76 FR 76192 - NRC Enforcement Policy
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0273] NRC Enforcement Policy AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Proposed enforcement policy revision; request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear... licensees, vendors, and contractors), on proposed revisions to the NRC's Enforcement Policy (the Policy) and...
Kammerer, A.M.; ten Brink, Uri S.; Twitchell, David C.; Geist, Eric L.; Chaytor, Jason D.; Locat, J.; Lee, H.J.; Buczkowski, Brian J.; Sansoucy, M.
2008-01-01
In response to the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) initiated a long-term research program to improve understanding of tsunami hazard levels for nuclear facilities in the United States. For this effort, the US NRC organized a collaborative research program with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and other key researchers for the purpose of assessing tsunami hazard on the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States. The initial phase of this work consisted principally of collection, interpretation, and analysis of available offshore data and information. Necessarily, the US NRC research program includes both seismic- and landslide-based tsunamigenic sources in both the near and the far fields. The inclusion of tsunamigenic landslides, an important category of sources that impact tsunami hazard levels for the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts over the long time periods of interest to the US NRC is a key difference between this program and most other tsunami hazard assessment programs. Although only a few years old, this program is already producing results that both support current US NRC activities and look toward the long-term goal of probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment. This paper provides a summary of results from several areas of current research. An overview of the broader US NRC research program is provided in a companion paper in this conference.
Stevens, Peter R.; Nicholson, Thomas J.
1996-01-01
This report contains papers presented at the "Joint U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Technical Workshop on Research Related to Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Disposal" that was held at the USGS National Center Auditorium, Reston, Virginia, May 4-6, 1993. The objective of the workshop was to provide a forum for exchange of information, ideas, and technology in the geosciences dealing with LLW disposal. This workshop was the first joint activity under the Memorandum of Understanding between the USGS and NRC's Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research signed in April 1992.Participants included invited speakers from the USGS, NRC technical contractors (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Laboratories and universities) and NRC staff for presentation of research study results related to LLW disposal. Also in attendance were scientists from the DOE, DOE National Laboratories, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, State developmental and regulatory agencies involved in LLW disposal facility siting and licensing, Atomic Energy Canada Limited (AECL), private industry, Agricultural Research Service, universities, USGS and NRC.
NRC antitrust licensing actions, 1978--1996
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Mayer, S.J.; Simpson, J.J.
NUREG-0447, Antitrust Review of Nuclear Power Plants, was published in May 1978 and includes a compilation and discussion of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proceedings and activity involving the NRC`s competitive review program through February 1978, NUREG-0447 is an update of an earlier discussion of the NRC`s antitrust review of nuclear power plants, NR-AIG-001, The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Antitrust Review of Nuclear Power Plants: The Conditioning of Licenses, which reviewed the Commission`s antitrust review function from its inception in December 1970 through April 1976. This report summarizes the support provided to NRC staff in updating the compilation of themore » NRC`s antitrust licensing review activities for commercial nuclear power plants that have occurred since February 1978. 4 refs., 4 tabs.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-11
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2009-0279] Impact of Reduced Dose Limits on NRC Licensed Activities; Solicitation of Public Comment AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is seeking public...
10 CFR 2.802 - Petition for rulemaking.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov...: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, and sent either by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... Information Exchange, e-mail, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC...
10 CFR 2.802 - Petition for rulemaking.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov...: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, and sent either by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... Information Exchange, e-mail, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC...
10 CFR 2.802 - Petition for rulemaking.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov...: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, and sent either by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... Information Exchange, e-mail, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC...
75 FR 12804 - Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 8.6
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-17
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0103] Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 8.6 AGENCY: Nuclear...[uuml]ller Counters.'' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harriet Karagiannis, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is withdrawing...
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission natural analogue research program
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kovach, L.A.; Ott, W.R.
1995-09-01
This article describes the natural analogue research program of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC). It contains information on the regulatory context and organizational structure of the high-level radioactive waste research program plan. It also includes information on the conditions and processes constraining selection of natural analogues, describes initiatives of the US NRC, and describes the role of analogues in the licensing process.
77 FR 45697 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-01
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0149] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending U.S. Nuclear... Budget and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites...
77 FR 29697 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-05-18
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0066] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending U.S. Nuclear... Budget and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites...
Title list of documents made publicly available July 1-31, 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This monthly publication describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC). This includes information on docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and non-docketed material published by the US NRC pertinent to it`s role as a regulatory agency.
1996 NRC annual report. Volume 13
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1997-10-01
This 22nd annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) describes accomplishments, activities, and plans made during Fiscal Year 1996 (FH 1996)--October 1, 1995, through September 30, 1996. Significant activities that occurred early in FY 1997 are also described, particularly changes in the Commission and organization of the NRC. The mission of the NRC is to ensure that civilian uses of nuclear materials in the US are carried out with adequate protection of public health and safety, the environment, and national security. These uses include the operation of nuclear power plants and fuel cycle plants and medical, industrial, andmore » research applications. Additionally, the NRC contributes to combating the proliferation of nuclear weapons material worldwide. The NRC licenses and regulates commercial nuclear reactor operations and research reactors and other activities involving the possession and use of nuclear materials and wastes. It also protects nuclear materials used in operation and facilities from theft or sabotage. To accomplish its statutorily mandated regulatory mission, the NRC issues rules and standards, inspects facilities and operations, and issues any required enforcement actions.« less
75 FR 44816 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-29
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0263] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... individual monitoring for occupational radiation exposure during a monitoring (one calendar year) period to...
77 FR 70192 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0263] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
76 FR 72982 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-28
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2011-0271] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
77 FR 69661 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0230] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
78 FR 70353 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-25
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0248] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
77 FR 21813 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-11
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0058] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
77 FR 58872 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-24
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0198] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
78 FR 66078 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-04
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0238] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
78 FR 42112 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-15
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0116] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
78 FR 28244 - Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0085] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
77 FR 44289 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0150] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
76 FR 72983 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-28
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2011-0250] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
77 FR 54617 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-05
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0184] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
76 FR 33788 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-09
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2011-0009] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... (OMB) and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites...
77 FR 44290 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0155] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
77 FR 48555 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0172] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
78 FR 79500 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-30
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0279] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment...
75 FR 39054 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0234] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of pending NRC..., or wishing to participate in a license application review for the potential geologic repository. 5...
77 FR 63893 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-17
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0228] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) invites...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-044; NRC-2010-0361] Toshiba Corporation; Acceptance for Docketing of an Application for Renewal of the U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design Certification On November 2, 2010, Toshiba Corporation (Toshiba) submitted an application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a design...
75 FR 39585 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-09
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0236] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of pending NRC... licensees to ascertain compliance with the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Title II...
10 CFR 52.3 - Written communications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... either by mail addressed: ATTN: Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC... submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html...) through (b)(7) of this section: to the NRC's Document Control Desk (if on paper, the signed original...
NRC Targets University Reactors.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Marshall, Eliot
1984-01-01
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) wants universities to convert to low-grade fuel in their research reactions. Researchers claim the conversion, which will bring U.S. reactors in line with a policy the NRC is trying to impress on foreigners, could be financially and scientifically costly. Impact of the policy is considered. (JN)
76 FR 32379 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-06
... asked to report: NRC contractors, licensees, applicants, and other (e.g. intervenor's) who marry or.... Mail comments to NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission... Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001...
76 FR 77021 - Notice of Availability of Combined License Applications
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-09
... searching on Docket ID NRC-2008-0170 (William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2), NRC-2008-0231...://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col.html . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Habib, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: (301) 415-1035...
76 FR 71608 - Notice of Availability of Combined License Applications
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-18
... searching on Docket ID NRC-2008-0170 (William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2), NRC-2008-0231...://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col.html . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Habib, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: (301) 415-1035...
76 FR 72725 - Notice of Availability of Combined License Applications
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-25
... searching on Docket ID NRC-2008-0170 (William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2), NRC-2008-0231...://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col.html . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Habib, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: (301) 415-1035...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-22
...; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is... NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. Environmental.... Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and...
10 CFR 50.4 - Written communications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
...: Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to... NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected] otherwise specified in paragraphs (b)(2) through (b)(7) of this section: to the NRC's Document Control Desk...
10 CFR 50.4 - Written communications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... Information Exchange, e-mail, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC... NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This monthly publication contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number Index. NRC documents that are publicly available may be examined without charge atmore » the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).« less
75 FR 15461 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-29
..., by telephone at 301- 415-6258, or by e-mail to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV . Dated at Rockville... free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-1.... Mail comments to NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
75 FR 82413 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-30
... Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, by telephone at 301- 415-6258, or by e-mail to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource... copy of the draft supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room... for Docket No. NRC-2010-0348. Mail comments to NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S...
75 FR 14205 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-24
..., by telephone at 301- 415-6258, or by e-mail to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV . Dated at Rockville... supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North.... Mail comments to NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
Development of NRC inspection procedure 38703: Commercial-grade dedication
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Potapovs, U.; Pettis, R.L. Jr.
1994-12-31
The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of the recently completed U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection procedure 38703, {open_quotes}Commercial Grade Dedication,{close_quotes} which was issued on November 8, 1993. This procedure embodies the information gained from the NRC`s inspections and assessments of licensee procurement practices, a public workshop, industry feedback and public comments, and the NRC`s perspective of the industry`s response to the Nuclear Management and Resource Council (NUMARC) procurement initiatives.
Licensing a new industrial irradiator.
Bates, Nicolas K; Entwistle, Frederick B
2010-02-01
After nearly three decades of medical product sterilization, 3M launched a major new project to build and license an irradiator facility. 3M Corporate Health Physics was responsible for the licensing aspect of this project. The licensing process consisted of six amendments, over 30 submissions to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) and four U.S. NRC site visits. It took approximately 22 months to complete. The six license amendments are reviewed and several of the submissions are discussed. These include 3M's response to the U.S. NRC's interest in the shielding calculations used for the bioshield, the development of a protocol of radiation safety system test methods, and an analysis to show that a dropped cask during loading operations would not fall on sealed sources. A number of lessons were learned during the course of licensing the new irradiator. Among these were the importance of understanding the U.S. NRC license reviewer's perspective, the need to thoroughly review the irradiator manufacturer's licensing package during project negotiations, the benefits of leaving the Health Physics Office and meeting with the non-health physicists involved in the project, and the necessity of maintaining the solid relationships that already existed with the site Radiation Safety Officer and Sterilization Engineer.
NRC/AMRMC Resident Research Associateship Program
2016-03-01
Washington, DC 20001 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Medical Research and...9) PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS RESULTING FROM NRC ASSOCIATESHIP RESEARCH Provide complete citations: author(s), title, full name of journal , volume...PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS RESULTING FROM NRC ASSOCIATESHIP RESEARCH Provide complete citations: author(s), title, full name of journal , volume number, page
ACToR – Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource ...
This presentation reviews the US EPAs reaction to the challenge of the NRC on the future of toxicity testing through the development of the ACTor Project and the ToxRef database. This presentation reviews the US EPAs reaction to the challenge of the NRC on the future of toxicity testing through the development of the ACTor Project and the ToxRef database.
78 FR 70965 - Ameren Missouri; Combined License Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 2, Exemption
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-037; NRC-2008-0556] Ameren Missouri; Combined License Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 2, Exemption 1.0 Background Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren UE, submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) a Combined License (COL) Application for a single unit of AREVA NP's U.S...
77 FR 76539 - Ameren Missouri; Combined License Application For Callaway Plant, Unit 2; Exemption
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-28
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-037; NRC-2008-0556] Ameren Missouri; Combined License Application For Callaway Plant, Unit 2; Exemption 1.0 Background Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren UE, submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) a Combined License (COL) Application for a single unit of AREVA NP's U.S...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Bradford, A.H.; Esh, D.W.; Ridge, A.C.
2006-07-01
Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to consult with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for certain non-high level waste (HLW) determinations. Under the NDAA, NRC performs consultative technical reviews of DOE's waste determinations and monitors DOE's disposal actions for such waste, but the NRC does not have regulatory authority over DOE's waste disposal activities. The NDAA provides the criteria that must be met to determine that waste is not HLW. The criteria require that the waste does not need to be disposedmore » of in a geologic repository, that highly radioactive radionuclides be removed to the maximum extent practical, and that the performance objectives of 10 CFR 61, Subpart C, be met. The performance objectives contain criteria for protection of the public, protection of inadvertent intruders, protection of workers, and stability of the disposal site after closure. This paper describes NRC's approach to implementing its responsibilities under the NDAA, as well as similar activities being performed for sites not covered by the NDAA. (authors)« less
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... to: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear... visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to MSHD.Resource...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
Memorandum of Understanding Between U.S. EPA Superfund and U.S. NRC
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Walker, Stuart
2008-01-15
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are responsible for implementing the 'Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites'. This paper provides a brief overview of the origin of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the major features of the MOU, and how the MOU has been implemented site specifically. EPA and NRC developed the MOU in response to direction from the House Committee on Appropriations to EPA and NRC to work togethermore » to address the potential for dual regulation. The MOU was signed by EPA on September 30, 2002 and NRC on October 9, 2002. The two agencies had worked on the MOU since March 2000. While both EPA and NRC have statutory authority to clean up these sites, the MOU provides consultation procedures between EPA and NRC to eliminate dual regulation. Under the MOU, EPA and NRC identified the interactions of the two agencies for the decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites and the ways in which those responsibilities will be exercised. Except for Section VI, which addresses corrective action under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), this MOU is limited to the coordination between EPA, when acting under its CERCLA authority, and NRC, when a facility licensed by the NRC is undergoing decommissioning, or when a facility has completed decommissioning, and the NRC has terminated its license. EPA believes that implementation of the MOU between the two agencies will ensure that future confusion about dual regulation does not occur regarding the cleanup and reuse of NRC-licensed sites. NRC and EPA have so far exchanged MOU consultation letters on eight NRC-licensed sites. EPA has responded to each consultation request with a letter expressing its views on actions that NRC should consider that address the site-specific matter that triggered consultation. Over the course of consultations on the eight sites, there have been some reoccurring themes to EPA's views. Primarily, these are EPA: 1. Recommending that NRC consider selecting institutional controls to ensure that NRC's assumptions about future human exposure at the site are not exceeded. 2. Recommending that NRC consider using more site-specific information when conducting dose assessment modeling. 3. Recommending that NRC consider a flexible approach to groundwater protection that still ensures the public is not exposed to contamination levels over drinking water limits. 4. Recommending that NRC consider an approach similar to how EPA implements supplemental standards under 40 CFR 192 as an ARAR when the UMTRCA soil standard of 5 pCi/g is not being met.« less
75 FR 8150 - STP Nuclear Operating Company
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499; NRC-2010-060] STP Nuclear Operating... The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to...,'' for Facility Operating [[Page 8151
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S...
NRC/AMRMC Resident Research Associateship Program
2018-05-01
Award Number: W81XWH-12-2-0010 TITLE: NRC/AMRMC Resident Research Associateship Program PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Howard Gamble CONTRACTING...ORGANIZATION: NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Washington, DC 20001 REPORT DATE: May 2018 TYPE OF REPORT: Final PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research ...1. REPORT DATE May 2018 2. REPORT TYPE Final 3. DATES COVERED 6 Feb 2012 - 28 Feb 2018 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE NRC/AMRMC Resident Research Associateship
77 FR 64562 - Draft Emergency Preparedness Frequently Asked Questions
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-22
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0248] Draft Emergency Preparedness Frequently Asked... Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Mark Thaggard, Deputy Director for Emergency Preparedness, Division of... comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making available for comment Emergency...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... this part must be addressed to the NRC's Document Control Desk, and sent by mail to the U.S. Nuclear...'s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]; or...
10 CFR 4.5 - Communications and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear...
10 CFR 4.5 - Communications and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]gov; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear...
Reassessment of NRC`s dollar per person-rem conversion factor policy
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1995-12-01
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has completed a review and analysis of its dollar per person-rem conversion factor policy. As a result of this review, the NRC has decided to adopt a $2000 per person-rem conversion factor, subject it to present worth considerations, and limit its scope solely to health effects. This is in contrast to the previous policy and staff practice of using an undiscounted $1000 per person-rem conversion factor that served as a surrogate for all offsite consequences (health and offsite property). The policy shift has been incorporated in ``Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the US Nuclear Regulatorymore » Commission,`` NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 2, November 1995.« less
78 FR 33862 - Draft Emergency Preparedness Frequently Asked Questions
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-05
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0113] Draft Emergency Preparedness Frequently Asked... Commission. William Gott, Acting Deputy Director for Emergency Preparedness, Division of Preparedness and... comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making available for comment Emergency...
77 FR 66650 - Proposed Revisions to Radiation Protection
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0268] Proposed Revisions to Radiation Protection AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Standard review plan-draft section revision; request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is revising the following sections...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Suber, Gregory
2012-07-01
In 2005 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began to implement a new set of responsibilities under the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of Fiscal Year 2005. Section 3116 of the NDAA requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to consult with the NRC for certain non-high level waste determinations and also requires NRC to monitor DOE's disposal actions related to those determinations. In Fiscal Year 2005, the NRC staff began consulting with DOE and completed reviews of draft waste determinations for salt waste at the Savannah River Site. In 2006, a second review was completed onmore » tank waste residuals including sodium-bearing waste at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center Tank Farm at the Idaho National Laboratory. Monitoring Plans were developed for these activities and the NRC is actively monitoring disposal actions at both sites. NRC is currently in consultation with DOE on the F-Area Tank Farm closure and anticipates entering consultation on the H-Area Tank Farm at the Savannah River Site. This paper presents, from the NRC perspective, an overview of how the consultation and monitoring process has evolved since its conception in 2005. It addresses changes in methods and procedures used to collect and develop information used by the NRC in developing the technical evaluation report and monitoring plan under consultation and the implementation the plan under monitoring. It will address lessons learned and best practices developed throughout the process. The NDAA has presented significant challenges for the NRC and DOE. Past and current successes demonstrate that the NDAA can achieve its intended goal of facilitating tank closure at DOE legacy defense waste sites. The NRC believes many of the challenges in performing the WD reviews have been identified and addressed. Lessons learned have been collected and documented throughout the review process. Future success will be contingent on each agencies commitment to consistently apply the lessons learned and continue to create an open and collaborative work environment to maintain the process of continuous improvement. (authors)« less
78 FR 66785 - Luminant Generation Company, LLC
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 52-034 and 52-035; NRC-2008-0594] Luminant Generation Company, LLC AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of receipt; availability. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is giving notice once each week for four consecutive weeks...
76 FR 63957 - Consumer Product Policy Statement
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0292] Consumer Product Policy Statement AGENCY: Nuclear...: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is proposing to update its policy statement... terminology used in radiation protection that have evolved over time, as well as relevant legislation and...
76 FR 66332 - Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive Service
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-26
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0249] Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive Service AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Appointment to Performance Review... the following appointments to the NRC Performance Review Boards. The following individuals are...
75 FR 17438 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2010-0141] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of... new Agreement State applications. Annually for participation by Agreement States in the IMPEP reviews...
75 FR 18241 - Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-09
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0148] Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Issuance and Availability of Draft Regulatory.... Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft guide in the...
75 FR 45166 - Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-02
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0265] Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Issuance and Availability of Draft Regulatory.... Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft guide in the...
76 FR 65541 - Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-21
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2009-0263] Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Regulatory guide; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is issuing a revision to Regulatory...
Steam Generator tube integrity -- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission perspective
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Murphy, E.L.; Sullivan, E.J.
1997-02-01
In the US, the current regulatory framework was developed in the 1970s when general wall thinning was the dominant degradation mechanism; and, as a result of changes in the forms of degradation being observed and improvements in inspection and tube repair technology, the regulatory framework needs to be updated. Operating experience indicates that the current U.S. requirements should be more stringent in some areas, while in other areas they are overly conservative. To date, this situation has been dealt with on a plant-specific basis in the US. However, the NRC staff is now developing a proposed steam generator rule asmore » a generic framework for ensuring that the steam generator tubes are capable of performing their intended safety functions. This paper discusses the current U.S. regulatory framework for assuring steam generator (SG) tube integrity, the need to update this regulatory framework, the objectives of the new proposed rule, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory guide (RG) that will accompany the rule, how risk considerations affect the development of the new rule, and some outstanding issues relating to the rule that the NRC is still dealing with.« less
78 FR 52570 - Draft Emergency Preparedness Frequently Asked Questions
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0197] Draft Emergency Preparedness Frequently Asked... comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is making available for comment Emergency Preparedness (EP) frequently asked questions (EPFAQs) No. 2013-004, No. 2013-006, and No. 2013-007. These...
78 FR 70079 - Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive Service
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-22
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0255] Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior... for Senior Executive Service. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the... and awarding authorities on performance appraisal ratings and performance awards for Senior Executives...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-31
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0143] Proposed International Isotopes Fluorine Extraction Process and Depleted Uranium Deconversion Plant in Lea County, New Mexico AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory... U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has published the Final Environmental...
75 FR 45676 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-03
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2010-0235] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of...: Applications for new licenses and amendments may be submitted at any time. Applications for renewal are...
75 FR 9444 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-02
... applications for licenses and amendments thereto to construct and operate nuclear power plants, preliminary or... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2010-0063] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of...
75 FR 37841 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-30
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2010-0214] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of... the collection is required: Applications for new licenses and amendments may be submitted at any time...
78 FR 69140 - CSMI, LLC; Request for Action
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-18
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0250] CSMI, LLC; Request for Action AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Request for action; receipt. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... petitioner) has requested that the NRC take action with regard to CSMI. The petitioner's requests are...
Jaczko to resign as chair of Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Showstack, Randy
2012-05-01
Gregory Jaczko, chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), announced on 21 May that he will resign once his successor is appointed. His resignation will end a stormy 3-year chairmanship during which he was accused of bullying NRC staff, lying to Congress, and being too close to the political process. Jaczko formerly served as science advisor to Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.). As NRC chair, Jaczko halted the commission's license application review for storing nuclear waste at Nevada's Yucca Mountain. In addition, during his NRC tenure the commission focused on identifying and implementing lessons from Japan's Fukushima Daiichi reactors damaged by the 2011 tsunami.
75 FR 45171 - Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-02
... Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555...-3040. This guide describes some engineering practices and methods generally considered by the NRC to be... they reflect the latest general engineering approaches that are acceptable to the NRC staff. If future...
76 FR 24831 - Alternative to Minimum Days Off Requirements
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-03
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 26 RIN 3150-AI94 [NRC-2011-0058] Alternative to Minimum Days Off Requirements AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is correcting a proposed rule that appeared in the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-29
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 052-00026; NRC-2008-0252] Inspections, Tests, Analyses... Commission. ACTION: Determination of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) completion. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the inspections, tests...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-30
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 052-00026; NRC-2008-0252] Inspections, Tests, Analyses... Commission. ACTION: Determination of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria completion. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the inspections, tests...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-29
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 052-00025; NRC-2008-0252] Inspections, Tests, Analyses... Commission. ACTION: Determination of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) completion. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the inspections, tests...
76 FR 33173 - Medical Use Regulations
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-08
...-2008-0071 and NRC-2008-0175] RIN 3150-AI26, 3150-AI63 Medical Use Regulations AGENCY: Nuclear... on certain issues under consideration to amend the medical use regulations, provides the date of the... concerning the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) proposed amendments to the medical use regulations...
77 FR 143 - Receipt of Request for Action
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-01-03
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0291] Receipt of Request for Action Notice is hereby given... U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take action to immediately suspend the operating licenses... request: enforcement action to ensure that the public health and safety is not unduly being jeopardized by...
Title list of documents made publicly available, June 1-30, 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This document is a monthly publication describing information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, {open_quotes}docketed{close_quotes} does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records.
NRC Perspectives on Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Consultations and Monitoring - 13398
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
McKenney, Christepher A.; Suber, Gregory F.; Felsher, Harry D.
2013-07-01
Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to consult with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for certain non-high level waste (HLW) determinations. The NDAA also requires NRC to monitor DOE's disposal actions related to those determinations to assess compliance with NRC regulations in 10 CFR Part 61, Subpart C. The NDAA applies to DOE activities that will remain within the States of South Carolina and Idaho. DOE has chosen to, under DOE Order 435.1, engage in consultation with NRC for similar activities inmore » the State of Washington and New York, however, the NRC has no monitoring responsibilities. In 2007, the NRC developed a draft Final Report for Interim Use entitled, NUREG-1854: NRC Staff Guidance for Activities Related to U.S. Department of Energy Waste Determinations. Since the law was enacted, the DOE and NRC have consulted on three waste determinations within the affected States: (1) the Saltstone Disposal Facility at the Savannah River Site (SRS) within the State of South Carolina in 2005, (2) the INTEC Tank Farm at the Idaho National Laboratory within the State of Idaho in 2006, and (3) the F Tank Farm at SRS in 2011. After the end of consultation and issuance by DOE of the final waste determination, monitoring began at each of these sites, including the development of monitoring plans. In addition to the NDAA sites, DOE has requested NRC consultation support on both individual tanks and the entire C Tank Farm at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the State of Washington. DOE also requested consultation of waste determinations performed on the melter and related feed tanks at the West Valley site in New York that would be disposed offsite. In the next few years, NRC and DOE will consult on the last of the NDAA waste determinations for a while, the H Tank Farm waste determination at SRS. DOE may identify other activities in the future but largely NRC's role will change from doing both consultation and monitoring to being focused on monitoring activities within NDAA. DOE has identified other activities at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation that would continue consultation activities but outside of the NDAA in the future. During the past seven years of consultations and monitoring a number of lessons learned about the process, communication issues, and technical guidance have been identified. With the change in focus from reviewing initial performance assessments and draft waste determinations to long-term monitoring (e.g., individual waste tank closure, at F Tank Farm or complete tank farm closure at INTEC expected in the near future), the NRC is going to revise and update its guidance over the next few years to reflect the lessons learned and the change in focus. In addition to the lessons learned, improvements in the guidance will have to account possible rule and guidance changes underway within Part 61. This paper will discuss the initial plans, approaches, and time lines to revise the guidance within NUREG-1854, including opportunities for public involvement. (authors)« less
10 CFR 52.3 - Written communications.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
..., for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, e-mail, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be... submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear...
75 FR 61780 - Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: NRC will convene a... Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors on a national medical events database; (2) a discussion on...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-19
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0230] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
76 FR 76327 - Installation of Radiation Alarms for Rooms Housing Neutron Sources
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 73 [Docket Nos. PRM-73-15; NRC-2011-0251] Installation of Radiation Alarms for Rooms Housing Neutron Sources AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-19
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0263] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-13
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2011-0181] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-15
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2011-0271] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2013-0116] OMB Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear... comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review...
78 FR 66785 - Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., and Korea Electric Power Corporation
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Project No. 0782; NRC-2013-0244] Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., and Korea Electric Power Corporation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of receipt; availability. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff acknowledges receipt of...
78 FR 63501 - Request To Submit a Two-Part Application-Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-24
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Project No. 0803; NRC-2013-0235] Request To Submit a Two-Part Application--Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Exemption. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an exemption in response to an August 9, 2013...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-03
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-482; NRC-2010-0032] Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, Wolf Creek Generating Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to Title...
76 FR 40204 - Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-07
... U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is publishing its semiannual regulatory agenda in.... Public comments on NRC's published rulemaking actions are available on the Federal rulemaking Web site at... under the heading ``Timetable'' is the date the rule is scheduled to be published in the Federal...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-01
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2011-0263] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0172] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC-2012-0155] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0067] Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate Interim...-Learned Project Directorate Interim Staff Guidance; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is issuing the Final Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate (JLD...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0069] Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate Interim...-Learned Project Directorate interim staff guidance; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is issuing the Final Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate Interim...
77 FR 40091 - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 2 and 3
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286; NRC-2008-0672] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 2 and 3 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission... renewal of nuclear plants; availability. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the...
76 FR 44865 - Domestic Licensing of Source Material-Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 40 RIN 3150-AI50 [NRC-2009-0079 and NRC-2011-0080] Domestic Licensing of Source Material--Amendments/Integrated Safety Analysis AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Extension of public comment period and public meeting. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear...
Talking with the Public about Regulating High-level Waste Disposal: Recent Progress
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kotra, J. P.; Leslie, B. W.
Increasing public confidence in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as an effective and independent regulator is an explicit goal of the Agency (1). Consistent with long-established mechanisms and procedures, NRC provides the public access to its decision-making process. Recently, during the course of a rulemaking required by statute, NRC examined its means for inviting public access as well as the NRC staff's effectiveness in furthering public confidence in it's actions as a regulator. When developing new, site-specific regulations for the proposed geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, NRC's Division of Waste Management found it necessary to adapt and improvemore » its efforts to inform and involve the public in NRC's decision making process. Major changes were made to the way in which technical staff prepare for speaking to general audiences. The format used for public meetings was modified to encourage dialogue with participants. Handout and presentation materials that explain NRC's role and technical topics of concern in plain language were developed and are regularly updated. NRC successfully applied these and other institutional changes as it completed final regulations for Yucca Mountain and while developing and introducing a draft license review plan for public comment.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0319; Docket No. 50-400] Carolina Power & Light Company; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has granted the request of the Carolina Power & Light Company...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-27
... Department of Natural Resources and Environment regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action... the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact... Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-02
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0076] Solicitation of Topics for Discussion at a Spent...: Solicitation of Topics for Discussion at a Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Licensing Conference. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting input on topics for discussion at a...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 30-36974; NRC-2010-0374] Notice of Availability of Final... AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has published a Final Supplement to the Environmental...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-15
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0183] Request for Comments on the Draft Policy Statement on Volume Reduction and Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Request for public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is revising its...
78 FR 51753 - AUC, LLC Reno Creek, In Situ Project, New Source Material License Application
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-21
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 040-09092; [NRC-2013-0164] AUC, LLC Reno Creek, In Situ Project, New Source Material License Application AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of..., AUC, LLC (AUC) submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) an application for a new...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-29
... Two White Flint North Building Entrance AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of... through the recently renovated One White Flint North (OWFN) building entrance lobby. Only NRC badged employees and contractors shall be permitted to use the Two White Flint North (TWFN) building entrance. NRC...
76 FR 75566 - Notice of Availability of Combined License Applications
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-02
....regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC-2008-0170 (William States Lee III Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2... available at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col.html . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Habib, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone...
78 FR 37848 - ASME Code Cases Not Approved for Use
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-24
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-1233, ``ASME Code Cases not Approved for Use.'' This regulatory guide lists the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Cases that the NRC has determined not to be acceptable for use on a generic basis.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-14
.... Ken Yale, of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment regarding the environmental...; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is..., the NRC performed an environmental assessment. Based on the results of the environmental assessment...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-17
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0242] In the Matter of Timothy M. Goold; IA-12-014... the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission's) Materials License No. 21-16560-01 which authorized, at the time, specific activities involving byproduct, source, and/or special nuclear material...
77 FR 25104 - Petition for Rulemaking; Submitted by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-27
.... ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear...), in the rulemaking process. The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to require... may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-09
... integral part of the evaluative process used by the agency to ensure the operational safety performance of... the AARM. The reason this additional criterion has been added is to allow NRC's senior management to..., Rockville, Maryland. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): Publicly available...
78 FR 26090 - Content Specifications and Shielding Evaluations for Type B Transportation Packages
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-03
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2013-04, ``Content Specifications and Shielding Evaluations for Type B Transportation Packages.'' This RIS clarifies the NRC's use of staff guidance in NUREG-1609, ``Standard Review Plan for Transport Packages for Radioactive Material,'' for the review of content specifications and shielding evaluations included in the Certificates of Compliance (CoC) and safety analysis reports (SARs) for Type B transportation packages. The RIS does not impose any additional regulatory requirements on NRC licensees.
Recommendations for NRC policy on shift scheduling and overtime at nuclear power plants
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Lewis, P.M.
1985-07-01
This report contains the Pacific Northwest Laboratory's (PNL's) recommendations to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for an NRC policy on shift scheduling and hours of work (including overtime) for control room operators and other safety-related personnel in nuclear power plants. First, it is recommended that NRC make three additions to its present policy on overtime: (1) limit personnel to 112 hours of work in a 14-day period, 192 hours in 28 days, and 2260 hours in one year; exceeding these limits would require plant manager approval; (2) add a requirement that licensees obtain approval from NRC if plant personnelmore » are expected to exceed 72 hours of work in a 7-day period, 132 hours in 14 days, 228 hours in 28 days, and 2300 hours in one year; and (3) make the policy a requirement, rather than a nonbinding recommendation. Second, it is recommended that licensees be required to obtain NRC approval to adopt a routine 12-hour/day shift schedule. Third, it is recommended that NRC add several nonbinding recommendations concerning routine 8-hour/day schedules. Finally, because additional data can strengthen the basis for future NRC policy on overtime, five methods are suggested for collecting data on overtime and its effects. 44 refs., 10 tabs.« less
Weber, Michael Fred
2017-02-01
The world is experiencing change at an unprecedented pace, as reflected in social, cultural, economic, political, and technological advances around the globe. Regulatory agencies, like the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), must also transform in response to and in preparation for these changes. In 2014, the NRC staff commenced Project Aim 2020 to transform the agency by enhancing efficiency, agility, and responsiveness, while accomplishing NRC's safety and security mission. Following Commission review and approval in 2015, the NRC began implementing the approved strategies, including strategic workforce planning to provide confidence that NRC will have employees with the right skills and talents at the right time to accomplish the agency's mission. Based on the work conducted so far, ensuring an adequate pipeline of radiation protection professionals is a significant need that NRC shares with states and other government agencies, private industry, academia, as well as international counterparts. NRC is working to ensure that sufficient radiation protection professionals will be available to fulfill its safety and security mission and leverage the work of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, the Health Physics Society, the Organization of Agreement States, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Nuclear Energy Agency, and others.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-28
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-033; NRC-2008-0566] Detroit Edison Company; Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Combined License for Unit 3 at the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Site Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) [[Page...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-18
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0241] Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses; Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Background Pursuant to section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission or NRC) is publishing...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-24
...: Gregory R. Trussell, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S... Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly-available documents online in the NRC... continues to be ensured. The direct final rule will become effective on January 7, 2014. However, if the NRC...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-27
...: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The NRC has recently submitted to OMB for review the following proposal for the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-24
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-266 And 50-301; NRC-2010-0123 FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an Exemption, pursuant to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-30
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0195; 030-33792; 12-16941-03 (terminated); EA-10-161] In.... 12-16941-03 issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to Title 10... of its Radiation Protection Program content and implementation; (5) provide annual reports of the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-09
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-298; NRC-2008-0617] Nebraska Public Power District: Cooper Nuclear Station; Notice of Availability of the Final Supplement 41 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, Commission) has...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-06-11
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 71 and 73 RIN 3150-AG41 [NRC-1999-0005] Advance Notification to Native American Tribes of Transportation of Certain Types of Nuclear Waste AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-29
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-016; NRC-2008-0250] UniStar Nuclear Energy; Combined License Application for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3; Exemption 1.0 Background: UniStar Nuclear Energy (UNE) submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission ) a...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0020] GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy; Notice of Receipt and... December 7, 2010, GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) filed with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC..., Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants,'' an application for a design certification (DC) renewal...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0205] Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Background Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission or NRC) is publishing thi...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-22
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0040] Biweekly Notice Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations I. Background Pursuant to Section 189a.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission or NRC) is publishing...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-01-25
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0019] Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations I. Background Pursuant to section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission or NRC) is publishing...
75 FR 13327 - Tennessee Valley Authority; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Exemption
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-19
... the rule's compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that the Commission's... compliance date (Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from R. W. Borchardt, NRC, to M. S. Fertel, Nuclear Energy... the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect. The facility...
Overview of NRC Proactive Management of Materials Degradation (PMMD) Program
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Carpenter, C. E. Gene; Hull, Amy; Oberson, Greg
Materials degradation phenomena, if not appropriately managed, have the potential to adversely impact the design functionality and safety margins of nuclear power plant (NPP) systems, structures and components (SSCs). Therefore, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has initiated an over-the-horizon multi-year research Proactive Management of Materials Degradation (PMMD) Research Program, which is presently evaluating longer time frames (i.e., 80 or more years) and including passive long-lived SSCs beyond the primary piping and core internals, such as concrete containment and cable insulation. This will allow the NRC to (1) identify significant knowledge gaps and new forms of degradation; (2) capture current knowledge base; and, (3) prioritize materials degradation research needs and directions for future efforts. This effort is being accomplished in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) LWR Sustainability (LWRS) program. This presentation will discuss the activities to date, including results, and the path forward.
Title list of documents made publicly available: June 1--30, 1995. Volume 17, Number 6
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1995-08-01
This monthly publication contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number Index.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Morris, E.B.
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed, material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index and amore » Report Number Index.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available: April 1--30, 1996. Volume 18, Number 4
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1996-06-01
This publication describes the information received and published by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number Index.
78 FR 38739 - Standard Format and Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-27
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.185, ``Standard Format and Content for Post-shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report.'' This guide describes a method that the NRC staff considers acceptable for use in complying with the Commission's requirements regarding the submission of a post-shutdown decommissioning activities report (PSDAR).
77 FR 75198 - Standard Format and Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-12-19
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-1272, ``Standard Format and Content for Post-shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report.'' This guide describes a method that the NRC staff considers acceptable for use in complying with the Commission's requirements regarding the submission of a post-shutdown decommissioning activities report (PSDAR).
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-24
... time that a document is referenced. Revision 3 of Regulatory Guide 1.129 is available in ADAMS under...-251-7455; email: [email protected] . Both of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S... NRC is issuing a revision to an existing guide in the NRC's ``Regulatory Guide'' series. This series...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-28
... November 27, 2012. IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory... accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires... requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0298; Docket No. 50-346] First Energy Nuclear Operating Company; Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Facility Operating License No. NPF-003 for an Additional 20-Year Period The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) has...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-10
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-366; NRC-2010-0345] Southern Nuclear Operating Company Inc. Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Unit No. 2 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, ...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-29
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364; NRC-2009-0375] Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an Exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-12
... text and image files of NRC's public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for the documents related...: 1. Letter dated June 14, 2007, from J. Schlueter, NRC, to J. Vranka, Colorado Department of Public.... ML100570213. 4. Letter dated March 11, 2010, from J. Opila, Colorado Department of Public Health and...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-24
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-039; NRC-2008-0603] PPL Bell Bend, LLC; Bell Bend... October 18, 2013 request from PPL Bell Bend, LLC (PPL). PPL requested an exemption from certain regulatory... Bend, LLC (PPL) submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) a Combined License (COL...
Title list of documents made publicly available, January 1-31, 1998
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1998-03-01
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and amore » Report Number Index. The docketed information in the Title List includes the information formerly issued through the Department of Energy publication Power Reactor Docket Information, last published in January 1979. NRC documents that are publicly available may be examined without charge at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). Duplicate copies in paper, microfiche, or (selectively) diskette, may be obtained for a fee.« less
Yanetz, Rivka; Kipnis, Victor; Carroll, Raymond J; Dodd, Kevin W; Subar, Amy F; Schatzkin, Arthur; Freedman, Laurence S
2008-03-01
It is now well-established that individuals misreport their dietary intake. We propose a new method (National Research Council-Biomarker [NRC-B]) for estimating population distributions of usual dietary intake from national survey 24-hour recall data, using additional biomarker data from an external study to adjust for such dietary misreporting. NRC-B is an extension of the NRC method, and is based upon two developed assumptions: the ratio of the mean of true intake to that of reported intake is equal in the survey and external biomarker study; and the ratio of the variance of true intake to that of reported intake is equal in these two studies. NRC-B adjusts the usual intake distribution both for within-person variation and for bias (underreporting) that occur with 24-hour recall reports. Using doubly labeled water ((2)H(2)(18)O) measurements from the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study, we applied NRC-B to data on energy intake for adults aged 40 to 69 years from two national surveys, the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We compared the results with the NRC and traditional methods that used only the survey data to estimate dietary intake distributions. Estimated distributions from NRC-B and NRC were much narrower and less skewed than from the traditional method. However, unlike NRC, the median of the NRC-B based distribution was higher by 8% to 16% than the traditional method in our examples. The proposed method adjusts for the well-documented problem of underreporting of energy intake.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate Source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principal Documents.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-02
... Spent Fuel Pool Study). The purpose of this study was to examine if faster removal of older, colder... NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public... of postulated spent fuel pool accidents. The purpose of this study is to examine if faster removal of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-13
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286; NRC-2012-0168] Entergy Nuclear Indian Point Unit 2, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point Unit 3, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-22
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366; NRC-2010-0024] Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an Exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-08
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-272, 50-311 and 50-354; NRC-2010-0043] PSEG Nuclear LLC; Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an Exemption, pursuant...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-26
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-003, 50-247, and 50-286; NRC-2010-0137] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-10-20
... medical records by 2014. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is seeking public comment on... Regulations (CFR) 35.40 and records for inspection required by 10 CFR part 35 subpart L). For medical use licensees, 10 CFR 35.5 permits the use of electronic media to produce and store records that are maintained...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-06-02
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0118] Final Memorandum of Understanding Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of availability. FOR FURTHER...
U.S. regulatory research program for implementation of burnup credit in transport casks
DOT National Transportation Integrated Search
2001-09-10
In 1999 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) initiated a research program to : support the development of technical bases and guidance that would facilitate the implementation of : burnup credit into licensing activities for transport an...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Uleck, R.B.; DeFino, C.V.
1991-12-31
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 (LLRWPAA) assigned States the responsibility to provide for disposal of commercial low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) by 1993. The LLRWPAA also required the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to establish procedures and develop the technical review capability to process license applications for new LLRW disposal facilities. Under the LLRWPAA, NRC is required, to the extent practicable, to complete its review of an LLRW disposal facility license application within 15 months of its submittal by a State. This provision of the LLRWPAA helps ensure that NRC, in addition to protecting public health andmore » safety and the environment, facilitates States` achievement of LLRWPAA milestones for new facility development. A timely NRC review is needed for States to accomplish their objective of having new disposal facilities in operation on the dates prescribed in the LLRWPAA. To help assure NRC and States` compliance with the provisions of the LLRWPAA, NRC has developed a licensing review strategy that includes: (1) the further development of regulatory guidance, (2) enhancement of licensing review capability, and (3) prelicensing regulatory consultation with potential applicants.« less
10 CFR 4.5 - Communications and reports.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC...; by e-mail to [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear...
Title list of documents made publicly available, July 1--31, 1996: Volume 18, No. 7
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This monthly publication describes information received and published by US NRC. This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. Following indexes are included: personal author, corporate source, report number, and cross reference of enclosures to principal documents.
49 CFR 173.471 - Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-10-01
... 49 Transportation 2 2011-10-01 2011-10-01 false Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...) Materials § 173.471 Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages. In addition to the applicable requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other requirements of...
49 CFR 173.471 - Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-10-01
... 49 Transportation 2 2014-10-01 2014-10-01 false Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...) Materials § 173.471 Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages. In addition to the applicable requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other requirements of...
49 CFR 173.471 - Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-10-01
... 49 Transportation 2 2010-10-01 2010-10-01 false Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...) Materials § 173.471 Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages. In addition to the applicable requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other requirements of...
49 CFR 173.471 - Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-10-01
... 49 Transportation 2 2013-10-01 2013-10-01 false Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...) Materials § 173.471 Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved packages. In addition to the applicable requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other requirements of...
77 FR 15529 - Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2012
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-15
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is proposing to amend the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its applicants and licensees. The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA-90), as amended, which requires the NRC to recover through fees approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, not including amounts appropriated for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR), and amounts appropriated for generic homeland security activities. President Obama signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 on December 23, 2011, giving the NRC a total appropriation of $1,038.1 million for FY 2012. The FY 2012 proposed fee rule, based on the FY 2012 appropriation, would require the NRC to recover fees of approximately $909.5 million from licensees. After accounting for billing adjustments, the total amount to be billed as fees is approximately $901 million.
NRC comprehensive records disposition schedule. Revision 3
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1998-02-01
Title 44 US Code, ``Public Printing and Documents,`` regulations issued by the General Service Administration (GSA) in 41 CFR Chapter 101, Subchapter B, ``Management and Use of Information and Records,`` and regulations issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 36 CFR Chapter 12, Subchapter B, ``Records Management,`` require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARA`s General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate durationmore » of retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 3, contains ``NRC`s Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule,`` and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 3 incorporates NARA approved changes and additions to the NRC schedules that have been implemented since the last revision dated March, 1992, reflects recent organizational changes implemented at the NRC, and includes the latest version of NARA`s General Records Schedule (dated August 1995).« less
Title list of documents made publicly available. Volume 17, No. 5
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1995-07-01
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (3) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index,more » and a Report Number Index.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available, December 1--31, 1993, Volume 15, No. 12
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index,more » and a Report Number Index.« less
NRC assessment of improvements in licensee procurement and dedication programs
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Grimes, B.K.; Potapovs, U.; Campbell, L.L.
1991-01-01
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recently conducted a series of on-site assessments at selected nuclear plants to review improvements that the licenses had made to their procurement and dedication activities. The assessments included an evaluation of the progress made by licensees to strengthen their commercial-grade dedication programs to comply with 10CRF50, Appendix B, and to implement the comprehensive procurement improvements suggested in Nuclear Management and Resource Council (NUMARC) publication 901-3. This paper discusses the overall purpose of the assessments, procurement areas assessed, major strengths and weaknesses identified in licensee procurement programs, and the NRC's perspective of the industry's responsemore » to NUMARC procurement initiatives.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available: May 1--31, 1997. Volume 19, Number 5
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and amore » Report Number Index.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available, September 1-30, 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and amore » Report Number Index.« less
A compilation of reports of the Advisory Committee on reactor safeguards. 1996 Annual report
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1997-04-01
This compilation contains 47 ACRS reports submitted to the Commission, or to the Executive Director for Operations, during calendar year 1996. It also includes a report to the Congress on the NRC Safety Research Program. All reports have been made available to the public through the NRC Public Document Room, the U.S. Library of Congress, and the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW. The reports are divided into two groups: Part 1 contains ACRS reports by project name and by chronological order within project name. Part 2 categorizes the reports by the most appropriate generic subject area and by chronological order within subjectmore » area.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available. Volume 17, No. 7
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1995-09-01
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index,more » and a Report Number Index.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available, March 1--31, 1998. Volume 20, Number 3
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a personal author index, a corporate source index, and amore » report number index.« less
Title list of documents made publicly available, January 1, 1997--January 31, 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1997-04-01
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and amore » Report Number Index.« less
76 FR 31379 - Notice of Issuance of Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-31
..., Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Telephone: 301-415-2963; e-mail... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0120] Notice of Issuance of Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear...
Colloid-facilitated radionuclide transport: a regulatory perspective
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Dam, W. L.; Pickett, D. A.; Codell, R. B.; Nicholson, T. J.
2001-12-01
What hydrogeologic-geochemical-microbial conditions and processes affect migration of radionuclides sorbed onto microparticles or native colloid-sized radionuclide particles? The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is responsible for protecting public health, safety, and the environment at numerous nuclear facilities including a potential high-level nuclear waste disposal site. To fulfill these obligations, NRC needs to understand the mechanisms controlling radionuclide release and transport and their importance to performance. The current focus of NRC staff reviews and technical interactions dealing with colloid-facilitated transport relates to the potential nuclear-waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. NRC staff performed bounding calculations to quantify radionuclide releases available for ground-water transport to potential receptors from a Yucca Mountain repository. Preliminary analyses suggest insignificant doses of plutonium and americium colloids could be derived from spent nuclear fuel. Using surface complexation models, NRC staff found that colloids can potentially lower actinide retardation factors by up to several orders of magnitude. Performance assessment calculations, in which colloidal transport of plutonium and americium was simulated by assuming no sorption or matrix diffusion, indicated no effect of colloids on human dose within the 10,000 year compliance period due largely to long waste-package lifetimes. NRC staff have identified information gaps and developed technical agreements with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to ensure sufficient information will be presented in any potential future Yucca Mountain license application. DOE has agreed to identify which radionuclides could be transported via colloids, incorporate uncertainties in colloid formation, release and transport parameters, and conceptual models, and address the applicability of field data using synthetic microspheres as colloid analogs. NRC is currently investigating approaches to colloid modeling in order to help evaluate DOE's approach. One alternative approach uses DOE laboratory data to invoke kinetic controls on reversible radionuclide attachment to colloids. A kinetic approach in which desorption from colloids is slow may help assess whether DOE's instantaneous equilibrium approach for reversible attachment, as well as their application of irreversible attachment to only a small portion of the radionuclide inventory, are reasonable and conservative. An approach to examine microbial processes would also contribute to considerations of leaching of radionuclides and colloid formation. Reducing uncertainties in colloid transport processes should help in better understanding their importance to repository performance. This work is an independent product and does not necessarily reflect the views or regulatory position of the NRC. CNWRA participation was funded under contract No. NRC-02-97-009.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Morris, E.B.
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes: (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number Index.
78 FR 63517 - Control of Ferrite Content in Stainless Steel Weld Metal
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-24
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.31, ``Control of Ferrite Content in Stainless Steel Weld Metal.'' This guide (Revision 4) describes a method that the NRC staff considers acceptable for controlling ferrite content in stainless steel weld metal. It updates the guide to remove references to outdated standards and to remove an appendix that has been incorporated into relevant specifications.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Wood, William B.
2002-01-01
A recently released National Research Council (NRC) report, "Learning and Understanding: Improving Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in U.S. High Schools", evaluated and recommended changes in the Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), and other advanced secondary school science programs. As part of this study,…
76 FR 60938 - Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes; Meeting Notice
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-30
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will convene a teleconference meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI) on October 18, 2011, to discuss the ACMUI Permanent Implant Brachytherapy Subcommittee Report. A copy of the agenda for the meeting will be available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc- collections/acmui/agenda or by contacting Ms. Ashley Cockerham using the information below.
Title of documents made publicly available, August 1--31, 1996
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Yanez, V.E.
1996-10-01
This publication describes the information received and published by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes: (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number Index.
Enhancement of NRC station blackout requirements for nuclear power plants
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
McConnell, M. W.
2012-07-01
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established a Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) in response to Commission direction to conduct a systematic and methodical review of NRC processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory system and to make recommendations to the Commission for its policy direction, in light of the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant. The NTTF's review resulted in a set of recommendations that took a balanced approach to defense-in-depth as applied to low-likelihood, high-consequence events such as prolonged station blackout (SBO) resulting from severe natural phenomena. Part 50,more » Section 63, of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 'Loss of All Alternating Current Power,' currently requires that each nuclear power plant must be able to cool the reactor core and maintain containment integrity for a specified duration of an SBO. The SBO duration and mitigation strategy for each nuclear power plant is site specific and is based on the robustness of the local transmission system and the transmission system operator's capability to restore offsite power to the nuclear power plant. With regard to SBO, the NTTF recommended that the NRC strengthen SBO mitigation capability at all operating and new reactors for design-basis and beyond-design-basis external events. The NTTF also recommended strengthening emergency preparedness for prolonged SBO and multi-unit events. These recommendations, taken together, are intended to clarify and strengthen US nuclear reactor safety regarding protection against and mitigation of the consequences of natural disasters and emergency preparedness during SBO. The focus of this paper is on the existing SBO requirements and NRC initiatives to strengthen SBO capability at all operating and new reactors to address prolonged SBO stemming from design-basis and beyond-design-basis external events. The NRC initiatives are intended to enhance core and spent fuel pool cooling, reactor coolant system integrity, and containment integrity. (authors)« less
Status of the NRC Decommissioning Program
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Orlando, D. A.; Camper, L.; Buckley, J.
2003-02-24
On July 21, 1997, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published the final rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination (the License Termination Rule or LTR) as Subpart E to 10 CFR Part 20. NRC regulations require that materials licensees submit Decommissioning Plans to support the decommissioning of its facility if it is required by license condition, or if the procedures and activities necessary to carry out the decommissioning have not been approved by NRC and these procedures could increase the potential health and safety impacts to the workers or the public. NRC regulations also require that reactor licensees submitmore » Post-shutdown Decommissioning Activities Reports and License Termination Plans to support the decommissioning of nuclear power facilities. This paper provides an update on the status of the NRC's decommissioning program that was presented during WM'02. It discusses the staff's current efforts to streamline the decommissioning process, current issues being faced in the decommissioning program, such as partial site release and restricted release of sites, as well as the status of the decommissioning of complex sites and those listed in the Site Decommissioning Management Plan. The paper discusses the status of permanently shut-down commercial power reactors and the transfer of complex decommissioning sites and sites listed on the SDMP to Agreement States. Finally the paper provides an update of the status of various tools and guidance the NRC is developing to assist licensees during decommissioning, including an effort to consolidate and risk-inform decommissioning guidance.« less
HFE Process Guidance and Standards for potential application to updating NRC guidance
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Jacques Hugo; J. J. Persensky
2012-07-01
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews and evaluates the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed tomore » the periodic update and improvement of these guidance documents to ensure that they remain state-of-the-art design evaluation tools. Thus, the NRC has initiated a project with BNL to update the NRC guidance to remain current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology. INL supported Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) to update the detailed HFE review criteria contained in NUREG-0711 and NUREG-0700 based on (1) feedback obtained from end users, (2) the results of NRC research and development efforts supporting the NRC staff’s HFE safety reviews, and (3) other material the project staff identify as applicable to the update effort. INL submitted comments on development plans and sections of NUREGs 0800, 0711, and 0700. The contractor prepared the report attached here as the deliverable for this work.« less
New Study Finds Increasing Gender Equity at U.S. Research Institutions
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Showstack, Randy
2009-06-01
Women and men faculty in science, engineering, and mathematics for the most part have comparable opportunities within major U.S. research universities, according to a report released 2 June by the U.S. National Research Council (NRC). The report found that gender does not appear to have been a factor in a number of important career transitions and outcomes, including hiring for tenure track and tenure positions and promotions. “That is probably going to be surprising to many people. It was surprising to our own panel. And it may not have been the case if we had done the study in 1985 instead of 2005,” said Claude Canizares, cochair of the NRC committee that prepared the report, entitled Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering and Mathematics Faculty.
Title list of documents made publicly available. Volume 17, No. 10
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate Source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principal Documents.
Title list of documents made publicly available, September 1--30, 1994. Volume 16, No. 9
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1994-11-01
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate Source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principal Documents.
77 FR 60478 - Control of Ferrite Content in Stainless Steel Weld Metal
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-03
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is issuing for public comment draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-1279, ``Control of Ferrite Content in Stainless Steel Weld Metal.'' This guide describes a method that the NRC staff considers acceptable for controlling ferrite content in stainless steel weld metal. Revision 4 updates the guide to remove references to outdated standards and to remove an appendix that has been incorporated into relevant specifications.
Title list of documents made publicly available, November 1--30, 1994. Volume 16, No. 11
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1995-01-01
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate Source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principal Documents.
Health physics aspects of advanced reactor licensing reviews
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Hinson, C.S.
1995-03-01
The last Construction Permit to be issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a U.S. light water reactor (LWR) was granted in the late 1970s. In 1989 the NRC issued 10 CFR Part 52 which is intended to serve as a framework for the licensing of future reactor designs. The NRC is currently reviewing four different future on {open_quotes}next-generation{close_quotes} reactor designs. Two of these designs are classified as evolutionary designs (modified versions of current generation LWRs) and two are advanced designs (reactors incorporating simplified designs and passive means for accident mitigation). These {open_quotes}next-generation{close_quotes} reactor designs incorporate many innovativemore » design features which are intended to maintain personnel doses ALARA and ensure that the annual average collective dose at these reactors does not exceed 100 person-rems (1 person-sievert) per year. This paper discusses some of the ALARA design features which are incorporated in the four {open_quotes}next-generation{close_quotes} reactor designs incorporate many innovative design features which are intended to maintain personnel doses ALARA and ensure that the annual average collective dose at these reactors does not exceed 100 person-rems (1 person-sievert) per year. This paper discusses some of the ALARA design features which are incorporated in the four {open_quotes}next-generation{close_quotes} reactor designs currently being reviewed by the NRC.« less
78 FR 41720 - CampCo Petition to Allow Commercial Distribution of Tritium Markers
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-11
...: Vanessa Cox, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear...: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is publishing for comment a petition for rulemaking (PRM... 301-415-1677. Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301-415-1101. Mail...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-25
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 03032042; NRC-2012-0219] License Amendment Request for the U.S. Department of the Army, National Ground Intelligence Center, Charlottesville, VA AGENCY... held by the U.S. Department of the Army, National Ground Intelligence Center (the licensee), for...
76 FR 59173 - Standard Format and Content of License Applications for Conventional Uranium Mills
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-23
...On May 30, 2008 (73 FR 31152), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published for public comment a notice of issuance and availability of Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)-3024, ``Standard Format and Content of License Applications for Conventional Uranium Mills.'' DG- 3024 was a proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.5. However, upon further consideration the NRC has decided not to revise RG 3.5 at this time. For this reason, DG-3024 will be withdrawn. The comment period closed on August 4, 2008, and 6 comments were received. The comments received will be considered and incorporated as appropriate if the NRC decides to revise RG 3.5 in the future.
Regulatory guidance on soil cover systems
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kane, J.D.
1991-12-31
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in September 1991, completed revisions to 14 sections of the Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the Review of a License Application for a Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility. The major purposes of the SRP are to ensure the quality and uniformity of the NRC staff`s safety reviews, and to present a well-defined base from which to evaluate the acceptability of information and data provided in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) portion of the license application. SRP 3.2, entitled, Design Considerations for Normal and Abnormal/Accident Conditions, was one of the sections that was revised bymore » the NRC staff. This revision was completed to provide additional regulatory guidance on the important considerations that need to be addressed for the proper design and construction of soil cover systems that are to be placed over the LLW. The cover system over the waste is acknowledged to be one of the most important engineered barriers for the long-term stable performance of the disposal facility. The guidance in revised SRP 3.2 summarizes the previous efforts and recommendations of the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and a peer review panel on the placement of soil cover systems. NRC published these efforts in NUREG/CR-5432. The discussions in this paper highlight selected recommendations on soil cover issues that the NRC staff considers important for ensuring the safe, long-term performance of the soil cover systems. The development phases to be discussed include: (1) cover design; (2) cover material selection; (3) laboratory and field testing; (4) field placement control and acceptance; and (5) penetrations through the constructed covers.« less
Senate examines measures to improve nuclear safety following Japan disaster
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Showstack, Randy
2012-03-01
One year after Japan suffered a devastating magnitude 9.0 earthquake and the resulting tsunami and nuclear disaster, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has taken a number of measures to try to ensure that nuclear plants in the United States are safe from natural hazards. At a U.S. Senate hearing on 15 March, NRC chair Gregory Jaczko announced that the commission had issued three key orders and several requests for information on 12 March that plant licensees must follow, and that NRC also plans to take additional actions. However, the commission is not moving quickly enough in some areas, such as ensuring that all plants are safe from seismic hazards, including those in areas with low seismic activity, according to Jaczko's testimony before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW) and the Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety. The 12 March orders require licensees to have strategies to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent-fuel pool cooling capabilities "following a beyond-design-basis extreme natural event" and have a reliable indication of the water level in spent-fuel storage pools.
Farewell TID-14844; hello SECY-92-127
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Lahti, G.P.; Johnson, W.J.
This year, 1992, marks the 50th anniversary of the first sustained nuclear reaction in the pile at the University of Chicago's Stagg Field. But it also marks the 30th anniversary of the publication of TID-14844, which has served as the design-basis source term for radiological assessments supporting the licensing of nuclear power plants in the United States since its inception. The conservative TID-14844 model assumes that 100% of the noble gases and 50% of the iodines are instantaneously released to the containment and are available for leakage to the environment. TID-14844 is formally embodied in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission'smore » (NRC's) regulations in parts 10CFR100 (siting) and 10CFR50 (review of control room habitability, postaccident shielding and sampling systems). It is also embodied in a host of NRC Regulatory Guides and NUREG reports that address off-site consequences of releases of radioactivity, equipment qualification, and other postaccident radiological concerns. On April 20, 1992, the NRC staff presented to the NRC commissioners the draft Revised Accident Source Terms for Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants.' This effort is documented in SECY-92-127 and provides the first official position of the NRC in this matter.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Haas, P M; Selby, D L; Hanley, M J
1983-09-01
This report summarizes results of research sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research to initiate the use of the Systems Approach to Training in the evaluation of training programs and entry level qualifications for nuclear power plant (NPP) personnel. Variables (performance shaping factors) of potential importance to personnel selection and training are identified, and research to more rigorously define an operationally useful taxonomy of those variables is recommended. A high-level model of the Systems Approach to Training for use in the nuclear industry, which could serve as a model for NRC evaluation of industrymore » programs, is presented. The model is consistent with current publically stated NRC policy, with the approach being followed by the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations, and with current training technology. Checklists to be used by NRC evaluators to assess training programs for NPP control-room personnel are proposed which are based on this model.« less
Moving forward with safety culture.
Weber, Michael
2012-04-01
Radiation safety and protection of people are shared goals of the Health Physics Society (HPS) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). A positive safety culture contributes to achieving radiation safety and protection of people, which are important to both the HPS and the NRC. Through unprecedented collaboration and engagement with diverse stakeholders, the NRC and the stakeholders developed a Safety Culture Policy Statement. The policy statement defines safety culture and describes the traits of a positive safety culture. Consideration of both safety and security issues and the interface of safety and security are underlying principles that support the policy. Examination of significant events, both within the nuclear industry and in society at large, illustrates how weaknesses in these traits can contribute to the occurrence and consequences of safety incidents, including serious injury and loss of life. With the policy statement in place, the NRC is moving forward with outreach and education about safety culture. Health physicists and other radiation safety specialists play an essential role in enhancing safety culture.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This report supplements the final safety evaluation report (FSER) for the System 80+ standard design. The FSER was issued by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff as NUREG-1462 in August 1994 to document the NRC staff`s review of the System 80+ design. The System 80+ design was submitted by Asea Brown Boveri-Combustion Engineering (ABB-CE), in accordance with the procedures of Subpart B to Part 52 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This supplement documents the NRC staff`s review of the changes to the System 80+ design documentation since the issuance of the FSER. ABB-CE made thesemore » changes as a result of its review of the System 80+ design details. The NRC staff concludes that the changes to the System 80+ design documentation are acceptable, and that ABB-CE`s application for design certification meets the requirements of Subpart B to 10 CFR Part 52 that are applicable and technically relevant to the System 80+ design.« less
75 FR 43208 - Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 5.17
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-23
... Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.... Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is withdrawing Regulatory Guide 5.17, ``Truck... Development Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. [FR Doc. 2010-18077 Filed...
Title list of documents made publicly available, December 1-31, 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This report includes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in December 1997. It includes: (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. This series of documents is indexed by author, corporate source, and report number. This report includes six docketed items and 24 non-docketed items.
77 FR 67678 - Content Specifications and Shielding Evaluations for Type B Transportation Packages
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-13
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is issuing for public comment Draft Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2012-XX, ``Content Specifications and Shielding Evaluations for Type B Transportation Packages.'' This RIS clarifies the NRC's use of staff guidance in NUREG-1609, ``Standard Review Plan for Transport Packages for Radioactive Material,'' for the review of content specifications and shielding evaluations included in the Certificates of Compliance (CoC) and safety analysis reports (SARs) for Type B transportation packages.
Title list of documents made publicly available: December 1--31, 1996. Volume 18, Number 12
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1997-03-01
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate Source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principal Documents.
Title List of documents made publicly available, September 1--30, 1993. Volume 15, No. 9
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1993-11-01
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate Source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principals Documents.
Title list of documents made publicly available: November 1--30, 1997. Volume 19, Number 11
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This document is a monthly publication containing descriptions of information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. The following indexes are included: Personal Author, Corporate source, Report Number, and Cross Reference of Enclosures to Principal Documents.
Lepoire, D; Richmond, P; Cheng, J-J; Kamboj, S; Arnish, J; Chen, S Y; Barr, C; McKenney, C
2008-08-01
As part of the requirement for terminating the licenses of nuclear power plants or other nuclear facilities, license termination plans or decommissioning plans are submitted by the licensee to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for review and approval. Decommissioning plans generally refer to the decommissioning of nonreactor facilities, while license termination plans specifically refer to the decommissioning of nuclear reactor facilities. To provide a uniform and consistent review of dose modeling aspects of these plans and to address NRC-wide knowledge management issues, the NRC, in 2006, commissioned Argonne National Laboratory to develop a Web-based training course on reviewing radiological dose assessments for license termination. The course, which had first been developed in 2005 to target specific aspects of the review processes for license termination plans and decommissioning plans, evolved from a live classroom course into a Web-based training course in 2006. The objective of the Web-based training course is to train NRC staff members (who have various relevant job functions and are located at headquarters, regional offices, and site locations) to conduct an effective review of dose modeling in accordance with the latest NRC guidance, including NUREG-1757, Volumes 1 and 2. The exact size of the staff population who will receive the training has not yet been accurately determined but will depend on various factors such as the decommissioning activities at the NRC. This Web-based training course is designed to give NRC staff members modern, flexible access to training. To this end, the course is divided into 16 modules: 9 core modules that deal with basic topics, and 7 advanced modules that deal with complex issues or job-specific topics. The core and advanced modules are tailored to various NRC staff members with different job functions. The Web-based system uses the commercially available software Articulate, which incorporates audio, video, and animation in slide presentations and has glossary, document search, and Internet connectivity features. The training course has been implemented on an NRC system that allows staff members to register, select courses, track records, and self-administer quizzes.
Charles Ying Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Brian Thomas* U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA ) Agriculture Research Service (ARS) James Lindsay Forest Service (FS) World L.S. Nieh National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Hongda Chen U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) Elizabeth R
75 FR 79049 - Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-17
..., Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission... INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision to an existing... Development Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. [FR Doc. 2010-31731 Filed...
NRC evaluates groundwater programs
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
A recent report by the National Research Council (NRC) noted that about half the people of the United States depend on wells for their drinking water, but recent tests reveal widespread contamination.Responsibility for monitoring and protecting groundwater supplies lies largely with state governments. Federal funding of model projects under the Clean Water Act expired in 1983. However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has asked the NRC to identify and evaluate ten state and local groundwater protection programs and to recommend features that may be applied in other areas. A committee, organized by the Water Science and Technology Board and chaired by Jerome B. Gilbert, general manager of the East Bay Municipal Utility District of Oakland, Calif., has undertaken the study. The report is expected to be completed in March 1986.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Morris, E.B.
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) non-docketed material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and amore » Report Number Index. The docketed information contained in the Title List includes the information formerly issued through the Department of Energy publication Power Reactor Docket Information, last published in January 1979.« less
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Kammerer, A. M.; Godoy, A. R.
2009-12-01
In response to the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, as well as the anticipation of the submission of license applications for new nuclear facilities, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) initiated a long-term research program to improve understanding of tsunami hazard levels for nuclear power plants and other coastal facilities in the United States. To undertake this effort, the US NRC organized a collaborative research program jointly undertaken with researchers at the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the purpose of assessing tsunami hazard on the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States. This study identified and modeled both seismic and landslide tsunamigenic sources in the near- and far-field. The results from this work are now being used directly as the basis for the review of tsunami hazard at potential nuclear plant sites. This application once again shows the importance that the earth sciences can play in addressing issues of importance to society. Because the Indian Ocean Tsunami was a global event, a number of cooperative international activities have also been initiated within the nuclear community. The results of US efforts are being incorporated into updated regulatory guidance for both the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United Nation’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Coordinated efforts are underway to integrate state-of-the art tsunami warning tools developed by NOAA into NRC and IAEA activities. The goal of the warning systems project is to develop automated protocols that allow scientists at these agencies to have up-to-the minute user-specific information in hand shortly after a potential tsunami has been identified by the US Tsunami Warning System. Lastly, USGS and NOAA scientists are assisting the NRC and IAEA in a special Extra-Budgetary Program (IAEA EBP) on tsunami being coordinated by the IAEA’s International Seismic Safety Center. This IAEA EBP is focused on sharing lessons learned, tsunami hazard assessment techniques, and numerical tools among UN Member States. The complete body of basic and applied research undertaken in these many projects represents the combined effort of a diverse group of marine geologists, geophysicists, geotechnical engineers, seismologists and hydrodynamic modelers at multiple organizations.
Accountability report - fiscal year 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1998-04-01
This document contains the US NRC`s accountability report for fiscal year 1997. Topics include uses of funds, financial condition, program performance, management accountability, and the audited financial statement.
Phenomena Important in Molten Salt Reactor Simulations
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Diamond, David J.; Brown, Nicholas R.; Denning, Richard
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is preparing for the future licensing of advanced reactors that will be very different from current light water reactors. Part of the NRC preparation strategy is to identify the simulation tools that will be used for confirmatory safety analysis of normal operation and abnormal situations in those reactors. This report advances that strategy for reactors that will use molten salts (MSRs). This includes reactors with the fuel within the salt as well as reactors using solid fuel. Although both types are discussed in this report, the emphasis is on those reactors with liquid fuelmore » because of the perception that solid-fuel MSRs will be significantly easier to simulate. These liquid-fuel reactors include thermal and fast neutron spectrum alternatives. The specific designs discussed in the report are a subset of many designs being considered in the U.S. and elsewhere but they are considered the most likely to submit information to the NRC in the near future. The objective herein, is to understand the design of proposed molten salt reactors, how they will operate under normal or transient/accident conditions, and what will be the corresponding modeling needs of simulation tools that consider neutronics, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and material composition changes in the molten salt. These tools will enable the NRC to eventually carry out confirmatory analyses that examine the validity and accuracy of applicant’s calculations and help determine the margin of safety in plant design.« less
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... Response, U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; (b) By hand delivery to the NRC's... [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...' classified mailing address listed in appendix A to part 73 of this chapter or delivered by hand in accordance...
75 FR 33736 - List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: MAGNASTOR System, Revision 1
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-15
... Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415- 6219..., 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System... M. McCausland, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S...
76 FR 69293 - U.S. Army Installation Management Command; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-08
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2009-0352; Docket No. 40-09083] U.S. Army Installation Management Command; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) has issued a Director...
77 FR 59994 - Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc., Erwin, TN; Issuance of License Renewal
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-01
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 70-143; NRC-2009-0435] Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc., Erwin, TN; Issuance of License Renewal AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of... Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001...
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Nicholson, T. J.; Raione, R.; Ahn, H.; Barnhurst, D.; Giacinto, J.; McBride, M.; Tiruneh, N. D.
2009-12-01
The NRC regulates the civilian use of radioactive materials and facilities in an open and transparent manner. The NRC regulatory criteria are designed to protect human health and safety, and the environment by regulating nuclear facilities. During review of new reactor licensing applications, NRC staff reviews and independently verifies hydrogeologic information submitted by the applicant in several topical areas such as development and testing of Conceptual Site Models (CSM) which may involve perched aquifers; engineered water level fluctuations of surface-water reservoirs; ground-water collector wells and local ground-water uses; design-basis ground-water levels for structural analysis; analysis of scenarios for potential release of radionuclides to the subsurface; deep well injection of effluents; and monitoring to detect radionuclide releases. This information is reviewed in a systematic manner in accordance with NRC requirements and guidance to evaluate safety and environmental impacts and reduce the uncertainties for these impacts. NRC licensing staff is reviewing 14 applications for siting new reactors. Experience gained through these licensing activities has shown the value of using site-specific data to evaluate the CSM and its use to assess design and operational issues. Optimizing the information flow process through a systemically and thorough review process creates efficiencies. Through an iterative process of evaluating various geographical settings and associated ground-water conditions, NRC staff has developed methods to minimize prediction uncertainty through the use of confirmatory analyses performed under conservative, hierarchal approaches.
Title list of documents made publicly available, November 1-30, 1995
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1996-01-01
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Indexmore » and a Report Number Index. The docketed information contained in the Title List includes the information formerly issued through the Department of Energy publication Power Reactor Docker Information, last published in January 1979. NRC documents that are publicly available may be examined without charge at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). Duplicate copies may be obtained for a fee. Standing orders for certain categories of documents are also available. Clients may search for and order desired titles through the PDR computerized Bibliographic Retrieval System, which is accessible both at the PDR and remotely. The PDR is staffed by professional technical librarians, who provide reference assistance to users.« less
75 FR 36715 - Final Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-06-28
... INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is issuing a revision..., Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory...
Kammerer, A.M.; ten Brink, Uri S.; Titov, V.V.
2017-01-01
In response to the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) initiated a long-term research program to improve understanding of tsunami hazard levels for nuclear facilities in the United States. For this effort, the US NRC organized a collaborative research program with the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) with a goal of assessing tsunami hazard on the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States. Necessarily, the US NRC research program includes both seismic- and landslide-based tsunamigenic sources in both the near and the far fields. The inclusion of tsunamigenic landslides, an important category of sources that impact tsunami hazard levels for the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts is a key difference between this program and most other tsunami hazard assessment programs. The initial phase of this work consisted of collection, interpretation, and analysis of available offshore data, with significant effort focused on characterizing offshore near-field landslides and analyzing their tsunamigenic potential and properties. In the next phase of research, additional field investigations will be conducted in key locations of interest and additional analysis will be undertaken. Simultaneously, the MOST tsunami generation and propagation model used by NOAA will first be enhanced to include landslide-based initiation mechanisms and then will be used to investigate the impact of the tsunamigenic sources identified and characterized by the USGS. The potential for probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment will also be explore in the final phases of the program.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-06
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-3042, ``Standard Format and Content for a License Application for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation or a Monitored Retrievable Storage Facility.'' This draft regulatory guide is proposed revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 3.50, which provides a format that the NRC considers acceptable for submitting the information for license applications to store spent nuclear fuel, high-level radioactive waste, and/or reactor-related Greater than Class C waste.
Two-Phase Flow Research on the ISS for Thermal Control Applications
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Motil, Brian J.
2013-01-01
With the era of full utilization of the ISS now upon us, this presentation will discuss some of the highest-priority areas for two-phase flow systems with thermal control applications. These priorities are guided by recommendations of a 2011 NRC Decadal Survey report, Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration, Life and Physical Sciences for a New Era as well as an internal NASA exercise in response to the NRC report conducted in early 2012. Many of these proposals are already in various stages of development, while others are still conceptual.
Title list of documents made publicly available, April 1--30 1997, Vol. 19, No. 4
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Morris, E.B.
This report describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes: (1) material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) material received and published by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. In this report, 7 items of the first type are included, and 25 regulatory type items are listed. The report is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number Index.
10 CFR 81.13 - Publication of NRC inventions available for licensing.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... inventions available for licensing under this subpart in the Federal Register, the U.S. Patent Office.... Patent Office. Copies of U.S. patent application specifications, or microfiche reproductions thereof, may.... Patent Office with Commission approval. [38 FR 7318, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 8793, Mar. 3...
10 CFR 81.13 - Publication of NRC inventions available for licensing.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... inventions available for licensing under this subpart in the Federal Register, the U.S. Patent Office.... Patent Office. Copies of U.S. patent application specifications, or microfiche reproductions thereof, may.... Patent Office with Commission approval. [38 FR 7318, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 8793, Mar. 3...
10 CFR 81.13 - Publication of NRC inventions available for licensing.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... inventions available for licensing under this subpart in the Federal Register, the U.S. Patent Office.... Patent Office. Copies of U.S. patent application specifications, or microfiche reproductions thereof, may.... Patent Office with Commission approval. [38 FR 7318, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 8793, Mar. 3...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-24
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0361] Toshiba Corporation Power Systems Company Notice of Receipt and Availability of an Application for Renewal of the U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design... application for a design certification (DC) renewal for the U.S. Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). An...
78 FR 56621 - Draft Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-13
.../public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm no later than 10 days prior to the meetings. Dated at Rockville... licensed life for operation and prior to ultimate disposal (proposed Waste Confidence rule). The NRC staff... confirming receipt, then contact us at 301-415-1677. Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-07
.... Background Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pursuant to Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [NRC-2012-0015] Memorandum of Understanding Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Homeland Security Regarding...
10 CFR 81.13 - Publication of NRC inventions available for licensing.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... inventions available for licensing under this subpart in the Federal Register, the U.S. Patent Office.... Patent Office. Copies of U.S. patent application specifications, or microfiche reproductions thereof, may.... Patent Office with Commission approval. [38 FR 7318, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 8793, Mar. 3...
10 CFR 81.13 - Publication of NRC inventions available for licensing.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... inventions available for licensing under this subpart in the Federal Register, the U.S. Patent Office.... Patent Office. Copies of U.S. patent application specifications, or microfiche reproductions thereof, may.... Patent Office with Commission approval. [38 FR 7318, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 8793, Mar. 3...
75 FR 43207 - Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-23
... INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision to an existing.... Jervey, Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
W. C. Adams
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requested that the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) perform a confirmatory survey on the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) at the Connecticut Yankee Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) in Haddam, Connecticut
Leak-Before-Break: Further developments in regulatory policies and supporting research
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Wilkowski, G.M.; Chao, K.-S.
1990-02-01
The fourth in a series of international Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Seminars supported in part by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission was held at the National Central Library in Taipei, Taiwan on May 11 and 12, 1989. The seminar updated the international polices and supporting research on LBB. Attendees included representatives from regulatory agencies, electric utilities, nuclear power plant fabricators, research organizations, and academic institutions. Regulatory policy was the subject of presentations by Mr. G. Arlotto (US NRC, USA) Dr. B. Jarman (AECB, Canada), Dr.P. Milella (ENEA-DISP, Italy), Dr. C. Faidy (EDF/Septen, France ), and Dr. K. Takumi (NUPEC, Japan). A papermore » by Mr. K. Wichman and Mr. A. Lee of the US NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is included as background material to these proceedings; it discusses the history and status of LBB applications in US nuclear power plants. In addition, several papers on the supporting research programs described regulatory policy or industry standards for flaw evaluations, e.g., the ASME Section XI code procedures. Supporting research programs were reviewed on the first and second day by several participants from Taiwan, US, Japan, Canada, Italy, and France. Each individual paper has been cataloged separately.« less
U.S. Earth Observation Programs May Still Be at Risk
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Zielinski, Sarah
2005-10-01
A recent interim report from a committee of the National Research Council (NRC) of the U.S. National Academies warned that the U.S. system of environmental satellites was ``at risk of collapse'' (see Eos, 10 May 2005, p. 186). Nearly six months later, despite assurances from NASA that the agency would work to address in its fiscal year (FY) 2007 budget some of the imbalances that have led to mission delays and cancellations, these satellite programs may still be at risk. NASA funding for Earth science has suffered in recent years due to several pressures on the budget: deficit reduction, efforts to restore the space shuttle program, and plans for missions to the Moon and Mars. The NRC report, which was released as a draft in April and in its final form on 8 September, noted that six planned missions with implications for Earth science research were delayed, descoped, or canceled in the proposed FY2006 NASA budget.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1985-11-01
This US Nuclear Regulatory Commission report documents the circumstances surrounding the March 26, 1985, confiscation and subsequent decontamination activities related to the use of unauthorized quantities of americium-241 at the John C. Haynes Company (licensee) of Newark, Ohio. It focuses on the period from early February to July 26, 1985. The incident started when NRC Region III recieved information that John C. Haynes possessed unauthorized quantities of americium-241 and was conducting unauthorized activities (diamond irradiation). By July 26, 1985, the decontamination activities at the licensee's laboratory were concluded. The licensee's actions with diamond irradiation resulted in contamination in restricted andmore » unrestricted areas of the facility. The confiscation and decontamination activities required the combined efforts of NRC, Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, the State of Ohio, and the US Environmental Protection Agency. The report describes the factual information and significant findings associated with the confiscation and decontamination activities.« less
Radiation protection at an aviation museum.
Barish, Robert J
2006-11-01
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) will soon publish a proposed amendment to its rules that will classify the naturally occurring isotope Ra as "byproduct material" subject to its regulatory control. One of the uses of radium in the first half of the twentieth century was as a source of energy that would make certain consumer products "glow in the dark." In addition to wristwatches and other timepieces, this form of self-luminescence was widely used on aircraft instruments. There have been a number of facilities where large numbers of such instruments were stored and leakage of this isotope occurred. Subsequent decontamination of these areas, including expensive disposal of the radioactive waste, was required. We were asked to evaluate the potential hazards of aircraft and aircraft instruments at a museum in New York City, specifically the decommissioned aircraft carrier USS Intrepid. We present the results of our investigation and discuss the implications as they relate to the proposed new U.S. NRC regulations and compatibility issues with State regulations.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Ridge, A. Christianne; Barr, Cynthia S.; Pinkston, Karen E.
Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) requires the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to consult with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for certain non-high level waste determinations. The NDAA also requires NRC to monitor DOE's disposal actions related to those determinations. In Fiscal Year 2011, the NRC staff reviewed DOE performance assessments for tank closure at the F-Tank Farm (FTF) Facility and salt waste disposal at the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) as part of consultation and monitoring, respectively. Differences in inventories, waste forms,more » and key barriers led to different areas of focus in the NRC reviews of these two activities at the SRS. Because of the key role of chemically reducing grouts in both applications, the evaluation of chemical barriers was significant to both reviews. However, radionuclide solubility in precipitated metal oxides is expected to play a significant role in FTF performance whereas release of several key radionuclides from the SDF is controlled by sorption or precipitation within the cementitious wasteform itself. Similarly, both reviews included an evaluation of physical barriers to flow, but differences in the physical configurations of the waste led to differences in the reviews. For example, NRC's review of the FTF focused on the modeled degradation of carbon steel tank liners while the staff's review of the SDF performance included a detailed evaluation of the physical degradation of the saltstone wasteform and infiltration-limiting closure cap. Because of the long time periods considered (i.e., tens of thousands of years), the NRC reviews of both facilities included detailed evaluation of the engineered chemical and physical barriers. The NRC staff reviews of residual waste disposal in the FTF and salt waste disposal in the SDF focused on physical barriers to flow and chemical barriers to radionuclide release from the waste. Because the waste inventory and concentration at both sites is sufficient to generate unacceptable doses to an off-site member of the public or inadvertent intruder in the absence of engineered barriers, the NRC staff review focused on the engineering features DOE plans to put in place to limit radionuclide release. At the FTF, DOE expects that peak doses are delayed beyond a 10,000 year performance period by a combination of (1) the flow-limiting effect of the steel tank liner and (2) chemical conditions created by the stabilizing grout overlying the waste that limit the solubility of key radionuclides for tens of thousands of years. At the SDF, DOE expects that flow will be significantly limited by water shedding along the closure cap lower drainage layer and that radionuclide release will be further limited by radionuclide precipitation or sorption within the high pH, chemically reducing conditions created within the saltstone waste form. Because the performance of both facilities depends on the performance of engineered barriers for thousands of years, the reviews included a detailed evaluation of the expected long-term behavior of these barriers. As previously discussed, NRC staff reviews of DOE waste determinations during consultation are designed to evaluate the three NDAA criteria, whereas the review of an updated PA during monitoring only addresses whether the NRC staff has reasonable assurance that the planned disposal action will meet the performance objectives of 10 CFR Part 61. The NRC staff review of the Waste Determination for the FTF did not include conclusions about whether the planned disposal of residual waste at the FTF would meet the NDAA criteria because of the substantial uncertainties in the degree of waste removal DOE would achieve and other technical uncertainties. The main product of the NRC staff review of the planned FTF disposal action is the recommendation that DOE should conduct waste release experiments to increase support for key modeling assumptions related to: (1) the evolution of pH and Eh in the grouted tank system over time; (2) identification of HRR association with solid phases comprising the residual wastes; and (3) expected solubility of HRRs under a range of environmental or service conditions that the residual wastes in the contaminated zone are expected to be exposed to over time. Implementation of this recommendation is deemed crucial for NRC staff to have reasonable assurance that the performance objectives in 10 CFR Part 61, Subpart C can be met. Given the risk-significance of Tank 18 to the overall PA and the short timeline for closure of this tank, the NRC staff recommended that DOE should initiate discussions with NRC staff regarding implementation of this recommendation for Tank 18 as soon as practical. The NRC staff also recommended that experiments to address this recommendation should be conducted prior to final closure of Tank 18. Results of the Tank 18 residual waste experiments, if conducted, will be evaluated by NRC staff to determine the need for additional data collection, experiments, and modeling for Tank 18, as well as other FTF tanks. Additional information regarding the NRC staff's recommendations in this area, including details on the suggested implementation of other recommendations will be provided in the NRC staff's plan for monitoring the FTF later in FY 2012, after DOE makes a final decision on the waste determination. The NRC staff's review of waste disposal at the SDF is ongoing. When complete, the SDF TER will indicate whether the NRC staff continues to have reasonable assurance that waste disposal at the SDF will meet the performance objectives of 10 CFR Part 61 (NDAA Criterion 3). The TER also will include risk insights that will form the basis of the NRC staff's revised monitoring plan for the SDF. The NRC staff will publish an updated monitoring plan for the SDF later in FY 2012. (authors)« less
Stephens, Martin L.; Barrow, Craig; Andersen, Melvin E.; Boekelheide, Kim; Carmichael, Paul L.; Holsapple, Michael P.; Lafranconi, Mark
2012-01-01
The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) report on “Toxicity Testing in the 21st century” calls for a fundamental shift in the way that chemicals are tested for human health effects and evaluated in risk assessments. The new approach would move toward in vitro methods, typically using human cells in a high-throughput context. The in vitro methods would be designed to detect significant perturbations to “toxicity pathways,” i.e., key biological pathways that, when sufficiently perturbed, lead to adverse health outcomes. To explore progress on the report’s implementation, the Human Toxicology Project Consortium hosted a workshop on 9–10 November 2010 in Washington, DC. The Consortium is a coalition of several corporations, a research institute, and a non-governmental organization dedicated to accelerating the implementation of 21st-century Toxicology as aligned with the NRC vision. The goal of the workshop was to identify practical and scientific ways to accelerate implementation of the NRC vision. The workshop format consisted of plenary presentations, breakout group discussions, and concluding commentaries. The program faculty was drawn from industry, academia, government, and public interest organizations. Most presentations summarized ongoing efforts to modernize toxicology testing and approaches, each with some overlap with the NRC vision. In light of these efforts, the workshop identified recommendations for accelerating implementation of the NRC vision, including greater strategic coordination and planning across projects (facilitated by a steering group), the development of projects that test the proof of concept for implementation of the NRC vision, and greater outreach and communication across stakeholder communities. PMID:21948868
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff; by hand delivery to the NRC...-submittals.html; by e-mail to [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S...
76 FR 65542 - N.S. Savannah; Exemption From Certain Security Requirements
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-21
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-238; NRC-2011-0222] N.S. Savannah; Exemption From Certain Security Requirements 1.0 Background The U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime [[Page 65543
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Yu, C.; Faillace, E.; Chen, S.Y.
RESRAD was one of the multimedia models selected by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to include in its workshop on radiation dose modeling and demonstration of compliance with the radiological criteria for license termination. This paper is a summary of the presentation made at the workshop and focuses on the 10 questions the NRC distributed to all participants prior to the workshop. The code selection criteria, which were solicited by the NRC, for demonstrating compliance with the license termination rule are also included. Among the RESRAD family of codes, RESRAD and RESRAD-BUILD are designed for evaluating radiological contamination inmore » soils and in buildings. Many documents have been published to support the use of these codes. This paper focuses on these two codes. The pathways considered, the databases and parameters used, quality control and quality assurance, benchmarking, verification and validation of these codes, and capabilities as well as limitations of these codes are discussed in detail.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-05-05
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 40-9083; NRC-2009-0352] License No. SUB-459; Acknowledgement of Request for Enforcement Action Against U.S. Army Installation Command (Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii) Notice is hereby given that by petition dated March 4, 2010, Isaac D. Harp...
The Next Generation Science Standards: A Focus on Physical Science
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Krajcik, Joe
2013-01-01
This article describes ways to adapt U.S. science curriculum to the U.S. National Research Council (NRC) "Framework for K-12 Science Education" and "Next Generation of Science Standards" (NGSS), noting their focus on teaching the physical sciences. The overall goal of the Framework and NGSS is to help all learners develop the…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-18
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-045; NRC-2011-0020] GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy... Certification On December 7, 2010, GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) submitted an application to the U.S. Nuclear... and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.'' A notice of receipt and availability of this application was...
Title list of documents made publicly available, October 1-31, 1997
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1997-12-01
This monthly publication describes the information received and published by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It includes: (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials, and (2) non-docketed material received and published. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index, and a Report Number index. Seven docketed items are included which pertain to licensing, radioactive waste, nuclear power plant design. The 26 non-docketed items include committee reports; NRC correspondence, issuances, and reports; inspections and deficiency findings; and waste management documents.
Current NRC Perspectives Concerning Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Alley, David; Dunn, Darrell
Materials currently used in nuclear power plants are reliable and are generally resistant to environmental degradation. However, occurrences of environmental degradation have been observed as the current fleet of reactors ages. Primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) is of particular interest to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This paper provides a historical assessment of operating experience associated with PWSCC and welding issues associated with PWSCC resistant materials. The paper also considers the regulatory issues associated with PWSCC, especially those associated with gaps in the understanding of the behavior of PWSCC resistant material under actual reactor conditions.
The NRC is the federal government's national communications center, which is staffed 24 hours a day by U.S. Coast Guard officers and marine science technicians. Sole federal point of contact for reporting all hazardous substance releases and oil spills
76 FR 14107 - Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-15
... INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is issuing a revision... Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. [FR Doc. 2011-5967 Filed 3-14-11...
78 FR 14879 - Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2013
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-07
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its applicants and licensees. The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA-90), as amended, which requires the NRC to recover through fees approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in Fiscal Year (FY) 2013, not including amounts appropriated for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) and amounts appropriated for generic homeland security activities. The NRC is currently operating under a Continuing Resolution (CR) which is set to expire on March 27, 2013. Based on the FY 2013 budget submitted to the Congress, the NRC is proposing fees in this rulemaking based on the FY 2013 budget which is estimated to be $1,053.2 million. After accounting for billing adjustments, the total amount to be billed as fees is approximately $924.8 million. These fees are subject to change pending congressional action which may include sequestration, full-year CR or issuance of an FY 2013 appropriation which differs from the FY 2013 budget submitted to Congress which could result in higher or lower fees than those proposed in this rulemaking.
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Chopra, Omesh K.; Diercks, Dwight R.; Ma, David Chia-Chiun
At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRC’s assessment processes. In themore » U.S., commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) are granted an initial 40-year operating license, which may be renewed for additional 20-year periods, subject to complying with regulatory requirements. The NRC has established a framework through its inspection, and operational experience processes to ensure the safe operation of licensed nuclear facilities on an ongoing basis. In contrast, most other countries do not impose a specific time limit on the operating licenses for NPPs, they instead require that the utility operating the plant perform PSRs, typically at approximately 10-year intervals, to assure continued safe operation until the next assessment. The staff contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) to perform a pilot review of selected translated PSR assessment reports and related documentation from foreign nuclear regulatory authorities to identify any potential new regulatory insights regarding license renewal-related topics and NPP operating experience (OpE). A total of 14 PSR assessment documents from 9 countries were reviewed. For all of the countries except France, individual reports were provided for each of the plants reviewed. In the case of France, three reports were provided that reviewed the performance assessment of thirty-four 900-MWe reactors of similar design commissioned between 1978 and 1988. All of the reports reviewed were the regulator’s assessment of the PSR findings rather than the original PSR report, and all but one were English translations from the original language. In these reviews, it was found that most of the countries base their regulatory guidance to some extent (and often to a large extent) on U.S. design codes and standards, NRC regulatory guidance, and U.S. industry guidance. In addition, many of the observed operational technical issues and OpE events reported for U.S. reactors are also cited in the PSR reports. The PSR reports also identified a number of potential technical material/component performance issues and OpE events that are not commonly reported for U.S. plants.« less
77 FR 69506 - Exelon Generation Company, LLC., Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Exemption
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-19
... INFORMATION CONTACT: John G. Lamb, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone 301-415-3100, email: John.Lamb@nrc.gov . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On...
Computational Sustainability Tools Illuminating the Triple Value Model
The National Research Council (NRC) report Sustainability and the U.S. EPA recommends development of a "sustainability toolbox" to address challenges associated with implementing sustainability at the EPA. The three pillars of sustainability - industrial, social, and en...
Marcus, Carol S
2015-07-01
On February 9, 2015, I submitted a petition to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to reject the linear-no threshold (LNT) hypothesis and ALARA as the bases for radiation safety regulation in the United States, using instead threshold and hormesis evidence. In this article, I will briefly review the history of LNT and its use by regulators, the lack of evidence supporting LNT, and the large body of evidence supporting thresholds and hormesis. Physician acceptance of cancer risk from low dose radiation based upon federal regulatory claims is unfortunate and needs to be reevaluated. This is dangerous to patients and impedes good medical care. A link to my petition is available: http://radiationeffects.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Hormesis-Petition-to-NRC-02-09-15.pdf, and support by individual physicians once the public comment period begins would be extremely important.
78 FR 79015 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-27
... Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of any qualifying statement or exception to any of the data contained in other reporting forms required under the U.S.-- IAEA Safeguards Agreement. 4. Who is required or asked... of Parts 40, 50, 70, and 150 are required to submit DOE/NRC Form 740M to inform the U.S. or the IAEA...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Jeffrey C. JOe; Ronald L. Boring
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) and Human Reliability Assessment (HRA) are important technical contributors to the United States (U.S.) Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) risk-informed and performance based approach to regulating U.S. commercial nuclear activities. Furthermore, all currently operating commercial NPPs in the U.S. are required by federal regulation to be staffed with crews of operators. Yet, aspects of team performance are underspecified in most HRA methods that are widely used in the nuclear industry. There are a variety of "emergent" team cognition and teamwork errors (e.g., communication errors) that are 1) distinct from individual human errors, and 2) important to understandmore » from a PRA perspective. The lack of robust models or quantification of team performance is an issue that affects the accuracy and validity of HRA methods and models, leading to significant uncertainty in estimating HEPs. This paper describes research that has the objective to model and quantify team dynamics and teamwork within NPP control room crews for risk informed applications, thereby improving the technical basis of HRA, which improves the risk-informed approach the NRC uses to regulate the U.S. commercial nuclear industry.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Korsah, Kofi; Muhlheim, Michael David; Wood, Richard
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is initiating a new rulemaking project to develop a digital system common-cause failure (CCF) rule. This rulemaking will review and modify or affirm the NRC's current digital system CCF policy as discussed in the Staff Requirements Memorandum to the Secretary of the Commission, Office of the NRC (SECY) 93-087, Policy, Technical, and Licensing Issues Pertaining to Evolutionary and Advanced Light Water Reactor (ALWR) Designs, and Branch Technical Position (BTP) 7-19, Guidance on Evaluation of Defense-in-Depth and Diversity in Digital Computer-Based Instrumentation and Control Systems, as well as Chapter 7, Instrumentation and Controls, in NRCmore » Regulatory Guide (NUREG)-0800, Standard Review Plan for Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (ML033580677). The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is providing technical support to the NRC staff on the CCF rulemaking, and this report is one of several providing the technical basis to inform NRC staff members. For the task described in this report, ORNL examined instrumentation and controls (I&C) technology implementations in nuclear power plants in the light of current CCF guidance. The intent was to assess whether the current position on CCF is adequate given the evolutions in digital safety system implementations and, if gaps in the guidance were found, to provide recommendations as to how these gaps could be closed.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-02
...: Song-Hua Shen, Division of Risk Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: (301) 251- 7571, email: Song-Hua.Shen@nrc.gov...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Sheehan, M.A.
1997-04-01
This compilation is the annual cumulation of bibliographic data and abstracts for the formal regulatory and technical reports issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff and its contractors.
78 FR 73897 - SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-09
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-608; NRC-2013-0053] SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: License application; docketing. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear... construction permit, submitted by SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. (SHINE) is acceptable for docketing...
Adaptive Nodal Transport Methods for Reactor Transient Analysis
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Thomas Downar; E. Lewis
2005-08-31
Develop methods for adaptively treating the angular, spatial, and time dependence of the neutron flux in reactor transient analysis. These methods were demonstrated in the DOE transport nodal code VARIANT and the US NRC spatial kinetics code, PARCS.
Plant biology research and training for the 21st century
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kelly, K.
1992-12-31
The committee was assembled in response to a request from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the US Department of Energy (DoE). The leadership of these agencies asked the National Academy of Sciences through the National Research Council (NRC) to assess the status of plant-science research in the United States in light of the opportunities arising from advances inother areas of biology. NRC was asked to suggest ways of accelerating the application of these new biologic concepts and tools to research in plant science with the aim of enhancing the acquisition of new knowledgemore » about plants. The charge to the committee was to examine the following: Organizations, departments, and institutions conducting plant biology research; human resources involved in plant biology research; graduate training programs in plant biology; federal, state, and private sources of support for plant-biology research; the role of industry in conducting and supporting plant-biology research; the international status of US plant-biology research; and the relationship of plant biology to leading-edge research in biology.« less
Plant biology research and training for the 21st century
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kelly, K.
1992-01-01
The committee was assembled in response to a request from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the US Department of Energy (DoE). The leadership of these agencies asked the National Academy of Sciences through the National Research Council (NRC) to assess the status of plant-science research in the United States in light of the opportunities arising from advances inother areas of biology. NRC was asked to suggest ways of accelerating the application of these new biologic concepts and tools to research in plant science with the aim of enhancing the acquisition of new knowledgemore » about plants. The charge to the committee was to examine the following: Organizations, departments, and institutions conducting plant biology research; human resources involved in plant biology research; graduate training programs in plant biology; federal, state, and private sources of support for plant-biology research; the role of industry in conducting and supporting plant-biology research; the international status of US plant-biology research; and the relationship of plant biology to leading-edge research in biology.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-31
...On May 29, 2013, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted an application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for renewal of Facility Operating Licenses (NPF-72 and NPF-77) for an additional 20 years of operation for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2. Braidwood Station is located in Will County, Illinois. The current operating licenses for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, expire on October 17, 2026 and December 18, 2027, respectively. This notice advises the public that the NRC intends to gather information to prepare an EIS on the proposed license renewal.
NRC Grants for Federal Research
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
The National Research Council is accepting applications for the 1989 Resident, Cooperative, and Postdoctoral Research Associateship Programs in science and engineering. NRC administers the awards for 30 federal agencies and research institutions, which have 115 participating laboratories in the U.S.About 450 new full-time Associateships will be given for research in biological, health, behaviorial sciences and biotechnology; chemistry; Earth and atmospheric sciences; engineering and applied sciences; mathematics; physics; and space and planetary sciences. Most of the programs are open to recent Ph.D.s and senior investigators and to citizens of the U.S. and other countries. More than 5500 scientists have received Associateships since the programs began in 1954.
78 FR 59982 - Revisions to Radiation Protection
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-09-30
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0268] Revisions to Radiation Protection AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Standard review plan section; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition'': Section 12.1...
A Framework for "Fit for Purpose" Dose Response Assessment
The NRC report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment made several recommendations to improve chemical risk assessment, with a focus on in-depth chronic dose-response assessments conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The recommendations addressed two ...
78 FR 29390 - Applications; SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Proj-0792; NRC-2013-0053] Applications; SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice; receipt and availability. FOR FURTHER... (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13088A192), SHINE Medical Technologies (SHINE) filed with the U.S. Nuclear...
78 FR 52579 - SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-608; NRC-2013-0053] SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of receipt and availability. SUMMARY: The U.S... application for a construction permit, submitted by SHINE Medical Technologies, Inc. (SHINE). ADDRESSES...
NRC Reviewer Aid for Evaluating the Human Factors Engineering Aspects of Small Modular Reactors
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.C.
Small modular reactors (SMRs) are a promising approach to meeting future energy needs. Although the electrical output of an individual SMR is relatively small compared to that of typical commercial nuclear plants, they can be grouped to produce as much energy as a utility demands. Furthermore, SMRs can be used for other purposes, such as producing hydrogen and generating process heat. The design characteristics of many SMRs differ from those of current conventional plants and may require a distinct concept of operations (ConOps). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducted research to examine the human factors engineering (HFE) and themore » operational aspects of SMRs. The research identified thirty potential human-performance issues that should be considered in the NRC's reviews of SMR designs and in future research activities. The purpose of this report is to support NRC HFE reviewers of SMR applications by identifying some of the questions that can be asked of applicants whose designs have characteristics identified in the issues. The questions for each issue were identified and organized based on the review elements and guidance contained in Chapter 18 of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), and the Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711).« less
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Fuller, C. W.; Unruh, J.; Lindvall, S.; Lettis, W.
2009-05-01
An integral component of the safety analysis for proposed nuclear power plants within the US is a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA). Most applications currently under NRC review followed guidance provided within NRC Regulatory Guide 1.208 (RG 1.208) for developing seismic source characterizations (SSC) for their PSHA. Three key components of RG 1.208 guidance is that applicants should: (1) use existing PSHA models and SSCs accepted by the NRC as SSC as a starting point for their SSCs; (2) evaluate new information and data developed since acceptance of the starting model to determine if the model should be updated; and (3) follow guidelines set forth by the Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) (NUREG/CR-6372) in developing significant updates (i.e., updates should capture SSC uncertainty through representing the "center, body, and range of technical interpretations" of the informed technical community). Major motivations for following this guidance are to ensure accurate representations of hazard and regulatory stability in hazard estimates for nuclear power plants. All current applications with the NRC have used the EPRI-SOG source characterizations developed in the 1980s as their starting point model, and all applicants have followed RG 1.208 guidance in updating the EPRI- SOG model. However, there has been considerable variability in how applicants have interpreted the guidance, and thus there has been considerable variability in the methodology used in updating the SSCs. Much of the variability can be attributed to how different applicants have interpreted the implications of new data, new interpretations of new and/or old data, and new "opinions" of members of the informed technical community. For example, many applicants and the NRC have wrestled with the challenge of whether or not to update SSCs in light of new opinions or interpretations of older data put forth by one member of the technical community. This challenge has been further complicated by: (1) a given applicant's uncertainty in how to revise the EPRI-SOG model, which was developed using a process similar to that dictated by SSHAC for a level 3 or 4 study, without conducting a resource-intensive SSHAC level 3 or higher study for their respective application; and (2) a lack of guidance from the NRC on acceptable methods of demonstrating that new data, interpretations, and opinions are adequately represented within the EPRI-SOG model. Partly because of these issues, initiative was taken by the nuclear industry, NRC and DOE to develop a new base PSHA model for the central and eastern US. However, this new SSC model will not be completed for several years and does not resolve many of the fundamental regulatory and philosophical issues that have been raised during the current round of applications. To ensure regulatory stability and to provide accurate estimates of hazard for nuclear power plants, a dialog must be started between regulators and industry to resolve these issues. Two key issues that must be discussed are: (1) should new data and new interpretations or opinions of old data be treated differently in updated SSCs, and if so, how?; and (2) how can new data or interpretations developed by a small subset of the technical community be weighed against and potentially combined with a SSC model that was originally developed to capture the "center, body and range" of the technical community?
IMPLEMENTING ACCOUNTABILITY WITHIN A MULTI-POLLUTANT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
In 2004, the National Research Council (NRC) published a major assessment of air quality management practices: Air Quality Management in the United States. The assessment resulted from a Congressional directive that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency commission the Nationa...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-15
...; correction. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice that was published...-0001, telephone: 301-287- 0949; email: [email protected] . Correction In the Federal Register (FR...
A vision for modernizing environmental risk assessment
In 2007, the US National Research Council (NRC) published a Vision and Strategy for [human health] Toxicity Testing in the 21st century. Central to the vision was increased reliance on high throughput in vitro testing and predictive approaches based on mechanistic understanding o...
Title list of documents made publicly available, March 1--31, 1995: Volume 17, No. 3
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
The Title List of Documents Made Publicly Available is a monthly publication. It contains descriptions of the information received and generated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This information includes (1) docketed material associated with civilian nuclear power plants and other uses of radioactive materials and (2) nondocketed material received and generated by NRC pertinent to its role as a regulatory agency. As used here, docketed does not refer to Court dockets; it refers to the system by which NRC maintains its regulatory records. This series of documents is indexed by a Personal Author Index, a Corporate Source Index,more » and a Report Number Index. The docketed information contained in the Title List includes the information formerly issued through the Department of Energy publication Power Reactor Docket Information, last published in January 1979. NRC documents that are publicly available may be examined without charge at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). Duplicate copies may be obtained for a fee. Standing orders for certain categories of documents are also available. Clients may search for and order desired titles through the PDR computerized Bibliographic Retrieval System, which is accessible both at the PDR and remotely. The PDR is staffed by professional technical librarians, who provide reference assistance to users. See NOTES at the end of the preface for information about reaching the PDR. Microfiche of the docketed information listed in the Title List is available for sale on a subscription basis from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS).« less
The report summarizes the capabilities, research needs and on-going projects of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission related to the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation. The statutory authorities of both EPA and NRC related to radiat...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Barry, Kenneth
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Licensing Task Force (TF) has been evaluating licensing issues unique and important to iPWRs, ranking these issues, and developing NEI position papers for submittal to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during the past three years. Papers have been developed and submitted to the NRC in a range of areas including: Price-Anderson Act, NRC annual fees, security, modularity, and staffing. In December, 2012, NEI completed a draft position paper on SMR source terms and participated in an NRC public meeting presenting a summary of this paper, which was subsequently submitted tomore » the NRC. One important conclusion of the source term paper was the evaluation and selection of high importance areas where additional research would have a significant impact on source terms. The highest ranked research area was iPWR containment aerosol natural deposition. The NRC accepts the use of existing aerosol deposition correlations in Regulatory Guide 1.183, but these were developed for large light water reactor (LWR) containments. Application of these correlations to an iPWR design has resulted in greater than a ten-fold reduction of containment airborne aerosol inventory as compared to large LWRs. Development and experimental justification of containment aerosol natural deposition correlations specifically for the unique iPWR containments is expected to result in a large reduction of design basis and beyond-design-basis accident source terms with concomitantly smaller dose to workers and the public. Therefore, NRC acceptance of iPWR containment aerosol natural deposition correlations will directly support the industry’s goal of reducing the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) for SMRs. Based on the results in this work, it is clear that thermophoresis is relatively unimportant for iPWRs. Gravitational settling is well understood, and may be the dominant process for a dry environment. Diffusiophoresis and enhanced settling by particle growth are the dominant processes for determining DFs for expected conditions in an iPWR containment. These processes are dependent on the areato-volume (A/V) ratio, which should benefit iPWR designs because these reactors have higher A/Vs compared to existing LWRs.« less
76 FR 64126 - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Procedures for Meetings
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-17
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Procedures for Meetings.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) pursuant to the... specified in the Federal Register Notice, care of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear...
78 FR 35056 - Effectiveness of the Reactor Oversight Process Baseline Inspection Program
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-11
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0125] Effectiveness of the Reactor Oversight Process... the effectiveness of the reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspection program with members of... Nuclear Reactor Regulations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301...
78 FR 67205 - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Procedures for Meetings
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-08
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Procedures for Meetings.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) pursuant to the... specified in the Federal Register Notice, care of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear...
76 FR 6085 - Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-02-03
...-2011-0014] RIN 3150-AI49 Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice Availability of Draft Regulatory Guide. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission or NRC) is issuing for public comment Draft Regulatory Guide, DG-5019, ``Reporting and...
Review breathes life into Yucca site
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Gwynne, Peter
2014-12-01
A review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on the long-term safety of the Yucca Mountain repository for nuclear waste in Nevada has improved the chances that it may go ahead, despite being mothballed by the administration of US president Barack Obama back in 2010.
Report from JEM-EUSO in the US
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Adams, Jim
2009-01-01
This slide presentation reviews the current status of interest in NASA for the Japanese Experiment Module-Extreme Universe Space Observatory (JEM-EUSO). It reviews the decadal survey performed by the National Research Council (NRC), the Technology Innovation Program, and plans for proposals to fund the experiment,
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-26
... Plant, Unit 4; Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Determination of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria completion. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the inspections, tests...
10 CFR 1.41 - Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... to the States as provided by section 274i of the Act and also to NRC staff and staff of the U.S. Navy... radioactive isotopes; (21) Oversees safe management and disposal of low-level radioactive wastes; (22) Plans...
10 CFR 1.41 - Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... to the States as provided by section 274i of the Act and also to NRC staff and staff of the U.S. Navy... radioactive isotopes; (21) Oversees safe management and disposal of low-level radioactive wastes; (22) Plans...
10 CFR 1.41 - Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... to the States as provided by section 274i of the Act and also to NRC staff and staff of the U.S. Navy... radioactive isotopes; (21) Oversees safe management and disposal of low-level radioactive wastes; (22) Plans...
10 CFR 1.41 - Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... to the States as provided by section 274i of the Act and also to NRC staff and staff of the U.S. Navy... radioactive isotopes; (21) Oversees safe management and disposal of low-level radioactive wastes; (22) Plans...
10 CFR 1.41 - Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... to the States as provided by section 274i of the Act and also to NRC staff and staff of the U.S. Navy... radioactive isotopes; (21) Oversees safe management and disposal of low-level radioactive wastes; (22) Plans...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
N /A
2004-01-22
This Supplement Analysis (SA) has been prepared to determine if the Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operations of Los Alamos National Laboratory (SWEIS) (DOE/EIS-0238) adequately addresses the environmental effects of recovery and storage for disposal of six strontium-90 (Sr-90) fueled radioisotope thermal electric generators (RTGs) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Technical Area (TA)-54, Area G, or if the SWEIS needs to be supplemented. DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) proposed to recover and store six Sr-90 RTGs from the commercial sector as part of its Offsite-Source Recovery Project (OSRP). The OSRP focuses on the proactive recovery andmore » storage of unwanted radioactive sealed sources exceeding the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) limits for Class C low-level waste (also known as Greater than Class C waste, or GTCC). In response to the events of September 11, 2001, NRC conducted a risk-based evaluation of potential vulnerabilities to terrorist threats involving NRC-licensed nuclear facilities and materials. NRC's evaluation concluded that possession of unwanted radioactive sealed sources with no disposal outlet presents a potential vulnerability (NRC 2002). In a November 25, 2003 letter to the manager of the NNSA's Los Alamos Site Office, the NRC Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response identified recovery of several Sr-90 RTGs as the highest priority and requested that DOE take whatever actions necessary to recovery these sources as soon as possible. This SA specifically compares key impact assessment parameters of this proposal to the offsite source recovery program evaluated in the SWEIS and a subsequent SA that evaluated a change to the approach of a portion of the recovery program. It also provides an explanation of any differences between the Proposed Action and activities described in the previous SWEIS and SA analyses.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1991-12-01
The uranium mill tailings site near Durango, Colorado, was one of 24 inactive uranium mill sites designated to be remediated by the US Department of Energy (DOE) under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (UMTRCA). Part of the UMTRCA requires that the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) concur with the DOE`s Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and certify that the remedial action conducted at the site complies with the standards promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Included in the RAP is this Remedial Action Selection Report (RAS), which has been developed to serve a two-fold purpose.more » First, it describes the activities that have been conducted by the DOE to accomplish remediation and long-term stabilization and control of the radioactive materials at the inactive uranium mill processing site near Durango, Colorado. Secondly, this document and the rest of the RAP, upon concurrence and execution by the DOE, the State of Colorado, and the NRC, become Appendix B of the Cooperative Agreement between the DOE and the State of Colorado.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1991-12-01
The uranium mill tailings site near Durango, Colorado, was one of 24 inactive uranium mill sites designated to be remediated by the US Department of Energy (DOE) under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (UMTRCA). Part of the UMTRCA requires that the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) concur with the DOE's Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and certify that the remedial action conducted at the site complies with the standards promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Included in the RAP is this Remedial Action Selection Report (RAS), which has been developed to serve a two-fold purpose.more » First, it describes the activities that have been conducted by the DOE to accomplish remediation and long-term stabilization and control of the radioactive materials at the inactive uranium mill processing site near Durango, Colorado. Secondly, this document and the rest of the RAP, upon concurrence and execution by the DOE, the State of Colorado, and the NRC, become Appendix B of the Cooperative Agreement between the DOE and the State of Colorado.« less
Phase 1 environmental report for the Advanced Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Blasing, T.J.; Brown, R.A.; Cada, G.F.
1992-02-01
The US Department of Energy (DOE) has proposed the construction and operation of the Advanced Neutron Source (ANS), a 330-MW(f) reactor, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to support neutron scattering and nuclear physics experiments. ANS would provide a steady-state source of neutrons that are thermalized to produce sources of hot, cold, and very coal neutrons. The use of these neutrons in ANS experiment facilities would be an essential component of national research efforts in basic materials science. Additionally, ANS capabilities would include production of transplutonium isotopes, irradiation of potential fusion and fission reactor materials, activation analysis, and production ofmore » medical and industrial isotopes such as {sup 252}Cf. Although ANS would not require licensing by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), DOE regards the design, construction, and operation of ANS as activities that would produce a licensable facility; that is, DOE is following the regulatory guidelines that NRC would apply if NRC were licensing the facility. Those guidelines include instructions for the preparation of an environmental report (ER), a compilation of available data and preliminary analyses regarding the environmental impacts of nuclear facility construction and operation. The ER, described and outlined in NRC Regulatory Guide 4.2, serves as a background document to facilitate the preparation of environmental impact statements (EISs). Using Regulatory Guide 4.2 as a model, this ANS ER provides analyses and information specific to the ANS site and area that can be adopted (and modified, if necessary) for the ANS EIS. The ER is being prepared in two phases. Phase 1 ER includes many of the data and analyses needed to prepare the EIS but does not include data or analyses of alternate sites or alternate technologies. Phase 2 ER will include the additional data and analyses stipulated by Regulatory Guide 4.2.« less
Bhattacharya, Sudin; Zhang, Qiang; Carmichael, Paul L.; Boekelheide, Kim; Andersen, Melvin E.
2011-01-01
The approaches to quantitatively assessing the health risks of chemical exposure have not changed appreciably in the past 50 to 80 years, the focus remaining on high-dose studies that measure adverse outcomes in homogeneous animal populations. This expensive, low-throughput approach relies on conservative extrapolations to relate animal studies to much lower-dose human exposures and is of questionable relevance to predicting risks to humans at their typical low exposures. It makes little use of a mechanistic understanding of the mode of action by which chemicals perturb biological processes in human cells and tissues. An alternative vision, proposed by the U.S. National Research Council (NRC) report Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy, called for moving away from traditional high-dose animal studies to an approach based on perturbation of cellular responses using well-designed in vitro assays. Central to this vision are (a) “toxicity pathways” (the innate cellular pathways that may be perturbed by chemicals) and (b) the determination of chemical concentration ranges where those perturbations are likely to be excessive, thereby leading to adverse health effects if present for a prolonged duration in an intact organism. In this paper we briefly review the original NRC report and responses to that report over the past 3 years, and discuss how the change in testing might be achieved in the U.S. and in the European Union (EU). EU initiatives in developing alternatives to animal testing of cosmetic ingredients have run very much in parallel with the NRC report. Moving from current practice to the NRC vision would require using prototype toxicity pathways to develop case studies showing the new vision in action. In this vein, we also discuss how the proposed strategy for toxicity testing might be applied to the toxicity pathways associated with DNA damage and repair. PMID:21701582
SMAP Algorithms & Cal/Val Workshop
USDA-ARS?s Scientific Manuscript database
The Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) mission is one of four Decadal Survey missions recommended by the U.S. National Research Council for launch in the early part of the next decade ("Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond," NRC, Committ...
76 FR 46856 - Qualification of Connection Assemblies for Nuclear Power Plants
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-08-03
... Power Plants AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Regulatory guide; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S..., ``Qualification of Connection Assemblies for Nuclear Power Plants.'' This guide describes a method that the NRC... in nuclear power plants. The environmental qualification helps ensure that connection assemblies can...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-346; NRC-2010-0121] Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company and Firstenergy Nuclear Generation Corp.; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has [[Page 13802
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Communications. 9.6 Section 9.6 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY... the NRC by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Communications. 9.6 Section 9.6 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY... the NRC by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Communications. 9.6 Section 9.6 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY... the NRC by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the...
78 FR 16601 - List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: MAGNASTOR® System
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-18
... Storage Casks: MAGNASTOR[supreg] System AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Direct final rule. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its spent fuel storage regulations by revising the NAC International, Inc. (NAC) Modular Advanced Generation Nuclear All-purpose Storage...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-18
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0109] NUREG/CR-XXXX, Development of Quantitative Software..., ``Development of Quantitative Software Reliability Models for Digital Protection Systems of Nuclear Power Plants... of Risk Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
78 FR 52987 - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-286; NRC-2013-0063] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Communications. 9.6 Section 9.6 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY... the NRC by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.The guidance discusses, among other topics, the...
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Communications. 9.6 Section 9.6 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY... the NRC by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by.... Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the...
78 FR 14593 - Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-06
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Meeting. SUMMARY: NRC will convene a... enforcement policy for Permanent Implant Brachytherapy programs; (3) medical- related events from fiscal year...
Teaching Spatial Thinking with the National Atlas of Korea in U.S. Secondary Level Education
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Chu, Gregory H.; Hwang, Chul Sue; Choi, Jongnam
2018-05-01
This paper is predicated on the body of literature that supports a theoretical concept that middle and high school age children possess the cognitive ability to understand thematic maps and achieve some degree of cartographic literacy. In 2006, the US National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies published a landmark book on Learning to Think Spatially. This book documented essential secondary education components and various aspects of teaching spatial thinking. The NRC defines spatial thinking as "a form of thinking based on a constructive amalgam of three elements: concepts of space, tools of representation, and processes of reasoning" (NRC, 2006, ix). This paper is an attempt to document and understand some of the attributes associated with these three elements. Specifically, it aims to find ways that can effectively contribute to the teaching of these elements associated with spatial thinking. The National Atlas of Korea is chosen for lesson plan development because it is well-designed and provides a range of contents and comprehensiveness that are ideal; in addition, it is freely accessible online and downloadable (http://nationalatlas.ngii.go.kr/). Four master geography teachers were invited to examine the Atlas to conceive and develop Advanced Placement Human Geography (APHG) lesson plans. Four lesson plans were written and have continually been implemented in classrooms to over 800 students in the States of Utah, Georgia, Minnesota, and Tennessee since the 2015 Fall semester. Results are presented in this paper.
Environmental assessment proposed license renewal of Nuclear Metals, Inc. Concord, Massachusetts
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Miller, R.L.; Easterly, C.E.; Lombardi, C.E.
1997-02-01
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate environmental issues associated with the renewal of licenses issued by NRC for facilities operated by Nuclear Metals, Inc. (NMI) in Concord, Massachusetts. By renewing the licenses, NRC proposes to allow the continuation of ongoing operations involving radioactive materials at NMI`s facilities. This EA focuses on the potential impacts related to air emissions at NMI during normal (incident-free) operations and accidental releases. Findings indicate that there are only two areas of potential concern. First, modeling results for sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) emissions from the boilers during normalmore » operations indicate that the potential exists for exceeding the short-term National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). NMI is prepared to undertake mitigative action to prevent potential exceedances of the short-term SO{sub 2} NAAQS, and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection is prepared to resolve the issue via a permit/approval change or through a Consent Order. Second, in the unlikely event of a severe fire, predicted sulfuric acid (H{sub 2}SO{sub 4}) concentrations based on conservative (upper bound) modeling exceed the Emergency Response Planning Guideline (ERPG) levels. NMI has committed to NRC to give a briefing for local emergency response officials regarding the potential for an accidental H{sub 2}SO{sub 4} release.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Chu, Tsong-Lun; Varuttamaseni, Athi; Baek, Joo-Seok
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) encourages the use of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) technology in all regulatory matters, to the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in PRA methods and data. Although much has been accomplished in the area of risk-informed regulation, risk assessment for digital systems has not been fully developed. The NRC established a plan for research on digital systems to identify and develop methods, analytical tools, and regulatory guidance for (1) including models of digital systems in the PRAs of nuclear power plants (NPPs), and (2) incorporating digital systems in the NRC's risk-informed licensing and oversight activities.more » Under NRC's sponsorship, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) explored approaches for addressing the failures of digital instrumentation and control (I and C) systems in the current NPP PRA framework. Specific areas investigated included PRA modeling digital hardware, development of a philosophical basis for defining software failure, and identification of desirable attributes of quantitative software reliability methods. Based on the earlier research, statistical testing is considered a promising method for quantifying software reliability. This paper describes a statistical software testing approach for quantifying software reliability and applies it to the loop-operating control system (LOCS) of an experimental loop of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL).« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Tortorelli, J.P.
1995-08-01
A workshop was held at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, August 16--18, 1994 on the topic of risk assessment on medical devices that use radioactive isotopes. Its purpose was to review past efforts to develop a risk assessment methodology to evaluate these devices, and to develop a program plan and a scoping document for future methodology development. This report contains a summary of that workshop. Participants included experts in the fields of radiation oncology, medical physics, risk assessment, human-error analysis, and human factors. Staff from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) associated with the regulation of medical uses of radioactivemore » materials and with research into risk-assessment methods participated in the workshop. The workshop participants concurred in NRC`s intended use of risk assessment as an important technology in the development of regulations for the medical use of radioactive material and encouraged the NRC to proceed rapidly with a pilot study. Specific recommendations are included in the executive summary and the body of this report. An appendix contains the 8 papers presented at the conference: NRC proposed policy statement on the use of probabilistic risk assessment methods in nuclear regulatory activities; NRC proposed agency-wide implementation plan for probabilistic risk assessment; Risk evaluation of high dose rate remote afterloading brachytherapy at a large research/teaching institution; The pros and cons of using human reliability analysis techniques to analyze misadministration events; Review of medical misadministration event summaries and comparison of human error modeling; Preliminary examples of the development of error influences and effects diagrams to analyze medical misadministration events; Brachytherapy risk assessment program plan; and Principles of brachytherapy quality assurance.« less
Trends in HFE Methods and Tools and Their Applicability to Safety Reviews
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
O'Hara, J.M.; Plott, C.; Milanski, J.
2009-09-30
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) conducts human factors engineering (HFE) safety reviews of applicant submittals for new plants and for changes to existing plants. The reviews include the evaluation of the methods and tools (M&T) used by applicants as part of their HFE program. The technology used to perform HFE activities has been rapidly evolving, resulting in a whole new generation of HFE M&Ts. The objectives of this research were to identify the current trends in HFE methods and tools, determine their applicability to NRC safety reviews, and identify topics for which the NRC may need additional guidance tomore » support the NRC's safety reviews. We conducted a survey that identified over 100 new HFE M&Ts. The M&Ts were assessed to identify general trends. Seven trends were identified: Computer Applications for Performing Traditional Analyses, Computer-Aided Design, Integration of HFE Methods and Tools, Rapid Development Engineering, Analysis of Cognitive Tasks, Use of Virtual Environments and Visualizations, and Application of Human Performance Models. We assessed each trend to determine its applicability to the NRC's review by considering (1) whether the nuclear industry is making use of M&Ts for each trend, and (2) whether M&Ts reflecting the trend can be reviewed using the current design review guidance. We concluded that M&T trends that are applicable to the commercial nuclear industry and are expected to impact safety reviews may be considered for review guidance development. Three trends fell into this category: Analysis of Cognitive Tasks, Use of Virtual Environments and Visualizations, and Application of Human Performance Models. The other trends do not need to be addressed at this time.« less
Auxiliary feedwater system risk-based inspection guide for the Salem Nuclear Power Plant
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Pugh, R.; Gore, B.F. Vo, T.V.
In a study by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Pacific Northwest Laboratory has developed and applied a methodology for deriving plant-specific risk-based inspection guidance for the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) system at pressurized water reactors that have not undergone probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). This methodology uses existing PRA results and plant operating experience information. Existing PRA-based inspection guidance information recently developed for the NRC for various plants was used to identify generic component failure modes. This information was then combined with plant-specific and industry-wide component information and failure data to identify failure modes and failure mechanisms for the AFW systemmore » at the selected plants. Salem was selected as the fifth plant for study. The product of this effort is a prioritized listing of AFW failures which have occurred at the plant and at other PWRs. This listing is intended for use by NRC inspectors in the preparation of inspection plans addressing AFW risk-important components at the Salem plant. 23 refs., 1 fig., 1 tab.« less
Workshop on environmental qualification of electric equipment
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Lofaro, R.; Gunther, W.; Villaran, M.
1994-05-01
Questions concerning the Environmental Qualification (EQ) of electrical equipment used in commercial nuclear power plants have recently become the subject of significant interest to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Initial questions centered on whether compliance with the EQ requirements for older plants were adequate to support plant operation beyond 40 years. After subsequent investigation, the NRC Staff concluded that questions related to the differences in EQ requirements between older and newer plants constitute a potential generic issue which should be evaluated for backfit, independent of license renewal activities. EQ testing of electric cables was performed by Sandia National Laboratoriesmore » (SNL) under contract to the NRC in support of license renewal activities. Results showed that some of the environmentally qualified cables either failed or exhibited marginal insulation resistance after a simulated plant life of 20 years during accident simulation. This indicated that the EQ process for some electric cables may be non-conservative. These results raised questions regarding the EQ process including the bases for conclusions about the qualified life of components based upon artificial aging prior to testing.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Tortorelli, J.P.
A workshop was held at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, August 16--18, 1994 on the topic of risk assessment on medical devices that use radioactive isotopes. Its purpose was to review past efforts to develop a risk assessment methodology to evaluate these devices, and to develop a program plan and a scoping document for future methodology development. This report contains presentation material and a transcript of the workshop. Participants included experts in the fields of radiation oncology, medical physics, risk assessment, human-error analysis, and human factors. Staff from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) associated with the regulation of medicalmore » uses of radioactive materials and with research into risk-assessment methods participated in the workshop. The workshop participants concurred in NRC`s intended use of risk assessment as an important technology in the development of regulations for the medical use of radioactive material and encouraged the NRC to proceed rapidly with a pilot study. Specific recommendations are included in the executive summary and the body of this report.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Buck, J.W.; Whelan, G.; Strenge, D.L.
This paper is in response to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) ten questions posed at the Modeling Workshop held November 13 and 14, 1997. The ten questions were developed in advance of the workshop to allow model developers to prepare a presentation at the Workshop. This paper is an expanded version of the Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) presentation given at the Modeling Workshop by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) staff. This paper is organized by the ten questions asked by the NRC, each section devoted to a single question. The current version of methodology is MEPAS 3.2more » (NRC 1997) and the discussion in this paper will pertain to that version. In some cases, MEPAS 4.0, which is currently being developed under the Framework for Risk Analysis in Multimedia Environmental Systems (FRAMES) (Whelan et al. 1997), will be referenced to inform the reader of potential capabilities in the near future. A separate paper is included in the document that discusses the FRAMES concept.« less
Rogério, Marcos Cláudio Pinheiro; de Castro, Eliane Minervina; Martins, Espedito Cezário; Monteiro, Jomar Patrício; Silva, Kleibe de Moraes; Cândido, Magno José Duarte; Gomes, Tereza Cristina Lacerda; Bloc, Antoine Francis Roux; de Vasconcelos, Angela Maria; Leite, Eneas Reis; Costa, Hélio Henrique Araújo
2013-01-01
This study compares both versions of the nutritional requirement system determined by the National Research Council (NRC) version 1985 (NRC85) and NRC version 2007 (NRC07), for finishing lambs in feedlots. Nineteen crossbred lambs were divided in four groups representing four experimental treatments: one diet according to NRC85 and three diets according to NRC07. The diets recommended by NRC07 considers crude protein intake relative to ruminal undegradable protein at 20, 40, and 60 % levels (NRC07/20, NRC07/40, and NRC07/60). Diets were composed of Brazilian semi-arid native grass silage, soybean meal, corn, annatto byproduct, and limestone. Purchases and sales of lambs were done according to average market prices in Brazil. The economic indicators considered pointed that all treatments were viable but NRC07/20 and NRC07/60 were more profitable with similar net present values (NPVs) and internal return rates (IRRs). NRC07/20 was the best option showing an IRR of 17.20 % and a payback period (PP) of 5.07 considering a fixed annual interest rate of 6 %. Sensitivity analysis considering a 10 % raise in variable costs showed negative NPVs, IRRs inferior to the opportunity cost rates adopted and PPs that exceeded the planning horizon of 7 years for both NRC85 and NRC07/40.
10 CFR 2.206 - Requests for action under this subpart.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and... [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... authorized to extend the time for Commission review on its own motion of a Director's denial under paragraph...
10 CFR 2.206 - Requests for action under this subpart.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and... [email protected]; or by writing the Office of Information Services, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... authorized to extend the time for Commission review on its own motion of a Director's denial under paragraph...
Annually, over 3 million dry tons of treated sewage sludge (or biosolids) are applied on agricultural lands in the U.S. In 2002, the National Research Council (NRC) recommended an examination of biosolids management practices including chemicals such as surfactants used in clean...
75 FR 41241 - Draft Regulatory Guide; Issuance, Availability
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-15
...: (301) 251-7404 or e-mail [email protected] . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S... analysis and testing applicable to Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) strainer performance and debris... provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are...
Back to the Sea: U.S. Strategic Requirements and Sea Control
2012-03-22
or request for forces? Does the habit of operating carriers with only one escort weaken our Navy institutionally by desensitizing the fleet to the...been in the marketplace since 2001," said Capt. Phil Altizer, director of Marketing and Advertising , NRC. http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 72-8; NRC-2010-0011] Constellation Energy; Notice of... Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of license..., Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S...
76 FR 26223 - Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Thomas Popik
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-06
... [in ensuring] that large U.S. land areas do not become contaminated with nuclear radiation and... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 50 [Docket No. PRM-50-96; NRC-2011-0069] Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Thomas Popik AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking...
77 FR 53769 - Receipts-Based, Small Business Size Standard; Confirmation of Effective Date
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-04
...-Based, Small Business Size Standard; Confirmation of Effective Date AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is confirming the effective date of August 22, 2012, for the direct final rule that appeared...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-12
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-225; NRC-2008-0277] Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Critical Experiments Facility; Notice of Issuance of Renewed Facility Operating License No. CX-22 The U.S... of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Critical Experiments Facility (RCF), located in Schenectady...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-11-08
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-020; NRC-2010-0313] Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor Notice of Issuance of Renewed Facility Operating; License No. R-37 The U.S. Nuclear... Institute of Technology (the licensee), which authorizes continued operation of the Massachusetts Institute...
77 FR 39385 - Receipts-Based, Small Business Size Standard
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-03
... Business Size Standard AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Direct final rule. SUMMARY: The U.S.... The NRC is increasing its receipts-based, small business size standard from $6.5 million to $7 million to conform to the standard set by the Small Business Administration (SBA). This size standard...
Based on the National Academy of Science’s 2004 report, “Air Quality Management in the United States”, the National Research Council (NRC) recommended to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that standard setting, planning, and control strategy development should be based...
78 FR 25488 - Qualification Tests for Safety-Related Actuators in Nuclear Power Plants
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-01
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0079] Qualification Tests for Safety-Related Actuators in... regulatory guide (DG), DG-1235, ``Qualification Tests for Safety-Related Actuators in Nuclear Power Plants...-251- 7495, email: [email protected] . Both of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear...
78 FR 36278 - Fuel Oil Systems for Emergency Power Supplies
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-17
... this notice (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is..., Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001... issuing a revision to an existing guide in the NRC's ``Regulatory Guide'' series. This series was...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-07
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0113] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory... byproduct, source, or special nuclear material that are ceasing licensed activities and terminating the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-29
... correspondence to addressees and subscribers through a computer-based email distribution system. Since then, the... Electronic Operating Reactor Correspondence The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this... available operating reactor licensing correspondence, effective December 9, 2013. Official agency records...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-293; NRC-2010-0010] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S... Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy or the licensee), for operation of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station...
78 FR 70588 - STP Nuclear Operating Company; South Texas Project
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-26
... efficiency; (8) wind power; (9) solar power; (10) hydroelectric power; (11) ocean wave and current energy... generic environmental impact statement for license renewal of nuclear plants; issuance. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has published the final, plant-specific...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-24
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0122] Proposed Generic Communications; Applicability of 10 CFR Part 21 Requirements to Applicants for Standard Design Certifications AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission...
75 FR 45678 - Notice of Availability of Interim Staff Guidance Document for Fuel Cycle Facilities
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-03
... Document for Fuel Cycle Facilities AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of availability..., Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S... Commission (NRC) prepares and issues Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) documents for fuel cycle facilities. These...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-25
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-255; NRC-2010-0127] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Palisades Nuclear Plant; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear... Operating License No. DPR-20, issued to Entergy Nuclear Operations, LLC (ENO) (the licensee), for operation...
10 CFR 75.7 - Notification of IAEA safeguards.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Notification of IAEA safeguards. 75.7 Section 75.7 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (CONTINUED) SAFEGUARDS ON NUCLEAR MATERIAL-IMPLEMENTATION OF US/IAEA AGREEMENT General Provisions § 75.7 Notification of IAEA safeguards. (a) The licensee must inform the NRC...
10 CFR 75.7 - Notification of IAEA safeguards.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Notification of IAEA safeguards. 75.7 Section 75.7 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (CONTINUED) SAFEGUARDS ON NUCLEAR MATERIAL-IMPLEMENTATION OF US/IAEA AGREEMENT General Provisions § 75.7 Notification of IAEA safeguards. (a) The licensee must inform the NRC...
76 FR 60939 - Metal Fatigue Analysis Performed by Computer Software
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-30
... Nuclear Power Plants,'' Revision 2, issued December 2010, which recommends that the effects of the reactor... design control in accordance with Appendix B, ``Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and... Nuclear Power Plants.'' Intent The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory...
The Adverse Outcome Pathway: A conceptual framework to support toxicity testing in the 21st century
The field of regulatory toxicity testing is at a turning point. The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) envisioned a shift away from traditional toxicity testing and towards a focused effort to explore and understand pathways perturbed by biologically active substances or their ...
78 FR 9745 - Kewaunee Power Station; Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-11
... FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Feintuch, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S... Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2013-03037 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-305; NRC-2013-0028] Kewaunee Power Station...
75 FR 16202 - Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-31
..., Revision 2, ``An Acceptable Model and Related Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Fuel Densification.... Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision to an existing guide in the... nuclear power reactors. To meet these objectives, the guide describes statistical methods related to...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0110; 50-382] Entergy Operations, Inc.; Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear... the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3), located in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana...
Technical support for the EPA cleanup rule on radioactively contaminated sites
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Hull, H.B.; Newman, A.; Wolbarst, A.B.
1995-12-31
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is developing a radiation site cleanup regulation for the protection of the public from radionuclide contamination at sites that are to be cleaned up and released for public use. The regulation will apply to sites under the control of Federal agencies, and to sites licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) or NRC Agreement States. The agency is therefore conducting a comprehensive technical analysis aimed at developing information that will be used to support the rule. This presentation describes the regulation and the approach developed to determine how radiological health impacts and volumes ofmore » soil requiring remediation vary as functions of the possible cleanup dose or risk level.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-10-21
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) is issuing a revision to regulatory guide (RG) 3.39, ``Standard Format and Content of License Applications for Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facilities.'' This guide endorses the standard format and content for license applications and integrated safety analysis (ISA) summaries described in the current version of NUREG-1718, ``Standard Review Plan for the Review of an Application for a Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility,'' as a method that the NRC staff finds acceptable for meeting the regulatory requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 70, ``Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material'' for mixed oxide fuel fabrication facilities.
Technical Basis for Physical Fidelity of NRC Control Room Training Simulators for Advanced Reactors
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Minsk, Brian S.; Branch, Kristi M.; Bates, Edward K.
2009-10-09
The objective of this study is to determine how simulator physical fidelity influences the effectiveness of training the regulatory personnel responsible for examination and oversight of operating personnel and inspection of technical systems at nuclear power reactors. It seeks to contribute to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) understanding of the physical fidelity requirements of training simulators. The goal of the study is to provide an analytic framework, data, and analyses that inform NRC decisions about the physical fidelity requirements of the simulators it will need to train its staff for assignment at advanced reactors. These staff are expected tomore » come from increasingly diverse educational and experiential backgrounds.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Boyack, B.E.; Steiner, J.L.; Harmony, S.C.
The PIUS advanced reactor is a 640-MWe pressurized water reactor developed by Asea Brown Boveri (ABB). A unique feature of the PIUS concept is the absence of mechanical control and shutdown rods. Reactivity is normally controlled by coolant boron concentration and the temperature of the moderator coolant. ABB submitted the PIUS design to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for preapplication review, and Los Alamos supported the NRC`s review effort. Baseline analyses of small-break initiators at two locations were performed with the system neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analysis code TRAC-PF1/MOD2. In addition, sensitivity studies were performed to explore the robustness ofmore » the PIUS concept to severe off-normal conditions having a very low probability of occurrence.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Oberson, Greg; Dunn, Darrell; Mintz, Todd
2013-07-01
At a number of locations in the U.S., spent nuclear fuel (SNF) is maintained at independent spent fuel storage installations (ISFSIs). These ISFSIs, which include operating and decommissioned reactor sites, Department of Energy facilities in Idaho, and others, are licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 72. The SNF is stored in dry cask storage systems, which most commonly consist of a welded austenitic stainless steel canister within a larger concrete vault or overpack vented to the external atmosphere to allow airflow for cooling. Some ISFSIs are located inmore » marine environments where there may be high concentrations of airborne chloride salts. If salts were to deposit on the canisters via the external vents, a chloride-rich brine could form by deliquescence. Austenitic stainless steels are susceptible to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking (SCC), particularly in the presence of residual tensile stresses from welding or other fabrication processes. SCC could allow helium to leak out of a canister if the wall is breached or otherwise compromise its structural integrity. There is currently limited understanding of the conditions that will affect the SCC susceptibility of austenitic stainless steel exposed to marine salts. NRC previously conducted a scoping study of this phenomenon, reported in NUREG/CR-7030 in 2010. Given apparent conservatisms and limitations in this study, NRC has sponsored a follow-on research program to more systematically investigate various factors that may affect SCC including temperature, humidity, salt concentration, and stress level. The activities within this research program include: (1) measurement of relative humidity (RH) for deliquescence of sea salt, (2) SCC testing within the range of natural absolute humidity, (3) SCC testing at elevated temperatures, (4) SCC testing at high humidity conditions, and (5) SCC testing with various applied stresses. Results to date indicate that the deliquescence RH for sea salt is close to that of MgCl{sub 2} pure salt. SCC is observed between 35 and 80 deg. C when the ambient (RH) is close to or higher than this level, even for a low surface salt concentration. (authors)« less
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Zielinski, Sarah
A draft plan setting out priorities for U.S. ocean research generally was lauded for its clear and well-articulated view in a recent report from a committee of the U.S. National Research Council (NRC) of the US. National Academies. However, the committee advised that the plan would benefit from a bold vision for the future of ocean science research, additional details, and a reorganization to include cross-cutting research.The draft "Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States: Research Priorities for the Next Decade" was made available for public comment in September 2006 by the U.S. National Science and Technology Council's Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology.
USDA-ARS?s Scientific Manuscript database
Assessment of beef cow energy balance and efficiency in grazing-extensive rangelands has occurred on a nominal basis over short time intervals and has not accounted for the complexity of metabolic and digestive responses; behavioral adaptations to climatic, terrain, and vegetation variables; and doc...
Career Fields for Inspection and Enforcement Personnel.
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Bartley, Hugh J.; And Others
This document is the General Research Corporation (GRC) report on Task II, which called for the development of career fields for headquarters and regional positions of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement (NRC/IE). GRC examined the data of Task I (development of qualifications requirements) for commonality of…
76 FR 70374 - List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: MAGNASTOR® System, Revision 2
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-11-14
... Trussell, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear... Management System (ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are available online... protection of public health and safety continues to be ensured. The direct final rule will become effective...
76 FR 56243 - Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes; Meeting Notice
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-12
... generators from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective; (5) a discussion on strontium breakthrough with rubidium-82 generators from an NRC perspective; (6) a discussion on ACMUI's 2008 recommended...: Discuss issues related to 10 CFR part 35 Medical Use of Byproduct Material. Date and Time for Closed...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-26
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-113; NRC-2009-0549] Notice of Issuance of License Amendment Regarding Decommission Plan Approval; University of Arizona Research Reactor The U.S. Nuclear... located within the University of Arizona Nuclear Reactor Laboratory (NRL) on the 325-acre campus of the...
78 FR 7818 - Duane Arnold Energy Center; Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-02-04
... methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013... search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web- based ADAMS Search.'' For problems... INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl D. Feintuch, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear...
77 FR 67837 - Callaway Plant, Unit 1; Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-14
... methods: Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2012... search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web- based ADAMS Search.'' For problems... INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl F. Lyon, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-16
... Commission and the Electric Power Research Institute on the Treatment of Probabilistic Risk Assessment.... SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), in cooperation with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), will hold a joint workshop on the Treatment of...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-05
...: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-25
...: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently submitted to OMB for review the...
PubMed Central Canada: Beyond an Open Access Repository?
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Nariani, Rajiv
2013-01-01
PubMed Central Canada (PMC Canada) represents a partnership between the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the National Research Council's Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (NRC-CISTI), and the National Library of Medicine of the US. The present study was done to gauge faculty awareness about the CIHR Policy on…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-08-24
... focuses on the unique aspects of nuclear safety and security and highlights the Commission's expectations... safety culture and (2) high level descriptions or traits of areas important to safety culture. The... NRC headquarters. Please allow time at both locations to register with building security upon entering...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-10-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 40-3392; License No. SUB-526; EA-12-157; NRC-2012-0244] Confirmatory Order; In the Matter of Honeywell International Inc.; Metropolis, Illinois I. Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell or Licensee) is the holder of Materials License No. SUB-526, issued by the U.S...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-11
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 70-7003 and 70-7004; NRC-2010-0355] Approval of Direct... Operating, LLC AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of approval of direct transfer of control and issuance of license amendments to effectuate such transfers. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear...
Creating Resiliency and Pathways to Opportunity. Strategies for Transformative Change
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Powell, M.; Hatch, M. A.; Fians, E.; Shinert, A.; Richie, D.
2016-01-01
Like many colleges funded by the U.S. Department of Labor's TAACCCT program, the goal of the Northeast Resiliency Consortium (NRC) (a Round Three grantee) was to enhance the capacity of colleges to accelerate learning, ensure that students attain industry-recognized credentials, foster innovative employer partnerships, use new technologies, and…
78 FR 70077 - Issuance of Materials License for U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-22
... Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area installations in Hawaii. Materials License SUC-1593 authorizes... conditions listed in Materials License SUC-1593. This notice also serves as the record of decision for the... Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area and issue Materials License SUC-1593. The NRC considers the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-10-25
...The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision to regulatory guide (RG), 1.79, ``Preoperational Testing of Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Pressurized-Water Reactors.'' This RG is being revised to incorporate guidance for preoperational testing of new pressurized water reactor (PWR) designs.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-11-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-247; NRC-2012-0284] Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC; Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2, Request for Action AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Request for Action; receipt. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear...
78 FR 39018 - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-06-28
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286; NRC-2008-0672] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission... Renewal of Nuclear Plants; issuance. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...
77 FR 11384 - Removal of Oman from the Restricted Destinations List
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-02-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 110 [NRC-2011-0264] RIN 3150-AJ06 Removal of Oman from... regulations by removing Oman from the list of restricted destinations. This amendment is necessary to conform... regard to U.S. Government law and policy on Oman. The Executive Branch recommended, in light of current...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-06
... DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [Docket ID FEMA-2012-0026...) AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Notice of public meetings. SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will hold two public...
Implementation of a Curriculum-Integrated Computer Game for Introducing Scientific Argumentation
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Wallon, Robert C.; Jasti, Chandana; Lauren, Hillary Z. G.; Hug, Barbara
2018-01-01
Argumentation has been emphasized in recent US science education reform efforts (NGSS Lead States 2013; NRC 2012), and while existing studies have investigated approaches to introducing and supporting argumentation (e.g., McNeill and Krajcik in "Journal of Research in Science Teaching," 45(1), 53-78, 2008; Kang et al. in "Science…
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Talbot, Kristen; Hug, Barbara
2013-01-01
Teachers often ask: How can I engage my students in the study of "real" science? The answer can be found in the National Research Council's "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (NRC 2012). This framework calls for a new approach to science education and is the basis for…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-26
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-440; NRC-2010-0124] FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company; Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S...,'' for Facility Operating License No. NPF-58, issued to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC, the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-16
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0055] Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor Standard Design: GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy; Issuance of Final Design Approval The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a final design approval (FDA) to GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) for the economic...
Applications of Computational Toxicology to the Understanding of Risks of Developmental Toxicity
In response to a request from US EPA, the National Research Council (NRC) developed a long-range vision and strategic plan for the future of toxicity testing in the 21st century. The report, published in 2007, called for a transformation in toxicology that would provide a more r...
Cultivating Primary Students' Scientific Thinking through Sustained Teacher Professional Development
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Miller, Roxanne Greitz; Curwen, Margaret Sauceda; White-Smith, Kimberly A.; Calfee, Robert C.
2015-01-01
While the United States' National Research Council (NRC 2012) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS 2013) advocate children's engagement in active science learning, elementary school teachers in the US indicate lack of time to teach science regularly because of (1) school and district pressure to focus on English language arts and…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-01
... Perry. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Mahoney, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S... Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2010-7331 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-440; NRC-2010-0124] FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-02
..., Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001..., Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011-4557 Filed 3-1... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-282; NRC-2011-0040] Prairie Island Nuclear Generating...
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Tamalis, Dimitri; Stiffin, Rose; Elliott, Michael; Huisso, Ayivi; Biegalski, Steven; Landsberger, Sheldon
2009-08-01
With the passing of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the United States is experiencing for the first time in over two decades, what some refer to as the "Nuclear Renaissance". The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recognizes this surge in application submissions and is committed to reviewing these applications in a timely manner to support the country's growing energy demands. Notwithstanding these facts, it is understood that the nuclear industry requires appropriately trained and educated personnel to support the growing needs of the nuclear industry and the US NRC. Equally important is the need to educate the next generation of students in nuclear non-proliferation, nuclear forensics and various aspects of homeland security for the national laboratories and the Department of Defense. From mechanical engineers educated and experienced in materials, thermal/fluid dynamics, and component failure analysis, to physicists using advanced computing techniques to design the next generation of nuclear reactor fuel elements, the need for new engineers, scientists, and health physicist has never been greater.
Lessons Learned in Over a Decade of Technical Support for U.S. Nuclear Cyber Security Programmes
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Glantz, Clifford S.; Landine, Guy P.; Craig, Philip A.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s (PNNL) nuclear cyber security team has been providing technical support to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) since 2002. This team has provided cyber security technical experties in conducting cyber security inspections, developing of regulatory rules and guidance, reviewing facility cyber security plans, developing inspection guidance, and developing and teaching NRC inspectors how to conduct cyber security assessments. The extensive experience the PNNL team has gathered has allowed them to compile a lenghty list of recommendations on how to improve cyber security programs and conduct assessments. A selected set of recommendations are presented, including the needmore » to: integrate an array of defenisve strategies into a facility’s cyber security program, coordinate physical and cyber security activities, train phycial security forces to resist a cyber-enabled physical attack, improve estimates of the consequences of a cyber attack, properly resource cyber security assessments, appropropriately account for insider threats, routinely monitor security devices for potential attacks, supplement compliance-based requirements with risk-based decision making, and introduce the concept of resilience into cyber security programs.« less
NRC Licensing Status Summary Report for NGNP
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Moe, Wayne Leland; Kinsey, James Carl
2014-11-01
The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Project, initiated at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, is based on research and development activities supported by the Department of Energy Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Initiative. The principal objective of the NGNP Project is to support commercialization of high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) technology. The HTGR is a helium-cooled and graphite moderated reactor that can operate at temperatures much higher than those of conventional light water reactor (LWR) technologies. The NGNP will be licensed for construction andmore » operation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However, not all elements of current regulations (and their related implementation guidance) can be applied to HTGR technology at this time. Certain policies established during past LWR licensing actions must be realigned to properly accommodate advanced HTGR technology. A strategy for licensing HTGR technology was developed and executed through the cooperative effort of DOE and the NRC through the NGNP Project. The purpose of this report is to provide a snapshot of the current status of the still evolving pre-license application regulatory framework relative to commercial HTGR technology deployment in the U.S. The following discussion focuses on (1) describing what has been accomplished by the NGNP Project up to the time of this report, and (2) providing observations and recommendations concerning actions that remain to be accomplished to enable the safe and timely licensing of a commercial HTGR facility in the U.S.« less
Ballenger, N
1998-02-01
The recently released National Research Council report, Colleges of Agriculture at the Land Grant Universities: Public Service and Public Policy (NRC 1996), may be of particular interest to poultry scientists. The dramatic changes in U.S. agriculture, which were among the factors that spawned the NRC's interest in a study of the land grant colleges, are probably nowhere more evident than in the poultry industry. Furthermore, there is considerable discussion in the report about the value of multi-state and multi-disciplinary efforts in teaching, research, and extension. The need to attract nontraditional students to poultry science curricula and to produce graduates well-suited for modern, vertically integrated agricultural enterprises, such as poultry, are a high priority.
Site-Specific Analyses for Demonstrating Compliance with 10 CFR 61 Performance Objectives - 12179
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Grossman, C.J.; Esh, D.W.; Yadav, P.
2012-07-01
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend its regulations at 10 CFR Part 61 to require low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities to conduct site-specific analyses to demonstrate compliance with the performance objectives in Subpart C. The amendments would require licensees to conduct site-specific analyses for protection of the public and inadvertent intruders as well as analyses for long-lived waste. The amendments would ensure protection of public health and safety, while providing flexibility to demonstrate compliance with the performance objectives, for current and potential future waste streams. NRC staff intends to submit proposed rule language and associated regulatorymore » basis to the Commission for its approval in early 2012. The NRC staff also intends to develop associated guidance to accompany any proposed amendments. The guidance is intended to supplement existing low-level radioactive waste guidance on issues pertinent to conducting site-specific analyses to demonstrate compliance with the performance objectives. The guidance will facilitate implementation of the proposed amendments by licensees and assist competent regulatory authorities in reviewing the site-specific analyses. Specifically, the guidance provides staff recommendations on general considerations for the site-specific analyses, modeling issues for assessments to demonstrate compliance with the performance objectives including the performance assessment, intruder assessment, stability assessment, and analyses for long-lived waste. This paper describes the technical basis for changes to the rule language and the proposed guidance associated with implementation of the rule language. The NRC staff, per Commission direction, intends to propose amendments to 10 CFR Part 61 to require licensees to conduct site-specific analyses to demonstrate compliance with performance objectives for the protection of public health and the environment. The amendments would require a performance assessment to demonstrate protection of the general population from releases of radioactivity, an assessment to demonstrate protection of a potential inadvertent intruder, and a long-term analysis to assess how the design of the facility considers the potential radiological impacts associated with disposal of long-lived waste streams. Concurrently, the NRC staff intends to propose associated guidance to facilitate the implementation of the requirements to conduct site-specific analyses. In proposing these amendments to the regulation and associated guidance, the NRC staff has conducted extensive public outreach since 2009 including three public meetings and four briefings of the NRC's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. The NRC staff plans to submit the proposed amendments to the regulations to the Commission in early 2012. Subsequently, the proposed amendments and associated guidance would be published in the Federal Register for public comment pending approval of the proposed amendments to the regulations by the Commission. Following the public comment period, NRC staff plans to address public comments and revise, as necessary, the regulations and associated guidance before publishing a final rule, which is anticipated in 2013. (authors)« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
LEHMAN LL
2008-01-23
Waste from a number of single-shell tanks (SST) at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site has been retrieved by CH2M HILL Hanford Group to fulfill the requirements of the 'Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (HFFACO) [1]. Laboratory analyses of the Hanford tank residual wastes have provided concentration data which will be used to determine waste classification and disposal options for tank residuals. The closure of tank farm facilities remains one of the most challenging activities faced by the DOE. This is due in part to the complicated regulatory structures that have developed. These regulatory structures aremore » different at each of the DOE sites, making it difficult to apply lessons learned from one site to the next. During the past two years with the passage of the Section 3116 of the 'Ronald Reagan Defense Authorization Act of 2005' (NDAA) [2] some standardization has emerged for Savannah River Site and the Idaho National Laboratory tank residuals. Recently, with the issuance of 'NRC Staff Guidance for Activities Related to US. Department of Energy Waste Determinations' (NUREG-1854) [3] more explicit options may be considered for Hanford tank residuals than are presently available under DOE Orders. NUREG-1854, issued in August 2007, contains several key pieces of information that if utilized by the DOE in the tank closure process, could simplify waste classification and streamline the NRC review process by providing information to the NRC in their preferred format. Other provisions of this NUREG allow different methods to be applied in determining when waste retrieval is complete by incorporating actual project costs and health risks into the calculation of 'technically and economically practical'. Additionally, the NUREG requires a strong understanding of the uncertainties of the analyses, which given the desire of some NRC/DOE staff may increase the likelihood of using probabilistic approaches to uncertainty analysis. The purpose of this paper is to discuss implications of NUREG-1854 and to examine the feasibility and potential benefits of applying these provisions to waste determinations and supporting documents such as future performance assessments for tank residuals.« less
NASA Space Biology Plant Research for 2010-2020
NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Levine, H. G.; Tomko, D. L.; Porterfield, D. M.
2012-01-01
The U.S. National Research Council (NRC) recently published "Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration: Life and Physical Sciences Research for a New Era" (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record id=13048), and NASA completed a Space Biology Science Plan to develop a strategy for implementing its recommendations ( http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/library/esmd documents.html). The most important recommendations of the NRC report on plant biology in space were that NASA should: (1) investigate the roles of microbial-plant systems in long-term bioregenerative life support systems, and (2) establish a robust spaceflight program of research analyzing plant growth and physiological responses to the multiple stimuli encountered in spaceflight environments. These efforts should take advantage of recently emerged analytical technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) and apply modern cellular and molecular approaches in the development of a vigorous flight-based and ground-based research program. This talk will describe NASA's strategy and plans for implementing these NRC Plant Space Biology recommendations. New research capabilities for Plant Biology, optimized by providing state-of-the-art automated technology and analytical techniques to maximize scientific return, will be described. Flight experiments will use the most appropriate platform to achieve science results (e.g., ISS, free flyers, sub-orbital flights) and NASA will work closely with its international partners and other U.S. agencies to achieve its objectives. One of NASA's highest priorities in Space Biology is the development research capabilities for use on the International Space Station and other flight platforms for studying multiple generations of large plants. NASA will issue recurring NASA Research Announcements (NRAs) that include a rapid turn-around model to more fully engage the biology community in designing experiments to respond to the NRC recommendations. In doing so, NASA's Space Biology research will optimize ISS research utilization, develop and demonstrate technology and hardware that will enable new science, and contribute to the base of fundamental knowledge that will facilitate development of new tools for human space exploration and Earth applications. By taking these steps, NASA will energize the Space Biology user community and advance our knowledge of the effect of the space flight environment on living systems.
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-12-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52-033; NRC-2008-0566] Detroit Edison Company; Notice of Availability of Errata Sheet for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Combined License for Unit 3 at the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Site Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-17
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2012-0090] Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Background Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission or...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-26
... requirements with current health and safety standards. Finally, the NRC is proposing to revise, clarify, or... lung and liver diseases.\\2\\ Because of the potential for uranium and thorium to produce health effects... order to better evaluate potential impacts to public health and safety. \\1\\ U.S. Department of Health...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-07-23
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0158] Biweekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations Background Pursuant to Section 189a. (2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission or...
10 CFR 2.802 - Petition for rulemaking.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
....gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov; or by writing the Office of..., Directives, and Editing Branch on (301) 415-7163, or toll free on (800) 368-5642, or send e-mail to NRCREP... sent either by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by...
10 CFR 2.802 - Petition for rulemaking.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
....gov/site-help/e-submittals.html; by e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov; or by writing the Office of..., Directives, and Editing Branch on (301) 415-7163, or toll free on (800) 368-5642, or send e-mail to NRCREP... sent either by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-04-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287; NRC-2012-0093] Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-10
..., Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to... Operating Company (licensee), for operation of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (BVPS-1...
77 FR 55509 - Indiana Michigan Power Company; Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2; Exemption
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-09-10
...; Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2; Exemption 1.0 Background Indian Michigan Power Company (the... Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 (CNP-2). The license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, or...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-02
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the Subcommittee on Plant Operations and Fire Protection The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant Operations and Fire Protection will hold a meeting on July 29, 2010, at the U.S. NRC Region IV, Texas Health Resources Tower, 612...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-29
... Decision Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has... notice also serves as the record of decision for Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-41, NPF-51... Decision--General.'' NUREG-1437, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-12-30
..., Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Minarik, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear... advanced pressurized water reactors to be constructed and operated at the Bellefonte site, located near the... 052000-15). The NRC docketed the Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4 (BLN 3&4) COL application on...
15 CFR 781.1 - Definitions of terms used in the Additional Protocol Regulations (APR).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in... Additional Protocol. Agreement State. Any State of the United States with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has entered into an effective agreement under Subsection 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of...
15 CFR 781.1 - Definitions of terms used in the Additional Protocol Regulations (APR).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in... Additional Protocol. Agreement State. Any State of the United States with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has entered into an effective agreement under Subsection 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of...
15 CFR 781.1 - Definitions of terms used in the Additional Protocol Regulations (APR).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in... Additional Protocol. Agreement State. Any State of the United States with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has entered into an effective agreement under Subsection 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of...
15 CFR 781.1 - Definitions of terms used in the Additional Protocol Regulations (APR).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in... Additional Protocol. Agreement State. Any State of the United States with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has entered into an effective agreement under Subsection 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of...
15 CFR 781.1 - Definitions of terms used in the Additional Protocol Regulations (APR).
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in... Additional Protocol. Agreement State. Any State of the United States with which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has entered into an effective agreement under Subsection 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of...
The Case against Michelle Rhee: How Persuasive Is It?
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
Peterson, Paul E.
2011-01-01
Recently, two separate studies--one by Alan Ginsburg, a former director of Policy and Program Studies in the U.S. Department of Education, the other by a committee constituted by the National Research Council (NRC)--have sought to discredit the work of Michelle Rhee, former chancellor of schools for the District of Columbia. According to Ginsburg,…
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-01-11
... nuclear power plants operating in the USA. II. Effective Date This MOU is effective December 30, 2009. III... requirements at commercial nuclear power plants operating in the United States of America (USA). The NRC's... digital assets at commercial nuclear power plants operating in the USA. This cooperation will ensure that...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-05-08
.... ACTION: Standard review plan section; issuance. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a new section of NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for... impacts.'' DATES: The effective date of this Standard Review Plan (SRP) update is June 7, 2013. ADDRESSES...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-06
... Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone (301..., Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011-11107 Filed 5-5-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0071; Docket No. 50-382] Entergy Operations, Inc...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-14
.... Brown, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555..., Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011-5756 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374; NRC-2011-0051] Exelon Generation...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-09-21
... issuance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Wengert, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S... Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2010-23516 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306; NRC-2010-0290] Northern States Power...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-03-21
... INFORMATION CONTACT: Nageswaran Kalyanam, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory..., Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2013-06510 Filed 3-20-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2013-0012] [Docket Nos. 50-458, 50-155, 72-043, 50-003, 50-247...
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Klise, G. T.; Roach, J. D.; Passell, H. D.; Moreland, B. D.; O'Leary, S. J.; Pienkos, P. T.; Whalen, J.
2010-12-01
Sandia National Laboratories is collaborating with the National Research Council (NRC) Canada and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to develop a decision-support model that will evaluate the tradeoffs associated with high-latitude algae biofuel production co-located with wastewater, CO2, and waste heat. This project helps Canada meet its goal of diversifying fuel sources with algae-based biofuels. The biofuel production will provide a wide range of benefits including wastewater treatment, CO2 reuse and reduction of demand for fossil-based fuels. The higher energy density in algae-based fuels gives them an advantage over crop-based biofuels as the “production” footprint required is much less, resulting in less water consumed and little, if any conversion of agricultural land from food to fuel production. Besides being a potential source for liquid fuel, algae have the potential to be used to generate electricity through the burning of dried biomass, or anaerobically digested to generate methane for electricity production. Co-locating algae production with waste streams may be crucial for making algae an economically valuable fuel source, and will certainly improve its overall ecological sustainability. The modeling process will address these questions, and others that are important to the use of water for energy production: What are the locations where all resources are co-located, and what volumes of algal biomass and oil can be produced there? In locations where co-location does not occur, what resources should be transported, and how far, while maintaining economic viability? This work is being funded through the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Biomass Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and is part of a larger collaborative effort that includes sampling, strain isolation, strain characterization and cultivation being performed by the NREL and Canada’s NRC. Results from the NREL / NRC collaboration including specific productivities of selected algal strains will eventually be incorporated into this model. Joint activities in algal biofuel research involving Sandia National Labs, NREL, and Canada’s NRC are supported by the U.S. - Canada Clean Energy Dialogue Secretariat. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
Management of radioactive material safety programs at medical facilities. Final report
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Camper, L.W.; Schlueter, J.; Woods, S.
A Task Force, comprising eight US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and two Agreement State program staff members, developed the guidance contained in this report. This report describes a systematic approach for effectively managing radiation safety programs at medical facilities. This is accomplished by defining and emphasizing the roles of an institution`s executive management, radiation safety committee, and radiation safety officer. Various aspects of program management are discussed and guidance is offered on selecting the radiation safety officer, determining adequate resources for the program, using such contractual services as consultants and service companies, conducting audits, and establishing the roles of authorized usersmore » and supervised individuals; NRC`s reporting and notification requirements are discussed, and a general description is given of how NRC`s licensing, inspection and enforcement programs work.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Eugene S. Grecheck
2010-11-30
This report serves to summarize the major activities completed as part of Virginia Electric and Power Company's North Anna construction and operating license demonstration project with DOE. Project successes, lessons learned, and suggestions for improvement are discussed. Objectives of the North Anna COL project included preparation and submittal of a COLA to the USNRC incorporating ESBWR technology for a third unit a the North Anna Power Station site, support for the NRC review process and mandatory hearing, obtaining NRC approval of the COLA and issuance of a COL, and development of a business case necessary to support a decision onmore » building a new nuclear power plant at the North Anna site.« less
2015-09-30
1 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. PCoD Lite - Using an Interim PCoD Protocol to Assess...US National Research Council (NRC 2005). Here, we provide an insight into how the Interim PCoD approach (Harwood et al. 2014, King et al. 2015...illustrate how the interim PCoD protocol can be used to inform the process of determining whether or not Navy activities are likely to have an impact on
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the US Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) standard design by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff. The application for the ABWR design was initially submitted by the General Electric Company, now GE Nuclear Energy (GE), in accordance with the procedures of Appendix O of Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50). Later GE requested that its application be considered as an application for design approval and subsequent design certification pursuant to 10 CFR {section} 52.45. The ABWR is a single-cycle, forced-circulation,more » boiling water reactor (BWR) with a rated power of 3,926 megawatts thermal (MWt) and a design power of 4,005 MWt. To the extent feasible and appropriate, the staff relied on earlier reviews for those ABWR design features that are substantially the same as those previously considered. Unique features of the ABWR design include internal recirculation pumps, fine-motion control rod drives, microprocessor-based digital logic and control systems, and digital safety systems. On the basis of its evaluation and independent analyses, the NRC staff concludes that, subject to satisfactory resolution of the confirmatory items identified in Section 1.8 of this SER, GE`s application for design certification meets the requirements of Subpart B of 10 CFR Part 52 that are applicable and technically relevant to the US ABWR standard design.« less
10 CFR 2.709 - Discovery against NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Discovery against NRC staff. 2.709 Section 2.709 Energy... Rules for Formal Adjudications § 2.709 Discovery against NRC staff. (a)(1) In a proceeding in which the NRC staff is a party, the NRC staff will make available one or more witnesses, designated by the...
10 CFR 2.709 - Discovery against NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Discovery against NRC staff. 2.709 Section 2.709 Energy....709 Discovery against NRC staff. (a)(1) In a proceeding in which the NRC staff is a party, the NRC staff will make available one or more witnesses, designated by the Executive Director for Operations or...
10 CFR 2.1202 - Authority and role of NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Authority and role of NRC staff. 2.1202 Section 2.1202... ORDERS Informal Hearing Procedures for NRC Adjudications § 2.1202 Authority and role of NRC staff. (a) During the pendency of any hearing under this subpart, consistent with the NRC staff's findings in its...
10 CFR 2.709 - Discovery against NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Discovery against NRC staff. 2.709 Section 2.709 Energy... Rules for Formal Adjudications § 2.709 Discovery against NRC staff. (a)(1) In a proceeding in which the NRC staff is a party, the NRC staff will make available one or more witnesses, designated by the...
10 CFR 2.709 - Discovery against NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Discovery against NRC staff. 2.709 Section 2.709 Energy....709 Discovery against NRC staff. (a)(1) In a proceeding in which the NRC staff is a party, the NRC staff will make available one or more witnesses, designated by the Executive Director for Operations or...
10 CFR 2.709 - Discovery against NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Discovery against NRC staff. 2.709 Section 2.709 Energy... Rules for Formal Adjudications § 2.709 Discovery against NRC staff. (a)(1) In a proceeding in which the NRC staff is a party, the NRC staff will make available one or more witnesses, designated by the...
10 CFR 2.1202 - Authority and role of NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Authority and role of NRC staff. 2.1202 Section 2.1202... for NRC Adjudications § 2.1202 Authority and role of NRC staff. (a) During the pendency of any hearing under this subpart, consistent with the NRC staff's findings in its review of the application or matter...
10 CFR 2.1202 - Authority and role of NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Authority and role of NRC staff. 2.1202 Section 2.1202... ORDERS Informal Hearing Procedures for NRC Adjudications § 2.1202 Authority and role of NRC staff. (a) During the pendency of any hearing under this subpart, consistent with the NRC staff's findings in its...
U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, , 01/30/1990
2011-04-14
... c·d l'l'I,IIc-at Ion If) II(lor aU11 hll~I' Itu;, .. d::. Hllrll)' I"r"!il,'cI IUI'"I'nrc ulld Hlurt'd d,01hlnl;, SIIfllY IlIfN'tI)' Into crll(~ks, I: I II!'I' I !' anti Inf,'··dl,,1 "P'1I5 fI ...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-03-02
... Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as a cooperating agency have published a... Licenses (COLs) at the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 3 and 4: Final Report'' for the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 3 and 4 COL application. The draft EIS was...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-08-02
... searching on http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2012-0180. You may submit comments by any of the following methods: Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID..., Policy Branch, Division of Advanced Reactors and Rulemaking, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear...
Issues Affecting the Future of the U.S. Space Science and Engineering Workforce: Interim Report
ERIC Educational Resources Information Center
National Academies Press, 2006
2006-01-01
In January 2006, the President announced a new civilian space policy focusing on exploration. As part of its preparations to implement that policy, NASA asked the NRC to explore long-range science and technology workforce needs to achieve the space exploration vision, identify obstacles to filling those needs, and put forward solutions to those…
76 FR 18261 - University of Wisconsin; Notice of Issuance of Renewed Facility License No. R-74
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-04-01
... of Issuance of Renewed Facility License No. R-74 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has issued renewed Facility License No. R-74, held by the University of Wisconsin (the licensee... to 1.4% [Delta]k/k. The renewed Facility License No. R-74 will expire at midnight 20 years from its...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-28
... University of Illinois Advanced TRIGA Reactor, License No. R-115 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is noticing the termination of Facility Operating License No. R-115, for the University of Illinois... Operating License No. R-115 is terminated. The above referenced documents may be examined, and/or copied for...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-05-20
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [DOCKET NO. 52-016; NRC-2008-0250] Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, LLC and Unistar Nuclear Operating Services, LLC; Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License Application for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit 3 Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1996-09-01
US DOE mixed low-level and mixed transuranic waste inventory was estimated at 181,000 cubic meters (about 2,000 waste streams). Treatability studies may be used as part of DOE`s mixed waste management program. Commercial treatability study suppliers have been identified that either have current capability in their own facilities or have access to licensed facilities. Numerous federal and state regulations, as well as DOE Order 5820.2A, impact the performance of treatability studies. Generators, transporters, and treatability study facilities are subject to regulation. From a mixed- waste standpoint, a key requirement is that the treatability study facility must have an NRC ormore » state license that allows it to possess radioactive materials. From a RCRA perspective, the facility must support treatability study activities with the applicable plans, reports, and documentation. If PCBs are present in the waste, TSCA will also be an issue. CERCLA requirements may apply, and both DOE and NRC regulations will impact the transportation of DOE mixed waste to an off-site treatment facility. DOE waste managers will need to be cognizant of all applicable regulations as mixed-waste treatability study programs are initiated.« less
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-01-25
... access publicly-available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html... produce at a faster rate, but not from more production areas. Uranium One maintains acceptable waste... NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . From this site, you can access the NRC's...
75 FR 15743 - Application for a License To Export High-Enriched Uranium
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-03-30
... Reading Room (PERR) link http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html at the NRC Homepage. A request for a..., Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications. The information concerning this application follows. NRC Export...
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data 1994-FY 95 annual report. Volume 9, Number 2
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) describes activities conducted during CY 1994 and FY 1995. The report is published in three parts. NUREG-1272, Vol. 9, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about the trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event reports, diagnostic evaluations, and reportsmore » to the NRC`s Operations Center. NUREG-1272, Vol. 9, No. 2, covers nuclear materials and presents a review of the events and concerns associated with the use of licensed material in nonreactor applications, such as personnel overexposures and medical misadministrations. Both reports also contain a discussion of the Incident Investigation Team program and summarize both the Incident Investigation Team and Augmented Inspection Team reports. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD reports issued from 1980 through FY 1995. NUREG-1272, Vol. 9, No. 3, covers technical training and presents the activities of the Technical Training Center in support of the NRC`s mission.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
NONE
1997-12-01
This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) describes activities conducted during 1996. The report is published in three parts. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event reports and reports to the NRC`s Operations Center. NUREG-1272, Vol.more » 10, No. 2, covers nuclear materials and presents a review of the events and concerns during 1996 associated with the use of licensed material in nonreactor applications, such as personnel overexposures and medical misadministrations. Both reports also contain a discussion of the Incident Investigation Team program and summarize both the Incident Investigation Team and Augmented Inspection Team reports. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD reports issued from CY 1980 through 1996. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 3, covers technical training and presents the activities of the Technical Training Center in support of the NRC`s mission in 1996.« less
Updating Human Factors Engineering Guidelines for Conducting Safety Reviews of Nuclear Power Plants
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
O, J.M.; Higgins, J.; Stephen Fleger - NRC
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodicmore » update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. This paper describes the role of HFE guidelines in the safety review process and the content of the key HFE guidelines used. Then we will present the methodology used to develop HFE guidance and update these documents, and describe the current status of the update program.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; Fleger, S.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodicmore » update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. NUREG-0711 is the first document to be addressed. We present the methodology used to update NUREG-0711 and summarize the main changes made. Finally, we discuss the current status of the update program and the future plans.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Anderson, James; Goins, Monty; Paul, Pran
This safety analysis report for packaging (SARP) presents the results of the safety analysis prepared in support of the Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC (CNS) request for licensing of the Model ES-3100 package with bulk highly enriched uranium (HEU) contents and issuance of a Type B(U) Fissile Material Certificate of Compliance. This SARP, published in the format specified in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide 7.9 and using information provided in UCID-21218 and NRC Regulatory Guide 7.10, demonstrates that the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) ES-3100 package with bulk HEU contents meets the established NRC regulations for packaging, preparation formore » shipment, and transportation of radioactive materials given in Title 10, Part 71, of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) [10 CFR 71] as well as U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations for packaging and shipment of hazardous materials given in Title 49 CFR. To protect the health and safety of the public, shipments of adioactive materials are made in packaging that is designed, fabricated, assembled, tested, procured, used, maintained, and repaired in accordance with the provisions cited above. Safety requirements addressed by the regulations that must be met when transporting radioactive materials are containment of radioactive materials, radiation shielding, and assurance of nuclear subcriticality.« less
Regulatory Guidance for Lightning Protection in Nuclear Power Plants
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kisner, Roger A; Wilgen, John B; Ewing, Paul D
2006-01-01
Abstract - Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was engaged by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to develop the technical basis for regulatory guidance to address design and implementation practices for lightning protection systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Lightning protection is becoming increasingly important with the advent of digital and low-voltage analog systems in NPPs. These systems have the potential to be more vulnerable than older analog systems to the resulting power surges and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when lightning strikes facilities or power lines. This paper discusses the technical basis for guidance tomore » licensees and applicants covered in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.204, Guidelines for Lightning Protection of Nuclear Power Plants, issued August 2005. RG 1.204 describes guidance for practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting nuclear power structures and systems from direct lightning strikes and the resulting secondary effects.« less
Regulatory guidance for lightning protection in nuclear power plants
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Kisner, R. A.; Wilgen, J. B.; Ewing, P. D.
2006-07-01
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was engaged by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to develop the technical basis for regulatory guidance to address design and implementation practices for lightning protection systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Lightning protection is becoming increasingly important with the advent of digital and low-voltage analog systems in NPPs. These systems have the potential to be more vulnerable than older analog systems to the resulting power surges and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when lightning strikes facilities or power lines. This paper discusses the technical basis for guidance to licensees andmore » applicants covered in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.204, Guidelines for Lightning Protection of Nuclear Power Plants, issued August 2005. RG 1.204 describes guidance for practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting nuclear power structures and systems from direct lightning strikes and the resulting secondary effects. (authors)« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Whelan, Gene; Pelton, Mitch A.
2007-08-09
One of the most important concerns for regulatory agencies is the concept of reproducibility (i.e., reproducibility means credibility) of an assessment. One aspect of reproducibility deals with tampering of the assessment. In other words, when multiple groups are engaged in an assessment, it is important to lock down the problem that is to be solved and/or to restrict the models that are to be used to solve the problem. The objective of this effort is to provide the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) with a means to limit user access to models and to provide a mechanism to constrain themore » conceptual site models (CSMs) when appropriate. The purpose is to provide the user (i.e., NRC) with the ability to “lock down” the CSM (i.e., picture containing linked icons), restrict access to certain models, or both.« less
Priority Planetary Science Missions Identified
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Showstack, Randy
2011-03-01
The U.S. National Research Council's (NRC) planetary science decadal survey report, released on 7 March, lays out a grand vision for priority planetary science missions for 2013-2022 within a tightly constrained fiscal environment. The cost-conscious report, issued by NRC's Committee on the Planetary Science Decadal Survey, identifies high-priority flagship missions, recommends a number of potential midsized missions, and indicates support for some smaller missions. The report states that the highest-priority flagship mission for the decade is the Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher (MAX-C)—the first of three components of a NASA/European Space Agency Mars sample return campaign—provided that the mission scope can be reduced so that MAX-C costs no more than $2.5 billion. The currently estimated mission cost of $3.5 billion “would take up a disproportionate near-term share of the overall budget for NASA's Planetary Science Division,” the report notes.
Development and verification of NRC`s single-rod fuel performance codes FRAPCON-3 AND FRAPTRAN
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Beyer, C.E.; Cunningham, M.E.; Lanning, D.D.
1998-03-01
The FRAPCON and FRAP-T code series, developed in the 1970s and early 1980s, are used by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to predict fuel performance during steady-state and transient power conditions, respectively. Both code series are now being updated by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to improve their predictive capabilities at high burnup levels. The newest versions of the codes are called FRAPCON-3 and FRAPTRAN. The updates to fuel property and behavior models are focusing on providing best estimate predictions under steady-state and fast transient power conditions up to extended fuel burnups (> 55 GWd/MTU). Both codes will be assessedmore » against a data base independent of the data base used for code benchmarking and an estimate of code predictive uncertainties will be made based on comparisons to the benchmark and independent data bases.« less
The Storage, Transportation, and Disposal of Nuclear Waste
NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)
Younker, J. L.
2002-12-01
The U.S. Congress established a comprehensive federal policy to dispose of wastes from nuclear reactors and defense facilities, centered on deep geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste. Site screening led to selection of three potential sites and in 1987, Congress directed the Secretary of Energy to characterize only one site: Yucca Mountain in Nevada. For more than 20 years, teams of scientists and engineers have been evaluating the potential suitability of the site. On the basis of their work, the U.S. Secretary of Energy, Spencer Abraham, concluded in February 2002 that a safe repository can be sited at Yucca Mountain. On July 23, 2002, President Bush signed Joint Resolution 87 approving the site at Yucca Mountain for development of a repository, which allows the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to prepare and submit a license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Concerns have been raised relative to the safe transportation of nuclear materials. The U.S. history of transportation of nuclear materials demonstrates that high-level nuclear materials can be safely transported. Since the 1960s, over 1.6 million miles have been traveled by more than 2,700 spent nuclear fuel shipments, and there has never been an accident severe enough to cause a release of radioactive materials. The DOE will use NRC-certified casks that must be able to withstand very stringent tests. The same design features that allow the casks to survive severe accidents also limit their vulnerability to sabotage. In addition, the NRC will approve all shipping routes and security plans. With regard to long-term safety, the Yucca Mountain disposal system has five key attributes. First, the arid climate and geology of Yucca Mountain combine to ensure that limited water will enter the emplacement tunnels. Second, the DOE has designed a waste package and drip shield that are expected to have very long lifetimes in the repository environment. Third, waste form solubilities limit radionuclide releases, and the invert material below the package would further delay radionuclide movement. Fourth, rock units in the unsaturated and saturated zone at Yucca Mountain will delay and dilute any radionuclides that have migrated away from the emplacement tunnels. Fifth, disruptions due to volcanism, seismic events, or nuclear criticality have been evaluated and all are shown to have very low likelihood of causing unacceptable doses. Volcanism could result in a small, but calculable, dose during the regulatory period of 10,000 years.
10 CFR 1.27 - Office of Congressional Affairs.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION Headquarters Commission... Congress on matters of interest to NRC; (c) Serves as primary contact point for all NRC communications with Congress; (d) Coordinates NRC internal activities with Congress; (e) Plans, develops, and manages NRC's...
77 FR 41107 - Decommissioning Planning During Operations
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-07-12
..., 40, 50, 70, and 72 [NRC-2011-0162] Decommissioning Planning During Operations AGENCY: Nuclear... (DG) 4014, ``Decommissioning Planning During Operations.'' This guide describes a method that the NRC staff considers acceptable for use in complying with the NRC's Decommissioning Planning Rule. The NRC...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-12-14
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286; NRC-2008-0672] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Availability of the Final Supplement 38 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear...
Northrop Triga facility decommissioning plan versus actual results
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Gardner, F.W.
1986-01-01
This paper compares the Triga facility decontamination and decommissioning plan to the actual results and discusses key areas where operational activities were impacted upon by the final US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-approved decontamination and decommissioning plan. Total exposures for fuel transfer were a factor of 4 less than planned. The design of the Triga reactor components allowed the majority of the components to be unconditionally released.
Review of Technical Studies in the United States in Support of Burnup Credit Regulatory Guidance
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Wagner, John C; Parks, Cecil V; Mueller, Don
2010-01-01
Taking credit for the reduction in reactivity associated with fuel depletion can enable more cost-effective, higher-density storage, transport, disposal, and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) while maintaining sufficient subcritical margin to establish an adequate safety basis. Consequently, there continues to be considerable interest in the United States (U.S.), as well as internationally, in the increased use of burnup credit in SNF operations, particularly related to storage, transport, and disposal of commercial SNF. This interest has motivated numerous technical studies related to the application of burnup credit, both domestically and internationally, as well as the design of SNF storage, transportmore » and disposal systems that rely on burnup credit for maintaining subcriticality. Responding to industry requests and needs, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated a burnup credit research program in 1999, with support from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to develop regulatory guidance and the supporting technical bases for allowing and expanding the use of burnup credit in pressurized-water reactor SNF storage and transport applications. Although this NRC research program has not been continuous since its inception, considerable progress has been achieved in many key areas in terms of increased understanding of relevant phenomena and issues, availability of relevant information and data, and subsequently updated regulatory guidance for expanded use of burnup credit. This paper reviews technical studies performed by ORNL for the U.S. NRC burnup credit research program. Examples of topics include reactivity effects associated with reactor operating characteristics, fuel assembly characteristics, burnable absorbers, control rods, spatial burnup distributions, cooling time, and assembly misloading; methods and data for validation of isotopic composition predictions; methods and data for validation of criticality calculations; and operational issues and data related to assembly burnup confirmation. The objective of this paper is to summarize the work and significant accomplishments, with references to the technical reports and publications for complete details, and provide a useful resource to others in the burnup credit community.« less
10 CFR 1.47 - NRC Regional Offices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... NRC Regional Offices. Each Regional Administrator executes established NRC policies and assigned... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false NRC Regional Offices. 1.47 Section 1.47 Energy NUCLEAR... response within Regional boundaries set out in § 1.5(b) of this part. ...
10 CFR 1.47 - NRC Regional Offices.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... NRC Regional Offices. Each Regional Administrator executes established NRC policies and assigned... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false NRC Regional Offices. 1.47 Section 1.47 Energy NUCLEAR... response within Regional boundaries set out in § 1.5(b) of this part. ...
75 FR 6063 - Availability of NRC Open Government Web Site
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-02-05
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0003] Availability of NRC Open Government Web Site AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Availability of Open Government Web site for Online... Register notice, informs the public that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Open Government Web site...
77 FR 18271 - Terrestrial Environmental Studies for Nuclear Power Stations
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2012-03-27
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0182] Terrestrial Environmental Studies for Nuclear Power... Environmental Studies for Nuclear Power Stations.'' This guide provides technical guidance that the NRC staff... nuclear power reactors. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2011-0182 when contacting the NRC about...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-16
... (NRC) is revising its regulations to change the fees for search and review of agency records by NRC... found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC-2010-0157. [[Page 41369... Fees for search and review of agency records by NRC personnel. * * * * * (a) Clerical search and review...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-09-16
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2011-0204] Proposed Generic Communication; Draft NRC Generic Letter 2011-XX: Seismic Risk Evaluations for Operating Reactors AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission... FR 54507), that requested public comment on Draft NRC Generic Letter 2011- XX: Seismic Risk...
78 FR 70964 - Luminant Generation Company, LLC
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-11-27
... search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0594. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone... at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web- based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's...
10 CFR 51.40 - Consultation with NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Consultation with NRC staff. 51.40 Section 51.40 Energy....40 Consultation with NRC staff. (a) A prospective applicant or petitioner for rulemaking is encouraged to confer with NRC staff as early as possible in its planning process before submitting...
10 CFR 51.40 - Consultation with NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Consultation with NRC staff. 51.40 Section 51.40 Energy....40 Consultation with NRC staff. (a) A prospective applicant or petitioner for rulemaking is encouraged to confer with NRC staff as early as possible in its planning process before submitting...
10 CFR 51.40 - Consultation with NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Consultation with NRC staff. 51.40 Section 51.40 Energy....40 Consultation with NRC staff. (a) A prospective applicant or petitioner for rulemaking is encouraged to confer with NRC staff as early as possible in its planning process before submitting...
10 CFR 51.40 - Consultation with NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Consultation with NRC staff. 51.40 Section 51.40 Energy....40 Consultation with NRC staff. (a) A prospective applicant or petitioner for rulemaking is encouraged to confer with NRC staff as early as possible in its planning process before submitting...
10 CFR 51.40 - Consultation with NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 2 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Consultation with NRC staff. 51.40 Section 51.40 Energy....40 Consultation with NRC staff. (a) A prospective applicant or petitioner for rulemaking is encouraged to confer with NRC staff as early as possible in its planning process before submitting...
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
McClure, J.D.; Luna, R.E.
1989-01-01
Several aspects of special packagings of plutonium for air transport should be recognized. The accident cases cited by Congressman Scheuer were incidents of local plutonium contamination in military aircraft accidents that had nuclear weapons on board. There is no disputing the occurrence of these military accidents but military weapon shipments were exempted from the provisions of the Scheuer amendment. There have been no recorded civilian aircraft crashes involving plutonium dispersal although there have been civilian aircraft crashes that were severe. Shortly after the introduction of the amendment by Mr. Scheuer on June 20, 1975, there was a serious aircraft crashmore » at JFK International. In his remarks to the House on July 24, 1975 Mr. Scheuer called attention to this event. The NRC originally opposed the provisions of the Scheuer amendment but with the passing of the amendment NRC compiled with its provisions. This led to the development of the plutonium air transport package PAT-1 in the US. The introduction of special rules for the air transport of plutonium into the US packaging regulations has been made them more severe than the provision of the international regulations, IAEA Safety Series 6. The IAEA is now discussing proposed regulations related to the air transport of plutonium. An additional legislative action was introduced the US in December 1987 which would require actual crash tests of packages intended for the air transport of plutonium, the Murkowski amendment. 13 refs.« less
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
COOPER, S.E.; BROWN, W.S.; WREATHALL, J.
2005-02-02
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is engaged in an initiative to risk-inform the regulation of byproduct materials. Operating experience indicates that human actions play a dominant role in most of the activities involving byproduct materials, which are radioactive materials other than those used in nuclear power plants or in weapons production, primarily for medical or industrial purposes. The overall risk of these activities is strongly influenced by human performance. Hence, an improved understanding of human error, its causes and contexts, and human reliability analysis (HRA) is important in risk-informing the regulation of these activities. The development of the humanmore » performance job aids was undertaken by stages, with frequent interaction with the prospective users. First, potentially risk significant human actions were identified based on reviews of available risk studies for byproduct material applications and of descriptions of events for byproduct materials applications that involved potentially significant human actions. Applications from the medical and the industrial domains were sampled. Next, the specific needs of the expected users of the human performance-related capabilities were determined. To do this, NRC headquarters and region staff were interviewed to identify the types of activities (e.g., license reviews, inspections, event assessments) that need HRA support and the form in which such support might best be offered. Because the range of byproduct uses regulated by NRC is so broad, it was decided that initial development of knowledge and tools would be undertaken in the context of a specific use of byproduct material, which was selected in consultation with NRC staff. Based on needs of NRC staff and the human performance related characteristics of the context chosen, knowledge resources were then compiled to support consideration of human performance issues related to the regulation of byproduct materials. Finally, with information sources and an application context identified, a set of strawman job aids was developed, which was then presented to prospective users for critique and comment. Work is currently under way to develop training materials and refine the job aids in preparation for a pilot evaluation.« less
Multi-Hazard Advanced Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Tools and Applications
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Coleman, Justin L.; Bolisetti, Chandu; Veeraraghavan, Swetha
Design of nuclear power plant (NPP) facilities to resist natural hazards has been a part of the regulatory process from the beginning of the NPP industry in the United States (US), but has evolved substantially over time. The original set of approaches and methods was entirely deterministic in nature and focused on a traditional engineering margins-based approach. However, over time probabilistic and risk-informed approaches were also developed and implemented in US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidance and regulation. A defense-in-depth framework has also been incorporated into US regulatory guidance over time. As a result, today, the US regulatory framework incorporatesmore » deterministic and probabilistic approaches for a range of different applications and for a range of natural hazard considerations. This framework will continue to evolve as a result of improved knowledge and newly identified regulatory needs and objectives, most notably in response to the NRC activities developed in response to the 2011 Fukushima accident in Japan. Although the US regulatory framework has continued to evolve over time, the tools, methods and data available to the US nuclear industry to meet the changing requirements have not kept pace. Notably, there is significant room for improvement in the tools and methods available for external event probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), which is the principal assessment approach used in risk-informed regulations and risk-informed decision-making applied to natural hazard assessment and design. This is particularly true if PRA is applied to natural hazards other than seismic loading. Development of a new set of tools and methods that incorporate current knowledge, modern best practice, and state-of-the-art computational resources would lead to more reliable assessment of facility risk and risk insights (e.g., the SSCs and accident sequences that are most risk-significant), with less uncertainty and reduced conservatisms.« less
Reassessment of the NRC`s program for protecting allegers against retaliation
DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI.GOV)
Not Available
1994-01-01
On July 6, 1993, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s (NRC`s) Executive Director for Operations established a review team to reassess the NRC`s program for protecting allegers against retaliation. The team evaluated the current system, and solicited comments from various NRC offices, other Federal agencies, licensees, former allegers, and the public. This report is subject to agency review. The report summarizes current processes and gives an overview of current problems. It discusses: (1) ways in which licensees can promote a quality-conscious work environment, in which all employees feel free to raise concerns without fear of retaliation; (2) ways to improve the NRC`smore » overall handling of allegations; (3) the NRC`s involvement in the Department of Labor process; (4) related NRC enforcement practices; and (5) methods other than investigation and enforcement that may be useful in treating allegations of potential or actual discrimination. Recommendations are given in each area.« less
10 CFR 1.51 - Description and custody of NRC seal.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Description and custody of NRC seal. 1.51 Section 1.51 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION NRC Seal and Flag § 1.51 Description and custody of NRC seal. (a) Pursuant to section 201(a) of the Energy...
10 CFR 1.51 - Description and custody of NRC seal.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Description and custody of NRC seal. 1.51 Section 1.51 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION NRC Seal and Flag § 1.51 Description and custody of NRC seal. (a) Pursuant to section 201(a) of the Energy...
10 CFR 7.10 - The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. 7.10 Section 7.10 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.10 The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. (a) The Chairman of the Commission or designee shall appoint an NRC Advisory Committee...
10 CFR 7.10 - The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. 7.10 Section 7.10 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.10 The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. (a) The Chairman of the Commission or designee shall appoint an NRC Advisory Committee...
10 CFR 7.10 - The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. 7.10 Section 7.10 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.10 The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. (a) The Chairman of the Commission or designee shall appoint an NRC Advisory Committee...
75 FR 44992 - Review of Management Directive 8.11
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-07-30
... NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2010-0242] Review of Management Directive 8.11 AGENCY: Nuclear... (NRC) is requesting public comment on Management Directive (MD) 8.11, ``Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206... members of the public and the NRC, the NRC is soliciting comments from the public, on what, if any...
10 CFR 2.1505 - Role of the NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false Role of the NRC staff. 2.1505 Section 2.1505 Energy... Legislative Hearings § 2.1505 Role of the NRC staff. The NRC staff shall be available to answer any Commission or presiding officer's questions on staff-prepared documents, provide additional information or...
10 CFR 2.1505 - Role of the NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2012 CFR
2012-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2012-01-01 2012-01-01 false Role of the NRC staff. 2.1505 Section 2.1505 Energy... Legislative Hearings § 2.1505 Role of the NRC staff. The NRC staff shall be available to answer any Commission or presiding officer's questions on staff-prepared documents, provide additional information or...
10 CFR 2.1505 - Role of the NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2013 CFR
2013-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2013-01-01 2013-01-01 false Role of the NRC staff. 2.1505 Section 2.1505 Energy... the NRC staff. The NRC staff shall be available to answer any Commission or presiding officer's questions on staff-prepared documents, provide additional information or documentation that may be available...
10 CFR 2.1505 - Role of the NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2014 CFR
2014-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2014-01-01 2014-01-01 false Role of the NRC staff. 2.1505 Section 2.1505 Energy... the NRC staff. The NRC staff shall be available to answer any Commission or presiding officer's questions on staff-prepared documents, provide additional information or documentation that may be available...
10 CFR 2.1505 - Role of the NRC staff.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false Role of the NRC staff. 2.1505 Section 2.1505 Energy... Legislative Hearings § 2.1505 Role of the NRC staff. The NRC staff shall be available to answer any Commission or presiding officer's questions on staff-prepared documents, provide additional information or...
10 CFR 7.10 - The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2010 CFR
2010-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-01 false The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. 7.10 Section 7.10 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.10 The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. (a) The Chairman of the Commission or designee shall appoint an NRC Advisory Committee...
10 CFR 7.10 - The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer.
Code of Federal Regulations, 2011 CFR
2011-01-01
... 10 Energy 1 2011-01-01 2011-01-01 false The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. 7.10 Section 7.10 Energy NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEES § 7.10 The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. (a) The Chairman of the Commission or designee shall appoint an NRC Advisory Committee...
Leibman-Markus, Meirav; Pizarro, Lorena; Schuster, Silvia; Lin, Z J Daniel; Gershony, Ofir; Bar, Maya; Coaker, Gitta; Avni, Adi
2018-05-23
Plant recognition and defense against pathogens employs a two-tiered perception system. Surface localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) act to recognize microbial features, while intracellular nucleotide binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) directly or indirectly recognize pathogen effectors inside host cells. Employing the tomato PRR LeEIX2/EIX model system, we explored the molecular mechanism of signaling pathways. We identified an NLR that can associate with LeEIX2, termed SlNRC4a (NB-LRR Required for HR-associated Cell death-4). Co-immunoprecipitation demonstrates that SlNRC4a is able to associate with different PRRs. Physiological assays with specific elicitors revealed that SlNRC4a generally alters PRR-mediated responses. SlNRC4a overexpression enhances defense responses while silencing SlNRC4 reduces plant immunity. Moreover, the coiled-coil domain of SlNRC4a is able to associate with LeEIX2 and is sufficient to enhance responses upon EIX perception. Based on these findings, we propose that SlNRC4a acts as a non-canonical positive regulator of immunity mediated by diverse PRRs. Thus, SlNRC4a could link both intracellular and extracellular immune perception. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Nuclear hormone receptor coregulator: role in hormone action, metabolism, growth, and development.
Mahajan, Muktar A; Samuels, Herbert H
2005-06-01
Nuclear hormone receptor coregulator (NRC) (also referred to as activating signal cointegrator-2, thyroid hormone receptor-binding protein, peroxisome proliferator activating receptor-interacting protein, and 250-kDa receptor associated protein) belongs to a growing class of nuclear cofactors widely known as coregulators or coactivators that are necessary for transcriptional activation of target genes. The NRC gene is also amplified and overexpressed in breast, colon, and lung cancers. NRC is a 2063-amino acid protein that harbors a potent N-terminal activation domain (AD1) and a second more centrally located activation domain (AD2) that is rich in Glu and Pro. Near AD2 is a receptor-interacting domain containing an LxxLL motif (LxxLL-1), which interacts with a wide variety of ligand-bound nuclear hormone receptors with high affinity. A second LxxLL motif (LxxLL-2) located in the C-terminal region of NRC is more restricted in its nuclear hormone receptor specificity. The intrinsic activation potential of NRC is regulated by a C-terminal serine, threonine, leucine-regulatory domain. The potential role of NRC as a cointegrator is suggested by its ability to enhance transcriptional activation of a wide variety of transcription factors and from its in vivo association with a number of known transcriptional regulators including CBP/p300. Recent studies in mice indicate that deletion of both NRC alleles leads to embryonic lethality resulting from general growth retardation coupled with developmental defects in the heart, liver, brain, and placenta. NRC(-/-) mouse embryo fibroblasts spontaneously undergo apoptosis, indicating the importance of NRC as a prosurvival and antiapoptotic gene. Studies with 129S6 NRC(+/-) mice indicate that NRC is a pleiotropic regulator that is involved in growth, development, reproduction, metabolism, and wound healing.
Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Resident Research Associateship Program
2017-05-01
Award Number: W81XWH-12-2-0033 TITLE: Army Medical Research & Materiel Command Resident Research Associateship Program PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR...PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for Public...SUBTITLE NRC/AMRMC Resident Research Associateship Program 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER W81XWH-12-2-0033 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2013-08-13
... the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will... methodology and performance criteria for licensees to identify fire protection systems and features that are... System (ADAMS): You may access publicly-available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc...
75 FR 20008 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2010-04-16
... 301- 415-6258, or by e-mail to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV . Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th... be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike... comments: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket No. NRC-2010-0064. Mail comments to NRC...
Federal Register 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
2011-07-08
... Commission (NRC) is proposing to issue a RIS that clarifies those discrete sources of radium-226 under... Officers. Intent The NRC is issuing this RIS to clarify which discrete sources of radium-226 under military... definition of byproduct material to include discrete sources of radium-226, discrete sources of naturally...