety rule'' as ``a consumer product safety rule under [the CPSA]...

  20. 75 FR 22746 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Notice of Requirements for Accreditation of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-04-30

    ... COMMISSION Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Notice of Requirements for Accreditation of... children's products for conformity with ``other children's product safety rules.'' Section 14(f)(1) of the CPSA defines ``children's product safety rule'' as ``a consumer product safety rule under [the CPSA]...

  1. In Situ Vitrification Engineering-Scale Test ES-INEL-4 Product Characterization Test Plan

    SciTech Connect

    Weidner, J.R.; Stoots, P.R.

    1990-06-01

    In 1987, the Buried Waste Program (BWP) was established within EG G Idaho, Inc., the prime contractor at INEL. Following the Environmental Restoration guidelines of the Buried Waste Program, the In Situ Vitrification Program is participating in a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for permanent disposal of INEL waste, in compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This study was requested and is being funded by the Office of Technology Development of the Idaho Operations Office of DOE (DOE-ID). As part of the RI/FS, an in situ vitrification (ISV) scoping study on the treatability of mixed low-level and mixed transuranic-contaminated waste is being performed to determine the applicability of ISV to remediation of waste at SDA. In examination of the ISV process for applicability to SDA waste, this In Situ Vitrification Engineering-Scale Test ES-INEL-4 Product Characterization Test Plan identifies the following: sampling and analysis strategy; sampling procedures; methods to conduct analyses; equipment; and procedures to ensure data quality. 8 refs., 2 tabs.

  2. 46 CFR 57.06-4 - Production testing specimen requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... pressure vessels as specified in § 57.06-5. (b) The test plates shall be so supported that the warping due... welding has warped the test plates, the plates shall be straightened before being stress-relieved....

  3. 46 CFR 57.06-4 - Production testing specimen requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... pressure vessels as specified in § 57.06-5. (b) The test plates shall be so supported that the warping due... welding has warped the test plates, the plates shall be straightened before being stress-relieved....

  4. 46 CFR 57.06-4 - Production testing specimen requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... pressure vessels as specified in § 57.06-5. (b) The test plates shall be so supported that the warping due... welding has warped the test plates, the plates shall be straightened before being stress-relieved....

  5. 46 CFR 57.06-4 - Production testing specimen requirements.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... pressure vessels as specified in § 57.06-5. (b) The test plates shall be so supported that the warping due... welding has warped the test plates, the plates shall be straightened before being stress-relieved....

  6. 46 CFR 160.023-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... the second test. (1) Inspections and tests by the manufacturer. The manufacturer's quality control procedures must include inspection of materials entering into construction of the signals and inspection of...-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION,...

  7. 46 CFR 160.023-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... the second test. (1) Inspections and tests by the manufacturer. The manufacturer's quality control procedures must include inspection of materials entering into construction of the signals and inspection of...-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION,...

  8. 46 CFR 160.023-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... the second test. (1) Inspections and tests by the manufacturer. The manufacturer's quality control procedures must include inspection of materials entering into construction of the signals and inspection of...-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION,...

  9. 46 CFR 160.171-25 - Production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... this test if— (1) The measured buoyancy of the suit differs by more than 10% from the measured buoyancy of the suit tested for approval, (2) The adjusted buoyancy of the suit calculated using the...

  10. 46 CFR 160.024-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... reworking performed on the rejected lot, and the results of the second test. (1) Lot size. For the purposes... laboratory must perform or supervise the technical tests in paragraph (d) of this section at least once for... laboratory must perform or supervise the inspections and tests of the reworked lot and the next lot...

  11. 46 CFR 160.077-23 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ...—(i) Perform all required tests and examinations on each PFD lot before the independent laboratory inspector tests and inspects the lot, except as provided in § 160.077-23(d)(5); (ii) Perform required... component materials for tests prescribed in this subpart. (2) Independent Laboratory. (i) An inspector...

  12. 46 CFR 160.077-23 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ...—(i) Perform all required tests and examinations on each PFD lot before the independent laboratory inspector tests and inspects the lot, except as provided in § 160.077-23(d)(5); (ii) Perform required... component materials for tests prescribed in this subpart. (2) Independent Laboratory. (i) An inspector...

  13. 46 CFR 160.024-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... reworking performed on the rejected lot, and the results of the second test. (1) Lot size. For the purposes... laboratory must perform or supervise the technical tests in paragraph (d) of this section at least once for... laboratory must perform or supervise the inspections and tests of the reworked lot and the next lot...

  14. 46 CFR 160.077-23 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ...—(i) Perform all required tests and examinations on each PFD lot before the independent laboratory inspector tests and inspects the lot, except as provided in § 160.077-23(d)(5); (ii) Perform required... component materials for tests prescribed in this subpart. (2) Independent Laboratory. (i) An inspector...

  15. Finding Creative Potential on Intelligence Tests via Divergent Production

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Kaufman, James C.; Kaufman, Scott Barry; Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O.

    2011-01-01

    Assessing creative potential using a comprehensive battery of standardized tests requires a focus on "how" and "why" an individual responds in addition to "how well" they respond. Using the "intelligent testing" philosophy of focusing on the person being tested rather than the measure itself helps…

  16. Growian rotor blades: Production development, construction and test

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Thiele, H. M.

    1984-01-01

    Development and construction of three 50 m rotor blades for a 3 MW wind turbine are described. A hybrid concept was chosen, i.e., a load carrying inflexible steel spar and a glass fiber reinforced plastic skin. A test blade was constructed and static loading tests, dynamic vibration tests and fatigue tests on critical welds as well as at the connection between spar and blade skin were performed. All test results show good accordance with calculated values, and were taken into consideration during the construction of two rotor blades.

  17. 46 CFR 160.077-23 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... product; (iv) Have a continuing program of employee training and a program for maintaining production and...: Inflation chamber materials See note 1 Seam strength 1 1 2 2 3 4 Over-pressure(2), (3) 1 2 3 4 6 8 Air retention Every device in the lot Buoyancy and inflation media retention 1 2 3 4 6 8 Tensile strength(4) 1...

  18. 76 FR 9028 - Guidance for Industry: Potency Tests for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products; Availability

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-02-16

    ... Industry: Potency Tests for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products'' dated January 2011. The guidance document provides manufacturers of cellular and gene therapy (CGT) products with recommendations for developing... document entitled ``Guidance for Industry: Potency Tests for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products''...

  19. 78 FR 11700 - Notice of Availability: Beta Test of Electronic Product Fulfillment for Addressing and Delivery...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-02-19

    ...) licensees to test a beta web service that allows the electronic download of these products through the USPS Electronic Product Fulfillment (EPF) Web site. DATES: Interested licensees should submit requests for... licensees to test a beta web service that allows the electronic download of these products through the...

  20. 30 CFR 250.804 - Production safety-system testing and records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Production safety-system testing and records. 250.804 Section 250.804 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT... Gas Production Safety Systems § 250.804 Production safety-system testing and records. (a)...

  1. 30 CFR 250.804 - Production safety-system testing and records.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Production safety-system testing and records. 250.804 Section 250.804 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT... Gas Production Safety Systems § 250.804 Production safety-system testing and records. (a)...

  2. 40 CFR 90.710 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 90.710 Section 90.710 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... KILOWATTS Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.710 Compliance with criteria for production...

  3. 40 CFR 90.710 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 21 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 90.710 Section 90.710 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... KILOWATTS Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.710 Compliance with criteria for production...

  4. 40 CFR 90.710 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Compliance with criteria for production line testing. 90.710 Section 90.710 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... KILOWATTS Manufacturer Production Line Testing Program § 90.710 Compliance with criteria for production...

  5. Coal desulfurization by chlorinolysis production and combustion test evaluation of product coals

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Kalvinskas, J. J.; Daly, D.

    1982-01-01

    Laboratory-scale screening tests were carried out on coal from Harrison County, Ohio to establish chlorination and hydrodesulfurization conditions for the batch reactor production of chlorinolysis and chlorinolysis-hydrodesulfurized coals. In addition, three bituminous coals, were treated on the lab scale by the chlorinolysis process to provide 39 to 62% desulfurization. Two bituminous coals and one subbituminous coal were then produced in 11 to 15 pound lots as chlorinolysis and hydrodesulfurized coals. The chlorinolysis coals had a desulfurization of 29-69%, reductions in voltatiles and hydrogen. Hydrodesulfurization provided a much greater desulfurization (56-86%), reductions in volatiles and hydrogen. The three coals were combustion tested in the Penn State ""plane flame furnace'' to determine ignition and burning characteristics. All three coals burned well to completion as: raw coals, chlorinolysis processed coals, and hydrodesulfurized coals. The hydrodesulfurized coals experienced greater ignition delays and reduced burning rates than the other coals because of the reduced volatile content. It is thought that the increased open pore volume in the desulfurized-devolatilized coals compensates in part for the decreased volatiles effect on ignition and burning.

  6. 46 CFR 160.026-6 - Sampling, inspection, and tests of production lots.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... under 46 CFR 159.010. The independent laboratory shall perform the tests outlined in Table 160.026-6(d2...)(2)—Description of Laboratory Tests Number of containers per set of samples to be tested Type of test... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Sampling, inspection, and tests of production lots....

  7. 46 CFR 160.026-6 - Sampling, inspection, and tests of production lots.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... under 46 CFR 159.010. The independent laboratory shall perform the tests outlined in Table 160.026-6(d2...)(2)—Description of Laboratory Tests Number of containers per set of samples to be tested Type of test... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Sampling, inspection, and tests of production lots....

  8. 21 CFR 355.70 - Testing procedures for fluoride dentifrice drug products.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-04-01

    ... 21 Food and Drugs 5 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false Testing procedures for fluoride dentifrice drug... SERVICES (CONTINUED) DRUGS FOR HUMAN USE ANTICARIES DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE Testing Procedures § 355.70 Testing procedures for fluoride dentifrice drug products. (a) A fluoride dentifrice...

  9. 76 FR 54218 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toys: Requirements for Accreditation of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-31

    ... COMMISSION Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toys: Requirements for Accreditation of Third... party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Toys: Requirements for Accreditation of Third party... stakeholders directly affected by the Notice of Requirements for Third Party Testing for Certain...

  10. 77 FR 64366 - Market Test of Experimental Product-Metro Post

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-19

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office POSTAL SERVICE Market Test... Service gives notice of a market test of an experimental product in accordance with statutory requirements... 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1), it will begin a market test of its Metro Post experimental product on or...

  11. 76 FR 2930 - Market Test of Experimental Product: “Gift Cards”

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-01-18

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office POSTAL SERVICE Market Test... Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an experimental product in accordance with statutory...) that it will begin a market test of its ``Gift Cards'' experimental product on or around May 1,...

  12. 75 FR 16874 - Market Test of “Samples Co-Op Box” Experimental Product

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-04-02

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office POSTAL SERVICE Market Test...: The Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an experimental product in accordance with...) that it will begin a market test of its ``Samples Co-Op Box'' experimental product on May 1, 2010....

  13. 77 FR 64566 - Market Test of Experimental Product-Metro Post

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-10-22

    ... Market Test of Experimental Product--Metro Post AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service proposal to conduct a market test involving the product called Metro Post. This document describes the proposed test, addresses...

  14. 78 FR 29780 - Fees for Testing, Evaluation, and Approval of Mining Products

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-05-21

    ... Safety and Health Administration Fees for Testing, Evaluation, and Approval of Mining Products AGENCY...) contains new authority for 30 CFR part 5, Fees for testing, evaluation, and approval of mining products; it allows MSHA to collect fees up to $2,499,000 for the testing, evaluation, and approval of certain...

  15. 16 CFR 1109.12 - Component part testing for lead content of children's products.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Component part testing for lead content of... Chemicals § 1109.12 Component part testing for lead content of children's products. A certifier may rely on component part testing of each accessible component part of a children's product for lead content,...

  16. 16 CFR 1109.12 - Component part testing for lead content of children's products.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Component part testing for lead content of... Chemicals § 1109.12 Component part testing for lead content of children's products. A certifier may rely on component part testing of each accessible component part of a children's product for lead content,...

  17. 16 CFR 1109.12 - Component part testing for lead content of children's products.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-01-01

    ... 16 Commercial Practices 2 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Component part testing for lead content of... Chemicals § 1109.12 Component part testing for lead content of children's products. A certifier may rely on component part testing of each accessible component part of a children's product for lead content,...

  18. 46 CFR 57.06-3 - Method of performing production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-3 Method of performing production testing. (a) Except as... is within the vessel material specification limits and the melting practice is the same. (c) Test... thickness as the material being welded and shall be of sufficient size to provide two specimens of each...

  19. 46 CFR 57.06-3 - Method of performing production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... AND BRAZING Production Tests § 57.06-3 Method of performing production testing. (a) Except as... is within the vessel material specification limits and the melting practice is the same. (c) Test... thickness as the material being welded and shall be of sufficient size to provide two specimens of each...

  20. 40 CFR 92.510 - Compliance with criteria for production line testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... Manufacturer and Remanufacturer Production Line Testing and Audit Programs § 92.510 Compliance with criteria for production line testing. (a) A failed locomotive or locomotive engine is one whose final test... 40 Protection of Environment 20 2014-07-01 2013-07-01 true Compliance with criteria for...

  1. 46 CFR 160.031-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ...'s quality control procedures must include the inspection of appliances during production as well as...-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Line-Throwing Appliance, Shoulder Gun Type...

  2. 46 CFR 160.031-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ...'s quality control procedures must include the inspection of appliances during production as well as...-5 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Line-Throwing Appliance, Shoulder Gun Type...

  3. IR Camera Report for the 7 Day Production Test

    SciTech Connect

    Holloway, Michael Andrew

    2016-02-22

    The following report gives a summary of the IR camera performance results and data for the 7 day production run that occurred from 10 Sep 2015 thru 16 Sep 2015. During this production run our goal was to see how well the camera performed its task of monitoring the target window temperature with our improved alignment procedure and emissivity measurements. We also wanted to see if the increased shielding would be effective in protecting the camera from damage and failure.

  4. 46 CFR 160.031-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Line-Throwing Appliance, Shoulder Gun Type (and... test. The operational test must be conducted as follows: (1) Three rounds must be fired by the gun, at... of the projectile must be in accordance with § 160.031-3(d) the gun must fire each round properly...

  5. 46 CFR 160.031-5 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Line-Throwing Appliance, Shoulder Gun Type (and... test. The operational test must be conducted as follows: (1) Three rounds must be fired by the gun, at... of the projectile must be in accordance with § 160.031-3(d) the gun must fire each round properly...

  6. 46 CFR 160.021-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... (specimen) must be tested as follows: (i) Conditioning of test specimens—water resistance. Immerse specimen horizontally with uppermost portion of the signal approximately 25 mm (1 in.) below the surface of the water for a period of 24 hours. If the signal is protected by alternate waterproofing consisting of a...

  7. 46 CFR 160.036-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Hand-Held Rocket-Propelled Parachute Red Flare... tested as follows: (i) Conditioning of test specimens—water resistant. Immerse specimen horizontally with uppermost portion of the signal approximately 25 mm (1 in.) below the surface of the water for a period...

  8. Recent Developments in Cell Vibration Testing at ABSL Space Products

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Roberts, Sam; Thwaite, Carl

    2014-08-01

    This paper will describe vibration testing performed at ABSL in recent years on 18650 lithium-ion cells, focussing on work done to expand knowledge of the newest cells (the HCM and NL cells) under random vibration loads. COTS cells as used by ABSL are not necessarily designed for vibration tolerance, and so understanding the conditions that cause failures, and the precise failure modes, is a critical activity.The approach used for cell testing will be described, including the test setup and overall test and analysis flow. In particular, two different approaches (using fixed and resonating interfaces) will be described. The results of survival testing performed on HCM and NL cells will be presented. In addition, the damping behaviour of the HC cell will be described.

  9. Environmental testing of block 3 solar cell modules. Part 1: Qualification testing of standard production modules

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Griffith, J. S.

    1979-01-01

    Qualification tests of solar cell modules are described. These modules continue to show improvement over earlier type modules tested. Cell cracking and delamination are less prevalent, and interconnect problems and electrical degradation from environmental testing are now rare.

  10. 75 FR 52616 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Youth All-Terrain Vehicles: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-27

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1420 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Youth All- Terrain Vehicles... be captioned ``Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; All- Terrain Vehicles... to assess children's products for conformity with ``other children's product safety rules.''...

  11. 75 FR 31688 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Infant Bath Seats: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-04

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1215 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Infant Bath Seats... conformity assessment bodies to assess children's products for conformity with ``other children's product safety rules.'' Section 14(f)(1) of the CPSA defines ``children's product safety rule'' as ``a...

  12. CALiPER Summary of Results. Round 13 of Product Testing

    SciTech Connect

    none,

    2011-10-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) Commercially Available Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Product Evaluation and Reporting (CALiPER) Program has been purchasing and testing general illumination solid-state lighting (SSL) products since 2006.

  13. TESTING INDOOR AIR PRODUCTS: ONE APPROACH TO DEVELOPING WIDELY ACCEPTED PROTOCOLS

    EPA Science Inventory

    The paper describes an approach to developing widely acce ted products for testing indoor air products. [NOTE: Research Triangle Institute (RTI) is a partner in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program with responsibil...

  14. 46 CFR 160.028-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    .... (1) Inspections and tests by the manufacturer. The manufacturer's quality control procedures must...-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Signal Pistols for Red Flare Distress...

  15. 46 CFR 160.028-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    .... (1) Inspections and tests by the manufacturer. The manufacturer's quality control procedures must...-4 Shipping COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Signal Pistols for Red Flare Distress...

  16. Limited Production (LP) Precision Runway Monitor (PRM) Operational Test and Evaluation integration and OT and E Operational Test Plan

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Livings, Jeffrey

    1995-05-01

    This document defines the Test Plan and corresponding Test Verification Requirements Traceability Matrix (TVRTM) that will be used to conduct the Limited Production (LP) Precision Runway Monitor (PRM) Operational Test and Evaluation (OT and E) Integration and OT and E Operational tests. These tests will be conducted at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport following the Contractor Site Acceptance Test. The LP PRM OT and E test effort will concentrate on Operational Effectiveness and Suitability. The Operational Effectiveness Test consists of a review of the contractor performed Development Test and Evaluation (DT and E) and Site Acceptance Tests. This review will evaluate whether each of the Measures of Effectiveness had been satisfactorily tested and whether the results meet the Minimum Acceptable Operational REquirements MAORs). This review will be conducted solely by test engineers and does not require the PRM system. The Operational Suitability Tests will expose the test participants (Air Traffic (AT) Controllers and Airway Facilities (AF) Technicians) to the PRM system in an operational environment while they perform specified operational procedures. These tests will be conducted in two separate phases: AT Suitability and AF Suitability. Each of these phases is focused on the specific test participants.

  17. Design and Drawing for Production. Syllabus. Field Test Edition II.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    New York State Education Dept., Albany.

    This syllabus, which replaces the New York State Education Department publication "Mechanical Drawing and Design," is intended for use in teaching a high school course in design and drawing for production. The materials included in the guide reflect a shift away from the conventional methods of teaching design and drawing to a greater…

  18. Recommendation for a test battery for the ecotoxicological evaluation of the environmental safety of construction products.

    PubMed

    Gartiser, Stefan; Heisterkamp, Ines; Schoknecht, Ute; Bandow, Nicole; Burkhardt, N Michael; Ratte, Monika; Ilvonen, Outi

    2017-03-01

    The European Construction Products Regulation allows Member States to adopt rules for evaluating the environmental impact of their buildings. The aim of the project was to develop recommendations for a test battery for the ecotoxicological assessment of the environmental impact of construction products for outdoor use and contribute to the European harmonization of test methods. From a shortlist of 39 products 20 products were included in the ecotoxicological testing program. Monolithic and plate-like construction products were eluted in the Dynamic Surface Leaching test (DSLT) in accordance with CEN/TS 16637-2, granular products were eluted in a one stage batch test in accordance with DIN EN 12457-1. The eluates were examined in four aquatic toxicity tests (algae, daphnia, luminescent bacteria, fish eggs), a genotoxicity test (umu test) and in the respirometer test (OECD 301 F). Here, low to very high ecotoxicity was observed (up to a dilution factor of 1536). Six out of 8 eluates, whose TOC exceeded 10 mg L(-1) showed a good biodegradability above 75%. The intra-laboratory repeatability of the Lowest Ineffective Dilution (LID) usually was within ±1 dilution steps (ecotoxicity tests) and ±2 dilution steps (leaching and ecotoxicity tests). This is acceptable, when considering that the overall variability of sample preparation, leaching test, and bioassays add up. The conclusions lead to practical recommendations for a suitable combination of leaching and ecotoxicity tests.

  19. 46 CFR 160.133-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of release mechanisms.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... SECURITY (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING..., tests, quality control, and conformance of release mechanisms. (a) Unless the Commandant...

  20. Facility for generating crew waste water product for ECLSS testing

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Buitekant, Alan; Roberts, Barry C.

    1990-01-01

    An End-use Equipment Facility (EEF) has been constructed which is used to simulate water interfaces between the Space Station Freedom Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) and man systems. The EEF is used to generate waste water to be treated by ECLSS water recovery systems. The EEF will also be used to close the water recovery loop by allowing test subjects to use recovered hygiene and potable water during several phases of testing. This paper describes the design and basic operation of the EEF.

  1. Status of Santa Clara MCFC product development test

    SciTech Connect

    Leo, A.J.; O`Shea, T.P.

    1995-08-01

    The objective of the 2MW Santa Clara Demonstration Project is the demonstration of the carbonate fuel cell technology at full scale. Additional objectives of the project include the demonstration of specific advantages of the direct carbonate fuel cell power plant, such as high efficiency, low emissions, reactive power capability, and high reliability and availability. The project will also provide design input for precommercial early production power plants.

  2. Testing of Willow Clones for Biomass Production in Wisconsin

    SciTech Connect

    Kubiske, Marke E.

    2005-01-01

    A core experiment with 31 willow clones and 8 standard poplar clones was established at the Harshaw Experimental Farm, Rhinelander, WI in 1997. Data analysis is continuing for survival, growth, and biomass data for all willow test sites in this project.

  3. 46 CFR 160.037-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ...: (i) Conditioning of test specimens—water resistance. Immerse specimen horizontally with uppermost portion of the signal approximately 25 mm (1 in.) below the surface of the water for a period of 24 hours. If the signal is protected by alternate waterproofing consisting of a water-resistant coating on...

  4. 46 CFR 160.037-4 - Approval and production tests.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ...: (i) Conditioning of test specimens—water resistance. Immerse specimen horizontally with uppermost portion of the signal approximately 25 mm (1 in.) below the surface of the water for a period of 24 hours. If the signal is protected by alternate waterproofing consisting of a water-resistant coating on...

  5. 76 FR 69481 - Testing and Labeling Pertaining to Product Certification

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-11-08

    ... assurance processes and risk management. Quality assurance processes can include: Factory/supplier... requirements in several respects; and (4) allowing the use of in-house ISO/IEC 17025:2005 laboratories to..., quality control, or testing procedures. Another commenter said that manufacturers would benefit...

  6. 46 CFR 164.023-13 - Production tests and inspections.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL MATERIALS Thread for Personal Flotation Devices § 164.023-13... otherwise specified in the referenced test procedure) on each lot of thread: (1) Breaking strength. One... strength. At least quarterly, one sample in each of the lightest and darkest colors accepted must be...

  7. Production test of Coseka well Federal 1-16

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1981-09-01

    The objectives of the project were to demonstrate drilling, fracturing, and recovery techniques of methane from unminable coal in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. Task I was to include: (1) testing of Federal 1-16 well which is already drilled; (2) drilling, fracturing, and testing a second well for methane recovery; and (3) preparation and presentation of a preliminary multiwell demonstration plan. Task II would have been the preparation of detailed design and analysis for a multiwell demonstration. The first part of Task I of this contract was completed with the testing of Federal 1-16. Analysis of this test indicated the gas content of the coal seam was low and that the hydraulic fracture performed was ineffective. Approval to drill and complete a second well in the coal seam was withheld by the USGS until a decision could be made by the Department of the Interior on whether or not the oil and gas lessee had the right to recover gas associated with coal deposits. Because this decision was not forthcoming the contract was cancelled for the convenience of the Government on June 24, 1981.

  8. Production Facility Prototype Blower 1000 Hour Test Results

    SciTech Connect

    Woloshun, Keith Albert; Dale, Gregory E.; Romero, Frank Patrick; Dalmas, Dale Allen

    2016-10-18

    The roots blower in use at ANL for in-beam experiments and also at LANL for flow tests was sized for 12 mm diameter disks and significantly less beam heating. Currently, the disks are 29 mm in diameter, with a 12 mm FWHM Gaussian beam spot at 42 MeV and 2.86 μA on each side of the target, 5.72 μA total. The target design itself is reported elsewhere. With the increased beam heating, the helium flow requirement increased so that a larger blower was needed for a mass flow rate of 400 g/s at 2.76 MPa (400 psig). An Aerzen GM 12.4 blower was selected, and is now installed at the LANL facility for target and component flow testing. Two extended tests of >1000 hr operation have been completed. Those results and discussion thereof are reported herein. Also included in Appendix A is the detailed description of the blower and its installation, while Appendix B documents the pressure vessel design analysis. The blower has been operated for 1000 hours as a preliminary investigation of long-term performance, operation and possible maintenance issues. The blower performed well, with no significant change in blower head or mass flow rate developed under the operating conditions. Upon inspection, some oil had leaked out of the shaft seal of the blower. The shaft seal and bearing race have been replaced. Test results and conclusions are in Appendix B.

  9. Results from a round robin test for the ecotoxicological evaluation of construction products using two leaching tests and an aquatic test battery.

    PubMed

    Gartiser, Stefan; Heisterkamp, Ines; Schoknecht, Ute; Burkhardt, Michael; Ratte, Monika; Ilvonen, Outi; Brauer, Frank; Brückmann, Jan; Dabrunz, André; Egeler, Philipp; Eisl, Andrea-Maria; Feiler, Ute; Fritz, Ines; König, Sabina; Lebertz, Herbert; Pandard, Pascal; Pötschke, Gabriele; Scheerbaum, Dirk; Schreiber, Frank; Soldán, Přemysl; Weiß, Roland; Weltens, Reinhilde

    2017-05-01

    A European round robin test according to ISO 5725-2 was conceptually prepared, realised, and evaluated. The aim was to determine the inter-laboratory variability of the overall process for the ecotoxicological characterization of construction products in eluates and bioassays. To this end, two construction products BAM-G1 (granulate) and HSR-2 (roof sealing sheet), both made of EPDM polymers (rubber), were selected. The granular construction product was eluted in a one stage batch test, the planar product in the Dynamic Surface Leaching test (DSLT). A total of 17 laboratories from 5 countries participated in the round robin test: Germany (12), Austria (2), Belgium (1), Czech Republic (1) and France (1). A test battery of four standardised ecotoxicity tests with algae, daphnia, luminescent bacteria and zebrafish eggs was used. As toxicity measures, EC50 and LID values were calculated. All tests, except the fish egg test, were basically able to demonstrate toxic effects and the level of toxicity. The reproducibility of test results depended on the test specimens and the test organisms. Generally, the variability of the EC50 or LID values increased with the overall level of toxicity. For the very toxic BAM-G1 eluate a relative high variability of CV = 73%-110% was observed for EC50 in all biotests, while for the less toxic HSR-2 eluate the reproducibility of EC50 varied with sensitivity: it was very good (CV = 9.3%) for the daphnia test with the lowest sensitivity, followed by the algae test (CV = 36.4%). The luminescent bacteria test, being the most sensitive bioassay for HSR-2 Eluate, showed the highest variability (CV = 74.8%). When considering the complex overall process the reproducibility of bioassays with eluates from construction products was acceptable.

  10. Architecture-Based Unit Testing of the Flight Software Product Line

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Ganesan, Dharmalingam; Lindvall, Mikael; McComas, David; Bartholomew, Maureen; Slegel, Steve; Medina, Barbara

    2010-01-01

    This paper presents an analysis of the unit testing approach developed and used by the Core Flight Software (CFS) product line team at the NASA GSFC. The goal of the analysis is to understand, review, and reconunend strategies for improving the existing unit testing infrastructure as well as to capture lessons learned and best practices that can be used by other product line teams for their unit testing. The CFS unit testing framework is designed and implemented as a set of variation points, and thus testing support is built into the product line architecture. The analysis found that the CFS unit testing approach has many practical and good solutions that are worth considering when deciding how to design the testing architecture for a product line, which are documented in this paper along with some suggested innprovennents.

  11. Production and test of isotopically modified Ge detectors for GERDA

    SciTech Connect

    Budjas, D.

    2011-07-01

    The viability of producing BEGe-type detectors from isotopically modified germanium for the GERDA experiment is demonstrated by a complete test of the supply chain. GERDA is built to search for neutrinoless double beta (0v{beta}{beta}) decay of Ge using high-purity germanium detectors made of material enriched in {sup 76}Ge. To reach a sensitivity for 0v{beta}{beta} decay of <1.4 x 10{sup 26} years, new active background suppression techniques are necessary. BEGe detectors enable a capability to efficiently identify and reject background events, while keeping large acceptance of 0v{beta}{beta} decay signal, by using novel pulse shape discrimination (PSD) techniques. The PSD as well as spectroscopic performance of prototype BEGe detectors from isotopically modified Ge was verified by comprehensive testing. (authors)

  12. Background information for Van Aken on testing of NESTT product

    SciTech Connect

    Reynolds, John G.

    2016-11-18

    Debris from explosives testing in a shot tank that contains 4 weight percent or less of explosive is shown to be non-reactive under the specified testing protocol in the Code of Federal Regulations. This debris can then be regarded as a non-hazardous waste on the basis of reactivity, when collected and packaged in a specified manner. If it is contaminated with radioactive components (e.g. depleted uranium), it can therefore be disposed of as radioactive waste or mixed waste, as appropriate (note that debris may contain other materials that render it hazardous, such as beryllium). We also discuss potential waste generation issues in contained firing operations that are applicable to the planned new Contained Firing Facility (CFF).

  13. Development and Production of a Leishmania Skin Test

    DTIC Science & Technology

    2009-03-01

    indurated border will be outlined as a solid line with a ballpoint pen . Erythema will be outlined with a broken (dotted) line. The tracing will be...shall be reported as mm edema/mm erythema. Skin tests read at 48 ± 6 hours shall be recorded in mm induration using the ballpoint pen method. (19...10.6.2.4 Measuring and Recording Induration The area of induration (firmness) shall be outlined with a ballpoint pen . A permanent record of the reaction

  14. Hydraulic testing of accelerator-production-of-tritium rod bundles

    SciTech Connect

    Spatz, T.L.; Siebe, D.A.

    1999-01-01

    Hydraulic tests have been performed on small pitch-to-diameter-ratio rod bundles using light water (1.7 < P/D < 1.17, and d = 3.175 mm). Flows cover the range from greater-than-nominal Reynolds numbers (fully turbulent) to low-speed laminar flows. Differential pressure measurements were made across the support plates holding the rod bundles, across the rod bundles, and across the entire assembly. Flow rates, temperatures, and gauge pressures also were measured. The data from these hydraulic tests have been compared to correlating literature for tightly pitched rod bundles. The prototypic geometry of these tests did not compare directly to any geometry found in the literature because of the variety of subchannels along the outer wall of the rod bundle. Under that constraint, there was excellent comparison of the rod-bundle friction factor with those factors given in the literature. The results show a large range of the Reynolds number over which the flow is in transition from laminar to turbulent (e.g., 580 < Re{sub Tr} < 13,000). Also presented is the comparison of the overall rung pressure drop to a solution based on hydraulic-resistance handbook calculations.

  15. Evaluation of long-term gas hydrate production testing locations on the Alaska North Slope

    USGS Publications Warehouse

    Collett, Timothy S.; Boswell, Ray; Lee, Myung W.; Anderson, Brian J.; Rose, Kelly K.; Lewis, Kristen A.

    2012-01-01

    The results of short-duration formation tests in northern Alaska and Canada have further documented the energy-resource potential of gas hydrates and have justified the need for long-term gas-hydrate-production testing. Additional data acquisition and long-term production testing could improve the understanding of the response of naturally occurring gas hydrate to depressurization-induced or thermal-, chemical-, or mechanical-stimulated dissociation of gas hydrate into producible gas. The Eileen gashydrate accumulation located in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area in northern Alaska has become a focal point for gas-hydrate geologic and production studies. BP Exploration (Alaska) Incorporated and ConocoPhillips have each established research partnerships with the US Department of Energy to assess the production potential of gas hydrates in northern Alaska. A critical goal of these efforts is to identify the most suitable site for production testing. A total of seven potential locations in the Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk River, and Milne Point production units were identified and assessed relative to their suitability as a long-term gas-hydrate-production test sites. The test-site-assessment criteria included the analysis of the geologic risk associated with encountering reservoirs for gas-hydrate testing. The site-selection process also dealt with the assessment of the operational/logistical risk associated with each of the potential test sites. From this review, a site in the Prudhoe Bay production unit was determined to be the best location for extended gas-hydrate-production testing. The work presented in this report identifies the key features of the potential test site in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area and provides new information on the nature of gas-hydrate occurrence and the potential impact of production testing on existing infrastructure at the most favorable sites. These data were obtained from well-log analysis, geological correlation and mapping, and numerical

  16. Evaluation of long-term gas hydrate production testing locations on the Alaska north slope

    USGS Publications Warehouse

    Collett, T.S.; Boswell, R.; Lee, M.W.; Anderson, B.J.; Rose, K.; Lewis, K.A.

    2011-01-01

    The results of short duration formation tests in northern Alaska and Canada have further documented the energy resource potential of gas hydrates and justified the need for long-term gas hydrate production testing. Additional data acquisition and long-term production testing could improve the understanding of the response of naturally-occurring gas hydrate to depressurization-induced or thermal-, chemical-, and/or mechanical-stimulated dissociation of gas hydrate into producible gas. The Eileen gas hydrate accumulation located in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area in northern Alaska has become a focal point for gas hydrate geologic and production studies. BP Exploration (Alaska) Incorporated and ConocoPhillips have each established research partnerships with U.S. Department of Energy to assess the production potential of gas hydrates in northern Alaska. A critical goal of these efforts is to identify the most suitable site for production testing. A total of seven potential locations in the Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk, and Milne Point production units were identified and assessed relative to their suitability as a long-term gas hydrate production test site. The test site assessment criteria included the analysis of the geologic risk associated with encountering reservoirs for gas hydrate testing. The site selection process also dealt with the assessment of the operational/logistical risk associated with each of the potential test sites. From this review, a site in the Prudhoe Bay production unit was determined to be the best location for extended gas hydrate production testing. The work presented in this report identifies the key features of the potential test site in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area, and provides new information on the nature of gas hydrate occurrence and potential impact of production testing on existing infrastructure at the most favorable sites. These data were obtained from well log analysis, geological correlation and mapping, and numerical simulation

  17. Evaluation of long-term gas hydrate production testing locations on the Alaska North Slope

    USGS Publications Warehouse

    Collett, Timothy; Boswell, Ray; Lee, Myung W.; Anderson, Brian J.; Rose, Kelly K.; Lewis, Kristen A.

    2011-01-01

    The results of short duration formation tests in northern Alaska and Canada have further documented the energy resource potential of gas hydrates and justified the need for long-term gas hydrate production testing. Additional data acquisition and long-term production testing could improve the understanding of the response of naturally-occurring gas hydrate to depressurization-induced or thermal-, chemical-, and/or mechanical-stimulated dissociation of gas hydrate into producible gas. The Eileen gas hydrate accumulation located in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area in northern Alaska has become a focal point for gas hydrate geologic and production studies. BP Exploration (Alaska) Incorporated and ConocoPhillips have each established research partnerships with U.S. Department of Energy to assess the production potential of gas hydrates in northern Alaska. A critical goal of these efforts is to identify the most suitable site for production testing. A total of seven potential locations in the Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk, and Milne Point production units were identified and assessed relative to their suitability as a long-term gas hydrate production test site. The test site assessment criteria included the analysis of the geologic risk associated with encountering reservoirs for gas hydrate testing. The site selection process also dealt with the assessment of the operational/logistical risk associated with each of the potential test sites. From this review, a site in the Prudhoe Bay production unit was determined to be the best location for extended gas hydrate production testing. The work presented in this report identifies the key features of the potential test site in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area, and provides new information on the nature of gas hydrate occurrence and potential impact of production testing on existing infrastructure at the most favorable sites. These data were obtained from well log analysis, geological correlation and mapping, and numerical simulation.

  18. Wood processing wastes recovery and composted product field test

    SciTech Connect

    Chang, C.T.; Lin, K.L.

    1997-12-31

    Lumber mill waste, more than 3,000 tons per month, is one of the main waste sources in I-Lan area. Most of the lumber mill waste is sawdust which takes a large parts of organic-containing wastes in I-Lan county. Wastes from seafood plants around the Sueou Harbor causes a treatment problem because of their high nitrogen and phosphorous concentrations. Furthermore, the distiller-by products in I-Lan Winery are easy to become spoiled and result in odor. In this study, the compost method is suggested to deal with these waste problems and make energy recovery. Microorganisms incubating in the laboratory provide the stable seed needed for composting. Flowers and vegetable raising are scheduled to be used in field to verify the efficiency of the products. The optimal combination ration of wastes and operation criteria then will be concluded in this study after economic analyzing. The results show that the Zinnia elegans leaves growth is relative with organic fertilizer. It can also be illustrated from the statistical value that the F value is 19.4 and above the critical value 9.4.

  19. 40 CFR 1054.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ...) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State the total U.S.-directed production volume and number of tests for each engine family. (3) Describe how you randomly... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW, SMALL NONROAD SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES...

  20. 40 CFR 1054.345 - What production-line testing records must I send to EPA?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ...) Describe any facility used to test production-line engines and state its location. (2) State the total U.S.-directed production volume and number of tests for each engine family. (3) Describe how you randomly... (CONTINUED) AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW, SMALL NONROAD SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES...

  1. 46 CFR 160.132-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of davits.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... Launching Appliances-Davits § 160.132-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of... necessary to maintain quality control and to monitor compliance with the requirements of this subpart....

  2. 46 CFR 160.133-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of release mechanisms.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ..., tests, quality control, and conformance of release mechanisms. (a) Unless the Commandant directs.... The manufacturer must— (1) Institute a quality control procedure to ensure that all production release... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control,...

  3. 46 CFR 160.115-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of winches.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... Launching Appliances-Winches § 160.115-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of... necessary to maintain quality control and to monitor compliance with the requirements of this subpart....

  4. 21 CFR 211.110 - Sampling and testing of in-process materials and drug products.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-04-01

    ... PHARMACEUTICALS Production and Process Controls § 211.110 Sampling and testing of in-process materials and drug... production process, e.g., at commencement or completion of significant phases or after storage for long... 21 Food and Drugs 4 2011-04-01 2011-04-01 false Sampling and testing of in-process materials...

  5. 75 FR 51016 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Clothing Textiles: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-08-18

    ... COMMISSION Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Clothing Textiles: Requirements for... September 17, 2010. Comments on this notice should be captioned ``Third Party Testing for Certain Children's... accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess children's products for conformity...

  6. 75 FR 42311 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Vinyl Plastic Film: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-21

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1611 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Vinyl Plastic Film... submitted by August 20, 2010. Comments should be captioned ``Third Party Testing for Certain Children's... accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess children's products for conformity...

  7. 75 FR 42315 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Carpets and Rugs: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-07-21

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Parts 1630 and 1631 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Carpets and Rugs... August 20, 2010. Comments on this notice should be captioned ``Third Party Testing for Certain Children's... conformity assessment bodies to assess children's products for conformity with ``other children's...

  8. High-Technology Companies Often Turn to Colleges for Confidential 'Beta Tests' of New Products.

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Turner, Judith Axler

    1988-01-01

    Beta testing--the process of trying a product in a real-world setting before releasing it commercially--exploits a natural interface between universities and high-technology industries. High-tech companies need confidential, real-world tests of new products, and universities are eager to get an early look at tomorrow's technology. (MLW)

  9. 75 FR 82074 - Fee Adjustment for Testing, Evaluation, and Approval of Mining Products

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-29

    ... for Testing, Evaluation, and Approval of Mining Products AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration... schedule for testing, evaluating, and approving mining products as provided by 30 CFR part 5. MSHA charges... equipment and materials manufactured for use in the mining industry. The new fee schedule, effective...

  10. 76 FR 18645 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Notice of Requirements for Accreditation of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-04-05

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1303 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Notice of Requirements for... captioned, ``Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Requirements for Accreditation of Third... sensitive or protected information (such as a Social Security Number) electronically; if furnished at...

  11. 40 CFR Table 3 to Subpart Nnnnn of... - Performance Test Requirements for HCl Production Affected Sources

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 14 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Performance Test Requirements for HCl... Requirements for HCl Production Affected Sources As stated in § 63.9020, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for HCl production for each affected source. For each HCl process vent...

  12. 46 CFR 160.115-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of winches.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Launching Appliances-Winches § 160.115-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance...

  13. 46 CFR 160.135-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of lifeboats.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Lifeboats (SOLAS) § 160.135-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of...

  14. 46 CFR 160.135-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of lifeboats.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Lifeboats § 160.135-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of lifeboats....

  15. 46 CFR 160.115-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of winches.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Launching Appliances-Winches § 160.115-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance...

  16. 46 CFR 160.132-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of davits.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Launching Appliances-Davits § 160.132-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance...

  17. 46 CFR 160.132-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of davits.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 6 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control, and... (CONTINUED) EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT Launching Appliances-Davits § 160.132-15 Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance...

  18. 30 CFR 250.1151 - How often must I conduct well production tests?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false How often must I conduct well production tests? 250.1151 Section 250.1151 Mineral Resources BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND... SHELF Oil and Gas Production Requirements Well Tests and Surveys § 250.1151 How often must I...

  19. 76 FR 49286 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Notice of Requirements for Accreditation of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-08-10

    ... COMMISSION 16 Chapter II Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Notice of Requirements for... Children's Toys and Child Care Articles AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice of... of Phthalates, and GB/T 22048- 2008, Toys and Children's Products--Determination of...

  20. Reliable test methods for the determination of a natural production of chloroform in soils.

    PubMed

    Grøn, Christian; Laturnus, Frank; Jacobsen, Ole Stig

    2012-03-01

    Chloroform is one of the most frequently found anthropogenic groundwater contaminants. Recent investigations, however, suggested that chloroform in groundwater may also originate from a natural production in soils. As societies response to the occurrence of chloroform in groundwater may depend upon its origin as anthropogenic or naturally produced, test methods are needed to measure the potential of natural soil chloroform production. Field measurements of ambient air and soil air, and field and laboratory incubation studies were evaluated for measurement of relative soil chloroform production at a site with four different vegetation types (spruce forest, beech forest, grassland, and grain field) on comparable geological soil. All test methods showed varying soil production of chloroform with spruce forest soil being most productive and grain field soil being least productive. Field measurements of the ratio of soil air to ambient air chloroform concentrations exhibited the smallest difference between high production and low production areas, whereas laboratory incubation studies showed the largest difference. Thus, laboratory incubation studies are suggested as most efficient for estimating relative chloroform production in soil. The study indicated that soil samples should be tested not more than 14 days after sampling. Furthermore, it was found that potentially limiting compounds, such as chloride or nitrate, are not needed to be added in spike experiments to obtain reliable production results. However, it should be recognized that the processes of soil chloroform production are not known yet in all details. Other factors than those studied here may affect the test methods for soil chloroform production too.

  1. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study.

    PubMed

    Fowler, J F; Fowler, L M; Hunter, J E

    1997-12-01

    Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) is an amphoteric surfactant commonly used in personal care products and surface cleaners. Patch testing with commercially-available CAPB has yielded occasional reactions indicative of allergic contact dermatitis. To determine if subjects with previous positive patch tests would react in provocative use tests of products containing CAPB, and to study various contaminants in commercial CAPB supplies for allergenicity in these subjects, 10 subjects previously positive to CAPB on patch testing used a hair shampoo, hand soap, and body wash containing CAPB for 1-6 weeks or until a reaction developed. Later, they were patch tested to 2 different purity grades of CAPB and 3 possible manufacturing contaminants (dimethylaminopropylamine, amidoamine, and sodium monochloroacetate). 7 of the 10 subjects developed dermatitis from 1 or more CAPB-containing products at some point during the study. 9 of the 10 use-test subjects were then patch tested, and 6 of these subjects showed a reaction to amidoamine (0.1% aq.). None reacted to dimethylaminopropylamine (0.1% pet.). 1 subject reacted to CAPB but not to amidoamine. In the follow-up patch testing with CAPB that was free of amidoamine, there were no positive reactions. Most subjects who were patch-test-positive showed a reaction when using CAPB-containing skin and hair care products. The chemical amidoamine, which is used in the synthesis of CAPB and which is a known contaminant of CAPB preparations, is likely to be the actual sensitizer in most cases rather than CAPB itself. The results do not rule out the possibility that CAPB itself may be an allergen in rare cases.

  2. Leaching characteristics of the metal waste form from the electrometallurgical treatment process: Product consistency testing

    SciTech Connect

    Johnson, S. G.; Keiser, D. D.; Frank, S. M.; DiSanto, T.; Noy, M.

    1999-11-11

    Argonne National Laboratory is developing an electrometallurgical treatment for spent fuel from the experimental breeder reactor II. A product of this treatment process is a metal waste form that incorporates the stainless steel cladding hulls, zirconium from the fuel and the fission products that are noble to the process, i.e., Tc, Ru, Nb, Pd, Rh, Ag. The nominal composition of this waste form is stainless steel/15 wt% zirconium/1--4 wt% noble metal fission products/1--2 wt % U. Leaching results are presented from several tests and sample types: (1) 2 week monolithic immersion tests on actual metal waste forms produced from irradiated cladding hulls, (2) long term (>2 years) pulsed flow tests on samples containing technetium and uranium and (3) crushed sample immersion tests on cold simulated metal waste form samples. The test results will be compared and their relevance for waste form product consistency testing discussed.

  3. Design, production and testing of PMN-PT electrostrictive transducers.

    PubMed

    Coutte, J; Dubus, B; Debus, J C; Granger, C; Jones, D

    2002-05-01

    Lead magnesium niobate ceramics (PMN) are promising materials for application in the field of high power transducers. The advantage of PMN materials are the large strains generated under moderate electric field and the low hysteresis. The electrostrictive effect is non-linear, the corresponding physical constants depend on temperature and frequency and a DC electrical bias is required. These difficulties must be considered at the design stage. A finite element model has been developed and validated in the ATILA code for non-linear static and time-domain analyses. These numerical modelings are used to design and test two Langevin-type electrostrictive transducers. The first transducer is made of PMN-PT-La (90-10-1%) ceramics (TRS Ceramics), the second one of ESCI ceramics (Morgan Matroc). For given static mechanical prestresses, resonance frequencies and effective coupling coefficients are measured at different DC electric fields and temperatures.

  4. Design, production, and testing of field effect transistors. [cryogenic MOSFETS

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Sclar, N.

    1982-01-01

    Cryogenic MOSFETS (CRYOFETS), specifically designed for low temperature preamplifier application with infrared extrinsic detectors were produced and comparatively tested with p-channel MOSFETs under matched conditions. The CRYOFETs exhibit lower voltage thresholds, high source-follower gains at lower bias voltage, and lower dc offset source voltage. The noise of the CRYOFET is found to be 2 to 4 times greater than the MOSFET with a correspondingly lower figure of merit (which is established for source-follower amplifiers). The device power dissipation at a gain of 0.98 is some two orders of magnitude lower than for the MOSFET. Further, CRYOFETs are free of low temperature I vs V character hysteresis and balky conduction turn-on effects and operate effectively in the 2.4 to 20 K range. These devices have promise for use on long term duration sensor missions and for on-focal-plane signal processing at low temperatures.

  5. Quality assurance for in vitro alternative test methods: quality control issues in test kit production.

    PubMed

    Rispin, Amy; Harbell, John W; Klausner, Mitchell; Jordan, Foster T; Coecke, Sandra; Gupta, Kailash; Stitzel, Katherine

    2004-06-01

    In vitro toxicology methods are being adopted by regulatory agencies worldwide. Many of these methods have been validated by using proprietary materials, often in the form of test kits. Guidelines for the use of Good Laboratory Practice methods for in vitro methods have been proposed. However, users of the data from these methods also need to be reassured that the proprietary materials and the test kits will provide consistent, good quality data over time, not just during the validation process. This paper presents an overview of the methods currently used by representatives of kit manufacturers and contract testing laboratories to ensure that the results from methods that utilise test kits are reproducible over time and across different types of test materials. This information will be valuable as a basis for future discussion on the need for formalised oversight of the quality of these materials.

  6. Moving Technologies from the Test Tube to Commercial Products

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Bryant, Robert G.

    2013-01-01

    Successful technologies include objects, processes, and procedures that share a common theme; they are being used to generate new products that create economic growth. The foundation is the invention, but the invention is a small part of the overall effort. The pathway to success is understanding the competition, proper planning, record keeping, integrating a supply chain, understanding actual costs, intellectual property (IP), benchmarking, and timing. Additionally, there are obstacles that include financing, what to make, buy, and sell, and the division of labor i.e. recognizing who is best at what task. Over the past two decades, NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) has developed several commercially available technologies. The approach to commercialization of three of these inventions; Langley Research Center-Soluble Imide (LaRC-SI, Imitec Inc.), the Thin Layer Unimorph Driver (THUNDER, FACE International), and the Macrofiber Composite (MFC, Smart Material Corp.) will be described, as well as some of the lessons learned from the process. What makes these three inventions interesting is that one was created in the laboratory; another was built using the previous invention as part of its process, and the last one was created by packaging commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) materials thereby creating a new component.

  7. Interference of production between two wells during a one month circulation test at the Hijiori Hot Dry Rock test site

    SciTech Connect

    Tenma, Norio; yamaguchi, Tsutomu; Matsunaga, Isao; Kuriyagawa, Michio; Sato, Yoshiteru

    1996-01-24

    In 1995, a one-month circulation test (Exp.9501) was carried out with HDR-1 as an injection well and HDR-2 and HDR-3 as production wells at the Hijiori HDR site in Yamagata prefecture, Japan. There are two reservoirs in a high temperature granite at the site. Exp.9501 was the first circulation test to evaluate characteristics of the deeper reservoir at about 2200 m deep and was a preliminary test for the subsequent two-years circulation test. The interference between the two reservoirs was observed because of water level changes in production wells. This observation was simulated by using a wellbore heat transfer ( WBHT) code and concluded that this could occur when downhole pressure changed by heating up of the wellbore. Geochemistry of the produced fluid support this conclusion.

  8. Interference of production between two wells during a one month circulation test at the Hijiori Hot Dry Rock test site

    SciTech Connect

    Tenma, Norio; Yamaguchi, Tsutomu; Matsunaga, Isao

    1996-12-31

    In 1995, a one-month circulation test (Exp.9501) was carried out with HDR-1 as an injection well and HDR-2 and HDR-3 as production wells at the Hijiori HDR site in Yamagata prefecture, Japan. There are two reservoirs in a high temperature granite at the site. Exp.9501 was the first circulation test to evaluate characteristics of the deeper reservoir at about 2200 m deep and was a preliminary test for the subsequent two-years circulation test. The interference between the two reservoirs was observed because of water level changes in production wells. This observation was simulated by using a wellbore heat transfer (WBHT) code and concluded that this could occur when downhole pressure changed by heating up of the wellbore. Geochemistry of the produced fluid support this conclusion.

  9. 78 FR 6232 - Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for Conventional Cooking Products With Induction...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-01-30

    ... Blocks 2. Carbon Steel Test Blocks 3. Carbon Steel Hybrid Test Blocks 4. Stainless Steel Hybrid Test... estimated annual operating cost of a covered product during a representative average use cycle or period of... reduction in the number of self-cleaning oven cycles per year; and (3) incorporation of portions...

  10. 76 FR 71087 - Market Test of Experimental Product: “First-Class Tracer”

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-11-16

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office POSTAL SERVICE Market Test...: The Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an experimental product in accordance with... 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1) that it will begin a market test of its ``First-Class Tracer''...

  11. 78 FR 53374 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Refrigerators...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-08-29

    ... Part 430 RIN 1904-AC76 Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for.... Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) for test procedures for... must identify the NOPR for test procedures for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers...

  12. Psychometric Characteristics of Single-Word Tests of Children's Speech Sound Production

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Flipsen, Peter, Jr.; Ogiela, Diane A.

    2015-01-01

    Purpose: Our understanding of test construction has improved since the now-classic review by McCauley and Swisher (1984) . The current review article examines the psychometric characteristics of current single-word tests of speech sound production in an attempt to determine whether our tests have improved since then. It also provides a resource…

  13. Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) product development test

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    1995-02-01

    M-C Power Corporation will design, fabricate, install, test, and evaluate a 250 kW Proof-of-Concept Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) Power Plant. The plant is to be located at the Naval Air Station Miramar in San Diego, California. This report summarizes the technical progress that has occurred in conjunction with this project in 1994. M-C Power has completed the tape casting and sintering of cathodes and is proceeding with the tape casting and sintering of anodes for the first 250 cell stack. M-C Power and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) relocated the fuel cell demonstration project to an alternate site at the Naval Air Station Miramar. For the new project location, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared by the Department of Energy in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The Environmental Assessment resulted in a categorical exclusion of the proposed action from all environmental permit requirements. Bechtel Corporation has completed the reformer process design coordination, a Process Description, the Pipe and Instrumentation Diagrams, a Design Criteria Document and General Project Requirement Document. Bechtel developed the requirements for soils investigation report and issued the following equipment bid packages to the suppliers for bids: inverter, reformer, desulfurization vessels, hot gas recycle blower, heat recovery steam generator, and recycle gas cooler. SDG&E has secured necessary site permits, conducted soils investigations, and is working on the construction plan. They are in final negotiations with the US Navy on a site agreement. Site drawings are required for finalization of the agreement.

  14. Using Standardized Tests to Inventory Consonant and Vowel Production: A Comparison of 11 Tests of Articulation and Phonology

    ERIC Educational Resources Information Center

    Eisenberg, Sarita L.; Hitchcock, Elaine R.

    2010-01-01

    Purpose: This report considered the validity of making conclusions about a child's phonetic inventory (the sounds a child can and cannot produce spontaneously without a prior model or other stimulation) based on the data from standardized single-word tests of articulation or phonology. Method: We evaluated the opportunities for production of…

  15. Single-trip tubing-conveyed perforating, production testing, and pressure-buildup testing in nonflowing wells

    SciTech Connect

    Barnes, J.A.; Snider, P.M. ); Swafford, C.V. )

    1991-05-01

    This paper describes tools and procedures for tubing-conveyed perforating (TCP) and subsequent production testing of a well with a reverse-flow jet pump with a specially designed blanking sleeve. A downhole shut-in pressure buildup is also obtained and all equipment is pressure-actuated, eliminating the use of wireline.

  16. Migration of fission products at the Nevada Test Site: Detection with an isotopic tracer

    SciTech Connect

    Thompton, J.L.; Gilmore, J.S. )

    1989-01-01

    Researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory are studying the migration of fission products away from explosion cavities formed by underground nuclear tests at the Nevada Test Site. In some cases, the isotopic composition of the fission products or activation products associated with a particular test are distinctive and we may identify them many years after the event. In this paper we describe a case in which we used rhodium isotopes to identify the source of radioactive material that had moved some 350 m from the explosion site. 4 refs., 2 figs., 2 tabs.

  17. Testing of household products and materials for emission of toluene diisocyanate.

    PubMed

    Kelly, T J; Myers, J D; Holdren, M W

    1999-06-01

    Polyurethane products were subjected to chamber testing to determine their emission rates of 2,4- and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (TDI). The polyurethane (PU) products included carpet padding, furniture cushions, sheet foam, varnishes, and sealants, as well as a commercially-applied water sealant product for concrete that contained up to 4 percent TDI by weight. The PU products were screened in a 9-L glass chamber, under elevated temperature and chamber loading conditions, using both a time-integrated sampling and analysis method specific for TDI and a continuous but non-specific real-time monitor for isocyanates. None of the products normally found in residences showed a positive response in the screening tests, indicating that TDI emissions and consequently toxic effects from such products are negligible. However, the commercially-applied water sealant gave a positive response in the screening test. Further testing of that product at realistic temperatures showed initial TDI emission rates of about 300,000 micrograms/m2/hr, with emissions lasting only one hour or less. At 21 and 27 degrees C, about 1 percent and 5 percent, respectively, of the TDI content of the product was released to the air. The emitted TDI was predominantly the 2,6-isomer, although the TDI originally present in the product was predominantly the 2,4-isomer.

  18. Electrical production testing of the D0 Silicon microstrip tracker detector modules

    SciTech Connect

    D0, SMT Production Testing Group; /Fermilab

    2006-03-01

    The D0 Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT) is the innermost system of the D0 detector in Run 2. It consists of 912 detector units, corresponding to 5 different types of assemblies, which add up to a system with 792,576 readout channels. The task entrusted to the Production Testing group was to thoroughly debug, test and grade each detector module before its installation in the tracker. This note describes the production testing sequence and the procedures by which the detector modules were electrically tested and characterized at the various stages of their assembly.

  19. 40 CFR 1051.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... production-line vehicles or engines? 1051.305 Section 1051.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line vehicles...

  20. 40 CFR 1051.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... production-line vehicles or engines? 1051.305 Section 1051.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line vehicles...

  1. 40 CFR 1051.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... production-line vehicles or engines? 1051.305 Section 1051.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line vehicles...

  2. 40 CFR 1051.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... production-line vehicles or engines? 1051.305 Section 1051.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line vehicles...

  3. 40 CFR 1051.305 - How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... production-line vehicles or engines? 1051.305 Section 1051.305 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.305 How must I prepare and test my production-line vehicles or engines? This section describes how to prepare and test production-line vehicles...

  4. 75 FR 35282 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Infant Walkers: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-21

    ... for Accreditation of Third Party Conformity Assessment Bodies AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety... acceptance of accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies for testing pursuant to specific CPSC...: Effective Date: The requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to...

  5. The Development of Testing Methods for Characterizing Emissions and Sources of Exposures from Polyurethane Products

    EPA Science Inventory

    The relationship between onsite manufacture of spray polyurethane foam insulation (SPFI) and potential exposures is not well understood. Currently, no comprehensive standard test methods exist for characterizing and quantifying product emissions. Exposures to diisocyanate compoun...

  6. 77 FR 70390 - Lifesaving Equipment: Production Testing and Harmonization With International Standards

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-11-26

    ..., harmonization with current international standards will facilitate marketing of their products internationally... Harmonization With International Standards AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed... adopted international standards affecting design, performance, and testing for such lifesaving...

  7. 46 CFR 54.20-5 - Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Welding qualification tests and production testing... OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING PRESSURE VESSELS Fabrication by Welding § 54.20-5 Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48)....

  8. 46 CFR 54.20-5 - Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Welding qualification tests and production testing... OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING PRESSURE VESSELS Fabrication by Welding § 54.20-5 Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48)....

  9. 46 CFR 54.20-5 - Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Welding qualification tests and production testing... OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING PRESSURE VESSELS Fabrication by Welding § 54.20-5 Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48)....

  10. 46 CFR 54.20-5 - Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48).

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-10-01

    ... 46 Shipping 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Welding qualification tests and production testing... OF HOMELAND SECURITY (CONTINUED) MARINE ENGINEERING PRESSURE VESSELS Fabrication by Welding § 54.20-5 Welding qualification tests and production testing (modifies UW-26, UW-28, UW-29, UW-47, and UW-48)....

  11. 40 CFR 1051.310 - How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... for production-line testing? 1051.310 Section 1051.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.310 How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing? (a) Test engines from each engine family as described in this section based on...

  12. 40 CFR 1051.310 - How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... for production-line testing? 1051.310 Section 1051.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.310 How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing? (a) Test engines from each engine family as described in this section based on...

  13. 40 CFR 1051.310 - How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... for production-line testing? 1051.310 Section 1051.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.310 How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing? (a) Test engines from each engine family as described in this section based on...

  14. 40 CFR 1051.310 - How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... for production-line testing? 1051.310 Section 1051.310 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL... VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.310 How must I select vehicles or engines for production-line testing? (a) Test engines from each engine family as described in this section based on...

  15. 46 CFR 160.170-15 - Production inspections, tests, quality control, and conformance of release mechanisms.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-10-01

    ..., quality control, and conformance of release mechanisms. (a) Unless the Commandant directs otherwise, an...— (1) Institute a quality control procedure to ensure that all production release mechanisms are... 46 Shipping 6 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Production inspections, tests, quality control,...

  16. 77 FR 30887 - Amendments to Sterility Test Requirements for Biological Products; Correction

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-05-24

    ...The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal Register of May 3, 2012. (77 FR 26162). The final rule provides manufacturers of biological products greater flexibility, as appropriate, and encourages use of the most appropriate and state-of-the-art test methods for assuring the safety of biological products. The rule was published with an......

  17. 75 FR 75289 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Residential Dishwashers...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-12-02

    ...In order to implement recent amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to amend its test procedures for residential dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and conventional cooking products (which include cooktops, ovens, and ranges) to provide for measurement of standby mode and off mode energy use by these products. The proposed......

  18. 75 FR 33683 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Infant Bath Seats: Requirements for...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-06-15

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1215 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Infant Bath Seats: Requirements for Accreditation of Third Party Conformity Correction In rule document 2010-13080 beginning...

  19. 75 FR 64621 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Residential Furnaces and...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2010-10-20

    ...-AB89 Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Residential Furnaces and... procedures for residential furnaces and boilers to include provisions for measuring standby mode and off mode... Products Other Than Automobiles,'' including residential furnaces and boilers (all of which are...

  20. 40 CFR 86.1836-01 - Manufacturer-supplied production vehicles for testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... 40 Protection of Environment 19 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Manufacturer-supplied production...-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks, and Complete Otto-Cycle Heavy-Duty Vehicles § 86.1836-01 Manufacturer-supplied production vehicles for testing. Any manufacturer obtaining certification under this subpart...

  1. 77 FR 76831 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Residential Furnaces and...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-12-31

    ... Comments 2. Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Comments IV. Effective Date and... issued similar test procedure amendments for other heating products (water heaters, direct heating... as applied to the other heating products. The second edition of IEC Standard 62301 has now...

  2. 76 FR 3679 - Market Test of Experimental Product: “Marketing Mail Made Easy”

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-01-20

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office POSTAL SERVICE Market Test of Experimental Product: ``Marketing Mail Made Easy'' AGENCY: Postal Service TM . ACTION: Notice... 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1) that it will begin a market test of its ``Marketing Mail Made...

  3. 78 FR 41129 - Market Test of Experimental Product - International Merchandise Return Service-Non-Published Rates

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-07-09

    ... From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office POSTAL SERVICE Market Test of Experimental Product -- International Merchandise Return Service--Non-Published Rates AGENCY: U.S. Postal Service\\TM\\. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Postal Service hereby gives notice of a market test...

  4. 77 FR 3559 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Refrigerators...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2012-01-25

    ... inability to capture all energy usage during defrost cycles when using the second (defrost) part of the test... / Wednesday, January 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations#0;#0; ] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 430 RIN 1904-AB92 Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Refrigerators,...

  5. 46 CFR 57.06-3 - Method of performing production testing.

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-10-01

    ... attached test plates, the weld metal shall be deposited in the test plate welding groove continuously with the weld metal deposited in the groove of the longitudinal joint. As an alternate method, the marine... material of a different product form, such as plate in lieu of a forging, provided the chemical...

  6. 78 FR 53625 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Residential Furnaces and...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2013-08-30

    ...-AC96 Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedures for Residential Furnaces and...) published a final rule in the Federal Register that amended the test procedure for residential furnaces and... Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-6590. Email:...

  7. 76 FR 22608 - Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Clothing Textiles: Revisions to Terms of...

    Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014

    2011-04-22

    ... COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 1610 Third Party Testing for Certain Children's Products; Clothing Textiles: Revisions... are taking this action in response to a request from certain members of the clothing textile industry to reduce unnecessary retesting of clothing textiles that have been tested already and found to be...

  8. Environmental Technology Verification--Baghouse Filtration Products: GE Energy QG061 Filtration Media (Tested September 2008)

    EPA Science Inventory

    This report reviews the filtration and pressure drop performance of GE Energy's QG061 filtration media. Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) testing of this technology/product was conducted during a series of tests in September 2008. The objective of the ETV Program is to ...

  9. Validation studies of the latex agglutination test for the detection of Trichinella larvae in meat products.

    PubMed

    Gayda, Jennifer; Reckinger, Sabine; Thaben, Nora; Nöckler, Karsten; Mayer-Scholl, Anne

    2016-11-15

    Human trichinellosis is a foodborne disease caused by ingestion of meat infected with Trichinella muscle larvae. To control Trichinella spp. infection in the European Union, all slaughtered pigs from holdings that are not officially recognized as applying controlled housing conditions and other animals susceptible to Trichinella infection and intended for human consumption should be examined by one of the approved digestion methods described in Regulation (EU) No. 2015/1375. In the past, Trichinella outbreaks due to the consumption of cured wild boar or pork products have been described in several European countries, making the identification of the larvae from these products relevant for Trichinella control. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the newly approved latex agglutination test (Trichin-L) for routine testing of cured meat products. The test was validated based on the OIE Guidelines using pork products spiked with Trichinella larvae. The sensitivity of the method varied greatly depending on the investigated meat product and was usually lower than for the gold standard, the magnetic stirrer method. The detection rate reached 80% for three larvae and 60% for one larva in cured pork sausages. A detection rate of 100% for three larvae and 50% for one larva was found in bacon. For frozen samples (-20°C) the Trichin-L kit is similarly sensitive as for cured samples. Further, to determine the performance of the test under field conditions, pork products from regions with known high Trichinella prevalences confiscated by customs authorities at two German international airports were analyzed. Problems associated with the Trichin-L test were incomplete digestion due to fatty ingredients, spices and very dry meat products, resulting in data which could not be evaluated. Therefore, the test is currently not suitable for the detection of Trichinella larvae in cured meat products and needs further adaptation steps to increase both usability and sensitivity.

  10. Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing: Its Application in Both Product Development and System Implementation.

    PubMed

    Kushniruk, Andre; Borycki, Elizabeth

    2017-01-01

    In recent years there has been considerable discussion around the need for certification and regulation of healthcare information technology (IT). In particular, the usability of the products being developed needs to be evaluated. This has included the application of standards designed to ensure the process of system development is user-centered and takes usability into consideration while a product is being developed. In addition to this, in healthcare, organizations in the United States and Europe have also addressed the need and requirement for product certification. However, despite these efforts there are continued reports of unusable and unsafe implementations. In this paper we discuss the need to not only include (and require) usability testing in the one-time development process of health IT products (such as EHRs), but we also argue for the need to additionally develop specific usability standards and requirements for usability testing during the implementation of vendor products (i.e. post product development) in healthcare settings. It is further argued that health IT products that may have been certified regarding their development process will still require application of usability testing in the process of implementing them in real hospital settings in order to ensure usability and safety. This is needed in order to ensure that the final result of both product development and implementation processes take into account and apply the latest usability principles and methods.

  11. The influence of socio-cultural background and product value in usability testing.

    PubMed

    Sonderegger, Andreas; Sauer, Juergen

    2013-05-01

    This article examines the influence of socio-cultural background and product value on different outcomes of usability tests. A study was conducted in two different socio-cultural regions, Switzerland and East Germany, which differed in a number of aspects (e.g. economic power, price sensitivity and culture). Product value (high vs. low) was varied by manipulating the price of the product. Sixty-four test participants were asked to carry out five typical user tasks in the context of coffee machine usage, measuring performance, perceived usability, and emotion. The results showed that in Switzerland, high-value products were rated higher in usability than low-value products whereas in East Germany, high-value products were evaluated lower in usability. A similar interaction effect of socio-cultural background and product value was observed for user emotion. Implications are that the outcomes of usability tests do not allow for a simple transfer across cultures and that the mediating influence of perceived product value needs to be taken into consideration.

  12. Provocative use tests in CAPB-allergic subjects with CAPB-containing product.

    PubMed

    Fartasch, M; Diepgen, T L; Kuhn, M; Basketter, D A

    1999-07-01

    Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) has been identified as a cause of contact allergy in personal care products. Furthermore, it has been suggested that chemicals responsible are impurities, especially dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA). However, skin contact concentrations with these impurities, especially DMAPA, are very low. The aim of the study was to analyse whether subjects with previous positive patch tests to CAPB would react in provocative use tests of a product containing CAPB. 10 individuals with a clinical history of contact allergy to CAPB (by positive patch test and history) took part in a ROAT which used a CAPB-based shower gel at 25% (DMAPA concentration < 1 ppm). None of the subjects showed positive allergic reactions. 1 of the test subjects did experience a flare of atopic dermatitis at the treatment site. Later, all 10 subjects were patch tested to 3 different concentrations of CAPB and DMAPA (0.1%, 0.3%, 1%) to verify the threshold that was capable of inducing a positive test reaction. 5/10 showed clear + reactions to 1% CAPB (typically at D3), whilst a further 3 gave marginal and/or irritant reactions. Only 1 of the subjects showed an allergic reaction to DMAPA. Finally, in uncontrolled use testing with the shower gel, none of the test subjects reported any adverse skin reactions. Thus, the study confirmed that CAPB-sensitive individuals can use a CAPB-based rinse-off product without the risk of experiencing an allergic reaction to CAPB.

  13. 40 CFR 1054.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1054.315 Section 1054.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  14. 40 CFR 1048.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1048.315 Section 1048.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass/fail criteria for...

  15. 40 CFR 1042.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1042.325 Section 1042.325 Protection of Environment... MARINE COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend...

  16. 40 CFR 1054.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1054.325 Section 1054.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  17. 40 CFR 1045.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1045.325 Section 1045.325 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  18. 40 CFR 1048.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1048.325 Section 1048.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  19. 40 CFR 1048.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1048.315 Section 1048.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass/fail criteria for...

  20. 40 CFR 1051.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1051.325 Section 1051.325 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  1. 40 CFR 1054.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1054.315 Section 1054.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  2. 40 CFR 1051.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1051.315 Section 1051.315 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  3. 40 CFR 1045.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1045.325 Section 1045.325 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  4. 40 CFR 1054.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1054.325 Section 1054.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  5. 40 CFR 1051.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1051.325 Section 1051.325 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  6. 40 CFR 1042.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1042.325 Section 1042.325 Protection of Environment... MARINE COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend...

  7. 40 CFR 1051.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1051.315 Section 1051.315 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  8. 40 CFR 1042.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1042.325 Section 1042.325 Protection of Environment... MARINE COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend...

  9. 40 CFR 1048.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1048.325 Section 1048.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  10. 40 CFR 1042.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1042.325 Section 1042.325 Protection of Environment... MARINE COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend...

  11. 40 CFR 1045.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1045.325 Section 1045.325 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  12. 40 CFR 1054.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1054.325 Section 1054.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  13. 40 CFR 1045.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1045.325 Section 1045.325 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  14. 40 CFR 1045.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1045.325 Section 1045.325 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  15. 40 CFR 1054.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1054.325 Section 1054.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  16. 40 CFR 1054.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1054.315 Section 1054.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  17. 40 CFR 1045.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1045.315 Section 1045.315 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  18. 40 CFR 1051.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1051.325 Section 1051.325 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  19. 40 CFR 1048.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1048.325 Section 1048.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  20. 40 CFR 1042.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR

    2010-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1042.325 Section 1042.325 Protection of Environment... MARINE COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1042.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend...

  1. 40 CFR 1051.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1051.325 Section 1051.325 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  2. 40 CFR 1051.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1051.325 Section 1051.325 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of...

  3. 40 CFR 1051.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1051.315 Section 1051.315 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  4. 40 CFR 1045.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1045.315 Section 1045.315 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  5. 40 CFR 1048.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1048.315 Section 1048.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass/fail criteria for...

  6. 40 CFR 1048.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1048.315 Section 1048.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass/fail criteria for...

  7. 40 CFR 1051.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1051.315 Section 1051.315 Protection of Environment... ENGINES AND VEHICLES Testing Production-Line Vehicles and Engines § 1051.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  8. 40 CFR 1048.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR

    2011-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1048.325 Section 1048.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  9. 40 CFR 1045.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1045.315 Section 1045.315 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  10. 40 CFR 1048.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR

    2013-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1048.325 Section 1048.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES Testing Production-line Engines § 1048.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  11. 40 CFR 1054.325 - What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... the production-line testing requirements? 1054.325 Section 1054.325 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.325 What happens if an engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? (a) We may suspend your certificate of conformity for...

  12. 40 CFR 1054.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR

    2012-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1054.315 Section 1054.315 Protection of Environment... SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND EQUIPMENT Production-line Testing § 1054.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  13. 40 CFR 1045.315 - How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements?

    Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR

    2014-07-01

    ... fails the production-line testing requirements? 1045.315 Section 1045.315 Protection of Environment... PROPULSION MARINE ENGINES AND VESSELS Testing Production-line Engines § 1045.315 How do I know when my engine family fails the production-line testing requirements? This section describes the pass-fail criteria...

  14. A test strategy for the assessment of additive attributed toxicity of tobacco products.

    PubMed

    Kienhuis, Anne S; Staal, Yvonne C M; Soeteman-Hernández, Lya G; van de Nobelen, Suzanne; Talhout, Reinskje

    2016-08-01

    The new EU Tobacco Product Directive (TPD) prohibits tobacco products containing additives that are toxic in unburnt form or that increase overall toxicity of the product. This paper proposes a strategy to assess additive attributed toxicity in the context of the TPD. Literature was searched on toxicity testing strategies for regulatory purposes from tobacco industry and governmental institutes. Although mainly traditional in vivo testing strategies have been applied to assess toxicity of unburnt additives and increases in overall toxicity of tobacco products due to additives, in vitro tests combined with toxicogenomics and validated using biomarkers of exposure and disease are most promising in this respect. As such, tests are needed that are sensitive enough to assess additive attributed toxicity above the overall toxicity of tobacco products, which can associate assay outcomes to human risk and exposure. In conclusion, new, sensitive in vitro assays are needed to conclude whether comparable testing allows for assessment of small changes in overall toxicity attributed to additives. A more pragmatic approach for implementation on a short-term is mandated lowering of toxic emission components. Combined with risk assessment, this approach allows assessment of effectiveness of harm reduction strategies, including banning or reducing of additives.

  15. Performance Assessment of Internal Quality Control (IQC) Products in Blood Transfusion Compatibility Testing in China

    PubMed Central

    Li, Jing-Jing; Gao, Qi; Liu, Zhi-Dong; Kang, Qiong-Hua; Hou, Yi-Jun; Zhang, Luo-Chuan; Hu, Xiao-Mei; Li, Jie; Zhang, Juan

    2015-01-01

    Internal quality control (IQC) is a critical component of laboratory quality management, and IQC products can determine the reliability of testing results. In China, given the fact that most blood transfusion compatibility laboratories do not employ IQC products or do so minimally, there is a lack of uniform and standardized IQC methods. To explore the reliability of IQC products and methods, we studied 697 results from IQC samples in our laboratory from 2012 to 2014. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the IQCs in anti-B testing were 100% and 99.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the IQCs in forward blood typing, anti-A testing, irregular antibody screening, and cross-matching were all 100%. The reliability analysis indicated that 97% of anti-B testing results were at a 99% confidence level, and 99.9% of forward blood typing, anti-A testing, irregular antibody screening, and cross-matching results were at a 99% confidence level. Therefore, our IQC products and methods are highly sensitive, specific, and reliable. Our study paves the way for the establishment of a uniform and standardized IQC method for pre-transfusion compatibility testing in China and other parts of the world. PMID:26488582

  16. How to assess the mutagenic potential of cosmetic products without animal tests?

    PubMed

    Speit, Günter

    2009-08-01

    Animal experiments (in vivo tests) currently play a key role in genotoxicity testing. Results from in vivo tests are, in many cases, decisive for the assessment of a mutagenic potential of a test compound. The Seventh Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive will, however, ban the European marketing of cosmetic/personal care products that contain ingredients that have been tested in animal experiments. If genotoxicity testing is solely based on the currently established in vitro tests, the attrition rate for chemicals used in cosmetic products will greatly increase due to irrelevant positive in vitro test results. There is urgent need for new and/or improved in vitro genotoxicity tests and for modified test strategies. Test strategies should consider all available information on chemistry of the test substance/the chemical class (e.g. SAR, metabolic activation and dermal adsorption). Test protocols for in vitro genotoxicity tests should be sensitive and robust enough to ensure that negative results can be accepted with confidence. It should be excluded that positive in vitro test results are due to high cytotoxicity or secondary genotoxic effects which may be thresholded and/or only occur under in vitro test conditions. Consequently, further research is needed to establish the nature of thresholds in in vitro assays and to determine the potential for incorporation of mode of action data into future risk assessments. New/improved tests have to be established and validated, considering the use of (metabolically competent) primary (skin) cells, 3D skin models and cells with defined capacity for metabolic activation (e.g. genetically engineered cell lines). The sensitivity and specificity of new and improved genotoxicity tests has to be determined by testing a battery of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals. New or adapted international guidelines will be needed for these tests. The establishment of such a new genotoxicity testing strategy will take time and the

  17. Tests of wildlife habitat models to evaluate oak-mast production

    USGS Publications Warehouse

    Schroeder, R.L.; Vangilder, L.D.

    1997-01-01

    We measured oak-mast production and forest structure and composition in the Ozark Mountains of Missouri and tested the accuracy of oak-mast prediction variables from 5 Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) species models. Acorn production was positively associated with several measures of abundance and canopy cover of oak trees, and with an index of mast production for all 5 HSI models. We developed 2 modified oak-mast models, based on inputs related to either oak tree density or oak canopy cover and diversity of oak tree species. The revised models accounted for 22-32% of the variance associated with acorn abundance. Future tests of HSI models should consider: (1) the concept of upper limits imposed by habitat and the effects of nonhabitat factors; (2) the benefits of a top-down approach to model development; and (3) testing models across broad geographic regions.

  18. Simulation tests to assess occupational exposure to airborne asbestos from asphalt-based roofing products.

    PubMed

    Mowat, Fionna; Weidling, Ryan; Sheehan, Patrick

    2007-07-01

    This study sought to evaluate exposure from specific products to evaluate potential risk from roof repair activities. Five asbestos-containing fibered roof coatings and plastic cements, representing a broad range of these types of products, were tested in exposure simulations. These products were applied to representative roof substrates. Release of asbestos fibers during application and sanding of the product shortly thereafter (wet sanding) were tested initially. Other roof substrates were cured to simulate a product that had been on a rooftop for several months and then were tested to evaluate release of fibers during hand sanding and hand scraping activities. Additional tests were also conducted to evaluate asbestos release during product removal from tools and clothing. Two personal (n = 84) and background/clearance (n = 49) samples were collected during each 30-min test and analyzed for total fiber concentration [phase-contrast microscopy (PCM)] and for asbestos fiber count [transmission electron microscopy (TEM)]. PCM concentrations ranged from <0.005 to 0.032 fibers per cubic centimeter (f cc(-1)). Chrysotile fibers were detected in 28 of 84 personal samples collected. TEM concentrations ranged from <0.0021 to 0.056 f cc(-1). Calculated 8-h time-weighted averages (TWAs) ranged from 0.0003 to 0.002 f cc(-1) and were comparable to the background TWA concentration of 0.0002 f cc(-1) measured in this study. Based on these results, it is unlikely that roofers were exposed to airborne asbestos concentrations above the current or historical occupational guidelines during scraping and sanding of these products during roof repair.

  19. Bioinformatics for the synthetic biology of natural products: integrating across the Design–Build–Test cycle

    PubMed Central

    Currin, Andrew; Jervis, Adrian J.; Rattray, Nicholas J. W.; Swainston, Neil; Yan, Cunyu; Breitling, Rainer

    2016-01-01

    Covering: 2000 to 2016 Progress in synthetic biology is enabled by powerful bioinformatics tools allowing the integration of the design, build and test stages of the biological engineering cycle. In this review we illustrate how this integration can be achieved, with a particular focus on natural products discovery and production. Bioinformatics tools for the DESIGN and BUILD stages include tools for the selection, synthesis, assembly and optimization of parts (enzymes and regulatory elements), devices (pathways) and systems (chassis). TEST tools include those for screening, identification and quantification of metabolites for rapid prototyping. The main advantages and limitations of these tools as well as their interoperability capabilities are highlighted. PMID:27185383

  20. Overview of the 2006-2008 JOGMEC/NRCan/Aurora Mallik Gas Hydrate Production Test Program

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Yamamoto, K.; Dallimore, S. R.

    2008-12-01

    During the winters of 2007 and 2008 the Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), with Aurora Research Institute as the operator, carried out an on-shore gas hydrate production test program at the Mallik site, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada. The prime objective of the program was to verify the feasibility of depressurization technique by drawing down the formation pressure across a 12m perforated gas hydrate bearing section. This project was the second full scale production test at this site following the 2002 Japex/JNOC/GSC et al Mallik research program in which seven participants organizatinos from five countries undertook a thermal test using hot water circulation Field work in 2007 was devoted to establishing a production test well, installing monitoring devices outside of casing, conducting base line geophysical studies and undertaking a short test to gain practical experience prior to longer term testing planned for 2008 . Hydrate-dissociated gas was produced to surface by depressurization achieved by lowering the fluid level with a dowhole pump. However, the operation was terminated 60 hours after the start of the pumping mainly due to sand production problems. In spite of the short period (12.5 hours of ellapsed pumping time), at least 830m3 of the gas was produced and accumulated in the borehole. Sand screens were installed across the perforated interval at the bottom hole for the 2008 program to overcome operational problems encountered in 2007 and achieve sustainable gas production. Stable bottom hole flowing pressures were successfully achieved during a 6 day test with continuous pump operation. Sustained gas production was achieved with rates between 2000- 4000m3/day and cummulative gas volume in the surface of approximately 13,000m3. Temperature and pressure data measured at the bottom hole and gas and water production rates gave positive evidence for the high efficiency of gas