Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-11
... Prospective Payment System and CY 2011 Payment Rates; Changes to the Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment System and CY 2011 Payment Rates; Changes to Payments to Hospitals for Graduate Medical Education Costs..., 2010, entitled ``Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System and CY 2011 Payment...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-14
... 0938-AP87 Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing... Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2011.'' DATES: Effective... illustrate the skilled nursing facility (SNF) prospective payment system (PPS) payment rate computations for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-03
... Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year 2013 Rates; Hospitals' Resident Caps for Graduate Medical Education Payment Purposes; Quality... entitled ``Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-10
... Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment... [CMS-1599-P] RIN 0938-AR53 Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute... capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-16
... Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment... Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment... inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-19
... Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care; Hospital Prospective Payment... Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective... prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-17
... [CMS-1588-F2] RIN 0938-AR12 Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year 2013 Rates; Hospitals' Resident Caps for Graduate Medical Education Payment Purposes; Quality Reporting Requirements for...
42 CFR 412.125 - Effect of change of ownership on payments under the prospective payment systems.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... prospective payment systems. 412.125 Section 412.125 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments to Hospitals Under the Prospective Payment Systems § 412.125 Effect of change of...
42 CFR 412.110 - Total Medicare payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments to Hospitals Under the Prospective Payment Systems § 412.110 Total Medicare payment. Under the prospective payment systems, Medicare... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Total Medicare payment. 412.110 Section 412.110...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-27
... [CMS-1510-CN2] RIN 0938-AP88 Medicare Program; Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for Calendar Year 2011; Changes in Certification Requirements for Home Health Agencies and Hospices AGENCY... ``Medicare Program; Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for Calendar Year 2011; Changes in...
42 CFR 412.535 - Publication of the Federal prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.535 Publication of the Federal prospective... care hospital prospective payment system effective for each annual update in the Federal Register. (a...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-09
... [CMS-1450-CN] RIN 0938-AR52 Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for CY 2014, Home Health Quality Reporting Requirements, and Cost Allocation of Home Health Survey... period titled ``Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for CY...
42 CFR 419.20 - Hospitals subject to the hospital outpatient prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... prospective payment system. 419.20 Section 419.20 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOSPITAL... Outpatient Prospective Payment System § 419.20 Hospitals subject to the hospital outpatient prospective...
42 CFR 412.300 - Scope of subpart and definition.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment... payment system for inpatient hospital capital-related costs. Under this system, payment is made on the... hospitals subject to the prospective payment system under subpart B of this part. (b) Definition. For...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-18
... Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment... Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective...-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with...
42 CFR 412.304 - Implementation of the capital prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs General Provisions § 412.304 Implementation of the capital prospective payment system. (a) General rule. As described in §§ 412.312 through 412.370...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-18
... [CMS-1510-F2] RIN 0938-AP88 Medicare Program; Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update for Calendar Year 2011; Changes in Certification Requirements for Home Health Agencies and Hospices; Correction... set forth an update to the Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) rates, including: The...
2014-06-17
This document announces changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals and to the Medicare-dependent hospital (MDH) program under the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for the second half of FY 2014 (April 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014) in accordance with sections 105 and 106, respectively, of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA).
42 CFR 412.20 - Hospital services subject to the prospective payment systems.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... payment systems. 412.20 Section 412.20 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Hospital Services Subject to and Excluded From the Prospective Payment Systems for Inpatient...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... payment system for long-term care hospitals. 412.505 Section 412.505 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.505 Conditions for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-08
...] RIN 0938-AQ27 Medicare Program; Changes to the End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System for... through Federal Digital System (FDsys), a service of the U.S. Government Printing Office. This database... Internet on the CMS Web site. The Addenda to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prospective Payment System...
42 CFR 412.6 - Cost reporting periods subject to the prospective payment systems.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... payment systems. 412.6 Section 412.6 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES... prospective payment system for inpatient operating costs, the reasonable costs of services furnished before...
42 CFR 412.120 - Reductions to total payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments to Hospitals Under the Prospective Payment Systems § 412.120 Reductions to total payments. (a) Deductible and coinsurance... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Reductions to total payments. 412.120 Section 412...
42 CFR 412.130 - Retroactive adjustments for incorrectly excluded hospitals and units.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
..., DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments to Hospitals Under the Prospective Payment Systems § 412.130 Retroactive adjustments for... hospital that was excluded from the prospective payment systems specified in § 412.1(a)(1) or paid under...
2017-11-01
This rule updates and makes revisions to the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2018. It also updates the payment rate for renal dialysis services furnished by an ESRD facility to individuals with acute kidney injury (AKI). This rule also sets forth requirements for the ESRD Quality Incentive Program (QIP), including for payment years (PYs) 2019 through 2021.
42 CFR 412.112 - Payments determined on a per case basis.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments to Hospitals Under the Prospective Payment Systems § 412.112 Payments determined on a per case basis. A hospital is... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Payments determined on a per case basis. 412.112...
42 CFR 412.4 - Discharges and transfers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES General Provisions § 412.4 Discharges... hospital inpatient is considered discharged from a hospital paid under the prospective payment system when... the initial discharge) to another hospital that is— (1) Paid under the prospective payment system...
42 CFR 412.4 - Discharges and transfers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES General Provisions § 412.4 Discharges... hospital inpatient is considered discharged from a hospital paid under the prospective payment system when... the initial discharge) to another hospital that is— (1) Paid under the prospective payment system...
42 CFR 412.4 - Discharges and transfers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES General Provisions § 412.4 Discharges... hospital inpatient is considered discharged from a hospital paid under the prospective payment system when... the initial discharge) to another hospital that is— (1) Paid under the prospective payment system...
42 CFR 412.4 - Discharges and transfers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES General Provisions § 412.4 Discharges... hospital inpatient is considered discharged from a hospital paid under the prospective payment system when... the initial discharge) to another hospital that is— (1) Paid under the prospective payment system...
42 CFR 412.4 - Discharges and transfers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES General Provisions § 412.4 Discharges... hospital inpatient is considered discharged from a hospital paid under the prospective payment system when... the initial discharge) to another hospital that is— (1) Paid under the prospective payment system...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... and for costs of an approved education program and other costs paid outside the prospective payment... must be approved by the intermediary and us. (3) Amount of payment. The amount of the accelerated...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR... inpatient psychiatric facility receives payment under this subpart for inpatient operating cost and capital-related costs for each inpatient stay following submission of a bill. (b) Periodic interim payments (PIP...
42 CFR 413.172 - Principles of prospective payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Principles of prospective payment. 413.172 Section... SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE...-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Services and Organ Procurement Costs § 413.172 Principles of prospective...
42 CFR 412.108 - Special treatment: Medicare-dependent, small rural hospitals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Special Treatment of Certain Facilities Under the Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Operating Costs... including days and discharges from units excluded from the prospective payment system under §§ 412.25...
42 CFR 412.332 - Payment based on the hospital-specific rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs Determination of Transition Period Payment Rates for... (f) is determined by multiplying the applicable hospital-specific rate by the DRG weighting factor...
42 CFR 412.8 - Publication of schedules for determining prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Publication of schedules for determining prospective payment rates. 412.8 Section 412.8 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL...
42 CFR 412.89 - Payment adjustment for certain replaced devices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments for... implantation of the device determines the DRG assignment. (2) CMS lists the DRGs that qualify under paragraph (b)(1) of this section in the annual final rule for the hospital inpatient prospective payment system...
42 CFR 412.101 - Special treatment: Inpatient hospital payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Special Treatment of Certain Facilities Under the Prospective Payment System for... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Special treatment: Inpatient hospital payment...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-06
... Hospital IPPS Inpatient prospective payment system MS-DRG Diagnosis-related group NCA National coverage... based on the ``inpatient prospective payment system'' (IPPS) described in section 1886(d) of the Act... and procedures, and payment systems. We reviewed various articles, reports, summaries, and data bases...
2016-08-05
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year (FY) 2017. In addition, it specifies a potentially preventable readmission measure for the Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing Program (SNF VBP), and implements requirements for that program, including performance standards, a scoring methodology, and a review and correction process for performance information to be made public, aimed at implementing value-based purchasing for SNFs. Additionally, this final rule includes additional polices and measures in the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program (SNF QRP). This final rule also responds to comments on the SNF Payment Models Research (PMR) project.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-04
... Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment... operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing... changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the rates for Medicare acute care hospital inpatient...
2015-11-13
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2016 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program and the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. Further, this document includes certain finalized policies relating to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system: Changes to the 2-midnight rule under the short inpatient hospital stay policy; and a payment transition for hospitals that lost their status as a Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital (MDH) because they are no longer in a rural area due to the implementation of the new Office of Management and Budget delineations in FY 2015 and have not reclassified from urban to rural before January 1, 2016. In addition, this document contains a final rule that finalizes certain 2015 proposals, and addresses public comments received, relating to the changes in the Medicare regulations governing provider administrative appeals and judicial review relating to appropriate claims in provider cost reports.
42 CFR 412.500 - Basis and scope of subpart.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... appropriate adjustments to that system, including adjustments to DRG weights, area wage adjustments... PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long... payment system for long-term care hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act. (2) Section...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-18
... Payments Under the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid... and technologies under the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). Interested parties are invited to this meeting to present their comments, recommendations, and data regarding whether the...
2007-11-27
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system. We describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2008. In addition, the rule sets forth the applicable relative payment weights and amounts for services furnished in ASCs, specific HCPCS codes to which the final policies of the ASC payment system apply, and other pertinent rate setting information for the CY 2008 ASC payment system. Furthermore, this final rule with comment period will make changes to the policies relating to the necessary provider designations of critical access hospitals and changes to several of the current conditions of participation requirements. The attached document also incorporates the changes to the FY 2008 hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) payment rates made as a result of the enactment of the TMA, Abstinence Education, and QI Programs Extension Act of 2007, Public Law 110-90. In addition, we are changing the provisions in our previously issued FY 2008 IPPS final rule and are establishing a new policy, retroactive to October 1, 2007, of not applying the documentation and coding adjustment to the FY 2008 hospital-specific rates for Medicare-dependent, small rural hospitals (MDHs) and sole community hospitals (SCHs). In the interim final rule with comment period in this document, we are modifying our regulations relating to graduate medical education (GME) payments made to teaching hospitals that have Medicare affiliation agreements for certain emergency situations.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-11
...This rule proposes to update and make revisions to the End- Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2013. This rule also proposes to set forth requirements for the ESRD quality incentive program (QIP), including for payment year (PY) 2015 and beyond. This proposed rule will implement changes to bad debt reimbursement for all Medicare providers, suppliers, and other entities eligible to receive bad debt. (See the Table of Contents for a listing of the specific issues addressed in this proposed rule.)
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determination of Transition Period Payment Rates for the Prospective Payment System for Inpatient... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-03
... Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2014; Correction AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid...; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2014.'' DATES: These...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-22
... estimated cost of the case exceeds the adjusted outlier threshold. We calculate the adjusted outlier... to 80 percent of the difference between the estimated cost of the case and the outlier threshold. In... Federal Prospective Payment Rates VI. Update to Payments for High-Cost Outliers under the IRF PPS A...
42 CFR 460.180 - Medicare payment to PACE organizations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 4 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Medicare payment to PACE organizations. 460.180... FOR THE ELDERLY (PACE) Payment § 460.180 Medicare payment to PACE organizations. (a) Principle of payment. Under a PACE program agreement, CMS makes a prospective monthly payment to the PACE organization...
Hernandez, John; Machacz, Susanne F; Robinson, James C
2015-02-01
Medicare pioneered add-on payments to facilitate the adoption of innovative technologies under its hospital prospective payment system. US policy makers are now experimenting with broader value-based payment initiatives, but these have not been adjusted for innovation. This article examines the structure, processes, and experience with Medicare's hospital new technology add-on payment program since its inception in 2001 and compares it with analogous payment systems in Germany, France, and Japan. Between 2001 and 2015 CMS approved nineteen of fifty-three applications for the new technology add-on payment program. We found that the program resulted in $201.7 million in Medicare payments in fiscal years 2002-13-less than half the level anticipated by Congress and only 34 percent of the amount projected by CMS. The US program approved considerably fewer innovative technologies, compared to analogous technology payment mechanisms in Germany, France and Japan. We conclude that it is important to adjust payments for new medical innovations within prospective and value-based payment systems explicitly as well as implicitly. The most straightforward method to use in adjusting value-based payments is for the insurer to retrospectively adjust spending targets to account for the cost of new technologies. If CMS made such retrospective adjustments, it would not financially penalize hospitals for adopting beneficial innovations. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-02
...This rule updates and makes revisions to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2014. This rule also sets forth requirements for the ESRD quality incentive program (QIP), including for payment year (PY) 2016 and beyond. In addition, this rule clarifies the grandfathering provision related to the 3-year minimum lifetime requirement (MLR) for Durable Medical Equipment (DME), and provides clarification of the definition of routinely purchased DME. This rule also implements budget-neutral fee schedules for splints and casts, and intraocular lenses (IOLs) inserted in a physician's office. Finally, this rule makes a few technical amendments and corrections to existing regulations related to payment for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) items and services.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-10
..., for issues related to OPPS pass-through devices, brachytherapy sources, intraoperative radiation... cardioverter defibrillator ICU Intensive care unit IHS Indian Health Service IMRT Intensity Modulated Radiation... Intraoperative radiation treatment IPPS [Hospital] Inpatient Prospective Payment System IQR [Hospital] Inpatient...
Holmes, George M; Pink, George H; Friedman, Sarah A
2013-01-01
To compare the financial performance of rural hospitals with Medicare payment provisions to those paid under prospective payment and to estimate the financial consequences of elimination of the Critical Access Hospital (CAH) program. Financial data for 2004-2010 were collected from the Healthcare Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS) for rural hospitals. HCRIS data were used to calculate measures of the profitability, liquidity, capital structure, and financial strength of rural hospitals. Linear mixed models accounted for the method of Medicare reimbursement, time trends, hospital, and market characteristics. Simulations were used to estimate profitability of CAHs if they reverted to prospective payment. CAHs generally had lower unadjusted financial performance than other types of rural hospitals, but after adjustment for hospital characteristics, CAHs had generally higher financial performance. Special payment provisions by Medicare to rural hospitals are important determinants of financial performance. In particular, the financial condition of CAHs would be worse if they were paid under prospective payment. © 2012 National Rural Health Association.
2012-11-15
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2013 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program, and the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Quality Reporting Program. We are continuing the electronic reporting pilot for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program, and revising the various regulations governing Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), including the secure transmittal of electronic medical information, beneficiary complaint resolution and notification processes, and technical changes. The technical changes to the QIO regulations reflect CMS' commitment to the general principles of the President's Executive Order on Regulatory Reform, Executive Order 13563 (January 18, 2011).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-06
...This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for Medicare inpatient hospital services provided by inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs) for discharges occurring during the rate year (RY) beginning July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. The final rule also changes the IPF prospective payment system (PPS) payment rate update period to a RY that coincides with a fiscal year (FY). In addition, the rule implements policy changes affecting the IPF PPS teaching adjustment. It also rebases and revises the Rehabilitation, Psychiatric, and Long-Term Care (RPL) market basket, and makes some clarifications and corrections to terminology and regulations text.
42 CFR 412.96 - Special treatment: Referral centers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Special Treatment of Certain Facilities Under the Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Operating Costs § 412.96 Special treatment... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Special treatment: Referral centers. 412.96 Section...
2017-08-03
This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2018 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system's (IRF PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2018. This final rule also revises the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes that are used to determine presumptive compliance under the "60 percent rule," removes the 25 percent payment penalty for inpatient rehabilitation facility patient assessment instrument (IRF-PAI) late transmissions, removes the voluntary swallowing status item (Item 27) from the IRF-PAI, summarizes comments regarding the criteria used to classify facilities for payment under the IRF PPS, provides for a subregulatory process for certain annual updates to the presumptive methodology diagnosis code lists, adopts the use of height/weight items on the IRF-PAI to determine patient body mass index (BMI) greater than 50 for cases of single-joint replacement under the presumptive methodology, and revises and updates measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP).
2015-08-17
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems for FY 2016. Some of these changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act), the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Reform(SGR) Act of 2013, the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, and other legislation. We also are addressing the update of the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits for FY 2016.As an interim final rule with comment period, we are implementing the statutory extensions of the Medicare dependent,small rural hospital (MDH)Program and changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals under the IPPS.We also are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) for FY 2016 and implementing certain statutory changes to the LTCH PPS under the Affordable Care Act and the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Reform Act of 2013 and the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014.In addition, we are establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for quality reporting by specific providers (acute care hospitals,PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, and LTCHs) that are participating in Medicare, including related provisions for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals participating in the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR)Incentive Program. We also are updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program.
2013-12-02
This rule updates and makes revisions to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2014. This rule also sets forth requirements for the ESRD quality incentive program (QIP), including for payment year (PY) 2016 and beyond. In addition, this rule clarifies the grandfathering provision related to the 3-year minimum lifetime requirement (MLR) for Durable Medical Equipment (DME), and provides clarification of the definition of routinely purchased DME. This rule also implements budget-neutral fee schedules for splints and casts, and intraocular lenses (IOLs) inserted in a physician's office. Finally, this rule makes a few technical amendments and corrections to existing regulations related to payment for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) items and services.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-08
...This rule proposes to update and make revisions to the End- Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2014. This rule also proposes to set forth requirements for the ESRD quality incentive program (QIP), including for payment year (PY) 2016 and beyond. In addition, this rule proposes to clarify the grandfathering provision related to the 3-year minimum lifetime requirement (MLR) for Durable Medical Equipment (DME). In addition, it provides clarification of the definition of routinely purchased DME. This rule also proposes the implementation of budget- neutral fee schedules for splints and casts, and intraocular lenses (IOLs) inserted in a physician's office. Finally, this rule would make a few technical amendments and corrections to existing regulations related to payment for DMEPOS items and services.
2006-11-24
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system, and to implement certain related provisions of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 and the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005. In this final rule with comment period, we describe changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2007. In addition, this final rule with comment period implements future CY 2009 required reporting on quality measures for hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. This final rule with comment period revises the current list of procedures that are covered when furnished in a Medicare-approved ambulatory surgical center (ASC), which are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2007. This final rule with comment period revises the emergency medical screening requirements for critical access hospitals (CAHs). This final rule with comment period supports implementation of a restructuring of the contracting entities responsibilities and functions that support the adjudication of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims. This restructuring is directed by section 1874A of the Act, as added by section 911 of the MMA. The prior separate Medicare intermediary and Medicare carrier contracting authorities under Title XVIII of the Act have been replaced with the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) authority. This final rule continues to implement the requirements of the DRA that require that we expand the "starter set" of 10 quality measures that we used in FY 2005 and FY 2006 for the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) Reporting Hospital Quality Data for the Annual Payment Update (RHQDAPU) program. We began to adopt expanded measures effective for payments beginning in FY 2007. In this rule, we are finalizing additional quality measures for the expanded set of measures for FY 2008 payment purposes. These measures include the HCAHPS survey, as well as Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP, formerly Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP)), and Mortality quality measures.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-09
... Blended Payment a. Update to the Drug Add-on to the Composite Rate Portion of the ESRD Blended Payment Rate i. Estimating Growth in Expenditures for Drugs and Biologicals in CY 2013 ii. Estimating Per Patient Growth iii. Applying the Growth Update to the Drug Add-On Adjustment iv. Update to the Drug Add-On...
2015-08-06
This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2016 as required by the statute. As required by section 1886(j)(5) of the Act, this rule includes the classification and weighting factors for the IRF PPS's case-mix groups and a description of the methodologies and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for FY 2016. This final rule also finalizes policy changes, including the adoption of an IRF-specific market basket that reflects the cost structures of only IRF providers, a 1-year phase-in of the revised wage index changes, a 3-year phase-out of the rural adjustment for certain IRFs, and revisions and updates to the quality reporting program (QRP).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-23
... services and technologies under the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). Interested parties are invited to this meeting to present their comments, recommendations, and data regarding whether... technologies under the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). In addition, section 1886(d)(5)(K...
2011-11-30
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) for CY 2012 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the OPPS. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates the revised Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system. In this final rule with comment period, we set forth the relative payment weights and payment amounts for services furnished in ASCs, specific HCPCS codes to which these changes apply, and other ratesetting information for the CY 2012 ASC payment system. We are revising the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, adding new requirements for ASC Quality Reporting System, and making additional changes to provisions of the Hospital Inpatient Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. We also are allowing eligible hospitals and CAHs participating in the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program to meet the clinical quality measure reporting requirement of the EHR Incentive Program for payment year 2012 by participating in the 2012 Medicare EHR Incentive Program Electronic Reporting Pilot. Finally, we are making changes to the rules governing the whole hospital and rural provider exceptions to the physician self-referral prohibition for expansion of facility capacity and changes to provider agreement regulations on patient notification requirements.
2016-11-14
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2017 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates and refines the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program and the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. Further, in this final rule with comment period, we are making changes to tolerance thresholds for clinical outcomes for solid organ transplant programs; to Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) definitions, outcome measures, and organ transport documentation; and to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs. We also are removing the HCAHPS Pain Management dimension from the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. In addition, we are implementing section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 relating to payment for certain items and services furnished by certain off-campus provider-based departments of a provider. In this document, we also are issuing an interim final rule with comment period to establish the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule payment rates for the nonexcepted items and services billed by a nonexcepted off-campus provider-based department of a hospital in accordance with the provisions of section 603.
42 CFR 412.76 - Recovery of excess transition period payment amounts resulting from unlawful claims.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Recovery of excess transition period payment... System for Inpatient Operating Costs § 412.76 Recovery of excess transition period payment amounts...
75 FR 49029 - Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-12
...This final rule implements a case-mix adjusted bundled prospective payment system (PPS) for Medicare outpatient end-stage renal disease (ESRD) dialysis facilities beginning January 1, 2011 (ESRD PPS), in compliance with the statutory requirement of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA), enacted July 15, 2008. This ESRD PPS also replaces the current basic case-mix adjusted composite payment system and the methodologies for the reimbursement of separately billable outpatient ESRD services.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-02
...This proposed rule is a supplement to the fiscal year (FY) 2011 hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) and long- term care prospective payment system (LTCH PPS) proposed rule published in the May 4, 2010 Federal Register. This supplemental proposed rule would implement certain statutory provisions relating to Medicare payments to hospitals for inpatient services that are contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act). It would also specify statutorily required changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the rates for Medicare acute care hospital inpatient services for operating costs and capital-related costs, and for long-term care hospital costs.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-02
...This notice contains the final wage indices, hospital reclassifications, payment rates, impacts, and other related tables effective for the fiscal year (FY) 2010 hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) and rate year 2010 long-term care hospital (LTCH) prospective payment system (PPS). The rates, tables, and impacts included in this notice reflect changes required by or resulting from the implementation of several provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. These provisions require the extension of the expiration date for certain geographic reclassifications and special exception wage indices through September 30, 2010; and certain market basket updates for the IPPS and LTCH PPS.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-06
...This proposed rule would update the payment rates used under the prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year (FY) 2014, would revise and rebase the SNF market basket, and would make certain technical and conforming revisions in the regulations text. This proposed rule also includes a proposed policy for reporting the SNF market basket forecast error correction in certain limited circumstances and a proposed new item for the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Version 3.0.
2014-11-06
This final rule will update and make revisions to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2015. This rule also finalizes requirements for the ESRD quality incentive program (QIP), including for payment years (PYs) 2017 and 2018. This rule will also make a technical correction to remove outdated terms and definitions. In addition, this final rule sets forth the methodology for adjusting Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) fee schedule payment amounts using information from the Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program (CBP); makes alternative payment rules for certain DME under the Medicare DMEPOS CBP; clarifies the statutory Medicare hearing aid coverage exclusion and specifies devices not subject to the hearing aid exclusion; will not update the definition of minimal self-adjustment; clarifies the Change of Ownership (CHOW) and provides for an exception to the current requirements; revises the appeal provisions for termination of a CBP contract, including the beneficiary notification requirement under the Medicare DMEPOS CBP, and makes a technical change to the regulation related to the conditions for awarding contracts for furnishing infusion drugs under the Medicare DMEPOS CBP.
The first 3 years of Medicare prospective payment: An overview
Guterman, Stuart; Eggers, Paul W.; Riley, Gerald; Greene, Timothy F.; Terrell, Sherry A.
1988-01-01
This article provides a synopsis of the available evidence on the impact of the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for hospitals over the first 3 years of its implementation. The impact of PPS on hospitals, Medicare beneficiaries, post-hospital care, other payers for inpatient hospital services, other health care providers, and Medicare program operations and expenditures is examined. PMID:10312519
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-18
...This proposed rule would revise the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system. In this proposed rule, we describe the proposed changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the OPPS. These proposed changes would be applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2012. In addition, this proposed rule would update the revised Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system. In this proposed rule, we set forth the proposed relative payment weights and payment amounts for services furnished in ASCs, specific HCPCS codes to which these proposed changes would apply, and other proposed ratesetting information for the CY 2012 ASC payment system. These proposed changes would be applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2012. We are proposing to revise the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, add new requirements for ASC Quality Reporting System, and make additional changes to provisions of the Hospital Inpatient Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. We also are proposing to allow eligible hospitals and CAHs participating in the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program to meet the clinical quality measure reporting requirement of the EHR Incentive Program for payment year 2012 by participating in the 2012 Medicare EHR Incentive Program Electronic Reporting Pilot. In addition, we are proposing to make changes to the rules governing the whole hospital and rural provider exceptions to the physician self-referral prohibition for expansion of facility capacity and changes to provider agreement regulations on patient notification requirements.
2013-10-03
: In the fiscal year (FY) 2014 inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS)/long-term care hospital (LTCH) PPS final rule, we established the methodology for determining the amount of uncompensated care payments made to hospitals eligible for the disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payment adjustment in FY 2014 and a process for making interim and final payments. This interim final rule with comment period revises certain operational considerations for hospitals with Medicare cost reporting periods that span more than one Federal fiscal year and also makes changes to the data that will be used in the uncompensated care payment calculation in order to ensure that data from Indian Health Service (IHS) hospitals are included in Factor 1 and Factor 3 of that calculation.
Medicare payment system for hospital inpatients: diagnosis-related groups.
Baker, Judith J
2002-01-01
Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) are categories of patient conditions that demonstrate similar levels of hospital resources required to treat the conditions. Each inpatient that is discharged from an acute care hospital can be classified into one of the 506 DRGs currently utilized by the Medicare program. The Medicare DRG prospective payment methodology has been in use for almost two decades and is used by hospital managers for planning and decisionmaking. The viability of DRGs for future prospective payment depends on the ability to keep up with the times through updates of the current methodology.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-24
..., specifically revenue codes 790 (Extra-Corp Shock Wave Therapy), 800 (Inpatient Dialysis), 801 (Inpatient... particular, those applied to the CY 2012 conversion factor. Using the corrected revenue code-to-cost center... conversion factor. To view the revised ASC payment rates that result from the revised ASC relative payment...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-06
... previous case-mix classification system. It also includes a discussion of a Non-Therapy Ancillary component... facilities. Finally, it proposes certain changes relating to the payment of group therapy services and... Payment for SNF Non-Therapy Ancillary Costs 1. Previous Research 2. Conceptual Analysis 3. Analytic Sample...
2016-08-22
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems for FY 2017. Some of these changes will implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Reform Act of 2013, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, the Notice of Observation Treatment and Implications for Care Eligibility Act of 2015, and other legislation. We also are providing the estimated market basket update to apply to the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits for FY 2017. We are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) for FY 2017. In addition, we are making changes relating to direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education payments; establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for quality reporting by specific Medicare providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities), including related provisions for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) participating in the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program; implementing statutory provisions that require hospitals and CAHs to furnish notification to Medicare beneficiaries, including Medicare Advantage enrollees, when the beneficiaries receive outpatient observation services for more than 24 hours; announcing the implementation of the Frontier Community Health Integration Project Demonstration; and making technical corrections and changes to regulations relating to costs to related organizations and Medicare cost reports; we are providing notice of the closure of three teaching hospitals and the opportunity to apply for available GME resident slots under section 5506 of the Affordable Care Act. We are finalizing the provisions of interim final rules with comment period that relate to a temporary exception for certain wound care discharges from the application of the site neutral payment rate under the LTCH PPS for certain LTCHs; application of two judicial decisions relating to modifications of limitations on redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board; and legislative extensions of the Medicare-dependent, small rural hospital program and changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals.
2011-08-18
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems and to implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act) and other legislation. We also are setting forth the update to the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits. We are updating the payment policy and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) and implementing certain statutory changes made by the Affordable Care Act. In addition, we are finalizing an interim final rule with comment period that implements section 203 of the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010 relating to the treatment of teaching hospitals that are members of the same Medicare graduate medical education affiliated groups for the purpose of determining possible full-time equivalent (FTE) resident cap reductions.
2015-08-04
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year (FY) 2016. In addition, it specifies a SNF all-cause all-condition hospital readmission measure, as well as adopts that measure for a new SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, and includes a discussion of SNF VBP Program policies we are considering for future rulemaking to promote higher quality and more efficient health care for Medicare beneficiaries. Additionally, this final rule will implement a new quality reporting program for SNFs as specified in the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (IMPACT Act). It also amends the requirements that a long-term care (LTC) facility must meet to qualify to participate as a skilled nursing facility (SNF) in the Medicare program, or a nursing facility (NF) in the Medicaid program, by establishing requirements that implement the provision in the Affordable Care Act regarding the submission of staffing information based on payroll data.
2013-12-02
This final rule will update the Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) rates, including the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rates, the national per-visit rates, the low-utilization payment adjustment (LUPA) add-on, and the non-routine medical supply (NRS) conversion factor under the Medicare prospective payment system for home health agencies (HHAs), effective January 1, 2014. As required by the Affordable Care Act, this rule establishes rebasing adjustments, with a 4-year phase-in, to the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rates; the national per-visit rates; and the NRS conversion factor. In addition, this final rule will remove 170 diagnosis codes from assignment to diagnosis groups within the HH PPS Grouper, effective January 1, 2014. Finally, this rule will establish home health quality reporting requirements for CY 2014 payment and subsequent years and will clarify that a state Medicaid program must provide that, in certifying HHAs, the state's designated survey agency carry out certain other responsibilities that already apply to surveys of nursing facilities and Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ICF-IID), including sharing in the cost of HHA surveys. For that portion of costs attributable to Medicare and Medicaid, we will assign 50 percent to Medicare and 50 percent to Medicaid, the standard method that CMS and states use in the allocation of expenses related to surveys of nursing homes.
2012-08-31
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. Some of the changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act) and other legislation. These changes will be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2012, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. We also are updating the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits. The updated rate-of-increase limits will be effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2012. We are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) and implementing certain statutory changes made by the Affordable Care Act. Generally, these changes will be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2012, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. In addition, we are implementing changes relating to determining a hospital's full-time equivalent (FTE) resident cap for the purpose of graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) payments. We are establishing new requirements or revised requirements for quality reporting by specific providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs)) that are participating in Medicare. We also are establishing new administrative, data completeness, and extraordinary circumstance waivers or extension requests requirements, as well as a reconsideration process, for quality reporting by ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) that are participating in Medicare. We are establishing requirements for the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-27
...) requirements, we made a typographical error in referencing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's... DATA FOR THE FY 2018 PAYMENT DETERMINATION--Continued,'' first column of the table (NQF measure ID...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-17
...This final rule sets forth an update to the Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) rates, including: the national standardized 60-day episode rates, the national per-visit rates, the nonroutine medical supply (NRS) conversion factors, and the low utilization payment amount (LUPA) add-on payment amounts, under the Medicare prospective payment system for HHAs effective January 1, 2011. This rule also updates the wage index used under the HH PPS and, in accordance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act), updates the HH PPS outlier policy. In addition, this rule revises the home health agency (HHA) capitalization requirements. This rule further adds clarifying language to the ``skilled services'' section. The rule finalizes a 3.79 percent reduction to rates for CY 2011 to account for changes in case-mix, which are unrelated to real changes in patient acuity. Finally, this rule incorporates new legislative requirements regarding face-to-face encounters with providers related to home health and hospice care.
Kulesher, Robert R
2006-01-01
The prospective payment system is one of many changes in reimbursement that has affected the delivery of health care. Originally developed for the payment of inpatient hospital services, it has become a major factor in how all health insurance is reimbursed. The policy implications extend beyond the Medicare program and affect the entire health care delivery system. Initially implemented in 1982 for payments to hospitals, prospective payment system was extended to payments for skilled nursing facility and home health agency services by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. The intent of the Balanced Budget Act was to bring into balance the federal budget through reductions in spending. The decisions that providers have made to mitigate the impact are a function of ownership type, organizational mission, and current level of Medicare participation. This article summarizes the findings of several initial studies on the Balanced Budget Act's impact and discusses how changes in Medicare reimbursement policy have influenced the delivery of health care for the general public and for Medicare beneficiaries.
2014-08-06
This final rule will update the prospective payment rates for Medicare inpatient hospital services provided by inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs). These changes will be applicable to IPF discharges occurring during the fiscal year (FY) beginning October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015. This final rule will also address implementation of ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS codes; finalize a new methodology for updating the cost of living adjustment (COLA), and finalize new quality measures and reporting requirements under the IPF quality reporting program.
Medicare program; prospective payment system for hospital outpatient services--HCFA. Proposed rule.
1998-09-08
As required by sections 4521, 4522, and 4523 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, this proposed rule would eliminate the formula-driven overpayment for certain outpatient hospital services, extend reductions in payment for costs of hospital outpatient services, and establish in regulations a prospective payment system for hospital outpatient services (and for Medicare Part B services furnished to inpatients who have no Part A coverage). The prospective payment system would simplify our current payment system and apply to all hospitals, including those that are excluded from the inpatient prospective payment system. The Balanced Budget Act provides for implementation of the prospective payment system effective January 1, 1999, but delays application of the system to cancer hospitals until January 1, 2000. The hospital outpatient prospective payment system would also apply to partial hospitalization services furnished by community mental health centers. Although the statutory effective date for the outpatient prospective payment system is January 1, 1999, implementation of the new system will have to be delayed because of year 2000 systems concerns. The demands on intermediary bill processing systems and HCFA internal systems to become compliant for the year 2000 preclude making the major systems changes that are required to implement the prospective payment system. The outpatient prospective payment system will be implemented for all hospitals and community mental health centers as soon as possible after January 1, 2000, and a notice of the anticipated implementation date will be published in the Federal Register at least 90 days in advance. This document also proposes new requirements for provider departments and provider-based entities. These proposed changes, as revised based on our consideration of public comments, will be effective 30 days after publication of a final rule. This proposed rule would also implement section 9343(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, which prohibits Medicare payment for nonphysician services furnished to a hospital outpatient by a provider or supplier other than a hospital, unless the services are furnished under an arrangement with the hospital. This section also authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General to impose a civil money penalty, not to exceed $10,000, against any individual or entity who knowingly and willfully presents a bill for nonphysician or other bundled services not provided directly or under such an arrangement. This proposed rule also addresses the requirements for designating certain entities as provider-based or as a department of a hospital.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... the long-term care hospital prospective payment system. 412.540 Section 412.540 Public Health CENTERS... PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals... payment system. The prospective payment system includes payment for inpatient operating costs of...
Stone, Devin A; Dickensheets, Bridget A; Poisal, John A
2018-02-01
To compare Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) inpatient hospital payments to expected Medicare payments. Medicaid and Medicare claims data, Medicare's MS-DRG grouper and inpatient prospective payment system pricer (IPPS pricer). Medicaid FFS inpatient hospital claims were run through Medicare's MS-DRG grouper and IPPS pricer to compare Medicaid's actual payment against what Medicare would have paid for the same claim. Average inpatient hospital claim payments for Medicaid were 68.8 percent of what Medicare would have paid in fiscal year 2010, and 69.8 percent in fiscal year 2011. Including Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH), graduate medical education (GME), and supplemental payments reduces a substantial proportion of the gap between Medicaid and Medicare payments. Medicaid payments relative to expected Medicare payments tend to be lower and vary by state Medicaid program, length of stay, and whether payments made outside of the Medicaid claims process are included. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
2015-11-05
This final rule will update Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) rates, including the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rates, the national per-visit rates, and the non-routine medical supply (NRS) conversion factor under the Medicare prospective payment system for home health agencies (HHAs), effective for episodes ending on or after January 1, 2016. As required by the Affordable Care Act, this rule implements the 3rd year of the 4-year phase-in of the rebasing adjustments to the HH PPS payment rates. This rule updates the HH PPS case-mix weights using the most current, complete data available at the time of rulemaking and provides a clarification regarding the use of the "initial encounter'' seventh character applicable to certain ICD-10-CM code categories. This final rule will also finalize reductions to the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rate in CY 2016, CY 2017, and CY 2018 of 0.97 percent in each year to account for estimated case-mix growth unrelated to increases in patient acuity (nominal case-mix growth) between CY 2012 and CY 2014. In addition, this rule implements a HH value-based purchasing (HHVBP) model, beginning January 1, 2016, in which all Medicare-certified HHAs in selected states will be required to participate. Finally, this rule finalizes minor changes to the home health quality reporting program and minor technical regulations text changes.
42 CFR 412.70 - General description.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false General description. 412.70 Section 412.70 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determination of Transition Period Payment Rates...
42 CFR 419.66 - Transitional pass-through payments: Medical devices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... replace human skin (for example, a biological skin replacement material or synthetic skin replacement... HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT... human tissue, and is surgically implanted or inserted whether or not it remains with the patient when...
42 CFR 419.66 - Transitional pass-through payments: Medical devices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... replace human skin (for example, a biological skin replacement material or synthetic skin replacement... HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT... human tissue, and is surgically implanted or inserted whether or not it remains with the patient when...
Swaminathan, Shailender; Mor, Vincent; Mehrotra, Rajnish; Trivedi, Amal
2013-01-01
Since 1973 Medicare has provided health insurance coverage to all people who have been diagnosed with end-stage renal disease, or kidney failure. In this article we trace the history of payment policies in Medicare’s dialysis program from 1973 to 2011, while also providing some insight into the rationale for changes made over time. Initially, Medicare adopted a fee-for-service payment policy for dialysis care, using the same reimbursement standards employed in the broader Medicare program. However, driven by rapid spending growth in this population, the dialysis program has implemented innovative payment reforms, such as prospective bundled payments and pay-for-performance incentives. It is uncertain whether these strategies can stem the increase in the total cost of dialysis to Medicare, or whether they can do so without adversely affecting the quality of care. Future research on the intended and unintended consequences of payment reform will be critical. PMID:22949455
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-29
...This proposed rule would implement section 3004 of the Affordable Care Act, which establishes a new quality reporting program that provides for a 2 percent reduction in the annual increase factor beginning in 2014 for failure to report quality data to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. This proposed rule would also update the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for Federal fiscal year 2012 (for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2011 and on or before September 30, 2012) as required by the Social Security Act (the Act). The Act requires the Secretary to publish in the Federal Register on or before the August 1 that precedes the start of each FY the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system (PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodology and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for that fiscal year. We are also proposing to consolidate, clarify, and revise existing policies regarding IRF hospitals and IRF units of hospitals to eliminate unnecessary confusion and enhance consistency. Furthermore, in accordance with the general principles of the President's January 18, 2011 Executive Order entitled ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' we are proposing to amend existing regulatory provisions regarding ``new'' facilities and changes in the bed size and square footage of IRFs and inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs) to improve clarity and remove obsolete material.
2014-11-06
This final rule updates Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) rates, including the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rates, the national per-visit rates, and the non-routine medical supply (NRS) conversion factor under the Medicare prospective payment system for home health agencies (HHAs), effective for episodes ending on or after January 1, 2015. As required by the Affordable Care Act, this rule implements the second year of the four-year phase-in of the rebasing adjustments to the HH PPS payment rates. This rule provides information on our efforts to monitor the potential impacts of the rebasing adjustments and the Affordable Care Act mandated face-to-face encounter requirement. This rule also implements: Changes to simplify the face-to-face encounter regulatory requirements; changes to the HH PPS case-mix weights; changes to the home health quality reporting program requirements; changes to simplify the therapy reassessment timeframes; a revision to the Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) personnel qualifications; minor technical regulations text changes; and limitations on the reviewability of the civil monetary penalty provisions. Finally, this rule also discusses Medicare coverage of insulin injections under the HH PPS, the delay in the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), and a HH value-based purchasing (HH VBP) model.
2010-11-17
This final rule sets forth an update to the Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) rates, including: the national standardized 60-day episode rates, the national per-visit rates, the nonroutine medical supply (NRS) conversion factors, and the low utilization payment amount (LUPA) add-on payment amounts, under the Medicare prospective payment system for HHAs effective January 1, 2011. This rule also updates the wage index used under the HH PPS and, in accordance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act), updates the HH PPS outlier policy. In addition, this rule revises the home health agency (HHA) capitalization requirements. This rule further adds clarifying language to the "skilled services" section. The rule finalizes a 3.79 percent reduction to rates for CY 2011 to account for changes in case-mix, which are unrelated to real changes in patient acuity. Finally, this rule incorporates new legislative requirements regarding face-to-face encounters with providers related to home health and hospice care.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-05
... A. Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program 1. Background a. Overview b. Statutory History and History of Measures Adopted for the Hospital IQR Program c. Maintenance of Technical Specifications for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-19
...) Payment System A. Background 1. Legislative History, Statutory Authority, and Prior Rulemaking for the ASC... A. Background 1. Overview 2. Statutory History of the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting... Interval for Patients With a History of Adenomatous Polyps--Avoidance of Inappropriate Use (NQF 0659) 5...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-06
... Payment System Transition Budget-Neutrality Adjustment AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services... comment will revise the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) transition budget-neutrality adjustment finalized... on April 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. We are revising the transition budget-neutrality...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-30
... Disorders Fourth Edition--Text Revision. DRGs Diagnosis-related groups. FY Federal fiscal year. ICD-9-CM...) coding and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) classification changes discussed in the annual update to the... for the following patient-level characteristics: Medicare Severity diagnosis related groups (MS-DRGs...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... target amount or prospective payment hospital-specific rate. 413.83 Section 413.83 Public Health CENTERS... Direct GME payments: Adjustment of a hospital's target amount or prospective payment hospital-specific...-increase ceiling or prospective payment base year for purposes of adjusting the hospital's target amount or...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... target amount or prospective payment hospital-specific rate. 413.83 Section 413.83 Public Health CENTERS... Direct GME payments: Adjustment of a hospital's target amount or prospective payment hospital-specific...-increase ceiling or prospective payment base year for purposes of adjusting the hospital's target amount or...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-04
... Donald Howard, (410) 786-6764, Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program Issues. SUPPLEMENTARY... analyses performed by Brandeis University and Mathematica Policy Research together despite their slightly...
42 CFR 413.345 - Publication of Federal prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.345 Publication of Federal prospective payment rates...
42 CFR 413.345 - Publication of Federal prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.345 Publication of Federal prospective payment rates...
2015-08-05
This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for Medicare inpatient hospital services provided by inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs) (which are freestanding IPFs and psychiatric units of an acute care hospital or critical access hospital). These changes are applicable to IPF discharges occurring during fiscal year (FY) 2016 (October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016). This final rule also implements: a new 2012-based IPF market basket; an updated IPF labor-related share; a transition to new Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) designations in the FY 2016 IPF Prospective Payment System (PPS) wage index; a phase-out of the rural adjustment for IPF providers whose status changes from rural to urban as a result of the wage index CBSA changes; and new quality measures and reporting requirements under the IPF quality reporting program. This final rule also reminds IPFs of the October 1, 2015 implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), and updates providers on the status of IPF PPS refinements.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-05
...This final rule will implement section 3004 of the Affordable Care Act, which establishes a new quality reporting program that provides for a 2 percent reduction in the annual increase factor beginning in 2014 for failure to report quality data to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. This final rule will also update the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for Federal fiscal year (FY) 2012 (for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2011 and on or before September 30, 2012) as required under section 1886(j)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act (the Act). Section 1886(j)(5) of the Act requires the Secretary to publish in the Federal Register on or before the August 1 that precedes the start of each FY the classification and weighting factors for the IRF prospective payment system (PPS) case-mix groups and a description of the methodology and data used in computing the prospective payment rates for that fiscal year. We are also consolidating, clarifying, and revising existing policies regarding IRF hospitals and IRF units of hospitals to eliminate unnecessary confusion and enhance consistency. Furthermore, in accordance with the general principles of the President's January 18, 2011 Executive Order entitled ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' we are amending existing regulatory provisions regarding ''new'' facilities and changes in the bed size and square footage of IRFs and inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs) to improve clarity and remove obsolete material.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-01
... Respiratory Care Services; Medicaid Program: Accreditation for Providers of Inpatient Psychiatric Services... Conditions of Participation for Rehabilitation and Respiratory Care Services; Medicaid Program: Accreditation... Participation for Rehabilitation and Respiratory Care Services; Medicaid Program: Accreditation for Providers of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-08
... order below: ABN Advance Beneficiary Notice AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ARD Assessment... Survey Certification and Reporting System PAC-PRD Post Acute Care Payment Reform Demonstration PECOS... which the hospital can use its beds to provide either acute or SNF care, as needed. For critical [[Page...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate for... Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determination of Transition Period Payment Rates...
42 CFR 412.624 - Methodology for calculating the Federal prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... defined in § 412.602. (4) Adjustments for teaching hospitals. For discharges on or after October 1, 2005... facilities that are teaching institutions or units of teaching institutions. This adjustment is made on a... location, and for teaching programs) as specified by CMS. The additional payment equals 80 percent of the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-03
... care hospital length of stay. ADL Activities of daily living. AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and.... DHHS Department of Health and Human Services. DM Diabetes mellitus. DME Durable medical equipment. DRA... payment [Adjustment]. POC Plan of care. PRRB Provider Reimbursement Review Board. PT Physical therapy. QAP...
2013-08-06
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year (FY) 2014. In addition, it revises and rebases the SNF market basket, revises and updates the labor related share, and makes certain technical and conforming revisions in the regulations text. This final rule also includes a policy for reporting the SNF market basket forecast error in certain limited circumstances and adds a new item to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Version 3.0 for reporting the number of distinct therapy days. Finally, this final rule adopts a change to the diagnosis code used to determine which residents will receive the AIDS add-on payment, effective for services provided on or after the October 1, 2014 implementation date for conversion to ICD-10-CM.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. 412.604 Section 412.604 Public Health CENTERS FOR... SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment for Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals and Rehabilitation Units § 412.604 Conditions for payment under the prospective payment system for inpatient...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... disease (ESRD) prospective payment system. 413.210 Section 413.210 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Services and Organ Procurement Costs...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... disease (ESRD) prospective payment system. 413.210 Section 413.210 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Services and Organ Procurement Costs...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... disease (ESRD) prospective payment system. 413.210 Section 413.210 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Services and Organ Procurement Costs...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... disease (ESRD) prospective payment system. 413.210 Section 413.210 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Services and Organ Procurement Costs...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... disease (ESRD) prospective payment system. 413.210 Section 413.210 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Services and Organ Procurement Costs...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-03
... part of the office-based and ancillary radiology payment methodology. This notice updates the CY 2010... covered ancillary radiology services to the lesser of the ASC rate or the amount calculated by multiplying... procedures and covered ancillary radiology services are determined using the amounts in the MPFS final rule...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-28
...This notice describes the changes made to the TRICARE DRG- based payment system in order to conform to changes made to the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS). It also provides the updated fixed loss cost outlier threshold, cost-to-charge ratios and the data necessary to update the FY 2012 rates.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-01
...This notice describes the changes made to the TRICARE DRG- based payment system in order to conform to changes made to the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS). It also provides the updated fixed loss cost outlier threshold, cost-to-charge ratios, and the data necessary to update the FY 2014 rates.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-29
...This notice describes the changes made to the TRICARE DRG- based payment system in order to conform to changes made to the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS). It also provides the updated fixed loss cost outlier threshold, cost-to-charge ratios and the data necessary to update the FY 2013 rates.
2016-11-03
This final rule updates the Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) payment rates, including the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rates, the national per-visit rates, and the non-routine medical supply (NRS) conversion factor; effective for home health episodes of care ending on or after January 1, 2017. This rule also: Implements the last year of the 4-year phase-in of the rebasing adjustments to the HH PPS payment rates; updates the HH PPS case-mix weights using the most current, complete data available at the time of rulemaking; implements the 2nd-year of a 3-year phase-in of a reduction to the national, standardized 60-day episode payment to account for estimated case-mix growth unrelated to increases in patient acuity (that is, nominal case-mix growth) between CY 2012 and CY 2014; finalizes changes to the methodology used to calculate payments made under the HH PPS for high-cost "outlier" episodes of care; implements changes in payment for furnishing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) using a disposable device for patients under a home health plan of care; discusses our efforts to monitor the potential impacts of the rebasing adjustments; includes an update on subsequent research and analysis as a result of the findings from the home health study; and finalizes changes to the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model, which was implemented on January 1, 2016; and updates to the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HH QRP).
2017-11-07
This final rule updates the home health prospective payment system (HH PPS) payment rates, including the national, standardized 60-day episode payment rates, the national per-visit rates, and the non-routine medical supply (NRS) conversion factor, effective for home health episodes of care ending on or after January 1, 2018. This rule also: Updates the HH PPS case-mix weights using the most current, complete data available at the time of rulemaking; implements the third year of a 3-year phase-in of a reduction to the national, standardized 60-day episode payment to account for estimated case-mix growth unrelated to increases in patient acuity (that is, nominal case-mix growth) between calendar year (CY) 2012 and CY 2014; and discusses our efforts to monitor the potential impacts of the rebasing adjustments that were implemented in CY 2014 through CY 2017. In addition, this rule finalizes changes to the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model and to the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HH QRP). We are not finalizing the implementation of the Home Health Groupings Model (HHGM) in this final rule.
2016-11-04
This rule updates and makes revisions to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prospective Payment System (PPS) for calendar year 2017. It also finalizes policies for coverage and payment for renal dialysis services furnished by an ESRD facility to individuals with acute kidney injury. This rule also sets forth requirements for the ESRD Quality Incentive Program, including the inclusion of new quality measures beginning with payment year (PY) 2020 and provides updates to programmatic policies for the PY 2018 and PY 2019 ESRD QIP. This rule also implements statutory requirements for bid surety bonds and state licensure for the Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). This rule also expands suppliers' appeal rights in the event of a breach of contract action taken by CMS, by revising the appeals regulation to extend the appeals process to all types of actions taken by CMS for a supplier's breach of contract, rather than limit an appeal for the termination of a competitive bidding contract. The rule also finalizes changes to the methodologies for adjusting fee schedule amounts for DMEPOS using information from CBPs and for submitting bids and establishing single payment amounts under the CBPs for certain groupings of similar items with different features to address price inversions. Final changes also are made to the method for establishing bid limits for items under the DMEPOS CBPs. In addition, this rule summarizes comments on the impacts of coordinating Medicare and Medicaid Durable Medical Equipment for dually eligible beneficiaries. Finally, this rule also summarizes comments received in response to a request for information related to the Comprehensive ESRD Care Model and future payment models affecting renal care.
2011-08-08
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year 2012. In addition, it recalibrates the case-mix indexes so that they more accurately reflect parity in expenditures between RUG-IV and the previous case-mix classification system. It also includes a discussion of a Non-Therapy Ancillary component currently under development within CMS. In addition, this final rule discusses the impact of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act, and reduces the SNF market basket percentage by the multi-factor productivity adjustment. This rule also implements certain changes relating to the payment of group therapy services and implements new resident assessment policies. Finally, this rule announces that the proposed provisions regarding the ownership disclosure requirements set forth in section 6101 of the Affordable Care Act will be finalized at a later date.
2014-08-22
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. Some of these changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act), the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, and other legislation. These changes are applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2014, unless otherwise specified in this final rule. We also are updating the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits. The updated rate-of-increase limits are effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2014. We also are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) and implementing certain statutory changes to the LTCH PPS under the Affordable Care Act and the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Reform Act of 2013 and the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014. In addition, we discuss our proposals on the interruption of stay policy for LTCHs and on retiring the "5 percent" payment adjustment for collocated LTCHs. While many of the statutory mandates of the Pathway for SGR Reform Act apply to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2014, others will not begin to apply until 2016 and beyond. In addition, we are making a number of changes relating to direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) payments. We are establishing new requirements or revising requirements for quality reporting by specific providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, and LTCHs) that are participating in Medicare. We are updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. In addition, we are making technical corrections to the regulations governing provider administrative appeals and judicial review; updating the reasonable compensation equivalent (RCE) limits, and revising the methodology for determining such limits, for services furnished by physicians to certain teaching hospitals and hospitals excluded from the IPPS; making regulatory revisions to broaden the specified uses of Medicare Advantage (MA) risk adjustment data and to specify the conditions for release of such risk adjustment data to entities outside of CMS; and making changes to the enforcement procedures for organ transplant centers. We are aligning the reporting and submission timelines for clinical quality measures for the Medicare HER Incentive Program for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) with the reporting and submission timelines for the Hospital IQR Program. In addition, we provide guidance and clarification of certain policies for eligible hospitals and CAHs such as our policy for reporting zero denominators on clinical quality measures and our policy for case threshold exemptions. In this document, we are finalizing two interim final rules with comment period relating to criteria for disproportionate share hospital uncompensated care payments and extensions of temporary changes to the payment adjustment for low-volume hospitals and of the Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural Hospital (MDH) Program.
Watnick, Suzanne; Weiner, Daniel E; Shaffer, Rachel; Inrig, Jula; Moe, Sharon; Mehrotra, Rajnish
2012-09-01
In addition to extending health insurance coverage, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 aims to improve quality of care and contain costs. To this end, the act allowed introduction of bundled payments for a range of services, proposed the creation of accountable care organizations (ACOs), and established the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test new care delivery and payment models. The ACO program began April 1, 2012, along with demonstration projects for bundled payments for episodes of care in Medicaid. Yet even before many components of the Affordable Care Act are fully in place, the Medicare ESRD Program has instituted legislatively mandated changes for dialysis services that resemble many of these care delivery reform proposals. The ESRD program now operates under a fully bundled, case-mix adjusted prospective payment system and has implemented Medicare's first-ever mandatory pay-for-performance program: the ESRD Quality Incentive Program. As ACOs are developed, they may benefit from the nephrology community's experience with these relatively novel models of health care payment and delivery reform. Nephrologists are in a position to assure that the ACO development will benefit from the ESRD experience. This article reviews the new ESRD payment system and the Quality Incentive Program, comparing and contrasting them with ACOs. Better understanding of similarities and differences between the ESRD program and the ACO program will allow the nephrology community to have a more influential voice in shaping the future of health care delivery in the United States.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-03
...This proposed rule would revise the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system and to implement certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act). In this proposed rule, we describe the proposed changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. These proposed changes would be applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2011. In addition, this proposed rule would update the revised Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system and to implement certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In this proposed rule, we set forth the proposed applicable relative payment weights and amounts for services furnished in ASCs, specific HCPCS codes to which these proposed changes would apply, and other pertinent ratesetting information for the CY 2011 ASC payment system. These proposed changes would be applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2011. This proposed rule also includes proposals to implement provisions of the Affordable Care Act relating to payments to hospitals for direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) costs; and new limitations on certain physician referrals to hospitals in which they have an ownership or investment interest.
Impact of the New Jersey all-payer rate-setting system: an analysis of financial ratios.
Rosko, M D
1989-01-01
Although prospective payment may contain costs, many analysts are concerned about the unintended consequences of rate regulation. This article presents the results of a case-study analysis of the New Jersey rate-setting programs during the period 1977-1985. Using measures of profitability, liquidity, and leverage, data for New Jersey, the Northeast, and the United States as a whole are used to contrast the impact of two forms of prospective payment. After attempting alternative cost-containment methods, the New Jersey Department of Health implemented an all-payer system in which prospective rates of compensation were established for DRGs. The new rate-setting system was designed to control costs, improve access to care, maintain quality of services, ensure financial viability of efficient providers, and limit the payment differentials associated with cost shifting. The results of this study have a number of implications for the evaluation of all-payer rate regulation. First, although the New Jersey all-payer system was more successful than the partial-payer program in restraining the rate of increase in cost per case, savings were achieved without adversely affecting the viability of regulated hospitals. Second, the large differentials among payers that were associated with the partial-payer program were reduced dramatically by the all-payer program. Third, using the financial position of inner-city hospitals relative to suburban hospitals as a measure of equity, the all-payer system appeared to be a fairer method of regulating rates.
42 CFR 413.337 - Methodology for calculating the prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... excluded from the data base used to compute the Federal payment rates. In addition, allowable costs related to exceptions payments under § 413.30(f) are excluded from the data base used to compute the Federal... prospective payment rates. (a) Data used. (1) To calculate the prospective payment rates, CMS uses— (i...
42 CFR 413.337 - Methodology for calculating the prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... excluded from the data base used to compute the Federal payment rates. In addition, allowable costs related to exceptions payments under § 413.30(f) are excluded from the data base used to compute the Federal... prospective payment rates. (a) Data used. (1) To calculate the prospective payment rates, CMS uses— (i...
42 CFR 413.337 - Methodology for calculating the prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... excluded from the data base used to compute the Federal payment rates. In addition, allowable costs related to exceptions payments under § 413.30(f) are excluded from the data base used to compute the Federal... prospective payment rates. (a) Data used. (1) To calculate the prospective payment rates, CMS uses— (i...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-20
...This notice describes the changes made to the TRICARE DRG- based payment system in order to conform to changes made to the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS). It also provides the updated fixed loss cost outlier threshold, cost-to-charge ratios and the data necessary to update the Fiscal Year 2011 rates.
The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system.
Mayes, Rick
2007-01-01
This article explains the origins, development, and passage of the single most influential postwar innovation in medical financing: Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS). Inexorably rising medical inflation and deep economic deterioration forced policymakers in the late 1970s to pursue radical reform of Medicare to keep the program from insolvency. Congress and the Reagan administration eventually turned to the one alternative reimbursement system that analysts and academics had studied more than any other and had even tested with apparent success in New Jersey: prospective payment with diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Rather than simply reimbursing hospitals whatever costs they charged to treat Medicare patients, the new model paid hospitals a predetermined, set rate based on the patient's diagnosis. The most significant change in health policy since Medicare and Medicaid's passage in 1965 went virtually unnoticed by the general public. Nevertheless, the change was nothing short of revolutionary. For the first time, the federal government gained the upper hand in its financial relationship with the hospital industry. Medicare's new prospective payment system with DRGs triggered a shift in the balance of political and economic power between the providers of medical care (hospitals and physicians) and those who paid for it--power that providers had successfully accumulated for more than half a century.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
... Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare-- Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: July 7, 2011...), HHS. ACTION: Correction of proposed rule. SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors that... explanation of publishing such Tables on the Internet), reflect an error in the calculation of the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-02
.... 93.773, Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare-- Supplementary Medical... technical errors that appeared in the supplementary proposed rule entitled ``Medicare Program; Supplemental... Doc. 2010-12567 filed May 21, 2010, there are technical and typographical errors that are identified...
42 CFR 412.115 - Additional payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Payments to Hospitals Under the Prospective Payment Systems § 412.115 Additional payments. (a) Bad debts. An additional payment is made to each... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Additional payments. 412.115 Section 412.115 Public...
Effect of medicare payment on rural health care systems.
McBride, Timothy D; Mueller, Keith J
2002-01-01
Medicare payments constitute a significant share of patient-generated revenues for rural providers, more so than for urban providers. Therefore, Medicare payment policies influence the behavior of rural providers and determine their financial viability. Health services researchers need to contribute to the understanding of the implications of changes in fee-for-service payment policy, prospects for change because of the payment to Medicare+Choice risk plans, and implications for rural providers inherent in any restructuring of the Medicare program. This article outlines the basic policy choices, implications for rural providers and Medicare beneficiaries, impacts of existing research, and suggestions for further research. Topics for further research include implications of the Critical Access Hospital program, understanding how changes in payment to rural hospitals affect patient care, developing improved formulas for paying rural hospitals, determining the payment-to-cost ratio for physicians, measuring the impact of changes in the payment methodology used to pay for services delivered by rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers, accounting for the reasons for differences in historical Medicare expenditures across rural counties and between rural and urban counties, explicating all reasons for Medicare+Choice plans withdrawing from some rural areas and entering others, measuring the rural impact of proposals to add a prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program, and measuring the impact of Medicare payment policies on rural economies.
42 CFR 413.304 - Eligibility for prospectively determined payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost...
42 CFR 413.304 - Eligibility for prospectively determined payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-26
... Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2012; Correction AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS... Nursing Facilities for FY 2012'' that appeared in the August 8, 2011 Federal Register. DATES: Effective... October 1, 2011. II. Summary of Errors The Addendum to the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective...
2005-04-29
To) 29-04-2005 Final Report July 2004 to July 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER The appli’eation of an army prospective payment model structured...Z39.18 Prospective Payment Model 1 The Application of an Army Prospective Payment Model Structured on the Standards Set Forth by the CHAMPUS Maximum...Health Care Administration 20060315 090 Prospective Payment Model 2 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge my wife, Karen, who allowed me the
42 CFR 413.337 - Methodology for calculating the prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.337 Methodology for calculating the...
42 CFR 413.337 - Methodology for calculating the prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.337 Methodology for calculating the...
Function-based payment model for inpatient medical rehabilitation: an evaluation.
Sutton, J P; DeJong, G; Wilkerson, D
1996-07-01
To describe the components of a function-based prospective payment model for inpatient medical rehabilitation that parallels diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), to evaluate this model in relation to stakeholder objectives, and to detail the components of a quality of care incentive program that, when combined with this payment model, creates an incentive for provides to maximize functional outcomes. This article describes a conceptual model, involving no data collection or data synthesis. The basic payment model described parallels DRGs. Information on the potential impact of this model on medical rehabilitation is gleaned from the literature evaluating the impact of DRGs. The conceptual model described is evaluated against the results of a Delphi Survey of rehabilitation providers, consumers, policymakers, and researchers previously conducted by members of the research team. The major shortcoming of a function-based prospective payment model for inpatient medical rehabilitation is that it contains no inherent incentive to maximize functional outcomes. Linkage of reimbursement to outcomes, however, by withholding a fixed proportion of the standard FRG payment amount, placing that amount in a "quality of care" pool, and distributing that pool annually among providers whose predesignated, facility-level, case-mix-adjusted outcomes are attained, may be one strategy for maximizing outcome goals.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-31
... Electronic Device (CIED) Procedures c. New Candidate HAC Condition: Iatrogenic Pneumothorax With Venous Catheterization 6. RTI Program Evaluation Summary a. RTI Analysis of FY 2011 POA Indicator Reporting Across.... Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program 1. Background a. History of Measures Adopted for the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-16
... Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare-- Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: November 9...: Correction notice. SUMMARY: This document corrects a technical error that appeared in the notice published in... of July 22, 2010 (75 FR 42836), there was a technical error that we are identifying and correcting in...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-14
....773, Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare-- Supplementary Medical Insurance... errors in the proposed rule entitled ``Medicare Program; Proposed Changes to the Hospital Inpatient...-9644 of May 5, 2011 (76 FR 25788), there were a number of technical and typographical errors that are...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-11
... Purchasing (VBP) Program, we inadvertently omitted data from the table entitled ``Proposed Performance..., Proposed Hospital Inpatient Value- Based Purchasing (VBP) Program Adjustment Factors for FY 2013, as a... partial paragraph-- (1) Lines 2 and 3, the phrase ``all hospitals are expected to experience a decrease...
2014-08-05
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year (FY) 2015. In addition, it adopts the most recent Office of Management and Budget (OMB) statistical area delineations to identify a facility's urban or rural status for the purpose of determining which set of rate tables will apply to the facility, and to determine the SNF PPS wage index including a 1-year transition with a blended wage index for all providers for FY 2015. This final rule also contains a revision to policies related to the Change of Therapy (COT) Other Medicare Required Assessment (OMRA). This final rule includes a discussion of a provision related to the Affordable Care Act involving Civil Money Penalties. Finally, this final rule discusses the SNF therapy payment research currently underway within CMS, observed trends related to therapy utilization among SNF providers, and the agency's commitment to accelerating health information exchange in SNFs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Periodic interim payments for skilled nursing facilities receiving payment under the skilled nursing facility prospective payment system for Part A...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Periodic interim payments for skilled nursing facilities receiving payment under the skilled nursing facility prospective payment system for Part A...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Periodic interim payments for skilled nursing facilities receiving payment under the skilled nursing facility prospective payment system for Part A...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Periodic interim payments for skilled nursing facilities receiving payment under the skilled nursing facility prospective payment system for Part A...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Periodic interim payments for skilled nursing facilities receiving payment under the skilled nursing facility prospective payment system for Part A...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING...
42 CFR 412.523 - Methodology for calculating the Federal prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
.... (4) Determining the Federal prospective payment rate for each LTC-DRG. The Federal prospective payment rate for each LTC-DRG is the product of the weighting factors described in § 412.515 and the... payment rate multiplied by the relative weight of the LTC-DRG assigned for that discharge. A hospital's...
42 CFR 413.217 - Items and services included in the ESRD prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... payment system. 413.217 Section 413.217 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT....217 Items and services included in the ESRD prospective payment system. The following items and services are included in the ESRD prospective payment system effective January 1, 2011: (a) Renal dialysis...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-06
... corresponding terms in alphabetical order below: AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ARD Assessment... resource-intensive than SNF residents, especially SNF post-acute care patients. These commenters stated...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-06
...This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2014 (for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2013 and on or before September 30, 2014) as required by the statute. This final rule also revised the list of diagnosis codes that may be counted toward an IRF's ``60 percent rule'' compliance calculation to determine ``presumptive compliance,'' update the IRF facility-level adjustment factors using an enhanced estimation methodology, revise sections of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, revise requirements for acute care hospitals that have IRF units, clarify the IRF regulation text regarding limitation of review, update references to previously changed sections in the regulations text, and revise and update quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program.
2013-08-06
This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2014 (for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2013 and on or before September 30, 2014) as required by the statute. This final rule also revised the list of diagnosis codes that may be counted toward an IRF's "60 percent rule'' compliance calculation to determine "presumptive compliance,'' update the IRF facility-level adjustment factors using an enhanced estimation methodology, revise sections of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, revise requirements for acute care hospitals that have IRF units, clarify the IRF regulation text regarding limitation of review, update references to previously changed sections in the regulations text, and revise and update quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program.
42 CFR 412.541 - Method of payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as long-term care hospital... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Method of payment under the long-term care hospital... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.541 Method of payment under the long...
42 CFR 412.541 - Method of payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as long-term care hospital... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Method of payment under the long-term care hospital... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.541 Method of payment under the long...
42 CFR 412.541 - Method of payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as long-term care hospital... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Method of payment under the long-term care hospital... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.541 Method of payment under the long...
42 CFR 412.541 - Method of payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as long-term care hospital... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Method of payment under the long-term care hospital... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.541 Method of payment under the long...
42 CFR 412.541 - Method of payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as long-term care hospital... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Method of payment under the long-term care hospital... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.541 Method of payment under the long...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-05-11
... Considered HAC Candidate: Iatrogenic Pneumothorax With Venous Catheterization 3. Present on Admission (POA.... History of Measures Adopted for the Hospital IQR Program b. Maintenance of Technical Specifications for...-Associated Infection (HAI) Measures (A) Proposed Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections ((CLABSI...
Lawler, Frank H; Wilson, Frank R; Smith, G Keith; Mitchell, Lynn V
2017-12-01
Healthcare reimbursement, which has traditionally been based on the quantity of services delivered, is currently moving toward value-based reimbursement-a system that addresses the quantity, quality, and cost of services. One such arrangement has been the evolution of bundled payments for a specific procedure or for an episode of care, paid prospectively or through post-hoc reconciliation. To evaluate the impact of instituting bundled payments that incorporate facility charges, physician fees, and all ancillary charges by the State of Oklahoma HealthChoice public employee insurance plan. From January 1 through December 31, 2016, HealthChoice, a large, government-sponsored Oklahoma health plan, implemented a voluntary, prospective, bundled payment system with network facilities, called Select. The Select program allows members at the time of certification of the services to opt to use participating facilities for specified services at a bundled rate, with deductible and coinsurance covered by the health plan. That is, the program allows any plan member to choose either a participating Select facility with no out-of-pocket costs or standard benefits at a participating network facility. During 2016, more than 7900 procedures were performed for 5907 patients who chose the Select arrangement (also designated as the intervention group). The most common outpatient Select procedures were for cardiology, colonoscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The most common inpatient procedures for Select-covered patients were in 6 diagnosis-related groups covering spinal fusions, joint replacement surgeries, and percutaneous coronary artery stenting. The allowable costs were similar for bundled procedures at ambulatory surgery centers and at outpatient hospital facilities; the allowable costs for patients not in the Select program (mean, $813) were lower at ambulatory surgery centers than at outpatient hospital departments (mean, $3086) because of differences in case mix. Patients in the Select system who had outpatient procedures had significantly fewer subsequent claims than those who were not in Select for hospitalization (1.7% vs 2.5%, respectively) and emergency department visits (4.4% vs 11.5%, respectively) in the 30 days postprocedure. Quality measures (eg, wound infection and reoperation) were similar for patients who were and were not in the Select group and had procedures. Surgical complication (ie, return to surgery) rates were higher for the Select group. The Select program demonstrated promising results during its first year of operation, suggesting that prospective bundled payment arrangements can be implemented successfully. Further research on reimbursement mechanisms, that is, how to pay physicians and facilities, and quality of outcomes is needed, especially with respect to which procedures are most suitable for this payment arrangement.
Lawler, Frank H.; Wilson, Frank R.; Smith, G. Keith; Mitchell, Lynn V.
2017-01-01
Background Healthcare reimbursement, which has traditionally been based on the quantity of services delivered, is currently moving toward value-based reimbursement—a system that addresses the quantity, quality, and cost of services. One such arrangement has been the evolution of bundled payments for a specific procedure or for an episode of care, paid prospectively or through post-hoc reconciliation. Objective To evaluate the impact of instituting bundled payments that incorporate facility charges, physician fees, and all ancillary charges by the State of Oklahoma HealthChoice public employee insurance plan. Method From January 1 through December 31, 2016, HealthChoice, a large, government-sponsored Oklahoma health plan, implemented a voluntary, prospective, bundled payment system with network facilities, called Select. The Select program allows members at the time of certification of the services to opt to use participating facilities for specified services at a bundled rate, with deductible and coinsurance covered by the health plan. That is, the program allows any plan member to choose either a participating Select facility with no out-of-pocket costs or standard benefits at a participating network facility. Results During 2016, more than 7900 procedures were performed for 5907 patients who chose the Select arrangement (also designated as the intervention group). The most common outpatient Select procedures were for cardiology, colonoscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The most common inpatient procedures for Select-covered patients were in 6 diagnosis-related groups covering spinal fusions, joint replacement surgeries, and percutaneous coronary artery stenting. The allowable costs were similar for bundled procedures at ambulatory surgery centers and at outpatient hospital facilities; the allowable costs for patients not in the Select program (mean, $813) were lower at ambulatory surgery centers than at outpatient hospital departments (mean, $3086) because of differences in case mix. Patients in the Select system who had outpatient procedures had significantly fewer subsequent claims than those who were not in Select for hospitalization (1.7% vs 2.5%, respectively) and emergency department visits (4.4% vs 11.5%, respectively) in the 30 days postprocedure. Quality measures (eg, wound infection and reoperation) were similar for patients who were and were not in the Select group and had procedures. Surgical complication (ie, return to surgery) rates were higher for the Select group. Conclusion The Select program demonstrated promising results during its first year of operation, suggesting that prospective bundled payment arrangements can be implemented successfully. Further research on reimbursement mechanisms, that is, how to pay physicians and facilities, and quality of outcomes is needed, especially with respect to which procedures are most suitable for this payment arrangement. PMID:29403570
42 CFR 412.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. The prospective payment rate for each discharge (as defined... the election in § 405.521 of this chapter. (4) The acquisition costs of hearts, kidneys, livers, lungs... payments to hospitals. In addition to payments based on the prospective payment system rates for inpatient...
42 CFR 412.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. The prospective payment rate for each discharge (as defined... the election in § 405.521 of this chapter. (4) The acquisition costs of hearts, kidneys, livers, lungs... payments to hospitals. In addition to payments based on the prospective payment system rates for inpatient...
42 CFR 412.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. The prospective payment rate for each discharge (as defined... the election in § 405.521 of this chapter. (4) The acquisition costs of hearts, kidneys, livers, lungs... payments to hospitals. In addition to payments based on the prospective payment system rates for inpatient...
42 CFR 412.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. The prospective payment rate for each discharge (as defined... the election in § 405.521 of this chapter. (4) The acquisition costs of hearts, kidneys, livers, lungs... payments to hospitals. In addition to payments based on the prospective payment system rates for inpatient...
42 CFR 412.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. The prospective payment rate for each discharge (as defined... the election in § 405.521 of this chapter. (4) The acquisition costs of hearts, kidneys, livers, lungs... payments to hospitals. In addition to payments based on the prospective payment system rates for inpatient...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... from a long-term care hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for... hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for prospective payment purposes for... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... from a long-term care hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for... hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for prospective payment purposes for... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... from a long-term care hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for... hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for prospective payment purposes for... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... from a long-term care hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for... hospital based on clinical characteristics and average resource use, for prospective payment purposes for... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care...
Effect of Medicaid Payment on Rehabilitation Care for Nursing Home Residents
Wodchis, Walter P.; Hirth, Richard A.; Fries, Brant E.
2007-01-01
There is considerable interest in examining how Medicaid payment affects nursing home care. This study examines the effect of Medicaid payment methods and reimbursement rates on the delivery of rehabilitation therapy to Medicaid nursing home residents in six States from 1992-1995. In States that changed payment from prospective facility-specific to prospective case-mix adjusted payment methods, Medicaid residents received more rehabilitation therapy after the change. While residents in States using case-mix adjusted payment rates for Medicaid payment were more likely to receive rehabilitation than residents in States using prospective facility-specific Medicaid payment, the differences were general and not specific to Medicaid residents. Retrospective payment for Medicaid resident care was associated with greater use of therapy for Medicaid residents. PMID:17645160
Effect of Medicaid payment on rehabilitation care for nursing home residents.
Wodchis, Walter P; Hirth, Richard A; Fries, Brant E
2007-01-01
There is considerable interest in examining how Medicaid payment affects nursing home care. This study examines the effect of Medicaid payment methods and reimbursement rates on the delivery of rehabilitation therapy to Medicaid nursing home residents in six States from 1992-1995. In States that changed payment from prospective facility-specific to prospective case-mix adjusted payment methods, Medicaid residents received more rehabilitation therapy after the change. While residents in States using case-mix adjusted payment rates for Medicaid payment were more likely to receive rehabilitation than residents in States using prospective facility-specific Medicaid payment, the differences were general and not specific to Medicaid residents. Retrospective payment for Medicaid resident care was associated with greater use of therapy for Medicaid residents.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-30
... Radiation Therapy (IMRT) (APC 0305) f. Computed Tomography of Abdomen/Pelvic (APCs 0331 and 0334) g. Complex Interstitial Radiation Source Application (APC 0651) h. Radioelement Applications (APC 0312) 8. Respiratory...
42 CFR 413.355 - Additional payment: QIO photocopy and mailing costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.355 Additional payment: QIO photocopy and mailing costs. An additional payment is made to a skilled nursing facility in accordance with § 476.78 of this...
42 CFR 413.355 - Additional payment: QIO photocopy and mailing costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.355 Additional payment: QIO photocopy and mailing costs. An additional payment is made to a skilled nursing facility in accordance with § 476.78 of this...
42 CFR 412.200 - General provisions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Operating... the prospective payment system for inpatient operating costs. Except as provided in this subpart, the... for § 412.60, which deals with DRG classification and weighting factors, the provisions of subparts D...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-10
...This final rule updates and makes certain revisions to the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) prospective payment system (PPS) for calendar year (CY) 2012. We are also finalizing the interim final rule with comment period published on April 6, 2011, regarding the transition budget-neutrality adjustment under the ESRD PPS,. This final rule also sets forth requirements for the ESRD quality incentive program (QIP) for payment years (PYs) 2013 and 2014. In addition, this final rule revises the ambulance fee schedule regulations to conform to statutory changes. This final rule also revises the definition of durable medical equipment (DME) by adding a 3-year minimum lifetime requirement (MLR) that must be met by an item or device in order to be considered durable for the purpose of classifying the item under the Medicare benefit category for DME. Finally, this final rule implements certain provisions of section 154 of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) related to the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) Competitive Acquisition Program and responds to comments received on an interim final rule published January 16, 2009, that implemented these provisions of MIPPA effective April 18, 2009. (See the Table of Contents for a listing of the specific issues addressed in this final rule.)
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD... the principles and authorities under which CMS is authorized to establish a prospective payment system...
42 CFR 412.232 - Criteria for all hospitals in a rural county seeking urban redesignation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... by the Bureau of the Census concerning population density or growth, or changes in designation of... SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR...
42 CFR 412.232 - Criteria for all hospitals in a rural county seeking urban redesignation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... by the Bureau of the Census concerning population density or growth, or changes in designation of... SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-23
... ResDAC Research Data Assistance Center RIA Regulatory Impact Analysis RHC Rural Health Clinic SNF... Community Health Applied Research Network. We believe that the proposals in this proposed rule benefited...
42 CFR 413.316 - Determining payment amounts: Ancillary services.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods...
42 CFR 413.316 - Determining payment amounts: Ancillary services.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods...
42 CFR 413.310 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998...
42 CFR 413.310 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Preadmission services as inpatient operating costs under the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. 412.405 Section 412.405 Public... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Preadmission services as inpatient operating costs under the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. 412.405 Section 412.405 Public... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Preadmission services as inpatient operating costs under the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. 412.405 Section 412.405 Public... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Preadmission services as inpatient operating costs under the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. 412.405 Section 412.405 Public... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Preadmission services as inpatient operating costs under the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. 412.405 Section 412.405 Public... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-04
...This final rule sets forth updates to the home health prospective payment system (HH PPS) rates, including: the national standardized 60-day episode rates; the national per-visit rates; and the low utilization payment amount (LUPA) under the Medicare PPS for home health agencies effective January 1, 2012. This rule applies a 1.4 percent update factor to the episode rates, which reflects a 1 percent reduction applied to the 2.4 percent market basket update factor, as mandated by the Affordable Care Act. This rule also updates the wage index used under the HH PPS, and further reduces home health payments to account for continued nominal growth in case-mix which is unrelated to changes in patient health status. This rule removes two hypertension codes from the HH PPS case-mix system, thereby requiring recalibration of the case-mix weights. In addition, the rule implements two structural changes designed to decrease incentives to upcode and provide unneeded therapy services. Finally, this rule incorporates additional flexibility regarding face-to-face encounters with providers related to home health care.
2011-11-04
This final rule sets forth updates to the home health prospective payment system (HH PPS) rates, including: the national standardized 60-day episode rates; the national per-visit rates; and the low utilization payment amount (LUPA) under the Medicare PPS for home health agencies effective January 1, 2012. This rule applies a 1.4 percent update factor to the episode rates, which reflects a 1 percent reduction applied to the 2.4 percent market basket update factor, as mandated by the Affordable Care Act. This rule also updates the wage index used under the HH PPS, and further reduces home health payments to account for continued nominal growth in case-mix which is unrelated to changes in patient health status. This rule removes two hypertension codes from the HH PPS case-mix system, thereby requiring recalibration of the case-mix weights. In addition, the rule implements two structural changes designed to decrease incentives to upcode and provide unneeded therapy services. Finally, this rule incorporates additional flexibility regarding face-to-face encounters with providers related to home health care.
Measure in the ESRD QIP for PY 2020. Final rule.
2017-08-04
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for fiscal year (FY) 2018. It also revises and rebases the market basket index by updating the base year from 2010 to 2014, and by adding a new cost category for Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Services. The rule also finalizes revisions to the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), including measure and standardized resident assessment data policies and policies related to public display. In addition, it finalizes policies for the Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing Program that will affect Medicare payment to SNFs beginning in FY 2019. The final rule also clarifies the regulatory requirements for team composition for surveys conducted for investigating a complaint and aligns regulatory provisions for investigation of complaints with the statutory requirements. The final rule also finalizes the performance period for the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Healthcare Personnel (HCP) Influenza Vaccination Reporting Measure included in the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Quality Incentive Program (QIP) for Payment Year 2020.
42 CFR 413.314 - Determining payment amounts: Routine per diem rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods...
42 CFR 413.314 - Determining payment amounts: Routine per diem rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods...
42 CFR 413.20 - Financial data and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... costs payable under the program. Standardized definitions, accounting, statistics, and reporting...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Accounting Records and... providers on an annual basis with reporting periods based on the provider's accounting year. In the...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Payment for drugs and biologicals that are not paid... biologicals that are not paid on a cost or prospective payment basis. (a) Applicability—(1) Payment for drugs and biologicals before January 1, 2004. Payment for a drug or biological that is not paid on a cost or...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Payment for drugs and biologicals that are not paid... biologicals that are not paid on a cost or prospective payment basis. (a) Applicability—(1) Payment for drugs and biologicals before January 1, 2004. Payment for a drug or biological that is not paid on a cost or...
The resource utilization group system: its effect on nursing home case mix and costs.
Thorpe, K E; Gertler, P J; Goldman, P
1991-01-01
Using data from 1985 and 1986, we examine how New York state's prospective payment system affected nursing homes. The system, called Resource Utilization Group (RUG-II), aimed to limit nursing home cost growth and improve access to nursing homes by "heavy-care" patients. As in Medicare's prospective hospital reimbursement system, payments to nursing homes were based on a "price," rather than facility-specific rates. With respect to cost growth, we observed considerable diversity among homes. Specifically, those nursing homes most financially constrained by the RUG-II methodology exhibited the slowest rates of cost growth; we observed higher cost growth among the homes least constrained. This higher rate of cost growth raises a question about the desirability of using a pricing methodology to determine nursing home payment rates. In addition to moderating cost growth, we also observed a significant change in the mix of patients admitted to nursing homes. During the first year of the RUG-II program, nursing homes admitted more heavy-care patients and reduced days of care to lighter-care patients. Thus, through 1986, the RUG-II program appeared to satisfy at least one of its major policy objectives.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-24
...The final rule with comment period in this document revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system and to implement certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act). In this final rule with comment period, we describe the changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare hospital outpatient services paid under the prospective payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2011. In addition, this final rule with comment period updates the revised Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from our continuing experience with this system and to implement certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In this final rule with comment period, we set forth the applicable relative payment weights and amounts for services furnished in ASCs, specific HCPCS codes to which these changes apply, and other pertinent ratesetting information for the CY 2011 ASC payment system. These changes are applicable to services furnished on or after January 1, 2011. In this document, we also are including two final rules that implement provisions of the Affordable Care Act relating to payments to hospitals for direct graduate medical education (GME) and indirect medical education (IME) costs; and new limitations on certain physician referrals to hospitals in which they have an ownership or investment interest. In the interim final rule with comment period that is included in this document, we are changing the effective date for otherwise eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals that have been reclassified from urban to rural under section 1886(d)(8)(E) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 412.103 to receive reasonable cost payments for anesthesia services and related care furnished by nonphysician anesthetists from cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2010, to December 2, 2010.
42 CFR 419.21 - Hospital services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... exhausted their Part A benefits but are entitled to benefits under Part B of the program. (c) Partial... treatment or by a hospice program furnishing services to patients outside the hospice benefit: (1) Antigens. (2) Splints and casts. (3) Hepatitis B vaccine. (e)(1) Effective January 1, 2005 through December 31...
42 CFR 419.21 - Hospital services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... exhausted their Part A benefits but are entitled to benefits under Part B of the program. (c) Partial... treatment or by a hospice program furnishing services to patients outside the hospice benefit: (1) Antigens. (2) Splints and casts. (3) Hepatitis B vaccine. (e)(1) Effective January 1, 2005 through December 31...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-03
...-migration adjustment based on commuting into a county located within CBSA 30780. Specifically, we are... provide a period for public comment before the provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section...
42 CFR 484.225 - Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Annual update of the unadjusted national... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.225 Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate. (a) CMS updates the unadjusted national 60-day episode...
42 CFR 484.225 - Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Annual update of the unadjusted national... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.225 Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate. (a) CMS updates the unadjusted national 60-day episode...
42 CFR 484.225 - Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Annual update of the unadjusted national... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.225 Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate. (a) CMS updates the unadjusted national 60-day episode...
42 CFR 484.225 - Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Annual update of the unadjusted national... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.225 Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate. (a) CMS updates the unadjusted national 60-day episode...
42 CFR 484.225 - Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Annual update of the unadjusted national... SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.225 Annual update of the unadjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate. (a) CMS updates the unadjusted national 60-day episode...
Effect of prospective reimbursement on nursing home costs.
Coburn, A F; Fortinsky, R; McGuire, C; McDonald, T P
1993-01-01
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluates the effect of Maine's Medicaid nursing home prospective payment system on nursing home costs and access to care for public patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING. The implementation of a facility-specific prospective payment system for nursing homes provided the opportunity for longitudinal study of the effect of that system. Data sources included audited Medicaid nursing home cost reports, quality-of-care data from state facility survey and licensure files, and facility case-mix information from random, stratified samples of homes and residents. Data were obtained for six years (1979-1985) covering the three-year period before and after implementation of the prospective payment system. STUDY DESIGN. This study used a pre-post, longitudinal analytical design in which interrupted, time-series regression models were estimated to test the effects of prospective payment and other factors, e.g., facility characteristics, nursing home market factors, facility case mix, and quality of care, on nursing home costs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. Prospective payment contributed to an estimated $3.03 decrease in total variable costs in the third year from what would have been expected under the previous retrospective cost-based payment system. Responsiveness to payment system efficiency incentives declined over the study period, however, indicating a growing problem in achieving further cost reductions. Some evidence suggested that cost reductions might have reduced access for public patients. CONCLUSIONS. Study findings are consistent with the results of other studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of prospective payment systems in restraining nursing home costs. Potential policy trade-offs among cost containment, access, and quality assurance deserve further consideration, particularly by researchers and policymakers designing the new generation of case mix-based and other nursing home payment systems. PMID:8463109
Effect of prospective reimbursement on nursing home costs.
Coburn, A F; Fortinsky, R; McGuire, C; McDonald, T P
1993-04-01
This study evaluates the effect of Maine's Medicaid nursing home prospective payment system on nursing home costs and access to care for public patients. The implementation of a facility-specific prospective payment system for nursing homes provided the opportunity for longitudinal study of the effect of that system. Data sources included audited Medicaid nursing home cost reports, quality-of-care data from state facility survey and licensure files, and facility case-mix information from random, stratified samples of homes and residents. Data were obtained for six years (1979-1985) covering the three-year period before and after implementation of the prospective payment system. This study used a pre-post, longitudinal analytical design in which interrupted, time-series regression models were estimated to test the effects of prospective payment and other factors, e.g., facility characteristics, nursing home market factors, facility case mix, and quality of care, on nursing home costs. Prospective payment contributed to an estimated $3.03 decrease in total variable costs in the third year from what would have been expected under the previous retrospective cost-based payment system. Responsiveness to payment system efficiency incentives declined over the study period, however, indicating a growing problem in achieving further cost reductions. Some evidence suggested that cost reductions might have reduced access for public patients. Study findings are consistent with the results of other studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of prospective payment systems in restraining nursing home costs. Potential policy trade-offs among cost containment, access, and quality assurance deserve further consideration, particularly by researchers and policymakers designing the new generation of case mix-based and other nursing home payment systems.
2017-08-14
We are revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems for FY 2018. Some of these changes implement certain statutory provisions contained in the Pathway for Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Reform Act of 2013, the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, the 21st Century Cures Act, and other legislation. We also are making changes relating to the provider-based status of Indian Health Service (IHS) and Tribal facilities and organizations and to the low-volume hospital payment adjustment for hospitals operated by the IHS or a Tribe. In addition, we are providing the market basket update that will apply to the rate-of-increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits for FY 2018. We are updating the payment policies and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) for FY 2018. In addition, we are establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for quality reporting by specific Medicare providers (acute care hospitals, PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, LTCHs, and inpatient psychiatric facilities). We also are establishing new requirements or revising existing requirements for eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAHs) participating in the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. We are updating policies relating to the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and the Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. We also are making changes relating to transparency of accrediting organization survey reports and plans of correction of providers and suppliers; electronic signature and electronic submission of the Certification and Settlement Summary page of the Medicare cost reports; and clarification of provider disposal of assets.
2014-08-06
This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2015 as required by the statute. This final rule finalizes a policy to collect data on the amount and mode (that is, Individual, Concurrent, Group, and Co-Treatment) of therapy provided in the IRF setting according to therapy discipline, revises the list of diagnosis and impairment group codes that presumptively meet the "60 percent rule'' compliance criteria, provides a way for IRFs to indicate on the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) form whether the prior treatment and severity requirements have been met for arthritis cases to presumptively meet the "60 percent rule'' compliance criteria, and revises and updates quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP). This rule also delays the effective date for the revisions to the list of diagnosis codes that are used to determine presumptive compliance under the "60 percent rule'' that were finalized in FY 2014 IRF PPS final rule and adopts the revisions to the list of diagnosis codes that are used to determine presumptive compliance under the "60 percent rule'' that are finalized in this rule. This final rule also addresses the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), for the IRF prospective payment system (PPS), which will be effective when ICD-10-CM becomes the required medical data code set for use on Medicare claims and IRF-PAI submissions.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-15
...-through devices, brachytherapy sources, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), brachytherapy composite... Modulated Radiation Therapy I/OCE Integrated Outpatient Code Editor IOL Intraocular lens IOM Institute of Medicine IORT Intraoperative radiation treatment IPF Inpatient Psychiatric Facility IPPS [Hospital...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false [Reserved] 412.98 Section 412.98 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Special Treatment of Certain Facilities Under the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-07
... and SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) Balanced Budget Refinement Act of the 1999 (BBRA....7 percent adjusted by a 0.1 percentage point reduction as required by section 1886(s)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and a 0.7 percentage point reduction as required by 1886(s)(2)(A)(i...
RUGs and "Medi-Cal" systems for classifying nursing home patients.
Grimaldi, P L
1985-12-01
Medicare and most state Medicaid programs currently use indirect case-mix measures to determine reimbursement for nursing home care. In the future, however, they probably will incorporate more direct case-mix measures into their payment systems. Care must be exercised in designing a case-based prospective payment system to ensure that its financial incentives motivate providers to expedite recovery, prevent deterioration, and admit heavy-care patients. For example, although use of a services-rendered approach helps guarantee that care will be provided when needed, it also offers providers an incentive to furnish a service regardless of whether it is in the patient's best interest. Consideration must be given to the frequency with which patients are reassessed. The implications of the timing of reassessments for quality of care also must be studied. Ideally, quality would be measured on an outcome basis--that is, payment would depend on whether targeted goals for individual patients are reached--rather than on structural or process measures alone. Two recent classification systems--Resource Utilization Groups and Medi-Cal groups--may serve as models for case-based prospective payment systems. Each method classifies patients into distinct, meaningful categories based on activities of daily living and services received.
42 CFR 412.90 - General rules.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false General rules. 412.90 Section 412.90 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Special Treatment of Certain Facilities Under the...
Huckfeldt, Peter J; Sood, Neeraj; Escarce, José J; Grabowski, David C; Newhouse, Joseph P
2014-03-01
Medicare continues to implement payment reforms that shift reimbursement from fee-for-service toward episode-based payment, affecting average and marginal payment. We contrast the effects of two reforms for home health agencies. The home health interim payment system in 1997 lowered both types of payment; our conceptual model predicts a decline in the likelihood of use and costs, both of which we find. The home health prospective payment system in 2000 raised average but lowered marginal payment with theoretically ambiguous effects; we find a modest increase in use and costs. We find little substantive effect of either policy on readmissions or mortality. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Huckfeldt, Peter J; Sood, Neeraj; Escarce, José J; Grabowski, David C; Newhouse, Joseph P
2014-01-01
Medicare continues to implement payment reforms that shift reimbursement from fee-for-service towards episode-based payment, affecting average and marginal payment. We contrast the effects of two reforms for home health agencies. The Home Health Interim Payment System in 1997 lowered both types of payment; our conceptual model predicts a decline in the likelihood of use and costs, both of which we find. The Home Health Prospective Payment System in 2000 raised average but lowered marginal payment with theoretically ambiguous effects; we find a modest increase in use and costs. We find little substantive effect of either policy on readmissions or mortality. PMID:24395018
Banks, D; Parker, E; Wendel, J
2001-03-01
Rising post-acute care expenditures for Medicare transfer patients and increasing vertical integration between hospitals and nursing facilities raise questions about the links between payment system structure, the incentive for vertical integration and the impact on efficiency. In the United States, policy-makers are responding to these concerns by initiating prospective payments to nursing facilities, and are exploring the bundling of payments to hospitals. This paper develops a static profit-maximization model of the strategic interaction between the transferring hospital and a receiving nursing facility. This model suggests that the post-1984 system of prospective payment for hospital care, coupled with nursing facility payments that reimburse for services performed, induces inefficient under-provision of hospital services and encourages vertical integration. It further indicates that the extension of prospective payment to nursing facilities will not eliminate the incentive to vertically integrate, and will not result in efficient production unless such integration takes place. Bundling prospective payments for hospitals and nursing facilities will neither remove the incentive for vertical integration nor induce production efficiency without such vertical integration. However, bundled payment will induce efficient production, with or without vertical integration, if nursing facilities are reimbursed for services performed. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-08
... effect in accordance with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b... incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons for it in the rule. Section 553(d) of the APA...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... such as radiology. (F) Section 1834(c)(1)(C) of the Act establishes the method for determining Medicare... interns and residents in approved teaching programs on the basis of a “per resident” amount. (2) Scope....170 establishes a prospective payment method for outpatient maintenance dialysis services that applies...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... such as radiology. (F) Section 1834(c)(1)(C) of the Act establishes the method for determining Medicare... interns and residents in approved teaching programs on the basis of a “per resident” amount. (2) Scope....170 establishes a prospective payment method for outpatient maintenance dialysis services that applies...
42 CFR 412.529 - Special payment provision for short-stay outliers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... system DRG weighting factors. (B) Is adjusted for different area wage levels based on the geographic...-related share, using the applicable hospital inpatient prospective payment system wage index value for... share of low-income patients. (iii) Hospital inpatient prospective payment system capital Federal rate...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... goods and services included in covered skilled nursing services. Resident classification system means a...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... goods and services included in covered skilled nursing services. Resident classification system means a...
Controller's role in monitoring prospective payment system.
Margrif, F D
1986-05-01
The challenge for hospital controllers in overseeing the prospective payment system (PPS) lies not in acquiring technical expertise but in working with the chief executive officer to coordinate organizational change. Specifically, the controller should assist in creating a prospective payment committee (PPC)--an interdisciplinary group of executives, middle managers, and medical staff. The PPC's duties, among others, include educating staff about the PPS, development of a productivity reporting system, and review of the responsibility accounting structure.
42 CFR 413.348 - Limitation on review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.348 Limitation on review. Judicial or administrative review under...
42 CFR 413.312 - Methodology for calculating rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning...
42 CFR 413.312 - Methodology for calculating rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning...
42 CFR 413.348 - Limitation on review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.348 Limitation on review. Judicial or administrative review under...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-03
... 2010 OPPS/ASC final rule, we estimated that pass-through spending for both drugs and biologicals and... pass through drugs and non-implantable biologicals, and device categories and the proportion of... and implantable biologicals), ``policy packaged'' drugs (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals and contrast...
42 CFR 412.612 - Coordination of the collection of patient assessment data.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Coordination of the collection of patient assessment data. 412.612 Section 412.612 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-07
... Fiscal Year 2011 Final Wage Indices Implementing the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act AGENCY: Centers... fiscal year (FY) 2011 wage indices and hospital reclassifications and other related tables which reflect... reclassifications and special exception wage indices through September 30, 2011. DATES: Applicability Date: The...
42 CFR 413.321 - Simplified cost report for SNFs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning...
42 CFR 413.321 - Simplified cost report for SNFs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning...
42 CFR 413.343 - Resident assessment data.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.343 Resident assessment data. (a) Submission of resident assessment data...
42 CFR 413.343 - Resident assessment data.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.343 Resident assessment data. (a) Submission of resident assessment data...
42 CFR 413.300 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998...
42 CFR 413.300 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998...
42 CFR 413.300 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998...
Trends in hospital labor and total factor productivity, 1981-86
Cromwell, Jerry; Pope, Gregory C.
1989-01-01
The per-case payment rates of Medicare's prospective payment system are annually updated. As one element of the update factor, Congress required consideration of changes in hospital productivity. In this article, calculations of annual changes in labor and total factor productivity during 1981-86 of hospitals eligible for prospective payment are presented using several output and input variants. Generally, productivity has declined since 1980, although the rates of decline have slowed since prospective payment implementation. According to the series of analyses most relevant for policy, significant hospital productivity gains occurred during 1983-86. This may justify a lower update factor. PMID:10313278
The ESRD Quality Incentive Program—Can We Bridge the Chasm?
Weiner, Daniel
2017-01-01
The ESRD Quality Incentive Program (QIP) is the first mandatory federal pay for performance program launched on January 1, 2012. The QIP is tied to the ESRD prospective payment system and mandated by the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, which directed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to expand the payment bundle for renal dialysis services and legislated that payment be tied to quality measures. The QIP links 2% of the payment that a dialysis facility receives for Medicare patients on dialysis to the facility’s performance on quality of care measures. Quality measures are evaluated annually for inclusion on the basis of importance, validity, and performance gap. Other quality assessment programs overlap with the QIP; all have substantial effects on provision of care as clinicians, patients, regulators, and dialysis organizations scramble to keep up with the frequent release of wide-ranging regulations. In this review, we provide an overview of quality assessment and quality measures, focusing on the ESRD QIP, its effect on care, and its potential future directions. We conclude that a patient-centered, individualized, and parsimonious approach to quality assessment needs to be maintained to allow the nephrology community to further bridge the quality chasm in dialysis care. PMID:28298324
Alternatives for using multivariate regression to adjust prospective payment rates
Sheingold, Steven H.
1990-01-01
Multivariate regression analysis has been used in structuring three of the adjustments to Medicare's prospective payment rates. Because the indirect-teaching adjustment, the disproportionate-share adjustment, and the adjustment for large cities are responsible for distributing approximately $3 billion in payments each year, the specification of regression models for these adjustments is of critical importance. In this article, the application of regression for adjusting Medicare's prospective rates is discussed, and the implications that differing specifications could have for these adjustments are demonstrated. PMID:10113271
Testing a diagnosis-related group index for skilled nursing facilities
Cotterill, Philip G.
1986-01-01
Interest in case-mix measures for use in nursing home payment systems has been stimulated by the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for short-term acute-care hospitals. Appropriately matching payment with care needs is important to equitably compensate providers and to encourage them to admit patients who are most in need of nursing home care. The skilled nursing facility (SNF) Medicare benefit covers skilled convalescent or rehabilitative care following a hospital stay. Therefore, it might appear that diagnosis-related groups (DRG's), the basis for patient classification in PPS, could also be used for the Medicare SNF program. In this study, a DRG-based case-mix index (CMI) was developed and tested to determine how well it explains cost differences among SNF's. The results suggest that a DRG-based SNF payment system would be highly problematic. Incentives of this system would appear to discourage placement of patients who require relatively expensive care. PMID:10311674
Testing a diagnosis-related group index for skilled nursing facilities.
Cotterill, P G
1986-01-01
Interest in case-mix measures for use in nursing home payment systems has been stimulated by the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for short-term acute-care hospitals. Appropriately matching payment with care needs is important to equitably compensate providers and to encourage them to admit patients who are most in need of nursing home care. The skilled nursing facility (SNF) Medicare benefit covers skilled convalescent or rehabilitative care following a hospital stay. Therefore, it might appear that diagnosis-related groups (DRG's), the basis for patient classification in PPS, could also be used for the Medicare SNF program. In this study, a DRG-based case-mix index (CMI) was developed and tested to determine how well it explains cost differences among SNF's. The results suggest that a DRG-based SNF payment system would be highly problematic. Incentives of this system would appear to discourage placement of patients who require relatively expensive care.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... percent) of the total number of its Medicare inpatients discharged from that acute care hospital, all such... transferred to onsite providers and readmitted to a long-term care hospital. 412.532 Section 412.532 Public... PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care...
42 CFR 412.624 - Methodology for calculating the Federal prospective payment rates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...) Adjustments for teaching hospitals. For discharges on or after October 1, 2005, CMS adjusts the Federal prospective payment on a facility basis by a factor as specified by CMS for facilities that are teaching institutions or units of teaching institutions. This adjustment is made on a claim basis as an interim payment...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient rehabilitation...) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient.... (2) Approval of payment. An inpatient rehabilitation facility's request for an accelerated payment...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient rehabilitation...) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient.... (2) Approval of payment. An inpatient rehabilitation facility's request for an accelerated payment...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient rehabilitation...) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient.... (2) Approval of payment. An inpatient rehabilitation facility's request for an accelerated payment...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
...) Recovery of payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient rehabilitation...) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient.... (2) Approval of payment. An inpatient rehabilitation facility's request for an accelerated payment...
42 CFR 413.330 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.330 Basis and scope. (a) Basis. This subpart implements section 1888(e) of the Act, which...
42 CFR 413.330 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.330 Basis and scope. (a) Basis. This subpart implements section 1888(e) of the Act, which...
42 CFR 413.330 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.330 Basis and scope. (a) Basis. This subpart implements section 1888(e) of the Act, which...
42 CFR 413.330 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.330 Basis and scope. (a) Basis. This subpart implements section 1888(e) of the Act, which...
42 CFR 413.330 - Basis and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing Facilities § 413.330 Basis and scope. (a) Basis. This subpart implements section 1888(e) of the Act, which...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-01
...-Loss Provision 3. Future Refinements VIII. Secretary's Recommendations IX. Waiver of Notice and Comment... corresponding meanings in alphabetical order below: BBRA Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP [State Children's Health... 1886(s)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and a 0.5 percentage point reduction for economy...
42 CFR 419.21 - Hospital outpatient services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
.... (c) Partial hospitalization services furnished by community mental health centers (CMHCs). (d) The following medical and other health services furnished by a home health agency (HHA) to patients who are not under an HHA plan or treatment or by a hospice program furnishing services to patients outside the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-28
... Administrator) concerning the clinical integrity of the APC groups and their weights. The advice provided by the Panel will be considered as CMS prepares its annual updates of the hospital outpatient prospective... clinical integrity of the Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) groups and their associated weights. The...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-03
..., Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1599-IFC, P.O. Box 8013, Baltimore, MD 21244-8013... for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1599-IFC... receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits and their Medicaid utilization. Under section 1886(r...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-03
... description of comorbidity for chronic renal failure. In addition, we inadvertently omitted from Table 11 the comorbidity code ``V4511'' for chronic renal failure. These changes are not substantive changes to the... heading ``Diagnoses codes,'' for the renal failure, chronic diagnoses codes, replace code ``V451'' with...
42 CFR 419.21 - Hospital outpatient services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
.... (c) Partial hospitalization services furnished by community mental health centers (CMHCs). (d) The... under an HHA plan or treatment or by a hospice program furnishing services to patients outside the hospice benefit: (1) Antigens. (2) Splints and casts. (3) Hepatitis B vaccine. (e)(1) Effective January 1...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-02
... Allocation of Home Health Survey Expenses; Final Rule #0;#0;Federal Register / Vol. 78 , No. 231 / Monday... Requirements, and Cost Allocation of Home Health Survey Expenses AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid... HHAs, the state's designated survey agency carry out certain other responsibilities that already apply...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-02
.... Monitoring Impact of FY 2012 Policy Changes and Certain SNF Practices A. RUG Distributions B. Group Therapy... Common Procedure Coding System HR-III Hybrid Resource Utilization Groups, Version 3 IHS IGI (Information... OCN OMB Control Number OMB Office of Management and Budget OMRA Other Medicare-Required Assessment PPS...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-08
...: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: This proposed rule..., especially the teaching status adjustment factor. Therefore, we implemented a 3-year moving average approach... moving average to calculate the facility-level adjustment factors. For FY 2011, we issued a notice to...
Use of Diagnosis-Related Groups by Non-Medicare Payers
Carter, Grace M.; Jacobson, Peter D.; Kominski, Gerald F.; Perry, Mark J.
1994-01-01
Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS) for hospital cases is based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). A wide variety of other third-party payers for hospital care have adapted elements of this system for their own use. The extent of DRG use varies considerably both by type of payer and by geographical area. Users include: 21 State Medicaid programs, 3 workers' compensation systems, the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS), more than one-half of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA) member plans, several self-insured employers, and a few employer coalitions. We describe how each of these payers use DRGs. No single approach is dominant. Some payers negotiate specific prices for so many combinations of DRG and hospital that the paradigm that payment equals rate times weight does not apply. What has emerged appears to be a very flexible payment system in which the only constant is the use of DRGs as a measure of output. PMID:10142368
42 CFR 413.124 - Reduction to hospital outpatient operating costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES... after October 1, 1990 and until the first date that the prospective payment system under part 419 of...
Prospective payment based on case mix: will it work in nursing homes?
Rosko, M D; Broyles, R W; Aaronson, W E
1987-01-01
This article evaluates the potential efficacy of implementing a prospective payment system based on case mix in the nursing home industry. The analysis of structural differences between the nursing home and hospital industries suggests that the mechanism of compensating long-term care facilities should be based on functional health status rather than on diagnosis and that incentives to improve quality and access should be strengthened. The article assesses several systems of classifying patients that have been proposed as the basis for implementing a prospective payment system in the nursing home industry. The article concludes with a discussion of policy issues related to the appropriate unit of payment and the scope of regulatory authority.
Final inpatient rehabilitation PPS rule improves on proposed rule.
Reynolds, M
2001-10-01
On August 7, 2001, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS--formerly HCFA) released the final rule for a new prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation services describing the process that must be used to receive payment for such services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. The process consists of five steps: First, a clinician performs assessments of the patient upon admission and at discharge. Second, the patient is classified into a case-mix group (CMG) with an assigned relative-value weight within that CMG. Third, the Federal prospective payment rate is determined by multiplying the relative-value weight by an annually updated, budget-neutral conversion factor. Fourth, the Federal prospective payment rate is adjusted to account for facility-specific factors. Finally, the facility-adjusted payment rate may be adjusted for case-specific factors. The final rule eliminates three deficiencies in the proposed rule by providing increased payment for treating any comorbidities documented prior to the second day before discharge, providing more appropriate payment for transfer cases, and minimizing the paperwork associated with patient assessment.
42 CFR 413.335 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Facilities § 413.335 Basis of payment. (a) Method of payment. Under the prospective payment system, SNFs... and, during a transition period, on the basis of a blend of the Federal rate and the facility-specific...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels. 484.220 Section 484.220 Public Health... Calculation of the adjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels... case-mix using a case-mix index to explain the relative resource utilization of different patients. To...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels. 484.220 Section 484.220 Public Health... Calculation of the adjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels... case-mix using a case-mix index to explain the relative resource utilization of different patients. To...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
...-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels. 484.220 Section 484.220 Public Health... Calculation of the adjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels... case-mix using a case-mix index to explain the relative resource utilization of different patients. To...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels. 484.220 Section 484.220 Public Health... Calculation of the adjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels... case-mix using a case-mix index to explain the relative resource utilization of different patients. To...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... address changes to the case-mix that are a result of changes in the coding or classification of different...-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels. 484.220 Section 484.220 Public Health... Calculation of the adjusted national prospective 60-day episode payment rate for case-mix and area wage levels...
Influence of the prospective payment system on speech-language pathology services.
Frymark, Tobi B; Mullen, Robert C
2005-01-01
The present study was performed to determine the clinical effects of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System (IRF PPS) on speech and language intervention services and to examine the feasibility of using the federally mandated FIM instrument to establish resource allocation to patients with cognitive, communication, and swallowing disorders. A pre-IRF PPS and post-IRF PPS comparative study was conducted over a 1-yr time interval using data from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's National Outcomes Measurement System. Toward this end, the National Outcomes Measurement System's Functional Communication Measures were used to obtain data from 2,631 patients residing in 96 freestanding rehabilitation hospitals or hospitals with rehabilitation units implementing the prospective payment system on or after January 1, 2002. To ensure reliable retrospective and prospective data comparisons, all sites were active participants within the National Outcomes Measurement System program before the introduction of IRF PPS within their facilities. Findings revealed changes in both the utilization of speech-language pathologists and patient outcomes. Under the IRF PPS, there was a clear decline in speech- and language-related lengths of stay. However, clinicians attempted to compensate for these decrements in lengths of stay by increasing the intensity and frequency of their speech and language services. Despite these compensatory efforts, further analyses of the data revealed that under the IRF PPS, fewer patients achieved multiple levels of functional progress in speech and language abilities than before this payment system was implemented. This trend was most noteworthy in the treatment areas of swallowing, motor speech, and memory. In addition, this study revealed that, compared with the National Outcomes Measurement System's Functional Communication Measures, the FIM instrument significantly under-represented and undervalued the extent of a patient's overall progress in recovering from their cognitive, communication, or swallowing disabilities. These findings support the notion that the introduction of the IRF PPS has, perhaps unintentionally, caused more patients with cognitive, communication, and swallowing disorders to be discharged from inpatient rehabilitative care with less than adequate functional skill levels. The discouraging results in speech-language pathology utilization and patient outcomes will be useful for clinicians in the future when facing the ongoing challenges of maintaining quality care while streamlining services under the prospective payment system.
A risk-based prospective payment system that integrates patient, hospital and national costs.
Siegel, C; Jones, K; Laska, E; Meisner, M; Lin, S
1992-05-01
We suggest that a desirable form for prospective payment for inpatient care is hospital average cost plus a linear combination of individual patient and national average cost. When the coefficients are chosen to minimize mean squared error loss between payment and costs, the payment has efficiency and access incentives. The coefficient multiplying patient costs is a hospital specific measure of financial risk of the patient. Access is promoted since providers receive higher reimbursements for risky, high cost patients. Historical cost data can be used to obtain estimates of payment parameters. The method is applied to Medicare data on psychiatric inpatients.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-06
..., ado- K2 $29.40 trastuzumab emtansine, 1 mg. C9736 Laparoscopy, G2 2,010.57 surgical, radiofrequency... Injection, K2 545.44 Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, Liposomal, Not Otherwise Specified, 10 mg. Q2051 Injection, K2 196.42 Zoledronic Acid, Not Otherwise Specified, 1 mg. * Note: HCPCS code Q2050 replaced code...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-30
... orthopedic M>34.35 and 1.1916 0.9820 0.9120 0.8248 12 12 11 11 M 24.15 and 1.5421 1.2709 1.1803 1.0674 16 15... Expired, orthopedic, length ......... ......... ......... 0.5866 ....... ....... ....... 7 of stay is 13 days or fewer. 5102 Expired, orthopedic, length ......... ......... ......... 1.5325...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
....102 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Special Treatment of Certain... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Special treatment: Hospitals located in areas that...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-27
.... Repeating this step for other periods produces a series of market basket levels over time. Dividing an index..., P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850. Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be...); interrupted stays; and a per treatment adjustment for patients who undergo ECT. A complete discussion of the...
42 CFR 412.62 - Federal rates for inpatient operating costs for fiscal year 1984.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Federal rates for inpatient operating costs for fiscal year 1984. 412.62 Section 412.62 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Basic Methodology for Determining...
42 CFR 412.62 - Federal rates for inpatient operating costs for fiscal year 1984.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Federal rates for inpatient operating costs for fiscal year 1984. 412.62 Section 412.62 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Basic Methodology for Determining...
42 CFR 412.62 - Federal rates for inpatient operating costs for fiscal year 1984.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Federal rates for inpatient operating costs for fiscal year 1984. 412.62 Section 412.62 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Basic Methodology for Determining...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-13
... comment period. 3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to the following address..., generally beginning approximately 3 weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the... Reconciliation Act of 1987, Pub. L. 100-2-3, enacted December 22, 1987 OCESAA Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-23
... comment period. 3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to the following address... approximately 3 weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the Centers for Medicare... 2. Regulatory Update 3. Statutory Update 4. Outlier Cap 5. Loss Sharing Ratio and Fixed Dollar Ratio...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-26
... 1202... Osteoarthritis M>30.75 and 1.1152 1.1152 1.0544 0.9966 16 16 14 13 M 36.35. 1302... Rheumatoid, other arthritis 1.1759 1.1759 1.1632 1.0370 17 17 14 13 M>26.15 and M 48.85 0.9405 0.7530 0.6659 0.6022...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-17
... footnoted).'' c. Third column, the title, ``Table 4J.--Out-Migration Adjustment-- FY 2010 (April 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010)'' is corrected to read ``Table 4J.--(Abbreviated) Out-Migration Adjustment for... corrected to read as follows: Table 4J--(Abbreviated) Out-Migration Adjustment for Acute Care Hospitals--FY...
42 CFR 412.507 - Limitation on charges to beneficiaries.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... prospective payment system. If Medicare has paid the full LTC-DRG payment, that payment applies to the... than the full LTC-DRG payment, that payment only applies to the hospital's costs for those costs or... receives a full LTC-DRG payment under this subpart for covered days in a hospital stay may charge the...
Medicaid prospective payment: Case-mix increase
Baker, Samuel L.; Kronenfeld, Jennie J.
1990-01-01
South Carolina Medicaid implemented prospective payment by diagnosis-related group (DRG) for inpatient care. The rate of complications among newborns and deliveries doubled immediately. The case-mix index for newborns increased 66.6 percent, which increased the total Medicaid hospital expenditure 5.5 percent. Outlier payments increased total expenditure further. DRG distribution change among newborns has a large impact on spending because newborn complication DRGs have high weights. States adopting a DRG-based payment system for Medicaid should anticipate a greater increase in case mix than Medicare experienced. PMID:10113463
2009-08-11
This final rule updates the payment rates used under the prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), for fiscal year (FY) 2010. In addition, it recalibrates the case-mix indexes so that they more accurately reflect parity in expenditures related to the implementation of case-mix refinements in January 2006. It also discusses the results of our ongoing analysis of nursing home staff time measurement data collected in the Staff Time and Resource Intensity Verification project, as well as a new Resource Utilization Groups, version 4 case-mix classification model for FY 2011 that will use the updated Minimum Data Set 3.0 resident assessment for case-mix classification. In addition, this final rule discusses the public comments that we have received on these and other issues, including a possible requirement for the quarterly reporting of nursing home staffing data, as well as on applying the quality monitoring mechanism in place for all other SNF PPS facilities to rural swing-bed hospitals. Finally, this final rule revises the regulations to incorporate certain technical corrections.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998... Medicare cost report. Routine operating costs means the cost of regular room, dietary, and nursing services...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998... Medicare cost report. Routine operating costs means the cost of regular room, dietary, and nursing services...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospectively Determined Payment Rates for Low-Volume Skilled Nursing Facilities, for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning Prior to July 1, 1998... Medicare cost report. Routine operating costs means the cost of regular room, dietary, and nursing services...
42 CFR 419.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... prospective payment system establishes a national payment rate, standardized for geographic wage differences... X-ray tests, diagnostic laboratory tests, and other diagnostic tests; (10) Durable medical equipment...
Hospital inpatient prospective payment system: incorporating new technology.
Durthaler, Jeffrey M; Miller, Alicia
2003-11-01
New technologies in the impatient prospective payment system are discussed. On December 21, 2000, Congress passed Public Law 106-554 that includes a requirement to establish a mechanism to more expeditiously incorporate the costs and establish qualifying criteria for payment of new services and technologies into the hospital inpatient prospective payment system. The final ruling of this law states that a new service or technology must demonstrate substantial improvement, be inadequately paid under the DRG system, and be "new." The intent of these criteria is to identify new technologies that offer substantial improvement over existing technologies and to provide supplemental payment that encourages physicians and hospitals to utilize the new technology. In November 2001, drotrecogin alfa (activated) received fast-track FDA approval because of the robust findings from the PROWESS trial. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) is the first agent proven to reduce mortality in patients suffering from severe sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction who are at a high risk of death (i.e., APACHE II score > 24). In August 2002, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was one of four such new technologies and the first agent approved for new technology payment under the prospective payment system (PPS). This decision offers confidence that the PPS is effectively striving to incorporate new medical services and technologies at a pace similar to that of innovation. Providers may receive up to $3400 in additional reimbursement when drotrecogin alfa (activated) is administered in the Medicare population. Pharmacy and patient accounting personnel should develop a collaborative process to identify, document, and capture this new source of payment.
42 CFR 413.340 - Transition period.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... minus 1 percentage point. (c) SNFs participating in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality Demonstration. SNFs that participated in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality Demonstration in a...
42 CFR 413.340 - Transition period.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... minus 1 percentage point. (c) SNFs participating in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality Demonstration. SNFs that participated in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality Demonstration in a...
Home Dialysis in the Prospective Payment System Era.
Lin, Eugene; Cheng, Xingxing S; Chin, Kuo-Kai; Zubair, Talhah; Chertow, Glenn M; Bendavid, Eran; Bhattacharya, Jayanta
2017-10-01
The ESRD Prospective Payment System introduced two incentives to increase home dialysis use: bundling injectable medications into a single payment for treatment and paying for home dialysis training. We evaluated the effects of the ESRD Prospective Payment System on home dialysis use by patients starting dialysis in the United States from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2013. We analyzed data on dialysis modality, insurance type, and comorbidities from the United States Renal Data System. We estimated the effect of the policy on home dialysis use with multivariable logistic regression and compared the effect on Medicare Parts A/B beneficiaries with the effect on patients with other types of insurance. The ESRD Prospective Payment System associated with a 5.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 6.0%) increase in home dialysis use by the end of the study period. Home dialysis use increased by 5.8% (95% CI, 4.3% to 6.9%) among Medicare beneficiaries and 4.1% (95% CI, 2.3% to 5.4%) among patients covered by other forms of health insurance. The difference between these groups was not statistically significant (1.8%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 3.8%). Conversely, in both populations, the training add-on did not associate with increases in home dialysis use beyond the effect of the policy. The ESRD Prospective Payment System bundling, but not the training add-on, associated with substantial increases in home dialysis, which were identical for both Medicare and non-Medicare patients. These spill-over effects suggest that major payment changes in Medicare can affect all patients with ESRD. Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-13
... effect in accordance with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b... incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice. Section 553(b) of the APA..., this correcting document does not constitute a rulemaking that would be subject to the APA notice and...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-08
..., as we described in the CY 2012 proposed and final rule. A research team of highly qualified personnel... period and from a follow-up year (for example, 2009). In addition, based on our past experience in... increasing lengths of stay in residential post-acute care for these patients. For example, within the 30 days...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-22
...: Rates. As discussed in section I.G.1. of this notice, we established per diem Federal rates for urban... Virus (HIV) Infection). For FY 2011, an urban facility with a resident with AIDS in hybrid RUG-III (HR... application of the MMA adjustment. After an increase of 128 percent, this urban facility would receive a case...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-12
... comments to be received before the close of the comment period. 3. By express or overnight mail. You may... they are received, generally beginning approximately 3 weeks after publication of a document, at the.... Background 2. Regulatory Update 3. Statutory Update 4. Loss-Sharing Ratio and Fixed Dollar Loss (FDL) Ratio 5...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-17
... the out-migration adjustment values presented in the May 4, 2010 FY 2011 IPPS/LTCH PPS proposed rule and that the out-migration adjustment values in revised Table 4J are based on corrected wage data as... 31049 through 31057 in Table 4J.--Proposed Out-Migration Adjustment for Acute Care Hospitals--FY 2011...
Insurance principles and the design of prospective payment systems.
Ellis, R P; McGuire, T G
1988-09-01
This paper applies insurance principles to the issues of optimal outlier payments and designation of peer groups in Medicare's case-based prospective payment system for hospital care. Arrow's principle that full insurance after a deductible is optimal implies that, to minimize hospital risk, outlier payments should be based on hospital average loss per case rather than, as at present, based on individual case-level losses. The principle of experience rating implies defining more homogenous peer groups for the purpose of figuring average cost. The empirical significance of these results is examined using a sample of 470,568 discharges from 469 hospitals.
42 CFR 413.340 - Transition period.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... the facility-specific rate. Allowable costs associated with exemptions, as described in § 413.30(e)(2... minus 1 percentage point. (c) SNFs participating in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality...
42 CFR 413.340 - Transition period.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... the facility-specific rate. Allowable costs associated with exemptions, as described in § 413.30(e)(2... minus 1 percentage point. (c) SNFs participating in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality...
42 CFR 413.340 - Transition period.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Prospective Payment for Skilled Nursing... the facility-specific rate. Allowable costs associated with exemptions, as described in § 413.30(e)(2... minus 1 percentage point. (c) SNFs participating in the Multistate Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality...
Prospective Payment and Baccalaureate Nursing Education: Projections for the Future.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Van Ort, Suzanne; And Others
1989-01-01
Changes in the health care delivery system and projected changes in baccalaureate nursing education anticipated in the wake of implementation of the prospective payment system for health care services are examined. The discussion is based on the results of a national survey. (MSE)
42 CFR 413.76 - Direct GME payments: Calculation of payments for GME costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING... nursing and allied health payment “pool” for the current calendar year as described at § 413.87(f), to the projected total Medicare+Choice direct GME payments made to all hospitals for the current calendar year. (e...
42 CFR 413.76 - Direct GME payments: Calculation of payments for GME costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING... nursing and allied health payment “pool” for the current calendar year as described at § 413.87(f), to the projected total Medicare+Choice direct GME payments made to all hospitals for the current calendar year. (e...
42 CFR 413.76 - Direct GME payments: Calculation of payments for GME costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING... nursing and allied health payment “pool” for the current calendar year as described at § 413.87(f), to the projected total Medicare+Choice direct GME payments made to all hospitals for the current calendar year. (e...
42 CFR 413.76 - Direct GME payments: Calculation of payments for GME costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING... nursing and allied health payment “pool” for the current calendar year as described at § 413.87(f), to the projected total Medicare+Choice direct GME payments made to all hospitals for the current calendar year. (e...
42 CFR 413.76 - Direct GME payments: Calculation of payments for GME costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING... nursing and allied health payment “pool” for the current calendar year as described at § 413.87(f), to the projected total Medicare+Choice direct GME payments made to all hospitals for the current calendar year. (e...
Bardey, David; Canta, Chiara; Lozachmeur, Jean-Marie
2012-09-01
This paper analyzes the regulation of payment schemes for health care providers competing in both quality and product differentiation of their services. The regulator uses two instruments: a prospective payment per patient and a cost reimbursement rate. When the regulator can only use a prospective payment, the optimal price involves a trade-off between the level of quality provision and the level of horizontal differentiation. If this pure prospective payment leads to underprovision of quality and overdifferentiation, a mixed reimbursement scheme allows the regulator to improve the allocation efficiency. This is true for a relatively low level of patients' transportation costs. We also show that if the regulator cannot commit to the level of the cost reimbursement rate, the resulting allocation can dominate the one with full commitment. This occurs when the transportation cost is low or high enough, and the full commitment solution either implies full or zero cost reimbursement. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
42 CFR 413.239 - Transition period.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD...-treatment payment amount for renal dialysis services (as defined in § 413.171 of this part) and home...
Betala Belinga, J-F; Valence, A; Zaccabri, A; Fresson, J
2010-11-01
Despite the implementation of prospective payment approach in France, induced legal abortion are still paid by capitation. Our aim was to evaluate the real cost of induced abortion in a public hospital in France. This study took place during the year 2008 in a public health hospital. Induced abortion cost was calculated according to national study cost's recommendations. The cost drawn from this was compared to what is paid by the medical insurance for spontaneous abortion. Induced abortion calculated cost was 562 €, the capitation amount was 286.86 €, the spontaneous abortion compensation amount was 645 €. Induced abortion should be paid by a prospective payment evaluation similar to diagnosis related groups approaches rather than a capitation payment, in order to reduce misstatements. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Implications of global budget payment system on nursing home costs.
Di Giorgio, Laura; Filippini, Massimo; Masiero, Giuliano
2014-04-01
Pressure on health care systems due to the increasing expenditures of the elderly population is pushing policy makers to adopt new regulation and payment schemes for nursing home services. We consider the behavior of nonprofit nursing homes under different payment schemes and empirically investigate the implications of prospective payments on nursing home costs under tightly regulated quality aspects. To evaluate the impact of the policy change introduced in 2006 in Southern Switzerland - from retrospective to prospective payment - we use a panel of 41 homes observed over a 10-years period (2001-2010). We employ a fixed effects model with a time trend that is allowed to change after the policy reform. There is evidence that the new payment system slightly reduces costs without impacting quality. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...) Recovery of accelerated payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient... cost report settlement specified in § 412.84(i) and § 412.84(m) of this part. (e) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient psychiatric...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...) Recovery of accelerated payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient... cost report settlement specified in § 412.84(i) and § 412.84(m) of this part. (e) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient psychiatric...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
...) Recovery of accelerated payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient... cost report settlement specified in § 412.84(i) and § 412.84(m) of this part. (e) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient psychiatric...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...) Recovery of accelerated payment. Recovery of the accelerated payment is made by recoupment as inpatient... cost report settlement specified in § 412.84(i) and § 412.84(m) of this part. (e) Accelerated payments—(1) General rule. Upon request, an accelerated payment may be made to an inpatient psychiatric...
Effects of Prospective Payment Financing on Rehabilitation Income.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Evans, Ron L.; And Others
1990-01-01
This study compared 187 patients discharged from a Veterans Administration hospital rehabilitation unit with 215 discharges that occurred following implementation of a prospective payment system. There were no significant differences in demographics, self-care ability, or readmissions. Length of stay and referrals for home health care decreased,…
Clinical Research Management in the Era of Prospective Payment.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Goodman, Ira S.; Fitzgerald, Thomas A.
1992-01-01
Medical Research conducted in the patient care setting is facing a new financial barrier, the prospective payment system. Both university and hospitals must rethink clinical research resource use. This may result in better accountability for research costs and affect the hospitals' willingness to conduct experimental or innovative treatments. (MSE)
42 CFR 419.21 - Hospital outpatient services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
.... (c) Partial hospitalization services furnished by community mental health centers (CMHCs). (d) The... 42 Public Health 3 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Hospital outpatient services subject to the outpatient prospective payment system. 419.21 Section 419.21 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID...
Hospital cost control in Norway: a decade's experience with prospective payment.
Crane, T S
1985-01-01
Under Norway's prospective payment system, which was in existence from 1972 to 1980, hospital costs increased 15.8 percent annually, compared with 15.3 percent in the United States. In 1980 the Norwegian national government started paying for all institutional services according to a population-based, morbidity-adjusted formula. Norway's prospective payment system provides important insights into problems of controlling hospital costs despite significant differences, including ownership of medical facilities and payment and spending as a percent of GNP. Yet striking similarities exist. Annual real growth in health expenditures from 1972 to 1980 in Norway was 2.2 percent, compared with 2.4 percent in the United States. In both countries, public demands for cost control were accompanied by demands for more services. And problems of geographic dispersion of new technology and distribution of resources were similar. Norway's experience in the 1970s demonstrates that prospective payment is no panacea. The annual budget process created disincentives to hospitals to control costs. But Norway's changes in 1980 to a population-based methodology suggest a useful approach to achieve a more equitable distribution of resources. This method of payment provides incentives to control variations in both admissions and cost per case. In contrast, the Medicare approach based on Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) is limited, and it does not affect variations in admissions and capital costs. Population-based methodologies can be used in adjusting DRG rates to control both problems. In addition, the DRG system only applies to Medicare payments; the Norwegian experience demonstrates that this system may result in significant shifting of costs onto other payors. PMID:3927385
42 CFR 484.245 - Accelerated payments for home health agencies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Accelerated payments for home health agencies. 484... HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION HOME HEALTH SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.245 Accelerated payments for home health agencies. (a) General rule...
42 CFR 484.245 - Accelerated payments for home health agencies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Accelerated payments for home health agencies. 484... HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION HOME HEALTH SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.245 Accelerated payments for home health agencies. (a) General rule...
42 CFR 484.245 - Accelerated payments for home health agencies.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Accelerated payments for home health agencies. 484... HUMAN SERVICES (CONTINUED) STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION HOME HEALTH SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Home Health Agencies § 484.245 Accelerated payments for home health agencies. (a) General rule...
2009-06-03
This interim final rule with comment period implements revised Medicare severity long-term care diagnosis-related group (MS-LTC-DRG) relative weights for payment under the long-term care hospital (LTCH) prospective payment system (PPS) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2009. We are revising the MS-LTC-DRG relative weights for FY 2009 due to the misapplication of our established methodology in the calculation of the budget neutrality factor. The revised FY 2009 MS-LTC-DRG relative weights are effective for the remainder of FY 2009 (that is, from June 3, 2009 through September 30, 2009).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-01
... with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we can waive... the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice. Section 553(b) of the APA ordinarily requires a... document does not constitute a rulemaking that would be subject to the APA notice and comment or delayed...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-29
... effect in accordance with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b... incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice. Section 553(d) of the APA... document does not constitute a rule that would be subject to the APA notice and comment or delayed...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-26
... accordance with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we can... statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice. Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in effective date of final rules after the date of their publication in the Federal...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate based on a Federal fiscal year 1982 base period. 412.73 Section 412.73 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determinatio...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate for inpatient operating costs based on a Federal fiscal year 1987 base period. 412.75 Section 412.75 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate for inpatient operating costs based on a Federal fiscal year 1987 base period. 412.75 Section 412.75 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate based on a Federal fiscal year 1982 base period. 412.73 Section 412.73 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determinatio...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate based on a Federal fiscal year 1982 base period. 412.73 Section 412.73 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determinatio...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate for inpatient operating costs based on a Federal fiscal year 1987 base period. 412.75 Section 412.75 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate based on a Federal fiscal year 1982 base period. 412.73 Section 412.73 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Determinatio...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Determination of the hospital-specific rate for inpatient operating costs based on a Federal fiscal year 1987 base period. 412.75 Section 412.75 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES MEDICARE PROGRAM PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT...
Prospective payment and the Medicare hospice benefit.
Bloom, B S; Amenta, M O
1993-01-01
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of very high cost patients on hospice financial status. Ten Pennsylvania hospices dually certified by Medicare were randomly selected and agreed to participate. Patient age, sex, diagnosis, length of stay and payer were fairly uniform across hospices. Payments varied by diagnosis and payer. High cost patients were irregularly found in hospices; low cost patients were commonly and regularly distributed. Every hospice had at least one high cost patient. In one, the uncompensated payment for the 6.6 percent of patients defined as high cost ($7,300 and above) would have been 14.7 percent of total annual revenues. In another, uncompensated payments for high cost patients (9.8 percent) would have accounted for 17.2 percent of revenue. In 96.3 percent of the instances patients utilized less than the Medicare Hospice Benefit maximum allowable cost ($7,300); and, 98.8 percent of the time patients stayed less than the maximum allowable length of time of 210 days. A logistic regression model found long length of stay (p < 0.0001), Medicare hospice benefit as primary payer (p < 0.0001), any hospitalization during hospice stay (p < 0.003) and cerebrovascular disease diagnosis (p < 0.02) to be significantly related to high cost. Between the time the study was planned and completed, Medicare instituted a reinsurance program allowing unused funds below the maximum allowable limit from one patient to be used for patients who exhausted their benefits. Thus, no study hospice was adversely affected by high cost patients. However, it should serve as an object lesson to Medicare in using prospective payment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Hospital non-price competition under the Global Budget Payment and Prospective Payment Systems.
Chen, Wen-Yi; Lin, Yu-Hui
2008-06-01
This paper provides theoretical analyses of two alternative hospital payment systems for controlling medical cost: the Global Budget Payment System (GBPS) and the Prospective Payment System (PPS). The former method assigns a fixed total budget for all healthcare services over a given period with hospitals being paid on a fee-for-service basis. The latter method is usually connected with a fixed payment to hospitals within a Diagnosis-Related Group. Our results demonstrate that, given the same expenditure, the GBPS would approach optimal levels of quality and efficiency as well as the level of social welfare provided by the PPS, as long as market competition is sufficiently high; our results also demonstrate that the treadmill effect, modeling an inverse relationship between price and quantity under the GBPS, would be a quality-enhancing and efficiency-improving outcome due to market competition.
42 CFR 412.370 - General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs Special Rules for Puerto Rico Hospitals § 412.370 General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Except as provided in § 412.374, hospitals located in Puerto Rico are subject to the rules in this subpart governing the prospective payment...
42 CFR 412.370 - General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs Special Rules for Puerto Rico Hospitals § 412.370 General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Except as provided in § 412.374, hospitals located in Puerto Rico are subject to the rules in this subpart governing the prospective payment...
42 CFR 412.370 - General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs Special Rules for Puerto Rico Hospitals § 412.370 General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Except as provided in § 412.374, hospitals located in Puerto Rico are subject to the rules in this subpart governing the prospective payment...
42 CFR 412.370 - General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs Special Rules for Puerto Rico Hospitals § 412.370 General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Except as provided in § 412.374, hospitals located in Puerto Rico are subject to the rules in this subpart governing the prospective payment...
42 CFR 412.370 - General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Hospital Capital Costs Special Rules for Puerto Rico Hospitals § 412.370 General provisions for hospitals located in Puerto Rico. Except as provided in § 412.374, hospitals located in Puerto Rico are subject to the rules in this subpart governing the prospective payment...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR... function of payment of depreciation to provide funds that make it possible to maintain the assets and...
Variation in Payment Rates under Medicare's Inpatient Prospective Payment System.
Krinsky, Sam; Ryan, Andrew M; Mijanovich, Tod; Blustein, Jan
2017-04-01
To measure variation in payment rates under Medicare's Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) and identify the main payment adjustments that drive variation. Medicare cost reports for all Medicare-certified hospitals, 1987-2013, and Dartmouth Atlas geographic files. We measure the Medicare payment rate as a hospital's total acute inpatient Medicare Part A payment, divided by the standard IPPS payment for its geographic area. We assess variation using several measures, both within local markets and nationally. We perform a factor decomposition to identify the share of variation attributable to specific adjustments. We also describe the characteristics of hospitals receiving different payment rates and evaluate changes in the magnitude of the main adjustments over time. Data downloaded from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the National Bureau of Economic Research, and the Dartmouth Atlas. In 2013, Medicare paid for acute inpatient discharges at a rate 31 percent above the IPPS base. For the top 10 percent of discharges, the mean rate was double the IPPS base. Variations were driven by adjustments for medical education and care to low-income populations. The magnitude of variation has increased over time. Adjustments are a large and growing share of Medicare hospital payments, and they create significant variation in payment rates. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-29
... Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Balance of Payments Program Exemption for Commercial... Balance of Payments Program for construction material that is commercial information technology. DATES..., Balance of Payments Program--Construction Material, and 252.225- 7045, Balance of Payments Program...
Brunelli, Steven M; Monda, Keri L; Burkart, John M; Gitlin, Matthew; Neumann, Peter J; Park, Grace S; Symonian-Silver, Margarita; Yue, Susan; Bradbury, Brian D; Rubin, Robert J
2013-06-01
Launched in January 2011, the prospective payment system (PPS) for the US Medicare End-Stage Renal Disease Program bundled payment for services previously reimbursed independently. Small dialysis organizations may be particularly susceptible to the financial implications of the PPS. The ongoing Study to Evaluate the Prospective Payment System Impact on Small Dialysis Organizations (STEPPS) was designed to describe trends in care and outcomes over the period of PPS implementation. This report details early results between October 2010 and June 2011. Prospective observational cohort study of patients from a sample of 51 small dialysis organizations. 1,873 adult hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Secular trends in processes of care, anemia, metabolic bone disease management, and red blood cell transfusions. Facility-level data are collected quarterly. Patient characteristics were collected at enrollment and scheduled intervals thereafter. Clinical outcomes are collected on an ongoing basis. Over time, no significant changes were observed in patient to staff ratios. There was a temporal trend toward greater use of peritoneal dialysis (from 2.4% to 3.6%; P = 0.09). Use of cinacalcet, phosphate binders, and oral vitamin D increased; intravenous (IV) vitamin D use decreased (P for trend for all <0.001). Parathyroid hormone levels increased (from 273 to 324 pg/dL; P < 0.001). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent doses decreased (P < 0.001 for IV epoetin alfa and IV darbepoetin alfa), particularly high doses. Mean hemoglobin levels decreased (P < 0.001), the percentage of patients with hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL increased (from 12.7% to 16.8%), and transfusion rates increased (from 14.3 to 19.6/100 person-years; P = 0.1). Changes in anemia management were more pronounced for African American patients. Limited data were available for the prebundle period. Secular trends may be subject to the ecologic fallacy and are not causal in nature. In the period after PPS implementation, IV vitamin D use decreased, use of oral therapies for metabolic bone disease increased, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use and hemoglobin levels decreased, and transfusion rates increased numerically. Copyright © 2013 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
42 CFR 419.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... part. (b) Determination of hospital outpatient prospective payment rates: Packaged costs. The..., that includes operating and capital-related costs that are integral, ancillary, supportive, dependent..., these packaged costs may include, but are not limited to, the following items and services, the payment...
42 CFR 419.2 - Basis of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... prospective payment system establishes a national payment rate, standardized for geographic wage differences...) Capital-related costs; (9) Implantable items used in connection with diagnostic X-ray tests, diagnostic laboratory tests, and other diagnostic tests; (10) Durable medical equipment that is implantable; (11...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Kanda, Katsuya; Mezey, Mathy
1991-01-01
Examined changes in resident acuity and registered nurse staffing in all nursing homes in Pennsylvania before and after introduction of Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS) in 1983. Found that acuity of nursing home residents increased significantly since introduction of PPS, full-time registered nurse staffing remained unchanged, and…
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... factor is the percentage increase in the market basket index for prospective payment hospitals (as..., the update factor is the percentage increase in the market basket index for prospective payment... Federal fiscal year 1995, the update factor is the percentage increase in the market basket index for...
Squitieri, Lee; Chung, Kevin C
2017-07-01
In 2015, the U.S. Congress passed the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which effectively repealed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services sustainable growth rate formula and established the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Payment Program. The Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act represents an unparalleled acceleration toward value-based payment models and a departure from traditional volume-driven fee-for-service reimbursement. The Quality Payment Program includes two paths for provider participation: the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Advanced Alternative Payment Models. The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System pathway replaces existing quality reporting programs and adds several new measures to create a composite performance score for each provider (or provider group) that will be used to adjust reimbursed payment. The advanced alternative payment model pathway is available to providers who participate in qualifying Advanced Alternative Payment Models and is associated with an initial 5 percent payment incentive. The first performance period for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System opens January 1, 2017, and closes on December 31, 2017, and is associated with payment adjustments in January of 2019. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimates that the majority of providers will begin participation in 2017 through the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System pathway, but aims to have 50 percent of payments tied to quality or value through Advanced Alternative Payment Models by 2018. In this article, the authors describe key components of the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act to providers navigating through the Quality Payment Program and discuss how plastic surgeons may optimize their performance in this new value-based payment program.
Restructuring in response to case mix reimbursement in nursing homes: A contingency approach
Zinn, Jacqueline; Feng, Zhanlian; Mor, Vincent; Intrator, Orna; Grabowski, David
2013-01-01
Background Resident-based case mix reimbursement has become the dominant mechanism for publicly funded nursing home care. In 1998 skilled nursing facility reimbursement changed from cost-based to case mix adjusted payments under the Medicare Prospective Payment System for the costs of all skilled nursing facility care provided to Medicare recipients. In addition, as of 2004, 35 state Medicaid programs had implemented some form of case mix reimbursement. Purpose The purpose of the study is to determine if the implementation of Medicare and Medicaid case mix reimbursement increased the administrative burden on nursing homes, as evidenced by increased levels of nurses in administrative functions. Methodology/Approach The primary data for this study come from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Online Survey Certification and Reporting database from 1997 through 2004, a national nursing home database containing aggregated facility-level information, including staffing, organizational characteristics and resident conditions, on all Medicare/Medicaid certified nursing facilities in the country. We conducted multivariate regression analyses using a facility fixed-effects model to examine the effects of the implementation of Medicaid case mix reimbursement and Medicare Prospective Payment System on changes in the level of total administrative nurse staffing in nursing homes. Findings Both Medicaid case mix reimbursement and Medicare Prospective Payment System increased the level of administrative nurse staffing, on average by 5.5% and 4.0% respectively. However, lack of evidence for a substitution effect suggests that any decline in direct care staffing after the introduction of case mix reimbursement is not attributable to a shift from clinical nursing resources to administrative functions. Practice Implications Our findings indicate that the administrative burden posed by case mix reimbursement has resource implications for all freestanding facilities. At the margin, the increased administrative burden imposed by case mix may become a factor influencing a range of decisions, including resident admission and staff hiring. PMID:18360162
Restructuring in response to case mix reimbursement in nursing homes: a contingency approach.
Zinn, Jacqueline; Feng, Zhanlian; Mor, Vincent; Intrator, Orna; Grabowski, David
2008-01-01
Resident-based case mix reimbursement has become the dominant mechanism for publicly funded nursing home care. In 1998 skilled nursing facility reimbursement changed from cost-based to case mix adjusted payments under the Medicare Prospective Payment System for the costs of all skilled nursing facility care provided to Medicare recipients. In addition, as of 2004, 35 state Medicaid programs had implemented some form of case mix reimbursement. The purpose of the study is to determine if the implementation of Medicare and Medicaid case mix reimbursement increased the administrative burden on nursing homes, as evidenced by increased levels of nurses in administrative functions. The primary data for this study come from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Online Survey Certification and Reporting database from 1997 through 2004, a national nursing home database containing aggregated facility-level information, including staffing, organizational characteristics and resident conditions, on all Medicare/Medicaid certified nursing facilities in the country. We conducted multivariate regression analyses using a facility fixed-effects model to examine the effects of the implementation of Medicaid case mix reimbursement and Medicare Prospective Payment System on changes in the level of total administrative nurse staffing in nursing homes. Both Medicaid case mix reimbursement and Medicare Prospective Payment System increased the level of administrative nurse staffing, on average by 5.5% and 4.0% respectively. However, lack of evidence for a substitution effect suggests that any decline in direct care staffing after the introduction of case mix reimbursement is not attributable to a shift from clinical nursing resources to administrative functions. Our findings indicate that the administrative burden posed by case mix reimbursement has resource implications for all freestanding facilities. At the margin, the increased administrative burden imposed by case mix may become a factor influencing a range of decisions, including resident admission and staff hiring.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2017-10-01
... INFRASTRUCTURE AND MODEL PROGRAMS COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT MODEL Pricing and Payment § 510.320 Treatment of incentive programs or add-on payments under existing Medicare payment systems. The CJR model... 42 Public Health 5 2017-10-01 2017-10-01 false Treatment of incentive programs or add-on payments...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2016-10-01
... INFRASTRUCTURE AND MODEL PROGRAMS COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT MODEL Pricing and Payment § 510.320 Treatment of incentive programs or add-on payments under existing Medicare payment systems. The CJR model... 42 Public Health 5 2016-10-01 2016-10-01 false Treatment of incentive programs or add-on payments...
42 CFR 412.508 - Medical review requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
.... Payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system is based in part on each patient's... the patient's medical record. The hospital must assure that physicians complete an acknowledgement...: Notice to Physicians: Medicare payment to hospitals is based in part on each patient's principal and...
42 CFR 412.508 - Medical review requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
.... Payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system is based in part on each patient's... the patient's medical record. The hospital must assure that physicians complete an acknowledgement...: Notice to Physicians: Medicare payment to hospitals is based in part on each patient's principal and...
42 CFR 412.508 - Medical review requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
.... Payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system is based in part on each patient's... the patient's medical record. The hospital must assure that physicians complete an acknowledgement...: Notice to physicians: Medicare payment to hospitals is based in part on each patient's principal and...
42 CFR 412.508 - Medical review requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
.... Payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system is based in part on each patient's... the patient's medical record. The hospital must assure that physicians complete an acknowledgement...: Notice to Physicians: Medicare payment to hospitals is based in part on each patient's principal and...
42 CFR 412.508 - Medical review requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
.... Payment under the long-term care hospital prospective payment system is based in part on each patient's... the patient's medical record. The hospital must assure that physicians complete an acknowledgement...: Notice to Physicians: Medicare payment to hospitals is based in part on each patient's principal and...
Himmelstein, D U; Woolhandler, S
1988-09-15
Recent developments in health care are strikingly congruent with a Marxist paradigm. For many years small scale owner producers (physicians) dominated medicine, and the corporate class supported the expansion of services. As health care expanded, corporate involvement in the direct provision of services emerged. This involvement is reflected not only in the rise of for-profit providers, but also in the influence of hospital administrators, utilization review organizations, insurance bureaucrats, and other functionaries unfamiliar with the clinical encounter, but well versed on the bottom line. Corporate providers' quest for increasing revenues has brought them into conflict with corporate purchasers of care, whose employee benefit costs have skyrocketed. This intercorporate conflict powerfully shapes health policy and has caused the rapid proliferation of health maintenance organizations and other forms of prospective payment. Corporate purchasers of care favor the incentives under prospective payment for providers to curtail care and its costs. For corporate providers, prospective payment has allowed increased profits even in the face of constrained revenues, because reimbursement is disconnected from resource use. Unfortunately, this corporate compromise serves patients and physicians poorly. Alternative policy options that challenge corporate interests could save money while improving care.
Grabowski, David C.; Huckfeldt, Peter J.; Sood, Neeraj; Escarce, José J; Newhouse, Joseph P.
2012-01-01
The Affordable Care Act mandates changes in payment policies for Medicare postacute care services intended to contain spending in the long run and help ensure the program’s financial sustainability. In addition to reducing annual payment increases to providers under the existing prospective payment systems, the act calls for demonstration projects of bundled payment, accountable care organizations, and other strategies to promote care coordination and reduce spending. Experience with the adoption of Medicare prospective payment systems in postacute care settings approximately a decade ago suggests that current reforms could, but need not necessarily, produce such undesirable effects as decreased access for less profitable patients, poorer patient outcomes, and only short-lived curbs on spending. Policy makers will need to be vigilant in monitoring the impact of the Affordable Care Act reforms and be prepared to amend policies as necessary to ensure that the reforms exert persistent controls on spending without compromising the delivery of patient-appropriate postacute services. PMID:22949442
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2017-10-01
... INFRASTRUCTURE AND MODEL PROGRAMS EPISODE PAYMENT MODEL Pricing and Payment § 512.320 Treatment of incentive... under such models are independent of, and do not affect, any incentive programs or add-on payments under... 42 Public Health 5 2017-10-01 2017-10-01 false Treatment of incentive programs or add-on payments...
Longo, Francesco; Siciliani, Luigi; Street, Andrew
2017-10-23
Prospective payment systems fund hospitals based on a fixed-price regime that does not directly distinguish between specialist and general hospitals. We investigate whether current prospective payments in England compensate for differences in costs between specialist orthopaedic hospitals and trauma and orthopaedics departments in general hospitals. We employ reference cost data for a sample of hospitals providing services in the trauma and orthopaedics specialty. Our regression results suggest that specialist orthopaedic hospitals have on average 13% lower profit margins. Under the assumption of break-even for the average trauma and orthopaedics department, two of the three specialist orthopaedic hospitals appear to make a loss on their activity. The same holds true for 33% of departments in our sample. Patient age and severity are the main drivers of such differences.
Capital financing in prospective payment.
Oszustowicz, R J; Dreachslin, J L
1984-03-01
In the era of prospective payment, arranging financing for hospital capital projects is expected to become even more complicated than under cost-based reimbursement systems. This article outlines the information needed for a bond issue in the prospective payment environment, defines the roles and duties of several external persons and organizations involved with planning a major capital financing, and provides an overview of the entire process. This article assumes for illustrative purposes that a tax-exempt bond issue is going to be used to finance a facility expansion. This method was chosen since over 70% of all major capital financing for hospitals use the tax-exempt bond as the principal vehicle for attracting the necessary debt to finance a major construction project. The tax-exempt bond issue also requires the most detail in documentation and legal provisions.
The variance of length of stay and the optimal DRG outlier payments.
Felder, Stefan
2009-09-01
Prospective payment schemes in health care often include supply-side insurance for cost outliers. In hospital reimbursement, prospective payments for patient discharges, based on their classification into diagnosis related group (DRGs), are complemented by outlier payments for long stay patients. The outlier scheme fixes the length of stay (LOS) threshold, constraining the profit risk of the hospitals. In most DRG systems, this threshold increases with the standard deviation of the LOS distribution. The present paper addresses the adequacy of this DRG outlier threshold rule for risk-averse hospitals with preferences depending on the expected value and the variance of profits. It first shows that the optimal threshold solves the hospital's tradeoff between higher profit risk and lower premium loading payments. It then demonstrates for normally distributed truncated LOS that the optimal outlier threshold indeed decreases with an increase in the standard deviation.
Freiman, M P
1990-01-01
We performed detailed simulations of DRG-based payments to general hospitals for treatment of nonexempt psychiatric and medical/surgical patients under Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS). We then compared these results to calculated costs for the same patients. Hospitals without specialized psychiatric units tend to fare better financially on their psychiatric than on their medical/surgical caseloads, although the levels of gain for these two types of patients are correlated. Hospitals with nonexempt psychiatric units generally have similar rates of gain on psychiatric and medical/surgical patients. Comparing psychiatric treatment in "scatter-bed" sites with that provided in nonexempt units, the higher rate of gain under PPS for treatment in scatter beds results largely from shorter lengths of stay. We discuss hospital behavior and the relationships between treatment of psychiatric illness under DRG-based payment and its treatment in exempt psychiatric units, which are excluded from DRG-based payment. PMID:2123839
Ross, Kaile M; Gilchrist, Emma C; Melek, Stephen P; Gordon, Patrick D; Ruland, Sandra L; Miller, Benjamin F
2018-05-23
Financially supporting and sustaining behavioral health services integrated into primary care settings remains a major barrier to widespread implementation. Sustaining Healthcare Across Integrated Primary Care Efforts (SHAPE) was a demonstration project designed to prospectively examine the cost savings associated with utilizing an alternative payment methodology to support behavioral health services in primary care practices with integrated behavioral health services. Six primary care practices in Colorado participated in this project. Each practice had at least one on-site behavioral health clinician providing integrated behavioral health services. Three practices received non-fee-for-service payments (i.e., SHAPE payment) to support provision of behavioral health services for 18 months. Three practices did not receive the SHAPE payment and served as control practices for comparison purposes. Assignment to condition was nonrandom. Patient claims data were collected for 9 months before the start of the SHAPE demonstration project (pre-period) and for 18 months during the SHAPE project (post-period) to evaluate cost savings. During the 18-month post-period, analysis of the practices' claims data demonstrated that practices receiving the SHAPE payment generated approximately $1.08 million in net cost savings for their public payer population (i.e., Medicare, Medicaid, and Dual Eligible; N = 9,042). The cost savings were primarily achieved through reduction in downstream utilization (e.g., hospitalizations). The SHAPE demonstration project found that non-fee-for-service payments for behavioral health integrated into primary care may be associated with significant cost savings for public payers, which could have implications on future delivery and payment work in public programs (e.g., Medicaid).
42 CFR 410.152 - Amounts of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
..., fair compensation, a pre-treatment prospective payment rate, or a standard overhead amount, or any... formula. (iv) Expenses in excess of the outpatient mental health treatment limitation described in § 410... section.) (b) Basic rules for payment. Except as specified in paragraphs (c) through (h) of this section...
42 CFR 410.152 - Amounts of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
..., fair compensation, a pre-treatment prospective payment rate, or a standard overhead amount, or any... formula. (iv) Expenses in excess of the outpatient mental health treatment limitation described in § 410... section.) (b) Basic rules for payment. Except as specified in paragraphs (c) through (h) of this section...
42 CFR 410.152 - Amounts of payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
..., fair compensation, a pre-treatment prospective payment rate, or a standard overhead amount, or any... formula. (iv) Expenses in excess of the outpatient mental health treatment limitation described in § 410... section.) (b) Basic rules for payment. Except as specified in paragraphs (c) through (h) of this section...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... outpatient maintenance dialysis for the treatment of ESRD and included in the composite payment system established under section 1881(b)(7) and the basic case-mix adjusted composite payment system established... dialysis services,” and paid under the ESRD prospective payment system under section 1881(b)(14) of the Act...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... outpatient maintenance dialysis for the treatment of ESRD and included in the composite payment system established under section 1881(b)(7) and the basic case-mix adjusted composite payment system established... dialysis services,” and paid under the ESRD prospective payment system under section 1881(b)(14) of the Act...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... outpatient maintenance dialysis for the treatment of ESRD and included in the composite payment system established under section 1881(b)(7) and the basic case-mix adjusted composite payment system established... dialysis services,” and paid under the ESRD prospective payment system under section 1881(b)(14) of the Act...
7 CFR 4288.130 - Payment applications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program... process and procedures the Agency will use to make payments to eligible advanced biofuel producers. In order to receive payments under this Program, eligible advanced biofuel producers with valid contracts...
7 CFR 4288.130 - Payment applications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program... process and procedures the Agency will use to make payments to eligible advanced biofuel producers. In order to receive payments under this Program, eligible advanced biofuel producers with valid contracts...
7 CFR 4288.130 - Payment applications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program... identify the process and procedures the Agency will use to make payments to eligible advanced biofuel producers. In order to receive payments under this Program, eligible advanced biofuel producers with valid...
Legal and ethical implications of health care provider insurance risk assumption.
Cox, Thomas
2010-01-01
From bedside to boardroom, nurses deal with the consequences of health care provider insurance risk assumption. Professional caregiver insurance risk refers to insurance risks assumed through contracts with third parties, federal and state Medicare and Medicaid program mandates, and the diagnosis-related groups and Prospective Payment Systems. This article analyzes the financial, legal, and ethical implications of provider insurance risk assumption by focusing on the degree to which patient benefits are reduced.
Lee, Kwangsoo; Lee, Sangil
2007-05-01
This study explored the effects of the diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based prospective payment system (PPS) operated by voluntarily participating organizations on the cesarean section (CS) rates, and analyzed whether the participating health care organizations had similar CS rates despite the varied participation periods. The study sample included delivery claims data from the Korean national health insurance program for the year 2003. Risk factors were identified and used in the adjustment model to distinguish the main reason for CS. Their risk-adjusted CS rates were compared by the reimbursement methods, and the organizations' internal and external environments were controlled. The final risk-adjustment model for the CS rates meets the criteria for an effective model. There were no significant differences of CS rates between providers in the DRG and fee-for-service system after controlling for organizational variables. The CS rates did not vary significantly depending on the providers' DRG participation periods. The results provide evidence that the DRG payment system operated by volunteering health care organizations had no impact on the CS rates, which can lower the quality of care. Although the providers joined the DRG system in different years, there were no differences in the CS rates among the DRG providers. These results support the future expansion of the DRG-based PPS plan to all health care services in Korea.
76 FR 53137 - Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative: Request for Applications
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-25
... (RFA) will test episode-based payment for acute care and associated post-acute care, using both retrospective and prospective bundled payment methods. The RFA requests applications to test models centered around acute care; these models will inform the design of future models, including care improvement for...
42 CFR 413.184 - Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix. 413.184 Section 413.184 Public Health CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN... patient mix. (a) Qualifications. To qualify for an exception to its prospective payment rate based on its...
7 CFR 1469.23 - Program payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... AGRICULTURE LOANS, PURCHASES, AND OTHER OPERATIONS CONSERVATION SECURITY PROGRAM Contracts and Payments § 1469.23 Program payments. (a) Stewardship component of CSP payments. (1) The conservation stewardship plan... Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) land rental data, and Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) rental rates...
42 CFR § 414.1460 - Monitoring and program integrity.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2017-10-01
... SERVICES (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM (CONTINUED) PAYMENT FOR PART B MEDICAL AND OTHER HEALTH SERVICES Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Alternative Payment Model Incentive § 414.1460 Monitoring and program integrity. (a) Vetting eligible clinicians prior to payment of the APM Incentive Payment. Prior to...
7 CFR 4288.131 - Payment provisions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program General Provisions Payment Provisions § 4288.131 Payment provisions. Payments to advanced biofuel producers for eligible advanced biofuel production will be determined in accordance with the provisions of...
42 CFR 416.164 - Scope of ASC services.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... and biologicals for which separate payment is not allowed under the hospital outpatient prospective... procurement of corneal tissue; (4) Certain drugs and biologicals for which separate payment is allowed under...
42 CFR 416.164 - Scope of ASC services.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... and biologicals for which separate payment is not allowed under the hospital outpatient prospective... procurement of corneal tissue; (4) Certain drugs and biologicals for which separate payment is allowed under...
42 CFR 413.184 - Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix. 413.184... patient mix. (a) Qualifications. To qualify for an exception to its prospective payment rate based on its pediatric patient mix a facility must demonstrate that— (1) At least 50 percent of its patients are...
42 CFR 413.184 - Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix. 413.184... patient mix. (a) Qualifications. To qualify for an exception to its prospective payment rate based on its pediatric patient mix a facility must demonstrate that— (1) At least 50 percent of its patients are...
42 CFR 413.184 - Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix. 413.184... patient mix. (a) Qualifications. To qualify for an exception to its prospective payment rate based on its pediatric patient mix a facility must demonstrate that— (1) At least 50 percent of its patients are...
42 CFR 413.184 - Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Payment exception: Pediatric patient mix. 413.184... patient mix. (a) Qualifications. To qualify for an exception to its prospective payment rate based on its pediatric patient mix a facility must demonstrate that— (1) At least 50 percent of its patients are...
Rural Implications of Medicare's Post-Acute-Care Transfer Payment Policy
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Schoenman, Julie A.; Mueller, Curt D.
2005-01-01
Under the Medicare post-acute-care (PAC) transfer policy, acute-care hospitals are reimbursed under a per-diem formula whenever beneficiaries are discharged from selected diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) to a skilled nursing facility, home health care, or a prospective payment system (PPS)-excluded facility. Total per-diem payments are below the…
Assessing present and future capital expense levels under PPS.
Cleverley, W O
1986-09-01
The expected shift in the method of payment for capital costs will affect the way decisions are made by hospital executives. The capital expense ratio model is one way executives can better assess their present and future capital expense levels as payments begin to be made under a prospective payment system.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Farley, Dean E.
A study examined the treatment of sole community hospitals under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) and the Prospective Payment System (PPS) for Medicare as compared to the treatment of hospitals not designated as sole community hospitals under these same two policy guidelines. (A sole community hospital is defined as a…
The impact of DRGs on the cost and quality of health care in the United States.
Davis, C; Rhodes, D J
1988-01-01
The prospective Payment System (PPS) represents a fundamental change in the way the United States government reimburses hospitals for medical services covered under Medicare, a federal health care insurance program for the elderly and disabled. PPS replaced the retrospective cost-based system of payment for Medicare services with a prospective payment system. Under PPS, a predetermined specific rate for each discharge dictates payment according to the diagnosis related group (DRG) in which the discharge is classified. The PPS was intended to create financial incentives that encourage hospitals to restrain the use of resources while providing high-quality inpatient care. Both objectives appear to have been met under PPS. Hospital utilization has declined, average length of stay has fallen, and the locus of care has shifted from the inpatient setting to less costly outpatient settings. The growth in inpatient hospital benefits has slowed and the impending insolvency of the Medicare trust fund has been forestalled. Studies have found no deterioration in the quality of care rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. Neither the mortality rate nor the rate of re-admission (presumably related to premature discharge) increased under PPS. Indeed, PPS appears to have enhanced the quality of inpatient care by discouraging unnecessary and potentially harmful procedures, and by encouraging the concentration of complex procedures in facilities in which the high frequency of these procedures promotes efficiency. Incentive-based reimbursement also appears to have contributed to the growth in alternative delivery systems, such as HMOs and PPOs, which contain costs by maintaining a high volume of a limited range of services. The success of the PPS/DRG system in controlling costs and promoting quality in this country suggests its application in other countries, either as a method of reimbursement or as a product line management tool.
42 CFR 413.195 - Limitation on Review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal... the Act, the application of the phase-in under section 1881(b)(14)(E) of the Act, and the...
42 CFR 413.195 - Limitation on Review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal... the Act, the application of the phase-in under section 1881(b)(14)(E) of the Act, and the...
42 CFR 413.195 - Limitation on Review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal... the Act, the application of the phase-in under section 1881(b)(14)(E) of the Act, and the...
42 CFR 413.195 - Limitation on Review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal... the Act, the application of the phase-in under section 1881(b)(14)(E) of the Act, and the...
42 CFR 413.195 - Limitation on Review.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
...; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Payment for End-Stage Renal... the Act, the application of the phase-in under section 1881(b)(14)(E) of the Act, and the...
Impacts of Hospital Budget Limits in Rochester, New York
Friedman, Bernard; Wong, Herbert S.
1995-01-01
During 1980-87, eight hospitals in the Rochester, New York area participated in an experimental program to limit total revenue. This article analyzes: increase of costs for Rochester hospitals; trends for inputs and compensation; and cash flow margins. Real expense per case grew annually by about 3 percent less in Rochester. However, after 1984, Medicare prospective payment had an effect of similar size outside Rochester. Some capital inputs to hospital care were restrained, as were wages and particularly benefits. The program did not generally raise or stabilize hospital revenue margins, while the ratio of cash flow to debt trended down. Financial stringency of this program relative to alternatives may have contributed to its end. PMID:10151889
Impacts of hospital budget limits in Rochester, New York.
Friedman, B; Wong, H S
1995-01-01
During 1980-87, eight hospitals in the Rochester, New York area participated in an experimental program to limit total revenue. This article analyzes: increase of costs for Rochester hospitals; trends for inputs and compensation; and cash flow margins. Real expense per case grew annually by about 3 percent less in Rochester. However, after 1984, Medicare prospective payment had an effect of similar size outside Rochester. Some capital inputs to hospital care were restrained, as were wages and particularly benefits. The program did not generally raise or stabilize hospital revenue margins, while the ratio of cash flow to debt trended down. Financial stringency of this program relative to alternatives may have contributed to its end.
76 FR 7935 - Advanced Biofuel Payment Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-11
...The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (Agency) is establishing the Advanced Biofuel Payment Program authorized under the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. Under this Program, the Agency will enter into contracts with advanced biofuel producers to pay such producers for the production of eligible advanced biofuels. To be eligible for payments, advanced biofuels must be produced from renewable biomass, excluding corn kernel starch, in a biofuel facility located in a State. In addition, this interim rule establishes new program requirements for applicants to submit applications for Fiscal Year 2010 payments for the Advanced Biofuel Payment Program. These new program requirements supersede the Notice of Contract Proposal (NOCP) for Payments to Eligible Advanced Biofuel Producers in its entirety.
Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.
Yang, Wu; Liu, Wei; Viña, Andrés; Luo, Junyan; He, Guangming; Ouyang, Zhiyun; Zhang, Hemin; Liu, Jianguo
2013-09-30
Systematic evaluation of the environmental and socioeconomic effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs is crucial for guiding policy design and implementation. We evaluated the performance of the Natural Forest Conservation Program (NFCP), a national PES program of China, in the Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. The environmental effects of the NFCP were evaluated through a historical trend (1965-2001) analysis of forest cover to estimate a counter-factual (i.e., without-PES) forest cover baseline for 2007. The socioeconomic effects of the NFCP were evaluated using data collected through household interviews carried out before and after NFCP implementation in 2001. Our results suggest that the NFCP was not only significantly associated with increases in forest cover, but also had both positive (e.g., labor reduction for fuelwood collection) and negative (e.g., economic losses due to crop raiding by wildlife) effects on local households. Results from this study emphasize the importance of integrating local conditions and understanding underlying mechanisms to enhance the performance of PES programs. Our findings are useful for the design and implementation of successful conservation policies not only in our study area but also in similar places around the world. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... Trade Agreements-Balance of Payments Program Certificate. 252.225-7035 Section 252.225-7035 Federal... Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program Certificate. As prescribed in 225.1101(10)(i), use the following provision: Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program Certificate (DEC...
48 CFR 252.225-7036 - Buy American Act-Free Trade Agreements-Balance of Payments Program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... Trade Agreements-Balance of Payments Program. 252.225-7036 Section 252.225-7036 Federal Acquisition... Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program. As prescribed in 225.1101(11)(i)(A), use the following clause: Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program (DEC 2010) (a) Definitions. As...
48 CFR 252.225-7036 - Buy American Act-Free Trade Agreements-Balance of Payments Program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Trade Agreements-Balance of Payments Program. 252.225-7036 Section 252.225-7036 Federal Acquisition... Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program. As prescribed in 225.1101(11)(i), use the following clause: Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program (JUL 2009) (a) Definitions. As used...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Trade Agreements-Balance of Payments Program Certificate. 252.225-7035 Section 252.225-7035 Federal... Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program Certificate. As prescribed in 225.1101(10), use the following provision: Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments Program Certificate (DEC...
The impact of prospective pricing on the information system in the health care industry.
Matta, K F
1988-02-01
The move from a retrospective payment system (value added) to a prospective payment system (diagnostic related) has not only influenced the health care business but also changed their information systems' requirements. The change in requirements can be attributed both to an increase in data processing tasks and also to an increase in the need for information to more effectively manage the organization. A survey was administered to capture the response of health care institutions, in the area of information systems, to the prospective payment system. The survey results indicate that the majority of health care institutions have responded by increasing their information resources, both in terms of hardware and software, and have moved to integrate the medical and financial data. In addition, the role of the information system has changed from a cost accounting system to one intended to provide a competitive edge in a highly competitive marketing environment.
A simulation model of hospital management based on cost accounting analysis according to disease.
Tanaka, Koji; Sato, Junzo; Guo, Jinqiu; Takada, Akira; Yoshihara, Hiroyuki
2004-12-01
Since a little before 2000, hospital cost accounting has been increasingly performed at Japanese national university hospitals. At Kumamoto University Hospital, for instance, departmental costs have been analyzed since 2000. And, since 2003, the cost balance has been obtained according to certain diseases for the preparation of Diagnosis-Related Groups and Prospective Payment System. On the basis of these experiences, we have constructed a simulation model of hospital management. This program has worked correctly at repeated trials and with satisfactory speed. Although there has been room for improvement of detailed accounts and cost accounting engine, the basic model has proved satisfactory. We have constructed a hospital management model based on the financial data of an existing hospital. We will later improve this program from the viewpoint of construction and using more various data of hospital management. A prospective outlook may be obtained for the practical application of this hospital management model.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... Federal or federally assisted program based on need, other than as provided under the Social Security Act... are: Needs-based payments for eligible individuals in programs under title II; incentive and bonus payments for participants in title II programs; work-based training payments for work experience, entry...
7 CFR 4288.134 - Refunds and interest payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... SERVICE AND RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program General Provisions § 4288.134 Refunds and interest payments. An eligible advanced biofuel producer...) An eligible advanced biofuel producer receiving payments under this subpart shall become ineligible...
7 CFR 4288.134 - Refunds and interest payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... SERVICE AND RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program General Provisions § 4288.134 Refunds and interest payments. An eligible advanced biofuel producer...) An eligible advanced biofuel producer receiving payments under this subpart shall become ineligible...
7 CFR 4288.131 - Payment provisions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program General Provisions § 4288.131 Payment provisions. Payments to advanced biofuel producers for eligible advanced biofuel production will be determined in accordance with the provisions of this section. (a) Types...
7 CFR 4288.131 - Payment provisions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program General Provisions § 4288.131 Payment provisions. Payments to advanced biofuel producers for eligible advanced biofuel production will be determined in accordance with the provisions of this section. (a) Types...
Reilly, Karen E; Mueller, Christine; Zimmerman, David R
2007-01-01
This paper presents the first comprehensive account of a major national demonstration designed to integrate skilled nursing facilities (SNF) prospective case-mix payment and quality of care. It describes the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Nursing Home Case-Mix and Quality (NHCMQ) Demonstration-the template for Medicare's SNF Prospective Payment System (PPS) implemented July 1998. The NHCMQ Demonstration provided the basis for one of the most significant changes in SNF reimbursement and quality monitoring policies to date. Prospective reimbursement policies created positive incentive for providers to admit Medicare residents under more equitable payment rates. However, controversy regarding unanticipated perverse provider incentives remains. The quality management system designed under the NHCMQDemonstration is currently used in over 17,000 nursing homes. Furthermore, under the NHCMQ Demonstration, one standardized assessment tool-the MDS-was used to assess a resident's clinical condition, to monitor quality, and to calculate provider reimbursement. Experiences from the NHCMQ Demonstration and continued evaluation of the current national PPS, along with state systems, provide a rich information source regarding prospective, case-mix reimbursement, and provider incentives.
7 CFR 1427.1204 - Eligible domestic users and exporters.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
...) Cotton Competitiveness Payment Program § 1427.1204 Eligible domestic users and exporters. (a) For the... entered into an agreement with CCC to participate in the ELS Cotton Competitiveness Payment Program; or (2... Competitiveness Payment Program. (b) Payment applications must contain the documentation required by this subpart...
A New Culture of Transparency: Industry Payments to Orthopedic Surgeons.
Lopez, Joseph; Ahmed, Rizwan; Bae, Sunjae; Hicks, Caitlin W; El Dafrawy, Mostafa; Osgood, Greg M; Segev, Dorry L
2016-11-01
Under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, "payments or transfers of value" by biomedical companies to physicians must be disclosed through the Open Payments Program. Designed to provide transparency of financial transactions between medication and device manufacturers and health care providers, the Open Payments Program shows financial relationships between industry and health care providers. Awareness of this program is crucial because its interpretation or misinterpretation by patients, physicians, and the general public can affect patient care, clinical practice, and research. This study evaluated nonresearch payments by industry to orthopedic surgeons. A retrospective cross-sectional review of the first wave of Physician Payments Sunshine Act data (August through December 2013) was performed to characterize industry payments to orthopedic surgeons by subspecialty, amount, type, origin, and geographic distribution. During this 5-month period, orthopedic surgeons (n=14,828) received $107,666,826, which included 3% of those listed in the Open Payments Program and 23% of the total amount paid. Of orthopedic surgeons who received payment, 45% received less than $100 and 1% received $100,000 or more. Median payment (interquartile range) was $119 ($34-$636), and mean payment was $7261±95,887. The largest payment to an individual orthopedic surgeon was $7,849,711. The 2 largest payment categories were royalty or license fees (68%) and consulting fees (13%). During the study period, orthopedic surgeons had substantial financial ties to industry. Of orthopedic surgeons who received payments, the largest proportion (45%) received less than $100 and only 1% received large payments (≥$100,000). The Open Payments Program offers insight into industry payments to orthopedic surgeons. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):e1058-e1062.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.
42 CFR 495.208 - Avoiding duplicate payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROGRAM Requirements Specific to Medicare Advantage (MA) Organizations § 495.208 Avoiding duplicate payment. (a) Unless a qualifying MA EP is entitled to a maximum payment for a year under the Medicare FFS EHR incentive program, payment for such an individual is only made under the MA EHR incentive program...
42 CFR 495.208 - Avoiding duplicate payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... PROGRAM Requirements Specific to Medicare Advantage (MA) Organizations § 495.208 Avoiding duplicate payment. (a) Unless a qualifying MA EP is entitled to a maximum payment for a year under the Medicare FFS EHR incentive program, payment for such an individual is only made under the MA EHR incentive program...
42 CFR 495.208 - Avoiding duplicate payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... PROGRAM Requirements Specific to Medicare Advantage (MA) Organizations § 495.208 Avoiding duplicate payment. (a) Unless a qualifying MA EP is entitled to a maximum payment for a year under the Medicare FFS EHR incentive program, payment for such an individual is only made under the MA EHR incentive program...
7 CFR 760.506 - Payment calculations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... who meets all of the requirements of § 760.504(b) or be considered the owner of the trees under... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Tree Assistance Program § 760.506 Payment calculations. (a) Payment to an eligible orchardist or nursery tree grower for the cost of replanting or...
7 CFR 760.506 - Payment calculations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... who meets all of the requirements of § 760.504(b) or be considered the owner of the trees under... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Tree Assistance Program § 760.506 Payment calculations. (a) Payment to an eligible orchardist or nursery tree grower for the cost of replanting or...
7 CFR 760.506 - Payment calculations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... who meets all of the requirements of § 760.504(b) or be considered the owner of the trees under... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Tree Assistance Program § 760.506 Payment calculations. (a) Payment to an eligible orchardist or nursery tree grower for the cost of replanting or...
7 CFR 760.506 - Payment calculations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... who meets all of the requirements of § 760.504(b) or be considered the owner of the trees under... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Tree Assistance Program § 760.506 Payment calculations. (a) Payment to an eligible orchardist or nursery tree grower for the cost of replanting or...
Stroke rehabilitation. 4. Stroke outcome and psychosocial consequences.
Flick, C L
1999-05-01
This self-directed learning module highlights recent research in assessment of stroke outcomes and management of the psychosocial consequences of stroke. It is a part of the chapter on stroke rehabilitation in the Self-Directed Physiatric Education Program for practitioners and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation. This article discusses predictive factors for mortality and functional recovery; proposed case mix adjustment and prospective payment systems for stroke rehabilitation; continuum of care and utilization of acute, nursing home, outpatient and home health rehabilitation programs; reintegration and socialization after stroke; vocational rehabilitation of stroke patients; and management of the psychosocial effects of stroke on patients and families.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... chapter for payment on a fee schedule basis. (b) Nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(ii) of the Act. (c) Physician assistant services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(i) of the Act. (d) Certified nurse-midwife services, as defined in section 1861(gg...
45 CFR 233.34 - Computing the assistance payment in the initial one or two months (AFDC).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 45 Public Welfare 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Computing the assistance payment in the initial... § 233.34 Computing the assistance payment in the initial one or two months (AFDC). A State shall compute...) If the initial month is computed prospectively as in paragraph (a) of this section, the second month...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... a stay occurs in a long-term care hospital. 412.531 Section 412.531 Public Health CENTERS FOR... SYSTEMS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES Prospective Payment System for Long-Term Care Hospitals § 412.531 Special payment provisions when an interruption of a stay occurs in a long-term care hospital. (a...
Zinn, Jacqueline S; Mor, Vincent; Intrator, Orna; Feng, Zhanlian; Angelelli, Joseph; Davis, Jullet A
2003-12-01
To examine skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) "make-or-buy" decisions with respect to rehabilitation therapy service provision in the 1990s, both before and after implementation of Medicare's Prospective Payment System (PPS) for SNFs. Longitudinal On-line Survey Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) data (1992-2001) on a sample of 10,241 freestanding urban SNFs. We estimated a longitudinal multinomial logistic regression model derived from transaction cost economic theory to predict the probability of the outcome in each of four service provision categories (all employed staff, all contract, mixed, and no services provided). Transaction frequency, uncertainty, and complexity result in greater control over therapy services through employment as opposed to outside contracting. For-profit status and chain affiliation were associated with greater control over therapy services. Following PPS, nursing homes acted to limit transaction costs by either exiting the rehabilitation market or exerting greater control over therapy services by managing rehabilitation services in-house. The financial incentives associated with changes in reimbursement methodology have implications that extend beyond the boundaries of the health care industry segment directly affected. Unintended quality and access consequences need to be carefully monitored by the Medicare program.
42 CFR 422.304 - Monthly payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
...) MEDICARE PROGRAM MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM Payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations § 422.304 Monthly... original fee-for-service benefits for an individual in an MA payment area for a month. (1) Payment of bid...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR... depreciation is not treated as a reduction of allowable interest expense under § 413.153(a). ...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR... depreciation is not treated as a reduction of allowable interest expense under § 413.153(a). ...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR... depreciation is not treated as a reduction of allowable interest expense under § 413.153(a). ...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR... depreciation is not treated as a reduction of allowable interest expense under § 413.153(a). ...
42 CFR 412.525 - Adjustments to the Federal prospective payment.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... its estimated costs for a patient exceed the adjusted LTC-MS-DRG payment plus a fixed-loss amount. For...-DRG relative weights that are in effect at the start of the applicable long-term care hospital...
24 CFR 880.611 - Conditions for receipt of vacancy payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-04-01
... leased as of the effective date of the Contract, the owner is entitled to vacancy payments in the amount... administrator of the vacancy or prospective vacancy and the reasons for the vacancy immediately upon learning of...
24 CFR 880.611 - Conditions for receipt of vacancy payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... leased as of the effective date of the Contract, the owner is entitled to vacancy payments in the amount... administrator of the vacancy or prospective vacancy and the reasons for the vacancy immediately upon learning of...
24 CFR 880.611 - Conditions for receipt of vacancy payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-04-01
... leased as of the effective date of the Contract, the owner is entitled to vacancy payments in the amount... administrator of the vacancy or prospective vacancy and the reasons for the vacancy immediately upon learning of...
24 CFR 880.611 - Conditions for receipt of vacancy payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-04-01
... leased as of the effective date of the Contract, the owner is entitled to vacancy payments in the amount... administrator of the vacancy or prospective vacancy and the reasons for the vacancy immediately upon learning of...
24 CFR 880.611 - Conditions for receipt of vacancy payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-04-01
... leased as of the effective date of the Contract, the owner is entitled to vacancy payments in the amount... administrator of the vacancy or prospective vacancy and the reasons for the vacancy immediately upon learning of...
20 CFR 408.1205 - How can a State have SSA administer its State recognition payment program?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... recognition payment program? 408.1205 Section 408.1205 Employees' Benefits SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN WORLD WAR II VETERANS Federal Administration of State Recognition Payments § 408.1205 How can a State have SSA administer its State recognition payment program? A State (or...
7 CFR 760.6 - Information to be furnished.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Dairy Indemnity Payment Program Payments to Dairy... period. (d) The average number of cows milked during the base period and during each pay period in the...
7 CFR 760.6 - Information to be furnished.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Dairy Indemnity Payment Program Payments to Dairy... period. (d) The average number of cows milked during the base period and during each pay period in the...
7 CFR 760.6 - Information to be furnished.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Dairy Indemnity Payment Program Payments to Dairy... period. (d) The average number of cows milked during the base period and during each pay period in the...
7 CFR 760.6 - Information to be furnished.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... AGRICULTURE SPECIAL PROGRAMS INDEMNITY PAYMENT PROGRAMS Dairy Indemnity Payment Program Payments to Dairy... period. (d) The average number of cows milked during the base period and during each pay period in the...
Squitieri, Lee; Chung, Kevin C
2017-07-01
In 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began requiring all eligible providers to participate in the Quality Payment Program or face financial reimbursement penalty. The Quality Payment Program outlines two paths for provider participation: the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Advanced Alternative Payment Models. For the first performance period beginning in January of 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimates that approximately 83 to 90 percent of eligible providers will not qualify for participation in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model and therefore must participate in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System program. The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System path replaces existing quality-reporting programs and adds several new measures to evaluate providers using four categories of data: (1) quality, (2) cost/resource use, (3) improvement activities, and (4) advancing care information. These categories will be combined to calculate a weighted composite score for each provider or provider group. Composite Merit-Based Incentive Payment System scores based on 2017 performance data will be used to adjust reimbursed payment in 2019. In this article, the authors provide relevant background for understanding value-based provider performance measurement. The authors also discuss Merit-Based Incentive Payment System reporting requirements and scoring methodology to provide plastic surgeons with the necessary information to critically evaluate their own practice capabilities in the context of current performance metrics under the Quality Payment Program.
76 FR 24343 - Advanced Biofuel Payment Program; Correction
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-02
...-AA75 Advanced Biofuel Payment Program; Correction AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service; Rural... Federal Register of February 11, 2011, establishing the Advanced Biofuel Payment Program authorized under... this Program, the Agency will enter into contracts with advanced biofuel producers to pay such...
24 CFR 888.315 - Restrictions on retroactive payments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... PROGRAM, SECTION 202 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY PROGRAM AND SECTION 811 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM) SECTION 8 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM-FAIR MARKET RENTS AND... Elderly or Handicapped, and Special Allocations Projects § 888.315 Restrictions on retroactive payments...
7 CFR 1493.60 - Payment guarantee.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... OF AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-102) and CCC Intermediate Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-103) Operations § 1493.60 Payment guarantee. (a) CCC's obligation. The payment guarantee will provide that CCC agrees to pay the...
7 CFR 1493.60 - Payment guarantee.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... OF AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-102) and CCC Intermediate Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-103) Operations § 1493.60 Payment guarantee. (a) CCC's obligation. The payment guarantee will provide that CCC agrees to pay the...
7 CFR 1493.60 - Payment guarantee.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... OF AGRICULTURE EXPORT PROGRAMS CCC EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE PROGRAMS CCC Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-102) and CCC Intermediate Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-103) Operations § 1493.60 Payment guarantee. (a) CCC's obligation. The payment guarantee will provide that CCC agrees to pay the...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... meet the requirements of § 415.102(a) of this chapter for payment on a fee schedule basis. (b) Nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(ii) of the Act. (c) Physician assistant services, as defined in section 1861(s)(2)(K)(i) of the Act. (d) Certified nurse-midwife...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Specific Categories of Costs § 413.81...) Community support. If the community has undertaken to bear the costs of medical education through community...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Goldfield, Norbert; Averill, Richard; Eisenhandler, Jon; Hughes, John S.; Muldoon, John; Steinbeck, Barbara; Bagadia, Farah
2001-01-01
Summarizes the development of a new risk adjustment methodology, the Clinical Risk Grouping System, a prospective capitation risk adjuster, that should be useful for payment and monitoring of episodes of clinical conditions that involve rehabilitation. (SLD)
Reed, Deoine; Kemmerly, Sandra A.
2009-01-01
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 2 million patients suffer from hospital-acquired infections every year and nearly 100,000 of them die. Most of these medical errors are preventable. Hospital-acquired infections result in up to $4.5 billion in additional healthcare expenses annually. The U.S. government has responded to this financial loss by focusing on healthcare quality report cards and by taking strong action to curb healthcare spending. The Medicare Program has proposed changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year Rates: Proposed Rule CMS 1488-P-Healthcare-associated infection. Payment will be linked to performance. Under the new rule, payment will be withheld from hospitals for care associated with treating certain catheter-associated urinary tract infections, vascular catheter-associated infections, and mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infection-prevention strategies are essential. In the healthcare setting, the infection control department is categorized as non-revenue-producing. Funds dedicated to resources such as staff, educational programs, and prevention measures are vastly limited. Hospital leaders will need to balance the upfront cost needed to prevent hospital-related infections with the non-reimbursed expense accrued secondary to potentially preventable infections. The purpose of this paper is to present case studies and cost analysis of hospital-acquired infections and present strategies that reduce infections and cost. PMID:21603406
7 CFR 226.11 - Program payments for centers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM Payment Provisions § 226.11 Program... payments for administrative costs to the amount approved in the annual administrative budget of the...
7 CFR 226.11 - Program payments for centers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM Payment Provisions § 226.11 Program... payments for administrative costs to the amount approved in the annual administrative budget of the...
7 CFR 226.11 - Program payments for centers.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM Payment Provisions § 226.11 Program... payments for administrative costs to the amount approved in the annual administrative budget of the...
41 CFR 301-73.301 - How do we obtain travel payment system services?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... payment system services? 301-73.301 Section 301-73.301 Public Contracts and Property Management Federal... PROGRAMS Travel Payment System § 301-73.301 How do we obtain travel payment system services? You may participate in GSA's or another Federal agency's travel payment system services program or you may contract...
2016-11-04
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) repeals the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR) methodology for updates to the physician fee schedule (PFS) and replaces it with a new approach to payment called the Quality Payment Program that rewards the delivery of high-quality patient care through two avenues: Advanced Alternative Payment Models (Advanced APMs) and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) for eligible clinicians or groups under the PFS. This final rule with comment period establishes incentives for participation in certain alternative payment models (APMs) and includes the criteria for use by the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) in making comments and recommendations on physician-focused payment models (PFPMs). Alternative Payment Models are payment approaches, developed in partnership with the clinician community, that provide added incentives to deliver high-quality and cost-efficient care. APMs can apply to a specific clinical condition, a care episode, or a population. This final rule with comment period also establishes the MIPS, a new program for certain Medicare-enrolled practitioners. MIPS will consolidate components of three existing programs, the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), the Physician Value-based Payment Modifier (VM), and the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for Eligible Professionals (EPs), and will continue the focus on quality, cost, and use of certified EHR technology (CEHRT) in a cohesive program that avoids redundancies. In this final rule with comment period we have rebranded key terminology based on feedback from stakeholders, with the goal of selecting terms that will be more easily identified and understood by our stakeholders.
The Alignment and Blending of Payment Incentives within Physician Organizations
Robinson, James C; Shortell, Stephen M; Li, Rui; Casalino, Lawrence P; Rundall, Thomas
2004-01-01
Objective To analyze the blend of retrospective (fee-for-service, productivity-based salary) and prospective (capitation, nonproductivity-based salary) methods for compensating individual physicians within medical groups and independent practice associations (IPAs) and the influence of managed care on the compensation blend used by these physician organizations. Data Sources Of the 1,587 medical groups and IPAs with 20 or more physicians in the United States, 1,104 responded to a one-hour telephone survey, with 627 providing detailed information on physician payment methods. Study Design We calculated the distribution of compensation methods for primary care and specialty physicians, separately, in both medical groups and IPAs. Multivariate regression methods were used to analyze the influence of market and organizational factors on the payment method developed by physician organizations for individual physicians. Principal Findings Within physician organizations, approximately one-quarter of physicians are paid on a purely retrospective (fee-for-service) basis, approximately one-quarter are paid on a purely prospective (capitation, nonproductivity-based salary) basis, and approximately one-half on blends of retrospective and prospective methods. Medical groups and IPAs in heavily penetrated managed care markets are significantly less likely to pay their individual physicians based on fee-for-service than are organizations in less heavily penetrated markets. Conclusions Physician organizations rely on a wide range of prospective, retrospective, and blended payment methods and seek to align the incentives faced by individual physicians with the market incentives faced by the physician organization. PMID:15333124
Ankjaer-Jensen, Anni; Rosling, Pernille; Bilde, Lone
2006-08-01
This article aims to describe and assess the Danish case-mix system, the cost accounting applied in setting national tariffs and the introduction of variable, prospective payment in the Danish hospital sector. The tariffs are calculated as a national average from hospital data gathered in a national cost database. However, uncertainty, mainly resulting from the definition of cost centres at the individual hospital, implies that the cost weights may not fully reflect the hospital treatment cost. As variable prospective payment of hospitals currently only applies to 20% of a hospital's budget, the incentives and the effects on productivity, quality and equality are still limited.
48 CFR 253.209-1 - Responsible prospective contractors.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... contracts, or contracts which provide for progress payments based on costs or on a percentage or stage of...) Packaging. An assessment of the prospective contractor's ability to meet all contractual packaging...)). (E) Plant safety. An assessment of the prospective contractor's ability to meet the safety...
75 FR 41397 - Asparagus Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-16
... Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment Program AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service... to implement the new Asparagus Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment (ALAP) Program authorized by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Farm Bill). The purpose of the program is to...
7 CFR 4288.113 - Payment record requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... SERVICE AND RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment... for Program payments, an advanced biofuel producer must maintain records for all relevant fiscal years and fiscal year quarters for each advanced biofuel facility indicating: (a) The type of eligible...
7 CFR 1416.304 - Payment calculations.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 7 Agriculture 10 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Payment calculations. 1416.304 Section 1416.304 Agriculture Regulations of the Department of Agriculture (Continued) COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT... PROGRAMS Citrus Disaster Program § 1416.304 Payment calculations. (a) Payments will be calculated by...
CMS keeps raising the stakes on quality improvement.
2014-10-01
A significant portion of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2015 Inpatient Prospective Payment System final rule focuses on quality and raises the percentage of the Medicare base payment hospitals can lose if they perform poorly. Case managers must be involved with patients from the minute they come in the door, through the hospital stay, and after discharge, experts say. Reimbursement is affected by risk-adjustment, which means case managers must make sure the documentation is as complete and specific as possible to show the full picture of the patient's severity of illness as well as any conditions that were present on admission. As the readmission reduction program expands to add new diagnoses and the penalties for poor performance increase, case managers must change their focus from discharge planning to transition planning that takes into account what resources patients need after discharge, experts say.
Alternative indicators for measuring hospital productivity.
Serway, G D; Strum, D W; Haug, W F
1987-08-01
This article explores the premise that the appropriateness and usefulness of typical hospital productivity measures have been affected by three changes in delivery: Organizational restructuring and other definition and data source changes that make full-time equivalent employee (FTE) measurements ambiguous. Transition to prospective payment (diagnosis-related groups). Increase in capitation (prepaid, at risk) programs. The effects of these changes on productivity management indicate the need for alternative productivity indicators. Several productivity measures that complement these changes in internal operations and the external hospital business environment are presented. These are based on an analysis of four hospitals within a multihospital system, and an illustration and interpretation of an array of measures, based on ten months of actual data, is provided. In conclusion, the recommendation is made for hospital management to collect an expanded set of productivity measures and review them in light of changing expense and revenue management schemes inherent in new payment modes.
42 CFR 413.153 - Interest expense.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Interest expense. 413.153 Section 413.153 Public... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Capital-Related Costs § 413.153 Interest...
42 CFR 413.153 - Interest expense.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Interest expense. 413.153 Section 413.153 Public... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Capital-Related Costs § 413.153 Interest...
42 CFR 413.153 - Interest expense.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Interest expense. 413.153 Section 413.153 Public... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Capital-Related Costs § 413.153 Interest...
42 CFR 413.153 - Interest expense.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Interest expense. 413.153 Section 413.153 Public... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Capital-Related Costs § 413.153 Interest...
42 CFR 413.153 - Interest expense.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 42 Public Health 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Interest expense. 413.153 Section 413.153 Public... PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Capital-Related Costs § 413.153 Interest...
42 CFR 413.100 - Special treatment of certain accrued costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Specific...) If the sick leave plan grants employees the nonforfeitable right to demand cash payment for unused... reporting periods that produce the highest average contribution(s), out of the five most recent Medicare...
42 CFR 413.100 - Special treatment of certain accrued costs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES Specific...) If the sick leave plan grants employees the nonforfeitable right to demand cash payment for unused... reporting periods that produce the highest average contribution(s), out of the five most recent Medicare...
42 CFR § 414.1310 - Applicability.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2017-10-01
... (CONTINUED) MEDICARE PROGRAM (CONTINUED) PAYMENT FOR PART B MEDICAL AND OTHER HEALTH SERVICES Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Alternative Payment Model Incentive § 414.1310 Applicability. (a) Program Implementation. Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, MIPS applies to payments for items and...
7 CFR 4288.132 - Payment adjustments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program... otherwise payable to the advanced biofuel producer if there is a difference between the amount actually...
7 CFR 4288.132 - Payment adjustments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program... to the advanced biofuel producer if there is a difference between the amount actually produced and...
7 CFR 4288.132 - Payment adjustments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Advanced Biofuel Payment Program... to the advanced biofuel producer if there is a difference between the amount actually produced and...
45 CFR 400.66 - Eligibility and payment levels in a publicly-administered RCA program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 45 Public Welfare 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Eligibility and payment levels in a publicly... REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM Refugee Cash Assistance § 400.66 Eligibility and payment levels in a publicly-administered RCA program. (a) In administering a publicly-administered refugee cash assistance program, the...