Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-08
... Failure To Submit a Complete State Implementation Plan for Section 110(a) Pertaining to the 2006 Fine... submission for some or all of these specific requirements. The finding of failure to submit for some or all... making a finding of failure to submit SIPs, or elements of SIPs, required by the CAA, where states have...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-06
... Ecology (Ecology) submitted its Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) on December 22, 2010 to meet... Ecology submitted an update to the SIP submittal containing a revised and updated BART determination for... organized as follows: I. What is the background for this final action? Ecology submitted its Regional Haze...
This fact sheet provides a basic overview of the May 17, 2008 notice that 11 states missed their deadlines to submit their state implementation plans (SIPs). The deadlines are for submitting complete plans showing how they will meet the 1997 ozone standard
On November 29, 2017 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that three states failed to submit timely state implementation plan (SIP) revisions necessary to satisfy certain Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA requirements for implementing the 2008 oz
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-16
... Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as a direct... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia; State Implementation Plan Miscellaneous Revisions AGENCY... State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division to EPA in...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-05
... Failure To Submit Certain State Implementation Plans Required for the 1-Hour Ozone NAAQS AGENCY...) for three ozone nonattainment areas to satisfy certain requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). To accompany this action we are issuing...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-15
... in their comment that EPA approve a conflict of interest protocol submitted for inclusion in the SIP... that with the inclusion of this protocol in the SIP, EPA would be able to approve Alabama's 1997 annual... the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions, submitted by the State of Alabama, through the...
78 FR 54177 - Adequacy Status of the Submitted 2009, 2017 and 2025 PM2.5
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-03
... criteria set forth by 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4), as follows: (i) The submitted control strategy implementation... strategy implementation plan or maintenance plan was submitted to EPA, consultation among federal, State... 2009, 2017 and 2025 budgets are less than the on-road mobile source inventory for 2007 that was shown...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-24
... Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze AGENCY: Environmental... (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Wyoming on January 12, 2011, that addresses regional haze...; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze; Proposed Rule (77...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-16
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North Carolina; State Implementation Plan Miscellaneous Revisions AGENCY... a revision to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan submitted on February 3, 2010, through... particulate matter found in the Code of Federal Regulations. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-13
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan AGENCY... the Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) (hereafter RH SIP) revision submitted by the... anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas [[Page 41280
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-08
..., Disapproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Wyoming; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze; Notice of Public Hearings AGENCY: Environmental...) addressing regional haze under. We are making this change in response to letters submitted by the Governor of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-09
... Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Hawaii; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone and... State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the state of Hawaii pursuant to the requirements... FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dawn Richmond, Air Planning Office (AIR-2), U.S. Environmental Protection...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-22
... 3745-21, submitted on June 24, 2003, as part of Ohio's five-year rule review process. DATES: Comments... the State. This revised version of paragraph (U)(2)(f), however, did not provide a suitable process... dictates a process in which States adopt measures required under the CAA, States submit these measures to...
77 FR 24160 - Revisions to the Hawaii State Implementation Plan
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-23
... the Hawaii State Implementation Plan AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Hawaii State Implementation Plan (SIP... Hawaii SIP in 1983. DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by May 23, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-04
... California State Implementation Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental... revision to the South Coast Air Quality Management District portion of the California State Implementation... Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? We are approving South Coast Air Quality Management District...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-05-09
...EPA proposed on April 25, 2012 (77 FR 24794) to take action on a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP) addressing regional haze submitted by the State of New York. In that proposal, EPA proposed to address through a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) certain requirements not addressed in New York's regional haze SIP submission or, alternatively, to approve a substantively identical SIP revision by New York, should the State timely submit such a revision. In two letters dated April 16, 2012, New York submitted additional materials relevant to our proposed action on its regional haze SIP submission, including proposed SIP revisions addressing the requirements for best available retrofit technology controls (BART) for a number of sources. EPA is providing notice of availability of these materials. The comment period on EPA's proposed action on the New York regional haze SIP closes on June 18, 2010.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-08
... California State Implementation Plan; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental... revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District portion of the California State Implementation...-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD) Rule 2.41, adopted on September 10, 2008, and submitted...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-04-17
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware, State Board Requirements AGENCY: Environmental... revision to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) on January 11, 2013. The SIP revision addresses requirements of...
2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Findings of Failure to Submit
This final action finds that 15 states and the District of Columbia have failed to submit specific state implementation plan (SIP) elements to satisfy certain nonattainment area, and/or Ozone Transport Region (OTR), planning requirements for the 2008 ozone
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-13
... this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as a direct final rule...] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Mississippi; Transportation Conformity SIP--Memorandum... proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan revision submitted by the Mississippi Department of...
Child Care and Development Fund: Report of State Plans FY 2002-2003.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Administration on Children, Youth, and Families (DHHS), Washington, DC. Child Care Bureau.
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act requires each state to submit a biennial plan to implement the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF). This report summarizes information in the biennial plans submitted for the period October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2003. The analysis includes information from 50 states, the…
Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Requirements and Guidance
The Clean Air Act requires states to submit SIPs that implement, maintain, and enforce a new or revised national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) within 3 years of EPA issuing the standard. The Infrastructure SIP is required for all states.
40 CFR 52.63 - PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.63 Section 52.63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.63 PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas. On March 15, 1989, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.881 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.881 Section 52.881 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kansas § 52.881 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. The state has submitted a committal SIP for...
40 CFR 52.63 - PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.63 Section 52.63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.63 PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas. On March 15, 1989, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.63 - PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.63 Section 52.63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.63 PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas. On March 15, 1989, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.935 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.935 Section 52.935 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kentucky § 52.935 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. On July 7, 1988, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.935 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.935 Section 52.935 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kentucky § 52.935 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. On July 7, 1988, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.935 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.935 Section 52.935 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kentucky § 52.935 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. On July 7, 1988, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.881 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.881 Section 52.881 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kansas § 52.881 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. The state has submitted a committal SIP for...
40 CFR 52.935 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.935 Section 52.935 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kentucky § 52.935 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. On July 7, 1988, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.881 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.881 Section 52.881 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kansas § 52.881 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. The state has submitted a committal SIP for...
40 CFR 52.881 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.881 Section 52.881 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kansas § 52.881 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. The state has submitted a committal SIP for...
40 CFR 52.63 - PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.63 Section 52.63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.63 PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas. On March 15, 1989, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.63 - PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.63 Section 52.63 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.63 PM10 State Implementation Plan development in group II areas. On March 15, 1989, the State submitted a...
40 CFR 52.881 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.881 Section 52.881 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kansas § 52.881 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. The state has submitted a committal SIP for...
40 CFR 52.935 - PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... development in group II areas. 52.935 Section 52.935 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Kentucky § 52.935 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas. On July 7, 1988, the State submitted a...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-17
... Implementation Plan to Meet the Requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--Interstate Transport... section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). On June 18, 2009 the State of Colorado submitted an interstate transport State Implementation Plan (SIP) addressing the interstate transport requirements under section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-21
... transportation conformity revisions to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth...). This addition consists of transportation conformity criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation and enforceability of certain transportation-related control measures and mitigation measures. The...
40 CFR 93.118 - Criteria and procedures: Motor vehicle emissions budget.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... PLANS Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and..., consultation among federal, State, and local agencies occurred; full implementation plan documentation was... response to comments that are required to be submitted with any implementation plan. EPA will document its...
40 CFR 93.118 - Criteria and procedures: Motor vehicle emissions budget.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... PLANS Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and..., consultation among federal, State, and local agencies occurred; full implementation plan documentation was... response to comments that are required to be submitted with any implementation plan. EPA will document its...
DOT National Transportation Integrated Search
1973-01-01
In fiscal year 1973 the NHTSA required the states to prepare and submit a new "State Comprehensive Plan" to replace the base year study and implementation plan submitted in November 1967. The comprehensive plan is a four-year estimate and projection ...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-29
... Quality Implementation Plans; California; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Prevention of... rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing approval of a permitting rule submitted for the South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The State is...
76 FR 508 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-05
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Idaho State Implementation Plan (SIP) that were submitted to EPA by the State of Idaho on April 16, 2007. This SIP submittal includes new and...
78 FR 50369 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-19
...] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan AGENCY: Environmental Protection... the State of Michigan's Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP) that Michigan had submitted on March 24, 2009. Michigan's submittal included revisions to Part 1, Definitions; Part 2, Air Use Approval...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-08
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to Chapter 116 Which Relate to the Application Review... approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Texas to EPA on... implements the requirements of House Bill 3732, 80th Legislature (2007), and the Texas Health and Safety Code...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-09
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota; Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limited Maintenance Plan for... June 16, 2010, to revise the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP) for carbon monoxide (CO) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State has submitted a limited maintenance plan for CO showing continued...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-29
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Clean Air Interstate Rule AGENCY: Environmental... State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State has submitted amendments to the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), which supplement Indiana's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), for which...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-26
...EPA is proposing to approve a State implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Colorado on May 25, 2011 that addresses regional haze (RH). EPA is proposing to determine that the plan submitted by Colorado satisfies the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act'') and our rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing man-made impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is taking this action pursuant to section 110 of the CAA.
40 CFR 52.346 - Air quality monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Air quality monitoring requirements. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Colorado § 52.346 Air quality monitoring... VIII Administrator, the State submitted a revised Air Quality Monitoring State Implementation Plan. The...
40 CFR 52.346 - Air quality monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Air quality monitoring requirements. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Colorado § 52.346 Air quality monitoring... VIII Administrator, the State submitted a revised Air Quality Monitoring State Implementation Plan. The...
40 CFR 52.346 - Air quality monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Air quality monitoring requirements. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Colorado § 52.346 Air quality monitoring... VIII Administrator, the State submitted a revised Air Quality Monitoring State Implementation Plan. The...
40 CFR 52.346 - Air quality monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Air quality monitoring requirements. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Colorado § 52.346 Air quality monitoring... VIII Administrator, the State submitted a revised Air Quality Monitoring State Implementation Plan. The...
40 CFR 52.346 - Air quality monitoring requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Air quality monitoring requirements. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Colorado § 52.346 Air quality monitoring... VIII Administrator, the State submitted a revised Air Quality Monitoring State Implementation Plan. The...
Implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act: Update and Next Steps
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Strobach, Kelly Vaillancourt
2018-01-01
Efforts to implement the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) are well underway, as states submitted their state plans to the Department of Education in September 2017. The entire education policy and advocacy community has been combing through the state plans to get an idea of how states will tackle efforts to improve student outcomes under the new…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-15
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Arizona; Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes AGENCY... (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Arizona to address the requirements regarding air pollution... air pollution emergency episodes in CAA section 110(a)(2)(G). Section 110(a)(2)(G) requires that each...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-25
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Revisions To Open Burning Regulations AGENCY... Emission Standards: General Burning authorizes the State to extend the time period for open burning. EPA is... submitted a SIP revision to Rule R307-202 Emission Standards: General Burning. This rule contains the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-08
... the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District AGENCY... approve revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California... submit regulations that control the primary and secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS...
40 CFR 35.917-6 - Acceptance by implementing governmental units.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-6 Acceptance by implementing governmental units. A facilities plan submitted for...
40 CFR 35.917-6 - Acceptance by implementing governmental units.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-6 Acceptance by implementing governmental units. A facilities plan submitted for...
40 CFR 35.917-6 - Acceptance by implementing governmental units.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-6 Acceptance by implementing governmental units. A facilities plan submitted for...
40 CFR 35.917-6 - Acceptance by implementing governmental units.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE Grants for Construction of Treatment Works-Clean Water Act § 35.917-6 Acceptance by implementing governmental units. A facilities plan submitted for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-20
...The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address regional haze in the State of Montana. EPA developed this proposal in response to the State's decision in 2006 to not submit a regional haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. EPA is proposing to determine that the FIP satisfies requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act'') that require states, or EPA in promulgating a FIP, to assure reasonable progress towards the national goal of preventing any future and remedying any existing man-made impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas. In addition, EPA is also proposing to approve a revision to the Montana SIP submitted by the State of Montana through the Montana Department of Environmental Quality on February 17, 2012. The State's submittal contains revisions to the Montana Visibility Plan that includes amendments to the ``Smoke Management'' section, which adds a reference to Best Available Control Technology (BACT) as the visibility control measure for open burning as currently administered through the State's air quality permit program. This change was made to meet the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule. EPA will act on the remaining revisions in the State's submittal in a future action.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-26
... Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as a direct final rule without...] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North Carolina; Transportation Conformity Memorandum of... Implementation Plan submitted on July 12, 2013, through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural...
24 CFR 598.605 - Implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY FACILITIES URBAN EMPOWERMENT ZONES: ROUND TWO AND THREE DESIGNATIONS Empowerment Zone Grants § 598.605 Implementation plan. (a) Implementation plan content. An EZ must submit an... requirements that the state and local governments, as Empowerment Zone designees, have agreed to meet as...
On February 3, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notified state, local and tribal air agencies that they have the option to submit state implementation plans (SIPs) using the EPA’s new electronic web-based SIP (eSIP) submission system.
78 FR 71508 - Availability of Federally-Enforceable State Implementation Plans for All States
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-29
...), EPA, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), 1445 Ross Avenue... Islands--on November 10, 1986 (51 FR 40799)]. Since 1972, each State and territory has submitted numerous...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-18
... technical analysis submitted for parallel-processing by DNREC on December 9, 2010, to address significant... technical analysis submitted by DNREC for parallel-processing on December 9, 2010, to satisfy the... consists of a technical analysis that provides detailed support for Delaware's position that it has...
75 FR 45080 - Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-02
... revisions concern oxides of nitrogen (NO X ) emissions from boilers, steam generators and process heaters... 1--Submitted Rule Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted SJVUAPCD 4308 Boilers, Steam... regulations that control NO X emissions. Rule 4308 limits NO X and CO emissions from boilers, steam generators...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-09
... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2007-1073; FRL-9263-8] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District AGENCY... 11, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR- 2007-1073, by one of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-15
... (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Georgia, through the Department of Natural Resources... SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a... public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-20
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From...) submitted March 17, 2011. This revision will amend the rule restricting emissions of particulate matter from... amendments to rule 10 CSR 10-6.400 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-27
... to approve revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Maryland... (Sparrows Point) is the only sintering plant located in the State of Maryland, and therefore the only source... compliance with specified pressure drop and flow rate operating parameters. EPA is approving these revisions...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-27
... taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted... steelmaking facility (Sparrows Point) is the only sintering plant located in the State of Maryland. The... emissions of particulate matter, continuously monitoring compliance with specified pressure drop and flow...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-05
...EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the North Dakota State Implementation Plan that the Governor of North Dakota submitted with a letter dated April 6, 2009. The revisions affect North Dakota's air pollution control rules regarding general provisions (including rules regarding shutdowns and malfunctions), ambient air quality standards, emissions of particulate matter, permitting, and fees. In addition, EPA is proposing administrative corrections to the regulatory text for North Dakota that will be codified in the Code of Federal Regulations; we made errors in the identification of plan table when we approved the North Dakota State Implementation Plan revisions for Interstate Transport of pollution, which the Governor also submitted on April 6, 2009. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
40 CFR 52.146 - Particulate matter (PM-10) Group II SIP commitments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Casa Grande, Show Low, Safford, Flagstaff... Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements for Casa Grande, Show Low, Safford, Flagstaff and Joseph City as provided...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-18
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Transportation Conformity Regulations AGENCY... Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by Maryland for Transportation Conformity Regulations. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-26
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Transportation Conformity Regulations AGENCY... Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by Maryland to establish transportation conformity regulations. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-23
...EPA is proposing to approve a portion of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Oregon for the purpose of addressing the third element of the interstate transport provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards) and the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. The third element of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requires that a State not interfere with any other State's required measures to prevent significant deterioration (PSD) of its air quality. EPA is also proposing to approve numerous revisions to the Oregon SIP that were submitted to EPA by the State of Oregon on October 8, 2008; October 10, 2008; March 17, 2009; June 23, 2010; December 22, 2010 and May 5, 2011. The revisions include updating Oregon's new source review (NSR) rules to be consistent with current Federal regulations and streamlining Oregon's air quality rules by clarifying requirements, removing duplicative rules, and correcting errors. The revisions were submitted in accordance with the requirements of section 110 and part D of the Act).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-13
...EPA is revising the format for materials submitted by the State of Nevada that are incorporated by reference (IBR) into the Nevada State Implementation Plan (SIP). The regulations affected by this format change have all been previously submitted by the State of Nevada and approved by EPA. This format revision will primarily affect the ``Identification of plan'' section, as well as the format of the SIP materials that will be available for public inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center located at EPA Headquarters in Washington, DC, and the EPA Regional Office. EPA is also adding a table in the ``Identification of plan'' section which summarizes the approval actions that EPA has taken on the non-regulatory and quasi-regulatory portions of the Nevada SIP.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-29
...), DNREC supplemented its September 16, 2009 submittal with a technical analysis submitted to EPA for... supplemental technical analysis, for which it has requested parallel-processing, through the public notice and... submitted the technical analysis to EPA as a formal supplement to its September 16, 2009 submittal. The...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-23
... Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated November 28, 2012... Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Second, EPA is proposing to approve updated rules submitted by Ecology... emissions. II. Summary of SIP Revision Ecology's November 28, 2012 SIP revision contains two elements for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-19
... request submitted by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated November 28, 2012, to establish.... Background On November 28, 2012, Ecology submitted a request for the EPA to approve motor vehicle emission... to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-15
... the APA, since the reorganization and codification of the revised format for denoting IBR of the state... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York; Revised Format of Materials Being Incorporated by Reference... Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is revising the format of materials submitted by the State of New York...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-13
... the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on July 29, 2010, to revise the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP) for lead (Pb) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State has submitted a joint Title I... that the conditions laid out with the citation ``Title I Condition: SIP for Lead NAAQS'' replace an...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-04
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; South Bend-Elkhart, Indiana Ozone Maintenance Plan..., Indiana 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) by replacing the... Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 2010a emissions model. Indiana submitted this request to EPA for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-27
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North Carolina: Approval of Rocky Mount Supplemental Motor Vehicle... is proposing to approve a revision to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted... supplements the original redesignation request and maintenance plan for Rocky Mount 1997 8-hour ozone area...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-23
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to Emissions Inventory Reporting... Consistent With the Cross Media Electronic Reporting Rule AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA... revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Governor of Texas and by the Texas...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-08
... and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Reasonably Available Control... Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Hampshire. The revision establishes Reasonably... intended effect of this action is to approve these requirements into the New Hampshire SIP. This action is...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-29
...): 17.8.102, 17.8.301, 17.8.901, and 17.8.1007. B. On May 4, 2009 the State of Montana submitted formal.... Therefore, in this action we are approving ARM sections 17.8.102, 17.8.301, 17.8.901, and 17.8.1007. B. 2009... 2008 revisions to ARM sections 17.8.102, 17.8.301, 17.8.901, and 17.8.1007 that the State submitted on...
41 CFR 105-71.111 - State plans.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 41 Public Contracts and Property Management 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false State plans. 105-71.111...-Award Requirements § 105-71.111 State plans. (a) Scope. The statutes for some programs require States to submit plans before receiving grants. Under regulations implementing Executive Order 12372...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 7 Agriculture 15 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false State plans. 3016.11 Section 3016.11 Agriculture... GOVERNMENTS Pre-Award Requirements § 3016.11 State plans. (a) Scope. The statutes for some programs require States to submit plans before receiving grants. Under regulations implementing Executive Order 12372...
2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Implementation Actions Fact Sheets
This page contains the fact sheets for the 2008 Lead (Pb) NAAQS. These actions deal with the finding of failure to submit various portions of the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the 2008 Lead NAAQS.
Infrastructure SIP Requirements and Guidance
The Clean Air Act requires states to submit SIPs that implement, maintain, and enforce a new or revised national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) within 3 years of EPA issuing the standard. The Infrastructure SIP is required for all states.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-14
.... SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to find that Arizona failed to make a state implementation plan (SIP... nonattainment area which, having failed to attain the PM-10 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by... today finding that Arizona failed to make the submittal required for the Maricopa area under section 189...
76 FR 41111 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; South Carolina; 110(a)(1) and (2...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
...EPA is taking final action to approve the December 13, 2007, submission submitted by the State of South Carolina, through the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) as demonstrating that the State meets the state implementation plan (SIP) requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. South Carolina certified that the South Carolina SIP contains provisions that ensure the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and maintained in South Carolina (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). South Carolina's infrastructure submission, provided to EPA on December 13, 2007, addressed all the required infrastructure elements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Additionally, EPA is correcting an inadvertent error and responding to adverse comments received on EPA's March 17, 2011, proposed approval of South Carolina's December 13, 2007, infrastructure submission.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-11
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Jersey and New York Ozone Attainment Demonstrations AGENCY... approving the ozone attainment demonstration portion of comprehensive State Implementation Plan revisions submitted by New Jersey and New York to meet Clean Air Act requirements for attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-05
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky: Kentucky Portion of Cincinnati-Hamilton, Supplement Motor.... SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted... maintenance plan for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN, maintenance area for the 1997...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-15
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Canton-Massillon 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan... the Canton-Massillon, Ohio 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP... using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-15
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Canton-Massillon 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan..., Ohio, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act... Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision request to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-28
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota; Sulfur Dioxide SIP Revision for Marathon Petroleum... October 6, 2009, Minnesota submitted a request for a sulfur dioxide State Implementation Plan revision for... installation of new boilers and a sulfur recovery unit and changes to three existing heaters. Overall, this...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-15
... Implementation Plan (SIP); Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency... Texas PSD State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA is approving a SIP revision submitted February 1, 2006... Texas PSD SIP; it merely approves reorganization and renumbering of the Texas PSD SIP rules. Further...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-22
... Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Nevada; Clark County; Stationary Source... Clark County, Nevada. DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by September 7, 2012. ADDRESSES... regulations submitted for approval into the Clark County portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan (SIP...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-14
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Revision to the Definition of Volatile Organic... approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia consisting... section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving Virginia's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-25
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Revisions to the Definition of Volatile Organic... proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia... (VOC). In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving Virginia's SIP submittal...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-15
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Revised Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the... Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia for the purpose of amending the 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Charleston, Huntington, Parkersburg, Weirton, and Wheeling 8-hour ozone...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-17
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Louisiana; Revisions To Control Volatile Organic Compound...: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions for control... submitted to EPA on August 31, 2010. EPA is also proposing to approve a SIP revision for control of emission...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-14
... Promulgation of Implementation Plans--Maricopa County (Phoenix) PM-10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area Plan for... implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Arizona to meet, among other requirements, section... (Maricopa area). Specifically, EPA proposed to disapprove provisions of the 189(d) plan because they do not...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 29 Labor 1 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 true State plans. 97.11 Section 97.11 Labor Office of the... LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Pre-Award Requirements § 97.11 State plans. (a) Scope. The statutes for some programs require States to submit plans before receiving grants. Under regulations implementing Executive Order...
40 CFR 52.1237 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1237 Control... Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a request to redesignate the Minneapolis/St. Paul CO... must be confirmed by the State), Minnesota will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s...
40 CFR 52.1237 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1237 Control... Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a request to redesignate the Minneapolis/St. Paul CO... must be confirmed by the State), Minnesota will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s...
40 CFR 52.1237 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1237 Control... Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a request to redesignate the Minneapolis/St. Paul CO... must be confirmed by the State), Minnesota will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s...
40 CFR 52.1237 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1237 Control... Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a request to redesignate the Minneapolis/St. Paul CO... must be confirmed by the State), Minnesota will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s...
DOT National Transportation Integrated Search
1997-11-01
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) require that states submit State Implementation Plans (SIPs) detailing strategies to improve air quality in nonattainment areas. This analysis first reviews the administrative procedures that states and the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-14
...] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards AGENCY: Environmental Protection... national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) are promulgated, the CAA requires states to submit a plan...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-28
... persons to submit comments on this document. Comments may be submitted by one of the following methods... very low (less than one percent), and this carcass sampling was expensive for the Agency. As stated in.... Following the implementation of PR/HACCP, FSIS analyzed only one pathogen per sample. Then, in 2008, FSIS...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-06
... : Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. E-mail: [email protected] . 3. Mail... disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information... provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-11
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Lima 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision; Motor... 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) to replace the previously... Simulator (MOVES) emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision request to EPA on January 11, 2013. DATES...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-11
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision; Motor... request by Ohio to revise the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP...) emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision request to EPA on December 7, 2012. DATES: Comments must be...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-11
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Lima 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision to... Lima, Ohio 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) to replace motor... (MOVES) emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision request to EPA on January 11, 2013. DATES: This...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-09
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Removal of NOX SIP Call Rules AGENCY... Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia that removes West Virginia's nitrogen oxides (NOx) SIP Call rules. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the...
40 CFR 52.376 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Connecticut § 52.376 Control strategy: Carbon... submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission...
40 CFR 52.283 - Interstate Transport.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Interstate Transport. 52.283 Section 52...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS California § 52.283 Interstate Transport. Link to an... Resources Board submitted the “Interstate Transport State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 1997 8-hour...
40 CFR 52.376 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Connecticut § 52.376 Control strategy: Carbon... submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission...
40 CFR 52.376 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Connecticut § 52.376 Control strategy: Carbon... submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission...
40 CFR 52.376 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Connecticut § 52.376 Control strategy: Carbon... submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission...
40 CFR 52.376 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Connecticut § 52.376 Control strategy: Carbon... submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-01
...] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards AGENCY: Environmental Protection... revised national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) are promulgated, the CAA requires states to submit...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-30
...] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA... ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) are promulgated, the CAA requires states to submit a plan for the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-28
...EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving a revision to the Oklahoma State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Oklahoma through the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality on February 19, 2010, intended to address the regional haze requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In addition, EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving a portion of a revision to the Oklahoma SIP submitted by the State of Oklahoma on May 10, 2007 and supplemented on December 10, 2007 to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) as it applies to visibility for the 1997 8- hour ozone and 1997 fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards. This CAA requirement is intended to prevent emissions from one state from interfering with the visibility programs in another state. EPA is approving certain core elements of the SIP including Oklahoma's: determination of baseline and natural visibility conditions; coordinating regional haze and reasonably attributable visibility impairment; monitoring strategy and other implementation requirements; coordination with states and Federal Land Managers; and a number of NOX, SO2, and PM BART determinations. EPA is finding that Oklahoma's regional haze SIP did not address the sulfur dioxide Best Available Retrofit Technology requirements for six units in Oklahoma in accordance with the Regional Haze requirements, or the requirement to prevent interference with other states' visibility programs. EPA is promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan to address these deficiencies by requiring emissions to be reduced at these six units. This action is being taken under section 110 and part C of the CAA.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-05-18
... 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; Ozone 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory AGENCY: Environmental... ozone 2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the state implementation plan (SIP) revision.... The emissions inventory is included in the ozone attainment demonstration that was submitted for the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-12
... ozone maintenance plans. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted this... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana; Removal of Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs for Clark... to allow the State to discontinue the vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in Clark and...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-26
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Particulate Matter Standards AGENCY: Environmental... in Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 3745-17, ``Particulate Matter Standards.'' The revisions were submitted by Ohio EPA to satisfy the State's 5-year review requirements. The particulate matter...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
...EPA is proposing a limited approval of a revision to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) on August 5, 2009, and supplemental information submitted on January 30, 2012, that addresses regional haze for the first implementation period. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing a limited approval of this SIP revision to implement the regional haze requirements for Missouri on the basis that the revision, as a whole, strengthens the Missouri SIP. In a separate action EPA has previously proposed a limited disapproval of the Missouri regional haze SIP because of deficiencies in the State's regional haze SIP submittal arising from the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia (DC Circuit) to the EPA of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). See 76 FR 82219. Therefore, we are not taking action in this notice to address the State's reliance on CAIR to meet certain regional haze requirements.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-16
...EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the District of Columbia State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the District of Columbia through the District Department of the Environment (DDOE) on October 27, 2011 that addresses regional haze for the first implementation period. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future, and remedy any existing, anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing to determine that the Regional Haze plan submitted by the District of Columbia satisfies these requirements of the CAA. EPA is also proposing to approve this revision as meeting the infrastructure requirements relating to visibility protection for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS.
40 CFR 52.2033 - Control strategy: Sulfur oxides.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... demonstration State Implementation Plan for the Conewango Township, Pleasant Township, Glade Township, and City... Monongahela River Valley areas of the Allegheny County Air Basin in Allegheny County, submitted by the...
40 CFR 52.2585 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 5 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2585... strategy: Ozone. (a) Disapproval—On November 6, 1986, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted as a proposed revision to the State's ozone State Implementation Plan a site-specific reasonably...
40 CFR 52.2585 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2585... strategy: Ozone. (a) Disapproval—On November 6, 1986, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted as a proposed revision to the State's ozone State Implementation Plan a site-specific reasonably...
40 CFR 52.2585 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 5 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2585... strategy: Ozone. (a) Disapproval—On November 6, 1986, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted as a proposed revision to the State's ozone State Implementation Plan a site-specific reasonably...
40 CFR 52.2585 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 5 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2585... strategy: Ozone. (a) Disapproval—On November 6, 1986, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted as a proposed revision to the State's ozone State Implementation Plan a site-specific reasonably...
40 CFR 52.283 - Interstate Transport.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS California § 52.283 Interstate Transport. (a) Approval. On November 16, 2007, the California Air Resources Board submitted the “Interstate Transport State... Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the State of California (September 21, 2007)” (“2007 Transport SIP...
40 CFR 52.283 - Interstate Transport.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS California § 52.283 Interstate Transport. (a) Approval. On November 16, 2007, the California Air Resources Board submitted the “Interstate Transport State... Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the State of California (September 21, 2007)” (“2007 Transport SIP...
40 CFR 52.283 - Interstate Transport.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS California § 52.283 Interstate Transport. (a) Approval. On November 16, 2007, the California Air Resources Board submitted the “Interstate Transport State... Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the State of California (September 21, 2007)” (“2007 Transport SIP...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-15
... Implementation Plan (SIP); Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas PSD State... revision submitted July 16, 2010. This action makes no significant changes to the Texas PSD SIP; it merely...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-29
... Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico. FOR FURTHER... Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Construction Permit Fees AGENCY: Environmental Protection... (SIP) for New Mexico submitted by the State of New Mexico on April 11, 2002, and April 25, 2005, which...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-24
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions To Control Volatile Organic Compound... Organic Compounds. The State submitted these revisions on March 4, 2010. These revisions remove the Texas... second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-22
... and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia; Prevention of Significant Deterioration and... Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Georgia in three submittals dated October 31, 2006, March 5, 2007... Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) permitting rules in the SIP to address changes to the federal New Source...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-28
...EPA is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of California to address Clean Air Act nonattainment area contingency measure requirements for the 1997 annual and 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards in the San Joaquin Valley. Final approval of this SIP revision would terminate the sanctions clocks and a federal implementation plan clock that were triggered by EPA's partial disapproval of a related SIP submission on November 9, 2011 (76 FR 69896).
78 FR 48326 - Partial Disapproval of State Implementation Plan; Arizona; Regional Haze Requirements
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-08
... State's failure to submit provisions to address eight of the State's Class I areas under 40 CFR 51.309(g... contribute to visibility impairment in the Class I areas on the Colorado Plateau. In particular, 40 CFR 51... geographic area. The Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or the ``Act'') and EPA's regulations require states to adopt and...
Air Quality Implementation Plans
States must develop plans to attain and maintain air quality standards. These plans, known as SIPs, are submitted to EPA for approval. This web site contains information about this process and the current status of the submittals.
40 CFR 52.1230 - Control strategy and rules: Particulates.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1230 Control strategy and rules: Particulates. (a) Part D(1) Approval. The State of Minnesota has satisfied the... provision of Rule 7005.2910. (b) Approval—On May 31, 1988, the State of Minnesota submitted a committal SIP...
40 CFR 52.1690 - Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) New York § 52.1690 Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program. On January 11, 1993, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation submitted a plan for the... Assistance Program for incorporation in the New York state implementation plan. This plan meets the...
7 CFR 272.2 - Plan of operation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 60 days prior to implementation. Minor changes to approved sampling plans shall be submitted at least... Plan of Operation. The State and FNS (USDA) further agree to fully comply with any changes in Federal... effect that, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of sex, race, color, age, political...
7 CFR 272.2 - Plan of operation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... 60 days prior to implementation. Minor changes to approved sampling plans shall be submitted at least... Plan of Operation. The State and FNS (USDA) further agree to fully comply with any changes in Federal... effect that, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of sex, race, color, age, political...
7 CFR 272.2 - Plan of operation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 60 days prior to implementation. Minor changes to approved sampling plans shall be submitted at least... Plan of Operation. The State and FNS (USDA) further agree to fully comply with any changes in Federal... effect that, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of sex, race, color, age, political...
76 FR 38977 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans, State of Louisiana
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-05
... submitted by the State of Louisiana, and include formatting changes, regulatory wording changes, substantive... other material, such as copyrighted material will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-20
...EPA is proposing to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Kansas on July 27, 2010, to add two new rules which implement restrictions on the idling of heavy duty diesel vehicles and reduce nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions at stationary sources in the Kansas portion of the Kansas City Maintenance Area for ozone. EPA is approving this revision because the standards and requirements set by the rules will strengthen the Kansas SIP. EPA's approval of this SIP revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-19
...EPA is approving a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources on June 7, 2012, concerning the state's vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in southeast Wisconsin. The revision amends I/M program requirements in the active control measures portion of the ozone SIP to reflect changes that have been implemented at the state level since EPA fully approved the I/M program on August 16, 2001. The submittal also includes a demonstration under section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) addressing lost emission reductions associated with the program changes.
75 FR 6813 - Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo County
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-11
...). ACTION: Direct final rule. SUMMARY: The EPA is approving revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP.... Background III. Summary of Changes to the New Mexico SIP IV. Final Action V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What Action Is EPA Taking? Today we are approving revisions to the New Mexico SIP, submitted by...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-09
... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0988; FRL-9135-5] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles AGENCY... (TAC), Chapter 114, Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles. The State submitted these revisions...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-26
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; The Washington County 2002 Base Year Inventory... approve the fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) 2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the State of... proposing to approve the 2002 base year PM 2.5 emissions inventory for Washington County submitted by MDE in...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-23
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; the 2002 Base Year Inventory AGENCY... particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) 2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the District of Columbia State... 2002 base year PM 2.5 emissions inventory submitted by DDOE in accordance with the requirements of the...
Child Care and Development Fund: Report of State Plans for the Period 10/01/99 to 9/30/01.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Stoney, Louise; Stanton, Nina
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act requires each state to submit a biennial plan to implement the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF). This report is based on the approved State Plans for the period October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2001. The analysis includes information from 48 states, the District of Columbia,…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-26
...EPA is proposing to partially approve and partially disapprove a Washington Regional Haze Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Washington on December 22, 2010, that addresses regional haze for the first implementation period. This plan was submitted to meet the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 169A and 169B that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing man-made impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas. EPA is proposing to: (1) Approve portions of this SIP submittal as meeting most of the requirements of the regional haze program, (2) propose a limited approval and limited disapproval of the SO2 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) determination for Intalco Aluminum Corp. (Intalco) potline operation and propose a federal ``Better than BART'' alternative, and (3) propose to disapprove the NOx BART determination for five BART emission units at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing refinery (Tesoro) and propose a federal Better than BART alternative. This combined rule package of proposed SIP approved elements and proposed federal elements will meet the requirements of CAA sections 169A and 169B. On August 20, 2012, EPA approved those provisions of the Washington SIP addressing the BART determination for TransAlta Centralia Generation L.L.C. coal fired power plant (TransAlta).
76 FR 10544 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans, State of Louisiana
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-25
..., were submitted by the State of Louisiana, and include formatting changes, regulatory wording changes... available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning Section (6PD- L), Environmental Protection...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-01
... Financial Reporting Forms for Mandatory Grant Programs AGENCY: Office of Administration (OA), ACF, HHS... Tribal plans, and program and financial reporting forms for mandatory grant programs to ACF's Online Data... mandatory grant programs will be required to submit State plans, and programmatic and financial reporting...
75 FR 24542 - Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-05
... by the State of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecology). These revisions pertain to the... maintenance plan. On January 17, 2007, EPA received a request from Ecology to approve under section 110 of the... about the SIP revisions Ecology has submitted for approval. The TSD is available for review as part of...
78 FR 11888 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-20
..., emergency department visits, school or work days missed, and limitations on activity due to asthma. The AIRS... implementation in 2010 AIRS, and technical assistance provided by NCEH staff, has provided states with uniform... NCEH asthma program (e.g., how many states have asthma interventions targeting schools, how many...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-01
... Coke Calcining Operations-- 01/18/11 06/20/11 Oxides of Sulfur. SJVUAPCD Synthesized Pharmaceutical.... (a) * * * (6) * * * (ix) Petroleum Coke Calcining Operations--Oxides of Sulfur submitted on June 20...
Beemsterboer Section 114 Information Request - Nov. 15, 2013
Letter requiring Beemsterboer Slag Corporation to submit emissions data from its petroleum coke (petcoke) facility at 2900 East 100th St. in Chicago, IL; to determine compliance with the Clean Air Act and Illinois State Implementation Plan.
77 FR 11748 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
... and non-substantive in nature. Immediate notice of this action in the Federal Register benefits the...) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-20
...EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Kansas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Kansas on July 27, 2010. The revision includes two new rules which implement restrictions on the idling of heavy duty diesel vehicles and reduce nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions at stationary sources in the Kansas portion of the Kansas City Maintenance Area for ozone. EPA is approving this revision because the standards and requirements set by the rules will strengthen the Kansas SIP. EPA's approval of this SIP revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
SU-E-P-03: Implementing a Low Dose Lung Screening CT Program Meeting Regulatory Requirements
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
LaFrance, M; Marsh, S; O'Donnell, G
Purpose: To provide information pertaining to IROC Houston QA Center's (RPC) credentialing process for institutions participating in NCI-sponsored clinical trials. Purpose: Provide guidance to the Radiology Departments with the intent of implementing a Low Dose CT Screening Program using different CT Scanners with multiple techniques within the framework of the required state regulations. Method: State Requirements for the purpose of implementing a Low Dose CT Lung Protocol required working with the Radiology and Pulmonary Department in setting up a Low Dose Screening Protocol designed to reduce the radiation burden to the patients enrolled. Radiation dose measurements (CTDIvol) for various CTmore » manufacturers (Siemens16, Siemens 64, Philips 64, and Neusoft128) for three different weight based protocols. All scans were reviewed by the Radiologist. Prior to starting a low dose lung screening protocol, information had to be submitted to the state for approval. Performing a Healing Arts protocol requires extensive information. This not only includes name and address of the applicant but a detailed description of the disease, the x-ray examination and the population to be examined. The unit had to be tested by a qualified expert using the technique charts. The credentials of all the operators, the supervisors and the Radiologists had to be submitted to the state. Results: All the appropriate documentation was sent to the state for review. The measured results between the Low Dose Protocol versus the default Adult Chest Protocol showed that there was a dose reduction of 65% for small (100-150 lb.) patient, 75% for the Medium patient (151-250 lbs.), and a 55% reduction for the Large patient ( over 250 lbs.). Conclusion: Measured results indicated that the Low Dose Protocol indeed lowered the screening patient's radiation dose and the institution was able to submit the protocol to the State's regulators.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-19
... Register on September 6, 2011 and concerns oxides of nitrogen (NO X ) emissions from biomass fuel-fired... SIP. Rule Rule title Amended Submitted PCAPCD 233 Biomass Boilers 12/10/09 05/17/10 We proposed a... emission limits for biomass boilers found in Section 301 implement RACT. Our proposed action contains more...
KCBX Section 114 Information Request - Nov. 15, 2013
Letter requiring KCBX Terminals Company to submit emissions data from its petroleum coke (petcoke) facility at 3259 East 100th St. in Chicago, IL; in order to determine compliance with the Clean Air Act and Illinois State Implementation Plan.
44 CFR 78.3 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... HOMELAND SECURITY INSURANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION National Flood Insurance Program FLOOD MITIGATION... each State through the annual Cooperative Agreements; (2) Approve Flood Mitigation Plans in accordance... Planning and Projects Grants; (2) Prepare and submit the Flood Mitigation Plan; (3) Implement all approved...
44 CFR 78.3 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... HOMELAND SECURITY INSURANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION National Flood Insurance Program FLOOD MITIGATION... each State through the annual Cooperative Agreements; (2) Approve Flood Mitigation Plans in accordance... Planning and Projects Grants; (2) Prepare and submit the Flood Mitigation Plan; (3) Implement all approved...
44 CFR 78.3 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... HOMELAND SECURITY INSURANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION National Flood Insurance Program FLOOD MITIGATION... each State through the annual Cooperative Agreements; (2) Approve Flood Mitigation Plans in accordance... Planning and Projects Grants; (2) Prepare and submit the Flood Mitigation Plan; (3) Implement all approved...
44 CFR 78.3 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... HOMELAND SECURITY INSURANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION National Flood Insurance Program FLOOD MITIGATION... each State through the annual Cooperative Agreements; (2) Approve Flood Mitigation Plans in accordance... Planning and Projects Grants; (2) Prepare and submit the Flood Mitigation Plan; (3) Implement all approved...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-10
... for parallel processing and re-submitted in final form as part of the State's September 17, 2012... characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about... the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-03
... violations of the NAAQS: `` * * * [h]owever, as a reflection of emission levels, the relatively (to the 1997..., even if the WRAP presentation submitted by the commenter were technically sound, the conclusion drawn... Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Wall v. U.S. EPA, 265 F.3d 426, 436 (6th Cir. 2001...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-06
... www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system... because the heads of Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) and the Maryland Public Service... SIP Revision On August 14, 2013, the State of Maryland, through MDE, submitted a SIP revision ( 13-03B...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-13
... Proposed Action on SIP Revisions V. Summary of EPA's Proposed Action VI. Statutory and Executive Order... Program, unless the context indicates otherwise. (xi) The initials SIP mean or refer to State... September 23, 2011 the State of Montana submitted new rules and revisions to revise the Montana SIP. The...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-27
... ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) that were submitted as part of the supplement, in conjunction...] that volatile organic compounds and NH 3 are not PM 2.5 precursors, as subpart 4 expressly governs...
44 CFR 78.3 - Responsibilities.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... SECURITY INSURANCE AND HAZARD MITIGATION National Flood Insurance Program FLOOD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE § 78... State through the annual Cooperative Agreements; (2) Approve Flood Mitigation Plans in accordance with... Planning and Projects Grants; (2) Prepare and submit the Flood Mitigation Plan; (3) Implement all approved...
2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Implementation Actions
Read about the EPA's infrastructure actions for the 2008 lead NAAQS. These actions are regarding states' failure to submit SIPs addressing various parts of the standards. Here you can read the federal register notices, fact sheets, and the docket folder.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-28
... has withdrawn its May 30, 2008 adequacy finding of the 2010 particulate matter of ten microns or less... particulate matter of ten microns or less (PM-10) motor vehicle emission budget (MVEB) for the Maricopa County...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-23
... contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment... information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your... (VOCs), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), smoke and odors. A summary of the regulations which the State...
45 CFR 261.62 - What must a State do to verify the accuracy of its work participation information?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
..., DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ENSURING THAT RECIPIENTS WORK How Do We Ensure the Accuracy of Work... internal controls to ensure compliance with the procedures; and (5) Submit to the Secretary for approval... countable work activity; and (5) A description of the internal controls that the State has implemented to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-09
... micrometers (PM 10 ) submitted by the State of Alaska on May 8, 2009 for the Mendenhall Valley nonattainment area (Mendenhall Valley NAA), and the State's request to redesignate the area to attainment for the... comments. Email: [email protected] Mail: Mr. Keith Rose, U.S. EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-12
... such shorter period as EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2) lists the specific infrastructure elements... Act (Act) requires that each state adopt and submit to EPA, within 3 years (or such shorter time... Tailoring Rule because the State does not have the authority to apply the meaning of the term ``subject to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-22
... this does not appear to be an error in the modeling system.'' \\9\\ Finally, the commenter argued that... flawed, WG concludes, because EPA identifies maintenance areas likely to exist by 2012 and does not... all 1. Introduction submitted: 6/14/ clarifications: 2. Legal Authority 73; 2/19/74; 6/ 3/2/76; 41 FR...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... elected officials: (1) By submitting a waiver plan which may accompany the State's WIA 5-year strategic... waiver and how those goals relate to the Strategic Plan goals; (2) Describes the actions that the State... outcomes and to implement other appropriate measures to ensure accountability. (f) The Secretary will issue...
Compilation of Abstracts of Theses Submitted by Candidates for Degrees.
1986-09-30
Musitano, J.R. Fin-line Horn Antennas 118 LCDR, USNR Muth, L.R. VLSI Tutorials Through the 119 LT, USN Video -computer Courseware Implementation...Engineer Allocation 432 CPT, USA Model Kiziltan, M. Cognitive Performance Degrada- 433 LTJG, Turkish Navy tion on Sonar Operator and Tor- pedo Data...and Computer Engineering 118 VLSI TUTORIALS THROUGH THE VIDEO -COMPUTER COURSEWARE IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM Liesel R. Muth Lieutenant, United States Navy
40 CFR 52.1219 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1219 Identification of plan—conditional approval. (a) On November 12, 1993, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision request to Minnesota's carbon monoxide SIP for approval of the State's basic inspection...
40 CFR 52.1219 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1219 Identification of plan—conditional approval. (a) On November 12, 1993, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision request to Minnesota's carbon monoxide SIP for approval of the State's basic inspection...
40 CFR 52.1219 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1219 Identification of plan—conditional approval. (a) On November 12, 1993, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision request to Minnesota's carbon monoxide SIP for approval of the State's basic inspection...
40 CFR 52.1219 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1219 Identification of plan—conditional approval. (a) On November 12, 1993, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision request to Minnesota's carbon monoxide SIP for approval of the State's basic inspection...
40 CFR 52.1219 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Minnesota § 52.1219 Identification of plan—conditional approval. (a) On November 12, 1993, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision request to Minnesota's carbon monoxide SIP for approval of the State's basic inspection...
75 FR 80056 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-21
... Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), DBS implemented a standalone survey designed to monitor mental... additional questions taken from standardized scales or from other surveys designed to measure anxiety... Surveillance (DBS) Gulf States Population Survey--New--Public Health Surveillance Program Office (PHSPO...
40 CFR 62.10100 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS South Carolina... Identification of plan. (a) Identification of plan. South Carolina Designated Facility Plan (Section 111(d) Plan). (b) The plan was officially submitted as follows: (1) Implementation Plan for Control of Designated...
40 CFR 52.56 - Review of new sources and modifications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
.... 52.56 Section 52.56 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.56 Review of new... and modifications in nonattainment areas are approved on condition that the State submit any necessary...
40 CFR 52.56 - Review of new sources and modifications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
.... 52.56 Section 52.56 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.56 Review of new... and modifications in nonattainment areas are approved on condition that the State submit any necessary...
40 CFR 52.56 - Review of new sources and modifications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
.... 52.56 Section 52.56 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.56 Review of new... and modifications in nonattainment areas are approved on condition that the State submit any necessary...
DOT National Transportation Integrated Search
1997-11-01
In response to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), areas designated as being in violation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) were required to submit State Implementation Plans (SIPs) beginning with 1990 Base Year Emissions In...
40 CFR 52.1391 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Emission inventories. 52.1391 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Montana § 52.1391 Emission inventories. (a) The Governor of the State of Montana submitted the 1990 carbon monoxide base year emission inventories...
40 CFR 52.348 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Colorado Springs, Denver/Longmont, and Fort Collins nonattainment areas on December 31, 1992, as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Governor submitted revisions to the Colorado Springs and... Emission Inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as revisions to the Colorado...
40 CFR 52.348 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... Colorado Springs, Denver/Longmont, and Fort Collins nonattainment areas on December 31, 1992, as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Governor submitted revisions to the Colorado Springs and... Emission Inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as revisions to the Colorado...
40 CFR 52.348 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... Colorado Springs, Denver/Longmont, and Fort Collins nonattainment areas on December 31, 1992, as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Governor submitted revisions to the Colorado Springs and... Emission Inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as revisions to the Colorado...
40 CFR 52.348 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Colorado Springs, Denver/Longmont, and Fort Collins nonattainment areas on December 31, 1992, as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Governor submitted revisions to the Colorado Springs and... Emission Inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as revisions to the Colorado...
40 CFR 52.348 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... Colorado Springs, Denver/Longmont, and Fort Collins nonattainment areas on December 31, 1992, as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Governor submitted revisions to the Colorado Springs and... Emission Inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as revisions to the Colorado...
77 FR 34953 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-12
... needs assessment similar to the assessment required for all States under the legislation and (2... 5-year cooperative agreements to conduct community needs assessments, plan for and implement (in... Childhood Home Visiting Program Guidance for Submitting a Needs Assessment and Plan for Responding to...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Schofer, Richard C.; And Others
A handbook to assist states in fulfilling requirements of Public Law 94-142 to provide a Comprehensive System of Personnel Development (CSPD) for special education staff is presented. The handbook is intended to help writers develop, review, update, and implement the CSPD, which is one section of the state plan submitted to the federal government.…
40 CFR 52.1132 - Control strategy: Carbon Monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon Monoxide. 52... strategy: Carbon Monoxide. (a) Approval—On November 13, 1992, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year...
40 CFR 52.1534 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1534... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the New Hampshire Department... revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the one-hour ozone attainment demonstration requirements of...
40 CFR 52.1129 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1129... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department...) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment...
40 CFR 52.1129 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1129... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department...) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment...
40 CFR 52.1534 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1534... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the New Hampshire Department... revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the one-hour ozone attainment demonstration requirements of...
40 CFR 52.1129 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1129... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department...) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment...
40 CFR 52.1129 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1129... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department...) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment...
40 CFR 52.1129 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1129... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department...) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment...
40 CFR 52.1534 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1534... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the New Hampshire Department... revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the one-hour ozone attainment demonstration requirements of...
40 CFR 52.1534 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1534... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the New Hampshire Department... revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the one-hour ozone attainment demonstration requirements of...
40 CFR 52.1534 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.1534... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the New Hampshire Department... revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the one-hour ozone attainment demonstration requirements of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-24
... Determination To Defer Sanctions; California; South Coast Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental... Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) published... California submitted the ``South Coast Air Quality Management District Proposed Contingency Measures for the...
40 CFR 142.22 - Review of State variances, exemptions and schedules.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... (CONTINUED) WATER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTATION Review of...) Not later than 18 months after the effective date of the interim national primary drinking water... scientific matters bearing on such variances and exemptions), and (2) advise of the opportunity to submit...
40 CFR 52.1036 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Emission inventories. 52.1036 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Maine § 52.1036 Emission inventories. (a) The Governor's designee for the State of Maine submitted 1990 base year emission inventories for the Knox and...
40 CFR 52.384 - Emission inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Emission inventories. 52.384 Section 52...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Connecticut § 52.384 Emission inventories. (a) The Governor's designee for the State of Connecticut submitted the 1990 base year emission inventories for the...
40 CFR 52.993 - Emissions inventories.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Emissions inventories. 52.993 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Louisiana § 52.993 Emissions inventories. (a) The Governor of the State of Louisiana submitted the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Baton Rouge...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-20
...-Hour Fine Particulate Standard for the Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle-York, Allentown, Johnstown, and...: EPA is proposing to determine that the Harrisburg-Lebanon- Carlisle-York, Allentown, Johnstown, and... before February 21, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments regarding the two-state Harrisburg- Lebanon...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-27
...EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of permitting rules submitted for the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on May 19, 2011 and concern New Source Review (NSR) permit programs for new and modified major stationary sources of air pollution. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-15
... redesignation. The maintenance plan includes an insignificance determination for the on-road motor vehicle... and Approval of the Associated Maintenance Plan AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION... proposing to approve the maintenance plan SIP revision that the State submitted in conjunction with its...
40 CFR 52.1373 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52...: Carbon monoxide. (a) On July 8, 1997, the Governor of Montana submitted revisions to the SIP narrative for the Missoula carbon monoxide control plan. (b) Revisions to the Montana State Implementation Plan...
40 CFR 52.1185 - Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Carbon monoxide. 52...: Carbon monoxide. (a) Approval—On November 24, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan. The submittal pertained to a plan for...
40 CFR 52.66 - Control Strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control Strategy: Ozone. 52.66 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.66 Control Strategy: Ozone. (a) The redesignation request submitted by the State of Alabama, on March 16, 1995 for the Birmingham marginal ozone...
40 CFR 52.66 - Control Strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control Strategy: Ozone. 52.66 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.66 Control Strategy: Ozone. (a) The redesignation request submitted by the State of Alabama, on March 16, 1995 for the Birmingham marginal ozone...
40 CFR 52.2088 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 5 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2088... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Rhode Island Department of...) of the Clean Air Act, for the Providence serious ozone nonattainment area. (b) Approval—Revisions to...
40 CFR 52.66 - Control Strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control Strategy: Ozone. 52.66 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.66 Control Strategy: Ozone. (a) The redesignation request submitted by the State of Alabama, on March 16, 1995 for the Birmingham marginal ozone...
40 CFR 52.2088 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2088... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Rhode Island Department of...) of the Clean Air Act, for the Providence serious ozone nonattainment area. (b) Approval—Revisions to...
40 CFR 52.66 - Control Strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control Strategy: Ozone. 52.66 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.66 Control Strategy: Ozone. (a) The redesignation request submitted by the State of Alabama, on March 16, 1995 for the Birmingham marginal ozone...
40 CFR 52.2088 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 5 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2088... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Rhode Island Department of...) of the Clean Air Act, for the Providence serious ozone nonattainment area. (b) Approval—Revisions to...
40 CFR 52.2088 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 4 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2088... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Rhode Island Department of...) of the Clean Air Act, for the Providence serious ozone nonattainment area. (b) Approval—Revisions to...
40 CFR 52.2088 - Control strategy: Ozone.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 5 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control strategy: Ozone. 52.2088... strategy: Ozone. (a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Rhode Island Department of...) of the Clean Air Act, for the Providence serious ozone nonattainment area. (b) Approval—Revisions to...
40 CFR 52.2732 - Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... (CONTINUED) Puerto Rico § 52.2732 Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program. On November 16, 1992, the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board submitted a plan for the... Assistance Program for incorporation in the Puerto Rico state implementation plan. This plan meets the...
40 CFR 52.2732 - Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) Puerto Rico § 52.2732 Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program. On November 16, 1992, the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board submitted a plan for the... Assistance Program for incorporation in the Puerto Rico state implementation plan. This plan meets the...
40 CFR 52.2732 - Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) Puerto Rico § 52.2732 Small business technical and environmental compliance assistance program. On November 16, 1992, the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board submitted a plan for the... Assistance Program for incorporation in the Puerto Rico state implementation plan. This plan meets the...
The Many Sides of Academic Dishonesty Sanctions
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Beasley, Eric Matthew
2012-01-01
In the fall of 2009, Michigan State University (MSU) implemented a new policy regarding reports of undergraduate academic dishonesty. Under the new system, instructors are required to submit an academic dishonesty report for any student that they penalize for violations of academic integrity, and these students are placed into a remediation class…
Adaptive control of anaerobic digestion processes-a pilot-scale application.
Renard, P; Dochain, D; Bastin, G; Naveau, H; Nyns, E J
1988-03-01
A simple adaptive control algorithm, for which theoretical stability and convergence properties had been previously demonstrated, has been successfully implemented on a biomethanation pilot reactor. The methane digester, operated in the CSTR mode was submitted to a shock load, and successfully computer controlled during the subsequent transitory state.
7 CFR 272.2 - Plan of operation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 60 days prior to implementation. Minor changes to approved sampling plans shall be submitted at least...) further agree to fully comply with any changes in Federal law and regulations. This agreement may be... the United States shall, on the grounds of sex, race, color, age, political belief, religion, handicap...
25 CFR 83.12 - Implementation of decisions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... the requirements of § 83.7(e) and maintaining significant social and political ties with the tribe (i.e., maintaining the same relationship with the tribe as those on the list submitted with the group's... government-to-government relationship with the United States. It shall also have the responsibilities and...
77 FR 1414 - Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Alaska
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-10
... the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or... section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through... revision submitted by Alaska included a technical analysis using EPA approved models and methods to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-29
... Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Finding of Failure To Submit State Implementation Plan Revisions Required for Greenhouse Gases AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The EPA is... Deterioration (PSD) requirements to greenhouse gas (GHG)-emitting sources. By notice dated December 13, 2010...
40 CFR 52.465 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... Castle County Portion of the Delaware State Implementation Plan, covering changes to the air pollution... Control of Air Pollution submitted on September 22, 1981 by the Secretary, Department of Natural Resources... Table I(a) to Regulation Number XXIV of the Delaware Regulations Governing the Control of Air Pollution...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-17
... Washington State Department of Ecology on February 4, 2005 and August 2, 2006. The submissions contain... Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted revisions to the Washington SIP to incorporate regulatory changes..., disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under...
40 CFR 51.1007 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... requirements. 51.1007 Section 51.1007 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR... Implementation of PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards § 51.1007 Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements. (a) For any area designated as nonattainment for the PM2.5 NAAQS, the State must submit an...
40 CFR 51.1007 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... requirements. 51.1007 Section 51.1007 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR... Implementation of PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards § 51.1007 Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements. (a) For any area designated as nonattainment for the PM2.5 NAAQS, the State must submit an...
40 CFR 51.1007 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... requirements. 51.1007 Section 51.1007 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR... Implementation of PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards § 51.1007 Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements. (a) For any area designated as nonattainment for the PM2.5 NAAQS, the State must submit an...
40 CFR 51.1007 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... requirements. 51.1007 Section 51.1007 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) AIR... Implementation of PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards § 51.1007 Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements. (a) For any area designated as nonattainment for the PM2.5 NAAQS, the State must submit an...
40 CFR 52.1470 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Highway 50 Corridor Study, June 1979 (Appendix C); (D) Reference from Transportation and Traffic... submitted on May 5, 1983 by the State: (i) “Stateline, Nevada, 1983 Carbon Monoxide Study”—a traffic... Implementation Plan, Post 1982 Update for Ozone adopted on October 16, 1984 (including section 33 (Chlorine in...
40 CFR 52.1470 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Highway 50 Corridor Study, June 1979 (Appendix C); (D) Reference from Transportation and Traffic... submitted on May 5, 1983 by the State: (i) “Stateline, Nevada, 1983 Carbon Monoxide Study”—a traffic... Implementation Plan, Post 1982 Update for Ozone adopted on October 16, 1984 (including section 33 (Chlorine in...
40 CFR 52.58 - Control strategy: Lead.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Control strategy: Lead. 52.58 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.58 Control strategy: Lead. The lead plan... the lead standard throughout Alabama. The lead plan submitted by the State on October 7, 1985, and...
40 CFR 52.58 - Control strategy: Lead.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Control strategy: Lead. 52.58 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.58 Control strategy: Lead. The lead plan... the lead standard throughout Alabama. The lead plan submitted by the State on October 7, 1985, and...
40 CFR 52.58 - Control strategy: Lead.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Control strategy: Lead. 52.58 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.58 Control strategy: Lead. The lead plan... the lead standard throughout Alabama. The lead plan submitted by the State on October 7, 1985, and...
40 CFR 52.58 - Control strategy: Lead.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Control strategy: Lead. 52.58 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.58 Control strategy: Lead. The lead plan... the lead standard throughout Alabama. The lead plan submitted by the State on October 7, 1985, and...
40 CFR 52.58 - Control strategy: Lead.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 40 Protection of Environment 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Control strategy: Lead. 52.58 Section...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Alabama § 52.58 Control strategy: Lead. The lead plan... the lead standard throughout Alabama. The lead plan submitted by the State on October 7, 1985, and...
78 FR 16790 - Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Idaho
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-19
... residue disposal requirements and establish a streamlined permitting process for spot burns, baled... process for spot burns, baled agricultural residue burns, and propane flaming. The submitted revisions... where the document begins] 624 Spot Burn, Baled 7/1/11 3/19/13 Agricultural Residue [Insert page number...
75 FR 10444 - Nuclear Energy Institute; Denial of Petition for Rulemaking
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-08
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 73 [Docket No. PRM-73-14; NRC-2009-0493] Nuclear Energy... (PRM) submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) (the petitioner). The petitioner requested that... rulemaking. The petitioner states that the nuclear energy industry has fully implemented numerous new...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-31
... Supplement (DFARS) to implement the United States--Panama Trade Promotion Agreement. This Trade Promotion...--Panama Trade Promotion Agreement. No respondents submitted public comments in response to the interim... effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-15
...EPA is taking final action to disapprove submittals from the State of Texas, through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), to revise the Texas Major and Minor NSR SIP. We are disapproving the submittals because they do not meet the 2002 revised Major NSR SIP requirements. We are also disapproving the submittals as not meeting the Major Nonattainment NSR SIP requirements for implementation of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is disapproving the submitted Standard Permit (SP) for Pollution Control Projects (PCP) because it does not meet the requirements of the CAA for a minor NSR Standard Permit program. Finally, EPA is also disapproving a submitted severable definition of best available control technology (BACT) that is used by TCEQ in its Minor NSR SIP permitting program. EPA is not addressing the submitted revisions concerning the Texas Major PSD NSR SIP, which will be addressed in a separate action. EPA is taking no action on severable provisions that implement section 112(g) of the Act and is restoring a clarification to an earlier action that removed an explanation that a particular provision is not in the SIP because it implements section 112(g) of the Act. EPA is not addressing severable revisions to definitions submitted June 10, 2005, submittal, which will be addressed in a separate action. We are taking no action on a severable provision relating to Emergency and Temporary Orders, which we will address in a separate action. EPA is taking these actions under section 110, part C, and part D, of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-19
...EPA is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of permitting rules submitted for the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The districts are required under Part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to adopt and implement a SIP-approved New Source Review (NSR) permit program. These rules update and revise the District's NSR permitting program for new and modified sources of air pollution. If EPA finalizes the limited approval and limited disapproval action, as proposed, then a sanctions clock would be triggered. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-04
...On December 26, 2012 the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) submitted a request for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to approve the redesignation of the New Jersey portion of the New York-N.New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ- CT nonattainment area, and the New Jersey portion of the Philadelphia- Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE nonattainment area, from nonattainment to attainment for the 1997 annual and the 2006 24-hour Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In conjunction with its redesignation request, New Jersey submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision containing a maintenance plan for the areas that provides for continued maintenance of the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The submittals included the 2007 ammonia (NH3), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOX), direct PM2.5 and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions inventories submitted to meet the comprehensive emissions inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), and accompanying motor vehicle emissions budgets. EPA is taking final action to approve the requested SIP revisions and to redesignate the New Jersey portions of the New York- N.New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT nonattainment area, and the Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE nonattainment area, to attainment for the 1997 annual and the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
Guidelines and Suggestions for Balloon Gondola Design
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Franco, Hugo
2017-01-01
This paper discusses the current gondola design requirements for the Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility (CSBF). The CSBF is responsible for launching and supporting balloon borne scientific instruments and has some current updated guidelines that will be discussed in this presentation. As the sophistication of Payload systems have increased in size and complexity new guidelines have been implemented in order to make these instruments stay within the acceptable launch risks. Additionally, there is a requirement to submit a proper stress analysis report that states the flight design requirements have been met. Suggestions are discussed in this presentation that establish the proper guidelines to submit these.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-10
... Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). This change to Allegheny County's Air Pollution Control Rules... Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final.... http://www.regulations.gov . Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. B. E-mail: cox...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-20
... 12866. J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Section 12(d) of the National Technology... Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-10
... instructions for submitting comments. Email: ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov . Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the.... FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency....crystal@epa.gov . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-19
... submitting comments. Email: ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov . Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual.... FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency....crystal@epa.gov . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-22
... maintenance plan update is for the Charlotte, Raleigh/Durham and Winston-Salem carbon monoxide (CO) maintenance areas. Specifically, the State submitted a limited maintenance plan update for CO, showing continued attainment of the 8-hour CO National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Charlotte, Raleigh...
40 CFR 52.1977 - Content of approved State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
...) Division 28—Stationary Source Air Pollution Control and Permitting Procedures Excess Emissions and... Requirements (11/4/93) 28-1450Enforcement Action Criteria (9/24/93) Division 200—General Air Pollution... Designations (10/14/99) 204-0090Oxygenated Gasoline Control Areas (3/27/01) Division 206—Air Pollution...
40 CFR 52.1977 - Content of approved State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...) Division 28—Stationary Source Air Pollution Control and Permitting Procedures Excess Emissions and... Requirements (11/4/93) 28-1450Enforcement Action Criteria (9/24/93) Division 200—General Air Pollution... Designations (10/14/99) 204-0090Oxygenated Gasoline Control Areas (3/27/01) Division 206—Air Pollution...
40 CFR 52.1977 - Content of approved State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
...) Division 28—Stationary Source Air Pollution Control and Permitting Procedures Excess Emissions and... Requirements (11/4/93) 28-1450Enforcement Action Criteria (9/24/93) Division 200—General Air Pollution... Designations (10/14/99) 204-0090Oxygenated Gasoline Control Areas (3/27/01) Division 206—Air Pollution...
40 CFR 52.1977 - Content of approved State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
...) Division 28—Stationary Source Air Pollution Control and Permitting Procedures Excess Emissions and... Requirements (11/4/93) 28-1450Enforcement Action Criteria (9/24/93) Division 200—General Air Pollution... Designations (10/14/99) 204-0090Oxygenated Gasoline Control Areas (3/27/01) Division 206—Air Pollution...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-15
..., 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General..., Chicago, IL 60604. EPA Region VI: Guy Donaldson, Chief, Arkansas, Louisiana, New Air Planning Section, EPA... Technology Transfer and Advancement Act J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-22
... applies to emissions of volatile organic matter (VOM) from Greif's fiber drum container manufacturing facility. VOM, as defined by the State of Illinois, is identical to volatile organic compound, as defined... Environmental Protection Agency submitted to EPA for approval an adjustment to the general rule, Organic...
40 CFR 49.24 - Federal Implementation Plan Provisions for Navajo Generating Station, Navajo Nation.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... in a log. (f) Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Unless otherwise stated all requests, reports... shall be submitted to the Director, Navajo Environmental Protection Agency, P.O. Box 339, Window Rock... to the Director, Navajo Environmental Protection Agency, by mail to: P.O. Box 339, Window Rock...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-02
...) State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions, submitted on May 6, 2013 by the Texas Commission on... effective August 19, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The essential information in this notice will be... to EPA. The word ``budget(s)'' refers to the mobile source emissions budget for volatile organic...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-04-17
... (SIP) revision submitted by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control... as a direct final rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial submittal... received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a...
40 CFR 96.257 - Closing of general accounts.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) NOX BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM AND CAIR NOX AND SO2 TRADING PROGRAMS FOR STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLANS CAIR SO2 Allowance Tracking System § 96.257 Closing of general accounts. (a) The CAIR authorized..., which shall include a correctly submitted allowance transfer under §§ 96.260 and 96.261 for any CAIR SO2...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-05
... that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations... adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The Five Percent Plan for PM-10 in the Maricopa County..., the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-04
... Rule). The 2008 Final Rule implemented an attestation-based application process and made several... applications for occupations involved in sheepherding and goatherding to reflect organizational changes, in... State based on the wage rate findings submitted by an adjoining or proximate SWA for the same or similar...
78 FR 54652 - Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-05
... Programs'' survey among a representative sample of local and state health departments implementing FSPs in... descriptive data on the current status and activities, to describe changes in status and activities from 2007... between different levels of funding and FSP effectiveness in the U.S. The evaluation survey will take...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
...EPA is proposing approval of a revision to the New Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) on January 29, 2010, with supplemental submittals on January 14, 2011, and August 26, 2011, that addresses regional haze for the first planning period from 2008 through 2018. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require States to prevent any future, and remedy any existing, manmade impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas.
78 FR 68377 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Ohio NOX
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-14
...On November 15, 2010, Ohio EPA submitted to EPA revisions to Ohio OAC 3745-14. EPA is proposing to approve these revisions under the Clean Air Act, which allows for Ohio's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) NOX Ozone Season Trading Program rules to supersede Ohio's nitrogen oxides (NOX) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Call Budget Trading Program rules, but leave other requirements of the NOX SIP Call in place for units not covered by CAIR.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-29
...Under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is proposing to correct our May 2004 final approval of revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District portion of the California State Implementation Plan. EPA is also proposing to take action on three amended District rules, one of which was submitted on March 7, 2008 and the other two of which were submitted on March 17, 2009. Two of the submitted rules reflect revisions to approved District rules that provide for review of new and modified stationary sources (``new source review'' or NSR) within the District, and the third reflects revisions to an approved District rule that provides a mechanism by which existing stationary sources may be exempt from the requirement to secure a Federally-mandated operating permit. The NSR rule revisions relate to exemptions from permitting and from offsets for certain agricultural operations, to the establishment of NSR applicability and offset thresholds consistent with a classification of ``extreme'' nonattainment for the ozone standard, and to the implementation of EPA's NSR Reform Rules. With respect to the revised District NSR rules, EPA is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval because, although the changes would strengthen the SIP, there are deficiencies in enforceability that prevent full approval. With respect to the operating permit rule, EPA is proposing a full approval. Lastly, EPA is proposing to rescind certain obsolete permitting requirements from the District portion of the California plan. If EPA were to finalize the limited approval and limited disapproval action, as proposed, then a sanctions clock, and EPA's obligation to promulgate a Federal implementation plan, would be triggered because certain revisions to the District rules that are the subject of this action are required under anti-backsliding principles established for the transition from the 1-hour to the 8-hour ozone standard.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-08
...EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of California on November 17, 2007, to address the ``transport SIP'' provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards) and the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA requires that each SIP contain, among other things, adequate measures prohibiting emissions of air pollutants in amounts which will interfere with any other State's measures required under title I, part C of the CAA to prevent significant deterioration of air quality. EPA is approving California's SIP revision with respect to those Districts that implement SIP- approved permit programs meeting the approval criteria and simultaneously disapproving California's SIP revision with respect to those Districts that do not implement SIP-approved permit programs meeting the approval criteria, as discussed in our May 31, 2011 proposed rule (76 FR 31263).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
...EPA is taking final action to approve the December 10, 2007, submission by the State of Alabama, through the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) as demonstrating that the State meets the state implementation plan (SIP) requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. Alabama certified that the Alabama SIP contains provisions that ensure the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and maintained in Alabama (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). Alabama's infrastructure submission, provided to EPA on December 10, 2007, addressed all the required infrastructure elements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Additionally, EPA is responding to adverse comments received on EPA's March 17, 2011, proposed approval of Alabama's December 10, 2007, infrastructure submission.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-23
...-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION... ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit... National Ambient Air Quality Standards.'' \\1\\ Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are not governed...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-26
... Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act J... Advancement Act Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public..., install and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating and verifying...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-04
... concerns volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from brandy and wine aging operations. We are approving... Submitted SJVUAPCD 4695 Brandy Aging and Wine Aging 09/17/09 05/17/10 Operations. We proposed to approve...) * * * (2) Rule 4695, ``Brandy Aging and Wine Aging Operations'' adopted on September 17, 2010...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-18
... submitted by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated November 28, 2012, to establish motor...)(5)(iii)). On November 28, 2012, Ecology requested that the EPA establish MVEBs for PM 2.5 and... in this case. Therefore, Ecology requested that MVEBs be established for on-road emissions of direct...
76 FR 17599 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Kansas
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-30
... strategies to reduce air pollution. KDHE submits a 5-Year Ambient Air Monitoring Network Assessment to EPA... control of air pollution with the Secretary of Health and Environment (``Secretary''). The Secretary in... pollution is defined in KSA Section 65-3002(c) as the presence in the outdoor atmosphere of one or more air...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-06
.... or until all parties present have had the opportunity to speak. EPA shall maintain a Web site at http... or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an... viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY...
40 CFR 52.1638 - Bernalillo County particulate matter (PM10) Group II SIP commitments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... (CONTINUED) New Mexico § 52.1638 Bernalillo County particulate matter (PM10) Group II SIP commitments. (a) On December 7, 1988, the Governor of New Mexico submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP... SIPs. The City of Albuquerque and Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board adopted this SIP revision...
40 CFR 52.1638 - Bernalillo County particulate matter (PM10) Group II SIP commitments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... (CONTINUED) New Mexico § 52.1638 Bernalillo County particulate matter (PM10) Group II SIP commitments. (a) On December 7, 1988, the Governor of New Mexico submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP... SIPs. The City of Albuquerque and Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board adopted this SIP revision...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-05
... Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) regulatory changes that strengthen the control measures... Standard (NAAQS) on August 7, 1987 (52 FR 29383). Ecology and ORCAA worked with the communities of Lacey... requirements imposed by the 1990 CAA Amendments, Ecology submitted a supplement to the attainment plan in...
Library Staff Development Workshops in an Urban University. A Project Report.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Harris, Jamie L.; Meeker, Robert B.
This set of materials reports the needs assessment and implementation of a library staff development project funded by a Chicago State University grant. Because of the limited opportunity provided for all library personnel to improve their job skills, a proposal for a staff development program was submitted to the university granting office. A…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-30
...: http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: [email protected] docket without change and may be made available online at http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, including... otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http:[sol][sol...
40 CFR 52.2479 - Contents of the federally approved, State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Perchloroethylene dry cleaning systems [02/19/91] 173-490-204 Graphic arts systems [02/19/91] 173-490-205 Surface...] 450 Emission Standards—Forward [04/14/93] 451 Emission of Air Contaminant—Visual Standards [10/13/94] 452 Motor Vehicle Visual Standard [04/14/93, except section .5] 455 Emission of Particulate Matter [04...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-06
... nitrogen (NO X ) emissions from biomass fuel-fired boilers. We are proposing action on a local rule that... Submitted PCAPCD 233 Biomass Boilers......... 12/10/09 05/07/10 On June 8, 2010, the submittal for PCAPCD... from biomass boilers and steam generators. EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-30
... Order Reviews I. What is the background for this action? Minnesota submitted its regional haze SIP on... thousands of pages lacked, among other things, actual NO X emission limits for taconite facilities. The... necessarily employing GCP when they were later required by Administrative Order (AO) to conduct NO X testing...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-30
... agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted SJVUAPCD 4694 Wine Fermentation and 12/15/05 11/18/11... SIP submittal of Rule 4694 (Wine Fermentation and Storage Tanks), as set forth in the strike-out... emissions from wine fermentation and storage. While EPA has not developed a CTG document for wine...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-04-10
...EPA is proposing action on four Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions. First, EPA is proposing to approve portions of two SIP submissions from the State of Missouri addressing the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1997 and 2006 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP to support implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each new or revised NAAQS promulgated by EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred to as ``infrastructure'' SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state's air quality management program are adequate to meet the state's responsibilities under the CAA. EPA is also proposing to approve two additional SIP submissions from Missouri, one addressing the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program in Missouri, and another addressing the requirements applicable to any board or body which approves permits or enforcement orders of the CAA, both of which support requirements associated with infrastructure SIPs.
75 FR 17709 - Adequacy Status of the Knoxville, Tennessee 1997 PM2.5
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-07
...In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that EPA has found that the direct particulate matter (PM2.5) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the Knoxville, Tennessee Attainment Demonstration Plan for the 1997 PM2.5 standard, submitted April 4, 2008, by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) ruled that submitted State Implementation Plans (SIPs) cannot be used for transportation conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of EPA's finding, the Knoxville, Tennessee area, including the portion of Roane County, must use the MVEBs for future conformity determinations for the 1997 PM2.5 standard.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-26
...EPA is proposing approval of a revision to the Connecticut State Implementation Plan (SIP) that addresses regional haze for the first planning period from 2008 through 2018. It was submitted by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (now known as Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, CT DEEP) on November 18, 2009, February, 24, 2012 and March 12, 2012. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require States to prevent any future, and remedy any existing, manmade impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-03
....gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact... modeling to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. States were required to submit such SIPs to EPA... on July 17, 2012. On July 6, 2011, WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club filed an amended complaint...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-07
... finalizing a determination that the Ogden City nonattainment area in Utah is currently attaining the 24-hour... monitoring data for the years 2009 through 2011. The State of Utah submitted a letter dated March 30, 2000... attaining the 24-hour PM 10 NAAQS based on certified and quality-assured data from the most recent three...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-04
... Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct... . Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. B. Email: cox[email protected] . C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0619, Kathleen Cox Associate Director, Office of Permits and Air Toxics, Mailcode 3AP10...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-09
... Ms. Gobeail McKinley, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Geographic Strategies Group, Mail... and the U.S. Region II, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New Virgin Islands. York, NY 10007-1866. Cristina... Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. EPA is making a finding of...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
North Central Technical Inst., Wausau, WI.
This final report contains the program proposal with supporting data for developing curriculum materials for and implementing an associate-degree laser technology program at the North Central Technical Institute. The proposal outline provides this information: (1) objectives for the program designed to prepare a technician to safely operate,…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-15
... Wheeling 8-hour ozone maintenance areas. This revision amends the maintenance plans' 2009 and 2018 motor... Revision and EPA's Review III. Final Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background On July... Review On March 14, 2011, the State of West Virginia submitted to EPA a formal revision to its SIP. The...
40 CFR 52.2479 - Contents of the federally approved, State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
...-087 Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) [02/19/91] 173-405-091 Special studies [02/19/91] 2... deterioration (PSD) [02/19/91] 173-410-100 Special studies [02/19/91] 2.2.415 WAC 173-415 Primary Aluminum...] 173-415-051 Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) [02/19/91] 173-415-060 Monitoring and...
40 CFR 52.2479 - Contents of the federally approved, State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
...-087 Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) [02/19/91] 173-405-091 Special studies [02/19/91] 2... deterioration (PSD) [02/19/91] 173-410-100 Special studies [02/19/91] 2.2.415 WAC 173-415 Primary Aluminum...] 173-415-051 Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) [02/19/91] 173-415-060 Monitoring and...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
... impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous... conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing to determine that the Regional Haze plan submitted by Maryland....regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-29
...) on a monthly basis and, in turn, the ITC was required to submit a report to Congress within 90 days of receiving CBP's final report. Congress also stated in the Act that, prior to January 1, 2011, CBP... Legislation and Implementing Regulations After CBP published its proposed interpretation document, Congress...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-14
... restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet... wherever any reference to ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's... the age of the facility and the impact of its emissions on the surrounding area. Texas submitted the...
Britton, Juliet; Bloom, Joseph D
2015-06-01
This article describes the State of Oregon's implementation of two programs designed to comply with federal gun laws regarding reporting individuals who have received mental health adjudications in criminal and civil courts. One mandate requires that states submit names of adjudicated individuals to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) while the second requires that the state establish a qualifying gun restoration program for those disqualified from gun ownership. In 2009, Oregon's Legislature developed an administrative approach to gun restoration and assigned the responsibility for conducting these hearing to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB). The PSRB is a state administrative board that has existed since 1977 and has been primarily focused on the supervision and treatment of adult and juvenile insanity acquittees. The gun restoration program began in 2010, but to date has only received three completed petitions requesting restoration of firearm rights. The article concludes with a discussion that surmises why very few of the Oregonians who are listed in NICS have submitted petitions for relief. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
...EPA is taking final action to approve the December 7, 2007, submission by the State of Mississippi, through the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) as demonstrating that the State meets the implementation plan (SIP) requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 1997 8- hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. Mississippi certified that the Mississippi SIP contains provisions that ensure the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and maintained in Mississippi (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). Mississippi's infrastructure submission, provided to EPA on December 7, 2007, addressed all the required infrastructure elements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Additionally, EPA is responding to adverse comments received on EPA's March 17, 2011, proposed approval of Mississippi's December 7, 2007, infrastructure submission.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-07
...EPA is proposing to approve a portion of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Oregon for the purpose of addressing the interstate transport provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards) and the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA requires that each State have adequate provisions to prohibit air emissions from adversely affecting air quality in other States through interstate transport. EPA is proposing to approve Oregon's SIP revision for the 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS as meeting the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) to prohibit emissions that will contribute significantly to nonattainment of the these standards in any other State and to prohibit emissions that will interfere with maintenance of these standards by any other State.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-09
...EPA is announcing that it has withdrawn its May 30, 2008 adequacy finding of the 2010 particulate matter of ten microns or less (PM-10) motor vehicle emission budget (MVEB) for the Maricopa County (Phoenix) Nonattainment Area. EPA has withdrawn the May 30, 2008 adequacy finding because the State of Arizona withdrew the state implementation plan (SIP) submission containing that MVEB. That SIP revision is no longer pending before EPA. On January 31, 2011, EPA sent letters to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) withdrawing the May 30, 2008 adequacy finding of the 2010 PM-10 MVEB. EPA's withdrawal of its May 30, 2008 adequacy finding means that the 2010 PM-10 MVEB is no longer available for transportation conformity purposes.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-12
...'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the... modeling to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. States were required to submit such SIPs to EPA... infrastructure elements for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS by October 3, 2008. On July 6, 2011, WildEarth Guardians and...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-18
... provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without going... body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to...), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), smoke and odors. A summary of the regulations is found below under section 110(a)(2)(C). b...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-20
... information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA... the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due... state board or body which approves permits or enforcement orders represent the public interest and do...
40 CFR 52.1977 - Content of approved State submitted implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Administration (1-86) 2.1 Agency Organization (1-86) 2.2 Legal Authority (1-86) 2.3 Resources (1-86) 2.4.../8/02 thru 4/6/03) 225-0030Procedural Requirements (7/1/01) 225-0040Air Quality Models (7/1/01) 225... Urban Growth Area 240-0100Applicability (10/14/99) 240-0110Wood Waste Boilers (7/1/01) 240-0120Veneer...
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2008
2008-01-01
In 2008, the Washington State Legislature passed HB 2722, which called for the appointment of an Advisory Committee charged with creating a plan--which, when fully implemented, will close the education gap for African American students. Beginning in May 2008, the newly appointed HB 2722 Advisory Committee took on this challenging charge. Early in…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
... furnaces and biomass boilers. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the.... Rule title Amended Submitted MDAQMD 1165 Glass Melting 08/12/08 12/23/08 Furnaces. YSAQMD 2.43 Biomass... emissions of NO X and CO from boilers that use biomass as fuel and that have a heat input rating of greater...
2009-05-27
technology network architecture to connect various DHS elements and promote information sharing.17 • Establish a DHS State, Local, and Regional...A Strategic Plan; training, and the implementation of a comprehensive information systems architecture .65 As part of its integration...information technology network architecture was submitted to Congress last year. See DHS I&A, Homeland Security Information Technology Network
Nwachukwu, Benedict U; Schairer, William W; So, Conan; Bernstein, Jaime L; Herndon, James; Dodwell, Emily R
2016-10-05
There was a dramatic increase in the volume of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) between 2009 and 2012. This resulted in increased journal administrative costs. To offset this financial burden, in May 2013, JBJS started charging authors an administrative processing fee at the time of submission. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the administrative fee on the volume and characteristics of manuscripts submitted to JBJS. Our analysis included 866 manuscripts submitted to JBJS between November 2012 and November 2013. We compared manuscripts submitted 6 months prior to fee implementation and prior to the announcement (denoted as the baseline group), in the several months prior to fee implementation but after the fee implementation announcement (denoted as the fee announcement group), and in the 6 months after fee implementation (denoted as the fee implementation group). Manuscripts were reviewed for institutional and author demographic characteristics, as well as for general study characteristics. In the first full calendar year (2014) after the implementation of the fee, the annual volume of submissions to JBJS declined by 33.5% compared with the annual submission volume in 2010 to 2012. In a comparative analysis, the geographical region of origin (p = 0.003), level of evidence (p < 0.0001), funding, and specialty differed between the 3 submission periods. However, subgroup analyses demonstrated that differences were attributable to the fee announcement group and that there were few important differences between the baseline and fee implementation groups. Reporting of funding information improved significantly between the baseline and fee implementation groups; in the post-fee implementation period, studies were more likely to have declared no external funding source (p = 0.001). The administrative processing fee at JBJS has been associated with a decrease in submission volume, but, overall, there has not been a change in the characteristics of studies submitted. However, decreased overall volume implies a decrease in the absolute number of high-level studies submitted to the journal. Administrative processing fees at high-volume journals may be a financially viable way to offset high administrative costs without substantially changing the characteristics of submitted articles. Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-21
...EPA is proposing to approve portions of two revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the Permits for Specific Designated Facilities Program, also referred to as the FutureGen Program. EPA has determined that the portions of these SIP revisions specific to the FutureGen Program submitted on March 9, 2006 and July 2, 2010, comply with the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations and are consistent with EPA policies. This action is being taken under section 110 and parts C and D of the Act.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-04-08
...EPA is issuing a supplement to its proposed approval of the State of Indiana's request to redesignate the Indianapolis area to attainment for the 1997 annual National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standard) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). This supplemental proposal revises and expands the basis for proposing approval of the state's request, in light of developments since EPA issued its initial proposal on September 27, 2011. This supplemental proposal addresses four issues, including the effects of two decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit or Court): the Court's August 21, 2012 decision to vacate and remand to EPA the Cross- State Air Pollution Control Rule (CSAPR) and the Court's January 4, 2013 decision to remand to EPA two final rules implementing the 1997 PM2.5 standard. In this supplemental proposal, EPA is also proposing to approve a supplement to the emission inventories previously submitted by the state. EPA is proposing that the inventories for ammonia and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), in conjunction with the inventories for nitrogen oxides (NOX), direct PM2.5, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) that EPA previously proposed to approve, meet the comprehensive emissions inventory requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Finally, this supplemental proposal solicits comment on the state's January 17, 2013 submission of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) developed using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 2010a emissions model to replace the MOBILE6.2 based MVEBs previously submitted as part of the PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Indianapolis area. EPA is seeking comment only on the issues raised in its supplemental proposal, and is not re-opening for comment other issues raised in its prior proposal.
Dennis, Amanda; Blanchard, Kelly
2013-01-01
Objective To evaluate the implementation of state Medicaid abortion policies and the impact of these policies on abortion clients and abortion providers. Data Source From 2007 to 2010, in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives of 70 abortion-providing facilities in 15 states. Study Design In-depth interviews focused on abortion providers' perceptions regarding Medicaid and their experiences working with Medicaid and securing reimbursement in cases that should receive federal funding: rape, incest, and life endangerment. Data Extraction Data were transcribed verbatim before being coded. Principal Findings In two study states, abortion providers reported that 97 percent of submitted claims for qualifying cases were funded. Success receiving reimbursement was attributed to streamlined electronic billing procedures, timely claims processing, and responsive Medicaid staff. Abortion providers in the other 13 states reported reimbursement for 36 percent of qualifying cases. Providers reported difficulties obtaining reimbursement due to unclear rejections of qualifying claims, complex billing procedures, lack of knowledgeable Medicaid staff with whom billing problems could be discussed, and low and slow reimbursement rates. Conclusions Poor state-level implementation of Medicaid coverage of abortion policies creates barriers for women seeking abortion. Efforts to ensure policies are implemented appropriately would improve women's health. PMID:22742741
Dennis, Amanda; Blanchard, Kelly
2013-02-01
To evaluate the implementation of state Medicaid abortion policies and the impact of these policies on abortion clients and abortion providers. From 2007 to 2010, in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives of 70 abortion-providing facilities in 15 states. In-depth interviews focused on abortion providers' perceptions regarding Medicaid and their experiences working with Medicaid and securing reimbursement in cases that should receive federal funding: rape, incest, and life endangerment. Data were transcribed verbatim before being coded. In two study states, abortion providers reported that 97 percent of submitted claims for qualifying cases were funded. Success receiving reimbursement was attributed to streamlined electronic billing procedures, timely claims processing, and responsive Medicaid staff. Abortion providers in the other 13 states reported reimbursement for 36 percent of qualifying cases. Providers reported difficulties obtaining reimbursement due to unclear rejections of qualifying claims, complex billing procedures, lack of knowledgeable Medicaid staff with whom billing problems could be discussed, and low and slow reimbursement rates. Poor state-level implementation of Medicaid coverage of abortion policies creates barriers for women seeking abortion. Efforts to ensure policies are implemented appropriately would improve women's health. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-13
... PM 2.5 NAAQS: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are... area do not interfere with measures required in the SIP of any other state under part C of the CAA to... part C of the Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 14, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit your...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-26
.... 172(c)(5) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(2)(i)-(iii). In summary, for the reasons stated above, the submitted.... EPA is taking this action under section 110 and parts C and D of Title I of the Act. DATES: This final.... Bill Deese at 214-665-7253. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ashley Mohr, Air Permits Section (6PD...
2010-03-19
network architecture to connect various DHS elements and promote information sharing.17 • Establish a DHS State, Local, and Regional Fusion Center...of reports; the I&A Strategic Plan; training, and the implementation of a comprehensive information systems architecture .73 As part of its...comprehensive information technology network architecture was submitted to Congress last year. See DHS I&A, Homeland Security Information Technology Network
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-12
...This final rule approves state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of California on June 15, 2004 and February 3, 2009, relating to reformulated gasoline (RFG) and diesel fuel sold or supplied as motor vehicle fuels in California. The revisions relating to RFG include California Phase 3 RFG (CaRFG3) regulations, correction of errors and streamlined requirements for compliance with and enforcement of the CaRFG3 standards, and an update to the State's predictive model to mitigate permeation emissions associated with the use of ethanol as a fuel additive. The revisions relating to diesel fuel include test methods for determining the aromatic hydrocarbon content in diesel fuel and reductions in the maximum allowable sulfur content for motor vehicle diesel fuel. The effect of today's action is to make these revisions federally enforceable as part of the California SIP.
EPA Office of Water (OW): 2002 Impaired Waters Baseline NHDPlus Indexed Dataset
This dataset consists of geospatial and attribute data identifying the spatial extent of state-reported impaired waters (EPA's Integrated Reporting categories 4a, 4b, 4c and 5)* available in EPA's Reach Address Database (RAD) at the time of extraction. For the 2002 baseline reporting year, EPA compiled state-submitted GIS data to create a seamless and nationally consistent picture of the Nation's impaired waters for measuring progress. EPA's Assessment and TMDL Tracking and Implementation System (ATTAINS) is a national compilation of states' 303(d) listings and TMDL development information, spanning several years of tracking over 40,000 impaired waters.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-02
...The Department invites the public, including NGOs, educational institutions, private sector enterprises and other interested persons, to submit written comments or suggestions regarding items for inclusion in the first Work Program for implementing the United States--Korea Environmental Cooperation Agreement, which entered into force on March 15, 2012. We encourage submitters to refer to: (1) The U.S.--Korea Environmental Cooperation Agreement; (2) Chapter 20 (Environment) of the U.S.--Korea Free Trade Agreement; and (3) the Environmental Review of the U.S.--Korea Free Trade Agreement. These documents are available at: http:// www.state.gov/e/oes/env/trade/c49687.htm.
78 FR 37717 - Adequacy Status of the Submitted 2009 and 2025 PM2.5
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-24
... control strategy implementation plan revision or maintenance plan was endorsed by the Governor (or his or...) Before the control strategy implementation plan or maintenance plan was submitted to EPA, consultation... maintenance: Both the 2009 and 2025 budgets are less than the on-road mobile source inventory for 2007 that...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 45 Public Welfare 4 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false What information must a State commission submit on the relative strengths of applicants for State competitive funding? 2522.465 Section 2522.465 Public... information must a State commission submit on the relative strengths of applicants for State competitive...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
...EPA is proposing a limited approval of a revision to the North Carolina state implementation plan (SIP) submitted by the State of North Carolina through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality (NCDAQ), on December 17, 2007, that addresses regional haze for the first implementation period. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas (national parks and wilderness areas) caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing a limited approval of this SIP revision to implement the regional haze requirements for North Carolina on the basis that the revision, as a whole, strengthens the North Carolina SIP. In a separate action, EPA has proposed a limited disapproval of the North Carolina regional haze SIP because of deficiencies in the State's regional haze SIP submittal arising from the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) to EPA of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). Consequently, EPA is not proposing to take action in this rulemaking to address the State's reliance on CAIR to meet certain regional haze requirements.
Implementation contexts of a Tuberculosis Control Program in Brazilian prisons
de Oliveira, Luisa Gonçalves Dutra; Natal, Sonia; Camacho, Luiz Antonio Bastos
2015-01-01
OBJECTIVE To analyze the influence from context characteristics in the control of tuberculosis in prisons, and the influence from the program implementation degrees in observed effects. METHODS A multiple case study, with a qualitative approach, conducted in the prison systems of two Brazilian states in 2011 and 2012. Two prisons were analyzed in each state, and a prison hospital was analyzed in one of them. The data were submitted to a content analysis, which was based on external, political-organizational, implementation, and effect dimensions. Contextual factors and the ones in the program organization were correlated. The independent variable was the program implementation degree and the dependent one, the effects from the Tuberculosis Control Program in prisons. RESULTS The context with the highest sociodemographic vulnerability, the highest incidence rate of tuberculosis, and the smallest amount of available resources were associated with the low implementation degree of the program. The results from tuberculosis treatment in the prison system were better where the program had already been partially implemented than in the case with low implementation degree in both cases. CONCLUSIONS The implementation degree and its contexts – external and political-organizational dimensions – simultaneously contribute to the effects that are observed in the control of tuberculosis in analyzed prisons. PMID:26465668
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-12
...The EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving a revision to the Arkansas State Implementation Plan (SIP) intended to address the regional haze (RH) requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). In addition, EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving the portion of the Arkansas Interstate Transport SIP submittal that addresses the visibility requirement of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) for the 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) that the Arkansas SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions from interfering with measures required in another state to protect visibility. EPA is approving certain core elements of the RH SIP including: identification of affected Class I areas; determination of baseline and natural visibility conditions; determination of Uniform Rate of Progress (URP); reasonable progress goal (RPG) consultation and long term strategy (LTS) consultation; coordination of RH and reasonably attributable visibility impairment (RAVI); regional haze monitoring strategy and other SIP requirements under 40 CFR 51.308(d)(4); commitment to submit periodic regional haze SIP revisions and periodic progress reports describing progress towards the RPGs; commitment to make a determination of the adequacy of the existing SIP at the time a progress report is submitted; and consultation and coordination with Federal land managers (FLMs). EPA is partially approving and partially disapproving portions of other core elements of the SIP including: identification of best available retrofit technology (BART) eligible sources and subject to BART sources; requirements for BART; Chapter 15 of the Air Pollution Control and Ecology Commission (APCEC) Regulation No. 19, also known as the State's RH Rule; and the LTS. EPA is disapproving Arkansas's reasonable progress goals (RPGs) required under 40 CFR 51.308(d)(1). This action is being taken under section 110 and part C of the CAA.
The Presidential Nuclear Initiatives of 1991-1992
2012-09-01
and/or warhead downloading ), and use START Treaty procedures to implement it. This was the first serious public proposal to emerge from a longstanding...discussion to relevant technolo- gies , rather than to venture into more sensitive areas of nuclear weapons practice and procedures.56 Gorbachev did not...States. The same basic points were made by 11 republic heads in the Alma- Ata Declaration on December 21.58 On December 25, Gorbachev submitted his
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Comptroller General of the U.S., Washington, DC.
The results of a federal audit of attendance and enrollment data from the Boston Public School System are summarized in this paper. The General Accounting Office (GAO) conducted the audit to determine the accuracy of the data submitted to the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts for use in implementing the Boston school desegregation plan and for…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-13
...EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) that establish the public participation requirements for air quality permits. EPA proposes to find that these revisions to the Texas SIP comply with the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA) and EPA regulations and are consistent with EPA policies. Texas submitted the public participation provisions in four separate revisions to the SIP on July 22, 1998; October 25, 1999; July 2, 2010; and March 11, 2011. EPA is proposing this action under section 110 and parts C and D of the Clean Air Act (the Act).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-04
...EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB or Board). This revision concerns two regulations that reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and other pollutants from in-use, heavy-duty diesel-fueled trucks and buses, and drayage trucks. EPA is approving this SIP revision because the Agency has determined that the regulations are consistent with the relevant Clean Air Act requirements, policies and guidance. Final approval of the two regulations and incorporation of them into the California SIP makes them federally enforceable.
40 CFR 52.800 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... were submitted on the dates specified. (1) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted a SO2 control strategy for the City of Indianapolis on March 16, 1972. (2) The Governor submitted Pub. L. 100...) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted additional information on surveillance methodology...
40 CFR 52.800 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... were submitted on the dates specified. (1) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted a SO2 control strategy for the City of Indianapolis on March 16, 1972. (2) The Governor submitted Pub. L. 100...) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted additional information on surveillance methodology...
40 CFR 52.800 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... were submitted on the dates specified. (1) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted a SO2 control strategy for the City of Indianapolis on March 16, 1972. (2) The Governor submitted Pub. L. 100...) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted additional information on surveillance methodology...
40 CFR 52.800 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... were submitted on the dates specified. (1) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted a SO2 control strategy for the City of Indianapolis on March 16, 1972. (2) The Governor submitted Pub. L. 100...) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted additional information on surveillance methodology...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
...EPA is taking final action to approve the December 13, 2007, submission by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division of Air Quality (KDAQ) as demonstrating that the Commonwealth meets the state implementation plan (SIP) requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 1997 8- hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. Kentucky certified that the Kentucky SIP contains provisions that ensure the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and maintained in Kentucky (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). Kentucky's infrastructure submission, provided to EPA on December 13, 2007, addressed all the required infrastructure elements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Additionally, EPA is responding to adverse comments received on EPA's March 17, 2011, proposed approval of Kentucky's December 13, 2007, infrastructure submission.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-06
... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval: Comment Request; Great Lakes Accountability System (Reinstatement... Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), Great Lakes Accountability System... legislation called for increased accountability for the GLRI and directed EPA to implement a process to track...
40 CFR 52.69 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Implementation Plan submitted on March 21, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (2) Compliance schedules submitted on April 18, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (3) Clarifying comments on the plan submitted on April 28, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (4) Semi...
30 CFR 254.53 - Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false Submitting a response plan developed under....53 Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements. (a) You may submit a response plan... Federal officials and response personnel if there is a spill. (3) Identify any private personnel and...
20 CFR 667.120 - What planning information must a State submit in order to receive a formula grant?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false What planning information must a State submit... INVESTMENT ACT Funding § 667.120 What planning information must a State submit in order to receive a formula grant? Each State seeking financial assistance under WIA sections 127 (youth) or 132 (adults and...
Electric Transport Traction Power Supply System With Distributed Energy Sources
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Abramov, E. Y.; Schurov, N. I.; Rozhkova, M. V.
2016-04-01
The paper states the problem of traction substation (TSS) leveling of daily-load curve for urban electric transport. The circuit of traction power supply system (TPSS) with distributed autonomous energy source (AES) based on photovoltaic (PV) and energy storage (ES) units is submitted here. The distribution algorithm of power flow for the daily traction load curve leveling is also introduced in this paper. In addition, it illustrates the implemented experiment model of power supply system.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-04-01
... institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of United States... depository institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of... depository institution that submits tenders or subscriptions for purchase on original issue of United States...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-04-01
... institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of United States... depository institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of... depository institution that submits tenders or subscriptions for purchase on original issue of United States...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-04-01
... institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of United States... depository institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of... depository institution that submits tenders or subscriptions for purchase on original issue of United States...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-04-01
... institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of United States... depository institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of... depository institution that submits tenders or subscriptions for purchase on original issue of United States...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of United States... depository institutions that submit tenders for the account of customers for purchase on original issue of... depository institution that submits tenders or subscriptions for purchase on original issue of United States...
30 CFR 254.53 - Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false Submitting a response plan developed under... of the Coast Line § 254.53 Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements. (a) You may submit a response plan to BSEE for approval that you developed in accordance with the laws or regulations...
30 CFR 254.53 - Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false Submitting a response plan developed under... of the Coast Line § 254.53 Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements. (a) You may submit a response plan to BSEE for approval that you developed in accordance with the laws or regulations...
30 CFR 254.53 - Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false Submitting a response plan developed under... Waters Seaward of the Coast Line § 254.53 Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements. (a) You may submit a response plan to MMS for approval that you developed in accordance with the laws...
30 CFR 254.53 - Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 30 Mineral Resources 2 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false Submitting a response plan developed under... of the Coast Line § 254.53 Submitting a response plan developed under State requirements. (a) You may submit a response plan to BSEE for approval that you developed in accordance with the laws or regulations...
Alberti, Philip M; Sutton, Karey M; Baker, Matthew
2018-05-22
U.S. teaching hospitals that qualify as 501(c)(3) organizations (a not-for-profit designation) are required to demonstrate community benefit annually. Increases in health insurance access driven by Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation, along with new regulations, research opportunities, and educational expectations, may be changing hospitals' allocations of community benefit dollars. This study aimed to describe changes in teaching hospitals' community benefit spending between 2012 (pre-ACA implementation) and 2015 (post-ACA implementation), and to explore differences in spending changes between hospitals in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. In 2017, for each teaching hospital member of the Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC's) Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems required to submit Form 990s to the Internal Revenue Service, the authors sought community benefit spending data for 2012 and 2015 as reported on Schedule H. The analysis included 169 pairs of Form 990s representing 184 AAMC member teaching hospitals (93% of 198 eligible hospitals). Compared with 2012, hospitals in 2015 spent $3.1 billion (20.14%) more on community benefit despite spending $804 million (16.17%) less on charity care. Hospitals in Medicaid expansion states increased spending on subsidized health services and Medicaid shortfalls at rates higher than hospitals in non-expansion states. The latter increased spending at higher rates on community health improvement and cash/in-kind contributions. After ACA implementation, teaching hospitals increased their overall community benefit spending while their charity care spending declined. Changes in community benefit spending differed according to states' Medicaid expansion status, demonstrating hospitals' responsiveness to state and local realities.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-18
...EPA is taking final action to approve a request submitted on December 18, 2009, and supplemented on December 22, 2010, from the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR), Division of Air Quality (DAQ), to redesignate the Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area (hereafter the ``Greensboro Area'' or ``Area'') to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Greensboro Area is comprised of Davidson and Guilford Counties in their entireties. EPA's approval of the redesignation request is based on the determination that the State of North Carolina has met the criteria for redesignation to attainment set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), including the determination that the Greensboro Area has attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Additionally, EPA is approving a revision to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) to include the 1997 Annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Greensboro Area that contains the new 2011 and 2021 motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and PM2.5 for both Davidson and Guilford Counties. This action also approves the emissions inventory submitted with the maintenance plan. Further, EPA is correcting a typographical error for the citation associated with a previous adequacy finding the Agency made for the NOX and PM2.5 MVEBs for both Davidson and Guilford Counties.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-28
...EPA is approving a redesignation request and State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) requested that the West Virginia portion of the Huntington- Ashland, WV-KY-OH fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area (``Huntington-Ashland Area'' or ``Area'') be redesignated as attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In this rulemaking action, EPA is approving the 1997 annual PM2.5 redesignation request for the West Virginia portion of the Area. EPA is also approving the maintenance plan SIP revision that the State submitted in conjunction with its redesignation request. The maintenance plan provides for continued attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for 10 years after redesignation of the West Virginia portion of the Area. The maintenance plan includes an insignificance determination for the onroad motor vehicle contribution of PM2.5, nitrogen oxides (NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the West Virginia portion of the Area for purposes of transportation conformity. EPA is approving West Virginia's insignificance determination for transportation conformity. EPA is also finding that the Area continues to attain the standard. This rulemaking action approving the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation request, maintenance plan, and insignificance determination for transportation conformity for the West Virginia portion of the Area is based on EPA's determination that the Area has met the criteria for redesignation to attainment specified in the Clean Air Act (CAA).
A Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative to Increase Breastfeeding Rates in Tennessee.
Ware, Julie L; Schetzina, Karen E; Morad, Anna; Barker, Brenda; Scott, Theresa A; Grubb, Peter H
2018-05-01
Tennessee has low breastfeeding rates and has identified opportunities for improvement to enhance maternity practices to support breastfeeding mothers. We sought a 10% relative increase in the aggregate Joint Commission measure of breastfeeding exclusivity at discharge (TJC PC-05) by focusing on high-reliability (≥90%) implementation of processes that promote breastfeeding in the delivery setting. A statewide, multidisciplinary development team reviewed evidence from the WHO-UNICEF "Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding" to create a consensus toolkit of process indicators aligned with the Ten Steps. Hospitals submitted monthly TJC PC-05 data for 6 months while studying local implementation of the Ten Steps to identify improvement opportunities, and for an additional 11 months while conducting tests of change to improve Ten Steps implementation using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, local process audits, and control charts. Data were aggregated at the state level and presented at 12 monthly webinars, 3 regional learning sessions, and 1 statewide meeting where teams shared their local data and implementation experiences. Thirteen hospitals accounting for 47% of live births in Tennessee submitted data on 31,183 mother-infant dyads from August 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013. Aggregate monthly mean PC-05 demonstrated "special cause" improvement increasing from 37.1% to 41.2%, an 11.1% relative increase. Five hospitals reported implementation of ≥5 of the Ten Steps and two hospitals reported ≥90% reliability on ≥5 of the Ten Steps using locally designed process audits. Using large-scale improvement methodology, a successful statewide collaborative led to >10% relative increase in breastfeeding exclusivity at discharge in participating Tennessee hospitals. Further opportunities for improvement in implementing breastfeeding supportive practices were identified.
Implementing desktop image access of GI images
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Grevera, George J.; Feingold, Eric R.; Horii, Steven C.; Laufer, Igor
1996-05-01
In this paper we present a specific example of the current state-of-the-art in desktop image access in the GI section of the Department of Radiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. We describe a system which allows physicians to view and manipulate images from a Philips digital fluoroscopy system at the workstations in their offices. Typically they manipulate and view these images on their desktop Macs and then submit the results for slide making or save the images in digital teaching files. In addition to a discussion of the current state-of-the-art here at HUP, we also discuss some future directions that we are pursuing.
20 CFR 645.415 - What planning information must a State submit in order to receive a formula grant?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false What planning information must a State submit in order to receive a formula grant? 645.415 Section 645.415 Employees' Benefits EMPLOYMENT AND... Grants Administration § 645.415 What planning information must a State submit in order to receive a...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false What are the time frames under which States submit performance progress reports and apply for incentive grants? 666.205 Section 666.205 Employees... the time frames under which States submit performance progress reports and apply for incentive grants...
77 FR 70752 - Notice of Decision Regarding Requests for a Waiver of the Renewable Fuel Standard
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-27
...The Governors of several States requested that EPA waive the national volume requirements for the renewable fuel standard program (RFS or RFS program), pursuant to section 211(o)(7) of the Clean Air Act (the Act), based on the effects of the drought on feedstocks used to produce renewable fuel in 2012-2013. Several other parties submitted similar requests. Based on a thorough review of the record in this case, EPA finds that the evidence and information does not support a determination that implementation of the RFS program during the 2012- 2013 time period would severely harm the economy of a State, a region, or the United States. EPA is therefore denying the requests for a waiver.
A physiome standards-based model publication paradigm.
Nickerson, David P; Buist, Martin L
2009-05-28
In this era of widespread broadband Internet penetration and powerful Web browsers on most desktops, a shift in the publication paradigm for physiome-style models is envisaged. No longer will model authors simply submit an essentially textural description of the development and behaviour of their model. Rather, they will submit a complete working implementation of the model encoded and annotated according to the various standards adopted by the physiome project, accompanied by a traditional human-readable summary of the key scientific goals and outcomes of the work. While the final published, peer-reviewed article will look little different to the reader, in this new paradigm, both reviewers and readers will be able to interact with, use and extend the models in ways that are not currently possible. Here, we review recent developments that are laying the foundations for this new model publication paradigm. Initial developments have focused on the publication of mathematical models of cellular electrophysiology, using technology based on a CellML- or Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML)-encoded implementation of the mathematical models. Here, we review the current state of the art and what needs to be done before such a model publication becomes commonplace.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-31
...EPA is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of a State Implementation Plan (``SIP'') revision submitted by the State of California on November 17, 2007, for the purpose of addressing the ``transport SIP'' provisions of Clean Air Act (``CAA'') section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards) and the 1997 fine particulate matter (``PM2.5'') NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA requires that each SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions that adversely affect air quality in other States through interstate transport. EPA is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of California's SIP revision for the 1997 8-hour ozone and 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to the requirement in CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) that each SIP contain adequate measures prohibiting emissions of air pollutants in amounts which will interfere with other States' measures required under title I, part C of the CAA to prevent significant deterioration of air quality. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve California's SIP revision with respect to those Districts in California that implement SIP-approved permit programs meeting the approval criteria under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), as discussed in this proposal. EPA is simultaneously proposing to disapprove California's SIP revision with respect to those Districts in California that do not implement SIP-approved permit programs meeting these approval criteria. For any District for which we finalize a disapproval, EPA intends to simultaneously promulgate a limited Federal Implementation Plan (``FIP''), as discussed in this proposal, unless the relevant area is already subject to a FIP.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-28
...EPA is proposing a limited approval of a revision to the Alabama state implementation plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Alabama through the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), on July 15, 2008, that addresses regional haze for the first implementation period. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas (national parks and wilderness areas) caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress towards the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing a limited approval of this SIP revision to implement the regional haze requirements for Alabama on the basis that the revision, as a whole, strengthens the Alabama SIP. Additionally, EPA is proposing to rescind the federal regulations previously approved into the Alabama SIP on November 24, 1987, and to rely on the provisions in Alabama's July 15, 2008, SIP submittal to meet the long-term strategy (LTS) requirements for reasonably attributable visibility impairment (RAVI). EPA has previously proposed a limited disapproval of the Alabama regional haze SIP because of deficiencies in the State's regional haze SIP submittal arising from the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) to EPA of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). Consequently, EPA is not proposing to take action in this rulemaking to address the State's reliance on CAIR to meet certain regional haze requirements.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-22
...EPA is disapproving a portion of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision received from the State of New Mexico on September 17, 2007, for the purpose of addressing the ``good neighbor'' requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards) and the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. In this action, EPA is disapproving the New Mexico Interstate Transport SIP provisions that address the requirement of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) that emissions from New Mexico sources do not interfere with measures required in the SIP of any other state under part C of the CAA to protect visibility. We have found that New Mexico sources, except the San Juan Generating Station, are sufficiently controlled to eliminate interference with the visibility programs of other states. EPA is promulgating a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address this deficiency by implementing nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limits necessary at the San Juan Generating Station (SJGS), to prevent such interference. EPA found in January 2009 that New Mexico had failed to submit a SIP addressing certain regional haze (RH) requirements, including the requirement for best available retrofit technology (BART). The Clean Air Act required EPA to promulgate a FIP to address RH requirements by January 2011. This FIP addresses the RH BART requirement for NOX for SJGS. In addition, EPA is implementing sulfuric acid (H2SO4) hourly emission limits at the SJGS, to minimize the contribution of this compound to visibility impairment. This action is being taken under section 110 and part C of the CAA.
Expanding physician education in health care fraud and program integrity.
Agrawal, Shantanu; Tarzy, Bruce; Hunt, Lauren; Taitsman, Julie; Budetti, Peter
2013-08-01
Program integrity (PI) spans the entire spectrum of improper payments from fraud to abuse, errors, and waste in the health care system. Few physicians will perpetrate fraud or abuse during their careers, but nearly all will contribute to the remaining spectrum of improper payments, making preventive education in this area vital. Despite the enormous impact that PI issues have on government-sponsored and private insurance programs, physicians receive little formal education in this area. Physicians' lack of awareness of PI issues not only makes them more likely to submit inappropriate claims, generate orders that other providers and suppliers will use to submit inappropriate claims, and document improperly in the medical record but also more likely to become victims of fraud schemes themselves.In this article, the authors provide an overview of the current state of PI issues in general, and fraud in particular, as well as a description of the state of formal education for practicing physicians, residents, and fellows. Building on the lessons from pilot programs conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and partner organizations, the authors then propose a model PI education curriculum to be implemented nationwide for physicians at all levels. They recommend that various stakeholder organizations take part in the development and implementation process to ensure that all perspectives are included. Educating physicians is an essential step in establishing a broader culture of compliance and improved integrity in the health care system, extending beyond Medicare and Medicaid.
Menges, Klaus
2008-07-01
Assessing Rules for Marketing Authorisation Applications and the Common Technical Document provide the framework regarding data-related requirements and regarding the structural requirements of marketing authorisation application dossiers, similar to the structural levels and rooms of buildings on the one hand and their interior equipment on the other hand. Since the 1970s requirements about how to submit application dossiers and how to assess them have become increasingly harmonised, aiming for the use of a single format and identical rules for assessment. In regard of the format, harmonisation has been achieved beyond Europe by implementing the mandatory use of CTD in the three main regions of interests of the pharmaceutical industry, Japan, the United States of America and Europe. The assessment rules have been extensively harmonised throughout Europe in a way that the same rules apply to the marketing authorisation applications submitted in Germany as well as in other Member States. Different interpretations of the guidance documents, different understanding of the provided data or divergent conclusions drawn up may still occur. All stakeholders within the European network of Drug Regulatory Affairs will act on the level floor of the European and--apart from some exceptions--also nationally implemented legislation. This will not only serve the internationally acting pharmaceutical companies' interests but also consumer interests in obtaining consistent information on drug products based on transparent rules safeguarding the necessary pharmaceutical quality, efficacy and safety with respect to an adequate risk-benefit relationship.
75 FR 33614 - Adequacy Status of the Submitted 2009 PM2.5
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-14
...In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets for PM2.5 and NOX in the submitted attainment demonstration state implementation plans for the New Jersey portions of the New York- Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT, and Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE, PM2.5 nonattainment areas to be adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) requires that the EPA conduct a public process and make an affirmative decision on the adequacy of budgets before they can be used by metropolitan planning organizations in conformity determinations. As a result of our finding, two metropolitan planning organizations in New Jersey (the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority and the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission) must use the new 2009 PM2.5 budgets for future transportation conformity determinations.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-30
...EPA is approving a redesignation request and State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West Virginia. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) requested that the West Virginia portion of the Wheeling, WV-OH fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area (``Wheeling Area'' or ``Area'') be redesignated as attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In this rulemaking action, EPA is approving the 1997 annual PM2.5 redesignation request for the West Virginia portion of the Area. EPA is also approving the maintenance plan SIP revision that the State submitted in conjunction with its redesignation request. The maintenance plan provides for continued attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for 10 years after redesignation of the West Virginia portion of the Area. The maintenance plan includes a comprehensive emissions inventory that EPA is approving in this rulemaking. The maintenance plan also includes an insignificance determination for the onroad motor vehicle contribution of PM2.5, nitrogen oxides (NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the West Virginia portion of the Area for purposes of transportation conformity. EPA is also approving West Virginia's insignificance determination for transportation conformity. In addition, EPA is also finding that the Area continues to attain the standard. This rulemaking action approving the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation request, maintenance plan, comprehensive emissions inventory, and insignificance determination for transportation conformity for the West Virginia portion of the Area is based on EPA's determination that the Area has met the criteria for redesignation to attainment specified in the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-18
...EPA is taking final action to approve a request submitted on December 18, 2009, and supplemented on December 22, 2010, from the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR), Division of Air Quality (DAQ), to redesignate the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area (hereafter the ``Hickory Area'' or ``Area'') to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The Hickory Area is comprised of Catawba County in its entirety. EPA's approval of the redesignation request is based on the determination that the State of North Carolina has met the criteria for redesignation to attainment set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), including the determination that the Hickory Area has attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Additionally, EPA is approving a revision to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) to include the 1997 Annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Hickory Area that contains the new motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) for the years 2011 and 2021 for Catawba County and the mobile insignificance determination for direct PM2.5 for the Hickory Area. This action also approves the emissions inventory submitted with the maintenance plan. Further, EPA is correcting a typographical error for the citation associated with a previous adequacy determination the Agency made for the NOX MVEBs for Catawba County and the mobile source insignificance determination for direct PM2.5 for the Hickory Area.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-27
...EPA is approving into the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) an adjusted standard for Royal Fiberglass Pools (``Royal'') at its Dix, Illinois facility. On November 8, 2010, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted to EPA for approval an adjustment to the general rule, Use of Organic Material Rule, commonly known as the eight pound per hour (8 lb/hr) rule, as it applies to emissions of volatile organic matter (VOM) from Royal's pool manufacturing facility. The adjusted standard relieves Royal from being subject to the general rule for VOM emissions from its Dix facility. EPA is approving this SIP revision because it will not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-30
...EPA is proposing to approve in part and disapprove in part state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by California to provide for attainment of the 1997 annual and 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) nonattainment area. The SIP revisions are the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan (revised 2010) and portions of the 2007 State Strategy (revised 2009). Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve the emissions inventories as meeting the requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA's fine particle implementing rule and to approve commitments to implement specific measures and meet specific aggregate emissions reductions by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and the California Air Resource Board. In addition, we are proposing to find that volatile organic compounds are a PM2.5 attainment plan precursor in the SJV for which controls should be evaluated. EPA is proposing to disapprove the attainment demonstration. EPA is also proposing to disapprove the reasonably available control measures/reasonably available control technology demonstration, the air quality modeling, the reasonable further progress (RFP) demonstration, the contingency measures, and the attainment and RFP conformity motor vehicle emissions budgets. EPA is also proposing to not grant California's request to extend to April 5, 2015 the deadline for the SJV nonattainment area to attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-16
...EPA is proposing a limited approval and a limited disapproval of two revisions to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky through the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet, Division of Air Quality (KYDAQ), on June 25, 2008, and May 28, 2010, that address regional haze for the first implementation period. These revisions address the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas (national parks and wilderness areas) caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing a limited approval of these SIP revisions to implement the regional haze requirements for Kentucky on the basis that the revisions, as a whole, strengthen the Kentucky SIP. Also in this action, EPA is proposing a limited disapproval of these same SIP revisions because of the deficiencies in the Commonwealth's regional haze SIP submittal arising from the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) to EPA of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR).
Leading Causes of Death in Males United States, 2010
... Submit What’s this? Submit Button Leading Causes of Death in Males and Females, United States Recommend on ... and previous listings for the leading causes of death for males and females in the United States. ...
Quarantine, isolation and the duty of easy rescue in public health.
Giubilini, Alberto; Douglas, Thomas; Maslen, Hannah; Savulescu, Julian
2018-06-01
We address the issue of whether, why and under what conditions, quarantine and isolation are morally justified, with a particular focus on measures implemented in the developing world. We argue that the benefits of quarantine and isolation justify some level of coercion or compulsion by the state, but that the state should be able to provide the strongest justification possible for implementing such measures. While a constrained form of consequentialism might provide a justification for such public health interventions, we argue that a stronger justification is provided by a principle of State Enforced Easy Rescue: a state may permissibly compel individuals to engage in activities that entail a small cost to them but a large benefit to others, because individuals have a moral duty of easy rescue to engage in those activities. The principle of State Enforced Easy Rescue gives rise to an Obligation Enforcement Requirement: the state should create the conditions such that submitting to coercive or compulsive measures becomes a fundamental moral duty of individuals, i.e. a duty of easy rescue. When the state can create such conditions, it has the strongest justification possible for implementing coercive or compulsive measures, because individuals have a moral duty to temporarily relinquish the rights that such measures would infringe. Our argument has significant implications for how public health emergencies in the developing world should be tackled. Where isolation and quarantine measures are necessary, states or the international community have a moral obligation to provide certain benefits to those quarantined or isolated. © 2017 The Authors Developing World Bioethics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
...EPA is proposing a limited approval and a limited disapproval of a revision to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of West Virginia through the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) on June 18, 2008, that addresses regional haze for the first implementation period. This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future, and remedy any existing, anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing a limited approval of this SIP revision to implement the regional haze requirements for West Virginia on the basis that the revision, as a whole, strengthens the West Virginia SIP. Also in this action, EPA is proposing a limited disapproval of this same SIP revision because of the deficiencies in the State's June 2008 regional haze SIP submittal arising from the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) to EPA of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). EPA is also proposing to approve this revision as meeting the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) and 110(a)(2)(J), relating to visibility protection for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... the relative strengths of applicants for State competitive funding? 2522.465 Section 2522.465 Public Welfare Regulations Relating to Public Welfare (Continued) CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE... information must a State commission submit on the relative strengths of applicants for State competitive...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-22
...EPA is making an interim final determination to stay the imposition of offset sanctions and to defer the imposition of highway sanctions based on a proposed approval of a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) published elsewhere in this Federal Register. The SIP revision concerns two permitting rules submitted by the PCAPCD and FRAQMD, respectively: Rule 502, New Source Review, and Rule 10.1, New Source Review.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-15
...EPA is notifying the public that EPA has withdrawn its previous adequacy finding on the 2012 motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for Connecticut's two 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. EPA has withdrawn the adequacy finding because Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CT DEP) withdrew its 2012 motor vehicle emission budgets from its eight-hour ozone attainment demonstration SIP for both ozone nonattainment areas. As a result of our finding, Connecticut can not use these 2012 motor vehicle emission budgets for future conformity determinations.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-26
....regulations.gov ). Instructions for submitting and reading comments are detailed on the site. Submit Comments Using the Internet: Go to Regulations.gov ( http://www.regulations.gov ). Instructions for submitting and reading comments are detailed on the site. Mail, Courier or Hand Delivery: Eric J. Jabs, Chief...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-13
...EPA is proposing to approve in part and disapprove in part state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by California to provide for attainment of the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV). These SIP revisions are the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan (revised 2010 and 2011) and SJV-related provisions of the 2007 State Strategy (revised 2009 and 2011). EPA is proposing to approve the emissions inventories; air quality modeling; the reasonably available control measures/reasonably available control technology, reasonable further progress, and attainment demonstrations; and the transportation conformity motor vehicle emissions budgets. EPA is also proposing to grant California's request to extend the attainment deadline for the SJV to April 5, 2015 and to approve commitments to measures and reductions by the SJV Air Pollution Control District and the California Air Resources Board. Finally, it is proposing to disapprove the SIP's contingency measures. This proposed rule amends EPA's November 30, 2010 proposed rule (75 FR 74518) on the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan and 2007 State Strategy.
24 CFR 598.605 - Implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-04-01
... 24 Housing and Urban Development 3 2014-04-01 2013-04-01 true Implementation plan. 598.605 Section 598.605 Housing and Urban Development Regulations Relating to Housing and Urban Development (Continued... Grants § 598.605 Implementation plan. (a) Implementation plan content. An EZ must submit an...
47 CFR 1.2002 - Applicants required to submit information.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... Implementation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 § 1.2002 Applicants required to submit information. (a) In... benefits pursuant to section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. 21 U.S.C. 862. If a section 5301...
47 CFR 1.2002 - Applicants required to submit information.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... Implementation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 § 1.2002 Applicants required to submit information. (a) In... benefits pursuant to section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. 21 U.S.C. 862. If a section 5301...
Report: EPA Can Improve Implementation of the Risk Management Program for Airborne Chemical Releases
Report #09-P-0092, February 10, 2009. EPA can improve its program management and oversight to better assure that facilities covered by the Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Program submit or re-submit an RMP.
77 FR 38399 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona; Nogales PM10
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-27
...EPA is proposing to approve a state implementation plan revision submitted by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to address the moderate area PM10, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to a nominal ten micrometers, planning requirements for the Nogales nonattainment area. Consistent with this proposal, EPA is also proposing to approve the following plan elements as meeting the requirements of the Clean Air Act: the Nogales nonattainment area 2008 and 2011 emission inventories; the demonstration that the Nogales nonattainment area is attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for PM10, but for international emissions sources in Nogales, Mexico; the demonstration that reasonably available control measures sufficient to meet the standard have been implemented in the nonattainment area; the reasonable further progress demonstration; the demonstration that implementation of measures beyond those needed for attainment meet the contingency measure requirement; and, the motor vehicle emissions budget for the purposes of determining the conformity of transportation plans, programs, and projects with this PM10 plan.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-10
...EPA is approving those revisions adopted by the State of Colorado on April 16, 2004 to Regulation No. 3 (Stationary Source Permitting and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements) that incorporate EPA's December 31, 2002 NSR Reforms. Colorado submitted the request for approval of these rule revisions into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) on July 11, 2005 and supplemented its request on October 25, 2005. EPA is approving only the portions of Colorado's revisions to Regulation Number 3 that relate to the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and non-attainment new source review (NSR) construction permit programs of the State of Colorado. Other revisions, renumberings, additions, or deletions to Regulation No. 3 made by Colorado as part of the April 16, 2004 final rulemaking are being acted on by EPA in a separate final action related to Colorado's Interstate Transport SIP (see proposed action at 76 FR 21835, April 19, 2011). Colorado has a federally approved NSR program for new and modified sources impacting attainment and non-attainment areas in the State. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
24 CFR 598.605 - Implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-04-01
... 24 Housing and Urban Development 3 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 false Implementation plan. 598.605 Section 598.605 Housing and Urban Development Regulations Relating to Housing and Urban Development... Empowerment Zone Grants § 598.605 Implementation plan. (a) Implementation plan content. An EZ must submit an...
24 CFR 598.605 - Implementation plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-04-01
... 24 Housing and Urban Development 3 2013-04-01 2013-04-01 false Implementation plan. 598.605 Section 598.605 Housing and Urban Development Regulations Relating to Housing and Urban Development... Empowerment Zone Grants § 598.605 Implementation plan. (a) Implementation plan content. An EZ must submit an...
Montana Consolidated State Application Accountability Workbook. Further Amended and Resubmitted
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
US Department of Education, 2006
2006-01-01
This workbook, submitted by the State of Montana to the U.S. Department of Education, is for State Grants under Title IX, Part C, Section 9302 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (Public Law 107-110). By January 31, 2003, States must complete and submit to the Department this Consolidated State Application Accountability Workbook. The…
34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... 34 Education 3 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...
34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... 34 Education 3 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...
34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... 34 Education 3 2012-07-01 2012-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...
34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...
34 CFR 461.13 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 34 Education 3 2011-07-01 2011-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 461.13 Section 461.13 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADULT EDUCATION STATE...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the wastewaters has... implementing the solvent management plan submitted to the permitting authority.” (b) In requesting that no monitoring of TTO be required, the direct discharger shall submit a solvent management plan that specifies to...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the wastewaters has... implementing the solvent management plan submitted to the permitting authority.” (b) In requesting that no monitoring of TTO be required, the direct discharger shall submit a solvent management plan that specifies to...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the wastewaters has... implementing the solvent management plan submitted to the permitting authority.” (b) In requesting that no monitoring of TTO be required, the direct discharger shall submit a solvent management plan that specifies to...
Gregg, Deborah J; Prokorym, Megan; Dennison, Barbara A; Waniewski, Patricia
2015-11-01
Primary care providers play an important role in encouraging and counseling pregnant and postpartum women to successfully breastfeed. One objective of this 1-year grant was to establish the Breastfeeding Friendly Practice Designation criteria and process to identify and designate at least 5 primary care practices as New York State Breastfeeding Friendly Practices in a high-need, racially/ethnically diverse, urban county in New York with very low prevalence of breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, and duration. A partnership between the New York State Department of Health and the P(2) Collaborative of Western New York and United Way of Buffalo & Erie County's Healthy Start Healthy Future for All Coalition facilitated the development of the New York State Ten Steps to a Breastfeeding Friendly Practice, accompanying implementation guide, designation criteria, and model office policies. Practice staff and providers received on-site training and materials and participated in a virtual learning network to share their experiences, celebrate successes, and overcome challenges in implementing system changes. Practice staff completed a self-assessment survey at baseline and after implementation of the Ten Steps and submitted their written office breastfeeding policy for review. Fourteen practices met the criteria for designation and were recognized by the New York State Health Commissioner. The number of practices designated as Breastfeeding Friendly far exceeded the grant objective. Future efforts are directed at expanding this initiative statewide and determining the impact of the designation on breastfeeding outcomes. © The Author(s) 2015.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-14
...EPA is proposing to determine that the Birmingham, Alabama, nonattainment area for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. This proposed determination is based upon complete, quality assured, quality controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data for the years 2007-2009 showing that this area has monitored attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. If this proposed determination is made final, the requirement for the State of Alabama to submit an attainment demonstration and associated reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, contingency measures, and other planning State Implementation Plans (SIPs) related to attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard for the Birmingham, Alabama, PM2.5 nonattainment area, shall be suspended for as long as this area continues to meet the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
34 CFR 403.33 - What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAM How Does A State Apply for a Grant? § 403.33 What procedures does a State use to... 34 Education 3 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false What procedures does a State use to submit its State plan? 403.33 Section 403.33 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education...
40 CFR 52.1519 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) New Hampshire § 52.1519... specified. (1) On January 12, 1993, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services submitted a small..., 1994, New Hampshire submitted a letter deleting portions of the January 12, 1993 submittal. In these...
40 CFR 52.1519 - Identification of plan-conditional approval.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) New Hampshire § 52.1519... specified. (1) On January 12, 1993, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services submitted a small..., 1994, New Hampshire submitted a letter deleting portions of the January 12, 1993 submittal. In these...
77 FR 62537 - Meetings of Humanities Panel
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-15
... of History of Science and Technology, submitted to the Division of Preservation and Access. 6. Date... subject of U.S. History and Culture, submitted to the Division of Preservation and Access. 3. Date... America's Historical & Cultural Organizations Implementation grant program on the subject of U.S. History...
45 CFR 400.8 - Approval of State plans and plan amendments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... amendment may not be earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter in which the State agency submits... 45 Public Welfare 2 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Approval of State plans and plan amendments. 400.8... amendments. (a) The State agency must submit the State plan and plan amendments which have been signed by the...
45 CFR 400.8 - Approval of State plans and plan amendments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... amendment may not be earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter in which the State agency submits... 45 Public Welfare 2 2013-10-01 2012-10-01 true Approval of State plans and plan amendments. 400.8... amendments. (a) The State agency must submit the State plan and plan amendments which have been signed by the...
45 CFR 400.8 - Approval of State plans and plan amendments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... amendment may not be earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter in which the State agency submits... 45 Public Welfare 2 2014-10-01 2012-10-01 true Approval of State plans and plan amendments. 400.8... amendments. (a) The State agency must submit the State plan and plan amendments which have been signed by the...
45 CFR 400.8 - Approval of State plans and plan amendments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... amendment may not be earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter in which the State agency submits... 45 Public Welfare 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Approval of State plans and plan amendments. 400.8... amendments. (a) The State agency must submit the State plan and plan amendments which have been signed by the...
45 CFR 400.8 - Approval of State plans and plan amendments.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... amendment may not be earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter in which the State agency submits... 45 Public Welfare 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Approval of State plans and plan amendments. 400.8... amendments. (a) The State agency must submit the State plan and plan amendments which have been signed by the...
40 CFR 62.5100 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... acid mist from sulfuric acid plants, submitted by the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene, State of..., submitted by the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene, State of Maryland on January 26, 1984. (c...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-27
...EPA is proposing to approve into the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) an adjusted standard for Royal Fiberglass Pools (``Royal'') at its Dix, Illinois facility. On November 8, 2010, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted to EPA for approval an adjustment to the general rule, Use of Organic Material Rule, commonly known as the eight pound per hour (8 lb/hr) rule, as it applies to emissions of volatile organic matter (VOM) from Royal's pool manufacturing facility. The adjusted standard relieves Royal from being subject to the general rule for VOM emissions from its Dix facility. EPA is approving this SIP revision because it will not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... incorporates the findings of a federally re-reviewed subsample of the State's review findings and is projected... Administration under an agreement under section 1634 of the Act or children found eligible for foster care and... to the original State review findings submitted to CMS. (vi) The State may not submit evidence...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... incorporates the findings of a federally re-reviewed subsample of the State's review findings and is projected... Administration under an agreement under section 1634 of the Act or children found eligible for foster care and... to the original State review findings submitted to CMS. (vi) The State may not submit evidence...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... incorporates the findings of a federally re-reviewed subsample of the State's review findings and is projected... Administration under an agreement under section 1634 of the Act or children found eligible for foster care and... to the original State review findings submitted to CMS. (vi) The State may not submit evidence...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... incorporates the findings of a federally re-reviewed subsample of the State's review findings and is projected... Administration under an agreement under section 1634 of the Act or children found eligible for foster care and... to the original State review findings submitted to CMS. (vi) The State may not submit evidence...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... incorporates the findings of a federally re-reviewed subsample of the State's review findings and is projected... Administration under an agreement under section 1634 of the Act or children found eligible for foster care and... to the original State review findings submitted to CMS. (vi) The State may not submit evidence...
42 CFR 455.434 - Criminal background checks.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... that each such provider or person submit fingerprints. (2) The State Medicaid agency must require a... submit a set of fingerprints, in a form and manner to be determined by the State Medicaid agency, within...
42 CFR 455.434 - Criminal background checks.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... that each such provider or person submit fingerprints. (2) The State Medicaid agency must require a... submit a set of fingerprints, in a form and manner to be determined by the State Medicaid agency, within...
42 CFR 455.434 - Criminal background checks.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... that each such provider or person submit fingerprints. (2) The State Medicaid agency must require a... submit a set of fingerprints, in a form and manner to be determined by the State Medicaid agency, within...
42 CFR 455.434 - Criminal background checks.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... that each such provider or person submit fingerprints. (2) The State Medicaid agency must require a... submit a set of fingerprints, in a form and manner to be determined by the State Medicaid agency, within...
40 CFR 52.2720 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Puerto Rico § 52.2720 Identification of plan. (a) Title of plan: “Clean Air for Puerto Rico.” (b) The plan was submitted on January 31, 1972. (c... submitted on April 5, 1973, by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board. (2) Compliance...
40 CFR 52.2720 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
...) APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS (CONTINUED) Puerto Rico § 52.2720 Identification of plan. (a) Title of plan: “Clean Air for Puerto Rico.” (b) The plan was submitted on January 31, 1972. (c... submitted on April 5, 1973, by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board. (2) Compliance...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-26
... Implementation Plan (SIP) means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations... Transportation Conformity Purposes AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of adequacy... adequate for use in transportation conformity determinations. Ohio submitted the Steubenville and Canton...
40 CFR 52.69 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Jefferson County Board of Health Air Pollution Control Rules and Regulations, which became effective June 14... Implementation Plan submitted on March 21, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (2) Compliance schedules submitted on April 18, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (3) Clarifying...
40 CFR 52.69 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... Jefferson County Board of Health Air Pollution Control Rules and Regulations, which became effective June 14... Implementation Plan submitted on March 21, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (2) Compliance schedules submitted on April 18, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (3) Clarifying...
40 CFR 52.69 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... Jefferson County Board of Health Air Pollution Control Rules and Regulations, which became effective June 14... Implementation Plan submitted on March 21, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (2) Compliance schedules submitted on April 18, 1972, by the Alabama Air Pollution Control Commission. (3) Clarifying...
40 CFR 790.50 - Submission of study plans.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-07-01
... no letter of intent to conduct the test had been submitted as described in § 790.45(e) and (f). (e... CONTROL ACT (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES GOVERNING TESTING CONSENT AGREEMENTS AND TEST RULES Implementation, Enforcement, and Modification of Test Rules § 790.50 Submission of study plans. (a) Who must submit study...
40 CFR 790.50 - Submission of study plans.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-07-01
... no letter of intent to conduct the test had been submitted as described in § 790.45(e) and (f). (e... CONTROL ACT (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES GOVERNING TESTING CONSENT AGREEMENTS AND TEST RULES Implementation, Enforcement, and Modification of Test Rules § 790.50 Submission of study plans. (a) Who must submit study...
40 CFR 790.50 - Submission of study plans.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-07-01
... no letter of intent to conduct the test had been submitted as described in § 790.45(e) and (f). (e... CONTROL ACT (CONTINUED) PROCEDURES GOVERNING TESTING CONSENT AGREEMENTS AND TEST RULES Implementation, Enforcement, and Modification of Test Rules § 790.50 Submission of study plans. (a) Who must submit study...
42 CFR 51.10 - Remedial actions.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 42 Public Health 1 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Remedial actions. 51.10 Section 51.10 Public Health... actions. Failure to submit an annual report in the designated format on time or to submit requested information and documentation, corrective action plans and ongoing implementation status reports in response...
20 CFR 641.340 - Must the Governor submit a State Plan each year?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Must the Governor submit a State Plan each year? 641.340 Section 641.340 Employees' Benefits EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM The State Senior Employment...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-05
... requests have occurred in several iterations: Window 1, for which SEAs submitted requests in November 2011; Window 2, for which SEAs submitted requests in February 2012; Window 3, for which SEAs submitted requests in September 2012; and Window 4, for which SEAs submitted requests in spring 2013. Generally, ED...
20 CFR 641.305 - Who is responsible for developing and submitting the State Plan?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... 20 Employees' Benefits 3 2010-04-01 2010-04-01 false Who is responsible for developing and submitting the State Plan? 641.305 Section 641.305 Employees' Benefits EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM The State Senior...
34 CFR 364.11 - When must the State plan be submitted for approval?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... 34 Education 2 2010-07-01 2010-07-01 false When must the State plan be submitted for approval? 364.11 Section 364.11 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING...
34 CFR 364.11 - When must the State plan be submitted for approval?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... 34 Education 2 2011-07-01 2010-07-01 true When must the State plan be submitted for approval? 364.11 Section 364.11 Education Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education (Continued) OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING...
21 CFR 100.1 - Petitions requesting exemption from preemption for State or local requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-04-01
... of the petition shall be submitted, or the petitioner may submit an original and a computer readable... of State Requirement Provide a copy of the State requirement that is the subject of the application. Where available, the application should also include copies of any legislative history or background...
21 CFR 100.1 - Petitions requesting exemption from preemption for State or local requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-04-01
... of the petition shall be submitted, or the petitioner may submit an original and a computer readable... of State Requirement Provide a copy of the State requirement that is the subject of the application. Where available, the application should also include copies of any legislative history or background...
21 CFR 100.1 - Petitions requesting exemption from preemption for State or local requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-04-01
... of the petition shall be submitted, or the petitioner may submit an original and a computer readable... of State Requirement Provide a copy of the State requirement that is the subject of the application. Where available, the application should also include copies of any legislative history or background...
21 CFR 100.1 - Petitions requesting exemption from preemption for State or local requirements.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-04-01
... of the petition shall be submitted, or the petitioner may submit an original and a computer readable... of State Requirement Provide a copy of the State requirement that is the subject of the application. Where available, the application should also include copies of any legislative history or background...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-26
... Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Adhesives and Sealants Rule AGENCY... Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The SIP revision pertains to... volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the manufacture, sale, use, or application of adhesives, sealants...
76 FR 24475 - Adequacy Status of the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, North Carolina 1997 Annual PM2.5
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-02
...In this notice, EPA is notifying the public of its finding that the nitrogen oxides (NOX) motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, North Carolina area (hereafter referred to as the ``Hickory Area'') maintenance plan for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard, submitted on December 18, 2009, and supplemented on December 22, 2010, by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. EPA is also making an insignificance finding for direct fine particulate (PM2.5) through the transportation conformity adequacy process for the Hickory Area. The Hickory Area is comprised of the entire county of Catawba in North Carolina. On March 2, 1999, the District of Columbia Circuit Court ruled that submitted state implementation plans (SIPs) cannot be used for transportation conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of EPA's finding, the Hickory Area must use the NOX MVEBs from the submitted maintenance plan and supplement for the Hickory Area for future conformity determinations. Additionally, as a result of this finding, the Hickory Area is not required to perform a regional emissions analysis for direct PM2.5 in future PM2.5 transportation conformity determinations for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-12
... Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Soil Fumigant Risk Mitigation AGENCY... with the Paperwork Reduction Act: ``Soil Fumigant Risk Mitigation'' (EPA ICR No. 2451.01, OMB Control... eligibility for certain soil fumigant chemicals are adequately implemented. Under section 3(c)(2)(B) of the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-22
... Pollution, submitted to EPA by the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board on July 13, 2011. This action...)(2).) List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation... Control of Atmospheric Pollution submitted on July 13, 2011 by the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board...
Incentivizing Multiple Revisions Improves Student Writing without Increasing Instructor Workload
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Stellmack, Mark A.; Sandidge, Rita R.; Sippl, Amy L.; Miller, Danneka J.
2015-01-01
Previous research has shown that when students are required to submit a draft and a revision of their writing, large proportions of students do not improve across drafts. We implemented a writing assignment in which students were permitted to submit up to four optional drafts. To encourage substantive revisions, students were awarded additional…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-28
... action against violators of the CCTA. DATES: Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or before October 26, 2010. Commenters should be aware that the electronic Federal...Rulemaking portal; follow the instructions for submitting comments. You may also view an electronic version...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-02
... (SIP) submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). These revisions pertain to... are listed in the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic docket, some... submitted by MDE, as described below. II. Summary of SIP Revision A. SIP Revision 07-13 On October 24, 2007...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-23
... directly or formed secondarily through chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Sulfates are a type of..., Indiana submitted modeling intended to show that the Evansville area would attain and maintain the... particular, on December 7, 2009, Indiana submitted the results of modeling purporting to show PM 2.5...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-08
... submitted a revision to the contingency portion of the Maintenance Plan. These submitted SIP revisions are..., penalties, milestones, contingency plans, and motor vehicle emission budgets. Consequently, the Court's... illustrating how the area will continue in attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS and contingency measures. Our...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-24
... Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) submitted a SIP revision to EPA that contained... 8-hour CO standard. On August 1, 2012, the NH DES submitted a limited maintenance plan SIP revision... DES's SIP revision uses EPA's limited maintenance plan approach, as detailed in the EPA guidance...
78 FR 6331 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-30
... Section 1876 of the Social Security Act are required to submit a budget and enrollment forecast, semi... under Section 1833 of the Social Security Act are required to submit a budget and enrollment forecast... Social Security Act. The purposes of the revisions were to implement some changes in response to the...
Knowles, Valerie; Wang, Bo; Deveaux, Lynette; Lunn, Sonja; Rolle, Glenda; Jones, Giavana; Harris, Carole; Kaljee, Linda; Li, Xiaoming; Koci, Veronica; Chen, Xinguang; Marshall, Sharon; Stanton, Bonita
2012-01-01
Using data from the preparatory phase prior to national implementation of an effective HIV prevention program (Focus on Youth in the Caribbean; FOYC) in all Bahamian government sixth-grade classes, we describe (1) actual FOYC implementation, (2) factors that influenced implementation, and (3) the relationship of implementation with intervention outcome. Six elementary schools (with 17 grade six classrooms) were selected to participate in the preparatory phase. The 17 teachers were invited to attend a training workshop, coordinate administration of questionnaires to the students, teach the 10 sessions of FOYC and complete self-assessment checklists. A total of 395 students submitted baseline and 311 students submitted year-end questionnaires. Thirteen teachers initiated FOYC; five completed all 10 sessions. Implementation of FOYC was not related to teacher FOYC workshop experience but did cluster by school. There were significant positive correlations between improved student knowledge of HIV/AIDS, protective health skills, perceived parental monitoring and reduced risk behaviours with the number of FOYC sessions delivered. Implementation was impeded by logistics issues, structural issues with the measures, and comfort-level issues, most of which can be addressed for national implementation. Degree of FOYC implementation is correlated with positive student outcomes.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-19
..., identified by NOAA-NMFS-2011-0206, by any of the following methods: Electronic Submission: Submit all... click on the ``Submit a Comment'' icon on the right of that line. Mail: Submit written comments to...-9135; Attn: Moira Kelly. Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above methods to ensure...
1994-01-12
This final rule with comment period permits States flexibility to revise the process by which incurred medical expenses are considered to reduce an individual's or family's income to become Medicaid eligible. This process is commonly referred to as "spenddown." Only States which cover the medically needy, and States which use more restrictive criteria to determine eligibility of the aged, blind, and disabled, than the criteria used to determine eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits (section 1902(f) States) have a spenddown. These revisions permit States to: Consider as incurred medical expenses projected institutional expenses at the Medicaid reimbursement rate, and deduct those projected expenses from income in determining eligibility; combine the retroactive and prospective medically needy budget periods; either include or exclude medical expenses incurred earlier than the third month before the month of application (States must, however, deduct current payments on old bills not previously deducted in any budget period); and deduct incurred medical expenses from income in the order in which the services were provided, in the order each bill is submitted to the agency, by type of service. All States with medically needy programs using the criteria of the SS program may implement any of the provisions. States using more restrict criteria than the SSI program under section 1902(f) of the Social Security Act may implement all of these provisions except for the option to exclude medical expenses incurred earlier than the third month before the month of application.
45 CFR 283.3 - What steps will we follow to award the bonus?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... will consider them for the bonus if they submit data on abortions as stated in § 283.6; and (5) Identify which of the potentially eligible States that submitted the required data on abortions have experienced decreases in their rates of abortion relative to 1995, as described in § 283.7. These States will...
45 CFR 283.3 - What steps will we follow to award the bonus?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... will consider them for the bonus if they submit data on abortions as stated in § 283.6; and (5) Identify which of the potentially eligible States that submitted the required data on abortions have experienced decreases in their rates of abortion relative to 1995, as described in § 283.7. These States will...
45 CFR 283.3 - What steps will we follow to award the bonus?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... will consider them for the bonus if they submit data on abortions as stated in § 283.6; and (5) Identify which of the potentially eligible States that submitted the required data on abortions have experienced decreases in their rates of abortion relative to 1995, as described in § 283.7. These States will...
45 CFR 283.3 - What steps will we follow to award the bonus?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... will consider them for the bonus if they submit data on abortions as stated in § 283.6; and (5) Identify which of the potentially eligible States that submitted the required data on abortions have experienced decreases in their rates of abortion relative to 1995, as described in § 283.7. These States will...
45 CFR 283.3 - What steps will we follow to award the bonus?
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... will consider them for the bonus if they submit data on abortions as stated in § 283.6; and (5) Identify which of the potentially eligible States that submitted the required data on abortions have experienced decreases in their rates of abortion relative to 1995, as described in § 283.7. These States will...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-12
... implementation plan revisions, submitted by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources... for the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEB) for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides that...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-07
... Total Maximum Daily Load: Instrument, Pre-Test, and Implementation AGENCY: Environmental Protection..., Pre-test, and Implementation'' (EPA ICR No. 2456.01, OMB Control No. 2010-NEW) to the Office of...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
Two Senate bills, S. 1517 and S. 1578, were the subject of joint hearings on the issue of the disposal of low-level wastes. At issue was the inability to meet the January 1 deadline for the states to develop regional compacts. Witnesses discussed interim measures until the compacts are in place as proposed in the two bills. S. 1517 continues DOE financial and technical assistance, and revises the guidelines for regional compacts. S. 1578 focuses on improving the procedures for establishing and implementing the compacts. The witnesses presented the views of several states, the nuclear and electric power industries, environmentalmore » and safety groups, and others. Two appendices with additional responses and material submitted for the record follow the text of the two bills and the statements and testimony of 24 witnesses.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-19
... http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know..., the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted revisions to its SIP (Maryland SIP 08-02....11.35). On May 28, 2009, MDE submitted another revision to its SIP (Maryland SIP 09-01) amending...
Department of Energy Efforts to Promote Universal Adherence to the IAEA Additional Protocol
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Killinger, Mark H.; Hansen, Linda H.; Kovacic, Don N.
2009-10-06
Entry-into-force of the U.S. Additional Protocol (AP) in January 2009 continues to demonstrate the ongoing commitment by the United States to promote universal adherence to the AP. The AP is a critical tool for improving the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) capabilities to detect undeclared activities that indicate a clandestine nuclear weapons program. This is because States Parties are required to provide information about, and access to, nuclear fuel cycle activities beyond their traditional safeguards reporting requirements. As part of the U.S. AP Implementation Act and Senate Resolution of Ratification, the Administration is required to report annually to Congress onmore » measures taken to achieve the adoption of the AP in non-nuclear weapon states, as well as assistance to the IAEA to promote the effective implementation of APs in those states. A key U.S. effort in this area is being managed by the International Nuclear Safeguards and Engagement Program (INSEP) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Through new and existing bilateral cooperation agreements, INSEP has initiated technical assistance projects for AP implementation with selected non-weapon states. States with which INSEP is currently cooperating include Vietnam and Thailand, with Indonesia, Algeria, Morocco, and other countries as possible future collaborators in the area of AP implementation. The INSEP collaborative model begins with a joint assessment with our partners to identify specific needs they may have regarding entering the AP into force and any impediments to successful implementation. An action plan is then developed detailing and prioritizing the necessary joint activities. Such assistance may include: advice on developing legal frameworks and regulatory documents; workshops to promote understanding of AP requirements; training to determine possible declarable activities; assistance in developing a system to collect and submit declarations; performing industry outreach to raise awareness; guidance for reporting export and manufacturing of “especially designed or prepared” equipment listed in AP Annex I/Annex II; and lastly, developing indigenous capabilities to sustain AP implementation. INSEP also coordinates with the IAEA to ensure the harmonization of the assistance provided by DOE and the IAEA. This paper describes current efforts and future plans for AP international implementation support.« less
77 FR 57559 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-18
... DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit to the Office of... benefits. OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, email: [email protected] . Once submitted, the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-25
...EPA is proposing a limited approval and a limited disapproval of six revisions to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia, through the Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ), that address regional haze for the first implementation period. These revisions address the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's rules that require states to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I areas (national parks and wilderness areas) caused by emissions of air pollutants from numerous sources located over a wide geographic area (also referred to as the ``regional haze program''). States are required to assure reasonable progress toward the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. EPA is proposing a limited approval of these SIP revisions to implement the regional haze requirements for Virginia on the basis that the revisions, as a whole, strengthen the Virginia SIP. Also in this action, EPA is proposing a limited disapproval of these same SIP revisions because of the deficiencies in the Commonwealth's regional haze SIP submittal arising from the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (DC Circuit) to EPA of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). EPA is also proposing to approve this revision as meeting the infrastructure requirements relating to visibility protection for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS.
47 CFR 90.727 - Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 5 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Extended implementation schedules for Phase I... Frequencies in the 220-222 MHz Band § 90.727 Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees. Except... constructing and placing a system in operation if: (a) The applicant submits justification for an extended...
47 CFR 90.727 - Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 5 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Extended implementation schedules for Phase I... Frequencies in the 220-222 MHz Band § 90.727 Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees. Except... constructing and placing a system in operation if: (a) The applicant submits justification for an extended...
47 CFR 90.727 - Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 5 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Extended implementation schedules for Phase I... Frequencies in the 220-222 MHz Band § 90.727 Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees. Except... constructing and placing a system in operation if: (a) The applicant submits justification for an extended...
47 CFR 90.727 - Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 5 2012-10-01 2012-10-01 false Extended implementation schedules for Phase I... Frequencies in the 220-222 MHz Band § 90.727 Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees. Except... constructing and placing a system in operation if: (a) The applicant submits justification for an extended...
47 CFR 90.727 - Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 47 Telecommunication 5 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Extended implementation schedules for Phase I... Frequencies in the 220-222 MHz Band § 90.727 Extended implementation schedules for Phase I licensees. Except... constructing and placing a system in operation if: (a) The applicant submits justification for an extended...
Pandis, Nikolaos; Shamseer, Larissa; Kokich, Vincent G; Fleming, Padhraig S; Moher, David
2014-09-01
To describe a novel CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) adherence strategy implemented by the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJO-DO) and to report its impact on the completeness of reporting of published trials. The AJO-DO CONSORT adherence strategy, initiated in June 2011, involves active assessment of randomized clinical trial (RCT) reporting during the editorial process. The completeness of reporting CONSORT items was compared between trials submitted and published during the implementation period (July 2011 to September 2013) and trials published between August 2007 and July 2009. Of the 42 RCTs submitted (July 2011 to September 2013), 23 were considered for publication and assessed for completeness of reporting, seven of which were eventually published. For all published RCTs between 2007 and 2009 (n = 20), completeness of reporting by CONSORT item ranged from 0% to 100% (Median = 40%, interquartile range = 60%). All published trials in 2011-2013, reported 33 of 37 CONSORT (sub) items. Four CONSORT 2010 checklist items remained problematic even after implementation of the adherence strategy: changes to methods (3b), changes to outcomes (6b) after the trial commenced, interim analysis (7b), and trial stopping (14b), which are typically only reported when applicable. Trials published following implementation of the AJO-DO CONSORT adherence strategy completely reported more CONSORT items than those published or submitted previously. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
20 CFR 628.430 - State SDA Submission.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-04-01
... job training plan and in accordance with instructions issued by the Secretary, an SDA job training... submitted to the Secretary for approval. (b) When a State submits an SDA job training plan or plan... Employees' Benefits EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROGRAMS UNDER TITLE II OF...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... Reports. (a) States with Phase 1 projects shall submit semi-annual progress reports (original and one copy... in the next six months. (b) Phase 2. States with Phase 2 projects shall submit progress reports... Phase 2 project progress reports shall be determined by the size and complexity of the project, and...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
... Reports. (a) States with Phase 1 projects shall submit semi-annual progress reports (original and one copy... in the next six months. (b) Phase 2. States with Phase 2 projects shall submit progress reports... Phase 2 project progress reports shall be determined by the size and complexity of the project, and...
29 CFR 1956.1 - Purpose and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
...), however, permits States to submit plans with respect to any occupational safety and health issue with... Relating to Labor (Continued) OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (CONTINUED... State plans submitted under section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 667...
29 CFR 1956.1 - Purpose and scope.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-07-01
...), however, permits States to submit plans with respect to any occupational safety and health issue with... Relating to Labor (Continued) OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (CONTINUED... State plans submitted under section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 667...
40 CFR 52.1870 - Identification of plan.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
..., 1981, the State of Ohio committed itself to submit by December 31, 1981, the corrective materials for... July 27, 1979, the State of Ohio submitted materials to satisfy the general requirements of the Clean... a variance for the Pipeline Working Tank at the ARCO Pipeline Refinery in Summit County, Ohio. (36...
40 CFR 52.200 - Original identification of plan section.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-07-01
... were held was submitted by the State Department of Pollution Control and Ecology on January 25, 1972. (Non-regulatory) (2) State Department of Pollution Control and Ecology letter outlining projected... submitted by the Department of Pollution Control and Ecology on July 7, 1972. (4) June 27, 1975, letter from...