Sample records for valitsemissektori koondeelarve tasakaal

  1. Mutations in the gravity persistence signal loci in Arabidopsis disrupt the perception and/or signal transduction of gravitropic stimuli

    NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    Wyatt, Sarah E.; Rashotte, Aaron M.; Shipp, Matthew J.; Robertson, Dominique; Muday, Gloria K.; Brown, C. S. (Principal Investigator)

    2002-01-01

    Gravity plays a fundamental role in plant growth and development, yet little is understood about the early events of gravitropism. To identify genes affected in the signal perception and/or transduction phase of the gravity response, a mutant screen was devised using cold treatment to delay the gravity response of inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis. Inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis show no response to gravistimulation at 4 degrees C for up to 3 h. However, when gravistimulated at 4 degrees C and then returned to vertical at room temperature (RT), stems bend in response to the previous, horizontal gravistimulation (H. Fukaki, H. Fujisawa, M. Tasaka [1996] Plant Physiology 110: 933-943). This indicates that gravity perception, but not the gravitropic response, occurs at 4 degrees C. Recessive mutations were identified at three loci using this cold effect on gravitropism to screen for gravity persistence signal (gps) mutants. All three mutants had an altered response after gravistimulation at 4 degrees C, yet had phenotypically normal responses to stimulations at RT. gps1-1 did not bend in response to the 4 degrees C gravity stimulus upon return to RT. gps2-1 responded to the 4 degrees C stimulus but bent in the opposite direction. gps3-1 over-responded after return to RT, continuing to bend to an angle greater than wild-type plants. At 4 degrees C, starch-containing statoliths sedimented normally in both wild-type and the gps mutants, but auxin transport was abolished at 4 degrees C. These results are consistent with GPS loci affecting an aspect of the gravity signal perception/transduction pathway that occurs after statolith sedimentation, but before auxin transport.

  2. Grain Boundary Sliding in Deforming Wehrlite: Rheology and Microstructure

    NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)

    Zhao, N.; Hirth, G.; Cooper, R. F.; Kruckenberg, S. C.

    2016-12-01

    Elastic anisotropy of Earth's upper mantle used to be attributed exclusively to dislocation creep. However, recent experimental results suggest that crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) in olivine, which contributes to elastic anisotropy, could also form during grain boundary sliding [e.g., 1-3]. Nevertheless, the fundamental problem of how CPO forms during grain boundary sliding is not fully understood. Our current efforts examine the grain-size-sensitive flow of wehrlite, to characterize the influence of the second phase (clinopyroxene) both on olivine CPO formation as well as the propensity of grain boundary sliding and accumulated strain to effect solid-state phase separation (i.e., metamorphic layering). Creep tests on fine-grain-size (2-5 µm) olivine and clinopyroxene aggregates (T =1100-1200ºC; P = 1.5 GPa; γ=3-7) have been conducted. These reveal strong type-B fabric for olivine. Characterization of effects of grain size, temperature and applied strain rate reveal the grain size dependence, stress exponent and activation energy of the flow kinetics of wehrlite. The stress exponent, which is similar to stress exponent for harzburgite reported by Sundberg & Cooper [1], and grain-size dependence suggest that the dominant deformation mechanism in our experiments may be grain boundary sliding. A large stress drop in early segments of experiments suggest an evolution of microstructure. The Fourier transform of backscatter images demonstrates that there exists a direction of foliation, defined by Ol-Cpx heterophase boundaries, which may be the key to understand the development of CPO formation. [1] Sundberg, M. & Cooper, R. F., J. Geophys. Res., 2008. [2] Miyazaki, T., Sueyoshi, K., and Hiraga, T., Nature, 2013. [3] Tielke, J. A., L. N. Hansen, M. Tasaka, C. Meyers, M. E. Zimmerman, and D. L. Kohlstedt, J. Geophys. Res., 2016.